No effect of rosuvastatin in the zoledronate-induced acute-phase response

Effect of a Three-Day Course of Dexamethasone on Acute Phase Response Following Treatment With Zoledronate: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zoledronate is a potent intravenous bisphosphonate effective in the management of osteoporosis, Paget's disease and skeletal-related events in malignancy. Its most frequent adverse effect is the acute phase response (APR), an inflammatory reaction characterized by fever, musculoskeletal pain, headache, and nausea. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study investigated the efficacy of a three-day course of dexamethasone 4 mg daily in reducing incidence of APR. Participants (n = 60) were randomized to receive either 4 mg of oral dexamethasone 1.5 hours before zoledronate and once a day for the following 2 days, or placebo. Oral temperature was measured at baseline and three times a day for the following 3 days, and questionnaires assessing symptoms of the APR were completed at baseline and for 3 days following zoledronate. Use of anti-inflammatory medication in the 3 days following zoledronate was recorded. The primary outcome was the temperature change from baseline. There was a significant difference in the primary outcome between the dexamethasone and placebo groups (p < 0.0001), with a mean decrease in temperature of 0.10°C (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.14) in the dexamethasone group compared with a mean increase in temperature of 0.84°C (95% CI, 0.53-1.16) in the placebo group on the evening following zoledronate. There was also a difference in APR-related symptom score over time between the two groups (p = 0.0005), with a median change in symptom score in the dexamethasone group 1 day after zoledronate of 0 (95% CI, 0-1) compared with 3 (95% CI, 0-5) in the placebo group. An increase in temperature of ≥1°C to a temperature of >37.5°C occurred in two of 30 (6.7%) participants in the dexamethasone group compared with 14 of 30 participants (46.7%) in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). This study demonstrates that a 3-day course of dexamethasone substantially reduces the APR following zoledronate infusion. © 2023 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Reduction effect of oral pravastatin on the acute phase response to intravenous zoledronic acid: protocol for a real-world prospective, placebo-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been used as a first-line treatment in patients with osteoporosis (OP) who receive an annual injection of 5 mg. However, side effects of bone pain and fever, known as the acute phase response (APR), have often been observed after clinical usage. A meta-analysis reported that the incidence of APR was 49.4% among patients with OP who received ZA for the first time and that 30% of patients with these adverse effects refused treatment in the following year. As a clinically used hypolipidaemic drug, statins can inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase to block the pathway upstream of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase. This process can decrease the accumulation of isopentenyl pyrophosphate to prevent γδT-cell activation and inflammatory factor production, blocking APR occurrence. The aim of this study is to determine the reduction effect of oral pravastatin on APR and investigate the possible mechanisms underlying the effect in vivo.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This will be a single-centre, placebo-controlled trial. Female participants will be allocated at a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral pravastatin or a placebo at 1-hour predose and 24 and 48 hours post-administration of ZA. The primary outcome will be the incidence of APR within 72 hours after ZA infusion. The secondary outcomes will include the occurrence time and severity of APR and the frequency and amount of acetaminophen usage within 72 hours after ZA infusion. This study will determine the preventive effect of oral pravastatin on APR in Chinese patients with OP, supporting the clinical application of ZA to alleviate concerns regarding safety and increase patient compliance.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study protocol has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov. This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Peking University Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. The results will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04719481.

Characteristics Associated with Acute-Phase Response following First Zoledronic Acid Infusion in Brazilian Population with Osteoporosis

We aimed to evaluate characteristics associated with acute-phase response (APR) following first zoledronic acid infusion in a Brazilian cohort. This retrospective cohort study enrolled all adults with osteoporosis who underwent a first zoledronic acid infusion at our centre between June 2015 and June 2019. Clinical demographics (age, sex, diabetes, smoking, body mass index, and previous oral bisphosphonate use) and laboratory data (calcium, parathyroid hormone, renal function, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and carboxy-terminal crosslinked telopeptide of type 1 collagen [CTX], both before and after infusion) were compared between patients with and without APR. We evaluated association magnitude between the presence of APR and clinical variables through logistic regression. This study enrolled 400 patients (women, 80%). APR was observed in 24.5% (n = 98) of patients. The mean symptom duration in days was 3.5 ± 2.8. Patients with APR were younger (67 ± 12 vs. 71 ± 11 years; p=0.001), used oral bisphosphonates less frequently (34% × 50%; p=0.005), and had greater baseline CTX (0.535 ng/mL [0.375, 0.697] × 0.430 [0.249, 0.681]; p=0.03) and ΔCTX (-69 [-76; -50] × -54 [-72; -23]; p=0.002) than those without APR. The other variables were similar between the groups. Only ΔCTX was associated (OR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.41-0.98) with APR after accounting for age and bisphosphonate use. APR occurred in 24.5% of the cohort. Younger age and absence of prior oral bisphosphonate use were associated with APR following first zoledronic acid infusion. APR was associated with ΔCTX (but no other variables) after adjusting for these factors.

Denosumab versus zoledronate for the treatment of low bone mineral density in male HIV-infected patients

Introduction

We aimed to compare annual changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine (LS) and the femoral neck (FN) in males with HIV-associated osteoporosis treated with either zoledronate (ZOL) or denosumab (Dmab).

Methods

In this open label, 12-month, prospective, multicenter, cohort study, 23 male people living with HIV (PLWH) under antiretroviral therapy (ART) with low BMD were administered either a single iv infusion of ZOL 5 mg (n = 10) or Dmab 60 mg sc injections biannually (n = 13). Fourteen age-matched male PLWH with normal BMD served as controls. BMD was measured at baseline and at 12 months.

Results

LS-BMD increased within both treatment groups at 12 months (ZOL 5.43% ± 3.60%, p = 0.001; Dmab 5.76% ± 3.44%, p < 0.005) and decreased in controls (−2.58% ± 4.12, p = 0.04). FN-BMD increased in both treatment groups at 12 months (ZOL 7.23% ± 5.46%, p = 0.003; Dmab 3.01% ± 2.46%, p < 0.005), and remained unchanged in controls (1.22% ± 2.09, p = 0.06). LS-BMD changes did not differ between the two treatment groups, but FN-BMD changes were more prominent in the ZOL group (p < 0.05). None of our study cohort sustained new fragility fractures during the 12-month study period, and no case of acute phase response was recorded in the ZOL group.

Conclusions

In male PLWH under ART requiring osteoporosis treatment both ZOL and Dmab are efficient and well tolerated therapeutic options achieving BMD increases at least for the first year of treatment.

•

Zoledronate and denosumab are efficient therapies for HIV-associated osteoporosis.

•

Zoledronate-induced acute phase response may be less frequent with concomitant ART.

•

Alternative osteoporosis agent should follow in case of denosumab discontinuation.

•

Significant annual BMD loss may occur in male PLWH under long term treatment with ART.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Optimal Management of Osteoporosis

Osteoporosis does not take a break while Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stunned and overtook everyone’s lives. Medical resources were immediately shifted, self-isolation and telemedicine were expanded, ambulatory care services such as bone densitometry and osteoporosis-centered clinics came to a near halt. Progress with fracture prevention has been challenged because osteoporotic fracture with low energy injury is more prevalent even though restriction of people’s movement. Thus we must re-engage with chronic bone health concerns and fracture prevention. This review discusses challenges in management of osteoporosis during the COVID-19 pandemic and reinforces the need to implementing recommendations concerning the importance of bone fragility care with at least those patients who are already treated with antiosteoporotic drugs maintaining their adherence to treatments.

Preventive Role of Vitamin D Supplementation for Acute Phase Reaction after Bisphosphonate Infusion in Paget's Disease

CONTEXT

Intravenous aminobisphosphonates (N-BPs) can induce an acute phase reaction (APR) in up to 40% to 70% of first infusions, causing discomfort and often requiring intervention with analgesics or antipyretics.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to explore the risk factors of APR in a large sample of patients with Paget's disease of bone (PDB) and to assess the possible preventive effects of vitamin D administration.

METHODS

An observational analysis was performed in 330 patients with PDB at the time of N-BP infusion. Then, an interventional study was performed in 66 patients with active, untreated PDB to evaluate if vitamin D administration (oral cholecalciferol 50 000 IU/weekly for 8 weeks before infusion) may prevent APR.

RESULTS

In a retrospective study, APR occurred in 47.6% and 18.3% of naive or previously treated patients, respectively. Its prevalence progressively increased in relation to the severity of vitamin D deficiency, reaching 80.0% in patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) levels below 10 ng/mL (relative risk (RR) = 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-4.7, P < .0001), even in cases previously treated with N-BPs. Moreover, APR occurred more frequently in patients who experienced a previous APR (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.2; P < .001) or in carriers of SQSTM1 mutation (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.2; P = .005). In the interventional study, vitamin D supplementation prevented APR in most cases, equivalent to a RR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.14-0.67; P < .005) with respect to prevalence rates of the observational cohort. A similar trend was observed concerning the occurrence of hypocalcemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The achievement of adequate 25OHD levels is recommended before N-BP infusion in order to minimize the risk of APR or hypocalcemia in PDB.

Effect of single-dose dexamethasone on acute phase response following zoledronic acid: a randomized controlled trial

Zoledronic acid provokes an inflammatory reaction, or acute phase response, in some individuals. We examined whether treatment with dexamethasone could prevent this response. A single dose of dexamethasone 4 mg, given at the time of zoledronic acid infusion, did not influence the incidence or severity of the acute phase response.

INTRODUCTION

The potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL) is used to treat osteoporosis, Paget's disease, and hypercalcemia of malignancy. This medication can provoke an inflammatory reaction, known as the acute phase response (APR). We examined whether glucocorticoid treatment at the time of first exposure to ZOL prevents the development of APR.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, controlled trial assessed 40 adults receiving ZOL 5 mg intravenously for the first time. Participants received oral dexamethasone 4 mg (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20) at the time of ZOL infusion. Oral temperature was measured at baseline and three times a day for 3 days following infusion. Symptoms of APR were assessed via questionnaire at baseline then daily for 3 days and again at day 15 post-infusion. Use of rescue medications (paracetamol or ibuprofen) in the 3 days following infusion was evaluated. Primary outcome was between-group difference in temperature change from baseline.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in temperature change (p = 0.95) or symptom score (p = 0.42) in the 3 days following ZOL between dexamethasone and placebo recipients. Eleven (55%) in the dexamethasone group and 10 (50%) placebo recipients experienced a temperature increase of ≥1 °C (p = 0.99). Seven (35%) in the dexamethasone group and 9 (45%) in the placebo group experienced an increase in symptom score of ≥3 points (p = 0.75). Thirteen (65%) dexamethasone recipients and 12 (60%) in the placebo group required rescue medications (p = 0.99). Dexamethasone was well-tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of dexamethasone 4 mg does not influence the incidence or severity of APR following first exposure to ZOL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12615000794505.

Prevention of Vγ9Vδ2 T Cell Activation by a Vγ9Vδ2 TCR Nanobody

Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation plays an important role in antitumor and antimicrobial immune responses. However, there are conditions in which Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation can be considered inappropriate for the host. Patients treated with aminobisphosphonates for hypercalcemia or metastatic bone disease often present with a debilitating acute phase response as a result of Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation. To date, no agents are available that can clinically inhibit Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation. In this study, we describe the identification of a single domain Ab fragment directed to the TCR of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells with neutralizing properties. This variable domain of an H chain-only Ab (VHH or nanobody) significantly inhibited both phosphoantigen-dependent and -independent activation of Vγ9Vδ2 T cells and, importantly, strongly reduced the production of inflammatory cytokines upon stimulation with aminobisphosphonate-treated cells. Additionally, in silico modeling suggests that the neutralizing VHH binds the same residues on the Vγ9Vδ2 TCR as the Vγ9Vδ2 T cell Ag-presenting transmembrane protein butyrophilin 3A1, providing information on critical residues involved in this interaction. The neutralizing Vγ9Vδ2 TCR VHH identified in this study might provide a novel approach to inhibit the unintentional Vγ9Vδ2 T cell activation as a consequence of aminobisphosphonate administration.

Severe polyarthritis secondary to zolendronic acid: a case report and literature review

Intravenous zolendronic acid is an established anti-resorptive treatment for post-menopausal osteoporosis and is usually well tolerated. Common side effects, including the classical 'acute phase response', are consented for prior to treatment. However, rare but serious adverse reactions to zolendronic acid have been described. We report the case of an older patient with osteoporosis and osteoarthritis who presented within 12 hours of her first zolendronic acid infusion with evidence of a severe acute polyarthritis affecting her peripheral appendicular skeleton, in joints affected by pre-existing osteoarthritis. Despite the prevalence of osteoarthritis, this is the most severe case of polyarthritis following intravenous zolendronic acid to date and only the second reported case. We remind prescribing physicians treating patients with intravenous bisphosphonates, to bear in mind possible rare serious adverse reactions as well as common benign side effects. We postulate age-associated frailty may reduce tolerability to even milder acute phase reactions.

Intravenous bisphosphonates for postmenopausal osteoporosis: safety profiles of zoledronic acid and ibandronate in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Intravenous bisphosphonates are widely used for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. They are associated with transient influenza-like symptoms, predominantly after the first zoledronic acid (up to 32 %) or ibandronate (up to 5 %) administration. The experience in clinical practice suggests that the incidence of post-dose symptoms is higher than has been reported in clinical trials. We assessed the safety of annual infusions of zoledronic acid and 3-monthly injections of ibandronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we analysed safety data from 272 postmenopausal women treated with zoledronic acid (n = 127; mean age 68.6 ± 9.4 years) or intravenous (IV) ibandronate (n = 145; mean age 69.1 ± 9.0 years). Safety data (including occurrence of acute-phase reactions and osteonecrosis of the jaw) were gathered in phone call interviews by using a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

The number of patients with adverse events was significantly higher in zoledronic acid as compared to ibandronate-treated patients, primarily because of a larger number of post-dose symptoms after bisphosphonate administrations (54.3 % vs. 33.1 %, p < 0.001). Except for occurrence of fever (more common after zoledronic acid infusion), other influenza-like symptoms (myalgia, arthralgia, headache) appeared in a similar proportion of patients after IV treatment (within 24-36 h). Symptoms lasted for >3 days in approximately 50 % of patients. The incidence of symptoms decreased after subsequent infusions. The rate of influenza-like symptoms was more frequent after zoledronic acid than after IV ibandronate in bisphosphonate-naïve patients but comparable in patients pretreated with oral bisphosphonates. There were no spontaneous reports of osteonecrosis of the jaw, arrhythmia or delayed fracture healing.

CONCLUSION

Although IV bisphosphonates are generally safe, the occurrence of transient influenza-like symptoms after IV bisphosphonates seems to be more frequent in clinical practice than has been reported in clinical trials.

Monocytes and γδ T cells control the acute-phase response to intravenous zoledronate: insights from a phase IV safety trial

Aminobisphosphonates (NBPs) are used widely against excessive bone resorption in osteoporosis and Paget's disease as well as in metastatic bone disease and multiple myeloma. Intravenous NBP administration often causes mild to severe acute-phase responses (APRs) that may require intervention with analgesics and antipyretics and lead to treatment noncompliance and nonadherence. We here undertook a phase IV safety trial in patients with osteoporosis to investigate the APR of otherwise healthy individuals to first-time intravenous treatment with the NBP zoledronate. This study provides unique insight into sterile acute inflammatory responses in vivo, in the absence of confounding factors such as infection or cancer. Our data show that both peripheral γδ T cells and monocytes become rapidly activated after treatment with zoledronate, which ultimately determines the clinical severity of the APR. Our study highlights a key role for IFN-γ in the zoledronate-induced APR and identifies pretreatment levels of monocytes and central/memory Vγ9/Vδ2 T cells as well as their responsiveness to zoledronate in vitro as predictive risk factors for the occurrence of subclinical and clinical symptoms. These findings have diagnostic and prognostic implications for patients with and without malignancy and are relevant for Vγ9/Vδ2 T-cell-based immunotherapy approaches.

The role of cytokines and adipocytokines in zoledronate-induced acute phase reaction in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

OBJECTIVE

Patients treated with intravenous zoledronate frequently experience an acute phase reaction (APR) characterized by flu-like symptoms and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines. We aimed to define the role of various cytokines/adipocytokines in zoledronate-induced APR and develop a prognostic model for its prediction.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Fifty-one postmenopausal women with low bone mass were subjected to zoledronate intravenous infusion. Patients were divided into those who experienced APR (APR+) and those who did not (APR-). APR was clinically defined by body temperature and the visual analogue pain scale for musculoskeletal symptoms. White blood cell count, leucocytic subpopulations, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, visfatin, resistin and leptin were measured before and 48 h following the infusion. The quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and homoeostasis model of assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were calculated to assess insulin sensitivity and resistance, respectively.

RESULTS

(APR+) patients were younger and had lower baseline visfatin and higher baseline lymphocytes and phosphate compared with APR- patients. QUICKI decreased and HOMA-IR increased in APR+ patients while remained unchanged in APR- patients. In binary logistic regression analysis, a model containing previous bisphosphonate treatment, age, body mass index, lymphocytes and visfatin, which predicted zoledronate-induced APR with 82·1% sensitivity and 73·9% specificity, was selected. In this model, lymphocytes (P = 0·010) and visfatin (P = 0·029) at baseline could independently predict APR.

CONCLUSIONS

Zoledronate-induced APR is associated with serum increases of pro-inflammatory cytokines and an increase of insulin resistance. Patients with higher lymphocytes and lower visfatin levels at baseline are at higher risk for APR.

Acute phase response following intravenous zoledronate in postmenopausal women with low bone mass

An acute phase response (APR) is frequently observed in patients treated with intravenous (i.v.) zoledronate (ZOL). We aimed to define clinical and laboratory parameters that may predict ZOL-induced APR in women with low bone mass. Fifty-one postmenopausal women with low bone mass were given a single i.v. infusion of ZOL 5mg. APR was clinically defined by the visual analog pain scale (VAS) for the musculoskeletal symptoms and body temperature. White blood cell count (WBC), leucocyte subpopulations, C-reactive protein (CRP), parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], interleukins (IL)-1b and -6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)α and interferon (IFN)γ were measured before and 48 h following the infusion. Subsequently, patients were divided into those experiencing APR (APR+) or not (APR-). WBC, granulocytes, CRP, IL-1b and IL-6 were significantly increased, whereas lymphocytes, eosinophils, calcium, phosphate and 25(OH)D decreased 48h after ZOL infusion. Twenty-eight of the 51 patients (54.9%) experienced an APR. APR+ patients were younger and had higher baseline lymphocytes compared to APR- patients. There was no difference (p=0.405) in the development of APR between treatment-naive patients (19/32, 59.4%) and patients previously treated with another oral nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (9/19, 47.4%). In conclusion, our data suggest that pre-treatment higher lymphocyte number increases the risk of APR while previous treatment with another nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate does not significantly reduce the risk. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations decrease significantly after the infusion, possibly as part of the inflammatory response to ZOL.