The pharmacological effects of the thermostabilising (m23) mutations and intra and extracellular (β36) deletions essential for crystallisation of the turkey β-adrenoceptor

Adrenoceptors: Receptors, Ligands and Their Clinical Uses, Molecular Pharmacology and Assays

The nine G protein-coupled adrenoceptor subtypes are where the endogenous catecholamines adrenaline and noradrenaline interact with cells. Since they are important therapeutic targets, over a century of effort has been put into developing drugs that modify their activity. This chapter provides an outline of how we have arrived at current knowledge of the receptors, their physiological roles and the methods used to develop ligands. Initial studies in vivo and in vitro with isolated organs and tissues progressed to cell-based techniques and the use of cloned adrenoceptor subtypes together with high-throughput assays that allow close examination of receptors and their signalling pathways. The crystal structures of many of the adrenoceptor subtypes have now been determined opening up new possibilities for drug development.

Binding kinetics drive G protein subtype selectivity at the β1-adrenergic receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) bind to different G protein α-subtypes with varying degrees of selectivity. The mechanism by which GPCRs achieve this selectivity is still unclear. Using 13C methyl methionine and 19F NMR, we investigate the agonist-bound active state of β1AR and its ternary complexes with different G proteins in solution. We find the receptor in the ternary complexes adopts very similar conformations. In contrast, the full agonist-bound receptor active state assumes a conformation differing from previously characterised activation intermediates or from β1AR in ternary complexes. Assessing the kinetics of binding for the agonist-bound receptor with different G proteins, we find the increased affinity of β1AR for Gs results from its much faster association with the receptor. Consequently, we suggest a kinetic-driven selectivity gate between canonical and secondary coupling which arises from differential favourability of G protein binding to the agonist-bound receptor active state.

Mass spectrometry captures biased signalling and allosteric modulation of a G-protein-coupled receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors signal through cognate G proteins. Despite the widespread importance of these receptors, their regulatory mechanisms for G-protein selectivity are not fully understood. Here we present a native mass spectrometry-based approach to interrogate both biased signalling and allosteric modulation of the β1-adrenergic receptor in response to various ligands. By simultaneously capturing the effects of ligand binding and receptor coupling to different G proteins, we probed the relative importance of specific interactions with the receptor through systematic changes in 14 ligands, including isoprenaline derivatives, full and partial agonists, and antagonists. We observed enhanced dynamics of the intracellular loop 3 in the presence of isoprenaline, which is capable of acting as a biased agonist. We also show here that endogenous zinc ions augment the binding in receptor-Gs complexes and propose a zinc ion-binding hotspot at the TM5/TM6 intracellular interface of the receptor-Gs complex. Further interrogation led us to propose a mechanism in which zinc ions facilitate a structural transition of the intermediate complex towards the stable state.

Structural basis and mechanism of activation of two different families of G proteins by the same GPCR

The β₁-adrenergic receptor (β₁-AR) can activate two families of G proteins. When coupled to Gs, β₁-AR increases cardiac output, and coupling to Gi leads to decreased responsiveness in myocardial infarction. By comparative structural analysis of turkey β₁-AR complexed with either Gi or Gs, we investigate how a single G-protein-coupled receptor simultaneously signals through two G proteins. We find that, although the critical receptor-interacting C-terminal α5-helices on Gα_i and Gα_s interact similarly with β₁-AR, the overall interacting modes between β₁-AR and G proteins vary substantially. Functional studies reveal the importance of the differing interactions and provide evidence that the activation efficacy of G proteins by β₁-AR is determined by the entire three-dimensional interaction surface, including intracellular loops 2 and 4 (ICL2 and ICL4).

Olfactory marker protein captures cAMP produced via Gαs-protein-coupled receptor activation

Olfactory marker protein (OMP) labels the matured stage of olfactory receptor neurons (ORN) and has promoted the investigation on the physiology of olfaction. OMP regulates olfactory sensitivity and axonal projection of ORNs, both of which are under the control of the olfactory signaling mediator cAMP. Recently, it has been reported that OMP contains cAMP-binding sites. OMP directly captures the photo-uncaged cAMP in the cytosol and rapidly terminates the olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels activity to sharpen the olfactory responses. Here, we investigate the contribution of OMP to cAMP acutely produced via activation of Gαs-protein coupled receptors (GPCR). We expressed OMP and non-desensitizing CNGA2 channels in HEK293T cells together with β1-adrenergic receptors (ADRB1) or photo-sensitive β2-adrenergic receptors (opto-β2). Continuous puff of adrenergic agonist isoproterenol to HEK29T cells with ADRB1 induced the lasting CNGA2 currents in the absence of OMP, while OMP rapidly deactivated the CNGA2 channel activity with residual currents. Photo-activation of opto-β2 in the absence of OMP induced the CNGA2 currents with a prolonged increase, while OMP swiftly deactivated the CNGA2 channels after the initial surge. Therefore, cytosolic OMP rapidly uncouples CNGA2 channels and cAMP-signaling produced via GPCRs in the submembrane compartment.

Molecular basis of β-arrestin coupling to formoterol-bound β1-adrenoceptor

The β₁-adrenoceptor (β₁AR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that couples¹ to the heterotrimeric G protein G_s. G-protein-mediated signalling is terminated by phosphorylation of the C terminus of the receptor by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and by coupling of β-arrestin 1 (βarr1, also known as arrestin 2), which displaces G_s and induces signalling through the MAP kinase pathway². The ability of synthetic agonists to induce signalling preferentially through either G proteins or arrestins-known as biased agonism³-is important in drug development, because the therapeutic effect may arise from only one signalling cascade, whereas the other pathway may mediate undesirable side effects⁴. To understand the molecular basis for arrestin coupling, here we determined the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the β₁AR-βarr1 complex in lipid nanodiscs bound to the biased agonist formoterol⁵, and the crystal structure of formoterol-bound β₁AR coupled to the G-protein-mimetic nanobody⁶ Nb80. βarr1 couples to β₁AR in a manner distinct to that⁷ of G_s coupling to β₂AR-the finger loop of βarr1 occupies a narrower cleft on the intracellular surface, and is closer to transmembrane helix H7 of the receptor when compared with the C-terminal α5 helix of G_s. The conformation of the finger loop in βarr1 is different from that adopted by the finger loop of visual arrestin when it couples to rhodopsin⁸. β₁AR coupled to βarr1 shows considerable differences in structure compared with β₁AR coupled to Nb80, including an inward movement of extracellular loop 3 and the cytoplasmic ends of H5 and H6. We observe weakened interactions between formoterol and two serine residues in H5 at the orthosteric binding site of β₁AR, and find that formoterol has a lower affinity for the β₁AR-βarr1 complex than for the β₁AR-G_s complex. The structural differences between these complexes of β₁AR provide a foundation for the design of small molecules that could bias signalling in the β-adrenoceptors.

A high-resolution description of β1-adrenergic receptor functional dynamics and allosteric coupling from backbone NMR

Signal transmission and regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by extra- and intracellular ligands occurs via modulation of complex conformational equilibria, but their exact kinetic details and underlying atomic mechanisms are unknown. Here we quantified these dynamic equilibria in the β₁-adrenergic receptor in its apo form and seven ligand complexes using ¹H/¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy. We observe three major exchanging conformations: an inactive conformation (C_i), a preactive conformation (C_p) and an active conformation (C_a), which becomes fully populated in a ternary complex with a G protein mimicking nanobody. The C_i ↔ C_p exchange occurs on the microsecond scale, the C_p ↔ C_a exchange is slower than ~5 ms and only occurs in the presence of two highly conserved tyrosines (Y^5.58, Y^7.53), which stabilize the active conformation of TM6. The C_p→C_a chemical shift changes indicate a pivoting motion of the entire TM6 that couples the effector site to the orthosteric ligand pocket.

Signal transmission and regulation of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) by ligands occurs via modulation of complex conformational equilibria. Here authors quantify these equilibria and their dynamics in the β1-adrenergic receptor in its apo form and seven ligand complexes using NMR.

Molecular basis for high-affinity agonist binding in GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the G protein-coupled active state have higher affinity for agonists as compared with when they are in the inactive state, but the molecular basis for this is unclear. We have determined four active-state structures of the β1-adrenoceptor (β1AR) bound to conformation-specific nanobodies in the presence of agonists of varying efficacy. Comparison with inactive-state structures of β1AR bound to the identical ligands showed a 24 to 42% reduction in the volume of the orthosteric binding site. Potential hydrogen bonds were also shorter, and there was up to a 30% increase in the number of atomic contacts between the receptor and ligand. This explains the increase in agonist affinity of GPCRs in the active state for a wide range of structurally distinct agonists.

Insight into partial agonism by observing multiple equilibria for ligand-bound and Gs-mimetic nanobody-bound β1-adrenergic receptor

A complex conformational energy landscape determines G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling via intracellular binding partners (IBPs), e.g., G_s and β-arrestin. Using ¹³C methyl methionine NMR for the β₁-adrenergic receptor, we identify ligand efficacy-dependent equilibria between an inactive and pre-active state and, in complex with G_s-mimetic nanobody, between more and less active ternary complexes. Formation of a basal activity complex through ligand-free nanobody–receptor interaction reveals structural differences on the cytoplasmic receptor side compared to the full agonist-bound nanobody-coupled form, suggesting that ligand-induced variations in G-protein interaction underpin partial agonism. Significant differences in receptor dynamics are observed ranging from rigid nanobody-coupled states to extensive μs-to-ms timescale dynamics when bound to a full agonist. We suggest that the mobility of the full agonist-bound form primes the GPCR to couple to IBPs. On formation of the ternary complex, ligand efficacy determines the quality of the interaction between the rigidified receptor and an IBP and consequently the signalling level.

β₁-adrenergic receptors are expressed in cardiac tissue and stimulated by the sympathetic nervous system. Here, the authors use NMR spectroscopy to unravel the conformational diversity upon β₁-adrenergic receptor activation and provide structural insights into partial agonism and basal activity.

A monoclonal antibody raised against a thermo-stabilised β1-adrenoceptor interacts with extracellular loop 2 and acts as a negative allosteric modulator of a sub-set of β1-adrenoceptors expressed in stable cell lines

Recent interest has focused on antibodies that can discriminate between different receptor conformations. Here we have characterised the effect of a monoclonal antibody (mAb3), raised against a purified thermo-stabilised turkey β₁-adrenoceptor (β₁AR-m23 StaR), on β₁-ARs expressed in CHO-K1 or HEK 293 cells. Immunohistochemical and radioligand-binding studies demonstrated that mAb3 was able to bind to ECL2 of the tβ₁-AR, but not its human homologue. Specific binding of mAb3 to tβ₁-AR was inhibited by a peptide based on the turkey, but not the human, ECL2 sequence. Studies with [³H]-CGP 12177 demonstrated that mAb3 prevented the binding of orthosteric ligands to a subset (circa 40%) of turkey β₁-receptors expressed in both CHO K1 and HEK 293 cells. MAb3 significantly reduced the maximum specific binding capacity of [³H]-CGP-12177 without influencing its binding affinity. Substitution of ECL2 of tβ₁-AR with its human equivalent, or mutation of residues D186S, P187D, Q188E prevented the inhibition of [³H]-CGP 12177 binding by mAb3. MAb3 also elicited a negative allosteric effect on agonist-stimulated cAMP responses. The identity of the subset of turkey β₁-adrenoceptors influenced by mAb3 remains to be established but mAb3 should become an important tool to investigate the nature of β₁-AR conformational states and oligomeric complexes.

Engineering a minimal G protein to facilitate crystallisation of G protein-coupled receptors in their active conformation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) modulate cytoplasmic signalling in response to extracellular stimuli, and are important therapeutic targets in a wide range of diseases. Structure determination of GPCRs in all activation states is important to elucidate the precise mechanism of signal transduction and to facilitate optimal drug design. However, due to their inherent instability, crystallisation of GPCRs in complex with cytoplasmic signalling proteins, such as heterotrimeric G proteins and β-arrestins, has proved challenging. Here, we describe the design of a minimal G protein, mini-G_s, which is composed solely of the GTPase domain from the adenylate cyclase stimulating G protein G_s. Mini-G_s is a small, soluble protein, which efficiently couples GPCRs in the absence of Gβγ subunits. We engineered mini-G_s, using rational design mutagenesis, to form a stable complex with detergent-solubilised β₁-adrenergic receptor (β₁AR). Mini G proteins induce similar pharmacological and structural changes in GPCRs as heterotrimeric G proteins, but eliminate many of the problems associated with crystallisation of these complexes, specifically their large size, conformational dynamics and instability in detergent. They are therefore novel tools, which will facilitate the biochemical and structural characterisation of GPCRs in their active conformation.

Stabilization of G protein-coupled receptors by point mutations

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are flexible integral membrane proteins involved in transmembrane signaling. Their involvement in many physiological processes makes them interesting targets for drug development. Determination of the structure of these receptors will help to design more specific drugs, however, their structural characterization has so far been hampered by the low expression and their inherent instability in detergents which made protein engineering indispensable for structural and biophysical characterization. Several approaches to stabilize the receptors in a particular conformation have led to breakthroughs in GPCR structure determination. These include truncations of the flexible regions, stabilization by antibodies and nanobodies, fusion partners, high affinity and covalently bound ligands as well as conformational stabilization by mutagenesis. In this review we focus on stabilization of GPCRs by insertion of point mutations, which lead to increased conformational and thermal stability as well as improved expression levels. We summarize existing mutagenesis strategies with different coverage of GPCR sequence space and depth of information, design and transferability of mutations and the molecular basis for stabilization. We also discuss whether mutations alter the structure and pharmacological properties of GPCRs.

The importance of interactions with helix 5 in determining the efficacy of β-adrenoceptor ligands

Structures of the inactive state of the thermostabilized β1-adrenoceptor have been determined bound to eight different ligands, including full agonists, partial agonists, inverse agonists and biased agonists. Comparison of the structures shows distinct differences within the binding pocket that correlate with the pharmacological properties of the ligands. These data suggest that full agonists stabilize a structure with a contracted binding pocket and a rotamer change of serine (5.46) compared with when antagonists are bound. Inverse agonists may prevent both of these occurrences, whereas partial agonists stabilize a contraction of the binding pocket but not the rotamer change of serine (5.46). It is likely that subtle changes in the interactions between transmembrane helix 5 (H5) and H3/H4 on agonist binding promote the formation of the activated state.

Crystal structure of oligomeric β1-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptors in ligand-free basal state

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate transmembrane signaling. Before ligand binding, GPCRs exist in a basal state. Crystal structures of several GPCRs bound with antagonists or agonists have been solved. However, the crystal structure of the ligand-free basal state of a GPCR, the starting point of GPCR activation and function, has not been determined. Here we report the X-ray crystal structure of the first ligand-free basal state of a GPCR in a lipid membrane-like environment. Oligomeric turkey β₁-adrenergic receptors display two alternating dimer interfaces. One interface involves the transmembrane domain (TM) 1, TM2, the C-terminal H8, and the extracellular loop 1. The other interface engages residues from TM4, TM5, the intracellular loop 2 and the extracellular loop 2. Structural comparisons show that this ligand-free state is in an inactive conformation. This provides the structural information regarding GPCR dimerization and oligomerization.

Crystal structures of a stabilized β1-adrenoceptor bound to the biased agonists bucindolol and carvedilol

The β₁-adrenoceptor (β₁AR) is the site of action of beta blockers used in the treatment of cardiac-related illnesses. Two beta blockers, carvedilol and bucindolol, show distinctive activities compared to other beta blockers and have been proposed as treatments tailored to the Arg/Gly389^8.56 polymorphism of the human β₁AR. Both carvedilol and bucindolol are classified as biased agonists, because they stimulate G protein-independent signaling, while acting as either inverse or partial agonists of the G protein pathway. We have determined the crystal structures of a thermostabilized avian β₁AR mutant bound to bucindolol and to carvedilol at 3.2 and 2.3 Å resolution, respectively. In comparison to other beta blockers, bucindolol and carvedilol interact with additional residues, in extracellular loop 2 and transmembrane helix 7, which may promote G protein-independent signaling. The structures also suggest that there may be a structural explanation for the pharmacological differences arising from the Arg/Gly389^8.56 polymorphism.

A crystal clear solution for determining G-protein-coupled receptor structures

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are medically important membrane proteins that are targeted by over 30% of small molecule drugs. At the time of writing, 15 unique GPCR structures have been determined, with 77 structures deposited in the PDB database, which offers new opportunities for drug development and for understanding the molecular mechanisms of GPCR activation. Many different factors have contributed to this success, but if there is one single factor that can be singled out as the foundation for producing well-diffracting GPCR crystals, it is the stabilisation of the detergent-solubilised receptor-ligand complex. This review will focus predominantly on one of the successful strategies for the stabilisation of GPCRs, namely the thermostabilisation of GPCRs using systematic mutagenesis coupled with thermostability assays. Structures of thermostabilised GPCRs bound to a wide variety of ligands have been determined, which has led to an understanding of ligand specificity; why some ligands act as agonists as opposed to partial or inverse agonists; and the structural basis for receptor activation.

Agonist-bound structures of G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) play a major role in intercellular communication by binding small diffusible ligands (agonists) at the extracellular surface. Agonist-binding induces a conformational change in the receptor, which results in the binding and activation of heterotrimeric G proteins within the cell. Ten agonist-bound structures of non-rhodopsin GPCRs published last year defined for the first time the molecular details of receptor activated states and how inverse agonists, partial agonists and full agonists bind to produce different effects on the receptor. In addition, the structure of the β(2)-adrenoceptor coupled to a heterotrimeric G protein showed how the opening of a cleft in the cytoplasmic face of the receptor as a consequence of agonist binding results in G protein coupling and activation of the G protein.