Rate of fall of blood glucose and physiological responses of counterregulatory hormones, clinical symptoms and cognitive function to hypoglycaemia in Type I diabetes mellitus in the postprandial state

Type 1 diabetes-associated cognitive decline: a meta-analysis and update of the current literature

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) can have a significant impact on brain structure and function, which is referred to as T1D-associated cognitive decline (T1DACD). Diabetes duration, early onset disease, and diabetes-associated complications are all proposed as factors contributing to T1DACD. However, there have been no comparisons in T1DACD between children and adults with T1D. To obtain a better insight into the occurrence and effects of T1DACD in T1D, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to investigate differences between children and adults and to analyse factors contributing T1DACD.

METHODS

Two electronic databases were consulted: PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge. Literature published up until the end of 2013 was included in the analysis. Effect sizes (Cohen's d), which are standardized differences between experimental and control groups, were calculated.

RESULTS

There was a small to modest decrease in cognitive performance in T1D patients compared with non-diabetic controls. Children with T1D performed worse while testing for executive function, full intelligence quotient (IQ), and motor speed, whereas adults with T1D performed worse while testing the full, verbal and performance IQ, part of the executive function, memory, spatial memory, and motor speed. Episodes of severe hypoglycemia, chronic hyperglycemia, and age of onset can be significant factors influencing cognitive function in T1D.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in the literature suggest that T1DACD is more severe in adults than children, indicating that age and diabetes duration contribute to this T1DACD.

Hypoglycemia induced by insulin as a triggering factor of cognitive deficit in diabetic children

This paper provides an overview of insulin-induced hypoglycemia as a triggering factor of cognitive deficit in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. For this purpose, databases from 1961 to 2013 were used with the objective of detecting the primary publications that address the impact of hypoglycemia on cognitive performance of diabetic children. The results obtained from experimental animals were excluded. The majority of studies demonstrated that the cognitive deficit in diabetic children involves multiple factors including duration, intensity, severity, and frequency of hypoglycemia episodes. Additionally, age at the onset of type 1 diabetes also influences the cognitive performance, considering that early inception of the disease is a predisposing factor for severe hypoglycemia. Furthermore, the results suggest that there is a strong correlation between brain damage caused by hypoglycemia and cognitive deterioration. Therefore, a more cautious follow-up and education are needed to impede and treat hypoglycemia in children with diabetes mellitus.

The effects of acute hypoglycaemia on cognitive function in type 1 diabetes

Throughout life with type 1 diabetes mellitus people with the condition are exposed to multiple episodes of hypoglycaemia associated with insulin therapy. Hypoglycaemia affects several domains of cognitive function. Studies in non-diabetic adults and in people with type 1 diabetes have shown that almost all domains of cognitive function are impaired to some degree during acute hypoglycaemia, with complex tasks being more greatly affected.

The specific cognitive functions of attention and memory are both profoundly impaired during hypoglycaemia. These cognitive processes are fundamental to the performance of many day to day tasks. Their impairment disrupts everyday life and raises safety concerns for the pursuit of activities such as driving.

Mood and emotion are also negatively affected by hypoglycaemia, resulting in tense tiredness, while motivation is reduced, and anger may be generated in some individuals. Hypoglycaemia can cause embarrassing social situations, and may lead to chronic anxiety and depression in people with type 1 diabetes.

At present few therapeutic measures can modify or ameliorate the effects of hypoglycaemia on cognitive function, so instigation of measures to prevent exposure to hypoglycaemia is of major clinical importance, while preserving good glycaemic control.

Hyperoxia blunts counterregulation during hypoglycaemia in humans: possible role for the carotid bodies?

Chemoreceptors in the carotid bodies sense arterial oxygen tension and regulate respiration. Isolated carotid body glomus cells also sense glucose, and animal studies have shown the carotid bodies play a role in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia. Thus, we hypothesized that glucose infusion rate would be augmented and neuro-hormonal counterregulation blunted during hypoglycaemia when the carotid bodies were desensitized by hyperoxia. Seven healthy adults (four male, three female) underwent two 180 min hyperinsulinaemic (2 mU (kg fat-free mass (FFM))(-1) min(-1)), hypoglycaemic (3.33 mmol l(-1)) clamps 1 week apart, randomized to either normoxia (arterial P(O2) (P(aO2)) 111 ± 6.3 mmHg) or hyperoxia (P(aO2) 345 ± 80.6 mmHg) (P < 0.05). Plasma glucose concentrations were similar during normoxia and hyperoxia at baseline (5.52 ± 0.15 vs. 5.55 ± 0.13 μmol ml(-1)) and during the clamp (3.4 ± 0.05 vs. 3.3 ± 0.05 μmol ml(-1)). The glucose infusion rate was 44.2 ± 3.5% higher (P < 0.01) during hyperoxia than normoxia at steady state during the clamp (28.2 ± 0.15 vs. 42.7 ± 0.65 μmol (kg FFM)(-1) min(-1); P < 0.01). Area under the curve values (expressed as percentage normoxia response) for counterregulatory hormones during hypoglycaemia were significantly suppressed by hyperoxia (noradrenaline 50.7 ± 5.2%, adrenaline 62.6 ± 3.3%, cortisol 63.2 ± 2.1%, growth hormone 53.1 ± 2.7%, glucagon 48.6 ± 2.1%, all P < 0.05 vs. normoxia). These data support the idea that the carotid bodies respond to glucose and play a role in the counterregulatory response to hypoglycaemia in humans.

Portal vein glucose sensors do not play a major role in modulating physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in humans

OBJECTIVE

Experimental data from animal studies indicate that portal vein glucose sensors play a key role in the responses to slow-fall hypoglycemia. However, their role in modulating these responses in humans is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to examine in humans the potential role of portal vein glucose sensors in physiological responses to insulin-induced hypoglycemia mimicking the slow fall of insulin-treated diabetic subjects.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten nondiabetic subjects were studied on two different occasions during intravenous insulin (2 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1)) plus variable glucose for 160 minutes. In both studies, after 60 min of normal plasma glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia (47 mg/dl) was induced slowly (60 min) and maintained for 60 min. Hypoglycemia was preceded by the ingestion of either oral placebo or glucose (28 g) given at 30 min.

RESULTS

Plasma glucose and insulin were not different with either placebo or glucose (P > 0.2). Similarly, counterregulatory hormones, substrates, and symptoms were not different with either placebo or glucose. The Stroop color and colored words subtest of the Stroop test deteriorated less (P < 0.05) with glucose than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to animals, in humans, prevention of portal hypoglycemia with oral glucose from the beginning of insulin-induced slow-fall hypoglycemia has no effect on sympathoadrenal and symptomatic responses to hypoglycemia.

Effect of oral amino acids on counterregulatory responses and cognitive function during insulin-induced hypoglycemia in nondiabetic and type 1 diabetic people

OBJECTIVE

Amino acids stimulate glucagon responses to hypoglycemia and may be utilized by the brain. The aim of this study was to assess the responses to hypoglycemia in nondiabetic and type 1 diabetic subjects after ingestion of an amino acid mixture.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Ten nondiabetic and 10 diabetic type 1 subjects were studied on three different occasions during intravenous insulin (2 mU . kg(-1) . min(-1)) plus variable glucose for 160 min. In two studies, clamped hypoglycemia (47 mg/dl plasma glucose for 40 min) was induced and either oral placebo or an amino acid mixture (42 g) was given at 30 min. In the third study, amino acids were given, but euglycemia was maintained.

RESULTS

Plasma glucose and insulin were no different in the hypoglycemia studies with both placebo and amino acids (P > 0.2). After the amino acid mixture, plasma amino acid concentrations increased to levels observed after a mixed meal (2.4 +/- 0.13 vs. placebo study 1.7 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P = 0.02). During clamped euglycemia, ingestion of amino acids resulted in transient increases in glucagon concentrations, which returned to basal by the end of the study. During clamped hypoglycemia, glucagon response was sustained and increased more in amino acid studies versus placebo in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects (P < 0.05), but other counter-regulatory hormones and total symptom score were not different. Beta-OH-butyrate was less suppressed after amino acids (200 +/- 15 vs. 93 +/- 9 micromol/l, P = 0.01). Among the cognitive tests administered, the following indicated less deterioration after amino acids than placebo: Trail-Making part B, PASAT (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test) (2 s), digit span forward, Stroop colored words, and verbal memory tests for nondiabetic subjects; and Trail-Making part B, digit span backward, and Stroop color tests for diabetic subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral amino acids improve cognitive function in response to hypoglycemia and enhance the response of glucagon in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects.

The locus for hypoglycemic detection shifts with the rate of fall in glycemia: the role of portal-superior mesenteric vein glucose sensing

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether portal glucose sensing extends beyond the portal vein to the superior mesenteric vein and then test whether the role of portal-superior mesenteric glucose sensors varies with the rate of fall in glycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Chronically cannulated rats underwent afferent ablation of the portal vein (PV) or portal and superior mesenteric veins (PMV) or sham operation (control). One week later, animals underwent hyperinsulinemic-hypoglycemic clamps in which the hypoglycemic nadir, 2.48 +/- 0.06 mmol/l, was reached at a rate of decline in glucose of -0.09 or -0.21 mmol x l(-1) x min(-1) (PMV and control only). Additional PMV and control animals received an intravenous injection of the glucopenic agent 2-deoxyglucose. RESULTS; Inducing hypoglycemia slowly, at a rate of -0.09 mmol x l(-1) x min(-1), resulted in a 26-fold increase in epinephrine (23.39 +/- 0.62 nmol/l) and 12-fold increase in norepinephrine (11.42 +/- 0.92 nmol/l) for controls (P < 0.001). The epinephrine response to hypoglycemia was suppressed by 91% in PMV (2.09 +/- 0.07 nmol/l) vs. 61% in PV (9.05 +/- 1.59 nmol/l) (P < 0.001). The norepinephrine response to hypoglycemia was suppressed by 94 and 80% in PMV and PV, respectively, compared with that in controls. In contrast, when arterial glucose was lowered to 2.49 +/- 0.06 mmol/l within 20 min, no significant differences were observed in the catecholamine responses for PMV and controls over the first 45 min of hypoglycemia (20-65 min). Only at min 105 were catecholamines significantly lower for PMV vs. controls. Injection of 2-deoxyglucose induced a very rapid sympathoadrenal response with no significant differences between PMV and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The critical locus for hypoglycemic detection shifts away from the portal-mesenteric vein to some other loci (e.g., the brain) when hypoglycemia develops rapidly.

Plasma glucagon decreases during night-time sleep in Type 1 diabetic patients and healthy control subjects

AIMS

In Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), the glucagon response to hypoglycaemia is known to disappear within a few months after the onset of the disease, whereas the response to other stimuli remains intact. The dynamics of spontaneous glucagon release have rarely been assessed. We monitored spontaneous glucagon release in T1DM patients and healthy subjects during a 7-h period of night-time sleep.

METHODS

Measurements were made in 14 T1DM patients and 14 control subjects matched for age, gender and body mass index after one night's adaptation in our laboratory. Circulating glucose, insulin and glucagon concentrations were measured at 30-min intervals. In diabetic patients, hypoglycaemia (< 3.9 mmol/l) was avoided by infusion of glucose whenever necessary.

RESULTS

During the entire night, plasma glucose and serum insulin levels were higher in T1DM patients than in healthy subjects (P < 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). Plasma glucagon concentrations decreased throughout the night in both groups (P < 0.001). Glucagon levels were similar in T1DM patients and healthy subjects (P > 0.87). The duration of diabetes (less and more than 5 years) did not affect glucagon secretion (P > 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma glucagon levels decrease significantly during night-time sleep in healthy control subjects. This nocturnal decrease is preserved in T1DM patients regardless of the duration of diabetes. These observations point to distinct nocturnal regulation of spontaneous glucagon release that does not depend on circulating glucose and insulin levels and is unaltered in T1DM patients.

The effects of acute hypoglycaemia on memory acquisition and recall and prospective memory in type 1 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Global memory performance is impaired during acute hypoglycaemia. This study assessed whether moderate hypoglycaemia disrupts learning and recall in isolation, and utilised a novel test of prospective memory which may better reflect the role of memory in daily life than conventional tests.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six subjects with type 1 diabetes participated, 20 with normal hypoglycaemia awareness (NHA) and 16 with impaired hypoglycaemia awareness (IHA). Each underwent a hypoglycaemic clamp with target blood glucose 2.5 mmol/l. Prior to hypoglycaemia, subjects attempted to memorise instructions for a prospective memory task, and recall was assessed during hypoglycaemia. Subjects then completed the learning and immediate recall stages of three conventional memory tasks (word recall, story recall, visual recall) during hypoglycaemia. Euglycaemia was restored and delayed memory for the conventional tasks was tested. The same procedures were completed in euglycaemic control studies (blood glucose 4.5 mmol/l).

RESULTS

Hypoglycaemia impaired performance significantly on the prospective memory task (p = 0.004). Hypoglycaemia also significantly impaired both immediate and delayed recall for the word and story recall tasks (p < 0.01 in each case). There was no significant deterioration of performance on the visual memory task. The effect of hypoglycaemia did not differ significantly between subjects with NHA and IHA.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Impaired performance on the prospective memory task during hypoglycaemia demonstrates that recall is disrupted by hypoglycaemia. Impaired performance on the conventional memory tasks demonstrates that learning is also disrupted by hypoglycaemia. Results of the prospective memory task support the relevance of these findings to the everyday lives of people with diabetes.

Evaluation of the accuracy of a microdialysis-based glucose sensor during insulin-induced hypoglycemia, its recovery, and post-hypoglycemic hyperglycemia in humans

BACKGROUND

These studies were designed to evaluate the accuracy of a microdialysis-based subcutaneous glucose sensor (GlucoDay, A. Menarini Diagnostics, Firenze, Italy) compared with a standard reference method of plasma glucose measurement during insulin-induced hypoglycemia.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Nine subjects without diabetes were studied in eu-, hypo-, and hyperglycemia (clamp technique). The GlucoDay was calibrated against one arterialized plasma glucose measurement (Glucose Analyzer, Beckman, Brea, CA), and plasma glucose estimates every 3 min were compared with paired plasma glucose values.

RESULTS

Accuracy of glucose estimates was not homogeneously distributed among subjects and depended on stability of the sensor's current signal during spontaneous euglycemia (R +/- -0.68). Linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between the two methods of measurement (R = 0.9), Deming regression showed the inclusion of the unit in the confidence interval of the slope (slope 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.02), and the accuracy of the GlucoDay reached 40 +/- 15% (American Diabetes Association criteria). The mean relative difference was 6 +/- 8% in euglycemia, 13 +/- 14% during plasma glucose fall, 5 +/- 22% in the hypoglycemic plateau, and -14 +/- 16% during recovery from hypoglycemia. The Bland-Altman analysis indicated a bias of -1.9 +/- 16.6 mg/dL, whereas the Error Grid Analysis showed 94% of the Gluco- Day measurements in the acceptable zones of the grid. The time to reach the glycemic nadir was longer when measured with the GlucoDay (90 +/- 5 vs. 72.5 +/- 9 min, P < 0.05). However, absolute values of glycemic nadir, time spent in hypoglycemia, and the rate of fall of glycemia and the rate of recovery from the hypoglycemia were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

GlucoDay closely monitors changes in plasma glucose before, during, and after hypoglycemia. However, these results can be achieved only if calibration of the GlucoDay is performed under conditions of sensor signal stability. Similar studies have to be performed in subjects with diabetes to validate the GlucoDay system.

Hypoglycaemia and cognitive function

Acute hypoglycaemia impairs cerebral function, and available data indicate that cognitive performance becomes impaired at a blood glucose level of 2.6-3.0 mmol/l in healthy subjects. Methodological problems limit comparisons between studies, but in general complex tasks are more sensitive to hypoglycaemia than simple tasks, and some cognitive abilities are completely abolished. The onset of hypoglycaemic cognitive dysfunction is immediate, but recovery may be considerably delayed. There is persuasive evidence of adaptation to hypoglycaemia, partly due to increased brain glucose uptake capacity, although other mechanisms may exist. Patients who are exposed to chronic or recurrent hypoglycaemia become remarkably tolerant to the state, but this is insufficient to prevent severe hypoglycaemia with neuroglycopenic decompensation, probably because symptomatic and counterregulatory responses adapt even more. During experimental hypoglycaemia, administration of non-glucose cerebral fuels preserves cognitive function. However, little progress has been made as yet towards protecting cognitive function during hypoglycaemia in clinical practice. The chronic effects of recurrent hypoglycaemia remain contentious. There are numerous case reports of hypoglycaemic brain damage and of cognitive deterioration attributed to repeated severe hypoglycaemia. The major prospective studies, including the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, did not report cognitive declines in intensively treated patients, but had unrepresentative study populations and may have been too short to detect such effects. Structural and functional brain changes are not only associated with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia, but also with hyperglycaemia and early disease onset and may in part be due to hyperglycaemic microvascular disease. Children may be more prone to acute metabolic insults, and there is evidence of developmental disadvantage associated with hypoglycaemic episodes.