Intra-and inter-reader reliability of semi-automated quantitative morphometry measurements and vertebral fracture assessment using lateral scout views from computed tomography

Does Position of Pedicle Screws Correlate With Adjacent Segment Degeneration? An Average 6-Year Follow-Up Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case serie.

OBJECTIVES

Assess the correlation between pedicle screw (PS) position of the first instrumented vertebra (FIV) with proximal adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) development or progression.

METHODS

Patients ≥55 years who have undergone lumbar fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Radiographic PS position was assessed by the angle between the first PS and the upper vertebral endplate (VE) and by the PS tip-VE distance. Radiographic parameters of ASD included: disc height, disc angle, and vertebral listhesis. ASD magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters included: disc degeneration and lumbar stenosis. ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the best cut-off points in correlation with lumbar stenosis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were included with an average follow-up of 6 years. All 48 included patients developed some degree of ASD whether on radiographic or MRI parameters. PS tip-VE distance and PS-VE angle were both positively correlated with: (1) Delta (Δ) lumbar stenosis; (2) Δ Disc degeneration; and (3) Δ Disc height. ROC curve analysis correlating PS tip-VE distance and PS-VE angle with an increase in the canal stenosis severity ≥2° resulted in a cut-off point of 36% and 9.5°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The cranial orientation (PS-VE angle) of the pedicle screw in the first instrumented vertebra, along with a shorter pedicle screw tip-vertebral endplate distance (PS tip-VE), positively correlated with ASD progression at an average 6-year follow-up. Protective values against lumbar stenosis were identified as a PS tip-VE distance ≥36% of the first instrumented vertebra height and a PS-VE angle ≤9.5° relative to the upper vertebral endplate.

Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for residual low back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common complication in elderly patients with osteoporosis. Despite undergoing percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) treatment, a significant percentage of OVCF patients (1.8% to 31.9%) continue to experience residual low back pain. While acupuncture has shown promise in relieving this pain, there is currently no systematic review on its efficacy specifically for residual low back pain after PKP in OVCF patients. This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture as a treatment for this condition.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive search will be conducted, including manual and electronic searches of literature published. Various databases such as MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, International Clinical Trial Registration Platform, China National Knowledge Network, China Biomedical Literature Database, China Scientific Journal Database and Wan-fang Database will be explored. Additional sources like bibliographies and meeting minutes will also be searched. All randomised controlled clinical trials related to acupuncture for treating residual low back pain after PKP in OVCF patients will be included. Two researchers will independently perform study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. The primary outcome measure will be pain relief assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) or other validated scales. Secondary outcomes include effectiveness, Oswestry dysfunction index (ODI), quality of life questionnaire (QUALEFFO-41), follow-up relapse rate and adverse events. If feasible, a meta-analysis using RevMan V.5.3 software will be conducted. Otherwise, descriptive or subgroup analyses will be performed. Database searches will commence after the publication of this agreement, with an estimated commencement date of 1 August 2024.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required since this review does not involve individual patient data. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals or relevant conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023478838.

EMG Validation of a Subject-Specific Thoracolumbar Spine Musculoskeletal Model During Dynamic Activities in Older Adults

Musculoskeletal models can uniquely estimate in vivo demands and injury risk. In this study, we aimed to compare muscle activations from subject-specific thoracolumbar spine OpenSim models with recorded muscle activity from electromyography (EMG) during five dynamic tasks. Specifically, 11 older adults (mean = 65 years, SD = 9) lifted a crate weighted to 10% of their body mass in axial rotation, 2-handed sagittal lift, 1-handed sagittal lift, and lateral bending, and simulated a window opening task. EMG measurements of back and abdominal muscles were directly compared to equivalent model-predicted activity for temporal similarity via maximum absolute normalized cross-correlation (MANCC) coefficients and for magnitude differences via root-mean-square errors (RMSE), across all combinations of participants, dynamic tasks, and muscle groups. We found that across most of the tasks the model reasonably predicted temporal behavior of back extensor muscles (median MANCC = 0.92 ± 0.07) but moderate temporal similarity was observed for abdominal muscles (median MANCC = 0.60 ± 0.20). Activation magnitude was comparable to previous modeling studies, and median RMSE was 0.18 ± 0.08 for back extensor muscles. Overall, these results indicate that our thoracolumbar spine model can be used to estimate subject-specific in vivo muscular activations for these dynamic lifting tasks.

Why Should Radiologists Evaluate MR Localizer Sequences?

AIM

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) localizer sequences in the detection of spinal incidental findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MR localizer sequence findings from 384 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The images were evaluated by an experienced radiologist. T2-weighted diagnostic sagittal and coronal images included in the abdominal images were taken as references.

RESULTS

Of the 384 patients, 170 were female and 214 were male. Pathology was detected in 63 of the patients. The findings were more common in male groups. These pathologies were spinal discopathy, metastases, hemangioma, angulation in the coccyx, and hemivertebra.

CONCLUSIONS

Although often overlooked, MR localizer images enable diagnosing additional pathologies in the spine. These are unsuspected but can be critical for patient management, reducing patient morbidity and mortality.

Using static postures to estimate spinal loading during dynamic lifts with participant-specific thoracolumbar musculoskeletal models

Static biomechanical simulations are sometimes used to estimate in vivo kinetic demands because they can be solved efficiently, but this ignores any potential inertial effects. To date, comparisons between static and dynamic analyses of spinal demands have been limited to lumbar joint differences in young males performing sagittal lifts. Here we compare static and dynamic vertebral compressive and shear force estimates during axial, lateral, and sagittal lifting tasks across all thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in older men and women. Participant-specific thoracolumbar full-body musculoskeletal models estimated vertebral forces from recorded kinematics both with and without consideration of dynamic effects, at an identified frame of peak vertebral loading. Static analyses under-predicted dynamic compressive and resultant shear forces, by an average of about 16% for all three lifts across the thoracic and lumbar spine but were highly correlated with dynamic forces (average r² > .95). The study outcomes have the potential to enable standard clinical and occupational estimates using static analyses.

Evaluation of Load-To-Strength Ratios in Metastatic Vertebrae and Comparison With Age- and Sex-Matched Healthy Individuals

Vertebrae containing osteolytic and osteosclerotic bone metastases undergo pathologic vertebral fracture (PVF) when the lesioned vertebrae fail to carry daily loads. We hypothesize that task-specific spinal loading patterns amplify the risk of PVF, with a higher degree of risk in osteolytic than in osteosclerotic vertebrae. To test this hypothesis, we obtained clinical CT images of 11 cadaveric spines with bone metastases, estimated the individual vertebral strength from the CT data, and created spine-specific musculoskeletal models from the CT data. We established a musculoskeletal model for each spine to compute vertebral loading for natural standing, natural standing + weights, forward flexion + weights, and lateral bending + weights and derived the individual vertebral load-to-strength ratio (LSR). For each activity, we compared the metastatic spines' predicted LSRs with the normative LSRs generated from a population-based sample of 250 men and women of comparable ages. Bone metastases classification significantly affected the CT-estimated vertebral strength (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.0001). Post-test analysis showed that the estimated vertebral strength of osteosclerotic and mixed metastases vertebrae was significantly higher than that of osteolytic vertebrae (p = 0.0016 and p = 0.0003) or vertebrae without radiographic evidence of bone metastasis (p = 0.0010 and p = 0.0003). Compared with the median (50%) LSRs of the normative dataset, osteolytic vertebrae had higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p = 0.0375), natural standing + weights (p = 0.0118), and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0111). Surprisingly, vertebrae showing minimal radiographic evidence of bone metastasis presented significantly higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p < 0.0001) and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0009) than the normative dataset. Osteosclerotic vertebrae had lower median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (p < 0.0001), natural standing + weights (p = 0.0005), forward flexion + weights (p < 0.0001), and lateral bending + weights (p = 0.0002), a trend shared by vertebrae with mixed lesions. This study is the first to apply musculoskeletal modeling to estimate individual vertebral loading in pathologic spines and highlights the role of task-specific loading in augmenting PVF risk associated with specific bone metastatic types. Our finding of high LSRs in vertebrae without radiologically observed bone metastasis highlights that patients with metastatic spine disease could be at an increased risk of vertebral fractures even at levels where lesions have not been identified radiologically.

Vertebral Deformity Measurements at MRI, CT, and Radiography Using Deep Learning

PURPOSE

To construct and evaluate the efficacy of a deep learning system to rapidly and automatically locate six vertebral landmarks, which are used to measure vertebral body heights, and to output spine angle measurements (lumbar lordosis angles [LLAs]) across multiple modalities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, MR (n = 1123), CT (n = 137), and radiographic (n = 484) images were used from a wide variety of patient populations, ages, disease stages, bone densities, and interventions (n = 1744 total patients, 64 years ± 8, 76.8% women; images acquired 2005-2020). Trained annotators assessed images and generated data necessary for deformity analysis and for model development. A neural network model was then trained to output vertebral body landmarks for vertebral height measurement. The network was trained and validated on 898 MR, 110 CT, and 387 radiographic images and was then evaluated or tested on the remaining images for measuring deformities and LLAs. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used in reporting LLA measurements.

RESULTS

On the holdout testing dataset (225 MR, 27 CT, and 97 radiographic images), the network was able to measure vertebral heights (mean height percentage of error ± 1 standard deviation: MR images, 1.5% ± 0.3; CT scans, 1.9% ± 0.2; radiographs, 1.7% ± 0.4) and produce other measures such as the LLA (mean absolute error: MR images, 2.90°; CT scans, 2.26°; radiographs, 3.60°) in less than 1.7 seconds across MR, CT, and radiographic imaging studies.

CONCLUSION

The developed network was able to rapidly measure morphometric quantities in vertebral bodies and output LLAs across multiple modalities.Keywords: Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD), MRI, CT, Spine, Demineralization-Bone, Feature Detection Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Observer Agreement of Vertebral Fracture Grading Using Dual Energy Absorptiometry Vertebral Fracture Assessment in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Routine screening of the spine for vertebral fracture is recommended in the recent international standards of care for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Recent international consensus endorses the use of dual energy absorptiometry vertebral fracture assessment for identification of vertebral fractures in children, which could be used instead of spine radiographs. This study aims to evaluate the inter-observer agreement for vertebral fracture classification in boys with DMD, and the impact on clinical management. Dual energy absorptiometry vertebral fracture assessment and morphometric analysis in 39 boys was performed by a reader with no prior experience (R1) and 2 readers with experience (R2 and R3). Inter-observer concordance of vertebral fracture grading comparing R1 with R2 and R3 was substantial (Kappa 0.66, 95% CI 0.56, 0.76). Concordance between R2 and R3 was almost perfect (Kappa 0.93, 95% CI 0.89, 0.97) which did not lead to differences in clinical management. Grading by R1 in comparison to R2 and R3 would have led to change in management of 5/39 boys (13%), according to recent standards of care guidance. Structured education programme on identification of vertebral fractures should be explored to ensure consistency of reporting of this important health outcome measure in DMD.

Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation

Osteoporosis causes bones to become weak, porous and fracture more easily. While a vertebral fracture is the archetypal fracture of osteoporosis, it is also the most difficult to diagnose clinically. Patients often suffer further spine or other fractures, deformity, height loss and pain before diagnosis. There were an estimated 520,000 fragility fractures in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2017 (costing £4.5 billion), a figure set to increase 30% by 2030. One way to improve both vertebral fracture identification and the diagnosis of osteoporosis is to assess a patient's spine or hips during routine computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients attend routine CT for diagnosis and monitoring of various medical conditions, but the skeleton can be overlooked as radiologists concentrate on the primary reason for scanning. More than half a million CT scans done each year in the National Health Service (NHS) could potentially be screened for osteoporosis (increasing 5% annually). If CT-based screening became embedded in practice, then the technique could have a positive clinical impact in the identification of fragility fracture and/or low bone density. Several companies have developed software methods to diagnose osteoporosis/fragile bone strength and/or identify vertebral fractures in CT datasets, using various methods that include image processing, computational modelling, artificial intelligence and biomechanical engineering concepts. Technology to evaluate Hounsfield units is used to calculate bone density, but not necessarily bone strength. In this rapid evidence review, we summarise the current literature underpinning approved technologies for opportunistic screening of routine CT images to identify fractures, bone density or strength information. We highlight how other new software technologies have become embedded in NHS clinical practice (having overcome barriers to implementation) and highlight how the novel osteoporosis technologies could follow suit. We define the key unanswered questions where further research is needed to enable the adoption of these technologies for maximal patient benefit.

Bone morbidity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), currently the most common pediatric leukemia, has a high curability rate of up to 90%. Endocrine disorders are highly prevalent in children with ALL, and skeletal morbidity is a major issue induced by multiple factors associated with ALL. Leukemia itself is a predominant risk factor for decreased bone formation, and major bone destruction occurs secondary to chemotherapeutic agents. Glucocorticoids are cornerstone drugs used throughout the course of ALL treatment that exert significant effects on demineralization and osteoclastogenesis. After completion of treatment, ALL survivors are prone to multiple hormone deficiencies that eventually affect bone mineral accrual. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the most widely used method of measuring bone mineral density, is used to determine the presence of childhood osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Supplementation with calcium and vitamin D, administration of pyrophosphate analogues, and promotion of mobility and exercise are effective options to prevent further bone resorption and fracture incidence. This review focuses on addressing bone morbidity after pediatric ALL treatment and provides an overview of bone pathology based on skeletal outcomes to increase awareness among pediatric hemato-oncologists and endocrinologists.

Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in children

Osteoporosis is a generalised disorder of the skeleton with reduced bone density and abnormal bone architecture. It increases bone fragility and renders the individual susceptible to fractures. Fractures of the vertebrae are common osteoporotic fractures. Vertebral fractures may result in scoliosis or kyphosis and, because they may be clinically silent, it is imperative that vertebral fractures are diagnosed in children accurately and at an early stage, so the necessary medical care can be implemented. Traditionally, diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures has been from lateral spine radiographs; however, a small number of studies have shown that dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is comparable to radiographs for identifying vertebral fractures in children, while allowing reduced radiation exposure. The diagnosis of vertebral fractures from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is termed vertebral fracture assessment. Existing scoring systems for vertebral fracture assessment in adults have been assessed for use in children, but there is no standardisation and observer reliability is variable. This literature review suggests the need for a semiautomated tool that (compared to the subjective and semiquantitative methods available) will allow more reliable and precise detection of vertebral fractures in children.

The impact of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic and classification process of osteoporotic vertebral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Standard radiographs are still considered as the gold standard for the early assessment of thoraco-lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs), although several studies demonstrated superior accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic process of OVFs. The aim of this study was to quantify the misdiagnosis rate of OVFs and analyse the impact of MRI on early diagnosis and classification, compared to standard radiographs alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 173 patients were enrolled in this study. All participants were 55 years of age or older (60 years for men) and complained acute back pain with suspected thoracolumbar OVFs without history of high-energy trauma. Diagnosis of OVF was initially performed on standard radiographs obtained in the emergency room. Then, all the patients underwent MRI scan with short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequencing within 7 days. We compared the level and number of fractures identified on standard radiographs with the MRI scan results. The discordance between radiographic and MRI diagnosis was quantified. Fractures were classified according to AO Spine Classification.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study participant was 74.2 years (range 55-92). They were 100 males and 73 females. MRI modified initial diagnosis in 52% (90/173) of our patients: in 43.9% of patients MRI identified one or more new thoracolumbar fracture. In 14 cases (8.1%) MRI disproved the evidence of any thoracolumbar fracture, even those recognized at plain X-rays. Bone bruise was detected by MRI in 19 vertebral bodies in 8 patients (4.6%) at levels that were classified as unremarkable on X-ray alone. In addition, 63 patients (36.4%) presented a total of 93 old fractures. The classification of fracture pattern after MRI changed in 28.90% of the patients (changes mostly involved AO type A1 patterns).

CONCLUSIONS

Underdiagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures is a common problem due to a lack of radiographic detection. Our results showed that the extensive use of MRI imaging allows better accuracy in the diagnostic process and in the classification assessment, compared to conventional radiographs. Further investigation should provide additional information about the impact of early MRI on treatment and management of elderly patients with suspected OVFs, including the decision to hospitalize or not, and how it could affect clinical outcome and social costs.

The protocol for the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology China Action on Spine and Hip status study

The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) China Action on Spine and Hip status (CASH) study focused on the prevalence of osteoporosis and spinal fracture in China. The aim of the PURE CASH study is to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and spinal fracture, and explore the potential relationship between spinal fracture and bone mineral density (BMD). This study is a prospective large-scale population study with a community-based sampling and recruitment strategy. The aim is to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture in this population, to evaluate the association between vertebral fractures and BMD values, and to assess the prediction power of BMD for incident fractures. Participants in the PURE CASH study are all from the PURE study in China, recruited from 12 centers in 7 Chinese provinces. The inclusion criteria are that participants should be aged more than 40 years and able to give informed consent. Exclusion criteria are pregnant women, individuals with metal implants in the lumbar spine, use of medications or the existence of any disease or condition known to have a major influence on BMD, and inability to give informed consent. A total of 3,457 participants undergo a quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan of the upper abdomen. The scanning parameters are as follows: 120 kVp at all centers, mAs between 75 and 200, FOV 40 cm×40 cm. The BMD values of L1 to L3 are measured, and the average BMD calculated. The American College of Radiology QCT criteria for the diagnosis of osteoporosis is applied to determine the presence of osteoporosis. The scout view images of T4-L4 vertebrae are reviewed by two experienced radiologists for semi-quantification of vertebral fractures according to Genant's method.

Diagnosis of vertebral deformities on chest CT and DXA compared to routine lateral thoracic spine X-ray

X-ray, CT and DXA enable diagnosis of vertebral deformities. For this study, level of agreement of vertebral deformity diagnosis was analysed. We showed that especially on subject level, these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION

X-ray and CT are frequently used for pulmonary evaluation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and also enable to diagnose vertebral deformities together with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. The aim of this research was to study the level of agreement of these imaging modalities for diagnosis of vertebral deformities from T4 to L1.

METHODS

Eighty-seven subjects (mean age of 65; 50 males; 57 COPD patients) who had X-ray, chest CT (CCT) and DXA were included. Evaluable vertebrae were scored twice using SpineAnalyzer™ software. ICCs and kappas were calculated to examine intra-observer variability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were calculated to compare vertebral deformities diagnosed on the different imaging modalities.

RESULTS

ICCs for height measurements were excellent (> 0.94). Kappas were good to excellent (0.64-0.77). At vertebral level, the AUROC was 0.85 for CCT vs. X-ray, 0.74 for DXA vs. X-ray and 0.77 for DXA vs. CCT. Sensitivity (51%-73%) and PPV (57%-70%) were fair to good; specificity and NPV were excellent (≥ 96%). At subject level, the AUROC values were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Reproducibility of height measurements of vertebrae is excellent with all three imaging modalities. On subject level, diagnostic performance of CT (PPV 79-82%; NPV 90-93%), and to a slightly lesser extend of DXA (PPV 73-77%; NPV 80-89%), indicates that these imaging techniques could be used for opportunistic screening of vertebral deformities in COPD patients.

Quantitative imaging techniques for the assessment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia

Bone and muscle are two deeply interconnected organs and a strong relationship between them exists in their development and maintenance. The peak of both bone and muscle mass is achieved in early adulthood, followed by a progressive decline after the age of 40. The increase in life expectancy in developed countries resulted in an increase of degenerative diseases affecting the musculoskeletal system. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and are associated with a significant increase in healthcare costs. Several imaging techniques are currently available for the non-invasive investigation of bone and muscle mass and quality. Conventional radiology, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound often play a complementary role in the study of osteoporosis and sarcopenia, depicting different aspects of the same pathology. This paper presents the different imaging modalities currently used for the investigation of bone and muscle mass and quality in osteoporosis and sarcopenia with special emphasis on the clinical applications and limitations of each technique and with the intent to provide interesting insights into recent advances in the field of conventional imaging, novel high-resolution techniques and fracture risk.

Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions

We created subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the thoracolumbar spine by incorporating spine curvature and muscle morphology measurements from computed tomography (CT) scans to determine the degree to which vertebral compressive and shear loading estimates are sensitive to variations in trunk anatomy. We measured spine curvature and trunk muscle morphology using spine CT scans of 125 men, and then created four different thoracolumbar spine models for each person: (i) height and weight adjusted (Ht/Wt models); (ii) height, weight, and spine curvature adjusted (+C models); (iii) height, weight, and muscle morphology adjusted (+M models); and (iv) height, weight, spine curvature, and muscle morphology adjusted (+CM models). We determined vertebral compressive and shear loading at three regions of the spine (T8, T12, and L3) for four different activities. Vertebral compressive loads predicted by the subject-specific CT-based musculoskeletal models were between 54% lower to 45% higher from those estimated using musculoskeletal models adjusted only for subject height and weight. The impact of subject-specific information on vertebral loading estimates varied with the activity and spinal region. Vertebral loading estimates were more sensitive to incorporation of subject-specific spinal curvature than subject-specific muscle morphology. Our results indicate that individual variations in spine curvature and trunk muscle morphology can have a major impact on estimated vertebral compressive and shear loads, and thus should be accounted for when estimating subject-specific vertebral loading. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2164-2173, 2017.

Thoracic Kyphosis and Physical Function: The Framingham Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between thoracic kyphosis and physical function.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort.

SETTING

Framingham, Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS

Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Third Generation cohort members who had computed tomography (CT) performed between 2002 and 2005 and physical function assessed a mean 3.4 years later (N = 1,100; mean age 61 ± 8, range 50-85).

MEASUREMENTS

Thoracic kyphosis (Cobb angle, T4-T12) was measured in degrees using supine CT scout images. Participants were categorized according to Cobb angle to compare those in the highest quartile (Q4, most-severe kyphosis) with those in the lowest quartiles (Q1-Q3). Quick walking speed (m/s), chair-stand time (seconds), grip strength (kg), and self-reported impairments were assessed using standardized procedures. Analyses were adjusted for age, height, weight, smoking, follow-up time, vertebral fractures, and prevalent spinal degeneration.

RESULTS

Thoracic kyphosis was not associated with physical function in women or men, and these results were consistent in those younger than 65 and those aged 65 and older. For example, walking speed was similar in adults younger than 65 with and without severe kyphosis (women, Q4: 1.38 m/s, Q1-Q3: 1.40 m/s, P = .69; men, Q4: 1.65 m/s, Q1-Q3: 1.60 m/s; P = .39).

CONCLUSION

In healthy relatively high-functioning women and men, kyphosis severity was not associated with subsequent physical function. Individuals at risk of functional decline cannot be targeted based on supine CT thoracic curvature measures alone.

CT-scout based, semi-automated vertebral morphometry after digital image enhancement

INTRODUCTION

Radiographic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture is necessary to reduce its substantial associated morbidity. Computed tomography (CT) scout has recently been demonstrated as a reliable technique for vertebral fracture diagnosis. Software assistance may help to overcome some limitations of that diagnostics. We aimed to evaluate whether digital image enhancement improved the capacity of one of the existing software to detect fractures semi-automatically.

METHODS

CT scanograms of patients suffering from osteoporosis, with or without vertebral fractures were analyzed. The original set of CT scanograms were triplicated and digitally modified to improve edge detection using three different techniques: SHARPENING, UNSHARP MASKING, and CONVOLUTION.

RESULTS

The manual morphometric analysis identified 1485 vertebrae, 200 of which were classified as fractured. Unadjusted morphometry (AUTOMATED with no digital enhancement) found 63 fractures, 33 of which were true positive (i.e., it correctly identified 52% of the fractures); SHARPENING detected 57 fractures (30 true positives, 53%); UNSHARP MASKING yielded 30 (13 true positives, 43%); and CONVOLUTION found 24 fractures (9 true positives, 38%). The intra-reader reliability for height ratios did not significantly improve with image enhancement (kappa ranged 0.22-0.41 for adjusted measurements and 0.16-0.38 for unadjusted). Similarly, the inter-reader agreement for prevalent fractures did not significantly improve with image enhancement (kappa 0.29-0.56 and -0.01 to 0.23 for adjusted and unadjusted measurements, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that digital image enhancement does not improve software-assisted vertebral fracture detection by CT scout.

Evaluation of a semi-automated software program for the identification of vertebral fractures in children

AIM

To assess observer reliability and diagnostic accuracy in children, of a semi-automated six-point technique developed for vertebral fracture (VF) diagnosis in adults, which records percentage loss of vertebral body height.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a semi-automated software program, five observers independently assessed T4 to L4 from the lateral spine radiographs of 137 children and adolescents for VF. A previous consensus read by three paediatric radiologists using a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique (i.e., no software involved) served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of a total of 1,781 vertebrae, 1,187 (67%) were adequately visualised according to three or more observers. Interobserver agreement in vertebral readability for each vertebral level for five observers ranged from 0.05 to 0.47 (95% CI: -0.19, 0.76). Intra-observer agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.25 to 0.61. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 18% (95% CI: 14-22) and 97% (95% CI: 97-98), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to adults, the six-point technique assessing anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral height ratios is neither satisfactorily reliable nor sensitive for VF diagnosis in children. Training of the software on paediatric images is required in order to develop a paediatric standard that incorporates not only specific vertebral body height ratios but also the age-related physiological changes in vertebral shape that occur throughout childhood.

Heritability of Thoracic Spine Curvature and Genetic Correlations With Other Spine Traits: The Framingham Study

Hyperkyphosis is a common spinal disorder in older adults, characterized by excessive forward curvature of the thoracic spine and adverse health outcomes. The etiology of hyperkyphosis has not been firmly established, but may be related to changes that occur with aging in the vertebrae, discs, joints, and muscles, which function as a unit to support the spine. Determining the contribution of genetics to thoracic spine curvature and the degree of genetic sharing among co-occurring measures of spine health may provide insight into the etiology of hyperkyphosis. The purpose of our study was to estimate heritability of thoracic spine curvature using T4 -T12 kyphosis (Cobb) angle and genetic correlations between thoracic spine curvature and vertebral fracture, intervertebral disc height narrowing, facet joint osteoarthritis (OA), lumbar spine volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and paraspinal muscle area and density, which were all assessed from computed tomography (CT) images. Participants included 2063 women and men in the second and third generation offspring of the original cohort of the Framingham Study. Heritability of kyphosis angle, adjusted for age, sex, and weight, was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43% to 64%). We found moderate genetic correlations between kyphosis angle and paraspinal muscle area (ρˆG , -0.46; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.26), vertebral fracture (ρˆG , 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.61), vBMD (ρˆG , -0.23; 95% CI, -0.41 to -0.04), and paraspinal muscle density (ρˆG , -0.22; 95% CI, -0.48 to 0.03). Genetic correlations between kyphosis angle and disc height narrowing (ρˆG , 0.17; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.38) and facet joint OA (ρˆG , 0.05; 95% CI, -0.15 to 0.24) were low. Thoracic spine curvature may be heritable and share genetic factors with other age-related spine traits including trunk muscle size, vertebral fracture, and bone mineral density. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Evaluation of a new approach to compute intervertebral disc height measurements from lateral radiographic views of the spine

PURPOSE

Current standard methods to quantify disc height, namely distortion compensated Roentgen analysis (DCRA), have been mostly utilized in the lumbar and cervical spine and have strict exclusion criteria. Specifically, discs adjacent to a vertebral fracture are excluded from measurement, thus limiting the use of DCRA in studies that include older populations with a high prevalence of vertebral fractures. Thus, we developed and tested a modified DCRA algorithm that does not depend on vertebral shape.

METHODS

Participants included 1186 men and women from the Framingham Heart Study Offspring and Third Generation Multidetector CT Study. Lateral CT scout images were used to place 6 morphometry points around each vertebra at 13 vertebral levels in each participant. Disc heights were calculated utilizing these morphometry points using DCRA methodology and our modified version of DCRA, which requires information from fewer morphometry points than the standard DCRA.

RESULTS

Modified DCRA and standard DCRA measures of disc height are highly correlated, with concordance correlation coefficients above 0.999. Both measures demonstrate good inter- and intra-operator reproducibility. 13.9 % of available disc heights were not evaluable or excluded using the standard DCRA algorithm, while only 3.3 % of disc heights were not evaluable using our modified DCRA algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our modified DCRA algorithm, it is not necessary to exclude vertebrae with fracture or other deformity from disc height measurements as in the standard DCRA. Modified DCRA also yields identical measurements to the standard DCRA. Thus, the use of modified DCRA for quantitative assessment of disc height will lead to less missing data without any loss of accuracy, making it a preferred alternative to the current standard methodology.

Software-assisted morphometry and volumetry of the lumbar spine

The aim of the study was to measure volumes of the lumbar vertebral bodies with use dedicated Computed Tomography (CT) workstation software to predict expected volume of PMMA for vertebroplasty and supplement calculations using computed tomography scanogram. Quantitative CT scans of 87 women's (mean age 69.4 years; SD 10.9) and 15 men's (mean age 64.3 years; SD 11.8) lumbar spines were analyzed; this made a total of 379 vertebrae. The population of patients was divided into three groups depending on measured BMD value, in accordance with American College of Radiology Practice Parameter for the Performance of Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Bone Densitometry. With the use of the general linear model and least squares means groups were compared regarding vertebral volume, anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral heights. Morphometric parameters tended to be greater in males than in females, in a population of diversified bone mineral density. BMD result should be considered as the modifying factor for preoperative planning of the bone cement volume to be deposited inside the vertebra. Vertebral body volumetry might prove to be a useful tool in pre-operative planning as well as an alternative for treatment monitoring after minimally invasive spinal procedures.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and bone fragility: Special focus on bone imaging

Fragility fracture rate is increased in type 2 diabetes patients despite of higher bone mineral density than non-diabetes control subjects. Vertebral fractures are usually asymptomatic; therefore, morphometric radiologic evaluation should be considered especially for diabetes patients.

Bone quality may more contribute to the increased risk of osteoporotic fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes than bone mass. Hip geometry, cortical porosity, and trabecular bone score have been studied as bone quality parameters by imaging in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Opportunistic Identification of Vertebral Fractures

Vertebral fractures are powerful predictors of future fracture, so, their identification is important to ensure that patients are commenced on appropriate bone protective or bone-enhancing therapy. Risk factors (e.g., low bone mineral density and increasing age) and symptoms (back pain, loss of height) may herald the presence of vertebral fractures, which are usually confirmed by performing spinal radiographs or, increasingly, using vertebral fracture assessment with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners. However, a large number (30% or more) of vertebral fractures are asymptomatic and do not come to clinical attention. There is, therefore, scope for opportunistic (fortuitous) identification of vertebral fractures from various imaging modalities (radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radionuclide scans) performed for other clinical indications and which include the spine in the field of view, with midline sagittal reformatted images from computed tomography having the greatest potential for such opportunistic detection. Numerous studies confirm this potential for identification but consistently find underreporting of vertebral fractures. So, a valuable opportunity to improve the management of patients at increased risk of future fracture is being squandered. Educational training programs for all clinicians and constant reiteration, stressing the importance of the accurate and clear reporting of vertebral fractures ("you only see what you look for"), can improve the situation, and automated computer-aided diagnostic tools also show promise to solve the problem of this underreporting of vertebral fractures.

Diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children: is a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique reliable?

BACKGROUND

Identification of osteoporotic vertebral fractures allows treatment opportunity reducing future risk. There is no agreed standardised method for diagnosing paediatric vertebral fractures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the precision of a modified adult algorithm-based qualitative (ABQ) technique, applicable to children with primary or secondary osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three radiologists independently assessed lateral spine radiographs of 50 children with suspected reduction in bone mineral density using a modified ABQ scoring system and following simplification to include only clinically relevant parameters, a simplified ABQ score. A final consensus of all observers using simplified ABQ was performed as a reference standard for fracture characterisation. Kappa was calculated for interobserver agreement of the components of both scoring systems and intraobserver agreement of simplified ABQ based on a second read of 29 randomly selected images.

RESULTS

Interobserver Kappa for modified ABQ scoring for fracture detection, severity and shape ranged from 0.34 to 0.49 Kappa for abnormal endplate and position assessment was 0.27 to 0.38. Inter- and intraobserver Kappa for simplified ABQ scoring for fracture detection and grade ranged from 0.37 to 0.46 and 0.45 to 0.56, respectively. Inter- and intraobserver Kappa for affected endplate ranged from 0.31 to 0.41 and 0.45 to 0.51, respectively. Subjectively, observers' felt simplified ABQ was easier and less time-consuming.

CONCLUSION

Observer reliability of modified and simplified ABQ was similar, with slight to moderate agreement for fracture detection and grade/severity. Due to subjective preference for simplified ABQ, we suggest its use as a semi-objective measure of diagnosing paediatric vertebral fractures.

Performance of statistical models of shape and appearance for semiautomatic segmentations of spinal vertebrae T4-L4 on digitized vertebral fracture assessment images

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Despite its clinical importance, accurate identification of vertebral fractures is problematic and time-consuming. There is a recognized need to improve the detection of vertebral fractures so that appropriate high-risk patients can be selected to initiate clinically beneficial therapeutic interventions.

PURPOSE

To develop and evaluate semiautomatic algorithms for detailed annotation of vertebral bodies from T4 to L4 in digitized lateral spinal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images.

STUDY DESIGN

Using lateral spinal DXA VFA images from subjects imaged at University Hospital fracture liaison service, image algorithms were developed for semiautomatic detailed annotation of vertebral bodies from T4 to L4.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Two hundred one women aged 50 years or older with nonvertebral fractures.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Algorithm accuracy and precision.

METHODS

Statistical models of vertebral shape and appearance from T4 to L4 were constructed using VFA images from 130 subjects. The resulting models form a part of an algorithm for performing semiautomatic detailed annotation of vertebral bodies from T4 to L4. Algorithm accuracy and precision were evaluated on a test-set of 71 independent images.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy was 0.72 mm (3.00% of vertebral height) and overall precision was 0.26 mm (1.11%) for point-to-line distance. Accuracy and precision were best on normal vertebrae (0.65 mm [2.67%] and 0.21 mm [0.90%], respectively) and mild fractures (0.78 mm [3.18%] and 0.32 mm [1.39%], respectively), but accuracy and precision errors were higher for moderate (1.07 mm [4.66%] and 0.48 mm [2.15%], respectively) and severe fractures (2.07 mm [9.65%] and 1.10 mm [5.09%], respectively). Accuracy and precision results for the algorithm were comparable with other reported results in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

This semiautomatic image analysis had high overall accuracy and precision on normal vertebrae and mild fractures, but performed less well in moderate and severe fractures. It is, therefore, a useful tool to identify normality of vertebral shape and to identify mild fractures.

Localizer sequences of magnetic resonance imaging accurately identify osteoporotic vertebral fractures

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of sagittal MR localizer (MR-loc), in terms of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-observer agreement in the detection of vertebral fractures (VFs). Three-hundred MR examinations of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were randomly collected. A semi-quantitative approach was used and morphometric analysis was performed when a VF was suspected. MR-loc images were evaluated blindly by three radiologists in two different sessions. A full diagnostic sagittal T1-weighted fast spin echo MR sequence was used as standard of reference (RS). Degenerative arthritis was also scored on RS. Only vertebral bodies which were assessable by both MR-loc and RS were considered for the analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Cohen kappa statistic, and linear-by-linear association were used for statistical analysis. Kappa values were compared by means of the z distribution. A total of 2186 vertebrae were analysed in 300 MRI exams (147 males, 153 females, 59.4±16.4y.o.). Sixty-seven out of 2136 (3.1%) VFs were identified in 23/300 (7.7%) patients submitted to MRI. In the detection of VFs, sensitivity and specificity of MR-loc were both 100% (accuracy AUROC=1.000). Inter-observer agreement was excellent (k=0.938±0.013), while intra-observer agreement was perfect (k=1.000). The diagnostic performance was independent from degenerative arthritis, vertebral level, type and grade of VFs. MR-loc is a simple but accurate tool in the detection of VFs. It should be introduced for systematic evaluation in the detection of VFs in MR examinations performed in daily clinical practice.

Comprehensive vertebral deformity and vertebral fracture assessment in clinical practice: intra- and inter-reader agreement of a clinical workflow tool

STUDY DESIGN

Study design randomized intra- and inter-reader reproducibility study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate reproducibility of quantitative morphometry (QM) and agreement of dichotomous fracture/no-fracture status on lateral spinal radiographs acquired during routine clinical practice using a clinical workflow tool.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several recent guidelines have underlined the importance of Genant semi-quantitative scoring and selective QM to confirm and grade suspected vertebral fractures in clinical practice.

METHODS

Thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were acquired from 98 consecutive subjects (mean age, 60.1 ± 11.7 yr) attending the clinic for osteoporosis evaluation. For each subject, QM and Genant semi-quantitative scoring were performed on all evaluable vertebrae from L4 to T4 using a software workflow tool. A radiologist and an experienced radiographical technician performed 2 repeat reading sessions of the radiographs 12 months apart, blinded to each other's results; for the second read, the cases were anonymized and the order was randomized.

RESULTS

Inter-reader reproducibility results were 3.1% and 3.2% coefficient of variation (%) for heights, 0.030 and 0.031 root mean square standard deviation for height ratios. For intrareader reproducibility, these values were 2.2% and 3.5% coefficient of variation %; 0.023 and 0.034 root mean square standard deviation. Kappa score results for agreement of dichotomous fracture/no-fracture status were 0.67 and 0.72 (inter-rater) and 0.50 and 0.67 (intrarater).

CONCLUSION

The software assessed in this study is a reliable clinical tool that facilitates QM and Genant semi-quantitative scoring of the spine in routine clinical practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Reliability and accuracy of scout CT in the detection of vertebral fractures

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reliability of scout CT (sCT) lateral radiograph, in terms of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and interobserver agreement in the detection of vertebral fractures (VFs).

METHODS

300 CT examinations of the thoracic and/or lumbar spine were collected and independently analysed by 3 musculoskeletal radiologists in 2 different sessions. A semi-quantitative approach was used for VF assessment on sCT, and morphometric analysis was performed when a VF was suspected. Results of multiplanar sagittal CT reconstructions interpreted by the most expert radiologist were considered as gold standard. Arthrosis was also scored. Only vertebral bodies assessable by both sCT and gold standard were considered for the analysis. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), Cohen's kappa statistic and linear-by-linear association were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

1522 vertebrae were considered (130 males and 170 females; ages, 73.0±2.8 years). 73 of 1522 (4.8%) VFs were identified in 34/300 patients (11.3%). In the detection of VFs, the sensitivity and specificity of sCT were 98.7% and 99.7%, respectively. Accuracy (AUROC=0.992±0.008), as well as interobserver agreement (k=0.968±0.008), was excellent. Intra-observer agreement was perfect (k=1.000). Performance of this method was independent of arthrosis, vertebral level and type and grade of VFs.

CONCLUSION

sCT is a simple but very accurate method for the detection of VFs. It should be introduced as a spine evaluation tool for the detection of VFs in examinations that are performed for other diagnostic purposes.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

sCT lateral radiograph is an accurate tool for the detection of VFs. This technique may be used with several advantages in clinical practice.

Intra and interobserver reliability and agreement of semiquantitative vertebral fracture assessment on chest computed tomography

Objectives

To evaluate the reliability of semiquantitative Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) on chest Computed Tomography (CT).

Methods

Four observers performed VFA twice upon sagittal reconstructions of 50 routine clinical chest CTs. Intra- and interobserver agreement (absolute agreement or 95% Limits of Agreement) and reliability (Cohen's kappa or intraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)) were calculated for the visual VFA measures (fracture present, worst fracture grade, cumulative fracture grade on patient level) and for percentage height loss of each fractured vertebra compared to the adjacent vertebrae.

Results

Observers classified 24–38% patients as having at least one vertebral fracture, giving rise to kappa's of 0.73–0.84 (intraobserver) and 0.56–0.81 (interobserver). For worst fracture grade we found good intraobserver (76–88%) and interobserver (74–88%) agreement, and excellent reliability with square-weighted kappa's of 0.84–0.90 (intraobserver) and 0.84–0.94 (interobserver). For cumulative fracture grade the 95% Limits of Agreement were maximally ±1,99 (intraobserver) and ±2,69 (interobserver) and the reliability (ICC) varied from 0.84–0.94 (intraobserver) and 0.74–0.94 (interobserver). For percentage height-loss on a vertebral level the 95% Limits of Agreement were maximally ±11,75% (intraobserver) and ±12,53% (interobserver). The ICC was 0.59–0.90 (intraobserver) and 0.53–0–82 (interobserver). Further investigation is needed to evaluate the prognostic value of this approach.

Conclusion

In conclusion, these results demonstrate acceptable reproducibility of VFA on CT.

Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D

Quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) was performed by parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in three dimensions (3D).

INTRODUCTION

Identification of vertebral fractures in two dimensions is a challenging task due to the projective nature of radiographic images and variability in the vertebral shape. By generating detailed 3D anatomical images, computed tomography (CT) enables accurate measurement of vertebral deformations and fractures.

METHODS

A detailed 3D representation of the vertebral body shape is obtained by automatically aligning a parametric 3D model to vertebral bodies in CT images. The parameters of the 3D model describe clinically meaningful morphometric vertebral body features, and QVM in 3D is performed by comparing the parameters to their statistical values. Thresholds and parameters that best discriminate between normal and fractured vertebral bodies are determined by applying statistical classification analysis.

RESULTS

The proposed QVM in 3D was applied to 454 normal and 228 fractured vertebral bodies, yielding classification sensitivity of 92.5% at 7.5% specificity, with corresponding accuracy of 92.5% and precision of 86.1%. The 3D shape parameters that provided the best separation between normal and fractured vertebral bodies were the vertebral body height and the inclination and concavity of both vertebral endplates.

CONCLUSION

The described QVM in 3D is able to efficiently and objectively discriminate between normal and fractured vertebral bodies and identify morphological cases (wedge, (bi)concavity, or crush) and grades (1, 2, or 3) of vertebral body fractures. It may be therefore valuable for diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures in patients who are at risk of osteoporosis.

Detection of incidental vertebral fractures in breast imaging: the potential role of MR localisers

OBJECTIVES

Incidental diagnosis of vertebral fractures (VFs) may represent a key point in the assessment of bone health status. Our purpose was to retrospectively evaluate localisation sequences (MR-loc) of breast MRI as a potential tool to detect osteoporotic VFs.

METHODS

MR-loc sagittal images of 856 breast MRIs were reviewed by three expert musculoskeletal radiologists with a semiquantitative approach to detecting VFs. Anamnesis and data of patients were investigated. Official breast MRI and previous imaging reports were checked to understand if VFs or other relevant bone findings were known in patients' clinical history.

RESULTS

A total of 780/856 female patients (91.1 %) undergoing MRI for oncological reasons and 76/856 (8.9 %) with non-oncological aims were recruited into the study (54.7 ± 12.2 years old, 21-89 years); 57/856 MR-loc images (6.7 %) were considered inadequate for diagnostic purposes and were excluded from the analysis. MR-loc detected VFs in 71/799 patients (8.9 %). VFs were neither reported nor previously known in the clinical history of 63/71 patients (88.7 %; P < 0.001). No mention of VFs was found in any breast MR reports. In four patients MR-loc identified vertebral metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

A systematic evaluation of MR-loc may offer additional clinical information to prevent unrecognised VFs. MR-loc may screen for VFs in other imaging settings.

KEY POINTS

Vertebral fractures are usually a hallmark of osteoporosis. Localisation sequences before breast MR examinations can identify vertebral fractures. MR localisers should be inspected for vertebral fractures in other clinical settings.

Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using CT lateral scout views: a comparison of semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry and radiologist semi-quantitative grading

We compared vertebral fracture assessment by semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry measurements with the conventional semi-quantitative (SQ) grading using lateral CT scout views. The semi-automated morphometry method showed good to excellent agreement with the visual SQ grading by radiologists for identification of vertebral fractures.

INTRODUCTION

Semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry (QM) measurements may enhance management of osteoporosis patients by providing an efficient means to identify vertebral fractures (VFx). We compared identification of prevalent VFx by semi-automated QM to SQ grading.

METHODS

A non-radiologist performed semi-automated QM from CT lateral scout views in 200 subjects (102 men, 98 women, 65.8 ± 8.9 years) selected from the Framingham Heart Study Multidetector CT Study. VFx were classified in the QM approach based on using Genant's criteria for deformities, and compared with conventional SQ grading performed by experienced radiologists as the gold standard. The kappa (k) statistics, percent agreement (% Agree), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed.

RESULTS

Among 200 subjects, 57 had mild and 41 had moderate or severe VFx by visual SQ grading. Per-person analyses showed excellent agreement between the two methods, with k = 0.780. The % Agree ranged from 86.7% to 91.2%, the SE was 81.3%-96%, and the SP was 86.5%-92%. Among 2,588 vertebrae analyzed, 107 had mild and 49 had moderate or severe VFx by visual SQ grading. Per-vertebra analyses revealed good agreement, with k = 0.580. Agreement between the methods tended to be highest in L1-L4 region. Agreement and validity measures were higher when only moderate and severe fractures were included.

CONCLUSION

The semi-automated quantitative vertebral morphometry measurements from CT lateral scout views provided good to excellent agreement with the standard SQ grading for assessment of prevalent vertebral fractures.

A careful evaluation of scout CT lateral radiograph may prevent unreported vertebral fractures

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to review scout CT lateral radiographs to reveal osteoporotic vertebral fractures unreported by radiologists and to explore scout CT as a potential diagnostic tool in the detection of vertebral fractures.

METHODS

We considered 500 patients (303 males, 197 females, age 64.6±13.5 year-old). Our investigation was firstly focused on scout CT lateral images to detect vertebral fractures with a combined semiquantitative and quantitative diagnostic approach. Findings addressed to vertebral fracture were subsequently confirmed by multiplanar sagittal CT reconstructions. Whenever a vertebral fracture was discovered the radiologist report was read and a collection of patient anamnesis followed to understand whether fractures were already known.

RESULTS

In 44/500 patients (8.8%) the evaluation on scout CT was incomplete or limited for patient/technical-based conditions, and 15 were excluded from the analysis. In 67/485 patients (13.8%) 99 vertebral fractures were detected. Among 67 fractured patients only 18 (26.9%) were previously diagnosed by radiologists. However, in the clinical history of 32 patients vertebral fractures were already known.

CONCLUSIONS

The perception and sensibility to vertebral fractures among radiologists are still poor when the assessment of the spine is not the aim of the examination. Short time spent for the evaluation of scout CT lateral radiographs could improve our accuracy.