Lumbar spine texture enhances 10-year fracture probability assessment

Trabecular bone score assessed by dual-energy X ray absorption predicts vertebral fractures in HIV infected young adults

Introduction

Bone mineral density (BMD) is reduced in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an additional feature calculated by dual-energy X ray absorption (DXA) that measures texture inhomogeneity at lumbar spine level, providing an index of bone microarchitecture. However, its clinical value still needs to be fully addressed. Aims of the study were to assess BMD and TBS in a cohort of patients with HIV compared to a population of healthy subjects and to investigate the prognostic value of TBS in HIV infected patients.

Method

Bone health was assessed by DXA in 165 patients with HIV infection (120 men, mean age 40 ± 7 years) and in 164 healthy subjects (53 male, mean age 37 ± 10 years). BMD was measured at level of lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip. TBS was computed from the images of lumbar spine using machine proprietary software.

Results

BMD at femoral neck level was similar in HIV infected patients and healthy subjects (p = 0.57), whereas BMD measured in total femur was lower in HIV infected patients compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05). Although mean BMD in lumbar spine was similar between HIV infected patients and healthy subjects (p = 0.90), mean lumbar TBS was lower in patients with HIV infection compared to healthy subjects (p < 0.05). Age, sex and HIV infection resulted independent predictors of reduced TBS. In HIV infected patients age, sex and protease inhibitor duration resulted independent predictors of reduced TBS. TBS was a significant predictor of vertebral fractures during follow-up (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with HIV infection have a significant reduction of TBS, a texture parameter related to bone microarchitecture that may provide skeletal information that is not captured from the standard BMD measurement.

Characterization of bone disease in cystic fibrosis

With the increased life expectancy of people with cystic fibrosis (CF), clinical attention has focused on prevention and treatment of non-pulmonary comorbidities. CF-related bone disease (CFBD) is a common complication and leads to increased fracture rates. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the recommended and gold standard technique to identify and monitor bone health. However, DXA has limitations because of its two-dimensional nature. Complementary tools to DXA are available, such as trabecular bone score (TBS) and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). Quantitative computed tomography (QCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) may also be useful.

Trabecular Bone Score as a Marker of Skeletal Fragility Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

The impairment of bone microarchitecture is a key determinant of skeletal fragility in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The trabecular bone score (TBS) has been developed as a reliable noninvasive index of bone quality. However, its utility in this setting is still debated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the available evidence about TBS as a marker of skeletal fragility across the spectrum of CKD.

METHODS

PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched until July 2023 for studies reporting data about TBS in patients with CKD. Effect sizes were pooled through a random-effect model.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, lower TBS values were observed in CKD patients not on dialysis (-0.057, 95%CI:[-0.090, -0.024], P < .01), in dialysis patients (-0.106, 95%CI:[-0.141, -0.070], P < .01), and in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) (-0.058, 95%CI:[-0.103, -0.012], P = .01). With respect to fracture risk, TBS was able to predict incident fractures in nondialysis patients at unadjusted analyses (hazard ratio [HR] per SD decrease: 1.45, 95%CI:[1.05, 2.00], P = .02), though only a nonsignificant trend was maintained when fully adjusting the model for FRAX® (HR = 1.26, 95%CI:[0.88, 1.80], P = .21). Dialysis patients with prevalent fractures had lower TBS values compared to unfractured ones (-0.070, 95% CI:[-0.111, -0.028], P < .01). Some studies supported a correlation between TBS and fracture risk in KTRs, but results could not be pooled due to the lack of sufficient data.

CONCLUSION

CKD patients are characterized by an impairment of bone microarchitecture, as demonstrated by lower TBS values, across the whole spectrum of kidney disease. TBS can also be helpful in the discrimination of fracture risk, with lower values being correlated with a higher risk of prevalent and incident fractures.

Value of Hounsfield units measured by chest computed tomography for assessing bone density in the thoracolumbar segment of the thoracic spine

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between Hounsfield unit (HU) values measured by chest computed tomography (CT) and dual-energy Xray absorptiometry (DXA) T-scores. HU-based thoracolumbar (T11 and T12) cutoff thresholds were calculated for a cohort of Chinese patients.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

For patients with osteoporosis, the incidence of fractures in the thoracolumbar segment is significantly higher than that in other sites. However, most current clinical studies have focused on L1.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent chest CT and DXA at our hospital between August 2021 and August 2022. Thoracic thoracolumbar segment HU values, lumbar T-scores, and hip T-scores were computed for comparison, and thoracic thoracolumbar segment HU thresholds suggestive of potential bone density abnormalities were established using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

In total, 470 patients (72.4% women; mean age, 65.5±12.3 years) were included in this study. DXA revealed that of the 470 patients, 90 (19%) had osteoporosis, 180 (38%) had reduced osteopenia, and 200 (43%) had normal bone mineral density (BMD). To differentiate osteoporosis from osteopenia, the HU threshold was established as 105.1 (sensitivity, 54.4%; specificity, 72.2%) for T11 and 85.7 (sensitivity, 69.4%; specificity, 61.1%) for T12. To differentiate between osteopenia and normal BMD, the HU threshold was 146.7 for T11 (sensitivity, 57.5%; specificity, 84.4%) and 135.7 for T12 (sensitivity, 59.5%; specificity, 80%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the significance of HU values from chest CT for BMD assessment. Chest CT provides a new method for clinical opportunistic screening of osteoporosis. When the T11 HU is >146.7 or the T12 HU is >135.7, additional osteoporosis testing is not needed unless a vertebral fracture is detected. If the T11 HU is <105.1 or the T12 HU is <85.7, further DXA testing is strongly advised. In addition, vertebral HU values that fall faster than those of the T11 and L1 vertebrae may explain the high incidence of T12 vertebral fractures.

Postmenopausal women with normal BMD who have fractures have deteriorated bone microarchitecture: A prospective analysis from The OFELY study

Most postmenopausal women who sustain fragility fracture (Fx) have their areal bone mineral density (BMD) above the osteoporosis threshold. A sizeable proportion of them have normal aBMD. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the association of fragility Fx with bone microarchitecture (MA) assessed by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in postmenopausal women without low BMD. At the 14th annual follow-up of the OFELY study, we measured bone MA at the distal radius and tibia with HR-pQCT in addition to areal BMD with DXA, in 586 postmenopausal women. Among them, 166 (29 %) women, mean (SD) age 65 (8) yr, had normal BMD defined as a T score ≥ -1 at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. During a median [IQR] 15 [14-15] yr of follow-up, 46 of those women sustained incident fragility Fx, including 19 women with a major osteoporotic Fx (clinical spine, forearm, proximal humerus, hip). Women who sustained Fx did not differ for age, BMI, tobacco and alcohol use, diabetes, falls, FRAX®, aBMD, and TBS compared with women without incident Fx. In contrast, they had significant impairment of volumetric densities, cortical area (Ct. Ar) and thickness (Ct. Th), stiffness (K), and estimated failure load (FL) at the radius compared with women without incident Fx. At the radius, each SD decrease of volumetric densities, Ct.Ar, Ct.Th, K, and estimated FL were significantly associated with an increased risk of all fragility fractures with hazard ratios (HR) from 1.44 to 1.56 and of major osteoporotic fractures (HR from 1.66 to 2.57). Lesser impairment of bone MA was seen at the tibia. We conclude that even in women with normal areal BMD fragility fractures are associated with deterioration of bone microarchitecture.

Clinical Use of Trabecular Bone Score: The 2023 ISCD Official Positions

Osteoporosis can currently be diagnosed by applying the WHO classification to bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, skeletal factors other than BMD contribute to bone strength and fracture risk. Lumbar spine TBS, a grey-level texture measure which is derived from DXA images has been extensively studied, enhances fracture prediction independent of BMD and can be used to adjust fracture probability from FRAX® to improve risk stratification. The purpose of this International Society for Clinical Densitometry task force was to review the existing evidence and develop recommendations to assist clinicians regarding when and how to perform, report and utilize TBS. Our review concluded that TBS is most likely to alter clinical management in patients aged ≥ 40 years who are close to the pharmacologic intervention threshold by FRAX. The TBS value from L1-L4 vertebral levels, without vertebral exclusions, should be used to calculate adjusted FRAX probabilities. L1-L4 vertebral levels can be used in the presence of degenerative changes and lumbar compression fractures. It is recommended not to report TBS if extreme structural or pathological artifacts are present. Monitoring and reporting TBS change is unlikely to be helpful with the current version of the TBS algorithm. The next version of TBS software will include an adjustment based upon directly measured tissue thickness. This is expected to improve performance and address some of the technical factors that affect the current algorithm which may require modifications to these Official Positions as experience is acquired with this new algorithm.

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Probability and Trabecular Bone Score Mediate the Relationship between Sphingosine 1-phosphate Levels and Fracture Risk

BACKGROUND

The sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) concentration is a potential biomarker of osteoporotic fracture and is associated with both the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) probability and trabecular bone score (TBS), which are well-known predictors of fracture. We sought to estimate the effect of the S1P concentration on fracture risk using the FRAX probability and TBS as mediators.

METHODS

Plasma S1P concentrations, FRAX variables, and TBSs were measured in 66 postmenopausal women with fractures and 273 postmenopausal women without fractures. Associations between S1P concentration, FRAX probability, TBS, and fracture risk were analyzed using correlation, logistic regression, and mediation analyses.

RESULTS

Subjects in the highest S1P concentration tertile had a higher fracture risk (odds ratio [OR], 5.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.22-11.67) than those in the lowest S1P concentration tertile before adjustment. Subjects in the highest FRAX probability tertile had a higher fracture risk (OR, 14.59; 95% CI, 5.01-42.53) than those in the lowest FRAX probability tertile before adjustment. Subjects in the lowest TBS tertile had a higher fracture risk (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 2.28-9.93) than those in the highest TBS tertile before adjustment. After adjustment for FRAX probability and TBS, the highest S1P concentration tertile was still associated with a higher fracture risk (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.28-7.66). The FRAX probability and TBS accounted for 32.6% and 21.7%, respectively, of the relationship between the S1P concentration and fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The relationship between the circulating S1P concentration and fracture risk was partly mediated by the FRAX probability, bone microarchitecture, and other factors.

Machine Learning for Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Using Knee CT Scans

PURPOSE

To predict whether a patient has osteoporosis/osteopenia using the attenuation of trabecular bone obtained from knee computed tomography (CT) scans.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 273 patients who underwent contemporaneous knee CT scans and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) within 1 year. Volumetric segmentation of the trabecular bone of the distal femur, proximal tibia, patella, and proximal fibula was performed to obtain the bone CT attenuation. The data was randomly split into training/validation (78%) and test (22%) datasets and the performance in the test dataset were evaluated. The predictive properties of the CT attenuation of each bone to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia were assessed. Multivariable support vector machines (SVM) and random forest classifiers (RF) were used to predict osteoporosis/osteopenia.

RESULTS

Patients with a mean age (range) of 67.9 (50-87) years, 85% female were evaluated. Seventy-seven (28.2%) of patients had normal bone mineral density (BMD), 140 (51.3%) had osteopenia, and 56 (20.5%) had osteoporosis. The proximal tibia had the best predictive ability of all bones and a CT attenuation threshold of 96.0 Hounsfield Units (HU) had a sensitivity of .791, specificity of .706, and area under the curve (AUC) of .748. The AUC for the SVM with cubic kernel classifier (AUC = .912) was better than the RF classifier (AUC = .683, P < .001) and better than using the CT attenuation threshold of 96.0 HU at the proximal tibia (AUC = .748, P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis/osteopenia can be performed using knee CT scans. Multivariable machine learning models are more predictive than the CT attenuation of a single bone.

Fracture risk gradient assessed by categories of bone mineral density and trabecular bone score: the Manitoba BMD Registry

Trabecular bonescore (TBS) helps to predict fracture risk in older adults. In this registry-based cohort study of patients aged 40 years and older, reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) and TBS are complementary for fracture risk prediction enhancement with lower BMD imparting greater risk than reduction in TBS.

PURPOSE

Trabecular bone score (TBS) enhances fracture risk prediction independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the gradient of fracture risk based on TBS tertile categories and WHO BMD categories, adjusted for other risk factors.

METHODS

Using the Manitoba DXA registry, patients aged 40 years and older with spine/hip DXA and L1-L4 TBS were identified. Any incident fractures, major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), and hip fractures were identified. Cox regression models were used to estimate unadjusted and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HR, 95%CI) for incident fracture by BMD and TBS category and for each SD decrease in BMD and TBS.

RESULTS

The study population included 73,108 individuals, 90% female with mean age 64 years. Mean (SD) minimum T-score was - 1.8 (1.1), and mean L1-L4 TBS was 1.257 (0.123). Lower BMD and TBS, both per SD, by WHO BMD category and by TBS tertile category, were significantly associated with MOF, hip, and any fracture (all HRs p < 0.001). However, the quantum of risk was consistently greater for BMD than TBS, with HRs showing non-overlapping CIs.

CONCLUSION

TBS is complementary to BMD in prediction of incident major, hip, and any osteoporosis-related fracture, but reductions in BMD impart greater risk than reductions in TBS on both continuous and categorical scales.

Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools

BACKGROUND

To inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, we reviewed evidence on the benefits, harms, and acceptability of screening and treatment, and on the accuracy of risk prediction tools for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care.

METHODS

For screening effectiveness, accuracy of risk prediction tools, and treatment benefits, our search methods involved integrating studies published up to 2016 from an existing systematic review. Then, to locate more recent studies and any evidence relating to acceptability and treatment harms, we searched online databases (2016 to April 4, 2022 [screening] or to June 1, 2021 [predictive accuracy]; 1995 to June 1, 2021, for acceptability; 2016 to March 2, 2020, for treatment benefits; 2015 to June 24, 2020, for treatment harms), trial registries and gray literature, and hand-searched reviews, guidelines, and the included studies. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted results, and appraised risk of bias, with disagreements resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. The overview of reviews on treatment harms relied on one reviewer, with verification of data by another reviewer to correct errors and omissions. When appropriate, study results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis; otherwise, findings were described narratively. Evidence certainty was rated according to the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

We included 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 controlled clinical trial (CCT) for the benefits and harms of screening, 1 RCT for comparative benefits and harms of different screening strategies, 32 validation cohort studies for the calibration of risk prediction tools (26 of these reporting on the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool without [i.e., clinical FRAX], or with the inclusion of bone mineral density (BMD) results [i.e., FRAX + BMD]), 27 RCTs for the benefits of treatment, 10 systematic reviews for the harms of treatment, and 12 studies for the acceptability of screening or initiating treatment. In females aged 65 years and older who are willing to independently complete a mailed fracture risk questionnaire (referred to as "selected population"), 2-step screening using a risk assessment tool with or without measurement of BMD probably (moderate certainty) reduces the risk of hip fractures (3 RCTs and 1 CCT, n = 43,736, absolute risk reduction [ARD] = 6.2 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 9.0-2.8 fewer, number needed to screen [NNS] = 161) and clinical fragility fractures (3 RCTs, n = 42,009, ARD = 5.9 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 10.9-0.8 fewer, NNS = 169). It probably does not reduce all-cause mortality (2 RCTs and 1 CCT, n = 26,511, ARD = no difference in 1000, 95% CI 7.1 fewer to 5.3 more) and may (low certainty) not affect health-related quality of life. Benefits for fracture outcomes were not replicated in an offer-to-screen population where the rate of response to mailed screening questionnaires was low. For females aged 68-80 years, population screening may not reduce the risk of hip fractures (1 RCT, n = 34,229, ARD = 0.3 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 4.2 fewer to 3.9 more) or clinical fragility fractures (1 RCT, n = 34,229, ARD = 1.0 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 8.0 fewer to 6.0 more) over 5 years of follow-up. The evidence for serious adverse events among all patients and for all outcomes among males and younger females (<65 years) is very uncertain. We defined overdiagnosis as the identification of high risk in individuals who, if not screened, would never have known that they were at risk and would never have experienced a fragility fracture. This was not directly reported in any of the trials. Estimates using data available in the trials suggest that among "selected" females offered screening, 12% of those meeting age-specific treatment thresholds based on clinical FRAX 10-year hip fracture risk, and 19% of those meeting thresholds based on clinical FRAX 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk, may be overdiagnosed as being at high risk of fracture. Of those identified as being at high clinical FRAX 10-year hip fracture risk and who were referred for BMD assessment, 24% may be overdiagnosed. One RCT (n = 9268) provided evidence comparing 1-step to 2-step screening among postmenopausal females, but the evidence from this trial was very uncertain. For the calibration of risk prediction tools, evidence from three Canadian studies (n = 67,611) without serious risk of bias concerns indicates that clinical FRAX-Canada may be well calibrated for the 10-year prediction of hip fractures (observed-to-expected fracture ratio [O:E] = 1.13, 95% CI 0.74-1.72, I2 = 89.2%), and is probably well calibrated for the 10-year prediction of clinical fragility fractures (O:E = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, I2 = 50.4%), both leading to some underestimation of the observed risk. Data from these same studies (n = 61,156) showed that FRAX-Canada with BMD may perform poorly to estimate 10-year hip fracture risk (O:E = 1.31, 95% CI 0.91-2.13, I2 = 92.7%), but is probably well calibrated for the 10-year prediction of clinical fragility fractures, with some underestimation of the observed risk (O:E 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.20, I2 = 0%). The Canadian Association of Radiologists and Osteoporosis Canada Risk Assessment (CAROC) tool may be well calibrated to predict a category of risk for 10-year clinical fractures (low, moderate, or high risk; 1 study, n = 34,060). The evidence for most other tools was limited, or in the case of FRAX tools calibrated for countries other than Canada, very uncertain due to serious risk of bias concerns and large inconsistency in findings across studies. Postmenopausal females in a primary prevention population defined as <50% prevalence of prior fragility fracture (median 16.9%, range 0 to 48% when reported in the trials) and at risk of fragility fracture, treatment with bisphosphonates as a class (median 2 years, range 1-6 years) probably reduces the risk of clinical fragility fractures (19 RCTs, n = 22,482, ARD = 11.1 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 15.0-6.6 fewer, [number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome] NNT = 90), and may reduce the risk of hip fractures (14 RCTs, n = 21,038, ARD = 2.9 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 4.6-0.9 fewer, NNT = 345) and clinical vertebral fractures (11 RCTs, n = 8921, ARD = 10.0 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 14.0-3.9 fewer, NNT = 100); it may not reduce all-cause mortality. There is low certainty evidence of little-to-no reduction in hip fractures with any individual bisphosphonate, but all provided evidence of decreased risk of clinical fragility fractures (moderate certainty for alendronate [NNT=68] and zoledronic acid [NNT=50], low certainty for risedronate [NNT=128]) among postmenopausal females. Evidence for an impact on risk of clinical vertebral fractures is very uncertain for alendronate and risedronate; zoledronic acid may reduce the risk of this outcome (4 RCTs, n = 2367, ARD = 18.7 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 25.6-6.6 fewer, NNT = 54) for postmenopausal females. Denosumab probably reduces the risk of clinical fragility fractures (6 RCTs, n = 9473, ARD = 9.1 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 12.1-5.6 fewer, NNT = 110) and clinical vertebral fractures (4 RCTs, n = 8639, ARD = 16.0 fewer in 1000, 95% CI 18.6-12.1 fewer, NNT=62), but may make little-to-no difference in the risk of hip fractures among postmenopausal females. Denosumab probably makes little-to-no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality or health-related quality of life among postmenopausal females. Evidence in males is limited to two trials (1 zoledronic acid, 1 denosumab); in this population, zoledronic acid may make little-to-no difference in the risk of hip or clinical fragility fractures, and evidence for all-cause mortality is very uncertain. The evidence for treatment with denosumab in males is very uncertain for all fracture outcomes (hip, clinical fragility, clinical vertebral) and all-cause mortality. There is moderate certainty evidence that treatment causes a small number of patients to experience a non-serious adverse event, notably non-serious gastrointestinal events (e.g., abdominal pain, reflux) with alendronate (50 RCTs, n = 22,549, ARD = 16.3 more in 1000, 95% CI 2.4-31.3 more, [number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome] NNH = 61) but not with risedronate; influenza-like symptoms with zoledronic acid (5 RCTs, n = 10,695, ARD = 142.5 more in 1000, 95% CI 105.5-188.5 more, NNH = 7); and non-serious gastrointestinal adverse events (3 RCTs, n = 8454, ARD = 64.5 more in 1000, 95% CI 26.4-13.3 more, NNH = 16), dermatologic adverse events (3 RCTs, n = 8454, ARD = 15.6 more in 1000, 95% CI 7.6-27.0 more, NNH = 64), and infections (any severity; 4 RCTs, n = 8691, ARD = 1.8 more in 1000, 95% CI 0.1-4.0 more, NNH = 556) with denosumab. For serious adverse events overall and specific to stroke and myocardial infarction, treatment with bisphosphonates probably makes little-to-no difference; evidence for other specific serious harms was less certain or not available. There was low certainty evidence for an increased risk for the rare occurrence of atypical femoral fractures (0.06 to 0.08 more in 1000) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (0.22 more in 1000) with bisphosphonates (most evidence for alendronate). The evidence for these rare outcomes and for rebound fractures with denosumab was very uncertain. Younger (lower risk) females have high willingness to be screened. A minority of postmenopausal females at increased risk for fracture may accept treatment. Further, there is large heterogeneity in the level of risk at which patients may be accepting of initiating treatment, and treatment effects appear to be overestimated.

CONCLUSION

An offer of 2-step screening with risk assessment and BMD measurement to selected postmenopausal females with low prevalence of prior fracture probably results in a small reduction in the risk of clinical fragility fracture and hip fracture compared to no screening. These findings were most applicable to the use of clinical FRAX for risk assessment and were not replicated in the offer-to-screen population where the rate of response to mailed screening questionnaires was low. Limited direct evidence on harms of screening were available; using study data to provide estimates, there may be a moderate degree of overdiagnosis of high risk for fracture to consider. The evidence for younger females and males is very limited. The benefits of screening and treatment need to be weighed against the potential for harm; patient views on the acceptability of treatment are highly variable.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42019123767.

Long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture as assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from FREEDOM and its open-label extension

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab treatment significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score, independently of bone mineral density. Long-term denosumab treatment decreased the number of high fracture-risk patients and shifted more patients to lower fracture-risk categories.

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture assessed by tissue thickness-adjusted trabecular bone score (TBS_TT) in post-hoc subgroup analysis of FREEDOM and open-label extension (OLE).

METHODS

Postmenopausal women with lumbar spine (LS) or total hip BMD T-score <-2.5 and ≥-4.0 who completed the FREEDOM DXA substudy and continued in OLE were included. Patients received either denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months for 3 years and same-dose open-label denosumab for 7 years (long-term denosumab; n=150) or placebo for 3 years and open-label denosumab for 7 years (crossover denosumab; n=129). BMD and TBS_TT were assessed on LS DXA scans at FREEDOM baseline, month 1, and years 1-6, 8, and 10.

RESULTS

In long-term denosumab group, continued increases from baseline to years 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 in BMD (11.6%, 13.7%, 15.5%, 18.5%, and 22.4%) and TBS_TT (3.2%, 2.9%, 4.1%, 3.6%, and 4.7%) were observed (all P < 0.0001). Long-term denosumab treatment decreased the proportion of patients at high fracture-risk (according to TBS_TT and BMD T-score) from baseline up to year 10 (93.7 to 40.4%), resulting in increases in the proportions at medium-risk (6.3 to 53.9%) and low-risk (0 to 5.7%) (P < 0.0001). Similar responses were observed in crossover denosumab group. Changes in BMD and TBS_TT were poorly correlated during denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, up to 10 years of denosumab significantly and continuously improved bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS_TT, independently of BMD, and shifted more patients to lower fracture-risk categories.

Effect of Abaloparatide on Bone Microarchitecture Assessed by Trabecular Bone Score in Women With Osteoporosis: Post Hoc Analysis of ACTIVE and ACTIVExtend

Although bone mineral density (BMD) is a predictor of fracture, many fractures occur in women with T-scores > -2.5. Bone microarchitecture, assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS), predicts fracture risk independent of BMD. We evaluated whether abaloparatide improves TBS and whether TBS trends were associated with vertebral fracture risk reduction. Women with osteoporosis randomized to abaloparatide or placebo for 18 months (ACTIVE), followed by alendronate for 24 months (ACTIVExtend), with evaluable TBS, were included in this post hoc analysis (N = 911). TBS was calculated from spine BMD scans using an algorithm adjusted for tissue thickness (TBS_th ) at baseline, 6, 18, and 43 months. Mean increments in TBS_th from baseline within and between treatment groups, proportion of women with TBS_th increments above least significant change (LSC) and proportion with degraded TBS_th (<1.027) were calculated. Risk estimates for vertebral fracture were compared using binary logistic regressions adjusted for baseline age and spine BMD. At baseline, 42% had degraded TBS_th . Mean TBS_th increased 4% after 18 months abaloparatide (p < 0.001) and was unchanged with placebo. After 2 subsequent years of alendronate, the total cumulative TBS_th increase was 4.4% with abaloparatide/alendronate and 1.7% with placebo/alendronate (group difference, p < 0.001). At 43 months, the proportion of women with degraded TBS_th had declined to 21% with abaloparatide/alendronate and 37% with placebo/alendronate (p < 0.05). An increase in TBS_th  ≥ LSC was observed in 50% of abaloparatide-treated women at 18 months and was associated with decreased odds (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]) of vertebral fracture (0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.80, 6 months; 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11-0.79, 43 months). In conclusion, abaloparatide increased TBS_th rapidly and progressively over 18 months and increments were maintained over 2 years with alendronate. TBS_th increase was associated with vertebral fracture risk reduction. Microarchitectural improvement may be one mechanism by which abaloparatide strengthens vertebral bone. © 2023 Radius Health, Inc and The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Updated trabecular bone score accounting for the soft tissue thickness (TBSTT) demonstrated significantly improved bone microstructure with denosumab in the FREEDOM TBS post hoc analysis

TBS algorithm has been updated to account for regional soft tissue noise. In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab improved tissue thickness-adjusted TBS vs placebo independently of bone mineral density over 3 years, with the magnitude of changes from baseline or placebo numerically greater than body mass index-adjusted TBS.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the effect of denosumab on bone microarchitecture assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS) in the FREEDOM study using the updated algorithm that accounts for regional soft tissue thickness (TBSTT) in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images and to compare percent changes from baseline and placebo with classical body mass index (BMI)-adjusted TBS (TBSBMI).

METHODS

Postmenopausal women with lumbar spine or total hip bone mineral density (BMD) T score <  - 2.5 and ≥  - 4.0 received placebo or denosumab 60 mg subcutaneously every 6 months. TBSBMI and TBSTT were assessed on lumbar spine DXA scans at baseline and months 1, 12, 24, and 36 in a subset of 279 women (129 placebo, 150 denosumab) who completed the 3-year FREEDOM DXA substudy and rolled over to open-label extension study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. TBSTT in the denosumab group showed numerically greater changes from both baseline and placebo than TBSBMI at months 12, 24, and 36. Denosumab led to progressive increases in BMD (1.2, 5.6, 8.1, and 10.5%) and TBSTT (0.4, 2.3, 2.6, and 3.3%) from baseline to months 1, 12, 24, and 36, respectively. Both TBS changes were significant vs baseline and placebo from months 12 to 36 (p < 0.0001). As expected, BMD and TBSTT were poorly correlated both at baseline and for changes during treatment.

CONCLUSION

In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, denosumab significantly improved bone microstructure assessed by TBSTT over 3 years. TBSTT seemed more responsive to denosumab treatment than TBSBMI and was independent of BMD.

Update on trabecular bone score

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is an indirect and noninvasive measure of bone quality. A low TBS indicates degraded bone microarchitecture, predicts osteoporotic fracture, and is partially independent of clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD). There is substantial evidence supporting the use of TBS to assess vertebral, hip, and major osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women, as well as to assess hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men aged > 50 years. TBS complements BMD information and can be used to adjust the FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment) score to improve risk stratification. While TBS should not be used to monitor antiresorptive therapy, it may be potentially useful for monitoring anabolic therapy. There is also a growing body of evidence indicating that TBS is particularly useful as an adjunct to BMD for fracture risk assessment in conditions associated with increased fracture risk, such as type-2 diabetes, chronic corticosteroid excess, and other conditions wherein BMD readings are often misleading. The interference of abdominal soft tissue thickness (STT) on TBS should also be considered when interpreting these findings because image noise can impact TBS evaluation. A new TBS software version based on an algorithm that accounts for STT rather than BMI seems to correct this technical limitation and is under development. In this paper, we review the current state of TBS, its technical aspects, and its evolving role in the assessment and management of several clinical conditions.

Management of osteoporosis in patients with chronic kidney disease

Patients with CKD have a 4-fivefold higher rate of fractures. The incidence of fractures increases with deterioration of kidney function. The process of skeletal changes in CKD patients is characterized by compromised bone strength because of deterioration of bone quantity and/or quality. The fractures lead to a deleterious effect on the quality of life and higher mortality in patients with CKD. The pathogenesis of bone loss and fracture is complex and multi-factorial. Renal osteodystrophy, uremic milieu, drugs, and systemic diseases that lead to renal failure all contribute to bone damage in CKD patients. There is no consensus on the optimal diagnostic method of compromised bone assessment in patients with CKD. Bone quantity and mass can be assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Bone quality on the other side can be assessed by non-invasive methods such as trabecular bone score (TBS), high-resolution bone imaging methods, and invasive bone biopsy. Bone turnover markers can reflect bone remodeling, but some of them are retained by kidneys. Understanding the mechanism of bone loss is pivotal in preventing fracture in patients with CKD. Several non-pharmacological and therapeutic interventions have been reported to improve bone health. Controlling laboratory abnormalities of CKD-MBD is crucial. Anti-resorptive therapies are effective in improving BMD and reducing fracture risk, but there are uncertainties about safety and efficacy especially in advanced CKD patients. Accepting the prevalent of low bone turnover in patients with advanced CKD, the osteo-anabolics are possibly promising. Parathyroidectomy should be considered a last resort for intractable cases of renal hyperparathyroidism. There is a wide unacceptable gap in osteoporosis management in patients with CKD. This article is focusing on the updated management of CKD-MBD and osteoporosis in CKD patients. Chronic kidney disease deteriorates bone quality and quantity. The mechanism of bone loss mainly determines pharmacological treatment. DXA and QCT provide information about bone quantity, but assessing bone quality, by TBS, high-resolution bone imaging, invasive bone biopsy, and bone turnover markers, can guide us about the mechanism of bone loss.

Effect of degeneration on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score and CT Hounsfield unit measurements in a spine surgery patient population

This study investigated the impact of spinal degeneration on bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and CT Hounsfield units in an at-risk population. We found that BMD was increased by degeneration, whereas TBS and HU were unaffected. These findings support that TBS is not adversely affected by spinal degeneration.

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the impact of spinal degeneration on BMD and TBS measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and on CT HU in a spine surgery patient population.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 63 patients referred for consideration of spine surgery or with history of spine surgery was performed. Patients were included if a DXA scan and a CT containing the lumbar spine were obtained within 18 months of each other. DXA data were collected and analyzed by vertebral level. Individual vertebrae were assessed for degenerative changes by qualitative evaluation of the anterior and posterior elements using CT. Degeneration scores were compared to BMD T-scores, TBS and CT HU at individual vertebral levels L1-4, and after applying International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) criteria for excluding vertebrae from diagnostic consideration.

RESULTS

Mean patient age and BMI were 67.2 years and 27.8 kg/m², respectively; 79.4% were female. Mean (SD) lowest T-scores of the hip, spine, and lowest overall T-score were - 1.3 (1.4), - 1.7 (0.9), and - 1.9 (1.0), respectively. Osteoporosis was present by T-score in 38% and osteopenia in 52%; 10% had a history of osteoporotic fracture. The mean degeneration score of individual vertebrae was 4.1 on a 0-6 scale. T-score correlated moderately with degeneration score (Spearman's rho 0.484, p < 0.001), whereas TBS and HU were unrelated. ISCD excluded vertebrae had a higher degeneration score than included vertebrae (p =  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a spine surgery population, TBS and CT HU values are unrelated to degeneration score and thus appear unaffected by lumbar vertebral degenerative changes. Additionally, these data support the ISCD criteria for vertebral exclusion.

The outcome of an automated assessment of trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs as a fracture risk predictor

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate if automated analyses of the trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs independently contribute to fracture risk assessment when other risk factors incorporated in the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) are taken into account. A secondary aim is to explore the correlation between the automated trabecular pattern assessment in intraoral radiographs and Trabecular Bone Score (TBS).

METHODS

A total of 567 intraoral radiographs from older females participating in a large population-based study (SUPERB) based in Gothenburg, Sweden, were selected to analyse trabecular pattern using semi-automated and fully automated software. Associations between trabecular pattern analysis and incident fractures were studied using Cox proportional hazard model, unadjusted and adjusted for FRAX risk factors (previous fracture, family history of hip fracture, smoking, corticosteroids, rheumatoid arthritis, without and with bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck). In addition, the correlation between trabecular pattern analysis and TBS of the lumbar spine was investigated using Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Neither the unadjusted nor the adjusted trabecular pattern analysis in intraoral radiographs was significantly associated with any fracture or major osteoporotic fracture (MOF). A weak correlation was found between semi-automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS. No correlation was found between the fully automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that semi-automated and fully automated digital analyses of the trabecular pattern in intraoral radiographs do not contribute to fracture risk prediction. Furthermore, the study shows a weak correlation between semi-automated trabecular pattern analysis and TBS.

Body Composition as a Modulator of Bone Health Changes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background: Bone impairment of multifactorial etiology is a common feature in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Body composition parameters, which might be selectively modified in these patients, are important determinants of bone strength. Our aim was to investigate the relationship between components of body composition and bone parameters in IBD patients. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study including 80 IBD patients (43 women, 37 men). Lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN) and whole body DXA scans were performed to analyze regional bone mineral density (BMD), as well as body composition, including appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI), total and visceral fat mass (VAT). Trabecular bone score (TBS) was assessed using iNsight Software. Results: Twenty (25%) IBD patients had inadequate LS-BMD z scores (<=−2DS). Lean mass (LM) was a significant determinant of LS-BMD, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI and fat mass (p < 0.01), while fat mass% remained associated with FN-BMD (p < 0.01). TBS correlated positively with BMI (r = 0.24, p < 0.05), LS-BMD (r = 0.56, p < 0.001), ASMI (r = 0.34, p < 0.001) and negatively with VAT/total fat% (r = −0.27, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that ASMI, LS-BMD (positively) and VAT/total fat% (negatively) were independently associated with TBS. Conclusions: In IBD patients, skeletal muscle mass and fat percentage and distribution are important factors associated with bone health.

Application and prospect of trabecular bone score in differentiated thyroid cancer patients receiving thyrotropin suppression therapy

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression therapy is one of the common treatments for most patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Unfortunately, its detrimental effects on bone health are receiving increasing attention. It may increase the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. The trabecular bone score (TBS) is a relatively new gray-scale texture measurement parameter that reflects bone microarchitecture and bone strength and has been shown to independently predict fracture risk. We reviewed for the first time the scientific literature on the use of TBS in DTC patients on TSH suppression therapy and aim to analyze and compare the utility of TBS with bone mass strength (BMD) in the management of skeletal health and prediction of fracture risk. We screened a total of seven relevant publications, four of which were for postmenopausal female patients and three for all female patients. Overall, postmenopausal female patients with DTC had lower TBS and a significant reduction in TBS after receiving TSH suppression therapy, but their BMD did not appear to change significantly. In addition, TBS was also found to be an independent predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk in postmenopausal women with DTC receiving TSH suppression therapy. However, due to limitations in the number of studies and study populations, this evidence is not sufficient to fully demonstrate the adverse effects of TSH suppression therapy on patients' TBS or BMD and the efficacy of TBS, and subsequent larger and more case-cohort studies are needed to further investigate the relationship and application of TBS to TSH suppression therapy in terms of skeletal health impairment and fracture risk in DTC patients.

Application of the Trabecular Bone Score in Clinical Practice

The trabecular bone score (TBS) was introduced as an indirect index of trabecular microarchitecture, complementary to bone mineral density (BMD), and is derived using the same dual energy X-ray absorptiometry images. Recently, it has been approved for clinical use in Korea. Therefore, we conducted a comprehensive review to optimize the use of TBS in clinical practice. The TBS is an independent predictor of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women and men aged >50 years. The TBS is potentially useful in monitoring the skeletal effects of anabolic agents but not of antiresorptive agents. In postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the TBS assesses osteoporotic fracture risk not captured by BMD. However, high body mass index and soft tissue thickness can cause underestimation of the TBS; however, this limitation has been improved in recent versions of the TBS software. However, a high precision error and low reproducibility limit the use of TBS. This review may provide information on the application of the TBS in clinical practice based on reliable evidence.

Approaches to Fracture Risk Assessment and Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To critically assess recent evidence concerning osteoporosis fracture risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Robust instruments exist for predicting factures incorporating well-documented risk factors especially prior fracture whose magnitude varies with site, occurrence time, and age. Stratifying time-since-prior fracture has resulted in the concept of imminent fracture risk and increased focus on secondary fracture prevention. Secondary fracture prevention recommendations include fracture liaison service, pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic multidisciplinary intervention, and communicating that fractures in older adults are the predictable consequence of underlying osteoporosis rather than unfortunate accidents. Quality improvement in osteoporosis care includes diagnosing osteoporosis on the basis of clinical fractures rather than exclusively relying on bone density testing; applying diagnostic rather than screening approaches to patients with prior fractures; regularly updating fall and fracture histories; performing a physical exam focused on spinal curvature, posture, and musculoskeletal function; reviewing images to identify prevalent fractures that may have been missed; and general use of fracture risk algorithms at all stages of osteoporosis management. Communicating effectively with patients about osteoporosis and fractures, their consequences, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological management is the cornerstone of high-value care.

Advances in the Bone Health Assessment of Children

The last 2 decades have seen tremendous growth in understanding the clinical characteristics of various childhood bone disorders, their mechanisms and natural histories, and their responses to treatment. In this review, the authors describe advances in bone assessment techniques for children. In addition, they provide their skeletal site-specific applications, underscore the principles that are relevant to the biology of the growing child, show how these methods assist in the diagnosis and management of pediatric bone diseases, and highlight how these techniques have shed light on bone development and underlying disease mechanisms.

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Predicts Fracture in Ankylosing Spondylitis: The Manitoba BMD Registry

INTRODUCTION

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the spine characterized among other features by spinal boney proliferation, back pain, loss of flexibility, and increased fracture risk. Overlying bone limits the utility of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the spine. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a bone texture measurement derived from the spine DXA image that indicates bone quality and fracture risk independent of BMD.

METHODOLOGY

Using the Manitoba Bone Density Program database, patients with diagnosis codes for ankylosing spondylitis, baseline DXA and lumbar spine TBS were identified. Incident nontraumatic fractures (major osteoporotic [MOF], clinical spine, hip, and all fracture) were identified from population based databases. Cox-proportional hazard models are presented.

RESULTS

We identified 188 patients with diagnosed AS. TBS was lower in those with incident MOF (1.278 ± 0.126, compared to 1.178 ± 0.136, p < 0.001). Unadjusted TBS and FRAX-MOF-BMD adjusted predicted major osteoporotic fracture (N = 19) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-2.26, p = 0.003; HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.11-2.96, p = 0.018). TBS unadjusted and FRAX-MOF-BMD adjusted also predicted clinical spine fracture (N = 7) (HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.17-5.37; p = 0.019; HR 2.40 95% CI: 1.1-5.25; p = 0.028). Higher HRs were observed for prediction of hip fracture (N = 6), but these did not achieve statistical significance (FRAX-adjusted HR 1.74, 95% 0.73-4.17; p = 0.211). Unadjusted models show TBS was predictive of all fracture (N = 27) (HR 1.60, 95% CI: 1.08-2.39; p = 0.020), which was borderline significant after adjustment for FRAX-MOF-BMD (HR 1.51, 95% CI: 1.00-2.29; p = 0.052).

CONCLUSION

We report the first analysis of TBS for fracture prediction as an incident event in AS. TBS independently predicted major osteoporotic and clinical spine fracture in AS independent of FRAX.

Predicting population level hip fracture risk: a novel hierarchical model incorporating probabilistic approaches and factor of risk principles

Fall-related hip fractures are a major public health issue. While individual-level risk assessment tools exist, population-level predictive models could catalyze innovation in large-scale interventions. This study presents a hierarchical probabilistic model that predicts population-level hip fracture risk based on Factor of Risk (FOR) principles. Model validation demonstrated that FOR output aligned with a published dataset categorized by sex and hip fracture status. The model predicted normalized FOR for 100000 individuals simulating the Canadian older-adult population. Predicted hip fracture risk was higher for females (by an average of 38%), and increased with age (by15% per decade). Potential applications are discussed.

Practical management of fracture risk among peri- and postmenopausal women

Fractures and their consequences are the clinically important manifestation of osteoporosis; preventing fractures is the primary goal of management. Effective management is achievable given present knowledge and tools but is seldom prescribed. This review will cover the individual and social burden of fracture, essential information about fracture risk and its estimation, an approach to patient care emphasizing specific information to elicit and therapeutic strategies to pursue, and existing gaps in knowledge and important questions for future research.

Trabecular bone scores in young HIV-infected men: a matched case-control study

Background

Screening for osteoporosis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is recommended for male HIV-infected patients only above the age of 50. Recently, trabecular bone score (TBS) has been introduced as a novel tool to assess bone microarchitecture using DXA of the lumbar spine. Few studies have reported TBS values in HIV-infected individuals younger than 50 years of age. This study compared TBS values in young males infected with HIV and matched controls, and investigated the associations between TBS and demographic parameters, clinical parameters, and bone mineral density (BMD) scores.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of BMD and TBS in HIV-infected men (n = 80) aged between 18 and 50 years and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 80) was conducted.

Results

The proportion of patients with low BMD (Z-score ≤ − 2) was significantly greater among HIV-infected patients than among matched controls (21.3% [17/80] vs. 8.8% [7/80], p = 0.027). Mean TBS values were significantly lower in HIV-infected patients than in controls (1.41 ± 0.07 vs. 1.45 ± 0.07, p = 0.008). In both groups, TBS values were positively correlated with BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip (p < 0.001); however, TBS was not correlated with body mass index. In the HIV group, TBS was negatively correlated with the duration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) exposure (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Young men infected with HIV had abnormal bone trabecular microarchitecture, as assessed by both TBS and BMD. TBS values were correlated with both BMD and the duration of TDF exposure.

A decade of FRAX: how has it changed the management of osteoporosis?

The fracture risk assessment tool, FRAX^®, was released in 2008 and provides country-specific algorithms for estimating individualized 10-year probability of hip and major osteoporotic fracture (hip, clinical spine, distal forearm, and proximal humerus). Since its release, 71 models have been made available for 66 countries covering more than 80% of the world population. The website receives approximately 3 million visits annually. Following independent validation, FRAX has been incorporated into more than 80 guidelines worldwide. The application of FRAX in assessment guidelines has been heterogeneous with the adoption of several different approaches in setting intervention thresholds. Whereas most guidelines adopt a case-finding strategy, the case for FRAX-based community screening in the elderly is increasing. The relationship between FRAX and efficacy of intervention has been explored and is expected to influence treatment guidelines in the future.

Structural and Metabolic Assessment of Bone

The assessment of bone structure and metabolism should focus on the bone strength. Many factors are involved, and although bone density is an important component, it is not the same as bone strength. Other aspects of bone quality include bone volume, micro-architecture, material composition, and ability to repair damage. This chapter briefly reviews some of the methods that can be used to assess both density and quality of bone. Non-invasive measurements of density or structure include dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), quantitative computed tomography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. DXA is most widely used and has advantages of safety and accessibility, but there are limitations in the interpretation of the results, and in clinical practice positioning errors are frequently seen. Invasive methods are used primarily for research. Samples of bone can be used to measure structure by histology as well as micro-computed tomography and infra-red spectroscopy or backscattered electron microscopy. Force can be directly applied to bone samples to measure the bones strength. Impact microindentation is a new minimally invasive technique that measures bone hardness. Metabolic assessment includes blood and urine tests that reflect diseases that cause bone loss, particularly problems with mineral metabolism. Tetracycline-labelled bone biopsies are the standard for measuring bone formation. Non-invasive biochemical tests of bone formation and resorption can evaluate a patient's skeletal physiology.

Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures

Guidance is provided in an international setting on the assessment and specific treatment of postmenopausal women at low, high and very high risk of fragility fractures.

INTRODUCTION

The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2019. This manuscript seeks to apply this in an international setting, taking additional account of further categorisation of increased risk of fracture, which may inform choice of therapeutic approach.

METHODS

Clinical perspective and updated literature search.

RESULTS

The following areas are reviewed: categorisation of fracture risk and general pharmacological management of osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use to characterise fracture risk and direct interventions.

FRAX: re-adjust or re-think

Since its development in 2008, FRAX has booked its place in the standard day to day management of osteoporosis. The FRAX tool has been appreciated for its simplicity and applicability for use in primary care, but criticised for the same reason, as it does not take into account exposure response. To address some of these limitations, relatively simple arithmetic procedures have been proposed to be applied to the conventional FRAX estimates of hip and major fracture probabilities aiming at adjustment of the probability assessment. However, as the list of these adjustments got longer, this has reflected on its implementation in the standard practice and gave FRAX a patchy look. Consequently, raises the need to re-think of the current FRAX and whether a second generation of the tool is required to address the perceived limitations of the original FRAX. This article will discuss both point of views of re-adjustment and re-thinking.

Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is associated with increased fragility of bone and a subsequent increased risk of fracture. The diagnosis of osteoporosis is intimately linked with the imaging and quantification of bone and BMD. Scanning modalities, such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry or quantitative CT, have been developed and honed over the past half century to provide measures of BMD and bone microarchitecture for the purposes of clinical practice and research. Combined with fracture prediction tools such as Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) (which use a combination of clinical risk factors for fracture to provide a measure of risk), these elements have led to a paradigm shift in the ability to diagnose osteoporosis and predict individuals who are at risk of fragility fracture. Despite these developments, a treatment gap exists between individuals who are at risk of osteoporotic fracture and those who are receiving therapy. In this Review, we summarize the epidemiology of osteoporosis, the history of scanning modalities, fracture prediction tools and future directions, including the most recent developments in prediction of fractures.

The utility and limitations of using trabecular bone score with FRAX

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a texture index derived from the lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry which can assess skeletal quality and provide information about fracture risk independent of bone mineral density (BMD). TBS is useful in assessing osteoporotic fracture risk, with lower TBS values associated with increased fracture risk. In this article, we review the current state of TBS, including its utility and limitations in the assessment and management of osteoporosis, with particular emphasis on the recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ten-year fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool can be improved through the use of a TBS adjustment. The use of TBS-adjusted FRAX can change management in a modest but significant number of patients, particularly in those close to an intervention threshold. Change in lumbar spine TBS for patients undergoing antiresorptive treatment is not a useful indicator of antifracture effect.

SUMMARY

Lumbar spine TBS provides information complementary to conventional BMD, and has been shown to be clinically useful for enhancing fracture risk prediction.

Effects of Thyrotropin Suppression on Bone Health in Menopausal Women with Total Thyroidectomy

Background

This study examined the change in the trabecular bone score (TBS), areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who underwent thyrotropin (TSH)-suppressive therapy for treating papillary thyroid cancer after a total thyroidectomy procedure.

Methods

We evaluated 36 postmenopausal women who received a total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer and were undergoing TSH suppressive therapy with levothyroxine. Postmenopausal women (n=94) matched for age and body mass index were recruited as healthy controls. The aBMD and TBS of the lumbar spine were compared between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at baseline and at follow-up after an average of 4.92 years.

Results

There was no significant difference in the rate of diagnoses of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal bone status between the 2 groups during the baseline DXA evaluation. However, the TBS was significantly lower whereas aBMD did not show significant difference at the time of baseline DXA measurement (1st DXA, 1.343±0.098 vs. 1.372±0.06317, P<0.001; 2nd DXA, 1.342±0.095 vs. 1.370±0.062, P<0.001). The TBS and aBMD did not differ significantly between the initial and follow-up DXA images in both groups of TSH suppressive patients and controls.

Conclusions

The average value of TBS and aBMD did not significantly change during the follow-up period. The TSH suppressive therapy was revealed as not a significant factor for the progressive deterioration of bone status during long term follow-up.

European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women at risk from fractures due to osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2013. This manuscript updates these in a European setting.

METHODS

Systematic reviews were updated.

RESULTS

The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk; general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis; monitoring of treatment; assessment of fracture risk; case-finding strategies; investigation of patients; health economics of treatment. The update includes new information on the evaluation of bone microstructure evaluation in facture risk assessment, the role of FRAX® and Fracture Liaison Services in secondary fracture prevention, long-term effects on fracture risk of dietary intakes, and increased fracture risk on stopping drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use.

Evaluation of Bone Mineral Density Using DXA and cQCT in Postmenopausal Patients Under Thyrotropin Suppressive Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the discrepancy in osteoporosis diagnoses between central quantitative computed tomography (cQCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and evaluated correlations among volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), areal bone mineral density (aBMD), and trabecular bone score(TBS) in postmenopausal women who were undergoing TSH suppressive therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled a total of 81 postmenopausal patients [median age: 58 years; interquartile range (IQR): 57 to 60 years] receiving TSH suppressive therapy with levothyroxine after undergoing total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer. Patients were diagnosed by their bone mineral density (BMD) T-score and categorized according to a vBMD threshold of 120 mg/cm3 for osteopenia and a threshold of 80 mg/cm3 for osteoporosis.

RESULTS

When DXA and cQCT were compared, the BMD evaluation results differed in 76% of patients (n = 62; P < 0.001), and the detection rate of osteoporosis was 30.9% for cQCT and 21.0% for DXA. Sixty-two patients had discordant results; in 46 of these patients (74%) whose DXA T-scores were normal, the diagnosis shifted to osteopenia (n = 35) and osteoporosis (n = 11) according to the vBMD on cQCT (P < 0.001), and their vBMD values were significantly correlated with TBS (r = 0.293; P = 0.008). However, aBMD was not significantly correlated with TBS (r = 0.080; P = 0.480). TBS was significantly lower in patients with osteopenia (median: 1.35; IQR: 1.18 to 1.47) and osteoporosis (median: 1.28; IQR: 1.07 to 1.47) than in those with a normal BMD value (median: 1.37; IQR: 1.25 to 1.49; P = 0.041) on cQCT. There was no significant difference in TBS according to DXA BMD status (P = 0.200).

CONCLUSIONS

DXA and cQCT yielded inconsistent results, and detection of osteopenia and osteoporosis was higher using cQCT. TBS showed a more significant correlation with vBMD than with aBMD.

A brief history of FRAX

This paper reviews the research programme that went into the development of FRAX® and its impact in the 10 years since its release in 2008.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is defined on the measurement of bone mineral density though the clinical consequence is fracture. The sensitivity of bone mineral density measurements for fracture prediction is low, leading to the development of FRAX to better calculate the likelihood of fracture and target anti-osteoporosis treatments.

METHODS

The method used in this paper is literature review.

RESULTS

FRAX, developed over an 8-year period, was launched in 2008. Since the launch of FRAX, models have been made available for 64 countries and in 31 languages covering more than 80% of the world population.

CONCLUSION

FRAX provides an advance in fracture risk assessment and a reference technology platform for future improvements in performance characteristics.

Less strict intervention thresholds for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX predict clinical fractures in osteopenic postmenopausal women with no prior fractures

Little is known about the clinical relevance of treating post-menopausal women with no prior history of fragility fracture and bone mineral densities (BMD) within the osteopenic range. In recent years, in addition to BMD and FRAX fracture probability assessments, a surrogate measure of bone micro-architecture quality, called the trabecular bone score (TBS), has been proven to predict future fragility fractures independently of both BMD and the FRAX. In this retrospective analysis of a follow-up study, we compared three risk assessment instruments-the FRAX, the TBS, and a TBS-adjusted FRAX score-in their ability, to predict future fragility fractures over a minimum of five years of follow-up among post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fragility fractures. We also sought to determine if more- versus less-stringent criteria were better when stratifying patients into higher-risk patients warranting osteoporosis-targeted intervention versus lower-risk patients in whom intervention would usually be deemed unnecessary. Over a mean 5.2 years follow-up, 18 clinical fragility fractures were documented among 127 women in the age 50 years and older (mean age = 66.1). On multivariate analysis utilizing regression models and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, less-stringent criteria for the FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX were capable of predicting future fractures (with sensitivity/specificity of 83/31; 39/77 and 78/50% for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively), while more-stringent criteria were incapable of doing so (with sensitivity/specificity of 56/60; 39/77 and 39/74 for TBS, FRAX and TBS-adjusted FRAX, respectively). Neither TBS threshold alone was a significant predictor of future fracture in our study. However, hazard ratio analysis revealed slight superiority of the TBS-adjusted FRAX over the FRAX alone (HR = 3.09 vs. 2.79). Adjusting the FRAX tool by incorporating the TBS may be useful to optimize the detection of post-menopausal osteopenic women with no prior fractures who warrant osteoporosis-targeted therapy.

HIV Infection Is Associated With Abnormal Bone Microarchitecture: Measurement of Trabecular Bone Score in the Women's Interagency HIV Study

OBJECTIVES

We compared skeletal microarchitecture using trabecular bone score (TBS) and evaluated relationships between change in TBS and lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) in women with and without HIV.

METHODS

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed on 319 women with HIV and 118 without HIV in the Women's Interagency HIV Study at baseline and 2 and 5 years, to measure regional BMD and lean and fat mass. TBS was extracted from LS dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images and examined continuously and categorically [normal (≥1.35), intermediate (1.20-1.35), or degraded (≤1.20) microarchitecture]. Pearson correlation and linear regression examined associations of TBS with regional BMD at baseline and over time.

RESULTS

Women with HIV were older (43 vs. 37 years), more likely to be postmenopausal (27% vs. 4%), have lower baseline total fat mass, trunk fat, and leg fat than uninfected women, degraded microarchitecture (27% vs. 9%, P = 0.001), and lower baseline mean TBS (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 1.4 ± 0.1, P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, race, menopause status, and body mass index, TBS remained lower in women with HIV (P < 0.0001). Annual change in TBS correlated with LS BMD change among women with HIV (r = 0.36, P < 0.0001) and without HIV (r = 0.26, P = 0.02); however, mean % annual TBS change did not differ by HIV status (-1.0%/yr ± 2.9% for HIV+ vs. -0.8%/yr ± 1.7% for HIV-, P = 0.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with HIV have worse bone microarchitecture than uninfected women, but annual percent change in LS BMD or TBS was similar. Use of TBS as an adjunct to BMD to improve prediction of fragility fractures in women with HIV merits further study.

Improved fracture prediction using different fracture risk assessment tool adjustments in HIV-infected women

OBJECTIVES

A fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) using clinical risk factors (CRFs) alone underestimates fracture risk in HIV-infected men. Our objective was to determine whether accuracy of FRAX would be improved by considering HIV as a cause of secondary osteoporosis, and further improved with addition of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry parameters in HIV-infected women.

DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of Women's Interagency HIV Study.

METHODS

We included 1148 women (900 HIV-infected and 248 uninfected) over age 40 with data to approximate FRAX CRFs and 10-year observational data for incident fragility fractures; 181 (20%) HIV-infected women had dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data. Accuracy of FRAX was evaluated by the observed/estimated ratios of fracture in four models: CRFs alone; CRFs with HIV included as a cause of secondary osteoporosis; CRFs and femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD); and CRFs, FN BMD and trabecular bone score.

RESULTS

FRAX using CRFs were less accurate in HIV-infected than uninfected women for major osteoporotic (observed/estimated ratio: 5.05 vs. 3.26, P < 0.001) and hip fractures (observed/estimated ratio: 19.78 vs. 7.94, P < 0.001), but improved when HIV was included as a cause of secondary osteoporosis. Among HIV-infected women, FRAX accuracy improved further with addition of FN BMD (observed/estimated ratio: 4.00) for hip fractures, but no further with trabecular bone score.

CONCLUSION

FRAX using CRFs alone underestimated fracture risk more in older HIV-infected women than otherwise similar uninfected women. Accuracy is improved when including HIV as a cause of secondary osteoporosis for both major osteoporotic and hip fractures, whereas addition of FN BMD only improved accuracy for hip fracture.

Vitamin D and Trabecular Bone Score in a Group of Young Lebanese Adults

The relationship between vitamin D and trabecular bone score (TBS) in young adults remains unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] serum levels and TBS in a healthy adult population. A total of 54 men and 61 women whose ages range from 18 to 35 participated in the present study. Participants with 25(OH)D insufficiency (between 21 and 29 ng/mL) were 55.7%, and those with 25(OH)D deficiency (≤20 ng/mL) were 11.4%. TBS positively correlated with 25(OH)D in men (r = 0.393; p <0.05) and women (r = 0.324; p < 0.05). In both genders, TBS was significantly higher in 25(OH)D-sufficient participants (≥30 ng/mL). The present study provides evidence that vitamin D positively affects bone health and suggests that maintaining adequate vitamin D status may be essential for optimal TBS values.

The challenges of diagnosing osteoporosis and the limitations of currently available tools

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was the first imaging tool widely utilized by clinicians to assess fracture risk, especially in postmenopausal women. The development of DXA nearly coincided with the availability of effective osteoporosis medications. Although osteoporosis in adults is diagnosed based on a T-score equal to or below − 2.5 SD, most individuals who sustain fragility fractures are above this arbitrary cutoff. This incongruity poses a challenge to clinicians to identify patients who may benefit from osteoporosis treatments. DXA scanners generate 2 dimensional images of complex 3 dimensional structures, and report bone density as the quotient of the bone mineral content divided by the bone area. An obvious pitfall of this method is that a larger bone will convey superior strength, but may in fact have the same bone density as a smaller bone. Other imaging modalities are available such as peripheral quantitative CT, but are largely research tools. Current osteoporosis medications increase bone density and reduce fracture risk but the mechanisms of these actions vary. Anti-resorptive medications (bisphosphonates and denosumab) primarily increase endocortical bone by bolstering mineralization of endosteal resorption pits and thereby increase cortical thickness and reduce cortical porosity. Anabolic medications (teriparatide and abaloparatide) increase the periosteal and endosteal perimeters without large changes in cortical thickness resulting in a larger more structurally sound bone. Because of the differences in the mechanisms of the various drugs, there are likely benefits of selecting a treatment based on a patient’s unique bone structure and pattern of bone loss. This review retreats to basic principles in order to advance clinical management of fragility fractures by examining how skeletal biomechanics, size, shape, and ultra-structural properties are the ultimate predictors of bone strength. Accurate measurement of these skeletal parameters through the development of better imaging scanners is critical to advancing fracture risk assessment and informing clinicians on the best treatment strategy. With this information, a “treat to target” approach could be employed to tailor current and future therapies to each patient’s unique skeletal characteristics.

2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis

OBJECTIVES

To update the 2012 recommendations on pharmacotherapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis, under the aegis of the Bone Task Force of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) and of the Osteoporosis Research and Information Group (GRIO), in collaboration with scientific societies (Collège national des généralistes enseignants, Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français, Fédération nationale des collèges de gynécologie médicale, Groupe d'étude de la ménopause et du vieillissement hormonal, Société française de chirurgie orthopédique, Société française d'endocrinologie, and Société française de gériatrie et de gérontologie).

METHODS

Updated recommendations were developed by a task force whose members represented the medical specialties involved in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The update was based on a literature review and developed using the method advocated by the French National Authority for Health (HAS).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The updated recommendations place strong emphasis on the treatment of women with severe fractures, in whom the use of osteoporosis medications is recommended. All the available osteoporosis medications are suitable in patients with severe fractures; zoledronic acid deserves preference as the fist-line drug after a hip fracture. In patients with or without non-severe fractures, the decision to use osteoporosis medications is based on bone mineral density values and in challenging cases, on probabilities supplied by prediction tools such as FRAX^®. All osteoporosis medications are suitable; raloxifene should be reserved for patients at low risk for peripheral fractures. The fracture risk should be reevaluated every 2 to 3 years to decide on the best follow-up treatment. These updated recommendations discuss the selection of first-line osteoporosis medications and treatment sequences.

Trabecular Bone Score in Obese and Nonobese Subjects With Primary Hyperparathyroidism Before and After Parathyroidectomy

CONTEXT

Obesity has been shown to be unfavorable to skeletal microarchitecture when assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS). The influence of adiposity on skeletal microstructure in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) has not yet been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of obesity on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) in subjects with PHPT at baseline and through 2 years after parathyroidectomy.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Referral center.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Thirty men and women with PHPT undergoing parathyroid surgery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

TBS and BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

There were notable improvements in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in the obese (lumbar spine: 4.3 ± 4.7%, femoral neck: 3.8 ± 6.6%; P < 0.05 for both) and nonobese subjects (lumbar spine: 3.8 ± 5.6%, femoral neck 3.1 ± 5.0%; P < 0.05 for both) but no marked change in TBS in either group at 24 months postparathyroidectomy. Obese subjects had fully degraded TBS values compared with the nonobese subjects, whose TBS values were minimally below normal throughout the study (baseline: 1.199 ± 0.086 vs 1.327 ± 0.099, respectively; P = 0.003; 24 months: 1.181 ± 0.061 vs 1.352 ± 0.114, respectively; P = 0.001), despite improvements in BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

The detrimental effect of obesity on TBS, an index of bone quality, was demonstrated in subjects with PHPT. Obesity was associated with fully degraded skeletal microarchitecture as measured by TBS in PHPT, despite similar values in bone density by DXA compared with nonobese subjects. TBS values did not improve postparathyroidectomy in either obese or nonobese subjects.

Bone microarchitecture and bone mineral density in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients are at increased risk of reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and fractures. The aetiology of bone loss in MS is unclear. Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a novel analytical tool that provides a measurement of the bone microarchitecture. Decreased TBS predicts increased fracture risk independently of BMD. To date, no studies have investigated TBS in MS patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess bone quality in MS patients by TBS and to evaluate potential risk factors that may affect BMD and TBS in patients with MS.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty MS patients were included. TBS was calculated using TBS iNsight software (MediMaps^® ). Multivariable regression analyses were performed with information on smoking, alcohol, glucocorticoid (GC) treatment, sun exposure, physical activity, vitamin D and BMI.

RESULTS

Trabecular bone score was not significantly different from an age-matched reference population. Low TBS was associated with high age (P = .014) and smoking (P = .03). Smoking and physical inactivity were associated with low BMD in spine (P = .034, P = .032). GC treatment was not associated with TBS.

CONCLUSION

We could not find altered TBS values among MS patients, suggesting that BMD alone, and not the bone microarchitecture, is affected in MS. However, larger studies are needed to verify these findings and to establish the role of TBS in MS. As in the background population, physical activity and non-smoking habits are associated with better bone health in MS.

Trabecular Bone Score in Men and Women with Impaired Fasting Glucose and Diabetes

Diabetes is associated with increased skeletal fragility, despite higher bone mineral density (BMD). Alternative measures are necessary to more accurately determine fracture risk in individuals with diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to describe the relationship between trabecular bone score (TBS) and normoglycaemia, impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and diabetes and determine whether TBS-adjusted FRAX (Aus) score differed between these groups. This study included 555 men (68.7 ± 12.2 years) and 514 women (62.0 ± 12.0 years), enrolled in the observational Geelong Osteoporosis Study. IFG was considered as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 5.5 mmol/L and diabetes as FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L, with the use of antihyperglycaemic medication and/or self-report. Using multivariable regression, the relationship between groups and TBS was determined. Men and women (all ages) with diabetes had lower mean TBS compared to those with normoglycaemia, in models adjusted for age, height and weight/waist circumference (all p < 0.05). Men with IFG had lower mean TBS in the age-adjusted models only (all p < 0.05). The addition of TBS to the FRAX score improved the discrimination between glycaemia groups, particularly for younger women (< 65 years). There was no difference in TBS detected between normoglycaemia and IFG; however, those with diabetes had lower TBS. Thus, the increased fracture risk in men and women with diabetes may be a result of BMD-independent bone deterioration. TBS adjustment of FRAX scores may be useful for younger women (< 65 years) with diabetes. This suggests that halting or reversing progression from IFG to diabetes could be important to prevent skeletal fragility in diabetes.

Trabecular bone score (TBS) is associated with sub-clinical vertebral fractures in HIV-infected patients

Fragility fractures risk is increased among HIV infected patients. Bone microstructure alterations, in addition to bone mineral density (BMD) reduction, might be responsible for the increased risk. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of vertebral fractures (VFs) and their association with trabecular bone score (TBS), an indirect index of bone microstructure, in a cohort of HIV-infected subjects. One-hundred and forty-one HIV-infected patients (87% males, median age 43 years, 94% on stable antiretroviral therapy with undetectable viral load) underwent viro-immunological and bone metabolism biochemical screenings. Lumbar TBS and BMD at femoral neck, total hip, and lumbar spine, were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). VFs were identified using the semiquantitative method and quantitative morphometric analysis from thoracic and lumbar spine X-ray images. VFs were observed in 19 patients (13.5%). BMD was below the expected range for age in 18 (12.8%) subjects. No significant differences were found stratifying VFs prevalence by BMD, whereas patients with lower TBS showed a higher prevalence of VFs (p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, TBS was the only factor significantly associated to VFs (OR = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.33-0.96; p = 0.034), with increased fracture risk for lower TBS values. VFs are prevalent and associated with low TBS among HIV-positive patients, whereas no significant association was found with BMD.

Prediction of major osteoporotic and hip fractures in Australian men using FRAX scores adjusted with trabecular bone score

There was no significant difference between the areas under receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) and diagnostic indexes (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) for either major osteoporotic or hip fracture FRAX scores when comparing the unadjusted and trabecular bone score (TBS)-adjusted scores.

INTRODUCTION

FRAX 10-year probability of fracture can be calculated with adjustment for the TBS. Studies have shown that TBS can improve FRAX assessments in some populations. This study aimed to determine if TBS-adjusted FRAX score is better than the unadjusted score for predicting major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture in Australian men.

METHODS

This study involved 591 men aged 40-90 years, enrolled in the Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Incident MOF (n = 50) and hip fractures (n = 14) were ascertained using radiological reports. Median follow-up time was 9.5 years (IQR7.5-11.4). Diagnostic indexes were calculated using cut points of ≥20% for MOF and ≥3% for the hip. AUROC curves were also determined for adjusted and unadjusted scores as continuous variables.

RESULTS

Sensitivity was higher in the TBS-adjusted scores (MOF 4%, hip 78.6%) than the unadjusted scores (MOF 2%, hip 57.1%), with a decrease in specificity (MOF 98.9 vs 99.3%; hip 79.9 vs 83.9%). When considering TBS-adjusted and unadjusted FRAX as continuous scores, AUROCs were 0.738 and 0.740, respectively, for MOF and 0.849 and 0.848 for the hip.

CONCLUSIONS

Prediction of fractures by MOF or hip FRAX was not substantially improved by TBS adjustment. There was no difference in AUROCs or diagnostic indexes for cut-off points of ≥20 for MOF and ≥3% for hip FRAX.