[Prehospital analgesia by emergency physicians and paramedics : Comparison of effectiveness]

Prevalence of prehospital pain and pain assessment difference between patients and paramedics: a prospective cross-sectional observational study

Adequate analgesia is one of the most important interventions in emergency medicine. However, studies suggest that many patients are undertreated for pain. There can be many reasons why patients assess their pain differently to the paramedics. This study aimed to assess the differences in pain ratings between patients and paramedics and factors influencing them in prehospital emergencies. This prospective cross-sectional observational study included patients treated and transported by paramedics or paramedics and emergency physicians of the German Red Cross in Reutlingen, Germany. This study included 6,365 patients. The prevalence of pain was 49.7%. Among patients with a self-reported numerical rating scale (NRS) > 0, the mean patient pain rating was NRS 4.2 ± 2.7, while the mean paramedic pain rating was NRS 3.6 ± 2.4 (p < 0.001). Approximately 11.8% (n = 751) of patients reported subjectively unbearable pain. Patients reported a mean NRS of 7.7 ± 1.8 for unbearable pain, but a mean NRS of 3.3 ± 2.0 for bearable pain (p < 0.001). The difference in pain ratings between patients and paramedics increased with pain severity. Univariate analysis showed that there were no gender differences, but the difference in pain rating was influenced by patient age (p < 0.001) and paramedic age (p = 0.042). The differences in pain ratings were particularly pronounced for abdominal diseases (p < 0.001) and trauma (p < 0.001). There is a difference in pain ratings between patients and paramedics, which increases with pain severity and appears to be associated with the patient's age and the paramedic's age. To determine the desire and need for analgesics, the question about unbearable pain is a good addition to the NRS.

Analgesic Therapy with the Opioids Fentanyl and Morphine by Ambulance Personnel in Rural Areas: An Observational Study Over 7 Years

Background

The treatment of severe pain is one of the basic procedures of emergency medicine. In rural regions, longer arrival times of the emergency doctor prevent the earliest possible treatment of pain. Since 2014, a project for independent analgesia by ambulance personnel has been introduced in our ambulance service area.

Methods

Over a period of 7 years the mission protocols were recorded and statistically evaluated within the framework of an observational study. Among other things, the attendance and transport times, vital signs, pain level, symptom groups (body region) and classification according to disease or accident mechanism were recorded. Treatment data by medication, including dosages, were recorded for fentanyl (monotherapy), morphine (monotherapy) and a combination (change from morphine to fentanyl, additional application of esketamine, metamizole or butylscopolamine).

Results

In 659 patients, the opioids fentanyl and morphine were used by the ambulance staff, 596 data sets could be evaluated. When an emergency physician was requested, the average time of presence at the scene was 34.8 +- 11.7 min, in cases of unavailability it was 29.0 +-9.8 min (p<0.0001). Analgesic therapy resulted in a reduction of pain from NRS 8.4 (+-1.3) to NRS 3.5 +-1.8 (p<0.0001). Pain intensity after treatment by emergency paramedics compared to emergency physicians was not significantly different with NRS 3.5 +- 1.7 versus NRS 3.6 +-1.9 (p=0.788). Fentanyl was used at a mean dose of 0.18mg +- 0.11 and morphine at a mean dose of 4.4mg +- 3.6mg. There was no clinically relevant decrease in oxygen saturation or respiratory rate in any of the treatment groups. Antagonisation of the opioid effect with naloxone was not necessary in any case.

Conclusion

Analgesia with morphine and fentanyl by specially trained ambulance personnel according to defined rules of use is a safe and necessary procedure for patients, especially in rural regions.

Patient-reported side effects and satisfaction of pre-hospital analgesia with low-dose esketamine: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Analgesia is a core intervention in emergency medicine. Pain is subjective, so patient-reported experience with pain and analgesia is essential for healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported side effects and satisfaction associated with pre-hospital analgesia with low-dose esketamine.

METHODS

This is an observational cross-sectional study conducted as part of quality assurance measures of the German Red Cross Emergency Medical Service, Reutlingen, Germany. The survey was administered to all patients who received prehospital esketamine analgesia from paramedics. Addresses were obtained from medical records and mailed 10 days after the event. Patient feedback was anonymous and could not be linked to operational documentation.

RESULTS

A total of 201 patients were contacted, and 119 responses were received via the online questionnaire and postal mail (response rate 59%). The mean age of the patients was 68±13 years, with 64.7% (n=77) being female. The main diagnosis reported was fractures of the extremities in 69.7%. Patients reported initial median pain intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 10 [8-10]. Pain was unbearable for 96.3% of patients. After administration of analgesia, 95.3% were satisfied or very satisfied. Patients reported no side effects in 78.5%, minor side effects in 10.0%, significant but well tolerable side effects in 11.3%, borderline tolerable side effects in 0.2%, and no unbearable side effects. Borderline tolerable nausea was reported in 2% of patients along with dreams in 0.8%. No nightmares were reported. Further analysis showed that patients older than 80 years reported significantly more side effects (p < 0.001) and were thus less satisfied with the analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Both patient perception and analgesia with few side effects were important for both safety and satisfaction. In the present study, low-dose esketamine analgesia was associated with low side effects and high patient satisfaction.

Application of analgesics in emergency services in Germany: a survey of the medical directors

ABSTRAC

BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute pain is an essential element of pre-hospital care for injured and critically ill patients. Clinical studies indicate the need for improvement in the prehospital analgesia.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess the current situation in out of hospital pain management in Germany regarding the substances, indications, dosage and the delegation of the use of analgesics to emergency medical service (EMS) staff.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A standardized survey of the medical directors of the emergency services (MDES) in Germany was carried out using an online questionnaire. The anonymous results were evaluated using the statistical software SPSS (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney-U test).

RESULTS

Seventy-seven MDES responsible for 989 rescue stations and 397 EMS- physician bases in 15 federal states took part in this survey. Morphine (98.7%), Fentanyl (85.7%), Piritramide (61%), Sufentanil (18.2%) and Nalbuphine (14,3%) are provided as opioid analgesics. The non-opioid analgesics (NOA) including Ketamine/Esketamine (98,7%), Metamizole (88.3%), Paracetamol (66,2%), Ibuprofen (24,7%) and COX-2-inhibitors (7,8%) are most commonly available. The antispasmodic Butylscopolamine is available (81,8%) to most rescue stations. Fentanyl is the most commonly provided opioid analgesic for treatment of a traumatic pain (70.1%) and back pain (46.8%), Morphine for visceral colic-like (33.8%) and non-colic pain (53.2%). In cases of acute coronary syndrome is Morphine (85.7%) the leading analgesic substance. Among the non-opioid analgesics is Ketamine/Esketamine (90.9%) most frequently provided to treat traumatic pain, Metamizole for visceral colic-like (70.1%) and non-colic (68.6%) as well as back pain (41.6%). Butylscopolamine is the second most frequently provided medication after Metamizole for "visceral colic-like pain" (55.8%). EMS staff (with or without a request for presence of the EMS physician on site) are permitted to use the following: Morphine (16.9%), Piritramide (13.0%) and Nalbuphine (10.4%), and of NOAs for (Es)Ketamine (74.1%), Paracetamol (53.3%) and Metamizole (35.1%). The dosages of the most important and commonly provided analgesic substances permitted to independent treatment by the paramedics are often below the recommended range for adults (RDE). The majority of medical directors (78.4%) of the emergency services consider the independent application of analgesics by paramedics sensible. The reason for the relatively rare authorization of opioids for use by paramedics is mainly due to legal (in)certainty (53.2%).

CONCLUSION

Effective analgesics are available for EMS staff in Germany, the approach to improvement lies in the area of application. For this purpose, the adaptations of the legal framework as well as the creation of a guideline for prehospital analgesia are useful.

[Emergency missions in Tyrol in spring 2020 : Influence of COVID-19-A retrospective observational study focusing on air rescue]

BACKGROUND

Tyrol, a province of Austria with about 760,000 inhabitants, was one of the first regions in Europe, along with northern Italy, to be affected by the pandemic spread of the coronavirus in spring 2020. A lockdown with far-reaching restrictions in all areas of life occurred from 16 March 2020. Restrictions were imposed in the areas of gastronomy, trade and free mobility as well as in recreational sports. The ski resorts were closed and due to the strong winter tourism in Tyrol, this meant that about 340,000 people left the region. In the province of Tyrol comprehensive emergency medical care is provided by 13 ground-based emergency medical systems (NEF) in combination with air rescue (16 emergency medical helicopters, some of which are seasonal). Normally, this system provides emergency medical care for approx. 1 million people; however, in spring 2020 during the first lockdown, the number of people to be cared for was approx. 30% less. In order to protect the emergency medical teams as best as possible from infections and thus the system from failures, the Integrated Control Center Tyrol (Landesleitstelle Tirol GmbH) adapted the release order for emergency medical resources. The aim of the study is to describe the influence of the pandemic in spring 2020 on the emergency medical services in Tyrol in comparison to the three preceding years.

METHODS

A retrospective survey of all emergency helicopter missions and ground-based emergency physician missions in Tyrol in the period 15 March 2020-15 May 2020, as well as in the same period of the previous years 2017-2019, was conducted. Detailed figures on medical procedures and patient-related data were collected from 6 ÖAMTC helicopter bases. In addition, all ground-based emergency physician missions from all 13 physician systems including appeal mission diagnoses were collected in the same period.

RESULTS

The total number of emergency helicopter missions and ground-based emergency physician missions showed a significant decrease during the observational period (67.3% and 39.8%, respectively). In the area of ground-based emergency medical resources, there was a significant increase in respiratory and CNS diseases during the observational period. The range of emergency helicopter missions showed a significant shift from sports and leisure missions to internal medicine and neurological emergencies and the duration of missions was significantly longer. The NACA score was higher with a significant decrease in NACA 3 scores in favor of NACA 4 and 5. The circulatory status of patients during the observational period was significantly more often documented as unstable. Hypertension, impending shock and circulatory arrest occurred more frequently in the trend. Cardiac massage, oxygen administration, circulatory drugs and specific monitoring were used more frequently in 2020. Analgesics were administered less frequently. In air rescue, there was no infection of rescue workers in the field.

CONCLUSION

The first pandemic wave in Tyrol and the consecutive lockdown from 16 March 2020 had a massive impact on emergency medical care in Tyrol, both quantitatively and in terms of the spectrum of operations and emergency medical interventions. The decline in patient numbers was highly relevant, especially in air rescue and can be explained in part by the discontinuation of tourism, the general exit restrictions and the restrictive disengagement order. This decline primarily affected patients in the NACA 3 category and the analgesic administration measure. The patients treated had a higher NACA score and the emergency procedures were more extensive during the observational period. The measures to protect the emergency helicopter team from infections were presumably successful as no infections occurred.

Efficacy and safety in ketamine-guided prehospital analgesia for abdominal pain

Abdominal pain is a common reason for presentation in the emergency department and for calling emergency medical services. The complexity of abdominal pain also influences the analgesia strategy. However, there are almost no data on the use of ketamine for abdominal pain. This study aims to analyze the safety and efficacy of using ketamine as an analgesic for abdominal pain. In a retrospective analysis of prehospital patient data within the framework of quality assurance, all cases with ketamine administered by paramedics as analgesia for abdominal pain were analyzed in terms of pain reduction and patient safety and also compared with other analgesic drugs including fentanyl, morphine, and metamizole. From 01/01/2018 to 11/24/2021, 129 datasets were analyzed. The mean patient age was 50 ± 19 years (19-90 years), with 47.3% (n = 61) women. The application of fentanyl was documented as a monotherapy in 10.9% (n = 14), morphine in 2.3% (n = 3), metamizole in 34.1% (n = 44), and ketamine in 52.7% (n = 68) of cases. The pain relief of fentanyl, metamizole, and ketamine differed significantly from each other (p < 0.001), with fentanyl and ketamine being comparable. Looking at the quality assurance definition of successful analgesia (pain on handover NRS < 5 or pain reduction ≥ 2 points), successful analgesia was shown in 92.9% (n = 13) of cases for fentanyl, in 65.9% (n = 44) for metamizole, and 92.6% (n = 68) for ketamine (p < 0.001). Adverse events were not observed in patients treated with ketamine. Analgesia is an important goal in the treatment of patients with abdominal pain. With ketamine, analgesia comparable to fentanyl can be achieved. Ketamine appears to be a safe and effective option for the treatment of patients with abdominal pain in emergency medicine.Trial registration number DRKS00027343, date of registration: 09.12.2021, retrospectively registered.

Telenotarztsysteme im deutschen Rettungsdienst: eine nationale Sachstandserhebung

Hintergrund und Fragestellung

Bislang liegen nur wenige Daten über den aktuellen Ausbaustand von Telenotarzt(TNA)-Systemen im deutschen Rettungsdienst vor. In einer nationalen Befragung wurde der Sachstand zu Ausbau und Nutzung von TNA-Systemen erhoben.

Material und Methode

Durchführung einer Online-Befragung unter aktiv im deutschen Rettungsdienst tätigen Personen zum Vorhandensein eines TNA-Systems und dessen Ausgestaltung, zu Standardarbeitsanweisungen (SAA) für Rettungsfachpersonal in ausgewählten Einsatzszenarien sowie zu persönlichen Einschätzungen zum Themenkomplex TNA.

Ergebnisse

1023 Teilnehmer aus 77,1 % (n = 299) aller deutschen Rettungsdienstbereiche nahmen teil. 90,3 % (n = 270) der Bereiche hatten kein TNA-System, ein mindestens teilweiser Betrieb war in 9,3 % (n = 29) etabliert. Die Ausgestaltung ist heterogen, die SAA für Rettungsfachpersonal unterscheiden sich auch innerhalb einzelner Bundesländer und zwischen Bereichen mit und ohne TNA erheblich. Regionen mit TNA verfügen zu einem größeren Anteil über SAA und führen einzelne Maßnahmen häufiger durch. So ist eine intravenöse Analgesie durch den Rettungswagen (RTW) bei 0,8 % vs. 8,9 % (n = 1 vs. n = 76) der Teilnehmenden nicht vorgesehen, die Gabe von Acetylsalicylsäure bei akutem Koronarsyndrom ohne ST-Hebung erfolgt in 3,1 % vs. 23,1 % (n = 4 vs. n = 198) nicht. Bei der persönlichen Einschätzung zum Thema TNA besteht ein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen Bereichen mit und ohne vorhandenes TNA-System.

Schlussfolgerungen

Im deutschen Rettungsdienst sind in weniger als einem Zehntel der Bereiche TNA-Systeme in Betrieb und die vorhandenen Systeme sind sehr heterogen gestaltet. Gleiches gilt für das Vorhandensein von Standardarbeitsanweisungen. Dies legt nahe, dass bei nationaler Betrachtung relevante Unterschiede in der notfallmedizinischen Versorgungsqualität der Bevölkerung bestehen.

Graphic abstract

Medikamentengabe durch Notfallsanitäter

Hintergrund

Der Bundesverband der Ärztlichen Leiter Rettungsdienst (BV-ÄLRD) hat einen umfangreichen Katalog an Medikamenten für die Anwendung durch Notfallsanitäter vorgeschlagen. Wir evaluierten, wie oft Auszubildende zum Notfallsanitäter diese in ihrer Ausbildung applizierten.

Methode

Wir befragten 71 Auszubildende zum Notfallsanitäter zur Anwendungshäufigkeit 30 verschiedener Medikamente. Die statistische Auswertung erfolgte mit SOFA (Paton-Simpson and Associates Ltd, USA). Die Ergebnisse sind als Mittelwert (Standardabweichung) dargestellt.

Ergebnisse

Adrenalin i.v. wurde 2,22 (6,67) Mal verabreicht. Atropin wurde bei Bradykardie 1,18 (1,97) Mal verabreicht. Benzodiazepine wurden präklinisch 7,27 (10,28) Mal angewendet. Inhalative Betamimetika wurden präklinisch 8,89 (8,06) Mal, Ipratropiumbromid 3,70 (5,91) Mal, Kortikoide 3,79 (5,32) Mal und Antihistaminika 1,82 (4,34) Mal verabreicht. Ondansetron wurde innerklinisch 14,38 (35,06) Mal angewendet. Präklinisch wurde Dimenhydrinat mit 8,14 (10,14) Anwendungen am häufigsten verabreicht. Furosemid wurde präklinisch 6,06 (9,45) Mal verabreicht. Heparin wurde präklinisch 12,00 (14,32) Mal, ASS 14,32 (14,29) Mal und Glyceroltrinitrat 12,25 (10,87) Mal verabreicht. Metamizol wurde präklinisch 8,59 (12,51) Mal, Ketamin 3,51 (5,23) Mal, Opiate/Opioide 10,72 (16,18) Mal und Naloxon 0,20 (0,67) Mal verabreicht. Glukose wurde präklinisch 7,38 (6,67) Mal verabreicht.

Schlussfolgerung

Die Bewertung, für welche Medikamente eine ausreichende Expertise besteht, kann aufgrund fehlender Daten zu Lernkurven oder konsentierter Mindestzahlen nur vor dem Hintergrund klinischer Erfahrung erfolgen. Aus Sicht der Autoren besteht für die meisten untersuchten Medikamente eine ausreichende Expertise.

[Best practice-example of a paramedic competence system in the context of user and patient safety: the Reutlinger Weg]

The discussion about the competencies and responsibilities of paramedics has been going on for decades and is the subject of controversial legal debates and currently the focus of political attention due to the heterogeneous country-specific design. However, there are only a few published examples of a so-called competency system for the safe and effective use of prehospital emergency medicine interventions. The practical experience of a competence system is presented. Adequate education and training are crucial for development of competence. A physician-supported quality assurance system creates the opportunity to confirm the competencies of paramedics within the framework of competence checks, monitor the system by means of indicators, and detect weak points at an early stage. Safety culture must be exemplified. Standard operating procedures (SOPs) are the guideline for implementation. In a competence system, certified paramedics can be granted authorization and thus contribute to rapid and efficient patient care, while keeping emergency physicians available for indications requiring their competencies.

[Analgesia for trauma patients in emergency medicine]

Adequate analgesia is one of the most important measures of emergency care in addition to treatment of vital function disorders and, if indicated, should be promptly undertaken; however, a large proportion of emergency patients receive no or only inadequate pain therapy. The numeric rating scale (NRS) is recommended for pain assessment but is not applicable to every group of patients; therefore, vital signs and body language should be included in the assessment. Pain therapy should reduce the NPRS to <5 points. Ketamine and fentanyl, which have an especially rapid onset of action, and also morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing patients. Basic prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals are the use of adequate monitoring, the provision of well-defined emergency equipment, and the mastery of emergency procedures. In a structured competence system, paramedics and nursing personnel can perform safe and effective analgesia.

Böttiger B, Bouillon B, Fischer M, Gaier G, Gliwitzky B, Helm M, Hilbert-Carius P, Hossfeld B, Meisner C, Schempf B, Wafaisade A, Bernhard M. Analgesia in Patients with Trauma in Emergency Medicine

BACKGROUND

Suitable analgesic drugs and techniques are needed for the acute care of the approximately 18 200-18 400 seriously injured patients in Germany each year.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesia in trauma patients was carried out on the basis of randomized, controlled trials and observational studies. A systematic search of the literature over the 10-year period ending in February 2016 was carried out in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Springer Link Library databases. Some of the considered trials and studies were included in a meta-analysis. Mean differences (MD) of pain reduction or pain outcome as measured on the Numeric Rating Scale were taken as a summarizing measure of treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

Out of 685 studies, 41 studies were considered and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among the drugs and drug combinations studied, none was clearly superior to another with respect to pain relief. Neither fentanyl versus morphine (MD -0.10 with a 95% confidence interval of [-0.58; 0.39], p = 0.70) nor ketamine versus morphine (MD -1.27 [-3.71; 1.16], p = 0.31), or the combination of ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone (MD -1.23 [-2.29; -0.18], p = 0.02) showed clear superiority regarding analgesia.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine, fentanyl, and morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing trauma patients. Fentanyl and ketamine have a rapid onset of action and a strong analgesic effect. Our quantitative meta-analysis revealed no evidence for the superiority of any of the three substances over the others. Suitable monitoring equipment, and expertise in emergency procedures are prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals..

Project for the introduction of prehospital analgesia with fentanyl and morphine administered by specially trained paramedics in a rural service area in Germany

Background

In patients with serious illness or trauma, reduction of severe pain is a key therapeutic goal of emergency medical service (EMS) teams. In Germany, only physicians are allowed to use opioid analgesics. In the rural EMS area studied, the mean arrival time for paramedics is 8 minutes, 23 seconds, and for the rescue physician between 10 minutes, 30 seconds and 16 minutes, 59 seconds, depending on EMS site. In cases of parallel callouts, rescue-physician arrival times may be considerably longer.

Objective

During this project, we assessed the administration of the opioid analgesics morphine and fentanyl by specially trained paramedics with regard to analgesia quality and patient safety.

Materials and methods

During the 18-month study period, specially trained paramedics administered morphine or fentanyl to patients with severe pain if indicated and if a rescue physician was not available in time. Besides basic documentation, pain intensity (using a numeric rating scale) and oxygen saturation were measured initially and at hospital handover.

Results

During the 18 months, 4,285 emergency callouts were attended to by the 13 specially trained paramedics of the district (total callouts during this period 21,423). In 77 patients (1.8%), fentanyl (n=53/68.8%) or morphine (n=24/31.2%) was administered. Based on the measurements obtained with the numeric rating scale at the start of treatment (7.9) and upon hospital handover (3.3), pain reduction was 4.52 overall (41.5%, P<0.001): 4.64 with fentanyl (42.9%, P<0.001) and 4.25 with morphine (43.2%, P<0.001). None of the patients had an oxygen saturation <95% at the time of handover, and no patient developed opioid-induced respiratory depression requiring treatment.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that the administration of opioid analgesics by specially trained and qualified paramedics is safe and effective.