1
|
Cooper C, Zabihi S, Akhtar A, Lee T, Isaaq A, Le Novere M, Barber J, Lord K, Rapaport P, Banks S, Duggan S, Ogden M, Walters K, Orgeta V, Rockwood K, Butler LT, Manthorpe J, Dow B, Hoe J, Hunter R, Banerjee S, Budgett J, Duffy L. Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae074. [PMID: 38643354 PMCID: PMC11032424 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the first randomised controlled trial of a dementia training and support intervention in UK homecare agencies, we aimed to assess: acceptability of our co-designed, manualised training, delivered by non-clinical facilitators; outcome completion feasibility; and costs for a future trial. METHODS This cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, feasibility trial involved English homecare agencies. Intervention arm agency staff were offered group videocall sessions: 6 over 3 months, then monthly for 3 months (NIDUS-professional). Family carers (henceforth carers) and clients with dementia (dyads) were offered six to eight complementary, individual intervention sessions (NIDUS-Family). We collected potential trial measures as secondary outcomes remotely at baseline and 6 months: HCW (homecare worker) Work-related Strain Inventory (WRSI), Sense of Competence (SoC); proxy-rated Quality of Life (QOL), Disability Assessment for Dementia scale (DAD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Homecare Satisfaction (HCS). RESULTS From December 2021 to September 2022, we met agency (4 intervention, 2 control) and HCWs (n = 62) recruitment targets and recruited 16 carers and 16/60 planned clients. We met a priori progression criteria for adherence (≥4/6 sessions: 29/44 [65.9%,95% confidence interval (CI): 50.1,79.5]), HCW or carer proxy-outcome completion (15/16 (93.8% [69.8,99.8]) and proceeding with adaptation for HCWs outcome completion (46/63 (73.0% [CI: 60.3,83.4]). Delivery of NIDUS-Professional costs was £6,423 (£137 per eligible client). WRSI scores decreased and SoC increased at follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. For intervention arm proxy-rated outcomes, carer-rated QOL increased, HCW-rated was unchanged; carer and HCW-rated NPI decreased; DAD decreased (greater disability) and HCS was unchanged. CONCLUSION A pragmatic trial is warranted; we will consider using aggregated, agency-level client outcomes, including neuropsychiatric symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sedigheh Zabihi
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Amirah Akhtar
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Teresa Lee
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Abdinasir Isaaq
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Marie Le Novere
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sandra Duggan
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Laurie T Butler
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London E1 2AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cooper C, Vickerstaff V, Barber J, Phillips R, Ogden M, Walters K, Lang I, Rapaport P, Orgeta V, Rockwood K, Banks S, Palomo M, Butler LT, Lord K, Livingston G, Banerjee S, Manthorpe J, Dow B, Hoe J, Hunter R, Samus Q, Budgett J. A psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for independence in dementia (NIDUS-Family) versus goal setting and routine care: a single-masked, phase 3, superiority, randomised controlled trial. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2024; 5:e141-e151. [PMID: 38310894 PMCID: PMC10834374 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00262-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although national guidelines recommend that everyone with dementia receives personalised post-diagnostic support, few do. Unlike previous interventions that improved personalised outcomes in people with dementia, the NIDUS-Family intervention is fully manualised and deliverable by trained and supervised, non-clinical facilitators. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of home-based goal setting plus NIDUS-Family in supporting the attainment of personalised goals set by people with dementia and their carers. METHODS We did a two-arm, single-masked, multi-site, randomised, clinical trial recruiting patient-carer dyads from community settings. We randomly assigned dyads to either home-based goal setting plus NIDUS-Family or goal setting and routine care (control). Randomisation was blocked and stratified by site (2:1; intervention to control), with allocations assigned via a remote web-based system. NIDUS-Family is tailored to goals set by dyads by selecting modules involving behavioural interventions, carer support, psychoeducation, communication and coping skills, enablement, and environmental adaptations. The intervention involved six to eight video-call or telephone sessions (or in person when COVID-19-related restrictions allowed) over 6 months, then telephone follow-ups every 2-3 months for 6 months. The primary outcome was carer-rated goal attainment scaling (GAS) score at 12 months. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN11425138. FINDINGS Between April 30, 2020, and May 9, 2021, we assessed 1083 potential dyads for eligibility, 781 (72·1%) of whom were excluded. Of 302 eligible dyads, we randomly assigned 98 (32·4%) to the control group and 204 (67·5%) to the intervention group. The mean age of participants with dementia was 79·9 years (SD 8·2), 169 (56%) were women, and 133 (44%) were men. 247 (82%) dyads completed the primary outcome, which favoured the intervention (mean GAS score at 12 months 58·7 [SD 13·0; n=163] vs 49·0 [14·1; n=84]; adjusted difference in means 10·23 [95% CI 5·75-14·71]; p<0·001). 31 (15·2%) participants in the intervention group and 14 (14·3%) in the control group experienced serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION To our knowledge, NIDUS-Family is the first readily scalable intervention for people with dementia and their family carers that improves attainment of personalised goals. We therefore recommend that it be implemented in health and care services. FUNDING UK Alzheimer's Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Cooper
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK.
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Margaret Ogden
- Research Network Volunteer, Alzheimer's Society, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Sara Banks
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Marina Palomo
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laurie T Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK
| | - Kathyrn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sube Banerjee
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- The Policy Institute at King's, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Geller Institute of Ageing and Memory, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of West London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Comans T, Nguyen K, Gray L, Flicker L, Williamson P, Dodd S, Kearney A, Cunningham C, Morris T, Nunn J, Trepel D, Almeida OP, Kenny D, Welch A, Lowthian JA, Quinn J, Petrie G, Dao-Tran TH, Manchha A, Kurrle SE. Measuring the success of programmes of care for people living with dementia: a protocol for consensus building with consumers to develop a set of Core Outcome Measures for Improving Care (COM-IC). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073884. [PMID: 38072498 PMCID: PMC10729031 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Core Outcome Measures for Improving Care (COM-IC) project aims to deliver practical recommendations on the selection and implementation of a suite of core outcomes to measure the effectiveness of interventions for dementia care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS COM-IC embeds a participatory action approach to using the Alignment-Harmonisation-Results framework for measuring dementia care in Australia. Using this framework, suitable core outcome measures will be identified, analysed, implemented and audited. The methods for analysing each stage will be codesigned with stakeholders, through the conduit of a Stakeholder Reference Group including people living with dementia, formal and informal carers, aged care industry representatives, researchers, clinicians and policy actors. The codesigned evaluation methods consider two key factors: feasibility and acceptability. These considerations will be tested during a 6-month feasibility study embedded in aged care industry partner organisations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION COM-IC has received ethical approval from The University of Queensland (HREC 2021/HE001932). Results will be disseminated through networks established over the project, and in accordance with both the publication schedule and requests from the Stakeholder Reference Group. Full access to publications and reports will be made available through UQ eSpace (https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/), an open access repository hosted by The University of Queensland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy Comans
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kim Nguyen
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Len Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Leon Flicker
- WA Centre for Health and Ageing, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Paula Williamson
- Department of Health and Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Susanna Dodd
- Department of Health and Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Kearney
- Department of Health and Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Colm Cunningham
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- HammondCare International, London, UK
| | - Thomas Morris
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- HammondCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jack Nunn
- Science for All, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dominic Trepel
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Osvaldo P Almeida
- WA Centre for Health and Ageing, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Danelle Kenny
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alyssa Welch
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Judy A Lowthian
- Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bolton Clarke, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Quinn
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Wynnum Manly Dementia Alliance, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Glenys Petrie
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Wynnum Manly Dementia Alliance, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tiet-Hanh Dao-Tran
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Asmita Manchha
- Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan E Kurrle
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee AR, Csipke E, Yates L, Moniz-Cook E, McDermott O, Taylor S, Stephens M, Kelleher D, Orrell M. A Web-Based Self-management App for Living Well With Dementia: User-Centered Development Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2023; 10:e40785. [PMID: 36826978 PMCID: PMC10007001 DOI: 10.2196/40785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management, autonomy, and quality of life are key constructs in enabling people to live well with dementia. This population often becomes isolated following diagnosis, but it is important for them to feel encouraged to maintain their daily activities and stay socially active. Promoting Independence in Dementia (PRIDE) fosters social inclusion and greater dementia self-management through an interactive handbook. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a paper-based PRIDE manual on a web-based platform. METHODS Two overarching stages were used to create the web-based version of PRIDE. The first was Preliminary Development, which encompassed tendering, preliminary development work, consultations, beta version of the website, user testing and consultation on beta version, and production of the final web-based prototype. The second stage was Development of the Final PRIDE App, which included 2 sprints and further user testing. RESULTS Through a lengthy development process, modifications were made to app areas such as the log-in process, content layout, and aesthetic appearance. Feedback from the target population was incorporated into the process to achieve a dementia-friendly product. The finished PRIDE app has defined areas for reading dementia-related topics, creating activity plans, and logging these completed activities. CONCLUSIONS The PRIDE app has evolved from its initial prototype into a more dementia-friendly and usable program that is suitable for further testing. The finished version will be tested in a reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance study, with its potential reach, effectiveness, and adoption explored. Feedback gathered during the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance study will lead to any further developments in the app to increase its applicability to the target audience and usability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Rebecca Lee
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emese Csipke
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Yates
- Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Esme Moniz-Cook
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Kingston-upon-Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Orii McDermott
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Daniel Kelleher
- Research & Development, Humber Teaching National Health Service Foundation Trust, Willerby, United Kingdom.,Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Orrell
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zabihi S, Duffy L, Kelleher D, Lord K, Dar A, Koutsoubelis F, Banks S, Rapaport P, Mason C, Vickerstaff V, Barber JA, Manthorpe J, Walters K, Lang I, Rockwood K, Duggan S, Kales H, Cooper C. Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-Professional, a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia: a cluster-randomised feasibility trial protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066166. [PMID: 36572489 PMCID: PMC9806004 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most people living with dementia want to remain living in their own homes, and are supported to do so by family carers and homecare workers. There are concerns that homecare is often unable to meet the needs of this client group, with limited evidence regarding effective interventions to improve it for people living with dementia. We have developed a training and support programme for homecare workers (NIDUS-Professional) to be delivered alongside support sessions for people living with dementia and their family carers (NIDUS-Family). We aim to assess (1) its acceptability among homecare workers and employing agencies, and (2) the feasibility of homecare workers, people living with dementia and their family carers completing the outcomes of intervention in a future randomised controlled trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, multisite feasibility trial. We aim to recruit 60-90 homecare workers, 30-60 clients living with dementia and their family carers through 6-9 English homecare agencies. In the intervention arm, homecare staff will be offered six group sessions on video call over three months, followed by monthly group sessions over the subsequent three-month period. Outcome measures will be collected at baseline and at six months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study received ethical approval on 7 January 2020 from the Camden & King's Cross Research Ethics Committee. Study reference: 19/LO/1667. Findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal, conference presentation and blog to research and clinical audiences; we will attend forums to present findings to participating homecare agencies and their clients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN15757555.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sedigheh Zabihi
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Ayesha Dar
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Sara Banks
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Mason
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie A Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula (PenARC), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | | | - Helen Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, UC Davis Health, University of California, Davis, California, USA
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Psychiatry and Mental Health, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Y, Li X, Li R, Chen N, Yang K. PROTOCOL: Home-based care for people with dementia: A systematic review. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2022; 18:e1285. [PMID: 36908844 PMCID: PMC9629276 DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The abstract section should read: This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: (1) Which formal HBC services for people with dementia have been tested in an RCT? (2) How effective are the different formal HBC services in improving the physical and mental health outcomes of people with dementia? (3) What is the cost and patient's health service usage of different formal HBC services?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanfei Li
- Evidence‐Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Xiuxia Li
- Evidence‐Based Social Sciences Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public HealthLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Rui Li
- Evidence‐Based Social Sciences Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public HealthLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| | - Nan Chen
- Research and Education DepartmentShanxi Provincial Rehabilitation HospitalXi'anChina
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence‐Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical SciencesLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
- Evidence‐Based Social Sciences Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public HealthLanzhou UniversityLanzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dibao-Dina C, Oger C, Foley T, Torzsa P, Lazic V, Kreitmayer Peštiae S, Adler L, Kareli A, Mallen C, Heaster C, Dumitra G, Kurpas D, Viegas R, Giezendanner S, Tkachenko V, De Lepeleire J, Falanga R, Missiou A, Jennings A, Petrazzuoli F. Intermediate care in caring for dementia, the point of view of general practitioners: A key informant survey across Europe. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1016462. [PMID: 36341273 PMCID: PMC9627031 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1016462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intermediate care is often defined as healthcare occurring somewhere between traditional primary (community) and secondary (hospital) care settings. High quality intermediate care is important in dementia, may prevent caregiver burnout and also lead to optimal care for people with dementia. However, very little is known about the point of intermediate care for persons with dementia in Europe. Research questions What intermediate care services exist and how are they utilized in the care of people with dementia in Europe? Objective This study aims at describing the point of view of General Practitioners on intermediate care services for people with dementia across Europe. Methods Key informant survey was sent to GPs via a self-developed questionnaire with space for open ended comments. 16 European countries participated to this cross-sectional mixed method study. Given the volunteer nature of the study, no minimum sample size requirements were applied to participation. Convenience sampling technique was used to address variations due to regional variations and regulations within the same country. Descriptive analyses of all intermediate care facilities groups by countries were performed. Qualitative analyses approach was used for the optional-free text to exemplify and/or complete the reasons contained in the closed response categories. Results The questionnaire was sent to 16 European countries. 583 questionnaires were analyzed. The responding physicians were 48 (± 11) years old on average and they had been in practice for an average of 18 (+ /11) years. The types of intermediate care considered were integrated at-home services, respite and relief services, day care centers and nursing homes. Their availability was considered very inhomogeneous by the majority of respondents. The main benefits of intermediate care cited were better medical care for the patient (78%), better quality of life for the caregiver (67%), prevention of the caregiver burden (73%) and a break for the caregiver (59%). The reported difficulties were: accessing these facilities due to limited financial support (76%) and cumbersome administrative procedures (67%). Many other facets of our findings were captured in the qualitative themes that emerged. Conclusion Intermediate care in Europe is diverse and heterogeneous. Major concerns of GPs are about the cost issues and the cumbersome administrative procedures to access them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Caroline Oger
- Department of General Practice, University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Tony Foley
- Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Péter Torzsa
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Sanda Kreitmayer Peštiae
- JZNU Dom Zdravlja “Dr. Mustafa Šehoviæ”, Department of General/Family Medicine, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Limor Adler
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ana Kareli
- Georgian Family Medicine Association, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - Christian Mallen
- Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, United Kingdom
| | - Cindy Heaster
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Gindrovel Dumitra
- Romanian National Society of Family Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Craiova, Romania
| | - Donata Kurpas
- Department of Family Medicine, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Rita Viegas
- Department of Family Medicine, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Victoria Tkachenko
- Department of Family Medicine, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Jan De Lepeleire
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, General Practice, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rosario Falanga
- Department of Primary Care, Azienda Sanitaria Friuli Occidentale, Pordenone, Italy
| | - Aristea Missiou
- Research Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Aisling Jennings
- Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ferdinando Petrazzuoli
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, ;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelleher D, Lord K, Duffy L, Rapaport P, Barber J, Manthorpe J, Leverton M, Dow B, Budgett J, Banks S, Duggan S, Cooper C. Time to reflect is a rare and valued opportunity; a pilot of the NIDUS-professional dementia training intervention for homecare workers during the Covid-19 pandemic. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e2928-e2939. [PMID: 35128740 PMCID: PMC9111618 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Most people living with dementia want to continue living in their own home for as long as possible and many rely on support from homecare services to do so. There are concerns that homecare often fails to meet the needs of clients with dementia, but there is limited evidence regarding effective interventions to improve its delivery for this client group. We aimed to assess whether a co-designed, 6-session dementia training intervention for homecare workers (NIDUS-professional) was acceptable and feasible. Facilitated training sessions were delivered over 3 months, followed by 3, monthly implementation meetings to embed changes in practice. Two trained and supervised facilitators without clinical qualifications delivered the intervention via group video-calls during Oct 2020-March 2021 to a group of seven homecare workers from one agency in England. Participants provided qualitative feedback 3- and 6-months post intervention. Qualitative interview data and facilitator notes were integrated in a thematic analysis. Adherence to the intervention and fidelity of delivery were high, indicating that it was acceptable and feasible to deliver in practice. Thirty of a possible 42 (71.4%) group sessions were attended. In our thematic analysis we report one over-arching theme: 'Having time and space to reflect is a rare opportunity'. Within this we identified four subthemes (Having time to reflect is a rare opportunity; Reflecting with peers enhances learning; Reflection and perspective taking can improve care; Recognising skills and building confidence) through which we explored how participants valued the intervention to discuss their work and learn new skills. Attendance was lower for the implementation sessions, perhaps reflecting participants' lack of clarity about their purpose. We used our findings to consider how we can maintain positive impacts of the manualised sessions, so that these are translated into tangible, scalable benefits for people living with dementia and the homecare workforce. A randomised feasibility trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia StudiesUniversity of BradfordBradfordUK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia StudiesUniversity of BradfordBradfordUK
| | - Larisa Duffy
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Julie Barber
- Statistical SciencesUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care WorkforceKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- NIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care WorkforceKing’s College LondonLondonUK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research InstituteUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | | | - Sara Banks
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of PsychiatryUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wyman DL, Butler L, Cooper C, Bright P, Morgan-Trimmer S, Barber J. Process evaluation of the New Interventions for independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS) Family stream randomised controlled trial: protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e054613. [PMID: 35680268 PMCID: PMC9185390 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION New Interventions for independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-Family is an Alzheimer's Society funded new manualised, multimodal psychosocial intervention to support people living with dementia (PLWD) to achieve goals that they and their family carers set, towards living as independently and as well as possible at home for longer. This process evaluation will be embedded within the NIDUS-Family Randomised Controlled Trial intervention-arm (n=199), testing how the intervention influences change, as measured by goal attainment. The evaluation will test, refine and develop the NIDUS-Family theoretical model, associated causal assumptions and logic model to identify key mechanisms of impact, implementation and contextual factors influencing the intervention's effectiveness. Findings will inform how the programme is implemented in practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The process evaluation will be theory driven and apply a convergent mixed-methods design. Dyads (PLWD and family carer) will be purposively sampled based on high or low Goal Attainment Scaling scores (trial primary outcome). Qualitative interviews with dyads (approx. n=30) and their respective facilitators post-trial will explore their experiences of receiving and delivering the intervention. Interviews will be iteratively thematically analysed. Matching observational quantitative data will be collected concurrently from videorecordings and/or audiorecordings of NIDUS-Family dyad trial sessions. Further quantitative data will be collected through an acceptability questionnaire for all intervention-arm dyads (n=199). Mixed-method integration will use an interactive analysis strategy, considering qualitative and quantitative findings through mixed-method matrix for dyadic level 'case studies', and a joint display for 'population' level analysis and interpretation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was received from Camden & Kings Cross Research Ethics Committee (REC). Study reference: 19/LO/1667. IRAS project ID: 271 363. This work is carried out within the UCL Alzheimer's Society Centre of Excellence (grant 300) for Independence at home, NIDUS programme.Findings will be disseminated through publications and conferences, and as recommendations for the implementation study and strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN11425138.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Laura Wyman
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University - Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Laurie Butler
- Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University - Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Psychiatry of Older Age, University College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Bright
- Psychology, Anglia Ruskin University - Cambridge Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morton T, Evans SB, Brooker D, Williamson T, Wong G, Tinelli M, Frost F, Bray J, Hullah N. Sustainability of locally driven centres for those affected by dementia: a protocol for the get real with meeting centres realist evaluation. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062697. [PMID: 35501073 PMCID: PMC9062872 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Improving support for people with early to moderate dementia to live at home in their communities is a global public health goal. Community adult social care is not robust in many parts of the UK, however, with the pandemic increasing pressure on services for this population. Community-led interventions can play a key role in supporting people postdiagnosis, helping delay decline, but many interventions struggle to sustain beyond 1-2 years. Meeting Centres (MCs) are one such intervention, which many UK community groups find attractive and achievable. However, it is not understood how these communities can ensure they are putting in place strategies that will help them sustain in the longer term, beyond start-up phase. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This realist evaluation aims to understand the factors affecting sustainability of MCs in rural areas and learn lessons from MCs that have sustained beyond 3 years. Data will be collected using mixed methods: interviews and group discussions with stakeholders involved at every level in three case study locations in England and Wales, analysed with Soft Systems modelling; a Discrete Choice Experiment exploring what people across the UK value and are willing to pay for MCs, analysed with regression modelling. All data will be synthesised using a Realist logic of analysis to build a theoretical model of how, why, for whom, in what contexts and to what extent MCs can be successfully implemented for the long term. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As participants may lack capacity for informed consent, favourable ethical opinion was received from a Health Research Authority research ethics committee. Resulting recommendations will be of interest to stakeholders including those commissioning, planning, running, supporting or attending MCs, as well as policy-makers and healthcare professionals. Knowledge will be shared with emerging MCs to help accelerate scale up of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Morton
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Shirley B Evans
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Dawn Brooker
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Tracey Williamson
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Michela Tinelli
- PSSRU, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Faith Frost
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Jennifer Bray
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Nigel Hullah
- 3 Nations Working Group for Dementia, Swansea, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Backhouse T, Ruston A. Home-care workers' experiences of assisting people with dementia with their personal care: A qualitative interview study. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e749-e759. [PMID: 34057255 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Home-care workers are increasingly caring for clients living with dementia. Workers usually have limited dementia training and are low paid and often lone working. Little is known about how home-care workers assist people with dementia with their personal care. We aimed to explore the experiences of home-care workers and the knowledge and skills they rely on when providing personal care to people with dementia. In 2020, we conducted 17 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with home-care workers in the East of England. Analysis was inductive and thematic. Two key themes were present in the data: 'structural conditions' and 'clients' dementia-related characteristics'. For each of these, we examined the challenges faced by home-care workers and the strategies they used to manage these challenges. Challenges included time allocation for visits, completing care plan tasks, lone working, communication and understanding, refusals of care, and client behaviours. To mitigate these challenges, home-care workers utilised system support, time management, training and experience and enacted a caring relationship, thought about their approach, and used distraction and communication skills. Workers relied on skills such as, relationship building, team working, observation, communication, decision making and interpersonal sensitivity. They drew on knowledge about the person, the person's needs, their own abilities, company policies and procedures and their role and responsibilities as a home-care worker. Home-care workers had more scope to mitigate client-based challenges by adapting care within client interactions, than to manage structural challenges where there was a limit to what workers could do. Despite a commissioning focus on time- and task-based care, when caring for people with dementia, home-care workers used interaction as a way to bring the person along and complete care activities. Home-care services should acknowledge the importance of interactions with people with dementia within home care and support their workers to develop interpersonal sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Backhouse
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Annmarie Ruston
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mamun MR, Hirakawa Y, Saif-Ur-Rahman KM, Sakaguchi T, Chiang C, Yatsuya H. Everyday wishes of older people living with dementia in care planning: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:184. [PMID: 35151313 PMCID: PMC8840703 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07606-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The dementia care policy in Japan emphasizes the views of people living with dementia in care planning. An exploration of the everyday wishes of older people living with dementia can help clarify their priorities and assist in improving dementia care. This study aimed to explore the everyday wishes of older people living with dementia in Japan. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in Aichi prefecture in Japan. Older people with mild to moderate dementia were considered for inclusion. Participants were recruited from a dementia outpatient clinic. In-depth interviews were conducted with 36 participants in the same dementia outpatient clinic from January to October 2019. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim. Inductive content analysis was carried out to analyze the data. Findings Participants expressed their everyday wishes within five themes (desire of being connected, freedom to decide, involvement in activities, status quo, and self-reliance). Older people living with dementia loved the connection with their family and wanted to have an enjoyable life by engaging in several activities without others’ interference. They desired to maintain the status quo and not be a burden to others. Conclusions This study provides evidence on the everyday wishes of people living with dementia. Identified wishes are mostly on emotional aspects of their daily lives. The findings of our study might help provide care for the people living with dementia considering their wishes. Further exploration, including people with severe dementia, is needed. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07606-1.
Collapse
|
13
|
Miller LM, Solomon DN, Whitlatch CJ, Hiatt SO, Wu CY, Reynolds C, Au-Yeung WTM, Kaye J, Steele JS. The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response Program: Development of an In-Home Dementia-Related Care Needs Assessment to Improve Well-Being. Innov Aging 2022; 6:igac006. [PMID: 35402736 PMCID: PMC8985764 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igac006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives The Remote Assessment and Dynamic Response (READyR) Program was developed in order to address the current lack of early-stage dementia care planning programs that assess the care needs of persons with dementia. The goal was to create a program informed by care values and ongoing ecologically valid data. The objectives of this study are to describe the development and design process of the READyR Program, and to evaluate the utility of the READyR Program for identifying dementia-related care needs. Research Design and Methods A prototype of the web-based READyR Program tool was first created using digital activity data that were collected by previous studies using a platform of multimodal sensors installed in the homes of older adult couples with and without dementia. Digital activity data were then mapped onto potential care values (e.g., safety & autonomy) to create a values-based needs assessment that is tailored to the individual care dyad. Next, evaluation of the READyR Program by 11 professional dementia care coordinators and case managers (across 3 semistructured focus groups) was used to explore the utility of READyR for assessing dementia-related needs. Qualitative description using conventional content analysis was used to iteratively code focus group data and to describe prevalent themes. Results Prevalent focus groups themes included barriers to (e.g., family relationship strain) and facilitators of (e.g., tailored assessments) the optimal process for assessing dementia-related care needs by care coordinators, as well as advantages to (e.g., providing new objective insights into function, and routines) and disadvantages of (e.g., bringing up new questions about care) incorporating the remote monitoring data into a values-based needs assessment. Discussion and Implications READyR has the potential to help family members, as well as care coordinators and providers, gain insight into the values-based care needs of persons with early-stage dementia. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT04542109.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsey M Miller
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Diane N Solomon
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Shirin O Hiatt
- School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Chao-Yi Wu
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- NIA-Layton Aging & Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christina Reynolds
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- NIA-Layton Aging & Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Wan-Tai Michael Au-Yeung
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- NIA-Layton Aging & Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeffrey Kaye
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- NIA-Layton Aging & Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Joel S Steele
- Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tuomikoski AM, Parisod H, Lotvonen S, Välimäki T. Experiences of people with progressive memory disorders participating in non-pharmacological interventions: a qualitative systematic review. JBI Evid Synth 2022; 20:1871-1926. [PMID: 35044362 DOI: 10.11124/jbies-21-00199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review identified, critically appraised, and synthesized the available evidence on the experiences of people with progressive memory disorders who are involved in non-pharmacological interventions. INTRODUCTION Non-pharmacological interventions are widely used to improve the quality of life and general well-being of people with progressive memory disorders. While an array of intervention effects has been studied, a systematic review of experiences is needed. First-hand knowledge and experience provides insight into noteworthy aspects of the use and timing of non-pharmacological interventions both in the community and institutionalized care. INCLUSION CRITERIA The review included studies of people of all ages with progressive memory disorders who described their experiences of non-pharmacological interventions. METHODS The search strategy used a three-step approach and sought to locate both published and unpublished studies. Key databases included MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), Medic, Scopus (Elsevier), and PsycARTICLES (ProQuest). MedNar was used to search for unpublished studies. The databases were searched from the date of inception of the database to May 2020, and a mix of controlled vocabulary (ie, MeSH, CINAHL headings) and keywords were used to capture all existing qualitative studies related to the experiences of people of all ages with progressive memory disorders participating in non-pharmacological interventions. Only English, Swedish, and Finnish studies were included during the screening of the study titles and abstracts. The recommended JBI approach was used for study selection, critical appraisal, data extraction, and data synthesis. RESULTS Forty-six studies were included in the review. The study designs included qualitative descriptions (n = 31), mixed methods (n = 8), grounded theory (n = 5), and ethnography (n = 2). The total number of participants was 444. The overall quality of the studies was rated as low or very low on the ConQual score, with dependability rated as low or moderate and credibility as moderate. Altogether, 189 findings were aggregated into eight categories and three synthesized findings. The synthesized findings describing the experiences of people with progressive memory disorders participating in a non-pharmacological intervention were as follows: i) It strengthened the sense of personhood; ii) it lightened up my life; and iii) what I find meaningful is that it was meant for us. CONCLUSIONS People with progressive memory disorders welcome non-pharmacological interventions. It is noteworthy that, regardless of what the interventions entailed, the participants experienced strengthened self-esteem and positive alterations to their daily life. To achieve the desired benefits, intervention development should embody communication based on equality and respect for those who suffer from memory disorders. However, the level of evidence of the review findings was evaluated as low or very low, which needs to be considered when applying the results in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Maria Tuomikoski
- Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland The Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Helsinki, Finland Department of Nursing Science and Health Management, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland Nursing Research Foundation, Helsinki, Finland Department of Nursing Science, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Goh AMY, Polacsek M, Malta S, Doyle C, Hallam B, Gahan L, Low LF, Cooper C, Livingston G, Panayiotou A, Loi SM, Omori M, Savvas S, Burton J, Ames D, Scherer SC, Chau N, Roberts S, Winbolt M, Batchelor F, Dow B. What constitutes 'good' home care for people with dementia? An investigation of the views of home care service recipients and providers. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:42. [PMID: 35016640 PMCID: PMC8751242 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02727-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our objective was to explore what people receiving and providing care consider to be 'good' in-home care for people living with dementia. METHODS We conducted 36 in-depth interviews and two focus groups with key stakeholders in Australia in the first quarter of 2018. Participants included those receiving care (4 people living with dementia, 15 family carers) or providing care (9 case managers, 5 service managers, 10 home care workers). Qualitative thematic analysis was guided by Braun and Clarke's six-step approach. RESULTS Consensus was reached across all groups on five themes considered as important for good in-home dementia care: 1) Home care workers' understanding of dementia and its impact; 2) Home care workers' demonstrating person-centred care and empathy in their care relationship with their client; 3) Good relationships and communication between care worker, person with dementia and family carers; 4) Home care workers' knowing positive practical strategies for changed behaviours; 5) Effective workplace policies and workforce culture. The results contributed to the co-design of a dementia specific training program for home care workers. CONCLUSIONS It is crucial to consider the views and opinions of each stakeholder group involved in providing/receiving dementia care from home care workers, to inform workforce training, education program design and service design. Results can be used to inform and empower home care providers, policy, and related decision makers to guide the delivery of improved home care services. TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN 12619000251123 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita M Y Goh
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Royal Melbourne Hospital, PO Box 2127, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia.
| | | | - Sue Malta
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Colleen Doyle
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Brendan Hallam
- Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luke Gahan
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,LaTrobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lee Fay Low
- University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anita Panayiotou
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Safer Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Samantha M Loi
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Royal Melbourne Hospital, PO Box 2127, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | - Maho Omori
- Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Steven Savvas
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Jason Burton
- dementia360, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Ames
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Kew, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Nadia Chau
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Stefanie Roberts
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Royal Melbourne Hospital, PO Box 2127, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | | | | | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lord K, Kelleher D, Ogden M, Mason C, Rapaport P, Burton A, Leverton M, Downs M, Souris H, Jackson J, Lang I, Manthorpe J, Cooper C. Co-designing complex interventions with people living with dementia and their supporters. DEMENTIA 2021; 21:426-441. [PMID: 34969312 PMCID: PMC8811333 DOI: 10.1177/14713012211042466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We engaged people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals in co-designing two dementia care interventions: for family carers and people living with dementia (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-family and home-care workers (NIDUS-professional training programme). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Over October 2019-March 2020, we invited public and patient (PPI) and professional members of our NIDUS co-design groups to complete the PPI Engagement Evaluation Tool (designed to assess engagement activities), and non-professional PPI members to participate in qualitative telephone interviews. We thematically analysed and integrated mixed-methods findings. RESULTS Most (15/20; 75%) of the PPI members approached participated. We identified four themes: (1) Creating the right atmosphere: participants found group meetings positive and enabling, though one health professional was unsure how to position themselves within them; (2) Participants influencing the outcome: while most members felt that they had some influence, for one carer consultation seemed too late to influence; (3) Having the right information: several carers wanted greater clarity and more regular updates from researchers; (4) Unique challenges for people living with dementia: memory problems presented challenges in engaging with substantial information, and within a large group. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS We reflect on the importance of providing accessible, regular updates, managing power imbalances between co-design group members with lived and professional experiences; and ensuring needs and voices of people living with dementia are prioritised. We encourage future studies to incorporate evaluations of co-design processes into study design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Clare Mason
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Murna Downs
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Helen Souris
- 53249NHS England and NHS Improvement London, London, UK
| | - Joy Jackson
- 4784Alzheimer's Society Research Network, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- 3286University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, 4616King's College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Armstrong M, Tuijt R, Read J, Pigott J, Davies N, Manthorpe J, Frost R, Schrag A, Walters K. Health care professionals' perspectives on self-management for people with Parkinson's: qualitative findings from a UK study. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:706. [PMID: 34911497 PMCID: PMC8672490 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02678-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parkinson's disease is a long-term, complex health condition. To improve or maintain quality of life, people with Parkinson's can have an active involvement in their care through self-management techniques. Given the complexity and individualization of self-management, people with Parkinson's will need support and encouragement from their healthcare professionals (HCPs). Despite the key role HCPs have in this, research has seldom explored their perspectives and understanding of self-management for people with Parkinson's. METHODS Multi-disciplinary teams providing care for people with Parkinson's across London, Coventry and Hertfordshire were approached and took part in either one of four focus groups or individual interviews. Forty-two HCPs, including a range of specialist doctors, general practitioners, allied health professionals, nurses, and social workers, took part in this study. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis to identify themes. RESULTS Four themes were developed from the data: 1) Empowerment of patients through holistic care and being person-centred; 2) Maximising motivation and capability for patients, for example using asset based approaches and increasing opportunities; 3) importance of empowerment of carers to support self-management and 4) contextual barriers to self-management such as the social context. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to explore the perspectives of HCPs on self-management in people with Parkinson's. Our findings have identified important considerations surrounding empowerment, motivation, carers and contextual barriers to better understand how we enable effective self-management techniques in people with Parkinson's. Research should build on these findings on to develop acceptable and effective self-management tools for use in practice with people affected by Parkinson's.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Armstrong
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - Remco Tuijt
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Joy Read
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Pigott
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nathan Davies
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Health & Social Care Workforce Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Frost
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Anette Schrag
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Burton A, Rapaport P, Palomo M, Lord K, Budgett J, Barber J, Hunter R, Butler L, Vickerstaff V, Rockwood K, Ogden M, Smith D, Lang I, Livingston G, Dow B, Kales H, Manthorpe J, Walters K, Hoe J, Orgeta V, Samus Q, Cooper C. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a New psychosocial intervention to support Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-family) for family carers and people living with dementia in their own homes: a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:865. [PMID: 34857029 PMCID: PMC8637036 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05851-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most people living with dementia want to remain living in their own homes and are supported to do so by family carers. No interventions have consistently demonstrated improvements to people with dementia's life quality, functioning, or other indices of living as well as possible with dementia. We have co-produced, with health and social care professionals and family carers of people with dementia, a new intervention (NIDUS-family). To our knowledge, NIDUS-family is the first manualised intervention that can be tailored to personal goals of people living with dementia and their families and is delivered by facilitators without clinical training. The intervention utilizes components of behavioural management, carer support, psychoeducation, communication and coping skills training, enablement, and environmental adaptations, with modules selected to address dyads' selected goals. We will evaluate the effect of NIDUS-family and usual care on goal attainment, as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) rated by family carers, compared to usual care alone at 12-month follow-up. We will also determine whether NIDUS-family and usual care is more cost-effective than usual care alone over 12 months. METHODS A randomised, two-arm, single-masked, multi-site clinical trial involving 297 people living with dementia-family carer dyads. Dyads will be randomised 2:1 to receive the NIDUS-family intervention with usual care (n = 199) or usual care alone (n = 98). The intervention group will be offered, over 1 year, via 6-8 video call or telephone sessions (or face to face if COVID-19 restrictions allow in the recruitment period) in the initial 6 months, followed by telephone follow-ups every 1-2 months to support implementation, with a trained facilitator. DISCUSSION Increasing the time lived at home by people living with dementia is likely to benefit lives now and in the future. Our intervention, which we adapted to include remote delivery prior to trial commencement due to the COVID-19 pandemic, aims to address barriers to living as well and as independently as possible that distress people living with dementia, exacerbate family carer(s) stress, negatively affect relationships, lead to safety risks, and frequently precipitate avoidable moves to a care home. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trials Number ISRCTN11425138 . Registered on 7 October 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Burton
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marina Palomo
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kathryn Lord
- The Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Barber
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laurie Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Margaret Ogden
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers, London, UK
| | - Debs Smith
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers, London, UK
| | - Iain Lang
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Helen Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, UC Davis Health, University of California, California, USA
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Juanita Hoe
- Division of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Orgeta
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nakanishi M, Yamasaki S, Endo K, Niimura J, Ziylan C, Bakker TJEM, Granvik E, Nägga K, Nishida A. e-Learning and Web-Based Tools for Psychosocial Interventions Addressing Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Dementia During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Tokyo, Japan: Quasi-Experimental Study. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 7:e30652. [PMID: 34543224 PMCID: PMC8513743 DOI: 10.2196/30652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concern has been raised that the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent social distancing measures may increase neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia. Thus, we developed and delivered an e-learning training course to professional caregivers on using a web-based tool for psychosocial interventions for people with dementia. OBJECTIVE The aim of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an e-learning course in combination with a web-based tool in addressing neuropsychiatric symptoms of dementia. METHODS A quasi-experimental design was used in Tokyo, Japan. The e-learning course was delivered three times to professional caregivers between July and December 2020. Caregivers who completed the course assessed the level of neuropsychiatric symptoms in people with dementia using the total score from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) via a web-based tool. The primary outcome measures were the number of caregivers who implemented follow-up NPI evaluations by March 2021 and the change in NPI scores from baseline to their most recent follow-up evaluations. As a control group, information was also obtained from professional caregivers who completed a face-to-face training course using the same web-based tool between July 2019 and March 2020. RESULTS A total of 268 caregivers completed the e-learning course in 2020. Of the 268 caregivers, 56 (20.9%) underwent follow-up evaluations with 63 persons with dementia. The average NPI score was significantly reduced from baseline (mean 20.4, SD 16.2) to the most recent follow-up evaluations (mean 14.3, SD 13.4). The effect size was assumed to be medium (Cohen drm [repeated measures]=0.40). The control group consisted of 252 caregivers who completed a face-to-face training course. Of the 252 caregivers, 114 (45.2%) underwent follow-up evaluations. Compared to the control group, caregivers who completed the e-learning course were significantly less likely to implement follow-up evaluations (χ21=52.0, P<.001). The change in NPI scores did not differ according to the type of training course (baseline-adjusted difference=-0.61, P=.69). CONCLUSIONS The replacement of face-to-face training with e-learning may have provided professionals with an opportunity to participate in the dementia behavior analysis and support enhancement (DEMBASE) program who may not have participated in the program otherwise. Although the program showed equal efficacy in terms of the two training courses, the feasibility was suboptimal with lower implementation levels for those receiving e-learning training. Thus, further strategies should be developed to improve feasibility by providing motivational triggers for implementation and technical support for care professionals. Using online communities in the program should also be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miharu Nakanishi
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai-shi, Japan
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Japan
| | - Syudo Yamasaki
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Japan
| | - Kaori Endo
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Japan
| | - Junko Niimura
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Japan
| | - Canan Ziylan
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ton J E M Bakker
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Stichting Wetenschap Balans, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eva Granvik
- Center for Excellence in Dementia, University Hospital, Malmö, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katarina Nägga
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Atsushi Nishida
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rapaport P, Burton A, Palomo M, Griffiths J, Kelleher D, Leverton M, Vickerstaff V, Barber J, Bird M, Budgett J, Birch J, Rockwood K, Downs M, Lord K, Kales HC, Livingston G, Riley P, Cooper C. A mixed-methods feasibility study of a goal-focused manualised intervention to support people with dementia to stay living independently at home with support from family carers: NIDUS (New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study) Family. Aging Ment Health 2021; 25:1463-1474. [PMID: 33222498 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1845299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-Family, a 6-8 session manualised, individually tailored, modular intervention supporting independence at home for people with dementia; and explore participants' and facilitators' experiences of the intervention. METHOD In this single group multi-site feasibility study, trained, supervised non-clinically qualified graduates (facilitators) delivered NIDUS-Family to family carer and people living with dementia dyads. We recruited participants from GP practices and memory services in London and Bradford. We completed quantitative outcomes pre- and post-intervention; and conducted qualitative interviews with participants and facilitators. Our pre-specified main outcomes were proportion of potential participants approached who agreed to participate, intervention adherence and acceptability to family carers, and facilitator fidelity to the manual. RESULTS We recruited 16 dyads (57% of those approached); 12 (75%) completed the intervention. Of 12 participants rating intervention acceptability, 9 (75%) agreed or strongly agreed that it had helped; 2 (18%) neither agreed nor disagreed and 1 (8%) disagreed. Mean facilitator fidelity was high (81.5%). Dyads set on average 3.9 goals; these most commonly related to getting out and about and increasing activity/hobby participation (n = 10); carer wellbeing (n = 6), managing physical complaints (n = 6); meal preparation/cooking (n = 5); and reducing irritability, frustration or aggression (n = 5). Almost all secondary outcomes changed in a direction indicating improvement. In our qualitative analysis we identified three overarching themes; relationships facilitate change, goal-focused versus manualised approach and balancing the needs of carers and people with dementia. CONCLUSION NIDUS-Family was feasible and acceptable to participants. Following refinements, testing in a pragmatic trial is underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, UCL, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Marina Palomo
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jessica Griffiths
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Daniel Kelleher
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Victoria Vickerstaff
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Unit , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Julie Barber
- Statistical Sciences, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Priment Clinical Trials Unit, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Megan Bird
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jessica Budgett
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Jodie Birch
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Aging, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Murna Downs
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford , Bradford , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Helen C Kales
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, UC Davis , Davis , CA , USA
| | - Gill Livingston
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Peter Riley
- Alzheimer's Society Research Network Volunteers , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, UCL , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust , London , United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morton T, Wong G, Atkinson T, Brooker D. Sustaining community-based interventions for people affected by dementia long term: the SCI-Dem realist review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e047789. [PMID: 34233990 PMCID: PMC8264885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Community-based support for people with earlier-stage dementia and their care partners, such as regularly meeting groups and activities, can play an important part in postdiagnostic care. Typically delivered piecemeal in the UK, by a variety of agencies with inconsistent funding, provision is fragmented and many such interventions struggle to continue after only a short start-up period. This realist review investigates what can promote or hinder such interventions in being able to sustain long term. METHODS Key sources of evidence were gathered using formal searches of electronic databases and grey literature, together with informal search methods such as citation tracking. No restrictions were made on article type or study design; only data pertaining to regularly meeting, ongoing, community-based interventions were included. Data were extracted, assessed, organised and synthesised and a realist logic of analysis applied to trace context-mechanism-outcome configurations as part an overall programme theory. Consultation with stakeholders, involved with a variety of such interventions, informed this process throughout. RESULTS Ability to continually get and keep members; staff and volunteers; the support of other services and organisations; and funding/income were found to be critical, with multiple mechanisms feeding into these suboutcomes, sensitive to context. These included an emphasis on socialising and person-centredness; lowering stigma and logistical barriers; providing support and recognition for personnel; networking, raising awareness and sharing with other organisations, while avoiding conflict; and skilled financial planning and management. CONCLUSIONS This review presents a theoretical model of what is involved in the long-term sustainability of community-based interventions. Alongside the need for longer-term funding and skilled financial management, key factors include the need for stigma-free, person-centred provision, sensitive to members' diversity and social needs, as well as the need for a robust support network including the local community, health and care services. Challenges were especially acute for small scale and rural groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Morton
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Teresa Atkinson
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| | - Dawn Brooker
- Association for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leverton M, Burton A, Beresford-Dent J, Rapaport P, Manthorpe J, Mansour H, Guerra Ceballos S, Downs M, Samus Q, Dow B, Lord K, Cooper C. 'You can't just put somebody in a situation with no armour'. An ethnographic exploration of the training and support needs of homecare workers caring for people living with dementia. DEMENTIA 2021; 20:2982-3005. [PMID: 34111969 PMCID: PMC8678657 DOI: 10.1177/14713012211023676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Homecare workers carry out complex work with people living with dementia, while under-supported, undervalued and undertrained. In this ethnographic study, we explore the skills, training and support needs of homecare workers supporting people living with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We conducted 82 interviews with people living with dementia (n = 11), family caregivers (n = 22), homecare staff (n = 30) and health and social care professionals (n = 19) and conducted 100-hours of participant observations with homecare workers (n = 16). We triangulated interview and observational findings and analysed data thematically. RESULTS We developed four themes: 1) 'Navigating the homecare identity and role': describing challenges of moving between different role identities and managing associated expectations, 2) 'Developing and utilising relational and emotional skills': boundaries between caring and getting emotionally involved felt blurred and difficult to manage, 3) 'Managing clients who resist care': homecare workers experienced clients' reactions as challenging and felt "thrown to the wolves" without sufficient training, and 4) 'Drawing on agency and team support': homecare work could be isolating, with no shared workplace, busy schedules and limited opportunity for peer support. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS It is important that training and support for homecare workers addresses the relational, emotional and rights-based aspects of the role. Where a flexible, responsive, person-centred service is required, corresponding training and support is needed, alongside organisational practices, taking account of the broader context of the homecare sector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, 4919University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jill Manthorpe
- NIHR Policy Research Unit on Health and Social Care Workforce, 4616King's College London, London, UK
| | - Hassan Mansour
- Division of Psychiatry, 4616University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Murna Downs
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Quincy Samus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bayview, 1466Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Briony Dow
- National Ageing Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; 2281University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, VIC, Australia
| | - Kathryn Lord
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, 1905University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, 1905University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Designing meaningful dementia care. Int Psychogeriatr 2021; 33:547-549. [PMID: 34082848 DOI: 10.1017/s1041610220001696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
24
|
Tuijt R, Frost R, Wilcock J, Robinson L, Manthorpe J, Rait G, Walters K. Life under lockdown and social restrictions - the experiences of people living with dementia and their carers during the COVID-19 pandemic in England. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:301. [PMID: 33971847 PMCID: PMC8107803 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02257-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The impact of COVID-19 restrictions on people living with dementia and their carers is an emerging focus of recent research determining how we can best support this population. People living with dementia have faced service curtailment, increased risk for COVID-19, as well as potential heightened deterioration. This study reports the experiences of people living with dementia and their family carers during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic in England and the impact on them. Methods We recruited and remotely interviewed 30 people living with dementia in their own homes and 31 family carers, via video or telephone call in mid-2020. Data were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Results People living with dementia often had a basic understanding of COVID-19 restrictions but could have difficulty translating this into personalised risk-appraisal of their own actions. Managing COVID-19 risks facing people living with dementia at home was largely done by family carers, exemplified by changes to living arrangements, which could strain or sustain caring relationships. Well-established familial caring relationships contributed to the wellbeing of the person living with dementia and their carer, as well as keeping to simple routines that included leaving the home for exercise and stimulation. People living with dementia reported some negative psychological and cognitive effects due to the imposed restrictions, such as increased apathy, irritability, or anxiety, which were fuelled by lack of social engagement. Conclusions Structuring routine (remote) social interactions where possible could increase social engagement and improve wellbeing for people living with dementia, especially those with limited familial support in a post-COVID-19 context. As some care relationships had been restructured to manage COVID-19 risks, additional carer strain may emerge as a result of the impact on the independence of the person living with dementia and come to the attention of professionals in health and care services. People living with dementia and their carers highlighted the importance of maintaining or adapting routines which may be useful learning for professionals, although additional support may be necessary for those who are impacted by more severe or worsening symptoms of dementia. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02257-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Tuijt
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - Rachael Frost
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Jane Wilcock
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | | | | | - Greta Rait
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Murphy C, De Laine C, Macaulay M, Hislop Lennie K, Fader M. Problems faced by people living at home with dementia and incontinence: causes, consequences and potential solutions. Age Ageing 2021; 50:944-954. [PMID: 33320926 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaa262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND many people living at home with dementia (PLWD) also have poorly managed toilet-use or incontinence problems with damaging consequences for both people with dementia, unpaid carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Currently, there are no theoretically or empirically based interventions to help. The underlying causes and subsequent consequences of these problems need to be fully understood in order to support the development of interventions that have the potential to decrease the impact of these problems on people's lives. AIM to establish the range of causes, consequences and potential solutions of toilet-use and incontinence problems for PLWD and their carers. METHOD a qualitative design was used. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with PLWD, carers and HCPs (continence or dementia nurses). PLWD and carers were recruited via www.joindementiaresearch.nihr.ac.uk and via dementia/carer groups. Nurses were recruited via their employers. Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was used to interpret the data to address the goal of the research. RESULTS in total, 45 people (26 unpaid carers, 2 people with dementia, 9 continence and 8 dementia HCPs) took part. The causes of toilet-use and incontinence problems were reported to be multi-faceted and complex including those related to dementia (e.g. lack of insight into toileting needs or how to use the toilet), those which are physical (e.g. existing bladder or bowel issues or poor mobility), psychosocial (e.g. inability to ask for help for incontinence) or societal (e.g. fear of stigma), or related to care systems (e.g. lack of expert knowledge) or products (e.g. poor fit or confusing for users). Consequences included harms to physical and mental health, social isolation, increased carer workload and care system resource implications. CONCLUSION this study provides the first detailed characterisation of the causes and consequences of and potential solutions for incontinence problems for PLWD at home and their carers. Multifaceted and complex problems were identified, layering dementia, physical, psychosocial, societal and care system factors and highlighting contextual variation. This new knowledge provides the essential basis for the (now underway) development of urgently needed practical and implementable interventions for this underserved population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Murphy
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Christine De Laine
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Margaret Macaulay
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Kelly Hislop Lennie
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Mandy Fader
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tuijt R, Rees J, Frost R, Wilcock J. Exploring how triads of people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals function in dementia health care: A systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis. DEMENTIA 2021; 20:1080-1104. [PMID: 32212862 PMCID: PMC8047709 DOI: 10.1177/1471301220915068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many qualitative studies report the post-diagnostic care experiences of carers and people living with dementia; however, this is not often accompanied by opportunities to hear the corresponding views of their health care professionals and how this triadic relationship functions. The aim of this review was to identify and thematically synthesize the experiences of health care services reported by people living with dementia, their carers and health care professionals. METHODS Medline, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL were searched from inception to 31 July 2019 for qualitative research including people living with dementia, carers and health care professionals. Data were coded and thematically synthesised using NVivo. RESULTS Of 10,045 search results, 29 papers relating to 27 studies were included in the final synthesis, including 261 people living with dementia, 444 carers and 530 health care professionals. Six themes emerged related to the functioning of a dementia care triad: (1) involving the person living with dementia, (2) establishing expectations of care and the roles of the members of the triad, (3) building trust, (4) effective communication, (5) continuity of care and (6) understanding the unique relationship dynamics within each triad. DISCUSSION The interactions and complexity of triadic dementia care relationships further our understanding of how to improve dementia care. Awareness of possible diverging attitudes highlights areas of necessary improvement and further research into facilitating engagement, such as when multiple professionals are involved or where there are mismatched expectations of the roles of triad members. In order to operate efficiently as a triad member, professionals should be aware of how pre-existing relations can influence the composition of a triad, encourage the involvement of the person living with dementia, clarify the expectations of all parties, establish trusting relationships and enable communication within the direct triad and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remco Tuijt
- Remco Tuijt, Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Caregivers search for mobile device apps that offer meaningful and enjoyable activities to simultaneously enhance the preserved cognitive and functional abilities of those in their care. The purpose of this review article was to describe the current state of tablet apps with which elders with Alzheimer's disease and related forms of dementia may engage as users. Using the keywords "app," "Alzheimer's," and "dementia," a sample of 83 apps was selected from the iTunes Store, Google, and discussion boards of Apple Support Communities. A descriptive content analysis was conducted using a coding scheme on the characteristics of tablet app activity and the requirements for functional abilities of the users. This review found that the activities of the selected apps included games, simple watching and viewing, music and sounds, memory training, learning and information, and social interaction starters. A high-level cognitive and physical ability such as eye-hand coordination is often required to play the majority of the game apps. A few apps are designed specifically for the population. Individuals' variability in cognitive and functional abilities necessitates a person-centered approach in designing and selecting games and activities for apps in order to increase engagement and promote positive experiences in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunghee H. Tak
- The Research Institute of Nursing Science, College of Nursing, Seoul National University, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-799, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ura C, Okamura T, Sugiyama M, Miyamae F, Yamashita M, Nakayama R, Edahiro A, Taga T, Inagaki H, Ogawa M, Awata S. Living on the edge of the community: factors associated with discontinuation of community living among people with cognitive impairment. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:131. [PMID: 33607947 PMCID: PMC7893898 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02084-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background As Japanese society continues to age, the isolation of older people is increasing, and community living for people with cognitive impairment is becoming more difficult. However, the challenges faced by people with cognitive impairment living in the community have not been fully explored because of methodological difficulties. This study re-accessed people with cognitive impairment identified in a previous epidemiological survey to explore their current situation and the risk factors associated with all-cause discontinuation of community living. Methods Under a community-based participatory framework, we examined a high-risk approach for people with cognitive impairment and a community action approach in parallel, to build a dementia-friendly community. For the high-risk approach, we achieved stepwise access to 7614 older residents, which enabled us to select and visit the homes of 198 participants with a Mini-Mental State Examination score < 24 in 2016. In 2019, we re-accessed these individuals. For the community action approach, we built a community space in the study area to build partnerships with community residents and community workers and were able to re-access participants using multiple methods. Results We found that 126 (63.6%) participants had continued living in the same community, but 58 (29.3%) had discontinued community living. Of these, 18 (9.1%) had died, 18 (9.1%) were institutionalized, 9 (4.5%) were hospitalized, and 13 (6.6%) had moved out of the community. A multiple logistic regression analysis identified the following risk factors associated with discontinuation of community living: being certified under long-term care insurance, needing housing support, and needing rights protection. Conclusions Three years after the baseline survey, 29.3% of people with cognitive impairment had discontinued community living. Despite having cognitive impairment or living alone, older people were able to continue living in the community if their needs for housing support and rights protection were met. Both social interventions and medical interventions are important to build age-friendly communities. Trial registration UMIN, UMIN000038189, Registered 3 October 2019, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000043521 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02084-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiaki Ura
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan.
| | - Tsuyoshi Okamura
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Mika Sugiyama
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Fumiko Miyamae
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Mari Yamashita
- Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Riko Nakayama
- Department of Integrated Education and Science, Graduate School of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayako Edahiro
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Taga
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Hiroki Inagaki
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Madoka Ogawa
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| | - Shuichi Awata
- Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2, Sakae-cho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo, 173-0015, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Fekonja Z, Kmetec S, Novak B, McCormack B, Mlinar Reljić N. A qualitative study of family members' experiences of their loved one developing dementia and their subsequent placement in a nursing home. J Nurs Manag 2021; 29:1284-1292. [PMID: 33484604 DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the family members' experiences with receiving help and support while their loved one develops dementia and their subsequent placement in nursing homes. BACKGROUND As the dementia disease progresses, some family members will struggle with the option of nursing home placement. This situation can precipitate feelings of anger, disappointment and guilt, all of which can be overwhelming. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study with in-depth interviews (n = 19) was carried out in several nursing homes of Slovenia's North Eastern Region. RESULTS Inductive thematic analysis identified two main themes: (i) developing the diagnosis and (ii) accommodation process. Family members noticed the progressive behavioural changes in their loved ones. While they were searching for help at the primary health care level, they experienced a lack of help and support. CONCLUSIONS When family members detect behavioural changes in their loved ones, the primary health care team should establish an early diagnosis of dementia and provide adequate decision-making support. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT The findings are useful to prepare guidance for a family member to inform them of the types of support available and from which associations and organisations. To achieve adequate management support, primary health care teams need to be aware of family member experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zvonka Fekonja
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sergej Kmetec
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Brendan McCormack
- Division of Nursing, Queen Margaret University Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Supporting independence at home for people living with dementia: a qualitative ethnographic study of homecare. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56:2323-2336. [PMID: 33893821 PMCID: PMC8558284 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-021-02084-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this ethnographic study was to investigate how homecare workers support or inhibit independence in people living with dementia. METHODS We undertook 100 h of participant observations with homecare workers (n = 16) supporting people living with dementia (n = 17); and 82 qualitative interviews with people living with dementia (n = 11), family carers (n = 22), homecare managers and support staff (n = 11), homecare workers (n = 19) and health and social care professionals (n = 19). We triangulated data and analysed findings thematically. RESULTS We developed three themes: (1) independence and the home environment, highlighting ongoing negotiations between familiarity, suitability and safety for care; (2) independence and identity, exploring how homecare workers' understanding of their clients' identity can enable active participation in tasks and meaningful choices; and (3) independence and empowerment, considering the important position of homecare workers to advocate for clients living with dementia while navigating authoritative power amongst proxy decision-makers. CONCLUSION We consider that person-centred care should also be home-centred, respecting the client's home as an extension of self. Homecare workers can use their understanding of clients' identities, alongside skills in providing choice and developing relationships of interdependence to engage clients in everyday tasks. Homecare workers are well placed to advocate for their client's voice within the care network, although their ability to do so is limited by their position within power structures.
Collapse
|
31
|
Nakanishi M, Niimura J, Ziylan C, Bakker TT, Granvik E, Nägga K, Shindo Y, Nishida A. Time Investment for Program Implementation to Manage Neuropsychiatric Symptoms: An Observational Longitudinal Study in In-Home and Residential Care Settings. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 2020; 4:441-453. [PMID: 33283165 PMCID: PMC7683103 DOI: 10.3233/adr-200235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are no studies on how the same psychosocial dementia care program is adapted to both in-home and residential care settings. Objective To evaluate the time investment required by professionals to implement a psychosocial dementia care program to manage neuropsychiatric symptoms. Methods A prospective observational study design was used. The program consisted of 1) a one-day training course, 2) three interdisciplinary discussion meetings in five months, and 3) a web-based tool for the continued assessment of neuropsychiatric symptoms. Care professionals implemented the intervention in in-home (19 in-home care management agencies and 14 multiple in-home service providers) and residential care settings (19 group homes and eight nursing homes) in Japan from October 2019 to February 2020. The level of neuropsychiatric symptoms for the participants was evaluated using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI: 0-144). The time investment was reported by participating professionals. A total of 125 persons with dementia were included at baseline. Results Neuropsychiatric symptoms were significantly decreased at the final follow-up in all types of providers (Cohen's drm = 0.44-0.61). The mean (SD) time required for the five-month implementation was 417.9 (219.8) minutes. There was a mean (SD) decrease of 8.6 (14.0) points in the total NPI score among the 103 persons with completed interventions. The time investment was significantly lower in in-home care management agencies than in group homes, and lower in follow-ups than at baseline assessment. Conclusion The program implementation may incur a substantial time investment regardless of setting. An additional benefit scheme to reward the time investment would be helpful to encourage implementation until the follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miharu Nakanishi
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Niimura
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Canan Ziylan
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton Tjem Bakker
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Stichting Wetenschap Balans, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Granvik
- Center of Excellence in Dementia, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katarina Nägga
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Yumi Shindo
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nishida
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rees JL, Burton A, Walters KR, Leverton M, Rapaport P, Herat Gunaratne R, Beresford-Dent J, Cooper C. Exploring how people with dementia can be best supported to manage long-term conditions: a qualitative study of stakeholder perspectives. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e041873. [PMID: 33033103 PMCID: PMC7545621 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 07/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore how the self-management of comorbid long-term conditions is experienced and negotiated by people with dementia and their carers. DESIGN Secondary thematic analysis of 82 semi-structured interviews. SETTING Community settings across the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 11 people with dementia, 22 family carers, 19 health professionals and 30 homecare staff. RESULTS We identified three overarching themes: (1) The process of substituting self-management: stakeholders balanced the wishes of people with dementia to retain autonomy with the risks of lower adherence to medical treatments. The task of helping a person with dementia to take medication was perceived as intermediate between a personal care and a medical activity; rules about which professionals could perform this activity sometimes caused conflict. (2) Communication in the care network: family carers often communicated with services and made decisions about how to implement medical advice. In situations where family carers or homecare workers were not substituting self-management, it could be challenging for general practitioners to identify changes in self-management and decide when to intervene. (3) Impact of physical health on and from dementia: healthcare professionals acknowledged the inter-relatedness of physical health and cognition to adapt care accordingly. Some treatments prescribed for long-term conditions were perceived as unhelpful when not adapted to the context of dementia. Healthcare professionals and homecare workers sometimes felt that family carers were unable to accept that available treatments may not be helpful to people with dementia and that this sometimes led to the continuation of treatments of questionable benefit. CONCLUSION The process of substituting self-management evolves with advancement of dementia symptoms and relies on communication in the care network, while considering the impact on and from dementia to achieve holistic physical health management. Care decisions must consider people with dementia as a whole, and be based on realistic outcomes and best interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kate R Walters
- Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nakanishi M, Ziylan C, Bakker T, Granvik E, Nägga K, Nishida A. Facilitators and barriers associated with the implementation of a Swedish psychosocial dementia care programme in Japan: a secondary analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. Scand J Caring Sci 2020; 35:430-441. [PMID: 32285513 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A psychosocial dementia care programme for challenging behaviour (DEMBASE® ) was developed in collaboration with a Swedish BPSD-registry team for in-home care services use in Japan. The programme consisted of a web-based tool for the continued assessment of challenging behaviours and interdisciplinary discussion meetings. Effectiveness of the adapted programme was verified through a cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Tokyo Metropolitan Government provided municipal funding to introduce the programme into daily practice beginning in April 2018. OBJECTIVES To investigate both facilitators and barriers associated with programme implementation. DESIGN A secondary analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. SETTINGS Data were collected in naturalistic long-term care settings from April 2018 to March 2019. PARTICIPANTS A total of 138 professionals and 157 people with dementia participated in the programme. METHODS Challenging behaviour in persons with dementia was assessed by professionals using a total Neuropsychiatric Inventory score. Data on expected facilitators and barriers were extracted for qualitative analysis from a debriefing meeting between professionals. RESULTS Of the 157 persons with dementia, 81 (51.6%) received follow-up behavioural evaluations by March 2019. The average level of challenging behaviour was significantly reduced for 81 persons from baseline to their most recent follow-up evaluations. Facilitators included 'programme available for care managers', 'visualised feedback on professionals' work', 'affordable for providers and professionals' and 'media coverage'. Barriers included 'professionals from different organisations', 'unpaid work', 'operation requirement for municipalities' and 'conflict with daily benefit-oriented framework'. CONCLUSIONS A follow-up evaluation was not fully achieved. Further strategies to address barriers may include the development of a benefit-rewarding scheme for interdisciplinary discussion meetings, an e-learning system capable of substituting training course portions and a cross-municipality training course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miharu Nakanishi
- Mental Health and Nursing Research Team, Mental Health Promotion Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Canan Ziylan
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ton Bakker
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Stichting Wetenschap Balans, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Granvik
- Center of excellence in dementia, university hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Katarina Nägga
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Atsushi Nishida
- Mental Health Promotion Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rapaport P, Burton A, Leverton M, Herat-Gunaratne R, Beresford-Dent J, Lord K, Downs M, Boex S, Horsley R, Giebel C, Cooper C. "I just keep thinking that I don't want to rely on people." a qualitative study of how people living with dementia achieve and maintain independence at home: stakeholder perspectives. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:5. [PMID: 31900113 PMCID: PMC6942277 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-019-1406-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most people living with dementia want to remain in their own homes, supported by family and paid carers. Care at home often breaks down, necessitating transition to a care home and existing interventions are limited. To inform the development of psychosocial interventions to enable people with dementia to live well for longer at home, we qualitatively explored the views of people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals, on how to achieve and maintain independence at home and what impedes this. Methods We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with 11 people living with dementia, 19 professionals and 22 family carers in England. Results We identified four overarching themes: being in a safe and familiar environment, enabling not disabling care, maintaining relationships and community connectedness, and getting the right support. For people living with dementia, the realities of staying active were complex: there was a tension between accepting support that enabled independence and a feeling that in doing so they were accepting dependency. Their and professionals’ accounts prioritised autonomy and ‘living well with dementia’, while family carers prioritised avoiding harm. Professionals promoted positive risk-taking and facilitating independence, whereas family carers often felt they were left holding this risk. Discussion Psychosocial interventions must accommodate tensions between positive risk-taking and avoiding harm, facilitating autonomy and providing support. They should be adaptive and collaborative, combining self-management with flexible support. Compassionate implementation of rights-based dementia care must consider the emotional burden for family carers of supporting someone to live positively with risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penny Rapaport
- University College London, London, UK. .,UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor Wing A, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Clarissa Giebel
- NIHR ARC NWC and Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Scott I, Cooper C, Leverton M, Burton A, Beresford-Dent J, Rockwood K, Butler L, Rapaport P. Effects of nonpharmacological interventions on functioning of people living with dementia at home: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2019; 34:1386-1402. [PMID: 31026082 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Slowing functional decline could enable people living with dementia to live for longer and more independently in their own homes. We aimed to update previous syntheses examining the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing functional decline (activities of daily living, activity-specific physical functioning, or function-specific goal attainment) in people living in their own homes with dementia. METHODS We systematically searched electronic databases from January 2012 to May 2018; two researchers independently rated risk of bias of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) fitting predetermined inclusion criteria using a checklist; we narratively synthesised findings, prioritising studies judged to have a lower risk of bias. RESULTS Twenty-nine papers (describing 26 RCTs) met eligibility criteria, of which we judged 13 RCTs to have a lower risk of bias. Study interventions were evaluated in four groups: physical exercise, occupational, multicomponent, and cognition-oriented interventions. Four out of 13 RCTs reported functional ability as a primary outcome. In studies judged to have a lower risk of bias, in-home tailored exercise, individualised cognitive rehabilitation, and in-home activities-focussed occupational therapy significantly reduced functional decline relative to control groups in individual studies. There was consistent evidence from studies at low risk of bias that group-based exercise and reminiscence therapies were ineffective at reducing functional decline. CONCLUSION We found no replicated evidence of intervention effectiveness in decreasing functional decline. Interventions associated with slower functional decline in individual trials have been individually delivered and tailored to the needs of the person with dementia. This is consistent with previous findings. Future intervention trials should prioritise these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iona Scott
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alex Burton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Medicine, Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Laurie Butler
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Anglia Ruskin University, UK
| | - Penny Rapaport
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|