1
|
Alam F, Alsaed O, Abdulla N, Abdulmomen I, Lutf A, Al Emadi S. Guidelines for fracture risk assessment and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50 in Qatar. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:34. [PMID: 38698101 PMCID: PMC11065783 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01389-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
We present comprehensive guidelines for osteoporosis management in Qatar. Formulated by the Qatar Osteoporosis Association, the guidelines recommend the age-dependent Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening, emphasizing risk-based treatment strategies and discouraging routine dual-energy X-ray scans. They offer a vital resource for physicians managing osteoporosis and fragility fractures nationwide. PURPOSE Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures are a growing public health issue with an impact on individuals and the healthcare system. We aimed to present guidelines providing unified guidance to all healthcare professionals in Qatar regarding the management of osteoporosis. METHODS The Qatar Osteoporosis Association formulated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men above the age of 50. A panel of six local rheumatologists who are experts in the field of osteoporosis met together and conducted an extensive review of published articles and local and international guidelines to formulate guidance for the screening and management of postmenopausal women and men older than 50 years in Qatar. RESULTS The guidelines emphasize the use of the age-dependent hybrid model of the Qatar fracture risk assessment tool for screening osteoporosis and risk categorization. The guidelines include screening, risk stratification, investigations, treatment, and monitoring of patients with osteoporosis. The use of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan without any risk factors is discouraged. Treatment options are recommended based on risk stratification. CONCLUSION Guidance is provided to all physicians across the country who are involved in the care of patients with osteoporosis and fragility fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiaz Alam
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Omar Alsaed
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Nabeel Abdulla
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ibrahim Abdulmomen
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Abdo Lutf
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Samar Al Emadi
- Rheumatology Section, Department of Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang YY, Xie N, Sun XD, Nice EC, Liou YC, Huang C, Zhu H, Shen Z. Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis. Bone Res 2024; 12:8. [PMID: 38368422 PMCID: PMC10874461 DOI: 10.1038/s41413-023-00306-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, has led to a high risk of fatal osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that sexual dimorphism is a notable feature of osteoporosis, with sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Specifically, females are more susceptible than males to osteoporosis, while males are more prone to disability or death from the disease. To date, sex chromosome abnormalities and steroid hormones have been proven to contribute greatly to sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis by regulating the functions of bone cells. Understanding the sex-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications is essential for improving treatment strategies tailored to women and men. This literature review focuses on the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, mainly in a population of aging patients, chronic glucocorticoid administration, and diabetes. Moreover, we highlight the implications of sexual dimorphism for developing therapeutics and preventive strategies and screening approaches tailored to women and men. Additionally, the challenges in translating bench research to bedside treatments and future directions to overcome these obstacles will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Drug-Targeting and Drug Delivery System of the Education Ministry and Sichuan Province, Sichuan Research Center for Drug Precision Industrial Technology, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Na Xie
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Sun
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Edouard C Nice
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia
| | - Yih-Cherng Liou
- Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117543, Republic of Singapore
| | - Canhua Huang
- Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, and West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Huili Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children of Ministry of Education, Department of Reproductive Medicine, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Zhisen Shen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital, Ningbo University, 315040, Ningbo, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Takeda D, Kurita H, Kashima Y, Hasegawa T, Miyakoshi M, Yamada SI, Yamamura Y, Soutome S. Is withdrawal of antiresorptive agents necessary before and after tooth extraction? A systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2023; 28:38. [PMID: 38150155 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05462-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The need for prevention and management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has increased with the growing number of patients using antiresorptive agents. The scope of this systematic review (SR) was to determine whether the withdrawal of antiresorptive agents is necessary for tooth extractions in patients receiving each of the antiresorptive medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS The searches were performed using the MEDLINE databases. We selected SRs, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective non-randomized clinical (observational) studies, and case reports/case series in this order of preference. RESULTS We included one SR, one RCT, five observational studies, and three case reports. Meta-analyses were not conducted because the RCT had an extremely small sample size and the observational studies had different definitions of intervention and comparison that could not be integrated across studies. In this SR, no studies showed a benefit (i.e., a reduction in the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw) of short-term withdrawal of antiresorptive agents for tooth extraction. Additionally, no studies examined the harm (i.e., an increase in femoral and vertebral fractures and skeletal-related events during bone metastasis) of withdrawal for tooth extraction. CONCLUSIONS We were unable to determine whether withdrawal before and after tooth extraction is necessary with a high certainty of evidence. Future systematic reviews including RCTs with larger samples are expected to provide such evidence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This systematic review provides evidence-based information for multidisciplinary collaborations related to patients receiving antiresorptive agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Takeda
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Kurita
- Department of Dentistry and Oral Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, 390-8621, Japan.
| | - Yoshihisa Kashima
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Hasegawa
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masaaki Miyakoshi
- Department of Maxillofacial Radiology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Yamada
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Yamamura
- Department of Oral Surgery, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Sakiko Soutome
- Department of Oral Health, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferrari S, Langdahl B. Mechanisms underlying the long-term and withdrawal effects of denosumab therapy on bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2023; 19:307-317. [PMID: 37024711 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-00935-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), is a potent inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and activity. As the first biologic drug used to treat osteoporosis, denosumab has shown potent anti-resorptive properties and anti-fracture efficacy. The effects of this drug are also unique compared with the effects of bisphosphonates: namely, long-term treatment with this drug results in a continuous gain of bone mineral density, whereas withdrawal of the drug results in a transient overshoot in bone turnover and rapid bone loss. Although the mechanisms for these specific effects remain incompletely understood, emerging experimental and clinical data have started to highlight potential biological and pharmacological mechanisms by which denosumab might affect osteoclasts, as well as osteoblasts, and cause both sustained bone gain and bone loss upon treatment cessation. This Perspective discusses those potential mechanisms and the future studies and clinical implications that might ensue from these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serge Ferrari
- Service of Bone Diseases, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Bente Langdahl
- Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Belaya Z, Rozhinskaya L, Dedov I, Drapkina O, Fadeev V, Golounina O, Lesnyak O, Mamedova E, Melnichenko G, Petraikin A, Rodionova S, Skripnikova I, Tkacheva O, Toroptsova N, Yureneva S, Kanis JA. A summary of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:429-447. [PMID: 36651943 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06667-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Key statements of the Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis are summarized. They were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis and approved by the Russian Ministry of Health. PURPOSE To summarize key statements of the Russian clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis. METHODS The Russian clinical guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis were developed by a task force representing the key Russian professional associations involved in the management of osteoporosis: These comprised the Russian Association of Endocrinologists, the Russian Association for Osteoporosis, the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia, the Association of Orthopedic surgeons and Traumatologists of Russia, the Russian Association of Gynecologists-Endocrinologists, and the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatrics. The guidelines are based on a systematic literature review and principles of evidence-based medicine and were compiled in accordance with the requirements for clinical recommendations developed by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. RESULTS Key statements included in the Russian guidelines of osteoporosis approved by the Russian Ministry of Health in 2021 are summarized. The statements are graded based on levels of evidence and supported by short comments. The guidelines are focused on the current approach to screening, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION These guidelines are a practical tool for general practitioners, as well as medical specialists, primarily endocrinologists, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, and other physicians who are involved in the management of patients with osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhanna Belaya
- Neuroendocrinology and Bone Diseases, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Liudmila Rozhinskaya
- Neuroendocrinology and Bone Diseases, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ivan Dedov
- Neuroendocrinology and Bone Diseases, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Oksana Drapkina
- National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia
| | - Valentin Fadeev
- Department of Endocrinology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Golounina
- Department of Endocrinology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Lesnyak
- Family Medicine Department-Western State Medical University Named After I.I. Mechnikov, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Elizaveta Mamedova
- Neuroendocrinology and Bone Diseases, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Galina Melnichenko
- Neuroendocrinology and Bone Diseases, Endocrinology Research Centre, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Petraikin
- Department of Radiation Diagnostics, Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics, Telemedicine Technologies of Moscow Health Care Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana Rodionova
- National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after. N.N. Priorov, Moscow, Russia
| | - Irina Skripnikova
- National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Tkacheva
- Russian National Research Medical University Named After N.I. Pirogov, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Svetlana Yureneva
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named After V.I. Kulakov, Moscow, Russia
| | - John A Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
- Center for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang F, Zhang X, Zhu S, Zhao G, Li T, Han A, Zhang X, Zhao T, Li D, Zhu W. The associations between short-term exposure to ambient particulate matter and hospitalizations for osteoporotic fracture in Hangzhou: a time-stratified case-crossover study. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 18:4. [PMID: 36469172 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01192-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Our results suggested that short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM) might increase the risks of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures. Government should protect its citizens by putting in place policies to reduce unhealthy emissions and air pollution. INTRODUCTION Osteoporotic fractures are accompanied by high rates of disability and mortality. PM has been linked with many health outcomes. However, few studies focus on the association of short-term exposure to ambient PM and osteoporotic fractures. METHODS Data on daily mean air pollution, meteorological factors, and hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures were collected from Hangzhou, China, 2020-2021. A time-stratified case-crossover design with extended Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to assess the associations between PM and osteoporotic fractures. RESULTS Short-term exposure to PM significantly increased the risks of hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures at cumulative lag days. Per 10 μg/m3 increased in PM2.5 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 μm), PMC (PM with an aerodynamic diameter between 2.5 μm and 10 μm), and PM10 (PM with an aerodynamic diameter ≤ 10 μm) were associated with 5.65% (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.29, 10.19), 3.19% (0.11, 6.36), and 2.45% (0.57, 4.37) increase in hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures, respectively. Significant PM-osteoporotic fracture associations were only observed in females and people aged over 65 years old. For the season, the estimates of PM on hospitalizations for osteoporotic fractures were 6.30% (95% CIs: 1.62, 11.20) in the cold season vs. 2.16% (95% CIs: - 4.62, 9.42) in the warm season for per 10 μg/m3 increase of PM2.5, and 0.99 (95% CIs: - 2.69, 4.80) vs. 6.72% (95% CIs: 0.68, 13.13) for PMC. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed PM was positively linked with the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Females and people aged over 65 years old were more susceptible to PM. The adverse impacts of PM2.5 in the cold season and PMC in the warm season were worthy of special attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faxue Zhang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xupeng Zhang
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Shijie Zhu
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Gaichan Zhao
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Tianzhou Li
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Aojing Han
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Xiaowei Zhang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Tingxiao Zhao
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, 310014, China.
| | - Dejia Li
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| | - Wei Zhu
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dubale NM, Kapron CM, West SL. Commentary: Zebrafish as a Model for Osteoporosis-An Approach to Accelerating Progress in Drug and Exercise-Based Treatment. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:15866. [PMID: 36497941 PMCID: PMC9739463 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192315866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a degenerative disease characterized by reduced bone strength and increased fracture risk. As the global population continues to age, the prevalence and economic burden of osteoporosis can be expected to rise substantially, but there remain various gaps in the field of OP care. For instance, there is a lack of anti-fracture drugs with proven long-term efficacy. Likewise, though exercise remains widely recommended in OP prevention and management, data regarding the safety and efficacy for patients after vertebral fracture remain limited. This lack of evidence may be due to the cost and inherent difficulties associated with exercise-based OP research. Thus, the current research landscape highlights the need for novel research strategies that accelerate OP drug discovery and allow for the low-cost study of exercise interventions. Here, we outline an example of one strategy, the use of zebrafish, which has emerged as a potential model for the discovery of anti-osteoporosis therapeutics and study of exercise interventions. The strengths, limitations, and potential applications of zebrafish in OP research will be outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natnaiel M. Dubale
- Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Carolyn M. Kapron
- Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Sarah L. West
- Department of Biology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
- Department of Kinesiology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
- Trent/Fleming School of Nursing, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Curtis EM, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Harvey NC. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2022; 36:101754. [PMID: 35691824 PMCID: PMC7614114 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Osteoporosis care has evolved markedly over the last 50 years, such that there are now an established clinical definition, validated methods of fracture risk assessment, and a range of effective pharmacological agents. However, it is apparent that both in the context of primary and secondary fracture prevention, there is a considerable gap between the population at high fracture risk and those actually receiving appropriate antiosteoporosis treatment. In this narrative review article, we document recent work describing the burden of disease, approaches to management, and service provision across Europe, emerging data on gaps in care, and existing/new ways in which these gaps may be addressed at the level of healthcare systems and policy. We conclude that although the field has come a long way in recent decades, there is still a long way to go, and a concerted, integrated effort is now required from all of us involved in this field to address these urgent issues to ensure the best possible outcomes for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Elaine M Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim J, Choi YJ, Park H, Yun HS. Fabrication of multifunctional alginate microspheres containing hydroxyapatite powder for simultaneous cell and drug delivery. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:827626. [PMID: 36017354 PMCID: PMC9395714 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.827626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Novel alginate-hydroxyapatite hybrid microspheres were developed for simultaneous delivery of drugs and cells as a multifunctional bone substitute for osteoporotic bone tissue regeneration. The microspheres were used to enhance osteogenesis and to carry and deliver quercetin, a representative phytoestrogen that controls bone tissue regeneration metabolism in osteoporosis patients, through sustained release over a long period. To overcome quercetin’s hydrophobicity and low solubility in aqueous environments, we added it to the surface of hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanoparticles before mixing them with an alginate solution. The homogeneous distribution of the HAp nanoparticles in the alginate solution was essential for preventing nozzle clogging and achieving successfully fabricated hybrid microspheres. To this end, a 3D ultrasonic treatment was applied. Electrostatic microencapsulation was then used to fabricate hybrid alginate-HAp microspheres containing quercetin and cells. The microspheres were approximately 290.7 ± 42.5 μm (aspect ratio of 1). The sustained release of quercetin was confirmed during a test period of 20 weeks. The cells in the hybrid microspheres maintained good cell viability during the entire testing period, and their osteogenic differentiation behavior was boosted by the presence of HAp. Thus, osteogenic differentiation could be greatly improved by adding quercetin. These novel multi-biofunctional hybrid microspheres have great potential for the regeneration of osteoporotic bone tissue at indeterminate defect sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jueun Kim
- Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon, South Korea
- Ceramic Materials Division, Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea
| | - Yeong-Jin Choi
- Ceramic Materials Division, Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea
| | - Honghyun Park
- Ceramic Materials Division, Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Honghyun Park, ; Hui-suk Yun,
| | - Hui-suk Yun
- Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, University of Science & Technology (UST), Daejeon, South Korea
- Ceramic Materials Division, Department of Advanced Biomaterials Research, Korea Institute of Materials Science (KIMS), Changwon, South Korea
- *Correspondence: Honghyun Park, ; Hui-suk Yun,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bisphosphonate Drug Holiday and Fracture Risk: Reviewing the Evidence. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40674-022-00191-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
11
|
Gregson CL, Compston JE. New national osteoporosis guidance-implications for geriatricians. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6565793. [PMID: 35403198 PMCID: PMC9760060 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Fragility fractures are painful, debilitating, often life-changing and accounted for an estimated 2.4% of pre-pandemic health care spending in the UK. Those who are older, frail and multimorbid have the highest fracture risk and therefore the most to gain from anti-osteoporosis treatments to reduce this risk. Currently, an unacceptable treatment gap exists between those eligible for and those who receive treatment. This commentary discusses the major changes to the new, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence accredited, UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) guidance (published March 2022) most relevant to the management of older people's bone health. Changes include intervention thresholds; using fracture probabilities from FRAX; for patients too frail to undergo DXA; greater emphasis on vertebral fracture detection and the use of intravenous zoledronate as a first-line anti-osteoporosis therapy; the new concept of 'very high fracture risk' which should prompt consideration of use of parenteral anti-osteoporosis therapy; new guidance regarding anabolic treatment options; concerns regarding denosumab cessation; and the urgent need to get patients with a fragility fracture onto treatment to reduce re-fracture risk with follow-up to check tolerance and ensure adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia L Gregson
- Address correspondence to: Celia L. Gregson, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Learning and Research Building, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK. Tel: +44 (0)117 4147842.
| | - Juliet E Compston
- Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0AH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang M, Wu Y, Girgis CM. Bisphosphonate Drug Holidays: Evidence from Clinical Trials and
Real‐World
Studies. JBMR Plus 2022; 6:e10629. [PMID: 35720669 PMCID: PMC9189912 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mawson Wang
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology Westmead Hospital Westmead NSW Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Yu‐Fang Wu
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology Westmead Hospital Westmead NSW Australia
| | - Christian M Girgis
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology Westmead Hospital Westmead NSW Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
- Department of Endocrinology Royal North Shore Hospital St Leonards NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gregson CL, Armstrong DJ, Bowden J, Cooper C, Edwards J, Gittoes NJL, Harvey N, Kanis J, Leyland S, Low R, McCloskey E, Moss K, Parker J, Paskins Z, Poole K, Reid DM, Stone M, Thomson J, Vine N, Compston J. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 17:58. [PMID: 35378630 PMCID: PMC8979902 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) has revised the UK guideline for the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years and older. Accredited by NICE, this guideline is relevant for all healthcare professionals involved in osteoporosis management. INTRODUCTION The UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) first produced a guideline on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in 2008, with updates in 2013 and 2017. This paper presents a major update of the guideline, the scope of which is to review the assessment and management of osteoporosis and the prevention of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women, and men age 50 years and older. METHODS Where available, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials were used to provide the evidence base. Conclusions and recommendations were systematically graded according to the strength of the available evidence. RESULTS Review of the evidence and recommendations are provided for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, fracture-risk assessment and intervention thresholds, management of vertebral fractures, non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments, including duration and monitoring of anti-resorptive therapy, glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and models of care for fracture prevention. Recommendations are made for training; service leads and commissioners of healthcare; and for review criteria for audit and quality improvement. CONCLUSION The guideline, which has received accreditation from the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), provides a comprehensive overview of the assessment and management of osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management. This position paper has been endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and by the European Society for the Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia L Gregson
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK.
- Royal United Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK.
| | - David J Armstrong
- Western Health and Social Care Trust (NI), Nutrition Innovation Centre for Food and Health, Ulster University, and Visiting Professor, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - Jean Bowden
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Edwards
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, and Wolstanton Medical Centre, Newcastle under Lyme, UK
| | - Neil J L Gittoes
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham & University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicholas Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John Kanis
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia and Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Low
- Abingdon and Specialty Doctor in Metabolic Bone Disease, Marcham Road Health Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA), Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Katie Moss
- St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jane Parker
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Kenneth Poole
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mike Stone
- University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Llandough, UK
| | | | - Nic Vine
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Learning and Research Building, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
| | - Juliet Compston
- University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Black DM, Condra K, Adams AL, Eastell R. Bisphosphonates and the risk of atypical femur fractures. Bone 2022; 156:116297. [PMID: 34920168 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Bisphosphonates are effective in reducing hip and other fractures. However, concerns about atypical femur fractures (AFFs) have contributed to substantially decreased bisphosphonate use, and hip fracture rates may be increasing. Despite this impact, important uncertainties remain regarding AFF risks including the association between bisphosphonate use and other risk factors such as BMD, age, weight, and race. To address this evidence gap, a cohort study of 196,129 women ≥50 years of age in the Southern California Kaiser Permanente HMO women (with ≥1 bisphosphonate prescription) were studied; the primary outcome was radiographically-adjudicated AFF between 2007 and 2017. Risk factors including bisphosphonate use and race were obtained from electronic health records. Multivariable Cox models were used for analysis. Benefit-risk was modeled for 1-10 years of bisphosphonates to compare fractures prevented vs. AFFs associated. Among 196,129 women, 277 (0.1%) sustained AFFs. After multivariable adjustment, AFF risk increased with longer bisphosphonate duration: hazard ratio (HR) increased from HR = 8.9 (95%CI: 2.8,28) for 3-5 years to HR = 43.5 (13.7138.1) for >8 years. Hip BMD, surprisingly, was not associated with AFF risk. Other risk factors included Asian ancestry (HR = 4.8 (3.6, 6.6)), short stature, overweight, and glucocorticoid use. Bisphosphonate discontinuation was associated with rapid decrease in AFF risk. Decreases in osteoporotic and hip fractures risk during 1-10 years of bisphosphonates far outweighed the increase AFF risk in Caucasians, but less so in Asians. In Caucasians, after 3 years 149 hip fractures were prevented with 2 AFFs associated compared to 91 and 8 in Asians. The evidence for several potential mechanisms is summarized with femoral geometry being the most likely to explain AFF risk differences between Asians and Caucasians. The results from this new study add to the evidence base for AFF risk factors and will help inform clinical decision-making for individual patients about initiation and duration of bisphosphonate therapy and drug holidays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis M Black
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, United States of America; Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States of America.
| | - Katherine Condra
- San Francisco VA Health Care System, Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, San Francisco, United States of America
| | - Annette L Adams
- Department of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States of America
| | - Richard Eastell
- University of Sheffield, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singer AJ, Liu J, Yan H, Stad RK, Gandra SR, Yehoshua A. Treatment patterns and long-term persistence with osteoporosis therapies in women with Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) coverage. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:2473-2484. [PMID: 34095966 PMCID: PMC8608759 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05951-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Osteoporosis, a chronic disease, requires long-term therapy. In Medicare-insured women, denosumab persistence was higher than oral bisphosphonate persistence over up to 3 years of follow-up. Longer-term persistence was higher among women who persisted in the first year of therapy. INTRODUCTION Osteoporosis, a chronic, progressive disease, requires long-term therapy; this study assessed long-term persistence with anti-resorptive therapies in postmenopausal women. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims for women with data in the 100% Medicare osteoporosis sample who initiated (index date) denosumab, oral/intravenous (IV) bisphosphonate, or raloxifene between 2011 and 2014 and who had ≥ 1 year (zoledronic acid: 14 months) of pre-initiation medical/pharmacy coverage (baseline). Persistence was assessed from index date through end of continuous coverage, post-index evidence of censoring events (e.g., incident cancer), death, or end of study (December 31, 2015). RESULTS The study included 318,419 oral bisphosphonate users (78% alendronate), 145,056 denosumab users, 48,066 IV bisphosphonate users, and 31,400 raloxifene users; mean age ranged from 75.5 years (raloxifene) to 78.5 years (denosumab). In women with at least 36 months of follow-up (denosumab N = 25,107; oral bisphosphonates N = 79,710), more denosumab than oral bisphosphonate initiators were persistent at 1 year (73% vs. 39%), 2 years (50% vs. 25%), and 3 years (38% vs. 17%). Persistence decreased over time for all treatment groups, with denosumab users having the highest persistence in every follow-up time interval at or after 18 months. Women using denosumab, oral bisphosphonates, or raloxifene who persisted in a given year were more likely to remain persistent through the subsequent year. CONCLUSIONS Denosumab users persisted longer with therapy than women using other anti-resorptive medications, including oral bisphosphonates. Early persistence may predict long-term persistence. Overall persistence with osteoporosis medications is suboptimal and may impact fracture risk. Efforts to improve first year persistence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Singer
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital and Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - J Liu
- Chronic Disease Research Group (CDRG), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - H Yan
- Chronic Disease Research Group (CDRG), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - R K Stad
- Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - S R Gandra
- Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | - A Yehoshua
- Global Health Economics, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu JJ, Fu SB, Jiang J, Tang XL. Association between outdoor particulate air pollution and the risk of osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2021; 32:1911-1919. [PMID: 33954814 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05961-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Air pollution is a major threat to global health, which is associated with several adverse health outcomes and increased mortality. Few studies have investigated the association between air pollution and osteoporosis, and their findings were inconclusive. Our objective is to determine whether exposure to outdoor air pollution is causally associated with risk of osteoporosis. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for publications up to December 2020 was conducted for studies reporting the association between air pollution and osteoporosis. Meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled effect size of air pollution on osteoporosis using the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Quality assessment was conducted, and all statistical analyses were performed by RevMan 5.3 software. Our search identified 9 eligible studies involving 9,371,212 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that there was an increased risk of osteoporosis (total body BMD and hip fracture) as a result of exposure to air pollution including PM2.5 and NO2. However, no significant excess risk of osteoporosis was found regardless of PM10, NO, and O3. In spite of a few number of epidemiological studies selected in the present literature review, this study indicated that the increased exposure to air pollutants was positively associated with high risk of osteoporosis. Further cohort studies with large sample sizes are needed to investigate different constituents and the duration of exposure of air pollutants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Liu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, No. 1 West Donggang Road, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - S B Fu
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, No. 1 West Donggang Road, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - J Jiang
- The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, No. 1 West Donggang Road, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China
| | - X L Tang
- Department of Endocrinology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, No. 1 West Donggang Road, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Differentiating the causes of adynamic bone in advanced chronic kidney disease informs osteoporosis treatment. Kidney Int 2021; 100:546-558. [PMID: 34102219 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.04.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased fracture risk because of impaired bone quality and quantity. Low bone mineral density predicts fracture risk in all CKD stages, including advanced CKD (CKD G4-5D). Pharmacological therapy improves bone mineral density and reduces fracture risk in moderate CKD. Its efficacy in advanced CKD remains to be determined, although pilot studies suggest a positive effect on bone mineral density. Currently, antiresorptive agents are the most commonly prescribed drugs for the prevention and therapy of osteoporosis. Their use in advanced CKD has been limited by the lack of large clinical trials and fear of causing kidney dysfunction and adynamic bone disease. In recent decades, adynamic bone disease has evolved as the most predominant form of renal osteodystrophy, commonly associated with poor outcomes, including premature mortality and progression of vascular calcification. Evolving evidence indicates that reduction of bone turnover by parathyroidectomy or pharmacological therapies, such as calcimimetics and antiresorptive agents, are not associated with premature mortality or accelerated vascular calcification in CKD. In contrast, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, malnutrition, and diabetes can induce low bone turnover and associate with poor prognosis. Thus, the conditions causing suppression of bone turnover rather than the low bone turnover per se may account for the perceived association with outcomes. Anabolic treatment, in contrast, has been suggested to improve turnover and bone mass in patients with advanced CKD and low bone turnover; however, uncertainty about safety even exceeds that of antiresorptive agents. Here, we critically review the pathophysiological concept of adynamic bone disease and discuss the effect of low bone turnover on the safety and efficacy of anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in advanced CKD.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Osteoporosis is an incurable chronic condition, like heart disease, diabetes, or hypertension. A large gap currently exists in the primary prevention of fractures, and studies show that an estimated 80% to 90% of adults do not receive appropriate osteoporosis management even in the secondary prevention setting. Case finding strategies have been developed and effective pharmacological interventions are available. This publication addresses how best to use the pharmacological options available for postmenopausal osteoporosis to provide lifelong fracture protection in patients at high and very high risk of fracture. The benefit of osteoporosis therapies far outweighs the rare risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacques P Brown
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Evenepoel P, Cunningham J, Ferrari S, Haarhaus M, Javaid MK, Lafage-Proust MH, Prieto-Alhambra D, Torres PU, Cannata-Andia J. European Consensus Statement on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in chronic kidney disease stages G4-G5D. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2021; 36:42-59. [PMID: 33098421 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Controlling the excessive fracture burden in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages G4-G5D remains an impressive challenge. The reasons are 2-fold. First, the pathophysiology of bone fragility in patients with CKD G4-G5D is complex and multifaceted, comprising a mixture of age-related (primary male/postmenopausal), drug-induced and CKD-related bone abnormalities. Second, our current armamentarium of osteoporosis medications has not been developed for, or adequately studied in patients with CKD G4-G5D, partly related to difficulties in diagnosing osteoporosis in this specific setting and fear of complications. Doubts about the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic approach fuel inertia in daily clinical practice. The scope of the present consensus paper is to review and update the assessment and diagnosis of osteoporosis in patients with CKD G4-G5D and to discuss the therapeutic interventions available and the manner in which these can be used to develop management strategies for the prevention of fragility fracture. As such, it aims to stimulate a cohesive approach to the management of osteoporosis in patients with CKD G4-G5D to replace current variations in care and treatment nihilism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter Evenepoel
- Department of Nephrology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - John Cunningham
- Centre for Nephrology, UCL Medical School, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Serge Ferrari
- Service of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland
| | - Mathias Haarhaus
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Diaverum Sweden, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Pablo Ureña Torres
- Department of Dialysis, AURA Nord Saint Ouen, Saint Ouen, France.,Department of Renal Physiology, Necker Hospital, University of Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Jorge Cannata-Andia
- Bone and Mineral Research Unit (ISPA) (REDinREN), Hospital Universitario Central Asturias, Oviedo University, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Coffman AA, Basta-Pljakic J, Guerra RM, Ebetino FH, Lundy MW, Majeska RJ, Schaffler MB. A Bisphosphonate With a Low Hydroxyapatite Binding Affinity Prevents Bone Loss in Mice After Ovariectomy and Reverses Rapidly With Treatment Cessation. JBMR Plus 2021; 5:e10476. [PMID: 33869992 PMCID: PMC8046044 DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Bisphosphonates (BPs) are a mainstay of osteoporosis treatment; however, concerns about bone health based on oversuppression of remodeling remain. Long‐term bone remodeling suppression adversely affects bone material properties with microdamage accumulation and reduced fracture toughness in animals and increases in matrix mineralization and atypical femur fractures in patients. Although a “drug holiday” from BPs to restore remodeling and improve bone quality seems reasonable, clinical BPs have long functional half‐lives because of their high hydroxyapatite (HAP) binding affinities. This places a practical limit on the reversibility and effectiveness of a drug holiday. BPs with low HAP affinity and strong osteoclast inhibition potentially offer an alternative approach; their antiresorptive effect should reverse rapidly when dosing is discontinued. This study tested this concept using NE‐58025, a BP with low HAP affinity and moderate osteoclast inhibition potential. Young adult female C57Bl/6 mice were ovariectomized (OVX) and treated with NE‐58025, risedronate, or PBS vehicle for 3 months to test effectiveness in preventing long‐term bone loss. Bone microarchitecture, histomorphometry, and whole‐bone mechanical properties were assessed. To test reversibility, OVX mice were similarly treated for 3 months, treatment was stopped, and bone was assessed up to 3 months post‐treatment. NE‐58025 and RIS inhibited long‐term OVX‐induced bone loss, but NE‐58025 antiresorptive effects were more pronounced. Withdrawing NE‐58025 treatment led to the rapid onset of trabecular resorption with a 200% increase in osteoclast surface and bone loss within 1 month. Cessation of risedronate treatment did not lead to increases in resorption indices or bone loss. These results show that NE‐58025 prevents OVX‐induced bone loss, and its effects reverse quickly following cessation treatment in vivo. Low‐HAP affinity BPs may have use as reversible, antiresorptive agents with a rapid on/off profile, which may be useful for maintaining bone health with long‐term BP treatment. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail A Coffman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York NY USA
| | - Jelena Basta-Pljakic
- Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York NY USA
| | - Rosa M Guerra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York NY USA
| | - Frank H Ebetino
- Department of Chemistry University of Rochester Rochester NY USA.,BioVinc, LLC Pasadena CA USA
| | - Mark W Lundy
- BioVinc, LLC Pasadena CA USA.,Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology Indiana University Indianapolis IN USA
| | - Robert J Majeska
- Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York NY USA
| | - Mitchell B Schaffler
- Department of Biomedical Engineering The City College of New York New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fuggle NR, Curtis B, Clynes M, Zhang J, Ward K, Javaid MK, Harvey NC, Dennison E, Cooper C. The treatment gap: The missed opportunities for osteoporosis therapy. Bone 2021; 144:115833. [PMID: 33359889 PMCID: PMC7116600 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Despite substantial advances in delineation of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk assessment and treatment of osteoporosis over the last three decades, a substantial proportion of men and women at high risk of fracture remain untreated - the so-called "treatment gap". This review summarises the important patient-, physician- and policyrelated causes of this treatment gap, before discussing in greater detail: (a) the evidence base for the efficacy of bisphosphonates in osteoporosis; (b) recent evidence relating to the adverse effects of this widely used therapeutic class, most notably atypical femoral fracture and osteonecrosis of the jaw; (c) available strategies to improve both secondary and primary prevention pathways for the management of this disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas R Fuggle
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Clynes
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Jean Zhang
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Ward
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Muhammad Kassim Javaid
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elaine Dennison
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK; Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dalle Carbonare L, Mottes M, Valenti MT. Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ): Are Antiresorptive Drugs the Main Culprits or Only Accomplices? The Triggering Role of Vitamin D Deficiency. Nutrients 2021; 13:561. [PMID: 33567797 PMCID: PMC7915474 DOI: 10.3390/nu13020561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a severe clinical condition characterized mostly but not exclusively by an area of exposed bone in the mandible and/or maxilla that typically does not heal over a period of 6-8 weeks. The diagnosis is first of all clinical, but an imaging feedback such as Magnetic Resonance is essential to confirm clinical suspicions. In the last few decades, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) has been widely discussed. From the first case reported in 2003, many case series and reviews have appeared in the scientific literature. Almost all papers concerning this topic conclude that bisphosphonates (BPs) can induce this severe clinical condition, particularly in cancer patients. Nevertheless, the exact mechanism by which amino-BPs would be responsible for ONJ is still debatable. Recent findings suggest a possible alternative explanation for BPs role in this pattern. In the present work we discuss how a condition of osteomalacia and low vitamin D levels might be determinant factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Dalle Carbonare
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Monica Mottes
- Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Biology and Genetics, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Maria Teresa Valenti
- Department of Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Joint position statement on management of patient with osteoporosis during COVID-19 contingency from the AMMOM, CONAMEGER, FELAEN, FEMECOG, FEMECOT, and ICAAFYD. Arch Osteoporos 2021; 16:18. [PMID: 33495916 PMCID: PMC7833891 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00869-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Infection by SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) has affected practically all the world. This joint position statement of Latin American Medical Societies provides an updated guide for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporotic patients in the face of possible clinical scenarios posed by the COVID-19 health crisis. BACKGROUND Infection by SARS-Cov-2 (COVID-19) has affected practically all the world. Characterized by high contagiousness, significative morbidity, and mortality in a segment of those infected, it has overwhelmed health services and forced to redirect resources to the emergency while impacting the attention of acute non-COVID-19 and many chronic conditions. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to provide an updated guide for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporotic patients in the face of possible clinical scenarios posed by the COVID-19 health crisis. METHODS A task force, of bone specialists with a wide range of disciplines in the field of osteoporosis and fragility fracture, was convened with the representation of several professional associations, namely, the Mexican Association of Bone and Mineral Metabolism (AMMOM), the National College of Geriatric Medicine (CONAMEGER), the Latin American Federation of Endocrinology (FELAEN), the Mexican Federation of Colleges of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FEMECOG), the Mexican Federation of Colleges of Orthopedics and Traumatology (FEMECOT), and the Institute of Applied Sciences for Physical Activity and Sports of the University of Guadalajara (ICAAFYD). Clinical evidence was collated, and an evidence report was rapidly generated and disseminated. After finding the gaps in the available evidence, a consensus opinion of experts was made. The resulting draft was reviewed and modified accordingly, in 4 rounds, by the participants. RESULTS The task force approved the initial guidance statements, with moderate and high consensus. These were combined, resulting in the final guidance statements on the (1) evaluation of fracture risk; (2) stratification of risk priorities; (3) indications of bone density scans and lab tests; (4) initiation and continuation of pharmacologic therapy; (5) interruptions of therapy; (6) treatment of patients with incident fracture; (7) physical therapy and fall prevention; and (8) nutritional interventions. CONCLUSION These guidance statements are provided to promote optimal care to patients at risk for osteoporosis and fracture, during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, given the low level of available evidence and the rapidly evolving literature, this guidance is presented as a "living document" and future updates are anticipated.
Collapse
|
24
|
Deligiorgi MV, Panayiotidis MI, Trafalis DT. Repurposing denosumab in breast cancer beyond prevention of skeletal related events: Could nonclinical data be translated into clinical practice? Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2020; 13:1235-1252. [PMID: 33070648 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2020.1839416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody inhibiting the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL). Initially approved as antiosteοporotic agent, denosumab is being currently pursued as a candidate for drug repurposing in oncology, especially breast cancer. AREAS COVERED The present review provides an overview of the therapeutic potential of denosumab in breast cancer beyond prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs), with focus on prevention of carcinogenesis in BRCA mutation carriers and on adjuvant treatment in early breast cancer patients. Study search was conducted on the following electronic databases: PubMed, Google scholar, Scopus.com, ClinicalTrials.gov, and European Union Clinical Trials Register from 2008 until June 2020. EXPERT OPINION Nonclinical data have established links between RANKL signaling and breast cancer initiation and progression, rationalizing exploring the potential bone-independent anticancer role of denosumab beyond SREs prevention. Preclinical and preliminary clinical data show that denosumab may inhibit carcinogenesis in BRCA mutation carriers. Denosumab adjuvant in early breast cancer has been shown, though inconsistently, to provide a disease-free survival benefit for a subgroup of patients. Despite promising results, the incorporation of denosumab in preventive and therapeutic protocols of breast cancer beyond prevention of SREs cannot be endorsed until further research consolidates its efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria V Deligiorgi
- Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens, Greece
| | - Mihalis I Panayiotidis
- Department of Electron Microscopy & Molecular Pathology, The Cyprus Institute of Neurology & Genetics , Nicosia, Cyprus.,The Cyprus School of Molecular Medicine, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Dimitrios T Trafalis
- Department of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens , Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tsourdi E, Zillikens MC, Meier C, Body JJ, Gonzalez Rodriguez E, Anastasilakis AD, Abrahamsen B, McCloskey E, Hofbauer LC, Guañabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Pepe J, Palermo A, Langdahl B. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 106:dgaa756. [PMID: 33103722 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Denosumab discontinuation is characterized by an increase in bone turnover overriding pre-treatment status, a rapid bone loss in the majority and multiple vertebral fractures (VFx) in some patients. METHODS A working group of the European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) performed an updated systematic review of existing literature on changes of bone turnover, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture risk after denosumab discontinuation and provided advice on management based on expert opinion. RESULTS Important risk factors for multiple VFx following denosumab cessation are prevalent VFx, longer duration off therapy, greater gain in hip BMD during therapy, and greater loss of hip BMD after therapy according to a retrospective analysis of the FREEDOM Extension Study. Case series indicate that prior bisphosphonate therapy mitigates the biochemical rebound phenomenon after denosumab discontinuation, but it is uncertain whether this attenuation prevents BMD loss and fractures. Current evidence indicates partial efficacy of subsequent antiresorptive treatment with results seemingly dependent on duration of denosumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS A careful assessment of indications to start denosumab treatment is advised, especially for younger patients. A case for long-term treatment with denosumab can be made for patients at high fracture risk already on denosumab treatment given the favorable efficacy and safety profile. In case of denosumab discontinuation, alternative antiresorptive treatment should be initiated 6 months after the final denosumab injection. Assessment of bone turnover markers may help define the optimal regimen, pending results of ongoing RCTs. Patients having sustained VFx should be offered prompt treatment to reduce high bone turnover.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Tsourdi
- Department of Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Healthy Aging, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
| | - M Carola Zillikens
- Bone Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christian Meier
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolism, University Hospital and University of Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jean-Jacques Body
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elena Gonzalez Rodriguez
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Bone diseases, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Bo Abrahamsen
- OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
- NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eugene McCloskey
- Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Mellanby Centre For Bone Research, The Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lorenz C Hofbauer
- Department of Medicine III, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Healthy Aging, Technische Universität Dresden Medical Center, Dresden, Germany
- Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nuria Guañabens
- Department of Rheumatology, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Medical University Graz
- Center for Biomarker Research in Medicine (CBmed),-Graz, Austria
| | - Stuart H Ralston
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Richard Eastell
- Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Jessica Pepe
- Department of clinical, internal, anesthesiology and cardiovascular sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Palermo
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Bente Langdahl
- Medical Department of Endocrinology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
With increasing longevity of the population globally, the prevalence of osteoporosis will rise, associated with significant morbidity, disability and increased mortality. Adequate intake of calcium, vitamin D, increasing physical activity, a strategy of avoiding falls, cessation of smoking and avoiding excessive alcohol intake are pivotal in maintaining healthy bones in all age groups. Oral bisphosphonates remain the most cost-effective first line of treatment. Better methods of identifying patients with high fracture risk is needed as there is adequate effective treatment for osteoporosis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
As the world grapples with the crisis of COVID-19, established economies and healthcare systems have been brought to their knees. Tough decisions regarding redirection of resources away from the management of conditions deemed "nonessential" are being made. How can we balance urgent resourcing of our acute crisis while not abandoning the real need of patients with osteoporosis? This article offers a few practical solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Girgis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
| | - R J Clifton-Bligh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gennari L, Merlotti D, Falchetti A, Eller Vainicher C, Cosso R, Chiodini I. Emerging therapeutic targets for osteoporosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2020; 24:115-130. [PMID: 32050822 DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2020.1726889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a chronic, skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength and increased fracture risk; it affects 50% of women and 20% of men. In the past two decades, there have been substantial improvements in the pharmacotherapy of osteoporosis which have yielded potent inhibitors of bone resorption or stimulators of bone formation.Areas covered: This review discusses newly identified targets and pathways and conceptual approaches to the prevention of multiple age-related disorders. Furthermore, it summarizes existing therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis.Expert opinion: Our enhanced understanding of bone biology and the reciprocal interactions between bone and other tissues have allowed the identification of new targets that may facilitate the development of novel drugs. These drugs will hopefully achieve the uncoupling of bone formation from resorption and possibly exert a dual anabolic and antiresorptive effect on bone. Alas, limitations regarding adherence, efficacy on nonvertebral fracture prevention and the long-term adverse events still exist for currently available therapeutics. Moreover, the efficacy of most agents is limited by the tight coupling of osteoblasts and osteoclasts; hence the reduction of bone resorption invariably reduces bone formation, and vice versa. This field is very much 'a work in progress.'
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Gennari
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Daniela Merlotti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Alberto Falchetti
- Unit for Bone Metabolism Diseases and Diabetes & Lab of Endocrine and Metabolic Research, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Eller Vainicher
- Endocrinology and Diabetology Units, Department of Medical Sciences and Community, Fondazione Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Cosso
- EndOsMet Villa Donatello Private Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Iacopo Chiodini
- Unit for Bone Metabolism Diseases and Diabetes & Lab of Endocrine and Metabolic Research, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Roux C, Briot K. The crisis of inadequate treatment in osteoporosis. THE LANCET. RHEUMATOLOGY 2020; 2:e110-e119. [PMID: 38263657 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(19)30136-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
The number of fractures related to osteoporosis is expected to increase dramatically in the next few decades because of an increase in the number of elderly patients at high risk of falls and fractures. Developments in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis might change our strategies for management of patients with osteoporosis: the imminent risk of fracture concept, the issue of how to correctly sequence treatment, the potential effectiveness of screening, and goal-directed treatment strategies. Despite advances, few patients receive appropriate treatment for osteoporosis, even after a fracture. The crisis in the treatment of osteoporosis is related to several factors, including the fears and beliefs that patients and physicians have about the adverse effects of treatments. Strategies to address this crisis pose a considerable challenge; nonetheless, prevention of fragility fractures is within our reach. To that end, careful selection of patients at high risk of fracture, selection of the best therapeutic strategy, and accurate communication about fracture risk and bone fragility must be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Roux
- Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche Epidémiologie et Statistiques, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1153, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France; Service de Rhumatologie, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hospital Cochin, Paris, France.
| | - Karine Briot
- Université de Paris, Centre de Recherche Epidémiologie et Statistiques, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1153, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France; Service de Rhumatologie, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hospital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Curtis EM, Woolford S, Holmes C, Cooper C, Harvey NC. General and Specific Considerations as to why Osteoporosis-Related Care Is Often Suboptimal. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2020; 18:38-46. [PMID: 32103393 PMCID: PMC7067731 DOI: 10.1007/s11914-020-00566-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The assessment of fracture risk and use of antiosteoporosis medications have increased greatly over the last 20-30 years. However, despite this, osteoporosis care remains suboptimal worldwide. Even in patients who have sustained a fragility fracture, fewer than 20% actually receive appropriate antiosteoporosis therapy in the year following the fracture. There is also evidence that treatment rates have declined substantially in the last 5-10 years, in many countries. The goal of this article is to consider the causes for this decline and consider how this situation could be remedied. RECENT FINDINGS A number of possible reasons, including the lack of prioritisation of osteoporosis therapy in ageing populations with multimorbidity, disproportionate concerns regarding the rare side effects of anti-resorptives and adverse changes in reimbursement in the USA, have been identified as contributing factors in poor osteoporosis care. Improved secondary prevention strategies; screening measures (primary prevention) and appropriate, cost-effective guideline and treatment threshold development could support the optimisation of osteoporosis care and prevention of future fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Curtis
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Stephen Woolford
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Holmes
- Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Cyrus Cooper
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP, Kagan R, Krakow D, McClung MR, Miller PD, Rush ET, Shuhart CR, Watts NB, Yu EW. Proceedings of the 2019 Santa Fe Bone Symposium: New Concepts in the Care of Osteoporosis and Rare Bone Diseases. J Clin Densitom 2020; 23:1-20. [PMID: 31685420 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The 20th annual Santa Fe Bone Symposium was held August 9-10, 2019, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. This is an annual meeting devoted to clinical applications of recent advances in skeletal research that impact the care of patients with osteoporosis, metabolic bone diseases, and inherited bone diseases. Participants included practicing and academic physicians, fellows, advanced practice providers, fracture liaison service (FLS) coordinators, clinical researchers, and bone density technologists. The symposium consisted of lectures, case presentations, and panel discussions, with an emphasis on learning through interaction of all attendees. Topics included new approaches in the use of anabolic agents for the treatment osteoporosis, a review of important events in skeletal health over the past year, new and emerging treatments for rare bone diseases, the use of genetic testing for bone diseases in clinical practice, medication-associated causes of osteoporosis, new concepts in the use of estrogen therapy for osteoporosis, new Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, skeletal consequences of bariatric surgery, and update on the progress and potential of Bone Health TeleECHO, a virtual community of practice using videoconferencing technology to link healthcare professionals for advancing the care of osteoporosis worldwide. Sessions on rare bone diseases were developed in collaboration with the Rare Bone Disease Alliance. Symposium premeetings included an FLS workshop by the National Osteoporosis Foundation and others devoted to the use of new therapeutic agents for the care of osteoporosis and related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Michael Lewiecki
- New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
| | - John P Bilezikian
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, NYC, NY, USA
| | - Risa Kagan
- UCSF and Sutter East Bay Medical Foundation, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Deborah Krakow
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael R McClung
- Oregon Osteoporosis Center, Portland, OR, USA; Mary MacKillop Center for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paul D Miller
- University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eric T Rush
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, MO, USA; Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA; University of Missouri - Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Nelson B Watts
- Mercy Health Osteoporosis and Bone Health Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elaine W Yu
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|