Effect of incremental PEEP titration on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial

Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) has a significant negative impact and are associated with increased length of hospital stay and cost of care. Emergency surgery is a well-established risk factor for PPC. Previous studies reported that personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) might reduce postoperative atelectasis and postoperative pulmonary complications. N = 168 adult patients undergoing major emergency laparotomy under general anesthesia were recruited in this study. A minimum driving pressure based incremental PEEP titration was compared to a fixed PEEP of 5 cmH2O. The primary outcome was PPC up to postoperative day 7. The mean (standard deviation) of the recruited patients was 41.7(16.1)y, and 48.8% (82 of 168 patients) were female. The risk of PPC at postoperative day 7 was similar in both the study groups [Relative risk (RR) (95% Confidence interval, CI) 0.81 (0.58, 1.13); p = 0.25]. In addition, the incidence of intraoperative hypotension [p = 0.75], oxygen-free days at day 28 [p = 0.27], duration of postoperative hospital stay [p = 0.50], length of postoperative intensive care unit stay [p = 0.28], and in-hospital mortality [p = 0.38] were similar in two groups. Incidence of PPC was not reduced with the use of an individualized PEEP strategy based on lowest driving pressure. However, the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia was also not increased with titrated PEEP.Trial Registration: www.ctri.nic.in ; CTRI/2020/12/029765.

Comparison of lung aeration loss in open abdominal oncologic surgeries after ventilation with electrical impedance tomography-guided PEEP versus conventional PEEP: a pilot feasibility study

Background

Existing literature lacks high-quality evidence regarding the ideal intraoperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to minimize postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). We hypothesized that applying individualized PEEP derived from electrical impedance tomography (EIT) would reduce the severity of postoperative lung aeration loss, deterioration in oxygenation, and PPC incidence.

Methods

A pilot feasibility study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent open abdominal oncologic surgery. The patients were randomized to receive individualized PEEP or conventional PEEP at 4 cm H2O. The primary outcome was the impact of individualized PEEP on changes in the modified lung ultrasound score (MLUS) derived from preoperative and postoperative lung ultrasonography. A higher MLUS indicated greater lung aeration loss. The secondary outcomes were the PaO2/FIO2 ratio and PPC incidence.

Results

A significant increase in the postoperative MLUS (12 ± 3.6 vs 7.9 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) and a significant difference between the postoperative and preoperative MLUS values (7.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.0 ± 1.6, P < 0.001) were found in the conventional PEEP group, indicating increased lung aeration loss. In the conventional PEEP group, the intraoperative PaO2/FIO2 ratios were significantly lower but not the postoperative ratios. The PPC incidence was not significantly different between the groups. Post-hoc analysis showed the increase in lung aeration loss and deterioration of intraoperative oxygenation correlated with the deviation from the individualized PEEP.

Conclusions

Individualized PEEP appears to protect against lung aeration loss and intraoperative oxygenation deterioration. The advantage was greater in patients whose individualized PEEP deviated more from the conventional PEEP.

Bedside personalized methods based on electrical impedance tomography or respiratory mechanics to set PEEP in ARDS and recruitment-to-inflation ratio: a physiologic study

BACKGROUND

Various Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration strategies have been proposed to optimize ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to compare PEEP titration strategies based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to methods derived from respiratory system mechanics with or without esophageal pressure measurements, in terms of PEEP levels and association with recruitability.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with ARDS were enrolled. Recruitability was assessed by the estimated Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/Iest) between PEEP 15 and 5 cmH2O. Then, a decremental PEEP trial from PEEP 20 to 5 cmH2O was performed. PEEP levels determined by the following strategies were studied: (1) plateau pressure 28-30 cmH2O (Express), (2) minimal positive expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Positive PLe), (3) center of ventilation closest to 0.5 (CoV) and (4) intersection of the EIT-based overdistension and lung collapse curves (Crossing Point). In addition, the PEEP levels determined by the Crossing Point strategy were assessed using different PEEP ranges during the decremental PEEP trial.

RESULTS

Express and CoV strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Positive PLe and Crossing Point ones (17 [14-17], 20 [17-20], 8 [5-11], 10 [8-11] respectively, p < 0.001). For each strategy, there was no significant association between the optimal PEEP level and R/Iest (Crossing Point: r2 = 0.073, p = 0.263; CoV: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.941; Express: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.920; Positive PLe: r2 = 0.037, p = 0.461). The PEEP level obtained with the Crossing Point strategy was impacted by the PEEP range used during the decremental PEEP trial.

CONCLUSIONS

CoV and Express strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Crossing Point and Positive PLe strategies. Optimal PEEP levels proposed by these four methods were not associated with recruitability. Recruitability should be specifically assessed in ARDS patients to optimize PEEP titration.

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure titration of intraoperative mechanical ventilation in different operative positions of female patients under general anesthesia

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of different titrated methods used to determine individual positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for intraoperative mechanical ventilation in female patients undergoing general anesthesia in different operative positions, and provide reference ranges of optimal PEEP values based on the titration.

Methods

A total of 123 female patients who underwent elective open abdominal surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After endotracheal intubation, patients' body position was adjusted to the supine position, Trendelenburg positions at 10° and 20° respectively. PEEP was titrated from 20 cmH2O to 4 cmH2O, decreasing by 2 cmH2O every 1 min. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT), hemodynamic and respiratory mechanics parameters were continuously monitored and recorded. Optimal PEEP values and reference ranges were respectively calculated based on optimal EIT parameters, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and lung dynamic compliance (Cdyn).

Results

EIT-guided optimal PEEP was found to have higher values than those of the MAP-guided and Cdyn-guided methods for all three body positions (P < 0.001), and it was observed to more significantly inhibit hemodynamics (P < 0.05). The variable coefficients of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were smaller than those of the other two methods, and this technique could provide better ventilation uniformity for dorsal/ventral lung fields and better balance for pulmonary atelectasis/collapse. The 95% reference ranges of EIT-guided optimal PEEP values were 4.6-13.8 cmH2O, 7.0-15.0 cmH2O and 8.6-17.0 cmH2O for the supine position, Trendelenburg 10°, and Trendelenburg 20° positions, respectively.

Conclusion

EIT-guided optimal PEEP titration was found to be a superior method for lung protective ventilation in different operative positions under general anesthesia. The calculated reference ranges of PEEP values based on the EIT-guided method can be used as a reference for intraoperative mechanical ventilation.

Dynamic lung aeration and strain with positive end-expiratory pressure individualized to maximal compliance versus ARDSNet low-stretch strategy: a study in a surfactant depletion model of lung injury

BACKGROUND

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) individualized to a maximal respiratory system compliance directly implies minimal driving pressures with potential outcome benefits, yet, raises concerns on static and dynamic overinflation, strain and cyclic recruitment. Detailed accurate assessment and understanding of these has been hampered by methodological limitations. We aimed to investigate the effects of a maximal compliance-guided PEEP strategy on dynamic lung aeration, strain and tidal recruitment using current four-dimensional computed tomography (CT) techniques and analytical methods of tissue deformation in a surfactant depletion experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS

ARDS was induced by saline lung lavage in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated healthy sheep (n = 6). Animals were ventilated in a random sequence with: (1) ARDSNet low-stretch protocol; (2) maximal compliance PEEP strategy. Lung aeration, strain and tidal recruitment were acquired with whole-lung respiratory-gated high-resolution CT and quantified using registration-based techniques.

RESULTS

Relative to the ARDSNet low-stretch protocol, the maximal compliance PEEP strategy resulted in: (1) improved dynamic whole-lung aeration at end-expiration (0.456 ± 0.064 vs. 0.377 ± 0.101, P = 0.019) and end-inspiration (0.514 ± 0.079 vs. 0.446 ± 0.083, P = 0.012) with reduced non-aerated and increased normally-aerated lung mass without associated hyperinflation; (2) decreased aeration heterogeneity at end-expiration (coefficient of variation: 0.498 ± 0.078 vs. 0.711 ± 0.207, P = 0.025) and end-inspiration (0.419 ± 0.135 vs. 0.580 ± 0.108, P = 0.014) with higher aeration in dorsal regions; (3) tidal aeration with larger inspiratory increases in normally-aerated and decreases in poorly-aerated areas, and negligible in hyperinflated lung (Aeration × Strategy: P = 0.026); (4) reduced tidal strains in lung regions with normal-aeration (Aeration × Strategy: P = 0.047) and improved regional distributions with lower tidal strains in middle and ventral lung (Region-of-interest [ROI] × Strategy: P < 0.001); and (5) less tidal recruitment in middle and dorsal lung (ROI × Strategy: P = 0.044) directly related to whole-lung tidal strain (r = 0.751, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In well-recruitable ARDS models, a maximal compliance PEEP strategy improved end-expiratory/inspiratory whole-lung aeration and its homogeneity without overinflation. It further reduced dynamic strain in middle-ventral regions and tidal recruitment in middle-dorsal areas. These findings suggest the maximal compliance strategy minimizing whole-lung dynamically quantified mechanisms of ventilator-induced lung injury with less cyclic recruitment and no additional overinflation in large heterogeneously expanded and recruitable lungs.

Time constant to determine PEEP levels in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ARDS: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

We hypothesized that the measured expiratory time constant (TauE) could be a bedside parameter for the evaluation of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) settings in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted including consecutively admitted adults (n = 16) with COVID-19-related ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation. A PEEP titration using PCV with a fixed driving pressure of 14 cmH₂O was performed and TauE recorded at each PEEP level (0 to 18 cmH₂O) in prone (n = 29) or supine (n = 24) positions. The PEEP setting with the highest TauE (TauE_MAX) was considered to represent the best tradeoff between recruitment and overdistention.

RESULTS

Two groups of patterns were observed in the TauE plots: recruitable (R) (75%) and nonrecruitable (NR) (25%). In the R group, the optimal PEEP and PEEP ranges were 8 ± 3 cmH₂O and 6-10 cmH₂O for the prone position and 9 ± 3 cmH₂O and 7-12 cmH₂O for the supine position. In the NR group, the optimal PEEP and PEEP ranges were 4 ± 4 cmH₂O and 1-8 cmH₂O for the prone position and 5 ± 3 cmH₂O and 1-7 cmH₂O for the supine position, respectively. The R group showed significantly higher optimal PEEP (p < 0.004) and PEEP ranges (p < 0.001) than the NR group. Forty-five percent of measurements resulted in the most optimal PEEP being significantly different between the positions (p < 0.01). Moderate positive correlation has been found between TauE vs C_RS at all PEEP levels (r² = 0.43, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TauE may be a novel method to assess PEEP levels. There was wide variation in patient responses to PEEP, which indicates the need for personalized evaluation.

Early individualized positive end-expiratory pressure guided by electrical impedance tomography in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Background

Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has potential interest in the optimization of ventilation distribution in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of the study was to determine whether early individualized titration of PEEP with EIT improved outcomes in patients with ARDS.

Methods

A total of 117 ARDS patients receiving mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned to EIT group (n = 61, PEEP adjusted based on ventilation distribution) or control group (n = 56, low PEEP/FiO₂ table). The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Secondary and exploratory outcomes were ventilator-free days, length of ICU stay, incidence of pneumothorax and barotrauma, and difference in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at day 1 (ΔD1-SOFA) and day 2 (ΔD2-SOFA) compared with baseline.

Measurements and main results

There was no statistical difference in the value of PEEP between the EIT group and control group, but the combination of PEEP and FiO₂ was different between groups. In the control group, a significantly positive correlation was found between the PEEP value and the corresponding FiO₂ (r = 0.47, p < 0.00001) since a given matched table was used for PEEP settings. Diverse combinations of PEEP and FiO₂ were found in the EIT group (r = 0.05, p = 0.68). There was no significant difference in mortality rate (21% vs. 27%, EIT vs. control, p = 0.63), ICU length of stay (13.0 (7.0, 25.0) vs 10.0 (7.0, 14.8), median (25th–75th percentile); p = 0.17), and ventilator-free days at day 28 (14.0 (2.0, 23.0) vs 19.0 (0.0, 24.0), p = 0.55) between the two groups. The incidence of new barotrauma was zero. Compared with control group, significantly lower ΔD1-SOFA and ΔD2-SOFA were found in the EIT group (p < 0.001) in a post hoc comparison. Moreover, the EIT group exhibited a significant decrease of SOFA at day 2 compared with baseline (paired t-test, difference by − 1 (− 3.5, 0), p = 0.001). However, the control group did show a similar decrease (difference by 1 (− 2, 2), p = 0.131).

Conclusion

Our study showed a 6% absolute decrease in mortality in the EIT group: a statistically non-significant, but clinically non-negligible result. This result along with the showed improvement in organ function might justify further reserach to validate the beneficial effect of individualized EIT-guided PEEP setting on clinical outcomes of patients with ARDS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials, NCT02361398. Registered 11 February 2015—prospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02361398.

Lung Recruitment, Individualized PEEP, and Prone Position Ventilation for COVID-19-Associated Severe ARDS: A Single Center Observational Study

Background: Patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may develop severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of the study was to explore the lung recruitability, individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and prone position in COVID-19-associated severe ARDS. Methods: Twenty patients who met the inclusion criteria were studied retrospectively (PaO₂/FiO₂ 68.0 ± 10.3 mmHg). The patients were ventilated under volume-controlled mode with tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight. The lung recruitability was assessed via the improvement of PaO₂, PaCO₂, and static respiratory system compliance (C_stat) from low to high PEEP (5-15 cmH₂O). Patients were considered recruitable if two out of three parameters improved. Subsequently, PEEP was titrated according to the best C_stat. The patients were turned to prone position for further 18-20 h. Results: For recruitability assessment, average value of PaO₂ was slightly improved at PEEP 15 cmH₂O (68.0 ± 10.3 vs. 69.7 ± 7.9 mmHg, baseline vs. PEEP 15 cmH₂O; p = 0.31). However, both PaCO₂ and C_stat worsened (PaCO₂: 72.5 ± 7.1 vs. 75.1 ± 9.0 mmHg; p < 0.01. C_stat: 17.5 ± 3.5 vs. 16.6 ± 3.9 ml/cmH₂O; p = 0.05). Only four patients (20%) were considered lung recruitable. Individually titrated PEEP was higher than the baseline PEEP (8.0 ± 2.1 cmH₂O vs. 5 cmH₂O, p < 0.001). After 18-20 h of prone positioning, investigated parameters were significantly improved compared to the baseline (PaO₂: 82.4 ± 15.5 mmHg. PaCO₂: 67.2 ± 6.4 mmHg. C_stat: 20.6 ± 4.4 ml/cmH₂O. All p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Conclusions: Lung recruitability was very low in COVID-19-associated severe ARDS. Individually titrated PEEP and prone positioning might improve lung mechanics and blood gasses.

[Specific treatment of acute lung failure]

Wegen der hohen Heterogenität und Dynamik des Krankheitsverlaufes stellt die Behandlung des akuten Lungenversagens Intensivmediziner vor außerordentliche Herausforderungen. Nachdem die aktuelle Definition, Pathophysiologie und die Differenzialdiagnosen in der vorliegenden Zeitschrift bereits dargestellt wurden, werden im Folgenden Möglichkeiten der spezifischen und individualisierten Therapie behandelt. Die Beatmungstherapie mit Limitierung der Tidalvolumina und Druckamplitude zeigt einen Vorteil hinsichtlich der Letalität, ist aber aufgrund der vielfältigen Ätiologie des akuten Lungenversagens im Kontext mit den unterschiedlichen Gegebenheiten individuell anzupassen. In den letzten Jahren wurde die Bedeutung der Bauchlage, der möglichst frühzeitigen Spontanatmung und der Frühmobilisation für den positiven Krankheitsverlauf erkannt. Eine individualisierte Therapie sollte die Besonderheiten des Patienten und den spezifischen Krankheitsverlauf berücksichtigen.

Effect of individualized PEEP titration guided by intratidal compliance profile analysis on regional ventilation assessed by electrical impedance tomography - a randomized controlled trial

Background

The application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may reduce dynamic strain during mechanical ventilation. Although numerous approaches for PEEP titration have been proposed, there is no accepted strategy for titrating optimal PEEP. By analyzing intratidal compliance profiles, PEEP may be individually titrated for patients.

Methods

After obtaining informed consent, 60 consecutive patients undergoing general anesthesia were randomly allocated to mechanical ventilation with PEEP 5 cmH₂O (control group) or PEEP individually titrated, guided by an analysis of the intratidal compliance profile (intervention group). The primary endpoint was the frequency of each nonlinear intratidal compliance (C_RS) profile of the respiratory system (horizontal, increasing, decreasing, and mixed). The secondary endpoints measured were respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic variables, and regional ventilation, which was assessed via electrical impedance tomography.

Results

The frequencies of the C_RS profiles were comparable between the groups. Besides PEEP [control: 5.0 (0.0), intervention: 5.8 (1.1) cmH₂O, p < 0.001], the respiratory and hemodynamic variables were comparable between the two groups. The compliance profile analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups. The loss of ventral and dorsal regional ventilation was higher in the control [ventral: 41.0 (16.3)%; dorsal: 25.9 (13.8)%] than in the intervention group [ventral: 29.3 (17.6)%; dorsal: 16.4 (12.7)%; p (ventral) = 0.039, p (dorsal) = 0.028].

Conclusions

Unfavorable compliance profiles indicating tidal derecruitment were found less often than in earlier studies. Individualized PEEP titration resulted in slightly higher PEEP. A slight global increase in aeration associated with this was indicated by regional gain and loss analysis. Differences in dorsal to ventral ventilation distribution were not found.

Trial registration

This clinical trial was registered at the German Register for Clinical Trials (DRKS00008924) on August 10, 2015.

Model-based PEEP titration versus standard practice in mechanical ventilation: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) at minimum respiratory elastance during mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) may improve patient care and outcome. The Clinical utilisation of respiratory elastance (CURE) trial is a two-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigating the performance of PEEP selected at an objective, model-based minimal respiratory system elastance in patients with ARDS.

Methods and design

The CURE RCT compares two groups of patients requiring invasive MV with a partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio ≤ 200; one criterion of the Berlin consensus definition of moderate (≤ 200) or severe (≤ 100) ARDS. All patients are ventilated using pressure controlled (bi-level) ventilation with tidal volume = 6–8 ml/kg. Patients randomised to the control group will have PEEP selected per standard practice (SPV). Patients randomised to the intervention will have PEEP selected based on a minimal elastance using a model-based computerised method. The CURE RCT is a single-centre trial in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Christchurch hospital, New Zealand, with a target sample size of 320 patients over a maximum of 3 years. The primary outcome is the area under the curve (AUC) ratio of arterial blood oxygenation to the fraction of inspired oxygen over time. Secondary outcomes include length of time of MV, ventilator-free days (VFD) up to 28 days, ICU and hospital length of stay, AUC of oxygen saturation (SpO₂)/FiO₂ during MV, number of desaturation events (SpO₂ < 88%), changes in respiratory mechanics and chest x-ray index scores, rescue therapies (prone positioning, nitric oxide use, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) and hospital and 90-day mortality.

Discussion

The CURE RCT is the first trial comparing significant clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS in whom PEEP is selected at minimum elastance using an objective model-based method able to quantify and consider both inter-patient and intra-patient variability. CURE aims to demonstrate the hypothesized benefit of patient-specific PEEP and attest to the significance of real-time monitoring and decision-support for MV in the critical care environment.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12614001069640. Registered on 22 September 2014.

(https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=366838&isReview=true) The CURE RCT clinical protocol and data usage has been granted by the New Zealand South Regional Ethics Committee (Reference number: 14/STH/132).

PEEP titration in moderate to severe ARDS: plateau versus transpulmonary pressure

BACKGROUND

Although lung protection with low tidal volume and limited plateau pressure (P_plat) improves survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (ARDS), the best way to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is still debated.

METHODS

This study aimed to compare two strategies using individual PEEP based on a maximum P_plat (28-30 cmH₂O, the Express group) or on keeping end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure positive (0-5 cmH₂O, P_Lexpi group). We estimated alveolar recruitment (Vrec), end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar distension based on elastance-related end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (P_L,EL).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO₂/FiO₂ < 150 mmHg) were included with a baseline PEEP of 7.0 ± 1.8 cmH₂O and a PaO₂/FiO₂ of 91.2 ± 31.2 mmHg. PEEP and oxygenation increased significantly from baseline with both protocols; PEEP Express group was 14.2 ± 3.6 cmH₂O versus 16.7 ± 5.9 cmH₂O in P_Lexpi group. No patient had the same PEEP with the two protocols. Vrec was higher with the latter protocol (299 [0 to 875] vs. 222 [47 to 483] ml, p = 0.049) and correlated with improved oxygenation (R² = 0.45, p = 0.002). Two and seven patients in the Express and P_L,expi groups, respectively, had P_L,EL > 25 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a great heterogeneity of P_Lexpi when P_plat is used to titrate PEEP but with limited risk of over-distension. A PEEP titration for a moderate positive level of P_Lexpi might slightly improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation but increases the risk of over-distension in one-third of patients.

Optimal PEEP during one-lung ventilation with capnothorax: An experimental study

BACKGROUND

One-lung ventilation (OLV) with induced capnothorax carries the risk of severely impaired ventilation and circulation. Optimal PEEP may mitigate the physiological perturbations during these conditions.

METHODS

Right-sided OLV with capnothorax (16 cm H₂ O) on the left side was initiated in eight anesthetized, muscle-relaxed piglets. A recruitment maneuver and a decremental PEEP titration from PEEP 20 cm H₂ O to zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) was performed. Regional ventilation and perfusion were studied with electrical impedance tomography and computer tomography of the chest was used. End-expiratory lung volume and hemodynamics were recorded and.

RESULTS

PaO₂ peaked at PEEP 12 cm H₂ O (49 ± 14 kPa) and decreased to 11 ± 5 kPa at ZEEP (P < 0.001). PaCO₂ was 9.5 ± 1.3 kPa at 20 cm H₂ O PEEP and did not change when PEEP step-wise was reduced to 12 cm H₂ O PaCO_2. At lower PEEP, PaCO₂ increased markedly. The ventilatory driving pressure was lowest at PEEP 14 cm H₂ O (19.6 ± 5.8 cm H₂ O) and increased to 38.3 ± 6.1 cm H₂ O at ZEEP (P < 0.001). When reducing PEEP below 12-14 cm H₂ O ventilation shifted from the dependent to the nondependent regions of the ventilated lung (P = 0.003), and perfusion shifted from the ventilated to the nonventilated lung (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Optimal PEEP was 12-18 cm H₂ O and probably relates to capnothorax insufflation pressure. With suboptimal PEEP, ventilation/perfusion mismatch in the ventilated lung and redistribution of blood flow to the nonventilated lung occurred.

Recruitment maneuver does not provide any mortality benefit over lung protective strategy ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the randomized controlled trials

Background

Clinical benefits of recruitment maneuver in ARDS patients are controversial. A number of previous studies showed possible benefits; a large recent study reported that recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration may even be harmful. This meta-analysis was designed to compare the clinical utility of recruitment maneuver with low tidal volume ventilation in adult patients with ARDS.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials comparing recruitment maneuver and lung protective ventilation strategy with lung protective strategy ventilation protocol alone in adult patients with ARDS has been included in this meta-analysis. PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 10 November 2017 to identify potentially eligible trials. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were calculated for binary and continuous variables respectively.

Results

Data of 2480 patients from 7 randomized controlled trials have been included in this meta-analysis and systemic review. Reported mortality at the longest available follow-up [RR (95% CI) 0.93 (0.80, 1.08); p = 0.33], ICU mortality [RR (95% CI) 0.91 (0.76, 1.10); p = 0.33] and in-hospital mortality [RR (95% CI) 0.95 (0.83, 1.08); p = 0.45] were similar between recruitment maneuver group and standard lung protective ventilation group. Duration of hospital stay [SMD (95% CI) 0.00 (− 0.09, 0.10); p = 0.92] and duration of ICU stays [SMD (95% CI) 0.05 (− 0.09, 0.19); p = 0.49] were also similar between recruitment maneuver group and standard lung protective ventilation group. Risk of barotrauma was also similar.

Conclusion

Use of recruitment maneuver along with co-interventions such as PEEP titration does not provide any benefit in terms of mortality, length of ICU, and hospital stay in ARDS patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40560-018-0305-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Recruitment and PEEP level influences long-time aeration in saline-lavaged piglets: an experimental model

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate aeration/ventilation in saline-lavaged piglets during a 3-h follow-up after a recruitment maneuver (RM)/PEEP titration compared with PEEP 10 cmH2O without a RM.

BACKGROUND

Lung recruitment and PEEP titration are used to find a PEEP preventing repetitive opening/collapsing of lung.

METHODS

Twenty-one lung-lavaged piglets, mean age 7 weeks and mean weight 10 kg; a RM-group and a PEEP10-group, were ventilated at PEEP 5 cmH2O (baseline) followed by zero PEEP ventilation. In the RM-group, tidal elimination of CO2 and dynamic compliance (Cdyn) guided recruitment and PEEP titration, respectively. A final 3-h ventilation followed using PEEP 2 cmH2O above the first decline of Cdyn and end-inspiratory pressure (EIP) for a target tidal volume (VT) of 10 ml · kg(-1). In the PEEP10-group, PEEP 10 cmH2O without a RM was used during the final 3-h ventilation. CT scans and blood gases were repeated every 30 min. Airway pressures, Cdyn and hemodynamics were continuously recorded.

RESULTS

Aeration improved without differences between groups. The RM-group PEEP level of 10 ± 0.6 cmH2O did not differ from the PEEP10-group. Compared to baseline EIP was lower in the RM-group after 3-h ventilation. In both groups, driving pressure (DP) was lower and Cdyn higher than baseline. In the RM-group, final EIP and DP were lower and Cdyn higher than in the PEEP10-group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both RM/PEEP titration and PEEP elevation resulted in improved aeration without differences between groups at the end point. Lung aeration was achieved at lower EIP and DP and higher Cdyn in the RM-group than in the PEEP10-group.