Does spinal anesthesia lead to postoperative urinary retention in same-day urogynecology surgery? A retrospective review

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Urinary Retention in Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The literature is inconsistent on the prevalence and risk factors of urinary retention in patients with cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review the literature on the prevalence of urinary retention in patients with cervical cancer and consolidate the risk factors.

METHODS

For this meta-analysis, eligible articles published in English or Chinese by December 10, 2021, were systematically searched for and retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid-Embase Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus. Prevalence, odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were included in the analysis. The pooled overall prevalence was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21-0.30, I2 = 95.0%). The identified risk factors were age (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.19), urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.48-7.49), surgical extent (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.27-6.85), and catheter indwelling time (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.43-3.87).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of urinary retention in patients with cervical cancer is 0.26. Older age, UTI, longer catheter indwelling time, and a larger surgical extent may increase the risk of urinary retention. Clinicians should identify patients at risk and adopt interventions such as individualized catheter care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nursing staff should assess the risk of urinary retention in a patient with cervical cancer according to her age, presence of UTI, surgical extent, and catheterization time. A carefully chosen surgical procedure and interventions such as individualized education, timely catheter removal, treatment of UTI, and rehabilitation should be offered.

Postoperative Urinary Retention

ABSTRACT

This clinical consensus statement on the management of postoperative (<6 weeks) urinary retention (POUR) reflects statements drafted by content experts from the American Urogynecologic Society's POUR writing group. The writing group used a modified Delphi process to evaluate statements developed from a structured literature search and assessed for consensus. After the definition of POUR was established, a total of 37 statements were assessed in the following 6 categories: (1) incidence of POUR, (2) medications, (3) patient factors, (4) surgical factors, (5) urodynamic testing, and (6) voiding trials. Of the 37 original statements, 34 reached consensus and 3 were omitted.

Effect of single spinal anesthesia with two doses ropivacaine on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy in male patients

Background

Anorectal diseases are common in the population and include internal, external, and mixed hemorrhoids. Although hemorrhoid surgery is a brief operation, anesthesia, anesthetic drugs, drug concentrations, and anesthesia level control are closely related to postoperative uroschesis. For hemorrhoid surgery, a single spinal block with ropivacaine is commonly used that blocks the S2-S4 parasympathetic nervous system, which in turn governs the voiding reflex, causing postoperative urinary retention; this affects the recovery of patients. This study was performed to investigate the effects of two doses ropivacaine that provided satisfactory analgesia and muscle relaxation and inhibited adverse reflexes on urinary retention after hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

The study included 200 male patients who underwent anorectal surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I-II single elective spinal anesthesia between March 2021 and March 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups using a random number table: Group A (n = 100) received 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine (1.5 ml 1% ropivacaine + 1.5 ml 10% glucose = 3 ml), and Group B (n = 100) received 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine (1.5 ml 1% ropivacaine + 1.5 ml 10% glucose = 3 ml).

Results

The anal sphincter exhibited good relaxation, and no obvious traction pain or significant difference in the time of muscle strength recovery was observed between the 10 mg and 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine groups (P > 0.05). The 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine group had shorter time of micturition exceeding 100 ml and lower voiding International Prostate Symptom Score than the 15 mg 0.5% ropivacaine group (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Single spinal anesthesia with 10 mg 0.5% ropivacaine not only provides satisfactory anesthetic effect for hemorrhoidectomy but also has less influence on postoperative uroschesis and is worthy of clinical application.

Trial registration

The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn; identifier: ChiCTR2,100,043,686) on February 27, 2021.

Clinical benefits of retrograde bladder filling method prior to catheter removal after TURP for BPH: A prospective randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate possible benefits and clinical feasibility of retrograde bladder filling method prior to intra-vesical catheter removal after transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Male patients undergoing TURP for BPH from January 2019 to October 2019 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either retrograde filling (RF) or spontaneous voiding (SV) methods at a single institution to determine safety and efficacy of RF (NCT04309032), with surgeons blinded to allocation. Perioperative outcomes including postoperative complications were compared between two groups. Clinician/patients' satisfaction level which was evaluated with postoperative questionnaires were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 56 patients were randomized into two groups and 56 were included in final analysis (28 men in RF group, 26 in SV group). No significant differences in baseline characteristics including age, prostate volume, or perioperative uroflowmetry were observed. However, RF significantly facilitated time to void (67.0±63.2 vs. 144.0±78.7 min; p<0.001) and time to discharge (168.4±57.2 vs. 218.9±106.9 min; p=0.046). Immediate postoperative complications were comparable in both methods with no significant difference. Overall patient and medical staff satisfaction showed tolerable and similar response by either procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

RF method for intra-vesical catheter removal is a safe and satisfactory method that can facilitate early voiding detection and shorten the time to discharge. Further trials are required to further validate our results.

The voiding VAS score is a simple and useful method for predicting POUR after laparoscopy for benign gynaecologic diseases: a pilot study

The aim of this study was to identify an appropriate scoring system for predicting postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. We analysed 99 patients who underwent gynaecological laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. All patients were asked to complete self-administered questionnaires, including the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), voiding visual analogue scale (VAS), and Brief Pain Inventory-Korean version. Of the 99 patients, 27 (27.3%) experienced urinary retention at least once, while 72 (72.7%) did not. The preoperative and postoperative IPSS scores were not associated with the development of POUR. However, the voiding VAS score was significantly lower in patients that developed POUR (p = .014). In conclusion, our results show that the voiding VAS score is a simple and useful method for identifying patients at risk of POUR after gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery for benign disease. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is an often underestimated complication defined as inability to void during the postoperative period despite a full bladder. Undetected POUR may lead to complications such as urinary tract infection, bladder distention, and bladder dysfunction. Routine assessment of POUR by bladder ultrasonography in all surgical patients places a larger workload on the nursing staff.What do the results of this study add? Among the self-scoring assessment tools, the voiding VAS provided the most accurate reflection of POUR in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery for benign disease.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? As laparoscopy is the most widely employed surgical procedure in gynaecology, our findings could have significant implications for postoperative care in daily clinical practice.

The efficacy of force of stream assessment for post-operative catheter management: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Postoperative urinary retention is common after urogynecologic procedures. Our objective is to determine the efficacy of force of stream (FOS) assessment without a visual analog scale for postoperative catheter management.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 110 women undergoing an inpatient gynecologic procedure. They were asked to subjectively assess FOS after surgery without a visual analog scale. If it was 50% or better than the usual preoperative void, they were discharged home without a catheter. If < 50%, the catheter was replaced and the patients were sent home and asked to follow up in 3 to 5 days for another void trial.

RESULTS

Average age was 56.9 ± 10.2 years; 63.6% underwent surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, 23.6% underwent sling for urinary incontinence, and 12.7% underwent a combination of both. Force of stream was > 50% in 93.6% of the patients; 6.4% had force of stream < 50% and hence were discharged home with a Foley catheter. Only two patients (1.8%) were discharged without a Foley catheter and returned to the emergency department for signs of urinary retention. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 77.8%, 100%, 100% and 98.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The subjective assessment of flow of stream is a reliable and safe method to assess postoperative voiding. Given it is less invasive than backfilling the bladder and easier than using a bladder scan, it should be the primary method to assess postoperative voiding.

Predictors of prolonged admission after outpatient female pelvic reconstructive surgery

Objectives

This study aimed to determine factors associated with prolonged hospital admission following outpatient female pelvic reconstructive surgery (FPRS) and associated adverse clinical outcomes.

Methods

Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we identified outpatient FPRS performed 2011–2016. Isolated hysterectomy without concurrent prolapse repair was excluded. Surgeries were classified as major or minor for analysis. The primary outcome was prolonged length of stay (LOS), defined as admission of ≥2 days. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmission and reoperation associated with prolonged LOS. We abstracted data on covariates, and following univariable analysis, performed backward stepwise regression analysis.

Results

A total of 29645 women were included: 12311 (41.5%) major and 17334 (58.5%) minor procedures. A total of 6.9% (2033) had a prolonged LOS. On full cohort multivariable regression analysis, patient characteristics associated with prolonged LOS were older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.1 per 10 years, confidence interval [CI]: 1.06–1.1, p < 0.001), frailty (OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3–2.6, p = 0.001), and Caucasian race (OR: 1.2, CI: 1.02–1.3, p = 0.024). Associated surgical factors included having a major surgical procedure (OR: 1.3, CI: 1.2–1.4, p < 0.001), use of general anesthesia (OR: 2.0, CI: 1.5–2.6, p < 0.001) and longer operative time (OR: 2.0, CI: 1.8–2.2, p < 0.001). The occurrence of any complication (10.3% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), hospital readmission (4.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), and reoperation (2.7% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001) were more likely with prolonged LOS.

Conclusions

After outpatient FPRS, 6.9% of patients experience an admission of ≥2 days. Prolonged LOS is more common in patients who are older, frail and Caucasian, and in those who have major surgery with long operative time and general anesthesia.

Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Postoperative Urinary Retention in Lung Cancer Patients

Indwelling catheter is a routine procedure in surgical patients. Studies have shown that prolonged indwelling urinary catheterization increases the risk of postoperative urinary tract infection. Although early removal of the urinary catheter after operation can reduce the risk of postoperative urinary symptoms and tract infections, it may lead to postoperative anesthetic dysuria. Therefore, this study investigates the urinary retention and related risk factors in patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia. The clinical data of 214 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of a tertiary class A cancer hospital in Beijing from July 2020 to April 2021 were collected. A risk prediction model was established by logistic regression analysis, and the prediction effect was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The incidence of indwelling catheter after thoracoscopic lobectomy was 44.8% (96/214). Sex (OR = 21.102, 95% CI: 2.906-153.239, P=0.003), perception of shame (OR = 74.256, 95% CI: 6.171-893.475, P=0.001), age (OR = 1.095, 95% CI: 1.014-1.182, P=0.021), and bed rest time (OR = 1.598, 95% CI: 1.263-2.023, P < 0.021) were the factors influencing urinary retention after thoracoscopic lobectomy. This model can effectively predict the occurrence of postoperative urinary retention in patients with lung cancer and help medical staff to intervene effectively before the onset of urinary retention, which provides reference for preventive treatment and nursing intervention.

Vaginal Hysterectomy Performed Under General Versus Neuraxial Regional Anesthesia: Comparison of Patient Characteristics and 30-Day Outcomes Using Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts

OBJECTIVES

Compared with surgery under general anesthesia (GA), surgery under neuraxial regional anesthesia (RA) has been associated with economic and clinical benefits in certain populations. Our aim was to compare preoperative and postoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes, including intraoperative complications, for patients undergoing benign vaginal hysterectomy under GA versus RA.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for benign indications between 2015 and 2019 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and stratified into GA and RA groups. Propensity score matching was performed to account for selection bias between anesthesia groups.

RESULTS

Of 18,030 vaginal hysterectomies performed during this study period, 17,472 (96.9%) were performed under GA and 558 (3.1%) under RA. The RA group was older, more likely to be White, and more likely to have a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic steroid use (P < 0.01 for all); they were less likely to be discharged the same day (8.6% vs 12.2%, P = 0.01). In the matched cohort, there were similar proportions of major, minor, and composite complications between RA and GA groups (major: odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.78; minor: OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.74-1.88; composite: OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.75-1.64). Similar proportions of same-day discharge were observed (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.47-1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Although RA comprises only 3% of the anesthetic modalities used for benign vaginal hysterectomies, it is associated with a similar incidence of postoperative complications compared with general anesthesia.

The effect of preoperative phenazopyridine on short-term urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Previous studies have found that administration of phenazopyridine decreased short-term urinary retention following surgery but other more recent trials have shown mixed results. This study sought to investigate the potential benefit of preoperative administration of oral phenazopyridine in relation to the prevention of short-term urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of a convenience sample of women undergoing urogynecologic surgery from June 2016 to March 2019. Following surgery, subjects underwent a standardized retrograde voiding trial. The data had previously been gathered from a prior prospective trial at our institution (Kesty et al. Int Urogynecol J 31(9):1899-1905, 11). Chart review was performed to determine whether patients that received 200 mg of preoperative oral phenazopyridine to better visualize ureteral efflux during cystourethroscopy were more or less likely to pass their postoperative voiding trial. Bivariate statistical analysis was performed as well as a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 165 subjects were included in the final analysis; 100 who did not receive preoperative phenazopyridine and 65 who did receive phenazopyridine. There was no statistical difference between voiding trial pass rates following urogynecologic surgery between those who did not receive preoperative phenazopyridine compared to those who did [77% (77/100) and 82% (53/65), respectively, p = 0.37)]. The multivariate logistic regression model demonstrated no difference in postoperative voiding trial pass rates among those who received preoperative phenazopyridine compared to those who did not (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 0.53, 5.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative administration of oral phenazopyridine does not decrease short-term urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery.

Optimal timing of a second postoperative voiding trial in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal reconstructive surgery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Rates of postoperative incomplete bladder emptying vary significantly after pelvic reconstructive surgery. With enhanced recovery protocols the paradigm is shifting towards same-day discharge and the rates of incomplete bladder emptying are expected to increase. The optimal length of time for postoperative catheter drainage has not been clearly established. There are no current studies that assess the optimal timing of a repeat voiding trial in women who have unsuccessful same day voiding trials.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of a second voiding trial performed 2-4 days (earlier group) vs 7 days (later group) postoperatively in women with incomplete bladder emptying after vaginal prolapse surgery. Secondary aims included postoperative urinary tract infection rates, total days with a catheter, and patient-reported catheter bother between groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Across 2 sites, women undergoing multicompartment vaginal repair were enrolled. Within 6 hours postoperatively, subjects had an active retrograde voiding trial. Those who passed this voiding trial exited the study; those who had persistent incomplete bladder emptying (postvoid residual >100 mL) had a transurethral indwelling catheter placed and were randomized to return for an earlier (postoperative day 2-4) vs later (postoperative day 7) follow-up office voiding trial. Subjects were followed for 6 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial. Secondary outcomes included rates of urinary tract infection, total days with a catheter, and subjective catheter bother. A power calculation based on a projected 31% difference, a power of 0.8, and an alpha of 0.05 revealed that 30 subjects were needed in each group.

RESULTS

A total of 102 subjects were enrolled; 38 exited on postoperative day 0, leaving 64 subjects for randomization (4 of whom withdrew after randomization). A comparison of data revealed that randomization was effective, with no differences between the earlier and later groups in terms of demographic data or surgical procedures. Using an intention-to-treat analysis, women in the earlier group were more likely to be unsuccessful in their follow-up office voiding trial (23.3%) than the later group (3.3%), with a risk difference of 20% (95% confidence interval, 3.56-36.44) and a relative risk of 7.00 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-53.47; P=.02). A number-needed-to-treat calculation found that for every 5 patients using a catheter for 7 days postoperatively, 1 case of persistent postoperative incomplete bladder emptying was prevented. Rates of catheter bother did not differ between groups at the time of the follow-up office voiding trial or at 6 weeks (P=.09 and P=.20, respectively). Urinary tract infection rates were higher in the earlier group but did not reach statistical significance (23% vs 7%, P=.07). Regression analysis revealed that subjects who required additional pain medication refills were 9.6 times (95% confidence interval, 1.24-73.77) more likely to have persistent incomplete bladder emptying after the follow-up office voiding trial.

CONCLUSION

Women with incomplete bladder emptying after multicompartment prolapse repair had a 7-fold higher risk of an unsuccessful repeat office voiding trial if performed within 4 days of surgery than when performed within 7 days of surgery. In addition, requiring additional prescriptions for analgesia increased the risk of an unsuccessful follow-up office voiding trial.

A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence

Introduction and hypothesis

The COVID-19 pandemic and the desire to “flatten the curve” of transmission have significantly affected the way providers care for patients. Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgeons (FPMRS) must provide high quality of care through remote access such as telemedicine. No clear guidelines exist on the use of telemedicine in FPMRS. Using expedited literature review methodology, we provide guidance regarding management of common outpatient urogynecology scenarios during the pandemic.

Methods

We grouped FPMRS conditions into those in which virtual management differs from direct in-person visits and conditions in which treatment would emphasize behavioral and conservative counseling but not deviate from current management paradigms. We conducted expedited literature review on four topics (telemedicine in FPMRS, pessary management, urinary tract infections, urinary retention) and addressed four other topics (urinary incontinence, prolapse, fecal incontinence, defecatory dysfunction) based on existing systematic reviews and guidelines. We further compiled expert consensus regarding management of FPMRS patients in the virtual setting, scenarios when in-person visits are necessary, symptoms that should alert providers, and specific considerations for FPMRS patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.

Results

Behavioral, medical, and conservative management will be valuable as first-line virtual treatments. Certain situations will require different treatments in the virtual setting while others will require an in-person visit despite the risks of COVID-19 transmission.

Conclusions

We have presented guidance for treating FPMRS conditions via telemedicine based on rapid literature review and expert consensus and presented it in a format that can be actively referenced.

Subjective versus objective determination of bladder emptying following urogynecological surgery: "do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?"

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We tested the hypothesis that women can subjectively determine if they have emptied their bladder after a spontaneous voiding attempt following urogynecological surgery to rule out post-operative urinary retention as determined by a voiding trial.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study of women undergoing urogynecological surgery at two academic institutions from June 2016 to March 2019. Following surgery, subjects underwent a voiding trial followed by measurement of the PVR via ultrasound bladder scan or straight catheterization. A successful voiding trial was defined as a PVR of ≤150 ml. Subjects were queried about their subjective sensation of bladder emptying; "Do you feel that you completely emptied your bladder?" Their responses were either "Yes", "No" or "I don't know". Their subjective responses were correlated with the voiding trial results using a Chi-squared analysis for sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV).

RESULTS

A total of 266 subjects were included in the final evaluation. The screening subjective question had a sensitivity of 85.7% (CI 71.46 to 94.57%), a specificity of 91.5% (CI 87.01 to 94.79%), a PPV of 65.4% (CI 54.78 to 74.77%), and an NPV of 97.14% (CI 94.18 to 98.62%) to detect a failed voiding trial.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPV of the subjective question regarding bladder emptying in the post-operative urogynecological setting is high at >97%, suggesting that it might be reasonable to forgo a formal voiding trial in patients who subjectively feel that they have emptied their bladder.