The insulin sensitiser pioglitazone does not influence skin microcirculatory function in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin

Does Thiazolidinedione therapy exacerbate fluid retention in congestive heart failure?

The ever-growing global burden of congestive heart failure (CHF) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as well as their co-existence necessitate that anti-diabetic pharmacotherapy will modulate the cardiovascular risk inherent to T2DM while complying with the accompanying restrictions imposed by CHF. The thiazolidinedione (TZD) family of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) agonists initially provided a promising therapeutic option in T2DM owing to anti-diabetic efficacy combined with pleiotropic beneficial cardiovascular effects. However, the utility of TZDs in T2DM has declined in the past decade, largely due to concomitant adverse effects of fluid retention and edema formation attributed to salt-retaining effects of PPARγ activation on the nephron. Presumably, the latter effects are potentially deleterious in the context of pre-existing fluid retention in CHF. However, despite a considerable body of evidence on mechanisms responsible for TZD-induced fluid retention suggesting that this class of drugs is rightfully prohibited from use in CHF patients, there is a paucity of experimental and clinical studies that investigate the effects of TZDs on salt and water homeostasis in the CHF setting. In an attempt to elucidate whether TZDs actually exacerbate the pre-existing fluid retention in CHF, our review summarizes the pathophysiology of fluid retention in CHF. Moreover, we thoroughly review the available data on TZD-induced fluid retention and proposed mechanisms in animals and patients. Finally, we will present recent studies challenging the common notion that TZDs worsen renal salt and water retention in CHF.

Ocular blood flow analysis detects microvascular abnormalities in impaired glucose tolerance

OBJECTIVE

Waveform analysis has been used to assess vascular resistance and predict cardiovascular events. We aimed to identify microvascular abnormalities in patients with IGT using ocular waveform analysis. The effects of pioglitazone were also assessed.

METHODS

Forty patients with IGT and 24 controls were studied. Doppler velocity recordings were obtained from the central retinal, ophthalmic, and common carotid arteries, and sampled at 200 Hz. A discrete wavelet-based analysis method was employed to quantify waveforms. The RI was also determined. Patients with IGT were randomized to pioglitazone or placebo, and measurements were repeated after 12-week treatment.

RESULTS

In the ocular waveforms, significant differences in power spectra were observed in frequency band 4 (corresponding to frequencies between 6.25 and 12.50 Hz) between groups (p < 0.05). No differences in RI occurred. No association was observed between waveform parameters and fasting glucose or insulin resistance. Pioglitazone had no effect on waveform structure, despite significantly reducing insulin resistance, fasting glucose, and triglycerides (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of ocular Doppler flow waveforms using the discrete wavelet transform identified microvascular abnormalities that were not apparent using RI. Pioglitazone improved glucose, insulin sensitivity, and triglycerides without influencing the contour of the waveforms.

Effects of intensive insulin therapy alone and with added pioglitazone on renal salt/water balance and fluid compartment shifts in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intensive insulin therapy alone or with added pioglitazone on renal salt/water balance and body fluid compartment shifts in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 25 insulin-treated, obese patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to pioglitazone 45 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 13) and treated intensively for 12-16 weeks to achieve equivalent glycaemic control. We measured total body water (TBW) and extracellular/intracellular fluid by bioimpedance analysis; plasma/RBC volume with I(131)albumin; sodium handling by fractional excretion of sodium/lithium (FeNa/FeLi) and other renal/hormonal parameters.

RESULTS

Intensification of insulin therapy and the addition of pioglitazone significantly improved glycaemia (HbA1C 7.8-7.2% and 7.6-7.1%) and increased body weight (1.7 and 4.9 kg) respectively. TBW increased 1.7 l with insulin alone (65% intracellular) and 1.6 l with added pioglitazone (75% extracellular) (p = 0.06 and 0.09 respectively). Plasma volume increased 0.2 +/- 0.1 l with insulin alone (p = 0.05) and 0.4 +/- 0.1 l with added pioglitazone (p < 0.05). Extravascular, extracellular (interstitial) fluid increased significantly and more with added pioglitazone (0.8 +/- 0.2 l, p < 0.01) than with insulin alone (0.4 +/- 0.2 l, p = ns). At steady-state, FeLi (marker of proximal-tubular sodium delivery to the distal nephron) increased significantly with added pioglitazone (12.4 +/- 1.3 to 18.0 +/- 3.2%) vs. no significant change with insulin alone (15.4 +/- 1.2 to 14.5 +/- 2.3%). There were no significant changes in the other parameters.

CONCLUSION

In intensively insulin-treated obese type 2 diabetic patients, at equivalent glycaemic control, the addition of pioglitazone causes greater weight gain, but a similar increase in body water that is mainly extracellular and interstitial compared with intracellular increase with insulin therapy alone. Pioglitazone also increases the filtered load of sodium reabsorbed at the distal nephron with no net change in FeNa.

Pleiotropic effects of thiazolidinediones on traditional and non-traditional atherosclerotic risk factors

BACKGROUND

The thiazolidinediones pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have established efficacy in improving insulin sensitivity, glycaemic control, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. As specific agonists of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, thiazolidinediones have also demonstrated protective effects on a variety of atherosclerosis biomarkers and surrogate measures of cardiovascular disease.

AIM

This paper reviews the evidence for pleiotropic effects on a variety of non-traditional atherosclerotic risk factors.

DISCUSSION

Thiazolidinediones attenuate circulating levels of pro-inflammatory mediators in patients with type 2 diabetes, including C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, CD40L, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and metalloproteinase-9. These agents also increase levels of the vascular protective adipokine, adiponectin. The clinical significance of these findings is supported by evidence of improved endothelial dysfunction, reduced carotid intima media thickness and improvements in stenosis following coronary artery stent implantation in patients treated with thiazolidinediones. Limited data suggest that thiazolidinediones might also improve the circulating levels and functional activity of angiogenic endothelial progenitor cells, which independently predict the incidence of cardiovascular events and death. It should be noted that the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have requested changes to the prescribing information for rosiglitazone to highlight the possibility of an increased risk with this agent in patients with ischaemic heart disease; on review, no such amendment was required for the pioglitazone prescribing information. Both agencies continue to suggest that the benefits of both thiazolidinediones outweight any possible detrimental effects. Further research remains to be conducted to elucidate the potentially differential vascular protective effects of thiazolidinediones. In the US, there are black box heart failure warnings for both agents.

CONCLUSION

In light of the established importance of reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes, current evidence continues to support the use of pioglitazone within multifactorial risk management strategies.

Pioglitazone and cardiovascular risk. A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIM

The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was to assess whether pioglitazone is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk, as recently reported for rosiglitazone.

METHODS

RCT of pioglitazone were retrieved from Medline (any date up to 31 August 2007; English language only). Unpublished RCT were identified through http://www.clinicaltrials.gov or http://www.fda.gov websites, and results on cardiovascular outcomes were retrieved from investigators and/or sponsors, whenever possible. RCT were included in meta-analysis if pioglitazone was compared with other treatments (placebo, active comparators or no treatment) for at least 4 weeks. Ninety-four trials, 10 of which were unpublished, were retrieved; those included in the analysis, which excluded PROspective PioglitAzone Clinical Trial In MacroVascular Events (PROACTIVE), enrolled 11 268 and 9912 patients in the pioglitazone and comparator groups respectively. Data for analysis, extracted independently by two observers, included all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and incidence of non-fatal coronary events and heart failure. Proportions of outcome measures across treatment groups were compared by odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone was associated with reduced all-cause mortality [OR 0.30 (0.14-0.63); p < 0.05], with no relevant effect on non-fatal coronary events. The observed increase in incidence of non-fatal heart failure was not statistically significant [OR 1.38 (0.90-2.12)].

CONCLUSION

The use of pioglitazone does not appear to be harmful in terms of cardiovascular events and all-cause deaths.

Thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizers and the heart: a tale of two organs?

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are relatively new agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. They act as agonists at the PPAR-gamma nuclear receptor and their therapeutic effects include decreased insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia, an improved plasma lipid, inflammation and pro-coagulant profile, and amelioration of hypertension, microalbuminuria and hepatic steatosis. The most common side effects of TZDs include weight gain and oedema, with occasional reports of congestive heart failure (CHF). This review discusses the benefit-risk profile of TZDs in treating patients with type 2 diabetes, with particular reference to the heart. To provide context, we explore briefly the epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes, touch on the association of heart disease and cardiovascular mortality with antihyperglycaemic treatment modalities other than TZDs, and then focus on the effects of TZDs on the heart, cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes. We describe the cluster of host factors, which seems to predispose patients with type 2 diabetes to TZD-induced or TZD-exacerbated oedema and CHF and then provide an overview of the putative mechanisms of these TZD-related side effects. We also propose that certain diuretics (amiloride and spironolactone), by targeting the distal nephron that expresses PPARgamma in collecting duct cells, might be of benefit in ameliorating the fluid retention and oedema associated with TZDs.