Effects of D2 or combined D1/D2 receptor antagonism on the methamphetamine-induced one-trial and multi-trial behavioral sensitization of preweanling rats

Reciprocal cross-sensitization between cocaine and RU 24969 in male and female preweanling rats

Neuronal adaptations involving dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems are responsible for behavioral sensitization. Because of common underlying mechanisms, cross-sensitization between compounds of different drug classes can be observed. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a one- or four-day pretreatment regimen of RU 24969 (a 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist) would reciprocally cross-sensitize with cocaine or methamphetamine in male and female preweanling rats. Rats were pretreated with RU 24969 (0 or 5 mg/kg) for 4 days (PD 17-20) and then challenged with cocaine (10 or 20 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1 or 2 mg/kg) on PD 22. Reciprocal cross-sensitization was also assessed (i.e., rats were pretreated with psychostimulants and tested with RU 24969). In a follow-up experiment, the ability of RU 24969 and cocaine to reciprocally cross-sensitize was assessed using a one-day pretreatment regimen. Reciprocal cross-sensitization between cocaine and RU 24969 was evident in preweanling rats, whereas methamphetamine and RU 24969 did not cross-sensitize. When a one-trial pretreatment regimen was used, cross-sensitization was only detected when rats were pretreated with RU 24969 and tested with cocaine, but not the reverse. In sum, the present results show that the nonselective 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist RU 24969 cross-sensitizes with cocaine, but not methamphetamine, in preweanling rats. This dichotomy may be a function of cocaine having a greater affinity for the serotonin transporter than methamphetamine.

Importance of dopaminergic neurotransmission for the RU 24969-induced locomotor activity of male and female rats during the preweanling period

There is disagreement about whether the locomotor activity produced by serotonin (5-HT) _1A/1B receptor agonists is ultimately mediated through a dopaminergic mechanism or is independent of dopamine (DA) system functioning. Using a developing rat model, we examined whether DA neurotransmission is necessary for the locomotor activity produced by 5-HT_1A/1B receptor stimulation. Depending on experiment, male and female preweanling rats were pretreated with vehicle, the monoamine-depleting agent reserpine, the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor 4-chloro-DL-phenylalanine methyl ester hydrochloride (PCPA), the DA synthesis inhibitor ∝-methyl-DL-p-tyrosine (AMPT), or the D1 and D2 receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and raclopride, respectively. After completing the pretreatment regimen, the behavioral effects of saline and the 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist RU 24969 were assessed during a 2-h test session. Locomotor activity in the center and margin of the testing chamber was recorded. RU 24969's locomotor activating effects were sensitive to blockade of the D2 receptor, but not the D1 receptor. The DA synthesis inhibitor (AMPT) significantly attenuated the RU 24969-induced locomotor activity of preweanling rats, as did the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor PCPA. The latter result suggests that presynaptic 5-HT_1A/1B receptors may have a role in mediating RU 24969-induced locomotion during the preweanling period. DA neurotransmission, especially involving D2 receptors, is necessary for the 5-HT_1A/1B-mediated locomotor activity of preweanling rats. The actions of PCPA, reserpine, and SCH 23390 differ substantially between preweanling and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms underlying these DA/5-HT interactions vary across ontogeny.

Profiling of behavioral effects evoked by ketamine and the role of 5HT2 and D2 receptors in ketamine-induced locomotor sensitization in mice

Ketamine has addictive potential, a troublesome fact due to its promising use as a therapeutic drug. An important phenomenon associated with drug addiction is behavioral sensitization, usually characterized as augmented locomotion. However, other behaviors may also be susceptible to sensitization, and/or interfere with locomotor activity. Thus, this study drew a comprehensive behavioral 'profiling' in an animal model of repeated administration of ketamine. Adult Swiss mice received single daily ketamine injections (30 or 50 mg/Kg, i.p.), which were followed by open field testing for 7 days (acquisition period, ACQ). A ketamine challenge (sensitization test, ST) was carried out after a 5-day withdrawal. Locomotion, rearing, grooming, rotation and falling were assessed during ACQ and ST. All behaviors were affected from the first ACQ day onwards, with no indication of competition between locomotion and the other behaviors. Only locomotion in response to 30 mg/Kg of ketamine both escalated during ACQ and expressed increased levels at ST, evidencing development and expression of locomotor sensitization. Considering the involvement of serotonin 5HT₍₂₎ and dopamine D₍₂₎ receptors on addiction mechanisms, we further tested the involvement of these receptors in ketamine-induced sensitization. Ketanserin (5HT₂ antagonist, 3 mg/Kg, s.c.) prevented ketamine-evoked development of locomotor sensitization. However, ketanserin pretreatment during ACQ failed to inhibit its expression during ST. Raclopride (D₂ antagonist, 0.5 mg/Kg, s.c.) evoked less robust reductions in locomotion but prevented the development of ketamine-evoked sensitization. Pretreatment during ACQ further inhibited the expression of sensitization during ST. These results indicate that a partial overlap in serotonergic and dopaminergic mechanisms underlies ketamine-induced locomotor sensitization.

Involvement of dopamine D3 receptor and dopamine transporter in methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization in tree shrews

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to establish a methamphetamine (METH)-induced behavioral sensitization model using tree shrews, as well as to measure the protein expression of the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) and dopamine transporter (DAT).

METHODS

Forty tree shrews were equally and randomly divided into four experimental groups: those administered with 1, 2, and 4 mg/kg METH and a control group (treated with an equal amount of normal saline). Each experimental group was repeatedly exposed to METH for nine consecutive days to induce the development of behavioral sensitization, followed by four days of withdrawal (without the METH treatment) to induce the transfer of behavioral sensitization, then given 0.5 mg/kg of METH to undergo the expression of behavioral sensitization. Altered locomotor and stereotypic behaviors were measured daily via open-field experiments during the development and expression stages, and weight changes were also recorded. Then, the Western blot method was used to detect the expression levels of D3R and DAT in three brain regions: the nucleus accumbens, prefrontal cortex, and dorsal striatum 24 hr after the last behavioral test.

RESULTS

METH administration augmented motor-stimulant responses and stereotypic behaviors in all experimental groups, and stereotypic behaviors intensified more in the groups treated with 2 and 4 mg/kg METH. Motion distance, speed, and trajectory were significantly elevated in all experimental, however, METH at 4 mg/kg induced more stereotypic behaviors, decreasing these locomotor activities as compared with the 2 mg/kg METH group. 2 and 4 mg/kg METH significantly upregulated and downregulated D3R and DAT expression levels, respectively, in three brain regions, and these changes are more pronounced in 2 mg/kg METH.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicated that this animal model may be used to study the neurobiological mechanisms that underly the development and expression of behavioral sensitization to METH. Deregulated D3R and DAT expression may be involved in the METH-induced behavioral sensitization.

Dopamine D1 receptor antagonist reduces stimulant-induced conditioned place preferences and dopamine receptor supersensitivity

Repeated administration of stimulants induces conditioned place preference (CPP). Dopamine receptor supersensitivity is developed in stimulant-induced CPP animals; however, dopamine receptor subtypes associated with the development of supersensitivity in CPP animals are largely unknown. The present preclinical study aimed to examine whether dopamine D1 or D2 receptor antagonists exert inhibitory effects on stimulant-induced psychological behaviors. Additionally, the authors aimed to elucidate the role of dopamine receptor supersensitivity on the development of reward-related behavior. Sprague Dawley rats subjected to methamphetamine- and cocaine-induced CPP tests were treated with dopamine D1 (SCH23390) or D2 (sulpiride) receptor antagonists. Following the CPP experiment, rats were challenged with apomorphine (dopamine receptor agonist), and locomotor activity was measured. Methamphetamine- and cocaine-induced CPP was reduced with the administration of SCH23390, but not sulpiride. In addition, the apomorphine challenge evoked an increase in locomotor activity in stimulant-pre-treated rats, reflecting dopamine receptor supersensitivity. SCH23390 pre-treatment inhibited the development of dopamine receptor supersensitivity, while sulpiride demonstrated no inhibitory effects. These results suggest that the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH23390 inhibits the development of dopamine receptor supersensitivity which is associated with the development of CPP.

Protective and restorative effects of the traditional Chinese medicine Jitai tablet against methamphetamine-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity

Background

Methamphetamine (METH) is a psychostimulant with high abuse liability that affects the monoamine neurotransmitter systems, particularly the dopamine system. Currently there are no effective medications for the treatment of METH abuse to restore METH-induced dopaminergic dysfunction. The Jitai tablet (JTT), a commercial traditional Chinese medicinal preparation, has been shown to modulate the dopaminergic function both in heroin addicts and in morphine-dependent rats. The purpose of this study was to investigate, in a rodent model, whether JTT can protect against METH-induced neurotoxicity, and/or restore METH-damaged dopaminergic function.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining and/or autoradiography staining were used to detect tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression in the substantia nigra, and to examine the levels of dopamine transporter (DAT), dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) and TH levels in the striatum. Using a stereotyped behavior rating scale, we evaluated the inhibitory effect of JTT on METH-induced behavioral sensitization.

Results

Repeated METH administration induced obvious stereotyped behavior and neurotoxicity on the dopaminergic system. Pre-treatment with JTT significantly attenuated METH-induced stereotyped responses, and interdicted METH-induced changes in the levels of DAT, D2R and TH expression. Treatment with JTT after METH administration restored DAT, D2R and TH expression to normal levels.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that JTT protects against METH-induced neurotoxicity and restores the dopaminergic function, and thus might be a potential treatment for the dopaminergic deficits associated with METH abuse.

Importance of D1 and D2 receptor stimulation for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization in preweanling rats

The behavioral manifestations of psychostimulant-induced sensitization vary markedly between young and adult rats, suggesting that the neural mechanisms mediating this phenomenon differ across ontogeny. In this project we examined the importance of D1 and D2 receptors for the induction and expression of cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization during the preweanling period. In the behavioral experiments, rats were injected with reversible D1 and/or D2 antagonists (SCH23390 and/or raclopride) or an irreversible receptor antagonist (EEDQ) either before cocaine administration on the pretreatment day (induction) or before cocaine challenge on the test day (expression). In the EEDQ experiments, receptor specificity was assessed by using selective dopamine antagonists to protect D1 and/or D2 receptors from inactivation. Receptor binding assays showed that EEDQ caused substantial reductions in dorsal striatal D1 and D2 binding sites, while SCH23390 and raclopride fully protected D1 and D2 receptors from EEDQ-induced alkylation. Behavioral results showed that neither D1 nor D2 receptor stimulation was necessary for the induction of cocaine sensitization in preweanling rats. EEDQ disrupted the sensitization process, suggesting that another receptor type sensitive to EEDQ alkylation was necessary for the induction process. Expression of the sensitized response was prevented by an acute injection of a D1 receptor antagonist. The pattern of DA antagonist-induced effects described for preweanling rats is, with few exceptions, similar to what is observed when the same drugs are administered to adult rats. Thus, it appears that maturational changes in D1 and D2 receptor systems are not responsible for ontogenetic differences in the behavioral manifestation of cocaine sensitization.