1
|
Keats K, Deng S, Chen X, Zhang T, Devlin JW, Murphy DJ, Smith SE, Murray B, Kamaleswaran R, Sikora A. Unsupervised machine learning analysis to identify patterns of ICU medication use for fluid overload prediction. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.03.21.24304663. [PMID: 38562806 PMCID: PMC10984037 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravenous (IV) medications are a fundamental cause of fluid overload (FO) in the intensive care unit (ICU); however, the association between IV medication use (including volume), administration timing, and FO occurrence remains unclear. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included consecutive adults admitted to an ICU ≥72 hours with available fluid balance data. FO was defined as a positive fluid balance ≥7% of admission body weight within 72 hours of ICU admission. After reviewing medication administration record (MAR) data in three-hour periods, IV medication exposure was categorized into clusters using principal component analysis (PCA) and Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM). Medication regimens of patients with and without FO were compared within clusters to assess for temporal clusters associated with FO using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Exploratory analyses of the medication cluster most associated with FO for medications frequently appearing and used in the first 24 hours was conducted. RESULTS FO occurred in 127/927 (13.7%) of the patients enrolled. Patients received a median (IQR) of 31 (13-65) discrete IV medication administrations over the 72-hour period. Across all 47,803 IV medication administrations, ten unique IV medication clusters were identified with 121-130 medications in each cluster. Among the ten clusters, cluster 7 had the greatest association with FO; the mean number of cluster 7 medications received was significantly greater in patients in the FO cohort compared to patients who did not experience FO (25.6 vs.10.9. p<0.0001). 51 of the 127 medications in cluster 7 (40.2%) appeared in > 5 separate 3-hour periods during the 72-hour study window. The most common cluster 7 medications included continuous infusions, antibiotics, and sedatives/analgesics. Addition of cluster 7 medications to a prediction model with APACHE II score and receipt of diuretics improved the ability for the model to predict fluid overload (AUROC 5.65, p =0.0004). CONCLUSIONS Using ML approaches, a unique IV medication cluster was strongly associated with FO. Incorporation of this cluster improved the ability to predict development of fluid overload in ICU patients compared with traditional prediction models. This method may be further developed into real-time clinical applications to improve early detection of adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli Keats
- Augusta University Medical Center, Department of Pharmacy, Augusta, GA
| | - Shiyuan Deng
- University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Xianyan Chen
- University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Tianyi Zhang
- University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Statistics, Athens, GA, USA
| | - John W Devlin
- Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston, MA
| | - David J Murphy
- Emory University, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Susan E Smith
- University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Brian Murray
- University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rishikesan Kamaleswaran
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Andrea Sikora
- 1120 15th Street, HM-118 Augusta, GA 30912
- University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sikora A, Zhang T, Murphy DJ, Smith SE, Murray B, Kamaleswaran R, Chen X, Buckley MS, Rowe S, Devlin JW. Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU. Sci Rep 2023; 13:19654. [PMID: 37949982 PMCID: PMC10638304 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46735-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Fluid overload, while common in the ICU and associated with serious sequelae, is hard to predict and may be influenced by ICU medication use. Machine learning (ML) approaches may offer advantages over traditional regression techniques to predict it. We compared the ability of traditional regression techniques and different ML-based modeling approaches to identify clinically meaningful fluid overload predictors. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients admitted to an ICU ≥ 72 h between 10/1/2015 and 10/31/2020 with available fluid balance data. Models to predict fluid overload (a positive fluid balance ≥ 10% of the admission body weight) in the 48-72 h after ICU admission were created. Potential patient and medication fluid overload predictor variables (n = 28) were collected at either baseline or 24 h after ICU admission. The optimal traditional logistic regression model was created using backward selection. Supervised, classification-based ML models were trained and optimized, including a meta-modeling approach. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared between the traditional and ML fluid prediction models. A total of 49 of the 391 (12.5%) patients developed fluid overload. Among the ML models, the XGBoost model had the highest performance (AUROC 0.78, PPV 0.27, NPV 0.94) for fluid overload prediction. The XGBoost model performed similarly to the final traditional logistic regression model (AUROC 0.70; PPV 0.20, NPV 0.94). Feature importance analysis revealed severity of illness scores and medication-related data were the most important predictors of fluid overload. In the context of our study, ML and traditional models appear to perform similarly to predict fluid overload in the ICU. Baseline severity of illness and ICU medication regimen complexity are important predictors of fluid overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Sikora
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, 1120 15th Street, HM-118, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA
| | - Tianyi Zhang
- Department of Statistics, University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Athens, GA, USA
| | - David J Murphy
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Susan E Smith
- Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, 1120 15th Street, HM-118, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA
| | - Brian Murray
- Department of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rishikesan Kamaleswaran
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Xianyan Chen
- Department of Statistics, University of Georgia Franklin College of Arts and Sciences, Athens, GA, USA
| | | | - Sandra Rowe
- Department of Pharmacy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John W Devlin
- Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, MA, USA.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Charaya S, Angurana SK, Nallasamy K, Jayashree M. Restricted versus Usual/Liberal Maintenance Fluid Strategy in Mechanically Ventilated Children: An Open-Label Randomized Trial (ReLiSCh Trial). Indian J Pediatr 2023:10.1007/s12098-023-04867-4. [PMID: 37851328 DOI: 10.1007/s12098-023-04867-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of restricted vs. usual/liberal maintenance fluid strategy on fluid overload (FO) among mechanically ventilated children. METHODS This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted over a period of 1 y (October 2020-September 2021) in a Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in North India. Hemodynamically stable mechanically ventilated children were randomized to 40% (restricted group, n = 50) and 70-80% (usual/liberal group, n = 50) of maintenance fluids. The primary outcome was cumulative fluid overload percentage (FO%) on day 7. Secondary outcomes were FO% >10%; vasoactive inotropic score, sequential organ failure assessment score, pediatric logistic organ dysfunction score and oxygenation index from day 1-7; ventilation free days (VFDs) and PICU free days (PFDs) through day 28; and mortality. RESULTS The restricted group had statistically non-significant trend towards lower cumulative FO% at day 7 [7.6 vs. 9.5, p = 0.40]; and proportion of children with FO% >10% (12% vs. 26%, p = 0.21) as compared to usual/liberal group. The increase in FO% from day 1-7 was significant in usual/liberal group as compared to restricted group (p <0.001 and p = 0.134, respectively). Restricted group received significantly lower amount of fluid in the first 5 d; had significantly higher VFDs (23 vs. 17 d, p = 0.008) and PFDs (19 vs. 15 d, p = 0.007); and trend towards lower mortality (8% vs. 16%, p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS Restricted as compared to usual/liberal maintenance fluid strategy among mechanically ventilated children was associated with a trend towards lower rate and severity of FO and mortality; and significantly lower fluid volume received, and higher VFDs and PFDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shubham Charaya
- Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Suresh Kumar Angurana
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India.
| | - Karthi Nallasamy
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| | - Muralidharan Jayashree
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Advanced Pediatrics Centre (APC), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, 160012, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdelbaky AM, Elmasry WG, Awad AH. Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Refractory Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2023; 15:e47783. [PMID: 37899903 PMCID: PMC10611918 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal fluid management strategy for patients with sepsis remains a topic of debate. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of restrictive versus liberal fluid regimens on mortality, adverse events, and other clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis. We systematically reviewed 11 randomized controlled trials published between 2008 and 2023, comprising a total of 4,121 participants. The studies assessed 90-day mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse events, hospital length of stay, ICU admission rate, mechanical ventilation, ventilator-free days, ICU-free days, and vasopressor-free days. Quality assessments indicated minimal bias across the studies. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality between restrictive and liberal fluid regimens (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.70; P=0.30). Similar results were observed for 30-day mortality (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.30 to 1.80; P=0.50). Adverse events were comparable between the two groups (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.19; P=0.28). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in hospital length of stay (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, -0.85 to 1.80; P=0.48) or ICU admission rate (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.77; P=0.75) between the restrictive and liberal fluid regimens. Regarding mechanical ventilation and ventilator-free days, no significant distinctions were observed (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.17; P=0.48; OR, 0.99; 95% CI, -0.17 to 2.15; P=0.09, respectively). ICU-free days and vasopressor-free days also showed no significant differences between the two groups (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, -0.28 to 2.21; P=0.13; OR, -0.38; 95% CI, -1.14 to 0.37; P=0.32, respectively). This comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical trials suggests that restrictive and liberal fluid management strategies have comparable outcomes in patients with sepsis, including mortality, adverse events, and various clinical parameters. However, most studies favored restrictive fluid regimen over liberal approach regarding the number of vasopressor-free days, need for mechanical ventilation, adverse events, 30-day mortality, and 90-day mortality in sepsis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed M Abdelbaky
- Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, Dubai Academic Health Corporation - Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE
| | - Wael G Elmasry
- Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Unit, Dubai Academic Health Corporation - Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE
| | - Ahmed H Awad
- Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit, Dubai Academic Health Corporation - Rashid Hospital, Dubai, ARE
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malbrain MLNG, Caironi P, Hahn RG, Llau JV, McDougall M, Patrão L, Ridley E, Timmins A. Multidisciplinary expert panel report on fluid stewardship: perspectives and practice. Ann Intensive Care 2023; 13:89. [PMID: 37747558 PMCID: PMC10519908 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-023-01177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Although effective and appropriate fluid management is a critical aspect of quality care during hospitalization, the widespread adoption of consistent policies that ensure adequate fluid stewardship has been slow and heterogenous. Despite evidence-based guidelines on fluid management being available, clinical opinions continue to diverge on important aspects of care in this setting, and the consistency of guideline implementation is far from ideal. A multidisciplinary panel of leading practitioners and experts convened to discuss best practices for ongoing staff education, intravenous fluid therapy, new training technologies, and strategies to track the success of institutional fluid stewardship efforts. Fluid leads should be identified in every hospital to ensure consistency in fluid administration and monitoring. In this article, strategies to communicate the importance of effective fluid stewardship for the purposes of education, training, institutional support, and improvement of patient outcomes are reviewed and recommendations are summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manu L N G Malbrain
- First Department Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
- International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium.
- Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel, Belgium.
- Medical Management, AZ Oudenaarde Hospital, Oudenaarde, Belgium.
| | - Pietro Caironi
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Robert G Hahn
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Juan V Llau
- Anaesthesiology and Post-Surgical Critical Care, University Hospital Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain
- Anaesthesiology, Department of Surgery, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marcia McDougall
- Anaesthetics and Intensive Care, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, Scotland
| | - Luís Patrão
- Intensive Care Unit, Centro HospitalarTondela-Viseu, EPE, Viseu, Portugal
- UpHill Health, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Emily Ridley
- Fluid Management lead, Department of Nursing, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, Scotland
| | - Alan Timmins
- Pharmacy Department, Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, Fife, Scotland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carlos Sanchez E, Pinsky MR, Sinha S, Mishra RC, Lopa AJ, Chatterjee R. Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet? J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures) 2023; 9:138-147. [PMID: 37588181 PMCID: PMC10425929 DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2023-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Septic shock is a common condition associated with hypotension and organ dysfunction. It is associated with high mortality rates of up to 60% despite the best recommended resuscitation strategies in international guidelines. Patients with septic shock generally have a Mean Arterial Pressure below 65 mmHg and hypotension is the most important determinant of mortality among this group of patients. The extent and duration of hypotension are important. The two initial options that we have are 1) administration of intravenous (IV) fluids and 2) vasopressors, The current recommendation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to administer 30 ml/kg fluid cannot be applied to all patients. Complications of fluid over-resuscitation further delay organ recovery, prolong ICU and hospital length of stay, and increase mortality. The only reason for administering intravenous fluids in a patient with circulatory shock is to increase the mean systemic filling pressure in a patient who is volume-responsive, such that cardiac output also increases. The use of vasopressors seems to be a more appropriate strategy, the very early administration of vasopressors, preferably during the first hour after diagnosis of septic shock, may have a multimodal action and potential advantages, leading to lower morbidity and mortality in the management of septic patients. Vasopressor therapy should be initiated as soon as possible in patients with septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Carlos Sanchez
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King Salman Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Michael R. Pinsky
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sharmili Sinha
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Rajesh Chandra Mishra
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ahmedabad Khyati Multi-speciality Hospitals, Ahmedabad, India Department of Critical Care Medicine, Ahmedabad Shaibya Comprehensive Care Clinic, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Ahsina Jahan Lopa
- ICU and Emergency Department, Shahabuddin Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Ranajit Chatterjee
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, accident and emergency, Swami Dayanand Hospital Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fot EV, Khromacheva NO, Ushakov AA, Smetkin AA, Kuzkov VV, Kirov MY. Optimizing Fluid Management Guided by Volumetric Parameters in Patients with Sepsis and ARDS. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24108768. [PMID: 37240114 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24108768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
We compared two de-escalation strategies guided by either extravascular lung water or global end-diastolic volume-oriented algorithms in patients with sepsis and ARDS. Sixty patients with sepsis and ARDS were randomized to receive de-escalation fluid therapy, guided either by the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI, n = 30) or the global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI, n = 30). In cases of GEDVI > 650 mL/m2 or EVLWI > 10 mL/kg, diuretics and/or controlled ultrafiltration were administered to achieve the cumulative 48-h fluid balance in the range of 0 to -3000 mL. During 48 h of goal-directed de-escalation therapy, we observed a decrease in the SOFA score (p < 0.05). Extravascular lung water decreased only in the EVLWI-oriented group (p < 0.001). In parallel, PaO2/FiO2 increased by 30% in the EVLWI group and by 15% in the GEDVI group (p < 0.05). The patients with direct ARDS demonstrated better responses to dehydration therapy concerning arterial oxygenation and lung fluid balance. In sepsis-induced ARDS, both fluid management strategies, based either on GEDVI or EVLWI, improved arterial oxygenation and attenuated organ dysfunction. The de-escalation therapy was more efficient for direct ARDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgeniia V Fot
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| | - Natalia O Khromacheva
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| | - Aleksei A Ushakov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| | - Aleksei A Smetkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| | - Vsevolod V Kuzkov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| | - Mikhail Y Kirov
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk 163000, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zheng R, Jin X, Liao W, Lin L. Association between the volume of fluid resuscitation and mortality modified by disease severity in patients with sepsis in ICU: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066056. [PMID: 37041062 PMCID: PMC10106076 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The important effect modifiers of high disease severity on the relationship between the different volumes of early fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic patients are unknown. Thus, this study was designed to assess whether the efficacy of different volumes in the early fluid resuscitation treatment of sepsis is affected by disease severity. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with sepsis from 2001 to 2012 in the MIMIC-III database. INTERVENTIONS The intravenous fluid volume within 6 hours after the sepsis diagnosis serves as the primary exposure. The patients were divided into the standard (≥ 30 mL/kg) and restrict (<30 mL/kg) groups. Disease severity was defined by the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score at ICU admission. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to ensure the robustness of our results. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary endpoint of this study was 28-day mortality. Days without needing mechanical ventilation or vasopressor administration within 28-day of ICU admission serving as the secondary endpoint. RESULTS In total, 5154 consecutive individuals were identified in data analysis, 776 patients had a primary end-point event, 386 (49.68%) in the restrict group and 387 (49.81%) in the standard group. Compared with the restrict group, the standard group had higher 28-day mortality (adjusted HR, 1.32; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.70; p=0.03) in the subgroup with a sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥10. By contrast, the risk of mortality reduction was modest in the subgroup with an SOFA score <10 (adjusted HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03; p=0.10). The effect of the interaction between the SOFA score and fluid resuscitation strategies on the 28-day mortality was significant (p=0.0035). CONCLUSIONS High disease severity modifies the relationship between the volume of fluid resuscitation and mortality in patients with sepsis in the ICU; future studies investigating this interaction are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Zheng
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xinhao Jin
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weichao Liao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ling Lin
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jimenez AE, Mukherjee D. High-Value Care Outcomes of Meningiomas. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2023; 34:493-504. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2023.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
|
10
|
Blok SG, Mousa A, Brouwer MG, de Grooth HJ, Neto AS, Blans MJ, den Boer S, Dormans T, Endeman H, Roeleveld T, Scholten H, van Slobbe-Bijlsma ER, Scholten E, Touw H, van der Ven FSLIM, Wils EJ, van Westerloo DJ, Heunks LMA, Schultz MJ, Paulus F, Tuinman PR. Effect of lung ultrasound-guided fluid deresuscitation on duration of ventilation in intensive care unit patients (CONFIDENCE): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:226. [PMID: 36964614 PMCID: PMC10038369 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07171-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluid therapy is a common intervention in critically ill patients. It is increasingly recognised that deresuscitation is an essential part of fluid therapy and delayed deresuscitation is associated with longer invasive ventilation and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. However, optimal timing and rate of deresuscitation remain unclear. Lung ultrasound (LUS) may be used to identify fluid overload. We hypothesise that daily LUS-guided deresuscitation is superior to deresuscitation without LUS in critically ill patients expected to undergo invasive ventilation for more than 24 h in terms of ventilator free-days and being alive at day 28. METHODS The "effect of lung ultrasound-guided fluid deresuscitation on duration of ventilation in intensive care unit patients" (CONFIDENCE) is a national, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial (RCT) in adult critically ill patients that are expected to be invasively ventilated for at least 24 h. Patients with conditions that preclude a negative fluid balance or LUS examination are excluded. CONFIDENCE will operate in 10 ICUs in the Netherlands and enrol 1000 patients. After hemodynamic stabilisation, patients assigned to the intervention will receive daily LUS with fluid balance recommendations. Subjects in the control arm are deresuscitated at the physician's discretion without the use of LUS. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days and being alive at day 28. Secondary endpoints include the duration of invasive ventilation; 28-day mortality; 90-day mortality; ICU, in hospital and total length of stay; cumulative fluid balance on days 1-7 after randomisation and on days 1-7 after start of LUS examination; mean serum lactate on days 1-7; the incidence of reintubations, chest drain placement, atrial fibrillation, kidney injury (KDIGO stadium ≥ 2) and hypernatremia; the use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring, and chest-X-ray; and quality of life at day 28. DISCUSSION The CONFIDENCE trial is the first RCT comparing the effect of LUS-guided deresuscitation to routine care in invasively ventilated ICU patients. If proven effective, LUS-guided deresuscitation could improve outcomes in some of the most vulnerable and resource-intensive patients in a manner that is non-invasive, easy to perform, and well-implementable. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05188092. Registered since January 12, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siebe G Blok
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Amne Mousa
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michelle G Brouwer
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Harm-Jan de Grooth
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michiel J Blans
- Department of Intensive Care, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Sylvia den Boer
- Department of Intensive Care, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, Hoofddorp, Netherlands
| | - Tom Dormans
- Department of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen, Netherlands
| | - Henrik Endeman
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Timo Roeleveld
- Department of Intensive Care, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, Netherlands
| | - Harm Scholten
- Department of Intensive Care, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | | | - Erik Scholten
- Department of Intensive Care, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hugo Touw
- Department of Intensive Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Fleur Stefanie L I M van der Ven
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, Netherlands
| | - Evert-Jan Wils
- Department of Intensive Care, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Leo M A Heunks
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marcus J Schultz
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederique Paulus
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Center of Expertise Urban Vitality, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter R Tuinman
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Leiden Intensive care Focused Echography (ALIFE, www.alifeofpocus.com ), Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan, 1117, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Effects of Fluids on the Sublingual Microcirculation in Sepsis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11247277. [PMID: 36555895 PMCID: PMC9786137 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the most common and deadly syndromes faced in Intensive Care settings globally. Recent advances in bedside imaging have defined the changes in the microcirculation in sepsis. One of the most advocated interventions for sepsis is fluid therapy. Whether or not fluid bolus affects the microcirculation in sepsis has not been fully addressed in the literature. This systematic review of the evidence aims to collate studies examining the microcirculatory outcomes after a fluid bolus in patients with sepsis. We will assimilate the evidence for using handheld intra vital microscopes to guide fluid resuscitation and the effect of fluid bolus on the sublingual microcirculation in patients with sepsis and septic shock. We conducted a systematic search of Embase, CENTRAL and Medline (PubMed) using combinations of the terms "microcirculation" AND "fluid" OR "fluid resuscitation" OR "fluid bolus" AND "sepsis" OR "septic shock". We found 3376 potentially relevant studies. Fifteen studies published between 2007 and 2021 fulfilled eligibility criteria to be included in analysis. The total number of participants was 813; we included six randomized controlled trials and nine non-randomized, prospective observational studies. Ninety percent used Sidestream Dark Field microscopy to examine the microcirculation and 50% used Hydroxyethyl Starch as their resuscitation fluid. There were no clear effects of fluid on the microcirculation parameters. There was too much heterogeneity between studies and methodology to perform meta-analysis. Studies identified heterogeneity of affect in the sepsis population, which could mean that current clinical classifications were not able to identify different microcirculation characteristics. Use of microcirculation as a clinical endpoint in sepsis could help to define sepsis phenotypes. More research into the effects of different resuscitation fluids on the microcirculation is needed.
Collapse
|
12
|
Cusack R, Leone M, Rodriguez AH, Martin-Loeches I. Endothelial Damage and the Microcirculation in Critical Illness. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123150. [PMID: 36551905 PMCID: PMC9776078 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Endothelial integrity maintains microcirculatory flow and tissue oxygen delivery. The endothelial glycocalyx is involved in cell signalling, coagulation and inflammation. Our ability to treat critically ill and septic patients effectively is determined by understanding the underpinning biological mechanisms. Many mechanisms govern the development of sepsis and many large trials for new treatments have failed to show a benefit. Endothelial dysfunction is possibly one of these biological mechanisms. Glycocalyx damage is measured biochemically. Novel microscopy techniques now mean the glycocalyx can be indirectly visualised, using sidestream dark field imaging. How the clinical visualisation of microcirculation changes relate to biochemical laboratory measurements of glycocalyx damage is not clear. This article reviews the evidence for a relationship between clinically evaluable microcirculation and biological signal of glycocalyx disruption in various diseases in ICU. Microcirculation changes relate to biochemical evidence of glycocalyx damage in some disease states, but results are highly variable. Better understanding and larger studies of this relationship could improve phenotyping and personalised medicine in the future. Damage to the glycocalyx could underpin many critical illness pathologies and having real-time information on the glycocalyx and microcirculation in the future could improve patient stratification, diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Cusack
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St. James’s Hospital, James’s Street, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marc Leone
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Nord, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille University, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Alejandro H. Rodriguez
- Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Universitario Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgil, 43007 Tarragona, Spain
- Departament Medicina I Cirurgia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43003 Tarragona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Martin-Loeches
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St. James’s Hospital, James’s Street, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, College Green, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Matsumura Y, Sugiyama T, Kondo N, Miyahara M, Hanaoka N, Nagashima H, Kasahara Y, Fujiyoshi N, Inada A, Inaba S. Fluid restriction management in the treatment of COVID-19: a single-center observational study. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17339. [PMID: 36243779 PMCID: PMC9569332 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22389-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The relationship between fluid management and the severity of illness, duration of treatment, and outcome of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is not fully understood. This study aimed to evaluate whether weight change during hospitalization was associated with COVID-19 severity, length of hospital stay, and route of admission. In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of fluid restriction management in patients with severe COVID-19. COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital between July 2020 and October 2021 were analyzed. Patients were treated with standard drug therapy based on the Japanese guidelines and respiratory support according to the severity of the disease. Early enteral nutrition, defecation management, and anticoagulation therapy were also administered. Fluid restriction management was performed using furosemide and continuous renal replacement therapy as needed unless hemodynamic instability or hyperlactatemia was present. Patient background, route of admission (ambulance, A; transfer, T), weight at admission and discharge, the severity of illness (oxygen therapy, G1; mechanical ventilation, G2; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, G3), in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay were analyzed. There were 116 subjects: G1 (n = 48), G2 (n = 43), and G3 (n = 25), with ages (median [IQR]) of 58 (47-70), 65 (53-71.5), 56 (51-62) years, 40 (83.3%), 31 (72.1%), and 19 (76.0%) males, respectively. Hospital stays were 4.5 (2-7), 10 (7-16), and 18 (15-26) days, and the in-hospital mortality rates were 0 (0%), 7 (16.3%), and 8 (32%), respectively. Body mass index on admission was 26 (23.1-30.2), 27.1 (22.7-31.1), and 31.5 (27.1-33.1) kg/m2, and weight loss during admission was 1.1 (0-2.9), 4.6 (2.3-5.7), 9.2 (5.6-10.5) kg (P < 0.001, Jonckheere-Terpstra test. Weight loss in the severe group (G2 + G3) was 3.4 (0.5-5.8) kg [A, n = 12] and 5.6 (4.4-9) kg [T, n = 43] [P = 0.026, Mann-Whitney U test]. The lengths of hospital stay were 5 (2-7), 9 (7-15), and 18 (12-26) days [P < 0.001, Jonckheere-Terpstra test]. In our fluid restriction management, patients with severe COVID-19 had significant longer hospital length of stay, weight loss, especially those who were transferred to the hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Matsumura
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan.
| | - Takuya Sugiyama
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
| | - Natsuki Kondo
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Masaya Miyahara
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Hanaoka
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Hideaki Nagashima
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Yuki Kasahara
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Naohiko Fujiyoshi
- Department of Intensive Care, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, 3-32-1, Isobe, Mihama, Chiba, Chiba, 261-0012, Japan
| | - Azusa Inada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shin Inaba
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chiba Emergency Medical Center, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kattan E, Castro R, Miralles-Aguiar F, Hernández G, Rola P. The emerging concept of fluid tolerance: A position paper. J Crit Care 2022; 71:154070. [PMID: 35660844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Fluid resuscitation is a core component of emergency and critical care medicine. While the focus of clinicians has largely been on detecting patients who would respond to fluid therapy, relatively little work has been done on assessing patients' tolerance to this therapy. In this article we seek to review the concept of fluid tolerance, propose a working definition, and introduce relevant clinical signals by which physicians can assess fluid tolerance, hopefully becoming a starting point for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Kattan
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Ricardo Castro
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | | | - Glenn Hernández
- Departamento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Philippe Rola
- Chief of Service, Intensive Care Unit, Hopital Santa Cabrini, CIUSSS EMTL, Montreal, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fluid Management, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension and the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome: A Narrative Review. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12091390. [PMID: 36143427 PMCID: PMC9502789 DOI: 10.3390/life12091390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: General pathophysiological mechanisms regarding associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) are evident, but specific effects of type, amount, and timing of fluids are less clear. Objectives: This review aims to summarize current knowledge on associations between fluid administration and intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and fluid management in patients at risk of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Methods: We performed a structured literature search from 1950 until May 2021 to identify evidence of associations between fluid management and intra-abdominal pressure not limited to any specific study or patient population. Findings were summarized based on the following information: general concepts of fluid management, physiology of fluid movement in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension, and data on associations between fluid administration and IAH. Results: We identified three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 38 prospective observational studies, 29 retrospective studies, 18 case reports in adults, two observational studies and 10 case reports in children, and three animal studies that addressed associations between fluid administration and IAH. Associations between fluid resuscitation and IAH were confirmed in most studies. Fluid resuscitation contributes to the development of IAH. However, patients with IAH receive more fluids to manage the effect of IAH on other organ systems, thereby causing a vicious cycle. Timing and approach to de-resuscitation are of utmost importance, but clear indicators to guide this decision-making process are lacking. In selected cases, only surgical decompression of the abdomen can stop deterioration and prevent further morbidity and mortality. Conclusions: Current evidence confirms an association between fluid resuscitation and secondary IAH, but optimal fluid management strategies for patients with IAH remain controversial.
Collapse
|
16
|
Malbrain MLNG, Martin G, Ostermann M. Everything you need to know about deresuscitation. Intensive Care Med 2022; 48:1781-1786. [PMID: 35932335 PMCID: PMC9362613 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-022-06761-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manu L N G Malbrain
- First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. .,International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium. .,Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel, Belgium.
| | - Greg Martin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Resuscitating Children With Sepsis and Impaired Perfusion With Maintenance Fluids: An Evolving Concept. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2022; 23:563-565. [PMID: 35797572 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
18
|
Wichmann S, Barbateskovic M, Liang N, Itenov TS, Berthelsen RE, Lindschou J, Perner A, Gluud C, Bestle MH. Loop diuretics in adult intensive care patients with fluid overload: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Ann Intensive Care 2022; 12:52. [PMID: 35696008 PMCID: PMC9192894 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-022-01024-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluid overload is a risk factor for organ dysfunction and death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but no guidelines exist for its management. We systematically reviewed benefits and harms of a single loop diuretic, the predominant treatment used for fluid overload in these patients. METHODS We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) of a single loop diuretic vs. other interventions reported in randomised clinical trials, adhering to our published protocol, the Cochrane Handbook, and PRISMA statement. We assessed the risks of bias with the ROB2-tool and certainty of evidence with GRADE. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020184799). RESULTS We included 10 trials (804 participants), all at overall high risk of bias. For loop diuretics vs. placebo/no intervention, we found no difference in all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-1.06; 4 trials; 359 participants; I2 = 0%; TSA-adjusted CI 0.15-3.48; very low certainty of evidence). Fewer serious adverse events were registered in the group treated with loop diuretics (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99; 6 trials; 476 participants; I2 = 0%; very low certainty of evidence), though contested by TSA (TSA-adjusted CI 0.55-1.20). CONCLUSIONS The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of loop diuretics on mortality and serious adverse events in adult ICU patients with fluid overload. Loop diuretics may reduce the occurrence of these outcomes, but large randomised placebo-controlled trials at low risk of bias are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sine Wichmann
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark.
| | - Marija Barbateskovic
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ning Liang
- Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, 16 Nanxiaojie, Dongzhimen, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Theis Skovsgaard Itenov
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Ehrenfried Berthelsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Jane Lindschou
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Gluud
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, The Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230, Odense, Denmark
| | - Morten Heiberg Bestle
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Messmer AS, Moser M, Zuercher P, Schefold JC, Müller M, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid Overload Phenotypes in Critical Illness-A Machine Learning Approach. J Clin Med 2022; 11:336. [PMID: 35054030 PMCID: PMC8780174 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The detrimental impact of fluid overload (FO) on intensive care unit (ICU) morbidity and mortality is well known. However, research to identify subgroups of patients particularly prone to fluid overload is scarce. The aim of this cohort study was to derive "FO phenotypes" in the critically ill by using machine learning techniques. METHODS Retrospective single center study including adult intensive care patients with a length of stay of ≥3 days and sufficient data to compute FO. Data was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression, fast and frugal trees (FFT), classification decision trees (DT), and a random forest (RF) model. RESULTS Out of 1772 included patients, 387 (21.8%) met the FO definition. The random forest model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.86), followed by multivariable logistic regression (0.81, 95% CI 0.77-0.86), FFT (0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.79) and DT (0.73, 95% CI 0.68-0.78) to predict FO. The most important predictors identified in all models were lactate and bicarbonate at admission and postsurgical ICU admission. Sepsis/septic shock was identified as a risk factor in the MV and RF analysis. CONCLUSION The FO phenotypes consist of patients admitted after surgery or with sepsis/septic shock with high lactate and low bicarbonate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna S. Messmer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (M.M.); (P.Z.); (J.C.S.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Michel Moser
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (M.M.); (P.Z.); (J.C.S.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Patrick Zuercher
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (M.M.); (P.Z.); (J.C.S.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Joerg C. Schefold
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (M.M.); (P.Z.); (J.C.S.); (C.A.P.)
| | - Martin Müller
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Carmen A. Pfortmueller
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland; (M.M.); (P.Z.); (J.C.S.); (C.A.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Bohorquez-Rivero JD, García-Ballestas E, Janjua T, Moscote-Salazar L. Liberal Versus Conservative Fluid Therapy in COVID-19 Patients: What is the Best Strategy for the Treatment of Critically ill Patients? JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE 2022. [PMCID: PMC9070581 DOI: 10.4103/jtccm.jtccm_1_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
21
|
Parekh A, Deokar K, Singhal S. A simple concept of fluid balance can be harder in the intensive care unit. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE NURSING 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/jin.jin_42_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
|
22
|
Barhight MF, Nelson D, Chong G, Basu RK, Sanchez-Pinto LN. Non-resuscitation fluid in excess of hydration requirements is associated with higher mortality in critically ill children. Pediatr Res 2022; 91:235-240. [PMID: 33731814 PMCID: PMC7968408 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-021-01456-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large volumes of non-resuscitation fluids are often administered to critically ill children. We hypothesize that excess maintenance fluid is a significant contributor to non-resuscitation fluid and that non-resuscitation fluid administered beyond hydration requirements is associated with worse clinical outcomes in critically ill children. METHODS We evaluated all patients admitted to two large urban pediatric intensive care units (PICU) between January 2010-August 2016 and January 2010-August 2018, respectively, who survived and remained in the hospital for at least 3 days following PICU admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Association of excess fluid with outcomes was adjusted for confounders (age, Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, study site, day 3 acute kidney injury, PICU era, resuscitation volume, and volume output) using multivariable regression. RESULTS We evaluated 14,483 patients; 52% received non-resuscitation fluid in excess of hydration requirements. Non-resuscitation fluid in excess of hydration requirements was associated with higher in-hospital mortality after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.01 per 10 mL/kg in excess fluid, 95% confidence interval: 1.002-1.02). CONCLUSIONS Non-resuscitation fluid in excess of hydration requirements is associated with increased mortality in critically ill children. Excess maintenance fluid is a modifiable contributor to this fluid volume. Strategies to reduce excess maintenance fluids warrant further study. IMPACT Critically ill children frequently receive non-resuscitation fluid in excess of their estimated hydration requirements. Non-resuscitation fluid volume in excess of estimated hydration requirements is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. Critically ill children receive a large volume burden from maintenance fluid. Maintenance fluid represents a modifiable contributor of non-resuscitation fluid in excess of hydration requirements. Strategies focused on limitation of maintenance fluid warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew F. Barhight
- grid.413808.60000 0004 0388 2248Division of Critical Care, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA ,grid.16753.360000 0001 2299 3507Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Delphine Nelson
- grid.413808.60000 0004 0388 2248Division of Kidney Diseases, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Grace Chong
- grid.428125.80000 0004 0383 0499The University of Chicago Comer Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Rajit K. Basu
- grid.189967.80000 0001 0941 6502Department of Pediatrics, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto
- grid.413808.60000 0004 0388 2248Division of Critical Care, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL USA ,grid.16753.360000 0001 2299 3507Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation. Intensive Care Med 2021; 48:148-163. [PMID: 34910228 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06595-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Clinical and pathophysiological understanding of septic shock has progressed exponentially in the previous decades, translating into a steady decrease in septic shock-related morbidity and mortality. Even though large randomized, controlled trials have addressed fundamental aspects of septic shock resuscitation, many questions still exist. In this review, we will describe the current standards of septic shock resuscitation, but the emphasis will be placed on evolving concepts in different domains such as clinical resuscitation targets, adequate use of fluids and vasoactive drugs, refractory shock, and the use of extracorporeal therapies. Multiple research opportunities remain open, and collaborative endeavors should be performed to fill in these gaps.
Collapse
|
24
|
Alaskar MA, Brown JD, Voils SA, Vouri SM. Loop diuretic use following fluid resuscitation in the critically ill. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 79:165-172. [PMID: 34553749 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE To identify the incidence of continuation of newly initiated loop diuretics upon intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge and identify factors associated with continuation. METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study using electronic health records in the setting of adult ICUs at a quaternary care academic medical center. It involved patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2019, who received intravenous fluid resuscitation. The endpoints of interest were (1) the incidence of loop diuretic use during an ICU stay following fluid resuscitation, (2) continuation of loop diuretics following transition of care, and (3) potential factors associated with loop diuretic continuation after transition from the ICU. RESULTS Of 3,591 patients who received intravenous fluid resuscitation for sepsis, 39.4% (n = 1,415) were newly started on loop diuretics during their ICU stay. Among patients who transitioned to the hospital ward from the ICU, loop diuretics were continued in 33% (388/1,193) of patients. At hospital discharge, 13.4% (52/388) of these patients were prescribed a loop diuretic to be used in the outpatient setting. History of liver disease, development of acute kidney injury, being on vasopressors while in the ICU, receiving blood products, and receiving greater than 90 mL/kg of bolus fluids were significant potential factors associated with loop diuretic continuation after transition from the ICU. CONCLUSION New initiation of loop diuretics following intravenous fluid resuscitation in patients with sepsis during an ICU stay is a common occurrence. Studies are needed to assess the effect of this practice on patient outcomes and resource utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mashael A Alaskar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation & Safety, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA, andKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Joshua D Brown
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation & Safety, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Stacy A Voils
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Scott M Vouri
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation & Safety, University of Florida, College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Törnblom S, Wiersema R, Prowle JR, Haapio M, Pettilä V, Vaara ST. Fluid balance-adjusted creatinine in diagnosing acute kidney injury in the critically ill. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2021; 65:1079-1086. [PMID: 33959961 PMCID: PMC8453932 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is often diagnosed based on plasma creatinine (Cr) only. Adjustment of Cr for cumulative fluid balance due to potential dilution of Cr and subsequently missed Cr‐based diagnosis of AKI has been suggested, albeit the physiological rationale for these adjustments is questionable. Furthermore, whether these adjustments lead to a different incidence of AKI when used in conjunction with urine output (UO) criteria is unknown. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of the Finnish Acute Kidney Injury study. Hourly UO and daily plasma Cr were measured during the first 5 days of intensive care unit admission. Cr values were adjusted following the previously used formula and combined with the UO criteria. Resulting incidences and mortality rates were compared with the results based on unadjusted values. Results In total, 2044 critically ill patients were analyzed. The mean difference between the adjusted and unadjusted Cr of all 7279 observations was 5 (±15) µmol/L. Using adjusted Cr in combination with UO and renal replacement therapy criteria resulted in the diagnosis of 19 (1%) additional AKI patients. The absolute difference in the incidence was 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3%‐1.6%). Mortality rates were not significantly different between the reclassified AKI patients using the full set of Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Conclusion Fluid balance‐adjusted Cr resulted in little change in AKI incidence, and only minor differences in mortality between patients who changed category after adjustment and those who did not. Using adjusted Cr values to diagnose AKI does not seem worthwhile in critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanna Törnblom
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
| | - Renske Wiersema
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
- Department of Critical Care University of GroningenUniversity Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - John R. Prowle
- Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group William Harvey Research InstituteQueen Mary University of London London UK
| | - Mikko Haapio
- Department of Nephrology University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
| | - Ville Pettilä
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
| | - Suvi T. Vaara
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Helsinki Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Behem CR, Graessler MF, Friedheim T, Kluttig R, Pinnschmidt HO, Duprée A, Debus ES, Reuter DA, Wipper SH, Trepte CJC. The use of pulse pressure variation for predicting impairment of microcirculatory blood flow. Sci Rep 2021; 11:9215. [PMID: 33911116 PMCID: PMC8080713 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88458-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Dynamic parameters of preload have been widely recommended to guide fluid therapy based on the principle of fluid responsiveness and with regard to cardiac output. An equally important aspect is however to also avoid volume-overload. This accounts particularly when capillary leakage is present and volume-overload will promote impairment of microcirculatory blood flow. The aim of this study was to evaluate, whether an impairment of intestinal microcirculation caused by volume-load potentially can be predicted using pulse pressure variation in an experimental model of ischemia/reperfusion injury. The study was designed as a prospective explorative large animal pilot study. The study was performed in 8 anesthetized domestic pigs (German landrace). Ischemia/reperfusion was induced during aortic surgery. 6 h after ischemia/reperfusion-injury measurements were performed during 4 consecutive volume-loading-steps, each consisting of 6 ml kg−1 bodyweight−1. Mean microcirculatory blood flow (mean Flux) of the ileum was measured using direct laser-speckle-contrast-imaging. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the ability of pulse pressure variation to predict a decrease in microcirculation. A reduction of ≥ 10% mean Flux was considered a relevant decrease. After ischemia–reperfusion, volume-loading-steps led to a significant increase of cardiac output as well as mean arterial pressure, while pulse pressure variation and mean Flux were significantly reduced (Pairwise comparison ischemia/reperfusion-injury vs. volume loading step no. 4): cardiac output (l min−1) 1.68 (1.02–2.35) versus 2.84 (2.15–3.53), p = 0.002, mean arterial pressure (mmHg) 29.89 (21.65–38.12) versus 52.34 (43.55–61.14), p < 0.001, pulse pressure variation (%) 24.84 (17.45–32.22) versus 9.59 (1.68–17.49), p = 0.004, mean Flux (p.u.) 414.95 (295.18–534.72) versus 327.21 (206.95–447.48), p = 0.006. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.88 (CI 95% 0.73–1.00; p value < 0.001) for pulse pressure variation for predicting a decrease of microcirculatory blood flow. The results of our study show that pulse pressure variation does have the potential to predict decreases of intestinal microcirculatory blood flow due to volume-load after ischemia/reperfusion-injury. This should encourage further translational research and might help to prevent microcirculatory impairment due to excessive fluid resuscitation and to guide fluid therapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph R Behem
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Michael F Graessler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Friedheim
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rahel Kluttig
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans O Pinnschmidt
- Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Anna Duprée
- Department of Visceral- and Thoracic Surgery, Center of Operative Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - E Sebastian Debus
- Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg GmbH (UHZ), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel A Reuter
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sabine H Wipper
- University Department for Vascular Surgery, Department of Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Constantin J C Trepte
- Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Chen YC, Zheng ZR, Wang CY, Chao WC. Impact of Early Fluid Balance on 1-Year Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Central Taiwan. Cancer Control 2021; 27:1073274820920733. [PMID: 32869657 PMCID: PMC7710398 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820920733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A positive fluid balance has been found to be deleterious in critically ill
patients; however, the impact of early fluid balance, particularly on long-term
outcomes, in critically ill patients with cancer remains unclear. We performed
this retrospective study at a tertiary-care referral hospital with 1500 beds and
6 intensive care units (ICUs) in central Taiwan, and 942 patients with cancer
admitted to ICUs during 2013 to 2016 were enrolled. The primary outcome was
1-year mortality. Cancer-related data were obtained from the cancer registry,
and data during ICU admissions were retrieved from the electronic medical
records. The association between fluid balance, which was represented by median
and interquartile range, and 1-year mortality was determined by calculating the
hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using a multivariable Cox
proportional hazards regression model. The in-hospital mortality rate was 22.9%
(216 of 942), and the mortality within 1 year after the index ICU admission was
38.7% (365 of 942). Compared to survivors, nonsurvivors tended to have a higher
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (24.1 ± 6.9 vs 20.5 ±
6.2, P < .01), a higher age (65.0 ± 14.4 vs 61.3 ± 14.3,
P < .01), a higher serum creatinine (1.5 ± 1.3 vs 1.0 ±
1.0, P < .01), and a higher cumulative day 1 to 4 fluid
balance (2669, 955-5005 vs 4103, 1268-7215 mL, P < .01).
Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis found that cumulative
day-4 fluid balance was independently associated with 1-year mortality (adj HR
1.227, 95% CI: 1.132-1.329). A positive day 1 to 4 cumulative fluid balance was
associated with shorter 1-year survival in critically ill patients with cancer.
Further studies are needed to validate this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yung-Chun Chen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung.,Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung
| | - Zhe-Rong Zheng
- Division of Chest Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung
| | - Chen-Yu Wang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung.,Department of Nursing, Hung-Kuang University, Taichung
| | - Wen-Cheng Chao
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung.,Department of Business Administration, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua.,Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zhao S, Xu D, Li R, Zou Q, Chen Z, Wang H, He X. [Clinical efficacy of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury]. NAN FANG YI KE DA XUE XUE BAO = JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY 2021; 41:111-115. [PMID: 33509762 DOI: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effects of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). METHODS Between January, 2019 and June, 2020, we randomly assigned 51 postoperative patients (stay in the ICU of no less than 7 days) with sTBI into treatment group (n=25) with restrictive fluid management and the control group (n=26) with conventional fluid management. The data of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MAC- PI), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and fluid balance of the patients were collected at ICU admission and at 1, 3 and 7 days after ICU admission, and the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and 28-day mortality were recorded. RESULTS The cumulative fluid balance of the two groups were positive on day 1 and negative on days 3 and 7 after ICU admission; at the same time points, the patients in the treatment group had significantly greater negative fluid balance than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In both of the groups, the ONSD and MCA-PI values were significantly higher on day 1 than the baseline (P < 0.05), reached the peak levels on day 3, and decreased on day 7; at the same time point, these values were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in NSE level on day 1 between the two groups (P>0.05); on day 3, NSE level reached the peak level and was significantly higher in the control group (P < 0.05); on day 7, NSE level was lowered the level of day 1 in the treatment group but remained higher than day 1 level in the control group. The 28-day mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (16.00% vs 23.08%, P>0.05); the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and the number of tracheotomy were all significantly shorter or lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Restrictive fluid management can reduce cerebral edema and improve the prognosis but does not affect the 28-day mortality of patients with sTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibing Zhao
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Decai Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Rui Li
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Qi Zou
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Zhenzhen Chen
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Huaxue Wang
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| | - Xiandi He
- Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Machine learning methods to improve bedside fluid responsiveness prediction in severe sepsis or septic shock: an observational study. Br J Anaesth 2021; 126:826-834. [PMID: 33461735 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.11.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Passive leg raising (PLR) predicts fluid responsiveness in critical illness, although restrictions in mobilising patients often preclude this haemodynamic challenge being used. We investigated whether machine learning applied on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) data might be used as a tool for predicting fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients. METHODS We studied, 100 critically ill patients (mean age: 62 yr [standard deviation: 14]) with severe sepsis or septic shock prospectively over 24 months. Transthoracic echocardiography measurements were performed at baseline, after PLR, and before and after a standardised fluid challenge in learning and test populations (n=50 patients each). A 15% increase in stroke volume defined fluid responsiveness. The machine learning methods used were classification and regression tree (CART), partial least-squares regression (PLS), neural network (NNET), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Each method was applied offline to determine whether fluid responsiveness may be predicted from left and right cardiac ventricular physiological changes detected by cardiac ultrasound. Predictive values for fluid responsiveness were compared by receiver operating characteristics (area under the curve [AUC]; mean [95% confidence intervals]). RESULTS In the learning sample, the AUC values were PLR 0.76 (0.62-0.89), CART 0.83 (0.73-0.94), PLS 0.97 (0.93-1), NNET 0.93 (0.85-1), and LDA 0.90 (0.81-0.98). In the test sample, the AUC values were PLR 0.77 (0.64-0.91), CART 0.68 (0.54-0.81), PLS 0.83 (0.71-0.96), NNET 0.83 (0.71-0.94), and LDA 0.85 (0.74-0.96) respectively. The PLS model identified inferior vena cava collapsibility, velocity-time integral, S-wave, E/Ea ratio, and E-wave as key echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning generated several models for predicting fluid responsiveness that were comparable with the haemodynamic response to PLR.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chow RS. Terms, Definitions, Nomenclature, and Routes of Fluid Administration. Front Vet Sci 2021; 7:591218. [PMID: 33521077 PMCID: PMC7844884 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.591218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluid therapy is administered to veterinary patients in order to improve hemodynamics, replace deficits, and maintain hydration. The gradual expansion of medical knowledge and research in this field has led to a proliferation of terms related to fluid products, fluid delivery and body fluid distribution. Consistency in the use of terminology enables precise and effective communication in clinical and research settings. This article provides an alphabetical glossary of important terms and common definitions in the human and veterinary literature. It also summarizes the common routes of fluid administration in small and large animal species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalind S Chow
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
The evolution of initial-hemostatic resuscitation and the void of posthemostatic resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2021; 89:597-601. [PMID: 32826738 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000002576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
32
|
Li YT, Wang M, Gu ZY, Xu MM, Zhang LD, Duan ML. Effect of intraoperative fluid administration on postoperative complications and length of stay following meningioma resection: A retrospective analysis. J Clin Anesth 2020; 67:109985. [PMID: 32682250 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 06/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ting Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, PR China
| | - Min Wang
- College of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, PR China
| | - Zhong-Ya Gu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210002, PR China
| | - Miao-Miao Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210002, PR China
| | - Li-Dong Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, PR China; Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210002, PR China.
| | - Man-Lin Duan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, the First School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, PR China; Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Nanjing University, Jiangsu 210002, PR China; College of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, PR China; Department of Anesthesiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Malbrain MLNG, Langer T, Annane D, Gattinoni L, Elbers P, Hahn RG, De Laet I, Minini A, Wong A, Ince C, Muckart D, Mythen M, Caironi P, Van Regenmortel N. Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA). Ann Intensive Care 2020; 10:64. [PMID: 32449147 PMCID: PMC7245999 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00679-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Intravenous fluid administration should be considered as any other pharmacological prescription. There are three main indications: resuscitation, replacement, and maintenance. Moreover, the impact of fluid administration as drug diluent or to preserve catheter patency, i.e., fluid creep, should also be considered. As for antibiotics, intravenous fluid administration should follow the four Ds: drug, dosing, duration, de-escalation. Among crystalloids, balanced solutions limit acid–base alterations and chloride load and should be preferred, as this likely prevents renal dysfunction. Among colloids, albumin, the only available natural colloid, may have beneficial effects. The last decade has seen growing interest in the potential harms related to fluid overloading. In the perioperative setting, appropriate fluid management that maintains adequate organ perfusion while limiting fluid administration should represent the standard of care. Protocols including a restrictive continuous fluid administration alongside bolus administration to achieve hemodynamic targets have been proposed. A similar approach should be considered also for critically ill patients, in whom increased endothelial permeability makes this strategy more relevant. Active de-escalation protocols may be necessary in a later phase. The R.O.S.E. conceptual model (Resuscitation, Optimization, Stabilization, Evacuation) summarizes accurately a dynamic approach to fluid therapy, maximizing benefits and minimizing harms. Even in specific categories of critically ill patients, i.e., with trauma or burns, fluid therapy should be carefully applied, considering the importance of their specific aims; maintaining peripheral oxygen delivery, while avoiding the consequences of fluid overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manu L N G Malbrain
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium. .,Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, Jette, 1090, Belgium. .,International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel, Belgium.
| | - Thomas Langer
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Djillali Annane
- General Intensive Care Unit, Raymond Poincaré Hospital (GHU APHP Université Paris Saclay), U1173 Inflammation & Infection, School of Medicine Simone Veil, UVSQ-University Paris Saclay, 104 Boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380, Garches, France
| | - Luciano Gattinoni
- Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Paul Elbers
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert G Hahn
- Karolinska Institutet at Danderyds Hospital (KIDS), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Inneke De Laet
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Andrea Minini
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Jette, Belgium
| | - Adrian Wong
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Can Ince
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Laboratory of Translational Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David Muckart
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.,Level I Trauma Unit and Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban, South Africa
| | - Monty Mythen
- University College London Hospitals, National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Pietro Caironi
- SCDU Anestesia e Rianimazione, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Italy.,Dipartimento di Oncologia, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Niels Van Regenmortel
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen, ZNA Stuivenberg, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hjortrup PB, Sandroni C, Aneman A. Focus on cardiovascular management in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:1607-1610. [PMID: 32313994 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06039-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Buhl Hjortrup
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Claudio Sandroni
- Istituto Anestesiologia E Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | - Anders Aneman
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, South Western Sydney Local Health District, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kjaer MBN, Meyhoff TS, Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Møller MH, Egerod I, Wetterslev J, Lange T, Cronhjort M, Laake JH, Jakob SM, Nalos M, Pettilä V, van der Horst ICC, Ostermann M, Mouncey P, Cecconi M, Ferrer R, Malbrain MLNG, Ahlstedt C, Hoffmann S, Bestle MH, Gyldensted L, Nebrich L, Russell L, Vang M, Sølling C, Brøchner AC, Rasmussen BS, Perner A. Long-term patient-important outcomes after septic shock: A protocol for 1-year follow-up of the CLASSIC trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64:410-416. [PMID: 31828753 DOI: 10.1111/aas.13519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with septic shock, mortality is high, and survivors experience long-term physical, mental and social impairments. The ongoing Conservative vs Liberal Approach to fluid therapy of Septic Shock in Intensive Care (CLASSIC) trial assesses the benefits and harms of a restrictive vs standard-care intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. The hypothesis is that IV fluid restriction improves patient-important long-term outcomes. AIM To assess the predefined patient-important long-term outcomes in patients randomised into the CLASSIC trial. METHODS In this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will assess all-cause mortality, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and cognitive function 1 year after randomisation in the two intervention groups. The 1-year mortality will be collected from electronic patient records or central national registries in most participating countries. We will contact survivors and assess EuroQol 5-Dimension, -5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale and Montreal Cognitive Assessment 5-minute protocol score. We will analyse mortality by logistic regression and use general linear models to assess HRQoL and cognitive function. DISCUSSION With this pre-planned follow-up study of the CLASSIC trial, we will provide patient-important data on long-term survival, HRQoL and cognitive function of restrictive vs standard-care IV fluid therapy in patients with septic shock.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maj-Brit N Kjaer
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tine S Meyhoff
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Martin B Madsen
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter B Hjortrup
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Hylander Møller
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Egerod
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jørn Wetterslev
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Theis Lange
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maria Cronhjort
- Section of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon H Laake
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Anaesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stephan M Jakob
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern (Inselspital), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marek Nalos
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, 1. Interni klinika, Fakultni Nemocnice, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Ville Pettilä
- Division of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, University Maastricht, Maastrict, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies Ostermann
- Department of Intensive Care, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paul Mouncey
- Clinical Trial Unit, Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ricard Ferrer
- Department of Intensive Care, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Jette, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Ahlstedt
- Department of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Søren Hoffmann
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten H Bestle
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Nordsjaellands Hospital, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Nebrich
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Lene Russell
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Vang
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Randers Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Sølling
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Viborg Hospital, Viborg, Denmark
| | - Anne C Brøchner
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding, Denmark
| | - Bodil S Rasmussen
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anders Perner
- Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Marik PE, Byrne L, van Haren F. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:S37-S47. [PMID: 32148924 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Large volume fluid resuscitation is currently viewed as the cornerstone of the treatment of septic shock. The surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) guidelines provide a strong recommendation to rapidly administer a minimum of 30 mL/kg crystalloid solution intravenously in all patients with septic shock and those with elevated blood lactate levels. However, there is no credible evidence to support this recommendation. In fact, recent findings from experimental, observational and randomized clinical trials demonstrate improved outcomes with a more restrictive approach to fluid resuscitation. Accumulating evidence suggests that aggressive fluid resuscitation is harmful. Paradoxically, excess fluid administration may worsen shock. In this review, we critically evaluate the scientific evidence for a weight-based fluid resuscitation approach. Furthermore, the potential mechanisms and consequences of harm associated with fluid resuscitation are discussed. Finally, we recommend an individualized, conservative and physiologic guided approach to fluid resuscitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul E Marik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Liam Byrne
- Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.,Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia
| | - Frank van Haren
- Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia.,Australian National University Medical School, Canberra Hospital, Garran, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kattan E, Ospina-Tascón GA, Teboul JL, Castro R, Cecconi M, Ferri G, Bakker J, Hernández G. Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. Crit Care 2020; 24:23. [PMID: 31973735 PMCID: PMC6979284 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2732-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluid boluses are administered to septic shock patients with the purpose of increasing cardiac output as a means to restore tissue perfusion. Unfortunately, fluid therapy has a narrow therapeutic index, and therefore, several approaches to increase safety have been proposed. Fluid responsiveness (FR) assessment might predict which patients will effectively increase cardiac output after a fluid bolus (FR+), thus preventing potentially harmful fluid administration in non-fluid responsive (FR-) patients. However, there are scarce data on the impact of assessing FR on major outcomes. The recent ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial included systematic per-protocol assessment of FR. We performed a post hoc analysis of the study dataset with the aim of exploring the relationship between FR status at baseline, attainment of specific targets, and clinically relevant outcomes. METHODS ANDROMEDA-SHOCK compared the effect of peripheral perfusion- vs. lactate-targeted resuscitation on 28-day mortality. FR was assessed before each fluid bolus and periodically thereafter. FR+ and FR- subgroups, independent of the original randomization, were compared for fluid administration, achievement of resuscitation targets, vasoactive agents use, and major outcomes such as organ dysfunction and support, length of stay, and 28-day mortality. RESULTS FR could be determined in 348 patients at baseline. Two hundred and forty-two patients (70%) were categorized as fluid responders. Both groups achieved comparable successful resuscitation targets, although non-fluid responders received less resuscitation fluids (0 [0-500] vs. 1500 [1000-2500] mL; p 0.0001), exhibited less positive fluid balances, but received more vasopressor testing. No difference in clinically relevant outcomes between FR+ and FR- patients was found, including 24-h SOFA score (9 [5-12] vs. 8 [5-11], p = 0.4), need for MV (78% vs. 72%, p = 0.16), need for RRT (18% vs. 21%, p = 0.7), ICU-LOS (6 [3-11] vs. 6 [3-16] days, p = 0.2), and 28-day mortality (40% vs. 36%, p = 0.5). Only thirteen patients remained fluid responsive along the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS Systematic assessment allowed determination of fluid responsiveness status in more than 80% of patients with early septic shock. Fluid boluses could be stopped in non-fluid responsive patients without any negative impact on clinical relevant outcomes. Our results suggest that fluid resuscitation might be safely guided by FR assessment in septic shock patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03078712. Registered retrospectively on March 13, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Kattan
- Departmento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Fundación Valle del Lili, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia
| | - Jean-Louis Teboul
- Service de réanimation médicale, Hopital Bicetre, Hopitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud; Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Sud, Paris, France
| | - Ricardo Castro
- Departmento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ferri
- Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Barros Luco Trudeau, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jan Bakker
- Departmento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Intensive Care Adults, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, New York University, New York, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Glenn Hernández
- Departmento de Medicina Intensiva, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Diagonal Paraguay 362, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Van Regenmortel N, Hendrickx S, Roelant E, Baar I, Dams K, Van Vlimmeren K, Embrecht B, Wittock A, Hendriks JM, Lauwers P, Van Schil PE, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Verbrugghe W, Malbrain MLNG, Van den Wyngaert T, Jorens PG. 154 compared to 54 mmol per liter of sodium in intravenous maintenance fluid therapy for adult patients undergoing major thoracic surgery (TOPMAST): a single-center randomized controlled double-blind trial. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45:1422-1432. [PMID: 31576437 PMCID: PMC6773673 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-019-05772-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effects of the sodium content of maintenance fluid therapy on cumulative fluid balance and electrolyte disorders. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled trial of adults undergoing major thoracic surgery, randomly assigned (1:1) to receive maintenance fluids containing 154 mmol/L (Na154) or 54 mmol/L (Na54) of sodium from the start of surgery until their discharge from the ICU, the occurrence of a serious adverse event or the third postoperative day at the latest. Investigators, caregivers and patients were blinded to the treatment. Primary outcome was cumulative fluid balance. Electrolyte disturbances were assessed as secondary endpoints, different adverse events and physiological markers as safety and exploratory endpoints. FINDINGS We randomly assigned 70 patients; primary outcome data were available for 33 and 34 patients in the Na54 and Na154 treatment arms, respectively. Estimated cumulative fluid balance at 72 h was 1369 mL (95% CI 601-2137) more positive in the Na154 arm (p < 0.001), despite comparable non-study fluid sources. Hyponatremia < 135 mmol/L was encountered in four patients (11.8%) under Na54 compared to none under Na154 (p = 0.04), but there was no significantly more hyponatremia < 130 mmol/L (1 versus 0; p = 0.31). There was more hyperchloremia > 109 mmol/L under Na154 (24/35 patients, 68.6%) than under Na54 (4/34 patients, 11.8%) (p < 0.001). The treating clinicians discontinued the study due to clinical or radiographic fluid overload in six patients receiving Na154 compared to one patient under Na54 (excess risk 14.2%; 95% CI - 0.2-30.4%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS In adult surgical patients, sodium-rich maintenance solutions were associated with a more positive cumulative fluid balance and hyperchloremia; hypotonic fluids were associated with mild and asymptomatic hyponatremia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels Van Regenmortel
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium.
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Campus Stuivenberg, Lange Beeldekensstraat 267, 2060, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Steven Hendrickx
- Department of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ella Roelant
- Clinical Trial Center (CTC), Clinical Research Center Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
- StatUa, Center for Statistics, University of Antwerp, Prinsstraat 13, 2000, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ingrid Baar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Karolien Dams
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Karen Van Vlimmeren
- Department of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Bart Embrecht
- Department of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anouk Wittock
- Department of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Jeroen M Hendriks
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Patrick Lauwers
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul E Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Walter Verbrugghe
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Manu L N G Malbrain
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brussels (UZB), Laarbeeklaan 101, Jette, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Laarbeeklaan 103, Jette, 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tim Van den Wyngaert
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Philippe G Jorens
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, Edegem, 2650, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|