Downhill walking gait pattern discriminates between types of knee arthroplasty: improved physiological knee functionality in UKA versus TKA

Effects of different slopes on hip and ankle biomechanics of replaced and non-replaced limbs of patients with total knee arthroplasty during incline ramp walking

Although knee biomechanics has been examined, hip and ankle biomechanics in incline ramp walking has not been explored for patients with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the hip and ankle joint kinematic and kinetic biomechanics of different incline slopes for replaced limbs and non-replaced limbs in individuals with TKA compared to healthy controls. Twenty-five patients with TKR and ten healthy controls performed walking trials on four slope conditions of level (0°), 5°, 10° and 15° on a customized instrumented ramp system. A 3x4 (limb x slope) repeated analysis of variance was used to evaluate selected variables. The results showed a greater peak ankle dorsiflexion angle in the replaced limbs compared to healthy limbs. No significant interactions or limb main effect for other ankle and hip variables. The peak dorsiflexion angle, eversion angle and dorsiflexion moment were progressively higher in each comparison from level to 15°. The peak plantarflexion moment was also increased with each increase of slopes. Both the replaced and non-replaced limbs of patients with TKA had lower hip flexion moments than the healthy control limbs. Hip angle at contact and hip extension range of motion increased with each increase of slopes. Peak hip loading-response internal extension moment increased with each increase in slope and peak hip push-off internal flexion moment decreased with each increase of slope. Our results showed increased dorsiflexion in replaced limbs but no other compensations of hip and ankle joints of replaced limbs compared to non-replaced limbs and their healthy controls during incline walking, providing further support of using incline walking in rehabilitation for patients with TKA.

[Successful medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-What are the most important surgical tricks?]

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established surgical treatment option for end-stage anteromedial osteoarthritis with excellent functional outcomes and implant survival. Routine preoperative varus and valgus stress views are crucial for the selection of patients for unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty.

THERAPY

UKA is a soft-tissue based operation that aims to reconstruct the individual joint line and pre-arthritic alignment by restoring the physiological tension of the medial collateral and the cruciate ligaments.

RESULTS

Current data for medial UKA show excellent results for both mobile and fixed bearing implant designs with the correct indication and surgical technique. Cementless fixation offers potential advantages over cemented implants. Registry data demonstrate that institutions and surgeons specializing in partial knee replacement (> 30 cases/year per surgeon, > 100/year per institution) with a high percentage of UKA relative to the total number of knee implants (> 20%) have significantly lower revision rates.

Impact of Proximal Tibial Varus Anatomy on Survivorship After Medial Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Precise indications for medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) continue to be defined. It is unclear if patients who have proximal tibia vara should be considered candidates for UKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of proximal tibial varus alignment on outcomes after UKA.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified 2,416 patients (3,029 knees) who underwent mobile-bearing medial UKA with 2-year minimum follow-up or revision. Preoperative radiographs were evaluated, and medial proximal tibial angle (mPTA) was measured. Patients were grouped into two groups as follows: mPTA <80 degrees and mPTA ≥80 degrees. Analyses were performed on the impact of mPTA on clinical outcomes, all-cause revisions, and tibial failures.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 0.5 years to 12.8 years), there was not a statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes nor increased risk for all-cause revision or tibial failure in patients who had an mPTA <80°. Mean mPTA in patients who had tibial failures was 82.5° and not significantly different than those who did not have a tibial failure (82.9°) (P = .289). Tibial failure rate in knees with an mPTA <80° was 2.2% and not significantly different than knees with an mPTA ≥80° at 1.4% (P = .211). The all-cause revision rate in knees with an mPTA <80° was 5.8% and was not significantly different than knees with an mPTA ≥80° at 4.9% (P = .492).

CONCLUSION

Patients who have tibia vara are not at increased risk for tibial related or all-cause failure in medial UKA. This data may allow surgeons to increase their indications for medial UKA.

Does contemporary bicruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restore the native knee kinematics? A descriptive literature review

BACKGROUND

There has been no consensus on the benefit of retaining the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in TKAs. This study aims to review recent evidences around the kinematics of bicruciate retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted on PubMed and Web of Science. Reports that assessed the BCR TKA kinematics, including both in vitro cadaveric studies and in vivo clinical studies, were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total number of 169 entries were obtained. By exclusion criteria, five in vitro studies using cadaveric knee specimens and six in vivo studies using patient cohorts were retained. In vitro studies showed a low internal rotation (< 10°) throughout the flexion path in all BCR TKAs. Compared to native knees, the difference in the internal rotation was maximal during early and late flexion; the femur in the BCR TKA was significantly more anteriorly positioned (1.7-3.6 mm from 0° to 110°) and more externally rotated (3.6°-4.2° at 110° and 120°). In vivo studies revealed that the native knee kinematics, in general, were not fully restored after BCR TKA during various knee activates (squatting, level-walking, and downhill-walking). There are asymmetric kinematics during the stance phase of gait cycle and a smaller range of axial rotation (23% patients exhibiting external tibial rotation) throughout the gait cycle in BCR TKAs.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical insights in the complex BCR TKA biomechanics have been reported from recent laboratory kinematics studies. However, whether contemporary BCR TKAs can fully restore native knee kinematics remains debatable, warranting further investigations.

Staged BiCompartmental Knee Arthroplasty has Greater Functional Improvement, but Equivalent Midterm Survivorship, as Revision TKA for Progressive Osteoarthritis After Partial Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Progressive arthritis in the unresurfaced compartments of the knee is one failure mode after partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). While progressive arthritis after PKA is typically treated with revision to TKA (rTKA), staged bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (sBiKA) -the addition of another PKA - is an alternative. This study compared outcomes of sBiKA and rTKA for progressive arthritis after PKA.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study of non-consecutive cases at four institutions were performed in patients with an intact PKA, without loosening or wear, who underwent sBiKA (n = 27) or rTKA (n = 30), for progressive osteoarthritis. Outcomes studied were new Knee Society Function and Objective Scores (KSSF, KSSO), KOOS, Jr., ROM, operative times, length of stay, complication rates and the need for reoperations.

RESULTS

Mean time to conversion was 7.4 ± 6 years for sBiKA and 9.7 ± 8 for rTKA, P = .178. Patient demographics and pre-operative outcomes were similar among cohorts. At an average of 5.7 ± 3 (sBiKA) and 3.2 ± 2 years (rTKA), KOOS, Jr. significantly improved, P < .001, by an equivalent amount. Post-operative KSSO and KSSF were significantly higher in the sBiKA cohort, respectively, (90.4 ± 10 vs 72.1 ± 20, P < .001) and (80.3 ± 18 vs 67.1 ± 19, P = .011). sBiKA patients had significantly greater improvement in KSSO (30.7 ± 33 vs 5.2 ± 18, P = .003). One sBiKA patient underwent reoperation for continued pain.

CONCLUSION

SBiKA has equivalent survivorship, but greater improvement in functional outcomes as rTKA at short to midterm follow-up. Given the shorter operative times and length of stay, sBiKA is a safe and cost-effective alternative to rTKA for progressive osteoarthritis following PKA. Nevertheless, further follow-up is necessary to determine whether sBiKA is a durable option.

Evaluation of Knee Kinematics and Moments during Active Deep Flexion Activity after Oxford Mobile-Bearing Medial UKA-A Two-Year Follow-Up Study

Few studies have assessed knee range of motion (ROM) and moments of patients with mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB UKA) during active deep flexion activities. We analyze knee kinematic and kinetic parameters during postoperative squatting-standing activity, aiming to evaluate the efficacy of MB UKA and postoperative rehabilitation progress. This was a clinical cohort study. We followed up with 37 patients diagnosed with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) with primary UKA. After screening 31 patients were recruited to take gait tests. Squatting-standing activities were performed under the test of 10-camera motion analysis system and force plates preoperatively at different stages after UKA (12, 18, and 24 months). The average duration of follow-up was 24.4 months (from 22.8 to 26.7 months). Hip-knee-ankle angle improved significantly compared with pre-UKA as well as scores of American Knee Society Score, numeric rating scale, ORS, and Western Ontario and McMasters. University Osteoarthritis Index. About 83.6% (31/37) of follow-up patients completed squatting-standing activity independently. At 1-year follow-up, peak varus angle (20.6 ± 2.8 degrees), internal rotation angle (13.6 ± 1.8 degrees), extensor moment (1.44 ± 0.04N*m/kg), and internal rotator moment (0.02 ± 0.005N*m/kg) of UKA knees were inferior to contralateral knees. Peak adductor moment (0.76 ± 0.05N*m/kg) was superior to contralateral knees. At 2-year follow-up, peak flexion angle (125.0 ± 2.8 degrees) showed a growing trend meanwhile extensor (1.70 ± 0.03N*m/kg) and adductor (0.68 ± 0.06 N*m/kg) moment closely resembled those of the contralateral knee. MB UKA could alleviate the affected knee mainly in flexion-extension ROM and moment meanwhile did not affect the biomechanical indicators of healthy limbs. OA knees in the early postoperative period showed decreased extensor moment and increased adductor moment during active deep flexion activity. Better ROM and relatively more natural extensor and adductor moment of UKA knee with rehabilitation time increasing may predict ideal rehabilitation outcome in the medium or longer term.

Variation in the patellar tendon moment arm identified with an improved measurement framework

The mechanical advantage of the knee extensor mechanism depends heavily on the patellar tendon moment arm (PTMA). Understanding which factors contribute to its variation may help improve functional outcomes following arthroplasty. This study optimized PTMA measurement, allowing us to quantify the contribution of different variables. The PTMA was calculated about the instantaneous helical axis of tibiofemoral rotation from optical tracked kinematics. A fabricated knee model facilitated calculation optimization, comparing four data smoothing techniques (raw, Butterworth filtering, generalized cross-validated cubic spline-interpolation and combined filtering/interpolation). The PTMA was then measured for 24 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, under physiologically based loading and extension rates. Combined filtering/interpolation enabled sub-mm PTMA calculation accuracy throughout the range of motion (root-mean-squared error 0.2 mm, max error 0.4 mm), whereas large errors were measured for raw, filtered-only and interpolated-only techniques at terminal flexion/extension. Before scaling, the mean PTMA was 46 mm; PTMA magnitude was consistently larger in males (mean differences: 5 to 10 mm, p < .05) and was strongly related to knee size: larger knees have a larger PTMA. However, while scaling eliminated sex differences in PTMA magnitude, the peak PTMA occurred closer to terminal extension in females (female 15°, male 29°, p = .01). Knee size accounted for two-thirds of the variation in PTMA magnitude, but not the flexion angle where peak PTMA occurred. This substantial variation in angle of peak PTMA has implications for the design of musculoskeletal models and morphotype-specific arthroplasty. The developed calculation framework is applicable both in vivo and vitro for accurate PTMA measurement.

Kinematic alignment of medial UKA is safe: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Owing to the improved understanding of knee kinematics and the successful introduction of the kinematic alignment (KA) technique for implanting total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it was recently understood that the "Cartier angle technique" corresponds to a kinematic implantation of the uni-compartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) components. When compared to the universally spread mechanical alignment (MA) technique for implanting UKA, the KA method generates a more anatomic prosthetic knee that may be clinically advantageous. The aims of this study are to determine if KA UKAs are associated with acceptable functional performance and patient satisfaction (question 1), rates of residual pain and tibia plateau fracture (question 2), and rates of reoperation and revision (question 3), and to define the component orientation and limb alignment as measured on radiograph (question 4), and the stress shielding related bone loss in the proximal tibia (question 5) with KA UKA, and where possible to compare with MA UKA.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

KA UKA generates good clinical outcomes, similar or superior to the ones of MA UKA.

METHOD

Systematic review of literature databases were primarily searched using Healthcare Databases Advanced Search (HDAS). Two primary searches were conducted using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed, and a secondary search was conducted using review articles and bibliography of obtained papers in order to ascertain more material.

RESULTS

Nine eligible non-comparative prospective (3) or retrospective (6) cohort studies, which cumulated 593 KA UKAs with follow-up between 3.2 and 12 years, fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The findings demonstrated high Knee Society Score (KSS) (from 87 to 95) and function scores (from 81 to above 91) in addition to patient satisfaction scores of 88%. There was no revision for tibia plateau fracture, 0.8% (5 cases) for unexplained pain tibia, 2.0% (12 cases) for component loosening, and 5.6% (33 cases) for any causes of aseptic failures reported for KA UKA. The prosthetic lower limb and tibia implant alignments were both found to be in slight varus (means between 3 and 5°), and the postoperative joint line and tibia component was shown to be parallel to the floor when standing. The KA UKA components migration, as measured on radiostereometry, was acceptable.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The KA technique is an alternative, personalised, more physiological method for implanting UKA, which could be clinically advantageous when compared to the MA technique. The literature supports the good mid- to long-term clinical safety and good efficacy of KA UKA; however, comparison between KA and MA techniques for UKA was not performed due to limited literature. Further investigations are needed to better define the clinical impact of KA UKA, and the acceptable limits for KA of the UKA tibial component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4; systematic review of level 4 studies.

Combined procedures with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: High risk of stiffness but promising concept in selected indications

Introduction: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has traditionally been contraindicated in the presence of an ACL deficient knee, bi-compartmental disease, or significant coronal deformity due to concerns regarding increased risk of persisted pain, knee instability, tibial loosening, or progression of osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing UKA with an associated surgical procedure in these specific indications. Method: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing UKA between December 2015 and October 2020. Patients were categorized into groups based on associated procedures: UKA + ACL, UKA + HTO, and bicompartmental arthroplasty. Outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and function scores and the Forgotten Joint Score. Radiological and complication analysis was performed at the last clinical follow-up. Results: Thirty-two patients (13 men and 19 women) were included. The mean age was 56.2 years ± 11.1 (range, 33–84) with a mean follow-up of 26.3 months ± 15 (7.3–61.1). There was a significant improvement between the pre-and postoperative KSS Knee (+34.3 ± 16.5 [12–69]), Function (+34.3 ± 18.6 [0–75]), and Total scores (+68.5 ± 29.4 [24–129]) (p = 0.001). Seven patients (21.8%) required an arthroscopic arthrolysis for persistent stiffness. Two patients (UKA + PFA and UKA + ACL) underwent revision to TKA. Patient satisfaction was 90%, and mean flexion at last follow-up was 122° ± 6 (120–140). The implant survival rate was 94%. Discussion: This study found performing UKA with an additional procedure to address relative contraindications to the arthroplasty in physically active patients with monocompartmental knee arthritis is an efficient strategy with good results at short-term follow-up. It should be reserved for patients where TKA is likely to have unsatisfactory results, and the patient has been fully counseled regarding the management options. Even if there is a high rate of complications with stiffness requiring a re-intervention, the final results are very satisfying with no impact of the reintervention on the clinical result in the short term.

The effect of gender, age, BMI and Kellgren-Lawrence grade on functional outcome after Physica ZUK medial unicompartmental knee replacement

PURPOSE

Several factors influence the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacements. This study investigates the correlation of specific preoperative patient variables with postoperative functional outcomes-measured with the American Knee Society Knee (KS-KS) and Function Scores (KS-FS), as well as the difference in knee flexion pre- and postoperatively.

METHODS

In a retrospective study of 242 patients who underwent a medial Physica ZUK unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), the American KS-KS, KS-FS as well as knee flexion were analyzed preoperatively and at 2-year follow-up. The absolute scores and improvement in scores were calculated per subgroup for gender, age, body mass index (BMI) and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) radiological grade and compared between the subgroups.

RESULTS

All groups had a significant improvement in range of flexion, KS-KS and KS-FS. Female patients had lower preoperative scores and significantly larger improvement in knee flexion and KS-FS. Age does not seem to be associated with the postoperative functional outcome. Patients with a BMI of 30 or higher had a lower postoperative KS-KS and KS-FS as well as knee flexion. Patients with KL grade IV changes had larger gain in KS-KS compared to patients with grade III.

CONCLUSION

Overall, KS-KS, KS-FS and knee flexion improve significantly 2 years following a Physica ZUK UKR in all groups. Although excellent results were found in patients with a BMI of 30 or higher, a decrease in BMI was associated with an increase in functional outcome. KL IV grade preoperatively was associated with a better KS-KS improvement compared to the KL III group 2 years postoperatively. This information can aid surgeons in patient selection and to counsel patients on outcomes.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

III.

Total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: the TOPKAT RCT

BACKGROUND

Late-stage medial compartment knee osteoarthritis can be treated using total knee replacement or partial (unicompartmental) knee replacement. There is high variation in treatment choice and insufficient evidence to guide selection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of partial knee replacement compared with total knee replacement in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. The findings are intended to guide surgical decision-making for patients, surgeons and health-care providers.

DESIGN

This was a randomised, multicentre, pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial that included an expertise component. The target sample size was 500 patients. A web-based randomisation system was used to allocate treatments.

SETTING

Twenty-seven NHS hospitals (68 surgeons).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

INTERVENTIONS

The trial compared the overall management strategy of partial knee replacement treatment with total knee replacement treatment. No specified brand or subtype of implant was investigated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Oxford Knee Score at 5 years was the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included activity scores, global health measures, transition items, patient satisfaction (Lund Score) and complications (including reoperation, revision and composite 'failure' - defined by minimal Oxford Knee Score improvement and/or reoperation). Cost-effectiveness was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 528 patients were randomised (partial knee replacement, n = 264; total knee replacement, n = 264). The follow-up primary outcome response rate at 5 years was 88% and both operations had good outcomes. There was no significant difference between groups in mean Oxford Knee Score at 5 years (difference 1.04, 95% confidence interval -0.42 to 2.50). An area under the curve analysis of the Oxford Knee Score at 5 years showed benefit in favour of partial knee replacement over total knee replacement, but the difference was within the minimal clinically important difference [mean 36.6 (standard deviation 8.3) (n = 233), mean 35.1 (standard deviation 9.1) (n = 231), respectively]. Secondary outcome measures showed consistent patterns of benefit in the direction of partial knee replacement compared with total knee replacement although most differences were small and non-significant. Patient-reported improvement (transition) and reflection (would you have the operation again?) showed statistically significant superiority for partial knee replacement only, but both of these variables could be influenced by the lack of blinding. The frequency of reoperation (including revision) by treatment received was similar for both groups: 22 out of 245 for partial knee replacement and 28 out of 269 for total knee replacement patients. Revision rates at 5 years were 10 out of 245 for partial knee replacement and 8 out of 269 for total knee replacement. There were 28 'failures' of partial knee replacement and 38 'failures' of total knee replacement (as defined by composite outcome). Beyond 1 year, partial knee replacement was cost-effective compared with total knee replacement, being associated with greater health benefits (measured using quality-adjusted life-years) and lower health-care costs, reflecting lower costs of the index surgery and subsequent health-care use.

LIMITATIONS

It was not possible to blind patients in this study and there was some non-compliance with the allocated treatment interventions. Surgeons providing partial knee replacement were relatively experienced with the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both total knee replacement and partial knee replacement are effective, offer similar clinical outcomes and have similar reoperation and complication rates. Some patient-reported measures of treatment approval were significantly higher for partial knee replacement than for total knee replacement. Partial knee replacement was more cost-effective (more effective and cost saving) than total knee replacement at 5 years.

FUTURE WORK

Further (10-year) follow-up is in progress to assess the longer-term stability of these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN03013488 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01352247.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement in Obese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Thanks to modern surgical techniques and implants, traditional exclusion criteria for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are no longer considered contraindications. The aim of this study is to clarify the impact of obesity on functional outcomes and revision rates of UKA. We performed a comprehensive systematic review using PubMed-Medline, Google Scholar and Cochrane Central. Then, we extracted data related to body mass index (BMI), age and follow-up, functional outcome scores and rate of revisions (all-cause, aseptic and septic). Patients were stratified according to BMI into two groups: non-obese (BMI < 30) and obese (BMI ≥ 30). We identified 22 eligible studies, of which 13 were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with a BMI > 30 had a significantly higher likelihood for revision (p = 0.02), while the risk of septic revision was similar (p = 0.79). The clinical outcome measures showed a significant difference in favor of patients with a BMI < 30 (p < 0.0001). The improvements in Oxford Knee Score and Knee Society Score were significant in both obese and non-obese patients, although the latter showed inferior results. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show that BMI is not a contraindication to UKA. However, obese patients have a higher risk for aseptic failure and lower improvement in clinical scores compared to non-obese patients.

TKA is More Durable Than UKA for Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) indications have expanded during the past two decades to include some morbidly obese patients (body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m²). Few published studies have compared UKA and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in this unique patient subgroup with conflicting observations.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared 89 mobile bearing UKA (71 patients) and 201 TKA (175 patients) performed at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.4 years). Demographic characteristics were similar for both patient cohorts. A detailed medical record review was performed to assess the frequency of component revision, revision indications, minor secondary procedures (components retained), and infections.

RESULTS

UKA was more frequently associated with clinical failure (29.2% vs 2.5%, P < .001) and component revision (15.7% vs 2.5%, P < .001), TKA was more frequently associated with extensor mechanism complications or knee manipulation (5.5% vs 0.0%, P = .02), and there was no difference in the infection rate (3.0% vs 2.2%, P = 1.0).

CONCLUSION

Early complications were lower following UKA but were outweighed by higher component revision rates for arthritis progression and implant failure. The study findings suggest that TKA provides a more predictable mid-term outcome for morbidly obese patients considering knee arthroplasty surgery.

[Focal femoral resurfacing and unicompartmental knee replacement : Between osteotomy and total knee replacement]

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, especially for both femorotibial compartments of the knee, is an established partly joint-saving treatment option for osteoarthritis of the knee if the disease is limited to one compartment. Even smaller implants or resurfacing of the patellofemoral joint have been shown-in smaller patient collectives-to have the potential to yield good clinical results.

The effect of tibial and femoral component coronal alignment on clinical outcomes and survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

AIMS

This study aimed to identify the tibial component and femoral component coronal angles (TCCAs and FCCAs), which concomitantly are associated with the best outcomes and survivorship in a cohort of fixed-bearing, cemented, medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs). We also investigated the potential two-way interactions between the TCCA and FCCA.

METHODS

Prospectively collected registry data involving 264 UKAs from a single institution were analyzed. The TCCAs and FCCAs were measured on postoperative radiographs and absolute angles were analyzed. Clinical assessment at six months, two years, and ten years was undertaken using the Knee Society Knee score (KSKS) and Knee Society Function score (KSFS), the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36), and range of motion (ROM). Fulfilment of expectations and satisfaction was also recorded. Implant survivorship was reviewed at a mean follow-up of 14 years (12 to 16). Multivariate regression models included covariates, TCCA, FCCA, and two-way interactions between them. Partial residual graphs were generated to identify angles associated with the best outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare implant survivorship between groups.

RESULTS

Significant two-way interaction effects between TCCA and FCCA were identified. Adjusted for each other and their interaction, a TCCA of between 2° and 4° and a FCCA of between 0° and 2° were found to be associated with the greatest improvements in knee scores and the probability of fulfilling expectations and satisfaction at ten years. Patients in the optimal group whose TCCA and FCCA were between 2° and 4°, and 0° and 2°, respectively, had a significant survival benefit at 15 years compared with the non-optimal group (optimal: survival = 100% vs non-optimal: survival = 92%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 88% to 96%).

CONCLUSION

Significant two-way interactions between the TCCA and FCCA demonstrate the importance of evaluating the alignment of the components concomitantly in future studies. By doing so, we found that patients who concomitantly had both a TCCA of between 2° and 4° and a FCCA of between 0° and 2° had the best patient-reported outcome measures at ten years and better survivorship at 15 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):338-346.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty results in a better gait pattern than total knee arthroplasty: Gait analysis with a smartphone application

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the smartphone- based gait analysis data of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2016 and April 2019, a total of 51 patients (3 males, 48 females; mean age: 60.92 years; range, 51 to 70 years) who were operated with UKA or TKA in our clinic were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the type of procedure as the UKA group (n=17) and unilateral TKA group (n=34). Gait analysis was made via a smartphone application (Gait Analyzer software version 0.9.95.0) with data acquired from the accelerometer of the smartphone. This analysis was performed using data collected from the Acceleration Sensor LSM6DSO into the Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus phone. Gait velocity, step time, step length, cadence, step time symmetry, step length symmetry, and vertical COM (vert-COM) parameters were measured.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in respect of age, sex, body mass index, operated side, and follow-up duration. Compared to the TKA group, the UKA patients showed a better gait pattern in gait velocity (p=0.03), step time symmetry (p=0.005), and step length symmetry (p=0.024). No significant difference was detected in step time (p=0.807), step length (p=0.302), cadence (p=0.727) and vert-COM parameters (p=0.608).

CONCLUSION

The gait of UKA patients is closer to the physiological pattern with a better gait velocity, step time symmetry, and step length symmetry than TKA patients. The surgical treatment option of UKA for knee medial compartment osteoarthritis leads to a better gait pattern than TKA.

The unicompartmental knee is the preferred side in individuals with both a unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the preferred knee in patients with both one total and one unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

METHOD

Patients simply with a unicompartmental (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on contralateral sides were retrospectively screened from three senior knee surgeon's logs over a 15 year period. Patients safe and free from other diseases to affect gait were approached. A total of 16 patients (mean age 70 ± 8) agreed to ground reaction force testing on an instrumented treadmill at a fair pace and incline. A gender-ratio identical group of 16 healthy control subjects (mean age 67 ± 10) and 16 patients with ipsilateral medial knee OA (mean age 66 ± 7) were analysed to compare.

RESULTS

Radiographically the mode preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence knee grade for each side was 3. Postoperatively, the TKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 89° with a mean posterior slope of 5° in the sagittal plane. The UKA side had a mean coronal femoral component alignment of 7° and a mean tibial coronal alignment of 86° with a mean posterior slope of 4° in the sagittal plane. In 7 patients, the TKA was the first procedure, while 6 for the UKA and 3 done simultaneously. Gait analysis demonstrated in both walking conditions the UKA limb was the preferred side through all phases of loading (p < 0.05) and nearer to normal than the TKA limb when compared to healthy controls and patients with knee OA. The greatest difference was observed between the transition of weight acceptance and midstance (p = 0.008), when 22% more load was taken by the UKA side.

CONCLUSION

By using a dynamic metric of an everyday activity, a distinct gait difference between differing arthroplasty types were established. A more natural loading pattern can be achieved with unicompartmentals as compared to total knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

A comparison of gait characteristics between posterior stabilized total knee and fixed bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties

Background/Objective

According to previous studies, physiological gait pattern was found in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) concerning the gait parameters including gait speed, cadence, and step length. However, little attention had been paid to the detailed kinematic and kinetic differences during gait between TKAs and UKAs. The aim of the present study was to investigate and to clarify the biomechanical differences between posterior stabilized TKAs and fixed bearing UKAs during walking.

Methods

A total of 28 patients participated in the present study. Fifteen patients who underwent TKA and thirteen patients who underwent UKA were enrolled. Gait analysis was done at an average of 12.9 months after surgery. The subjects performed level walking at a preferred speed. For each subject, three-dimensional kinematic, kinetic and ground reaction force data were recorded as well as clinical data including range of motion at the knee joint and plain radiographs. Differences of knee kinematics or kinetics were compared between TKAs and UKAs using two-tailed Mann Whitney U-test.

Results

On physical examination, passive range motion was significantly smaller in TKAs than in UKAs, while femorotibial angle on plain radiographs was not significantly different on plain radiographs. In terms of kinematics, TKAs were more flexed at heel contact and less extended in mid-stance phase compared to UKAs in the sagittal plane, and total excursion of TKAs were also smaller than UKAs. Regarding knee kinetics, TKA patients had significantly less peak tibial internal rotation moment in terminal stance phase. In addition, peak knee adduction moment was significantly larger in UKAs than in TKAs, while peak knee flexion moment was not significantly different.

Conclusion

Posterior stabilized TKAs exhibited less peak tibial internal rotation moment, which is known as pivot shift avoidance gait, in the present study, compared to fixed bearing UKAs. TKAs had similar gait pattern to anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees, compared to UKAs even if patients with TKAs had no subjective pain during walking.

Anatomy-mimetic design preserves natural kinematics of knee joint in patient-specific mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate whether different tibial-femoral conformities for patient-specific mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) preserve natural knee kinematics, using computational simulations.

METHODS

Different designs for patient-specific mobile-bearing UKAs were evaluated using finite element analysis. Three designs for the identical femoral component were considered: flat (non-conforming design), anatomy-mimetic, and conforming for the tibial insert.

RESULTS

The conforming design for the patient-specific mobile-bearing UKAs exhibited a 1.2 mm and 0.7° decrease in the translation and rotation, respectively, in the swing phase compared with those of the natural knee. In addition, the femoral rollback and internal rotation were 2.6 mm and 1.2° lower, respectively, than those of the natural knee, for the conforming design under the deep-knee-bend condition. The flat design for the patient-specific mobile-bearing UKAs exhibited a 2.2 mm and 1.4° increase in the femoral rollback and rotation compared with the natural knee under the deep-knee-bend condition. The anatomy-mimetic patient-specific mobile-bearing UKAs best preserved the natural knee kinematics under the gait and deep-knee-bend loading conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The kinematics of the loading conditions in patient-specific mobile-bearing UKAs was determined to closely resemble those of a native knee. In additional, by replacing the anatomy-mimetic design with a mobile-bearing, natural knee kinematics during gait and deep-knee-bend motions is preserved. These results confirm the importance of tibiofemoral conformity in preserving native knee kinematics in patient-specific mobile-bearing UKA.

High Failure Rates for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Several recent studies have recommended offering unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to all patients regardless of body mass index (BMI). The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the proposition that UKA can indeed be offered to the morbidly-obese and super-obese (morbidly-obese, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) without compromising results or survivorship.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed mobile-bearing medial UKA procedures performed at our facility from January 2012 to May 2015 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The study cohort was divided into patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²) and those without morbid obesity (BMI < 40 kg/m²). A detailed medical record review was performed. Extracted outcome data included the frequency of (1) major revision procedures (components revised), (2) minor secondary procedures (components not revised), (3) infection procedures, and (4) recommendations for revision.

RESULTS

We found 152 patients (190 knees) who met criteria for inclusion. Mean follow-up duration was 3.4 years (range: 2.0-6.8 years). Major revision surgery occurred more frequently in the morbid-obesity UKA group (15.7% vs 3.0%, P < .01). Rates of minor secondary surgery and infection were comparable for both groups. Most failures in the morbid-obesity UKA group (85.7%) were due to disease progression involving other compartments or mobile-bearing instability.

CONCLUSION

We found the rate of early major revision surgery in morbidly-obese patients undergoing UKA to be over 5-times greater than that of other patients. Failure was predominantly due to disease progression in other compartments or mobile-bearing instability. Further study is warranted and needed before expanding UKA indications to the morbidly-obese population.

Simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee replacement improves gait parameters in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) can provide reliable clinical and functional outcomes when performed simultaneously in both knees for treating bilateral osteoarthritis (OA). No studies to date have evaluated gait pattern after simultaneous bilateral UKR. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in gait variables after bilateral single-stage UKR (B-UKR) and to compare them with the outcomes after unilateral UKR in two other groups of patients: one with bilateral knee OA (P-UKR) and one with the contralateral knee unaffected (H-UKR).

METHODS

Three-dimensional motion cohort data were prospectively collected before and six months after surgery; 37 were allocated to the B-UKR (n = 13), P-UKR (n = 12) or H-UKR (n = 12) group. Spatiotemporal variables (stride length, gait speed, gait cadence, stance phase, swing phase, and double support phase) and kinematic parameters (knee flexion and extension peak values, knee range of motion (ROM), and hip abduction peak value) were analyzed using mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA). The magnitude of effect for significant outcomes (ES) was determined using Cohen's d.

RESULTS

Postoperative improvement in gait cadence (P < 0.01; ES = 1.20), walking speed (P < 0.05; ES = 0.58), stride length (P < 0.05; ES = 0.67), knee ROM (P < 0.05; ES = 0.89), knee flexion (P < 0.05; ES = 0.94), and hip abduction (P < 0.001; ES = 1.16) was noted for the B-UKR group, whereas only stride length improved (P < 0.05; ES = 0.48) for the H-UKR group, and no changes in any gait parameter were seen for the P-UKR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative improvement in gait parameters was observed in the B-UKR patients with bilateral OA. Whenever possible, simultaneous bilateral UKR should be considered in such patients.

Reduced opioid requirements following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) provides improved early functional outcomes and less postoperative morbidity and pain compared with total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Opioid prescribing has increased in the last two decades, and recently states in the USA have developed online Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs to prevent overprescribing of controlled substances. This study evaluates differences in opioid requirements between patients undergoing TKA and UKA.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 676 consecutive TKAs and 241 UKAs. Opioid prescriptions in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), sedatives, benzodiazepines, and stimulants were collected from State Controlled Substance Monitoring websites six months before and nine months after the initial procedures. Bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed for patients who had a second prescription and continued use.

Results

Patients undergoing UKA had a second opioid prescription filled 50.2% of the time, compared with 60.5% for TKA (p = 0.006). After controlling for potential confounders, patients undergoing UKA were still less likely to require a second prescription than those undergoing TKA (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.81; p = 0.001). Continued opioid use requiring more than five prescriptions occurred in 13.7% of those undergoing TKA and 5.8% for those undergoing UKA (p = 0.001), and was also reduced in UKA patients compared with TKA patients (adjusted OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.67; p = 0.022) in multivariate analysis. The continued use of opioids after six months was 11.8% in those undergoing TKA and 8.3% in those undergoing UKA (p = 0.149). The multivariate models for second prescriptions, continued use with more than five, and continued use beyond six months yielded concordance scores of 0.70, 0.86, and 0.83, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with TKA, patients undergoing UKA are less likely to require a second opioid prescription and use significantly fewer opioid prescriptions. Thus, orthopaedic surgeons should adjust their patterns of prescription and educate patients about the reduced expected analgesic requirements after UKA compared with TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(7 Supple C):22–27

Comparison of 2 Forms of Kinetic Biofeedback on the Immediate Correction of Knee Extensor Moment Asymmetry Following Total Knee Arthroplasty During Decline Walking

BACKGROUND

Individuals with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) display interlimb knee extensor moment (KEM) asymmetry during level walking that is exacerbated as task demands are increased. Studies using biofeedback to correct interlimb KEM asymmetry following TKA have reported mixed results.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the immediate effect of 2 forms of real-time kinetic biofeedback-vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) or KEM-on improving interlimb peak KEM symmetry during the weight-acceptance phase of decline walking in persons who have undergone TKA.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional, controlled laboratory study, 30 participants (17 men; mean ± SD age, 61.9 ± 8.5 years; body mass index, 28.4 ± 3.7 kg/m²) were allocated to either a vGRF or KEM real-time biofeedback group. Peak KEM interlimb asymmetry was obtained during both nonbiofeedback and biofeedback decline walking trials 3 months following TKA.

RESULTS

Significant interlimb asymmetry in peak KEM was observed in both groups during the nonbiofeedback condition (KEM, P = .02; vGRF, P<.01). The KEM biofeedback group demonstrated an immediate improvement in peak KEM asymmetry (P = .42). No change in peak KEM asymmetry was observed in the vGRF biofeedback group (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Knee extensor moment biofeedback has an immediate effect on improving peak KEM asymmetry 3 months post TKA. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(2):105-111. Epub 20 Aug 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.7800.

Medium-term outcome of cementless, mobile-bearing, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Background

Cemented, mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty (UKA) yields good functional results. However, radiolucent lines (RLL) are not uncommon, even in asymptomatic patients, and it has been debated whether these "physiological" RLLs are indicative of loosening. Cementless UKA may lead to fewer RLLs compared with cemented devices. The present study was designed to document mid-term outcome with an emphasis on clinical outcomes.

Methods

We included 153 knees of 150 consecutive patients in a retrospective study. All patients had received a cementless medial mobile-bearing UKA. Patients were evaluated with use of the Knee Society Score (KSS), which was obtained at baseline and at final follow-up. The WOMAC, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS-12) were administered at the final follow-up. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were taken at final follow-up.

Results

At a mean follow-up of 5 years (range, 3-7 years), implant survival was 97.1% (95% confidence interval, 91.1-99.1%). Excellent postoperative KSS, WOMAC, OKS and FJS scores were obtained. Postoperative radiography was available for 78 knees. RLL was observed in 10.3% of the cases, but no cases with complete RLLs were seen.

Conclusions

Favourable results were found for cementless, mobile-bearing UKA, with no aseptic loosening at an average follow-up of 5 years. Cementless UKA fixation may lead to a clinically "forgotten joint" and may decrease the rate of RLLs.

Level and Downhill Walking to Assess Implant Functionality in Bicruciate- and Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to set up a functional motion analysis test to examine effects of the anterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients by comparing knee kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation patterns during level and downhill walking for patients with posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) and bicruciate-retaining (BiCR) TKAs.

METHODS

Motion and electromyography (EMG) data were collected for 12 subjects (4/8 male/female, 64 ± 11 years, 31.3 ± 7.3 body mass index, 6/6 right/left) with BiCR TKAs and 15 subjects (6/9 male/female, 67 ± 7 years, 30.5 ± 5.1 body mass index, 4/11 right/left) with PCR TKAs during level and downhill walking using the point cluster marker set and surface electrodes placed on the vastus medialis obliquus, rectus femoris, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus muscles.

RESULTS

Level walking exhibited no significant differences in knee kinematics, kinetics, or EMG patterns. During downhill walking, BiCR subjects had significantly lower peak muscle activity in the vastus medialis obliquus and rectus femoris (P = .045 and .018, respectively), a trending higher peak knee flexion moment (2.0 ± 0.6% BW*HT vs 1.5 ± 0.6% BW*HT, P = .076), and significantly more knee flexion at heel strike (5.1° ± 4.7° vs 1.8° ± 2.8°, P = .044) compared with PCR subjects.

CONCLUSION

Anterior cruciate ligament retention led to altered muscle recruitment during downhill walking in BiCR subjects compared with PCR subjects; thus, BiCR TKAs may offer some neuromuscular benefits for stabilizing the knee joint. In conclusion, level and downhill walking knee kinematics and kinetics combined with corresponding quadriceps and hamstrings EMG signals begin to build an overall picture of implant functionality.

The loading patterns of a short femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty: gait analysis at increasing walking speeds and inclines

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to examine the gait pattern of total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients with a new short femoral stem at different speeds and inclinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 unilateral THA patients were tested on an instrumented treadmill. They comprised two groups (shorter stemmed THA n = 20, longer stemmed THA n = 20), both which had the same surgical posterior approach. The shorter femoral stemmed patients were taken from an ongoing hip trial with minimum 12 months postop. The comparative longer THR group with similar disease and severity were taken from a gait database along with a demographically similar group of healthy controls (n = 35). All subjects were tested through their entire range of gait speeds and inclines with ground reaction forces collected. Body weight scaling was applied and a symmetry index to compare the implanted hip to the contralateral normal hip. An analysis of variance with significance set at α = 0.05 was used.

RESULTS

The experimental groups were matched demographically and implant groups for patient reported outcome measures and radiological disease. Both THA groups walked slower than controls, but symmetry at all intervals for all groups were not significantly different. Push-off loading was less favourable for both the shorter and longer stemmed THR groups (p < 0.05) depending on speed.

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of femoral stem length, symmetry for ground reaction forces for both THA groups were returned to a normal range when compared to controls. However individual implant performance showed inferior (p < 0.05) push-off forces and normalised step length in both THR groups when compared to controls.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A Novel Downhill Gait-Training Program Following a Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report Highlighting the Impacts of Self-selected Speed on Gait Symmetry

Study Design Case report. Background Walking plays an essential role in activities of daily living and has varied health benefits. Studies report that gait speed and symmetry are impacted in individuals following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Unfortunately, abnormal gait patterns persist in individuals after TKA. Downhill walking may provide a simple and feasible exercise regimen to improve gait patterns. The purpose of this case report was to describe the application of a downhill treadmill training program and the subsequent changes in gait patterns in an individual following a unilateral TKA. Case Description The participant was a 59-year-old woman following a right TKA. Downhill gait training was initiated 1 month post TKA and completed for 5 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using questionnaires, mobility tests, strength of quadriceps, and gait patterns. The treadmill speed was determined by the participant's self-selected gait speed on a level surface. Outcomes The participant's eccentric quadriceps strength in the operated limb significantly increased after the gait training. Her physical function recovered to a level similar to that of previous reports. Postintervention gait analysis was conducted at 2 self-selected speeds, due to an increase in the participant's self-selected gait speed between sessions. The participant demonstrated a more symmetrical gait pattern when walking slower and a more asymmetrical gait pattern at the faster speed. Discussion After completion of downhill gait training in conjunction with therapeutic exercises, the participant showed an increase in quadriceps strength and improved physical function. This case report describes the utilization and potential feasibility of downhill gait training in conjunction with outpatient physical therapy for an individual following unilateral TKA. Level of Evidence Therapy, level 5. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48(2):104-110. Epub 7 Nov 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2018.7374.

Unicompartmental knee replacement - Current perspectives

Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is an effective treatment for end-stage, symptomatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee. However, certain aspects of the procedure are still debated. These areas of discussion include patient selection criteria, implant design and the discrepancy in survival rates between national registries and independent case series. These may contribute in limiting the more widespread acceptance of unicompartmental knee replacement. The aim of this paper is to review the up-to-date evidence on UKR and discuss the most relevant controversies regarding this procedure.

Up to 10 year follow-up of the Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee Replacement from an independent centre

BACKGROUND

The Oxford Domed Lateral Partial Knee Replacement (ODLPKR) was designed specifically for the lateral compartment in response to the unacceptable dislocation rate seen with the Oxford Partial Knee. This paper presents the up to 10-year follow-up of an independent, single surgeon series using this implant. The aim of this study is to assess the medium term outcome of the ODLPKR. The primary outcome measures were 13 revision surgery, re-operation and functional outcome.

METHODS

Sixty-four knees in 58 patients were performed between 2005 and 2009. Patients were interviewed by telephone to determine whether further surgery had been conducted on their knee and to complete an Oxford Knee Score (OKS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

The status of 61 knees was confirmed with a median follow-up period of 84months. One patient sustained two bearing dislocations ultimately requiring an elective bearing exchange. Two knees underwent revision to TKR and five other patients reported further operations. Median OKS was 26 (range nine to 36) pre-operatively and 42 (10-48) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The ODLPKR offers an effective and safe treatment for lateral compartment osteoarthritis. Bearing dislocation does not appear to be a significant issue with this implant and implant retention is similar to that achieved by medial unicompartmental knee replacements in the medium term.

Kinematics of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to native: results from an in vitro study

INTRODUCTION

Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) closely replicates native knee kinematics. As few studies have assessed kinematics following mobile-bearing (MB) UKA, the current study aimed to investigate whether MB UKA preserves natural knee kinematics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seven fresh-frozen full-leg cadaver specimens were prepared and mounted in a kinematic rig that allowed all degrees of freedom at the knee. Three motion patterns, passive flexion-extension (0°-110° flexion), open-chain extension (5°-70° flexion) and squatting (30°-100° flexion), were performed pre- and post-implantation of a medial MB UKA and compared in terms of rotational and translational knee joint kinematics in the different anatomical planes, respectively.

RESULTS

In terms of frontal plane rotational kinematics, MB UKA specimens were in a more valgus orientation for all motion patterns. In the axial plane, internal rotation of the tibia before and after UKA was consistent, regardless of motion task, with no significant differences. In terms of frontal plane, i.e., inferior-superior, translations, the FMCC was significantly higher in UKA knees in all flexion angles and motor tasks, except in early flexion during passive motion. In terms of axial plane, i.e., anteroposterior (AP), translations, during open-chain activities, the femoral medial condyle center (FMCC) tended to be more posterior following UKA relative to the native knee in mid-flexion and above. AP excursions of the FMCC were small in all tested motions, however. There was substantial AP translation of the femoral lateral condyle center during passive motion before and after UKA, which was significantly different for flexion angles > 38°.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study data demonstrate that the kinematics of the unloaded knee following MB UKA closely resemble those of the native knee while relative medial overstuffing with UKA will result in the joint being more valgus. However, replacing the conforming and rigidly fixed medial meniscus with a mobile inlay may successfully prevent aberrant posterior translation of the medial femoral compartment during passive motion and squatting motion.

Annual revision rates of partial versus total knee arthroplasty: A comparative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) as alternatives to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) has increased. However, no single resource consolidates survivorship data between TKA and partial resurfacing options for each variant of unicompartmental OA. This meta-analysis compared survivorship between TKA and medial UKA (MUKA), lateral UKA (LUKA) and PFA using annual revision rate as a standardized metric.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for studies quantifying TKA, MUKA, LUKA and/or PFA implant survivorship. Studies were classified by evidence level and assessed for bias using the MINORS and PEDro instruments. Annual revision rates were calculated for each arthroplasty procedure as percentages/observed component-year, based on a Poisson-normal model with random effects using the R-statistical software package.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-four studies (113 cohort and 11 registry-based studies) met inclusion/exclusion criteria, providing data for 374,934 arthroplasties and 14,991 revisions. The overall evidence level was low, with 96.7% of studies classified as level III-IV. Annual revision rates were lowest for TKA (0.49%, CI 0.41 to 0.58), followed by MUKA (1.07%, CI 0.87 to 1.31), LUKA (1.13%, CI 0.69 to 1.83) and PFA (1.75%, CI 1.19 to 2.57). No difference was detected between revision rates for MUKA and LUKA (p=0.222).

CONCLUSIONS

Revisions of MUKA, LUKA and PFA occur at an annual rate of 2.18, 2.31 and 3.57-fold that of TKA, respectively. These estimates may be used to inform clinical decision-making, guide patient expectations and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in the setting of unicompartmental OA.

What Postoperative Outcome Measures Link Joint Stability to Patient Satisfaction?

Total knee arthroplasty is a common, effective treatment for disabling arthritis of the knee. However, not all patients receiving total knee arthroplasty achieve what is considered an optimal outcome, and not all patients report high satisfaction with their results. Because the focus of attention increasingly turns to optimizing outcomes and utilization of healthcare resources, it is worthwhile to review the array of available tools and techniques for quantifying postoperative outcomes after knee arthroplasty and identify how these might be used to guide refinement of the treatment to achieve even better and more predictable outcomes. This review summarizes current methods for assessing postoperative outcomes on a biomechanical basis, organizes them into three complementary domains, and suggests how these domains must be linked to address the titular question.

Early outcomes of twin-peg mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Since redesign of the Oxford phase III mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) femoral component to a twin-peg design, there has not been a direct comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Thus, we explored differences between the two cohorts.

Patients and Methods

A total of 168 patients (201 knees) underwent medial UKA with the Oxford Partial Knee Twin-Peg. These patients were compared with a randomly selected group of 177 patients (189 knees) with primary Vanguard TKA. Patient demographics, Knee Society (KS) scores and range of movement (ROM) were compared between the two cohorts. Additionally, revision, re-operation and manipulation under anaesthesia rates were analysed.

Results

The mean follow-up for UKA and TKA groups was 5.4 and 5.5 years, respectively. Six TKA (3.2%) versus three UKAs (1.5%) were revised which was not significant (p = 0.269). Manipulation was more frequent after TKA (16; 8.5%) versus none in the UKA group (p < 0.001). UKA patients had higher post-operative KS function scores versus TKA patients (78 versus 66, p < 0.001) with a trend toward greater improvement, but there was no difference in ROM and KS clinical improvement (p = 0.382 and 0.420, respectively).

Conclusion

We found fewer manipulations, and higher functional outcomes for patients treated with medial mobile-bearing UKA compared with TKA. TKA had twice the revision rate as UKA although this did not reach statistical significance with the numbers available.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(10 Suppl B):28–33.

Deficits in functional performance and gait one year after total knee arthroplasty despite improved self-reported function

PURPOSE

The current literature lacks sufficient information about improvements in gait patterns and function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and whether patients return to full function. This study evaluated change in gait, performance-based function, and self-reported function 1 year after TKA in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis and how these aspects interrelate.

METHODS

A total of 28 patients (64 % female) with knee osteoarthritis, with a mean age of 66 (±7) years, and 25 age- and gender-matched controls participated in this prospective cohort study. Three-dimensional gait analysis generated comprehensive measures of kinematic and kinetic gait deviations, respectively. Participants completed the Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5STS) test, and the self-reported questionnaire Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), at baseline prior to surgery and 1 year after TKA.

RESULTS

Kinetic gait deviations of both the operated and non-operated limb persisted in patients with knee osteoarthritis at 1 year after surgery, while kinematic gait patterns were comparable to controls. Performance on the 5STS and KOOS scores in patients with knee osteoarthritis improved significantly 1 year after surgery (effect size 0.5-1.5), but did not reach the level of controls. Ten patients with knee osteoarthritis (36 %) exceeded the minimally detectable change on the 5STS.

CONCLUSION

Measures of overall gait patterns and the 5STS revealed improvements in function 1 year after TKA, but were not restored to the level of healthy controls. Based on change in 5STS performance, we identified patients with substantial improvements in gait patterns. Self-reported measures of function could not detect differences between patients improving in 5STS performance and those who did not. These findings highlight the use of the 5STS in clinical practice since improvement on this test seems to follow the reduction in gait pattern deviations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Knee Extensor Strength and Gait Characteristics After Minimally Invasive Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty vs Minimally Invasive Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In light of the existing lack of evidence, it was the aim of this study to compare gait characteristics and knee extensor strength after medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty (MUKA) with those after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), given the same standardized minimally invasive surgery (MIS) approach in both groups.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for MIS-MUKA or MIS-TKA as part of clinical routine were invited to participate. A posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee design was used for all MIS-TKA. A 3-dimensional gait analysis was performed preoperatively with a VICON system and at 8 weeks postoperative to determine temporospatial parameters, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments. At the same 2 times, isokinetic tests were performed to obtain peak values of knee extensor torque. A multivariate analysis of variance was conducted and included the main effects time (before and after surgery) and surgical group and the group-by-time interaction effect.

RESULTS

Fifteen MIS-MUKA patients and 17 MIS-TKA patients were eligible for the final analysis. The groups showed no differences regarding age, body mass index, sex, side treated, or stage of osteoarthritis. We determined neither intergroup differences nor time × group interactions for peak knee extensor torque or any gait parameters (temporospatial, ground reaction forces, joint angles, and joint moments).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that MUKA is not superior to TKA with regard to knee extensor strength or 3-dimensional gait characteristics at 8 weeks after operation. As gait characteristics and knee extensor strength are only 2 of the various potential outcome parameters (knee scores, activity scores…) and quadriceps strength might take a longer time to recover, our findings should be interpreted with caution.