Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens

Mesoporous CdO/CdGa2O4 microsphere for rapidly detecting triethylamine at ppb level

Developing fast, accurate and sensitive triethylamine gas sensors with low detection limits is paramount to ensure the safety of workers and the public. However, sensors based on single metal oxide materials still suffer from drawbacks such as low response sensitivity and long response and recovery times. To address these challenges, in this work, a series of mesoporous CdO/CdGa2O4 microspheres were synthesized. We optimized the sensor's sensing performance to triethylamine by fine-tuning the ratio of CdO to CdGa2O4. Among them, CdO:3CdGa2O4-based sensor demonstrates a rapid response time of 2 s to detect 100 ppm of triethylamine, with a high response value of 211 and exceptional selectivity. Furthermore, it exhibits a low detection limit of 20 ppb for triethylamine, making it suitable for practically testing fish freshness. Crucially, electron transfer between the heterojunctions increases the chemically adsorbed oxygen on the materials' surface, thereby enhancing the sensor's response sensitivity to triethylamine. This discovery provides new insights and methodologies for the design of highly efficient triethylamine gas sensors.

Approaches for the setting of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for carcinogens

This article addresses issues of importance for occupational exposure limits (OELs) and chemical carcinogens with a focus on non-threshold carcinogens. It comprises scientific as well as regulatory issues. It is an overview, not a comprehensive review. A central topic is mechanistic research and insights, and its implications for cancer risk assessment. Alongside scientific advancements, the approaches of hazard identification and qualitative and quantitative risk assessment have developed over the years. The key steps in a quantitative risk assessment are outlined, with special attention given to the dose-response assessment and the derivation of an OEL using risk calculations or default assessment factors. The work procedures of several bodies performing cancer hazard identifications and quantitative risk assessments, as well as regulatory procedures to derive OELs for non-threshold carcinogens, are presented. Non-threshold carcinogens for which the European Union (EU) introduced binding OELs in 2017-2019 serve as illustrations together with some currently used strategies in the EU and elsewhere. Available knowledge supports the derivation of health-based OELs (Hb-OELs) for non-threshold carcinogens, and the use of a risk-based approach with low-dose linear extrapolation (linear non-threshold, LNT) as the default for non-threshold carcinogens. However, there is a need to develop methods that allow recent years' advances in cancer research to be used for improving risk estimates. It is recommended that defined risk levels (terminology and numerical values) are harmonised, and that both collective and individual risks are considered and clearly communicated. Socioeconomic aspects should be dealt with transparently and separated from the scientific health risk assessment.

Risk assessment of chemical mixtures by benchmark dose-principle component analysis approach in occupational exposure

Mixtures of organic solvents are widely used in industrial processes. Risk assessment for chemical co-exposure has always been a challenge in past years. The present study aims to employ principle component analysis (PCA) to produce an entry for benchmark dose approximation in shoemakers based on the color vision effect. A total of 134 subjects consisting of 67 shoemakers and 67 staff workers were employed for Benchmark Dose (BMD) evaluation. Occupational exposure to benzene, toluene, xylene, and n-hexane was evaluated using NIOSH 1501 and OSHA ID-07 methods. The color vision effect was quantified using Lanthony D-15 desaturated test (D-15d). PCA was run for cumulative exposure dose (CED) of the solvents by MATLAB 2018. Finally, the lowest 95% confidence limit of the benchmark dose (BMDL) was determined using US EPA benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 3.2.1. The color confusion index (CCI) level in shoemakers increased from 1 to 1.15 by a median of 1.07. There was a significant difference in the CCI level (p value<0.0001) between exposed and control subjects. The first score of PCA was used as intake dose level (IDL) in solvents co-exposure. Using BMD analysis, the log-logistics model was fitted with a p-value> 0.1 and the lowest BMDL level. BMDL level was evaluated at 1.63, 10.25, 2.21, and 3.35 ppm for benzene, toluene, xylene, and n-hexane, respectively. The results showed a risk of color vision effect with co-exposure to solvents at different levels in the occupational exposure standards. In conclusion BMDL-PCA approach has been suggested for the risk assessment of chemical co-exposure.

Thresholds of adversity and their applicability to endocrine disrupting chemicals

Within the European Union, various legislative acts contain specific provisions on endocrine disruption, requiring the regulation of substances with endocrine disrupting properties via a hazard-based approach. Presumably this is due to an assumed lack of thresholds for the adverse effects of such substances. Conversely, in other jurisdictions, such as USA, Canada, Australia and Japan, endocrine disruptors (EDs) are regulated using a risk-based approach. As a consequence, in recent years there has been increasing controversy on whether thresholds can be inferred for endocrine-mediated effects. There is concern that the endocrine system is too complex to allow estimation of safe levels of exposure to such chemicals. This brief review aims to evaluate the available scientific evidence in this area and offer a sound and robust conclusion supported by this analysis. It is concluded that there is nothing special or unique about endocrine disruption or greater uncertainties in its assessment compared to other non-genotoxic forms of toxicity to justify adopting a non-threshold approach by default. Biology predicts that thresholds of adversity exist and are the rule for all endpoints, including those arising from endocrine disruption. A threshold approach to the risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals is scientifically justified.

Classification or non-classification of substances with positive tumor findings in animal studies: Guidance by the German MAK commission

One of the important tasks of the German Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (known as the MAK Commission) is in the evaluation of a potential for carcinogenicity of hazardous substances at the workplace. Often, this evaluation is critically based on data on carcinogenic responses seen in animal studies and, if positive tumor responses have been observed, this will mostly lead to a classification of the substance under investigation into one of the classes for carcinogens. However, there are cases where it can be demonstrated with a very high degree of confidence that the tumor findings in the experimental animals are not relevant for humans at the workplace and, therefore, the MAK Commission will not classify the respective substance into one of the classes for carcinogens. This paper will summarize the general criteria used by the MAK Commission for the categorization into "carcinogen" and "non-carcinogen" and compare this procedure with those used by other national and international organizations.

Development of a database on key characteristics of human carcinogens

A database on mechanistic characteristics of human carcinogenic agents was developed by collecting mechanistic information on agents identified as human carcinogens (Group 1) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in the IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. A two-phase process is described for the construction of the database according to 24 toxicological endpoints, derived from appropriate test systems that were acquired from data obtained from the mechanisms sections of the IARC Monographs (Section 4) and a supplementary PubMed search. These endpoints were then aligned with 10 key characteristics of human carcinogens that reflect the broader attributes of these agents relating to the development of cancer in humans. The considerations involved in linking of toxicological endpoints to key characteristics are described and specific examples of the determination of key characteristics for six specific agents (tamoxifen, hepatitis B virus, arsenic, ultraviolet and solar radiation, tobacco smoking, and dioxin) are provided. Data for humans and animals were tabulated separately, as were results for in-vivo and for in-vitro sources of information. The database was constructed to support a separate analysis of the expression of these endpoints by 86 Group 1 carcinogens, in-vivo and in-vitro along with an analysis of the key characteristics of these agents.

Evaluation of 12 mouse marker genes in rat toxicogenomics public data, Open TG-GATEs: Discrimination of genotoxic from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens

Previously, we proposed 12 marker genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2 and Tubb4b) to discriminate mouse genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (GTHC) from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGTHC). This was determined by qPCR and principal component analysis (PCA), as the aim of an in vivo short-term screening for genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. For this paper, we conducted an application study of the 12 mouse marker genes to rat data, Open TG-GATEs (public data). We analyzed five typical rat GTHC (2-acetamodofluorene, aflatoxin B1, 2-nitrofluorene, N-nitrosodiethylamine and N-nitrosomorpholine), and not only seven typical rat NGTHC (clofibrate, ethanol, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, hexachlorobenzene, phenobarbital and WY-14643) but also 11 non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens (NGTNHC; allyl alcohol, aspirin, caffeine, chlorpheniramine, chlorpropamide, dexamethasone, diazepam, indomethacin, phenylbutazone, theophylline and tolbutamide) from Open TG-GATEs. The analysis was performed at 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after a single administration and 4, 8, 15 and 29 days after repeated administrations. We transferred Open TG-GATEs DNA microarray data into log₂ data using the "R Project for Statistical Computing". GTHC-specific dose-dependent gene expression changes were observed and significance assessed with the Williams test. Similar significant changes were observed during 3-24 h and 4-29 days, assessed with Welch's t-test, except not for NGTHC or NGTNHC. Significant differential changes in gene expression were observed between GTHC and NGTHC in 11 genes (except not Tubb4b) and between GTHC and NGTNHC in all 12 genes at 24 h and 10 genes (except Ccnf and Mbd1) at 29 days, per Tukey's test. PCA successfully discriminated GTHC from NGTHC and NGTNHC at 24 h and 29 days. The results demonstrate that 12 previously proposed mouse marker genes are useful for discriminating rat GTHC from NGTHC and NGTNHC from Open TG-GATEs.

Cobalt and its compounds: update on genotoxic and carcinogenic activities

This article summarizes recent experimental and epidemiological data on the genotoxic and carcinogenic activities of cobalt compounds. Emphasis is on the respiratory system, but endogenous exposure from Co-containing alloys used in endoprostheses, and limited data on nanomaterials and oral exposures are also considered. Two groups of cobalt compounds are differentiated on the basis of their mechanisms of toxicity: (1) those essentially involving the solubilization of Co(II) ions, and (2) metallic materials for which both surface corrosion and release of Co(II) ions act in concert. For both groups, identified genotoxic and carcinogenic mechanisms are non-stochastic and thus expected to exhibit a threshold. Cobalt compounds should, therefore, be considered as genotoxic carcinogens with a practical threshold. Accumulating evidence indicates that chronic inhalation of cobalt compounds can induce respiratory tumors locally. No evidence of systemic carcinogenicity upon inhalation, oral or endogenous exposure is available. The scarce data available for Co-based nanosized materials does not allow deriving a specific mode of action or assessment for these species.

Using RNA-Seq with 11 marker genes to evaluate 1,4-dioxane compared with typical genotoxic and non-genotoxic rat hepatocarcinogens

It has long been unclear whether 1,4-dioxane (DO) is a genotoxic hepatocarcinogen (GTHC). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate rat GTHCs and non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGTHCs) via selected gene expression patterns in the liver, as determined by next generation sequencing-targeted mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) and principal component analysis (PCA). Previously, we selected 11 marker genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2, and Tubb4b) to discriminate GTHCs and NGTHCs. In the present study, we quantified changes in the expression of these genes following DO treatment, and compared them with treatment with two typical rat GTHCs, N-nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) and 3,3'-dimethylbenzidine·2HCl (DMB), and a typical rat NGTHC, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP). RNA-Seq was conducted on liver samples from groups of five male, 10-week-old F344 rats after 4 weeks' feeding of chemicals in the water or the food. Rats in the control group were given water and a basal diet. Significant changes in gene expression in experimental groups compared with the control group were observed in eight genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Phlda3 and Plk2), as shown by Tukey's test. Gene expression profiles of the 11 genes under DO treatment differed significantly from those with DEN and DMB, as well as DEHP. Gene expression profiles with DO treatment differed partially from those with typical GTHCs for five genes (Bax, Btg2, Cdkn1a, Lrp1 and Plk2) and were substantially different from treatment with a typical NGTHC (DEHP) for nine genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Mbd1, Phlda3 and Tubb4b) as determined by Tukey's test. Finally, PCA successfully differentiated GTHCs from DEHP and DO with the 11 genes. The present results suggest that RNA-Seq and PCA are useful to evaluate rat typical GTHCs and typical NGTHCs. DO was suggested to result in a different intermediate gene expression profile from typical GTHCs and NGTHC.

Biochemical strategies for the detection and detoxification of toxic chemicals in the environment

Addressing the problems related to the widespread presence of an increasing number of chemicals released into the environment by human activities represents one of the most important challenges of this century. In the last few years, to replace the high cost, in terms of time and money, of conventional technologies, the scientific community has directed considerable research towards the development both of new detection systems for the measurement of the contamination levels of chemicals in people’s body fluids and tissue, as well as in the environment, and of new remediation strategies for the removal of such chemicals from the environment, as a means of the prevention of human diseases. New emerging biosensors for the analysis of environmental chemicals have been proposed, including VHH antibodies, that combine the antibody performance with the affinity for small molecules, genetically engineered microorganisms, aptamers and new highly stable enzymes. However, the advances in the field of chemicals monitoring are still far from producing a continuous real-time and on-line system for their detection. Better results have been obtained in the development of strategies which use organisms (microorganisms, plants and animals) or metabolic pathway-based approaches (single enzymes or more complex enzymatic solutions) for the fixation, degradation and detoxification of chemicals in the environment. Systems for enzymatic detoxification and degradation of toxic agents in wastewater from chemical and manufacturing industries, such as ligninolytic enzymes for the treatment of wastewater from the textile industry, have been proposed. Considering the high value of these research studies, in terms of the protection of human health and of the ecosystem, science must play a major role in guiding policy changes in this field.

Setting evidence-based occupational exposure limits for manganese

In 2004, a review by the Institute of Environment and Health (IEH) made recommendations on occupational exposure limits (OELs) for manganese and its inorganic compounds for inhalable and respirable fractions respectively. These OELs were based on a detailed comprehensive evaluation of all the scientific data available at that time. Since then, more published studies have become available and a number of occupational standard-setting committees (EU SCOEL, US ACGIH-TLV, and German MAK) have proposed OEL's for manganese and its inorganic compounds that are somewhat lower that those proposed in the 2004 review. Based on current understanding, the key toxicological and human health issues that are likely to influence a health-based recommendation relate to: neurotoxicology; reproductive and developmental toxicology; and mutagenicity/carcinogenicity. Of these, it is generally considered that neurotoxicity presents the most sensitive endpoint. As such, many of the studies that have been reported since the IEH review have sought to use those neurofunctional tests that appear to be particularly sensitive at identifying the subtle neurological changes thought to associate with manganese toxicity. These recent studies have, however, continued to be limited to a significant extent by reliance on cross-sectional designs and also by use of unreliable exposure estimation methods. Consequently the strength of the potential association between manganese exposure and these subtle subclinical cognitive or neuromotor changes is still poorly characterised and the relevance of these minor differences in terms of either their clinical or quality of life consequences remains unknown. Based upon the overall evidence, it is concluded that the 8-h time weighted averages (TWA) for respirable (0.05mg/m³ as Mn) and inhalable (0.2mg/m³ as Mn) fractions as recommended by the SCOEL in 2011 are the most methodologically-sound, as they are based on the best available studies, most suited to the development of health-based OELs for both respirable and inhalable fractions. The dose-response characterisation informed by the examined studies used can be considered to establish a true human NOAEL for all the neurofunctional endpoints examined within the selected studies.

Collaborative studies in toxicogenomics in rodent liver in JEMS·MMS; a useful application of principal component analysis on toxicogenomics

Toxicogenomics is a rapidly developing discipline focused on the elucidation of the molecular and cellular effects of chemicals on biological systems. As a collaborative study group of Toxicogenomics/JEMS·MMS, we conducted studies on hepatocarcinogens in rodent liver in which 100 candidate marker genes were selected to discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens. Differential gene expression induced by 13 chemicals were examined using DNA microarray and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), including eight genotoxic hepatocarcinogens [o-aminoazotoluene, chrysene, dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, diethylnitrosamine (DEN), 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene, dimethylnitrosamine, dipropylnitrosamine and ethylnitrosourea (ENU)], four non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens [carbon tetrachloride, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP), phenobarbital and trichloroethylene] and a non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogen [ethanol]. Using qPCR, 30 key genes were extracted from mouse livers at 4 h and 28 days following dose-dependent gene expression alteration induced by DEN and ENU: the most significant changes in gene expression were observed at 4 h. Next, we selected key point times at 4 and 48 h from changes in time-dependent gene expression during the acute phase following administration of chrysene by qPCR. We successfully showed discrimination of eight genotoxic hepatocarcinogens [2-acetylaminofluorene, 2,4-diaminotoluene, diisopropanolnitrosamine, 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene, 4-(methylnitsosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone, N-nitrosomorpholine, quinoline and urethane] from four non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens [1,4-dichlorobenzene, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, DEHP and furan] using qPCR and principal component analysis. Additionally, we successfully identified two rat genotoxic hepatocarcinogens [DEN and 2,6-dinitrotoluene] from a nongenotoxic-hepatocarcinogen [DEHP] and a non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogen [phenacetin] at 4 and 48 h. The subsequent gene pathway analysis by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis extracted the DNA damage response, resulting from the signal transduction of a p53-class mediator leading to the induction of apoptosis. The present review of these studies suggests that application of principal component analysis on the gene expression profile in rodent liver during the acute phase is useful to predict genotoxic hepatocarcinogens in comparison to non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens and/or non-carcinogenic hepatotoxins.

Assessment of human exposure to environmental sources of nickel in Europe: Inhalation exposure

The paper describes the inhalation nickel (Ni) exposure of humans via the environment for the regional scale in the EU, together with a tiered approach for assessing additional local exposure from industrial emissions. The approach was designed, in the context of REACH, for the purpose of assessing and controlling emissions and air quality in the neighbourhood of Ni producers and downstream users. Two Derived No Effect Level (DNEL) values for chronic inhalation exposure to total Ni in PM10 (20 and 60ngNi/m(3)) were considered. The value of 20ngNi/m(3) is the current EU air quality guidance value. The value of 60ngNi/m(3) is derived here based on recently published Ni data (Oller et al., 2014). Both values are protective for respiratory toxicity and carcinogenicity but differ in the application of toxicokinetic adjustments and cancer threshold considerations. Estimates of air Ni concentrations at the European regional scale were derived from the database of the European Environment Agency. The 50th and 90th percentile regional exposures were below both DNEL values. To assess REACH compliance at the local scale, measured ambient air data are preferred but are often unavailable. A tiered approach for the use of modelled ambient air concentrations was developed, starting with the application of the default EUSES model and progressing to more sophisticated models. As an example, the tiered approach was applied to 33 EU Ni sulphate producers' and downstream users' sites. Applying the EUSES model demonstrates compliance with a DNEL of 60ngNi/m(3) for the majority of sites, while the value of the refined modelling is demonstrated when a DNEL of 20ngNi/m(3) is considered. The proposed approach, applicable to metals in general, can be used in the context of REACH, for refining the risk characterisation and guiding the selection of risk management measures.

Derivation of PM10 size-selected human equivalent concentrations of inhaled nickel based on cancer and non-cancer effects on the respiratory tract

Abstract Nickel (Ni) in ambient air is predominantly present in the form of oxides and sulfates, with the distribution of Ni mass between the fine (particle aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 µm; PM2.5) and coarser (2.5-10 µm) size-selected aerosol fractions of PM10 dependent on the aerosol's origin. When deriving a long-term health protective reference concentration for Ni in ambient air, the respiratory toxicity and carcinogenicity effects of the predominant Ni compounds in ambient air must be considered. Dosimetric adjustments to account for differences in aerosol particle size and respiratory tract deposition and/or clearance among rats, workers, and the general public were applied to experimentally- and epidemiologically-determined points of departure (PODs) such as no(low)-effect concentrations, for both cancer and non-cancer respiratory effects. This approach resulted in the derivation of threshold-based PM10 size-selected equivalent concentrations (modified PODs) of 0.5 µg Ni/m(3) based on workers' cancer effects and 9-11 µg Ni/m(3) based on rodent respiratory toxicity effects. Sources of uncertainty in exposure extrapolations are described. These are not reference concentrations; rather the derived PM10 size-selected modified PODs can be used as the starting point for the calculation of ambient air reference concentrations for Ni. The described approach is equally applicable to other particulates.

New results on formaldehyde: the 2nd International Formaldehyde Science Conference (Madrid, 19-20 April 2012)

The toxicology and epidemiology of formaldehyde were discussed on the 2nd International Formaldehyde Science Conference in Madrid, 19-20 April 2012. It was noted that a substantial amount of new scientific data has appeared within the last years since the 1st conference in 2007. Progress has been made in characterisation of genotoxicity, toxicokinetics, formation of exogenous and endogenous DNA adducts, controlled human studies and epidemiology. Thus, new research results are now at hand to be incorporated into existing evaluations on formaldehyde by official bodies.

Proposal on limits for chemical exposure in saturation divers' working atmosphere: the case of benzene

Saturation diving is performed under extreme environmental conditions. The divers are confined to a limited space for several weeks under high environmental pressure and elevated oxygen partial pressure. At present, divers are protected against chemical exposure by standard exposure limits only adjusted for the increased exposure length, i.e. from 8 to 24 hours a day and from 5 to 7 days a week. The objective of the present study was to indicate a procedure for derivation of occupational exposure limits for saturation diving, termed hyperbaric exposure limits (HEL). Using benzene as an example, a procedure is described that includes identification of the latest key documents, extensive literature search with defined exclusion criteria for the literature retrieved. Hematotoxicity and leukemia were defined as the critical effects, and exposure limits based upon concentration and cumulative exposure data and corresponding risks of leukemia were calculated. Possible interactions of high pressure, elevated pO₂, and continuous exposure have been assessed, and incorporated in a final suggestion of a HEL for benzene. The procedure should be applicable for other relevant chemicals in the divers' breathing atmosphere. It is emphasized that the lack of interactions from pressure and oxygen indicated for benzene may be completely different for other chemicals.

Use of threshold and mode of action in risk assessment

Under current guidelines, exposure guidelines for toxicants are determined by following one of two different tracks depending on whether the toxicant's mode of action (MOA) is believed to involve an exposure threshold. Although not denying the existence of thresholds, this paper points out problems with how the threshold concept and MOA is used in risk assessment. Thresholds are frequently described using imprecise terms that imply some unspecified increase in risk, which robs them of any meaning (any reasonable dose response will satisfy such a definition) and tacitly implies a value judgment about how large a risk is acceptable. MOA is generally used only to inform a threshold's existence and not its value. Often MOA is used only to conclude that the adverse effect requires an upstream cellular or biochemical response for which a threshold is simply assumed. Data to inform MOA often come from animals, which complicates evaluation of the role of human variation in genetic and environmental conditions, and the possible interaction of the toxicant with processes already producing background toxicity in humans. In response to these and other problems with the current two-track approach, this paper proposes a modified point of departure/safety factor approach to setting exposure guidelines for all toxicants. MOA and the severity of the toxic effect would be addressed using safety factors calculated from guidelines established by consensus and based on scientific judgment. The method normally would not involve quantifying low-dose risk, and would not require a threshold determination, although MOA information regarding the likelihood of a threshold could be used in setting safety factors.