[Resection of colorectal liver metastases. What prognostic factors determine patient selection?]

The evolution of surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A persistent challenge to improve survival

Only a few decades ago, the opinion that colorectal liver metastases were a palliative diagnosis changed. In fact, previously, the prevailing view was strongly resistant against resecting colorectal liver metastases. Constant technical improvement of liver surgery and, much later, effective chemotherapy allowed for a successful wider application of surgery. The clinical use of portal vein embolization was the starting signal of regenerative liver surgery, where insufficient liver volume can be expanded to an extent where safe resection is possible. Today, a number of these techniques including portal vein ligation, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and bi-embolization (portal and hepatic vein) can be successfully used to address an insufficient future liver remnant in staged resections. It turned out that the road to success is embedding surgery in a well-orchestrated oncological concept of controlling systemic disease. This concept was the prerequisite that meant liver transplantation could enter the treatment strategy for colorectal liver metastases, ending up with a 5-year overall survival of 80% in highly selected cases. In particular, techniques combining principles of 2-stage hepatectomy and liver transplantation, such as "resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy" (RAPID) are on the rise. These techniques enable the use of partial liver grafts with primarily insufficient liver volume. All this progress also prompted a number of innovative local therapies to address recurrences ultimately transferring colorectal liver metastases from instantly deadly into a chronic disease in some cases.

Hepatectomy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy with 3-Month Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Lessons Learned

Three‐month adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination (CAPOX) appeared to reduce recurrence, with mild toxicity in postcurative resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM).

Recurrence in patients who underwent the 3‐month adjuvant CAPOX after resection of CLM was most commonly at extrahepatic sites.

Background

The role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of initially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM) is still unclear. We evaluated the feasibility of 3‐month adjuvant treatment with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in combination (CAPOX) for postcurative resection of CLM.

Methods

Patients received one cycle of capecitabine followed by four cycles of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of CLM. Oral capecitabine was given as 1,000 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks in a 3‐week cycle, and CAPOX consisted of oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1 in a 3‐week cycle. Primary endpoint was the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included recurrence‐free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), dose intensity, and safety.

Results

Twenty‐eight patients were enrolled. Median age was 69.5 years, 54% of patients had synchronous metastases, and 29% were bilobar. Mean number of lesions resected was two, and mean size of the largest lesion was 31 mm. Among patients, 20 (71.4%; 95% confidence interval, 53.6%–89.3%) completed the protocol treatment and met its primary endpoint. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicity was neutropenia (29%). Five‐year recurrence‐free survival and overall survival were 65.2% and 87.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

Three‐month adjuvant treatment with CAPOX is tolerable and might be a promising strategy for postcurative resection of CLM.

Proposal of Two Prognostic Models for the Prediction of 10-Year Survival after Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases

Background

One-third of 5-year survivors after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) develop recurrence or tumor-related death. Therefore 10-year survival appears more adequate in defining permanent cure. The aim of this study was to develop prognostic models for the prediction of 10-year survival after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Methods

N=965 cases of liver resection for CLM were retrospectively analyzed using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Receiver operating curve analyses were used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of developed prognostic models and their potential clinical usefulness.

Results

The 10-year survival rate was 15.2%. Age at liver resection, application of chemotherapies of the primary tumor, preoperative Quick's value, hemoglobin level, and grading of the primary colorectal tumor were independent significant predictors for 10-year patient survival. The generated formula to predict 10-year survival based on these preoperative factors displayed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.716. In regard to perioperative variables, the distance of resection margins and performance of right segmental liver resection were additional independent predictors for 10-year survival. The logit link formula generated with pre- and perioperative variables showed an AUROC of 0.761.

Conclusion

Both prognostic models are potentially clinically useful (AUROCs >0.700) for the prediction of 10-year survival. External validation is required prior to the introduction of these models in clinical patient counselling.

Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Current Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Metastases to the liver is the leading cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

The authors review the data on diagnosis and management of this clinical problem, and they discuss management options that can be considered.

RESULTS

Complete surgical resection of metastases from colorectal cancer that are localized to the liver results in 5-year survival rates ranging from 26% to 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

By adding modalities such as targeted systemic therapy and other "local" treatments for liver metastases, further gains in survival are anticipated.

Trans-arterial chemoperfusion for the treatment of liver metastases of breast cancer and colorectal cancer: Clinical results in palliative care patients

AIM

To evaluate the clinical value and efficiency of trans-arterial chemoperfusion (TACP) in patients with liver metastases from breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

We treated 36 patients with liver metastases of BC (n = 19, 19 females) and CRC (n = 17; 8 females, 9 males) with repeated TACP. The treatment interval was 4 wk. TACP was performed with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and mitomycin (10 mg/m²), administered within 1 h after positioning the catheter tip in the hepatic artery. Before treatment, the size, location, tumour volume, vascularization and number of liver tumours were evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Tumour response was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines.

RESULTS

TACP using gemcitabine and mitomycin for metastases from CRC and BC was performed without any serious side effects. The follow-up MRI showed a therapeutic response in 84.2% of the BC patients - stable disease 47.4% and partial response 36.8%. A progression was seen in 15.8%. CRC patients showed a therapeutic response in 52.9% of cases. A progression of the disease was documented in 47.1% of the patients with CRC. These data show that TACP in patients with liver metastases of BC leads to a significantly better therapeutic response compared with CRC patients (P = 0.042). The median survival time was 13.2 mo for the BC patients, which is significantly longer than for CRC patients at 9.3 mo (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TACP for liver metastases of BC appears to be a safe and effective palliative treatment with improved outcomes in comparison to patients with CRC.

The impact of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with previously resected colorectal cancer liver metastases

Background

40–50% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) will develop liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of the disease. One third of these patients will additionally develop pulmonary metastases.

Methods

137 consecutive patients with CRLM, were analyzed regarding survival data, clinical, histological data and treatment. Results were stratified according to the occurrence of pulmonary metastases and metastases resection.

Results

39% of all patients with liver resection due to CRLM developed additional lung metastases. 44% of these patients underwent subsequent pulmonary resection. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better five-year survival compared to patients not qualified for curative resection (5-year survival 71.2% vs. 28.0%; p = 0.001). Interestingly, the 5-year survival of these patients was even superior to all patients with CRLM, who did not develop pulmonary metastases (77.5% vs. 63.5%; p = 0.015). Patients, whose pulmonary metastases were not resected, were more likely to redevelop liver metastases (50.0% vs 78.6%; p = 0.034). However, the rate of distant metastases did not differ between both groups (54.5 vs.53.6; p = 0.945).

Conclusion

The occurrence of colorectal lung metastases after curative liver resection does not impact patient survival if pulmonary metastasectomy is feasible. Those patients clearly benefit from repeated resections of the liver and the lung metastases.

Preoperative selection of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis for hepatic resection

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has a well-documented improvement in survival. To benefit from this intervention, proper selection of patients who would be adequate surgical candidates becomes vital. A combination of imaging techniques may be utilized in the detection of the lesions. The criteria for resection are continuously evolving; currently, the requirements that need be met to undergo resection of CRLM are: the anticipation of attaining a negative margin (R0 resection), whilst maintaining an adequate functioning future liver remnant. The timing of hepatectomy in regards to resection of the primary remains controversial; before, after, or simultaneously. This depends mainly on the tumor burden and symptoms from the primary tumor. The role of chemotherapy differs according to the resectability of the liver lesion(s); no evidence of improved survival was shown in patients with resectable disease who received preoperative chemotherapy. Presence of extrahepatic disease in itself is no longer considered a reason to preclude patients from resection of their CRLM, providing limited extra-hepatic disease, although this currently is an area of active investigations. In conclusion, we review the indications, the adequate selection of patients and perioperative factors to be considered for resection of colorectal liver metastasis.

Multimodal therapy in treatment of rectal cancer is associated with improved survival and reduced local recurrence - a retrospective analysis over two decades

Background

The management of rectal cancer (RC) has substantially changed over the last decades with the implementation of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, adjuvant therapy and improved surgery such as total mesorectal excision (TME). It remains unclear in which way these approaches overall influenced the rate of local recurrence and overall survival.

Methods

Clinical, histological and survival data of 658 out of 662 consecutive patients with RC were analyzed for treatment and prognostic factors from a prospectively expanded single-institutional database. Findings were then stratified according to time of diagnosis in patient groups treated between 1993 and 2001 and 2002 and 2010.

Results

The study population included 658 consecutive patients with rectal cancer between 1993 and 2010. Follow up data was available for 99.6% of all 662 treated patients. During the time period between 2002 and 2010 significantly more patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (17.6% vs. 60%) and adjuvant chemotherapy (37.9% vs. 58.4%). Also, the rate of reported TME during surgery increased. The rate of local or distant metastasis decreased over time, and tumor related 5-year survival increased significantly with from 60% to 79%.

Conclusion

In our study population, the implementation of treatment changes over the last decade improved the patient’s outcome significantly. Improvements were most evident for UICC stage III rectal cancer.

Single-dose radiosurgical treatment for hepatic metastases--therapeutic outcome of 138 treated lesions from a single institution

BACKGROUND

Local ablative therapies such as stereotactically guided single-dose radiotherapy or helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (tomotherapy) with high single-doses are successfully applied in many centers in patients with liver metastasis not suitable for surgical resection. This study presents results from more than 10 years of clinical experience and evaluates long-term outcome and efficacy of this therapeutic approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1997 to 2009 a total of 138 intrahepatic tumors of 90 patients were irradiated with single doses of 17 to 30 Gy (median dose 24 Gy). Median age of the patients was 64 years (range 31-89 years). Most frequent underlying tumor histologies were colorectal adenocarcinoma (70 lesions) and breast cancer (27 lesions). In 35 treatment sessions multiple targets were simultaneously irradiated (up to four lesions at once). Local progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after treatment were investigated using uni- and multiple survival regression models.

RESULTS

Median overall survival of all patients was 24.3 months. Local PFS was 87%, 70% and 59% after 6, 12 and 18 months, respectively. Median time to local progression was 25.5 months. Patients with a single lesion and no further metastases at time of RT had a favorable median PFS of 43.1 months according to the Kaplan-Meier estimator. The type of tumor showed a statistical significant influence on local PFS, with a better prognosis for breast cancer histology than for colorectal carcinoma in uni- and multiple regression analysis (p = 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed no influence of planning target volume (PTV), patient age and radiation dose on local PFS. Treatment was well tolerated with no severe adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms safety of SBRT in liver lesions, with 6- and 12 months local control of 87% and 70%. The dataset represents the clinical situation in a large oncology setting, with many competing treatment options and heterogeneous patient characteristics.

Selection for hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement

Hepatic resection offers a chance of a cure in selected patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). To achieve adequate patient selection and curative surgery, (i) precise assessment of the extent of disease, (ii) sensitive criteria for chemotherapy effect, (iii) adequate decision making in surgical indication and (iv) an optimal surgical approach for pre-treated tumours are required. For assessment of the extent of the disease, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is recommended depending on the local expertise and availability. Positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT may offer additive information in detecting extrahepatic disease. The RECIST criteria are a reasonable method to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy. However, they are imperfect in predicting a pathological response in the era of modern systemic therapy with biological agents. The assessment of radiographical morphological changes is a better surrogate of the pathological response and survival especially in the patients treated with bevacizumab. Resectability of CLM is dependent on both anatomic and oncological factors. To decrease the surgical risk, a sufficient volume of liver remnant with adequate blood perfusion and biliary drainage is required according to the degree of histopathological injury of the underlying liver. Portal vein embolization is sometimes required to decrease the surgical risk in a patient with small future liver remnant volume. As a complete radiological response does not signify a complete pathological response, liver resection should include all the site of a tumour detected prior to systemic treatment.

Outcome of operative therapy of hepatic metastatic stomach carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

In general, hepatic metastasis from stomach carcinoma has an unfavorable prognosis. In addition, there are often further metastases in other organs, such as peritoneal carcinomatosis. The major aim of the present study was to investigate a potential curative surgical approach in these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with hepatic metastases from stomach cancer were treated in the University Clinic Erlangen-Nürnberg. The data were collected retrospectively from 1972 to 1977 and prospectively since 1978 at the Erlangen Cancer Registry. The time frame of this retrospective analysis from patients who had surgical resection of hepatic metatases from gastric cancer was from 1972 to 2008. The median age of the patients was 65 years, and the ratio of men to women was 2:1.

RESULTS

Atypical or anatomical resections of segments were possible in 21 cases. Larger operations, such as hemihepatectomy (right/left), were performed in 10 patients. The postoperative complication rate was 29%, and the hospital mortality was 6%. The five-year survival rate was 13%; R0 resection was achieved in 23 patients. We also found a significant difference in the 5-year survival rate between synchronous and metachronous metastases (0 vs. 29%; p < 0.001) and R0 resected patients (p = 0.002). Patients with solitary metastases had a significantly better median survival than patients with multiple metastases (21 vs. 4 months; p < 0.005.)

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival in our study was 13%; therefore gastric cancer with liver metastases is not in every case a palliative situation. It seems that patients with liver metastases benefit from resection, especially if the metastases are metachronous (p < 0.001) and solitary, provided that a curative R0 resection has been achieved. An interdisciplinary approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy appears useful. Additional controlled studies should be conducted.

Resection margin with anatomic or nonanatomic hepatectomy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

When hepatectomy is used as a primary treatment for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRCLM), the balance between surgical curability and functional preservation of the remnant liver is of great importance.

METHODS

A total of 108 patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CRCLM were retrospectively analyzed with respect to tumor extent, operative method, and prognosis, including recurrence.

RESULTS

The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) for all patients were 90.5%, 77.8%, 63.2%, and 51.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level after hepatectomy (<36 or ≥36 mAU/mL) and presence of recurrence as independent prognostic factors of OS (P = 0.0458 and 0.0249, respectively), and tumor depth of colorectal cancer (<se (a2) vs. ≥se (a2)) and serum CA 19-9 level after hepatectomy as the significant factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.0025 and 0.00138, respectively). Neither resection margin nor type of hepatectomy (anatomic or nonanatomic) for CRCLM was a significant prognostic factor for OS or DFS or CRCLM recurrence, including intrahepatic recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In CRCLM, we believe that nonanatomic hepatectomy with narrow margin is indicated, and optimal treatment would include functional preservation of as much of the remnant liver as possible.

Surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Treatment strategies for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer have changed markedly in the last decade. Patients with colorectal cancer metastases to the liver have always been a fascinating group to consider biologically and for local-regional treatment strategies. In the late 1980s through the 1990s, resection was performed for a select subset of patients who had resectable disease. However, a high proportion of patients had bilobar unresectable disease and were treated with either 5-fluorouracil-based systemic chemotherapy or implanted hepatic arterial infusion pumps. The advent of the new millennium was associated with the availability of several new cytotoxic and biologic agents active in colorectal cancer. These agents have completely changed the approach to the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases and thus have increased the complexity of the decision-making process for treatment of these patients.

Prognostic models for outcome following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Liver resection provides the best chance for cure in colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastases. A variety of factors that might influence survival and recurrence have been identified. Predictive models can help in risk stratification, to determine multidisciplinary treatment and follow-up for individual patients.

AIMS

To systematically review available prognostic models described for outcome following resection of CRC liver metastases and to assess their differences and applicability.

METHODS

The Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles proposing a prognostic model or risk stratification system for resection of CRC liver metastases. Search terms included 'colorectal', 'liver', 'metastasis', 'resection', 'prognosis' and 'prediction'. The articles were systematically reviewed.

RESULTS

Fifteen prognostic systems were identified, published between 1996 and 2009. The median study population was 305 patients and the median follow-up was 32 months. All studies used Cox proportional hazards for multi-variable analysis. No prognostic factor was common in all models, though there was a tendency towards the number of metastases, CRC spread to lymph nodes, maximum size of metastases, preoperative CEA level and extrahepatic spread as representing independent risk factors. Seven models assigned more weight to selected factors considered of higher predictive value.

CONCLUSION

The existing predictive models are diverse and their prognostic factors are often not weighed according to their impact. For the development of future predictive models, the complex relations within datasets and differences in relevance of individual factors should be taken into account, for example by using artificial neural networks.

Clinical effectiveness of fresh frozen plasma compared with fibrinogen concentrate: a systematic review

Introduction

Haemostatic therapy in surgical and/or massive trauma patients typically involves transfusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Purified human fibrinogen concentrate may offer an alternative to FFP in some instances. In this systematic review, we investigated the current evidence for the use of FFP and fibrinogen concentrate in the perioperative or massive trauma setting.

Methods

Studies reporting the outcome (blood loss, transfusion requirement, length of stay, survival and plasma fibrinogen level) of FFP or fibrinogen concentrate administration to patients in a perioperative or massive trauma setting were identified in electronic databases (1995 to 2010). Studies were included regardless of type, patient age, sample size or duration of patient follow-up. Studies of patients with congenital clotting factor deficiencies or other haematological disorders were excluded. Studies were assessed for eligibility, and data were extracted and tabulated.

Results

Ninety-one eligible studies (70 FFP and 21 fibrinogen concentrate) reported outcomes of interest. Few were high-quality prospective studies. Evidence for the efficacy of FFP was inconsistent across all assessed outcomes. Overall, FFP showed a positive effect for 28% of outcomes and a negative effect for 22% of outcomes. There was limited evidence that FFP reduced mortality: 50% of outcomes associated FFP with reduced mortality (typically trauma and/or massive bleeding), and 20% were associated with increased mortality (typically surgical and/or nonmassive bleeding). Five studies reported the outcome of fibrinogen concentrate versus a comparator. The evidence was consistently positive (70% of all outcomes), with no negative effects reported (0% of all outcomes). Fibrinogen concentrate was compared directly with FFP in three high-quality studies and was found to be superior for > 50% of outcomes in terms of reducing blood loss, allogeneic transfusion requirements, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay and increasing plasma fibrinogen levels. We found no fibrinogen concentrate comparator studies in patients with haemorrhage due to massive trauma, although efficacy across all assessed outcomes was reported in a number of noncomparator trauma studies.

Conclusions

The weight of evidence does not appear to support the clinical effectiveness of FFP for surgical and/or massive trauma patients and suggests it can be detrimental. Perioperatively, fibrinogen concentrate was generally associated with improved outcome measures, although more high-quality, prospective studies are required before any definitive conclusions can be drawn.

Synchronous rectal and hepatic resection of rectal metastatic disease

BACKGROUND

The objectives were to determine the feasibility of combined rectal and hepatic resections and analyze the disease-free survival and overall survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Sixty patients who underwent resection for metastatic rectal disease from 1991 to 2005 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: rectal cancer with metastatic liver disease and resectability of metastases. The exclusion criteria were: metachronous resection (n = 15). Kaplan-Meier Survival estimated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Cox proportional hazard models examined the association between groups and survival.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 22 men and 23 women, with median age of 63 years. Surgical management included: abdominoperineal resection, 13 patients (29%); low anterior resection, 29 (64%); local excision, one; total proctocolectomy, one; and pelvic exenteration, one. Major hepatic resection was performed in 22%. There was no mortality, but there were 26 postoperative complications. Disease-free survival from local recurrence at 1, 2, and 5 years was 92%, 86%, and 80%, respectively. Disease-free survival from distant recurrence at 1, 2, and 5 years was 62%, 43%, and 28%, respectively. Overall survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 88%, 72%, and 32%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined rectal and hepatic resection is safe. Morbidity and mortality do not preclude concurrent resection. The DFS and OS are comparable to that of patients undergoing a staged procedure.

Predictors of long-term survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a single center study and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Prognosis after resection of liver metastases of colorectal cancer is influenced by a variety of clinical factors. For more than 20 years, efforts have been made to restructure and simplify prognostic parameters into clinical scores. We evaluated the influence of various clinical and pathological factors on survival and recurrence and developed a simple model for risk stratification.

METHODS

We have analyzed a total of 13 prognostic factors in 382 consecutive and prospectively enrolled R0-resected patients and applied our data set to ten published prognostic scoring systems. Prognostic factors that influenced disease-specific and disease-free survival were included into a model clinical risk score.

RESULTS

The 5- and 10-year observed survival rates were 43% and 28%, respectively, for all 382 patients. The disease-specific 5- and 10-year survival rates were 49% and 37%, respectively; the 5- and 10-year recurrence rates were 68% and 70%, respectively. For patients with synchronous liver metastases, survival was not affected by the timing of liver resection. The prognosis after treatment of any recurrence was best after the accomplishment of a repeated R0 situation, independent of the location of the recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, the disease-specific survival and recurrence rates were statistically significantly influenced by more than three lymph node metastases of the primary tumor, more than two lesions within the liver, and the presence of extrahepatic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

From these data, we have developed a simple score for the risk stratification which may be useful for future studies on interdisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases.

Effect of preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy on CCL20/CCR6 expression in colorectal liver metastases

AIM: To evaluate the influence of preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy on CCL20/CCR6 expression in liver metastases of stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS: Using Real Time-PCR, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Western Blots and immunohistochemistry, we have analyzed the expression of CCL20, CCR6 and proliferation marker Ki-67 in colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) specimens from stage IV CRC patients who received preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy (n = 53) and in patients who did not receive FOLFOX chemotherapy prior to liver surgery (n = 29).

RESULTS: Of the 53 patients who received FOLFOX, time to liver surgery was ≤ 1 mo in 14 patients, ≤ 1 year in 22 patients and > 1 year in 17 patients, respectively. In addition, we investigated the proliferation rate of CRC cells in liver metastases in the different patient groups. Both CCL20 and CCR6 mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly increased in patients who received preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy ≤ 12 mo before liver surgery (P < 0.001) in comparison to patients who did not undergo FOLFOX treatment. Further, proliferation of CRLM cells as measured by Ki-67 was increased in patients who underwent FOLFOX treatment. CCL20 and CCR6 expression levels were significantly increased in CRLM patients who had undergone preoperative FOLFOX chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION: This chemokine/receptor up-regulation could lead to increased proliferation/migration through an autocrine mechanism which might be used by surviving metastatic cells to escape cell death caused by FOLFOX.

Prospective volumetric assessment of the liver on a personal computer by nonradiologists prior to partial hepatectomy

Background

A small remnant liver volume is an important risk factor for posthepatectomy liver failure. ImageJ and OsiriX^® are both free, open-source image processing software packages. The aim of the present study was to compare ImageJ and OsiriX^® in performing prospective computed tomography (CT) volumetric analysis of the liver on a personal computer (PC) in patients undergoing major liver resection.

Methods

Patients scheduled for a right hemihepatectomy were eligible for inclusion. Two surgeons and one surgical trainee measured volumes of total liver, tumor, and future resection specimen prospectively with ImageJ and OsiriX^®. A radiologist also measured these volumes with CT scanner-linked Aquarius iNtuition^® software. Resection volumes were compared with the actual weights of the liver specimens removed during surgery, and differences between the measured liver volumes were analyzed.

Results

A total of 15 patients (8 men, 7 women) with a median age of 63 years (48–79 years) were included. There was a significant correlation between the measured weights of resection specimens and the volumes calculated prospectively with ImageJ and OsiriX^® (r = 0.89; r = 0.83, respectively). There was also a significant correlation between the volumes measured with radiological software iNtuition^® and the volumes measured with ImageJ and OsiriX^® (r = 0.93; r = 0.95, respectively).

Conclusions

There were no major differences in total liver volumes, resection volumes, or tumour volumes for these three software packages. Prospective hepatic CT volumetry with ImageJ or OsiriX^® is reliable and can be accurately used on a PC by nonradiologists. ImageJ and OsiriX^® yield results comparable to the radiological software iNtuition^®.

Metastasectomy for stage IV colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer traditionally has been considered incurable. Over the past 3 decades, however, resection of low-volume hepatic disease has been recognized as beneficial in some cases. More recently, resection of isolated pulmonary metastases has been shown to offer long-term survival in carefully selected patients. Resection of metastases to more unusual sites (ovary, brain, peritoneal cavity) is more controversial; nevertheless, retrospective data suggest that a few patients may be cured with resection of these tumors. In this article, we review the history and current status of metastasectomy in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

The liver is the most common site of metastatic spread of colorectal cancer (CRC). Liver may be the only site of spread in as many as 30% to 40% of patients with advanced disease and can be treated with regional therapies directed toward their liver tumors. Surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment, with a 5-year survival rate as high as 30% to 40% in selected patients. However, fewer than 25% of cases are candidates for curative resection. A number of other locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, cryotherapy, and chemotherapy, may be offered to patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases. However, for most patients with metastatic spread beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy rather than regional therapy is a more appropriate option. We review the status of various regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal metastases to the liver in the light of the available, published prospective, randomized trials; this discipline has not yet been properly applied to the burgeoning use of locally ablative techniques. The regional strategies reviewed include portal venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), intra-arterial chemotherapy (hepatic arterial infusion [HAI]), chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

Management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

About 50% of colorectal cancer patients develop liver metastasis, and liver resection is considered the only curative therapy. However, the rate of recurrence is high, which contributes to poor prognosis. Since surgical resection coverage has increased because of improved hepatectomy including portal vein embolization, tumors shrink because of the effectiveness of recent chemotherapy, such as FOLFOX and FOLFIRI, and it has become possible for many patients whose cancer was judged unresectable before to undergo resection. Improvement of new anticancer drugs such as molecularly targeted biologics is greatly changing therapeutic systems of metastatic colorectal cancer, and it is time for us to innovate stage IV therapy. In this report, we will review new treatment strategies for metastatic liver cancer from colorectal cancer, clinical trials of new anticancer drugs for liver metastasis, surgery and ablation as local therapy, and further clarify complex therapeutic systems for metastatic liver tumors from colorectal cancer.

The surgical treatment of hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Colorectal carcinoma with hepatic metastases was long considered an incurable disease. Recent advances in surgical treatment have substantially improved the affected patients' prognosis. At first, surgery was only performed in patients whose hepatic tumor burden was small (<4 nodes, <5 cm). Currently, however, the main issue is the feasibility of curative resection of all metastases.

METHOD

The PubMed literature database was selectively searched for articles with the keywords "colorectal liver metastases," "chemotherapy," and "surgery." Particular attention was devoted to studies of large groups of patients, randomized trials, the German guidelines, and an analysis of the authors' own patient population.

RESULTS

Only 10% to 20% of all patients are candidates for surgical therapy (hepatic resection), as the rest are disqualified either by extensive liver involvement or by extrahepatic neoplasia. A further 10% of patients have hepatic metastases that are primarily considered inoperable, yet later become amenable to surgery after interdisciplinary treatment involving preoperative chemotherapy, portal-vein embolization, two-stage hepatectomy, and/or locally ablative procedures. Chemotherapy is probably beneficial after hepatic resection, although the benefit has not yet been definitively demonstrated by clinical trials. Therefore, chemotherapy should only be given perioperatively in selected cases, when recommended by an interdisciplinary treatment team.

CONCLUSION

A multimodal approach to the treatment of hepatic metastases of colorectal carcinoma has led to an increase in the number of resections and to an improved long-term survival rate (currently more than 40% at 5 years).

Evolution in surgery: influence of minimally invasive approaches on the hepatobiliary surgeon

BACKGROUND

Advances in technology and in medical knowledge underlie the constant change in paradigms for medical care. Those who understand, anticipate, and plan for these changes will have the greatest impact on future care of patients and education of the next generation of scholars.

METHODS

Review of pertinent literature.

RESULTS

In hepatobiliary surgery, rapid developments in laparoscopic surgery, image-guided interventions, and minimally invasive ablative therapies have combined to produce much improved care for patients with disease of the liver and biliary tract. Laparoscopic procedures of the gallbladder, bile duct, and liver have altered the morbidity of operations on these organs. Major changes in the treatment of liver abscess, gallstone disease, and liver tumors have resulted from recent changes in technology, highlighting the great opportunities the surgeon anticipating these changes may capitalize on to improve, not only patient care, but the field of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Active investigation and developments in education in these areas to improve the training of the next generation of surgeons undoubtedly will improve patient care.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX/FOLFIRI on disease-free and overall survival of patients with colorectal metastases

STUDY AIMS

To determine if neoadjuvant FOLFOX/FOLFIRI is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal metastases (CRM) to the liver.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients (from 457 eligible) with CRM that underwent hepatic resection during 2000 to 2005 were included. Group 1 (n = 44) patients received neoadjuvant FOLFOX/FOLFIRI, and Group 2 (n = 55) did not receive neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

There were 58% men. The median age for Group 1 was 58 and Group 2, 64 (p = 0.03). OS for Group 1 at 1, 3, and 5 years was 93%, 62%, and 51%, respectively, with a median OS of 5.8 years. In Group 2 survival at 1l, 3, and 5 years was 90%, 63%, and 45%, respectively, with a median OS of 3.7 years (HR 1.06, p = 0.87). The DFS for Group 1 at 1, 3, and 5 years was 51%, 20%, and 20%, with a median DFS of 1.1 years and Group 2 at 1, 3, and 5 years was 58%, 32%, and 32% (median DFS-1.2 years; HR = 1.24, p = 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant FOLFOX/FOLFIRI was employed more frequently in younger patients with CRM; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy for CRM was not significantly associated with an increase in OS or DFS, despite additional adjuvant therapy.

Comparison of clinical risk scores predicting prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the risk scores of Fong et al., Nordlinger et al., and the TNM classification of colorectal liver metastases proposed by the UICC.

METHODS

Data from 282 consecutive patients undergoing 303 liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between 1995 and 2006 at the Department of Surgery, University of Erlangen were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 34 months. A curative (R0) resection was performed in 92% of the patients.

RESULTS

Applying the clinical risk score of Fong with preoperative data identified three risk groups. The survival rates between "low risk" (n = 22) and "intermediate risk" (n = 222) diverged (P = 0.073). The survival rates between "intermediate risk" and "high risk" (n = 59) differed significantly (P = 0.030). Using the risk scoring system of Nordlinger, patients were divided into two risk groups (i.e., "low risk" (n = 218) and "intermediate risk" (n = 68)). Significant differences in survival between the groups were noted (P = 0.012). Applying the clinical TNM classification of colorectal liver metastases revealed no significant differences in survival between the risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found the clinical risk score developed by Fong et al. to be a reliable preoperative prognostic tool for selecting patients for surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Liver Resection and Diaphragm Excision for Advanced Colorectal Liver Metastases

INTRODUCTION

At present, liver resection offers the best long-term outcome and only chance for cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases. However, there are no large series that report the early and long-term outcomes of patients who require simultaneous diaphragm excision. This study was designed to investigate these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 285 consecutive liver resections were performed over a 10-year period. Of these, 258 had liver resections alone and 27 underwent liver resection and simultaneous diaphragm excision. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Pre-operative assessment was standardised. The outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULT

There was no difference in age, hospital stay or intra-operative blood loss. The diaphragm was histologically involved in four out of 27 resections. As a result, the cancer involved resection margin incidence was greater in the liver resection and diaphragm excision group (14.8% versus 3.9%; P = 0.12). The median tumour size was also different between the two groups (60 mm versus 30 mm; P = 0.001). The liver and diaphragm resection group had a greater peri-operative complication rate (44.4% versus 21.3%; P = 0.02) and mortality (7.4% versus 1.6%; P = 0.25). Overall and disease-free survival was significantly worse in the group who underwent simultaneous diaphragm excision and liver resection (P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Diaphragm invasion was found to be an independent predictor of poor overall outcome (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection and simultaneous diaphragm excision have a greater incidence of peri-operative morbidity and mortality and a significantly worse long-term outcome compared with liver resection alone. However, these data suggest that liver resection in the presence of diaphragm invasion may still offer a favourable outcome compared with chemotherapy treatment alone. Therefore, we believe that diaphragm involvement by tumour should not be a contra-indication to hepatectomy.

Operative mortality, blood loss and the use of Pringle manoeuvres in 526 consecutive liver resections

INTRODUCTION

Centres with high volumes of high-risk surgery have significantly better outcomes than low-volume centres for pancreatic resection, oesophagectomy and pelvic exenteration. However, this has not to date been conclusively demonstrated for hepatic resection. With increased experience, operative practice can change. The use of the Pringle manoeuvre reduced substantially over a 12-year period in a single centre as it was felt anecdotally that its use increased the incidence of hepatic insufficiency and operative mortality. This study was designed to review 12 years of experience in a single hepatobiliary centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data regarding 526 consecutive liver resections were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analysed in a high-volume referral unit over a 12-year period. Patients' demographics, operative mortality and morbidity were analysed on an annual basis.

RESULTS

Overall peri-operative mortality was 1.9%. Operative mortality in the first 6 years compared to the latter 6 years was 4.1% and 1.2%, respectively (P = 0.13). The morbidity rate was 26.8% and 20.3% in the first and second halves of the study, respectively (P = 0.15). With increased experience, intra-operative blood loss and patients receiving blood transfusions decreased (P = 0.047 and 0.03, respectively) while the number of intra-operative Pringle manoeuvres also decreased (P < 0.0001). Hospital stay decreased significantly over the 12 years (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

High-volume centres are the safest environment for hepatic resection. With increased experience, it may be possible to reduce the intra-operative use of the Pringle manoeuvre without increasing the intra-operative blood loss. This may be associated with a decrease in hepatic insufficiency and peri-operative mortality.

Early and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing liver resection and diaphragm excision for advanced colorectal liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

At present, liver resection offers the best long-term outcome and only chance for cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases. However, there are no large series that report the early and long-term outcomes of patients who require simultaneous diaphragm excision. This study was designed to investigate these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 285 consecutive liver resections were performed over a 10-year period. Of these, 258 had liver resections alone and 27 underwent liver resection and simultaneous diaphragm excision. Data were collected prospectively and analysed retrospectively. Pre-operative assessment was standardised. The outcomes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in age, hospital stay or intra-operative blood loss. The diaphragm was histologically involved in four out of 27 resections. As a result, the cancer involved resection margin incidence was greater in the liver resection and diaphragm excision group (14.8% versus 3.9%; P = 0.12). The median tumour size was also different between the two groups (60 mm versus 30 mm; P = 0.001). The liver and diaphragm resection group had a greater peri-operative complication rate (44.4% versus 21.3%; P = 0.02) and mortality (7.4% versus 1.6%; P = 0.25). Overall and disease-free survival was significantly worse in the group who underwent simultaneous diaphragm excision and liver resection (P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Diaphragm invasion was found to be an independent predictor of poor overall outcome (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection and simultaneous diaphragm excision have a greater incidence of peri-operative morbidity and mortality and a significantly worse long-term outcome compared with liver resection alone. However, these data suggest that liver resection in the presence of diaphragm invasion may still offer a favourable outcome compared with chemotherapy treatment alone. Therefore, we believe that diaphragm involvement by tumour should not be a contra-indication to hepatectomy.

The Role of Aggressive Regional Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Surgical resection is the most effective treatment modality for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. However, most patients with liver metastases are not candidates for resection due to extensive intrahepatic disease. Approximately one-half of the patients who are able to undergo resection will eventually recur within the remnant liver. Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) chemotherapy takes advantage of the arterial blood supply of colorectal liver metastases to increase tumor exposure to chemotherapy while minimizing systemic toxicity. HAI chemotherapy has been utilized in patients with unresectable disease in the neoadjuvant setting in an effort to convert them to resectability as well as in patients with resectable disease in the adjuvant setting in an effort to prevent recurrence. This article reviews the roles of HAI chemotherapy in an aggressive approach toward colorectal liver metastases.

Integrating targeted agents into therapeutic regimens for patients with resectable colorectal cancer

New surgical techniques and new systemic treatments have come together to increase the number of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have been cured. There is great hope that new targeted agents will further increase our success, both through improved therapeutic outcomes and better selection of patients for this more invasive and aggressive approach. A summary of this current clinical data is presented herein to establish our current standards and to guide us toward our future goals. We are increasingly managing patients with a multidisciplinary approach, a critical element in our success. Biologic therapies will continue to play an important role in the management of these patients.

Surgical treatment of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an 11-year Western single-center experience in 107 patients

Hepatic resection is the only cure for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC). The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcome of patients with ICC. We retrospectively studied the records of 67 patients who underwent laparotomy for ICC from January 1995 through December 2005. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for several variables to evaluate their influence on the outcome. Forty-five patients underwent hepatic resection. In 19 patients, the tumors were found to be unresectable at the time of laparotomy. Median 2- and 5-year survival rates in the 45 resected patients were 62% and 35%, respectively. For 36 patients who underwent curative resection, the 2- and 5-year survival were 67% and 41%, respectively; with a median survival of 43 months. The overall 5-year recurrence-free survival was 30%. The 90-day postoperative mortality rate was 4% and morbidity 28%. Multivariate analyses confirmed resection margin, lymph node involvement, blood loss, and blood transfusion to be independent significant variables for overall survival. Predictors of longer recurrence-free survival were lymph node involvement, vascular infiltration, blood loss, and transfusion. Surgical treatment of ICC by curative hepatic resection in patients without nodal invasion provides good long-term results. In contrast, incomplete tumor removal does not provide a survival benefit. An improved quality of preoperative staging was able to increase the resectability rate to acceptable 70%.

Mesohepatectomy as an option for the treatment of central liver tumors

BACKGROUND

Despite substantial improvements in intra- and postoperative management of extended hemihepatectomy as the curative option for treatment of central liver tumors, the high morbidity and mortality rates accompanying the procedure still represent major obstacles. Mesohepatectomy preserves up to 35% more functional liver tissue than extended hepatectomy, but it has not been widely applied, perhaps because of its complexity as a resection method.

STUDY DESIGN

Forty-eight consecutive patients (29 men and 19 women) with centrally located liver tumors underwent mesohepatectomy. Peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were prospectively evaluated and analyzed. Mean age of the patients was 60.7 years. Indications for mesohepatectomy were liver metastasis (n = 29), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), gallbladder carcinoma (n = 4), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 4), hemangioma (n = 2), and other benign diseases (n = 4).

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 238 minutes (range 65 to 480 minutes) and mean intraoperative blood loss was 1,120 mL (range 100 to 5,000 mL). Mean amount of intraoperative red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma transfusion was 3.6 U (range 1 to 12 U) and 3.8 U (range 2 to 14 U), respectively. Mean postoperative hospitalization was 15.8 days (range 6 to 104 days). Postoperative surgical complications were seen in 18.8% of patients (n = 9) and included liver failure (n = 1), intraabdominal abscess (n = 1), bilioma or bile leakage (n = 4), hemorrhage and hematoma (n = 2), peritonitis because of intestinal perforation (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 1). One patient (2%) died in the early postoperative phase from portal vein bleeding and disseminated intravascular coagulation, followed by liver failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with extended liver resection, mesohepatectomy clearly leads to less parenchymal loss. Although it is a technically difficult operation and requires special attention to prevent surgical complications, it is justified in selected patients with centrally located tumors and is a feasible and safe alternative to extended liver resection.

Survival and recurrence after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and liver resection for colorectal metastases: a ten year study

BACKGROUND

Currently liver resection offers the only potential cure for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). We prospectively audited the outcome of CRLM treated by a combination of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery.

METHODS

283 consecutive patients underwent liver resection for CRLM over 10 years with curative intent. Patients received chemotherapy preoperatively for synchronous and early (< 2 years) metachronous metastases. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify mortality risk factors.

RESULTS

Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 90%, 59.2% and 46.1%, respectively. Disease free survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 68.1%, 34.8% and 27.9%, respectively. Operative mortality was 2.1% and morbidity was 23.7%. Patients with macroscopic diaphragm invasion by tumour, CEA > 100 ng/ml, tumour size > 5 cm or cancer involved resection margins (CIRM) had a significantly worse overall survival. Incidence of CIRM and re-resection was 4.9% and 4.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver surgery is associated with improved survival and low CIRM and re-resection rates.

Management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers: an update

Approximately 50%-60% of patients with colorectal cancers will develop liver lesions in their life span. Despite the potential of surgical resection to provide long-term survival in this subset of patients, only 15%-20% are found to be resectable. The introduction of new neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic agents and the expanding criteria of resection have enhanced the overall 5-year survival from 30% to 60% in the past decade. The use of technical innovations such as staged resection; portal vein embolization, and repeat resection have allowed higher resection rates in patients with bilobar disease. Extrahepatic primary and liver-exclusive recurrent disease no longer represent an absolute contraindication to resection. The role of regional therapy using hepatic arterial infusion is being redefined for liver-exclusive unresectable disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy in combination with regional therapies is being looked at from fresh perspectives. Ablative approaches have gained a firm role both as an adjunct to surgical resection and in the management of patients who are not surgical candidates. Overall, the management of hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancers requires a multimodal approach.

[Metastases of colorectal carcinoma]

Metastases of colorectal cancer represent an interdisciplinary therapeutic challenge. Evidence-based guidelines are supportive of treatment decisions in specific situations with the objective to improve the therapeutic outcome for patients. Interventional tumor therapies are increasingly applied therapeutic options in the treatment of colorectal metastases. The current literature indicates that thermoablation of colorectal liver metastasis can lead to an improved survival in selected patients. However, recommendation of thermoablation as a part of guidelines for the therapy of colorectal metastases is restricted due to a shortcoming of randomized controlled trials. Therefore, interventional tumor therapies have to be evaluated in comparison with standard therapies, particularly with regard to surgical resection and chemotherapy. Moreover, the interdisciplinary combination of tumor ablation, surgical resection, and chemotherapy is a promising approach for the optimization of oncological therapy strategies in the treatment of colorectal metastases.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Potentially Curative Resection of Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized Trials

Purpose

Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy administered after surgical resection of colorectal cancer metastases may reduce the risk of recurrence and improve survival, but its benefit has never been demonstrated. Two phase III trials (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive [FFCD] Trial 9002 and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group/Gruppo Italiano di Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia [ENG] trial) used a similar design and showed a trend favoring adjuvant chemotherapy, but both had to close prematurely because of slow accrual, thus lacking the statistical power to demonstrate the predefined difference in survival. We report here a pooled analysis based on individual data from these two trials.

Patients and Methods

After complete resection of colorectal liver or lung metastases, patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy (CT arm; fluorouracil [FU] 400 mg/m2 administered intravenously [IV] once daily plus dl-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 [FFCD] × 5 days or FU 370 mg/m2 plus l-leucovorin 100 mg/m2 IV × 5 days [ENG] for six cycles at 28-day intervals) or to surgery alone (S arm).

Results

A total of 278 patients (CT, n = 138; S, n = 140) were included in the pooled analysis. Median progression-free survival was 27.9 months in the CT arm as compared with 18.8 months in the S arm (hazard ratio = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.76; P = .058). Median overall survival was 62.2 months in the CT arm compared with 47.3 months in the S arm (hazard ratio = 1.32; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.82; P = .095). Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with both progression-free survival and overall survival in multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

This pooled analysis shows a marginal statistical significance in favor of adjuvant chemotherapy with an FU bolus–based regimen after complete resection of colorectal cancer metastases.

[Early results of liver resection due to metastases of colorectal carcinoma]

BACKGROUND/AIM

Liver metastases are most frequently the result of colorectal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to analyse early results of operative treatment of the patients with the liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

This retrospective, prospective study included 387 patients with colorectal carcinoma operated during the period from 2005-2007. All the patients were submitted to oncologic surgery protocol. The functional state of the liver was assessed, especially in the patients with hemotherapy. Diagnostic protocol further included color Doppler ultrasonography of the liver and port system, as well as spiral computed tomography includy angiography. Nine (5.7%) of the patients were submitted to explorative laparotomy.

RESULTS

Of all the patients 157 (40.6%) had metastases in the liver, synhronous 78 (20.15%) and metachronous 79 (20.45%), Forty two (26.7%) patients were indicated for the liver resection. In 33 (21%) of them it was performed successfully. There were 18 females and 15 males of the average age 60.09 (42-81) years. Up to 4 metastases had 90.9% of the patients and in 9.09% had up to 5 and more metastases. On average, metastases occupied 2.6 of the liver segments. There were 21.2% of solitary lesions (7 patients), 63.6% of multilple unilobular (21 patients) and 15.15% of multiple bilobular metastases (5 patients). Liver resection was done using ultraharmonic scalpel. At spacious liver resections we used a device for intraoperative saving of blood (cell saver) and applied a technique of selective hepatic vascular exclusion. An average disease-free interval was 16.7 months. There were 60.6% of anatomical liver resections and 39.4% of atypical resections. In 31.1% of the operated patients we made resection on up to two segments of the liver and in 30.3% we made resection of four segments. An average number of segments where resection had been performed was 2.65 and the duration of operation was 143 minutes. In 39.4% of the cases we used a technique of liver vascular isolation, an average duration was 38 minutes. In 30.3% of resections we used cell saver and 70% of operated patients were transfused. On average, 493 ml of blood was transfused. Of the total number of resections, 90.9% was of the type R0, 9.09% of the type R1. An average duration of postoperative hospitalization was 10.6 days. Operative morbidity rate was 15.15% and operative mortality 3.03%. During a six-month observing there were not any mortality or repeated metastases in liver.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic liver resection including selective vascular hepatic excision by the use of an ultraharmonic scalpel and cell saver is considered to be efficient and secure method for the reduction of intraoperative and postoperative complications rendering good surgical results.

Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with cancer-specific survival and develop a predictive model for patients undergoing primary hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND

No published studies investigated collectively the inter-relation of factors related to patient cancer-specific survival after hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Clinical, pathologic, and complete follow-up data were prospectively collected from 929 consecutive patients undergoing primary (n = 925) or repeat hepatic resection (n = 80) for colorectal liver metastases at a tertiary referral center from 1987 to 2005. Parametric survival analysis was used to identify predictors of cancer-specific survival and develop a predictive model. The model was validated using measures of discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 25.9%, respectively. 5-year and 10-year cancer-specific survival were 36% and 23%. On multivariate analysis, 7 risk factors were found to be independent predictors of poor survival: number of hepatic metastases >3, node positive primary, poorly differentiated primary, extrahepatic disease, tumor diameter > or =5 cm, carcinoembryonic antigen level >60 ng/mL, and positive resection margin. The first 6 of these criteria were used in a preoperative scoring system and the last 6 in the postoperative setting. Patients with the worst postoperative prognostic criteria had an expected median cancer-specific survival of 0.7 years and a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 2%. Conversely, patients with the best prognostic postoperative criteria had an expected median cancer-specific survival of 7.4 years and a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 64%. When tested both predictive models fitted the data well with no significant differences between observed and predicted outcomes (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Resection of liver metastases provides good long-term cancer-specific survival benefit, which can be quantified pre- or postoperatively using the criteria described. The "Basingstoke Predictive Index" may be used for risk-stratifying patients who may benefit from intensive surveillance and selection for adjuvant therapy and trials.

Liver volumetry plug and play: do it yourself with ImageJ

Background

A small remnant liver volume is an important risk factor for posthepatectomy liver failure and can be predicted accurately by computed tomography (CT) volumetry using radiologic image analysis software. Unfortunately, this software is expensive and usually requires support by a radiologist. ImageJ is a freely downloadable image analysis software package developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and brings liver volumetry to the surgeon’s desktop. We aimed to assess the accuracy of ImageJ for hepatic CT volumetry.

Methods

ImageJ was downloaded from http://www.rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Preoperative CT scans of 15 patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Scans were opened in ImageJ; and the liver, all metastases, and the intended parenchymal transection line were manually outlined on each slice. The area of each selected region, metastasis, resection specimen, and remnant liver was multiplied by the slice thickness to calculate volume. Volumes of virtual liver resection specimens measured with ImageJ were compared with specimen weights and calculated volumes obtained during pathology examination after resection.

Results

There was an excellent correlation between the volumes calculated with ImageJ and the actual measured weights of the resection specimens (r² = 0.98, p < 0.0001). The weight/volume ratio amounted to 0.88 ± 0.04 (standard error) and was in agreement with our earlier findings using CT-linked radiologic software.

Conclusion

ImageJ can be used for accurate hepatic CT volumetry on a personal computer. This application brings CT volumetry to the surgeon’s desktop at no expense and is particularly useful in cases of tertiary referred patients, who already have a proper CT scan on CD-ROM from the referring institution. Most likely the discrepancy between volume and weight results from exsanguination of the liver after resection.

[Hepatic resections. Analysis of data from the Tumor Documentation Center in the state of Brandenburg, Germany, focusing on liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Data from the Brandenburg Tumor Documentation Center (TDCB) in Germany were analyzed for an overview of the current treatment standards of liver surgery in that state.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The analysis was based on prospective data from a total of 37,165 patients diagnosed with malignant tumors between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2004. Of these patients, 3,986 were diagnosed with liver metastases and 554 had primary tumors of the liver or bile duct. Liver metastases of colorectal carcinoma were reported in 1,299.

RESULTS

Analysis confirmed that resection of colorectal metastases (51%) and primary liver or bile duct tumors (23.1%) is by far the most frequent indication for liver surgery. Liver metastasis was developed by 29.2% (n=1299) of patients with colorectal carcinoma. Of the patient total, 71.5% showed evidence of liver metastasis already present when colorectal carcinoma was diagnosed. Of 248 patients who had received liver surgery after diagnosis of liver metastases of a colorectal carcinoma, 114 (46%) underwent hepatic segment resection, which was thus performed in only 8.8% (n=114) of patients with liver metastases after colorectal carcinoma (n=1299).

CONCLUSIONS

Since only 8.8% of those with liver metastases underwent curative hepatic segment resection, we can conclude that if patients and doctors were provided with adequate information on the curative potential of this surgical method along with regular consultations with surgeons experienced in liver surgery, the result on resection rates would be positive. Data from tumor documentation centers enable selective analysis of the oncological situation of specific diseases.

Does chemotherapy prior to liver resection increase the potential for cure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? A report from the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group

Liver resection offers the only chance of cure for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Typically, the 5-year survival rates following liver resection range from 25% to 40%. Unfortunately, approximately 85% of patients with stage IV CRC have liver disease which is considered unresectable at presentation. However, the rapid expansion in the use of improved combination therapy regimens has increased the percentage of patients eligible for potentially curative surgery. Despite this, the selection criteria for patients potentially suitable for resection are not well documented and patient management by multidisciplinary teams, although essential, is still evolving. The goal of the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group is to establish pan-European guidelines for the treatment of patients with CRC liver metastases that can be adopted more widely by established treatment centres and to develop more accurate staging systems and evaluation criteria.

Surgical therapy of liver metastases

The liver is the most common site of metastatic disease from both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal malignancies. Historically, only a minority of patients with colorectal liver metastases were candidates for resection. However, over the past several decades, liver resection has evolved as a safe and potentially curative treatment for hepatic colorectal metastases. The development of active chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapies, together with newer modalities like radiofrequency ablation, have expanded the indications for hepatic resection and improved survival. Selected patients with isolated liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors, germ cell cancers, ocular melanoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), and breast cancer also may be considered for hepatic surgery.

Curative in situ ablation of colorectal liver metastases-experimental and clinical implementation

INTRODUCTION

In situ ablation of colorectal liver metastases is frequently assessed for palliative treatment only. The establishment of clinically relevant lesion size and a lack of long-term survival data were regarded as main limitations to using them with curative intention. In contrast to surgical liver resection, whose oncological findings seem to have remained unchanged over the years, the in situ ablation methods have considerably changed technically and clinically in the last few years.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the paper was to point out experimental and clinical data underlining the impact of in situ ablation for potentially curative treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

DISCUSSION

On the basis of experimental data, the aim of complete local tumor control (R0 ablation) can only be obtained if additional energy is applied after reaching the tumor-adapted maximal coagulation volume. Analogous to the oncological safety margin in surgical resection, we defined this decisive energy difference as the "energy safety margin" for in situ ablation. The energy safety margin is the energy that must be additionally applied after reaching the plateau in the energy/volume curve to achieve complete tumor coagulation. In addition to that, in situ ablation should be combined with temporary interruption of hepatic perfusion whenever possible to prevent intralesional recurrences. In this way, the thermoprotective mechanism of hepatic perfusion can be effectively eliminated. With restrictions, the survival data after ablation in specialized centers is comparable to surgical resection with concomitantly lower morbidity and mortality. Based on recent findings and with the corresponding expertise in the field of ablation and state-of-the-art equipment, ablation is, thus, an alternative to surgical resection. The combined application of surgical resection and ablation is also a suitable method for increasing the R0 rate and thus helps improve the prognosis of treated patients. In summary, it can be said that in situ ablation is a useful expansion of the therapeutic spectrum of liver metastases and can be applied as an alternative to or in combination with surgical resection.