[Long-term treatment of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: focus on pharmacotherapy]

[The Attitude of the Public Concerning Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients]

OBJECTIVE

To examine the attitude of the general public in Basel concerning the use of coercive measures while dealing with psychiatric patients. The common population indirectly governs the use of coercive measures in psychiatry by its stigmatization of people with psychiatric illnesses, and its attitude towards treatment in psychiatry and by local opinion leaders and reactions of social networks.

METHODS

The answers of 1,112 persons from a representative population survey were evaluated. Participants were mailed case vignettes and questionnaires, and asked if they considered involuntary admission, coercive medication, and/or seclusion as acceptable measures in dealing with psychiatric patients.

RESULTS

When symptoms of a psychotic disorder were present, 31.5% approved of at least one coercive measure, with 22% approval in the case of a borderline personality disorder, and 20.7% in the case of alcohol dependency. However, the overall rejection of coercive measures by the general public in Basel was high. The differential approval of the examined coercive measures depending on psychiatric symptoms was in line with professional medical and ethical guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Public attitudes have an indirect influence on the local use of coercive measures and should be included in the specialist psychiatric discourse.

Compulsory psychiatric admissions in the canton of Basel-Stadt between September 2013 and April 2022: Analysis of the cantonal database of the Health Department of Basel-Stadt

BACKGROUND

According to federal and cantonal law, persons with an acute mental illness can be admitted to a psychiatric hospital or another suitable institution against their will, when other therapeutic options are not available or have been exhausted. In the canton of Basel-Stadt, this is the responsibility of public health officers employed by the division of Social Medicine of the cantonal Health Department.

AIMS

This study aims to elucidate which factors influence the decision-making of public health officers regarding compulsory admissions over the period from September 2013 to April 2022 in the canton of Basel-Stadt.

METHOD

Leveraging comprehensive clinical data from the health department of the canton Basel-Stadt (N = 5,'550), we estimated a mixed effects logistic regression model to identify factors contributing to the decision of public-health officers to compulsorily admit patients, while controlling for potential clustering effects among public health officers.

RESULTS

The risk for compulsory admissions was most strongly predicted by the presence of potential self-harm. In comparison, while being a strong predictor, potential harm to others played a considerably lesser role. Furthermore, psychiatric syndrome, previous compulsory admissions, and the specific context of evaluation were significant predictors. Finally, we found no meaningful personal bias among public health officers.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that public health officers' decision-making regarding compulsory admissions focuses on preventing self-harm and, to a lesser degree, harm to others. This indicates that such measures are only used as a measure of last resort, which is in line with current evidence regarding the detrimental effects of compulsory measures on treatment outcomes in psychiatry. Our findings suggest that all relevant stakeholders, including the police, share this perspective. Decision-making regarding compulsory admissions was mostly free of personal biases, suggesting adherence to shared professional standards by public health officers.

Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in Public Perception and the Role of Stigmatization

Background: Coercion is routinely used in psychiatry. Its benefits and drawbacks are controversially debated. In addition, the majority of persons with mental health problems are exposed to stigmatization and are assumed to be dangerous. Stigmatization is associated with negative consequences for individuals with mental illness such as disapproval, social rejection, exclusion, and discrimination. Being subjected to coercive measures can increase the stigmatization of the affected persons, and stigmatization might lead to higher approval for coercion. Aims of the Study: This study aims to examine the approval for coercive measures in psychiatry by the general public, and to explore its relation with person- and situation-specific factors as well as with stigmatization. Method: We conducted a representative survey of the general population (N = 2,207) in the canton of Basel-Stadt, Switzerland. Participants were asked to read a vignette depicting psychopathological symptoms of a fictitious character and indicate whether they would accept coercive measures for the person in the vignette. Desire for social distance and perceived dangerousness were assessed as measures of stigmatization. Findings: The person in the case vignette exhibiting dangerous behavior, showing symptoms of a psychotic disorder, being perceived as dangerous, and treatment being understood as helpful increased approval of coercion in general, while familiarity of the respondents with mental illness decreased approval. Conclusions: The public attitude regarding the approval of coercion in psychiatry is highly differentiated and largely follows the current legal framework and medical treatment guidelines. Higher approval occurred in situations of self-harm or harm to others and when coercive measures were thought to have a beneficial effect for the affected persons. A considerable part of the approval for coercion is predicted by stigmatization. With the increasing severity of coercive measures, the influence of person- and situation-specific factors and of familiarity with mental illness decreased and generalizing and stigmatizing attitudes became stronger predictors for the approval of more severe measures.

Could Animal-Assisted Therapy Help to Reduce Coercive Treatment in Psychiatry?

For psychiatric patients, compulsory admission and coercive measures can constitute distressing and sometimes traumatizing experiences. As a consequence, clinicians aim at minimizing such procedures. At the same time, they need to ensure high levels of safety for patients, staff and the public. In order to prevent compulsory measures and to favor the use of less restrictive alternatives, innovative interventions improving the management of dangerous situations are needed. Animal-assisted therapy (AAT) is being applied in a variety of diagnoses and treatment settings, and could have the potential to reduce aggression and psychopathology. Therefore, AAT might be of use in the prevention and early treatment of aggression, and might constitute a promising component of treatment alternatives to forced interventions. To our knowledge, no study evaluating the effect of AAT on compulsory measures in persons with psychiatric diseases has been published up to date. This narrative expert review including a systematic literature search examines the published literature about the use of AAT in psychiatry. Studies report reduced anxiety and aggressiveness as well as positive effects on general wellbeing, self-efficacy, quality of life and mindfulness. Although literature on the applicability of AAT as a component of preventive or de-escalating treatment settings is sparse, beneficial effects of AAT have been reported. Therefore, we encourage examining AAT as a promising new treatment approach to prevent compulsory measures.

[Six years of open-door policy at the University Psychiatric Hospital Basel]

BACKGROUND

Coercive measures in psychiatry have well-known negative consequences for the patients and their treatment. They are considered ethically problematic and must only be used as a last resort. Locked wards may promote a threatening atmosphere leading to more aggression and a subsequent higher use of coercive measures. The aim of this was to investigate the frequency of seclusion and forced medication during clinic-wide implementation of an open-door policy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this 6‑year longitudinal observational study (2010-2015) the frequencies of seclusion and forced medication were investigated on the basis of 17,359 cases treated in the University Psychiatric Hospital Basel. During the observational period, six formerly permanently locked wards were opened.

RESULTS

The examined data showed a clinically relevant decrease in the frequency of seclusion (from 8.2% to 3.5%) and forced medication (from 2.4% to 1.2%) during the observational period.

CONCLUSION

These results underline the potential of a less restrictive policy in psychiatry to reduce the frequency of coercive measures.

Reduction of seclusion on a hospital-wide level: successful implementation of a less restrictive policy

PURPOSE

Change of treatment policy from closed to open ward settings has been shown to reduce coercive measures. The aim of the current study was to examine the effects of the change from closed to open wards on the frequency of seclusion and forced medication in a hospital-wide setting.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

2-year, longitudinal observational study with 2838 inpatient cases.

RESULTS

On a hospital-wide level, the percentage of patients with at least one seclusion was decreased significantly (χ(2)(1) = 5.8; p = .016), while there was no significant change in forced medication (χ(2)(1) = .08; p = .775). The frequency of seclusions and forced medication decreased significantly on newly opened wards, and there were no significant changes regarding seclusion on permanently closed or open wards, while the number of forced medications increased significantly on closed wards. The decrease in seclusions on newly opened wards remained statistically significant after controlling for diagnoses and severity of illness.

DISCUSSION

Our results indicate that a reduction of overall seclusion can be successfully attained, and that, in particular, the frequency of seclusion and forced medication on newly opened wards was decreased significantly. These changes were not accompanied by a significant increase in seclusion on other wards.

CONCLUSION

Open ward treatment was successfully implemented and was associated with a significant decrease of coercive measures in our study. It might therefore provide a good care model, strengthening the patient's right to autonomy and leading to a reduction of coercive measures.