Asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent: preclinical evidence for clinical effects in schizophrenia

The 5-HT7 receptor system as a treatment target for mood and anxiety disorders: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Preclinical animal and preliminary human studies indicate that 5-HT7 antagonists have the potential as a new treatment approach for mood and anxiety disorders. In this systematic review, we aimed to review the relationship between the 5-HT7 receptor system and mood and anxiety disorders, and to explore the pharmacology and therapeutic potential of medications that target the 5-HT7 receptor for their treatment.

METHODS

Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO databases, the National Institute of Health website Clinicaltrials.gov, controlled-trials.com, and relevant grey literature were used to search for original research articles, and reference lists of included articles were then hand searched.

RESULTS

Sixty-four studies were included in the review: 52 animal studies and 12 human studies. Studies used a variety of preclinical paradigms and questionnaires to assess change in mood, and few studies examined sleep or cognition. Forty-four out of 47 (44/47) preclinical 5-HT7 modulation studies identified potential antidepressant effects and 20/23 studies identified potential anxiolytic effects. In clinical studies, 5/7 identified potential antidepressant effects in major depressive disorder, 1/2 identified potential anxiolytic effects in generalized anxiety disorder, and 3/3 identified potential antidepressant effects in bipolar disorders.

CONCLUSION

While there is some evidence that the 5-HT7 receptor system may be a potential target for treating mood and anxiety disorders, many agents included in the review also bind to other receptors. Further research is needed using drugs that bind specifically to 5-HT7 receptors to examine treatment proof of concept further.

Chronic treatment with asenapine affects cytochrome P450 2D (CYP2D) in rat brain and liver. Pharmacological aspects

Neuroleptics have to be used for a long time to produce a therapeutic effect. Cytochrome P450 2D (CYP2D) enzymes mediate alternative pathways of neurotransmitter synthesis (i.e. tyramine hydroxylation to dopamine and 5-methoxytryptamine O-demethylation to serotonin), and metabolism of neurosteroids. The aim of our present study was to examine the influence of chronic treatment with the new atypical neuroleptic asenapine on CYP2D in rat brain. In parallel, liver CYP2D was investigated for comparison. Asenapine added in vitro to microsomes of control rats competitively, but weakly inhibited the activity of CYP2D (brain: Ki = 385 μM; liver: Ki = 36 μM). However, prolonged administration of asenapine (0.3 mg/kg sc. for 2 weeks) significantly diminished the activity and protein level of CYP2D in the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, hippocampus and cerebellum, but did not affect the enzyme in the hypothalamus, brain stem, substantia nigra and the remainder of the brain. In contrast, asenapine enhanced the enzyme activity and protein level in the striatum. In the liver, chronically administered asenapine reduced the activity and protein level of CYP2D, and the CYP2D1 mRNA level. In conclusion, prolonged administration of asenapine alters the CYP2D expression in the brain structures and in the liver. Through affecting the CYP2D activity in the brain, asenapine may modify its pharmacological effect. By increasing the CYP2D expression/activity in the striatum, asenapine may accelerate the synthesis of dopamine (via tyramine hydroxylation) and serotonin (via 5-methoxytryptamine O-demethylation), and thus alleviate extrapyramidal symptoms. By reducing the CYP2D expression/activity in other brain structures asenapine may diminish the 21-hydroxylation of neurosteroids and thus have a beneficial influence on the symptoms of schizophrenia. In the liver, by reducing the CYP2D activity, asenapine may slow the biotransformation of concomitantly administered CYP2D substrates (drugs) during continuous treatment of schizophrenia or bipolar disorders.

The Influence of Long-Term Treatment with Asenapine on Liver Cytochrome P450 Expression and Activity in the Rat. The Involvement of Different Mechanisms

Therapy of schizophrenia requires long-term treatment with a relevant antipsychotic drug to achieve a therapeutic effect. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of prolonged treatment with the atypical neuroleptic asenapine on the expression and activity of rat cytochrome P450 (CYP) in the liver. The experiment was carried out on male Wistar rats. Asenapine (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) was administered for two weeks. The levels of CYP mRNA protein and activity were determined in the liver and hormone concentrations were measured in the pituitary gland and blood serum. Asenapine significantly decreased the activity of CYP1A (caffeine 8-hydroxylation and 3-N-demethylation), CYP2B, CYP2C11 and CYP3A (testosterone hydroxylation at positions 16β; 2α and 16α; 2β and 6β, respectively). The neuroleptic did not affect the activity of CYP2A (testosterone 7α-hydroxylation), CYP2C6 (warfarin 7-hydroxylation) and CYP2E1 (chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation). The mRNA and protein levels of CYP1A2, CYP2B1, CYP2C11 and CYP3A1 were decreased, while those of CYP2B2 and CYP3A2 were not changed. Simultaneously, pituitary level of growth hormone-releasing hormone and serum concentrations of growth hormone and corticosterone were reduced, while that of triiodothyronine was enhanced. In conclusion, chronic treatment with asenapine down-regulates liver cytochrome P450 enzymes, which involves neuroendocrine mechanisms. Thus, chronic asenapine treatment may slow the metabolism of CYP1A, CYP2B, CYP2C11 and CYP3A substrates (steroids and drugs). Since asenapine is metabolized by CYP1A and CYP3A, the neuroleptic may inhibit its own metabolism, therefore, the plasma concentration of asenapine in patients after prolonged treatment may be higher than expected based on a single dose.

Asenapine reduces anxiety-related behaviours in rat conditioned fear stress model

OBJECTIVE

Asenapine is an atypical antipsychotic that is currently available for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Although the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine are effective for depression and anxiety in schizophrenia, as demonstrated by animal model studies, this has not been clarified for asenapine. Therefore, we compared the effects of asenapine in the conditioned fear stress model with those of clozapine and olanzapine.

METHOD

Rats were individually fear conditioned using electrical foot shock in a Skinner box. Approximately 24 h later, individual animals were returned to the same Skinner box (without electrical shock) and their freezing behaviour was observed for 5 min. Animals were treated with asenapine, clozapine, olanzapine, the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist buspirone, or the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 at 30 min before freezing behaviour assessment. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 or the 5-HT2C receptor agonist Ro60-0175 was also used concomitantly with asenapine. The effects of asenapine, clozapine, and olanzapine on serotonin release in the rat hippocampus were also measured using in vivo microdialysis.

RESULTS

Asenapine reduced freezing behaviour, while neither clozapine nor olanzapine reduced freezing behaviour. Buspirone and SB242084 also reduced freezing behaviour. The effect of asenapine in reducing freezing behaviour was not altered by the concomitant administration of WAY100635 or Ro60-0175. Both asenapine and clozapine, but not olanzapine, increased serotonin release in the rat hippocampus.

CONCLUSION

Asenapine may have superior therapeutic effect on anxiety symptoms than other agents, although the underlying mechanism of its anxiolytic activity remains unknown.

Asenapine: A Review in Schizophrenia

Asenapine (Saphris(®), Sycrest(®)) is an atypical antipsychotic that is administered sublingually twice daily and is approved for schizophrenia in the USA, Japan and other countries, but not in the EU. This article reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy and tolerability profile of asenapine in the treatment of adults with schizophrenia. Clinical trials with asenapine have demonstrated efficacy in terms of both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia, although findings have not always been consistent. Across three short-term (6-week) studies in acute schizophrenia (including one in Asian patients), asenapine was generally superior to placebo and had broadly similar efficacy to active controls in improving total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. A meta-analysis of four short-term trials with asenapine (that also included a negative study and a failed trial) also showed significant benefit with asenapine over placebo. In longer-term trials and extensions (up to ≈3 years' duration), asenapine was effective relative to placebo in preventing relapse in schizophrenia, but was less effective than olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (according to intent-to-treat LOCF analysis). However, in two trials in patients with persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia, asenapine and olanzapine were similarly effective in reducing negative symptoms at week 26, with asenapine providing better results than olanzapine at week 52 in one of the extensions. The most frequently reported adverse events with asenapine are somnolence, akathisia and oral hypoesthesia. Although potentially associated with more extrapyramidal symptoms, asenapine appears to have less weight gain and metabolic effects than some other antipsychotic agents, such as olanzapine.

Intranasal delivery of asenapine loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: formulation, characterization, pharmacokinetic and behavioural assessment

The aim of the present research work was to develop asenapine (ASM) loaded nanostructured lipid carriers (ANLC) for the delivery of drugs in the brain by an intranasal route to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Asenapine in the Treatment of Acute Mania: A Real-World Observational Study With 6 Months Follow-Up

Asenapine is a second-generation antipsychotic with a unique pharmacological profile that was recently approved for the treatment of moderate/severe manic episodes. Real-world data on rapidity of action in inpatient settings are lacking.The aims of the current real-world observational study were to evaluate: (i) short-term efficacy of asenapine after 7 days (T0-T1) in patients hospitalized for a manic episode in the course of bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder (group A), (ii) differences in length of stay (LoS), and (iii) rehospitalization compared to a control population (group B) with a 6-month follow-up.Twenty patients were included in each group. The mean total Young Mania Rating Scale score decreased by 12.6 (SD ±10.3; t(17) = 5.2, P < 0.005), implying a mean 37.8% improvement. A statistically significant reduction was observed for all Young Mania Rating Scale items, except for "sexual interest." The mean total BPRS score decreased by 17.2 (SD ±14.9; t(17) = 4.9, P < 0.005). A statistically significant reduction was observed for several items, including "conceptual disorganization," "grandiosity," "unusual thought content," and "excitement". Length of stay was 17.9 (SD ±9.0) days for group A and 14.7 (SD ±12.7) days for group B; the result of the Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences (χ = 2.199, P = 0.138). Despite a high discontinuation rate, only 17.7% of patients in group A were rehospitalized in the following 6 months compared to 41.2% of those in group B (relative risk = 0.43, 95% confidence interval, 0.13-1.39).Findings from this small, preliminary study at least partially support the results of previous trials, confirming effectiveness and tolerability in the context of comorbidity and polypsychopharmacology.

A systematic microdialysis study of dopamine transmission in the accumbens shell/core and prefrontal cortex after acute antipsychotics

RATIONALE

The only systematic in vivo studies comparing antipsychotic (AP) effects on nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell and core dopamine (DA) transmission are voltammetric studies performed in pargyline-pretreated, halothane-anaesthetized rats. Studies in freely moving rats not pretreated with pargyline are not available. This study was intended to fill this gap by the use of in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with microdialysis probes in the NAc shell and core and medial prefrontal cortex (PFCX). The next day, rats were administered intravenously with two or three doses of APs, and dialysate DA was monitored in 10-min samples. Some rats were pretreated with pargyline (75 mg/kg i.p.) and after 1 h were given clozapine or risperidone.

RESULTS

Clozapine, risperidone, quetiapine, raclopride, sulpiride and amisulpride increased DA preferentially in the NAc shell. Such preferential effect on shell DA was not observed after haloperidol, chlorpromazine and olanzapine. In contrast to voltammetric studies, a preferential effect on NAc core DA was not observed after any dose of AP. Pargyline pretreatment did not reduce but actually amplified the preferential effect of clozapine and risperidone on NAc shell DA.

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from raclopride and olanzapine, the APs with lower extrapyramidal effects could be distinguished from typical APs on the basis of their ability to preferentially stimulate DA transmission in the NAc shell. There was no relationship between stimulation of PFCX DA and atypical APs profile. The differences between this study and voltammetry studies were not attributable to pargyline pretreatment.

Asenapine alters the activity of monoaminergic systems following its subacute and long-term administration: an in vivo electrophysiological characterization

Asenapine is a tetracyclic atypical antipsychotic used for treatment of schizophrenia and mania. Previous in vivo electrophysiological studies demonstrated antagonistic action of asenapine at dopamine D2, serotonin (5-HT)2A, and α2-adrenergic receptors. Here, we assessed monoamine system activities after two-day and 21-day asenapine administration at a dosage (0.1mg/kg/day) resulting in clinically relevant plasma levels. In the ventral tegmental area (VTA), asenapine increased the number of spontaneously active dopamine neurons, while firing parameters remained unchanged. Asenapine partially prevented the D2 autoreceptor-mediated inhibitory response to apomorphine after two days of administration. This effect was lost after 21 days of administration, suggesting adaptive changes leading to D2 receptor sensitization. Asenapine increased the firing activity of noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus (LC) after 21, but not two days of administration. Furthermore, it potently blocked 5-HT2A receptors while α2-adrenergic receptors were unaffected by this drug regimen. Both acute and long-term asenapine administration partially blocked α2-adrenergic receptors in the CA3 region of the hippocampus, and noradrenergic tone on α1- and α2-adrenoceptors remained unchanged. In the dorsal raphe nucleus, asenapine increased the firing rate of 5-HT neurons after two, but not 21 days of administration. In addition, responsiveness of 5-HT1A autoreceptors was unaltered by asenapine. In the hippocampus, 21-day asenapine administration increased serotonergic tone by partial agonistic action on postsynaptic 5-HT1A and terminal 5-HT1B receptors. Taken together, asenapine had profound effects on both catecholamine systems, potently blocked 5-HT2A receptors, and enhanced 5-HT tone, effects that could be important in treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia.

Progressive recruitment of cortical and striatal regions by inducible postsynaptic density transcripts after increasing doses of antipsychotics with different receptor profiles: insights for psychosis treatment

Antipsychotics may modulate the transcription of multiple gene programs, including those belonging to postsynaptic density (PSD) network, within cortical and subcortical brain regions. Understanding which brain region is activated progressively by increasing doses of antipsychotics and how their different receptor profiles may impact such an activation could be relevant to better correlate the mechanism of action of antipsychotics both with their efficacy and side effects. We analyzed the differential topography of PSD transcripts by incremental doses of two antipsychotics: haloperidol, the prototypical first generation antipsychotic with prevalent dopamine D2 receptors antagonism, and asenapine, a second generation antipsychotic characterized by multiple receptors occupancy. We investigated the expression of PSD genes involved in synaptic plasticity and previously demonstrated to be modulated by antipsychotics: Homer1a, and its related interacting constitutive genes Homer1b/c and PSD95, as well as Arc, C-fos and Zif-268, also known to be induced by antipsychotics administration. We found that increasing acute doses of haloperidol induced immediate-early genes (IEGs) expression in different striatal areas, which were progressively recruited by incremental doses with a dorsal-to-ventral gradient of expression. Conversely, increasing acute asenapine doses progressively de-recruited IEGs expression in cortical areas and increased striatal genes signal intensity. These effects were mirrored by a progressive reduction in locomotor animal activity by haloperidol, and an opposite increase by asenapine. Thus, we demonstrated for the first time that antipsychotics may progressively recruit PSD-related IEGs expression in cortical and subcortical areas when administered at incremental doses and these effects may reflect a fine-tuned dose-dependent modulation of the PSD.

Adjunctive treatment with asenapine augments the escitalopram-induced effects on monoaminergic outflow and glutamatergic neurotransmission in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat

BACKGROUND

Substantial clinical data support the addition of low doses of atypical antipsychotic drugs to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) to rapidly enhance the antidepressant effect in treatment-resistant depression. Preclinical studies suggest that this effect is at least partly explained by an increased catecholamine outflow in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC).

METHODS

In the present study we used in vivo microdialysis in freely moving rats and in vitro intracellular recordings of pyramidal cells of the rat mPFC to investigate the effects of adding the novel atypical antipsychotic drug asenapine to the SSRI escitalopram with regards to monoamine outflow in the mPFC and dopamine outflow in nucleus accumbens as well as glutamatergic transmission in the mPFC.

RESULTS

The present study shows that addition of low doses (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) of asenapine to escitalopram (5 mg/kg) markedly enhances dopamine, noradrenaline, and serotonin release in the rat mPFC as well as dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens. Moreover, this drug combination facilitated both N-methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA)- and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-induced currents as well as electrically evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials in pyramidal cells of the rat mPFC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the notion that the augmentation of SSRIs by atypical antipsychotic drugs in treatment-resistant depression may, at least in part, be related to enhanced catecholamine output in the prefrontal cortex and that asenapine may be clinically used to achieve this end. In particular, the subsequent activation of the D1 receptor may be of importance for the augmented antidepressant effect, as this mechanism facilitated both NMDA and AMPA receptor-mediated transmission in the mPFC. Our novel observation that the drug combination, like ketamine, facilitates glutamatergic transmission in the mPFC may contribute to explain the rapid and potent antidepressant effect obtained when atypical antipsychotic drugs are added to SSRIs.

Asenapine sensitization from adolescence to adulthood and its potential molecular basis

Asenapine is a new antipsychotic drug that induces a long-lasting behavioral sensitization in adult rats. The present study investigated the developmental impacts of adolescent asenapine treatment on drug sensitivity and on 3 proteins implicated in the action of antipsychotic drugs (i.e. brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), dopamine D2 receptor, and ΔFosB) in adulthood. Male adolescent Sprague-Dawley rats (postnatal days, P 43-48) were first treated with asenapine (0.05, 0.10 or 0.20mg/kg, sc) and tested in the conditioned avoidance or PCP (2.0mg/kg, sc)-induced hyperlocomotion tasks for 5 days. After they became adults (∼P 76), asenapine sensitization was assessed in a single avoidance or PCP-induced hyperlocomotion challenge test with all rats being injected with asenapine (0.10mg/kg, sc). Rats were then sacrificed 1 day later and BDNF, D2 and ΔFosB in the prefrontal cortex, striatum and hippocampus were examined using Western blotting. In adolescence, repeated asenapine treatment produced a persistent and dose-dependent inhibition of avoidance response, spontaneous motor activity and PCP-induced hyperlocomotion. In the asenapine challenge test, adult rats treated with asenapine (0.10 and 0.20mg/kg) in adolescence made significantly fewer avoidance responses and showed a stronger inhibition of spontaneous motor activity than those previously treated with saline. However, no group difference in the levels of BDNF, D2 and ΔFosB expression was found. These findings suggest that although adolescent asenapine treatment for a short period of time induces a robust behavioral sensitization that persists into adulthood, such a long-term effect is not likely to be mediated by BDNF, D2 and ΔFosB.

Asenapine review, part I: chemistry, receptor affinity profile, pharmacokinetics and metabolism

INTRODUCTION

Asenapine is a second-generation (atypical) antipsychotic currently marketed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar mania/mixed episodes.

AREAS COVERED

The purpose of this review is to describe the chemistry, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of asenapine.

EXPERT OPINION

Asenapine has a complex pharmacodynamic profile with affinities at multiple dopamine, serotonin, histamine, and α-adrenergic receptors, all at which asenapine functions as an antagonist. Sublingual asenapine tablets are absorbed in the oral mucosa, with a Tmax occurring between 30 and 90 min. Terminal half-life is approximately 24 h. Asenapine has multiple inactive metabolites, produced via direct glucuronidation (primarily via UGT1A4), demethylation, and oxidative metabolism (primarily via CYP1A2). Hepatic and renal routes contribute approximately equally to the elimination of asenapine and its metabolites. Two notable drug-drug interactions are evident: asenapine (an inhibitor of CYP2D6) can increase plasma levels of paroxetine, and fluvoxamine (a CYP1A2 inhibitor) can increase plasma levels of asenapine. Caution is required when coadministering asenapine with drugs that are both substrates and inhibitors of CYP2D6.

Time-dependence of risperidone and asenapine sensitization and associated D2 receptor mechanism

When an antipsychotic drug is given repeatedly and intermittently, there is often a long-term increase in its behavioral efficacy, termed antipsychotic sensitization. With the passage of time, the magnitude of antipsychotic sensitization may increase or decrease based on the principle of time-dependent sensitization (TDS) or memory decay, respectively. In the present study, we examined the time-dependent feature and possible dopamine D2 receptor mechanism of sensitization induced by risperidone and asenapine in the conditioned avoidance response test. Well-trained male adult Sprague-Dawley rats were first repeatedly treated with risperidone (1.0mg/kg) or asenapine (0.2mg/kg) and tested for avoidance response daily for 5 consecutive days. Eight, 18 or 38 days after the 5th drug treatment, all rats were retested drug-free to assess the long-term impact of prior risperidone or asenapine treatment. Drug-pretreated rats had significantly lower avoidance than vehicle-pretreated ones on this test, and the group differences increased with the passage of time. In the subsequent drug challenge test at 10, 20 or 40 days after the 5th drug treatment, all rats were injected with a low dose of risperidone (0.3mg/kg) or asenapine (0.1mg/kg). Drug-pretreated rats again made significantly fewer avoidances than controls, confirming the antipsychotic sensitization effect. Finally, in the quinpirole (a D2/3 receptor agonist, 1.0mg/kg, sc)-induced hyperlocomotion test, risperidone-pretreated rats exhibited a significantly higher level of motor activity than the vehicle-pretreated ones. These findings suggest that risperidone and asenapine sensitization is long-lasting, follows the TDS principle, and is likely mediated by D2 receptor supersensitivity.

Repeated asenapine treatment produces a sensitization effect in two preclinical tests of antipsychotic activity

Among several commonly used atypical antipsychotic drugs, olanzapine and risperidone cause a sensitization effect in the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) and phencyclidine (PCP)-induced hyperlocomotion paradigms--two well established animal tests of antipsychotic drugs, whereas clozapine causes a tolerance effect. Asenapine is a novel antipsychotic drug recently approved for the treatment of schizophrenia and manic disorders. It shares several receptor binding sites and behavioral features with other atypical antipsychotic drugs. However, it is not clear what type of repeated effect (sensitization or tolerance) asenapine would induce, and whether such an effect is transferrable to other atypicals. In this study, male adult Sprague-Dawley rats were first repeatedly tested with asenapine (0.05, 0.10 or 0.20 mg/kg, sc) for avoidance response or PCP (3.20 mg/kg, sc)-induced hyperlocomotion daily for 5 consecutive days. After 2-3 days of retraining/drug-free recovery, they were then challenged with asenapine (0.10 mg/kg, sc), followed by olanzapine (0.50 mg/kg, sc) and clozapine (2.50 mg/kg, sc). During the 5-day drug test period (the induction phase), repeated asenapine treatment progressively increased its inhibition of avoidance response and PCP-induced hyperlocomotion in a dose-dependent fashion. On the asenapine and olanzapine challenge tests (the expression phase), rats previously treated with asenapine still showed significantly lower avoidance response and lower PCP-induced hyperlocomotion than those previously treated with vehicle. An increased reactivity to clozapine challenge in prior asenapine-treated rats was also found in the PCP-induced hyperlocomotion test. These findings suggest that asenapine is capable of inducing a sensitization effect and a cross-sensitization to olanzapine and clozapine (to a lesser extent). Because the behavioral profile of asenapine in both tests is similar to that of olanzapine, but different from that of clozapine, we suggest that asenapine resembles olanzapine to a greater extent than clozapine in its therapeutic and side effect profiles.

Drug-drug conditioning between citalopram and haloperidol or olanzapine in a conditioned avoidance response model: implications for polypharmacy in schizophrenia

Patients with schizophrenia often have anxiety and depression, and thus are treated with multiple psychotherapeutic medications. This practice of polypharmacy increases the possibility for drug-drug interactions. However, the pharmacological and behavioral mechanisms underlying drug-drug interactions in schizophrenia remain poorly understood. In the present study, we adopted a preclinical approach and examined a less known behavioral mechanism, drug-drug conditioning (DDC) between haloperidol (a typical antipsychotic) or olanzapine (atypical antipsychotic) and citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor). A rat two-way conditioned avoidance response paradigm was used to measure antipsychotic activity and determine how DDC may alter the antipsychotic efficacy in this model. Following acquisition of the avoidance response, rats were then randomly assigned to receive vehicle, citalopram (10.0 mg/kg, intraperitoneally), haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg, subcutaneously), olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg, subcutaneously), combined haloperidol with citalopram, or combined olanzapine with citalopram treatment for seven avoidance test sessions. In comparison with antipsychotic treatment alone, combined treatment with citalopram potentiated the antiavoidance effect of olanzapine or haloperidol (to a lesser extent) during the seven drug-test sessions. In addition, repeated pairing of citalopram with haloperidol or olanzapine caused citalopram to show a newly acquired avoidance-disruptive effect. This effect was context specific because citalopram paired with haloperidol or olanzapine outside the avoidance testing context (i.e. home cages) did not show such an effect. These findings indicate that concurrent antidepressant and antipsychotic treatments may engender a DDC process that follows the general Pavlovian associative conditioning principles. They also indicate that adjunctive citalopram treatment may enhance the antipsychotic efficacy of haloperidol and olanzapine in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Metabolic side-effects of the novel second-generation antipsychotic drugs asenapine and iloperidone: a comparison with olanzapine

Background

The second generation antipsychotic (SGA) drugs are widely used in psychiatry due to their clinical efficacy and low incidence of neurological side-effects. However, many drugs in this class cause deleterious metabolic side-effects. Animal models accurately predict metabolic side-effects for SGAs with known clinical metabolic liability. We therefore used preclinical models to evaluate the metabolic side-effects of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance with the novel SGAs asenapine and iloperidone for the first time. Olanzapine was used as a comparator.

Methods

Adults female rats were treated with asenapine (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg), iloperidone (0.03, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg) or olanzapine (0.1, 0.5, 1.5, 5.0, 10.0 mg/kg) and subjected to the glucose tolerance test (GTT). Separate groups of rats were treated with asenapine (0.1 and 1.0 mg/kg), iloperidone (1.0 and 10 mg/kg) or olanzapine (1.5 and 15 mg/kg) and tested for insulin resistance with the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC).

Results

Asenapine showed no metabolic effects at any dose in either test. Iloperidone caused large and significant glucose intolerance with the three highest doses in the GTT, and insulin resistance with both doses in the HIEC. Olanzapine caused significant glucose intolerance with the three highest doses in the GTT, and insulin resistance with the higher dose in the HIEC.

Conclusions

In preclinical models, asenapine shows negligible metabolic liability. By contrast, iloperidone exhibits substantial metabolic liability, comparable to olanzapine. These results emphasize the need for appropriate metabolic testing in patients treated with novel SGAs where current clinical data do not exist.

New serotonin/dopamine antagonists for the treatment of schizophrenia: are we making real progress?

The introduction of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), heralded by clozapine in 1990, represented an important advance in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. However, several recent comparative effectiveness trials found that non-clozapine SGAs provided little or no advantage in efficacy over first-generation antipsychotics, and all agents had substantial safety and tolerability concerns. Clearly, there remains a great unmet need for more effective and better-tolerated antipsychotics. Relatively potent antagonism of serotonin 5-HT2A receptors coupled with relatively weaker antagonism of dopamine D2 receptors is the central pharmacological characteristic shared by most SGAs. This profile continues to be a favored model for developing new SGAs, commonly defined as serotonin/dopamine antagonists. In the past ten years, aripiprazole, paliperidone, asenapine, iloperidone, and lurasidone have been introduced. Studies suggest that the newer agents have similar short-term efficacy to earlier serotonin/dopamine antagonists, and several demonstrate at least modest improvements in safety and tolerability profiles, particularly metabolic measures. However, as a group, the newer serotonin/dopamine antagonists are pharmacologically heterogeneous, and their side-effect burden can still be considerable. Moreover, their putative clinical advantages have not yet been well demonstrated via direct comparative studies. The absence of such evidence adds to the challenges in defining their place among more established treatment choices, or in providing clinicians with clear indications to guide treatment choices for individual patients. Long-term, head-to-head comparative studies are required to clarify the risk/benefit profiles of the newer antipsychotics and their roles in the treatment of schizophrenia.

Iloperidone, asenapine and lurasidone: a primer on their current status

INTRODUCTION

Three newer atypical antipsychotic drugs were FDA-approved in 2009 and 2010 in the following order: iloperidone, asenapine and lurasidone. The three drugs are indicated for the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Asenapine is also approved for treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder, for the maintenance treatment of schizophrenia and as an adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adults.

AREAS COVERED

This review compares and contrasts the current preclinical, clinical, safety and tolerability profiles of the three newer drugs, as reported in published preclinical and clinical studies, product labels, poster presentations and press releases.

EXPERT OPINION

Preclinical studies have reported that the three drugs have variable affinities for a wide range of neurotransmitter receptors, and are active in animal models predictive of antipsychotic activity. Asenapine is the first antipsychotic to be administered sublingually, whereas iloperidone requires titration to minimize orthostatic hypotension. Asenapine and lurasidone are associated with dose-related akathisia, whereas iloperidone is not. The three drugs appear to have relatively benign metabolic profiles. The availability of the three novel antipsychotics should provide additional options for improved treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.

Asenapine: a clinical review of a second-generation antipsychotic

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are both prevalent types of psychiatric illness in the United States. As second-generation antipsychotics have become a more viable first-line treatment option, their use has been associated with a new era of adverse events (AEs), most notably metabolic and cardiovascular concerns. Although treatment options for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have arguably improved, there continues to be a need for medications that achieve and maintain desired efficacy with minimal AEs.

OBJECTIVES

This article serves as a comprehensive review of the pharmacologic profile of the second-generation antipsychotic asenapine, as well as a review of its efficacy and safety profiles based on the findings from clinical trials in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Searches of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and IDIS were conducted (January 1996 to November 2011) to identify clinical studies and other primary literature sources with the following search terms: asenapine, bipolar disorder, antipsychotic, psychosis, dopamine, and schizophrenia. Only studies of asenapine and placebo and/or active-comparator arms were included.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 67 unique articles, including review articles, which were excluded. The efficacy of asenapine was reported in 3 clinical studies in patients with schizophrenia, 1 each in acute and long-term settings, measured as significant changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores over 6 and 52 weeks. Asenapine also had reported efficacy in the prevention of relapse in schizophrenia during a 26-week extension study. In addition, efficacy of asenapine was reported in 2 studies in acute mania as well as extension phases of both 9 and 40 weeks, as determined by significant changes in Young Mania Rating Scale scores. The most commonly reported AEs in these studies were somnolence (13%-24%), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) (7%-12%), and dizziness (11%).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from multiple studies have suggested that asenapine is efficacious in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. Asenapine has reported long-term efficacy for this indication and the potential to reduce the incidence of relapse. Asenapine efficacy was also reported in the treatment of acute manic or mixed states associated with bipolar I disorder. Asenapine had an acceptable safety profile across the different disease states studied, although it was not devoid of metabolic and EPS-related AEs.

Attenuation of chronic mild stress-induced 'anhedonia' by asenapine is not associated with a 'hedonic' profile in intracranial self-stimulation

Chronic mild stress (CMS)-induced 'anhedonia' is a predictive model of antidepressant activity. We assessed the reversal of CMS-induced behavioral changes by asenapine, the antidepressant imipramine, and the atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and risperidone. Secondarily, the ability of these agents to facilitate intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was assessed to ensure that any attenuation of CMS-induced anhedonia was not associated with an overt hedonic profile. After 2 weeks of CMS, male Wistar rats were administered asenapine (0.06-0.6 mg/kg), olanzapine (2 mg/kg), risperidone (0.5 mg/kg), or imipramine (10 mg/kg) by intraperitoneal injection over 5 weeks to examine their ability to reverse CMS-induced reductions in the intake of a sucrose solution. For the ICSS study, rats were trained to deliver an electrical stimulus to the ventral tegmental area. The effects of acute doses of subcutaneous asenapine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3 and 1 mg/kg), risperidone (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg), and intraperitoneal imipramine (3-30 mg/kg), cocaine (5.0 mg/kg), or amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) on ICSS were then examined. CMS significantly reduced sucrose intake (P < 0.001). All active agents (0.6 mg/kg asenapine, 2 mg/kg olanzapine, 0.5 mg/kg risperidone, and 10 mg/kg imipramine) reversed the effect of CMS (all P < 0.001). In the ICSS protocol, asenapine (0.01 and 0.03 mg/kg), olanzapine (1 mg/kg), and risperidone (0.3 mg/kg) impaired ICSS performance, whereas positive controls (5 mg/kg cocaine, 1 mg/kg amphetamine) facilitated ICSS. Asenapine reversed CMS-induced anhedonia without facilitating ICSS, providing support for a role of asenapine in treating bipolar disorder and aspects of negative and/or affective symptoms in schizophrenia.

Newer molecules in the treatment of schizophrenia: A clinical update

Schizophrenia is a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder in which multiple neurotransmitter systems have been implicated. Increased and decreased dopamine transmission in the subcortical meso-limbic and meso-cortical systems is closely linked to the “positive” and “negative” symptoms of schizophrenia, respectively. Important roles have also been found for serotonin and acetylcholine, both of which are closely linked to dopamine. An abnormality in glutamate functioning involving N-methyl-D-aspartic acid as well as other receptor subtypes may underlie the dopamine dysfunction observed in schizophrenia. Since the discovery of chlorpromazine in 1952, researchers have been developing new molecules targeting various neurotransmitter systems to maximize their efficacy and tolerability. The advancements in molecular genetics have opened up new horizons to manipulate the post-receptor protein cascade and gene expression. Although the magic-wand still eludes us, the newer molecules hold a lot of promise in this condition.

Asenapine improves phencyclidine-induced object recognition deficits in the rat: evidence for engagement of a dopamine D1 receptor mechanism

RATIONALE

Cognitive deficits are common in schizophrenia. Asenapine is an atypical antipsychotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in adults for treatment of schizophrenia or acute treatment, as monotherapy or adjunct therapy to lithium or valproate, of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder.

OBJECTIVES

Based on the receptor pharmacology of asenapine, the current study assessed the efficacy and mechanism of action of asenapine to improve a subchronic phencyclidine (PCP)-induced deficit in visual recognition memory using the novel object recognition (NOR) paradigm in the rat, a paradigm of relevance to cognition in schizophrenia.

METHODS

Female-hooded Lister rats received vehicle or PCP (2 mg/kg, i.p.) for 7 days, followed by a 7-day washout. On the test day, rats were given asenapine (0.001-0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) alone or in combination with the D(1) receptor antagonist SCH-23390 (0.05 mg/kg, i.p.) or 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635 (1 mg/kg, i.p.). Time spent exploring two identical objects during a 3-min acquisition trial (followed by a 1-min intertrial interval) and then a familiar and a novel object for another 3 min (retention trial) were recorded onto videotape and scored blind.

RESULTS

In the retention trial, vehicle- but not PCP-treated animals explored the novel object significantly more than the familiar object (p < 0.001). Asenapine (0.01-0.075 mg/kg) reversed PCP-induced deficits in NOR (p < 0.01-0.001) in a dose-related manner. This effect was antagonised by SCH-23390 but not by WAY100635.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate a role for D(1) but not 5-HT(1A) receptor mechanisms in mediating the cognitive effects of asenapine in this rodent model.

Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of asenapine in schizophrenia

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Asenapine is a new atypical antipsychotic medication with high affinity for D(2) and 5HT(2A) receptors that has been approved by the FDA in adults for the acute treatment of schizophrenia in the USA. The purpose of this review is to describe the compound and examine whether it addresses some of the unmet clinical needs in treating schizophrenia.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

The development of asenapine is described with attention to its chemistry, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile. Preclinical and clinical trials of safety and efficacy are reviewed. The advantages and disadvantages of asenapine relative to other antipsychotic medications are discussed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Asenapine will be evaluated for whether it: i) causes a reduction in symptoms of schizophrenia; ii) has a side-effect profile minimizing extrapyramidal symptoms, weight gain and cardiac effects; and iii) affects negative and/or cognitive symptoms.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Asenapine is a recently approved agent with an acceptable cardiometabolic profile and exhibits similar efficacy as other antipsychotic medications, primarily on positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Relatively less weight gain compared with other agents may confer a notable advantage. Sublingual administration may have positive and negative effects on patient compliance. Potential 'pro-cognitive' effects of asenapine are preliminary and require more investigation.

Adjunctive alpha2-adrenoceptor blockade enhances the antipsychotic-like effect of risperidone and facilitates cortical dopaminergic and glutamatergic, NMDA receptor-mediated transmission

Compared to both first- and second-generation antipsychotic drugs (APDs), clozapine shows superior efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. In contrast to most APDs clozapine possesses high affinity for alpha2-adrenoceptors, and clinical and preclinical studies provide evidence that the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist idazoxan enhances the antipsychotic efficacy of typical D2 receptor antagonists as well as olanzapine. Risperidone has lower affinity for alpha2-adrenoceptors than clozapine but higher than most other APDs. Here we examined, in rats, the effects of adding idazoxan to risperidone on antipsychotic effect using the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) test, extrapyramidal side-effect (EPS) liability using the catalepsy test, brain dopamine efflux using in-vivo microdialysis in freely moving animals, cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated transmission using intracellular electrophysiological recording in vitro, and ex-vivo autoradiography to assess the in-vivo alpha2A- and alpha2C-adrenoceptor occupancies by risperidone. The dose of risperidone needed for antipsychotic effect in the CAR test was approximately 0.4 mg/kg, which produced 11% and 17% in-vivo receptor occupancy at alpha2A- and alpha2C-adrenoceptors, respectively. Addition of idazoxan (1.5 mg/kg) to a low dose of risperidone (0.25 mg/kg) enhanced the suppression of CAR, but did not enhance catalepsy. Both cortical dopamine release and NMDA receptor-mediated responses were enhanced. These data propose that the therapeutic effect of risperidone in schizophrenia can be enhanced and its EPS liability reduced by adjunctive treatment with an alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist, and generally support the notion that the potent alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonistic action of clozapine may be highly important for its unique efficacy in schizophrenia.

Reboxetine enhances the olanzapine-induced antipsychotic-like effect, cortical dopamine outflow and NMDA receptor-mediated transmission

Preclinical data have shown that addition of the selective norepinephrine transporter (NET) inhibitor reboxetine increases the antipsychotic-like effect of the D(2/3) antagonist raclopride and, in parallel, enhances cortical dopamine output. Subsequent clinical results suggested that adding reboxetine to stable treatments with various antipsychotic drugs (APDs) may improve positive, negative and depressive symptoms in schizophrenia. In this study, we investigated in rats the effects of adding reboxetine to the second-generation APD olanzapine on: (i) antipsychotic efficacy, using the conditioned avoidance response (CAR) test, (ii) extrapyramidal side effect (EPS) liability, using a catalepsy test, (iii) dopamine efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens, using in vivo microdialysis in freely moving animals and (iv) cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated transmission, using intracellular electrophysiological recording in vitro. Reboxetine (6 mg/kg) enhanced the suppression of CAR induced by a suboptimal dose (1.25 mg/kg), but not an optimal (2.5 mg/kg) dose of olanzapine without any concomitant catalepsy. Addition of reboxetine to the low dose of olanzapine also markedly increased cortical dopamine outflow and facilitated prefrontal NMDA receptor-mediated transmission. Our data suggest that adjunctive treatment with a NET inhibitor may enhance the therapeutic effect of low-dose olanzapine in schizophrenia without increasing EPS liability and add an antidepressant action, thus in principle allowing for a dose reduction of olanzapine with a concomitant reduction of dose-related side effects, such as EPS and weight gain.

Repeated effects of asenapine on adrenergic and cholinergic muscarinic receptors

Adrenergic (alpha1 and alpha2) and cholinergic muscarinic (M1-M5) receptor binding in rat forebrain was quantified after 4 wk of twice-daily subcutaneous administration of asenapine or vehicle. Asenapine (0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg) produced increases in [3H]prazosin binding to alpha1-adrenergic receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC: 30%, 39%, 57%) and dorsolateral frontal cortex (DFC: 27%, 37%, 53%) and increased [3H]RX821002 binding to alpha2-adrenergic receptors in mPFC (36%, 43%, 50%) and DFC (41%, 44%, 52%). Despite showing no appreciable affinity for muscarinic receptors, asenapine produced regionally selective increases in binding of [3H]QNB to M1-M5 receptors in mPFC (26%, 31%, 43%), DFC (27%, 34%, 41%), and hippocampal CA1 (40%, 44%, 42%) and CA3 (25%, 52%, 48%) regions. These regionally selective effects of asenapine on adrenergic and cholinergic muscarinic receptor subtypes may contribute to its beneficial clinical effects in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Asenapine induces differential regional effects on serotonin receptor subtypes

Asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent being developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, has high affinity for a wide range of receptors, including the serotonergic receptors 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(2A), 5-HT( 2B), 5-HT(2C), 5-HT(5A), 5-HT(6) and 5-HT( 7). We examined the long-term effects in rat brain of multiple doses of asenapine on representative serotonin receptor subtypes: 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(2C). Rats were given asenapine (0.03, 0.1 or 0.3 mg/kg) subcutaneously twice daily or vehicle for 4 weeks. Brain sections were collected from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), dorsolateral frontal cortex (DFC), caudate putamen, nucleus accumbens, hippocampal CA( 1) and CA(3) regions, and entorhinal cortex and processed for in-vitro receptor autoradiography. Asenapine 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg significantly increased 5-HT(1A) binding in mPFC (by 24% and 33%, respectively), DFC (27%, 31%) and hippocampal CA(1) region (23%, 25%) (all P < 0.05). All three asenapine doses (0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) significantly decreased 5-HT(2A) binding by a similar degree in mPFC (40%, 44%, 47%, respectively) and DFC (45%, 51%, 52%) (all P < 0.05), but did not alter 5-HT(2A) binding in the other brain regions studied. In contrast to the effects on 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptors, asenapine did not alter 5-HT(2C) binding in any brain region examined at the doses tested. Our results indicate that repeated administration of asenapine produces regional-specific effects on 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptors in rat forebrain regions, which may contribute to the distinctive psychopharmacologic profile of asenapine.

Sertindole improves sub-chronic PCP-induced reversal learning and episodic memory deficits in rodents: involvement of 5-HT(6) and 5-HT (2A) receptor mechanisms

AIM

This study examined the efficacy of sertindole in comparison with a selective 5-HT(6) and a 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist to reverse sub-chronic phencyclidine (PCP)-induced cognitive deficits in female rats.

METHODS

In the first test, adult female hooded Lister rats were trained to perform an operant reversal learning task to 90% criterion. After training, rats were treated with PCP at 2 mg/kg (i.p.) or vehicle twice daily for 7 days, followed by 7 days washout. For the second test, novel object recognition (NOR), a separate batch of rats, had the same sub-chronic PCP dosing regime and washout period. In reversal learning, rats were treated acutely with sertindole, the selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist M100.907 or the selective 5-HT(6) receptor antagonist SB-742457.

RESULTS

The PCP-induced selective reversal learning deficit was significantly improved by sertindole, M100.907 and SB-742457. Sertindole also significantly improved the sub-chronic PCP-induced deficit in NOR, a test of episodic memory following a 1 min and 1 h inter-trial interval. In vivo binding studies showed that the dose-response relationship for sertindole in this study most closely correlates with affinity for 5-HT(6) receptor in vivo binding in striatum, although contribution from binding to 5-HT(2A) receptors in vivo in cortex may also provide an important mechanism.

CONCLUSION

The efficacies of selective 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(6) receptor antagonists suggest potential mechanisms mediating the effects of sertindole, which has high affinity for these 5-HT receptor subtypes. The sertindole-induced improvement in cognitive function in this animal model suggests relevance for the management of cognitive deficit symptoms in schizophrenia.

Asenapine effects in animal models of psychosis and cognitive function

RATIONALE

Asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent in the development for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, has high affinity for serotonergic, alpha-adrenergic, and dopaminergic receptors, suggesting potential for antipsychotic and cognitive-enhancing properties.

OBJECTIVES

The effects of asenapine in rat models of antipsychotic efficacy and cognition were examined and compared with those of olanzapine and risperidone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity (Amp-LMA; 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg s.c.) and apomorphine-disrupted prepulse inhibition (Apo-PPI; 0.5 mg/kg s.c.) were used as tests for antipsychotic activity. Delayed non-match to place (DNMTP) and five-choice serial reaction (5-CSR) tasks were used to assess short-term spatial memory and attention, respectively. Asenapine doses varied across tasks: Amp-LMA (0.01-0.3 mg/kg s.c.), Apo-PPI (0.001-0.3 mg/kg s.c.), DNMTP (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.), and 5-CSR (0.003-0.3 mg/kg s.c.).

RESULTS

Asenapine was highly potent (active at 0.03 mg/kg) in the Amp-LMA and Apo-PPI assays. DNMTP or 5-CSR performance was not improved by asenapine, olanzapine, or risperidone. All agents (P < 0.01) reduced DNMTP accuracy at short delays; post hoc analyses revealed that only 0.1 mg/kg asenapine and 0.3 mg/kg risperidone differed from vehicle. All active agents (asenapine, 0.3 mg/kg; olanzapine, 0.03-0.3 mg/kg; and risperidone, 0.01-0.1 mg/kg) significantly impaired 5-CSR accuracy (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Asenapine has potent antidopaminergic properties that are predictive of antipsychotic efficacy. Asenapine, like risperidone and olanzapine, did not improve cognition in normal rats. Rather, at doses greater than those required for antipsychotic activity, asenapine impaired cognitive performance due to disturbance of motor function, an effect also observed with olanzapine and risperidone.

Asenapine

Asenapine is a novel psychopharmacological agent that binds with high affinity and specificity to numerous dopamine, serotonin, noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and histamine receptor subtypes. It is being developed for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar mania. In two randomized, controlled trials of asenapine monotherapy and in one randomized, controlled trial of adjunctive asenapine therapy in adult patients with bipolar I disorder, sublingual asenapine produced significantly greater reductions from baseline than placebo in clinician-assessed Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score at 3 weeks. In two randomized, controlled trials in adult patients with acute schizophrenia, treatment with asenapine reduced from baseline the clinician-assessed Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score to a significantly greater extent than placebo at 6 weeks. In schizophrenic patients with predominant, persistent, negative symptoms, asenapine at 26 weeks reduced the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-16) total score from baseline to an extent similar to that observed with olanzapine. Sublingual asenapine was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with most treatment-emergent adverse events being of mild to moderate severity. Incidence rates of clinically significant weight gain, extrapyramidal symptoms, hyperprolactinaemia and alterations in glucose or lipid metabolism were generally low.

Asenapine elevates cortical dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin release. Evidence for activation of cortical and subcortical dopamine systems by different mechanisms

RATIONALE

Asenapine, a psychopharmacologic agent developed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, has higher affinity for 5-HT(2A/C,6,7) and alpha(2) adrenergic receptors than for D(2) receptors. Asenapine exhibits potent antipsychotic-like effects without inducing catalepsy, increases cortical and subcortical dopamine release, and facilitates cortical glutamatergic transmission in rats. In this study, we further analyzed the effects of asenapine on dopaminergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic systems in the rat brain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the effects of asenapine on (1) dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and noradrenergic neurons in the locus coeruleus using in vivo single cell recording, (2) release of dopamine and noradrenaline (medial prefrontal cortex), serotonin (frontal cortex), and dopamine (nucleus accumbens), using in vivo microdialysis.

RESULTS

Systemic asenapine increased dopaminergic (0.001-0.2 mg/kg, i.v.) and noradrenergic (0.025-0.05 mg/kg i.v.) neuronal firing, and asenapine (0.1-0.2 mg/kg, s.c) increased cortical noradrenaline and serotonin output. Local asenapine administration increased all three monoamines in the cortex but did not affect accumbal dopamine output. Intra-VTA tetrodotoxin perfusion blocked asenapine-induced accumbal but not cortical dopamine outflow.

CONCLUSION

Asenapine at doses associated with antipsychotic activity enhanced cortical monoamine efflux. Whereas the asenapine-induced dopamine increase in nucleus accumbens is dependent on activation of dopaminergic neurons in the VTA, the increase of cortical dopamine outflow involves largely a local action at nerve terminals. Our data provide further insight on the pharmacologic characteristics of asenapine that may have bearing on its clinical efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Modeling and simulation of the time course of asenapine exposure response and dropout patterns in acute schizophrenia

Modeling and simulation were utilized to characterize the efficacy dose response of sublingual asenapine in patients with schizophrenia and to understand the outcomes of six placebo-controlled trials in which placebo responses and dropout rates varied. The time course of total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores was characterized for placebo and asenapine treatments in a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model in which the asenapine effect was described by an E(max) model, increasing linearly over the 6-week study period. A logistic regression model described the time course of dropouts, with previous PANSS value being the most important predictor. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) time courses were well described in simulations from the combined PANSS + dropout model. The observed trial outcomes were successfully predicted for all the placebo arms and the majority of the treatment arms. Although simulations indicated that the post hoc probability of success of the performed trials was low to moderate, these analyses demonstrated that 5 and 10 mg twice-daily (b.i.d.) doses of asenapine have similar efficacy.

Electrophysiological characterization of the effects of asenapine at 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), alpha(2)-adrenergic and D(2) receptors in the rat brain

Asenapine is a psychopharmacologic agent being developed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. This study electrophysiologically characterized the in vivo effects of asenapine at dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) and hippocampus serotonin-1A (5-HT(1A)), ventral tegmental area D(2), locus coeruleus 5-HT(2A,) and alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors in anesthetized rats. Asenapine displayed potent antagonistic activity at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (ED(50), 85+/-2 microg/kg), 5-HT(2A) (ED(50), 75+/-2 microg/kg) and D(2) receptors (ED(50), 40+/-2 microg/kg) as evidenced by its reversal of clonidine-, DOI-, and apomorphine-induced inhibition of norepinephrine and dopamine neurons. In contrast, asenapine acted as a partial agonist at 5-HT(1A) receptors in DRN and hippocampus, as indicated by blockade of its inhibitory effect on neuronal firing by the 5-HT(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 and the partial inhibition of the suppressant action of 5-HT when co-applied by microiontophoresis. These results confirm that asenapine displays potent antagonistic activity at 5-HT(2A), D(2), alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors and provide evidence to support its 5-HT(1A) partial agonistic activity.

Upcoming agents for the treatment of schizophrenia: mechanism of action, efficacy and tolerability

Since the introduction of a group of atypical antipsychotics in the 1990s, there has been a decline in the rate of new antipsychotics being introduced into clinical practice. However, with increasing safety and efficacy concerns over currently available drugs and a dearth of options available for atypical depot formulations, there is a considerable need for the development of new formulations and agents. This review examines the profile of seven antipsychotic drugs currently in the premarketing stage of development and summarizes their mechanism of action, clinical potential and safety.Asenapine is an antipsychotic with activity for multiple receptors and has potential to improve negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia. Bifeprunox is a partial dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist showing a less than convincing efficacy profile, but which may offer safety advantages over available agents by means of a reduced risk of metabolic complications. Iloperidone is a D2 and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist requiring further studies to establish its effectiveness. It has a high affinity for alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, which can lead to associated haemodynamic adverse effects. Nemonapride is essentially a typical antipsychotic drug, similar in structure to sulpiride, which has been available for some time in Japan. It has efficacy against positive symptoms and has shown some antidepressant and anxiolytic properties, although efficacy data for it are somewhat limited. Norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) is a major metabolite of clozapine formed by its demethylation. Its partial agonist activity at D2 receptors has raised interest in it as an antipsychotic in its own right. In addition, it appears to have muscarinic agonist activity, which is believed to be responsible for the observed positive effects it has on cognition. It was envisaged to be effective as an adjunct to other agents or at high doses in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia, although a recent randomized, controlled study showed that it was no more effective than placebo in patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute psychotic episode. Olanzapine pamoate depot injection has shown comparable efficacy to oral olanzapine in several studies. However, it has provoked considerable safety concerns by its association with inadvertent intravascular injection events in numerous patients. This accidental intravascular administration of olanzapine pamoate leads to excessive sedation, confusion, dizziness and altered speech. Post-injection observation periods and postmarketing surveillance are planned following the introduction of the depot. Paliperidone palmitate is the palmitate ester of paliperidone, the major metabolite of risperidone, and is formulated as a long-acting injection for intramuscular use. Its pharmacology is comparable to risperidone, having D2 and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist activity. Efficacy studies have shown positive results, and because paliperidone has no antagonistic activity at cholinergic receptors, it has low potential for anticholinergic adverse effects, including cognitive dysfunction. However, with higher doses, the frequency of extrapyramidal side effects and orthostatic hypotension have been shown to be greater than with placebo.

Asenapine monotherapy in the acute treatment of both schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder

Asenapine is a new atypical antipsychotic agent currently under development for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. It has high affinity for various receptors including antagonism at 5HT(2A), 5HT(2B), 5HT(2C), 5HT(6) and 5HT(7) serotonergic receptor subtypes, alpha(1A), alpha(2A), alpha(2B) and alpha(2C) adrenergic and D(3) and D(4) dopaminergic receptors. As with other atypicals, asenapine exhibits a high 5HT(2A):D(2) affinity ratio. Although similar to clozapine in its multi-target profile, it shows no appreciable affinity for muscarinic receptors. Asenapine has shown efficacy in alleviating both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia compared with placebo. Although promising, further studies are required in order to determine whether it has advantages over placebo and other antipsychotics in alleviating cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. It has also shown long-term efficacy comparable with olanzapine in bipolar I disorder. Asenapine is generally well tolerated and appears to be metabolically neutral. It has low propensity to cause weight gain and prolactin elevation. There were no concerns in the studies about its effects on the cardiovascular system and QTc prolongation. The incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms with asenapine however has been found to be higher than that with olanzapine. It may be a useful alternative to aripiprazole in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in patients who are at high risk of metabolic abnormalities.

Asenapine restores cognitive flexibility in rats with medial prefrontal cortex lesions

RATIONALE

Cognitive inflexibility in schizophrenia is treatment-resistant and predictive of poor outcome. This study examined the effect of asenapine, a novel psychopharmacologic agent being developed for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, on cognitive dysfunction in the rat.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper was to establish whether asenapine has a beneficial effect on the performance of rats with ibotenic acid-induced lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in an intradimensional/extradimensional (ID/ED) test of cognitive flexibility.

METHODS

The effect of subcutaneously administered asenapine (0.75, 7.5, 75 microg/kg) on ID/ED performance of controls or mPFC-lesioned rats was examined using a within-subjects, repeated-measures design. In a second experiment, lesioned and control rats were tested with or without asenapine in a modified version of the task, with multiple set-shifts, before brains were processed for Fos-immunoreactivity in the mPFC.

RESULTS

The mPFC lesion-induced deficit in the ID/ED task was stable with repeated testing over more than two months. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c., p < 0.05) completely restored the performance of lesioned rats. Experiment 2 replicated both lesion and asenapine effects and demonstrated that it is possible to measure set-shifting multiple times within a test session. Asenapine (75 microg/kg s.c.) was associated with differential activation of the neurons in the anterior mPFC of lesioned animals, but was without effect in controls.

CONCLUSION

Asenapine can ameliorate mPFC lesion-induced impairment in attentional set-shifting, and is associated with a greater activation of the spared neurons in the anterior mPFC. These data suggest that asenapine may benefit impaired cognitive flexibility in disorders such as schizophrenia.

Differential regional and dose-related effects of asenapine on dopamine receptor subtypes

RATIONALE

The novel psychopharmacologic agent, asenapine, has high affinity for a range of receptors including the dopaminergic receptors.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the long-term effects of multiple doses of asenapine on dopamine receptor subtypes: D(1)-like (D(1) and D(5)), D(2), D(3), and D(4).

METHODS

Rats were given asenapine 0.03, 0.1, or 0.3 mg/kg (subcutaneously, twice daily) or vehicle for 4 weeks. Receptor binding was determined by autoradiography from brain sections collected from the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), dorsolateral frontal cortex, caudate putamen (CPu), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and hippocampus (HIP).

RESULTS

Four weeks of asenapine at 0.3 mg/kg significantly (P < 0.05) increased D(1)-like binding in the mPFC (by 26%), NAc (59%), and CPu (55%). Asenapine (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) also increased D(2) binding in mPFC (43% and 55%, respectively). All doses of asenapine dose-dependently increased D(2) binding in HIP (by 32%, 45%, and 63%, respectively). In contrast, only 0.3 mg/kg of asenapine significantly (P < 0.05) increased D(2) binding in the NAc (32%) and CPu (41%). Repeated treatment with 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg of asenapine increased D(4) binding in the NAc (36% and 71%), CPu (27% and 70%), and HIP (48% and 77%). However, asenapine, at the doses tested, did not significantly alter D(3) binding in the brain regions examined in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that asenapine has region-specific and dose-dependent effects on dopamine receptor subtypes in rat forebrain, which may contribute to asenapine's unique psychopharmacological properties.

Actions of novel agonists, antagonists and antipsychotic agents at recombinant rat 5-HT6 receptors: a comparative study of coupling to G alpha s

Though 5-HT6 receptors are targets for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders, the influence of drugs upon signal transduction has not been extensively characterized. Herein, we employed a Scintillation Proximity Assay (SPA)/antibody-immunocapture procedure of coupling to G alpha s to evaluate the interaction of a broad range of novel agonists, antagonists and antipsychotics at rat 5-HT(6) receptors stably expressed in HEK293 cells. Serotonin (pEC(50), 7.7) increased [35S]GTP gamma S binding to G alpha s by ca 2-fold without affecting binding to Gi/o or Gq. LSD (9.2), 5-MeODMT (7.9), 5-CT (7.0) and tryptamine (6.1) were likewise full agonists. In contrast, the novel sulfonyl derivatives, WAY181,187 (9.1) and WAY208,466 (7.8), behaved as partial agonists and attenuated the actions of 5-HT. SB271,046 and SB258,585 abolished activation of G alpha s by 5-HT with pKb values of 10.2 and 9.9, respectively, actions mimicked by the novel antagonist, SB399,885 (10.9). SB271,046 likewise blocked partial agonist properties of WAY181,187 and WAY208,466 with pKb values of 9.8 and 9.0, respectively. 5-HT-stimulated [35S]GTP gamma S binding to G alpha s was antagonised by various antipsychotics including olanzapine (7.8), asenapine (9.1) and SB737,050 (7.8), whereas aripiprazole and bifeprunox were inactive. Further, antagonist properties of clozapine (8.0) were mimicked by its major metabolite, N-desmethylclozapine (7.9). In conclusion, the novel ligands, WAY208,466 and WAY181,187, behaved as partial agonists at 5-HT6 receptors coupled to G alpha s, while SB399,885 was a potent antagonist. Though 5-HT6 receptor blockade is not indispensable for therapeutic efficacy, it may well play a role in the functional actions of certain antipsychotic agents.