Locomotor effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and its deuterated form in mice: psychostimulant effects, stereotypy, and sensitization

Effects of ambient temperature on locomotor activity and place conditioning elicited by abused psychostimulants in mice: Role of 3,4-methylenedioxy moiety

BACKGROUND

Humans often administer psychostimulants in party or music festival settings characterized by warm ambient temperatures, which may impact drug effects; however, preclinical studies rarely investigate drug effects at multiple ambient temperatures. Work with 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) suggests that the presence of a 3,4-methylenedioxy ring moiety may influence ambient temperature-dependent effects.

METHODS

Locomotor activity and conditioned place preference dose-response curves were generated at 20±2°C for two amphetamine analogues (MDMA and methamphetamine [METH]) and two cathinone analogues (MDPV and α-pyrrolidinopentiophenone [αPVP]) in mice. Effects were then redetermined at 29±2°C for each drug and assay.

RESULTS

All four drugs elicited dose-dependent locomotor stimulation at the cool ambient temperature. At the warm ambient temperature, MDMA and MDPV produced sensitization to stereotypy, whereas METH and αPVP produced sensitization to locomotor activity. Regarding place conditioning, the warm ambient environment potentiated place preference elicited by doses of METH and αPVP that were sub-threshold in the cool ambient environment, but attenuated the effects of analogous doses of MDMA and MDPV.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies suggest that warmer ambient temperatures may potentiate typical stimulant effects for the drugs lacking the 3,4-methylenedioxy ring, but may potentiate the behaviorally toxic/adverse effects for the drugs containing a 3,4-methylenedioxy ring. Thus, preclinical abuse liability studies conducted at standard laboratory temperatures may not fully capture the effects of psychostimulants and highlight the need to model the environments in which drugs are typically used by humans.

MDMA treatment paired with a trauma-cue promotes adaptive stress responses in a translational model of PTSD in rats

MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), a synthetic ring-substituted amphetamine, combined with psychotherapy has demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients. This controlled prospective study aimed to assess the bio-behavioral underpinnings of MDMA in a translational model of PTSD. Rats exposed to predator-scent stress (PSS) were subjected to a trauma-cue at day 7 shortly after single-dose MDMA injection (5 mg/kg). The elevated plus maze and acoustic startle response tests were assessed on day 14 and served for classification into behavioral response groups. Freezing response to a further trauma-reminder was assessed on Day 15. The morphological characteristics of the dentate gyrus (DG) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) were subsequently examined. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and 5-hydroxytryptamine involvement were evaluated using: (1) corticosterone measurements at 2 h and 4 h after MDMA treatment, (2) Lewis strain rats with blunted HPA-response and (3) pharmacological receptor-blockade. MDMA treatment was effective in attenuating stress behavioral responses only when paired with memory reactivation by a trauma-cue. The effects of the treatment on behavior were associated with a commensurate normalization of the dendritic cytoarchitecture of DG and BLA neurons. Pretreatment with RU486, Ketanserin, or Pindolol prevented the above improvement in anxiety-like behavioral responses. MDMA treatment paired with memory reactivation reduced the prevalence rate of PTSD-phenotype 14 days later and normalized the cytoarchitecture changes induced by PSS (in dendritic complexities) compared to saline control. MDMA treatment paired with a trauma-cue may modify or update the original traumatic memory trace through reconsolidation processes. These anxiolytic-like effects seem to involve the HPA axis and 5-HT systems.

Effects of repeated treatment with the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B agonists (R)-( +)-8-hydroxy-DPAT and CP-94253 on the locomotor activity and axillary temperatures of preweanling rats: evidence of tolerance and behavioral sensitization

RATIONALE

Drugs that stimulate 5-HT_1A/1B receptors produce both tolerance and behavioral sensitization in adult rats and mice, yet it is unknown whether the same types of plasticity are evident during earlier ontogenetic periods.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether repeated treatment with selective 5-HT_1A and/or 5-HT_1B agonists cause tolerance and/or sensitization in preweanling rats.

METHODS

In Experiments 1 and 2, male and female preweanling rats were given a single pretreatment injection of saline, the 5-HT_1A agonist (R)-( +)-8-hydroxy-DPAT (8-OH-DPAT), or the 5-HT_1B agonist CP-94253 on PD 20. After 48 h, rats received a challenge injection of 8-OH-DPAT or CP-94253, respectively. In Experiment 3, rats were pretreated with saline or DPAT + CP on PD 20 and challenged with the same drug cocktail on PD 22. In Experiment 4, the tolerance- or sensitization-inducing properties of 8-OH-DPAT, CP-94253, or DPAT + CP were tested after a 4-day pretreatment regimen on PD 17-20.

RESULTS

On the first pretreatment day, 8-OH-DPAT, CP-94253, and DPAT + CP increased locomotion and caused hypothermia. Repeated treatment with 8-OH-DPAT (2 or 8 mg/kg) or DPAT + CP caused locomotor sensitization in preweanling rats. In contrast, tolerance to the hypothermic effects of 8-OH-DPAT (8 mg/kg), CP-94253 (5-20 mg/kg), or DPAT + CP was evident after repeated drug treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

During the preweanling period, a single injection of a selective 5-HT_1A or 5-HT_1B agonist is capable of producing drug-induced plasticity. A pretreatment administration of 8-OH-DPAT causes both tolerance (hypothermia) and behavioral sensitization (locomotor activity) in preweanling rats, whereas repeated CP-94253 treatment results in tolerance.

Reciprocal cross-sensitization between cocaine and RU 24969 in male and female preweanling rats

Neuronal adaptations involving dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and serotonergic neurotransmitter systems are responsible for behavioral sensitization. Because of common underlying mechanisms, cross-sensitization between compounds of different drug classes can be observed. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a one- or four-day pretreatment regimen of RU 24969 (a 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist) would reciprocally cross-sensitize with cocaine or methamphetamine in male and female preweanling rats. Rats were pretreated with RU 24969 (0 or 5 mg/kg) for 4 days (PD 17-20) and then challenged with cocaine (10 or 20 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1 or 2 mg/kg) on PD 22. Reciprocal cross-sensitization was also assessed (i.e., rats were pretreated with psychostimulants and tested with RU 24969). In a follow-up experiment, the ability of RU 24969 and cocaine to reciprocally cross-sensitize was assessed using a one-day pretreatment regimen. Reciprocal cross-sensitization between cocaine and RU 24969 was evident in preweanling rats, whereas methamphetamine and RU 24969 did not cross-sensitize. When a one-trial pretreatment regimen was used, cross-sensitization was only detected when rats were pretreated with RU 24969 and tested with cocaine, but not the reverse. In sum, the present results show that the nonselective 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist RU 24969 cross-sensitizes with cocaine, but not methamphetamine, in preweanling rats. This dichotomy may be a function of cocaine having a greater affinity for the serotonin transporter than methamphetamine.

Effects of repeated RU 24969 treatment on the locomotor activity, motoric capacity, and axillary temperatures of male and female preweanling rats

Serotonin (5-HT) _1A and _1B receptors have been implicated in behavioral sensitization, but adult rats appear to develop tolerance to RU 24969 (a 5-HT_1A/1B receptor agonist) rather than a sensitized response. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a one- or four-day pretreatment regimen of RU 24969 would cause sensitization or tolerance in male and female preweanling rats. Depending on experiment, rats were pretreated with RU 24969 (0, 2.5, or 5 mg/kg) for 1 or 4 days (PD 17-20), while testing with lower or higher doses of RU 24969 occurred on PD 22. Locomotor activity, motoric capacity, and axillary temperatures were recorded. The role of Pavlovian contextual conditioning was assessed by administering RU 24969 to rats in either the home cage or a novel environment. On the first pretreatment day, RU 24969 caused both an increase in forward locomotion and motoric impairment, along with a substantial decrease in axillary temperatures. Repeated treatment with the same dose of RU 24969 caused all three dependent measures to show a tolerance response. When given a higher dose of RU 24969 on the test day, the responses lost due to repeated drug treatment were fully (locomotor activity) or partially (motoric capacity and axillary temperatures) reinstated. There was no evidence of behavioral tolerance. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that a subsensitivity of 5-HT_1A/1B receptors is at least partially responsible for the tolerance caused by RU 24969, but dispositional tolerance cannot be excluded as a contributing factor.