Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients

Risk factors for nonresponse to 2 years of denosumab administration in patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective single-center cohorts study

Background and Aims

To investigate the factors associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and the incidence of fractures in osteoporotic patients treated with denosumab.

Methods

This retrospective study included 162 osteoporotic patients treated with denosumab for 24 months between 2013 and 2019. Patients were divided according to the changes in BMD as nonresponders (NL group: <3% increase in lumbar spine BMD [LBMD], NH group: <0% increase in femoral neck BMD [FNBMD]) or responders (RL group: ≥3% increase in LBMD, RH group: ≥0% increase in FNBMD).

Results

The respective changes in the LBMD and FNBMD after 24 months of denosumab treatment were 9.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.1-10.6) and 3.3% (95% CI: 2.1-4.5). Twenty-eight (17.3%) patients were in the NL group, and 134 (82.7%) were in the RL group. A history of bisphosphonate treatment was a risk factor for being in the NL group (odds ratio [OR]: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.38-10.71, p = 0.007; adjusted OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.01-10.19, p = 0.048). Although the NH (n = 48; 30.8%) and RH (n = 108; 69.2%) groups had similar baseline characteristics, the NH group had a significantly higher baseline FNBMD than the RH group (p = 0.003). The change in FNBMD was negatively associated with the FNBMD at baseline (r = -0.34, p < 0.001). No new osteoporotic fractures occurred in either group during follow-up.

Conclusion

In osteoporotic patients receiving denosumab treatment, a history of bisphosphonate treatment was a risk factor for a lack of increase in LBMD, and a higher FNBMD at baseline was negatively associated with the change in FNBMD.

Adherence of denosumab treatment for low bone mineral density in Japanese people living with HIV: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Long-term care issues, specifically metabolic bone disorders, are a concern for people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) who undergo life-long antiretroviral therapy (ART). Previous clinical trials with denosumab, an anti-RANKL antibody inhibitor, have revealed its effectiveness in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with osteoporosis. However, there are limited data on adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in PLWH. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the adherence and effectiveness of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis in Japanese PLWH.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective exploratory analysis of 29 Japanese PLWH who initiated denosumab treatment for osteoporosis, between 2013 and 2021. The study included patients who received at least one dose of denosumab every 6 months. Adherence and persistence were defined as receiving two consecutive injections of denosumab 6 months ± 4 weeks apart and 6 months + 8 weeks apart, respectively. The primary outcome measure of the study was the adherence of denosumab treatment for 24 months. The secondary outcome measures included treatment persistence and BMD. The period after January 2020 was defined as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period, and its impact on adherence was investigated.

RESULTS

The treatment adherence rates at 12 and 24 months were 89.7% and 60.7%, respectively. By contrast, the treatment persistence at 12 and 24 months was 100% and 85.7%, respectively. More patients in the group who initiated denosumab treatment after the COVID-19 pandemic reached non-adherence than in the group who initiated denosumab treatment before the pandemic. BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck significantly increased compared to that at baseline, with median percentage changes of 8.7% (p < 0.001) and 3.5% (p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that patients in the study had a high rate of non-adherence but a lower rate of non-persistence. Additionally, PLWH on ongoing ART experienced increased BMD with denosumab treatment. This study provides an opportunity to improve future strategies for denosumab treatment in the Japanese PLWH.

Up-to-Date Knowledge on Osteoporosis Treatment Selection in Postmenopausal Women

The concept of a super-aged society has led to a steady increase in the average lifespan and hence, interest in a healthy life has increased. Aging is a major risk factor for many diseases, including osteoporosis. Osteoporotic fractures have a significant impact on the quality of life of the elderly and hence, it is pivotal to provide effective treatment of osteoporosis after menopause. Osteoporosis requires proper management and the treatment must be centered on long-term goals. New drugs with diverse mechanisms have been developed for treating osteoporosis. Current management of osteoporosis generally focuses on the importance of risk-based strategies to maximize the effectiveness of existing treatments and mitigate potential negative side-effects. Additionally, there is a need for sequential treatment of osteoporosis in the future. This review discusses the dynamic strategies for osteoporosis treatment and the importance of long-term management in postmenopausal women.

Risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Denosumab has been reported to increase bone mineral density (BMD) and suppress fractures, but poor responders are not uncommon. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor response to denosumab treatment. This is the first study to explore risk factors for poor response to denosumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective observational study investigated 227 Japanese postmenopausal women who received denosumab with monitoring of BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at 6-month intervals. Risk factors were identified using Cox's proportional hazard modeling. Poor responders were defined as not exceeding the least significant change of BMD from baseline for 3 years.

RESULTS

Mean relative change from baseline for 3 years in lumbar spine (LS)-BMD, femoral neck (FN)-BMD, and total hip (TH)-BMD were 12.6%, 6.8%, and 6.1%, respectively. Numbers of poor responders were 10 in LS-BMD, 47 in FN-BMD, 38 in TH-BMD. Risk factors for poor response were concomitant glucocorticoid use for LS-BMD, low body mass index or initiation at higher BMD for FN-BMD, and pretreatment with bisphosphonates or initiation at higher BMD for TH-BMD.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for insufficient denosumab effect differed between BMD measurement sites. These results should be taken into consideration when selecting denosumab in clinical practice.

Structural characterization and anti-osteoporosis activity of two polysaccharides extracted from the rhizome of Curculigo orchioides

Curculigo orchioides is widely used to treat osteoporosis in China. In this study, we identified the active substances in the crude polysaccharide (CO50) from C. orchioides that had anti-osteoporosis activity in vivo. Two polysaccharides, COP50-1 and COP50-4, were purified from CO50. Based on structural analysis, COP50-1 was composed of α-D-Glcp-(1→, β-D-Galp-(1→, →4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, →3,4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, →4,6)-α-D-Glcp-(1→, →4,6)-β-D-Manp-(1→, whereas COP50-4 was composed of α-L-Araf-(1→, →2)-α-L-Rhap-(1→, β-D-Manp-(1→, α-D-Galp-(1→, →2,4)-α-L-Rhap-(1→, →2)-β-D-Manp-(1→, →4)-α-D-GlcAp-(1→, →3)-α-D-GalAp-(1→, →4,6)-α-D-Galp-(1→, →2,3,6)-β-D-Manp-(1→, →2,3,5)-α-L-Araf-(1→, →2,5)-α-L-Araf-(1→, →4)-α-D-Glcp-(1→ and →3)-α-D-Galp-(1→. Pharmacological assessment revealed that COP50-1 had no obvious osteogenic activity. However, COP50-4 (0.5 μM) significantly enhanced the differentiation and mineralization of osteoblasts in vitro. Moreover, the effect of COP50-4 was greater than that of 17β-estradiol. Therefore, COP50-4 may be an effective component of CO50 that has great potential for development as an alternative drug for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Beneficial effects of switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and osteopenia/osteoporosis

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a higher bone fracture risk than patients without diabetes. Although denosumab (Dmab) is a potent bone resorption inhibitor, its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the effects of switching to Dmab from bisphosphonates (BP) or a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) in postmenopausal type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a three medical institutions, prospective, observational study for postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose T-score of femoral neck or lumbar spine bone mineral density was under -1.0 standard deviation, even after >6 months of BP or SERM administration. After obtaining consent, participants were treated for osteopenia/osteoporosis by either continuing BP (BP-BP group)/SERM (SERM-SERM group), or by switching to Dmab (BP-Dmab or SERM-Dmab groups). Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism marker levels were evaluated after 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients were included in this study, and each group comprised 12 patients. No significant difference existed in baseline characteristics among the groups. The average age and glycated hemoglobin were 71 ± 8 years and 7.2 ± 0.9%, respectively. In the SERM-Dmab group, lumbar spine bone mineral density was significantly increased by 5.0% compared with the SERM-SERM group (P < 0.04). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b were significantly decreased in the BP-Dmab and SERM-Dmab groups compared with the BP-BP and SERM-SERM groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching to Dmab from BP or SERM is beneficial to prevent osteoporosis progression in postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Analysis of the subsequent treatment of osteoporosis by transitioning from bisphosphonates to denosumab, using quantitative computed tomography: A prospective cohort study

Purpose

Denosumab reduces bone resorption and improves bone mineral density (BMD). Studies have analyzed subsequent treatment transitioning from bisphosphonates to denosumab based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning (DXA). Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can help assess cortical and trabecular bones separately in three dimensions without the interference of the surrounding osteophytes. In the present study, we analyzed the subsequent treatment transition from bisphosphonates to denosumab using QCT.

Methods

Thirty-two patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis to be treated with denosumab were recruited. The patients were divided into two groups (15 prior bisphosphonate and 17 naïve) based on their previous treatment. BMD of the lumbar spine and hip were evaluated by DXA and QCT at baseline and 12 months following denosumab treatment.

Results

The percentage change in volumetric BMD assessed by QCT at 12 months significantly improved in the naïve group compared with that in the prior bisphosphonate group. The region-specific assessment of femur at 12 months revealed that denosumab treatment was effective in both cortical and trabecular bones except the trabecular region of the prior bisphosphonate group.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that although denosumab treatment was useful in both treatment groups, BMD increase was significantly higher in the naïve group than in the prior-bisphosphonate group. Interestingly, in the prior-bisphosphonate group, denosumab treatment was more effective in the cortical region than the trabecular region. Our study offers insights into the subsequent treatment and permits greater confidence when switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates.

•

We analyzed the treatment transition from bisphosphonates to denosumab using QCT.

•

Percentage change in volumetric BMD at 12 months significantly improved in the naïve group.

•

Denosumab treatment was more effective on the cortical region than the trabecular region.

•

Our study offers insights into the subsequent treatment when switching to denosumab.

Effects of denosumab on rheumatic diseases and refractory glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a prospective study

This study evaluates the clinical efficacy of denosumab for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) refractory to previous osteoporosis treatment. Our results show that denosumab significantly increased BMD of the lumbar spine and bilateral hip over the 24-month study period. Denosumab demonstrates potential as a treatment for GIOP refractory to previous therapy.

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of denosumab in patients with rheumatic diseases and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) refractory to previous osteoporosis treatment.

METHODS

All patients were treated with 60 mg of denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months for 2 years after administration of bisphosphonates or rhPTH was stopped. We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and bilateral hip at baseline, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. We measured serum levels of bone alkaline acid phosphatase (BAP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b at baseline, and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients with rheumatic diseases and GIOP were enrolled in this study. All patients were treated with bisphosphonates (n=40), recombinant human parathyroid hormone (n=4), or active vitamin D₃ (n=11). Over the 24-month study period, denosumab significantly increased the mean BMD of the lumbar spine and bilateral hip (5.8 ± 0.7%, and 1.3 ± 0.4%, respectively). Additionally, denosumab also significantly reduced the serum levels of TRACP-5b and BAP over this same period (by -38.8 ± 3.5% and -16.3 ± 3.1%, respectively), although these changes in bone turnover markers were not predictive factors of an improvement in BMD values. While three patients developed fragility fractures during the study period, all three had several risk factors for fragility fractures in GIOP.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, denosumab is a potential treatment for GIOP in rheumatic diseases, especially in patients refractory to previous therapy, including bisphosphonate therapy.

Efficacy of Denosumab Therapy Following Treatment with Bisphosphonates in Women with Osteoporosis: A Cohort Study

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes RANKL, a cytokine able to interact with the RANK receptor on preosteoclasts and osteoclasts, decreasing their recruitment and differentiation, leading to a decreased bone resorption. The aim of this observational real-life study was to analyze adherence to denosumab therapy and assess its efficacy in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and modulating biochemical skeletal markers following previous treatments with bisphosphonates in a group of post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. Women were recruited in the specialized center from March 2012 to September 2019. Biochemical markers were recorded at baseline and every six months prior to subsequent drug injection. Dual X-ray absorptiometry was requested at baseline and after 18/24 months. Comparing BMD at baseline and after denosumab therapy in naive patients and in those previously treated with bisphosphonates, a positive therapeutic effect was observed in both groups. The results of our real-life study demonstrate, as expected, that BMD values significantly increased upon denosumab treatment. Interestingly, denosumab showed an increased efficacy in patients previously treated with bisphosphonates. Moreover, biochemical markers data indicate that osteoporotic patients, without other concomitant unstable health conditions, could be evaluated once a year, decreasing the number of specialistic center access.

Remarkable loss of bone mineral density in 6 months after denosumab discontinuation: a case report

In recent years, several studies have shown that multiple vertebral fractures sometimes occur after denosumab discontinuation. Herein, we report the case of a 63-year-old woman with osteoporosis who lost 60% of lumbar bone mineral density acquired during osteoporosis treatment after 6 months of denosumab discontinuation.

Same-side insufficiency fractures of the tibia and femur after denosumab discontinuation: a case report

Osteoporosis (OP) is a common disease in the elderly that causes bone fractures and increases mortality. Denosumab (DMAB) is one of several medications to treat OP. DMAB not only reduces the risk of fractures, but also improves the quality of life. However, an increase in the risk of multiple vertebral fractures has been reported after DMAB discontinuation. We described the rare case of a 71-year-old woman with severe OP who experienced same-side insufficiency fractures of the tibia and femur at 18 months after DMAB discontinuation. Careful monitoring for both vertebral and lower limb fragility fractures is advised after DMAB cessation.

Combination and sequential treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis

Introduction: Since postmenopausal osteoporosis is a chronic, potentially disabling condition requiring long-term treatment, the physician is expected to decide the optimal treatment strategy, e.g. how to use the available osteoanabolic and antiresorptive agents, sequentially or in combination, in the most effective and safe way, based on personalized patient care.Areas covered: Herein, the authors outline clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of various sequential treatment strategies. More specifically, they compare the efficacy of osteoanabolic agents when they precede or follow antiresorptive treatment, as well as the efficacy of antiresorptives following other antiresorptives. Finally, the authors quote and discuss available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of the co-administration of osteoanabolics and antiresorptives in comparison with monotherapies.Expert opinion: Initiation with an osteoanabolic agent followed by an antiresorptive seems to be the optimal treatment sequence, at least in patients with severe osteoporosis. Osteoanabolic treatment following antiresorptives seems to lead in more modest responses in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers. Combination therapy with teriparatide and denosumab or zoledronate has achieved higher BMD gains compared to each agent alone; however, due to the high cost, combination therapy is rarely compensated. On the contrary, the combination of teriparatide with alendronate results in smaller BMD increases than TPTD monotherapy.

Efficacy of Denosumab for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in an Adolescent Patient with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Case Report

CASE

We report the case of a 13-year-old boy with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) who sustained bilateral femoral neck fractures associated with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Denosumab therapy for 18 months markedly improved the lumbar bone mineral density and the bone turnover markers. No fractures or complications were recorded during the treatment period.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of denosumab treatment for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in a patient with DMD. The drug merits additional testing as an effective therapy for osteoporosis in patients with DMD.

Effectiveness of monthly intravenous ibandronate on the low responders to oral bisphosphonate: the MOVEMENT study

The MOVEMENT study was designed to assess the effectiveness of monthly intravenous ibandronate on bone mineral density (BMD) in daily clinical practice in Japanese patients with primary osteoporosis whose lumbar spine BMD did not increase despite oral bisphosphonate therapy. This study was a multicenter, prospective, interventional study (52 sites; August 2015 to March 2018). Patients aged ≥ 50 years with primary osteoporosis, evaluated as low responders to oral bisphosphonate treatment for 1-3 years, continued on their existing oral bisphosphonate or switched to monthly intravenous ibandronate (1 mg) for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in lumbar spine BMD from baseline to 12 months in the intravenous ibandronate group (IV IBN). A total of 240 and 141 patients were enrolled in the IV IBN and oral bisphosphonate groups (OBP), respectively. At 12 months, a significant increase in mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD was observed in the IV IBN (2.70%). This change was also significant at 6 months (1.92%). Similarly, the change in total hip BMD showed a significant increase at 12 months (0.78%). In the IV IBN, the responder rate, percentage of patient whose change from baseline of lumbar spine BMD has greater than 0%, for lumbar spine BMD was high at both 6 (72.3%, 141/195 patients) and 12 (78.0%, 145/186 patients) months. No new safety concerns were observed in either treatment group. Treatment with intravenous ibandronate significantly increased lumbar spine BMD without any new safety concerns in Japanese patients with osteoporosis who showed low response to existing oral bisphosphonates.

Unexpected rapid increase in bone mineral density by bisphosphonate therapy after multiple spinal fractures: a case report

Background

Osteoporosis is a serious disease that causes bone fragility fractures and increases mortality. Bisphosphonates are the first-line drugs for osteoporosis. However, the gains in bone mineral density by use of bisphosphonates alone are limited.

Case presentation

We describe the clinical outcome of a Japanese woman with osteoporosis treated with bisphosphonates after multiple spinal fractures. After 3 years of treatment with the bisphosphonate alendronate, her lumbar bone mineral density and bilateral hip bone mineral density markedly increased by 61.9% and 32.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

We considered that our patient’s multiple fractures had caused a decrease in bone mineral density, which naturally improved with fracture healing to enhance the increase in bone mineral density with bisphosphonate treatment.

Additive effects of eldecalcitol in poorly responding long-term bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis

Objectives

We examined whether eldecalcitol (ELD) provided additive bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover marker gains in patients undergoing long-term bisphosphonate (BP) usage, especially in osteoporotic individuals exhibiting a poor response to BPs.

Methods

Forty-two post-menopausal patients with primary osteoporosis and low lumbar BMD (L-BMD) and/or bilateral total hip BMD (H-BMD) values receiving long-term BP treatment were prospectively enrolled. Serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) was measured as a bone formation marker and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) was assessed as a bone resorption marker. L-BMD, H-BMD, and femoral neck BMD (N-BMD) were recorded before, at the commencement of, and during ELD administration.

Results

BAP and urinary NTX were significantly decreased by BP therapy prior to ELD. ELD addition further significantly decreased the bone turnover markers (both p < 0.01). The mean L-BMD increase rate was 0.2% (p = 0.81) from 2 to 1 years before ELD administration, -0.7% (p = 0.30) during the year before ELD, and 2.9% (p < 0.01) during 1 year of ELD. Similar findings were observed for the mean increase rate of H-BMD, with values of 0.2% (p = 0.55), -0.7% (p < 0.01), and 1.2% (p < 0.01), respectively. The mean N-BMD increase rate was significantly increased after ELD administration (1.1%, p = 0.03) despite no gains by BP therapy alone.

Conclusions

This study suggests that ELD addition may be useful for osteoporotic patients exhibiting a diminished long-term BP therapy response.

Severe hypocalcemia following denosumab treatment in a patient with secondary osteoporosis associated with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) has been known as a cause of secondary osteoporosis, which often requires medication. Herein, we give the first report of a case of a 38-year-old man with fatigue and paralysis in both upper limbs who had been treated with denosumab for secondary osteoporosis associated with PSC. Since bisphosphonate (alendronate) was ineffective in our patient, the treatment was changed from alendronate to denosumab. Despite replacements with calcium and active vitamin D (alfacalcidol; 1-hydroxycholecalciferol), he developed severe hypocalcemia (albumin-adjusted serum calcium: 5.2 mg/dL) 2 weeks after the second administration of denosumab, which required immediate correction. After that, the corrected serum calcium levels were controlled within the normal range with 0.75 μg of eldecalcitol (1α,25-dihydroxy-2β-(3-hydroxypropyloxy)vitamin D3) and increased doses of calcium (1,500 mg daily) and phosphate (900 mg daily) without denosumab. Even though denosumab treatment had been terminated, the T score of the lumbar spine improved from -4.4 to -2.6 by 1 year after the second administration, possibly due to the amelioration of osteomalacia through the treatment with eldecalcitol and the higher doses of calcium and phosphate. This report indicates that denosumab can cause severe hypocalcemia in patients with osteoporosis associated with chronic diseases of the hepatobiliary system including PSC, in turn suggesting that the possibility of vitamin D deficiency or osteomalacia should be considered before administering treatments and that serum calcium levels should be closely monitored to detect life-threatening hypocalcemia in patients who have high risk factors for hypocalcemia.

Denosumab effects on bone density and turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass with or without previous treatment

PURPOSE

Prior osteoporosis therapies may affect the skeletal response to denosumab. We compared the effect of denosumab (60 mg every 6 months for 12 months) on bone mineral density and bone metabolism parameters in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who were either treatment-naïve (n = 30), or previously treated either with zoledronic acid (n = 30), or teriparatide (n = 22).

METHODS

We assessed lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and measured serum concentrations of the bone turnover markers pro-collagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal-cross-linking telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX), as well as sclerostin, dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), and myostatin.

RESULTS

Lumbar spine BMD increased equivalently in all three groups after 12 months of denosumab compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Serum PINP and CTX decreased significantly with denosumab in pre-treated women reaching the same nadir levels as in treatment-naïve patients (p < 0.001). Women pre-treated with teriparatide displayed lower baseline myostatin concentrations as compared to the other two groups (p < 0.001). Changes in lumbar spine BMD in teriparatide pre-treated women correlated with changes in bone turnover markers and myostatin.

CONCLUSIONS

Denosumab induced similar increases in lumbar spine BMD in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients and suppressed serum PINP and CTX to the same levels regardless of prior treatments. In teriparatide pre-treated patients the magnitude of change in bone turnover markers is associated with BMD response.

Potential association with early changes in serum calcium level after starting or switching to denosumab combined with eldecalcitol

The aims of this study are to investigate changes in serum calcium (Ca) level after switching from either non-therapy, bisphosphonate, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERM) or teriparatide treatments to a combination therapy of denosumab (DMAb), and eldecalcitol, and the association between early changes in serum calcium and changes in bone metabolic markers and bone mineral density (BMD). 129 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis (32 non-pretreatment, 50 bisphosphonates, 18 SERM, and 29 teriparatide) were recruited and switched to DMAb plus eldecalcitol. Serum calcium levels, bone metabolism markers, and BMD measurements of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were evaluated. All groups showed an increase in BMD 6 months and 1 year after DMAb administration compared to baseline via suppression of bone metabolism markers. The TPD group showed a significant decrease in serum calcium level 1 week after the first injection of DMAb and eldecalcitol compared to baseline and the bisphosphonate group. Changes in serum calcium level from baseline to 1 week after the first injection of DMAb trended to correlate with changes in bone metabolism markers and lumbar BMD. The risks of DMAb-induced hypocalcemia are different between starting and switching from bone resorption inhibitors and bone formation promoters. Therefore, appropriate assessment before administration of DMAb, including pretreatment therapy as well as serum Ca and bone metabolic markers will help identify the risk of hypocalcemia following DMAb in combination with eldecalcitol. Our findings also showed that early change in serum Ca level after DMAb initiation could potentially predict the efficacy for therapy reaction.

The impact of switching once-weekly teriparatide to denosumab in osteoporosis patients

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that switching from daily (d) teriparatide (TPTD) to denosumab (DMAb) is effective for severe osteoporosis patients. However, there have been no reports about switching from weekly (w) TPTD to DMAb in patients with osteoporosis. Once-weekly 56.5-μg TPTD treatment increases bone mineral density (BMD) and reduces fracture events. The objective of the current retrospective study was to elucidate the impact of switching w-TPTD to DMAb in patients with osteoporosis.

METHODS

In this study, 40 patients were treated with w-TPTD for 18 months and then switched to DMAb for 18 months. The sample included 2 men and 38 women with a mean age of 74.5 (60-85) years. Twenty-five subjects had primary osteoporosis, and 15 had secondary osteoporosis. The mean number of osteoporotic vertebral fractures was 4.1. Serum bone turnover markers and BMD were evaluated every 6 months.

RESULTS

Bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP5b), markers of bone formation and resorption respectively, were not significantly different in w-TPTD subjects at 18 months compared with those at baseline (p > 0.05), but BAP and TRACP5b in subjects treated with DMAb were significantly lower at 36 months compared with those at baseline (p < 0.05). BMD of the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) increased by 12.3%, 2.5%, and 2.2% by 36 months with DMAb treatment, significantly higher than at baseline (p < 0.05). Changes in BMD of FN and TH in primary osteoporosis patients were significantly higher than in secondary osteoporosis patients at 18 months (w-TPTD) and 36 months (DMAb, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BMD significantly increased in osteoporosis patients switched from w-TPTD to DMAb. However, the impact of switching from w-TPTD to DMAb in secondary osteoporosis patients was not as great as in primary osteoporosis patients at the view points of changes in BMD of FN and TH.

Efficacy of denosumab therapy for neurofibromatosis type 1 with osteoporosis and history of fractures: a case report

Background

The natural history and pathogenesis of the skeletal abnormalities found in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) are poorly understood, and the therapeutic options for these manifestations remain limited. This report first describes the clinical outcomes of denosumab treatment for a patient with NF1 suffering from osteoporosis.

Methods

We enrolled a patient with NF1 under denosumab treatment for osteoporosis, prior fractures, and no improvement in bone mineral density (BMD) over 3 years of alendronate therapy. BMD was monitored by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Tested laboratory data included bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, urinary type I collagen amino-terminal telopeptide, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, 1-alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃, and parathyroid hormone. BMD and laboratory data were evaluated before, between 2 and 4 months, and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment.

Case presentation

During 2 years of denosumab therapy for osteoporosis in a 58-year-old female NF1 patient with prior fractures, BMD increased by 6.5% in the lumbar spine and 10.6% in the total hips, and bone turnover markers were notably improved. No fractures occurred during the latter half of treatment.

Conclusion

Denosumab represents an effective treatment option for osteoporosis in NF1 patients.

THERAPY OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Denosumab vs bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

The most widely used medications for the treatment of osteoporosis are currently bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab (Dmab). Both are antiresorptives, thus targeting the osteoclast and inhibiting bone resorption. Dmab achieves greater suppression of bone turnover and greater increases of bone mineral density (BMD) at all skeletal sites, both in naïve and pretreated patients. No superiority on fracture risk reduction has been documented so far. In long-term administration, BPs reach a plateau in BMD response after 2-3 years, especially at the hip, while BMD increases progressively for as long as Dmab is administered. Both BPs and Dmab are generally considered safe, although they have been correlated to rare adverse events, such as osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical femoral fractures. Dmab should be preferred in patients with impaired renal function. BPs are embedded in the bone, from which they are slowly released during bone remodeling, therefore continuing to act for years after their discontinuation. In contrast, Dmab discontinuation fully and rapidly reverses its effects on bone markers and BMD and increases the risk for fractures; therefore, Dmab discontinuation should be discouraged, especially in previously treatment-naïve patients, regardless of the conventional fracture risk. In case of discontinuation, other treatment, mainly BPs, should immediately follow, although the optimal sequential treatment strategy is yet to be defined. Combination of teriparatide with Dmab or zoledronic acid, but not alendronate, provides increased BMD gains at all sites. In conclusion, both BPs and Dmab are safe and efficient therapeutic options although their particularities should be carefully considered in an individual basis.

Pretreatment of daily teriparatide enhances the increase of bone mineral density in cortical bones by denosumab therapy

Background

While it is well known that teriparatide (TPTD) increases bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic patients, it is unknown whether TPTD pretreatment affects BMD after denosumab (DMAb) therapy.

Methods

Fifty-seven patients in TPTD-pretreated group and 35 patients in DMAb-alone group had been further analyzed, all of whom were treated by DMAb for 1.5 years. Vitamin D (400 IU) and Ca (600 mg) supplementation was used in all patients. The BMD of lumbar 1–4 vertebrae (L-BMD), bilateral total hips (H-BMD), and bilateral femoral neck (FN-BMD) was quantified at first visit, and at 4, 8, 12, and 18 months after daily TPTD treatment following four times DMAb treatment.

Results

There were significant differences in L-BMD (p=0.004) and H-BMD (p=0.026) at baseline between TPTD-pretreated and DMAb-alone groups, although there was no significant difference in FN-BMD between the two groups. The increase of L-BMD by DMAb therapy was less in TPTD-pretreated group than in DMAb-alone group. There was no significant difference in H-BMD, although percent changes of H-BMD tended to be higher in the TPTD-pretreated group than those in the DMAb-alone group. Percent change in FN-BMD at 4 months (p=0.067) and 12 months (p=0.057) tended to be higher in TPTD-pretreated group than in DMAb-alone group. Percent change in FN-BMD at 18 months was significantly higher in TPTD-pretreated group (p=0.004) than in DMAb-alone group.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the pretreatment of TPTD might have enhanced the increase of BMD in cortical bones treated by DMAb. Thus, it is favorable that TPTD can be used for osteoporotic patients who have high fracture risks with cortical bones.

Significant improvement of bone mineral density by denosumab treatment in Japanese osteoporotic patients following breast cancer treatment

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of denosumab in patients with osteoporosis (OP) and non-metastatic breast cancer following treatment of 1) surgery, 2) surgery and aromatase inhibitors, and 3) surgery, aromatase inhibitors, and anti-cancer agents, compared with those in primary OP patients.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective 24-month study, patients were divided into the primary OP group (34 cases) or OP receiving breast cancer treatment group (breast cancer group; 17 cases). We measured serum calcium, whole parathyroid hormone (PTH), 1,25OH₂D₃, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar 1-4 vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral total hips (H-BMD) for 24 months.

Results

The percent changes of serum calcium in the breast cancer group were significantly lower than those in the primary OP group at 1 week, 1 and 12 months. The percent changes of whole PTH in the primary OP group were significantly lower than those in the breast cancer group at 2 and 4 months. Significant differences were found between the groups at 18 months (-34.5% in the primary OP group and -52.6% in the breast cancer group, respectively) for the percent changes of BAP. Significant differences were found between the groups at 12, 18, and 24 months (-39.7% in the primary OP group and -64.0% in the breast cancer group at 24 months, respectively) for the percent changes of TRACP-5b. The percent changes of L-BMD and H-BMD were significantly increased at 12, 18, and 24 months in both the primary OP group (7.0% and 4.7% at 24 months, respectively) and breast cancer group (8.0% and 5.4% at 24 months, respectively), compared with pre-treatment levels. Significant differences were not found between the groups for the percent changes of L-BMD and H-BMD.

Conclusion

Denosumab significantly increased L-BMD and H-BMD to comparable degrees in both groups; therefore, it represents a good therapeutic option for OP receiving breast cancer treatment as well as primary OP. Also, vitamin D supplementation is required due to the potential hypocalcemia, and estrogen may be responsible for the decrease of serum calcium in the breast cancer patients.

Denosumab significantly improves lumbar spine bone mineral density more in treatment-naïve than in long-term bisphosphonate-treated patients

The purpose of our study was to compare the skeletal responses to 3-year denosumab treatment in bisphosphonate (BP)-naïve and long-term BP-treated patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Female patients who were BP treatment-naïve (treatment-naïve group: 25 cases) or who received long-term BPs (BP pre-treated group: 24 cases) were compared for serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX) at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, 30, 33, and 36 months of denosumab therapy. Lumbar 1-4 (L) spine bone mineral density (BMD), total hip (H)-BMD, and femoral neck (FN)-BMD values were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. The percentage changes of bone turnover markers were significantly decreased throughout the study period by a larger margin in the treatment-naïve group than in the BP pre-treated group. L-BMD, H-BMD, and FN-BMD were all significantly increased in the treatment-naïve and BP pre-treated groups at 36 months (12.9% and 7.5%, 5.9% and 6.0%, and 7.6% and 4.5%, respectively), compared with pre-treatment levels. There were significant differences for L-BMD at 12, 24, 30, and 36 months between the groups. Our findings suggest that the BMD response to denosumab, especially that of L-BMD, was diminished following BP therapy relative to treatment-naïve patients, thus providing evidence supporting the use of denosumab as a first-line therapy.

Vitamin D and Calcium Addition during Denosumab Therapy over a Period of Four Years Significantly Improves Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Japanese Osteoporosis Patients

This study investigated whether or not vitamin D and calcium supplementation affected bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD) over a period of four years of denosumab therapy in patients with primary osteoporosis. Patients were divided into a denosumab monotherapy group (22 cases) or a denosumab plus vitamin D and calcium supplementation group (combination group, 21 cases). We measured serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (NTX), and BMD of the lumbar 1-4 vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral hips (H-BMD) at baseline and at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months of treatment. There were no significant differences in patient background. Serum BAP, TRACP-5b, and urinary NTX were significantly and comparably inhibited in both groups from 12 to 48 months versus baseline values. L-BMD was significantly increased at every time point in both groups, while H-BMD was significantly increased at every time point in the combination group only. There were significant differences between the groups for L-BMD at 24, 36, and 48 months (P < 0.05) and for H-BMD at 12 months (P < 0.05). Compared with denosumab monotherapy, combination therapy of denosumab plus vitamin D and calcium significantly increased H-BMD at 12 months and L-BMD from 24 to 48 months. These findings indicate that continuous vitamin D and calcium supplementation is important, especially for 12 months to improve H-BMD and from 24 to 48 months to improve L-BMD.

Vitamin D and calcium are required at the time of denosumab administration during osteoporosis treatment

To evaluate the differences in outcomes of treatment with denosumab alone or denosumab combined with vitamin D and calcium supplementation in patients with primary osteoporosis. Patients were split into a denosumab monotherapy group (18 cases) or a denosumab plus vitamin D supplementation group (combination group; 23 cases). We measured serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b and urinary N-terminal telopeptide of type-I collagen (NTX) at baseline, 1 week, as well as at 1 month and 2, 4, 8 and 12 months. We also measured bone mineral density (BMD) of L1–4 lumbar vertebrae (L)-BMD and bilateral hips (H)-BMD at baseline and at 4, 8 and 12 months. There was no significant difference in patient background. TRACP-5b and urinary NTX were significantly suppressed in both groups from 1 week to 12 months (except at 12 months for NTX). In the combination group, TRACP-5b was significantly decreased compared with the denosumab monotherapy group at 2 and 4 months (P<0.05). BAP was significantly suppressed in both groups at 2–12 months. L-BMD significantly increased at 8 and 12 months (8.9%) in the combination group and at 4, 8 and 12 months (6.0%) in the denosumab monotherapy group, compared with those before treatment. H-BMD was significantly increased in the combination group (3.6%) compared with the denosumab group (1.2%) at 12 months (P<0.05). Compared with denosumab monotherapy, combination therapy of denosumab with vitamin D and calcium stopped the decrease in calcium caused by denosumab, inhibited bone metabolism to a greater extent, and increased BMD (especially at the hips).

Serum bone alkaline phosphatase is a useful marker to evaluate lumbar bone mineral density in Japanese postmenopausal osteoporotic women during denosumab treatment

A worldwide health concern, osteoporosis (OP), increases the risk of bone fracture and results in morbidity. This study examined whether the representative bone absorption marker serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP-5b) or bone formation marker bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) could estimate primary OP status and denosumab efficacy in a real-world setting. We retrospectively enrolled 114 female postmenopausal primary OP patients in Japan. Values and percent changes in TRACP-5b, BAP, lumbar 1-4 bone mineral density (L-BMD), and total hip BMD (H-BMD) were assessed before treatment and at 4, 8, and 12 months of therapy to identify the correlations between the percent changes in bone metabolic markers and BMD. We also established two sets of subgroups based on the upper limits of reference values in Japan for serum: TRACP-5b (<420 mU/dL) and (≥420 mU/dL) and BAP (<14.5 µg/L) and (≥14.5 µg/L). Negative correlations were observed for the percent changes of TRACP-5b and H-BMD at 4 months (r=-0.3476) and 8 months (r=-0.3880), for the percent changes of BAP and H-BMD at 8 months (r=-0.3354), and for the percent changes of BAP and L-BMD at 12 months (r=-0.3186). We observed a significant difference between the subgroups for the percent changes of L-BMD at 8 months (p=0.013) and 12 months (p=0.004) in BAP values. These results suggest that TRACP-5b and BAP had negative correlations with BMD, and that BAP represented a useful serum marker to evaluate L-BMD during denosumab therapy for OP.

New Molecules Modulating Bone Metabolism – New Perspectives in the Treatment of Osteoporosis

In this review the authors outline traditional antiresorptive pharmaceuticals, such as bisphosphonates, monoclonal antibodies against RANKL, SERMs, as well as a drug with an anabolic effect on the skeleton, parathormone. However, there is also a focus on non-traditional strategies used in therapy for osteolytic diseases. The newest antiosteoporotic pharmaceuticals increase osteoblast differentiation via BMP signaling (harmine), or stimulate osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through Wnt/β-catenin (icarrin, isoflavonoid caviunin, or sulfasalazine). A certain promise in the treatment of osteoporosis is shown by molecules targeting non-coding microRNAs (which are critical for osteoclastogenesis) or those stimulating osteoblast activity via epigenetic mechanisms. Vitamin D metabolites have specific antiosteoporotic potencies, modulating the skeleton not only via mineralization, but markedly also through the direct effects on the bone microstructure.

Two-year clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in Japanese treatment-naive postmenopausal osteoporotic women

This randomized prospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of denosumab treatment alone and in combination with teriparatide in treatment-naive postmenopausal Japanese female patients with osteoporosis. Thirty patients were randomly assigned to two groups: (1) denosumab group (denosumab alone, n=13); and (2) combination group (denosumab+teriparatide, n=17). Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP)-5b, urinary cross-linked N-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX), and bone mineral density (BMD) of L1–4 lumbar vertebrae (L-BMD) and bilateral total hips (H-BMD) were determined at the first visit and at various time points up to 24 months post-treatment to determine percentage changes. Serum TRACP-5b and urinary NTX were equally suppressed in both groups and maintained at low levels, with slight increases at 12, 18 and 24 months. BAP was significantly decreased in both groups from 4 to 24 months, with significant differences between the groups at 4, 8 and 15 months (P<0.05). L-BMD was significantly increased at most time points in both groups, with a significant difference between the combination group and denosumab group at 24 months (17.2% increase versus 9.6% increase; P<0.05). There was no significant difference in H-BMD between the two groups, although the levels tended to be higher in the combination group than in the denosumab group (9.5% increase versus 5.6% increase). These findings suggest that denosumab+teriparatide combination therapy may represent an important treatment for primary osteoporotic patients at high risk of vertebral fracture.

Compliance and discontinuation of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with primary osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis

Objectives

The aim of this study was to examine the discontinuation and occurrence of fracture during denosumab treatment in Japanese women with primary osteoporosis or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with osteoporosis.

Methods

This retrospective study included 143 patients with primary osteoporosis and 96 patients with RA and osteoporosis who were treated with denosumab. Treatment discontinuation, fracture occurrence, lumbar spine (L1–4) bone mineral density (LS-BMD), and bilateral total hip BMD (TH-BMD) were examined before and at 1 and 2 years after treatment commencement.

Results

In the primary osteoporosis group, 32 cases dropped out and no fractures occurred from 0 to 1 year. Eighteen cases were lost to follow-up and no fractures were noted from 1 to 2 years. In the RA with osteoporosis group, 7 cases dropped out and no fracture occurred from 0 to 1 year. Twenty-one cases were lost to follow-up and 2 nonvertebral fractures were noted from 1 to 2 years. In this group, 13 cases dropped out from 1 to 2 years and 16 cases dropped out during the 2-year study period due to economic reasons. LS-BMD and TH-BMD values increased continuously for 2 years of treatment in both primary osteoporosis and RA with osteoporosis groups.

Conclusions

These results suggest that during denosumab therapy, the discontinuation rate is expected to remain low during 2 years of treatment in primary osteoporotic patients. In RA patients with osteoporosis, however, the discontinuation rate may increase due to economic reasons from 1 to 2 years of therapy.

Comparison of the effects of denosumab with either active vitamin D or native vitamin D on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a worldwide health concern. Although treatment with denosumab plus the active vitamin D alfacalcidol has been found to improve femoral neck (FN) and distal forearm bone mineral density (BMD), there have been no reports on the efficacy or adverse effects of denosumab plus eldecalcitol (ELD) in primary osteoporosis patients. Fifty-six treatment-naïve post-menopausal women with primary osteoporosis were recruited and divided into denosumab plus native vitamin D or denosumab plus ELD. Ultimately, 26 subjects in the native vitamin D group and 24 in the ELD group were analyzed. Lumbar and total hip BMD significantly increased in both groups. However, there was no significant difference in the percent increase of lumbar and total hip BMD between two groups. FN-BMD was significantly increased from 6 to 12 months in the ELD group compared with baseline. This study revealed that combination therapy with denosumab and ELD could improve FN-BMD more effectively than denosumab plus native vitamin D. Thus, the addition of ELD may enhance the effects of denosumab treatment for primary osteoporosis.