Early changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover and their relationship with bone mineral density changes after 24 months of treatment with teriparatide

Analyzing the factors associated with efficacy among teriparatide treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

Teriparatide (TPTD) is a widely used anabolic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis. Several factors have been identified to be related to bone mineral density (BMD) increase in anti-osteoporosis treatment with other agents; however, there has been no systematic analysis to summarize the associated determinants of BMD reaction to daily teriparatide treatment.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we performed a comprehensive investigation involving not only clinical data but also several relevant lifestyle factors to be examined for their potential contribution to BMD response. This post-hoc analysis included 258 post-menopaused patients with osteoporosis who received TPTD at 20 µg/day for 12 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to distinguish the response variables of lumbar spine (LS) BMD transformation, the principal outcome measure of efficacy, from the baseline at 12 months.

RESULTS

Twelve months of TPTD treatment resulted in an absolute 0.39 ± 0.37 increase in T-score of LS BMD. Gastrointestinal disease, prior bisphosphonate or glucocorticoid treatment, no vitamin K2 supplementation, low levels of serum 25(OH)D and PINP, weak increment of PINP and β-CTX at 3 months, unhealthy lifestyle (excessive smoking, tea, coffee, and drinking), vegetarian diet pattern, low ALT level, and high BMD at baseline were determined by univariate analyses to be related to the weak reaction of TPTD treatment (P < 0.10). In the multiple regression model, postmenopausal women with vitamin K2 supplementation, higher baseline serum 25(OH)D level, and higher PINP concentration at 3 months indicated a good reaction of LS BMD at 12 months (P < 0.05). Patients with gastrointestinal disease, prior bisphosphonate and glucocorticoid treatment, vegetarian diet pattern, and higher baseline BMD were significantly more likely to have a lower absolute LS BMD response compared to patients without these characteristics (P < 0.05). Further analysis confirmed the negative effect of unhealthy lifestyle on TPTD treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our results emphasize the significance of a comprehensive assessment of clinical or lifestyle-related characteristics of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in the management of TPTD therapy in routine care.

Zoledronic acid sequential to teriparatide may promote greater inhibition of bone resorption than zoledronic acid alone

Background

Teriparatide (TPTD) should be followed by an antiresorptive to maximize bone mineral density gain and anti-fracture protection. Infrequent zoledronic acid (ZOL) administration has demonstrated effectiveness. The duration of ZOL effect following TPTD is unknown.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of ZOL on bone resorption marker in a post-TPTD versus ZOL-alone scenario in osteoporotic patients.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Patients treated with TPTD followed by ZOL (TPTD-ZOL) or with a single ZOL infusion were identified in the database of a tertiary referral center. Clinical and laboratory data, including C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) following ZOL treatment, were compared.

Results

Twenty-six patients (93% women) treated with TPTD-ZOL and 41 with ZOL were comparable in age (median 70.1 versus 69.6 years, p = 0.6) and sex. Timing of CTX measurement post-ZOL was the same, median 1.0 year. CTX was lower following TPTD-ZOL (median 142.1 versus 184.2 pg/mL, p = 0.005). In a multivariable regression model (controlled for baseline characteristics), pretreatment with TPTD strongly predicted CTX <150 pg/mL, 1 year following ZOL (odds ratio = 7.5, 95% CI 1.3-58.1, p = 0.03). In a subgroup with sequential CTX measurements following one ZOL, significantly lower levels persisted in the TPTD-ZOL group for a median of 4.4 years follow-up.

Conclusion

ZOL-administered sequential to TPTD yielded deeper and more prolonged bone resorption suppression than ZOL alone. Prospective data are needed to confirm whether in a sequential treatment scenario, subsequent ZOL dosing interval should be less frequent.

Factors associated with bone response to teriparatide in young postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the factors associated with changes in vertebral bone mineral density during teriparatide treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single centre, longitudinal study involving 145 osteoporotic postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide. Clinical evaluation, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements assessment and laboratory analyses were performed at baseline then after 12 and 18 months of treatment. Bone non-response to treatment was defined as no significant increase in BMD at 18 months as compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 145 women initially included, 109 completed the 18-month course of the treatment. 75% of them had a history of prior osteoporotic treatment. Baseline mean age was 60 ± 8 years. Mean baseline vertebral T-score was - 3.7 ± 0.7 and 83 (76%) women had suffered at least one vertebral fracture. At the end of treatment, 18 women (17%) were classified as non-responders. In the responder group (n = 91), vertebral BMD increased by 0.091 ± 0.04 g/cm2 (12.2 ± 5.3%). Clinical characteristics, baseline BMDs and the percentage of women previously treated with bisphosphonates as well as the duration of prior treatment did not significantly differ between the two groups of responders and non-responders. At baseline, non-responders had significant mean lower C-terminal fragment of type 1 collagen (CTX) values than responders (p < 0.01). Only baseline CTX values (r = 0.30 p < 0.01) were independently correlated to vertebral BMD changes during teriparatide treatment.

CONCLUSION

A minority of treated women had no vertebral densitometric gain after 18 months of teriparatide therapy. Low levels of baseline bone remodeling were the main factor associated with poor response to treatment.

Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Mineral Density and Bone Markers in Real-Life: Argentine Experience

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of teriparatide (TPTD) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers under clinical practice conditions. To assess whether the results in real-life match those published in clinical trials.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of postmenopausal women treated with TPTD for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

264 patients were included in the study. Main characteristics are as follows: age: 68.7 ± 10.2 years, previous fractures: 57.6%, and previously treated with antiresorptive (AR-prior): 79%. All bone turnover markers studied significantly increased after 6 months. CTX and BGP remained high up to 24 months, but total and bone alkaline phosphatase returned to basal values at month 18. There was a significant increase in lumbar spine (LS) BMD after 6 months (+6.2%), with a maximum peak at 24 months (+13%). Femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) BMD showed a significant increase later than LS (just at month 12), reaching a maximum peak at month 24 (FN + 7.9% and TH + 5.5%). A significant increase in LS BMD was found from month 6 to month 24 compared to basal in both AR-naïve, and AR-prior patients (+16.7% and +10.5%, respectively), without significant differences between the two groups. Comparable results were found in FN and TH BMD. Main conclusions. As reported in real-life clinical studies, treatment of osteoporotic postmenopausal women with TPTD induced a significant increase in bone turnover markers from month 6 onward and an increase in BMD from months 6-12 with continuous gain up to month 24. The real-life results of our study matched the results of randomized clinical trials. In addition, TPTD induced an increase in BMD, regardless of the previous use of AR.

Association between P1NP and bone strength in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between P1NP and bone strength in postmenopausal women treated with teriparatide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 248 postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) bone mineral density (BMD) and LS trabecular bone score (TBS) were measured by Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and 12 months.

RESULTS

With teriparatide use, P1NP levels increase and peaked at 6 months. Significant increase in LS and hip BMD and LS TBS were also noted. The percentage change or absolute change >10 μg/L in PINP at 3 months was only related to changes in LS BMD at 12 months. With a median baseline P1NP level was 65.5 ng/mL, we found no correlation between P1NP and LS and hip BMD nor LS TBS. There was no association between LS TBS and axial BMD. After treatment, there was also no significance between the changes in TBS and axial BMD. Over the study period, 83.9% of the 248 participants were persistent with teriparatide at 3 months, 77.8% at 6 months, and 67.3% women at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

P1NP levels may provide a signal of osteoporosis risk but is not related to bone strength. Early changes in P1NP may offer information regarding subsequent BMD response so standardized monitoring of P1NP levels at baseline and at 3 months should be considered during osteoporosis therapy. As an additional benefit, serum level monitoring during treatment may also improve medication persistence.

Case report: Early-onset osteoporosis in a patient carrying a novel heterozygous variant of the WNT1 gene

The WNT1 gene is crucial for bone development and homeostasis. Homozygous mutations in WNT1 cause severe bone fragility known as osteogenesis imperfecta type XV. Moreover, heterozygous WNT1 mutations have been found in adults with early-onset osteoporosis. We identified a 35 year-old Caucasian woman who experienced multiple vertebral fractures two months after her second pregnancy. There was no history of risk factors for secondary osteoporosis or family history of osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry confirmed a marked reduction of bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (0.734 g/cm², Z-score -2.8), femoral neck (0.48 g/cm², Z-score -3.5), and total hip (0.589 g/cm², Z-score -3.0). Blood tests excluded secondary causes of bone fragility. Genetic analysis revealed a heterozygous missense mutation (p.Leu370Val) in the WNT1 gene. Varsome classified it as a variant of uncertain significance. However, the fact that the Leucine residue at position 370 is highly conserved among vertebrate species and the variant has a very low allelic frequency in the general population would exclude the possibility of a polymorphism. The patient was treated for two years with teriparatide therapy associated with calcium and vitamin D supplements. During the follow-up period she did not report further clinical fractures. After 24 months of teriparatide, BMD increased at lumbar spine (+14.6%), femoral neck (+8.3%) and total hip (+4.9%) compared to baseline. We confirm that the heterozygous WNT1 mutation could cause a variable bone fragility and low turnover osteoporosis. We suggest that teriparatide is one of the most appropriate available therapies for this case.

Advances in bone turnover markers

Bone fragility fractures remain an important worldwide health and economic problem due to increased morbidity and mortality. The current methods for predicting fractures are largely based on the measurement of bone mineral density and the utilization of mathematical risk calculators based on clinical risk factors for bone fragility. Despite these approaches, many bone fractures remain undiagnosed. Therefore, current research is focused on the identification of new factors such as bone turnover markers (BTM) for risk calculation. BTM are a group of proteins and peptides released during bone remodeling that can be found in serum or urine. They derive from bone resorptive and formative processes mediated by osteoclasts and osteoblasts, respectively. Potential use of BTM in monitoring these phenomenon and therefore bone fracture risk is limited by physiologic and pathophysiologic factors that influence BTM. These limitations in predicting fractures explain why their inclusion in clinical guidelines remains limited despite the large number of studies examining BTM.

Treatment of osteoporosis with teriparatide: The Slovenian experience

The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of postmenopausal women prescribed with teriparatide in Slovenia, during the first decade after its approval, and the predictors of bone mineral density (BMD) improvement with treatment. We retrospectively studied postmenopausal osteoporotic patients prescribed with teriparatide at tertiary center from 2006 to 2015. BMD was measured at standard sites by DXA at baseline, after 12 and 24 months. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were measured at the same time-points. The inclusion criteria were met by 188 women (aged 71 years on average), 151 (80.3%) with postmenopausal and 37 (19.7%) with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Everyone had at least one fracture, 159 (84.6%) had ≥2 fractures, with vertebral fractures in 172 patients (91.5%). All patients had been previously on antiresorptives for 8.6 years on average. The average BMD change at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck was +5.0%, −1.1%, and +0.3% after 24 months of treatment, respectively. Higher baseline PINP was associated with higher BMD increase at all sites after the first 12 months. Teriparatide was prescribed mostly to elderly women with severe osteoporosis who had sustained two or more fractures despite long-term antiresorptive therapy. Baseline PINP might predict initial BMD increase with teriparatide.

Teriparatide Treatment in Patients with Pregnancy- and Lactation-Associated Osteoporosis

Pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis (PLO) is a rare disease, presenting in most cases with severe back pain due to low energy vertebral fractures (VFs). Our purpose was to assess the effect of teriparatide (TPTD) vs. conventional management on areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) in patients with PLO. A multicenter retrospective cohort study concerning premenopausal women with PLO. Nineteen women were treated with TPTD (20 μg/day) (group A) plus calcium and vitamin D and eight women with calcium and vitamin D only (group B) for up to 24 months. The primary end-point was between group differences in lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) aBMD, and TBS at 12 and 24 months. Patients in group A had sustained a median of 4.0 VFs (3-9) vs. 2.5 VFs (1-10) in group B (p = 0.02). At 12 months, patients on TPTD vs. controls achieved a mean aBMD increase of 20.9  ±  11.9% vs. 6.2  ±  4.8% at the LS (p < 0.001), 10.0  ±  11.6% vs. 5.8  ±  2.8% at the TH (p = 0.43), and 6.7  ±  6.9% vs. 0.9  ±  3.7% in TBS (p = 0.09), respectively. At 24 months, seven patients on TPTD and six controls achieved a mean LS aBMD increase of 32.9  ±  13.4% vs. 12.2  ±  4.2% (p = 0.001). P1NP levels during the first month of TPTD treatment were positively correlated with the 1-year LS aBMD change (r = 0.68, p = 0.03). No new clinical fractures occurred while on-treatment. In patients with PLO, TPTD treatment resulted in significantly greater increases in LS aBMD compared with calcium and vitamin D supplementation at 12 and 24 months.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine the safety, pharmacokinetics and effects of Epimedium prenylflavonoids, on bone specific alkaline phosphatase and the osteoclast adaptor protein TRAF6 in post-menopausal women

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures due to menopausal osteoporosis are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Osteoporotic medications have substantial side effects that limit long term use.

HYPOTHESES

Ingestion of a purified extract of Epimedium spp. (EP) is safe, can increase serum levels of prenylflavonoid metabolites, exert positive changes in bone specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP), suppress of tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6) protein in osteoclast-precursor monocytes in peripheral blood and therefore have the potential to reduce post-menopausal bone loss.

STUDY DESIGN & METHODS

Healthy postmenopausal women were randomized in a double-blind fashion to consume either EP prenylflavonoid extract (740 mg daily) or placebo daily for 6 weeks. The main outcome measures were safety and pharmacokinetics of EP flavonoids. Fasting blood was collected at 3- and 6-weeks, and two weeks after stopping medication for safety evaluations and measurement of BSAP. Peripheral blood monocytes were harvested for measurement of TRAF6 levels. Serum levels of the EP metabolites icariin, icariside I & II, icaritin and desmethylicaritin were measured using tandem mass spectrometry, and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analyses performed using WinNonlin software.

RESULTS

Between October 2018 and Jun 2020, 58 postmenopausal women, aged 57.9 ± 8.9 years, were randomized and completed the study. Consumption of EP prenylflavonoids was not associated with any significant adverse symptoms, with no changes in hepatic, hematological, and renal parameters observed. The main metabolites detected in sera after ingestion of EP prenylflavonoid capsules were desmethylicaritin, icaritin and icariside II. Icariin and icariside I were below detection levels. Ingestion of EP prenylflavonoids induced a median C_max and AUC_0→∞ for desmethylicaritin of 60.9 nM, and 157.9 nM ×day, respectively; and were associated with higher levels of BSAP (p < 0.05) and a trend (p = 0.068) towards lower levels of TRAF6 in peripheral blood monocytes eight weeks after commencing prenylflavonoid ingestion. Prenylflavonoid metabolites were not detected in the sera of placebo participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the widespread consumption of EP extracts, the safety, mechanisms of action of their bioactive compounds, and therapeutic indications in humans are unknown. Daily consumption of EP prenylflavonoids for six weeks was safe. The predominant metabolite in sera was desmethylicaritin. Rise in prenylflavonoid metabolites was associated with higher levels of the bone anabolic marker BSAP, suggesting potential therapeutic value for post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Switching to Denosumab or Bisphosphonates After Completion of Teriparatide Treatment in Women With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

To compare bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 12 months of treatment with denosumab or bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis after stopping teriparatide therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 140 postmenopausal women (mean age, 74.2 years) with severe osteoporosis who had been treated with teriparatide for 18 to 24 months at our outpatient clinic in a tertiary endocrine center between 2006 and 2015. After stopping teriparatide therapy, they continued treatment with a bisphosphonate (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid) or denosumab while receiving daily vitamin D and calcium. BMD at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry when teriparatide therapy was discontinued (baseline) and after 12 months of further treatment. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the predictors of BMD gain.

RESULTS

After stopping teriparatide therapy, 70 women continued treatment with bisphosphonates and 70 received denosumab. LS, but not TH or FN, BMD gain was significantly greater in the denosumab group than in the bisphosphonates group at 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that BMD gain at the LS was negatively associated with bisphosphonate versus denosumab treatment and positively associated with baseline serum total procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. BMD gains at the FN were predicted by higher baseline serum urate levels. BMD gains at the TH and FN were negatively associated with pretreatment BMD gains at the same site.

CONCLUSION

Twelve months after stopping teriparatide therapy, sequential denosumab treatment appeared to yield higher additional LS BMD gain on average compared with bisphosphonates treatment.

Serum TRACP5b, a Marker of Bone Resorption, Is Associated With Adverse Cardiac Prognosis in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure

Background

Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRACP5b) is derived from osteoclasts, and has been used as a marker of osteoporosis (bone resorption). Although heart failure (HF) is associated with catabolic bone remodelling, serum TRACP5b levels have not been rigourously examined in patients with HF.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study of 688 decompensated HF patients who had been discharged and whose TRACP5b had been measured. These patients were divided into tertiles on the basis of serum TRACP5b levels: first (TRACP5b < 316 mU/dL, n = 229), second (TRACP5b 316-489 mU/dL, n = 229), and third (TRACP5b ≥ 490 mU/dL, n = 230). We compared the patient baseline characteristics, exercise capacity, and their postdischarge prognosis, including cardiac mortality and cardiac events such as cardiac death and worsening HF.

Results

Age was significantly higher, and prevalence of female sex and anemia was significantly higher in the third tertile than in the first and second tertiles (P < 0.05, respectively). Circulating TRACP5b levels were correlated with peak breath-by-breath oxygen consumption, but not with left ventricular ejection fraction. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis (mean follow-up, 426 days), cardiac mortality and cardiac event rates progressively increased from the first to the third tertiles (P < 0.05, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, the third tertile was an independent predictor of cardiac mortality and cardiac events (cardiac mortality hazard ratio, 2.493; P = 0.040; cardiac events hazard ratio, 1.687; P = 0.030).

Conclusions

High serum levels of TRACP5b, a marker of bone resorption, are associated with high cardiac mortality and cardiac events, accompanied by impaired exercise capacity.

Anabolic Agents for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: How Do You Choose?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There are now three anabolic agents available for the treatment of postmenopausal women at high risk for fracture. The purpose of this review is to supply a rationale to aid in determining which agent should be used in which clinical settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies over the last decade have shown that anabolic agents produce faster and larger effects against fracture than antiresorptive agents. Furthermore, trials evaluating anabolic antiresorptive treatment sequences have shown that anabolic first treatment strategies produce the greatest benefits to bone density, particularly in the hip region. However, there are no head-to-head evaluations of the three anabolic therapies with fracture outcomes or bone density, and these studies are not likely to occur. How to decide which agent to use at which time in a woman's life is unknown. We review the most significant clinical trials of anabolic agents which have assessed fracture, areal or volumetric bone density, microarchitecture, and/or bone strength, as well as information gleaned from histomorphometry studies to provide a rationale for consideration of one agent vs another in various clinical settings. There is no definitive answer to this question; all three agents increase bone strength and reduce fracture risk rapidly. Since the postmenopausal lifespan could be as long as 40-50 years, it is likely that very high-risk women will utilize different anabolic agents at different points in their lives.

Safety and efficacy of teriparatide treatment for severe osteoporosis in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Osteoporosis is a major concern in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In this novel study of teriparatide treatment in 6 patients with severe osteoporosis, bone health (fractures, vertebral morphometry, and DXA) remained stable, with no adverse events. These findings will help inform future osteoporosis research in this challenging population.

INTRODUCTION

Despite standard therapy with vitamin D and bisphosphonates (BP), many patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) continue to sustain fragility fractures due to long-term glucocorticoid treatment and limited mobility. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of teriparatide for the treatment of severe osteoporosis in adolescent and young adult patients with DMD.

METHODS

We prospectively treated 6 patients with DMD who had severe osteoporosis with teriparatide 20 mcg subcutaneously daily for 1-2 years. Inclusion criteria were long-term glucocorticoid therapy, and severe osteoporosis despite treatment with BP, or intolerance to BP. We examined long bone and vertebral fracture outcomes, including vertebral morphometry measures, bone mineral density and content, bone formation markers, safety indices, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean age at teriparatide start was 17.9 years (range 13.9-22.1 years). All 6 patients were on daily glucocorticoids (mean ± SD; duration 10.9 ± 2.5 years) and 5 were non-ambulatory. Five patients had been treated with BP for 7.9 ± 4.2 years. All had vertebral and a history of long bone fragility fractures at baseline. Vertebral heights and Genant fracture grading remained stable. Long bone fracture rate appeared to decrease (from 0.84/year to 0.09/year); one patient sustained a long bone fracture at 6 months of treatment. Trajectories for change in bone mineral density and content were not different post- vs. pre-teriparatide. Procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) increased, while laboratory safety indices remained stable and non-concerning. No adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

In six patients with DMD treated with teriparatide for severe osteoporosis, we observed stable bone health and modest increases in P1NP, without safety concerns. Further studies are needed to better understand teriparatide efficacy for treatment of osteoporosis in patients with DMD.

The combined effect of Parathyroid hormone (1-34) and whole-body Vibration exercise in the treatment of postmenopausal OSteoporosis (PaVOS study): a randomized controlled trial

Treatment effects of combining teriparatide and whole-body vibration exercise (WBV) vs teriparatide alone in twelve months were compared using bone mineral density (BMD), bone microarchitecture, and bone turnover markers. We found an increased effect in lumbar spine BMD by adding WBV to teriparatide in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

INTRODUCTION

The parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogue teriparatide is an effective but expensive anabolic treatment for osteoporosis. Whole-body vibration exercise (WBV) has been found to stimulate muscle and bone strength in some studies. Animal data demonstrate a beneficial effect on bone when combining PTH with mechanical loading. The aim of this study was to investigate if combining WBV exercise and teriparatide treatment gives additional beneficial effects on bone compared to teriparatide alone in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

METHODS

The PaVOS study is a randomized controlled trial where postmenopausal osteoporotic women starting teriparatide 20 μg/day were randomized to WBV + teriparatide or teriparatide alone. WBV consisted of three sessions a week (12 min, including 1:1 ratio of exercise:rest). Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone microarchitecture, bone turnover markers, and sclerostin measurements were obtained. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed regression model with adjustment for baseline values or robust cluster regression in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-five women were randomized (17 in teriparatide + WBV group and 18 in teriparatide group). At 12 months, both groups increased significantly in BMD at the lumbar spine. The teriparatide + WBV group increased by (mean ± SD) 8.90% ± 5.47 and the teriparatide group by 6.65% ± 5.51. The adjusted treatment effect of adding WBV to teriparatide was statistically significant at 2.95% [95% CI = 0.14-5.77; P = 0.040]. Markers of bone turnover increased significantly in both groups at three and six months with no significant difference between groups. No other treatment effects were observed in hip BMD, bone microarchitecture parameters, or sclerostin levels in either group.

CONCLUSION

Twelve months of WBV and teriparatide had a significant clinically relevant treatment effect in lumbar spine BMD compared to teriparatide alone in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. ClinicalTrials.gov :(NCT02563353).

Bone turnover markers to explain changes in lumbar spine BMD with abaloparatide and teriparatide: results from ACTIVE

Early PINP changes correlate with 18-month lumbar spine BMD changes and the correlation was greater with abaloparatide versus teriparatide. The uncoupling index was similar between the two agents.

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the relationship between early PINP changes and subsequent changes in spine BMD following abaloparatide and teriparatide treatments. We also explored the use of an "uncoupling index" (UI), the balance between bone formation and bone resorption, which we hypothesised would be similar in response to these treatment groups.

METHODS

Blood samples were taken for measurement of bone turnover markers (BTMs) s-PINP and s-CTX at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months from 189 abaloparatide patients and 227 teriparatide patients randomly selected from all participants who completed the study. BMD was measured by DXA at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months. Correlations were calculated between log ratio of BTMs from baseline to 3 months and percent change from baseline in BMD at 18 months. A UI was calculated using log transformation and subtraction of the standard deviate for s-CTX from the standard deviate for s-PINP for each patient.

RESULTS

Early BTM changes were associated with subsequent BMD changes for both treatments. Pearson correlations for the log ratio of PINP over baseline at 3 months and BMD percent change from baseline at 18 months were larger (P < 0.0001) with abaloparatide (r = 0.561) than teriparatide (r = 0.198). The mean UI at 1 month was greater for abaloparatide versus teriparatide (1.743 and 1.493, respectively; P = 0.03) but was similar at 3 months or later time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Early s-PINP changes correlate with percentage change in lumbar spine BMD 18 months after treatment with both abaloparatide and teriparatide, though the correlation with abaloparatide was greater. The UI was similar between abaloparatide and teriparatide suggesting that the balance between formation and resorption markers was similar.

[Significance of Bone Turnover Marker Measurement in the Treatment of Osteoporosis]

The bone turnover marker (BTM) measurement in osteoporosis treatment includes evaluation of bone metabolism status or evaluation of bone loss risk level, determination of fracture risk, and evaluation of drug treatment. Currently, by using the BTM, it has become possible to evaluate and select an effective treatment for osteoporosis. The BTM has become widely used as a clinical test item in actual clinical practice. Patients' low adherence to osteoporosis medication regimens increases the risk of vulnerable fractures and affects the cost effectiveness of therapeutics. A joint working group has been established, with International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) and International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) in a central role. The joint policy document of the joint working group is intended to increase the international application of BTM in clinical medicine, and to eliminate blood type I procollagen-N-propeptide (P1NP) and type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (CTX) in observational research and intervention studies, in order to eliminate the inherent uncertainty of these measurements in clinical use. Current osteoporotic drug treatment has been proven to prevent bone fractures, but poor adherence to dosage regimens is an ongoing problem in clinical practice; various attempts have been made to improve adherence. Low adherence to an osteoporosis medication regimen increases the risk of fracture, and affects cost effectiveness. The BTM is an effective indicator in monitoring reactivity to osteoporosis drug therapy, and can be used to individually evaluate guidelines for treatment continuity and medication. In addition, providing BTM information to patients has reportedly improved their adherence to therapeutics, thereby potentially improving both the outcome and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis drug therapy.

Effects of bone remodeling agents following teriparatide treatment

Teriparatide is an anabolic therapy used to treat patients with osteoporosis and is only approved for 2 years of treatment. This is the first study to look at two common osteoporosis drugs in maintaining its beneficial effects: denosumab and zoledronic acid. Denosumab treatment was associated with the greatest increase in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and lumbar spine, an amount that was statistically greater than no treatment and zoledronic acid treatment.

INTRODUCTION

Teriparatide, a hallmark treatment for osteoporosis, has been shown to increase BMD and bone turnover. This can be measured using BMD scans, N-terminal propeptide of type-1 collagen (P1NP) for bone formation and C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) for bone resorption. This study examines the effects of the two most common antiresorptive drugs prescribed following 2 years of teriparatide treatment: zoledronic acid and denosumab. The purpose of this study is to quantify the beneficial effects of teriparatide and compare the ability of each antiresorptive drug to maintain the effects.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients with prior fragility fractures were identified from a bone health clinic associated with a level I trauma center. All of the study participants completed 2 years of treatment with teriparatide between 2008 and 2013 followed by 2 years of treatment with zoledronic acid, denosumab, or no treatment. After excluding patients with insufficient laboratory data, 64 patients remained for analysis in this retrospective cohort study. Bone mineral density was measured in the lumbar spine and femoral neck.

RESULTS

Following completion of teriparatide, patients who were started on denosumab showed the largest increase in bone mineral density after 2 years of treatment: lumbar spine 4.94% ± 8.2%, femoral neck 5.68% ± 6.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who elected to discontinue osteoporosis treatment experienced a significant decline in the change in BMD compared to the change on teriparatide putting them at higher risk for recurrence of fragility fractures. Patients on denosumab following teriparatide had the largest increase in BMD.

Optimal dosing and delivery of parathyroid hormone and its analogues for osteoporosis and hypoparathyroidism - translating the pharmacology

In primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), bone loss results from the resorptive effects of excess parathyroid hormone (PTH). Under physiological conditions, PTH has actions that are more targeted to homeostasis and to bone accrual. The predominant action of PTH, either catabolic, anabolic or homeostatic, can be understood in molecular and pharmacokinetic terms. When administered intermittently, PTH increases bone mass, but when present continuously and in excess (e.g. PHPT), bone loss ensues. This dual effect of PTH depends not only on the dosing regimen, continuous or intermittent, but also on how the PTH molecule interacts with various states of its receptor (PTH/PTHrP receptor) influencing downstream signalling pathways differentially. Altering the amino-terminal end of PTH or PTHrP could emphasize the state of the receptor that is linked to an osteoanabolic outcome. This concept led to the development of a PTHrP analogue that interacts preferentially with the transiently linked state of the receptor, emphasizing an osteoanabolic effect. However, designing PTH or PTHrP analogues with prolonged state of binding to the receptor would be expected to be linked to a homeostatic action associated with the tonic secretory state of the parathyroid glands that is advantageous in treating hypoparathyroidism. Ideally, further development of a drug delivery system that mimics the physiological tonic, circadian, and pulsatile profile of PTH would be optimal. This review discusses basic, translational and clinical studies that may well lead to newer approaches to the treatment of osteoporosis as well as to different PTH molecules that could become more advantageous in treating hypoparathyroidism.

Bone Turnover Status: Classification Model and Clinical Implications

Aim: To develop a practical model for classification bone turnover status and evaluate its clinical usefulness. Methods: Our classification of bone turnover status is based on internationally recommended biomarkers of both bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type1 procollagen, P1NP) and bone resorption (beta C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, bCTX), using the cutoffs proposed as therapeutic targets. The relationships between turnover subtypes and clinical characteristic were assessed in1223 hospitalised orthogeriatric patients (846 women, 377 men; mean age 78.1±9.50 years): 451(36.9%) subjects with hip fracture (HF), 396(32.4%) with other non-vertebral (non-HF) fractures (HF) and 376 (30.7%) patients without fractures. Resalts: Six subtypes of bone turnover status were identified: 1 - normal turnover (P1NP>32 μg/L, bCTX≤0.250 μg/L and P1NP/bCTX>100.0[(median value]); 2- low bone formation (P1NP ≤32 μg/L), normal bone resorption (bCTX≤0.250 μg/L) and P1NP/bCTX>100.0 (subtype2A) or P1NP/bCTX<100.0 (subtype 2B); 3- low bone formation, high bone resorption (bCTX>0.250 μg/L) and P1NP/bCTX<100.0; 4- high bone turnover (both markers elevated ) and P1NP/bCTX>100.0 (subtype 4A) or P1NP/bCTX<100.0 (subtype 4B). Compared to subtypes 1 and 2A, subtype 2B was strongly associated with nonvertebral fractures (odds ratio [OR] 2.0), especially HF (OR 3.2), age>75 years and hyperparathyroidism. Hypoalbuminaemia and not using osteoporotic therapy were two independent indicators common for subtypes 3, 4A and 4B; these three subtypes were associated with in-hospital mortality. Subtype 3 was associated with fractures (OR 1.7, for HF OR 2.4), age>75 years, chronic heart failure (CHF), anaemia, and history of malignancy, and predicted post-operative myocardial injury, high inflammatory response and length of hospital stay (LOS) above10 days. Subtype 4A was associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), anaemia, history of malignancy and walking aids use and predicted LOS>20 days, but was not discriminative for fractures. Subtype 4B was associated with fractures (OR 2.1, for HF OR 2.5), age>75 years, CKD and indicated risks of myocardial injury, high inflammatory response and LOS>10 days. Conclusions: We proposed a classification model of bone turnover status and demonstrated that in orthogeriatric patients altered subtypes are closely related to presence of nonvertebral fractures, comorbidities and poorer in-hospital outcomes. However, further research is needed to establish optimal cut points of various biomarkers and improve the classification model.

Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bone turnover comprises two processes: the removal of old bone (resorption) and the laying down of new bone (formation). N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) and C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) are markers of bone formation and resorption, respectively, that are recommended for clinical use. Bone turnover markers can be measured on several occasions in one individual with good precision. However, these markers are subject to several sources of variability, including feeding (resorption decreases) and recent fracture (all markers increase for several months). Bone turnover markers are not used for diagnosis of osteoporosis and do not improve prediction of bone loss or fracture within an individual. In untreated women, very high bone turnover marker concentrations suggest secondary causes of high bone turnover (eg, bone metastases or multiple myeloma). In people with osteoporosis, bone turnover markers might be useful to assess the response to anabolic and antiresorptive therapies, to assess compliance to therapy, or to indicate possible secondary osteoporosis. Much remains to be learnt about how bone turnover markers can be used to monitor the effect of stopping bisphosphonate therapy (eg, to identify a threshold above which restarting therapy should be considered). More studies are needed to investigate the use of bone turnover markers for assessment of the bone safety of new medications.

Bone Mineral Density Response from Teriparatide in Patients with Osteoporosis

BACKGROUND

A review of data from large clinical trials reported more than 90% of subjects significantly improved their bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) with teriparatide (TPTD) (bone 39:1268-1275, 1). However, our clinical experience suggests that many patients may be non-responders, raising questions as to the true efficacy of TPTD in improving BMD in osteoporotic patients.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of the study is to determine the rate of improvement in BMD following 18-24 months of teriparatide (TPTD) in patients with osteoporosis within an orthopedic hospital setting.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review of patients with osteoporosis who completed 18-24 months of TPTD therapy. The primary endpoint was the change in BMD at lumbar spine (LS) and hip-femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) following treatment. Secondary endpoints included the effect of prior bisphosphonate therapy, age, body mass index (BMI) and family history of fracture on BMD response, and the changes in bone-specific markers during active treatment.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight women and men with mean T-scores at the LS = -2.63 met the inclusion criteria. The overall group showed a 10.7% increase in LS-BMD after 24 months of TPTD. Eighty-three percent were considered responders defined as ≥3.0% increase in LS-BMD. Non-responders (16.7%) had mean LS-BMD change = -1.41%. No difference in baseline vitamin D, calcium, creatinine, BMI, age, gender, prior fracture history, or bisphosphonate use was observed between responders and non-responders. No consistent pattern of change in measures of bone markers was noted between responders and non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Eighty-three percent of patients with osteoporosis showed a >3% increase in BMD after TPTD treatment. Baseline parameters, prior bisphosphonate therapy, and the changes in bone markers showed no correlation with final BMD outcome.

Influence of Dosing Interval and Administration on the Bone Metabolism, Skeletal Effects, and Clinical Efficacy of Parathyroid Hormone in Treating Osteoporosis: A Narrative Review

Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the key anabolic agent used for preventing fracture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. In bone metabolism, PTH signaling is mediated through a G protein–coupled receptor that affects various post‐receptor signaling pathways. Results of preclinical and clinical studies have shown that PTH improves both the structure and strength of bone tissue. Once daily subcutaneous injection of the PTH fragment, teriparatide (PTH [1‐34]), is the most commonly recommended formulation and dosing strategy in clinical practice. However, other dosing intervals, formulations, and routes have been investigated in preclinical and clinical studies. In particular, once‐weekly and cyclical administration have been investigated mainly as a means of reducing the high direct costs of treatment. In preclinical studies, bone formation/resorption markers, bone mineral density measurements, and histomorphometric parameters improved with both once‐daily and once‐weekly administration. However, the magnitude and duration of such improvements were generally greater with once‐daily PTH administration. In clinical studies, reductions in fracture incidence were also noted with both once‐daily and once‐weekly PTH administration, although improvements in nonvertebral fractures are less evident with once‐weekly administration. This narrative review details the differences between PTH formulation and dosing strategies in relation to preclinical and clinical efficacy/safety parameters, although it should be stressed that no head‐to‐head studies allow direct comparisons. This review also seeks to outline practical considerations involved with PTH prescribing and new directions in research regarding routes of administration. © 2017 The Authors. JBMR Plus is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Relationship between bone turnover and density with teriparatide, denosumab or both in women in the DATA study

BACKGROUND

While changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover (BTM) have been reported to predict changes in bone mineral density (BMD), the relationship between changes in BMD and BTMs with combined antiresorptive/anabolic therapy is unknown.

METHODS

In the DATA study, 94 postmenopausal osteoporotic women (ages 51-91) received either teriparatide 20-mcg SC daily, denosumab 60-mg SC every 6months, or both for 2years. Pearson's correlation coefficients (R) were calculated to determine the relationship between baseline and early changes in BTMs (as well as serum sclerostin) and 2-year changes in BMD.

RESULTS

In women receiving teriparatide, baseline BTMs did not correlate with 2-year BMD changes though 12-month increases in osteocalcin and P1NP were associated with 2-year increases in spine BMD. In women receiving denosumab, spine and hip BMD gains correlated with both baseline and changes in P1NP and C-telopeptide. In women receiving combined teriparatide/denosumab, while both baseline and decreases in P1NP were associated with spine BMD gains, distal radius increases were associated with less CTX suppression. Neither baseline nor changes in serum sclerostin correlated with BMD in any treatment group.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

In women treated with teriparatide or denosumab, early BTM changes (increases and decreases, respectively) predict 2-year BMD gains, especially at the spine. In women treated with combined teriparatide/denosumab therapy, BMD increases at the distal radius were associated with less suppression of bone turnover. These results suggest that efficacy of combination therapy at cortical sites such as the radius may depend on residual bone remodeling despite RANKL inhibition.

Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients

Bone mineral density (BMD) sometimes cannot be improved by long-term bisphosphonate (BP) therapy in osteoporosis (OP). This study showed that lumbar as well as hip BMD significantly increased after denosumab treatment in patients not responsive to BPs. Thus, denosumab may be a strong OP treatment option for BP-unresponsive patients.

INTRODUCTION

BMD sometimes cannot be improved by long-term BP therapy.

METHODS

We administered denosumab to osteoporotic patients with a poor response to BPs who had been taking them for 2 years or longer. Ninety-eight women with BP-poor responsive OP were enrolled in this study. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 71.2 (6.9) years and mean (SD) duration of BP treatment was 59.9 (34.3) months. We distinguished BP responders from non-responders based on changes in BMD values at denosumab commencement (baseline) from 2 years beforehand.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, duration of BP use, bone turnover markers, or BMD at baseline between the groups. Prior to denosumab, BMD had increased significantly in responders and decreased significantly in non-responders. Bone turnover markers had decreased significantly at 4 months of denosumab treatment (P < 0.001) and lumbar and hip BMD were significantly increased at 1 year of therapy in both groups (P < 0.001). Simple correlation coefficients were -0.337 for lumbar and -0.339 for hip BMD changes (both P = 0.001) before and after denosumab treatment. Both at the lumbar spine and hips, decreased BMD before denosumab therapy was significantly associated with an increase in BMD at 1 year of treatment (spine, t value = -3.502, P = 0.001, R = 0.113; hip, t value = -3.526, P = 0.001, R = 0.115).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that denosumab may be a strong OP treatment option for BP-unresponsive patients.

Bone Turnover Markers in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Metabolic Bone Disease

BACKGROUND

Disorders of bone metabolism, most notably osteoporosis, are highly prevalent and predispose to fractures, causing high patient morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis and monitoring of bone metabolic defects can present a major challenge as these disorders are largely asymptomatic and radiographic measures of bone mass respond slowly to changes in bone physiology.

CONTENT

Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are a series of protein or protein derivative biomarkers released during bone remodeling by osteoblasts or osteoclasts. BTMs can offer prognostic information on fracture risk that supplements radiographic measures of bone mass, but testing using BTMs has to take into account the large number of preanalytic factors and comorbid clinical conditions influencing BTM levels. BTMs respond rapidly to changes in bone physiology, therefore, they have utility in determining patient response to and compliance with therapies for osteoporosis.

SUMMARY

BTMs are a useful adjunct for the diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of bone metabolic disorders, but their use has to be tempered by the known limitations in their clinical utility and preanalytic variables complicating interpretation.

Effect of teriparatide treatment on endothelial function, glucose metabolism and inflammation markers in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVE

Teriparatide, an anabolic agent used in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, can induce effects similar to primary hyperparathyroidism. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of teriparatide on endothelial functions, glucose metabolism and inflammation markers in patients diagnosed with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

This was a single-centre, single-arm, 6-month prospective study. Twenty-three postmenopausal women over 65 years old with a lumbar spine or femoral neck T-score of -4·0 or lower and having at least two compression fractures in thoracic or lumbar spine were studied. Low-dose intermittent teriparatide (20 μg/day) was supplemented with calcium carbonate (1000 mg elemental calcium) and 880 IU cholecalciferol for 6 months. The biochemical parameters for glucose metabolism, inflammation and atherosclerosis were determined. For the assessment of vascular endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), brachial artery intima-media thickness (BIMT), per cent change in flow-mediated dilation (FMD%) and nitroglycerine-induced dilations (NID%) were measured on ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The fasting plasma glucose, homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, fibrinogen, homocysteine and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly with teriparatide treatment (P < 0·05 for all). Baseline CIMT and BIMT did not change significantly with 6 months of teriparatide treatment (P > 0·05); however, FMD% and NID% showed significant decrease after treatment (P < 0·01 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Intermittent teriparatide treatment may adversely affect some parameters of glucose metabolism, inflammation and endothelial function. On the basis of our findings, further large-scale and controlled studies are needed to clarify the exact effect of teriparatide treatment on glucose metabolism, inflammation and endothelial function.

A retrospective analysis of nonresponse to daily teriparatide treatment

Some patients with osteoporosis do not respond to teriparatide treatment. Prior bisphosphonate use, lower bone turnover marker (BTMs) concentrations, and lower early increases in BTMs were significantly associated with a blunted lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) response to daily treatment with teriparatide, although the impact was limited.

INTRODUCTION

Some osteoporosis patients do not respond to teriparatide treatment. To better understand the factors underlying treatment nonresponses, we compared nonresponders' and responders' characteristics.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 354 male and female patients with osteoporosis who were administered teriparatide (20 μg/day) for 24 months. The patients were categorized as responders (≥3 % lumber spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) increase) or nonresponders (<3 % LS BMD increase), and the groups were compared.

RESULTS

The univariate analyses determined that prior bisphosphonate use, a lower baseline procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) concentration and a lower urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTX) concentration at baseline were significantly associated with teriparatide nonresponses, but these factors were not significant following multivariate analysis. Diminished early increases in the bone turnover markers (BTMs) were also related to nonresponses after teriparatide treatment began. In the nonresponders, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) absolute LS and femoral neck (FN) BMD changes were -0.002 g/cm(2) (0.032) and -0.010 g/cm(2) (0.045), respectively. In the responders, the mean (SD) absolute LS and FN BMD changes were 0.118 g/cm(2) (0.056) and 0.021 g/cm(2) (0.046), respectively. The serum PINP and uNTX levels increased rapidly in both groups, but the responders showed higher early absolute serum PINP and uNTX increases.

CONCLUSIONS

The factors associated with nonresponses were prior bisphosphonate use, lower baseline BTM levels, and lower early increases in the BTMs after starting teriparatide treatment, but the impact of these factors on achieving a ≥3 % LS BMD increase at 24 months was limited.

Improvement of cancellous bone microstructure in patients on teriparatide following alendronate pretreatment

An increase in procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) early after teriparatide initiation was shown to correlate with increased lumbar spine areal BMD and is a good predictor of the anabolic response to teriparatide. Few data exist correlating PINP and bone microstructure, and no data exist in patients on teriparatide following prior potent antiresorptive treatment. This exploratory analysis aimed to investigate the effects of teriparatide on cancellous bone microstructure and correlations of bone markers with microstructure in alendronate-pretreated patients. This was a post hoc analysis of changes in bone markers and three-dimensional indices of bone microstructure in paired iliac crest biopsies from a prospective teriparatide treatment study in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were either treatment-naïve (TN, n=16) or alendronate-pretreated (ALN, n=29) at teriparatide initiation. Teriparatide (20μg/day) was given for 24months; biopsies were taken at baseline and endpoint, and serum concentrations of PINP and type 1 collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide (βCTX) were measured at intervals up to 24months. In the TN and ALN groups, respectively, mean (SD) increases in three-dimensional bone volume/tissue volume were 105 (356)% (P=0.039) and 55 (139)% (P<0.005) and trabecular thickness 30.4 (30)% (P<0.001) and 30.8 (53)% (P<0.001). No significant changes were observed in trabecular number or separation. In the ALN patients, 3-month change of neither PINP nor βCTX correlated with indices of cancellous bone microstructure. However, 12-month changes in biochemical bone markers correlated significantly with improvements in bone volume/tissue volume, r=0.502 (P<0.01) and r=0.378 (P<0.05), trabecular number, r=0.559 (P<0.01) and r=0.515 (P<0.01), and reduction of trabecular separation, r=-0.432 (P<0.05) and r=-0.530 (P<0.01), for PINP and βCTX, respectively. We conclude that cancellous bone microstructure improved with teriparatide therapy irrespective of prior antiresorptive use.

Safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide in a prospective observational study in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan: final report

This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the safety and effectiveness of teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan. The patients received teriparatide 20 μg daily by subcutaneous injection, for a maximum of 24 months. Safety and effectiveness analyses were based on data from 1,847 patients who were predominantly female (92.6%) with a mean age of 75.4 years. A total of 157 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 140 (7.58%) patients; the most common ADRs were hyperuricemia, nausea, and dizziness. Only six (0.32%) patients reported serious ADRs, the most common being nausea (two patients; 0.1%). Persistence with teriparatide treatment was 60.8% and 39.1% at 18 and 24 months, respectively. There were significant increases in biomarkers for bone formation (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) and bone resorption (collagen type I cross-linked C telopeptide and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b) throughout the study. These were accompanied by significant increases in bone mineral density and low incidences of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Patient-reported measurements for health-related quality of life revealed significant improvements from baseline in back pain and overall health-related quality of life (Short Form-8™ health survey). The results of this 24-month postmarketing surveillance study imply that teriparatide has a favorable safety profile and is effective in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in Japan. Teriparatide may also be a useful treatment for osteoporosis in other societies with aging populations.

A Longitudinal Study of Skeletal Histomorphometry at 6 and 24 Months Across Four Bone Envelopes in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis Receiving Teriparatide or Zoledronic Acid in the SHOTZ Trial

Previously, we reported the effects of teriparatide (TPTD) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) on bone formation based on biochemical markers and bone histomorphometry of the cancellous envelope at month 6 in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who participated in the 12-month primary Skeletal Histomorphometry in Subjects on Teriparatide or Zoledronic Acid Therapy (SHOTZ) study. Patients were eligible to enter a 12-month extension on their original treatment regimen: TPTD 20 μg/day (s.c. injection) or ZOL 5 mg/year (i.v. infusion). A second biopsy was performed at month 24. Here we report longitudinal changes between and within each treatment group in the cancellous, endocortical, intracortical, and periosteal bone envelopes in patients with evaluable biopsies at months 6 and 24 (paired data set: TPTD, n = 10; ZOL, n = 9). Between-group differences are also reported in the larger set of patients with evaluable biopsies at month 6 (TPTD, n = 28; ZOL, n = 30). Data from the cancellous envelope at month 6 or month 24 provided a reference to compare differences across envelopes within each treatment group. The 24-month results extend our earlier report that TPTD and ZOL possess different tissue-level mechanisms of action. Moreover, these differences persisted for at least 2 years in all four bone envelopes. Few longitudinal differences were observed within or across bone envelopes in ZOL-treated patients, suggesting that the low bone formation indices at month 6 persisted to month 24. Conversely, the magnitude of the effect of TPTD on bone formation varied across individual envelopes: median values for mineralizing surface (MS/BS) and bone formation rate (BFR/BS) at month 6 were approximately 3-fold to 5-fold higher in the endocortical and intracortical envelopes compared to the cancellous envelope. Although MS/BS and BFR/BS declined in these envelopes at month 24, median values continued to exceed, or were not significantly different from, those in the cancellous envelope. This study demonstrates for the first time that bone formation indices are higher with TPTD treatment than with ZOL in all four bone envelopes and the difference persists for at least 2 years. Moreover, the magnitude of the effect of TPTD in cortical bone remains robust at 24 months. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

The role of biochemical of bone turnover markers in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease: a consensus paper of the Belgian Bone Club

The exact role of biochemical markers of bone turnover in the management of metabolic bone diseases remains a topic of controversy. In this consensus paper, the Belgian Bone Club aimed to provide a state of the art on the use of these biomarkers in different clinical or physiological situations like in postmenopausal women, osteoporosis in men, in elderly patients, in patients suffering from bone metastasis, in patients with chronic renal failure, in pregnant or lactating women, in intensive care patients, and in diabetics. We also gave our considerations on the analytical issues linked to the use of these biomarkers, on potential new emerging biomarkers, and on the use of bone turnover biomarkers in the follow-up of patients treated with new drugs for osteoporosis.

Commentary: Concurrent administration of PTH and antiresorptives: Additive effects or DXA cosmetics

Osteoanabolic therapy with parathyroid hormone (PTH(1-84)) or the PTH analogues teriparatide (PTH(1-34), TPTD) and abaloparatide induces a positive remodeling balance and increases modeling and remodeling activity on bone surfaces. As the anabolic action of PTH is primarily remodeling based increased bone turnover maximizes bone accrual. Increased remodeling, however, also increases cortical porosity and reduces mineralization of newly formed bone, which may cause initial reductions in BMD, particularly at sites rich in cortical bone. Increased cortical porosity may also have negative consequences for bone strength. Consequently, an interest developed in concurrent therapies offsetting the potential early negative cortical bone effects developed, and several studies using varying concurrent combinations of TPTD or PTH(1-84) with various antiresorptive (anti-catabolic) agents (estrogen, SERMs, bisphosphonates and denosumab) have been published. This commentary addresses the discrepancy between changes in areal bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTM) in concurrent therapy studies leading to possible misinterpretations of the results. In studies of concurrent therapies increases in BMD are generally accompanied by decreases in biochemical markers of bone turnover. This includes Procollagen Type I N-Terminal Propetide (PINP), which has emerged as a reliable marker of bone formation during osteoanabolic therapy. We therefore want to submit, that the larger increases in BMD seen initially in patients on concurrent therapy mask the potential for later reduced osteoanabolic action of PTH. This notion is corroborated by: 1) the lesser impairment of bone anabolism seen with milder antiresorptive modalities like hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs); 2) the changes in BMD seen in extension studies where treatment naïve patients previously treated with PTH alone are crossed over to antiresorptive drugs. We therefore advise against a general use of concurrent therapy with PTH and antiresorptive agents, as it entails blunting of osteoanabolic action of PTH in the long run.

Correlations Between Abnormal Glucose Metabolism and Bone Mineral Density or Bone Metabolism

Background

The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the correlations of abnormal glucose metabolism (AGM) with bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism.

Material/Methods

Relevant studies were identified using computerized and manual search strategies. The included studies were in strict accordance with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were conducted with the Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2.0 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA).

Results

Our present meta-analysis initially searched 844 studies, and 7 studies were eventually incorporated in the present meta-analysis. These 7 cohort studies included 1123 subjects altogether (560 patients with AGM and 563 healthy controls). The results showed that bone mass index (BMI), insulin, and insulin resistance (IR) of patients with AGM were significantly higher than that of the population with normal glucose metabolism (BMI: SMD=1.658, 95% CI=0.663~2.654, P=0.001; insulin: SMD=0.544, 95% CI=0.030~1.058, P=0.038; IR: SMD=8.767, 95% CI=4.178~13.356, P<0.001). However, the results also indicated there was no obvious difference in osteocalcin (OC) and BMD in patients with AGM and the population with normal glucose metabolism (OC: SMD=0.293, 95% CI=−0.023~0.609, P=0.069; BMD: SMD=0.805, 95% CI=−0. 212~1.821, P=0.121).

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis results suggest that AGM might lead to increased BMI, insulin, and IR, while it has no significant correlation with BMD or bone metabolism.

Association between basal metabolic function and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes is a risk factor for osteoporosis, and glycemic control is critical during osteoporosis treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, diabetic therapies have potentially adverse effects on bone metabolism. Additionally, biomarkers for bone metabolism are directly affected by drug therapies for osteoporosis. This study examined resting energy expenditure (REE) and respiratory quotient (RQ) as indices of bone metabolism in postmenopausal Japanese women with T2D.

METHODS

Forty-six postmenopausal Japanese women with T2D were examined. Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP, a fasting serum bone formation marker) and carboxy-terminal collagen cross-links-1 (CTX-1, a resorption marker) were evaluated, along with intact parathyroid hormone, 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D), urine microalbumin, motor nerve conduction velocity, sensory nerve conduction velocity, R-R interval, body composition, REE, RQ, and bone mineral density at the nondominant distal radius.

RESULTS

The mean T-score was low with high variance (-1.7 ± 1.6), and 18 patients (39%) met the criteria for osteoporosis. REE was positively correlated with body mass index (β = 0.517; r(2) = 0.250), serum calcium (β = 0.624; r(2) = 0.200), glycated hemoglobin A1C for the previous 6 mo (β = 0.395; r(2) = 0.137), and the serum P1NP/CTX-1 ratio (β = 0.380; r(2) = 0.144). RQ was positively correlated with serum 25(OH)D (β = 0.387; r(2) = 0.131).

CONCLUSION

The basal metabolic rate and diabetic pathophysiology are interrelated with bone turnover.

The safety and effectiveness profile of daily teriparatide in a prospective observational study in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture: interim report

This postmarketing surveillance study assessed the safety and effectiveness of daily teriparatide treatment in patients with osteoporosis in a Japanese clinical setting. In this prospective, multicenter, observational study, patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture received subcutaneous injections of teriparatide (20 μg/day) for a maximum of 24 months. For this interim report, data from 1,671 patients were eligible for analysis at the cutoff date. The mean age was 75.3 years; 93% of patients (1,552/1,671 patients) were women. There were 117 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in 101 of 1,671 patients (6.04%); the most common reported ADRs were nausea, dizziness, headache, and palpitations. No clinically significant safety issues were identified, although 5 serious ADRs were reported in 4/1,671 (0.24 %) patients. At 12 months, 71.9% of patients remained on teriparatide treatment. From 1 month, there were rapid increases in the biomarkers of bone formation P1NP and, to a lesser extent, BAP. In contrast, increases in the biomarkers of bone resorption, serum NTX, urinary NTX, and TRACP5b, were smaller. After 12 months of treatment, there was an increase in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip, and a decrease in the Visual Analog Scale score for back pain. The incidence of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures was 1.21% and 3.18%, respectively. In conclusion, the favorable safety profile and effectiveness of teriparatide observed in this population of Japanese patients with osteoporosis were accompanied by relatively high persistence with treatment, which is a key factor in the success of osteoporosis treatment.

A phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of the calcium-sensing receptor antagonist MK-5442 in the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

CONTEXT

MK-5442 is an orally bioavailable calcium-sensing receptor antagonist that is hypothesized to stimulate bone formation by stimulating endogenous secretion of a pulse of PTH. Earlier clinical and preclinical studies demonstrated increased bone mineral density (BMD) after treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to identify a dose of MK-5442 that produces osteoanabolic effects without excessive hypercalcemia.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial of private or institutional practice.

PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION

In total, 383 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were administered daily oral MK-5442 (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, or 15 mg) or placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Serum PTH and calcium, bone turnover markers, areal BMD, and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent transient increase in PTH occurred after an MK-5442 dose and lasted more than 3.5 hours. Compared with placebo, significant increases in bone formation markers (serum procollagen 1 N-terminal peptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) were observed by 6 months, whereas bone resorption markers (serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen, urine N-telopeptides of type 1 collagen) initially decreased but were also significantly increased by 6 months. Despite the biochemical marker changes suggestive of an anabolic response, there were no statistically significant differences between any dose of MK-5442 and placebo in percent change from baseline at month 6 in any of the BMD endpoints. The frequency of hypercalcemia (trough serum calcium ≥ 10.8 mg/dL) was greater with higher MK-5442 doses.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women with low bone mass, treatment with MK-5442 resulted in transient pulses of PTH. Bone formation markers increased quickly and bone resorption markers decreased temporarily, suggestive of an anabolic window. However, there were no increases in BMD versus placebo.

PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis may require treatment with the bone anabolic drug teriparatide. While changes in bone mineral density (BMD) are one measure of response, BMD changes often require a minimum of one year to observe measureable changes. Biochemical markers of bone turnover change within 1 to 3 months of initiating osteoporosis therapy. Monitoring with a marker such as procollagen type I N propeptide (PINP), an osteoblast-derived protein, during teriparatide treatment may provide clinically useful information for managing patients with osteoporosis. Clinical trials have shown consistent increases in PINP within 3 months of initiating teriparatide, increases that are significantly greater than placebo and significantly different from baseline. Increases in PINP concentrations during teriparatide treatment correlate well with increases in skeletal activity assessed by radioisotope bone scans and quantitative bone histomorphometry parameters. Individuals treated with teriparatide in clinical trials usually experienced an increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L from baseline, while those given placebo usually did not. In the clinical setting, patients experiencing a significant increase in PINP > 10 mcg/L after initiating teriparatide therapy may receive an earlier confirmation of anabolic effect, while those who do not may be assessed for adherence, proper injection technique, or undetected secondary conditions that might mitigate an anabolic response. PINP monitoring may provide information supplemental to BMD monitoring and be a useful aid in managing patients receiving anabolic osteoporosis treatment in the same way that biochemical markers of bone resorption are useful in monitoring antiresorptive therapy. This review examines PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis.

Early changes in biochemical markers of bone formation during teriparatide therapy correlate with improvements in vertebral strength in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Changes of the bone formation marker PINP correlated positively with improvements in vertebral strength in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) who received 18-month treatment with teriparatide, but not with risedronate. These results support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in GIO patients treated with teriparatide.

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the correlations between biochemical markers of bone turnover and vertebral strength estimated by finite element analysis (FEA) in men with GIO.

METHODS

A total of 92 men with GIO were included in an 18-month, randomized, open-label trial of teriparatide (20 μg/day, n = 45) and risedronate (35 mg/week, n = 47). High-resolution quantitative computed tomography images of the 12th thoracic vertebra obtained at baseline, 6 and 18 months were converted into digital nonlinear FE models and subjected to anterior bending, axial compression and torsion. Stiffness and strength were computed for each model and loading mode. Serum biochemical markers of bone formation (amino-terminal-propeptide of type I collagen [PINP]) and bone resorption (type I collagen cross-linked C-telopeptide degradation fragments [CTx]) were measured at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 18 months. A mixed-model of repeated measures analysed changes from baseline and between-group differences. Spearman correlations assessed the relationship between changes from baseline of bone markers with FEA variables.

RESULTS

PINP and CTx levels increased in the teriparatide group and decreased in the risedronate group. FEA-derived parameters increased in both groups, but were significantly higher at 18 months in the teriparatide group. Significant positive correlations were found between changes from baseline of PINP at 3, 6 and 18 months with changes in FE strength in the teriparatide-treated group, but not in the risedronate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive correlations between changes in a biochemical marker of bone formation and improvement of biomechanical properties support the use of PINP as a surrogate marker of bone strength in teriparatide-treated GIO patients.

Teriparatide for idiopathic osteoporosis in premenopausal women: a pilot study

CONTEXT

Premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis (IOP) have abnormal cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that teriparatide increases bone mineral density (BMD) and bone formation and improves trabecular microarchitecture and stiffness in women with IOP.

DESIGN

This was an open-label pilot study.

SETTING

The setting was a tertiary care referral center.

PATIENTS

Participants were 21 premenopausal women with unexplained fragility fractures or low BMD.

INTERVENTION

Teriparatide was administered at 20 μg daily for 18 to 24 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was within-subject percent change in lumbar spine BMD. Secondary endpoints included percent change in hip and forearm BMD, transiliac biopsy parameters (trabecular bone volume, microarchitecture, stiffness, and adipocytes), serum N-terminal propeptide of procollagen type 1 (P1NP), and C-telopeptide.

RESULTS

BMD increased at the spine (10.8 ± 8.3% [SD]), total hip (6.2 ± 5.6%), and femoral neck (7.6 ± 3.4%) (all P < .001). Serum P1NP doubled by 1 month, peaked at 6 months, and returned to baseline by 18 to 24 months. Transiliac biopsies demonstrated significant increases in cortical width and porosity and trabecular bone volume and number increased, mirrored by a 71% increase in trabecular bone stiffness (P < .02-.001). Adipocyte area, perimeter, and volume/marrow volume decreased, with no change in adipocyte number. Four women had no increase in BMD and a blunted, delayed increase in serum P1NP. Nonresponders had markedly lower baseline bone formation rate (0.002 ± 0.001 vs 0.011 ± 0.006 mm²/mm/y; P < .001) and higher serum IGF-1 (208 ± 54 vs 157± 44 ng/mL; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Teriparatide was associated with increased spine and hip BMD and improved trabecular microarchitecture and stiffness at the iliac crest in the majority of women with IOP.

Effects of morning vs. evening teriparatide injection on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

A 12-month morning teriparatide (TPTD) administration resulted in a larger increase in the lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) than the evening application. The results indicate that the response of bone cells to teriparatide treatment depends on dosing time.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effects of the morning vs. the evening teriparatide administration on BMD and bone turnover markers (BTMs) in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

Fifty women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis were randomized to 12-month treatment with 20 μg of TPTD, administered daily in the morning or in the evening. The BMD and serum concentrations of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b (TRAP 5b) were measured at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. General linear model-repeated measurements were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

After 12 months, the lumbar spine BMD grew markedly (p < 0.001) with a significantly greater increase in the morning arm compared to the evening arm (9.1% vs. 4.8%, respectively, p < 0.05). The BMD at the distal radius significantly decreased (p < 0.001), with no differences between the arms. The BMD at proximal femur did not change significantly. After 6 months, the BTMs were significantly increased compared with baseline (p < 0.001). The increases in the evening arm vs. the morning arm, however, were more pronounced in PINP (+358% vs. +215%, respectively) and in TRAP 5b (+70% vs. +37%, respectively) (both p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

12-month morning administration of TPTD resulted in a larger increase in the lumbar spine BMD than the evening application. The timing of TPTD administration may be important for its efficacy.

Serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin level increases with 48 weeks of teriparatide treatment in pre-treated elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients who use anti-resorptive drugs

AIM

The serum undercarboxylated osteocalcin (ucOC) level, a biochemical bone marker of vitamin K insufficiency, is often affected by anti-osteoporosis drugs. There have been no reports regarding the relationship between ucOC and teriparatide.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study of 26 female rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. The patients were divided into 3 groups: those who underwent a direct switch from anti-resorptive drugs to teriparatide (12 cases), those who started teriparatide without pre-treatment (5 cases), and the control patients (9 cases). The median age (interquartile range) of the patients in each group was 75 (67-77), 82 (78-84), and 69 (62-80) yr, respectively. All patients, except controls, received 48-week treatments of teriparatide. We analyzed the median 48-week changes from baseline of the serum ucOC levels with the Steel-Dwass method.

RESULTS

The median change from baseline in the direct switch group was higher than that in other groups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The serum ucOC levels increased with treatment of teriparatide in elderly RA patients, especially when the patients received pre-treatment.

Anabolic therapies for osteoporosis

As the first FDA-approved anabolic agent for osteoporosis, teriparatide has proven effective for people at highest risk of fracture, despite limitations of expense, route of delivery, and length of treatment. Available data show that combination therapy with teriparatide and antiresorptive agents does not offer a therapeutic advantage. However, treatment with an antiresorptive agent after teriparatide discontinuation is essential to prevent the ensuing bone loss. Although pretreatment with bisphosphonates may somewhat attenuate the anabolic effect of teriparatide, significant gains in bone mineral density are still achieved and prior bisphosphonate use should not dissuade clinicians from using teriparatide in select patients.

A fracture does not adversely affect bone mineral density responses after teriparatide treatment

BACKGROUND

Fracture leads to local and systemic catabolic physiologic changes. As teriparatide is an agent used to treat osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures, it is unclear whether teriparatide treatment alters bone mineral density (BMD) and bone markers when given to patients with fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked whether BMD and bone marker responses would be blunted in patients with fractures placed on teriparatide after fracture compared with patients without fractures on teriparatide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 141 patients treated with teriparatide for osteoporosis. Seventy-seven patients received teriparatide after fractures (fracture group), whereas 64 were treated for other indications (nonfracture group). We determined BMD at the lumbar spine and at the proximal femur before and 12 and 24 months posttreatment. Bone markers (urine N-telopeptide [urine NTX], bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [BALP]) were measured at baseline and 3, 12, and 24 months posttreatment.

RESULTS

Mean lumbar spine and hip BMDs at last followup increased from baseline with no differences between groups to approximately 9% and 4% at 24 months, respectively. Both bone markers increased from baseline in the nonfracture group, peaking at 12 months. For the fracture group, only urine NTX increased at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. Although the peak levels of both bone markers in the nonfracture group were greater, there was no difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fracture does not have a negative effect on the BMD and bone marker responses to teriparatide treatment. Clinicians should anticipate comparable BMD responses when treating patients with teriparatide for osteoporotic fractures and for other indications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The role of bone turnover markers in monitoring treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Bone metabolism is assessed using biochemical bone turnover markers (BTM). BTM reflect the metabolic effect of drugs on bone turnover, help to establish the lowest dose inducing the largest change in the BTM, predict treatment-related reduction in fracture risk, and are helpful in bridging studies. Changes in BTM during anti-osteoporotic therapy depend on the cellular mechanism of action of the drug, degree of change in bone turnover rate and route of administration. BTM help to establish the optimal dose of anti-osteoporotic drugs because treatment-related changes in BTM are more rapid compared with change in BMD. A greater decrease in BTM levels during the first year of tantiresorptive treatment is associated with greater antifracture efficacy over 3 years. According to preliminary data, measurement of BTM can improve persistence with anti-resorptive treatment. The use of BTM to monitor anti-osteoporotic therapy in "real life" is limited at this stage.

Effects of teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis pre-treated with bisphosphonates: 36-month results from the European Forsteo Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To describe fracture rates, back pain, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and prior bisphosphonate therapy, treated with teriparatide for up to 18 months and followed up for a further 18 months.

DESIGN

Prospective, multinational, and observational study.

METHODS

Data on prior bisphosphonate use, clinical fractures, back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and HRQoL (EQ-5D) were collected over 36 months. Fracture data were summarized in 6-month intervals and analyzed using logistic regression with repeated measures. Changes from baseline in back pain VAS and EQ-VAS were analyzed using a repeated measures model.

RESULTS

Of the 1581 enrolled patients with follow-up data, 1161 (73.4%) had a history of prior bisphosphonate use (median duration: 36 months). Of them, 169 (14.6%) sustained ≥1 fracture during 36-month follow-up. Adjusted odds of fracture were significantly decreased at each 6-month interval compared with the first 6 months of teriparatide treatment: 37% decrease in the 12 to <18 months period during teriparatide treatment (P=0.03) and a 76% decrease in the 12- to 18-month period after teriparatide was discontinued (P<0.001). Significant reductions in back pain and improvement in HRQoL were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis previously treated with bisphosphonates had a significant reduction in the incidence of fractures compared with the first 6 months of therapy, a reduction in back pain and an improvement in HRQoL during up to 18 months of teriparatide treatment. These outcomes were still evident for at least 18 months after teriparatide was discontinued. The results should be interpreted in the context of an uncontrolled, observational study in a routine clinical setting.

Sequential osteoporosis treatments

Osteoporosis is a major public health concern due both to its high prevalence and to its association with potentially serious fractures. The chronic nature of osteoporosis, together with the aging of the population, may result in a need for prolonged treatment consisting in the sequential use of several osteoporosis drugs. Situations in which switching from one osteoporosis drug to another may be considered include the occurrence of a fracture despite treatment, poor treatment adherence, side effects, and completion of a first-line treatment course. The available recommendations for postmenopausal women deal only with the indications for first-line osteoporosis treatment. Studies on drug sequences used an open-label design and failed to collect data on fractures. Thus, there is no scientific evidence supporting a specific treatment sequence, the only exception being teriparatide followed by a bone resorption inhibitor. Consequently, selection of the second drug in an osteoporotic woman is a matter of clinical judgment, which can be guided by several factors such as health insurance reimbursement restrictions, characteristics of the osteoporosis (e.g., severity and whether there is a predominant risk of peripheral fractures), co-morbidities, contraindications to specific drugs, and patient adherence to prescriptions.