GRAND: the German retrospective cohort analysis on compliance and persistence and the associated risk of fractures in osteoporotic women treated with oral bisphosphonates

Nocebo-associated treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs. A systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-arm dropouts in randomized-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Nocebo is a concept of therapeutics referring to unpleasant symptoms attributed by a patient to a drug, due to negative anticipation. Patients receiving oral anti-osteoporotic drugs in randomized controlled trials (RCT) can experience adverse events leading to dropout, implying that nocebo contributes to treatment discontinuation for these drugs. In this study we aim to investigate the nocebo effect of subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs with a higher compliance rate than orally administered drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases for double-blind trials investigating subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs for osteoporosis (namely, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide and romosozumab) published up to May 2023.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Dropouts due to reported adverse events in the placebo arms ("nocebo dropouts").

RESULTS

Data from 17 trials were extracted. Among 10,529 placebo-treated patients the pooled nocebo-dropout percentage was 3 % for denosumab (average: 0.03; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.05), 1 % for romosozumab (average: 0.01; 95 % CI: 0.00-0.03) and 6 % for teriparatide and abaloparatide (average: 0.06; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.07). Nocebo-dropouts were significantly higher in men than women (6 % vs. 3 %, respectively, p = 0.012), in older (mean age >68 years) than in younger patients (5 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.017) and in those with more severe osteoporosis (based on the percentage of participants with prior fragility-related fractures in the study cohort) compared with patients with no prior fracture history (4 % vs. 1 %, respectively, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

Nocebo responses may contribute to treatment discontinuation with subcutaneous anti-osteoporotic drugs in clinical practice. Higher nocebo-related dropout rates in the higher-risk RCT population (older patients, males, those with prior fractures) show that nocebo mechanisms have the potential to hinder therapeutic efforts to specific populations who would benefit most. Prospero registration number CRD42020212843.

Impact of Medication Adherence on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

Osteoporosis is a chronic, prevalent disease marked by decreased bone mass and changes in bone anatomy associated with significant morbidity. The management of osteoporosis necessitates long-term therapy for which patient adherence is of vital importance. In the present review, we aim to collect all potential evidence from relevant studies that reported the impact of medication adherence on bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. We have conducted both electronic and manual search strategies within the potential databases and included articles and reviews to find relevant studies. We have assessed the effects of osteoporotic medication adherence on fracture rates and bone mineral density. The study participants were divided into two groups, adherent and non-adherent. Studies from the year 2010-2023 were included. Final inclusion consisted of 14 studies that showed variation in adherence rates with only three studies reporting optimal adherence followed by two studies with nearly half adherent population while the rest of the studies reported low medication adherence. The highest adherence rate reported was 82% while the lowest was 8%. Among the included studies the fracture rates varied significantly. Decreased rates of fracture were observed in the adherent population however two of the included studies were contrary to these findings. Additionally, only three studies discussed the effect of adherence on bone mineral density. Lack of medication adherence is linked to an increased risk of fracture, and low bone mineral density, further associated with more severe complications as per the evidence from the literature. However, variation in the fracture rates as observed in our findings advocates the need for further research for the generalizability of results.

Adherence of bisphosphonate and decreased risk of clinical vertebral fracture in osteoporotic patients: A propensity score matching analysis

Objectives

Bisphosphonate is associated with a decreased risk of vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis. However, there are limited studies on how poor compliance with bisphosphonate affects the risk of vertebral fractures in a nationwide cohort. We aim to evaluate whether adherence to bisphosphonate affects the risk of fracture in osteoporosis patients.

Methods

We used the data of the Korean National Health Insurance Service Senior Cohort. A total of 33,315 (medication possession ratio [MPR]: 50) osteoporosis patients were matched using the propensity score matching method: those who received low-dose bisphosphonate and those who received high-dose bisphosphonate. Twenty-two confounding variables, including age, socioeconomic status, medications prescribed, and underlying diseases that may affect the risk of fracture were adjusted for propensity score matching. The risk of vertebral fracture was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

Patients with a higher MPR showed a decreased vertebral fracture risk than those with a lower MPR (MPR 50 = hazard ratio [HR] 0.909; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.877–0.942 P < 0.001; MPR 70 = HR: 0.874, 95% CI: 0.838–0.913, P < 0.001; MPR 90 = HR: 0.822, 95% CI: 0.780–0.866, P < 0.001). MPR was associated with a decreased vertebral fracture risk in both groups with or without history of fracture. In the subgroup analysis, MPR was associated with a decreased vertebral fracture risk in women, in all ages, with or without T2DM, and with or without hypertension.

Conclusions

Higher MPR is associated with a lower vertebral fracture risk.

Comparison of Denosumab and Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS)

BACKGROUND

Denosumab (DEN) and zoledronic acid (ZOL) currently represent the most potent antiresorptive agents for the treatment of osteoporosis. Despite similar effects on bone resorption, these agents have distinct mechanisms of action. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of DEN and ZOL after two-year administration on bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), bone turnover markers, and persistence.

METHODS

A total of 585 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who did not use osteoporosis medications were retrospectively reviewed. 290 patients were administered 60 mg DEN subcutaneously every 6 months from 2017 to 2018, and 295 patients were treated with 5 mg ZOL intravenously yearly from 2015 to 2017. BMD, TBS, and C-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) measurements were obtained at baseline and two-year after DEN injection or ZOL infusion.

RESULTS

After two-year follow-up, 188 patients in the DEN group and 183 patients in the ZOL group were compared. BMD change from baseline at two years was significantly greater in the DEN group compared with the ZOL group (P < 0.001). The changes of TBS in the DEN group were statistically significant compared with baseline (P < 0.001) and the ZOL group (P < 0.001). The DEN group led to significantly greater reduction of CTX compared with ZOL group (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, DEN was associated with greater BMD increase at all measured skeletal sites, greater increase of TBS, and greater inhibition of bone remodeling compared with ZOL.

The Effects of Trends in Osteoporosis Treatment on the Incidence of Fractures

OBJECTIVE

This study focused on the trends in antiosteoporosis drug preferences and compared the incidence of fractures between patients treated orally and those who were exposed to an awareness campaign and assigned to intravenous/subcutaneous treatment.

METHODS

Our hospital registry included 1,716 osteoporotic women who were over 65 years of age without preexisting vertebral and nonvertebral fractures over 1 year before this study, with bone mineral density (BMD) < -2.5 standard deviation (SD) and fracture assessment tool (FRAX) score > 20%, who were given 1,337 oral and 379 intravenous/subcutaneous prescriptions to treat their osteoporosis. Self-administered surveys (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016) collected data on trends of preferences among nine drugs and fracture prevention using relative risk reduction (RRR).

RESULTS

The number of patients taking oral prescriptions decreased gradually from 2012 to 2016, while the number of patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous injections increased. The incidence of fracture was lower in patients receiving intravenous and subcutaneous injections than in patients taking oral medications.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate a decrease in oral prescriptions for osteoporosis treatment and that treatment for osteoporosis using intravenous or subcutaneous injections of antiosteoporosis drugs is more effective for preventing fractures.

Comparing the efficacies of bisphosphonates' therapies for osteoporosis persistence and compliance: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disorder worldwide. This review was undertaken to compare the efficacies of bisphosphonates therapies for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the available reporting items. MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were applied for literature searched up to January 2020. All major studies such as prospective, retrospective and reviews articles that examined patient persistence or compliance to bisphosphonates for osteoporosis were included.

RESULTS

Literature search found 656 relevant published reports, out of which 87 were included. The 10,712,176 osteoporotic patients were studied for patient persistence and 5,875,718 patients were studied for patient compliances. Analysis of all studied bisphosphonates showed almost similar patterns for patient persistence rates as it was decreased over the time following initial prescription but persistence length was found to be significantly high for alendronate therapy as compared to the other studied bisphosphonates (p<0.001), whereas the length of persistence of all other bisphosphonates (other than alendronate) were almost same (p>0.05). Analysis of patient compliances with etidronate therapy showed the highest percent medication possession ratio (MRP) at 12 months, followed by the MRPs of ibandronate, alendronate, risedronate, and clodronate.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review that shows the comparison of the efficiencies of bisphosphonates for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis. The data showed that the length of patient persistence was highest for alendronate therapy, whereas patient compliance was highest for etidronate therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Persistence with Denosumab in Women at High Risk of Fracture in Bulgaria

Introduction

Post-menopausal women with osteoporosis > 70 years of age at high risk of fracture urgently require treatment for fracture prevention. Moreover, persistence with osteoporosis therapy is critical for real-world effectiveness. We estimated persistence with denosumab in older women at high fracture risk in clinical practice in Bulgaria.

Methods

Eligible participants were post-menopausal women, > 70 years of age, diagnosed with osteoporosis (T-score ≤ − 2.5) and at high risk of fracture (≥ 3% for hip and ≥ 20% for major osteoporotic fracture) who received at least one denosumab injection before enrollment. Planned follow-up was 24 months. The primary endpoint was persistence to denosumab at 12, 18, and 24 months (defined as receiving all denosumab injections within 6 months ± 60 days of the previous injection).

Results

250 women were enrolled across 12 Bulgarian endocrinology/rheumatology practices; median follow up, 736 days. Mean (SD) age was 75.8 (4.2) years; mean (SD) FRAX^® was 13.1 (8.6) for hip and 26.1 (9.5) for major osteoporotic fracture; 47 (18.8%) women had prior osteoporosis therapy and 104 (41.6%) had prior fracture. Denosumab persistence was high: 98.0%, 92.4%, and 84.4% at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. A total of 42 (16.8%) women discontinued denosumab during follow-up, mostly for financial reasons [25/42 (59.5%)] or loss to follow-up [8/42 (19.0%)]. After 24 months of denosumab treatment, BMD T-score improvement to the range of osteopenia (− 2.5 ≤ T < − 1.5) was achieved by 42.4% at the femoral neck, 23.6% at the lumbar spine, and 49.2% at the total hip; complete recovery (T-score ≥ − 1.5) was observed in 9.0%, 26.4%, and 23.0% respectively. New fracture was reported in 5 patients (2%).

Conclusions

Even in an elderly population, persistence with denosumab was high despite the challenge imposed by the 50% co-pay in Bulgaria.

Trial Registration

Bulgarian Drug Agency, №HИП-0009 (registered 28.06.2017); Central Ethics Commission: №КИ-41 (registered 16.05.2017)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00282-3.

Evaluation of pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in parenterally treated patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction in parenterally treated patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).

Patients and methods

Between May 2016 and January 2018, a total of 138 patients (mean age 63.78 years; range, 50 to 70 years) with postmenopausal OP were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were previously treated with denosumab (DEN) and parenteral forms of bisphosphonates such as zoledronic acid (ZOL) and ibandronate (IBN). The pain severity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF). The quality of life was evaluated using the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (Qualeffo-41). For the evaluation of patient satisfaction, a three-item questionnaire including satisfaction with the medication, route, and frequency of administration was applied.

Results

Of the patients, 50 received DEN, 48 received ZOL, and 40 received IBN treatment. There was no significant difference in any of the pain parameters. All domains of the Qualeffo-41 were similar among the three groups. The patients in the DEN group were more satisfied with their medication (DEN: 88%, ZOL: 43.75%, and IBN: 52.5%), its administration route (DEN: 84%, ZOL: 43.8%, and IBN: 57.5%), and the frequency of its administration (DEN: 84%, ZOL: 56.25%, and IBN: 52.5%) (p=0.0001).

Conclusion

Neither of the medication showed a superior effect on quality of life. However, patients were more satisfied with medications used in a six-month interval and applied subcutaneously. Of these three treatment options, DEN seems to be a step ahead in terms of patient satisfaction.

Undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture: a retrospective, observational study in Singapore

Undertreatment of osteoporosis after hip fracture increases the risk of death, disability, recurrent osteoporotic fractures, and financial burden. Only half were compliant with osteoporosis medications. Elderly patients were less persistent and compliant to treatment. Denosumab was associated with a higher proportion of days covered by osteoporosis medications than oral bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify factors that contributed to the initiation of osteoporosis medications following hip fracture as well as the compliance and persistence to osteoporosis medications.

METHODS

Clinical data of 532 patients older than 50 years old admitted for surgical fixation of hip fractures were reviewed. Three hundred forty-seven had sufficient data for analysis after excluding patients with non-fragility fractures. Prescription for any osteoporosis medication in the year following hip fracture as well as compliance to treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Only 40.3% of patients were prescribed with osteoporosis medication within 1 year post-hip fracture. Females (p = 0.020) performing dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan (p < 0.001) and 25 hydroxyvitamin D levels testing post-hip fracture (p < 0.027) were independent determinants of increased likelihood of being prescribed with osteoporosis medication. Patients with proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 0.8 (or 80% of days covered in a year) were defined as compliant. Overall, only 49.7% of the patients were compliant with osteoporosis medications. Elderly patients aged 70-79 years (p = 0.002) and males (p = 0.017) were less persistent with osteoporosis treatment when compared with patients aged < 69 years and females. The compliance was poorer in patients aged 70-79 years (p = 0.026) as compared with those under 69 years of age. Statistically significant difference (p = 0.032) was observed between mean PDC of oral bisphosphonates (0.66) and denosumab (0.83). Only 39.3% of patients were persistent with treatment at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate the urgent need to increase awareness through a structured protocol of osteoporosis treatment. A multi-disciplinary Fracture Liaison Service should be set up to ensure compliance to osteoporosis medication post-hip fracture.

The challenge of long-term adherence: The role of bone turnover markers in monitoring bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Oral Bisphosphonates (BPs) are the mainstay of osteoporotic treatment, however long-term adherence remains a challenge, primarily owing to the chronic character of the disease and the regimen complexity. Poor compliance has been shown to have a clear link to fracture risk. The role of bone turnover markers (BTMs) as a tool to ascertain adherence and response to therapy is supported by their rapid response to treatment; a decrease in values is witnessed within days or weeks of commencing treatment. A greater reduction of serum CTX and NTX is evidenced with alendronate and ibandronate compared to risedronate. A change in bone formation BTMs appears to be related to vertebral fracture risk reduction, whereas no significant relationship is evident for hip and non-vertebral fractures. The utility of BTMs as an adjunct for monitoring withdrawal of treatment with oral BP has also been suggested. Finally, studies evaluating BTMs as an intervention, failed to demonstrate any effect on adherence. This review explores the challenge of long-term adherence with bisphosphonates and provides an analytic framework with respect to the role of BTMs in monitoring bisphosphonate treatment, adherence and the offset of treatment effect.

Real-world Adherence and Persistence with Bisphosphonate Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Bisphosphonate therapy is a well-established and effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis and the prevention of osteoporotic fracture. However, poor adherence to and poor persistence with bisphosphonate therapy may reduce its benefits. Previous studies have documented the poor rates of adherence and persistence among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. The objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate adherence, persistence, and the impact of adherence and persistence on fracture risk in postmenopausal women with diagnosed osteoporosis.

METHODS

Articles eligible for review included observational studies of the real-world use of bisphosphonates in 23 countries and were identified by using MEDLINE, EMBASE, IMSEAR (Index Medicus for South-East Asia Region), and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Database).

FINDINGS

We identified and evaluated 10 studies that assessed bisphosphonate adherence by measuring medication possession ratio (MPR), persistence, and/or the impact of adherence and persistence on fracture risk. Mean MPR at 1 year ranged from 54% to 71% in the 3 studies that reported this assessment of adherence, and 40%-85% of patients at 1 year were adherent, defined as an MPR ≥80%, in the 8 studies that reported this end point. At 1 year, rates of persistence ranged from 28% to 74%. Rates of adherence and persistence were highest with agents requiring less frequent administration and typically declined over time. Fracture rates were significantly lower among adherent women with MPRs ≥80% compared with women with MPRs <80%.

IMPLICATIONS

Our results show that suboptimal adherence to and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy in postmenopausal women are common and increase the risk of fracture. Additional research is needed to identify and incorporate effective strategies for improving adherence to bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women.

Long-Term Oral Bisphosphonate Compliance Focusing on Switching of Prescription Pattern

BACKGROUND

Factors determining bisphosphonate compliance are not fully understood. We examined fluctuations in oral bisphosphonate dosing intervals to gauge therapeutic compliance in patients with osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital data accruing between 2010 and 2017 were accessed to retrospectively study patients ≥50 years old (N=1873), each prescribed bisphosphonate at initial diagnosis of osteoporosis. The medication possession ratio (MPR), calculated as total days supplied divided by length of follow-up, served to measure therapeutic compliance. We compared MPRs of various prescription patterns (daily, weekly, monthly, and switch [ie, ≥1 change in pattern] groups). We also analyzed the impact of age, sex, fracture history, surgical history, and comorbidities. Multiple regression analysis was ultimately performed, using MPR as a dependent variable.

RESULTS

In our cohort (mean follow-up=5.7±2.4 years), once weekly dosing was the most common prescription pattern (1223/1873, 65.3%), as opposed to monthly (366/1873, 19.5%) or daily (164/1873, 8.8%) dosing. A total of 120 patients (6.4%) comprising the switch group changed dosing patterns during the study period. MPR was significantly higher in the switch group (32.8±22.7) than in the other three groups (daily, 21.9±25.9; weekly, 22.7±27.3; monthly, 23.2±27.7). In multiple regression analysis, younger age (P<0.001), female sex (P=0.004), and switching of prescription pattern (decrease or increase frequency) were factors significantly associated with higher MPR, signaling better compliance.

CONCLUSION

Better bisphosphonate compliance was associated with physician-modified dosing patterns. We therefore recommend adjustments of prescription intervals in poorly compliant patients requiring long-term treatment.

Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of monthly delayed-release versus daily immediate-release risedronate tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis

Absorption of oral immediate-release (IR) risedronate tablets is reduced by food intake, thus a delayed-release (DR) tablet has been developed to overcome the necessity of taking IR tablets under fasting conditions. This randomized, double-blind, phase II/III study compared efficacy and safety of risedronate IR once-daily (QD) and DR once-monthly (QM) tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. Patients received 2.5 mg IR on awakening QD, or 25 or 37.5 mg DR on awakening, following breakfast, or 30 min after breakfast, QM for 12 months. Primary endpoint was non-inferiority in mean percent change from baseline to end of study (month 12, last observation carried forward [M12, LOCF]) in mean lumbar spine (L₂-L₄) bone mineral density (BMD) between risedronate IR on awakening and DR following breakfast. Mean percent changes in (L₂-L₄) BMD at M12, LOCF were 5.07% (IR at awakening, n = 190), 3.36% (25 mg DR following breakfast, n = 194), and 4.11% (37.5 mg DR following breakfast, n = 181). Mean percent change in (L₂-L₄) BMD was numerically lower in the DR following breakfast groups versus the respective on awakening and 30 min after breakfast DR groups. Overall incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between groups. In the DR groups, 1.5-4.0% of patients reported TEAEs potentially associated with acute-phase reactions versus 0% in the IR group. In this study, non-inferiority could not be declared for 37.5 or 25 mg DR following breakfast QM (p = 0.1346 or p = 0.6711, respectively) versus 2.5 mg IR on awakening QD.

Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

This study examined patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in real-world settings.

METHODS

A systematic review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database NHS EED) databases were searched for studies published in English language up to April 2018. Prospective and retrospective observational studies that used prescription claim databases or hospital medical records to examine patient adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonate treatment among adults with osteoporosis were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

The search yielded 540 published studies, of which 89 were deemed relevant and were included in this review. The mean age of patients included within the studies ranged between 53 to 80.8 years, and the follow-up varied from 3 months to 14 years. The mean persistence of oral bisphosphonates for 6 months, 1 year and 2 years ranged from 34.8% to 71.3%, 17.7% to 74.8% and 12.9% to 72.0%, respectively. The mean medication possession ratio ranged from 28.2% to 84.5%, 23% to 50%, 27.2% to 46% over 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. All studies included scored between 6 to 8 out of 9 on the NOS. The determinants of adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates included geographic residence, marital status, tobacco use, educational status, income, hospitalisation, medication type and dosing frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

While a number of studies reported high levels of persistence and adherence, the findings of this review suggest that patient persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates medications was poor and reduced notably over time. Overall, adherence was suboptimal. To maximise adherence and persistence to oral bisphosphonates, it is important to consider possible determinants, including characteristics of the patients.

Medication persistence and risk of fracture among female Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with osteoporosis

We examined the relationship between persistent osteoporosis medication use and fracture risk among female Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with osteoporosis using Medicare claims, 2009-2012. Persistent use was associated with reduced risk of fracture and significantly lower total health care costs in the follow-up period. Results were consistent using different analytical methods.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to examine the relationship between medication persistence and fracture risk among female Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with osteoporosis.

METHODS

Elderly female Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with osteoporosis and initiated on osteoporosis medication January 1, 2009-June 30, 2011, were included. Persistent medication use was defined as continuous use (no gap ≥ 60 days) for 1 year or longer. The key outcome was fragility fracture. A difference-in-difference analysis was performed at the log scale of fracture rate using a Poisson regression model with months 1-6 before medication initiation as the pre-initiation period and up to 18 months after as the post-initiation period. Total health care costs were compared using a similar approach. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using different pre- and post-initiation periods.

RESULTS

The study included 294,369 patients; 32.9% were persistent osteoporosis medication users and 67.1% non-persistent (< 12 months continuous use). Fracture incidence rates were 16.2 per 100 patient-years pre-initiation and 4.1 post-initiation for persistent users; corresponding rates for non-persistent users were 19.0 and 7.3 per 100 patient-years. The adjusted post-/pre-initiation fracture rate ratios were 0.284 for persistent and 0.411 for non-persistent users. The ratio of the two rate ratios was 0.692 (persistent vs. non-persistent, p < 0.0001), suggesting a significantly greater fracture rate reduction for persistent users. Adjusted cost ratios were significantly lower for persistent users. Sensitivity analyses results were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent use of osteoporosis medications was associated with reduced risk of fracture and significantly lower total health care costs. Payers and patients would benefit from interventions aimed at improving medication persistence.

Impact of bisphosphonate compliance on the risk of osteoporotic fracture in France

Limited information is available on the impact of bisphosphonate compliance levels on fracture risk in osteoporosis patients in France. The results of this nested case-control, retrospective study suggest that fracture risk did not significantly change with bisphosphonate compliance levels, except for highly compliant patients.

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION

This was the first study conducted in France to evaluate the impact of compliance levels for bisphosphonates, the most frequently prescribed first-line anti-osteoporotic treatment, on fracture risk.

METHODS

This retrospective nested case-control study included patients ≥ 50 years old, who were recorded in a random sample of French claims data, did not die between 2006 and 2013, and received ≥ 1 reimbursement for anti-osteoporotic treatment between 2007 and 2013. Cases (patients hospitalised for osteoporosis-related fractures) were matched to 1-3 controls (patients hospitalised for other reasons). Patients hospitalised for fractures within 12 months preceding the first delivery of anti-osteoporotic treatment or during the first 24 months of follow-up were excluded. Bisphosphonate compliance during the 24 months preceding hospitalisation was calculated by the Continuous measure of Medication Acquisition version 7 (CMA7). We evaluated the impact of bisphosphonate compliance (CMA7 ≥ 80%) and very good compliance levels (CMA7 > 90%) on fracture risk.

RESULTS

In the main analysis, the mean CMA7 values during the 24 months preceding hospitalisation were 48.4% for the 434 cases and 51.3% for the 1123 age-matched controls. An adjusted conditional logistic regression showed no significant impact (odds ratio: 0.851 [95% confidence interval: 0.668, 1.084]) of bisphosphonate compliance on fracture occurrence. In the sensitivity analysis, including one randomly selected control per case and only controls with CMA7 values > 90%, occurrence of fractures was lower (odds ratio: 0.741 [95% confidence interval: 0.608, 0.903]) among the 119 controls.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study suggested that very high levels of compliance with bisphosphonates are necessary to induce significant decreases in fracture risk.

Comparison of Osteoporosis Pharmacotherapy Fracture Rates: Analysis of a MarketScan® Claims Database Cohort

BACKGROUND

Several different classes of medications have been shown to be efficacious at preventing fractures in patients with osteoporosis. No study has compared real world efficacy at preventing fractures between all currently approved medications.

OBJECTIVES

To directly compare the efficacy of all currently available osteoporosis medications by using a large population claims database.

METHODS

The Truven Health Analytics MarketScan^® database from 2008 - 2012 was used to identify all patients who started a new osteoporosis medication. Patients who experienced a fracture after at least 12 months of treatment were identified and risk factors for fracture for all patients were recorded. Logistic regression was used to account for and quantify the contribution of risk factors, and to make direct comparisons between different osteoporosis medications.

RESULTS

A total of 51649 patients were included in the cohort, with an average age of 56 years. The overall incidence rate of fracture was 1.55 per 100 person - years of treatment. Orally administered medications had the lowest fracture rates, led by raloxifene and alendronate (1.24 and 1.54 respectively), while parenterally administered medications including teriparatide and zolerdonic acid had the highest rates (3.90 and 1.98 respectively). No statistically significant differences found between oral or parenterally administered bisphosphonate medications.

CONCLUSIONS

While patients taking orally administered drugs including bisphosphonates had less frequent incident fracture no statistically significant differences were found between most drugs in head - to - head comparisons, even considering the route of administration of bisphosphonates. These findings support previous evidence that minimal differences in efficacy exist between different osteoporosis medications. This is the first study using a large database to compare all currently available osteoporosis treatments and will hopefully be augmented by further study to provide more evidence to make clinical decisions on osteoporosis medication use.

Safety and efficacy of denosumab in osteoporotic patients previously treated with other medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that received approval by the FDA for the treatment of osteoporosis in 2010. Available higher level research evidence concerns the treatment of patients that have not received any anti-osteoporotic medication in the past. Further investigation is warranted, since clinicians often face the challenge of administering the most efficacious drug in patients, pretreated with other medications.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab compared to other active anti-osteoporotic agents in patients formerly receiving other treatments. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) and clinicaltrials.gov up to April 2017 to identify eligible trials in patients with primary osteoporosis.

EXPERT OPINION

Our meta-analysis included 6 Randomised Controlled Trials encompassing 2968 patients formerly treated with anti-osteoporotic medications. Quantitative data synthesis demonstrated superiority of denosumab in augmenting Bone Mineral Density in all skeletal sites studied compared to controls [treatment difference in total hip: 1.59% (95% CI 1.01, 2.17)], whereas the overall incidence of serious adverse events was not increased (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.47, p = 0.42). Future research geared towards the fracture incidence, quality of life and patient reported outcomes is warranted.

[Experience in using Prolia in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in clinical practice]

AIM

To evaluate the efficiency and safety of long-term Prolia therapy in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (OP).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The open prospective study enrolled 98 women (mean age, 68±9 years; mean menopause duration, 17±4 years) with postmenopausal OP, who were followed up in an outpatient setting at the National Medical Research Center for Preventive Medicine and who had been treated with denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 12 months or more. The maximum follow-up period was 4 years: 48, 29, 11, and 10 patients were treated for 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The patients were allocated into 2 groups: those who received and those who had not previously received antiosteoporotic therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual-energy X-ray densitometry of the lumbar spine (L_I-L_IV) and proximal femur (PF). The ten-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures was estimated once in 72 patients not previously receiving antiosteoporotic therapy before the prescription of denosumab.

RESULTS

In the patients not previously receiving therapy, the median 10-year probability of major fractures using the FRAX algorithm was 14.9%; that of femoral neck (FN) fractures was 3.7%. During denosumab treatment, the BMD increase in the lumbar spine was 4.2% at 12 months, 7.5% at 24 months, was 8.8% at 36 months; that in FN was 3.1, 3.9, and 5.3%, that in PF was 2.8, 4.1, and 5%; and that in the 1/3 forearm was 0.9, 1.4, and 2.6%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the persons receiving and not previously receiving the therapy, the BMD increase was similar, i.e. there was an additional positive effect when switching to denosumab. The decrease in the serum concentration of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) was 54% at 6 months after initiation of denosumab therapy (p < 0.001) and 72% at 12 months (p<0.001); and the achieved marker level remained unchanged at 48 months. Transition from the OP zone to osteopenia one was noted in 23 patients with low BMD (T-score -2.5 SD) in L_I-L_II and in 12 patients with that in FN at 12 months of denosumab therapy and this was in 25 patients at 24 months. Nine-eight patients receiving the first Prolia injection refused to continue treatment on their own; adverse events were not the reason for drug discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with denosumab was effective in increasing BMD in routine outpatient practice and in allowing 25% of patients to achieve target values of this indicator. The marked decrease in the level of the bone resorption marker STX suggested that the drug had antiresorptive potency. The frequency of adverse reactions was low, confirming the good tolerability and safety profile of the drug. The convenience of the scheme and route of drug administration contributed to strict compliance with the doctor's recommendations. Denosumab was effective in increasing BMD not only in untreated patients, but also in those who had previously received antiosteoporotic therapy. The pharmacokinetic characteristics of denosumab, which contribute to its uniform distribution in trabecular and cortical bone tissue, regardless of active bone remodeling, and the fact that the clearance of the drug is independent of kidney function offer an advantage of administering the drug to patients with significant loss of FN and radius BMD and of reducing kidney function.

The impact of GI events on persistence and adherence to osteoporosis treatment: 3-, 6-, and 12-month findings in the MUSIC-OS study

The goal of this multinational, prospective, observational study was to examine the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported levels of medication adherence and persistence in postmenopausal women. A total of 73.9% of patients remained on their osteoporosis (OP) therapy at month 12, although the presence of a GI event at baseline, month 3, and month 6 significantly reduced month 12 persistence among new users. The odds of a month-12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6. The occurrence of GI events was observed to be associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence and persistence to OP medication.

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the relationship between gastrointestinal (GI) events and self-reported adherence and persistence with initial osteoporosis (OP) therapy over the course of the first 12 months of treatment.

METHODS

The Medication Use Patterns, Treatment Satisfaction, and Inadequate Control of Osteoporosis Study was a multinational, prospective, observational study examining the impact of GI events on OP management in postmenopausal women. Information regarding GI events was collected at the time of enrollment and at months 3, 6, and 12 of follow-up. Patients reported GI events and medication persistence and completed the 12-item Adherence Evaluation of Osteoporosis treatment (ADEOS) questionnaire. Multivariate logistic and general linear models examined the association between GI events at various time points and persistence and adherence at month 12.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 2943 women; 22.8% were classified as new users of OP therapy and the remainder were considered experienced users. Across all patients, 68.1% reported GI events at baseline; by month 12, over 80% of subjects who completed follow-up reported at least one GI problem. The majority of patients (86.7%) were treated only with bisphosphonates at baseline. At month 12, 73.9% of patients remained on therapy; logistic regression revealed that those with GI problems by month 6 were significantly less likely to persist with treatment, after adjusting for other factors. The odds of a month 12 ADEOS score ≥ 20 (considered predictive of adherence) were significantly lower among patients who experienced a GI event between baseline and month 6.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of GI events was associated with a lower likelihood of patient adherence to and persistence with OP medication.

Medication-taking behaviour in Bulgarian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab or monthly oral bisphosphonates

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is critical for fracture risk reduction. This observational study evaluated medication-taking behaviour of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis receiving denosumab or oral ibandronate in real-world clinical practice in Bulgaria. Compared with ibandronate, densoumab was associated with a lower discontinuation rate and greater increases in bone mineral density.

PURPOSE

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is critical for fracture risk reduction and the effectiveness of such treatments may be reduced by low persistence. Alternative therapies such as denosumab may improve persistence. This study aimed to describe medication-taking behaviour in women with osteoporosis, prescribed denosumab or oral ibandronate, in Bulgarian clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicentre chart review (with up to 24 months follow-up) enrolled postmenopausal women initiating 6-monthly denosumab injection or monthly oral ibandronate treatment for osteoporosis between 1 October 2011 and 30 September 2012.

RESULTS

Overall, 441 women were enrolled (224 had initiated denosumab, 217 had initiated ibandronate). At baseline, more women in the denosumab group than in the ibandronate group had a previous fracture (25.5 vs 17.5%; p = 0.043) and past exposure to osteoporosis therapy (19.6 vs 12.0%; p = 0.028). At 24 months, 4.5% of women receiving denosumab had discontinued therapy compared with 56.2% of women receiving ibandronate. Median time to discontinuation was longer in the denosumab group (729 days; interquartile range (IQR), 728.3-729.0) than in the ibandronate group (367 days; IQR, 354.0-484.8; p < 0.001). At 24 months, there were significantly greater changes in BMD T-scores at the lumbar spine (p < 0.001) and femoral neck (p < 0.001) in patients receiving denosumab than in those receiving ibandronate. At 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 98.7%.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study demonstrates there is a low discontinuation rate and high persistence with denosumab. Denosumab was associated with greater BMD increases than ibandronate, which could reduce fracture risk.

Two-year persistence and compliance with osteoporosis therapies among postmenopausal women in a commercially insured population in the United States

This retrospective, observational study assessed 2-year persistence and compliance by treatment, route of administration, and dosing frequency in postmenopausal women initiating a new osteoporosis therapy. Two-year persistence and compliance rates were higher in women receiving injectables compared with oral agents.

PURPOSE

This study extends previous studies limited to 1-year follow-up by examining persistence with osteoporosis therapies over a 2-year period and compares short- and long-term trends in persistence and compliance among postmenopausal women with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance in the USA.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study enrolled women ≥50 years newly initiating osteoporosis therapy between January 1 and December 31, 2012 (i.e., the index date), with continuous enrollment ≥14 months before and ≥24 months after their index date. Persistence (continuous therapy without a >60-day gap) and compliance with the index therapy were evaluated at 2 years of follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the odds of persistence and compliance across treatment and dosing regimens.

RESULTS

This study included 43,543 patients with mean (standard deviation) age 65 (10) years. At 2 years of follow-up, persistence and compliance were higher for patients treated with injectable agents (ranging from 34 to 41%, excluding an every-3-month injection) than those treated with oral agents (ranging from 20 to 31%). Additionally, patients initiating oral bisphosphonates (except risedronate once daily), raloxifene (daily), or zoledronic acid (annually) had significantly lower odds of persistence compared with denosumab (every 6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients initiating injectable therapies had greater persistence and compliance at 2 years than those initiating oral therapies. Patients initiating an every-6-month injection had significantly higher persistence compared with those initiating more frequently dosed (e.g., daily and weekly) oral or injectable agents.

One and two-year persistence with different anti-osteoporosis medications: a retrospective cohort study

Adherence to anti-osteoporosis medications is poor. We carried out a cohort study using a real-world population database to estimate the persistence of anti-osteoporosis drugs. Unadjusted 2-year persistence ranged from 10.3 to 45.4%. Denosumab users had a 40% lower risk of discontinuation at 2 years compared to alendronate users.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to estimate real-world persistence amongst incident users of anti-osteoporosis medications.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort using data from anonymised records and dispensation data ( www.sidiap.org ). Eligibility comprised the following: women aged ≥50, incident users of anti-osteoporosis medication (2012), with data available for at least 12 months prior to therapy initiation. Exclusions are other bone diseases/treatments and uncommon anti-osteoporosis drugs (N < 100). Follow-up was from first pharmacy dispensation until cessation, end of study, censoring or switching. Outcomes are 2- and 1-year persistence with a permissible gap of up to 90 days. Persistence with alendronate was compared to other bisphosphonates, strontium ranelate, selective oestrogen receptor modulators, teriparatide and denosumab. Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios of therapy cessation according to drug used after adjustment for age, sex, BMI, smoking, alcohol drinking, Charlson co-morbidity index, previous fractures, use of anti-osteoporosis medication/s, oral corticosteroids and socio-economic status.

RESULTS

A total of 19,253 women were included. Unadjusted 2-year persistence [95% CI] ranged from 10.3% [9.1-11.6%] (strontium ranelate) to 45.4% [43.1-47.8%] (denosumab). One-year persistence went from 35.8% [33.9%-37.7%] (strontium ranelate) to 65.8% [63.6%-68.0%] (denosumab). At the end of the first year and compared to alendronate users, both teriparatide and denosumab users had reduced cessation risk (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.86 and 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.59 respectively) while at the end of the second year, only denosumab had a lower risk of discontinuation (adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.56-0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Unadjusted 2-year persistence is suboptimal. However, both teriparatide and denosumab users had better 1-year persistence and only denosumab had 2-year better persistence compared to alendronate users. Unmeasured confounding by indication might partially explain our findings.

Adherence and persistence of patients using oral bone sparing drugs in primary care

AIM

Studies based on pharmacy medication records have shown suboptimal adherence and persistence of osteoporosis treatment with oral bone sparing drugs (OBSD). Little is known about adherence and persistence of OBSD treatment in primary care. We assessed adherence and persistence of OBSD use of patients in general practices and identified associated factors.

METHODS

Using electronic medical records, adherence and persistence of newly prescribed treatment with OBSD in patients from 16 general practices was retrospectively assessed. The Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) was calculated as a proxy for adherence (MPR > 75%), persistence rates were estimated using survival analysis. Determinants of adherence and persistence using logistic regression and Cox regression analysis were assessed.

RESULTS

OBSD treatment was initiated in 957 patients. Seventy-five percent and 45% of the patients persisted OBSD treatment for one and five years, respectively. Being adherent in the first year decreased the risk of long-term non-persistence [hazard ratio (HR) 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.57; P < 0.001]. Patients receiving the majority of their prescriptions by a specialist tended to be more non-persistent (HR 1.37; 96%; CI 0.96-1.94; P = 0.08). Adherence was 62.5% in the first year and 60.8% in the overall treatment period. Non-adherence was associated with the specialist being the main prescriber [odds ratio (OR) 3.76; 95% CI 2.43-5.82; P < 0.001] and younger age (<65 years, OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.01-2.08; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Older age of the patients and the GP prescribing the majority of medication were associated with better adherence and persistence. Good adherence in the first prescription year was associated with better persistence.

Very high frequency of fragility fractures associated with high-dose glucocorticoids in postmenopausal women: A retrospective study

Purpose To evaluate the incidence of fragility fractures associated with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy in patients with systemic rheumatic disease.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who were treated with high-dose prednisolone (> 0.8 mg/kg) for systemic rheumatic disease at Kobe University Hospital from April 1988 to March 2012. The primary outcome was a major osteoporotic fracture (defined as a clinical vertebral, hip, forearm, or proximal humerus fracture) after high-dose glucocorticoid therapy. For postmenopausal women and men over 40 of age, the patient's fracture risk at the beginning of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy was assessed by the World Health Organization's Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®). Results Of 229 patients (median age: 49 years), 57 suffered a fragility fracture during the observation period (median observation period: 1558 days). Of 84 premenopausal patients, 5 suffered a fracture. In contrast, of 86 postmenopausal female, 36 suffered a fracture. Fragility fractures were far more frequent than predicted by the FRAX® score. Patients with FRAX® scores over 8.3% had a particularly high risk of fracture. Conclusions Fragility fractures associated with high-dose glucocorticoid therapy are common among postmenopausal women. Extreme care should be taken especially for postmenopausal women when high-dose glucocorticoid therapy is required.

Compliance and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Poor adherence with oral bisphosphonates (BPs) can mitigate their therapeutic benefit for osteoporosis and is a significant clinical burden. Most previous studies regarding adherence with oral BPs have focused on postmenopausal osteoporosis, but little attention has been given to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Thus, we investigated compliance and persistence with oral BPs in the treatment of osteoporosis and analyzed risk factors for poor adherence in female patients with (RA) in real setting.

Methods

This is a retrospective longitudinal study including 396 female patients with RA in whom oral BPs were newly initiated from Aug 2004 to Aug 2014 at a university rheumatology center in South Korea. Compliance was quantified using the 1-year medication possession ratio (MPR), while persistence was defined as duration from the initiation to the end of BPs therapy without interruption exceeding 56 days. Seropositve RA was defined as having a positive test result for the presence of either rheumatoid factor or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody.

Results

Of 396 RA patients, 221 (55.8%) were prescribed risedronate 35 mg weekly; 17 (4.3%) received alendronate 70 mg weekly; and 158 (39.9%) received ibandronate 150 mg monthly. The 1-year MPR was 70.1% and the proportion of RA patients with the 1-year MPR ≥ 0.8 was 60.1%. A total of 274 (69.2%) patients discontinued oral BPs during the study period and persistence with BPs was 63.3% at 1 year, 50.7% at 2 years and 33.3% at 3 years. The most common cause of non-persistence was adverse events (47.5%), followed by poor health literacy (40.5%) and cost (12%). Both compliance and persistence with monthly oral BPs were significantly lower than those with weekly regimens (OR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.59–3.89, P < 0.001 and HR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.69–2.83, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, patients with seropositive RA showed better compliance and persistence with BPs compared with their seronegative counterparts.

Conclusions

Compliance and persistence with oral BPs in RA patients were suboptimal in real practice, thereby limiting the efficacy of osteoporosis treatment. Extending the dosing interval of BPs may improve medication adherence in RA patients.

Intravenous Zoledronic Acid 5 mg on Bone Turnover Markers and Bone Mineral Density in East China Subjects with Newly Diagnosed Osteoporosis: A 24-month Clinical Study

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessed the necessity of early intervention, safety and efficacy of intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg/year in East China women with newly diagnosed osteoporosis at high risk of fracture during a 24-month treatment period.

METHODS

Subjects (57 [52-62] years old) were randomized 3:2 to zoledronic acid versus placebo (randomized at baseline, zoledronic acid [175 cases], placebo-zoledronic acid [110 cases]). The bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and total hip was measured every 6 months with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Serum procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) and serum C-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) levels were measured every 6 months. The primary end point was the rate of change in the bone mineral density at the posteroanterior spine.

RESULTS

For subjects with measurements at 24 months, zoledronic acid significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (mean percent change ± SD, zoledronic acid 5.390% ± 0.854% versus placebo-zoledronic acid -1.038% ± 0.599%), the total hip (zoledronic acid 1.900% ± 0.262% versus placebo-zoledronic acid -1.631% ± 0.649%). Serum procollagen I N-terminal pro-peptide (PINP) and CTX decreased rapidly with zoledronic acid 5 mg treatment (P < 0.001 versus placebo at 6 month and 24 months) and changed from baseline in the zoledronic acid 5 mg and placebo-zoledronic acid 5 mg at 6 months by a mean of -66.348% and -75.375%, respectively (P < 0.001), and at 24 months by -49.950% and -52.325%, respectively (P < 0.001). No cases of serious adverse events were observed in two groups. Headache, pyrexia and myalgia occurred more commonly within the first 3 days after infusion with zoledronic acid 5 mg than with placebo (13.7% versus 2.1%, P = 0.0018; 28.0% versus 3.2%, P < 0.001; 21.7% versus 4.2%, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that early application of zoledronic acid 5 mg/year was well stimulated and tolerated for bone mass in newly diagnosed east china subjects with osteoporosis in a 24-month treatment.

Early drug use of dapagliflozin prescribed by general practitioners and diabetologists in Germany

OBJECTIVES

Dapagliflozin is an inhibitor of the human sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) that has been shown to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and treatment patterns of dapagliflozin users in comparison to users of other anti-diabetic (AD) treatments in Germany.

METHODS

Data from patients with T2DM initiating at least one prescription for dapagliflozin or other AD therapy between November 2012 and April 2014 were collected from the IMS German Disease Analyzer database.

RESULTS

The use of dapagliflozin combination therapy (n=1034; 74%) was more common than monotherapy (n=371; 26%). In comparison with other AD therapy users, a higher percentage of dapagliflozin users were ⩽64years of age (62.3% vs. 36.4%), and a higher proportion were male (59.1% vs. 53.6%). The average duration of diabetes was comparable between dapagliflozin patients and other AD therapy users (5.7yearsvs. 5.5years), however higher levels of HbA1c were found in dapagliflozin users (8.2% (66mmol/mol) vs. 7.5% (58mmol/mol). For the vast majority (71.5% of 10mg dapagliflozin users and 88.9% of 5mg users), dapagliflozin was prescribed in combination with other AD therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients starting on dapagliflozin differed in several demographic and health-related respects to patients starting another AD therapy during the same period. Dapagliflozin was predominantly used as a component of combination therapy, adding on to existing therapy. After initiation, switching to other AD treatments or adding to therapy was comparatively rare during the first year.

The impact of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on fracture risk: a case-control study from the UK

There has been concerning about women receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception because of the prolonged hypoestrogenemic state regarding the potential negative effects on bone health. This study showed that DMPA exposure is associated with increased fracture risk and that fracture risk increases with longer DMPA exposure.

INTRODUCTION

DMPA has been associated with impaired bone mineral acquisition during adolescence and accelerated bone loss in later life. We performed this large population-based study to assess the association between use of DMPA or combined oral contraceptives and the incident risk of fracture.

METHODS

We identified 4189 women between 20 and 44 years of age with a first-time fracture diagnosis, matched them with 4189 random controls using the Disease Analyzer database and investigated the relation with DMPA exposure.

RESULTS

Overall, 11 % of the fracture cases and 7.7 % of the controls had DMPA use recorded. The adjusted OR for developing a fracture in patients with current use of DMPA compared to non-users was 0.97 (95 % CI 0.51-1.86), 2.41 (95 % CI 1.42-4.08), and 1.46 (95 % CI 0.96-2.23) for 1-2, 3-9, and ≥10 prescriptions, respectively. The adjusted OR for developing a fracture in patients with past use of DMPA compared to non-users was 0.96 (95 % CI 0.73-1.26), 1.14 (95 % CI 0.86-1.51), and 1.55 (95 % CI 1.07-2.27) for 1-2, 3-9, and ≥10 prescriptions, respectively. The highest fracture risk was identified in young patients less than 30 years with longer DMPA exposure (≥10 prescriptions; OR 3.04, 95 % CI 1.36-6.81), as well as in patients in the late reproductive years with past use of DMPA (OR 1.72, 95 % CI 1.13-2.63).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that DMPA exposure is associated with increased fracture risk and may have negative effects on bone metabolism, resulting in impaired bone mineral acquisition during adolescence and accelerated bone loss in adult life.

Exploring methods for comparing the real-world effectiveness of treatments for osteoporosis: adjusted direct comparisons versus using patients as their own control

Using Swedish and Dutch registry data for women initiating bisphosphonates, we evaluated two methods of comparing the real-world effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments that attempt to adjust for differences in patient baseline characteristics. Each method has advantages and disadvantages; both are potential complements to clinical trial analyses.

PURPOSE

We evaluated methods of comparing the real-world effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments that attempt to adjust for both observed and unobserved confounding.

METHODS

Swedish and Dutch registry data for women initiating zoledronate or oral bisphosphonates (OBPs; alendronate/risedronate) were used; the primary outcome was fracture. In adjusted direct comparisons (ADCs), regression and matching techniques were used to account for baseline differences in known risk factors for fracture (e.g., age, previous fracture, comorbidities). In an own-control analysis (OCA), for each treatment, fracture incidence in the first 90 days following treatment initiation (the baseline risk period) was compared with fracture incidence in the 1-year period starting 91 days after treatment initiation (the treatment exposure period).

RESULTS

In total, 1196 and 149 women initiating zoledronate and 14,764 and 25,058 initiating OBPs were eligible in the Swedish and Dutch registries, respectively. Owing to the small Dutch zoledronate sample, only the Swedish data were used to compare fracture incidences between treatment groups. ADCs showed a numerically higher fracture incidence in the zoledronate than in the OBPs group (hazard ratio 1.09-1.21; not statistically significant, p > 0.05). For both treatment groups, OCA showed a higher fracture incidence in the baseline risk period than in the treatment exposure period, indicating a treatment effect. OCA showed a similar or greater effect in the zoledronate group compared with the OBPs group.

CONCLUSIONS

ADC and OCA each possesses advantages and disadvantages. Combining both methods may provide an estimate of real-world treatment efficacy that could potentially complement clinical trial findings.

Factors associated with high 24-month persistence with denosumab: results of a real-world, non-interventional study of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium

Persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium found that persistence with denosumab remains consistently high after 24 months in patients at high risk of fracture.

PURPOSE

Continued persistence with osteoporosis therapy is vital for fracture prevention. This non-interventional study of clinical practice evaluated medication-taking behavior of postmenopausal women receiving denosumab in Germany, Austria, Greece, and Belgium and factors influencing persistence.

METHODS

Subcutaneous denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) was assigned according to prescribing information and local guidelines before and independently of enrollment; outcomes were recorded during routine practice for up to 24 months. Persistence was defined as receiving the subsequent injection within 6 months + 8 weeks of the previous injection and adherence as administration of subsequent injections within 6 months ± 4 weeks of the previous injection. Medication coverage ratio (MCR) was calculated as the proportion of time a patient was covered by denosumab. Associations between pre-specified baseline covariates and 24-month persistence were assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The 24-month analyses included 1479 women (mean age 66.3-72.5 years) from 140 sites; persistence with denosumab was 75.1-86.0%, adherence 62.9-70.1%, and mean MCR 87.4-92.4%. No covariate had a significant effect on persistence across all four countries. For three countries, a recent fall decreased persistence; patients were generally older with chronic medical conditions. In some countries, other covariates (e.g., older age, comorbidity, immobility, and prescribing reasons) decreased persistence. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 2.3-6.9% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four-month persistence with denosumab is consistently high among postmenopausal women in Europe and may be influenced by patient characteristics. Further studies are needed to identify determinants of low persistence.

Cost and health care resource use associated with noncompliance with oral bisphosphonate therapy: an analysis using Danish health registries

We estimated the rate of compliance with oral bisphosphonates among Danish women and examined its association with health care resource use and cost. Approximately 30 % of Danish females aged >55 who take bisphosphonates are noncompliant, and noncompliance is significantly associated with increased health care resource use and cost.

INTRODUCTION

Two objectives of this study were to estimate the rate of oral bisphosphonate compliance among Danish women and to examine the association of noncompliance with health care resource use and cost.

METHODS

Women ≥55 with an index prescription claim for an oral bisphosphonate were identified from Danish national health registries between 2003 and 2008. Compliance was measured as the medication possession ratio (MPR) during the first 12 months post-index. Cost and health care resource use were collected for the following 12 months.

RESULTS

Among the 38,234 women meeting the study inclusion criteria, 29.9 % were noncompliant (MPR <70 %). Younger age was associated with higher odds of compliance (OR [95 % CI] 1.22 [1.15-1.29] for ages 55-64 and 1.18 [1.12-1.24] for ages 65-74; reference age group ≥75 years). Rates of all-cause health care resource use were significantly higher in noncompliant subjects: 28.9 versus 23.0 % had inpatient admissions, 16.5 versus 13.0 % had emergency room visits, and 48.7 versus 43.3 % used outpatient services (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The total mean (SD) all-cause cost per patient (excluding office visits) was €626 (2344) and €4178 (7854), respectively. The mean (SD) osteoporosis-related cost per patient (excluding office visits) was €572 (2085) and €754 (2857) for compliant and non-compliant subjects, respectively. The compliant subjects accrued significantly lower all-cause and OP-related cost than noncompliant subjects, regardless of whether the total cost or medical cost only was considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 30 % of Danish females aged 55 or older who take bisphosphonates are noncompliant. Noncompliance is significantly associated with increased health care resource use and cost.

Favorable therapeutic response of osteoporosis patients to treatment with intravenous zoledronate compared with oral alendronate

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy of orally-administered alendronate compared with intravenously-administered zoledronate.

Methods:

This prospective study was carried out at Barts Health HNS Trust between April 2010 and March 2012. This study compares changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in 234 patients treated with 2 bisphosphonates: alendronate taken orally, and zoledronate administered intravenously. One hundred and eighteen patients received alendronate at 70 mg/week, while 116 patients received zoledronate once annually. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry was used to measure BMD of the left hip and anterior-posterior spine (lumbar L1-L4) skeletal sites at baseline, and at one-, and 2-years post-treatment.

Results:

This study provides evidence that lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.6% in patients receiving alendronate, and 5.7% in patients receiving zoledronate after 2 years compared with baseline values (p=0.0001 for both). Total hip BMD decreased in patients treated with alendronate by 0.4% but increased in patients receiving zoledronate by 0.8% (p=0.0001).

Conclusion:

This study provides evidence that zoledronate is more effective than alendronate in treating patients with osteoporosis and with no gastrointestinal (GI) serious side effects. Furthermore, zoledronate appears to have the added advantage of a better safety profile in patients suffering from GI intolerance of oral bisphosphonates.

[Compliance of osteoporosis patients with additional specific osteoporosis-training course]

BACKGROUND

In the present study patients with an osteoporotic fracture were examined in order to determine how many patients decided to continue their therapy as outpatients having taken part in osteoporosis training at the Dr. Becker Rhein-Sieg Clinic.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had previously suffered an osteoporotic fracture and thereafter received inpatient rehabilitation were selected for the study. Patients (n = 95) who had taken part in inpatient rehabilitation after an osteoporotic fracture were approached either via telephone or mail and were then followed up after 6 and 12 months with regard to their adherence to the treatment.

RESULTS

From a total of 95 patients, after 6 months 82 % (n = 78) were contacted successfully and included in the study. 68 out of 78 patients (72 %) had continued their medication. After 1 year 76 % of patients (n = 72) were successfully contacted once. Here, 62 % of patients (n = 59) had continued their medication under medical supervision. In the 1‑year follow-up period there were eight cases of falls, and one of these resulted in a peripheral fracture, which was treated conservatively.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis-specific information and osteoporosis training of patients after osteoporotic fracture are important tools to improve the motivation and compliance of patients. One possibility to realize this is osteoporosis-specific training with video presentations and individual care and education of the patients within outpatient or inpatient rehabilitation.

GRAND-4: the German retrospective analysis of long-term persistence in women with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates or denosumab

This retrospective database study assessed 2-year persistence with bisphosphonates or denosumab in a large German cohort of women with a first-time prescription for osteoporosis treatment. Compared with intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, 2-year persistence was 1.5-2 times higher and risk of discontinuation was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) with denosumab.

INTRODUCTION

Persistence with osteoporosis therapies is critical for fracture risk reduction. Detailed data on long-term persistence (≥2 years) with bisphosphonates and denosumab are sparse.

METHODS

From the German IMS® database, we included women aged 40 years or older with a first-time prescription for bisphosphonates or denosumab between July 2010 and August 2014; patients were followed up until December 2014. The main outcome was treatment discontinuation, with a 60-day permissible gap between filled prescriptions. Two-year persistence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with treatment discontinuation as the failure event. Denosumab was compared with intravenous (i.v.) and oral bisphosphonates separately. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) for the 2-year risk of discontinuation were calculated, with adjustment for age, physician specialty, health insurance status, and previous medication use.

RESULTS

Two-year persistence with denosumab was significantly higher than with i.v. or oral bisphosphonates (39.8 % [n = 21,154] vs 20.9 % [i.v. ibandronate; n = 20,472] and 24.8 % [i.v. zoledronic acid; n = 3966] and 16.7-17.5 % [oral bisphosphonates; n = 114,401]; all P < 0.001). Patients receiving i.v. ibandronate, i.v. zoledronic acid, or oral bisphosphonates had a significantly increased risk of treatment discontinuation than did those receiving denosumab (HR = 1.65, 1.28, and 1.96-2.02, respectively; all P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year persistence with denosumab was 1.5-2 times higher than with i.v. or oral bisphosphonates, and risk of discontinuation was significantly lower with denosumab than with bisphosphonates. A more detailed understanding of factors affecting medication-taking behavior may improve persistence and thereby reduce rates of fracture.

Role of Side Effects, Physician Involvement, and Patient Perception in Non-Adherence with Oral Bisphosphonates

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of osteoporosis therapy are compromised by low adherence, thus requiring a better understanding of its barriers and unmet needs. The objective of this study was to assess reasons for non-adherence with oral bisphosphonates among osteoporotic women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional patient survey of women who initiated therapy with risedronate or alendronate between the years 2010 and 2012 were non-adherent [Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) <70%] or switched therapy within the first year. Survey participants were identified using Maccabi Health Services computerized database. Patients who gave informed consent completed a 20-min telephonic survey, assessing reasons for discontinuation or switching, including physician involvement, side effects, administration regimen, perceptions of bone health, and medications' efficacy.

RESULTS

The study population included 493 females (mean age = 66 ± 7) of whom 40% discontinued all anti-osteoporotic therapy (mean MPR = 19%), 9% remained on initial therapy (mean MPR = 47%), and 51% switched therapy (mean MPR = 62%). Family history, fracture history, socioeconomic status, and index drug class and frequency were similar in all groups. The most common reasons for switching or discontinuation of the first-line therapy were gastrointestinal side effects, such as heartburn, acid reflux or other (40.0%), and physician recommendation (26.7%). The major reasons for complete discontinuation of therapy were side effects (26.9%) and physician recommendation (20.0%). Perceived low importance was more commonly mentioned than high cost of medication (14% vs. 3%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of low tolerability to non-adherence with osteoporosis therapy and underlines poor patients' awareness and sub-optimal physicians' involvement in conveying the importance of this therapy.

FUNDING

Merck & Co Inc.

Can Alarming Improve Compliance with Weekly Bisphosphonate in Patients with Osteoporosis?

Background

Although bisphosphonate is effective for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, poor medication compliance is a key-limiting factor. We determined whether alarm clock could improve compliance with weekly bisphosphonate in patients with osteoporosis, by comparing with age- and gender-matched control group.

Methods

Fifty patients with osteoporosis were recruited and participated in alarm clock group. Patients were asked to take orally weekly risedronate for 1 year, and received alarm clock to inform the time of taking oral bisphosphonate weekly. Using the propensity score matching with age and gender, 50 patients were identified from patients with osteoporosis medication. We compared the compliance with bisphosphonate using medication possession ratio (MPR) between two groups.

Results

Although there was no significant difference of baseline characteristics between both groups, the mean MPR (0.80±0.33) of alarm clock group was higher than that (0.56±0.34) of control group (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Alarming could improve the compliance with weekly oral bisphosphonate in patients with osteoporosis.

Which Bisphosphonate? It's the Compliance!: Decision Analysis

Background

The best options of several bisphosphonates for prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women remain controversial. We determined which bisphosphonate provides better efficacy in prevention of osteoporotic fractures using a decision analysis tool, in terms of quality of life.

Methods

A decision analysis model was constructed containing final outcome score and the probability of vertebral and hip fracture within 1 year. Final outcome was defined as health-related quality of life, and was used as an utility in the decision tree. Probabilities were obtained by literature review, and health-related quality of life was evaluated by consensus committee. A roll back tool was used to determine the best bisphosphonate, and sensitivity analysis was performed to compensate for decision model uncertainty.

Results

The decision model favored bisphosphonate with higher compliance in terms of quality of life. In one-way sensitivity analysis, ibandronate was more beneficial than the others, when probability of compliance on ibandronate was above 0.589.

Conclusions

In terms of quality of life, the decision analysis model showed that compliance was most important for patients in real world, regardless of type of bisphosphonate.

Non-adherence with bisphosphonates among patients with osteoporosis: impact on fracture risk and healthcare cost‏

Osteoporosis-related fractures at the spine and hip have a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in older adults worldwide. Adherence to bisphosphonates is essential for effective treatment and fracture prevention. Nevertheless, numerous studies from various populations and study designs clearly indicated that adherence and persistence are poor with more than 50% of patients discontinuing therapy within one year. This is primarily explained by mild adverse effects, dosing regimens, and costs. Studies have also shown that good adherence is associated with reduced osteoporosis-related and non-related healthcare costs as soon as 2 years from therapy initiation. Nonetheless, we found only little improvement in adherence rates over the years. In light of the importance of medication adherence and the limited success of previous programs, other than reducing dosing frequency, new directions should be explored to engage patients and care givers in order to improve adherence and prevent fractures.

Do patients with lactose intolerance exhibit more frequent comorbidities than patients without lactose intolerance? An analysis of routine data from German medical practices

Background

The increase in food intolerances poses a burgeoning problem in our society. Food intolerances not only lead to physical impairment of the individual patient but also result in a high socio-economic burden due to factors such as the treatment required as well as absenteeism. The present study aimed to explore whether lactose intolerant (LI) patients exhibit more frequent comorbidities than non-LI patients.

Methods

The study was conducted on a case-control basis and the results were determined using routine data analysis. Routine data from the IMS Disease Analyzer database were used for this purpose. A total of 6,758 data records were processed and analyzed.

Results

There were significant correlations between LI and the incidence of osteoporosis, changes in mental status, and the presence of additional food intolerances. Comparing 3,379 LI vs. 3,379 non-LI patients, 34.5% vs. 17.7% (P<0.0001) suffered from abdominal pain; 30.6% vs. 17.2% (P<0.0001) from gastrointestinal infections; and 20.9% vs. 16.0% (P=0.0053) from depression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were the highest for fructose intolerance (n=229 LI vs. n=7 non-LI; OR 31.06; P<0.0001), irritable bowel syndrome (n=247 LI vs. n=44 non-LI; OR 5.23; P<0.0001), and bloating (n=351 LI vs. n=68 non-LI; OR 4.94; P<0.0001).

Conclusion

The study confirms that LI should not be regarded as an isolated illness but considered a possible trigger for further diseases. Additional research is necessary to assert more precise statements.

Increased treatment persistence and its determinants in women with osteoporosis with prior fracture compared to those without fracture

SUMMARY

The purpose of this study is to analyze treatment persistence in patients with osteoporosis after fracture diagnosis in German primary care practices. We found that pain increased treatment persistence. One key next step is to demonstrate whether or not this pain is related to fracture.

INTRODUCTION

To analyze treatment persistence in patients with osteoporosis after fracture diagnosis in German primary care practices.

METHODS

This study included postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged between 40 and 90 years from 1188 general and 175 orthopedist practices in Germany. Treatment started between 2004 and 2013. The primary outcome measure was treatment persistence within 12 months after therapy initiation. Discontinuation of treatment was defined as a period of at least 90 days without therapy. Persistence analyses were carried out using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, and the analyses of the impact of fracture on discontinuation risk were based on Cox regression models (with and without adjustment for pain medications).

RESULTS

Thirteen thousand nine hundred seventy-five subjects (mean age = 74.8 years) were included in the group with fracture before therapy initiation and 18,138 (mean age = 72.7 years) in the group without fracture. Within 12 months after treatment initiation, therapy persistence increased with the delay between osteoporosis diagnosis and therapy initiation, rising from 40.7% when the delay was lower than or equal to 12 months to 44.3% when it exceeded 36 months (p value <0.0001). Fracture only decreased the risk of treatment discontinuation when the model was not adjusted for pain medications (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.98, p value <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain increased treatment persistence in women with osteoporosis and fracture. Further studies are needed to better understand factors influencing persistence.

A Retrospective Longitudinal Database Study of Persistence and Compliance with Treatment of Osteoporosis in Hungary

This study assessed persistence and compliance with anti-osteoporosis therapies, and associations between compliance and clinical outcomes (fracture, fracture-related hospitalization and death), in Hungarian women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. The study used the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund Administration database and included women with PMO aged at least 50 years, for whom a prescription for anti-osteoporosis medication had been filled between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2013 (index event). Persistence (prescription refilled within 8 weeks of the end of the previous supply) was evaluated over 2 years; good compliance (medication possession ratio ≥ 80 %) was evaluated at 1 year. Associations between compliance and clinical outcomes (data collected for up to 6 years) were assessed with adjustment for baseline covariates. A total of 296,300 women met the inclusion criteria (524,798 index events). Persistence and compliance were higher for less frequent and parenteral therapies (1- and 2-year persistence: half-yearly [parenteral] vs. daily/weekly/monthly [oral and parenteral], 81 and 38 % vs. 21-34 and 10-18 %, respectively; parenteral vs. oral, 75 and 36 % vs. 32 and 16 %; good compliance: half-yearly vs. daily/weekly/monthly, 70 vs. 24-39 %; parenteral vs. oral 78 vs. 36 %). Good compliance significantly reduced the risks of fracture, fracture-related hospitalization and death (relative risk vs. non-compliance [95 % confidence interval]: 0.77 [0.70-0.84], 0.72 [0.62-0.85] and 0.57 [0.51-0.64], respectively; P < 0.01). Improving compliance through long-interval parenteral therapies may result in clinical benefits for patients.

Gender- and age-related treatment compliance in patients with osteoporosis in Germany

AIM

The purpose of this study was to analyze treatment compliance in osteoporotic patients treated with osteoporosis medications in Germany.

METHODS

Patients included in the analysis had been diagnosed with osteoporosis with or without fractures and started anti-osteoporotic therapy (bisphosphonates, denosumab, or strontium ranelate) between 2011 and 2014 in a general (GP) or orthopedic practice (OP) setting in Germany. Data pertaining to 6,221 individuals followed in GP and 4,044 individuals followed in OP were analyzed retrospectively. The last follow-up was in December 2015. The main outcome measure was the compliance within the one-year period after the index prescription date. Compliance was measured indirectly and was based on the mean possession ratio (MPR). A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the association between MPR (dependent variable) and age, gender, type of practice, type of osteoporosis treatment, therapy frequency, and history of fracture (covariates).

RESULTS

The mean age of the study group was 73.3 years, and 13.2% of subjects were men. Regarding type of practice, 60.6% of individuals were followed in GP and 39.4% in OP. Noncompliance was observed in 55.2% of the patients. Patients in the age group ≤60 years were at a higher risk of being noncompliant when compared to those in the age group of 61-70 years. Men and patients who received oral drugs were also more likely to be noncompliant than women and patients who received injectable or intravenous drugs. Finally, therapies that were given every three or six months were associated with a decrease in the risk of noncompliance when compared to weekly therapy, whereas daily and monthly treatments were associated with an increased risk.

CONCLUSION

Compliance is insufficient in osteoporotic patients treated with osteoporosis medications.

Adjuvant bisphosphonates in early breast cancer: consensus guidance for clinical practice from a European Panel

Bisphosphonates have been studied in randomised trials in early breast cancer to investigate their ability to prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL) and reduce the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis. Treatment benefits have been reported but bisphosphonates do not currently have regulatory approval for either of these potential indications. This consensus paper provides a review of the evidence and offers guidance to breast cancer clinicians on the use of bisphosphonates in early breast cancer. Using the nominal group methodology for consensus, a systematic review of the literature was augmented by a workshop held in October 2014 for breast cancer and bone specialists to present and debate the available pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of adjuvant bisphosphonates. This was followed by a questionnaire to all members of the writing committee to identify areas of consensus. The panel recommended that bisphosphonates should be considered as part of routine clinical practice for the prevention of CTIBL in all patients with a T score of <-2.0 or ≥2 clinical risk factors for fracture. Compelling evidence from a meta-analysis of trial data of >18,000 patients supports clinically significant benefits of bisphosphonates on the development of bone metastases and breast cancer mortality in post-menopausal women or those receiving ovarian suppression therapy. Therefore, the panel recommends that bisphosphonates (either intravenous zoledronic acid or oral clodronate) are considered as part of the adjuvant breast cancer treatment in this population and the potential benefits and risks discussed with relevant patients.

Early (1-year) Discontinuation of Different Anti-osteoporosis Medications Compared: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Although a number of reports suggest very low persistence with oral bisphosphonates, there is limited data on persistence with other anti-osteoporosis medications. We compare rates of early discontinuation (in the first year) with all available outpatient anti-osteoporosis drugs in Catalonia, Spain. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using data from the SIDIAP database. SIDIAP contains computerized primary care records and pharmacy dispensing data for >80 % of the population of Catalonia (>5 million people). All SIDIAP participants starting an anti-osteoporosis drug between 1/1/2007 and 30/06/2011 (with 2 years wash-out) were included. We modelled persistence as the time between first prescription and therapy discontinuation (refill gap of at least 6 months) using Fine and Gray survival models with competing risk for death. We identified 127,722 patients who started any anti-osteoporosis drug in the study period. The most commonly prescribed drug was weekly alendronate (N = 55,399). 1-Year persistence ranges from 40 % with monthly risedronate to 7.7 % with daily risedronate, and discontinuation was very common [from 49.5 % (monthly risedronate) to 84.4 % (daily risedronate)] as was also switching in the first year of therapy [from 2.8 % (weekly alendronate) to 10 % (daily alendronate)]. Multivariable-adjusted models showed that only monthly risedronate had better one-year persistence than weekly alendronate and teriparatide equivalent, whilst all other therapies had worse persistence. Early discontinuation with available anti-osteoporosis oral drugs is very common. Monthly risedronate, weekly alendronate, and daily teriparatide are the drugs with the best persistence, whilst daily oral drugs have 40-60 % higher first-year discontinuation rates compared to weekly alendronate.

Comorbidities, bone-sparing agent prescription history and their determinants among postmenopausal women in UK primary care settings: a retrospective database study

SUMMARY

Distinguishing oral bisphosphonates from other bone-sparing therapies, this retrospective observational study, first, characterized treated osteoporosis patients in the UK, and secondly, explored factors associated with the risk of discontinuation or switching between therapies. The latter should be considered when evaluating real-world data.

PURPOSE

This retrospective observational study evaluated the characteristics of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, including comorbidities and determinants of treatment patterns with bone-sparing agents.

METHODS

The UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink was used to identify postmenopausal women (aged ≥50 years) treated with a bone-sparing agent or diagnosed with osteoporosis between 1 January 1993 and 31 December 2008. Two non-mutually-exclusive subpopulations were defined: (1) patients active in the database on 31 December 2008; (2) patients treated with a bone-sparing agent since 1 January 1993. Subpopulation 1 was used to describe patient comorbidities and osteoporosis treatment history, and subpopulation 2 was used to explore the characteristics associated with bone-sparing treatment patterns use via multivariable regression for repeated multinomial responses.

RESULTS

A total of 62,657 individuals met the inclusion criteria; subpopulation 1 comprised 38,469 women (61.4%), of whom 21,687 received a bone-sparing agent in 2008 (99.7% oral bisphosphonates and the remainder other agents). Those receiving other agents were more likely to have had previous treatment with bone-sparing agents, to have experienced previous fractures, and to have visited their doctor more frequently. Analyses also identified several comorbidities associated with an increased risk of discontinuation of bone-sparing agents, including heart disease, gastrointestinal disease, and renal failure. Anticonvulsant use was associated with a dramatic increase in the risk of switching.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient characteristics were associated with discontinuation of, or switching between, bone-sparing treatments. Patients receiving bone-sparing medication other than oral bisphosphonates were more likely to have comorbid conditions and a history of fracture and to have taken an oral bisphosphonate previously.

3-D bone models to improve treatment initiation among patients with osteoporosis: A randomised controlled pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of 3-D printed bone models as a tool to facilitate initiation of bisphosphonate treatment among individuals who were newly diagnosed with osteoporosis.

DESIGN

Fifty eight participants with estimated fracture risk above that at which guidelines recommend pharmacological intervention were randomised to receive either a standard physician interview or an interview augmented by the presentation of 3-D bone models.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants' beliefs about osteoporosis and bisphosphonate treatment, initiation of bisphosphonate therapy assessed at two months using self-report and pharmacy dispensing data.

RESULTS

Individuals in the 3-D bone model intervention condition were more emotionally affected by osteoporosis immediately after the interview (p = .04) and reported a greater understanding of osteoporosis at follow-up (p = .04), than the control group. While a greater proportion of the intervention group initiated an oral bisphosphonate regimen (alendronate) (52%) in comparison with the control group (21%), the overall initiation of medication for osteoporosis, including infusion (zoledronate), did not differ significantly (intervention group 62%, control group 45%, p = .19).

CONCLUSION

The presentation of 3-D bone models during a medical consultation can modify cognitive and emotional representations relevant to treatment initiation among people with osteoporosis and might facilitate commencement of bisphosphonate treatment.