Withdrawal symptoms in children after long-term administration of sedatives and/or analgesics: a literature review. "Assessment remains troublesome"

Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Maximizing Neurodevelopmental Outcomes Through Specialty Care

The field of pediatric neurocritical care (PNCC) has expanded and evolved over the last three decades. As mortality from pediatric critical care illness has declined, morbidity from neurodevelopmental disorders has expanded. PNCC clinicians have adopted a multidisciplinary approach to rapidly identify neurological injury, implement neuroprotective therapies, minimize secondary neurological insults, and establish transitions of care, all with the goal of improving neurocognitive outcomes for their patients. Although there are many aspects of PNCC and adult neurocritical care (NCC) medicine that are similar, elemental difference between adult and pediatric medicine has contributed to a divergent evolution of the respective fields. The low incidence of pediatric critical care illness, the heterogeneity of neurological insults, and the limited availability of resources all shape the need for a PNCC clinical care model that is distinct from the established paradigm adopted by the adult neurocritical care community at large. Considerations of neurodevelopment are fundamental in pediatrics. When neurological injury occurs in a child, the neurodevelopmental stage at the time of insult alters the impact of the neurological disease. Developmental variables contribute to a range of outcomes for seemingly similar injuries. Despite the relative infancy of the field of PNCC, early reports have shown that implementation of a specialized PNCC service elevates the quality and safety of care, promotes education and communication, and improves outcomes for children with acute neurological injuries. The multidisciplinary approach of PNCC clinicians and researchers also promotes a culture that emphasizes the importance of quality improvement and education initiatives, as well as development of and adherence to evidence-based guidelines and family-focused care models.

Acute Pain Management Protocols in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

Pediatric pain has historically been difficult to assess and even more difficult to treat. It is encouraging that there is current research regarding pain control in pediatric patients that provide evidence for treating pediatric pain. Patients in a pediatric intensive care setting demonstrate a great deal of patient variability with regard to patient diagnosis, age, developmental level, weight, and amount of pain control needed. The use of an evidence-based protocol for pediatric pain control can decrease variability in pain control and decrease potential adverse effects such as respiratory depression, constipation, withdrawal, delirium, and developmental delays while allowing for patient variability.

Validation of the withdrawal assessment tool-1 (WAT-1) in pediatric cardiovascular patients on an inpatient unit

PURPOSE

Sedation and analgesia are administered to critically ill patients, which may result in physical dependence and subsequent iatrogenic withdrawal. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) was developed and validated as an objective measurement of pediatric iatrogenic withdrawal in intensive care units (ICUs), with a WAT-1 score ≥ 3 indicative of withdrawal. This study's objectives were to test interrater reliability and validity of the WAT-1 in pediatric cardiovascular patients in a non-ICU setting.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This prospective observational cohort study was conducted on a pediatric cardiac inpatient unit. WAT-1 assessments were performed by the patient's nurse and a blinded expert nurse rater. Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated, and Kappa statistics were estimated. A two-sample, one-sided test of proportions of weaning (n = 30) and nonweaning (n = 30) patients with a WAT-1 ≥3 were compared.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was low (K = 0.132). The WAT-1 area under the receiver operating curve was 0.764 (95% confidence interval; ± 0.123). There was a significantly higher proportion (50%, p = 0.009) of weaning patients with WAT-1 scores ≥3 compared to the nonweaning patients (10%). The WAT-1 elements of moderate/severe uncoordinated/repetitive movement and loose, watery stools were significantly higher in the weaning population.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Methods to improve interrater reliability warrant further examination. The WAT-1 had good discrimination at identifying withdrawal in cardiovascular patients on an acute cardiac care unit. Frequent nurse re-education may increase accurate tool use. The WAT-1 tool may be used in the management of iatrogenic withdrawal in pediatric cardiovascular patients in a non-ICU setting.

Incidence of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and associated factors in surgical pediatric intensive care

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) is a complication of prolonged sedation/analgesia in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients. The epidemiology of IWS is poorly understood, as validated diagnostic tools are rarely used. The main objective of our study was to use the WAT-1 score to assess the incidence of IWS in our unit. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the consequences of IWS, associated factors, and management modalities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From July 2018 to January 2019, 48 children receiving endotracheal ventilation and sedation/analgesia by continuous infusion (>48 h) of benzodiazepines and/or opioids were included. As soon as sedation/analgesia was decreased and until 72 h after its complete discontinuation, the WAT-1 score was determined every 12 h. Substitution therapy was used for 98% of patients upon opioid and/or benzodiazepine withdrawal. IWS was defined as a WAT-1 score ≥3. Factors associated with IWS were assessed by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

IWS occurred in 25 (52%) patients. IWS was associated with a higher number of ventilator-associated pneumonia episodes (17 [68%] vs. one [4%]) and a longer PICU stay (13 [7; 25] vs. 9.0 [5.0; 10.5]) (p<0.001). Overall, 11 patients developed IWS after less than 5 days of sedation/analgesia. Severe head injury was associated with IWS (p = 0.03). Neither sedation discontinuation nor IWS prevention was standardized.

CONCLUSION

The high incidence and adverse consequences of IWS require improved prevention. Risk groups should be defined and a standardized withdrawal protocol established. The occurrence of IWS should be monitored routinely using a validated score.

Is ketamine infusion effective and safe as an adjuvant of sedation in the PICU? Results from the Ketamine Infusion Sedation Study (KISS)

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine in ensuring comfort and sparing conventional drugs when used as an adjuvant for analgesia and sedation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) as a continuous infusion (≥12 h).

DESIGN

Observational prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care-center PICU.

PATIENTS

All consecutive patients <18 years who received ketamine for ≥12 h between January 2019 and July 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

ketamine infusion for ≥12 h.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients (median age 16 months, Interquartile Range (IQR) 7-43) were enrolled. Twenty-six percent of patients (n = 20) were paralyzed, while 74% (n = 57) were not. The median infusion duration was 90 h (IQR 39-193), with doses between 15 (IQR 15-20) and 30 μg/kg/min (IQR 20-50). At 24 h of ketamine infusion, values of COMFORT-B-Scale (CBS) were significantly lower compared with values pre-ketamine (p < 0.001). Simultaneously, doses/kg/h of opioids and benzodiazepines significantly decreased at 24 h (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), while doses/kg/h of propofol (p = 0.500) and dexmedetomidine (p = 0.072) did not significantly change. Seventy-four percent of non-paralyzed patients (42/57) had a decrease in CBS ≥2 points with no increase of concomitant analgosedation drugs. Among paralyzed patients (n = 20), 13 (65%) had no increase of concomitant analgosedation within 24 h after ketamine initiation. Overall, 55/77 (71%) of patients responded to ketamine. The mean and maximum ketamine infusion dosages were significantly higher in the non-responders (p = 0.021 and 0.028, respectively). Eleven patients had adverse events potentially related to ketamine (hypersalivation, systemic hypertension, dystonia/dyskinesia, tachycardia, and agitation) and six patients required intervention (dose reduction, suspension, or pharmacologic therapy). None of the patients developed delirium during ketamine infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Ketamine used as a continuous infusion in the PICU might represent a valid strategy to ensure comfort and spare opioids and benzodiazepines in difficult-to-sedate PICU patients. Adverse events are minor and easily reversible. Future study will be needed to investigate long-term outcomes.

Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in Critically Ill Neonates: A Review of Mechanisms, Assessment, Management, and Prevention

Considering that neonatal pain is a relevant matter given its implications and consequences, many neonates, particularly those undergoing critical care, are subjected to analgo-sedation therapies, which commonly includes treatment with opioids and benzodiazepines. These drugs, however, can induce tolerance and dependency, leading to the development of the so-called iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) which is observed following discontinuation of these therapeutic agents particularly when utilized for a prolonged period of time (≥5 days). IWS consists of signs and symptoms manifested especially in young children, such as term and premature newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit, who are less capable of metabolizing and eliminating these drugs, compared with older patients. In this study, we review assessment tools that were developed to identify, evaluate, and manage children affected by IWS. The studies reviewed demonstrate that optimal management of IWS includes consideration of alternate routes of drug administration, the need for adequate time for drug tapering, and also the presence of planned rescue therapy when encountering cases refractory to ongoing management. Equally important is prevention of IWS which can be accomplished with the implementation of drug rotation protocols and, adherence to evidenced-based guidelines which facilitate an overall decline in the use and duration of opioids and benzodiazepines. Finally, our review strongly supports the need for more research on IWS in neonates given their increased susceptibility and sparse published data for this age group.

Lived Experiences of Delirium in Critically Ill Children: A Qualitative Study

The aim of this study was to understand the lived experiences of delirium in critically ill children. We conducted phenomenological qualitative interviews with critically ill pediatric survivors aged 0 to 18 years who had experienced delirium, along with their family caregivers and health care providers, from pediatric intensive care units in two tertiary care children's hospitals in Canada. Cases were identified if they had a Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) score of ≥ 9 for at least 48 hours. Thirteen interviews were conducted, representing 10 index patients with delirium (age range: 7 weeks to 17 years). Participants shared experiences that were divided into themes of delirium symptoms, the impact of delirium, and their experience with the care of delirium. Within each theme, subthemes were identified. Symptoms of delirium included hallucinations, fluctuating symptoms, and lack of eye contact. Children were often described as “not himself/herself.” Delirium had long-lasting impact on patients; memories remained prominent even after the hospital stay. Family members and health care providers often felt helpless and ill-prepared to manage delirium. The delirium experience had significant impact on loved ones, causing persistent and vicarious suffering after the critical illness course. Family members and health care providers prioritized nonpharmacological strategies, family presence, and education as key strategies for delirium management. The lived experience of delirium in both infants and older children is physically, psychologically, and emotionally distressing. Given the traumatic long-term consequences, there is an urgent need to target delirium education, management, and prevention to improve long-term outcomes in PICU survivors and their families.

Trial Registration number: NCT04168515.

Patient-Specific Factors Associated with Dexmedetomidine Dose Requirements in Critically Ill Children

The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-specific factors associated with dexmedetomidine dose requirements during continuous infusion. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of electronic health record-derived data spanning 10 years for patients admitted with a primary respiratory diagnosis at a quaternary children's hospital and who received a dexmedetomidine continuous infusion (n = 346 patients) was conducted. Penalized regression was used to select demographic, clinical, and medication characteristics associated with a median daily dexmedetomidine dose. Identified characteristics were included in multivariable linear regression models and sensitivity analyses. Critically ill children had a median hourly dexmedetomidine dose of 0.5 mcg/kg/h (range: 0.1–1.8), median daily dose of 6.7 mcg/kg/d (range: 0.9–38.4), and median infusion duration of 1.6 days (range: 0.25–5.0). Of 26 variables tested, 15 were selected in the final model with days of dexmedetomidine infusion (β: 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6, 2.3), median daily morphine milligram equivalents dosing (mg/kg/d) (β: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.5), median daily ketamine dosing (mg/kg/d) (β: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.3), male sex (β: −1.1; 95% CI: −2.0, −0.2), and non-Black reported race (β: −1.2; 95% CI: −2.3, −0.08) significantly associated with median daily dexmedetomidine dose. Approximately 56% of dose variability was explained by the model. Readily obtainable information such as demographics, concomitant medications, and duration of infusion accounts for over half the variability in dexmedetomidine dosing. Identified factors, as well as additional environmental and genetic factors, warrant investigation in future studies to inform precision dosing strategies.

Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatric Patients

The optimal management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the pediatric population has not been well studied. There are a limited number of research articles studying the management of TBI in children. Given the prevalence of severe TBI in the pediatric population, it is crucial to develop a reference TBI management plan for this vulnerable population. In this review, we seek to delineate the differences between severe TBI management in adults and children. Additionally, we also discuss the known molecular pathogenesis of TBI. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of TBI will inform clinical management and development of therapeutics. Finally, we propose a clinical algorithm for the management and treatment of severe TBI in children using published data.

2022 Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines on Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients With Consideration of the ICU Environment and Early Mobility

RATIONALE

A guideline that both evaluates current practice and provides recommendations to address sedation, pain, and delirium management with regard for neuromuscular blockade and withdrawal is not currently available.

OBJECTIVE

To develop comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for critically ill infants and children, with specific attention to seven domains of care including pain, sedation/agitation, iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment, and early mobility.

DESIGN

The Society of Critical Care Medicine Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility Guideline Taskforce was comprised of 29 national experts who collaborated from 2009 to 2021 via teleconference and/or e-mail at least monthly for planning, literature review, and guideline development, revision, and approval. The full taskforce gathered annually in-person during the Society of Critical Care Medicine Congress for progress reports and further strategizing with the final face-to-face meeting occurring in February 2020. Throughout this process, the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures Manual for Guidelines development was adhered to.

METHODS

Taskforce content experts separated into subgroups addressing pain/analgesia, sedation, tolerance/iatrogenic withdrawal, neuromuscular blockade, delirium, PICU environment (family presence and sleep hygiene), and early mobility. Subgroups created descriptive and actionable Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome questions. An experienced medical information specialist developed search strategies to identify relevant literature between January 1990 and January 2020. Subgroups reviewed literature, determined quality of evidence, and formulated recommendations classified as "strong" with "we recommend" or "conditional" with "we suggest." Good practice statements were used when indirect evidence supported benefit with no or minimal risk. Evidence gaps were noted. Initial recommendations were reviewed by each subgroup and revised as deemed necessary prior to being disseminated for voting by the full taskforce. Individuals who had an overt or potential conflict of interest abstained from relevant votes. Expert opinion alone was not used in substitution for a lack of evidence.

RESULTS

The Pediatric Pain, Agitation, Neuromuscular Blockade, and Delirium in critically ill pediatric patients with consideration of the PICU Environment and Early Mobility taskforce issued 44 recommendations (14 strong and 30 conditional) and five good practice statements.

CONCLUSIONS

The current guidelines represent a comprehensive list of practical clinical recommendations for the assessment, prevention, and management of key aspects for the comprehensive critical care of infants and children. Main areas of focus included 1) need for the routine monitoring of pain, agitation, withdrawal, and delirium using validated tools, 2) enhanced use of protocolized sedation and analgesia, and 3) recognition of the importance of nonpharmacologic interventions for enhancing patient comfort and comprehensive care provision.

Suspected benzodiazepine withdrawal-associated seizures in 3 young dogs undergoing mechanical ventilation

OBJECTIVE

To describe new onset of generalized seizures in 3 young dogs following cessation of a benzodiazepine-containing sedation protocol to facilitate mechanical ventilation (MV) for hypoxemia.

SERIES SUMMARY

Three dogs under 5 months of age underwent MV due to severe hypoxemia. All 3 dogs were sedated with a constant rate infusion of benzodiazepines as part of their sedation protocol to facilitate MV. All 3 dogs had an acute onset of generalized seizures within 36 hours of sedation cessation and weaning from MV. All 3 dogs' seizures were successfully managed with a slow, tapering course of benzodiazepines. One dog was additionally treated with levetiracetam at the time of initial seizure activity, which was discontinued 1 year following discharge and absence of ongoing seizure activity. All 3 dogs were discharged successfully with no reports of ongoing seizures or neurologic deficits after discharge.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

Young dogs managed with benzodiazepines to facilitate MV may have acute onset of generalized seizures following cessation, which can be successfully managed with short-term benzodiazepine therapy. The 3 cases in this series demonstrated a positive outcome and were successfully managed following acute onset of generalized seizure activity post-MV.

The Withdrawal Assessment Tool to identify iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms in critically ill paediatric patients: A COSMIN systematic review of measurement properties

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) is one of the most widely used clinician-reported outcome measures to evaluate iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms (IWS) in critically ill children. However, the WAT-1's measurement properties have not been aggregated. Aggregating psychometric research on the WAT-1 will enhance appropriate use, and outline gaps for future empirical research. The aim of this systematic review is to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the measurement properties and evidence quality, and describe the interpretability and feasibility of the WAT-1 for identifying IWS symptoms in critically ill children.

METHODS

A systematic search of Medline, Embase and CINAHL was conducted from inception to 15 April 2020. Study inclusion/exclusion, data extraction, and measurement property evidence and the modified GRADE quality scoring were applied according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the review. There was sufficient, high-quality evidence for reliability, structural validity, criterion validity, measurement error, construct validity, and feasibility. More information is required to support the WAT-1's content validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and interpretability according to COSMIN guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review indicate that the WAT-1 is a precise, easy to use measure of IWS in critically ill children despite some measurement property inconsistencies and gaps in the publication record. More information is required to support its content validity, responsiveness, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, and interpretability.

Maternal and iatrogenic neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: Differences and similarities in recognition, management, and consequences

Opioids are potent analgesics used to manage pain in both young and old, but the increased use in the pregnant population has significant individual and societal implications. Infants dependent on opioids, either through maternal or iatrogenic exposure, undergo neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS), where they may experience withdrawal symptoms ranging from mild to severe. We present a detailed and original review of NOWS caused by maternal opioid exposure (mNOWS) and iatrogenic opioid intake (iNOWS). While these two entities have been assessed entirely separately, recognition and treatment of the clinical manifestations of NOWS overlap. Neonatal risk factors such as age, genetic predisposition, drug type, and clinical factors like type of opioid, cumulative dose of opioid exposure, and disease status affect the incidence of both mNOWS and iNOWS, as well as their severity. Recognition of withdrawal is dependent on clinical assessment of symptoms, and the use of clinical assessment tools designed to determine the need for pharmacotherapy. Treatment of NOWS relies on a combination of non-pharmacological therapies and pharmacological options. Long-term consequences of opioids and NOWS continue to generate controversy, with some evidence of anatomic brain changes, but conflicting animal and human clinical evidence of significant cognitive or behavioral impacts on school-age children. We highlight the current knowledge on clinically relevant recognition, treatment, and consequences of NOWS, and identify new advances in clinical management of the neonate. This review brings a unique clinical perspective and critically analyzes gaps between the clinical problem and our preclinical understanding of NOWS.

Dexmedetomidine and Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome in Critically Ill Children

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome is a well-known adverse effect of sedatives and analgesics commonly used in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit, with an incidence of up to 64.6%. When standard sedative and analgesic treatment is inadequate, dexmedetomidine may be added. The effect of supplemental dexmedetomidine on iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the potentially preventive effect of dexmedetomidine, used as a supplement to standard morphine and midazolam regimens, on the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used data from patients on a 10-bed general pediatric intensive care unit. Iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome was measured using the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms-scale.

RESULTS

In a sample of 102 patients, the cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine had no preventive effect on the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (P = .19). After correction for the imbalance in the baseline characteristics between patients who did and did not receive dexmedetomidine, the cumulative dose of midazolam was found to be a significant risk factor for iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (P < .03).

CONCLUSION

In this study, supplemental dexmedetomidine had no preventive effect on iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in patients receiving sedative treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit. The cumulative dose of midazolam was a significant risk factor for iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.

Protocolized Sedative Weaning vs Usual Care in Pediatric Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Aims

The prolonged use of benzodiazepines and opioids can lead to an increase in the incidence of withdrawal syndrome. One of the known risk factors is the lack of a sedative-weaning protocol. This study established a sedative-weaning protocol and compared this protocol with the usual care of weaning in high-risk critically ill children.

Materials and methods

This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial in a tertiary-care hospital. We recruited children aged 1 month to 18 years who had received intravenous sedative or analgesic drugs for at least 5 days. The exclusion criteria were patients who had already experienced the withdrawal syndrome. We established a weaning protocol. Eligible patients were randomly divided into the protocolized (intervention) and usual care (control) groups. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of the withdrawal syndrome compared between two groups.

Results

Thirty eligible patients were enrolled (19 in the intervention and 11 in the control group). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between both the groups. The prevalence of the withdrawal syndrome was 84% and 81% of patients in the intervention and control group, respectively. The duration of the initial weaning phase was shorter in the intervention group than in the control group (p value = 0.026). The cumulative dose of morphine solution for rescue therapy in the intervention group was statistically lower than that in the control group (p value = 0.016).

Conclusion

The implementation of the sedative-weaning protocol led to a significant reduction in the percentage of withdrawal days and length of intensive care unit stay without any adverse drug reactions. External validation would be needed to validate this protocol.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT03018977

How to cite this article

Tiacharoen D, Lertbunrian R, Veawpanich J, Suppalarkbunlue N, Anantasit N. Protocolized Sedative Weaning vs Usual Care in Pediatric Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(6):451–458.

Assessment and treatment of the withdrawal syndrome in paediatric intensive care units: Systematic review

BACKGROUND

Sedoanalgesia secondary iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (IWS) in paediatric intensive units is frequent and its assessment is complex. Therapies are heterogeneous, and there is currently no gold standard method for diagnosis. In addition, the assessment scales validated in children are scarce. This paper aims to identify and describe both the paediatric diagnostic and assessment tools for the IWS and the treatments for the IWS in critically ill paediatric patients.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. This review included descriptive and observational studies published since 2000 that analyzed paediatric scales for the evaluation of the iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and its treatments. The eligibility criteria included neonates, newborns, infants, pre-schoolers, and adolescents, up to age 18, who were admitted to the paediatric intensive care units with continuous infusion of hypnotics and/or opioid analgesics, and who presented signs or symptoms of deprivation related to withdrawal and prolonged infusion of sedoanalgesia.

RESULTS

Three assessment scales were identified: Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1, Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms, and Opioid and Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Score. Dexmedetomidine, methadone and clonidine were revealed as options for the treatment and prevention of the iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. Finally, the use of phenobarbital suppressed symptoms of deprivation that are resistant to other drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The reviewed scales facilitate the assessment of the iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and have a high diagnostic quality. However, its clinical use is very rare. The treatments identified in this review prevent and effectively treat this syndrome. The use of validated iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome assessment scales in paediatrics clinical practice facilitates assessment, have a high diagnostic quality, and should be encouraged, also ensuring nurses' training in their usage.

Increased Severity of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Associated With Concomitant Antenatal Opioid and Benzodiazepine Exposure

BACKGROUND

Polysubstance use is common among opioid-using women, yet its association with pharmacotherapy for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) remains unclear. We hypothesized that benzodiazepine exposure would increase risk of an infant developing pharmacologically treated NAS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of maternal-infant dyads enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid, using individual-level data linkage of vital records and administrative (ie, outpatient, inpatient, and prescription) data from 2009 to 2011. These data underwent chart review from 2013 to 2016 to obtain clinically relevant exposure data (eg, toxicology testing). The association of antenatal exposures with pharmacologically treated NAS was evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for maternal and infant factors and clustered by hospital.

RESULTS

Among 112 029 maternal-infant dyads, we confirmed 822 cases of NAS, of which 598 (72.7%) were cases of pharmacologically treated NAS. Infants who developed pharmacologically treated NAS were more likely to have been exposed to antenatal benzodiazepines compared with infants with confirmed NAS not treated pharmacologically (40.9% vs 30.8%; P = .008). In adjusted analyses, benzodiazepine exposure was associated with greater risk of developing pharmacologically treated NAS (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% confidence interval: 1.04-2.21). Alternatively, exposure to tobacco, marijuana, cocaine, gabapentin, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were not associated with increased risk of developing pharmacologically treated NAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a population of infants with intrauterine polysubstance exposure, benzodiazepine exposure was an independent predictor of an infant developing pharmacologically treated NAS. Obtaining history of antenatal benzodiazepine exposure among opioid-exposed infants may allow for risk stratification and development of personalized care plans.

The sedation practices of paediatric intensive care unit nurses and the influencing factors in China

Nurses play a key role in administering sedation to mechanically ventilated children, which impacts children's psychological, physiological and cognitive changes in the paediatric intensive care unit. This study aimed to survey the sedation practices of paediatric intensive care unit nurses on mechanically ventilated children in China and explored the influencing factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted based on electronic questionnaires comprised of the Nurse Sedation Practices Scale (Chinese version) in 14 different types of paediatric intensive care units of 11 academic hospitals in China from 15 February to 15 April 2017. A convenience sample of 495 nurses [73·4% response rate, (674)] completed the survey. Seven units applied Ramsay Sedation Scale as a sedative assessment tool. The majority of the nurses used observed behaviours and physiological changes of the ventilated children as indicators to assess the sedation level, and they had a positive attitude and intention, which may influence practice positively, whereas high clinical workload and the lack of communication between the nurses and families might hinder practice. The practice of sedation varied greatly in different regions, and the respondents of the northwest region scored lower. Paediatric nurses in China rarely used a validated paediatric instrument to assess sedation, and most nurses relied on physiological and behavioural cues. The quality of sedation training, nursing workload and regional economic disparity affected the sedation practice. The restricted visiting policy and lack of clearly defined nursing responsibilities around sedation may hinder effective sedation assessment and management. This study found that there was no paediatric-validated tool popularized in paediatric intensive care units in China and explored influencing factors. We suggest that a validated tool, high-quality training and hospital's policy, such as visiting regulation, should be promoted to improve the sedation practice.

Sedation Management for Critically Ill Children with Pre-Existing Cognitive Impairment

OBJECTIVE

To compare current analgesia and sedation management practices between critically ill children with pre-existing cognitive impairment and critically ill neurotypical children, including possible indicators of therapeutic efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN

This study used secondary analysis of prospective data from the RESTORE clinical trial, with 2449 children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit and receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Subjects with a baseline Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category ≥3 were defined as subjects with cognitive impairment, and differences between groups were explored using regression methods accounting for pediatric intensive care unit as a cluster variable.

RESULTS

This study identified 412 subjects (17%) with cognitive impairment. Compared with neurotypical subjects, subjects with cognitive impairment were older (median, years, 6.2 vs 1.4; P < .001) with more severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (40% vs 33%; P = .009). They received significantly lower cumulative doses of opioids (median, mg/kg, 14.2 vs 16.2; P < .001) and benzodiazepines (10.6 vs 14.4; P < .001). Three nonverbal subjects with cognitive impairment received no analgesia or sedation. Subjects with cognitive impairment were assessed as having more study days awake and calm and fewer study days with an episode of pain. They were less likely to be assessed as having inadequate pain/sedation management or unplanned endotracheal/invasive tube removal. Subjects with cognitive impairment had more documented iatrogenic withdrawal symptoms than neurotypical subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with cognitive impairment in this study received less medication, but it is unclear whether they have authentically lower analgesic and/or sedative requirements or are vulnerable to inadequate assessment of discomfort because of the lack of validated assessment tools. We recommend the development of pain and sedation assessment tools specific to this patient population.

Opioid tapering and weaning protocols in pediatric critical care units: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Opioid abstinence syndrome is common in the pediatric intensive care environment because sedation is often needed during the children's treatment. There is no specific guideline regarding the management of these patients; and lately, methadone is an important drug for the prevention of abstinence symptoms during the weaning of opioids. This study gathers the available research to establish the initial dose of methadone, the rate of taper and tools to recognize this syndrome and act promptly.

METHODS

A systematic review was made from data of four different databases. Forty-nine articles of observational and experimental studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria (critical pediatric patients in acute use of opioids) and exclusion criteria (previous chronic use of opioids, other medications). The data regarding specific themes were separated in sections: initial dose of methadone, use of protocols in clinical practice, abstinence scales and adjuvant drugs.

RESULTS

The articles showed a great heterogeneity of ways to calculate the initial dose of methadone. The pediatric intensive care units of the study had different weaning protocols, with a lower incidence of abstinence when a pre-defined sequence of tapering was used. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool - 1 was the most used scale for tapering the opioids, with good sensitivity and specificity for signs and symptoms.

CONCLUSION

There is still little evidence of other medications that can help prevent the abstinence syndrome of opioids. This study tries to promote a better practice during opioid weaning.

Evaluation of IV to Enteral Benzodiazepine Conversion Calculations in a Pediatric Intensive Care Setting

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate if institutionally established calculations for transitioning continuous IV midazolam to enteral benzodiazepines maintain Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 scores equal to or less than preconversion values.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of benzodiazepine conversion calculations embedded within an institution-specific clinical pathway for sedation and weaning of mechanically ventilated pediatric patients.

SETTING

A 55-bed, mixed-medical, noncardiac surgical PICU in a tertiary care children's hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients age 6 months to 18 years who received continuous midazolam for 5 days or longer while mechanically ventilated for 5-21 days and were then converted to either enteral diazepam or lorazepam following extubation (or return to baseline ventilator settings in tracheostomy-dependent patients) between January 1, 2015, and June 30, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Benzodiazepine conversion calculations were applied according to institutional clinical pathway guidance.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 scores were compared pre and post benzodiazepine conversion. Patient demographics, benzodiazepine dose escalations, as needed benzodiazepine requirements, and severe adverse events within 48 hours of conversion were assessed. Seventy-one patient encounters were analyzed (median age, 2.5 yr; interquartile range, 1.2-5.3). The median Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 scores pre conversion and post conversion were not significantly different (1 [interquartile range, 0.75-2] and 1 [interquartile range, 0.25-2], respectively, p = 0.1). As needed benzodiazepine doses were administered in 38% of encounters post conversion, but escalation of a scheduled enteral benzodiazepine regimen was only required in 2.8% of encounters. Post conversion, one patient (1.4%) had increased seizure activity, and four patients (5.6%) required fluid boluses secondary to tachycardia or dehydration, but not hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that standardized benzodiazepine conversions successfully achieved consistent Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 scores compared with preconversion values. Severe adverse events associated with oversedation and/or withdrawal were minimal and confounded by underlying disease states.

In Vitro Adsorption of Analgosedative Drugs in New Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuits

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate drug disposition of sedatives and analgesics in the Xenios/Novalung extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.

DESIGN

In vitro experimental study.

SETTING

Erasmus MC - Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

Nine closed-loop extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits, made up of the iLA Activve console with four different iLA Activve kits: two X-lung kits, two iLA-Activve iLA kits, two MiniLung kits, and three MiniLung petite kits.

INTERVENTIONS

The circuits were primed with fresh whole blood and maintained under physiologic conditions (pH/temperature) throughout 24 hours. Paracetamol, morphine, midazolam, fentanyl, and sufentanil were injected as standard age-related doses into nine closed-loop extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pre-membrane (P2) blood samples were obtained prior to drug injection and after injection at 2, 10, 30, 180, 360 minutes, and at 24 hours. A control sample at 2 minutes was collected for spontaneous drug degradation testing at 24 hours. Two hundred sixteen samples were analyzed. After correction for the spontaneous drug degradation, the mean drug loss at 24 hours was paracetamol 49%, morphine 51%, midazolam 40%, fentanyl 84%, sufentanil 83%. Spontaneous degradation was paracetamol 6%, morphine 0%, midazolam 11%, fentanyl 4%, and sufentanil 0%. The decline of drug concentration over time was more pronounced for the more lipophilic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of highly lipophilic drugs in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits at 24 hours was remarkable. Drug loss is comparable with other hollow fiber extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems but less than in silicone-based membranes especially in the first hours after injection.

Interprofessional Team's Perception of Care Delivery After Implementation of a Pediatric Pain and Sedation Protocol

BACKGROUND

Pain and agitation are common experiences of patients in pediatric cardiac intensive care units. Variability in assessments by health care providers, communication, and treatment of pain and agitation creates challenges in management of pain and sedation.

OBJECTIVES

To develop guidelines for assessment and treatment of pain, agitation, and delirium in the pediatric cardiac intensive unit in an academic children's hospital and to document the effects of implementation of the guidelines on the interprofessional team's perception of care delivery and team function.

METHODS

Before and after implementation of the guidelines, interprofessional team members were surveyed about the members' perception of analgesia, sedation, and delirium management RESULTS: Members of the interprofessional team felt more comfortable with pain and sedation management after implementation of the guidelines. Team members reported improvements in team communication on patients' comfort. Members thought that important information was less likely to be lost during transfer of care. They also noted that the team carried out comfort management plans and used pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies better after implementation of the guidelines than they did before implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines for pain and sedation management were associated with perceived improvements in team function and patient care by members of the interprofessional team.

Prolonged Dexmedetomidine Infusion and Drug Withdrawal In Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVE

To characterise the incidence, symptoms and risk factors for withdrawal associated with prolonged dexmedetomidine infusion in paediatric critically ill patients.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review in the paediatric intensive care unit and the cardiac critical care unit of a single tertiary children's hospital. Patients up to 18 years old, who received dexmedetomidine for longer than 48 hours were included.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients accounted for 68 unique dexmedetomidine treatment courses of more than 48 hours. We identified 24 separate episodes of withdrawal in the 68 dexmedetomidine courses (incidence 35%). Of these episodes 38% occurred in patients who were weaned from dexmedetomidine alone while the remaining occurred in patients who had concurrent weans of opioids and/or benzodiazepines. Most common symptoms were agitation, fever, vomiting/retching, loose stools and decreased sleep. The symptoms occurred during the latter part of the wean or after discontinuation of dexmedetomidine. A cumulative dose of dexmedetomidine of 107 mcg/kg prior to initiation of wean was more likely associated with withdrawal (this equates to a dexmedetomidine infusion running at 1 mcg/kg/hr over 4 days). Duration of opioid use was an additional risk factor for withdrawal. The use of clonidine, as a transition from dexmedetomidine, did not protect against withdrawal (p = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

A withdrawal syndrome may occur after prolonged infusion of dexmedetomidine. As all our patients were also exposed to opioids this may be affected by the duration of opioid use. We identified a cumulative dose of 107 micrograms/kg of dexmedetomidine beyond which withdrawal symptoms were more likely (which equates to 4 days of use at a dose of 1 mcg/kg/hr). A protocol for weaning should be considered in this circumstance.

Opioid and Benzodiazepine Weaning in Pediatric Patients: Review of Current Literature

Pediatric opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal are avoidable complications of pain and sedation management that is well described in the literature. To prevent withdrawal from occurring, practitioners regularly use a steady decrease of pain and sedation medications, also known as a weaning or tapering schedule. The weaning schedule is highly variable based on clinician preference and is usually dependent on the clinician. The purposes of this review are to evaluate the current literature on the process of opioid and benzodiazepine weaning in pediatric patients and to assess the various standardized protocols used to decrease withdrawal occurrences. We conducted a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Academic Search Premier, and PsycInfo databases. Studies were included if they described a wean or taper in pediatric patients aged 18 years or younger. Studies describing neonatal abstinence syndrome were excluded from the review. A total of 97 studies published between 2000 and 2014 were retrieved; of those, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. Studies were evaluated for selection of withdrawal assessment tool, wean protocol summary, preferred weaning agents, benzodiazepine withdrawal, and wean-at-home regimen. The most common opioid-weaning protocol approaches described a 10-20% dose decrease per day. Benzodiazepine weaning was not regularly standardized or described. The use of a standardized opioid-weaning protocol reduced withdrawal rates compared with nonstandardized weaning plans. Benzodiazepine weaning was inconsistently evaluated and may have affected study outcomes. Identified areas of improvement include the use of newer withdrawal assessment tools validated in the older pediatric population and standardized withdrawal assessment and reporting.

Considerations for pediatric burn sedation and analgesia

Burn patients experience anxiety and pain in the course of their injury, treatment, and recovery. Hence, treatment of anxiety and pain is paramount after burn injury. Children, in particular, pose challenges in anxiety and pain management due to their unique physiologic, psychologic, and anatomic status. Burn injuries further complicate pain management and sedation as such injuries can have effects on medication response and elimination. Burn injuries further complicate pain management and sedation as such injuries can have effects on medication response and elimination. The purpose of this review is to describe the challenges associated with management of anxiety, pain, and sedation in burned children and to describe the different options for treatment of anxiety and pain in burned children.

Iatrogenic Opioid Withdrawal in Critically Ill Patients: A Review of Assessment Tools and Management

OBJECTIVE

To (1) provide an overview of the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and risk factors of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients and (2) conduct a literature review of assessment and management of iatrogenic opioid withdrawal in critically ill patients.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (1946-June 2017), EMBASE (1974-June 2017), and CINAHL (1982-June 2017) with the terms opioid withdrawal, opioid, opiate, critical care, critically ill, assessment tool, scale, taper, weaning, and management. Reference list of identified literature was searched for additional references as well as www.clinicaltrials.gov .

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We restricted articles to those in English and dealing with humans.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We identified 2 validated pediatric critically ill opioid withdrawal assessment tools: (1) Withdrawal Assessment Tool-Version 1 (WAT-1) and (2) Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale (SOS). Neither tool differentiated between opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal. WAT-1 was evaluated in critically ill adults but not found to be valid. No other adult tool was identified. For management, we identified 5 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective studies, and 2 systematic reviews. Most studies were small and only 2 studies utilized a validated assessment tool. Enteral methadone, α-2 agonists, and protocolized weaning were studied.

CONCLUSION

We identified 2 validated assessment tools for pediatric intensive care unit patients; no valid tool for adults. Management strategies tested in small trials included methadone, α-2 agonists, and protocolized sedation/weaning. We challenge researchers to create validated tools assessing specifically for opioid withdrawal in critically ill children and adults to direct management.

Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 Monitoring in PICU: A Multicenter Study on Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Withdrawal syndrome is an adverse reaction of analgesic and sedative therapy, with a reported occurrence rate between 17% and 57% in critically ill children. Although some factors related to the development of withdrawal syndrome have been identified, there is weak evidence for the effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic strategies. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of withdrawal syndrome in Italian PICUs, using a validated instrument. We also analyzed differences in patient characteristics, analgesic and sedative treatment, and patients' outcome between patients with and without withdrawal syndrome.

DESIGN

Observational multicenter prospective study.

SETTING

Eight Italian PICUs belonging to the national PICU network Italian PICU network.

PATIENTS

One hundred thirteen patients, less than 18 years old, mechanically ventilated and treated with analgesic and sedative therapy for five or more days. They were admitted in PICU from November 2012 to May 2014.

INTERVENTIONS

Symptoms of withdrawal syndrome were monitored with Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 scale.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The occurrence rate of withdrawal syndrome was 64.6%. The following variables were significantly different between the patients who developed withdrawal syndrome and those who did not: type, duration, and cumulative dose of analgesic therapy; duration and cumulative dose of sedative therapy; clinical team judgment about analgesia and sedation's difficulty; and duration of analgesic weaning, mechanical ventilation, and PICU stay. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that patients receiving morphine as their primary analgesic were 83% less likely to develop withdrawal syndrome than those receiving fentanyl or remifentanil.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal syndrome was frequent in PICU patients, and patients with withdrawal syndrome had prolonged hospital treatment. We suggest adopting the lowest effective dose of analgesic and sedative drugs and frequent reevaluation of the need for continued use. Further studies are necessary to define common preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Clinical recommendations for pain, sedation, withdrawal and delirium assessment in critically ill infants and children: an ESPNIC position statement for healthcare professionals

Background

This position statement provides clinical recommendations for the assessment of pain, level of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium in critically ill infants and children. Admission to a neonatal or paediatric intensive care unit (NICU, PICU) exposes a child to a series of painful and stressful events. Accurate assessment of the presence of pain and non-pain-related distress (adequacy of sedation, iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium) is essential to good clinical management and to monitoring the effectiveness of interventions to relieve or prevent pain and distress in the individual patient.

Methods

A multidisciplinary group of experts was recruited from the members of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC). The group formulated clinical questions regarding assessment of pain and non-pain-related distress in critically ill and nonverbal children, and searched the PubMed/Medline, CINAHL and Embase databases for studies describing the psychometric properties of assessment instruments. Furthermore, level of evidence of selected studies was assigned and recommendations were formulated, and grade or recommendations were added on the basis of the level of evidence.

Results

An ESPNIC position statement was drafted which provides clinical recommendations on assessment of pain (n = 5), distress and/or level of sedation (n = 4), iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome (n = 3) and delirium (n = 3). These recommendations were based on the available evidence and consensus amongst the experts and other members of ESPNIC.

Conclusions

This multidisciplinary ESPNIC position statement guides professionals in the assessment and reassessment of the effectiveness of treatment interventions for pain, distress, inadequate sedation, withdrawal syndrome and delirium.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4344-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact of a Standardized Treatment Guideline for Pediatric Iatrogenic Opioid Dependence: A Quality Improvement Initiative

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether utilization of a hospital-based clinical practice guideline for the care of pediatric iatrogenic opioid dependence (IOD) would promote a decrease in opioid exposure and improve management of opioid abstinence syndrome (AS).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of critically ill patients from a tertiary care children's hospital. Inclusion criteria included mechanically ventilated patients up to 18 years of age who received continuous opioid infusions for at least 7 days and any length of methadone administration. Data on IOD patients from January 2005 to June 2010 was divided into 3 periods: baseline, phase 1, and phase 2. Primary outcome was decrease in opioid exposure, measured by methadone duration of use and any additional opioid bolus doses used in AS management. Documentation of additional opioid bolus doses was regarded as a surrogate measure of AS. Secondary outcomes included total cumulative fentanyl dose, continuous fentanyl infusion duration of use, and hospital and pediatric intensive care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in methadone duration of use in IOD patients from 15.3 ± 8.7 days at baseline to 9.5 ± 3.7 days during phase 1 (p = 0.002), to 8.1 ± 3.7 days on phase 2 (reduction not significant, p = 0.106) of this evaluation. Additional opioid bolus doses were significantly lower from baseline to phase 1 (5.5 ± 5.1 vs. 1.8 ± 2.3, p = 0.001) and from phase 1 to phase 2 (1.8 ± 2.3 vs. 0.2 ± 1.5, p = 0.003). For the remaining outcomes, differences were not observed among the evaluation periods, except for the total cumulative fentanyl dose, which was reduced from 2.8 ± 3.7 mg/kg at baseline to 1 ± 1 mg/kg only during phase 1 (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of a standardized, hospital-based clinical practice guideline for children with IOD reduced the length of exposure to opioids and improved opioid AS management.

Sedation in Critically Ill Children with Respiratory Failure

This article discusses the rationale of sedation in respiratory failure, sedation goals, how to assess the need for sedation as well as effectiveness of interventions in critically ill children, with validated observational sedation scales. The drugs and non-pharmacological approaches used for optimal sedation in ventilated children are reviewed, and specifically the rationale for drug selection, including short- and long-term efficacy and safety aspects of the selected drugs. The specific pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of sedative drugs in the critically ill child and consequences for dosing are presented. Furthermore, we discuss different sedation strategies and their adverse events, such as iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and delirium. These principles can guide clinicians in the choice of sedative drugs in pediatric respiratory failure.

Pediatric Withdrawal Identification and Management

Sedation administered by continuous intravenous infusion is commonly used in the pediatric intensive care unit to facilitate and maintain safe care of children during critical illness. Prolonged use of sedatives, including opioids, benzodiazepines, and potentially other adjunctive agents, is known to cause withdrawal symptoms when they are stopped abruptly or weaned quickly. In this review, the common signs and symptoms of opioid, benzodiazepine, and dexmedetomidine withdrawal will be discussed. Current tools used to measure withdrawal objectively, as well as withdrawal prevention and management strategies, will be discussed.

Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia management of critically ill children: a pilot study evaluating guideline impact and feasibility in the PICU

AIMS

The aim of this study was to develop and implement guidelines for sedation and analgesia management in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and evaluate the impact, feasibility and acceptability of these as part of a programme of research in this area and as a prelude to future trial work.

METHOD

This pilot study used a pre-post design using a historical control.

SETTING

Two PICUs at different hospitals in an Australian metropolitan city.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients admitted to the PICU and ventilated for ≥24 h, aged more than 1 month and not admitted for seizure management or terminal care.

INTERVENTION

Guidelines for sedation and analgesia management for critically ill children including algorithm and assessment tools.

OUTCOME VARIABLES

In addition to key outcome variables (ventilation time, medication dose and duration, length of stay), feasibility outcomes data (recruitment, data collection, safety) were evaluated. Guideline adherence was assessed through chart audit and staff were surveyed about merit and the use of guidelines.

RESULTS

The guidelines were trialled for a total of 12 months on 63 patients and variables compared with the historical control group (n=75). Analysis revealed differences in median Morphine infusion duration between groups (pretest 3.63 days (87 h) vs post-test 2.83 days (68 h), p=0.05) and maximum doses (pretest 120 μg/kg/h vs post-test 97.5 μg/kg/h) with no apparent change to ventilation duration. Chart audit revealed varied use of tools, but staff were positive about the guidelines and their use in practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The sedation guidelines impacted on the duration and dosage of agents without any apparent impact on ventilation duration or length of stay. Furthermore, the guidelines appeared to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice. The results of the study have laid the foundation for follow-up studies in withdrawal from sedation, point prevalence and longitudinal studies of sedation practices as well as drug trial work.

Risk factors associated with iatrogenic opioid and benzodiazepine withdrawal in critically ill pediatric patients: a systematic review and conceptual model

OBJECTIVES

Analgesia and sedation are common therapies in pediatric critical care, and rapid titration of these medications is associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify all common and salient risk factors associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome and build a conceptual model of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome risk in critically ill pediatric patients.

DATA SOURCES

Multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials, were searched using relevant terms from January 1, 1980, to August 1, 2014.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were included if they were published in English and discussed iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome following either opioid or benzodiazepine therapy in children in acute or intensive care settings. Articles were excluded if subjects were neonates born to opioid- or benzodiazepine-dependent mothers, children diagnosed as substance abusers, or subjects with cancer-related pain; if data about opioid or benzodiazepine treatment were not specified; or if primary data were not reported.

DATA EXTRACTION

In total, 1,395 articles were evaluated, 33 of which met the inclusion criteria. To facilitate analysis, all opioid and/or benzodiazepine doses were converted to morphine or midazolam equivalents, respectively. A table of evidence was developed for qualitative analysis of common themes, providing a framework for the construction of a conceptual model. The strongest risk factors associated with iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome include duration of therapy and cumulative dose. Additionally, evidence exists linking patient, process, and system factors in the development of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome.

FINDINGS

Most articles were prospective observational or interventional studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the state of existing evidence, well-designed prospective studies are required to better characterize iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome in critically ill pediatric patients. This review provides data to support the construction of a conceptual model of iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome risk that, if supported, could be useful in guiding future research.

High doses of benzodiazepine predict analgesic and sedative drug withdrawal syndrome in paediatric intensive care patients

AIM

Critically ill children can develop withdrawal syndrome after prolonged analgesia and sedation in a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU), when treatment is stopped abruptly or reduced quickly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of withdrawal syndrome in patients after three or more days of analgesic or sedative drug therapy, using a validated scale. We also analysed the association between withdrawal syndrome and the patients' outcome and factors related to analgesia and sedation treatment.

METHODS

This prospective observational study analysed 89 periods of weaning from analgesia and sedation in 60 children between October 2010 and October 2011. Of these, 65% were less than six months old and 45% were admitted to the PICU after heart surgery. Withdrawal syndrome was assessed using the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 (WAT-1) scale.

RESULTS

The incidence of withdrawal syndrome was 37%, and the only variable that predicted its presence was the highest administered dose of benzodiazepine. The duration of weaning, Sophia Observational Withdrawal Symptom scale score and nurse judgment were also associated with positive WAT-1 scores.

CONCLUSION

Withdrawal syndrome should be considered after three or more days of analgesic or sedative treatment. A high dose of benzodiazepine increases the risk of developing withdrawal symptoms.

Sedation and analgesia in critically ill children

The interplay of pain, discomfort, and fear can cause agitation in critically ill children. Therefore, sedation and analgesia are essential components in the intensive care unit setting and are best managed with a multidisciplinary team approach. No one standard approach exists to assess and manage pain and anxiety. Many tools are available for the assessment of pain and sedation, but each tool has its advantages and disadvantages. Clinicians should consider adopting a validated tool for routine continuous assessment. Multiple pharmacological therapies are available to manage pain, anxiety, fear, and agitation. Dosing of these agents can be influenced by age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. Agents should be selected on the basis of the child's disease state, desired level of sedation, and cardiac and respiratory status.

Psychometric evaluation of the Sophia Observation withdrawal symptoms scale in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

The Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale is an instrument for screening benzodiazepine and opioid withdrawal syndrome in pediatric critical care patients. The objectives of this study were to establish cutoff scores and to test sensitivity to change. Second, risk factors for withdrawal syndrome were explored.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study with repeated measures.

SETTING

Level IV ICU at a university children's hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 154 children with median age 5 months (interquartile range, 0-42 mo) who received continuous infusion of benzodiazepines and/or opioids for 5 or more days.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Nurses repeatedly applied the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale and the Numeric Rating Scale withdrawal when children were weaned off benzodiazepines and opioids. The latter represents the nurse's expert opinion. We analyzed 3,754 paired assessments; the median number per child was 15 (interquartile range, 7-31) over a median of 5 days (interquartile range, 3-11 d). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 and 0.93, respectively, for the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale cutoff score of 4 or higher against a Numeric Rating Scale-withdrawal score of 4 or higher. Sensitivity to change was determined by comparing 156 Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale assessments (n = 51 patients) before and after additional sedatives or opioids. Multilevel regression analysis showed a mean decline of 1.5 points (at score range 0-15) after intervention (p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified duration of preweaning of midazolam, duration of weaning of midazolam, duration of preweaning of morphine, duration of weaning of morphine, and number of additional sedatives/opioids as statistically significant risk factors for withdrawal syndrome in these children.

CONCLUSIONS

The Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale is a valid tool with good psychometric properties to assess withdrawal symptoms in PICU patients.

Babies breaking bad: neonatal and iatrogenic withdrawal syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will summarize the symptoms, evaluation, and treatment of neonatal and iatrogenic withdrawal syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Buprenorphine is emerging as the drug of choice for maintaining opioid-dependent women during pregnancy, because of its association with less severe withdrawal symptoms. Recent findings suggest it may be the drug of choice for treating the opioid-exposed neonate as well.

SUMMARY

Healthcare workers should be cognizant of the risk factors for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), as well as its symptoms, so that nonpharmalogic and pharmacologic therapies can be initiated. With increased emphasis on pain control in children, it is likely that iatrogenic withdrawal will continue to be a concern, and healthcare workers should understand the similarities and differences between this and NAS.

The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial

BACKGROUND

Adequate sedation is crucial to the management of children requiring assisted ventilation on Paediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). The evidence-base of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this area is small and a trial was planned to compare midazolam and clonidine, two sedatives widely used within PICUs neither of which being licensed for that use. The application to obtain a Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) required a dossier summarising the safety profiles of each drug and the pharmacovigilance plan for the trial needed to be determined by this information. A systematic review was undertaken to identify reports relating to the safety of each drug.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) were obtained for each sedative. The MHRA were requested to provide reports relating to the use of each drug as a sedative in children under the age of 16. Medline was searched to identify RCTs, controlled clinical trials, observational studies, case reports and series. 288 abstracts were identified for midazolam and 16 for clonidine with full texts obtained for 80 and 6 articles respectively. Thirty-three studies provided data for midazolam and two for clonidine. The majority of data has come from observational studies and case reports. The MHRA provided details of 10 and 3 reports of suspected adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

No adverse reactions were identified in addition to those specified within the SmPC for the licensed use of the drugs. Based on this information and the wide spread use of both sedatives in routine practice the pharmacovigilance plan was restricted to adverse reactions. The Clinical Trials Authorisation was granted based on the data presented in the SmPC and the pharmacovigilance plan within the clinical trial protocol restricting collection and reporting to adverse reactions.

Does neonatal morphine use affect neuropsychological outcomes at 8 to 9 years of age?

Morphine is widely used to treat severe pain in neonatal intensive care unit patients. Animal studies suggest adverse long-term side effects of neonatal morphine, but a follow-up study of 5-year-old children who participated in a morphine-placebo controlled trial as newborns found no such effects on the child's general functioning. This study indicated that morphine may negatively affect response inhibition, a domain of executive functions. Therefore, we performed a second follow-up study in the same population at the age of 8 to 9 years, focused on the child's general functioning in terms of intelligence, visual motor integration, and behavior and on executive functions. Children in the morphine group showed significantly less externalizing problems according to the parents but more internalizing behavior according to the teachers, but only after adjustment for intelligence quotient (IQ), potential confounders using a propensity score, and additional open-label morphine. Morphine-treated children showed significantly fewer problems with executive functions in daily life as rated by parents for the subscales inhibition and organization of materials and for planning/organizing as rated by the teachers. After adjustment for IQ and the propensity score, executive functioning as rated by the parents remained statistically significantly better in the morphine-treated group. The influence of the additional morphine given was not of a significant influence for any of the outcome variables. Overall, the present study demonstrates that continuous morphine infusion of 10 μg/kg/h during the neonatal period does not harm general functioning and may even have a positive influence on executive functions at 8 to 9 years.

Pentobarbital withdrawal and treatment in an infant in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit

Withdrawal syndromes following administration of sedative and analgesic infusions represent a significant morbidity that is described increasingly in the pediatric critical care literature. However, there are few descriptions of pentobarbital withdrawal symptoms and their treatment in the pediatric population. We describe an infant receiving multiple sedative and analgesic medications, including pentobarbital, who was resistant to our institution's standard weaning protocol, but whose severe withdrawal symptoms responded dramatically to phenobarbital loading and maintenance.

Infant pupillary response to methadone administration during treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Pupil diameter is a frequently assessed objective index of the pharmacodynamic effects of opioids in adults, but to our knowledge has never been examined in infants. Such a measure could improve assessment and treatment of neonates exposed to opioids in utero. The present study examined changes in pupil diameter after opioid administration in opioid-exposed infants who required pharmacological treatment for neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) to test the feasibility of using pupil diameter as a measure of opioid effects in these infants.

METHODS

Ten infants (2-7 days old) receiving methadone (0.4-0.5 mg every 12 h) for the treatment of NAS participated. A picture of one of each infant's eyes was taken under controlled illumination conditions with a standard digital camera just prior to dosing and 0-1, 2-4, 5-7, and 8-10h after dosing. The diameters of the pupil and iris were measured and relative pupil diameter (pupil diameter expressed as a percentage of iris diameter) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean (±SE) relative pupil diameter decreased significantly after dosing from 41±2% to 29±2%. After dosing, a significant increasing linear trend was observed over time, with values of 29±2%, 33±3%, 38±3%, and 41±3% at 0-1, 2-4, 5-7, and 8-10h after dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Infant pupils respond to opioid administration in the same sensitive, orderly manner as is commonly observed in adults. Pupil diameter appears to be an objective, sensitive measure of neonatal response to opioids that may be a useful complement to, or perhaps at times a replacement for, observer-rated scale scores.

Biomarkers and clinical tools in critically ill children: are we heading toward tailored drug therapy?

In pediatric critical care, validated biomarkers are essential for guiding drug therapy. The aim of this article is to present examples of current biomarker developments in its full breadth, including biochemical substances, physiological measurements and clinical scoring tools, with a focus on the field of circulatory, renal and neurophysiologic failure. Within each field we consecutively discuss the rationale for the selected biomarkers, studies in critically ill children, biomarker validation stage and biomarker use or potential use in drug studies and clinical drug dosing. This article demonstrates that there is paucity of properly validated biomarkers. Nevertheless, recent developments in, for instance, the field of sepsis, point us toward a future wherein, for critically ill children, drug therapy may be personalized using proteomic profiling instead of a small number of biomarkers, in order to establish a personal and dynamic disease profile.