1
|
McCloskey E, Tan ATH, Schini M. Update on fracture risk assessment in osteoporosis. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2024; 31:141-148. [PMID: 38809256 DOI: 10.1097/med.0000000000000871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The assessment of fracture risk is playing an ever-increasing role in osteoporosis clinical management and informing international guidelines for osteoporosis. FRAX, a fracture risk calculator that provides individualized 10-year probabilities of hip and major osteoporotic fracture, has been widely used since 2008. In this review, we recap the development and limitations of intervention thresholds and the role of absolute fracture risk. RECENT FINDINGS There is an increasing awareness of disparities and inequities in the setting of intervention thresholds in osteoporosis. The limitations of the simple use of prior fracture or the DXA-derived BMD T -score threshold are increasingly being discussed; one solution is to use fracture risk or probabilities in the setting of such thresholds. This approach also permits more objective assessment of high and very high fracture risk to enable physicians to make choices not just about the need to treat but what agents to use in individual patients. SUMMARY Like all clinical tools, FRAX has limitations that need to be considered, but the use of fracture risk in deciding who to treat, when to treat and what agent to use is a mechanism to target treatment equitably to those at an increased risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene McCloskey
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Andre T H Tan
- Fast and Chronic Programmes, Alexandra Hospital, Queenstown
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marian Schini
- Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tuzun S, Akarirmak U, Kulaksiz B, Keles A, Okutan D, Karsli P, Kurtoglu SS, Aygun E, Palamar D. The association of FRAX with predictors of falls in the assessment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Turkey: the fracture study of Turkey (FRACT study). Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:29. [PMID: 38642281 PMCID: PMC11032283 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01387-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Although FRAX is used for fracture risk evaluation, this tool does not include balance and fall risk. The association between the predictors of falls and high FRAX scores we found in this study suggests that risk indicators for falls may add substantial value to FRAX by improving fracture risk prediction. PURPOSE This observational, descriptive, and cross-sectional study aimed to assess the fall risk predictors and explore their association with FRAX in Turkish patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS Two hundred and nine (209) women with postmenopausal osteoporosis referred to the Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) at Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa were enrolled in the FRACT study (The Fracture Study of Turkey). Clinical risk factors were assessed using the FRAX tool. Tandem stance, Tandem walking, Timed up and go (TUG), and Chair stand tests were performed to assess balance and fall risk. RESULTS Among patients with a mean age of 67.6 (± 9.7) years, 66 patients (31.6%) had osteoporosis without fractures and 143 patients (68.4%) had fragility fractures. The proportion of patients with poor performance of fall prediction tests was significantly higher in patients with a fragility fracture than those with osteoporosis alone. There was an inverse relationship between dynamic balance tests and the reported number of prior falls in the past year. FRAX score was higher in patients with impaired Tandem stance, Tandem walking, and TUG tests (p = 0.008, p = 0.035, p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Assessment of fall risk predictors should be one of the major pillars in the physical evaluation of osteoporotic patients in the FLS setting. FRAX is a useful tool to determine the fracture risk of patients with both static and dynamic balance impairments. Combining balance assessment with FRAX may be an important step to optimize osteoporosis risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sansin Tuzun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Ulku Akarirmak
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bilal Kulaksiz
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aslinur Keles
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dilara Okutan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pinar Karsli
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sevgi Selin Kurtoglu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Eren Aygun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Deniz Palamar
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Individuals with cancer face unique risk factors for osteoporosis and fractures. Clinicians must consider the additive effects of cancer-specific factors, including treatment-induced bone loss, and premorbid fracture risk, utilizing FRAX score and bone mineral densitometry when available. Pharmacologic therapy should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines, when available, or local general osteoporosis guidelines informed by clinical judgment and patient preferences. Our objective was to review and summarize the epidemiologic burden of osteoporotic fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in adults with cancer, and recommended treatment thresholds for cancer treatment-induced bone loss, with specific focus on breast, prostate, thyroid, gynecological, multiple myeloma, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This narrative review was informed by PubMed searches to July 25, 2022, that combined terms for cancer, stem cell transplantation, fracture, bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score, FRAX, Garvan nomogram or fracture risk calculator, QFracture, prediction, and risk factors. The literature informs that cancer can impact bone health in numerous ways, leading to both systemic and localized decreases in BMD. Many cancer treatments can have detrimental effects on bone health. In particular, hormone deprivation therapies for hormone-responsive cancers such as breast cancer and prostate cancer, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hematologic malignancies, adversely affect bone turnover, resulting in osteoporosis and fractures. Surgical treatments such as hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for gynecological cancers can also lead to deleterious effects on bone health. Radiation therapy is well documented to cause localized bone loss and fractures. Few studies have validated the use of fracture risk prediction tools in the cancer population. Guidelines on cancer-specific treatment thresholds are limited, and major knowledge gaps still exist in fracture risk and fracture risk assessment in patients with cancer. Despite the limitations of current knowledge on fracture risk assessment and treatment thresholds in patients with cancer, clinicians must consider the additive effects of bone damaging factors to which these patients are exposed and their premorbid fracture risk profile. Pharmacologic treatment should be offered as per cancer-specific guidelines when available, or per local general osteoporosis guidelines, in accordance with clinical judgment and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Ye
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kanis JA, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Lorentzon M, Liu E, Vandenput L, Morin S, Leslie WD, McCloskey EV. Adjusting conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the number of prior falls in the preceding year. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:479-487. [PMID: 36562788 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06633-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
A greater propensity to falling is associated with higher fracture risk. This study provides adjustments to FRAX-based fracture probabilities accounting for the number of prior falls. INTRODUCTION Prior falls increase subsequent fracture risk but are not currently directly included in the FRAX tool. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of the number of prior falls on the 10-year probability of fracture determined with FRAX®. METHODS We studied 21,116 women and men age 40 years or older (mean age 65.7 ± 10.1 years) with fracture probability assessment (FRAX®), self-reported falls for the previous year, and subsequent fracture outcomes in a registry-based cohort. The risks of death, hip fracture, and non-hip major osteoporotic fracture (MOF-NH) were determined by Cox proportional hazards regression for fall number category versus the whole population (i.e., an average number of falls). Ten-year probabilities of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were determined according to the number of falls from the hazards of death and fracture incorporated into the FRAX model for the UK. The probability ratios (number of falls vs. average number of falls) provided adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the number of falls. RESULTS Compared with the average number of falls, the hazard ratios for hip fracture, MOF-NH and death were lower than unity in the absence of a fall history. Hazard ratios increased progressively with an increasing number of reported falls. The probability ratio rose progressively as the number of reported falls increased. Probability ratios decreased with age, an effect that was more marked the greater the number of prior falls. CONCLUSION The probability ratios provide adjustments to conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the number of prior falls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | - Helena Johansson
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Vandenput
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Suzanne Morin
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Izquierdo-Avino R, Cebollada-Gadea L, Jordan-Jarque M, Bordonaba-Bosque D, López-Cabanas JA. Risk of osteoporotic fracture and refracture: the importance of index fracture site. Arch Osteoporos 2023; 18:27. [PMID: 36705860 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-023-01213-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The current study shows that patients aged 50 or more who have sustained an osteoporotic fracture have a significant risk of suffering a new fracture. Refracture risk is also increased when anatomic site of both index and subsequent fracture are the same. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of a patient sustaining a fragility fracture, the influence of the initial or index fracture on subsequent fracture risk and the role that anatomic site of index and subsequent fracture play on fracture risk. METHODS In this retrospective observational cohort study, individuals aged ≥ 50 years who sustained at least one clinical fragility fracture were identified from the public health service register between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. Two separate analysis cohorts were identified. Group 1 (index FF) included patients that sustained at least one clinical fragility fracture during the study period. Group 2 (subsequent FF) included those patients from group 1 who sustained at least one clinical subsequent fracture during the following 2 years after index fracture. RESULTS A total of 11,986 fractures constituted group 1 (index FF), and 792 constituted group 2 (subsequent FF). The incidence of subsequent fractures was 6.61%, with a major percentage of them (36.99%) identified within the first 6 months following index FF. Hip was the most frequent site for index (30.09%) and subsequent fracture (34.85%). We found an increased risk mainly when anatomic site of index and subsequent FF are the same. CONCLUSIONS Sustaining a subsequent fracture after an index fracture is a common event in the population over age 50, more commonly occurring within 6 months of index fracture. Analysis of fracture site correlation shows that refracture risk is increased mainly when index and subsequent fracture site are the same.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Izquierdo-Avino
- Fracture Liaison Service Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Provincial Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain.
| | - L Cebollada-Gadea
- Fracture Liaison Service Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Provincial Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - M Jordan-Jarque
- Fracture Liaison Service Unit, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Provincial Nuestra Señora de Gracia, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - D Bordonaba-Bosque
- Statistical and Methodological Support (SAME), Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain
| | - J A López-Cabanas
- Statistical and Methodological Support (SAME), Aragon Health Sciences Institute (IACS), Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
David K, Narinx N, Antonio L, Evenepoel P, Claessens F, Decallonne B, Vanderschueren D. Bone health in ageing men. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2022; 23:1173-1208. [PMID: 35841491 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-022-09738-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis does not only affect postmenopausal women, but also ageing men. The burden of disease is projected to increase with higher life expectancy both in females and males. Importantly, osteoporotic men remain more often undiagnosed and untreated compared to women. Sex steroid deficiency is associated with bone loss and increased fracture risk, and circulating sex steroid levels have been shown to be associated both with bone mineral density and fracture risk in elderly men. However, in contrast to postmenopausal osteoporosis, the contribution of relatively small decrease of circulating sex steroid concentrations in the ageing male to the development of osteoporosis and related fractures, is probably only minor. In this review we provide several clinical and preclinical arguments in favor of a 'bone threshold' for occurrence of hypogonadal osteoporosis, corresponding to a grade of sex steroid deficiency that in general will not occur in many elderly men. Testosterone replacement therapy has been shown to increase bone mineral density in men, however data in osteoporotic ageing males are scarce, and evidence on fracture risk reduction is lacking. We conclude that testosterone replacement therapy should not be used as a sole bone-specific treatment in osteoporotic elderly men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel David
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, ON1bis box 902, 3000 , Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nick Narinx
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, ON1bis box 902, 3000 , Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leen Antonio
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, ON1bis box 902, 3000 , Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Evenepoel
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Decallonne
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, ON1bis box 902, 3000 , Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vanderschueren
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, ON1bis box 902, 3000 , Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harvey NC, Orwoll E, Cauley JA, Kwok T, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE, Ribom E, Cawthon PM, Ensrud K, Liu E, Laskou F, Ward KA, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Vandenput L, Lorentzon M, Ohlsson C, Mellström D, Johansson H, McCloskey E. Greater pQCT Calf Muscle Density Is Associated with Lower Fracture Risk, Independent of FRAX, Falls and BMD: A Meta-Analysis in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. JBMR Plus 2022; 6:e10696. [PMID: 36530188 PMCID: PMC9751652 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
We investigated the predictive performance of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measures of both calf muscle density (an established surrogate for muscle adiposity, with higher values indicating lower muscle adiposity and higher muscle quality) and size (cross-sectional area [CSA]) for incident fracture. pQCT (Stratec XCT2000/3000) measurements at the tibia were undertaken in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) United States (US), Hong Kong (HK), and Swedish (SW) cohorts. Analyses were by cohort and synthesized by meta-analysis. The predictive value for incident fracture outcomes, illustrated here for hip fracture (HF), using an extension of Poisson regression adjusted for age and follow-up time, was expressed as hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) increase in exposure (HR/SD). Further analyses adjusted for femoral neck (fn) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) 10-year fracture probability (major osteoporotic fracture) and prior falls. We studied 991 (US), 1662 (HK), and 1521 (SW) men, mean ± SD age 77.0 ± 5.1, 73.9 ± 4.9, 80 ± 3.4 years, followed for a mean ± SD 7.8 ± 2.2, 8.1 ± 2.3, 5.3 ± 2.0 years, with 31, 47, and 78 incident HFs, respectively. Both greater muscle CSA and greater muscle density were associated with a lower risk of incident HF [HR/SD: 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.0 and 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91, respectively]. The pattern of associations was not materially changed by adjustment for prior falls or FRAX probability. In contrast, after inclusion of fn BMD T-score, the association for muscle CSA was no longer apparent (1.04; 95% CI, 0.88-1.24), whereas that for muscle density was not materially changed (0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82). Findings were similar for osteoporotic fractures. pQCT measures of greater calf muscle density and CSA were both associated with lower incidence of fractures in older men, but only muscle density remained an independent risk factor for fracture after accounting for fn BMD. These findings demonstrate a complex interplay between measures of bone, muscle size, and quality, in determining fracture risk. © 2022 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C. Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Eric Orwoll
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, School of MedicineOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Jane A. Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public HealthUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPAUSA
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics and School of Public HealthThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinChina
| | - Magnus K. Karlsson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences MalmoLund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University HospitalMalmoSweden
| | - Björn E. Rosengren
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences MalmoLund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University HospitalMalmoSweden
| | - Eva Ribom
- Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden
| | - Peggy M. Cawthon
- Research InstituteCalifornia Pacific Medical CenterSan FranciscoCAUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Kristine Ensrud
- Medicine and Epidemiology & Community HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisMNUSA
- Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes ResearchMinneapolis VA Health Care SystemMinneapolisMNUSA
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Faidra Laskou
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Kate A. Ward
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Elaine M. Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - John A. Kanis
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Liesbeth Vandenput
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Claes Ohlsson
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Dan Mellström
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Helena Johansson
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health ResearchAustralian Catholic UniversityMelbourneAustralia
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Centre for Integrated Research into Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorentzon M, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Liu E, Vandenput L, Crandall CJ, Cauley JA, LeBoff MS, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA. Menopausal hormone therapy reduces the risk of fracture regardless of falls risk or baseline FRAX probability-results from the Women's Health Initiative hormone therapy trials. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:2297-2305. [PMID: 35833956 PMCID: PMC9568435 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06483-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In a combined analysis of 25,389 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years, enrolled in the two Women's Health Initiative hormone therapy trials, menopausal hormone therapy vs. placebo reduced the risk of fracture regardless of baseline FRAX fracture probability and falls history. INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to determine if the anti-fracture efficacy of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) differed by baseline falls history or fracture risk probability as estimated by FRAX, in a combined analysis of the two Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy trials. METHODS A total of 25,389 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years were randomized to receive MHT (n = 12,739) or matching placebo (n = 12,650). At baseline, questionnaires were used to collect information on falls history, within the last 12 months, and clinical risk factors. FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) was calculated without BMD. Incident clinical fractures were verified using medical records. An extension of Poisson regression was used to investigate the relationship between treatment and fractures in (1) the whole cohort; (2) those with prior falls; and (3) those without prior falls. The effect of baseline FRAX probability on efficacy was investigated in the whole cohort. RESULTS Over 4.3 ± 2.1 years (mean ± SD), MHT (vs. placebo) significantly reduced the risk of any clinical fracture (hazard ratio [HR] 0.72 [95% CI, 0.65-0.78]), MOF (HR 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.69]), and hip fracture (0.66 [95% CI, 0.45-0.96]). Treatment was effective in reducing the risk of any clinical fracture, MOF, and hip fracture in women regardless of baseline FRAX MOF probability, with no evidence of an interaction between MHT and FRAX (p > 0.30). Similarly, there was no interaction (p > 0.30) between MHT and prior falls. CONCLUSION In the combined WHI trials, compared to placebo, MHT reduces fracture risk regardless of FRAX probability and falls history in postmenopausal women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mattias Lorentzon
- Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
- Geriatric Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital Mölndal, 43180, Mölndal, Sweden.
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Helena Johansson
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Liesbeth Vandenput
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carolyn J Crandall
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jane A Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Meryl S LeBoff
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mustamsir E, Irsan II, Huwae TECJ, Yudistira A, Pradana AS, Sugiarto MA, Siahaan LD, Rahmad. Study epidemiology of risk fracture in osteoporosis based on frax score, and osta score, with risk of fall using Ontario score in elderly Indonesia. J Public Health Res 2022; 11:22799036221115777. [PMID: 36147208 PMCID: PMC9486270 DOI: 10.1177/22799036221115777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is characterized by a low bone mass of bone tissue. If
osteoporosis is not treated properly, it will increase the high risk of
fracture. The common causes of fracture on osteoporosis condition due to
falls. This study aims to find the correlation between the risk of
osteoporosis with fall risk (ONTARIO) based on osteoporosis fracture risk
(FRAX) Methods: This study is an analytic study with a cross-sectional method. We collected
the sample using random cluster sampling in the six primary health care in
Malang on different times service since August–September 2021. Total patient
139, however only 132 patients were included in this study. After collecting
data is complete, we analyze using Chi-square tests. Results: The mean age of participants was 63.9 ± 7.14. with the age group was
dominated by the range of 60–64. It was found that the result of the FRAX
SCORE had a low-risk category for major fracture osteoporosis and risk hip
fracture. In contrast, from the OSTA score in this study, more than 68
participants (50.8%) were found medium and high-risk scores. Then, in
ONTARIO score of the risk fall assessment, and high score in 57 participants
(43.2%). If compared between OSTA and ONTARIO, there was a significant
relationship between OSTA score and ONTARIO score
(p < 0.000) with high-risk OSTA have a significant
relationship with a high risk of falling and vice versa. Conclusion: In this study, there was a relationship between the risk of high osteoporosis
and the risk of falling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edi Mustamsir
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Istan Irmansyah Irsan
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Thomas E C J Huwae
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Andhika Yudistira
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Ananto Satya Pradana
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Muhammad Alwy Sugiarto
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Lasa Dhakka Siahaan
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| | - Rahmad
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University-Saiful Anwar General Hospital, Malang, East Java, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The effects of falls on the prediction of osteoporotic fractures: epidemiological cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:110. [PMID: 34245374 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-021-00977-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fall is the major risk factor of fracture that has not been included in FRAX®. Whether different age may determine the effect of falls on FRAX® is still uncertain. This epidemiological cohort study reveals that history of fall is a significant predictor of incident fracture independent of FRAX probability, especially in subjects < 75 years old. INTRODUCTION The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) calculates 10-year fracture risk using 11 clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD); however, it does not include fall history in its risk assessment. Here, we investigated whether fall history is an independent risk factor on fracture prediction after adjustment of FRAX scores in two age subgroups (40-75 and ≥ 75 years). METHODS Beginning in 2009 to 2010, 1975 people (914 men) from Taiwan were followed for 6.8 ± 1.1 years by matching them with their records in the 2008-2016 National Health Insurance databank. We validated FRAX predictive accuracy with or without fall history by Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS After adjusting for FRAX risk, a history of falling was still a significant predictor of major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) (using BMD, hazard ratio [HR], 1.47; p = 0.03; without using BMD, HR, 1.54; p = 0.01). A history of recurrent falls was also a significant predictor of both incident MOFs and hip fractures. However, when the subjects were stratified based on age group, a history of falling and recurrent falls were strong predictors of MOFs and hip fractures in the younger but not the older subgroup. CONCLUSION A fall history can predict incident fracture independently of FRAX probability, particularly in subjects younger than 75 years old.
Collapse
|
11
|
Harvey NC, Orwoll E, Kwok T, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE, Ribom E, Cauley JA, Cawthon PM, Ensrud K, Liu E, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Fielding RA, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Lorentzon M, Ohlsson C, Mellström D, Johansson H, McCloskey E. Sarcopenia Definitions as Predictors of Fracture Risk Independent of FRAX ® , Falls, and BMD in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study: A Meta-Analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36:1235-1244. [PMID: 33831257 PMCID: PMC7611727 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived appendicular lean mass/height2 (ALM/ht2 ) is the most commonly used estimate of muscle mass in the assessment of sarcopenia, but its predictive value for fracture is substantially attenuated by femoral neck (fn) bone mineral density (BMD). We investigated predictive value of 11 sarcopenia definitions for incident fracture, independent of fnBMD, fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX® ) probability, and prior falls, using an extension of Poisson regression in US, Sweden, and Hong Kong Osteoporois Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) cohorts. Definitions tested were those of Baumgartner and Delmonico (ALM/ht2 only), Morley, the International Working Group on Sarcopenia, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP1 and 2), Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) 1 and 2 (using ALM/body mass index [BMI], incorporating muscle strength and/or physical performance measures plus ALM/ht2 ), and Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (gait speed and grip strength). Associations were adjusted for age and time since baseline and reported as hazard ratio (HR) for first incident fracture, here major osteoporotic fracture (MOF; clinical vertebral, hip, distal forearm, proximal humerus). Further analyses adjusted additionally for FRAX-MOF probability (n = 7531; calculated ± fnBMD), prior falls (y/n), or fnBMD T-score. Results were synthesized by meta-analysis. In 5660 men in USA, 2764 Sweden and 1987 Hong Kong (mean ages 73.5, 75.4, and 72.4 years, respectively), sarcopenia prevalence ranged from 0.5% to 35%. Sarcopenia status, by all definitions except those of FNIH, was associated with incident MOF (HR = 1.39 to 2.07). Associations were robust to adjustment for prior falls or FRAX probability (without fnBMD); adjustment for fnBMD T-score attenuated associations. EWGSOP2 severe sarcopenia (incorporating chair stand time, gait speed, and grip strength plus ALM) was most predictive, albeit at low prevalence, and appeared only modestly influenced by inclusion of fnBMD. In conclusion, the predictive value for fracture of sarcopenia definitions based on ALM is reduced by adjustment for fnBMD but strengthened by additional inclusion of physical performance measures. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Eric Orwoll
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and School of Public Health, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
| | - Magnus K Karlsson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Björn E Rosengren
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmo, Lund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Eva Ribom
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Jane A Cauley
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Peggy M Cawthon
- Research Institute, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristine Ensrud
- Medicine and Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Enwu Liu
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Roger A Fielding
- Nutrition, Exercise Physiology, and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Claes Ohlsson
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Center for Bone and Arthritis Research, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Drug Treatment, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Dan Mellström
- Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Center for Bone and Arthritis Research, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Helena Johansson
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Centre for Integrated research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brown JE, Handforth C, Compston JE, Cross W, Parr N, Selby P, Wood S, Drudge-Coates L, Walsh JS, Mitchell C, Collinson FJ, Coleman RE, James N, Francis R, Reid DM, McCloskey E. Guidance for the assessment and management of prostate cancer treatment-induced bone loss. A consensus position statement from an expert group. J Bone Oncol 2020; 25:100311. [PMID: 32995252 PMCID: PMC7516275 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2020.100311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Incidence of prostate cancer (PC) is increasing, but androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and other therapies are substantially improving survival. In this context, careful consideration of skeletal health is required to reduce the risk of treatment-related fragility fractures and their associated morbidity and mortality. This risk is currently not well-managed. ADT causes significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD). In the metastatic setting, systemic treatments (e.g. chemotherapy, abiraterone, enzalutamide) are used alongside ADT and may require concomitant glucocorticoids. Both ADT and glucocorticoids pose significant challenges to skeletal health in a population of patients already likely to have ongoing age-related bone loss and/or comorbid conditions. Current PC guidelines lack specific recommendations for optimising bone health. This guidance presents evidence for assessment and management of bone health in this population, with specific recommendations for clinical practitioners in day-to-day PC management. METHODS Structured meetings of key opinion leaders were integrated with a systematic literature review. Input and endorsement was sought from patients, nursing representatives and specialist societies. SUMMARY OF GUIDANCE All men starting or continuing long-term ADT should receive lifestyle advice regarding bone health. Calcium/vitamin D supplementation should be offered if required. Fracture risk should be calculated (using the FRAX® tool), with BMD assessment included where feasible. BMD should always be assessed where fracture risk calculated using FRAX® alone is close to the intervention threshold. Intervention should be provided if indicated by local or national guidelines e.g. UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) thresholds. Men requiring bone protection therapy should be further assessed (e.g. renal function), with referral to specialist centres if available and offered appropriate treatment to reduce fracture risk. Those near to, but below an intervention threshold, and patients going on to additional systemic therapies (particularly those requiring glucocorticoids), should have FRAX® (including BMD) repeated after 12-18 months. PATIENT SUMMARY Modern treatments for prostate cancer have led to significant improvements in survival and quality of life. However, some of these treatments may lead to weakening of patient's bones with risk of fracture and it is therefore important to monitor patients' bone health and provide bone protection where needed. This paper provides specific guidance to clinical teams, based on the most recent research evidence, to ensure optimal bone health in their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E. Brown
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Handforth
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - William Cross
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Parr
- Department of Urology, Wirral University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Selby
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Wood
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jennifer S. Walsh
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Mitchell
- Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona J. Collinson
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Robert E. Coleman
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Nicholas James
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Francis
- Institute of Cellular Medicine, University of Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - David M. Reid
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ito K. Cost-effectiveness of Screening for Osteoporosis in Older Men With a History of Falls. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2027584. [PMID: 33258906 PMCID: PMC7708999 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Falls and osteoporosis share the potential clinical end point of fractures among older patients. To date, few fall prevention guidelines incorporate screening for osteoporosis to reduce fall-related fractures. Objective To assess the cost-effectiveness of screening for osteoporosis using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) followed by osteoporosis treatment in older men with a history of falls. Design, Setting, and Participants In this economic evaluation, a Markov model was developed to simulate the incidence of major osteoporotic fractures in a hypothetical cohort of community-dwelling men aged 65 years who had fallen at least once in the past year. Data sources included literature published from January 1, 1946, to July 31, 2020. The model adopted a societal perspective, a lifetime horizon, a 1-year cycle length, and a discount rate of 3% per year for both health benefits and costs. The analysis was designed and conducted from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020. Interventions Screening with DXA followed by treatment for men diagnosed with osteoporosis compared with usual care. Main Outcomes and Measures Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured by cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Results Among the hypothetical cohort of men aged 65 years, the screening strategy had an ICER of $33 169/QALY gained and was preferred over usual care at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY gained. The number needed to screen to prevent 1 hip fracture was 1876; to prevent 1 major osteoporotic fracture, 746. The screening strategy would become more effective and less costly than usual care for men 77 years and older. The ICER for the screening strategy did not substantially change across a wide range of assumptions tested in all other deterministic sensitivity analyses. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY gained, screening was cost-effective in 56.0% of simulations; at $100 000/QALY gained, 90.8% of simulations; and at $200 000/QALY gained, 99.6% of simulations. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that for older men who have fallen at least once in the past year, screening with DXA followed by treatment for those diagnosed with osteoporosis is a cost-effective use of resources. Fall history could be a useful cue to trigger assessment for osteoporosis in men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kouta Ito
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester
- Meyers Primary Care Institute, Worcester, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barron RL, Oster G, Grauer A, Crittenden DB, Weycker D. Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:2103-2111. [PMID: 32613410 PMCID: PMC7560920 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05294-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
In elderly women with osteoporosis, prior fracture, low BMD, impaired physical functioning, poorer general health, and recent falls were all direct predictors of imminent (in next year) fracture risk. Prior fracture, older age, worse health, impaired cognitive functioning, and recent falls indirectly increased imminent risk by reducing physical functioning/general health. INTRODUCTION This study was designed to examine determinants of imminent risk of osteoporotic fracture (i.e., next 1-2 years) in postmenopausal women. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from Caucasian women age 65 or older with osteoporosis who participated in the observational Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). We examined potential direct and indirect predictors of hip and nonvertebral fractures in 1-year follow-up intervals including anthropometric measures, bone mineral density (T-score), fracture since age 50, physical function, cognition, medical conditions, recent (past year) falls, and lifestyle factors. Clinically related variables were grouped into constructs via factor analysis. These constructs and selected individual variables were incorporated into a theoretical structural equation model to evaluate factors that influence imminent risk. RESULTS Among 2261 patients, 19.4% had a nonvertebral fracture and 5.5% had a hip fracture within 1 year of a study visit between 1992 and 2008. Prior fracture, lower T-scores, lower physical functioning, and recent falls all directly increased 1-year risk of nonvertebral fracture. For both nonvertebral and hip fractures, prior fracture and recent falls influenced risk indirectly through general health, while cognition influenced risk via physical functioning. Age influenced both physical functioning and general health. CONCLUSIONS Several established risk factors for 10-year fracture risk also played a role in predicting imminent risk of fracture (e.g., T-scores, prior fracture), as did falls, cognition, physical functioning, and general health. Fracture risk assessments should also consider falls and fall risk factors as well as established bone-related risk factors in assessing imminent fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Barron
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - G Oster
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA, USA
| | - A Grauer
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - D B Crittenden
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
| | - D Weycker
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Barron RL, Oster G, Grauer A, Crittenden DB, Weycker D. Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:2103-2111. [PMID: 32613410 PMCID: PMC7560920 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05294-3 10.1080/03007995.2018.1552576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED In elderly women with osteoporosis, prior fracture, low BMD, impaired physical functioning, poorer general health, and recent falls were all direct predictors of imminent (in next year) fracture risk. Prior fracture, older age, worse health, impaired cognitive functioning, and recent falls indirectly increased imminent risk by reducing physical functioning/general health. INTRODUCTION This study was designed to examine determinants of imminent risk of osteoporotic fracture (i.e., next 1-2 years) in postmenopausal women. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used data from Caucasian women age 65 or older with osteoporosis who participated in the observational Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). We examined potential direct and indirect predictors of hip and nonvertebral fractures in 1-year follow-up intervals including anthropometric measures, bone mineral density (T-score), fracture since age 50, physical function, cognition, medical conditions, recent (past year) falls, and lifestyle factors. Clinically related variables were grouped into constructs via factor analysis. These constructs and selected individual variables were incorporated into a theoretical structural equation model to evaluate factors that influence imminent risk. RESULTS Among 2261 patients, 19.4% had a nonvertebral fracture and 5.5% had a hip fracture within 1 year of a study visit between 1992 and 2008. Prior fracture, lower T-scores, lower physical functioning, and recent falls all directly increased 1-year risk of nonvertebral fracture. For both nonvertebral and hip fractures, prior fracture and recent falls influenced risk indirectly through general health, while cognition influenced risk via physical functioning. Age influenced both physical functioning and general health. CONCLUSIONS Several established risk factors for 10-year fracture risk also played a role in predicting imminent risk of fracture (e.g., T-scores, prior fracture), as did falls, cognition, physical functioning, and general health. Fracture risk assessments should also consider falls and fall risk factors as well as established bone-related risk factors in assessing imminent fracture risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R L Barron
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - G Oster
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA, USA
| | - A Grauer
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA
| | - D B Crittenden
- Amgen Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
| | - D Weycker
- Policy Analysis Inc. (PAI), Brookline, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Matsumoto H, Tanimura C, Kushida D, Osaka H, Kawabata Y, Hagino H. FRAX score and recent fall history predict the incidence for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults: a prospective cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:1985-1994. [PMID: 32448948 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-020-05447-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We hypothesized that the baseline FRAX score and previous falls would predict the incidence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults who received medical check-ups. The FRAX score (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.087, 95% CI 1.014-1.167) and previous falls (HR = 5.181, 95% CI 1.002-26.777) were determined to be independent risk factors for the incidence of sarcopenia. PURPOSE This prospective study was performed to elucidate the prevalence and incidence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults who received medical check-ups, and to determine whether FRAX score and fall history predict the incidence of sarcopenia. METHODS Participants were recruited from a group of individuals who had registered for an annual town-sponsored medical check-up. Study inclusion criteria were aged older than 60 years, living independently, and ability to walk without assistance. Individuals who received nursing care were excluded from the study. A total of 426 residential participants were analyzed. Demographic information, fall history of the previous year, and FRAX score without bone mineral density were assessed. The assessment for sarcopenia was based on the recommendations of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. RESULTS The final sample for the assessment of sarcopenia incidence comprised 258 participants. The mean follow-up time was 2.92 years. The rate of sarcopenia was 1.06 cases per 100 person-years at risk. The Cox multivariate logistic regression model in our analysis was adjusted for age, gender, muscle mass, and covariates and showed that the FRAX score (HR = 1.087, 95% CI 1.014-1.167) and recent history of falls (HR = 5.181, 95% CI 1.002-26.777) were independent risk factors for the incidence of sarcopenia. CONCLUSION FRAX and history of falling can be a simple screening tool to raise awareness of the prevention of osteoporosis and sarcopenia in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Matsumoto
- Department of Physical Therapist, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Matsushima 288, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan.
| | - C Tanimura
- School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishicho 86, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan
| | - D Kushida
- Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, (Cross-Informatics Research Center), Tottori University, Koyama-cho Minami 4-101, Tottori, 680-8552, Japan
| | - H Osaka
- Department of Physical Therapist, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Matsushima 288, Kurashiki, Okayama, 701-0193, Japan
| | - Y Kawabata
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shuto General Hospital, JA Yamaguchi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperative, Kogaisaku 1000-1, Yanai, Yamaguchi, 742-0032, Japan
| | - H Hagino
- School of Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishicho 86, Yonago, Tottori, 683-8503, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rochira V. Late-onset Hypogonadism: Bone health. Andrology 2020; 8:1539-1550. [PMID: 32469467 DOI: 10.1111/andr.12827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone health is underdiagnosed and undermanaged in men. Bone loss occurs in men with hypogonadism and in aging men. Thus, patients with a diagnosis of late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) are at risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. OBJECTIVES To provide an update on research data and clinical implications regarding bone health in men with LOH by reviewing literature articles on this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS A thorough search of listed publications in PubMed on bone health in older men with hypogonadism was performed, and other articles derived from these publications were further identified. RESULTS Late-onset Hypogonadism may be associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). In a pathophysiological perspective, the detrimental effects of testosterone (T) deficiency on BMD are partly ascribed to relative estrogen deficiency and both serum T and serum estradiol (E2) need to be above 200 ng/dL and 20 pg/mL to prevent bone loss. The effects of exogenous T on BMD are controversial, but most of the studies confirm that testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) increases BMD and prevents further bone loss in men with hypogonadism. No data are available on TRT and the prevention of fractures. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION In men with documented LOH, a specific clinical workup should be addressed to the diagnosis of osteoporosis in order to program subsequent follow-up and consider specific bone active therapy. TRT should be started according to guidelines of male hypogonadism while keeping in mind that it may also have positive effects also on bone health in men with LOH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Rochira
- Unit of Endocrinology, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.,Department of Medical Specialties, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Condurache CI, Chiu S, Chotiyarnwong P, Johansson H, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Khioe RFS, Fordham R, Gittoes N, Harvey I, Harvey NC, Heawood A, Holland R, Howe A, Kanis JA, Marshall T, O'Neill TW, Peters TJ, Redmond NM, Torgerson D, Turner D, McCloskey E. Screening for high hip fracture risk does not impact on falls risk: a post hoc analysis from the SCOOP study. Osteoporos Int 2020; 31:457-464. [PMID: 31960099 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05270-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED A reduction in hip fracture incidence following population screening might reflect the effectiveness of anti-osteoporosis therapy, behaviour change to reduce falls, or both. This post hoc analysis demonstrates that identifying high hip fracture risk by FRAX was not associated with any alteration in falls risk. INTRODUCTION To investigate whether effectiveness of an osteoporosis screening programme to reduce hip fractures was mediated by modification of falls risk in the screening arm. METHODS The SCOOP study recruited 12,483 women aged 70-85 years, individually randomised to a control (n = 6250) or screening (n = 6233) arm; in the latter, osteoporosis treatment was recommended to women at high risk of hip fracture, while the control arm received usual care. Falls were captured by self-reported questionnaire. We determined the influence of baseline risk factors on future falls, and then examined for differences in falls risk between the randomisation groups, particularly in those at high fracture risk. RESULTS Women sustaining one or more falls were slightly older at baseline than those remaining falls free during follow-up (mean difference 0.70 years, 95%CI 0.55-0.85, p < 0.001). A higher FRAX 10-year probability of hip fracture was associated with increased likelihood of falling, with fall risk increasing by 1-2% for every 1% increase in hip fracture probability. However, falls risk factors were well balanced between the study arms and, importantly, there was no evidence of a difference in falls occurrence. In particular, there was no evidence of interaction (p = 0.18) between baseline FRAX hip fracture probabilities and falls risk in the two arms, consistent with no impact of screening on falls in women informed to be at high risk of hip fracture. CONCLUSION Effectiveness of screening for high FRAX hip fracture probability to reduce hip fracture risk was not mediated by a reduction in falls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C I Condurache
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Chiu
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - P Chotiyarnwong
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - H Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - L Shepstone
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E Lenaghan
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Clarke
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R F S Khioe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - R Fordham
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Harvey
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - A Heawood
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - R Holland
- Leicester Medical School, Centre for Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - A Howe
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
- Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T Marshall
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - T W O'Neill
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - T J Peters
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - N M Redmond
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation, Bristol, UK
| | - D Torgerson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - D Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - E McCloskey
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Aging, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, Martineau P, Bryanton M, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA. Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:2195-2203. [PMID: 31372711 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-019-05106-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
A simple question construct regarding number of falls in the previous year, ascertained by a single question, was strongly associated with incident fractures in routine clinical practice using a population-based dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) registry. INTRODUCTION There is conflicting evidence from research cohorts that falls independently increase fracture risk. We examined the independent effects of falls on subsequent fractures in a large clinical registry of bone mineral density (BMD) results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada that has been systematically collecting self-reported falls information since September 1, 2012. METHODS The study population consisted of 24,943 women and men aged 40 years and older (mean age 65.5 ± 10.2 years) with fracture probability assessment (FRAX), self-reported falls for the previous year (categorized as none, 1, 2, or > 3) and fracture outcomes. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95 confidence intervals (CI) for time to fracture were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS During mean observation time of 2.7 ± 1.0 years, 863 (3.5%) sustained one or more major osteoporotic fractures (MOF), 212 (0.8%) sustained a hip fracture, and 1210 (4.9%) sustained any incident fracture. Compared with no falls in the previous year (referent), there was a gradient of increasing risk for fracture with increasing number of falls (all P < 0.001). Results showed minimal attenuation with covariate adjustment. When adjusted for baseline fracture probability (FRAX score with BMD) the HR for MOF increased from 1.49 (95% CI 1.25-1.78) for one fall to 1.74 (1.33-2.27) for two falls to 2.62 (2.06-3.34) for ≥ 3 falls. HRs were similar for any incident fracture and slightly greater for prediction of hip fracture, reaching 3.41 (95% CI 2.19-5.31) for ≥ 3 previous falls. CONCLUSIONS Self-report number of falls in the previous year is strongly associated with incident fracture risk in the routine clinical practice setting, and this risk is independent of age, sex, BMD, and baseline fracture probability. Moreover, there is dose-response with multiple falls (up to a maximum of 3) conferring greater risk than a single fall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W D Leslie
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | | | - L M Lix
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - P Martineau
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - M Bryanton
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - E V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - H Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Liu J, Curtis EM, Cooper C, Harvey NC. State of the art in osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment. J Endocrinol Invest 2019; 42:1149-1164. [PMID: 30980341 PMCID: PMC6751157 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-019-01041-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm, and humerus. Over recent decades, it has evolved from being viewed as an inevitable consequence of ageing, to being recognised as a serious and eminently treatable disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this article, we review the literature pertaining to the epidemiology of osteoporosis, associated health burden, approaches to risk assessment and treatment. RESULTS Although there is some evidence that fracture incidence has reached a plateau, or even started to decline, in the developed world, an ageing population and adoption of westernised lifestyles in transitioning populations is leading to an increasing burden of osteoporosis across the world. Whilst the clinical definition of osteoporosis has been based solely on bone mineral density, the prediction of fracture at the individual level has been improved by consideration of clinical risk factors in tools such as FRAX®, derived from a greater understanding of the epidemiology of osteoporosis. Such advances in approaches to primary and secondary prevention of fractures, coupled with elucidation of the underlying biology, and the development of a range of highly effective antiosteoporosis medications, have enabled a step change in our ability to prevent osteoporosis-related fractures. However, there remains a substantial disparity between the number of individuals at high fracture risk and number treated globally. CONCLUSION Urgent work is needed at the level of health care systems, national and international policy, and in communication with patients and public, to ensure that all patients who should receive treatment for osteoporosis actually do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Liu
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - E M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Nutrition Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Consideration of Anticoagulation: Surgical Care for the Elderly in Current Geriatrics Reports. CURRENT GERIATRICS REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s13670-019-00290-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
22
|
Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30:3-44. [PMID: 30324412 PMCID: PMC7026233 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 898] [Impact Index Per Article: 179.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Guidance is provided in a European setting on the assessment and treatment of postmenopausal women at risk from fractures due to osteoporosis. INTRODUCTION The International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis published guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in 2013. This manuscript updates these in a European setting. METHODS Systematic reviews were updated. RESULTS The following areas are reviewed: the role of bone mineral density measurement for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk; general and pharmacological management of osteoporosis; monitoring of treatment; assessment of fracture risk; case-finding strategies; investigation of patients; health economics of treatment. The update includes new information on the evaluation of bone microstructure evaluation in facture risk assessment, the role of FRAX® and Fracture Liaison Services in secondary fracture prevention, long-term effects on fracture risk of dietary intakes, and increased fracture risk on stopping drug treatment. CONCLUSIONS A platform is provided on which specific guidelines can be developed for national use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
- Mary McKillop Health Institute, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - C Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Rizzoli
- University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J-Y Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
- Prince Mutaib Chair for Biomarkers of Osteoporosis, Biochemistry Department, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nakada T, Teranishi M, Ueda Y, Sone M. Fracture probability assessed using FRAX® in elderly women with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Auris Nasus Larynx 2018; 45:1173-1177. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2018.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 04/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
24
|
Harvey NC, Odén A, Orwoll E, Lapidus J, Kwok T, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE, Ribom E, Cooper C, Cawthon PM, Kanis JA, Ohlsson C, Mellström D, Johansson H, McCloskey E. Measures of Physical Performance and Muscle Strength as Predictors of Fracture Risk Independent of FRAX, Falls, and aBMD: A Meta-Analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:2150-2157. [PMID: 30011086 PMCID: PMC6272117 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 06/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Measures of muscle mass, strength, and function predict risk of incident fractures, but it is not known whether this risk information is additive to that from FRAX (fracture risk assessment tool) probability. In the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study cohorts (Sweden, Hong Kong, United States), we investigated whether measures of physical performance/appendicular lean mass (ALM) by DXA predicted incident fractures in older men, independently of FRAX probability. Baseline information included falls history, clinical risk factors for falls and fractures, femoral neck aBMD, and calculated FRAX probabilities. An extension of Poisson regression was used to investigate the relationship between time for five chair stands, walking speed over a 6 m distance, grip strength, ALM adjusted for body size (ALM/height2 ), FRAX probability (major osteoporotic fracture [MOF]) with or without femoral neck aBMD, available in a subset of n = 7531), and incident MOF (hip, clinical vertebral, wrist, or proximal humerus). Associations were adjusted for age and time since baseline, and are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) for first incident fracture per SD increment in predictor using meta-analysis. 5660 men in the United States (mean age 73.5 years), 2764 men in Sweden (75.4 years), and 1987 men in Hong Kong (72.4 years) were studied. Mean follow-up time was 8.7 to 10.9 years. Greater time for five chair stands was associated with greater risk of MOF (HR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.34), whereas greater walking speed (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.90), grip strength (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.82), and ALM/height2 (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) were associated with lower risk of incident MOF. Associations remained largely similar after adjustment for FRAX, but associations between ALM/height2 and MOF were weakened (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99). Inclusion of femoral neck aBMD markedly attenuated the association between ALM/height2 and MOF (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.10). Measures of physical performance predicted incident fractures independently of FRAX probability. Whilst the predictive value of ALM/height2 was substantially reduced by inclusion of aBMD requires further study, these findings support the consideration of physical performance in fracture risk assessment. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Harvey
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southamptonand University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Anders Odén
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR)Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Eric Orwoll
- Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Jodi Lapidus
- Department of Public Health and Preventive MedicineDivision of BiostatisticsOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine & Therapeutics and School of Public HealthThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong KongThe People's Republic of China
| | - Magnus K Karlsson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research UnitLund University, Lund, Sweden; and Department of OrthopedicsSkane University HospitalMalmöSweden
| | - Björn E Rosengren
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research UnitLund University, Lund, Sweden; and Department of OrthopedicsSkane University HospitalMalmöSweden
| | - Eva Ribom
- Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southamptonand University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Peggy M Cawthon
- Research InstituteCalifornia Pacific Medical CenterSan FranciscoCAUSA
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of California–San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Institute for Health and AgingCatholic University of AustraliaMelbourneAustralia
| | - Claes Ohlsson
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR)Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Dan Mellström
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR)Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR)Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Institute for Health and AgingCatholic University of AustraliaMelbourneAustralia
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA)Mellanby Centre for Bone ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Taxel P, Faircloth E, Idrees S, Van Poznak C. Cancer Treatment-Induced Bone Loss in Women With Breast Cancer and Men With Prostate Cancer. J Endocr Soc 2018; 2:574-588. [PMID: 29942922 PMCID: PMC6007245 DOI: 10.1210/js.2018-00052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer and cancer therapies can have a negative impact on bone health. Because cancer is a common diagnosis, survivorship concerns for osteoporosis and fragility fractures are an important component of care. This review addresses management of bone health in nonmetastatic cancer survivorship with a focus on breast cancer and prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sana Idrees
- Saint Vincent's Hospital, Bridgeport, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rochira V, Antonio L, Vanderschueren D. EAA clinical guideline on management of bone health in the andrological outpatient clinic. Andrology 2018; 6:272-285. [DOI: 10.1111/andr.12470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- V. Rochira
- Unit of Endocrinology; Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia; Modena Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena; Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara; Modena Italy
| | - L. Antonio
- Department of Endocrinology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| | - D. Vanderschueren
- Department of Endocrinology; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine; Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology; KU Leuven; Leuven Belgium
- Department of Laboratory Medicine; University Hospitals Leuven; Leuven Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Harvey NC, Odén A, Orwoll E, Lapidus J, Kwok T, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE, Ljunggren Ö, Cooper C, McCloskey E, Kanis JA, Ohlsson C, Mellström D, Johansson H. Falls Predict Fractures Independently of FRAX Probability: A Meta-Analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33:510-516. [PMID: 29220072 PMCID: PMC5842893 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Although prior falls are a well-established predictor of future fracture, there is currently limited evidence regarding the specific value of falls history in fracture risk assessment relative to that of other clinical risk factors and bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. We therefore investigated, across the three Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study cohorts, whether past falls predicted future fracture independently of FRAX and whether these associations varied with age and follow-up time. Elderly men were recruited from MrOS Sweden, Hong Kong, and USA. Baseline data included falls history (over the preceding 12 months), clinical risk factors, BMD at femoral neck, and calculated FRAX probabilities. An extension of Poisson regression was used to investigate the associations between falls, FRAX probability, and incident fracture, adjusting for age, time since baseline, and cohort in base models; further models were used to investigate interactions with age and follow-up time. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize the individual country associations. Information on falls and FRAX probability was available for 4365 men in USA (mean age 73.5 years; mean follow-up 10.8 years), 1823 men in Sweden (mean age 75.4 years; mean follow-up 8.7 years), and 1669 men in Hong Kong (mean age 72.4 years; mean follow-up 9.8 years). Rates of past falls were similar at 20%, 16%, and 15%, respectively. Across all cohorts, past falls predicted incident fracture at any site (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49, 1.90), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.33, 1.83), and hip fracture (HR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.27, 2.05). Relationships between past falls and incident fracture remained robust after adjustment for FRAX probability: adjusted HR (95% CI) any fracture: 1.63 (1.45, 1.83); MOF: 1.51 (1.32, 1.73); and hip: 1.54 (1.21, 1.95). In conclusion, past falls predicted incident fracture independently of FRAX probability, confirming the potential value of falls history in fracture risk assessment. © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Anders Odén
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Eric Orwoll
- Oregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Jodi Lapidus
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Division of BiostatisticsOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Timothy Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics and School of Public HealthThe Chinese University of Hong KongHong Kong
| | - Magnus K Karlsson
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences MalmoLund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University HospitalMalmoSweden
| | - Björn E Rosengren
- Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences MalmoLund University and Department of Orthopedics, Skane University HospitalMalmoSweden
| | - Östen Ljunggren
- Department of Medical SciencesUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology UnitUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Bone ResearchUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Institute for Health and AgingCatholic University of AustraliaMelbourneAustralia
| | - Claes Ohlsson
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Dan Mellström
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR), Sahlgrenska AcademyUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
- Centre for Metabolic Bone DiseasesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Institute for Health and AgingCatholic University of AustraliaMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Su Y, Leung J, Kwok T. The role of previous falls in major osteoporotic fracture prediction in conjunction with FRAX in older Chinese men and women: the Mr. OS and Ms. OS cohort study in Hong Kong. Osteoporos Int 2018; 29:355-363. [PMID: 29067485 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4277-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Falls are a major concern in terms of fracture risk. Although awareness rising for the absence of falls in the FRAX algorithm, our study only identified the independent predictive role of previous recurrent falls and their better conjunction use with FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture prediction in older Chinese men. INTRODUCTION Although the association of falls with fracture has been widely explored, the impact of previous falls is not included in the FRAX algorithm currently. Our aim was to examine the FRAX-independent associations between falls in the previous year and subsequent fracture risk, as well as the conjunctive use of falls and the FRAX score for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) prediction in older Chinese people. METHODS Four thousand community older men and women aged 65 years or older were followed up for 9.9 ± 2.7 and 8.8 ± 1.5 years, respectively. The associations between falls in the previous 1 year and MOF risk by follow-up years were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model. New prediction scores were calculated by incorporating the falls and FRAX scores using the Fine and Gray model, or developed by adjusting the FRAX scores by 30% increased risk for each fall in the previous year. The predictive powers for MOF risk between the new scores and FRAX scores were evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) and category-based net reclassification improvement index (NRI). RESULTS During the follow-up period, 139 (7.0%) men and 236 (11.8%) women had at least one incident MOF. One previous fall significantly predicted the first year incident MOF in men [hazard ratio (HR) (95%CI), 3.47 (1.02, 11.80)]. Previous recurrent falls significantly predicted a 10-year incident MOF in men [HR (95%CI), 2.42 (1.30, 4.51)]. In men, the fall-adjusting FRAX scores showed significant improvement on total net reclassification of fracture (3-6%). No improved predictive accuracy shown in women. CONCLUSION Falls in the previous year are likely to provide some predictive power to FRAX for MOF risk assessment in older Chinese men, but not women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Su
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - J Leung
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - T Kwok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
- Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Curtis EM, Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C. The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide. Bone 2017; 104:29-38. [PMID: 28119181 PMCID: PMC5420448 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm and humerus. Substantial geographic variation has been noted in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide, with Western populations (North America, Europe and Oceania), reporting increases in hip fracture throughout the second half of the 20th century, with a stabilisation or decline in the last two decades. In developing populations however, particularly in Asia, the rates of osteoporotic fracture appears to be increasing. The massive global burden consequent to osteoporosis means that fracture risk assessment should be a high priority among health measures considered by policy makers. The WHO operational definition of osteoporosis, based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been used globally since the mid-1990s. However, although this definition identifies those at greatest individual risk of fracture, in the population overall a greater total number of fractures occur in individuals with BMD values above the threshold for osteoporosis diagnosis. A number of web-based tools to enable the inclusion of clinical risk factors, with or without BMD, in fracture prediction algorithms have been developed to improve the identification of individuals at high fracture risk, the most commonly used globally being FRAX®. Access to DXA, osteoporosis risk assessment, case finding and treatment varies worldwide, but despite such advances studies indicate that a minority of men and women at high fracture risk receive treatment. Importantly, research is ongoing to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis case finding and risk assessment strategies worldwide. The huge burden caused by osteoporosis related fractures to individuals, healthcare systems and societies should provide a clear impetus for the progression of such approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Rebecca J Moon
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; Paediatric Endocrinology, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tarantino U, Iolascon G, Cianferotti L, Masi L, Marcucci G, Giusti F, Marini F, Parri S, Feola M, Rao C, Piccirilli E, Zanetti EB, Cittadini N, Alvaro R, Moretti A, Calafiore D, Toro G, Gimigliano F, Resmini G, Brandi ML. Clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis: summary statements and recommendations from the Italian Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology. J Orthop Traumatol 2017; 18:3-36. [PMID: 29058226 PMCID: PMC5688964 DOI: 10.1007/s10195-017-0474-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Italian Society for Orthopaedics and Traumatology conceived this guidance-which is primarily addressed to Italian orthopedic surgeons, but should also prove useful to other bone specialists and to general practitioners-in order to improve the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis and its consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature reviews by a multidisciplinary team. RESULTS The following topics are covered: the role of instrumental, metabolic, and genetic evaluations in the diagnosis of osteoporosis; appraisal of the risk of fracture and thresholds for intervention; general strategies for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis (primary and secondary prevention); the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis; the setting and implementation of fracture liaison services for tertiary prevention. Grade A, B, and C recommendations are provided based on the main levels of evidence (1-3). Toolboxes for everyday clinical practice are provided. CONCLUSIONS The first up-to-date Italian guidelines for the primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umberto Tarantino
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Iolascon
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Luisella Cianferotti
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Gemma Marcucci
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Giusti
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Marini
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Simone Parri
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Feola
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Rao
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Piccirilli
- Policlinico Tor Vergata Foundation, Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Emanuela Basilici Zanetti
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Noemi Cittadini
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosaria Alvaro
- Nursing Science, Center of Excellence for Culture and Nursing Research-IPASVI, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Antimo Moretti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Dario Calafiore
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Toro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Gimigliano
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties and Dentistry, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Resmini
- Section of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Centre for the Study of Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease, Treviglio-Caravaggio Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University Hospital of Florence, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, 50139, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ritchey K, Olney A, Shofer J, Phelan EA, Matsumoto AM. Implementation of a fall screening program in a high risk of fracture population. Arch Osteoporos 2017; 12:96. [PMID: 29090360 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0393-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fall prevention is an important way to prevent fractures in person with osteoporosis. We developed and implemented a fall screening program in the context of routine osteoporosis care. This program was found to be feasible and showed that a significant proportion of persons with osteoporosis are at risk of falling. PURPOSE Falls are the most common cause of fracture in persons with osteoporosis. However, osteoporosis care rarely includes assessment and prevention of falling. We thus sought to assess the feasibility of a fall screening and management program integrated into routine osteoporosis care. METHODS The program was developed and offered to patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia seen at an outpatient clinic between May 2015 and May 2016. Feasibility was measured by physical therapist time required to conduct screening and ease of integrating the screening program into the usual clinic workflow. Self-report responses and mobility testing were conducted to describe the fall and fracture risk profile of osteoporosis patients screened. Effects on fall-related care processes were assessed via chart abstraction of patient participation in fall prevention exercise. RESULTS Of the 154 clinic patients who presented for a clinic visit, 68% met screening criteria and completed in two thirds of persons. Screening was completed in a third of the time typically allotted for traditional PT evaluations and did not interfere with clinic workflow. Forty percent of those screened reported falling in the last year, and over half had two or more falls in the past year. Over half reported a balance or lower extremity impairment, and over 40% were below norms on one or more performance tests. Most patients who selected a group exercise fall prevention program completed all sessions while only a quarter completed either supervised or independent home-based programs. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a fall risk screening program in an outpatient osteoporosis clinic appears feasible. A substantial proportion of people with osteoporosis screened positive for being at risk of falling, justifying integration of fall prevention into routine osteoporosis care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Ritchey
- Geriatric Research, Education, Clinical Center, Veteran's Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, S-182-GRECC, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA.
| | - Amanda Olney
- Rehabilitation Care Services, Veteran's Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, S-117-RCS, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA
| | - Jane Shofer
- Geriatric Research, Education, Clinical Center, Veteran's Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, S-182-GRECC, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Phelan
- Division of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Box 359755, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Alvin M Matsumoto
- Geriatric Research, Education, Clinical Center, Veteran's Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, 1660 S. Columbian Way, S-182-GRECC, Seattle, WA, 98108, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hoff M, Meyer HE, Skurtveit S, Langhammer A, Søgaard AJ, Syversen U, Dhainaut A, Skovlund E, Abrahamsen B, Schei B. Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study, Norway. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:2935-2944. [PMID: 28668994 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-017-4134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) without bone mineral density (BMD) for hip fracture prediction was validated in a Norwegian population 50-90 years. Fracture risk increased with higher FRAX score, and the observed number of hip fractures agreed well with the predicted number, except for the youngest and oldest men. Self-reported fall was an independent risk factor for fracture in women. INTRODUCTION The primary aim was to validate FRAX without BMD for hip fracture prediction in a Norwegian population of men and women 50-90 years. Secondary, to study whether information of falls could improve prediction of fractures in the subgroup aged 70-90 years. METHODS Data were obtained from the third survey of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT3), the fracture registry in Nord-Trøndelag, and the Norwegian Prescription Database (NorPD), including 15,432 women and 13,585 men. FRAX hip without BMD was calculated, and hip fractures were registered for a median follow-up of 5.2 years. The number of estimated and observed fractures was assessed, ROC curves with area under the curve (AUC), and Cox regression analyses. For the group aged 70-90 years, self-reported falls the last year before HUNT3 were included in the Cox regression model. RESULTS The risk of fracture increased with higher FRAX score. When FRAX groups were categorized in a 10-year percentage risk for hip fracture as follows, <4, 4-7.9, 8-11.9, and ≥12%, the hazard ratio (HR) for hip fracture between the lowest and the highest group was 17.80 (95% CI: 12.86-24.65) among women and 23.40 (13.93-39.30) in men. Observed number of hip fractures agreed quite well with the predicted number, except for the youngest and oldest men. AUC was 0.81 (0.78-0.83) for women and 0.79 (0.76-0.83) for men. Self-reported fall was an independent risk factor for fracture in women (HR 1.64, 1.20-2.24), and among men, this was not significant (1.09, 0.65-1.83). CONCLUSIONS FRAX without BMD predicted hip fracture reasonably well. In the age group 70-90 years, falls seemed to imply an additional risk among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hoff
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
- Department of Rheumatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - H E Meyer
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Community Medicine and Global Health, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Skurtveit
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Langhammer
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A J Søgaard
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - U Syversen
- Department of Endocrinology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Institute of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - A Dhainaut
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Rheumatology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - E Skovlund
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - B Abrahamsen
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
- Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - B Schei
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, PB 8905, 7491, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Gynecology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cruz DMCD, Lima TDC, Nock LJ, Figueiredo MDO, Paulisso DC. Relationships between falls, age, independence, balance, physical activity, and upper limb function in elderly Brazilians. COGENT MEDICINE 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/2331205x.2017.1367058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Marinho Cezar da Cruz
- Department of Occupational Therapy - Center of Biological and Health Sciences (CCBS), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Tatiane de Carvalho Lima
- Department of Occupational Therapy - Center of Biological and Health Sciences (CCBS), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Lauren Jane Nock
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Mirela de Oliveira Figueiredo
- Department of Occupational Therapy - Center of Biological and Health Sciences (CCBS), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| | - Debora Caires Paulisso
- Department of Occupational Therapy - Center of Biological and Health Sciences (CCBS), Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Curtis EM, Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C. Reprint of: The impact of fragility fracture and approaches to osteoporosis risk assessment worldwide. Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs 2017; 26:7-17. [PMID: 28578992 PMCID: PMC5480618 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2017.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Osteoporosis constitutes a major public health problem, through its association with age-related fractures, particularly of the hip, vertebrae, distal forearm and humerus. Substantial geographic variation has been noted in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures worldwide, with Western populations (North America, Europe and Oceania), reporting increases in hip fracture throughout the second half of the 20th century, with a stabilisation or decline in the last two decades. In developing populations however, particularly in Asia, the rates of osteoporotic fracture appears to be increasing. The massive global burden consequent to osteoporosis means that fracture risk assessment should be a high priority amongst health measures considered by policy makers. The WHO operational definition of osteoporosis, based on a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), has been used globally since the mid-1990s. However, although this definition identifies those at greatest individual risk of fracture, in the population overall a greater total number of fractures occur in individuals with BMD values above threshold for osteoporosis diagnosis. A number of web-based tools to enable the inclusion of clinical risk factors, with or without BMD, in fracture prediction algorithms have been developed to improve the identification of individuals at high fracture risk, the most commonly used globally being FRAX®. Access to DXA, osteoporosis risk assessment, case finding and treatment varies worldwide, but despite such advances studies indicate that a minority of men and women at high fracture risk receive treatment. Importantly, research is ongoing to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis case finding and risk assessment strategies worldwide. The huge burden caused by osteoporosis related fractures to individuals, healthcare systems and societies should provide a clear impetus for the progression of such approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Rebecca J Moon
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK; Paediatric Endocrinology, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK; NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cianferotti L, Bertoldo F, Carini M, Kanis JA, Lapini A, Longo N, Martorana G, Mirone V, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Brandi ML. The prevention of fragility fractures in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer: a position statement by the international osteoporosis foundation. Oncotarget 2017; 8:75646-75663. [PMID: 29088899 PMCID: PMC5650454 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy is commonly employed for the treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer as primary or adjuvant treatment. The skeleton is greatly compromised in men with prostate cancer during androgen deprivation therapy because of the lack of androgens and estrogens, which are trophic factors for bone. Men receiving androgen deprivation therapy sustain variable degrees of bone loss with an increased risk of fragility fractures. Several bone antiresorptive agents have been tested in randomized controlled trials in these patients. Oral bisphosphonates, such as alendronate and risedronate, and intravenous bisphosphonates, such as pamidronate and zoledronic acid, have been shown to increase bone density and decrease the risk of fractures in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Denosumab, a fully monoclonal antibody that inhibits osteoclastic-mediated bone resorption, is also effective in increasing bone mineral density and reducing fracture rates in these patients. The assessment of fracture risk, T-score and/or the evaluation of prevalent fragility fractures are mandatory for the selection of patients who will benefit from antiresorptive therapy. In the future, new agents modulating bone turnover and skeletal muscle metabolism will be available for testing in these subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisella Cianferotti
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Marco Carini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, University Hospital of Florence, Largo Brambilla Florence, Italy
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Lapini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, University Hospital of Florence, Largo Brambilla Florence, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Martorana
- Department of Urology, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mirone
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Jean-Yves Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, University of Liege, CHU Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium
| | - Rene Rizzoli
- Service of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Luisa Brandi
- Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, University Hospital of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lundin H, Sääf M, Strender LE, Nyren S, Johansson SE, Salminen H. Gait speed and one-leg standing time each add to the predictive ability of FRAX. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28:179-187. [PMID: 27844133 PMCID: PMC5206249 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3818-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Gait speed or one-leg standing time (OLST) as additional predictors in FRAX. Population 351 elderly women followed 10 years. Both could improve predictions. The area under curve (AUC) for FRAX is 0.59, OLST is 0.69 and gait speed is 0.71. The net reclassification index (NRI) for classification to highest risk quartile or lowest three quartiles was 0.24 for gait speed and non-significant for OLST. INTRODUCTION The risk of falls and bone strength are two main determinants of hip fracture risk. The fracture risk assessment tool FRAX, however, lacks direct measures of fall risk1. A short OLST and a slow gait speed are both fall-related risk factors for hip fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the addition to FRAX of either gait speed or OLST could improve the predictive ability for hip fractures, compared to FRAX alone. METHODS A population-based sample of 351 women aged between 69 and 79 years were tested for one-leg standing time with eyes open and mean gait speed over a 15 + 15-m walk. Fracture and mortality data were obtained from health care registers. RESULTS The AUC for the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) increased from 0.61 to 0.71 when gait speed was added to FRAX. The AUC was 0.69 for OLST added to FRAX. The highest quartile of hip fracture risks according to FRAX had an absolute 10-year risk of ≥15%. The population was divided into one group with a hip fracture risk of ≥15% and one group with a fracture risk of <15%. NRI for addition of gait speed to FRAX was 0.24 (p = 0.023), while NRI was 0.08 (p = 0.544) for addition of OLST to FRAX. CONCLUSION Gait speed tended to improve the predictive ability of FRAX more than OLST, but they both added value to FRAX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Lundin
- Division of Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 14183 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - M Sääf
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (MMK), Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L-E Strender
- Division of Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 14183 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Nyren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S-E Johansson
- Division of Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 14183 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Salminen
- Division of Family Medicine, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Alfred Nobels allé 23, 14183 Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Relationship between the FRAX ® score and falls in community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly people. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2016; 2:221-227. [PMID: 30775490 PMCID: PMC6372775 DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 10/23/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Falls is a risk factor for fracture. The FRAX® predicts fractures. Whether the FRAX® is associated with fall in both gender is inconclusive. The aim of our study is to evaluate the association between FRAX scores and falls. METHODS The cross-sectional study set from 2009 to 2010 included 1200 community-dwelling people who were systematically sampled in central Taiwan. The 1200 participants (men: 524; women: 676; ≥40 years old) completed questionnaires about socioeconomic status; lifestyle; medical and fall history were completed. FRAX scores with and without bone mineral density (BMD) were calculated by using the Taiwan calculator. RESULTS A total of 19.8% participants fell down. Binary regression models showed that diabetes mellitus history (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.03-2.52), the FRAX without BMD in a continuous major score (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.03-1.09), continuous hip score (OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05-1.16), categorical major score ≥ 10% (OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.25-2.61), and categorical hip score ≥ 3% (OR: 1.80; 95% CI: 1.30-2.50) were independent risk factors for falls. FRAX with BMD in a continuous major score (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), continuous hip score (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09), categorical major score ≥ 10% (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.09-2.12), and categorical hip score ≥ 3% (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.13-2.09) were also independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that FRAX® scores with and without BMD were unanimously correlated with falls in community-dwelling middle-aged and elderly males and females.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Cooper C, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV. A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Arch Osteoporos 2016; 11:25. [PMID: 27465509 PMCID: PMC4978487 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-016-0278-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED This systematic review identified assessment guidelines for osteoporosis that incorporate FRAX. The rationale for intervention thresholds is given in a minority of papers. Intervention thresholds (fixed or age-dependent) need to be country-specific. INTRODUCTION In most assessment guidelines, treatment for osteoporosis is recommended in individuals with prior fragility fractures, especially fractures at spine and hip. However, for those without prior fractures, the intervention thresholds can be derived using different methods. The aim of this report was to undertake a systematic review of the available information on the use of FRAX® in assessment guidelines, in particular the setting of thresholds and their validation. METHODS We identified 120 guidelines or academic papers that incorporated FRAX of which 38 provided no clear statement on how the fracture probabilities derived are to be used in decision-making in clinical practice. The remainder recommended a fixed intervention threshold (n = 58), most commonly as a component of more complex guidance (e.g. bone mineral density (BMD) thresholds) or an age-dependent threshold (n = 22). Two guidelines have adopted both age-dependent and fixed thresholds. RESULTS Fixed probability thresholds have ranged from 4 to 20 % for a major fracture and 1.3-5 % for hip fracture. More than one half (39) of the 58 publications identified utilised a threshold probability of 20 % for a major osteoporotic fracture, many of which also mention a hip fracture probability of 3 % as an alternative intervention threshold. In nearly all instances, no rationale is provided other than that this was the threshold used by the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. Where undertaken, fixed probability thresholds have been determined from tests of discrimination (Hong Kong), health economic assessment (USA, Switzerland), to match the prevalence of osteoporosis (China) or to align with pre-existing guidelines or reimbursement criteria (Japan, Poland). Age-dependent intervention thresholds, first developed by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG), are based on the rationale that if a woman with a prior fragility fracture is eligible for treatment, then, at any given age, a man or woman with the same fracture probability but in the absence of a previous fracture (i.e. at the 'fracture threshold') should also be eligible. Under current NOGG guidelines, based on age-dependent probability thresholds, inequalities in access to therapy arise especially at older ages (≥70 years) depending on the presence or absence of a prior fracture. An alternative threshold using a hybrid model reduces this disparity. CONCLUSION The use of FRAX (fixed or age-dependent thresholds) as the gateway to assessment identifies individuals at high risk more effectively than the use of BMD. However, the setting of intervention thresholds needs to be country-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
- Institute of Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Anders Odén
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In the 8 years since the launch of the FRAX tool, it has continued to grow with the addition of new country or territory models. Although the core of the fracture risk algorithm remains unchanged, there is growing evidence of possible additional independent clinical variables that might modulate the interpretation of the FRAX outputs. There is also an expanding number of international guidelines that incorporate FRAX assessments, leading to discussions on the use of FRAX in treated patients and the determination of intervention thresholds. RECENT FINDINGS This review encompasses recent information on the use of FRAX in immigrant populations and the potential influence of skeletal and extraskeletal risk factors on FRAX estimations. For example, trabecular bone score and falls risk appear to be promising additional factors in individual risk assessment. FRAX appears to remain accurate in those on osteoporosis treatments, but FRAX is not a suitable tool for use in treat-to-target strategies. SUMMARY The assessment of fracture risk in immigrants is probably more accurate with the use of the FRAX tool for the country of origin, if available. The impact of additional risk variables will need evaluation of the impact of these on recharacterizing patients by moving them across intervention thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene V McCloskey
- aCentre for Metabolic Bone Diseases bCentre for Integrated Research Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield cMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Najafi DA, Dahlberg LE, Hansson EE. A combination of clinical balance measures and FRAX® to improve identification of high-risk fallers. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:94. [PMID: 27142632 PMCID: PMC4855351 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-016-0266-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The FRAX® algorithm quantifies a patient’s 10-year probability of a hip or major osteoporotic fracture without taking an individual’s balance into account. Balance measures assess the functional ability of an individual and the FRAX® algorithm is a model that integrates the individual patients clinical risk factors [not balance] and bone mineral density. Thus, clinical balance measures capture aspects that the FRAX® algorithm does not, and vice versa. It is therefore possible that combining FRAX® and clinical balance measures can improve the identification of patients at high fall risk and thereby high fracture risk. Our study aim was to explore whether there is an association between clinical balance measures and fracture prediction obtained from FRAX®. Method A cross-sectional study design was used where post hoc was performed on a dataset of 82 participants (54 to 89 years of age, mean age 71.4, 77 female), with a fall-related wrist-fracture between 2008 and 2012. Balance was measured by tandem stance, standing one leg, walking in the figure of eight, walking heel to toe on a line, walking as fast as possible for 30 m and five times sit to stand balance measures [tandem stance and standing one leg measured first with open and then with closed eyes] and each one analyzed for bivariate relations with the 10-year probability values for hip and major osteoporotic fractures as calculated by FRAX® using Spearman’s rank correlation test. Results Individuals with high FRAX® values had poor outcome in balance measures; however the significance level of the correlation differed between tests. Standing one leg eyes closed had strongest correlation to FRAX® (0.610 p = < 0.01) and Five times sit to stand was the only test that did not correlate with FRAX® (0.013). Conclusion This study showed that there is an association between clinical balance measures and FRAX®. Hence, the use of clinical balance measures and FRAX® in combination, might improve the identification of individuals with high risk of falls and thereby following fractures. Results enable healthcare providers to optimize treatment and prevention of fall-related fractures. Trial registration The study has been registered in Clinical Trials.gov, registration number NCT00988572.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Najafi
- Department of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Lund University, Baravägen 3, 22240, Lund, Sweden
| | - Leif E Dahlberg
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Eva Ekvall Hansson
- Department of Health Sciences, Health Sciences Centre, Lund University, Baravägen 3, 22240, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sugiyama T, Kono Y, Sekiguchi K, Kim YT, Oda H. Age-related fragility fracture: insights from the natural homeostatic system in the skeleton. Arch Osteoporos 2015; 10:45. [PMID: 26628422 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-015-0251-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Toshihiro Sugiyama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiko Kono
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Kogoro Sekiguchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Yoon Taek Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| | - Hiromi Oda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saitama Medical University, 38 Morohongo, Moroyama, Saitama, 350-0495, Japan
| |
Collapse
|