Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications

Subjective grade of apprehension during the pivot-shift test reflects patient-reported outcomes more than conventional pivot-shift test grade after ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the pivot-shift test reflects patient-reported outcomes 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction based on a multicentre prospective cohort study.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using the hamstring tendons. The pivot-shift test grades were determined according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form as 0, 1+, 2+ or 3+. In addition, patients' subjective apprehension during the pivot-shift test were classified as 0 (no-apprehension), 1+ (mild-apprehension), 2+ (moderate-apprehension) or 3+ (severe-apprehension). In this study, a positive pivot-shift test was defined as grade 1+ or higher.

RESULTS

A total of 837 patients were enroled in this study. One year postoperatively, there was no significant difference in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), IKDC score, Lysholm knee scale and Tegner activity scale between the positive (118 patients) and negative (719 patients) groups of the conventional IKDC grading of the pivot-shift test. However, when divided into two groups based on the apprehension grading of the pivot-shift test after surgery, the postoperative scores were significantly lower in the apprehension-positive group (114 patients) than those in the apprehension-negative group (723 patients) on the Tegner activity scale and KOOS Symptom, Sports/Rec and Quality of Life subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' subjective apprehension during the pivot-shift test after ACL reconstruction was significantly associated with the postoperative Tegner activity scale and three subscales of the KOOS. However, there was no association between the conventional IKDC grading of the pivot-shift test and any patient-reported outcomes postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Mobile App for Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Assessment in Conscious Subjects: "Pivot-Shift Meter"

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) instability poses a considerable challenge in traumatology and orthopedic medicine, demanding precise diagnostics for optimal treatment. The pivot-shift test, a pivotal assessment tool, relies on subjective interpretation, emphasizing the need for supplementary imaging. This study addresses this limitation by introducing a machine learning classification algorithm integrated into a mobile application, leveraging smartphones' built-in inertial sensors for dynamic rotational stability assessment during knee examinations. Orthopedic specialists conducted knee evaluations on a cohort of 52 subjects, yielding valuable insights. Quantitative analyses, employing the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), demonstrated robust agreement in both intraobserver and interobserver assessments. Specifically, ICC values of 0.94 reflected strong concordance in the timing between maneuvers, while signal amplitude exhibited consistency, with the ICC ranging from 0.71 to 0.66. The introduced machine learning algorithms proved effective, accurately classifying 90% of cases exhibiting joint hypermobility. These quantifiable results underscore the algorithm's reliability in assessing knee stability. This study emphasizes the practicality and effectiveness of implementing machine learning algorithms within a mobile application, showcasing its potential as a valuable tool for categorizing signals captured by smartphone inertial sensors during the pivot-shift test.

A comparison of the outcomes of anterior curciate ligament reconstruction with large-size graft versus reconstruction with average-size graft combined with extraarticular tenodesis

INTRODUCTION

Many patients who have had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (R) complain of instability, inability to return to previous levels of sports activity, and possible ACL graft failure. Graft size was discovered to be an important factor in lowering ACL failure rates. Also, extraarticular tenodesis decreases recurrent instability, A comparative study was done to compare the effect of graft size and lateral external tenodesis on the recurrence of instability after ACL-R.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Prospective Blinded Randomized Controlled study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent ACL-R with hamstring tendon grafts in our Hospital. The patients were allocated into two groups (Group A and B) with randomization; group A received ACL-R with a large-size ACL-graft diameter of 6 strands, and group B received ACL-R of 4 strands combined with lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) (Modified Lemaire). Each group had fifty patients. The follow-up time was two years. They were examined for graft failure, anterolateral rotatory instability with the pivot shift test, and clinical outcomes, which were evaluated with the International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC) both subjective and objective.

RESULTS

In this study; group A, graft failure occurred in three (6.3%) patients, a positive pivot shift test grade I was detected in eight (17.8%) patients, grade II in three (6.7%) patients, and grade III in one (2.2%) patient. The subjective IKDC score was 87.9 (± 7.19) points. The objective IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 43 (93.4%) patients. In group B, one (2.1%) patient had graft failure, five (10.9%) had a positive pivot shift test grade I, one (2.1%) had a grade II, and no patient had a grade III. The subjective IKDC score was 91.9 (± 8.9) points. The objective IKDC score was normal or nearly normal in 44 (95.6%) patients. As regard the subjective IKDC score, there was a non-significant difference between both groups (p value = 0.465).

CONCLUSION

Both groups showed a low ACL-graft failure rate, low anterolateral rotatory instability, and a good clinical outcome. Although there was no significant difference in subjective IKDC score between both groups, the failure rate and anterolateral rotatory instability were significantly lower in the ACL-R (4 strands) with LET combination group than in the group with the large-diameter (6 strands) graft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1; Randomized Comparative Study.

Risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Although anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is considered a successful procedure, residual pivot-shift after surgery remains to be solved. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the risk factors of residual pivot-shift after anatomic double-bundle (DB) ACLR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 164 patients who underwent primary anatomic DB-ACLR between January 2014 and December 2019 and screw removal after the index ACLR in our hospital were included in this retrospective case-control study. The manual pivot-shift test was performed under general anesthesia during screw removal surgery, and patients with grade 1 or higher pivot-shift were classified as the positive pivot-shift group, and those with grade 0 were defined as the negative pivot-shift group. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with postoperative residual pivot-shift. Assessment included sex, age, time to surgery, preoperative Tegner activity scale, preoperative pivot-shift grade, preoperative anterior tibial translation by the KT-2000 arthrometer measurement, meniscus injury and its surgical procedure, knee hyperextension, cartilage damage, Segond fracture, medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, lateral-medial slope asymmetry, participation in pivoting sport/activity at the time of injury, and return to sports at postoperative one year line.

RESULTS

Postoperative positive pivot-shift was observed in 14 (8.5%) of 164 patients. The KT-2000 measurement at 1-year postoperatively was significantly higher in the residual pivot-shift-positive group than in the negative group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age of patients < 20 years [P < 0.05, odds ratio (OR): 6.1)], preoperative pivot-shift grade (P < 0.05, OR: 4.4), and hyperextended knee (P < 0.05, OR: 11.8) were risk factors of postoperative pivot-shift. There were no statistically significant differences between other variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients < 20 years of age, with high-grade preoperative pivot-shift, or hyperextended knees had a higher risk of residual postoperative pivot-shift.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Not Superior to Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction at 10-Year Follow-up: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

The anatomic double-bundle (DB) technique is purported to be a superior technique due to its mimicking of the double-stranded anatomic formation of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Previous studies with 2-, 5- and 10-year follow-up are conflicted as to whether this technique is superior to the previous gold standard method of ACL reconstruction, the anatomic single-bundle (SB) reconstruction.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of the anatomic DB technique and anatomic SB technique with independent drilling at 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We hypothesized that DB ACL reconstruction would result in a better outcome in terms of the pivot-shift test.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients (33 women, 72 men; median age, 27 years [range, 18-52 years]) were randomized and underwent ACL reconstruction (DB group: n = 53; SB group: n = 52). All reconstruction procedures were performed anatomically by identifying the ACL footprint, using the anteromedial portal for femoral tunnel drilling, and utilizing interference screws for tibial and femoral fixation. One blinded observer examined the patients both preoperatively and at follow-up (median, 120 months [range, 112-134 months]). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluations were used to assess the outcomes. Radiographic assessments of osteoarthritis were performed using the Ahlbäck, Kellgren-Lawrence, and Fairbank classification systems early postoperatively and at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no differences were found between the study groups. Overall, 70 patients (67%; DB group: n = 39; SB group: n = 31) were available for analysis at 10-year follow-up. No significant difference could be shown between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift grade, knee laxity measurements using the KT-1000 arthrometer, manual Lachman grade, single-leg hop test result, range of motion measurements, Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) score. Correspondingly, no differences were found between the groups regarding the presence of radiographic osteoarthritis at follow-up. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with preoperatively in terms of the pivot-shift grade, knee laxity measurements using the KT-1000 arthrometer, manual Lachman grade, Lysholm knee score, and KOOS score (P < .05 [highest P value for any comparison]).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic DB technique was not superior to the anatomic SB technique with independent drilling at 10-year follow-up in regard to objective and subjective measurements. As such, one could argue that there is no need for the continued use of the anatomic DB technique in an unselected population.

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction in addition to primary double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for grade 3 pivot shift improves residual knee instability during surgery

Purpose

High-grade pivot shift in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured knee is a risk factor for postoperative residual pivot shift. Procedures in addition to ACL reconstruction such as anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction have been performed for patients with a high-risk of residual pivot shift. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the addition of ALL reconstruction to primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction in patients with preoperative high-grade pivot shift to improve stability as evaluated by quantitative measurement.

Methods

Patients with ACL injuries who showed preoperative grade 3 subjective pivot shift and who underwent primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction combined with ALL reconstructions were retrospectively enrolled. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) in the Lachman test, and acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) in the pivot shift were measured as quantitative values. Quantitative values before surgical intervention for ACL-injured knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact), after temporary fixation of the isolated ACL grafts (ACLR), and subsequently after temporary fixation of both ACL and ALL grafts (ACLR + ALLR) were measured with the patient under general anaesthesia.

Results

In total, 18 patients were included. The ATT was lower in ACLR and ACLR + ALLR than in intact (P = .008 and .005), while there was no significant difference between ACLR and ACLR + ALLR (P > .05). The acceleration of ACLR + ALLR was lower than that for ACLR (P = .008), while there was no significant difference between intact and ACLR or ACLR + ALLR (P > .05). The ERAV of ACLR was higher than that of intact (P < .001), while that of ACLR + ALLR was lower than that of ACLR (P < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in ERAV between intact and ACLR + ALLR (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

According to quantitative assessment of the pivot shift, the addition of ALL reconstruction to primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction improved residual knee instability and restored knee stability during surgery. Combination of ALL reconstruction with primary double-bundle ACL reconstruction was effective for patients with ACL injuries exhibiting a preoperative grade 3 subjective pivot shift.

Level of evidence

IV

A Biomechanical Study of Pivot-Shift and Lachman Translations in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Sectioned Knees, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knees, and Knees With Partial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Slackening: Instrumented Lachman Tests Statistically Correlate and Supplement Subjective Pivot-Shift Tests

PURPOSE

To determine the statistical and predictive correlation between instrumented Lachman and pivot-shift tests with progressive loss of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) function.

METHODS

The kinematic correlations between pivot-shift and Lachman anterior tibial translations (ATTs) in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed states and in partially lax ACL grafts were determined with precise robotic testing in cadaveric knees. The Lachman test (100-N anteroposterior) and 2 pivot-shift loadings were conducted: anterior tibial loading (100 N), valgus rotation (7 Nm), and internal rotation (5 Nm and 1 Nm). The tibia was digitized to study the resulting medial, central, and lateral tibiofemoral compartment translations. In group 1 knees, 15 bone-patellar tendon-bone reconstructions were first tested, followed by ACL graft loosening with 3- and 5-mm increases in Lachman ATT. In group 2, 43 knees underwent robotic testing before and after ACL sectioning and underwent analysis of the effect of 3- and 5-mm increases in Lachman ATT and complete ACL sectioning on pivot-shift compartment translations.

RESULTS

In group 1 knees, ACL graft loosening allowing a 3-mm increase in Lachman ATT resulted in increases in pivot-shift lateral compartment translation (lateral compartment ATT) of only 1.6 ± 0.3 mm and 2.2 ± 1.0 mm (internal rotation of 5 Nm and 1 Nm, respectively) that were one-half of those required for a positive pivot-shift test finding. In group 2, for a 3-mm increased Lachman test, there were no positive pivot-shift values. In both groups, a Lachman test with an increase in ATT of 3 mm or less (100 N) had a 100% predictive value for a negative pivot-shift test finding. With ACL graft loosening and a 5-mm increase in the Lachman ATT, group 1 still had no positive pivot-shift values, and in group 2, a positive pivot-shift test finding occurred in 3 of 43 knees (7%, pivot shift 1-Nm internal rotation). After ACL sectioning, a highly predictive correlation was found between abnormal increases in Lachman and pivot-shift translations (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACL graft slackening and an instrumented Lachman test with an increase in ATT of 3 mm or less were 100% predictive of a negative pivot-shift subluxation finding and retained ACL stability. Further graft slackening and a 5-mm increase in the Lachman ATT produced pivot-shift lateral compartment ATT increases still less than the values in the ACL-deficient state; however, 7% of the knees (3 of 43) were converted to a positive pivot-shift test finding indicative of ACL graft failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Instrumented Lachman tests provide objective data on ACL function and graft failure to supplement subjective pivot-shift tests and are highly recommended for single-center and multicenter ACL studies. In the past decade, a near majority of published ACL studies no longer reported on instrumented Lachman tests, relying solely on highly subjective pivot-shift grading by multiple examiners.

Preoperative Knee Instability Affects Residual Instability as Evaluated by Quantitative Pivot-Shift Measurements During Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction

Background:

The pivot-shift test is an important indicator of functional outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Preoperative instability as indicated by the pivot-shift test is associated with residual instability after ACLR. Few studies have used quantitative means to evaluate the pivot shift after ACLR.

Purpose:

To investigate the relationship between preoperative and residual instability and to identify the risk factors for residual instability by using quantitative measurements of the pivot shift.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 91 patients undergoing primary double-bundle ACLR were retrospectively enrolled. Quantitative measurements of instability for ACL-deficient knees (ACLD) and uninjured contralateral knees (intact) preoperatively, as well as ACLR knees intraoperatively, were performed under general anesthesia using the pivot-shift test, with inertial sensors to measure acceleration and external rotational (ER) angular velocity. The ratios of intact to ACLD (ACLD/I) and intact to ACLR (ACLR/I) were measured. Patients who showed an ACLR/I of >1 were classified into the residual instability group, and those with an ACLR/I of ≤1 were classified into the noninstability group. Regarding demographic, surgical, and quantitative measurement factors, between-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were conducted for predictors of residual instability. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I and the cutoff value of ACLD/I in predicting residual instability.

Results:

The predictive factors for intraoperative residual instability included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.9]; P = .034) and ACLD/I for acceleration (OR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.2-2.1]; P < .001), and ACLD/I for ER angular velocity (OR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.2-3.1]; P = .013). Correlations between ACLD/I and ACLR/I were moderate with respect to both acceleration (r = 0.435; P < .001) and ER angular velocity (r = 0.533; P < .001). The cutoff points for ACLD/I were 4.9 for acceleration (sensitivity, 65.1%; specificity, 85.7%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.76) and 2.4 for ER angular velocity (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 50.0%; AUC, 0.74).

Conclusion:

Greater preoperative instability was a risk factor for residual instability as measured intraoperatively by a quantitatively evaluation in the pivot shift during ACL reconstruction. Quantitative measurements of instability during the pivot shift mechanism under general anesthesia may enable surgeons to predict postoperative residual instability.

Quantitative assessment of the pivot shift test with smartphone accelerometer

PURPOSE

The pivot shift (PS) test is commonly used to diagnose and evaluate the dynamic instability of the knee joint in cases of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. There is a need of a reliable and inexpensive tool which is easily available to measure PS objectively in a clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone, which is readily available, to assess the PS phenomenon.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with unilateral ACL-injured knees, undergoing ACL reconstruction, were enrolled in the study. PS was initially graded according to the International Knee Documentation Committee classification by two observers. The PS test was then performed by them in normal and injured knees under anaesthesia using a smartphone attached to Gerdy's tubercle. Acceleration changes during the PS test were recorded using the smartphone accelerometer application. Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the test among the two observers were evaluated. Acceleration changes were compared between the injured and normal knees, and also between the clinical grades of PS. Diagnostic utility of the smartphone accelerometer was examined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were high for the smartphone accelerometer. The acceleration change was higher in the ACL-injured knees than in normal knees. The mean acceleration change was 2.54 m/s² (SD = 0.97) in ACL-injured knees and 0.73 m/s² (SD = 0.19) in normal knees (p < 0.001). The mean acceleration change of Grade 1 knees was 1.89 m/s² (SD = 0.57), and that of knees of Grade 2 and above were 2.99 m/s² (SD = 0.95) (p < 0.05). Sensitivity was 94% and specificity was 100% for the acceleration change required to detect ACL injury, i.e., 1.24 m/s².

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that a smartphone can be used to evaluate the PS quantitatively and reliably, in the diagnosis of ACL injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction as an augmented procedure for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores rotational stability: Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift test using an inertial sensor

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the biomechanical function of the anterolateral structures (ALS) of the knee regarding rotational stability, and to attempt to verify the effectiveness of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction concomitant with double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by quantifying the pivot shift test (PST) using an inertial sensor.

METHODS

Six knees of the fresh-frozen cadavers were evaluated during the following phases: (1) [Intact]; (2) ACL-deficient [ACL-D]; (3) ACL-reconstructed [ACL-R]; (4) ACL-reconstructed + ALS-deficient [ACL-R + ALS-D]; and (5) combined ACL and ALL reconstructed [ACL-R + ALL-R]. We evaluated knee rotational instability during each phase using the PST. We used an inertial sensor to calculate tibial external rotational angular velocity (ERAV) and tibial acceleration. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance; statistical significance was accepted as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Relative to [Intact], [ACL-D] caused a significant increase in ERAV and acceleration. However, there was no difference in these parameters between [ACL-R] and [Intact]. [ACL-R + ALS-D] increased ERAV significantly compared with [ACL-R], and there was a significant difference between ERAV during [ACL-R + ALS-D] and [Intact]. However, ERAV was significantly reduced during [ACL-R + ALL-R] compared with [ACL-R + ALS-D], and there was no significant difference in ERAV or acceleration between [ACL-R + ALL-R] and [Intact].

CONCLUSIONS

ALS controlled rotational instability in cooperation with the ACL in a cadaveric model. In cases of combined injury of ACL and ALS, concomitant ACL and ALL reconstruction may restore knee stability comparable with the intact state.

Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position on Stability and Clinical Outcomes After Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Outside-In Technique

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of the femoral tunnel location in the femoral footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) on postoperative knee stability and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction (ACLR) using the outside-in technique.

METHODS

From December 2012 to August 2014, ACLR was performed using the outside-in technique in 137 patients. Among these patients, those who had a follow-up period of over 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. The relative location of the femoral tunnel in the lateral condyle was evaluated as a percentage using the standardized grid system on a 3-dimensional computed tomography image. Each patient was then classified into the anterior group, center group (anteroposterior plane, 29.3% ± 3.5%), or posterior group depending on the location of the femoral tunnel. Knee laxity was evaluated using a GNRB knee arthrometer, stress radiography, and the pivot-shift test. From a clinical perspective, patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form and Lysholm knee score) were then evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 102 patients, 31 (30.4%) were assigned to the anterior group, 46 (45.1%) were assigned to the center group, and 25 (24.5%) were assigned to the posterior group. Postoperative side-to-side differences, which were measured using stress radiographs and the GNRB arthrometer, were significantly smaller in the posterior group (1.7 ± 0.6 mm and 1.5 ± 0.5 mm, respectively) than in the center group (2.3 ± 0.9 mm and 2.2 ± 2.8 mm, respectively) and anterior group (2.4 ± 0.7 mm and 2.4 ± 1.3 mm, respectively) (P = .002 for stress radiography and P = .002 for GNRB arthrometer). No significant between-group differences were observed in the pivot-shift test results and patient-reported outcomes among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The location of the femoral tunnel in the anatomic ACL footprint did not affect postoperative stability and clinical outcomes in the case of ACLR using the outside-in technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Influence of knee position and examiner-induced motion on the kinematics of the pivot shift

Background

Grading of the pivot shift test varies significantly depending on the examiner’s technique. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of knee starting position and the magnitude of motion during the reduction event on the magnitude of the pivot shift test.

Methods

Twenty-five clinical providers each performed a total of twenty pivot shift tests on one of two fresh-frozen cadaveric full lower extremity specimens with different grades of rotatory knee laxity. By means of ACL transection and lateral meniscectomy, one specimen was prepared to have a high-grade pivot shift and one to have a low-grade pivot shift. Six-degree-of-freedom kinematics were recorded during each pivot shift test using an electromagnetic-tracking-system. Successful pivot shift tests were defined and selected using an automated, mathematical algorithm based on the exceeding of a threshold value of anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment. The kinematics were correlated with the magnitude of anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment based on varying degrees of rotatory knee laxity using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results

Only mild correlations between anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment and internal tibial rotation at the start of the reduction event were observed in both specimens. The ability to generate a successful reduction event was significantly dependent on the rotatory knee laxity, with a 54% success rate on the high-laxity specimen compared to a 30% success rate on the low-laxity specimen (p < 0.001). Nearly 80% of the variability of the anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment in both specimens was accounted for by external rotation during the reduction event (r = 0.847; p < 0.001). Varus rotation during the reduction event also showed a strong correlation with the anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment in the low-laxity specimen (r = 0.835; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Magnitude of motion during the reduction event affected the magnitude of anterior translation of the lateral knee compartment more than the starting position. External rotation during the reduction event accounted for most of the variability in the pivot shift test. More uniform maneuvers and improved teaching are essential to generate repeatable quantitative results of the pivot shift test.

The Pivot Shift: Current Experimental Methodology and Clinical Utility for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Associated Injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this manuscript is to (1) examine the history, techniques, and methodology behind quantitative pivot shift investigations to date and (2) review the current status of pivot shift research for its clinical utility for management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with associated injuries including the anterolateral complex (ALC).

RECENT FINDINGS

The pivot shift is a useful physical exam maneuver for diagnosis of rotatory instability related to ACL tear. Recent evidence suggests that the pivot shift is multifactorial and can be seen in the presence of ACL tear with concomitant injury to secondary stabilizers or with predisposing anatomical factors. The presence of a pivot shift post-operatively is associated with poorer outcomes after ACL reconstruction. Recent clinical and biomechanical investigations can help guide clinicians in utilizing pivot shift in diagnosis and surgical planning. Further research is needed to clarify optimal management of ALC in addition to ACL injury.

Static Lateral Tibial Plateau Subluxation Predicts High-Grade Rotatory Knee Laxity in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees

BACKGROUND

In anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACL-D) knees, injury pattern and bony morphologic features have been shown to influence both static anterior tibial subluxation relative to the femur and dynamic rotatory knee laxity. Therefore, the relationship between static anterior tibial subluxation and dynamic rotatory knee laxity was investigated.

PURPOSE

To determine whether static tibial subluxation as measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is associated with the grade of rotatory knee laxity in ACL-D knees.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Two-hundred fifty-eight knees underwent preoperative, image-guided assessment of lateral knee compartment translation during quantitative pivot shift (QPS). Subluxations of the medial and lateral tibial plateaus were measured on preoperative MRI in a subset of primary ACL-D knees meeting criteria for high-grade (QPS > 5.2 mm) and low-grade (QPS < 2.4 mm) rotatory laxity. Tibial subluxations on MRI were compared between patients with high- and low-grade rotatory laxity through use of pairwise t test and were analyzed via univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

On MRI, greater anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau was observed in patients with high-grade compared with low-grade rotatory knee laxity (4.5 mm vs 2.3 mm; P < .05). No similar relationship was observed for the medial tibial plateau (-0.9 mm vs -0.4 mm; P > .05). Univariate logistic regression demonstrated that static subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau was associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity (odds ratio [OR], 1.2; P < .05). An optimal cutoff of 2.95 mm of static lateral tibial subluxation was associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity (sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 63%). Lateral meniscal injury was the first variable entered into a multivariate regression analysis and proved to be most associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity (OR, 6.8; P < .05). When lateral meniscal injury was excluded from multivariate regression analysis, static anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau alone was associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity (OR, 1.2; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Data from this MRI study of two distinct rotatory knee laxity groups showed that static anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau of 2.95 mm or greater was associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity, and each millimeter increase of lateral tibial plateau subluxation was associated with a 1.2-fold odds of high-grade rotatory knee laxity. Anterior subluxation of the lateral tibial plateau on MRI was not independently associated with high-grade rotatory knee laxity in the presence of concomitant lateral meniscal injury. Static measurements made preoperatively may aid in predicting high-grade rotatory knee laxity and refining the indications for individualized knee surgery.

Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction or in Combination With Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Although the cause of rotational instability after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is multifactorial, the rationale of adding an extra-articular procedure is based on its ability to restrict rotational instability.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction on revision ACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 87 patients who underwent revision ACLR between March 2011 and July 2014 with a follow-up of more than 3 years were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into the isolated revision ACLR group (group I, n = 45, from March 2011 to January 2013) or the revision ACLR in combination with ALL reconstruction group (group C, n = 42, from February 2013 to July 2014). Subjective knee assessments including the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were used. Clinical and functional tests were performed before surgery and at ≥6 months after surgery. All tests were usually completed at 36 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration for groups I and C were 41.5 ± 8.2 and 38.2 ± 6.9 months, respectively ( P = .451). The subjective IKDC score, Tegner score, and ACL-RSI score were significantly better in group C compared with those in group I at the last follow-up (84.3 ± 18.5 vs 75.9 ± 19.2, 7.0 ± 0.8 vs 6.3 ± 0.7, and 69.5 ± 25.4 vs 51.9 ± 23.1, respectively), although they were not significantly different between the 2 groups at 12 months after surgery (79.2 ± 18.8 vs 76.7 ± 17.2, 6.7 ± 0.7 vs 6.5 ± 0.9, and 50.2 ± 24.6 vs 49.9 ± 25.1, respectively). There were no significant differences in KT-2000 arthrometer, isokinetic extensor strength, single-legged hop for distance, co-contraction test, or carioca test results between the 2 groups at the last follow-up ( P = .304, .068, .125, .056, and .066, respectively). Preoperatively, 43 (95.6%) patients in group I and 40 (95.2%) patients in group C had a grade 2 or 3 pivot shift ( P = .387). Postoperatively, 23 (53.5%) patients in group I and 38 (90.5%) patients in group C had a negative pivot shift ( P < .001). Group C showed a higher rate of return to the same level of sports activity than group I (57.1% vs 25.6%, respectively; P = .008), although there was no significant difference in the rate of return to any sports activity at the last follow-up (88.4% in group I vs 88.1% in group C; P = .713).

CONCLUSION

Revision ACLR in combination with ALL reconstruction significantly reduced rotational laxity and showed a higher rate of return to the same level of sports activity than revision ACLR alone, although there were no significant differences in anterior laxity or functional test results between the 2 groups.

Single-leg vertical jump test as a functional test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to identify the correlations between the single-leg vertical jump (SLVJ) test and subjective and objective tests which were used widely for determining return-to-sports (RTS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Seventy-five patients (29.5 ± 9.2 years) who underwent ACLR between May 2012 and Jan 2014 were included. Subjective knee scoring systems including subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, Tegner activity scale, and ACL-Return to Sports after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale were assessed. Objective tests were also performed.

RESULTS

The limb symmetry index (LSI) for SLVJ test and single-leg hop for distance (SLHD) test was 89.4 ± 14.9% and 90.7 ± 11.7%. LSI for SLVJ test was correlated to subjective IKDC scores (r = 0.26, P = 0.024), Tegner activity scale (r = 0.64, P < 0.001), ACL-RSI scale (r = 0.61, P < 0.001), LSI for SLHD (r = 0.45, P < 0.001), Co-contraction (r = -0.57, P < 0.001), Shuttle run (r = -0.52, P < 0.001), and Carioca (r = -0.54, P < 0.001) tests. In isokinetic strength tests, extensor peak torque (r = 0.30, P = 0.009) and extensor strength deficit (r = -0.41, P < 0.001) were correlated with LSI for SLVJ test.

CONCLUSION

There were considerable correlations between SLVJ test and subjective IKDC scores, Tegner activity scale, ACL-RSI scale, isokinetic extensor muscle strength, and all other functional tests. SLVJ test could be used conveniently to determine RTS after ACLR in outpatient clinics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Femoral tunnel enlargement after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-patellar tendon-bone /single rectangular tunnel versus hamstring tendon / double tunnels

PURPOSE

This study aimed to prospectively compare the femoral tunnel enlargement at the aperture as well as inside the tunnel after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft to that with hamstring tendon (HST) graft.

METHODS

This study included 24 patients with unilateral ACL rupture. Twelve patients underwent anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL reconstruction with BTB graft and the remaining 12 underwent anatomic triple-bundle (ATB) ACL reconstruction with HST graft. Three-dimensional computer models of femur and bone tunnels were reconstructed from computed tomography images obtained at 3 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. The femoral tunnel enlargement from 3 weeks to 1 year was evaluated by comparing the cross-sectional area (CSA), and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The CSA in the ART group at 1 year decreased at the aperture as well as inside the tunnel comparing that at 3 weeks. The CSAs of both tunnels in the ATB group at 1 year significantly increased at the aperture in comparison to those at 3 weeks, and gradually decreased toward the inside of the tunnel. The enlargement rate at the aperture in the ART group was -12.9%, which was significantly smaller than that of anteromedial graft (27.9%; P = 0.006) and posterolateral graft (31.3%; P = 0.003) in the ATB group. The tunnel enlargement rate at 5 mm from the aperture in the ART group was also significantly smaller than that in the ATB group. At 10 mm from the aperture, there was no significant difference between the tunnel enlargement rate in the ART group and that of anteromedial tunnel.

CONCLUSIONS

The tunnel enlargement rate around the aperture was significantly smaller after the ART procedure than that after the ATB procedure. Thus, BTB graft might be preferable as a graft material to HST graft in the femoral tunnel enlargement.

Increased Postoperative Manual Knee Laxity at 2 Years Results in Inferior Long-term Subjective Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Increased postoperative rotatory knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may be associated with an increased risk of osteoarthritis and inferior subjective outcome, although long-term studies are lacking. In terms of anteroposterior knee laxity, this association has not yet been established. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate whether postoperative knee laxity is associated with inferior long-term outcome in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis was that increased laxity would cause an inferior long-term clinical and radiographic outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 193 patients underwent ACL reconstruction and were examined at both 2 and 16 years postoperatively. At the 2-year follow-up, knee laxity was tested by use of the Lachman test, the anterior drawer test, the pivot-shift test, and the KT-1000 arthrometer. Outcome variables examined at the 16-year follow-up involved a radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis, patient-reported outcome measurements, and the single-legged hop test.

RESULTS

At the long-term follow-up, 147 (76%) patients were examined. The mean follow-up period for the included patients was 16.4 ± 1.2 years. A negative Lachman test at 2 years resulted in a superior International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (76.3 ± 19.4 vs 67.8 ± 19.3, P < .05) and Lysholm score (85.2 ± 11.9 vs 76.9 ± 17.8, P < .05) at the 16-year follow-up. Correspondingly, a negative anterior drawer test at 2 years was associated with a superior IKDC score (75.3 ± 18.7 vs 62.9 ± 20.2, P < .05) and Lysholm score (84.1 ± 12.1 vs 72.6 ± 20.2, P < .05) at 16 years. A negative pivot-shift test resulted in a superior IKDC score (74.5 ± 18.8 vs 46.9 ± 17.8, P < .05), a superior Lysholm score (83.3 ± 13.4 vs 58.9 ± 23.0, P < .05), and an increased level of activity (Tegner activity scale, median [range]: 4 [1-10] vs 3 [0-5], P < .05). Osteoarthritis was overrepresented in patients with positive manual knee laxity tests, but the difference was not statistically significant. The KT-1000 arthrometer result was not correlated with any outcome variables assessed in this study.

CONCLUSION

Increased manual anteroposterior and rotatory knee laxity 2 years after ACL reconstruction is associated with an inferior long-term subjective outcome.

Evaluation of Anterolateral Ligament Injuries and Concomitant Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injuries with a ruptured acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and to analyze the presence of concomitant bone contusions and meniscal lesions.

METHODS

From March 2015 to March 2017, we retrospectively analyzed 378 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstructions. Using magnetic resonance imaging, we evaluated the presence of ALL injury and concomitant lesions within 3 weeks of the injury. Meniscal tears were also identified on representative arthroscopic images.

RESULTS

Following the inclusion criteria, we included a total of 275 patients in this study. The mean duration from ACL rupture to magnetic resonance imaging examination was 5.0 ± 6.0 days. We visualized ALL in 98.2% of patients, of whom 64% had ALL injuries (10.9%, 4.7%, and 48.4% were complete ruptures, Segond fracture, and partial ruptures, respectively). We found that ALL injuries were most commonly found in the femoral location. The intra- and interobserver agreement on the severity of ALL injury (κ = 0.83 and 0.81, respectively) and the location of ALL injury (κ = 0.85 and 0.84, respectively) were excellent. The association between ALL injury and lateral meniscal lesions was significant (P = .03). In particular, the proportion of the lateral meniscal posterior horn radial tears was significantly larger in nonintact ALL than in intact ALL (P = .042). The correlation between the severity of ALL injury and the degree of bone contusion at lateral compartments was significant but weak (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that more than half of acute ACL ruptures have ALL injuries. The presence of ALL injury was significantly associated with the presence of lateral meniscal lesions, especially lateral meniscal posterior horn radial tears, or lateral bone contusions. Interestingly, the severity of ALL injury significantly correlated with the degree of lateral bone contusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic cross-sectional study.

Lateral meniscus posterior root tear contributes to anterolateral rotational instability and meniscus extrusion in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to investigate (1) meniscus status and clinical findings in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients to clarify associations between the meniscus posterior root tear (PRT) and knee instability, and (2) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of the PRT to clarify sensitivity and specificity of MRI and prevalence of meniscus extrusion.

METHODS

Three hundred and seventeen patients with primary ACL reconstruction were included. PRTs for both medial and lateral sides were confirmed by reviewing surgical records. Preoperative MRI was reviewed to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the PRT and meniscus extrusion width (MEW). Clinical information regarding the number of giving-way episodes, preoperative KT-1000 measurements and preoperative pivot shift was also assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients had a lateral meniscus (LM) PRT, whereas only four patients had a medial meniscus PRT. One hundred and seventeen patients had no meniscus tear (control). Twenty-eight patients (71.8%) showed positive signs of the LMPRT based on at least one view of MR images, with the coronal view showing the highest sensitivity. MEW in the LMPRT group was significantly larger than that in the control group. The preoperative pivot shift test grade in the LMPRT group was significantly greater than that in the control group. There were no significant differences in other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACL-injured patients, the LMPRT was associated with ALRI as well as with meniscus extrusion. The coronal view of MRI was useful in identifying the LMPRT, although its sensitivity was not high. Therefore, surgeons should prepare to repair PRTs at the time of ACL reconstruction regardless of MRI findings, and they should make every effort to repair the LMPRT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Correlation between quantitative pivot shift and generalized joint laxity: a prospective multicenter study of ACL ruptures

PURPOSE

To investigate whether an increased magnitude of quantitative rotatory knee laxity is associated with a greater level of generalized joint laxity in ACL-injured and contralateral knees.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled across four international centers to undergo anatomic ACL reconstruction. Rotatory knee laxity was evaluated preoperatively, both in the awake state and under anesthesia, using the standardized pivot shift test. Two devices were used to quantify rotatory knee laxity; an inertial sensor, measuring the joint acceleration, and an image analysis system, measuring the lateral compartment translation of the tibia. The presence of generalized joint laxity was determined using the Beighton Hypermobility Score. The correlation between the level of generalized joint laxity and the magnitude of rotatory knee laxity was calculated for both the involved knee and the non-involved knee. Further, patients were dichotomized into low (0-4) or high (5-9) Beighton Score groups. Alpha was set at < 0.05.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients had complete datasets, 83 and 13 in the low and high Beighton Score groups respectively. In anesthetized patients, there was a significant correlation between the degree of Beighton Score and quantitative pivot shift when analyzing the non-involved knee using the image analysis system (r = 0.235, p < 0.05). When analyzing the same knee, multivariate analysis adjusted for meniscal injury, age and gender revealed an increased odds ratio for patients with increased lateral compartment translation to be part of the high Beighton Score group (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.10-3.17, p < 0.05). No other correlation was significant. When analyzing the dichotomized subgroups, no significant correlations could be established.

CONCLUSION

The findings in this study suggest that there is a weak correlation between generalized joint laxity and the contralateral healthy knee, indicating increased rotatory knee laxity in these patients. Generalized joint laxity does not appear to correlate with rotatory knee laxity in ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study; level of evidence, 2.

Radiographic Tibial Tunnel Assessment After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts and Biocomposite Screws: A Prospective Study With 5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To radiographically assess the tibial tunnel up to 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts and biocomposite interference screws.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with metal interference screws in the femur and biocomposite interference screws in the tibia. Standardized digital radiographs with weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral views of the index knee were taken in the early postoperative period and at 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Of 51 patients, 40 (78%) underwent radiographic assessment on all 3 occasions. Subjective and objective clinical assessments were obtained preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 65 months (±3.9 months), with a minimum of 59 months. The width of the tibial tunnel on the anteroposterior view was 9.4 mm (±1.4 mm) in the early postoperative period and 9.2 mm (±1.5 mm) at 5 years (P = .64). The corresponding widths on the lateral view were 9.6 mm (±1.5 mm) in the early postoperative period and 9.0 mm (±1.4 mm) at 5 years (P = .014). In 33 of 40 patients (83%) the width of the tibial tunnel had decreased on 1 or both views at 5 years compared with the early postoperative period. The study group had improved significantly at the 5-year follow-up compared with the preoperative assessments in terms of the KT-1000 arthrometer laxity tests (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), pivot-shift test, Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm knee score (P < .001). No correlations were found between the tunnel widths and the KT-1000 assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

In 83% of patients, the width of the tibial tunnel had decreased on 1 or both radiographic views at 5 years compared with the early postoperative period after ACL reconstruction using biocomposite interference screws.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective study.

Comparison of quantitative evaluation between cutaneous and transosseous inertial sensors in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Recently several authors have reported on the quantitative evaluation of the pivot-shift test using cutaneous fixation of inertial sensors. Before utilizing this sensor for clinical studies, it is necessary to evaluate the accuracy of cutaneous sensor in assessing rotational knee instability. To evaluate the accuracy of inertial sensors, we compared cutaneous and transosseous sensors in the quantitative assessment of rotational knee instability in a cadaveric setting, in order to demonstrate their clinical applicability.

METHODS

Eight freshly frozen human cadaveric knees were used in this study. Inertial sensors were fixed on the tibial tuberosity and directly fixed to the distal tibia bone. A single examiner performed the pivot shift test from flexion to extension on the intact knees and ACL deficient knees. The peak overall magnitude of acceleration and the maximum rotational angular velocity in the tibial superoinferior axis was repeatedly measured with the inertial sensor during the pivot shift test. Correlations between cutaneous and transosseous inertial sensors were evaluated, as well as statistical analysis for differences between ACL intact and ACL deficient knees.

RESULTS

Acceleration and angular velocity measured with the cutaneous sensor demonstrated a strong positive correlation with the transosseous sensor (r = 0.86 and r = 0.83). Comparison between cutaneous and transosseous sensor indicated significant difference for the peak overall magnitude of acceleration (cutaneous: 10.3 ± 5.2 m/s², transosseous: 14.3 ± 7.6 m/s², P < 0.01) and for the maximum internal rotation angular velocity (cutaneous: 189.5 ± 99.6 deg/s, transosseous: 225.1 ± 103.3 deg/s, P < 0.05), but no significant difference for the maximum external rotation angular velocity (cutaneous: 176.1 ± 87.3 deg/s, transosseous: 195.9 ± 106.2 deg/s, N.S).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a positive correlation between cutaneous and transosseous inertial sensors. Therefore, this study indicated that the cutaneous inertial sensors could be used clinically for quantifying rotational knee instability, irrespective of the location of utilization.

Effects of initial graft tension on femoral tunnel widening after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft

INTRODUCTION

The effects of initial graft tension upon tunnel widening (TW) following anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the effect of two different graft-tensioning protocols upon femoral TW following anatomic ACL reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft and a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) model.

METHODS

Forty-three patients who underwent isolated ACL reconstruction using BPTB grafts were included in this study. In 18 out of the 43 patients, the graft was fixed at full knee extension with manual maximum pull (Group H). These patients were compared with 25 patients in whom the BPTB graft was fixed at full knee extension with 80-N pull (Group L). Tunnel aperture area was measured using 3D CT 1 week and 1 year postoperatively, thus enabling us to calculate the percentage change in the area of femoral tunnel aperture. Clinical assessment was performed 1 year postoperatively, corresponding to the time period of CT assessment, and involved the evaluation of Lysholm score, anterior knee stability using a KneeLax3 arthrometer, and the pivot-shift test.

RESULTS

When measured at 1 year postoperatively, the mean area of the femoral tunnel aperture had increased by 78.6 ± 36.8% in Group H when compared with at 1 week postoperatively, whereas that of Group L had increased by 27.7 ± 32.3%. Furthermore, TW (%) in Group H was significantly greater than that of Group L (P < 0.001). No significant differences were detected between the two groups with regard to any of the clinical outcomes evaluated.

CONCLUSION

High levels of initial graft tension resulted in greater TW of the femoral tunnel aperture following anatomical ACL reconstruction using BPTB grafts. However, such levels of graft tension did not affect clinical outcome.

Evaluation of pivot shift phenomenon while awake and under anaesthesia by different manoeuvres using triaxial accelerometer

PURPOSE

Evaluating pivot shift phenomenon is difficult due to its subjectivity, wide variation of testing manoeuvres, and difficulty in evaluating patients while awake. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pivot shift phenomenon using a triaxial accelerometer by two different manoeuvres, the pivot shift test as representative of flexion manoeuvre and N test as a representative of extension manoeuvre, and in two different conditions, awake and under anaesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee were included. Pivot shift test and N test were performed for both injured and uninjured legs while awake and under anaesthesia, with the acceleration measurements using a triaxial accelerometer (KiRA). The tests were also subjectively graded on a scale of 0-6 based on the modification of IKDC criteria.

RESULTS

Under anaesthesia, acceleration of ACL-injured knees was greater than that of uninjured knees in both pivot shift test (P < 0.001) and N test (P < 0.001) , whereas the acceleration value was greater in the N test. Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between the acceleration and subjective grading in both tests, whereas the N test was more significant than the pivot shift test. On the other hand, there was no statistical significance in acceleration between ACL-injured and uninjured knees in either test while the patient was awake.

CONCLUSION

The triaxial accelerometer was useful to objectively detect and quantitatively evaluate the pivot shift phenomenon by both the pivot shift test and N test under anaesthesia. The acceleration of ACL-injured knees was greater than that of uninjured knees, and the acceleration was correlated with the subjective manual grading, especially in the N test. On the other hand, its use while the patient was awake was likely limited.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study of non-consecutive patients without a universally applied gold standard, Level III.

Combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament associated with anterolateral tenodesis effectively controls the acceleration of the tibia during the pivot shift

PURPOSE

The pivot shift test is quantified subjectively during assessment of patients presenting with suspected Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears and has a low interobserver reproducibility. The Kinematic Rapid Assessment (KiRA) is a triaxial accelerometer that makes it possible to non-invasively quantify tibial acceleration during the pivot shift test. Abolishing pivot shift is considered to be a key element in surgical reconstruction but is incomplete in 25-38% of patients.

METHODS

Patients were included prospectively. Inclusion criteria were patients requiring ACL reconstruction associated with at least one of the following factors corresponding to the patient who have a high risk of rupture either by their sports activity, a failure case, or the notion of important rotational laxity: the patient practiced a competitive pivot-contact sport, revision ACL reconstruction (besides STG (semitendinosus-gracilis graft) repair), subjective explosive rotational laxity, Segond fracture, and TELOS value of >10 mm. Standardized pre- and postoperative pivot shift tests were immediately performed under anesthesia in both knees.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included. Mean preoperative variations in tibial acceleration in the healthy and injured knees were 1.2 ± 0.1 and 2.7 ± 0.3 m/s², respectively, p < 0.01. A statistically significant decrease in immediate postoperative mean variations in acceleration in the injured knee occurred: 1.5 ± 0.3 m/s², p < 0.01. There was no longer any statistical difference between postoperative contralateral healthy knees and operated knees (n.s).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ACL reconstruction associated with anterolateral tenodesis suppress acute pathologic tibial acceleration in the pivot shift.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Dynamic Evaluation of Pivot-Shift Phenomenon in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Triaxial Accelerometer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of initial graft tension on rotational stability and to determine the minimum required tension (MRT) based on the pivot-shift phenomenon in isolated anteromedial bundle (AMB), isolated posteromedial bundle (PLB), and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions using a triaxial accelerometer during surgery.

METHODS

Primary double-bundle ACL reconstructions were included. The pivot-shift test and N-test were performed before and during surgery with the acceleration measurements using a triaxial accelerometer. The pivot-shift test was also manually graded. The AMB and PLB were fixed to a graft tensioning system during surgery with the following settings: (1) AMB only (AMB), (2) PLB only (PLB), and (3) AMB and PLB (A+P). The total graft tension was first set at 20 N and then was increased in increments of 10 N until the pivot-shift test became negative, which was defined as the MRT in each setting.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were evaluated. The MRT in the AMB setting averaged 26 N (range, 20 to 40 N); in the PLB setting, 28 N (range, 20 to 40 N); and in the A+P setting, 24 N (range, 20 to 40 N). The MRT in the A+P setting was significantly smaller than that in the PLB setting (P = .008). The acceleration in the A+P setting was significantly smaller than that in the AMB and PLB settings both in the pivot-shift test (vs AMB: P = .007, vs PLB: P = .011) and in the N-test (vs AMB: P < .001, vs PLB: P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction better controlled rotational stability with smaller MRT than isolated PLB reconstruction at the time of surgery. In double-bundle reconstruction, the MRT based on the pivot-shift phenomenon could be larger than previously reported MRT based on anteroposterior laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Correlation between a 2D simple image analysis method and 3D bony motion during the pivot shift test

BACKGROUND

The pivot shift test is the most specific clinical test to detect anterior cruciate ligament injury. The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between the 2D simple image analysis method and the 3D bony motion of the knee during the pivot shift test and assess the intra- and inter-examiner agreements.

METHODS

Three orthopedic surgeons performed three trials of the standardized pivot shift test in seven knees. Two devices were used to measure motion of the lateral knee compartment simultaneously: 1) 2D simple image analysis method: translation was determined using a tablet computer with custom motion tracking software that quantified movement of three markers attached to skin over bony landmarks; 2) 3D bony motion: electromagnetic tracking system was used to measure movement of the same bony landmarks.

RESULTS

The 2D simple image analysis method demonstrated a good correlation with the 3D bony motion (Pearson correlation: 0.75, 0.76 and 0.79). The 3D bony translation increased by 2.7 to 3.5 times for every unit increase measured by the 2D simple image analysis method. The mean intra-class correlation coefficients for the three examiners were 0.6 and 0.75, respectively for 3D bony motion and 2D image analyses, while the inter-examiner agreement was 0.65 and 0.73, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2D simple image analysis method results are related to 3D bony motion of the lateral knee compartment, even with skin artifact present. This technique is a non-invasive and repeatable tool to quantify the motion of the lateral knee compartment during the pivot shift test.

Objective measures on knee instability: dynamic tests: a review of devices for assessment of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test

Current reconstructive methods used after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury do not entirely restore native knee kinematics. Evaluation of dynamic knee laxity is important to accurately diagnose ACL deficiency, to evaluate reconstructive techniques, and to construct treatment algorithms for patients with ACL injury. The purpose of this study is to present recent progress in evaluation of dynamic knee laxity through utilization of the pivot shift test. A thorough electronic search was performed and relevant studies were assessed. Certain dynamic knee laxity measurement methods have been present for over 10 years (Navigation system, Electromagnetic sensor system) while other methods (Inertial sensor, Image analysis system) have been introduced recently. Methods to evaluate dynamic knee laxity through the pivot shift test are already potent. However, further refinement is warranted. In addition, to correctly quantify the pivot shift test, the involved forces need to be controlled through either standardization or mechanization of the pivot shift test.

Comparison of Anatomic Double- and Single-Bundle Techniques for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Prospective Randomized Study With 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of the anatomic double-bundle (DB) and anatomic single-bundle (SB) techniques 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Since more effective restoration of rotational laxity is considered the main advantage of the DB technique, the pivot-shift test was the primary outcome variable of the study.

HYPOTHESIS

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction will result in a better outcome in terms of the pivot-shift test.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients (33 women, 72 men; median age, 27 years; range, 18-52 years) were randomized and underwent ACL reconstruction (DB group, n = 53; SB group, n = 52). All reconstructions were performed anatomically by identifying the ACL footprints, using the anteromedial portal for the femoral tunnel drilling, and utilizing interference screw for tibial and femoral fixation. A single blinded observer examined the patients preoperatively and at follow-up (median, 64 months; range, 55-75 months). Multiple subjective and objective clinical evaluation tests and radiographic assessments of osteoarthritis (OA) were performed using the Ahlbäck, Kellgren-Lawrence, and Fairbank grading systems at 6 weeks postoperatively and at the final follow-up evaluation.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, no differences were found between the study groups, apart from the preinjury Tegner activity level, which was lower in the DB group (SB: mean, 7.8 [range, 3-9]; DB: mean, 7.3 [range, 0-9]; P = .02). Eighty-seven patients (83%) were available for examination at the 5-year follow-up. Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test, single-legged-hop test, square-hop test, range of motion, Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Correspondingly, no differences were found between the groups regarding the presence of OA at follow-up. However, a significant increase of OA was found within the DB group at the 5-year follow-up. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment in terms of the laxity tests, hop tests, and scoring scales.

CONCLUSION

At the 5-year follow-up of an unselected group of patients, anatomic DB reconstruction was not superior to anatomic SB reconstruction in terms of the pivot-shift test.

The use of a robotic tibial rotation device and an electromagnetic tracking system to accurately reproduce the clinical dial test

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to: (1) determine whether a robotic tibial rotation device and an electromagnetic tracking system could accurately reproduce the clinical dial test at 30° of knee flexion; (2) compare rotation data captured at the footplates of the robotic device to tibial rotation data measured using an electromagnetic sensor on the proximal tibia.

METHODS

Thirty-two unilateral ACL-reconstructed patients were examined using a robotic tibial rotation device that mimicked the dial test. The data reported in this study is only from the healthy legs of these patients. Torque was applied through footplates and was measured using servomotors. Lower leg motion was measured at the foot using the motors. Tibial motion was also measured through an electromagnetic tracking system and a sensor on the proximal tibia. Load-deformation curves representing rotational motion of the foot and tibia were compared using Pearson's correlation coefficients. Off-axis motions including medial-lateral translation and anterior-posterior translation were also measured using the electromagnetic system.

RESULTS

The robotic device and electromagnetic system were able to provide axial rotation data and translational data for the tibia during the dial test. Motion measured at the foot was not correlated to motion of the tibial tubercle in internal rotation or in external rotation. The position of the tibial tubercle was 26.9° ± 11.6° more internally rotated than the foot at torque 0 Nm. Medial-lateral translation and anterior-posterior translation were combined to show the path of the tubercle in the coronal plane during tibial rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The information captured during a manual dial test includes both rotation of the tibia and proximal tibia translation. All of this information can be captured using a robotic tibial axial rotation device with an electromagnetic tracking system. The pathway of the tibial tubercle during tibial axial rotation can provide additional information about knee instability without relying on side-to-side comparison between knees. The translation of the proximal tibia is important information that must be considered in addition to axial rotation of the tibia when performing a dial test whether done manually or with a robotic device. Instrumented foot position cannot provide the same information.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A Comparison of Ligament Tensions Between Intra- and Extra-Articular Measurement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the treatments of ACL injuries. In the surgery, the reconstructed ligament should be properly tensioned to provide a normal ligament behavior. However, the ligament tension has been measured with an extra-articular technique in past studies, while the intra-articular ligament tension is still unknown. The purpose of this study is to compare the ligament tensions between intra- and extra-articular measurements in the ACL reconstruction. Intra-articular measurement employs a micro-force sensor designed with a width and thickness same as those of the reconstructed ligament. This study performed two experiments (i.e., sensor accuracy and cadaveric study). In the sensor accuracy experiment, the accuracy of the sensor was about 3% until an applied force of 100 N. In the cadaveric study, the results of the intra- and extra-articular measurement tensions were 13.6±3.9 N and 18.7±1.3 N (n= 6), respectively. The significant difference in student t-test (p-value was 0.026) between the intra- and extra- articular measurements was observed. The bending angle and friction between the graft and bone tunnel, and the shape of the intra-articular edge of tibial bone tunnel affected the intra-articular measurement in ACL reconstruction.

Novel approach to dynamic knee laxity measurement using capacitive strain gauges

PURPOSE

Knee joint laxities are observed in patients after severe trauma to the joint, resulting in ligament tears. Specifically, injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament may cause a significant instability. The degree of these laxities is essential in diagnostics and may affect which treatment option is suggested.

METHODS

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) strain gauges are proposed as a non-invasive, highly accurate and easy-to-use measurement method to quantify anterolateral and rotational laxities of the knee joint during active and passive motion. In this work, proof-of-concept measurements and a prototype of the proposed device are displayed. The measurements were taken using a knee test rig, which has specifically been designed for this purpose. This apparatus allows the simulation of isolated knee joint instabilities with a motor-controlled model of a human knee.

RESULTS

The absolute sensitivity [Formula: see text] of an exemplary sensor was determined to be 2.038 [Formula: see text]; the relative sensitivity [Formula: see text] was 1.121 [Formula: see text]. Optimal positions of sensors to capture bone-to-bone displacement as projected displacement on the skin were identified.

CONCLUSION

PDMS strain gauges are capable of measuring bone-to-bone displacements on the skin. We present an experimental in vitro study using an artificial knee test rig to simulate knee joint laxities and display the feasibility of our novel measurement approach.

A mechanical pivot-shift device for continuously applying defined loads to cadaveric knees

PURPOSE

Current techniques to study the biomechanics of the pivot-shift utilize either static or poorly defined loading conditions. Here, a novel mechanical pivot-shift device that continuously applies well-defined loads to cadaveric knees is characterized and validated against the manual pivot-shift.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen human lower limb specimens were potted at the femur, mounted on a hinged testing base, and fitted with the mechanical device. Five mechanical and manual pivot-shift tests were performed on each knee by two examiners before and after transecting the ACL. Three-dimensional kinematics (anterior and internal-rotary displacements, and posterior and external-rotary velocities) and kinetics (forces and moments applied to the tibia by the device) were recorded using an optical navigation system and 6-axis load cell. Analysis of variance and Bland-Altman statistics were used to gauge repeatability within knees, reproducibility between knees, agreement between the mechanical and manual test methods, and agreement between examiners.

RESULTS

The forces and moments applied by the device were continuous and repeatable/reproducible to within 4/10 % of maximum recorded values. Kinematic variables (excluding external-rotary velocity) were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to manual pivot-shift kinematics, and were more repeatable and reproducible.

CONCLUSION

The presented device induces pivot-shift-like kinematics by applying highly repeatable three-dimensional loads to cadaver knees. It is based on a simple mechanical principle and designed using easily obtainable components. Consequently, the device enables orthopaedic biomechanists to easily and reliably quantify the effect of ACL injury and reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.

Individualized ACL reconstruction

The pivot shift test is the only physical examination test capable of predicting knee function and osteoarthritis development after an ACL injury. However, because interpretation and performance of the pivot shift are subjective in nature, the validity of the pivot shift is criticized for not providing objective information for a complete surgical planning for the treatment of rotatory knee laxity. The aim of ACL reconstruction was eliminating the pivot shift sign. Many structures and anatomical characteristics can influence the grading of the pivot shift test and are involved in the genesis and magnitude of rotatory instability after an ACL injury. The objective quantification of the pivot shift may be able to categorize knee laxity and provide adequate information on which structures are affected besides the ACL. A new algorithm for rotational instability treatment is presented, accounting for patients' unique anatomical characteristics and objective measurement of the pivot shift sign allowing for an individualized surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine whether anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction more effectively restored antero-posterior (A-P) laxity, rotatory laxity and reduced frequency of graft rupture. Our hypothesis was that anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction results in superior rotational knee laxity and fewer graft ruptures due to its double-bundle tension pattern, compared with anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. All therapeutic trials written in English reporting knee kinematic outcomes and graft rupture rates of primary anatomic double- versus single-bundle ACL reconstruction were included. Only clinical studies of levels I-II evidence were included. Data regarding kinematic tests were extracted and included pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, KT-1000 measurements, A-P laxity measures using navigation and total internal-external (IRER) laxity measured using navigation, as well as graft failure frequency.

RESULTS

A total of 7,154 studies were identified of which 15 papers (8 randomized controlled trials and 7 prospective cohort studies, n = 970 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Anatomic ACL double-bundle reconstruction demonstrated less anterior laxity using KT-1000 arthrometer with a standard mean difference (SMD) = 0.36 (95% CI 0.214-0.513, p < 0.001) and less A-P laxity measured with navigation (SMD = 0.29 95% CI 0.01-0.565, p = 0.042). Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction did not lead to significant improvements in pivot-shift test, Lachman test, anterior drawer test, total IRER or graft failure rates compared to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction is superior to anatomic single-bundle reconstruction in terms of restoration of knee kinematics, primarily A-P laxity. Whether these improvements of laxity result in long-term improvement of clinical meaningful outcomes remains uncertain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Non-invasive, non-radiological quantificationof anteroposterior knee joint ligamentous laxity: A study in cadavers

OBJECTIVES

We performed in vitro validation of a non-invasive skin-mounted system that could allow quantification of anteroposterior (AP) laxity in the outpatient setting.

METHODS

A total of 12 cadaveric lower limbs were tested with a commercial image-free navigation system using trackers secured by bone screws. We then tested a non-invasive fabric-strap system. The lower limb was secured at 10° intervals from 0° to 60° of knee flexion and 100 N of force was applied perpendicular to the tibia. Acceptable coefficient of repeatability (CR) and limits of agreement (LOA) of 3 mm were set based on diagnostic criteria for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency.

RESULTS

Reliability and precision within the individual invasive and non-invasive systems was acceptable throughout the range of flexion tested (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.88, CR 1.6 mm). Agreement between the two systems was acceptable measuring AP laxity between full extension and 40° knee flexion (LOA 2.9 mm). Beyond 40° of flexion, agreement between the systems was unacceptable (LOA > 3 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that from full knee extension to 40° flexion, non-invasive navigation-based quantification of AP tibial translation is as accurate as the standard validated commercial system, particularly in the clinically and functionally important range of 20° to 30° knee flexion. This could be useful in diagnosis and post-operative evaluation of ACL pathology. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2013;2:233-7.

Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Background:

The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake.

Purpose:

To assess the differences in knee kinematics of awake and anesthetized patients.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 50 patients with unilateral ACL rupture were examined. Anteroposterior tibial translation was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer at maximal manual power. Anterior tibial translations during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of tibial posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were also measured using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). All 3 measurements were performed on the day previous to surgery while the patients were awake and on the operative day before the surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia.

Results:

The mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation was 5.6 ± 2.6 mm in the awake state and 5.9 ± 3.5 mm under anesthesia, indicating a nonsignificant difference. According to the EMS, the mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation during the Lachman test was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm in the awake state and 6.9 ± 4.3 mm under anesthesia, indicating a significant difference (P < .01). The mean APT during the pivot-shift test was −0.8 ± 0.3 m/s² in intact knees and −1.1 ± 0.4 m/s² in ACL-deficient knees when the patients were awake and was −0.7 ± 0.2 m/s² and −1.7 ± 1.0 m/s², respectively, when the patients were under anesthesia. In ACL-deficient knees, the APT pivot-shift test result was significantly higher when the patients were under anesthesia than when they were awake (P < .01).

Conclusion:

In ACL-deficient knees, the knee kinematics during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests is significantly affected by patient consciousness, and caution is needed in quantifying anterior knee laxity during these tests when the patients are awake.

Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad

PURPOSE

To enable comparison of test results, a widely available measurement system for the pivot shift test is needed. Simple image analysis of lateral knee joint translation is one such system that can be installed on a prevalent computer tablet (e.g. iPad). The purpose of this study was to test a novel iPad application to detect the pivot shift. It was hypothesized that the abnormal lateral translation in ACL deficient knees would be detected by the iPad application.

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive ACL deficient patients were tested. Three skin markers were attached on the following bony landmarks: (1) Gerdy's tubercle, (2) fibular head and (3) lateral epicondyle. A standardized pivot shift test was performed under anaesthesia, while the lateral side of the knee joint was monitored. The recorded movie was processed by the iPad application to measure the lateral translation of the knee joint. Lateral translation was compared between knees with different pivot shift grades.

RESULTS

Valid data sets were obtained in 20 (59 %) ACL deficient knees. The remaining 14 data sets were invalid because of failure to detect translation or detection of excessive translation. ACL deficient knees had larger lateral translation than the contra-lateral knees (p < 0.01). In the 20 valid data sets, which were graded as either grade 1 (n = 10) or grade 2 (n = 10), lateral translation was significantly larger in the grade 2 pivot shift (3.6 ± 1.2 mm) than the grade 1 pivot shift (2.7 ± 0.6 mm, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although some technical corrections, such as testing manoeuvre and recording procedure, are needed to improve the image data sampling using the iPad application, the potential of the iPad application to classify the pivot shift was demonstrated.

Current concept in rotational laxity control and evaluation in ACL reconstruction

Rotation combined with translation; compose the three-dimensional motion of the knee subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. The worldwide scientists were focused initially on the translation part of this complex 3D motion, but since the beginning of the century there was a large interest on knee rotational laxity study. Lot of paper reported new devices and results with an explosion since the beginning of the decade. The purpose of this review is to provide an extensive critical analysis of the literature and clarify the knowledge on this topic. We will start with a dismemberment of different rotational laxities reported: the rotation coupled with translation in 2D tests such as Lachman test and anterior drawer test; the rotational envelope considering the maximum internal external rotation; and the "active rotation" occurring in 3D Pivot-shift (PS) test. Then we will analyze the knee kinematics and the role of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bundle on rotation. A review of different mechanical and radiological devices used to assess the different rotations on ACL deficient knees will be presented. Two groups will be analyzed, dynamic and static conditions of tests. Navigation will be described precisely; it was the starter of this recent interest in rotation studies. Opto electronic and electromagnetic navigation systems will be presented and analyzed. We will conclude with the last generation of rotational laxity assessment devices, using accelerometers, which are very promising.

Innovative technology for knee laxity evaluation: clinical applicability and reliability of inertial sensors for quantitative analysis of the pivot-shift test

There has been an increased interest in the quantification of the knee laxity secondary to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. In clinical practice, the diagnosis is performed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging analysis and confirmed arthroscopically. The pivot shift phenomenon has been identified as one of the essential signs of functional ACL insufficiency. A reliable system to adequately assess patients with ACL injury, quantifying the pivot shift test outcome, is needed. Several studies have been conducted in this regard but the proposed methods remain confined to a research area. The goal of this article is to summarize the actual knowledge and current concepts.