[Food allergy in childhood]

[Food Allergy in Childhood]

Food Allergy in Childhood Abstract. Food allergies in childhood are on the rise and are therefore a topical issue in practice. In this article, we describe the most common allergens and risk factors for the development of a food allergy. The classification of IgE- and non-IgE-mediated food allergies and their respective clinical manifestations are highlighted. The importance of a careful diagnosis with targeted history taking and allergy testing and finally the performance of oral provocation for the diagnosis will be presented in a practical manner. We will discuss the care of families of children with food allergies, whereby support through nutritional counselling as well as equipping families with an emergency kit, including appropriate instructions for use, are important. Finally, the latest therapeutic approaches of specific immunotherapy, which aims to induce tolerance, are presented and the prognosis of food allergies is discussed.

Potato protein: An emerging source of high quality and allergy free protein, and its possible future based products

Recently protein has gained eminence due to awareness and demand for healthy food. Potato proteins are extracted from potato fruit juice and industrial potato waste; its nutritional and functional values have been found more significant than other vegetables and cereal proteins. Potato proteins can be easily extracted by various separation techniques, including an ion exchange (IEX) and expanded bed adsorption (EBA), and their functional properties can be modified for desire purposes. It contains many essential amino acids necessary for the human body, with an amino acid score (AAS) of 65%. Recent research on potato proteins resulted in several descriptions of new technologies to produce food-grade potato protein. It has recently drawn more attention as a protein source for human consumption, especially as an allergy free protein source and selective activity against cancer cells. Growing shreds of evidence have highlighted that potato protein can be used in many upcoming nutraceuticals and allergy-free food products. Therefore it is gaining more attention from nutritionists and food scientists. This review has summarized the recent knowledge on the nutritional and functional aspects of potato proteins, especially its non-allergic properties, enhancement in functional properties, and possible future-based products.

The Efficacy and Safety of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the effect and safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for allergic diseases.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CQ VIP Database, Wanfang Data, and international trial register from their inception to July 29, 2019, without language restrictions, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared EPIT versus no EPIT for allergen-triggered allergic reactions. We assessed certainty of evidence by the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs with 1,085 participants (aged from 10 months to 65 years) comparing EPIT with placebo for peanut, cow milk, or grass-pollen allergy met the eligibility criteria. A substantial benefit in terms of desensitization in EPIT group was more likely for peanut or cow milk protein allergy (risk ratio [RR] 2.34, 95% CI 1.69-3.23; I2 = 0%; high certainty evidence). EPIT increased local-treatment-related adverse events (L-TRAE; RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.03-2.36; I2 = 82%; moderate certainty evidence). But there were no significantly increased risk of any TRAEs (low certainty evidence) or systemic-TRAEs (S-TRAEs; very low certainty evidence) in EPIT group. The incidence rate of serious AEs, the use of rescue medications, and anaphylactic reactions stratified by organ systems including skin and mucosa, eyes and upper respiratory, lower respiratory, and gastrointestinal system in EPIT group were similar to placebo group. In subgroup analysis, desensitization of EPIT was significantly effective in peanut allergy (RR 2.29, 95% CI 1.64-3.21; I2 = 0%) and children <12 years (RR 2.85, 95% CI 1.92-4.24; I2 = 0%) with high certainty evidence. Only epicutaneous grass-pollen immunotherapy significantly increased the risk of S-TRAE (RR 4.65, 95% CI 1.10-19.64; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

The systematic review suggests that EPIT might induce desensitization in peanut allergy and an increased risk of local AEs. These findings should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited study and heterogeneity. More data in the older (children ≥12 years and adults) and other allergic diseases are needed.

Identification of a common Ara h 3 epitope recognized by both the capture and the detection monoclonal antibodies in an ELISA detection kit

Allergy to peanuts has become a common and severe problem, especially in westernized countries. In this study, we evaluated the target and epitope specificity of the capture and detection mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) used in a commercial peanut allergen detection platform. We first identified the target of these antibodies as Ara h 3 and then used an overlapping peptide array of Ara h 3 to determine the antibody-binding epitopes. Further amino acids critical for the binding via alanine substitutions at individual amino acid residues within the epitope were mapped. Finally, inhibition ELISA and inhibition immunoblotting using a recombinant Ara h 3 protein were performed to confirm these results. Surprisingly, the capture and detection mAbs showed identical binding characteristics and were presumed to represent two isolates of the same clone, a notion supported by both isoelectric focusing electrophoresis and Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry experiments. The simultaneous binding of a pair of identical mAbs to an individual allergen such as Ara h3 is attributed to the multivalency of the analyte and has implications for developing diagnostic assays for additional multimeric allergens.

[Food Allergy and Intolerance : Distinction, Definitions and Delimitation]

Immunologically mediated hypersensitivity to foods is defined as food allergy, mainly due to immunglobulins of class E (IgE) triggering immediate reactions (type I hypersensitivity) with possible involvement of mucosa, skin, airways, intestinal tract, and the vascular system. Primary food allergy is based on (early) IgE sensitization against animal (e. g., cow's milk, hen's eggs) or plant proteins (e. g. peanut, hazelnut or wheat). In the case of secondary food allergies, IgE against pollen proteins (e. g., birch) reacts to structurally related food proteins (with cross-reactions to stone and pit fruits). Non-immunological food intolerance reactions are mostly based on carbohydrate malassimilation (e. g., lactose intolerance, fructose malabsorption) and are rarely due to pseudo-allergies (e. g., flavors, dyes, preservatives) primarily in patients with chronic urticaria. Common intestinal symptoms are mainly due to functional disorders (e. g., irritable bowel disease), rarely because of inflammatory intestinal diseases (e. g., celiac disease). Histamine intolerance, gluten hypersensitivity, and so-called food type III hypersensitivities are controversial diagnoses. The aforementioned disease entities/models are of variable importance for the affected individuals, the public health system, and society in general.