Discriminative stimulus effects in rats of SR-141716 (rimonabant), a cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist

Drug discrimination learning: Interoceptive stimulus control of behavior and its implications for regulated and dysregulated drug intake

Drug discrimination research has generated rich evidence for the capacity of interoceptive drug stimuli to control behavior by serving as discriminative cues. Owing to its neuropharmacological specificity, drug discrimination learning has been widely used to characterize the stimulus effects and neuropharmacological underpinning of drugs. Apart from such utility, discriminative drug stimuli may help regulate drug use by disambiguating conditioned associations and post-intake outcomes. First, this review summarizes the evidence supporting interoceptive regulation of drug intake from the literature of exteroceptive discriminative control of drug-related behavior, effects of drug priming, and self-titration of drug intake. Second, an overview of interoceptive control of reward-seeking and the animal model of discriminated goal-tracking is provided to illustrate interoceptive stimulus control of the initiation and patterning of drug intake. Third, we highlight the importance of interoceptive control of aversion-avoidance in the termination of drug-use episodes and describe the animal model of discriminated taste avoidance that supports such a position. In bridging these discriminative functions of drug stimuli, we propose that interoceptive drug stimuli help regulate intake by disambiguating whether intake will be rewarding, nonrewarding, or aversive. The reflection and discussion on current theoretical formulations of interoceptive control of drug intake may further scientific advances to improve animal models to study the mechanisms by which interoceptive stimuli regulate drug intake, as well as how alterations of interoceptive processes may contribute to the transition to dysregulated drug use.

Conditioned Taste Avoidance Drug Discrimination Procedure: Assessments and Applications

In the present chapter, we summarize much of the work on the taste avoidance drug discrimination procedure, presenting the logic for its initial introduction and the extension of the procedure in the investigation of the discriminative properties of various drugs. Results from these assessments parallel those from more traditional operant and maze designs in classifying and characterizing the discriminative properties of drug. At the same time, this design reveals a procedure that is sensitive in such assessments by indexing these stimulus properties more rapidly and at lower doses than in the more traditional procedures (in some cases for drugs heretofore resistant in their detection). Importantly, much remains to be learned about the taste avoidance procedure in that the nature of such learning remains unknown and the specific parameters under which it can be established and generalized and its neurochemical and neuroanatomical bases are largely unexplored. The application of drug discrimination learning to human drug abuse continues to be an important consideration for this specific design (as well as that of drug discrimination procedures in general), and recent parallels between drug use and food intake in terms of its regulation by interoceptive stimuli suggests a possible role of the loss of stimulus control in drug escalation and addiction (with possible therapeutic implications via the modulation of these interoceptive cues).

Discriminative Stimulus Properties of Phytocannabinoids, Endocannabinoids, and Synthetic Cannabinoids

Psychoactive cannabinoids from the marijuana plant (phytocannabinoids), from the body (endocannabinoids), and from the research lab (synthetic cannabinoids) produce their discriminative stimulus effects by stimulation of CB1 receptors in the brain. Early discrimination work with phytocannabinoids confirmed that Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) is the primary psychoactive constituent of the marijuana plant, with more recent work focusing on characterization of the contribution of the major endocannabinoids, anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), to Δ9-THC-like internal states. Collectively, these latter studies suggest that endogenous increases in both anandamide and 2-AG seem to be optimal for mimicking Δ9-THC's discriminative stimulus effects, although suprathreshold concentrations of anandamide also appear to be Δ9-THC-like in discrimination assays. Recently, increased abuse of synthetic cannabinoids (e.g., "fake marijuana") has spurred discrimination studies to inform regulatory authorities by predicting which of the many synthetic compounds on the illicit market are most likely to share Δ9-THC's abuse liability. In the absence of a reliable model of cannabinoid self-administration (specifically, Δ9-THC self-administration), cannabinoid discrimination represents the most validated and pharmacologically selective animal model of an abuse-related property of cannabinoids - i.e., marijuana's subjective effects. The influx of recent papers in which cannabinoid discrimination is highlighted attests to its continued relevance as a valuable method for scientific study of cannabinoid use and abuse.

Novel 3-substituted rimonabant analogues lack Δ(9) -tetrahydrocannabinol-like abuse-related behavioural effects in mice

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Previous structure-activity relationship studies with analogues of the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant have demonstrated that a subset of these analogues with 3-substituent replacements of rimonabant's pyrazole core displayed cannabimimetic profiles seemingly independent of CB1 receptors. We sought to further evaluate these analogues in several behavioural models sensitive to detecting THC-like abuse liability.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Selected analogues were tested in a battery of tests in mice to replicate previous findings. Cross-generalization tests were conducted in mice trained to discriminate either THC or O-6629 from vehicle. Rimonabant and its analogues were also evaluated in substitution and challenge tests. Finally, development of cross-tolerance between THC and O-6211 in the mouse test battery was assessed.

KEY RESULTS

O-6629 and O-6658 produced dose-dependent acute cannabimimetic activity in mice, but neither substituted for nor antagonized THC's discriminative stimulus. Cross-substitution was observed with O-6658 in mice discriminating O-6629, whereas rimonabant neither substituted for nor attenuated the O-6629 discriminative stimulus. THC and morphine did not generate O-6629-like responding. Cross-tolerance did not develop in mice repeatedly treated with THC when tested with O-6211 in the mouse test battery.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

While some overlap exists between the pharmacological profiles of THC and these 3-substituent rimonabant analogues, the effects are mediated by distinct neural targets. Notably, these analogues are unlikely to possess marijuana-like abuse liability in humans, but general abuse liability has not yet been determined. Efforts to determine the mechanism(s) of action of this seemingly unique class of compounds are underway.

"Herbal incense": designer drug blends as cannabimimetics and their assessment by drug discrimination and other in vivo bioassays

Recently, synthetic cannabinoids originally designed for testing in the laboratory only have found use recreationally in designer herbal blends, originally called "Spice". The myriad of compounds found are for the most part potent full agonists of the cannabinoid receptor 1, producing effects similar to tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and marijuana. Drug discrimination of these compounds offers a specific behavioral test that can help determine whether these new synthetic compounds share a similar "subjective high" with the effects of marijuana/THC. By utilization of drug discrimination and other behavioral techniques, a better understanding of these new "designer" cannabinoids may be reached to assist in treating both the acute and chronic effects of these drugs. The paper provides a brief exposé of modern cannabinoid research as a backdrop to the recreational use of designer herbal blend cannabimimetics.

AM2389, a high-affinity, in vivo potent CB1-receptor-selective cannabinergic ligand as evidenced by drug discrimination in rats and hypothermia testing in mice

RATIONALE

The endocannabinoid signaling system (ECS) has been targeted for developing novel therapeutics since ECS dysfunction has been implicated in various pathologies. Current focus is on chemical modifications of the hexahydrocannabinol (HHC) nabilone (Cesamet(®)).

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the novel, high-affinity cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)R) HHC-ligand AM2389 [9β-hydroxy-3-(1-hexyl-cyclobut-1-yl)-hexahydrocannabinol in two rodent pre-clinical assays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CB(1)R mediation of AM2389-induced hypothermia in mice was evaluated with AM251, a CB(1)R-selective antagonist/inverse agonist. Additionally, two groups of rats discriminated the full cannabinergic aminoalkylindole AM5983 (0.18 and 0.56 mg/kg) from vehicle 20 min post-injection in a two-choice operant conditioning task motivated by 0.1% saccharin/water. Generalization/substitution tests were conducted with AM2389, AM5983, and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC).

RESULTS

Δ(9)-THC (30 mg/kg)-induced hypothermia exhibited a faster onset and shorter duration of action compared with AM2389 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg). AM251 (3 and 10 mg/kg) attenuated/blocked hypothermia induced by 0.3 mg/kg AM2389. In drug discrimination, the order of potency was AM2389 > AM5983 > Δ(9)-THC with ED(50) values of 0.0025, 0.0571, and 0.2635 mg/kg, respectively, in the low-dose condition. The corresponding ED(50) values in the high-dose condition were 0.0069, 0.1246, and 0.8438 mg/kg, respectively. Onset of the effects of AM2389 was slow with a protracted time-course; the functional, perceptual in vivo half-life was approximately 17 h.

CONCLUSIONS

This potent cannabinergic HHC exhibited a slow onset of action with a protracted time-course. The AM2389 chemotype appears well suited for further drug development, and AM2389 currently is used to probe behavioral consequences of sustained ECS activation.

Dissimilar cannabinoid substitution patterns in mice trained to discriminate Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol or methanandamide from vehicle

Δ(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) discrimination in rodents is a behavioral assay that has been used to probe differences among classes of cannabinoids in rats. The purpose of this study was to determine whether traditional and anandamide-like cannabinoids were distinguishable in cannabinoid discrimination procedures in mice. Male mice were trained to discriminate 30 mg/kg THC or 70 mg/kg methanandamide from vehicle in a two-lever milk-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. After acquisition, agonist tests with THC, methanandamide, CP 55940, and anandamide were conducted, as were antagonism tests with rimonabant. Substitution (agonism) and antagonism tests were also carried out in female mice trained to discriminate THC. THC and CP 55940 fully substituted in THC-trained mice of both sexes. Further, THC substitution was rimonabant reversible. In contrast, mice injected with methanandamide or anandamide failed to respond substantially on the THC lever, even up to doses that decreased overall responding. In methanandamide-trained mice, methanandamide fully generalized to the methanandamide training dose. Rimonabant did not reverse this generalization. Although THC, CP 55940, and anandamide also increased responding on the methanandamide lever, the magnitude of substitution was less than for methanandamide. These results suggest incomplete overlap in the underlying mechanisms mediating endocannabinoid pharmacology and marijuana intoxication. Further, they suggest that methanandamide discrimination may involve a non-CB(1) receptor mechanism that is particularly prominent at higher doses.

3-Substituted pyrazole analogs of the cannabinoid type 1 (CB₁) receptor antagonist rimonabant: cannabinoid agonist-like effects in mice via non-CB₁, non-CB₂ mechanism

The prototypic cannabinoid type 1 (CB₁) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, rimonabant, is comprised of a pyrazole core surrounded by a carboxyamide with terminal piperidine group (3-substituent), a 2,4-dichlorophenyl group (1-substituent), a 4-chlorophenyl group (5-substituent), and a methyl group (4-substituent). Previous structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis has suggested that the 3-position may be involved in receptor recognition and agonist activity. The goal of the present study was to develop CB₁-selective compounds and explore further the SAR of 3-substitution on the rimonabant template. 3-Substituted analogs with benzyl and alkyl amino, dihydrooxazole, and oxazole moieties were synthesized and evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Several notable patterns emerged. First, most of the analogs exhibited CB₁ selectivity, with many lacking affinity for the CB₂ receptor. Affinity tended to be better when [³H]5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4-methyl-N-(piperidin-1-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR141716), rather than [³H](-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4(1,1-dimethyl-heptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexanol (CP55,940), was used as the binding radioligand. Second, many of the analogs produced an agonist-like profile of effects in mice (i.e., suppression of activity, antinociception, hypothermia, and immobility); however, their potencies were not well correlated with their CB₁ binding affinities. Further assessment of selected analogs showed that none were effective antagonists of the effects of Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol in mice, their agonist-like effects were not blocked by rimonabant, they were active in vivo in CB₁⁻/⁻ mice, and they failed to stimulate guanosine-5'-O-(3-[³⁵S]thio)-triphosphate binding. Several analogs were inverse agonists in the latter assay. Together, these results suggest that this series of 3-substituted pyrazole analogs represent a novel class of CB₁-selective cannabinoids that produce agonist-like effects in mice through a non-CB₁, non-CB₂ mechanism.

Application of the conditioned taste aversion paradigm to assess discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulants in rats

BACKGROUND

The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm is one of the reliable methods to evaluate the discriminative stimulus properties of drugs and is characterized by a short conditioning period and no need for special equipment. This method, however, has not yet been fully investigated for psychostimulants such as cocaine and methamphetamine.

METHODS

In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate between cocaine and a vehicle using CTA and substitution tests with various psychostimulants were conducted to evaluate the usefulness of the method for assessing the discriminative stimulus properties of this pharmacological class. Male rats received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of cocaine (10mg/kg) 10 min prior to access saccharin for 20-min, and immediately after the saccharin access they received an i.p. dose of LiCl (1.8 mEq; n=8, Group CL) or the vehicle (n=8, Group CW) on the day of conditioning; on the other days (2 or 3 days between the cocaine conditioning days), they were injected with saline prior to access to saccharin without the LiCl or vehicle injection after the access.

RESULTS

By the fifteenth cocaine conditioning trial, all animals acquired discrimination. In the substitution test, cocaine dose dependently decreased saccharin consumption. The psychostimulants, methamphetamine, methylphenidate, bupropion and sibutramine, substituted for cocaine, whereas the opioid μ agonist morphine and the cannabinoid agonist, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol, did not substitute for cocaine. Mazindol did not substitute for cocaine although it has CNS stimulant activities.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that discriminative stimulus properties of psychostimulants can be evaluated using the CTA paradigm.

Central mediation and differential blockade by cannabinergics of the discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in rats

RATIONALE

Discovery of an endocannabinoid signaling system launched the development of the blocker rimonabant, a cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist. Due to untoward effects, this medication was withdrawn and efforts have been directed towards discovering chemicals with more benign profiles.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to comparatively evaluate new ligands using a rimonabant discriminated drinking aversion procedure.

METHODS

Rats discriminated between rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg) and vehicle. The 30 min saccharin (0.1%) drinking after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental animals. After vehicle pretreatment, experimental animals were given i.p. NaCl (10 ml/kg). Postdrinking treatment for controls was NaCl, irrespective of pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle).

RESULTS

The centrally acting neutral CB(1)R antagonist AM4113, but not the limited brain penetrating CB(1)R neutral antagonist AM6545, substituted for rimonabant. The CB(1)R agonists THC (1-10 mg/kg), AM1346 (1-10 mg/kg) did not substitute. The rimonabant-induced conditioned suppression of saccharin drinking was attenuated when CB(1)R agonists AM5983 (0.01-1 mg/kg) and THC (10 mg/kg), but not the CB(1)R agonist AM1346 (0.1-18 mg/kg), were combined with rimonabant (5.6 mg/kg). By varying the injection-to-test interval, we gauged the relative duration of the cueing effects of rimonabant, and the in vivo functional half-life was estimated to be approximately 1.5 h.

CONCLUSION

A neutral CB(1)R antagonist (AM4113) produced cueing effects similar to those of rimonabant and generalization likely was centrally mediated. The functional cueing effects of rimonabant are relatively short-acting, pharmacologically selective, and differentially blocked by cannabinergics.

Discriminative stimulus functions of methanandamide and delta(9)-THC in rats: tests with aminoalkylindoles (WIN55,212-2 and AM678) and ethanol

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize in vivo the aminoalkylindoles WIN55,212-2 (WIN) and AM678 (naphthalen-1-yl(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone) as cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)R) ligands using drug discrimination. Tests also involved delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and R-(+)-methanandamide (mAEA), a metabolically stable analog of the endogenous ligand anandamide, as well as the CB(1)R selective antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant; tests with ethanol assessed pharmacological specificity. We used two different drug discriminations (mAEA and THC) allowing us to explore potential differences in CB(1)R activation which could be attributed to variations in their respective CB(1)R signaling mechanisms.

METHODS

There were two concurrently trained groups of rats. One group discriminated between i.p. injected vehicle and 10 mg/kg mAEA. The other group was trained to discriminate between vehicle and 1.8 mg/kg THC.

RESULTS

Dose generalization curves for AM678, WIN55,212-2, THC, and mAEA suggested the following rank order of potency: AM678 > WIN55,212-2 > or = THC > mAEA in both drug discrimination groups. Challenge by 1 mg/kg rimonabant resulted in shifts to the right of the generalization curves for the two aminoalkylindoles (4.4-fold for AM678 and 11.3-fold for WIN in the mAEA group, whereas for the THC group, the corresponding values were 13 and 2.6, respectively), suggesting surmountable antagonism. Ethanol did not generalize in either of the two groups, suggesting pharmacological specificity.

CONCLUSION

Data are congruent with the general observation that there is substantial overlap in the discriminative stimulus effects of CB(1)R ligands across different chemical classes. However, the quantitative differences in the interactions between the two aminoalkylindoles and rimonabant in the two discrimination groups suggest subtle variations in the ligand-receptor activation(s).

Effects of sibutramine and rimonabant in rats trained to discriminate between 22- and 2-h food deprivation

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether sibutramine and rimonabant, drugs that decrease food intake in human and non-human animals, affect the discriminative stimulus effects associated with acute food deprivation ("hunger").

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were trained to discriminate between 22- and 2-h food deprivation in a two-lever choice procedure. After rats acquired the discrimination, subjects were food-restricted for 22 h and administered with sibutramine (0.32-10 mg/kg, p.o.) or rimonabant (0.32-10 mg/kg, s.c.) before a generalization test session.

RESULTS

Sibutramine (3.2 mg/kg) produced significant decreases in 22-h deprivation-appropriate responding, response rates (resulting in lever pressing rates similar to those following 2-h food deprivation), and food intake measured 1 h after the generalization test. A larger sibutramine dose eliminated responding and significantly reduced food intake. Rimonabant did not alter the discriminative stimulus effects of 22-h food deprivation, but rimonabant did significantly reduce both response rates and food intake.

CONCLUSION

Sibutramine appears to decrease food intake by reducing hunger sensations associated with food deprivation. In contrast, rimonabant does not alter the discrimination of acute food deprivation. The use of food-deprivation discrimination techniques may be useful in identifying the role of specific neuroactive compounds in eating stimulated by a sense of hunger and may aid in medication development for more effective treatments for obesity and other eating-related conditions.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant in rats

OBJECTIVE

To examine the discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor (CB(1)R) antagonist/inverse agonist rimonabant (SR141716A) using a discriminated taste aversion (DTA) procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Groups of rats were trained to discriminate between drug (5.6 or 3 mg/kg) and vehicle in DTA (t' = 20 min). The 30-min drinking opportunity after rimonabant pretreatment was followed by injection of lithium chloride (120 mg/kg) in the experimental (EXP) animals. When offered fluid after vehicle pretreatment, EXP animals subsequently were given intraperitoneal saline (NaCl, 10 ml/kg). Post-drinking treatment for controls (CONT) was NaCl irrespective of the pretreatment condition (rimonabant or vehicle). Tests examined other doses and drugs (t' = 20 min).

RESULTS

The rimonabant analog AM251 (1 to 5.6 mg/kg) substituted for rimonabant. AM281 also appeared to substitute, but interpretation is complicated by unconditioned effects (drinking suppressed also in the CONT group). The CB(2)R antagonists SR144528 (18 and 30 mg/kg), AM630 (1 to 10 mg/kg), and the CB(1)R agonist methanandamide (mAEA, 3 and 10 mg/kg) did not substitute. There was a dose-related attenuation of the rimonabant-induced suppression of saccharin drinking when Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC; 0.3 to 5.6 mg/kg), but not mAEA (1 to 10 mg/kg), was given together with rimonabant (3 mg/kg). Unconditioned effects occurred with the mAEA-rimonabant combination, not evident for combinations of rimonabant and Delta9-THC. mAEA (10 mg/kg) plus AM251 (5.6 mg/kg) resulted in strong unconditioned effects.

CONCLUSION

Rimonabant induces a discriminative stimulus in DTA that continues to show potential for further examination of cannabinoid receptor antagonism.

Pharmacological characterization and appetite suppressive properties of BMS-193885, a novel and selective neuropeptide Y(1) receptor antagonist

Treatment of obesity is still a large unmet medical need. Neuropeptide Y is the most potent orexigenic peptide in the animal kingdom. Its five cloned G-protein couple receptors are all implicated in the regulation of energy homeostasis evidenced by overexpression or deletion of neuropeptide Y or its receptors. Neuropeptide Y most likely exerts its orexigenic activity via the neuropeptide Y(1) and neuropeptide Y(5) receptors, although the involvement of the neuropeptide Y(2) and neuropeptide Y(4) receptors are also gaining importance. The lack of potent, selective, and brain penetrable pharmacologic agents at these receptors made our understanding of the modulation of food intake by neuropeptide Y-ergic agents elusive. BMS-193885 (1,4-dihydro-[3-[[[[3-[4-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperidinyl]propyl]amino] carbonyl]amino]phenyl]-2,6-dimethyl-3,5-pyridinedicarboxylic acid, dimethyl ester) is a potent and selective neuropeptide Y(1) receptor antagonist. BMS-193885 has 3.3 nM affinity at the neuropeptide Y(1) receptor, acting competitively at the neuropeptide Y binding site. BMS-193885 increased the K(d) of [(125)I]PeptideYY from 0.35 nM to 0.65 nM without changing the B(max) (0.16 pmol/mg of protein) in SK-N-MC cells that endogenously express the neuropeptide Y(1) receptor. It is also found to be a full antagonist with an apparent K(b) of 4.5 nM measured by reversal of forskolin (FK)-stimulated inhibition of cAMP production by neuropeptide Y. Pharmacological profiling showed that BMS-193885 has no appreciable affinity at the other neuropeptide Y receptors, and is also 200-fold less potent at the alpha(2) adrenergic receptor. Testing the compound in a panel of 70 G-protein coupled receptors and ion channels resulted in at least 200-fold or greater selectivity, with the exception of the sigma(1) receptor, where the selectivity was 100-fold. When administered intracerebroventricularly or directly into the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, it blocked neuropeptide Y-induced food intake in rats. Intraperitoneal administration of BMS-193885 (10 mg/kg) also reduced one-hour neuropeptide Y-induced food intake in satiated rats, as well as spontaneous overnight food consumption. Chronic administration of BMS-193885 (10 mg/kg) i.p. for 44 days significantly reduced food intake and the rate of body weight gain compared to vehicle treated control without developing tolerance or affecting water intake. These results provide supporting evidence that BMS-193885 reduces food intake and body weight via inhibition of the central neuropeptide Y(1) receptor. BMS-193885 has no significant effect of locomotor activity up to 20 mg/kg dose after 1 h of treatment. It also showed no activity in the elevated plus maze when tested after i.p. and i.c.v. administration, indicating that reduction of food intake is unrelated to anxious behavior. BMS-193885 has good systemic bioavailability and brain penetration, but lacks oral bioavailability. The compound had no serious cardiovascular adverse effect in rats and dogs up to 30 and 10 mg/kg dose, respectively, when dosed intravenously. These data demonstrate that BMS-193885 is a potent, selective, brain penetrant Y(1) receptor antagonist that reduces food intake and body weight in animal models of obesity both after acute and chronic administration. Taken together the data suggest that a potent and selective neuropeptide Y(1) receptor antagonist might be an efficacious treatment for obesity in humans.

Discriminative stimulus effects of the cannabinoid CB1 antagonist SR 141716A in rhesus monkeys pretreated with Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol

RATIONALE

Drug discrimination can be used to examine tolerance and dependence in agonist-treated animals by establishing an appropriate antagonist as a discriminative stimulus.

OBJECTIVE

Establish intravenous SR 141716A as a discriminative stimulus in four rhesus monkeys pretreated with a relatively small dose of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9-THC).

METHODS

Rhesus monkeys received i.v. Delta9-THC (0.32 mg/kg) and discriminated i.v. SR 141716A (1 mg/kg) from vehicle while responding under a fixed ratio (FR) 5 schedule of stimulus-shock termination.

RESULTS

The discriminative stimulus effects of SR 141716A were dose-dependent (ED50=0.33 mg/kg) and were mimicked by the CB1 antagonist AM 251 (ED50=0.98 mg/kg), but not by a benzodiazepine (midazolam) or an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist (ketamine). An additional dose (0.32 mg/kg in addition to 0.32 mg/kg administered before the session) of Delta9-THC shifted the SR 141716A dose-effect curve 3-fold rightward. Omitting Delta9-THC before test sessions resulted in responding on the SR 141716A lever that was attenuated by subsequent administration of Delta9-THC (ED50=0.13 mg/kg), CP 55940 (ED50=0.013 mg/kg), and WIN 55212-2 (ED50=0.35 mg/kg); midazolam and ketamine did not attenuate responding on the SR 141716A lever. SR 141716A (1 mg/kg) shifted the Delta9-THC and CP 55940 dose-effect curves 3.4-fold rightward; the WIN 55212-2 dose-effect curve was not significantly modified by a dose of 1 mg/kg of SR 141716A.

CONCLUSIONS

SR 141716A can be established as a discriminative stimulus in animals pretreated with Delta9-THC, and this assay is selective for cannabinoid activity. Differential antagonism of cannabinoids by SR 141716A might indicate that the mechanism of action of WIN 55212-2 is not identical to other cannabinoids. This study demonstrates that, under the appropriate conditions, drug discrimination has utility for examining cannabinoid dependence and withdrawal.

Evaluation of the role of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes and cannabinoid system in the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats

Male Wistar rats were trained to discriminate (-)-nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline under a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule of water reinforcement. During test sessions the following drugs were coadministered with saline (substitution studies) or nicotine (0.025-0.4 mg/kg; combination studies): the alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE), the non-selective nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist mecamylamine, the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist methyllycaconitine (MLA), the alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype agonist 5-iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (5-IA), the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist/partial agonist rimonabant, the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo-[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methybenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 144528), the cannabinoid CB1/2 receptor agonists (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxy-propyl)cyclohexanol (CP 55,940) or R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]-pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)-methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2), the endogenous cannabinoid agonist and non-competitive alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype antagonist anandamide, the anandamide uptake and fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (AM-404), the fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor cyclohexylcarbamic acid 3'-carbamoyl-biphenyl-3-yl ester (URB 597), AM-404+anandamide or URB 597+anandamide. 5-IA (0.01 mg/kg) fully substituted for nicotine, while other drugs were inactive. In combination studies, DHbetaE and mecamylamine dose-dependently attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine and the full substitution of 5-IA, while MLA, rimonabant, SR 144528, CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2, and URB 597 did not alter the nicotine cue. Pretreatment with AM-404+anandamide or URB 597+anandamide weakly enhanced nicotine-lever responding. Our pharmacological analyses demonstrates that the expression of nicotine discrimination is under the control of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes composed of alpha4beta2 (but not of alpha7) subunits. Furthermore, we excluded the involvement of either cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors or increases in the endocannabinoid tone in the nicotine discrimination.

Antagonism of discriminative stimulus effects of delta(9)-THC and (R)-methanandamide in rats

RATIONALE

In previous drug discrimination studies we observed surmountable antagonism by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the presence of constant doses of SR-141716 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloro-phenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide] (0.3 and 1 mg/kg), but there was only marginal evidence for surmountable antagonism with combinations of SR-141716 and (R)-methanandamide, a chiral analog of the endocannabioid anandamide.

OBJECTIVE

Here we examine antagonism where the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonist [Delta(9)-THC and (R)-methanandamide] dose is held constant (i.e., the training dose) and the antagonist {i.e., SR-141716 and AM-251 [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; 2 ml/kg]} dose varied. We also tested the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR-144528 {N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo(2.2.1)heptan-2-yl]5-(4-chloro-3-methyl-phenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide}.

METHODS

Different groups of rats were trained to discriminate between vehicle and three different doses of Delta(9)-THC (1.8, 3, and 5.6 mg/kg, presumably reflecting different efficacy demands) as well as 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide. Dose-generalization tests involved different doses of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists. Antagonist tests varied the dose of the antagonist (range: 0.1 and 3 mg/kg for SR-141716 and AM-251, and 1 to 10 mg/kg for SR-144528).

RESULTS

SR-141716 and AM-251 doses dependently blocked the agonist-induced discriminative stimulus effects. SR-141716 tended to be slightly more potent than AM-251. The effective dose 50 (ED(50)) of SR-141716 was higher in the 5.6 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC-trained group relative to the two other Delta(9)-THC-trained groups. The cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist SR-144528 combined with the training dose of 1.8 mg/kg Delta(9)-THC, as well as when combined with the training dose of 10 mg/kg (R)-methanandamide, did not markedly change drug-appropriate (agonist) responses.

CONCLUSION

Data support that the discriminative stimulus effects of (R)-methanandamide and its overlap with the Delta(9)-THC cue are, indeed, CB1 receptor mediated events as revealed in antagonism tests with the selective central CB1 receptor antagonists SR-141716 and AM-251. The activation of cannabinoid CB2 receptors appears to be insignificant for these discriminations.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2004

This paper is the 27th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over 30 years of research. It summarizes papers published during 2004 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior, and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia; stress and social status; tolerance and dependence; learning and memory; eating and drinking; alcohol and drugs of abuse; sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology; mental illness and mood; seizures and neurologic disorders; electrical-related activity and neurophysiology; general activity and locomotion; gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; and immunological responses.