How to manage anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Anti-Xa-guided Anticoagulation With Unfractionated Heparin and Thrombosis During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) triggers complex coagulation processes necessitating systemic anticoagulation. Therefore, anticoagulation monitoring is crucial to avoid adverse events such as thrombosis and hemorrhage. The main aim of this work was to analyze the association between anti-Xa levels and thrombosis occurrence during ECMO support.

DESIGN

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis (Scopus and PubMed, up to July 29, 2023).

SETTING

All retrospective and prospective studies.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving ECMO support.

INTERVENTION

Anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 16 articles with 1,968 patients were included in the review and 7 studies in the meta-analysis (n = 374). Patients with thrombosis had significantly lower mean anti-Xa values (standardized mean difference -0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.62 to -0.11, p < 0.01). Furthermore, a positive correlation was observed between unfractionated heparin infusion and anti-Xa levels (pooled estimate of correlation coefficients 0.31, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.43, p < 0.001). The most common adverse events were major bleeding (42%) and any kind of hemorrhage (36%), followed by thromboembolic events (30%) and circuit or oxygenator membrane thrombosis (19%). More than half of the patients did not survive to discharge (52%).

CONCLUSIONS

This work revealed significantly lower levels of anti-Xa in patients experiencing thromboembolic events and a positive correlation between anti-Xa and unfractionated heparin infusion. Considering the contemplative limitations of conventional monitoring tools, further research on the role of anti-Xa is warranted. New trials should be encouraged to confirm these findings and determine the most suitable monitoring strategy for patients receiving ECMO support.

Evaluation of the Nautilus Smart Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Hemostatic Alteration: A Case Series

The intricate management of hemostatic disorders in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) assisted patients poses challenges, particularly when procoagulant administration is necessary. We hereby report the performance of the Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module in three patients with hemostatic disorders. We collected data from ECMO procedures with Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module and analyzed the performance: the operating pressures and resistance of the device in addition to the coagulation status of the patients. During the three procedures, partial pressure oxygen post-oxygenator (paO2) stayed above 100 mm Hg and partial pressure carbon dioxide post-oxygenator (paCO2) did not exceed 45 mm Hg. Membrane FiO2 (fractional inspired O2) did not exceed 75% and air flow remained within a 1:1 ratio with blood flow in veno-arterial ECMO (V-A) and within 1:2 in veno-venous ECMO (V-V). There was no evidence of excessive operating pressure for the device, with a pressure drop consistently below 28 mm Hg and a maximum peak resistance of 7 Δmm Hg/L/min. The Nautilus* Smart ECMO Module showed good performance in patients with hemostatic disorders despite the implications associated with procoagulant administration.

Integration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation into the Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Overview of Current Evidence

High-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) refers to a large embolic burden causing right ventricular failure and hemodynamic instability. It accounts for approximately 5% of all cases of PE but contributes significantly to overall PE mortality. Systemic thrombolysis is the first-line revascularization therapy in high-risk PE. Surgical embolectomy or catheter-directed therapy is recommended in patients with an absolute contraindication to systemic thrombolysis. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides respiratory and hemodynamic support for the most critically ill PE patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The complex management of these individuals requires urgent yet coordinated multidisciplinary care. In light of existing evidence regarding the utility of ECMO in the management of high-risk PE patients, a number of possible indications for ECMO utilization have been suggested in the literature. Specifically, in patients with refractory cardiac arrest, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or refractory shock, including in cases of failed thrombolysis, venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) should be considered, either as a bridge to percutaneous or surgical embolectomy or as a bridge to recovery after surgical embolectomy. We review here the current evidence on the use of ECMO as part of the management strategy for the highest-risk presentations of PE and summarize the latest data in this indication.

Association of anti-factor Xa-guided anticoagulation with hemorrhage during ECMO support: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex hemostatic changes. Systemic anticoagulation is initiated to prevent clotting in the ECMO system, but this comes with an increased risk of bleeding. Evidence on the use of anti-Xa-guided monitoring to prevent bleeding during ECMO support is limited. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the association between anti-factor Xa-guided anticoagulation and hemorrhage during ECMO.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed (up to August 2023).

PROSPERO

CRD42023448888.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies comprising 2293 patients were included in the analysis, with six works being part of the meta-analysis. The mean anti-Xa values did not show a significant difference between patients with and without hemorrhage (standardized mean difference -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.19; 0.28, p = .69). We found a positive correlation between anti-Xa levels and unfractionated heparin dose (UFH; pooled estimate of correlation coefficients 0.44; 95% CI: 0.33; 0.55, p < .001). The most frequent complications were any type of hemorrhage (pooled 36%) and thrombosis (33%). Nearly half of the critically ill patients did not survive to hospital discharge (47%).

CONCLUSIONS

The most appropriate tool for anticoagulation monitoring in ECMO patients is uncertain. Our analysis did not reveal a significant difference in anti-Xa levels in patients with and without hemorrhagic events. However, we found a moderate correlation between anti-Xa and the UFH dose, supporting its utilization in monitoring UFH anticoagulation. Given the limitations of time-guided monitoring methods, the role of anti-Xa is promising and further research is warranted.

Anticoagulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A narrative review

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is a technology that offers organ support for critically ill patients with respiratory and/or cardiac failure. Despite improvements in recent years in technology and the biocompatibility of circuits, patients on ECMO remain at high risk of hematologic complications, such as bleeding or thrombosis. Anticoagulation is required in most cases to limit the risk of clotting, but questions persist regarding the optimal anticoagulation strategy. More precisely, there is still debate around the best anticoagulation agent and monitoring tools as well as on the transfusion thresholds and appropriate corrective measures when faced with complications. This narrative review provides an overview of hemostasis on ECMO and the impact of circuit size and coating. The benefits and downsides of unfractionated heparin (UHF) and Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTIs) as anticoagulation agents are reviewed. Finally, commonly available coagulation tests (activated clotting time, activated partial thrombin time, anti-Xa, and viscoelastic tests) and their limitations are addressed. In conclusion, future research is needed to determine the best anticoagulation strategy for patients on ECMO.

Outcomes of heparinized adult veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients managed with low and high activated partial thromboplastin time targets: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials comparing low and high activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) targets in heparinized adult veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. Our systematic review and meta-analysis summarized complication rates in adult VA ECMO patients treated with low and high aPTT targets.

METHODS

Studies published from January 2000 to May 2022 were identified using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature). Studies were included if aPTT was primarily used to guide heparin anticoagulation. For the low aPTT group, we included studies where aPTT goal was ≤60 seconds and for the high aPTT group, we included studies where aPTT goal was ≥60 seconds. Proportional meta-analysis with a random effects model was used to calculate pooled complication rates for patients in the two aPTT groups.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met inclusion criteria (5 in the low aPTT group and 7 in the high aPTT group). The pooled bleeding complication incidence for low aPTT studies was 53.6% (95% CI = 37.4%-69.4%, I2 = 60.8%) and for high aPTT studies was 43.8% (95% CI = 21.7%-67.1%, I2 = 91.8%). No studies in the low aPTT group reported overall thrombosis incidence, while three studies in the high aPTT group reported overall thrombosis incidence. The pooled thrombosis incidence for high aPTT studies was 16.1% (95% CI = 9.0%-24.5%, I2 = 13.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adult ECMO patients managed with low and high aPTT goals appeared to have similar bleeding and other complication rates further highlighting the need for a randomized controlled trial.

Iatrogenic blood loss from phlebotomy during adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients are at high risk for allogeneic blood transfusion. Few studies have characterized iatrogenic blood loss from phlebotomy in adult ECMO patients. We hypothesized that iatrogenic phlebotomy would be a significant source of blood loss during ECMO.

METHODS

Adults who had their entire ECMO run at our medical center between 2020 and 2022 were included. Average daily phlebotomy volume and total phlebotomy volume during ECMO were estimated based on the total number of laboratory tests that were processed. In addition, the crude and adjusted association between total phlebotomy volume during ECMO and RBC transfusion during ECMO was evaluated using linear regression and Loess curve analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients who underwent 162 ECMO runs were included. Of the 162 ECMO runs, 88 (54.3%) were veno-arterial and 74 (45.7%) were veno-venous ECMO. Median duration of ECMO was 5 days [25th, 75th percentile = 2, 11]. Median daily phlebotomy volume was 130 mLs [25th, 75th percentile = 94, 170] and median total phlebotomy volume during ECMO was 579 mLs [25th, 75th percentile = 238, 1314]. There was a significant crude and adjusted association between total phlebotomy volume and RBC transfusion during ECMO (beta coefficient = 0.0023 and 0.0024 respectively, both p < .001) based on linear regression analysis.

DISCUSSION

Phlebotomy for laboratory testing is a significant source of blood loss during ECMO in adults. Comprehensive patient blood management for adult ECMO patients should include strategies to reduce laboratory testing and/or phlebotomy volume during ECMO.

Predictors of thrombosis during VV ECMO: an analysis of 9809 patients from the ELSO registry

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a life-saving therapy for critically ill patients, but it carries an increased risk of thrombosis due to blood interacting with non-physiological surfaces. While the relationship between clinical variables and thrombosis remains unclear, our study aimed to identify which factors are most predictive of thrombosis. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry was queried to obtain a cohort of VV-ECMO patients aged 18 years and older from 2015 to 2019. Patients who were over 80-years-old, at the extremes of weight, who received less than 24 h of ECMO, multiple rounds of ECMO, or had missing data were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to assess predictors of thrombosis and mortality. A total of 9809 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 47.1 ± 15.1 years and an average ECMO run time of 305 ± 353 h. Thrombosis occurred in 19.9% of the cohort, with circuit thrombosis (8.6%) and membrane lung failure (6.1%) being the most common. Multivariate analysis showed that ECMO runs over 14 days (OR: 2.62, P < 0.001) and pregnancy-related complications (OR: 1.79, P = 0.004) were associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Risk factors for circuit thrombosis included incremental unit increases in the pump flow rate at 24 h (OR: 1.07 [1.00-1.14], P = 0.044) and specific cannulation sites. Increased body weight (OR: 1.02 [1.00-1.04], P = 0.026) and increased duration on ECMO (OR: 3.82 [3.12-4.71], P < 0.001) were predictive of membrane lung failure. Additionally, patients with thrombosis were at increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.52, P < 0.001). This study identified multiple thrombotic risk factors in VV-ECMO, suggesting that future studies investigating the impact of pregnancy associated complications and ECMO flow rate on hemostasis would be illuminating.

Anticoagulation and Bleeding during Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Insights from the PROTECMO Study

Rationale: Definitive guidelines for anticoagulation management during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are lacking, whereas bleeding complications continue to pose major challenges. Objectives: To describe anticoagulation modalities and bleeding events in adults receiving VV ECMO. Methods: This was an international prospective observational study in 41 centers, from December 2018 to February 2021. Anticoagulation was recorded daily in terms of type, dosage, and monitoring strategy. Bleeding events were reported according to site, severity, and impact on mortality. Measurements and Main Results: The study cohort included 652 patients, and 8,471 days on ECMO were analyzed. Unfractionated heparin was the initial anticoagulant in 77% of patients, and the most frequently used anticoagulant during the ECMO course (6,221 d; 73%). Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) was the most common test for monitoring coagulation (86% of days): the median value was 52 seconds (interquartile range, 39 to 61 s) but dropped by 5.3 seconds after the first bleeding event (95% confidence interval, -7.4 to -3.2; P < 0.01). Bleeding occurred on 1,202 days (16.5%). Overall, 342 patients (52.5%) experienced at least one bleeding event (one episode every 215 h on ECMO), of which 10 (1.6%) were fatal. In a multiple penalized Cox proportional hazard model, higher aPTT was a potentially modifiable risk factor for the first episode of bleeding (for 20-s increase; hazard ratio, 1.07). Conclusions: Anticoagulation during VV ECMO was a dynamic process, with frequent stopping in cases of bleeding and restart according to the clinical picture. Future studies might explore lower aPTT targets to reduce the risk of bleeding.

Anticoagulation Management in V-V ECMO Patients: A Multidisciplinary Pragmatic Protocol

(1) Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a complex procedure affecting both the risk of thrombosis and bleeding. High-quality data to personalize anticoagulation management in ECMO are lacking, resulting in a high variability in practice among centers. For this reason, we review coagulation methods and monitoring and share a pragmatic proposal of coagulation management, as performed in our high-volume ECMO Referral Centre; (2) Methods: We revised the anticoagulation options and monitoring methods available for coagulation management in ECMO through PubMed search based on words including "anticoagulation," "coagulation assays," "ECMO," "ELSO," and "ISTH"; (3) Results: Actual revision of the literature was described as our routine practice regarding ECMO anticoagulation and monitoring; (4) Conclusions: No coagulation test is exclusively predictive of bleeding or thrombotic risk in patients undergoing ECMO support. An approach that allows for a tailored regimen of anticoagulation (regardless of agent used) and monitoring is mandatory. To accomplish this, we propose that the titration of anticoagulation therapies should include multiple laboratory tests, including anti-Xa, aPTT, ACT, viscoelastic tests, AT levels, platelet count, fibrinogen, and FXIII levels. Anticoagulation regimens should be tailored to a specific patient and personalized based on this complex array of essays.

Optimal Antithrombotic Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) represents a critical condition with a high mortality rate. The most common cause of CS is coronary artery disease, and patients typically present with myocardial infarction, necessitating immediate treatment through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and often requiring mechanical circulatory support. CS is associated with a prothrombotic situation, while on the other hand, there is often a significant risk of bleeding. This dual challenge complicates the selection of an optimal antithrombotic strategy. The choice of antithrombotic agents must be personalized, taking into consideration all relevant conditions. Repeated risk assessment, therapeutic monitoring, and adjusting antithrombotic therapy are mandatory in these patients. This review article aims to provide an overview of the current evidence and practical guidance on antithrombotic strategies in the context of CS.

Current knowledge gaps in extracorporeal respiratory support

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for acute respiratory failure encompasses veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). V-V ECMO is primarily used to treat severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), characterized by life-threatening hypoxemia or ventilatory insufficiency with conventional protective settings. It employs an artificial lung with high blood flows, and allows improvement in gas exchange, correction of hypoxemia, and reduction of the workload on the native lung. On the other hand, ECCO2R focuses on carbon dioxide removal and ventilatory load reduction ("ultra-protective ventilation") in moderate ARDS, or in avoiding pump failure in acute exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical indications for V-V ECLS are tailored to individual patients, as there are no absolute contraindications. However, determining the ideal timing for initiating extracorporeal respiratory support remains uncertain. Current ECLS equipment faces issues like size and durability. Innovations include intravascular lung assist devices (ILADs) and pumpless devices, though they come with their own challenges. Efficient gas exchange relies on modern oxygenators using hollow fiber designs, but research is exploring microfluidic technology to improve oxygenator size, thrombogenicity, and blood flow capacity. Coagulation management during V-V ECLS is crucial due to common bleeding and thrombosis complications; indeed, anticoagulation strategies and monitoring systems require improvement, while surface coatings and new materials show promise. Moreover, pharmacokinetics during ECLS significantly impact antibiotic therapy, necessitating therapeutic drug monitoring for precise dosing. Managing native lung ventilation during V-V ECMO remains complex, requiring a careful balance between benefits and potential risks for spontaneously breathing patients. Moreover, weaning from V-V ECMO is recognized as an area of relevant uncertainty, requiring further research. In the last decade, the concept of Extracorporeal Organ Support (ECOS) for patients with multiple organ dysfunction has emerged, combining ECLS with other organ support therapies to provide a more holistic approach for critically ill patients. In this review, we aim at providing an in-depth overview of V-V ECMO and ECCO2R, addressing various aspects of their use, challenges, and potential future directions in research and development.

Acute coronary syndrome associated cardiogenic shock in the catheterization laboratory: peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator management and recommendations

Cardiogenic shock (CS) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a critical disease with high mortality rates requiring complex treatment to maximize patient survival chances. Emergent coronary revascularization along with circulatory support are keys to saving lives. Mechanical circulatory support may be instigated in severe, yet still reversible instances. Of these, the peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (pVA-ECMO) is the most widely used system for both circulatory and respiratory support. The aim of our work is to provide a review of our current understanding of the pVA-ECMO when used in the catheterization laboratory in a CS ACS setting. We detail the workings of a Shock Team: pVA-ECMO specifics, circumstances, and timing of implantations and discuss possible complications. We place emphasis on how to select the appropriate patients for potential pVA-ECMO support and what characteristics and parameters need to be assessed. A detailed, stepwise implantation algorithm indicating crucial steps is also featured for practitioners in the catheter laboratory. To provide an overall aspect of pVA-ECMO use in CS ACS we further gave pointers including relevant human resource, infrastructure, and consumables management to build an effective Shock Team to treat CS ACS via the pVA-ECMO method.

Anti-Factor-Xa and Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Concordance and Outcomes in Adults Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Secondary Analysis of the Pilot Low-Dose Heparin in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the concordance between activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and anti-factor-Xa (anti-Xa) in adults undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and to identify the factors associated with discordant paired aPTT/anti-Xa.

DESIGN

Pre-planned secondary analysis of the Low-Dose Heparin in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation pilot randomized unblinded, parallel-group controlled trial.

SETTING

Two ICUs in two university hospitals.

PATIENTS

Thirty-two critically ill patients who underwent ECMO and who had at least one paired aPTT and anti-Xa assay performed at the same time.

INTERVENTIONS

We analyzed the concordance between aPTT and anti-Xa and identified factors associated with discordant paired aPTT/anti-Xa based on their respective therapeutic ranges. We also compared biological parameters between heparin resistance episode and no heparin resistance.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 32 patients who were included in this study, 24 (75%) had at least one discordant paired aPTT/anti-Xa. Of the 581 paired aPTT/anti-Xa that were analyzed, 202 were discordant. The aPTT was relatively lower than anti-Xa in 66 cases (32.7%) or relatively higher than anti-Xa in 136 cases (67.3%). Thirty-three heparin resistance episodes were identified in six patients (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

In these critically ill patients undergoing ECMO, one third of paired aPTT/anti-Xa measures was discordant. Coagulopathy and heparin resistance might be the reasons for discordance. Our results support the potential importance of routinely monitoring both tests in this setting.

Liberation From Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Safe and timely liberation from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) would be expected to reduce the duration of ECMO, the risk of complications, and costs. However, how to liberate patients from venovenous ECMO effectively remains understudied.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the current state of the evidence on liberation from venovenous ECMO?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We systematically searched for relevant publications on liberation from venovenous ECMO in Medline and EMBASE. Citations were included if the manuscripts provided any of the following: criteria for readiness for liberation, a liberation protocol, or a definition of successful decannulation or decannulation failure. We included randomized trials, observational trials, narrative reviews, guidelines, editorials, and commentaries. We excluded single case reports and citations where the full text was unavailable.

RESULTS

We screened 1,467 citations to identify 39 key publications on liberation from venovenous ECMO. We then summarized the data into five main topics: current strategies used for liberation, criteria used to define readiness for liberation, conducting liberation trials, criteria used to proceed with decannulation, and parameters used to predict decannulation outcomes.

INTERPRETATION

Practices on liberation from venovenous ECMO are heterogeneous and are influenced strongly by clinician preference. Additional research on liberation thresholds is needed to define optimal liberation strategies and to close existing knowledge gaps in essential topics on liberation from venovenous ECMO.

How I approach the prevention and treatment of thrombotic complications in hospitalized patients

This article uses case-based discussion to review prevention and management of thrombotic problems in hospitalized patients that involve a clinical hematologist. There is variation in the clinical hematologist's role in thrombosis practice throughout the world, and we discuss this where indicated. Hospital-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), or hospital-associated thrombosis (HAT), is the term to cover VTE occurring during admission and for 90 days postdischarge and is a common patient safety problem. HATs are the most common cause of VTE accounting for 55% to 60% of all VTE, with an estimated 10 million occurring globally. VTE risk assessment alongside evidence-based thromboprophylaxis reduces this risk significantly. Many hospitalized patients, especially older patients, use direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), mainly to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation. DOACs require perioperative management and may need urgent reversal. Other complex interventions such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation which require anticoagulation are also discussed. Lastly, those with uncommon high-risk thrombophilias, especially those with antithrombin deficiency, produce unique challenges when hospitalized.

Subtypes and Mechanistic Advances of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Related Acute Brain Injury

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a frequently used mechanical cardiopulmonary support for rescuing critically ill patients for whom conventional medical therapies have failed. However, ECMO is associated with several complications, such as acute kidney injury, hemorrhage, thromboembolism, and acute brain injury (ABI). Among these, ABI, particularly intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and infarction, is recognized as the primary cause of mortality during ECMO support. Furthermore, survivors often suffer significant long-term morbidities, including neurocognitive impairments, motor disturbances, and behavioral problems. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the different subtypes of ECMO-related ABI and the updated advance mechanisms, which could be helpful for the early diagnosis and potential neuromonitoring of ECMO-related ABI.

Reduced anticoagulation strategy is associated with a lower incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage in COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BACKGROUND

Optimal anticoagulation strategies for COVID-19 patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) remain uncertain. A higher incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) during VV ECMO support compared to non-COVID-19 viral ARDS patients has been reported, with increased bleeding rates in COVID-19 attributed to both intensified anticoagulation and a disease-specific endotheliopathy. We hypothesized that lower intensity of anticoagulation during VV ECMO would be associated with a lower risk of ICH. In a retrospective, multicenter study from three academic tertiary intensive care units, we included patients with confirmed COVID-19 ARDS requiring VV ECMO support from March 2020 to January 2022. Patients were grouped by anticoagulation exposure into higher intensity, targeting anti-factor Xa activity (anti-Xa) of 0.3-0.4 U/mL, versus lower intensity, targeting anti-Xa 0.15-0.3 U/mL, cohorts. Mean daily doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) per kg bodyweight and effectively measured daily anti-factor Xa activities were compared between the groups over the first 7 days on ECMO support. The primary outcome was the rate of ICH during VV ECMO support.

RESULTS

141 critically ill COVID-19 patients were included in the study. Patients with lower anticoagulation targets had consistently lower anti-Xa activity values over the first 7 ECMO days (p < 0.001). ICH incidence was lower in patients in the lower anti-Xa group: 4 (8%) vs 32 (34%) events. Accounting for death as a competing event, the adjusted subhazard ratio for the occurrence of ICH was 0.295 (97.5% CI 0.1-0.9, p = 0.044) for the lower anti-Xa compared to the higher anti-Xa group. 90-day ICU survival was higher in patients in the lower anti-Xa group, and ICH was the strongest risk factor associated with mortality (odds ratio [OR] 6.8 [CI 2.1-22.1], p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

For COVID-19 patients on VV ECMO support anticoagulated with heparin, a lower anticoagulation target was associated with a significant reduction in ICH incidence and increased survival.

aPTT-guided anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The initiation of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex coagulatory and inflammatory processes and consequently needed anticoagulation. Systemic anticoagulation bears an additional risk of serious bleeding, and its monitoring is of immense importance. Therefore, our work aims to analyze the association of anticoagulation monitoring with bleeding during ECMO support.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis, complying with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO-CRD42022359465).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies comprising 3249 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients experiencing hemorrhage had a longer activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), a longer ECMO duration, and higher mortality. We could not find strong evidence of any aPTT threshold association with the bleeding occurrence, as less than half of authors reported a potential relationship. Finally, we identified the acute kidney injury (66%, 233/356) and hemorrhage (46%, 469/1046) to be the most frequent adverse events, while almost one-half of patients did not survive to discharge (47%, 1192/2490).

CONCLUSION

The aPTT-guided anticoagulation is still the standard of care in ECMO patients. We did not find strong evidence supporting the aPTT-guided monitoring during ECMO. Based on the weight of the available evidence, further randomized trials are crucial to clarify the best monitoring strategy.

Comparison of anticoagulation monitoring strategies for adults supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation is critical in patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The appropriate monitoring strategies for heparin remain unclear.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to compare the accuracy and safety of various monitoring strategies for patients supported on ECMO.

METHODS

The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for articles in March 2023 without restrictions on publication date. Anticoagulation monitoring strategies for adults supported on ECMO were compared across all included studies. The incidence of bleeding, thrombosis, mortality, blood transfusion, correlation between tests and heparin dose, and the discordance between different tests were discussed in the included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration's tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies, including a total of 1,684 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The monitoring of anticoagulation by activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) resulted in less blood product transfusion than that by activated clotting time (ACT). Moreover, the monitoring of anticoagulation by anti-factor Xa (Anti-Xa) resulted in a more stable anticoagulation than that by aPTT. Anti-Xa and aPTT correlated with heparin dose better than ACT, and the discordance between different monitoring tests was common. Finally, combined monitoring showed some advantages in reducing mortality and blood product transfusion.

CONCLUSION

Anti-Xa and aPTT are more suitable for anticoagulation monitoring for patients supported on ECMO than ACT. Thromboelastography and combination strategies are less applied. Most of the studies were retrospective, and their sample sizes were relatively small; thus, more appropriate monitoring strategies and higher quality research are needed.

Association of aPTT-Guided Anticoagulation Monitoring with Thromboembolic Events in Patients Receiving V-A ECMO Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex inflammatory and coagulatory processes, raising the need for systemic anticoagulation. The balance of anticoagulatory and procoagulant factors is essential, as therapeutic anticoagulation confers a further risk of potentially life-threatening bleeding. Therefore, our study aims to systematize and analyze the most recent evidence regarding anticoagulation monitoring and the thromboembolic events in patients receiving veno-arterial ECMO support.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the Scopus and PubMed databases up to October 2022. A weighted effects model was employed for the meta-analytic portion of the study.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising 1728 patients were included in the final analysis. Unfractionated heparin was used for anticoagulation, with an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring goal set between 45 and 80 s. The majority of studies aimed to investigate the incidence of adverse events and potential risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events. None of the authors found any association of aPTT levels with the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Finally, the most frequent adverse events were hemorrhage (pooled 43%, 95% CI 28.4; 59.5) and any kind of thrombosis (pooled 36%, 95% CI 21.7; 53.7), and more than one-half of patients did not survive to discharge (pooled 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the tremendous development of critical care, aPTT-guided systemic anticoagulation is still the standard monitoring tool. We did not find any association of aPTT levels with thrombosis. Further evidence and new trials should clarify the true incidence of thromboembolic events, along with the best anticoagulation and monitoring strategy in veno-arterial ECMO patients.

Anticoagulation Management during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Mini-Review

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been established as a life-saving technique for patients with the most severe forms of respiratory or cardiac failure. It can, however, be associated with severe complications. Anticoagulation therapy is required to prevent ECMO circuit thrombosis. It is, however, associated with an increased risk of hemocoagulation disorders. Thus, safe anticoagulation is a cornerstone of ECMO therapy. The most frequently used anticoagulant is unfractionated heparin, which can, however, cause significant adverse effects. Novel drugs (e.g., argatroban and bivalirudin) may be superior to heparin in the better predictability of their effects, functioning independently of antithrombin, inhibiting thrombin bound to fibrin, and eliminating heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. It is also necessary to keep in mind that hemocoagulation tests are not specific, and their results, used for setting up the dosage, can be biased by many factors. The knowledge of the advantages and disadvantages of particular drugs, limitations of particular tests, and individualization are cornerstones of prevention against critical events, such as life-threatening bleeding or acute oxygenator failure followed by life-threatening hypoxemia and hemodynamic deterioration. This paper describes the effects of anticoagulant drugs used in ECMO and their monitoring, highlighting specific conditions and factors that might influence coagulation and anticoagulation measurements.

Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

The development of extracorporeal life support technology has added a new dimension to the care of critically ill patients who fail conventional treatment options. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)—specialized temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure—plays a role in bridging the time for organ recovery, transplant, or permanent assistance. The overall patient outcome is dependent on the underlying disease, comorbidities, patient reaction to critical illness, and potential adverse events during ECMO. Moreover, the contact of the blood with the large artificial surface of an extracorporeal system circuit triggers complex inflammatory and coagulation responses. These processes may further lead to endothelial injury and disrupted microcirculation with consequent end-organ dysfunction and the development of adverse events like thromboembolism. Therefore, systemic anticoagulation is considered crucial to alleviate the risk of thrombosis and failure of ECMO circuit components. The gold standard and most used anticoagulant during extracorporeal life support is unfractionated heparin, with all its benefits and disadvantages. However, therapeutic anticoagulation of a critically ill patient carries the risk of clinically relevant bleeding with the potential for permanent injury or death. Similarly, thrombotic events may occur. Therefore, different anticoagulation strategies are employed, while the monitoring and the balance of procoagulant and anticoagulatory factors is of immense importance. This narrative review summarizes the most recent considerations on anticoagulation during ECMO support, with a special focus on anticoagulation monitoring and future directions.