The assessment of transpulmonary pressure in mechanically ventilated ARDS patients

Transpulmonary pressure monitoring in critically ill patients: pros and cons

The use of transpulmonary pressure monitoring based on measurement of esophageal pressure has contributed importantly to the personalization of mechanical ventilation based on respiratory pathophysiology in critically ill patients. However, esophageal pressure monitoring is still underused in the clinical practice. This technique allows partitioning of the respiratory mechanics between the lungs and the chest wall, provides information on lung recruitment and risk of barotrauma, and helps titrating mechanical ventilation settings in patients with respiratory failure. In assisted ventilation modes and during non-invasive respiratory support, esophageal pressure monitoring provides important information on the inspiratory effort and work of breathing. Nonetheless, several controversies persist on technical aspects, interpretation and clinical decision-making based on values derived from this monitoring technique. The aim of this review is to summarize the physiological bases of esophageal pressure monitoring, discussing the pros and cons of its clinical applications and different interpretations in critically ill patients undergoing invasive and non-invasive respiratory support.

Setting positive end-expiratory pressure: the use of esophageal pressure measurements

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the key concepts, physiological rationale and clinical evidence for titrating positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) using transpulmonary pressure ( PL ) derived from esophageal manometry, and describe considerations to facilitate bedside implementation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The goal of an esophageal pressure-based PEEP setting is to have sufficient PL at end-expiration to keep (part of) the lung open at the end of expiration. Although randomized studies (EPVent-1 and EPVent-2) have not yet proven a clinical benefit of this approach, a recent posthoc analysis of EPVent-2 revealed a potential benefit in patients with lower APACHE II score and when PEEP setting resulted in end-expiratory PL values close to 0 ± 2 cmH 2 O instead of higher or more negative values. Technological advances have made esophageal pressure monitoring easier to implement at the bedside, but challenges regarding obtaining reliable measurements should be acknowledged.

SUMMARY

Esophageal pressure monitoring has the potential to individualize the PEEP settings. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical benefit of such approach.

Advanced respiratory mechanics assessment in mechanically ventilated obese and non-obese patients with or without acute respiratory distress syndrome

BACKGROUND

Respiratory mechanics is a key element to monitor mechanically ventilated patients and guide ventilator settings. Besides the usual basic assessments, some more complex explorations may allow to better characterize patients' respiratory mechanics and individualize ventilation strategies. These advanced respiratory mechanics assessments including esophageal pressure measurements and complete airway closure detection may be particularly relevant in critically ill obese patients. This study aimed to comprehensively assess respiratory mechanics in obese and non-obese ICU patients with or without ARDS and evaluate the contribution of advanced respiratory mechanics assessments compared to basic assessments in these patients.

METHODS

All intubated patients admitted in two ICUs for any cause were prospectively included. Gas exchange and respiratory mechanics including esophageal pressure and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) measurements and low-flow insufflation to detect complete airway closure were assessed in standardized conditions (tidal volume of 6 mL kg-1 predicted body weight (PBW), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O) within 24 h after intubation.

RESULTS

Among the 149 analyzed patients, 52 (34.9%) were obese and 90 (60.4%) had ARDS (65.4% and 57.8% of obese and non-obese patients, respectively, p = 0.385). A complete airway closure was found in 23.5% of the patients. It was more frequent in obese than in non-obese patients (40.4% vs 14.4%, p < 0.001) and in ARDS than in non-ARDS patients (30% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.029). Respiratory system and lung compliances and EELV/PBW were similarly decreased in obese patients without ARDS and obese or non-obese patients with ARDS. Chest wall compliance was not impacted by obesity or ARDS, but end-expiratory esophageal pressure was higher in obese than in non-obese patients. Chest wall contribution to respiratory system compliance differed widely between patients but was not predictable by their general characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Most respiratory mechanics features are similar in obese non-ARDS and non-obese ARDS patients, but end-expiratory esophageal pressure is higher in obese patients. A complete airway closure can be found in around 25% of critically ill patients ventilated with a PEEP of 5 cmH2O. Advanced explorations may allow to better characterize individual respiratory mechanics and adjust ventilation strategies in some patients. Trial registration NCT03420417 ClinicalTrials.gov (February 5, 2018).

Hypothesis-driven modeling of the human lung-ventilator system: A characterization tool for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome research

Mechanical ventilation is an essential tool in the management of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), but it exposes patients to the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). The human lung-ventilator system (LVS) involves the interaction of complex anatomy with a mechanical apparatus, which limits the ability of process-based models to provide individualized clinical support. This work proposes a hypothesis-driven strategy for LVS modeling in which robust personalization is achieved using a pre-defined parameter basis in a non-physiological model. Model inversion, here via windowed data assimilation, forges observed waveforms into interpretable parameter values that characterize the data rather than quantifying physiological processes. Accurate, model-based inference on human-ventilator data indicates model flexibility and utility over a variety of breath types, including those from dyssynchronous LVSs. Estimated parameters generate static characterizations of the data that are 50%-70% more accurate than breath-wise single-compartment model estimates. They also retain sufficient information to distinguish between the types of breath they represent. However, the fidelity and interpretability of model characterizations are tied to parameter definitions and model resolution. These additional factors must be considered in conjunction with the objectives of specific applications, such as identifying and tracking the development of human VILI.

Gas distribution by EIT during PEEP inflation: PEEP response and optimal PEEP with lowest trans-pulmonary driving pressure can be determined without esophageal pressure during a rapid PEEP trial in patients with acute respiratory failure

Objective. Protective ventilation should be based onlungmechanics and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔPTP), as this 'hits' the lung directly.Approach. The change in end-expiratory lung volume (ΔEELV) is determined by the size of the PEEP step and the elastic properties of the lung (EL), ΔEELV/ΔPEEP. Consequently, EL can be determined as ΔPEEP/ΔEELV. By calibration of tidal inspiratory impedance change with ventilator inspiratory tidal volume, end-expiratory lung impedance changes were converted to volume changes and lung P/V curves were obtained during a PEEP trial in ten patients with acute respiratory failure. The PEEP level where ΔPTP was lowest (optimal PEEP) was determined as the steepest point of the lung P/V curve.Main results. Over-all EL ranged between 7.0-23.2 cmH₂O/L. Optimal PEEP was 12.9 cmH₂O (10-16) with ΔPTP of 4.1 cmH₂O (2.8-7.6). Patients with highest EL were PEEP non-responders, where EL increased in non-dependent and dependent lung at high PEEP, indicating over-distension in all lung. Patients with lower EL were PEEP responders with decreasing EL in dependent lung when increasing PEEP.Significance. PEEP non-responders could be identified by regional lung P/V curves derived from ventilator calibrated EIT. Optimal PEEP could be determined from the equation for the lung P/V curve.

Advances in Ventilator Management for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The ventilatory care of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is evolving as our understanding of physiologic mechanisms of respiratory failure improves. Despite several decades of research, the mortality rate for ARDS remains high. Over the years, we continue to expand strategies to identify and mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury. This now includes a greater understanding of the benefits and harms associated with spontaneous breathing.

Assessment of different computing methods of inspiratory transpulmonary pressure in patients with multiple mechanical problems

While plateau airway pressure alone is an unreliable estimate of lung overdistension inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL) is an important parameter to reflect it in patients with ARDS and there is no concensus about which computation method should be used to calculate it. Recent studies suggest that different formulas may lead to different tidal volume and PEEP settings. The aim of this study is to compare 3 different inspiratory PL measurement method; direct measurement (PL_D), elastance derived (PL_E) and release derived (PL_R) methods in patients with multiple mechanical abnormalities. 34 patients were included in this prospective observational study. Measurements were obtained during volume controlled mechanical ventilation in sedated and paralyzed patients. During the study day airway and eosephageal pressures, flow, tidal volume were measured and elastance, inspiratory PL_E, PL_D and PL_R were calculated. Mean age of the patients was 67 ± 15 years and APACHE II score was 27 ± 7. Most frequent diagnosis of the patients were pneumonia (71%), COPD exacerbation(56%), pleural effusion (55%) and heart failure(50%). Mean plateau pressure of the patients was 22 ± 5 cmH₂O and mean respiratory system elastance was 36.7 ± 13 cmH₂O/L. E_L/E_RS% was 0.75 ± 0.35%. Mean expiratory transpulmonary pressure was 0.54 ± 7.7 cmH₂O (min: − 21, max: 12). Mean PL_E (18 ± 9 H₂O) was significantly higher than PL_D (13 ± 9 cmH₂O) and PL_R methods (11 ± 9 cmH₂O). There was a good aggreement and there was no bias between the measurements in Bland–Altman analysis. The estimated bias was similar between the PL_D and PL_E (− 3.12 ± 11 cmH₂O) and PL_E and PL_R (3.9 ± 10.9 cmH₂O) measurements. Our results suggest that standardization of calculation method of inspiratory PL is necessary before using it routinely to estimate alveolar overdistension.

Calculation of Transpulmonary Pressure From Regional Ventilation Displayed by Electrical Impedance Tomography in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Transpulmonary driving pressure (DP_L) corresponds to the cyclical stress imposed on the lung parenchyma during tidal breathing and, therefore, can be used to assess the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Its measurement at the bedside requires the use of esophageal pressure (Peso), which is sometimes technically challenging. Recently, it has been demonstrated how in an animal model of ARDS, the transpulmonary pressure (P_L) measured with Peso calculated with the absolute values method (P_L = Paw—Peso) is equivalent to the transpulmonary pressure directly measured using pleural sensors in the central-dependent part of the lung. We hypothesized that, since the P_L derived from Peso reflects the regional behavior of the lung, it could exist a relationship between regional parameters measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) and driving P_L (DP_L). Moreover, we explored if, by integrating airways pressure data and EIT data, it could be possible to estimate non-invasively DP_L and consequently lung elastance (EL) and elastance-derived inspiratory P_L (PI). We analyzed 59 measurements from 20 patients with ARDS. There was a significant intra-patient correlation between EIT derived regional compliance in regions of interest (ROI1) (r = 0.5, p = 0.001), ROI2 (r = −0.68, p < 0.001), and ROI3 (r = −0.4, p = 0.002), and DP_L. A multiple linear regression successfully predicted DP_L based on respiratory system elastance (Ers), ideal body weight (IBW), roi1%, roi2%, and roi3% (R² = 0.84, p < 0.001). The corresponding Bland-Altmann analysis showed a bias of −1.4e-007 cmH₂O and limits of agreement (LoA) of −2.4–2.4 cmH₂O. EL and PI calculated using EIT showed good agreement (R² = 0.89, p < 0.001 and R² = 0.75, p < 0.001) with the esophageal derived correspondent variables. In conclusion, DP_L has a good correlation with EIT-derived parameters in the central lung. DP_L, PI, and EL can be estimated with good accuracy non-invasively combining information coming from EIT and airway pressure.

Personalized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Comparison Between Optimal Distribution of Regional Ventilation and Positive Transpulmonary Pressure

OBJECTIVES

Different techniques exist to select personalized positive end-expiratory pressure in patients affected by the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure strategy aims to counteract dorsal lung collapse, whereas electrical impedance tomography could guide positive end-expiratory pressure selection based on optimal homogeneity of ventilation distribution. We compared the physiologic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure guided by electrical impedance tomography versus transpulmonary pressure in patients affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN

Cross-over prospective physiologic study.

SETTING

Two academic ICUs.

PATIENTS

Twenty ICU patients affected by acute respiratory distress syndrome undergoing mechanical ventilation.

INTERVENTION

Patients monitored by an esophageal catheter and a 32-electrode electrical impedance tomography monitor underwent two positive end-expiratory pressure titration trials by randomized cross-over design to find the level of positive end-expiratory pressure associated with: 1) positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PEEPPL) and 2) proportion of poorly or nonventilated lung units (Silent Spaces) less than or equal to 15% (PEEPEIT). Each positive end-expiratory pressure level was maintained for 20 minutes, and afterward, lung mechanics, gas exchange, and electrical impedance tomography data were collected.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PEEPEIT and PEEPPL differed in all patients, and there was no correlation between the levels identified by the two methods (Rs = 0.25; p = 0.29). PEEPEIT determined a more homogeneous distribution of ventilation with a lower percentage of dependent Silent Spaces (p = 0.02), whereas PEEPPL was characterized by lower airway-but not transpulmonary-driving pressure (p = 0.04). PEEPEIT was significantly higher than PEEPPL in subjects with extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.006), whereas the opposite was true for pulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized positive end-expiratory pressure levels selected by electrical impedance tomography- and transpulmonary pressure-based methods are not correlated at the individual patient level. PEEPPL is associated with lower dynamic stress, whereas PEEPEIT may help to optimize lung recruitment and homogeneity of ventilation. The underlying etiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome could deeply influence results from each method.

Individualized PEEP to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Higher intraoperative driving pressures (ΔP) are associated with increased postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC). We hypothesised that dynamic adjustment of PEEP throughout abdominal surgery reduces ΔP, maintains positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures (P_{tp_ee}) and increases respiratory system static compliance (C_rs) with PEEP levels that are variable between and within patients.

METHODS

In a prospective multicentre pilot study, adults at moderate/high risk for PPC undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomised to one of three ventilation protocols: (1) PEEP≤2 cm H₂O, compared with periodic recruitment manoeuvres followed by individualised PEEP to either optimise respiratory system compliance (PEEP_maxCrs) or maintain positive end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PEEP_{Ptp_ee}). The composite primary outcome included intraoperative ΔP, P_{tp_ee}, C_rs, and PEEP values (median (interquartile range) and coefficients of variation [CV_PEEP]).

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (48.6% female; age range: 47-73 yr) were assigned to control (PEEP≤2 cm H₂O; n=13), PEEP_maxCrs (n=16), or PEEP_{Ptp_ee} (n=8) groups. The PEEP_{Ptp_ee} intervention could not be delivered in two patients. Subjects assigned to PEEP_maxCrs had lower ΔP (median8 cm H₂O [7-10]), compared with the control group (12 cm H₂O [10-15]; P=0.006). PEEP_maxCrs was also associated with higher P_{tp_ee} (2.0 cm H₂O [-0.7 to 4.5] vs controls: -8.3 cm H₂O [-13.0 to -4.0]; P≤0.001) and higher C_rs (47.7 ml cm H₂O [43.2-68.8] vs controls: 39.0 ml cm H₂O [32.9-43.4]; P=0.009). Individualised PEEP (PEEP_maxCrs and PEEP_{Ptp_ee} combined) varied widely (median: 10 cm H₂O [8-15]; CV_PEEP=0.24 [0.14-0.35]), both between, and within, subjects throughout surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study suggests that individualised PEEP management strategies applied during abdominal surgery reduce driving pressure, maintain positive P_{tp_ee} and increase static compliance. The wide range of PEEP observed suggests that an individualised approach is required to optimise respiratory mechanics during abdominal surgery.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02671721.

Assessment of spontaneous breathing during pressure controlled ventilation with superimposed spontaneous breathing using respiratory flow signal analysis

Integrating spontaneous breathing into mechanical ventilation (MV) can speed up liberation from it and reduce its invasiveness. On the other hand, inadequate and asynchronous spontaneous breathing has the potential to aggravate lung injury. During use of airway-pressure-release-ventilation (APRV), the assisted breaths are difficult to measure. We developed an algorithm to differentiate the breaths in a setting of lung injury in spontaneously breathing ewes. We hypothesized that differentiation of breaths into spontaneous, mechanical and assisted is feasible using a specially developed for this purpose algorithm. Ventilation parameters were recorded by software that integrated ventilator output variables. The flow signal, measured by the EVITA® XL (Lübeck, Germany), was measured every 2 ms by a custom Java-based computerized algorithm (Breath-Sep). By integrating the flow signal, tidal volume (V_T) of each breath was calculated. By using the flow curve the algorithm separated the different breaths and numbered them for each time point. Breaths were separated into mechanical, assisted and spontaneous. Bland Altman analysis was used to compare parameters. Comparing the values calculated by Breath-Sep with the data from the EVITA® using Bland-Altman analyses showed a mean bias of - 2.85% and 95% limits of agreement from - 25.76 to 20.06% for MV_total. For respiratory rate (RR) RR_set a bias of 0.84% with a SD of 1.21% and 95% limits of agreement from - 1.53 to 3.21% were found. In the cluster analysis of the 25th highest breaths of each group RR_total was higher using the EVITA®. In the mechanical subgroup the values for RR_spont and MV_spont the EVITA® showed higher values compared to Breath-Sep. We developed a computerized method for respiratory flow-curve based differentiation of breathing cycle components during mechanical ventilation with superimposed spontaneous breathing. Further studies in humans and optimizing of this technique is necessary to allow for real-time use at the bedside.

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on functional residual capacity in two experimental models of acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Measurement of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)-induced recruitment lung volume using passive spirometry is based on the assumption that the functional residual capacity (FRC) is not modified by the PEEP changes. We aimed to investigate the influence of PEEP on FRC in different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

A randomized crossover study was performed in 12 pigs. Pulmonary (n = 6) and extra-pulmonary (n = 6) ARDS models were established using an alveolar instillation of hydrochloric acid and a right atrium injection of oleic acid, respectively. Low (5 cmH2O) and high (15 cmH2O) PEEP were randomly applied in each animal. FRC and recruitment volume were determined using the nitrogen wash-in/wash-out technique and release maneuver.

RESULTS

FRC was not significantly different between the two PEEP levels in either pulmonary ARDS (299 ± 92 mL and 309 ± 130 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively) or extra-pulmonary ARDS (305 ± 143 mL and 328 ± 197 mL at 5 and 15 cmH2O, respectively). The recruitment volume was not significantly different between the two models (pulmonary, 341 ± 100 mL; extra-pulmonary, 351 ± 170 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

PEEP did not influence FRC in either the pulmonary or extra-pulmonary ARDS pig model.

Use of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) to Estimate Global and Regional Lung Recruitment Volume (VREC) Induced by Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP): An Experiment in Pigs with Lung Injury

Background

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a real-time tool used to monitor lung volume change at the bedside, which could be used to measure lung recruitment volume (V_REC) for setting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). We assessed and compared the agreement in V_REC measurement with the EIT method versus the flow-derived method.

Material/Methods

In 12 Bama pigs, lung injury was induced by tracheal instillation of hydrochloric acid and verified by an arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction ratio below 200 mmHg. During the end-expiratory occlusion, an airway release maneuver was conduct at 5 and 15 cmH₂O of PEEP. V_REC was measured by flow-integrated PEEP-induced lung volume change (flow-derived method) and end-expiratory lung impedance change (EIT-derived method). Linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis were used to test the correlation and agreement between these 2 measures.

Results

Lung injury was successfully induced in all the animals. EIT-derived V_REC was significantly correlated with flow-derived V_REC (R²=0.650, p=0.002). The bias (the lower and upper limits of agreement) was −19 (−182 to 144) ml. The median (interquartile range) of EIT-derived V_REC was 322 (218–469) ml, with 110 (59–142) ml and 194 (157–307) ml in dependent and nondependent lung regions, respectively. Global and regional respiratory system compliance increased significantly at high PEEP compared to those at low PEEP.

Conclusions

Close correlation and agreement were found between EIT-derived and flow-derived V_REC measurements. The advantages of EIT-derived recruitability assessment included the avoidance of ventilation interruption and the ability to provide regional recruitment information.

Determinants of the esophageal-pleural pressure relationship in humans

Esophageal pressure has been suggested as adequate surrogate of the pleural pressure. We investigate after lung surgery the determinants of the esophageal and intrathoracic pressures and their differences. The esophageal pressure (through esophageal balloon) and the intrathoracic/pleural pressure (through the chest tube on the surgery side) were measured after surgery in 28 patients immediately after lobectomy or wedge resection. Measurements were made in the nondependent lateral position (without or with ventilation of the operated lung) and in the supine position. In the lateral position with the nondependent lung, collapsed or ventilated, the differences between esophageal and pleural pressure amounted to 4.4 ± 1.6 and 5.1 ± 1.7 cmH₂O. In the supine position, the difference amounted to 7.3 ± 2.8 cmH₂O. In the supine position, the estimated compressive forces on the mediastinum were 10.5 ± 3.1 cmH₂O and on the iso-gravitational pleural plane 3.2 ± 1.8 cmH₂O. A simple model describing the roles of chest, lung, and pneumothorax volume matching on the pleural pressure genesis was developed; modeled pleural pressure = 1.0057 × measured pleural pressure + 0.6592 (r² = 0.8). Whatever the position and the ventilator settings, the esophageal pressure changed in a 1:1 ratio with the changes in pleural pressure. Consequently, chest wall elastance (E_cw) measured by intrathoracic (E_cw = ΔPpl/tidal volume) or esophageal pressure (E_cw = ΔPes/tidal volume) was identical in all the positions we tested. We conclude that esophageal and pleural pressures may be largely different depending on body position (gravitational forces) and lung-chest wall volume matching. Their changes, however, are identical.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Esophageal and pleural pressure changes occur at a 1:1 ratio, fully justifying the use of esophageal pressure to compute the chest wall elastance and the changes in pleural pressure and in lung stress. The absolute value of esophageal and pleural pressures may be largely different, depending on the body position (gravitational forces) and the lung-chest wall volume matching. Therefore, the absolute value of esophageal pressure should not be used as a surrogate of pleural pressure.

Esophageal Manometry and Regional Transpulmonary Pressure in Lung Injury

RATIONALE

Esophageal manometry is the clinically available method to estimate pleural pressure, thus enabling calculation of transpulmonary pressure (Pl). However, many concerns make it uncertain in which lung region esophageal manometry reflects local Pl.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of esophageal pressure (Pes) and in which regions esophageal manometry reflects pleural pressure (Ppl) and Pl; to assess whether lung stress in nondependent regions can be estimated at end-inspiration from Pl.

METHODS

In lung-injured pigs (n = 6) and human cadavers (n = 3), Pes was measured across a range of positive end-expiratory pressure, together with directly measured Ppl in nondependent and dependent pleural regions. All measurements were obtained with minimal nonstressed volumes in the pleural sensors and esophageal balloons. Expiratory and inspiratory Pl was calculated by subtracting local Ppl or Pes from airway pressure; inspiratory Pl was also estimated by subtracting Ppl (calculated from chest wall and respiratory system elastance) from the airway plateau pressure.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In pigs and human cadavers, expiratory and inspiratory Pl using Pes closely reflected values in dependent to middle lung (adjacent to the esophagus). Inspiratory Pl estimated from elastance ratio reflected the directly measured nondependent values.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of esophageal manometry in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Assuming correct calibration, expiratory Pl derived from Pes reflects Pl in dependent to middle lung, where atelectasis usually predominates; inspiratory Pl estimated from elastance ratio may indicate the highest level of lung stress in nondependent "baby" lung, where it is vulnerable to ventilator-induced lung injury.

Noninvasive quantification of macrophagic lung recruitment during experimental ventilation-induced lung injury

Macrophagic lung infiltration is pivotal in the development of lung biotrauma because of ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). We assessed the performance of [¹¹C](R)-PK11195, a positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer binding the translocator protein, to quantify macrophage lung recruitment during experimental VILI. Pigs (n = 6) were mechanically ventilated under general anesthesia, using protective ventilation settings (baseline). Experimental VILI was performed by titrating tidal volume to reach a transpulmonary end-inspiratory pressure (∆P_L) of 35-40 cmH₂O. We acquired PET/computed tomography (CT) lung images at baseline and after 4 h of VILI. Lung macrophages were quantified in vivo by the standardized uptake value (SUV) of [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 measured in PET on the whole lung and in six lung regions and ex vivo on lung pathology at the end of experiment. Lung mechanics were extracted from CT images to assess their association with the PET signal. ∆P_L increased from 9 ± 1 cmH₂O under protective ventilation, to 36 ± 6 cmH₂O during experimental VILI. Compared with baseline, whole-lung [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 SUV significantly increased from 1.8 ± 0.5 to 2.9 ± 0.5 after experimental VILI. Regional [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 SUV was positively associated with the magnitude of macrophage recruitment in pathology (P = 0.03). Compared with baseline, whole-lung CT-derived dynamic strain and tidal hyperinflation increased significantly after experimental VILI, from 0.6 ± 0 to 2.0 ± 0.4, and 1 ± 1 to 43 ± 19%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, both were significantly associated with regional [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 SUV. [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 lung uptake (a proxy of lung inflammation) was increased by experimental VILI and was associated with the magnitude of dynamic strain and tidal hyperinflation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We assessed the performance of [¹¹C](R)-PK11195, a translocator protein-specific positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer, to quantify macrophage lung recruitment during experimental ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI). In this proof-of-concept study, we showed that the in vivo quantification of [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 lung uptake in PET reflected the magnitude of macrophage lung recruitment after VILI. Furthermore, increased [¹¹C](R)-PK11195 lung uptake was associated with harmful levels of dynamic strain and tidal hyperinflation applied to the lungs.

PEEP titration in moderate to severe ARDS: plateau versus transpulmonary pressure

BACKGROUND

Although lung protection with low tidal volume and limited plateau pressure (P_plat) improves survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (ARDS), the best way to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is still debated.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare two strategies using individual PEEP based on a maximum P_plat (28-30 cmH₂O, the Express group) or on keeping end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure positive (0-5 cmH₂O, P_Lexpi group). We estimated alveolar recruitment (Vrec), end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar distension based on elastance-related end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (P_L,EL).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 150 mmHg) were included with a baseline PEEP of 7.0 ± 1.8 cmH₂O and a PaO₂/FiO₂ of 91.2 ± 31.2 mmHg. PEEP and oxygenation increased significantly from baseline with both protocols; PEEP Express group was 14.2 ± 3.6 cmH₂O versus 16.7 ± 5.9 cmH₂O in P_Lexpi group. No patient had the same PEEP with the two protocols. Vrec was higher with the latter protocol (299 [0 to 875] vs. 222 [47 to 483] ml, p = 0.049) and correlated with improved oxygenation (R² = 0.45, p = 0.002). Two and seven patients in the Express and P_L,expi groups, respectively, had P_L,EL > 25 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great heterogeneity of P_Lexpi when P_plat is used to titrate PEEP but with limited risk of over-distension. A PEEP titration for a moderate positive level of P_Lexpi might slightly improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation but increases the risk of over-distension in one-third of patients.

Driving Pressure and Transpulmonary Pressure: How Do We Guide Safe Mechanical Ventilation?

The physiological concept, pathophysiological implications and clinical relevance and application of driving pressure and transpulmonary pressure to prevent ventilator-induced lung injury are discussed.

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Summary on Management

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has multiple causes and is characterized by acute lung inflammation and increased pulmonary vascular permeability, leading to hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pulmonary radiographic opacities. The acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and effective treatment strategies are limited. This review presents the current state of the literature regarding the etiology, pathogenesis, and management strategies for ARDS.

Esophageal pressure monitoring: why, when and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Esophageal manometry has shown its usefulness to estimate transpulmonary pressure, that is lung stress, and the intensity of spontaneous effort in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, clinical uptake of esophageal manometry in ICU is still low. Thus, the purpose of review is to describe technical tips to adequately measure esophageal pressure at the bedside, and then update the most important clinical applications of esophageal manometry in ICU.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each esophageal balloon has its own nonstressed volume and it should be calibrated properly to measure pleural pressure accurately: transpulmonary pressure calculated on absolute esophageal pressure reflects values in the lung regions adjacent to the esophageal balloon (i.e. dependent to middle lung). Inspiratory transpulmonary pressure calculated from airway plateau pressure and the chest wall to respiratory system elastance ratio reasonably reflects lung stress in the nondependent 'baby' lung, at highest risk of hyperinflation. Also esophageal pressure can be used to detect and minimize patient self-inflicted lung injury.

SUMMARY

Esophageal manometry is not a complicated technique. There is a large potential to improve clinical outcome in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, acting as an early detector of risk of lung injury from mechanical ventilation and vigorous spontaneous effort.

The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by a new acute onset of hypoxemia secondary to a pulmonary edema of non-cardiogenic origin, bilateral lung opacities and reduction in respiratory system compliance after an insult direct or indirect to lungs. Its first description was in 1970s, and then several shared definitions tried to describe this clinical entity; the last one, known as Berlin definition, brought an improvement in predictive ability for mortality.

In the present chapter, the diagnostic workup of the syndrome will be presented with particular attention to microbiological investigations which represent a milestone in the diagnostic process and to imaging techniques such as CT scan and lung ultrasound.

Despite the treatment is mainly based on supportive strategies, attention should be applied to assure adequate respiratory gas exchange while minimizing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) onset. Therefore will be described several therapeutic approaches to ARDS, including noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV), high-flow nasal cannulas (HFNC) and invasive ventilation with particular emphasis to risks and benefits of mechanical ventilation, PEEP optimization and lung protective ventilation strategies. Rescue techniques, such as permissive hypercapnia, prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, inhaled vasodilators, corticosteroids, recruitment maneuvers and extracorporeal life support, will also be reviewed.

Finally, the chapter will deal with the mechanical ventilation weaning process with particular emphasis on extrapulmonary factors such as neurologic, diaphragmatic or cardiovascular alterations which can lead to weaning failure.

Peep titration based on the open lung approach during one lung ventilation in thoracic surgery: a physiological study

BACKGROUND

During thoracic surgery in lateral decubitus, one lung ventilation (OLV) may impair respiratory mechanics and gas exchange. We tested a strategy based on an open lung approach (OLA) consisting in lung recruitment immediately followed by a decremental positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to the best respiratory system compliance (C_RS) and separately quantified the elastic properties of the lung and the chest wall. Our hypothesis was that this approach would improve gas exchange. Further, we were interested in documenting the impact of the OLA on partitioned respiratory system mechanics.

METHODS

In thirteen patients undergoing upper left lobectomy we studied lung and chest wall mechanics, transpulmonary pressure (P_L), respiratory system and transpulmonary driving pressure (ΔP_RS and ΔP_L), gas exchange and hemodynamics at two time-points (a) during OLV at zero end-expiratory pressure (OLV_pre-OLA) and (b) after the application of the open-lung strategy (OLV_post-OLA).

RESULTS

The external PEEP selected through the OLA was 6 ± 0.8 cmH₂O. As compared to OLV_pre-OLA, the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio went from 205 ± 73 to 313 ± 86 (p = .05) and C_L increased from 56 ± 18 ml/cmH₂O to 71 ± 12 ml/cmH₂O (p = .0013), without changes in C_CW. Both ΔP_RS and ΔP_L decreased from 9.2 ± 0.4 cmH₂O to 6.8 ± 0.6 cmH₂O and from 8.1 ± 0.5 cmH₂O to 5.7 ± 0.5 cmH₂O, (p = .001 and p = .015 vs OLV_pre-OLA), respectively. Hemodynamic parameters remained stable throughout the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In our patients, the OLA strategy performed during OLV improved oxygenation and increased C_L and had no clinically significant hemodynamic effects. Although our study was not specifically designed to study ΔP_RS and ΔP_L, we observed a parallel reduction of both after the OLA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

TRN: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03435523 , retrospectively registered, Feb 14 2018.

Should we titrate peep based on end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure?-yes

Ventilator management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has been characterized by implementation of basic physiology principles by minimizing harmful distending pressures and preventing lung derecruitment. Such strategies have led to significant improvements in outcomes. Positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is an important part of a lung protective strategy but there is no standardized method to set PEEP level. With widely varying types of lung injury, body habitus and pulmonary mechanics, the use of esophageal manometry has become important for personalization and optimization of mechanical ventilation in patients with ARDS. Esophageal manometry estimates pleural pressures, and can be used to differentiate the chest wall and lung (transpulmonary) contributions to the total respiratory system mechanics. Elevated pleural pressures may result in negative transpulmonary pressures at end expiration, leading to lung collapse. Measuring the esophageal pressures and adjusting PEEP to make transpulmonary pressures positive can decrease atelectasis, derecruitment of lung, and cyclical opening and closing of airways and alveoli, thus optimizing lung mechanics and oxygenation. Although there is some spatial and positional artifact, esophageal pressures in numerous animal and human studies in healthy, obese and critically ill patients appear to be a good estimate for the "effective" pleural pressure. Multiple studies have illustrated the benefit of using esophageal pressures to titrate PEEP in patients with obesity and with ARDS. Esophageal pressure monitoring provides a window into the unique physiology of a patient and helps improve clinical decision making at the bedside.

Technical aspects of bedside respiratory monitoring of transpulmonary pressure

Transpulmonary pressure, that is the difference between airway pressure (Paw) and pleural pressure, is considered one of the most important parameters to know in order to set a safe mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients but also in critically ill obese patients, in abdominal pathologies or in pathologies affecting the chest wall itself. Transpulmonary pressure should rely on the assessment of intrathoracic pleural pressure. Esophageal pressure (Pes) is considered the best surrogate of pleural pressure in critically ill patients, but concerns about its reliability exist. The aim of this article is to describe the technique of Pes measurement in mechanically ventilated patients: the catheter insertion, the proper balloon placement and filling, the validation test and specific procedures to remove the main artifacts will be discussed.

Interpretation of the transpulmonary pressure in the critically ill patient

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving procedure, which takes over the function of the respiratory muscles while buying time for healing to take place. However, it can also promote or worsen lung injury, so that careful monitoring of respiratory mechanics is suggested to titrate the level of support and avoid injurious pressures and volumes to develop. Standard monitoring includes flow, volume and airway pressure (Paw). However, Paw represents the pressure acting on the respiratory system as a whole, and does not allow to differentiate the part of pressure that is spent di distend the chest wall. Moreover, if spontaneous breathing efforts are allowed, the Paw is the sum of that applied by the ventilator and that generated by the patient. As a consequence, monitoring of Paw has significant shortcomings. Assessment of esophageal pressure (Pes), as a surrogate for pleural pressure (Ppl), may allow the clinicians to discriminate between the elastic behaviour of the lung and the chest wall, and to calculate the degree of spontaneous respiratory effort. In the present review, the characteristics and limitations of airway and transpulmonary pressure monitoring will be presented; we will highlight the different assumptions underlying the various methods for measuring transpulmonary pressure (i.e., the elastance-derived and the release-derived method, and the direct measurement), as well as the potential application of transpulmonary pressure assessment during both controlled and spontaneous/assisted mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.

Can we estimate transpulmonary pressure without an esophageal balloon?-yes

A protective ventilation strategy is based on separation of lung and chest wall mechanics and determination of transpulmonary pressure. So far, this has required esophageal pressure measurement, which is cumbersome, rarely used clinically and associated with lack of consensus on the interpretation of measurements. We have developed an alternative method based on a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) step procedure where the PEEP-induced change in end-expiratory lung volume is determined by the ventilator pneumotachograph. In pigs, lung healthy patients and acute lung injury (ALI) patients, it has been verified that the determinants of the change in end-expiratory lung volume following a PEEP change are the size of the PEEP step and the elastic properties of the lung, ∆PEEP × Clung. As a consequence, lung compliance can be calculated as the change in end-expiratory lung volume divided by the change in PEEP and esophageal pressure measurements are not needed. When lung compliance is determined in this way, transpulmonary driving pressure can be calculated on a breath-by-breath basis. As the end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure increases as much as PEEP is increased, it is also possible to determine the end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure at any PEEP level. Thus, the most crucial factors of ventilator induced lung injury can be determined by a simple PEEP step procedure. The measurement procedure can be repeated with short intervals, which makes it possible to follow the course of the lung disease closely. By the PEEP step procedure we may also obtain information (decision support) on the mechanical consequences of changes in PEEP and tidal volume performed to improve oxygenation and/or carbon dioxide removal.

Should we titrate positive end-expiratory pressure based on an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure?

Arguments continue to swirl regarding the need for and best method of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration. An appropriately conducted decremental method that uses modest peak pressures for the recruiting maneuver (RM), a lung protective tidal excursion, relatively small PEEP increments and appropriate timing intervals is currently the most logical and attractive option, particularly when the esophageal balloon pressure (Pes) is used to calculate transpulmonary driving pressures relevant to the lung. The setting of PEEP by the Pes-guided end-expiratory pressure at the 'polarity transition' point of the transmural end-expiratory pressure is quite relevant to the locale of the esophageal balloon catheter. Its desirability, however, is limited by its tendency to encourage PEEP levels that are higher than most other PEEP titration methods. These Pes-set PEEP values promote higher mean airway pressures and are likely to be unnecessary when small tidal driving pressures are in use. Because high airway pressures increase global lung stress and risk hemodynamic compromise, the Pes-determined PEEP would seem associated with a relatively high hazard to benefit ratio for many patients.

Regional distribution of transpulmonary pressure

The pressure across the lung, so-called transpulmonary pressure (P_L), represents the main force acting toward to provide lung movement. During mechanical ventilation, P_L is provided by respiratory system pressurization, using specific ventilator setting settled by the operator, such as: tidal volume (V_T), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), respiratory rate (RR), and inspiratory airway flow. Once P_L is developed throughout the lungs, its distribution is heterogeneous, being explained by the elastic properties of the lungs and pleural pressure gradient. There are different methods of P_L calculation, each one with importance and some limitations. Among the most known, it can be quoted: (I) direct measurement of P_L; (II) elastance derived method at end-inspiration of P_L; (III) transpulmonary driving pressure. Recent studies using pleural sensors in large animal models as also in human cadaver have added new and important information about P_L heterogeneous distribution across the lungs. Due to this heterogeneous distribution, lung damage could happen in specific areas of the lung. In addition, it is widely accepted that high P_L can cause lung damage, however the way it is delivered, whether it's compressible or tensile, may also further damage despite the values of P_L achieved. According to heterogeneous distribution of P_L across the lungs, the interstitium and lymphatic vessels may also interplay to disseminate lung inflammation toward peripheral organs through thoracic lymph tracts. Thus, it is conceivable that juxta-diaphragmatic area associated strong efforts leading to high values of P_L may be a source of dissemination of inflammatory cells, large molecules, and plasma contents able to perpetuate inflammation in distal organs.

Intracranial pressure responsiveness to positive end-expiratory pressure is influenced by chest wall elastance: a physiological study in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

Background

Respiratory system elastance (E_RS) is an important determinant of the responsiveness of intracranial pressure (ICP) to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, lung elastance (E_L) and chest wall elastance (E_CW) were not differentiated in previous studies. We tested the hypothesis that patients with high E_CW or a high E_CW/E_RS ratio have greater ICP responsiveness to PEEP.

Methods

An esophageal balloon catheter was placed to measure esophageal pressure. PEEP was increased from 5 to 15 cmH₂O. Airway pressure and esophageal pressure were measured and E_L, E_CW and E_RS were calculated at the two PEEP levels. Patients were classified into either an ICP responder group or a non-responder group based on whether the change of ICP after PEEP adjustment was greater than or less than the median of the overall study population.

Results

The magnitude of the increase in esophageal pressure (median [interquartile range]) at end-expiratory occlusion was significantly increased in the responder group compared with that in the non-responder group (4.1 [2.7–4.1] versus 2.7 [0.0–2.7] cmH₂O, p = 0.033) after PEEP adjustment. E_CW and the E_CW/E_RS ratio were significantly higher in ICP responders than in non-responders at both low PEEP (p = 0.021 and 0.017) and high PEEP (p = 0.011 and 0.025) levels. No significant differences in E_RS and E_L were noted between the two groups at both PEEP levels.

Conclusions

Patients with greater ICP responsiveness to increased PEEP exhibit higher E_CW and a higher E_CW/E_RS ratio, suggesting the importance of ECW monitoring.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12883-018-1132-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Use of esophageal balloon pressure-volume curve analysis to determine esophageal wall elastance and calibrate raw esophageal pressure: a bench experiment and clinical study

BACKGROUND

Accurate measurement of esophageal pressure (Pes) depends on proper filling of the balloon. Esophageal wall elastance (Ees) may also influence the measurement. We examined the estimation of balloon-surrounding elastance in a bench model and investigated a simplified calibrating procedure of Pes in a balloon with relatively small volume.

METHODS

The Cooper balloon catheter (geometric volume of 2.8 ml) was used in the present study. The balloon was progressively inflated in different gas-tight glass chambers with different inner volumes. Chamber elastance was measured by the fitting of chamber pressure and balloon volume. Balloon pressure-volume (P-V) curves were obtained, and the slope of the intermediate linear section was defined as the estimated chamber elastance. Balloon volume tests were also performed in 40 patients under controlled ventilation. The slope of the intermediate linear section on the end-expiratory esophageal P-V curve was calculated as the Ees. The balloon volume with the largest Pes tidal swing was defined as the best volume. Pressure generated by the esophageal wall during balloon inflation (Pew) was estimated as the product of Ees and best volume. Because the clinical intermediate linear section enclosed filling volume of 0.6 to 1.4 ml in each of the patient, we simplified the estimation of Ees by only using parameters at these two filling volumes.

RESULTS

In the bench experiment, bias (lower and upper limits of agreement) was 0.5 (0.2 to 0.8) cmH₂O/ml between the estimated and measured chamber elastance. The intermediate linear section on the clinical and bench P-V curves resembled each other. Median (interquartile range) Ees was 3.3 (2.5-4.1) cmH₂O/ml. Clinical best volume was 1.0 (0.8-1.2) ml and ranged from 0.6 to 1.4 ml. Estimated Pew at the best volume was 2.8 (2.5-3.5) cmH₂O with a maximum value of 5.2 cmH₂O. Compared with the conventional method, bias (lower and upper limits of agreement) of Ees estimated by the simple method was - 0.1 (- 0.7 to 0.6) cmH₂O/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

The slope of the intermediate linear section on the balloon P-V curve correlated with the balloon-surrounding elastance. The estimation of Ees and calibration of Pes were feasible for a small-volume-balloon.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Identifier NCT02976844 . Retrospectively registered on 29 November 2016.

High frequency percussive ventilation increases alveolar recruitment in early acute respiratory distress syndrome: an experimental, physiological and CT scan study

Background

High frequency percussive ventilation (HFPV) combines diffusive (high frequency mini-bursts) and convective ventilation patterns. Benefits include enhanced oxygenation and hemodynamics, and alveolar recruitment, while providing hypothetic lung-protective ventilation. No study has investigated HFPV-induced changes in lung aeration in patients with early acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods

Eight patients with early non-focal ARDS were enrolled and five swine with early non-focal ARDS were studied in prospective computed tomography (CT) scan and animal studies, in a university-hospital tertiary ICU and an animal laboratory. Patients were optimized under conventional “open-lung” ventilation. Lung CT was performed using an end-expiratory hold (Conv) to assess lung morphology. HFPV was applied for 1 hour to all patients before new CT scans were performed with end-expiratory (HFPV EE) and end-inspiratory (HFPV EI) holds. Lung volumes were determined after software analysis. At specified time points, blood gases and hemodynamic data were collected. Recruitment was defined as a change in non-aerated lung volumes between Conv, HFPV EE and HFPV EI. The main objective was to verify whether HFPV increases alveolar recruitment without lung hyperinflation. Correlation between pleural, upper airways and HFPV-derived pressures was assessed in an ARDS swine-based model.

Results

One-hour HFPV significantly improved oxygenation and hemodynamics. Lung recruitment significantly rose by 12.0% (8.5–18.0%), P = 0.05 (Conv-HFPV EE) and 12.5% (9.3–16.8%), P = 0.003 (Conv-HFPV EI). Hyperinflation tended to increase by 2.0% (0.5–2.5%), P = 0.89 (Conv-HFPV EE) and 3.0% (2.5–4.0%), P = 0.27 (Conv-HFPV EI). HFPV hyperinflation correlated with hyperinflated and normally-aerated lung volumes at baseline: r = 0.79, P = 0.05 and r = 0.79, P = 0.05, respectively (Conv-HFPV EE); and only hyperinflated lung volumes at baseline: r = 0.88, P = 0.01 (Conv-HFPV EI). HFPV CT-determined tidal volumes reached 5.7 (1.1–8.1) mL.kg^-1 of ideal body weight (IBW). Correlations between pleural and HFPV-monitored pressures were acceptable and end-inspiratory pleural pressures remained below 25cmH₂0.

Conclusions

HFPV improves alveolar recruitment, gas exchanges and hemodynamics of patients with early non-focal ARDS without relevant hyperinflation. HFPV-derived pressures correlate with corresponding pleural or upper airways pressures.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02510105. Registered on 1 June 2015. The trial was retrospectively registered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1924-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Esophageal pressure: research or clinical tool?

Esophageal manometry has traditionally been utilized for respiratory physiology research, but clinicians have recently found numerous applications within the intensive care unit. Esophageal pressure (P_Es) is a surrogate for pleural pressures (P_Pl), and the difference between airway pressure (P_AO) and P_Es provides a good estimate for the pressure across the lung also known as the transpulmonary pressure (P_L). Differentiating the effects of mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing on the respiratory system, chest wall, and across the lung allows for improved personalization in clinical decision making. Measuring P_L in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may help set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent derecruitment and atelectrauma, while assuring peak pressures do not cause over distension during tidal breathing and recruitment maneuvers. Monitoring P_Es allows improved insight into patient-ventilator interactions and may help in decisions to adjust sedation and paralytics to correct dyssynchrony. Intrinsic PEEP (auto-PEEP) may be monitored using esophageal manometry, which may also improve patient comfort and synchrony with the ventilator. Finally, during weaning, P_Es may be used to better predict weaning success and allow for rapid intervention during failure. Improved consistency in definition and terminology and further outcomes research is needed to encourage more widespread adoption; however, with clear clinical benefit and increased ease of use, it appears time to reintroduce basic physiology into personalized ventilator management in the intensive care unit.

Measurements Obtained From Esophageal Balloon Catheters Are Affected by the Esophageal Balloon Filling Volume in Children With ARDS

BACKGROUND

Esophageal balloon inflation volume may affect the accuracy of transpulmo-nary pressure estimates in adults, but the effect is unknown in pediatrics. Using a combination bench and human study, we sought to determine a range of optimal filling volumes for esophageal balloon catheters and to derive a technique to inflate catheters to yield the most accurate estimates of pleural pressure.

METHODS

In the laboratory study, we evaluated 4 pediatric and adult esophageal balloon catheters, a liquid-filled catheter, and a micro-tip catheter, both with and without a model esophagus. We compared the measured esophageal pressure for each type of catheter within a pressurized chamber. Esophageal balloon catheters were also tested by manipulating the esophageal balloon inflation volume, and we attempted to derive a filling-volume technique that would assure accuracy. We then tested the feasibility of this technique in 5 mechanically ventilated pediatric subjects with ARDS.

RESULTS

In the laboratory study, smaller inflation volumes underestimated the chamber pressure at higher chamber pressures, and larger inflation volumes overestimated the chamber pressure at lower chamber pressures. Using an optimal filling-volume technique resulted in a mean total error that ranged from -0.53 to -0.10 cm H₂O. The optimal filling-volume values for the pediatric catheters were 0.2-0.6 mL, and 0.4-0.8 mL for the adult catheters. When correctly positioned and calibrated, the micro-tip transducer and liquid-filled catheters were within ± 1 cm H₂O of chamber pressure for all ranges of pressure. In the clinical study, high variability in measured esophageal pressure and subsequent transpulmonary pressure during exhalation and during inhalation was observed within the manufacturer's recommended esophageal balloon inflation ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Manufacturer-recommended esophageal balloon inflation ranges do not assure accuracy. Individual titration of esophageal balloon volume may improve accuracy. Better esophageal catheters are needed to provide reliable esophageal pressure measurements in children.

Assessing Respiratory System Mechanical Function

The main goals of assessing respiratory system mechanical function are to evaluate the lung function through a variety of methods and to detect early signs of abnormalities that could affect the patient's outcomes. In ventilated patients, it has become increasingly important to recognize whether respiratory function has improved or deteriorated, whether the ventilator settings match the patient's demand, and whether the selection of ventilator parameters follows a lung-protective strategy. Ventilator graphics, esophageal pressure, intra-abdominal pressure, and electric impedance tomography are some of the best-known monitoring tools to obtain measurements and adequately evaluate the respiratory system mechanical function.

Transpulmonary Pressure: The Importance of Precise Definitions and Limiting Assumptions

Recent studies applying the principles of respiratory mechanics to respiratory disease have used inconsistent and mutually exclusive definitions of the term "transpulmonary pressure." By the traditional definition, transpulmonary pressure is the pressure across the whole lung, including the intrapulmonary airways, (i.e., the pressure difference between the opening to the pulmonary airway and the pleural surface). However, more recently transpulmonary pressure has also been defined as the pressure across only the lung tissue (i.e., the pressure difference between the alveolar space and the pleural surface), traditionally known as the "elastic recoil pressure of the lung." Multiple definitions of the same term, and failure to recognize their underlying assumptions, have led to different interpretations of lung physiology and conclusions about appropriate therapy for patients. It is our view that many current controversies in the physiological interpretation of disease are caused by the lack of consistency in the definitions of these common physiological terms. In this article, we discuss the historical uses of these terms and recent misconceptions that may have resulted when these terms were confused. These misconceptions include assertions that normal pleural pressure must be negative (subatmospheric) and that a pressure in the pleural space may not be substantially positive when a subject is relaxed with an open airway. We urge specificity and uniformity when using physiological terms to define the physical state of the lungs, the chest wall, and the integrated respiratory system.

Transpulmonary pressure: importance and limits

Transpulmonary pressure (P_L) is computed as the difference between airway pressure and pleural pressure and separates the pressure delivered to the lung from the one acting on chest wall and abdomen. Pleural pressure is measured as esophageal pressure (P_ES) through dedicated catheters provided with esophageal balloons. We discuss the role of P_L in assessing the effects of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In the supine position, directly measured P_L represents the pressure acting on the alveoli and airways. Because there is a pressure gradient in the pleural space from the non-dependent to the dependent zones, the pressure in the esophagus probably represents the pressure at a mid-level between sternal and vertebral regions. For this reason, it has been proposed to set the end-expiratory pressure in order to get a positive value of P_L. This improves oxygenation and compliance. P_L can also be estimated from airway pressure plateau and the ratio of lung to respiratory elastance (elastance-derived method). Some data suggest that this latter calculation may better estimate P_L in the nondependent lung zones, at risk for hyperinflation. Elastance-derived P_L at end-inspiration (P_Lend-insp) may be a good surrogate of end-inspiratory lung stress for the "baby lung", at least in non-obese patients. Limiting end-inspiratory P_L to 20-25 cmH₂O appears physiologically sound to mitigate ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Last, lung driving pressure (∆P_L) reflects the tidal distending pressure. Changes in P_L may also be assessed during assisted breathing to take into account the additive effects of spontaneous breathing and mechanical breaths on lung distension. In summary, despite limitations, assessment of P_L allows a deeper understanding of the risk of VILI and may potentially help tailor ventilator settings.

Current Concepts of ARDS: A Narrative Review

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by the acute onset of pulmonary edema of non-cardiogenic origin, along with bilateral pulmonary infiltrates and reduction in respiratory system compliance. The hallmark of the syndrome is refractory hypoxemia. Despite its first description dates back in the late 1970s, a new definition has recently been proposed. However, the definition remains based on clinical characteristic. In the present review, the diagnostic workup and the pathophysiology of the syndrome will be presented. Therapeutic approaches to ARDS, including lung protective ventilation, prone positioning, neuromuscular blockade, inhaled vasodilators, corticosteroids and recruitment manoeuvres will be reviewed. We will underline how a holistic framework of respiratory and hemodynamic support should be provided to patients with ARDS, aiming to ensure adequate gas exchange by promoting lung recruitment while minimizing the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury. To do so, lung recruitability should be considered, as well as the avoidance of lung overstress by monitoring transpulmonary pressure or airway driving pressure. In the most severe cases, neuromuscular blockade, prone positioning, and extra-corporeal life support (alone or in combination) should be taken into account.

Effect of driving pressure on mortality in ARDS patients during lung protective mechanical ventilation in two randomized controlled trials

Background

Driving pressure (ΔPrs) across the respiratory system is suggested as the strongest predictor of hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We wonder whether this result is related to the range of tidal volume (V_T). Therefore, we investigated ΔPrs in two trials in which strict lung-protective mechanical ventilation was applied in ARDS. Our working hypothesis was that ΔPrs is a risk factor for mortality just like compliance (Crs) or plateau pressure (Pplat,rs) of the respiratory system.

Methods

We performed secondary analysis of data from 787 ARDS patients enrolled in two independent randomized controlled trials evaluating distinct adjunctive techniques while they were ventilated as in the low V_T arm of the ARDSnet trial. For this study, we used V_T, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), Pplat,rs, Crs, ΔPrs, and respiratory rate recorded 24 hours after randomization, and compared them between survivors and nonsurvivors at day 90. Patients were followed for 90 days after inclusion. Cox proportional hazard modeling was used for mortality at day 90. If colinearity between ΔPrs, Crs, and Pplat,rs was verified, specific Cox models were used for each of them.

Results

Both trials enrolled 805 patients of whom 787 had day-1 data available, and 533 of these survived. In the univariate analysis, ΔPrs averaged 13.7 ± 3.7 and 12.8 ± 3.7 cmH₂O (P = 0.002) in nonsurvivors and survivors, respectively. Colinearity between ΔPrs, Crs and Pplat,rs, which was expected as these variables are mathematically coupled, was statistically significant. Hazard ratios from the Cox models for day-90 mortality were 1.05 (1.02–1.08) (P = 0.005), 1.05 (1.01–1.08) (P = 0.008) and 0.985 (0.972–0.985) (P = 0.029) for ΔPrs, Pplat,rs and Crs, respectively. PEEP and V_T were not associated with death in any model.

Conclusions

When ventilating patients with low V_T, ΔPrs is a risk factor for death in ARDS patients, as is Pplat,rs or Crs. As our data originated from trials from which most ARDS patients were excluded due to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, these findings must be validated in independent observational studies in patients ventilated with a lung protective strategy.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00299650. Registered 6 March 2006 for the Acurasys trial.

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00527813. Registered 10 September 2007 for the Proseva trial.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1556-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The promises and problems of transpulmonary pressure measurements in acute respiratory distress syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The optimal strategy for assessing and preventing ventilator-induced lung injury in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is controversial. Recent investigative efforts have focused on personalizing ventilator settings to individual respiratory mechanics. This review examines the strengths and weaknesses of using transpulmonary pressure measurements to guide ventilator management in ARDS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical studies suggest that adjusting ventilator settings based on transpulmonary pressure measurements is feasible, may improve oxygenation, and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury.

SUMMARY

The measurement of transpulmonary pressure relies upon esophageal manometry, which requires the acceptance of several assumptions and potential errors. Notably, this includes the ability of localized esophageal pressures to represent global pleural pressure. Recent investigations demonstrated improved oxygenation in ARDS patients when positive end-expiratory pressure was adjusted to target specific end-inspiratory or end-expiratory transpulmonary pressures. However, there are different methods for estimating transpulmonary pressure and different goals for positive end-expiratory pressure titration among recent studies. More research is needed to refine techniques for the estimation and utilization of transpulmonary pressure to guide ventilator settings in ARDS patients.

Effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on esophageal and transpulmonary pressures in moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

Background

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) has not been shown to be beneficial in the management of moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). There is uncertainty about the actual pressure applied into the lung during HFOV. We therefore performed a study to compare the transpulmonary pressure (P_L) during conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) and different levels of mean airway pressure (mPaw) during HFOV.

Methods

This is a prospective randomized crossover study in a university teaching hospital. An esophageal balloon catheter was used to measure esophageal pressures (Pes) at end inspiration and end expiration and to calculate P_L. Measurements were taken during ventilation with CMV (CMVpre) after which patients were switched to HFOV with three 1-h different levels of mPaw set at +5, +10 and +15 cm H₂O above the mean airway pressure measured during CMV. Patients were thereafter switched back to CMV (CMVpost).

Results

Ten patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS were included. We demonstrated a linear increase in Pes and P_L with the increase in mPaw during HFOV. Contrary to CMV, P_L was always positive during HFOV whatever the level of mPaw applied but not associated with improvement in oxygenation. We found significant correlations between mPaw and Pes.

Conclusion

HFOV with high level of mPaw increases transpulmonary pressures without improvement in oxygenation.

Reliability of transpulmonary pressure-time curve profile to identify tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental unilateral pleural effusion

The stress index (SI) is a parameter that characterizes the shape of the airway pressure-time profile (P/t). It indicates the slope progression of the curve, reflecting both lung and chest wall properties. The presence of pleural effusion alters the mechanical properties of the respiratory system decreasing transpulmonary pressure (Ptp). We investigated whether the SI computed using Ptp tracing would provide reliable insight into tidal recruitment/overdistention during the tidal cycle in the presence of unilateral effusion. Unilateral pleural effusion was simulated in anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs. Respiratory system mechanics and thoracic computed tomography (CT) were studied to assess P/t curve shape and changes in global lung aeration. SI derived from airway pressure (Paw) was compared with that calculated by Ptp under the same conditions. These results were themselves compared with quantitative CT analysis as a gold standard for tidal recruitment/hyperinflation. Despite marked changes in tidal recruitment, mean values of SI computed either from Paw or Ptp were remarkably insensitive to variations of PEEP or condition. After the instillation of effusion, SI indicates a preponderant over-distension effect, not detected by CT. After the increment in PEEP level, the extent of CT-determined tidal recruitment suggest a huge recruitment effect of PEEP as reflected by lung compliance. Both SI in this case were unaffected. We showed that the ability of SI to predict tidal recruitment and overdistension was significantly reduced in a model of altered chest wall-lung relationship, even if the parameter was computed from the Ptp curve profile.

How much esophageal pressure-guided end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure is sufficient to maintain lung recruitment in lavage-induced lung injury?

BACKGROUND

Because of limitations of the esophageal balloon technique, the value of using esophageal pressure (Pes)-guided end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL-exp) to maintain lung recruitment in adult respiratory distress syndrome is controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether tailoring PL-exp to greater than 0 was enough to maintain lung recruitment.

METHODS

Ten pigs with severe lavage-induced lung injury were mechanically ventilated in a decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial that was reduced from 20 to 6 cm H2O after full-lung recruitment. Respiratory mechanics, blood gases, hemodynamic data, and whole-lung computed tomography scans were recorded at each PEEP level. Open-lung PEEP (OL-PEEP) was determined by computed tomography, while Pes-guided PEEP (Pes-PEEP) was to maintain PL-exp greater than 0.

RESULTS

OL-PEEP was higher than Pes-PEEP, which induced a higher PL-exp at OL-PEEP than at Pes-PEEP (4.6 [1.6] cm H2O vs. 1.2 [0.6] cm H2O, p < 0.001). Compared with OL-PEEP, the nonaerated lung region was significantly increased at Pes-PEEP. Superimposed pressure (SP) of the lung tissue between the esophageal plane and the dorsal level was higher at Pes-PEEP than at OL-PEEP, whereas PL-exp at the dorsal level was lower at Pes-PEEP than at OL-PEEP (-1.5 [0.7] cm H2O vs. 2.5 [1.5] cm H2O, p < 0.001). The SP correlated with PL-exp at the dorsal level and the nonaerated lung region.

CONCLUSION

In this surfactant-depleted model, maintaining PL-exp just greater than 0 using Pes was unable to maintain lung recruitment; this was partly caused by a lack of compensation for the increased SP between the esophageal plane and the dorsal level.

Severe hypoxemia: which strategy to choose

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by a noncardiogenic pulmonary edema with bilateral chest X-ray opacities and reduction in lung compliance, and the hallmark of the syndrome is hypoxemia refractory to oxygen therapy. Severe hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 100 mmHg), which defines severe ARDS, can be found in 20-30 % of the patients and is associated with the highest mortality rate. Although the standard supportive treatment remains mechanical ventilation (noninvasive and invasive), possible adjuvant therapies can be considered. We performed an up-to-date clinical review of the possible available strategies for ARDS patients with severe hypoxemia.

MAIN RESULTS

In summary, in moderate-to-severe ARDS or in the presence of other organ failure, noninvasive ventilatory support presents a high risk of failure: in those cases the risk/benefit of delayed mechanical ventilation should be evaluated carefully. Tailoring mechanical ventilation to the individual patient is fundamental to reduce the risk of ventilation-induced lung injury (VILI): it is mandatory to apply a low tidal volume, while the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure should be selected after a stratification of the severity of the disease, also taking into account lung recruitability; monitoring transpulmonary pressure or airway driving pressure can help to avoid lung overstress. Targeting oxygenation of 88-92 % and tolerating a moderate level of hypercapnia are a safe choice. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are useful to maintain patient-ventilation synchrony in the first hours; prone positioning improves oxygenation in most cases and promotes a more homogeneous distribution of ventilation, reducing the risk of VILI; both treatments, also in combination, are associated with an improvement in outcome if applied in the acute phase in the most severe cases. The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in severe ARDS is increasing worldwide, but because of a lack of randomized trials is still considered a rescue therapy.

CONCLUSION

Severe ARDS patients should receive a holistic framework of respiratory and hemodynamic support aimed to ensure adequate gas exchange while minimizing the risk of VILI, by promoting lung recruitment and setting protective mechanical ventilation. In the most severe cases, NMBAs, prone positioning, and ECMO should be considered.