1
|
Dudley R, Dodgson G, Common S, Ogundimu E, Liley J, O'Grady L, Watson F, Gibbs C, Arnott B, Fernyhough C, Alderson-Day B, Aynsworth C. Effects of a novel, brief psychological therapy (Managing Unusual Sensory Experiences) for hallucinations in first episode psychosis (MUSE FEP): Findings from an exploratory randomised controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res 2024; 174:289-296. [PMID: 38678686 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
Hallucinations are a common feature of psychosis, yet access to effective psychological treatment is limited. The Managing Unusual Sensory Experiences for First-Episode-Psychosis (MUSE-FEP) trial aimed to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a brief, hallucination-specific, digitally provided treatment, delivered by a non-specialist workforce for people with psychosis. MUSE uses psychoeducation about the causal mechanisms of hallucinations and tailored interventions to help a person understand and manage their experiences. We undertook a two-site, single-blind (rater) Randomised Controlled Trial and recruited 82 participants who were allocated 1:1 to MUSE and treatment as usual (TAU) (n = 40) or TAU alone (n = 42). Participants completed assessments before and after treatment (2 months), and at follow up (3-4 months). Information on recruitment rates, adherence, and completion of outcome assessments was collected. Analyses focussed on feasibility outcomes and initial estimates of intervention effects to inform a future trial. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry 16793301. Criteria for the feasibility of trial methodology and intervention delivery were met. The trial exceeded the recruitment target, had high retention rates (87.8%) at end of treatment, and at follow up (86.6%), with good acceptability of treatment. There were 3 serious adverse events in the therapy group, and 5 in the TAU group. Improvements were evident in both groups at the end of treatment and follow up, with a particular benefit in perceived recovery in the MUSE group. We showed it was feasible to increase access to psychological intervention but a definitive trial requires further changes to the trial design or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Dudley
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St. Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3XT, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of York, YO10 5DD, United Kingdom.
| | - Guy Dodgson
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St. Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3XT, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Common
- Tees, Esk & Wear Valley NHS Trust, Wessex House, Falcon Court, Stockton on Tees, TS18 3TX, United Kingdom
| | - Emmanuel Ogundimu
- University of Durham, Stockton Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
| | - James Liley
- University of Durham, Stockton Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy O'Grady
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St. Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3XT, United Kingdom
| | - Florence Watson
- Tees, Esk & Wear Valley NHS Trust, Wessex House, Falcon Court, Stockton on Tees, TS18 3TX, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Gibbs
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St. Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3XT, United Kingdom
| | - Bronia Arnott
- Newcastle University, Population Health Sciences Institute, Baddiley-Clark, NE2 4AX, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ben Alderson-Day
- University of Durham, Stockton Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Aynsworth
- Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St. Nicholas Hospital, Jubilee Road, Gosforth, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE3 3XT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Griffiths SL, Murray GK, Logeswaran Y, Ainsworth J, Allan SM, Campbell N, Drake RJ, Katshu MZUH, Machin M, Pope MA, Sullivan SA, Waring J, Bogatsu T, Kane J, Weetman T, Johnson S, Kirkbride JB, Upthegrove R. Implementing and Evaluating a National Integrated Digital Registry and Clinical Decision Support System in Early Intervention in Psychosis Services (Early Psychosis Informatics Into Care): Co-Designed Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e50177. [PMID: 38502175 PMCID: PMC10988369 DOI: 10.2196/50177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 01/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services are nationally mandated in England to provide multidisciplinary care to people experiencing first-episode psychosis, which disproportionately affects deprived and ethnic minority youth. Quality of service provision varies by region, and people from historically underserved populations have unequal access. In other disease areas, including stroke and dementia, national digital registries coupled with clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have revolutionized the delivery of equitable, evidence-based interventions to transform patient outcomes and reduce population-level disparities in care. Given psychosis is ranked the third most burdensome mental health condition by the World Health Organization, it is essential that we achieve the same parity of health improvements. OBJECTIVE This paper reports the protocol for the program development phase of this study, in which we aimed to co-design and produce an evidence-based, stakeholder-informed framework for the building, implementation, piloting, and evaluation of a national integrated digital registry and CDSS for psychosis, known as EPICare (Early Psychosis Informatics into Care). METHODS We conducted 3 concurrent work packages, with reciprocal knowledge exchange between each. In work package 1, using a participatory co-design framework, key stakeholders (clinicians, academics, policy makers, and patient and public contributors) engaged in 4 workshops to review, refine, and identify a core set of essential and desirable measures and features of the EPICare registry and CDSS. Using a modified Delphi approach, we then developed a consensus of data priorities. In work package 2, we collaborated with National Health Service (NHS) informatics teams to identify relevant data currently captured in electronic health records, understand data retrieval methods, and design the software architecture and data model to inform future implementation. In work package 3, observations of stakeholder workshops and individual interviews with representative stakeholders (n=10) were subject to interpretative qualitative analysis, guided by normalization process theory, to identify factors likely to influence the adoption and implementation of EPICare into routine practice. RESULTS Stage 1 of the EPICare study took place between December 2021 and September 2022. The next steps include stage 2 building, piloting, implementation, and evaluation of EPICare in 5 demonstrator NHS Trusts serving underserved and diverse populations with substantial need for EIP care in England. If successful, this will be followed by stage 3, in which we will seek NHS adoption of EPICare for rollout to all EIP services in England. CONCLUSIONS By establishing a multistakeholder network and engaging them in an iterative co-design process, we have identified essential and desirable elements of the EPICare registry and CDSS; proactively identified and minimized potential challenges and barriers to uptake and implementation; and addressed key questions related to informatics architecture, infrastructure, governance, and integration in diverse NHS Trusts, enabling us to proceed with the building, piloting, implementation, and evaluation of EPICare. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/50177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân Lowri Griffiths
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Graham K Murray
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- CAMEO, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yanakan Logeswaran
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Ainsworth
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie M Allan
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapies, Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Niyah Campbell
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J Drake
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mohammad Zia Ul Haq Katshu
- Institute of Mental Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Machin
- The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Megan A Pope
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah A Sullivan
- Centre for Academic Mental Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Waring
- School of Social Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tumelo Bogatsu
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Julie Kane
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tyler Weetman
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James B Kirkbride
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Upthegrove
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hyatt A, Mullin B, Hasler V, Madore D, Progovac AM, Cook BL, DeLisi LE. Predictors of relapse and engagement in care one year after ending services in an urban safety net coordinated specialty care program for first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2024; 264:140-146. [PMID: 38128345 PMCID: PMC10983670 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2023.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to identify risk factors for relapse (psychiatric emergency department visits or hospitalization) and lack of follow-up with outpatient psychiatric care in the 12 months after ending services in an urban safety net coordinated specialty care (CSC) program for first episode psychosis (FEP). METHODS The study population (n = 143) were individuals with FEP who had any CSC care between 2014 and 2021. To identify risk factors for relapse and follow up after exit, multivariable logistic regression was performed using data from electronic health records and linked insurance claims data. RESULTS Individuals with any emergency department visit or hospitalization 12 months prior to ending CSC (aOR = 4.69, 95 % CI 1.78-12.34) and those who were using cannabis at last CSC contact (aOR = 4.06, 95 % CI 1.56-10.56) had a higher risk of relapse after ending CSC services. Cannabis use at last contact was also associated with lower rates of outpatient psychiatric follow-up (aOR = 0.32, 95 % CI 0.12-0.94), while CSC duration in months had a small positive association with post-CSC psychiatric follow-up. There were no differences in relapse or follow-up by race or ethnicity, primary diagnosis, or medication usage. CONCLUSIONS Prior relapse during CSC predicted relapse in the 12 months after ending CSC services, but not outpatient follow up. Cannabis use predicted both a higher rate of relapse and a lower rate of follow up after ending services. There were no differences by race or ethnicity in our sample, suggesting that once individuals engaged in FEP care there were no evident disparities in the observed outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Hyatt
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States.
| | - Brian Mullin
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States
| | - Victoria Hasler
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States
| | - Drew Madore
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States
| | - Ana M Progovac
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States
| | - Benjamin Lê Cook
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States
| | - Lynn E DeLisi
- Cambridge Health Alliance, Department of Psychiatry, 1493 Cambridge Street, Cambridge 02139, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston 02115, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|