Current practice in paediatric videofluoroscopy

Influence of frame rate in detecting oropharyngeal aspiration in paediatric videofluoroscopic swallow studies - An observational study

OBJECTIVES

The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS), currently the gold standard for assessing aspiration in children, incurs radiation. Adhering to the ALARA principle is crucial in minimising radiation dose whilst obtaining accurate diagnostic information in children. International adult VFSS guidelines recommend a capture rate of 30 frames per second (fps). Higher capture rates increase radiation yet there is limited evidence on best practice VFSS capture rates in children, particularly on thin fluid consistency-the fastest viscosity with the highest potential for missed aspiration on slower capture rates. We aimed to determine if image acquisition at 30fps versus 15fps alters the accuracy of detecting aspiration when assessing thin fluids during paediatric VFSS.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Seventeen speech language pathologists (SLPs) blindly rated a total of 2,356 swallow loops for the presence/absence of aspiration from VFSS recordings of 13 infants/children drinking thin fluids. 76 swallow loops were randomly presented at 15 versus 30fps, on two occasions. Area under receiver operating curve (aROCs) was used to compare the accuracy of aspiration ratings at 15 versus 30fps compared to a comparison set. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to examine rater reliability.

RESULTS

Accuracy for detecting aspiration was near-identical at 15fps (aROC:0.97; 95%CI:0.96-0.97) and 30fps (0.96; 95%CI 0.96-0.97). Good inter-rater (ICC:0.82; 95%CI:0.72-0.89) and intra-rater reliability among the raters (ICC:0.89; 95%CI:0.82-0.93) was found.

CONCLUSION

Using 15fps in paediatric VFSS when assessing thin fluid consistency aspiration provides a similar detection rate to using 30fps. As 15fps would have a lower radiation dose than 30fps, we recommend using 15fps when undertaking VFSS in children.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Adhering to the ALARA principles, a capture rate of 15fps should be used in paediatric VFSS for assessment on thin fluids.

The Role of Bolus Residue and Its Relation with Respiratory Problems in Children with Esophageal Atresia

Bolus residue is significant risk factor for postswallow aspiration. A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of bolus residue and its relation with respiratory problems in children with esophageal atresia. Children were evaluated for demographic features, type of esophageal atresia, associated anomalies, and respiratory problems. The videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation (VFSE) was performed, and scored by using the penetration aspiration scale (PAS), bolus residual score (BRS) and normalized residual ratio scale (NRRS). Children with and without respiratory problems were also compared in terms of aspiration and bolus residue. Forty-one children with a median age of 15 months (1-138 months), male:female ratio of 26:15 was included. 65.9% (n = 27) of children were type-C and 24.4% (n = 10) were type-A EA. In 61% (n = 25) of children had liquid aspiration (PAS ≥ 6) and 9.8% (n = 4) had aspiration in pudding consistencies. Children with aspiration in liquids had significantly higher NRRS and BRS scores in vallecular residue for pudding consistencies when compared to children without aspiration (p < 0.05). No difference was detected in terms of PAS scores and bolus residual parameters between children with and without respiratory problems (p > 0.05). Children with aspiration in liquids have higher scores of BRS and NRRS at the level of vallecular especially in pudding consistencies. VFSE findings for bolus residue did not show significant relation with respiratory problems. Respiratory morbidity in children with EA is multifactorial and may not only explained by bolus residuals and aspiration.

Predictive Factors in Identifying Pediatric Patients at Risk of Diagnostically Limited Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies

Objective: Videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) are highly effective in characterizing pediatric dysphagia, but they are time- and resource-intensive, and necessitate the use of radiation. Identifying patients unlikely to benefit from VFSS is crucial to improving patient safety and resource allocation. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the ability of a patient to consume at least 0.5 oz by mouth is a reliable indicator of their ability to produce a diagnostically useful VFSS. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Methods: Clinical data of pediatric patients aged 0 to 18 years, who underwent VFSS at a tertiary academic medical center from 2014 to 2021 were analyzed. Results: Regardless of whether due to mechanical dysphagia or oral aversion, an inability to consume at least 0.5 oz of any texture by mouth at home was not found to be associated with nondiagnostic VFSS. Age was found to have an effect on VFSS utility with toddlers having higher odds of nondiagnostic VFSS compared to children and adolescents. Overall, there was no significant interaction between the ability to take at least 0.5 oz and age group. Gastrointestinal (GI) and neuromuscular comorbidities were also associated with clinically useful swallow studies. Conclusions and Relevance: Clinicians should consider several factors, including age, at-home intake by mouth, and comorbidities such as neuromuscular and GI disorders, as they decide whether to order a VFSS.

Effect of rapid maxillary expansion on masticatory and swallowing functions in children with posterior crossbite

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the influence of posterior crossbite on masticatory and swallowing functions by videofluoroscopy examination and to analyze the effects of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) on the same functions.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal study was conducted on 32 children, 21 of them with posterior crossbite (10 girls and 11 boys, mean age 9.2 years, study group) and 11 children with no occlusal changes (6 girls and 5 boys, mean age 9.3 years, control group). The children were evaluated by an orthodontist for diagnosis, group characterization and occlusal treatment, by the otorhinolaryngology team for the assessment of respiratory symptoms, and by a speech therapist for videofluoroscopic evaluation of masticatory and swallowing parameters. The children with posterior crossbite were treated orthodontic ally using the Haas disjunctor for approximately six months and re-evaluated 5-months after removal of the appliance. Data were analyzed statistically by the Studentt-test for independent samples for comparison of the crossbite and control groups before and after treatment.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in oral preparatory and oral transit times, nor in cycles and masticatory frequency, between the pre and post orthodontic treatment groups and the control group.

CONCLUSION

Rapid maxillary expansion did not influence the masticatory and swallowing variables studied by videofluoroscopy. However, the data require caution in interpretation.

The Role of Oral Feeding Time and Sham Feeding on Oropharyngeal Swallowing Functions in Children with Esophageal Atresia

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the role of oral feeding (OF) time and sham feeding (SF) on oral-pharyngeal swallowing functions in children with esophageal atresia (EA). Patients with EA were evaluated for age, sex, and types of atresia, time to start OF and surgical complications. Three to six weeks after full OF, videofluoroscopic swallowing evaluation (VFSE) was performed, and Penetration Aspiration Score (PAS, no aspiration = 1, penetration = 2-5, aspiration = 6-8), delay in swallowing reflex and residue after liquid and pudding consistency were noted. Patients were divided into three groups according to repair time; early primary repair (EPR, < 1 month of age), delayed primary repair (DPR, ≥ 1 month of age) and colonic interposition (CI). VFSE findings were compared between groups. In CI group, patients without aspiration in VFSE were encouraged to sham SF before CI. Patients with and without SF in CI group were also compared for oro-pharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). PAS scores were significantly higher in DPR (n = 13) group when compared to CI group (n = 12) in liquid swallowing (p = 0.032) and higher than EPR (n = 30) in pudding consistency (p = 0.03). Patients with CI showed significant OPD when compared to EPR (p = 0.017). Swallowing reflex delay was similar in both groups (p > 0.05). DPR group had significantly higher liquid residue at the level of vallecula (p = 0.028). The residue at other levels (oral, tongue base, pharyngeal wall and pyriform sinus) were similar in all groups in both liquid and pudding consistencies. There was no significant difference between sham-fed (n = 6) and not sham-fed (n = 6) infants in VFSE of OPD (p > 0.05). Patients with DPR without SF had significantly higher incidence of OPD and PAS scores when compared to EPR and CI. Although CI groups has the latest OF time, SF may improve oral motor abilities and cause better OF swallowing functions than patients with delayed repair.

Altered Brain Function Activity in Patients With Dysphagia After Cerebral Infarction: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Objective

Dysphagia after cerebral infarction (DYS) has been detected in several brain regions through resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). In this study, we used two rs-fMRI measures to investigate the changes in brain function activity in DYS and their correlations with dysphagia severity.

Method

In this study, a total of 22 patients with DYS were compared with 30 patients without dysphagia (non-DYS) and matched for baseline characteristics. Then, rs-fMRI scans were performed in both groups, and regional homogeneity (ReHo) and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) values were calculated in both groups. The two-sample t-test was used to compare ReHo and fALFF between the groups. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the correlations between the ReHo and fALFF of the abnormal brain regions and the scores of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), the Standardized Bedside Swallowing Assessment (SSA), the Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study (VFSS), and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS).

Results

Compared with the non-DYS group, the DYS group showed decreased ReHo values in the left thalamus, the left parietal lobe, and the right temporal lobe and significantly decreased fALFF values in the right middle temporal gyrus and the inferior parietal lobule. In the DYS group, the ReHo of the right temporal lobe was positively correlated with the SSA score and the PAS score (r = 0.704, p < 0.001 and r = 0.707, p < 0.001, respectively) but negatively correlated with the VFSS score (r = −0.741, p < 0.001). The ReHo of the left parietal lobe was positively correlated with SSA and PAS (r = 0.621, p = 0.002 and r = 0.682, p < 0.001, respectively) but negatively correlated with VFSS (r = −0.679, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

The changes in the brain function activity of these regions are related to dysphagia severity. The DYS group with high ReHo values in the right temporal and left parietal lobes had severe dysphagia.

Developing a Protocol for Quantitative Analysis of Liquid Swallowing in Children

PURPOSE

Objective measures in videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSSs) can quantify swallow biomechanics. There are a wide array of validated measures studied in infants, children, and adults. There is a need for a pediatric VFSS protocol that consists of a small number of vital, time efficient, and clinically relevant measures. In this study, we aimed to establish a standard protocol for quantitative VFSS analysis in children.

METHOD

Protocol development began with a systematic literature review, which identified 22 quantitative and eight descriptive measures available in the literature. A pediatric VFSS database of 553 children was collected using a standardized VFSS protocol. Studies were evaluated using the 30 previously reported measures covering displacement and timing parameters as well as penetration-aspiration and residue. Measures were tested for rater reliability and internal consistency. Measures meeting acceptable values for protocol inclusion were included in the final protocol (Cronbach's alpha > .53).

RESULTS

Interrater and intrarater reliability of 17 measures met acceptable reliability levels. During internal consistency testing, we removed six further measures based on Cronbach's alpha levels indicating that two or more measures were equivalent in measuring the same aspect of swallow biomechanics in children. A VFSS protocol of reliable, valid, and obtainable objective quantitative (n = 6) and descriptive measures (n = 3) with separate protocols for young infants (≤ 9 months) and older children was established.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized quantitative VFSS protocol for children has been developed to suit two age groups (≤ 9 and > 9 months old). Consistent VFSS administration and reporting support assessment over time and across disease groups. Future research should focus on how this information can be used by clinicians to produce individualized treatment plans for children with swallowing impairment.

Conceptual Framework Behind the Development of a Level of Confidence Tool: The Pediatric Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study Value Scale

PURPOSE

The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is the most commonly used instrumental procedure for evaluating swallowing in pediatric populations suspected of having dysphagia. Assessment and interpretation of a VFSS in pediatric populations is frequently challenged by testing-specific factors that can raise concerns regarding the representativeness of swallow events observed during testing compared to daily feeding/swallowing physiology. When VFSS findings do not represent typical swallowing patterns, treatment recommendations can result in suboptimal outcomes. To address this current challenge to pediatric VFSS interpretation and associated treatment recommendations, the pediatric VFSS Value Scale (pVFSS Value Scale) was developed within a tertiary regional pediatric medical center. This clinical focus article summarizes the initial scale development phases and resulting conceptual framework for rating clinical testing factors that influence a clinician's level of confidence regarding pediatric VFSS findings. Future goals for scientific evaluation and clinical utilization of this new rating scale are also reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The pVFSS Value Scale was developed to assist clinicians with interpretation of pediatric VFSS assessment outcomes and to efficiently communicate factors influencing impressions and treatment recommendations with team members and caregivers. This clinical concept article summarizes potential uses of this tool to inform treatment planning as well as future clinical research to evaluate its psychometrics and clinical utility.

Surgically Acquired Vocal Cord Palsy in Infants and Children with Congenital Heart Disease (CHD): Description of Feeding Outcomes

Impaired swallowing in infants can impact upon the ability to feed orally, often resulting in dependency on supplementary feeding. Such difficulties can lead to an increased burden of care and associated costs. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vocal cord palsy (VCP), acquired intraoperatively during cardiac surgery, on the feeding outcomes of infants at a tertiary metropolitan children's hospital. An additional aim was to obtain preliminary information on the impact of feeding difficulties in this group on the quality of life of parents and families. A review of 48 patients who had been referred to the speech pathology service was undertaken. Participants presented with heterogeneous cardiac diagnoses, and had an initial Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study (VFSS) at a median corrected age of 3.6 weeks. Sixty percent of participants presented with silent aspiration on VFSS. Thirty percent of participants required supplementary tube feeding more than 6 months post-surgery. Six percent of participants with poor feeding progress and persistent aspiration required further surgical intervention to support nutrition. Findings revealed no significant relationship between participant factors and the presence of feeding difficulties, however, infants with concomitant genetic and syndromic conditions were found to be most at-risk for long-term feeding difficulties. Analysis of informal parent questionnaire responses indicated parents experienced stress and anxiety after their child's discharge. This was noted in regard to their child's feeding, which impacts quality of life across a number of domains. Findings of this study highlight the importance of communicating the potential feeding difficulties to parents of at-risk infants prior to cardiac surgery. This study further highlighted the importance of routine post-operative otorhinolaryngology examinations following high-risk surgeries, as well as speech pathology management for all infants and children identified with VCP. Post-operative input from appropriately trained Speech Pathologists is vital in assisting parents to support and mitigate their child's difficulties through the provision of early intervention for feeding difficulties.

Safety of Bottle-Feeding Under Nasal Respiratory Support in Preterm Lambs With and Without Tachypnoea

Aim: Convalescing preterm infants often require non-invasive respiratory support, such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannulas. One challenging milestone for preterm infants is achieving full oral feeding. Some teams fear nasal respiratory support might disrupt sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination and induce severe cardiorespiratory events. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety of oral feeding of preterm lambs on nasal respiratory support, with or without tachypnoea.

Methods: Sucking, swallowing and breathing functions, as well as electrocardiogram, oxygen haemoglobin saturation, arterial blood gases and videofluoroscopic swallowing study were recorded in 15 preterm lambs during bottle-feeding. Four randomly ordered conditions were studied: control, nasal continuous positive airway pressure (6 cmH₂O), high-flow nasal cannulas (7 L•min^–1), and high-flow nasal cannulas at 7 L•min^–1 at a tracheal pressure of 6 cmH₂O. The recordings were repeated on days 7–8 and 13–14 to assess the effect of maturation.

Results: None of the respiratory support impaired the safety or efficiency of oral feeding, even with tachypnoea. No respiratory support systematically impacted sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination, with or without tachypnoea. No effect of maturation was found.

Conclusion: This translational physiology study, uniquely conducted in a relevant animal model of preterm infant with respiratory impairment, shows that nasal respiratory support does not impact the safety or efficiency of bottle-feeding or sucking–swallowing–breathing coordination. These results suggest that clinical studies on bottle-feeding in preterm infants under nasal continuous positive airway pressure and/or high-flow nasal cannulas can be safely undertaken.

Instrumental Swallowing Assessments in the Neonatal and Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review

The scientific scope of swallowing disorders in the neonatal and pediatric populations is growing exponentially; however, the preponderance of evidence for evaluation protocols has been concentrated in non-instrumental evaluations creating a lack of research about protocols for instrumental swallowing assessment. Thus, the purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to identify and to report protocols used in instrumental assessments through videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in the neonatal and pediatric populations to support clinical decision making. The search strategy was applied in five online databases, no filters were applied to restrict languages or publication dates and the gray literature was reviewed. PRISMA statement was used to guide the construction of this review. The studies included validated and unvalidated protocols, the validated protocols had their risk of bias estimated using the QUADAS-2. In total, 13 studies were included in the final review, of these eleven assessed through QUADAS-2, and two classified with low risk of bias. One study is in the process of standardization and validation of an instrumental assessment protocol for swallowing in bottle-fed infants through VFSS. Information about validity and reliability of published protocols for instrumental evaluation in the neonatal and pediatric populations is limited. Therefore, further research is needs to development studies aiming to standardize and validate protocols for instrumental assessments in these populations.

Clinical and videofluoroscopic evaluation of feeding and swallowing in infants with oropharyngeal dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia impacts infants' health and well-being and may result in aspiration pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate feeding and swallowing functions in infants with dysphagia to determine the possible causes of dysphagia and their relationship with the medical diagnoses. Clinical and videofluoroscopic findings were compared to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical evaluation and identify clinical predictors of laryngeal penetration and aspiration.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 60 infants in the age range 2-19 months (median seven months) with suspected aspiration and/or feeding problems. All cases were subjected to both clinical and videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing.

RESULTS

The two most frequently observed videofluoroscopic findings were aspiration and suck-swallow-breathing incoordination. Infants with structural laryngeal abnormalities were significantly more likely to experience aspiration. A significant association was found between the presence of aspiration and the presence of both recurrent chest infection and gurgly voice combined, which increased the risk of aspiration by 3.57 times. However, the presence of gagging alone and gagging combined with a recurrent chest infection significantly reduced the risk of aspiration. The clinical assessment accuracy presented 56.70%, with 55.60% sensitivity, 58.30% specificity, and a positive predictive value higher than the negative.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the importance of complementing clinical evaluation, in infants with dysphagia, with an objective evaluation of swallowing such as videofluoroscopy due to the high proportion of false positives noticed in clinical evaluation and the high prevalence of silent aspiration in infants.

Mechanisms and management considerations of parent-chosen feeding approaches to infants with swallowing difficulties: an observational study

Videofluoroscopy swallow studies (VFSS) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) methods complement to ascertain mechanisms of infant feeding difficulties. We hypothesized that: (a) an integrated approach (study: parent-preferred feeding therapy based on VFSS and HRM) is superior to the standard-of-care (control: provider-prescribed feeding therapy based on VFSS), and (b) motility characteristics are distinct in infants with penetration or aspiration defined as penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) score ≥ 2. Feeding therapies were nipple flow, fluid thickness, or no modification. Clinical outcomes were oral-feeding success (primary), length of hospital stay and growth velocity. Basal and adaptive HRM motility characteristics were analyzed for study infants. Oral feeding success was 85% [76-94%] in study (N = 60) vs. 63% [50-77%] in control (N = 49), p = 0.008. Hospital-stay and growth velocity did not differ between approaches or PAS ≥ 2 (all P > 0.05). In study infants with PAS ≥ 2, motility metrics differed for increased deglutition apnea during interphase (p = 0.02), symptoms with pharyngeal stimulation (p = 0.02) and decreased distal esophageal contractility (p = 0.004) with barium. In conclusion, an integrated approach with parent-preferred therapy based on mechanistic understanding of VFSS and HRM metrics improves oral feeding outcomes despite the evidence of penetration or aspiration. Implementation of new knowledge of physiology of swallowing and airway protection may be contributory to our findings.

Infant aspiration and associated signs on clinical feeding evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have examined clinical signs of aspiration in infants <51 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) for whom the laryngeal cough reflex is not fully developed. This retrospective study explored 1) the association between signs of aspiration on a clinical feeding evaluation (CFE) and/or comorbid conditions with aspiration (silent or overt) on a modified barium swallow study (MBS) for infants in this age range, 2) the association between lower respiratory infection (LRI) and aspiration on MBS, and 3) the sensitivity and specificity of detecting aspiration according to signs on CFE and the evaluating speech-language pathologist's (SLP) years of experience.

METHODS

A retrospective review of charts of patients with MBS completed January 1, 2012-December 31, 2014 was performed. Patients were included if they were <51-weeks PMA at the time of MBS and had a CFE conducted no more than seven days prior to the MBS. Patient age, comorbidities, and MBS and CFE details were collected. The impact of CFE findings, patient age, comorbid syndromes/associations, and aerodigestive diagnoses on the odds of demonstrating silent aspiration (SA) or overt aspiration during MBS with thin liquids was determined using logistic regression, and the sensitivity and specificity of CFE for identifying SA was calculated.

RESULTS

Results from 114 patients indicated that 46 (40 %) of the infants had SA and nine (8 %) had overt aspiration on MBS. Notable signs on CFEs were cough (36 %), oxygen desaturations (33 %), and chest congestion (32 %). On multiple regression analysis there was increased odds of SA on MBS with at least one clinical sign on CFE (OR: 24.3, p = 0.02), chronic lung disease, (OR: 18.2, p = 0.01), and airway abnormalities (OR: 2.94, p = 0.01). Cough on CFE was associated with increased odds of overt aspiration on MBS (OR: 5.69, p = 0.04). Neither SA nor overt aspiration were significantly associated with LRI. Sensitivity and specificity of CFE for correctly identifying the presence of SA were 98 % and 15 %, respectively; experience of the SLP was not a contributing factor.

CONCLUSION

Further study is required to determine if specific signs on CFE are predictive of aspiration.

Nasal respiratory support and tachypnea and oral feeding in full-term newborn lambs

Newborn infants with respiratory difficulties frequently require nasal respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC). Oral feeding of these infants under nasal respiratory support remains controversial out of fear of aspiration and cardiorespiratory events. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of oral feeding under different types of nasal respiratory support in newborn lambs without or with tachypnea. Eight lambs aged 4-5 days were instrumented to record sucking, swallowing, respiration, ECG, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gases. Each lamb was given two bottles of 30 mL of milk with a pause of 30 s under videofluoroscopy in four conditions [no respiratory support, nCPAP 6 cmH₂O, HFNC 7 L/min, HFNC_CPAP (= HFNC 7 L/min + CPAP 6 cmH₂O)] administered in random order. The study was conducted in random order over 2 days, with or without standardized tachypnea induced by thoracic compression with a blood pressure cuff. Generalized linear mixed models were used to compare the four nasal respiratory supports in terms of safety (cardiorespiratory events and aspiration), sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination, and efficacy of oral feeding. Results reveal that no nasal respiratory support impaired the safety of oral feeding. Most of the few laryngeal penetrations we observed occurred with HFNC_CPAP. Nasal CPAP modified sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination, whereas the efficiency of oral feeding decreased under HFNC_CPAP. Results were similar with or without tachypnea. In conclusion, oral feeding under nasal respiratory support is generally safe in a term lamb, even with tachypnea.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The practice of orally feeding newborns suffering from respiratory problems while on nCPAP or HFNC remains controversial for fear of triggering cardiorespiratory events or aspiration pneumonia, or aggravating chronic lung disease. The present results show that bottle-feeding is generally safe in full-term lambs under nasal respiratory support, both without and with tachypnea.

Development of the Pediatric Dysphagia Risk Screening Instrument (PDRSI)

OBJETIVO

Desenvolver um instrumento de rastreio para a identificação de crianças com risco para disfagia, em ambiente hospitalar.

MÉTODO

O Instrumento de Rastreio para o Risco de Disfagia Pediátrica (IRRD-Ped), constituído por 23 questões, foi desenvolvido por fonoaudiólogos, após revisão da literatura. Ele foi proposto para ser aplicado aos responsáveis por crianças em internação hospitalar. O IRRD-Ped foi enviado a juízes para análise, tendo sido também realizado um estudo piloto. Para verificar a validade de critério, aplicou-se o IRRD-Ped aos responsáveis por crianças internadas e, posteriormente, realizou-se, com estas crianças, avaliação clínica da deglutição, através do Protocolo de Avaliação da Disfagia Pediátrica (PAD-PED). Os responsáveis assinaram o Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido. Os sujeitos foram separados em dois grupos (com disfagia e com deglutição normal), sendo verificada a associação entre as questões do IRRD-Ped e o resultado do PAD-PED, através do teste qui-quadrado de Person ou exato de Fisher. Definiu-se o ponto de corte para presença de risco para disfagia através da Curva ROC. A confiabilidade do IRRD-Ped foi verificada pelo coeficiente α de Cronbach.

RESULTADOS

A amostra foi constituída por 40 crianças com mediana de idade de 3,7 meses. Verificou-se associação estatisticamente significativa em oito itens do instrumento. A consistência interna do IRRD-Ped foi de 0,828. O ponto de corte para o risco de disfagia foi de cinco pontos (sensibilidade = 100% e especificidade = 80%).

CONCLUSÃO

Devido aos satisfatórios resultados encontrados, deve-se dar prosseguimento ao processo de validação do IRRD-Ped.

Exploring the utility of fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing in young children- A comparison with videofluoroscopy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

In adults, fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has established its place in the assessment of dysphagia and aspiration vis-à-vis the current gold standard, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS), almost at parity. However, in children with quite a different set of factors in play, its role is not certain. The primary objective was to measure the accuracy of FEES in young children with dysphagia, compared to VFSS. The secondary objective was to correlate other endoscopic findings with aspiration in videofluoroscopy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, observational.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty-five children, aged 0.4-36 months with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration underwent FEES and VFSS. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and diagnostic agreement of FEES were calculated using VFSS as the gold standard. To test the statistical significance of the difference in two measurements, Mc Nemar's Chi-square test was used and to test the agreement between FEES and VFSS, Kappa value was calculated. To test the statistical significance of the association of endoscopic findings with VFSS findings, Chi-square test was used.

RESULTS

FEES performed in young children was found to be less sensitive (50%) but more specific of aspiration (82%) with an accuracy of 77% in comparison with VFSS. The reverse was true of penetration (81%, 44% and 59% respectively). The agreement between FEES and VFSS in young children, on all parameters were low (k = 0.061-0.302). Endoscopic findings such as glottic secretions (P = 0.02), weak or diminished laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) (P = 0.001) and penetration (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with aspiration in VFSS. Excessive secretions in the hypopharynx had a stronger correlation with oesophageal dysmotility (P = 0.02) than pharyngeal dysphagia (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

FEES in young children appears to have a low agreement with VFSS unlike in adults. Aspiration observed in FEES is likely to be significant since specificity is high. FEES negative for aspiration may be interpreted taking into account, the aspiration risk of the subject and/or other endoscopic risk factors (penetration, weak/absent LAR & glottic secretions), if VFSS is not a viable alternative.

Predictive Utility of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Inter-Arytenoid Injection Augmentation

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the utility of preoperative penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) scores and clinical findings on modified barium swallow (MBS) in predicting advancement of diet after interarytenoid injection augmentation (IAIA).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 372 consecutive patients who underwent IAIA for pharyngeal dysphagia between 2009 and 2019 were initially identified. Patients were excluded from the study if they had insufficient preop MBS, no postop MBS within 3 months of injection, supraglottoplasty, or underlying neurological condition. Ninety-three patients were included in the study. Pre- and postoperative PAS scores were recorded, as were pre and postop diets. PAS scores were calculated by a single pediatric speech and language pathologist.

RESULTS

Average PAS score on MBS was 5.87 (standard deviation [SD] 2.74); median (range) = 8 (1-8). Postop average was 4.29 (SD 3.02); median (range) = 2 (1-8), P < .001. Those with worse preop PAS scores had increased odds of improvement in diet (odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.49, P = .029). An improvement in PAS score of 3.0 or greater predicted an improvement in diet with a sensitivity of 76.7% and a specificity of 85.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

PAS score on MBS can be a useful tool when assessing pediatric patients who may be candidates for IAIA. Prospectively comparing PAS score in patients post-IAIA to patients solely undergoing diet modification can help to better objectively assess differences in outcomes and understand the full utility of PAS score.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Individual Cohort Study) Laryngoscope, 131:E1707-E1713, 2021.

Best Practices in Modified Barium Swallow Studies

Purpose The modified barium swallow study (MBSS) is a widely used videofluoroscopic evaluation of the functional anatomy and physiology of swallowing that permits visualization of bolus flow throughout the upper aerodigestive tract in real time. The information gained from the examination is critical for identifying and distinguishing the type and severity of swallowing impairment, determining the safety of oral intake, testing the effect of evidence-based frontline interventions, and formulating oral intake recommendations and treatment planning. The goal of this review article is to provide the state of the science and best practices related to MBSS. Method State of the science and best practices for MBSS are reviewed from the perspectives of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and radiologists who clinically practice and conduct research in this area. Current quandaries and emerging clinical and research trends are also considered. Results This document provides an overview of the MBSS and standards for conducting, interpreting, and reporting the exam; the SLPs' and radiologist's perspectives on standardization of the exam; radiation exposure; technical parameters for recording and reviewing the exam; the importance of an interdisciplinary approach with engaged radiologists and SLPs; and special considerations for examinations in children. Conclusions The MBSS is the primary swallowing examination that permits visualization of bolus flow and swallowing movement throughout the upper aerodigestive tract in real time. The clinical validity of the study has been established when conducted using reproducible and validated protocols and metrics applied according to best practices to provide accurate and reliable information necessary to direct treatment planning and limit radiation exposure. Standards and quandaries discussed in this review article, as well as references, provide a basis for understanding the current best practices for MBSS.

Radiation Safety in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study: Systematic Review

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) is generally used to diagnose dysphagia and oropharyngeal aspiration during swallowing movement. Patients and bolus-feeding operators (such as occupational therapist and speech language pathologist) may undergo multiple VFSS procedure, placing them at risk for more radiation exposure due to increased scan time. The present study investigated the dose-area product, effective dose of various protocols, and summarized dose reports from various studies of VFSS. The PubMed database searched for relevant publications reporting radiation dose in the VFSS procedure. 13 articles were selected to be reviewed. This systematic review involved 13 peer-reviewed articles that reported the specific dose of the VFSS procedure. The articles were categorized into three types: operator radiation dose, adult patient radiation dose, and pediatric radiation dose. The operator dose reports showed that the operators' scattering exposure, equivalent dose (across the whole body, eyes, and hands), and annual effective dose were significantly lower than the annual dose limit of 20 mSv. Both adult and pediatric patient dose reports showed that the effective dose, which was estimated from recorded dose-area product, was significantly lower than the annual background exposure of 2.4 mSv in various protocols. The present literature review suggested that the radiation dose of VFSS by modified barium swallowing is acceptable in both operators and patients. However, various radiation protection strategies should be conducted during the procedure to reduce the risk of stochastic effect.

BaByVFSSImP© A Novel Measurement Tool for Videofluoroscopic Assessment of Swallowing Impairment in Bottle-Fed Babies: Establishing a Standard

AIM

This investigation tested the construct validity of the first standardized assessment tool, the BaByVFSS Impairment Profile, (BaByVFSSImP©), developed for the quantification of swallowing observations made from videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) in bottle-fed babies.

METHOD

Construct validity of the measures was tested using descriptive methods and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of swallowing scores obtained from a cohort of bottle-fed babies (median age 3 months 1 day, interquartile range 1 month 4 days-7 months 4 days) sequentially referred for VFSS based on clinical signs, symptoms, or risk factors associated with dysphagia and/or aspiration. Main outcome measures were emergence of functional domains derived from swallowing component impairment scores.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in 21 significant components (factor loadings ≥ 0.5) grouping into five functional domains labeled for common contribution to overall swallowing function. The tool was organized into the BaByVFSSImP. Clinical relevance was explored using correlational analyses between domain scores, maximum penetration/aspiration scores, feeding status, and caregiver burden.

INTERPRETATION

Quantification of physiologic swallowing impairment captured by BaByVFSSImP holds promise for identification of physiologically based targets for intervention, clinical decisions regarding enteral feeding, and tracking the trajectory of swallowing impairment throughout development in young children.

Swallowing problems in children with a tracheostomy tube

INTRODUCTION

Swallowing problems in children with a tracheostomy tube seem to be a common problem, although exact prevalence is not known. The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and type of swallowing problems in children with a tracheostomy tube.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 44 children having a tracheostomy tube at Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's hospital. Assessment by a specialized speech and language therapist, the Modified Evans Blue Dye test, Video Fluoroscopic Swallowing Study and a Fiber-optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing were reviewed with regard to the different phases of swallowing, in particular signs of aspiration.

RESULTS

In our cohort, 31 (70%) children with a tracheostomy tube presented with problems in the oral and/or the pharyngeal phase of swallowing. Overall 19 (43%) children aspirated.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of children with a tracheostomy tube have swallowing problems in the different swallowing phases with a high risk for aspiration.

Reliability and Construct Validity of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale for Quantifying Pediatric Outcomes after Interarytenoid Augmentation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability and construct validity of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in children.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of pre- and postoperative video modified barium swallow studies from children who underwent interarytenoid injection augmentation for unexplained persistent pharyngeal dysphagia. Two pediatric speech and language pathologists reviewed each study twice in a blinded and randomized fashion.

SETTING

Tertiary academic pediatric hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Thirty children were identified with adequate pre- and postoperative modified barium swallow studies within 4 weeks of intervention. Children were separated into clinical outcome groups based on ability to advance to thinner diet consistencies postoperatively. Construct validity was assessed with a mixed linear model to test the hypothesis that only the clinically improved group would receive better Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores after surgery. Reliability was assessed by calculating chance-corrected agreement between raters (interrater) and raters' repeat evaluations (intrarater).

RESULTS

Inter- and intrarater reliabilities (Cohen's κ) were both excellent. Results of the mixed model revealed a significant interaction between outcome group and pre- and postoperative time interval. As hypothesized, this involved a significant improvement in Penetration-Aspiration Scale score only in the improved group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the Penetration-Aspiration Scale is a reliable and valid measure of clinical response to interarytenoid injection augmentation in children.

The Impact of the American Academy of Pediatrics Brief Resolved Unexplained Event Guidelines on Gastrointestinal Testing and Prescribing Practices

OBJECTIVES

To determine if hospitalization, testing, diagnosis, and management of suspected gastroesophageal reflux, and follow-up visits decreased since introduction of American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for brief resolved unexplained events (BRUEs).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study of infants with BRUE evaluated at Boston Children's Hospital in the year before and after guideline implementation to determine if practice patterns have changed. Outcomes included hospitalization rates, frequency of swallow assessments, other diagnostic testing, and reflux diagnoses, cost of care, and number of repeat visits. Groups were compared based on whether they presented before or after guideline implementation.

RESULTS

In total, 359 subjects (186 pre-, 173 post-guidelines) were identified. There were no significant differences in practice patterns or outcomes before or after guideline implementation. Subjects had mean age 2.53 ± 0.15 months, and 80% were hospitalized for 2.49 ± 0.26 days. Each subject had 2.47 diagnostic tests performed, and 89% were noncontributory. Despite only 13% having videofluoroscopic swallow study performed, 72% showed aspiration/penetration. No subject had gastroesophageal reflux testing, yet reflux was implicated as the cause for admission in 40% of subjects, resulting in increased odds of discharge on acid suppressing medications (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.68-4.92, P = .0001). In follow-up, 28% of subjects had repeat hospitalizations or emergency department visits for persistent symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Infants with BRUE continue to undergo low-yield diagnostic testing and after admission remain symptomatic and frequently re-present to medical care. Swallow testing remains infrequent despite its high-yield, reflux continues to be implicated and children are still being discharged on acid suppression despite lack of efficacy.

Feeding Interventions Are Associated With Improved Outcomes in Children With Laryngeal Penetration

OBJECTIVES

To determine if children with laryngeal penetration on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) who received feeding interventions (thickened liquids, change in liquid flow rate, and/or method of liquid delivery) had improved symptoms and decreased hospitalizations compared with those without intervention.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of children under 2 years with laryngeal penetration on VFSS at our institution in 2015 to determine initial and follow-up VFSS findings, symptom improvement at follow-up, and hospitalization risk before and after VFSS. Proportions were compared with Fisher exact test and hospitalizations with paired t tests.

RESULTS

We evaluated 137 subjects with age 8.93 ± 0.59 months who had laryngeal penetration without aspiration on VFSS. Fifty-five percent had change in management, with 40% receiving thickening and 15% a change in flow rate. There was significant improvement in symptoms for children that had feeding intervention and this improvement was the greatest with thickening (OR 41.8, 95% CI 12.34-141.69, P < 0.001). On repeat VFSS, 26% had evidence of aspiration that was not captured on initial VFSS. Subjects had decreased total and pulmonary hospitalizations with feeding intervention and decreased pulmonary nights with thickening (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laryngeal penetration appears to be clinically significant in children with oropharyngeal dysphagia and interventions to decrease its occurrence are associated with improved outcomes including decreased symptoms of concern and hospitalization nights. Thickening or other feeding intervention should be considered for all symptomatic children with laryngeal penetration on swallow study.

Standardization of Radiologic Procedures for Pediatric Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies: A Service-based Quality Improvement Initiative

Introduction

The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) remains the primary method to evaluate swallowing function in infants and children. However, limited standards exist to guide the image acquisition during pediatric VFSSs, leading to inadequate images, variable assessment quality, and potential for suboptimal diagnostic accuracy. The goal of this quality improvement project was to standardize the radiological procedure for radiologists at our institution.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team of project leaders established 3 imaging standards to target (magnification, the field of view, and pulse repetition rate), based on the best available evidence. The team used the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement to guide the project, identified key drivers, and implemented specific interventions. Project leaders observed a total of 170 VFSS examinations, performed by radiology faculty, fellows, and residents over 24 months. The primary outcome for this project was physician compliance with 3 established imaging standards: field of view, magnification, and pulse repetition rate. Project leaders collected data without the radiologists' knowledge, and also recorded average radiation exposure as a balancing measure during this process.

Results

At baseline, compliance with all 3 criteria was 20%. Following interventions designed to improve radiologist performance with the 3 identified standards, the compliance rate reached 100% for the last 50 recorded VFSSs. During this same time, there was no meaningful increase in average radiation exposure compared with the 6 months before the implementation of this project.

Conclusions

Compliance with standardized image acquisition of VFSSs can be accomplished using a systematic quality improvement protocol targeting simple, inexpensive interventions.

Presenting Signs and Symptoms do not Predict Aspiration Risk in Children

OBJECTIVES

To determine if any presenting symptoms are associated with aspiration risk, and to evaluate the reliability of clinical feeding evaluation (CFE) in diagnosing aspiration compared with videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed records of children under 2 years of age who had evaluation for oropharyngeal dysphagia by CFE and VFSS at Boston Children's Hospital and compared presenting symptoms, symptom timing, and CFE and VFSS results. We investigated the relationship between symptom presence and aspiration using the Fisher exact test and stepwise logistic regression with adjustment for comorbidities. CFE and VFSS results were compared using the McNemar test. Intervals from CFE to VFSS were compared using the Student t test.

RESULTS

A total of 412 subjects with mean (±SD) age 8.9 ± 6.9 months were evaluated. No symptom, including timing relative to meals, predicted aspiration on VFSS. This lack of association between symptoms and VFSS results persisted even in the adjusted multivariate model. The sensitivity of CFE for predicting aspiration by VFSS was 44%. Patients with a reassuring CFE waited 28.2 ± 8.5 days longer for confirmatory VFSS compared with those with a concerning CFE (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Presenting symptoms are varied in patients with aspiration and cannot be relied upon to determine which patients have aspiration on VFSS. The CFE does not have the sensitivity to consistently diagnose aspiration so a VFSS should be performed in persistently symptomatic patients.

Swallowing outcomes in children after slide tracheoplasty

INTRODUCTION

Slide tracheoplasty is now considered gold standard treatment for long segment congenital tracheal stenosis. Outcomes are typically focused upon airway patency. Dysphagia is often reported in children undergoing cardiothoracic surgery, but not specifically after slide tracheoplasty. This study was carried out to describe the nature and prevalence of dysphagia following slide tracheoplasty for long segment congenital tracheal stenosis.

METHODS

Retrospective case note review was conducted on a series of patients who underwent swallow evaluation following slide tracheoplasty between 2006 and 2014. A clinical swallow assessment was carried out by a Speech and Language Therapist with videofluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing where indicated. Logistic regression assessed the impact of gender, feeding history, weight, tracheal diameter, stenting and co-morbidities on the likelihood of having post-operative dysphagia.

RESULTS

43 out of 83 slide tracheoplasty patients underwent swallow evaluation. Dysphagia was identified in 30 (70%) of 43 patients. Videofluoroscopy was undertaken in 22 of these patients. All patients who had a videofluoroscopy presented with altered swallow physiology. Aspiration risk was confirmed in 15 patients with frank aspiration seen in 9. Pre-operative history of dysphagia was present in 9 patients. There were two cases of vocal fold palsy. The presence of a stent was the strongest predictor of post-operative dysphagia with an odds ratio of 10.6 (95% CI 1.2-92.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents a high prevalence of post-operative dysphagia in a pediatric population following slide tracheoplasty. In most cases there was no history suggestive of dysphagia pre-operatively. Swallowing needs to be assessed after slide tracheoplasty and longitudinal studies are required.

Feeding Problems in Infants and Children: Assessment and Etiology

Feeding problems in infants and young children are common. In healthy children who are developing and growing normally, feeding problems are usually not serious and can be managed conservatively by reassuring the family and providing them with anticipatory guidance and follow-up. A majority of serious childhood feeding problems occur in children who have other medical, developmental, or behavioral problems. These are best evaluated and treated by an interprofessional team who can identify and address issues in the medical and/or developmental history, problems with oral motor control and function, problems with swallowing, and behavioral and/or sensory issues that may interfere with normal feeding.

Reliability for detecting oropharyngeal aspiration in children using cervical auscultation

PURPOSE

Limited data exist that support the reproducibility of cervical auscultation (CA) use in children. This study aimed to determine the reliability of CA in detecting oropharyngeal aspiration (OPA) in children within a controlled environment.

METHOD

This observational study included eight speech-language pathologists who rated clips of 40 normal and 40 OPA swallowing sounds on two separate occasions (i.e.160 sound clips rated by each speech-language pathologist) to comprise a total of 1280 swallow clips rated. Swallowing sound clips were collected from (1) a volunteer sample of 20 healthy children from the general community (mean 16.2 ± 10.7 months; 65% female); (2) a referred sample of 19 children with demonstrated OPA (mean 22.8 ± 25.5 months; 36.8% female), as determined on videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) (≥6 score).

RESULT

Inter-rater reliability was very good (kappa =0.81, 95%CI 0.79-0.84). Intra-rater reliability for each rater was good to very good (kappa range 0.72-0.98). Overall sensitivity was 93.9% (95%CI 91.8-95.6) and specificity was 94.5% (95%CI 92.5-96.2). High reliability values were found for the detection of OPA versus normal swallows using CA alone.

CONCLUSION

Future research should investigate the use of CA in a variety of clinical settings with less environmental control before CA can be advocated for use in routine clinical practice.

Evaluation of Swallow Function in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia: A Retrospective Study

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is characterized by underdevelopment of the structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches resulting in aesthetic, psychological, and functional problems including feeding and swallowing difficulties. The aim of this study is to gain more insight into swallowing difficulties in patients with CFM. A retrospective study was conducted in the population of patients diagnosed with CFM at three major craniofacial units. Patients with feeding difficulties and those who underwent video fluoroscopic swallow (VFS) studies were included for further analyses. The outcome of the VFS-studies was reviewed with regard to the four phases of swallowing. In our cohort, 13.5% of the 755 patients were diagnosed with swallowing difficulties. The outcome of the VFS-studies of 42 patients showed difficulties in the oral and pharyngeal phases with both thin and thick liquids. Patients with more severe mandibular hypoplasia showed more difficulties to form an appropriate bolus compared to patients who were less severely affected. This is the first study to document swallowing problems in patients with CFM. Difficulties were seen in both the oral and pharyngeal phases. We recommend routine screening for swallowing issues by a speech and language therapist in all patients with CFM and to obtain a VFS-study in patients with a type III mandible.

First Steps Towards Development of an Instrument for the Reproducible Quantification of Oropharyngeal Swallow Physiology in Bottle-Fed Children

The incidence of feeding/swallowing impairments (deglutition disorders) in young children is rising and poses serious acute and long-term health consequences. Accurate detection and prompt intervention can lessen the impact of dysphagia-induced sequelae. Videofluoroscopic Swallow Studies (VFSSs) are used to make critical decisions for medically fragile children despite procedural variability and the lack of agreed upon measures for interpreting and reporting results. This investigation represents the first steps in the development of a novel tool for the quantification of oropharyngeal swallow physiology from full-length VFSS examinations in bottle-fed children. The Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile MBSImP™© served as the conceptual assessment model for development of components and operational score variants to characterize distinguishable VFSS observations. Twenty-four components of swallowing physiology were validated via expert consensus. Training materials included a library of 94 digitized video images comprised of distinct score variants for each component. Materials were disseminated to seven speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who participated in didactic and self-training sessions, and rated components. All SLPs achieved ≥80% reliability criterion after completing two or three training sessions. Agreement for 17 (71%) components was achieved after two sessions. Nutritive sucking/oral and airway-related components were most difficult to distinguish. Three sessions were required for 2 (33%) of the sucking/oral components and 4 (57%) of the airway-related components. These findings support the feasibility to standardize training and reliably score swallowing physiology using precise definitions and unambiguous visual images, and represent preliminary steps towards content validity and reliability of a standardized VFSS tool for bottle-fed children.

Screening and evaluation tools of dysphagia in children with neuromuscular diseases: a systematic review

AIM

Dysphagia is frequent in paediatric patients with neuromuscular diseases (pNMD). Its detection is important for initiating early diagnosis and treatment as well as for minimizing related complications. The aim of this study was to review the literature on dysphagia screening and evaluation tools in pNMD.

METHOD

A systematic review was performed on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and ScienceDirect) were searched. Measurement properties of tools and the quality index developed by Downs and Black were considered.

RESULTS

Our search yielded four studies and four different tools for paediatric patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire, surface electromyography, Neuromuscular Disease Swallowing Status Scale, and videofluoroscopic swallow study showed interesting properties for DMD. No data were available for other NMD and children under 9 years. The mean total score for the quality index was 17.5.

INTERPRETATION

We did not identify any superior validated tools, either for screening or for evaluation of dysphagia, and no widely accepted protocol. Further studies are needed to identify the simplest assessment with the best psychometric properties for pNMD. We recommend establishing a specific tool for pNMD.

Scintigraphic Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Pulmonary Aspiration in Children

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and pulmonary aspiration are encountered in children of all ages. Signs, symptoms, and complications vary from mild and transient to severe life-threatening conditions. This review will present relevant clinical information on these conditions as well as common diagnostic procedures. The role of scintigraphic techniques used in the evaluation of these conditions will be discussed in detail including protocols and performance in comparison to other diagnostic methods.

Preliminary psychometric performance of the Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale

Objective

The objective was to determine the preliminary psychometric performance of a new clinical feeding scale to diagnose oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in neonates.

Methods

Twenty neonates with a median gestational age of 35 weeks were evaluated using the Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) and modified barium swallow studies (MBSS). The results were compared.

Results

Nine of the 20 participants presented with OPD on the NFAS. Comparison of the scale’s results with instrumental MBSS indicated that all participants without OPD were correctly excluded (100% sensitivity). The specificity was 78.6%, indicating that three participants were falsely identified with OPD on the scale. Inter-rater reliability was determined on 50% (n = 10) of the sample. Substantial agreement (80%) was obtained between two raters in five of the six sections of the scale and on the diagnostic outcome.

Conclusion

The preliminary performance of the scale appears to be promising. A further validation study will take place.

Application and Verification of Quantitative Objective Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Measures in a Pediatric Population with Dysphagia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of obtaining and utilizing objective measures of timing and displacement from videofluoroscopy performed in pediatrics.

STUDY DESIGN

Children (n = 121; mean age 38 months, range 9 days-21 years, SD 4 years) referred for videofluoroscopy were recruited. All underwent a standardized protocol including a mid-feed 20-second loop recorded at 25 frames per second. Videos were analyzed using objective digital measures of timing and displacement. Radiation dose was recorded.

RESULTS

Quantitative measures were obtained in all children. Maximum opening of the pharyngoesophageal segment and timing measures were correlated with increasing age. Values were congruent with validated adult data. Mean radiation time was 1.58 minutes (range 0.15-3.47, SD 0.66), and mean radiation dose was 30.16 cGycm² (range 6.5-85 SD 15.17). Radiation dose (P = .21) and radiation time (P = .72) were not significantly different using the increased frame rate compared with an age-matched cohort (n =100) prior to protocol change.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective quantitative measures of swallowing measurements can be obtained successfully from pediatric videofluoroscopy performed at high frame rates, without increasing radiation dose. Measures are biologically consistent, reproducible, demonstrate internal cross-correlation, and mirror adult data. These measures have potential to support targeted management and objective monitoring of change by pediatric feeding teams in the future.

Radiation exposure from videofluoroscopic swallow studies in children with a type 1 laryngeal cleft and pharyngeal dysphagia: A retrospective review

INTRODUCTION

Radiation exposure is recognized as having long term consequences, resulting in increased risks over the lifetime. Children, in particular, have a projected lifetime risk of cancer, which should be reduced if within our capacity. The objective of this study is to quantify the amount of ionizing radiation in care for children being treated for aspiration secondary to a type 1 laryngeal cleft. With this baseline data, strategies can be developed to create best practice pathways to maintain quality of care while minimizing radiation exposure.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 78 children seen in a tertiary pediatric aerodigestive center over a 5 year period from 2008 to 2013 for management of a type 1 laryngeal cleft. The number of videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSS) per child was quantified, as was the mean effective dose of radiation exposure. The 78 children reviewed were of mean age 19.9 mo (range 4 mo-12 years). All children were evaluated at the aerodigestive center with clinical symptomatology and subsequent diagnosis of a type 1 laryngeal cleft. Aspiration was assessed via VFSS and exposure data collected. Imaging exams where dose parameters were not available were excluded.

RESULTS

The mean number of VFSS each child received during the total course of treatment was 3.24 studies (range 1-10). The average effective radiation dose per pediatric VFSS was 0.16 mSv (range: 0.03 mSv-0.59 mSv) per study. Clinical significance was determined by comparison to a pediatric CXR. At our facility a CXR yields an effective radiation dose of 0.017 mSv. Therefore, a patient receives an equivalent total of 30.6 CXR over the course of management.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure has known detrimental effects particularly in pediatric patients. The total ionizing radiation from VFSS exams over the course of management of aspiration has heretofore not been reported in peer reviewed literature. With this study's data in mind, future developments are indicated to create innovative clinical pathways and limit radiation exposure.

Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts

Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts are rare congenital anomalies of the aerodigestive tract. Patients may present with airway and/or swallowing impairments. An approach to evaluation and management is presented. Important pearls for conservative and surgical management are discussed. Open versus endoscopic surgical techniques are reviewed.

Swallowing dysfunction among patients with laryngeal cleft: More than just aspiration?

BACKGROUND

The Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) is the most widely utilized instrumental assessment of swallowing disorders in children; however, the exact role in the evaluation of laryngeal clefts remains controversial.

METHODS

This study was an IRB-approved retrospective review on patients diagnosed with laryngeal cleft from 2002 to 2014. The objective was to describe the range of swallowing dysfunction that may be present in patients with laryngeal clefts both pre- and post-intervention (conservative management versus surgery). A speech-language pathologist reviewed MBS studies and medical records to determine Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-five patients who underwent laryngeal cleft repair during the study period (type 1, n=111; type 2, n=54; type 3, n=9; type 4, n=1) were included. Fifty patients who were managed conservatively (type 1) were also included. Swallowing impairment was demonstrated in all phases of swallowing for all cleft types. Oral phase impairment ranged from 27-67% pre-intervention to 19-75% post-intervention, triggering impairment from 24-42% pre-intervention to 24-75% post-intervention, and pharyngeal phase impairment (laryngeal penetration and aspiration) from 57-100% pre-intervention to 40-100% post-intervention. Laryngeal penetration and aspiration on thin and thick liquids, silent aspiration, PAS, and FOIS scores are reported. Significant improvements in swallowing function (p<0.05) were documented in all of the conservatively and surgically managed sub-groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The MBS study is a useful tool for evaluating swallowing function in patients with laryngeal cleft and provides information beyond the lack or presence of aspiration. Understanding impairments in all phases of swallowing may be beneficial for perioperative management.

Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between an image-intensifier system and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system — technical phantom measurements and evaluation of clinical imaging in children

BACKGROUND

Many image-intensifier fluoroscopy systems have been replaced by flat-panel detectors in recent years.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the level of contrast, image resolution and radiation dose between an image-intensifier and a newer-generation flat-panel detector system in a pediatric radiology unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared two systems — a conventional image intensifier and a newer-generation flat-panel system. We measured image quality and radiation dose using a technical phantom. Additionally, we retrospectively compared age-matched fluoroscopic pediatric voiding cystourethrography (n = 15) and upper gastrointestinal investigations (n = 25).

RESULTS

In phantom studies image contrast was equal while image resolution was higher and mean radiation dose lower using the flat-panel system (P < 0.0001). In pediatric investigations, mean dose area product was significantly reduced on the flat-panel system for upper gastrointestinal investigation (45 ± 38 μGy*m2 vs. 11 ± 9 μGy*m2; P < 0.0001) and for voiding cystourethrography (18 ± 20 μGy*m2 vs. 10 ± 12 μGy*m2; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The newer flat-panel system performs at lower dose levels with equal to better image quality and therefore seems to be the more suitable technique for pediatric fluoroscopy in comparison to image-intensifier systems.

Dysphagia in children with repaired oesophageal atresia

Dysphagia is a common problem in children with repaired oesophageal atresia (OA). Abnormalities in the oropharyngeal and oesophageal phase have hardly been studied. The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of dysphagia in children with repaired OA and to identify and differentiate oral and pharyngeal dysphagia based on videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) findings in a limited number of children in this cohort. Medical records of 111 patients, born between January 1996 and July 2013 and treated at the Radboudumc Amalia Children's Hospital, were retrospectively reviewed. The prevalence of dysphagia was determined by the objective and modified Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) in four age groups. The first performed VFSS of 12 children was structurally assessed. The prevalence of dysphagia was 61 of 111 patients (55 %) in age group <1 year. In age group 1-4, 5-11 and 12-18 years, the prevalence of dysphagia decreased from 54 of 106 (51 %) patients to 11 of 64 (17 %) and 5 of 24 (21 %) patients. The 12 VFSS's reviews revealed oral dysphagia in 36 % and pharyngeal dysphagia in 75 %.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights dysphagia as an important problem in different age groups of children with repaired OA. Furthermore, our study shows the presence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in this population. This study emphasizes the need to standardize the use of objective dysphagia scales, like the modified FOIS, to provide a careful follow-up of children with repaired OA.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Prevalence of dysphagia in children with repaired oesophageal atresia varies widely (ranges from 45 to 70 %) in literature. • Oral, pharyngeal and oesophageal dysphagia require different treatment approaches. What is New: • We determined dysphagia based on functional oral intake and provide an overview of change in dysphagia prevalence and severity over time in children with repaired OA. • Our study shows that dysphagia, including oropharyngeal dysphagia, is highly prevalent in young children with repaired OA and improves with time.

Hard to swallow: Developmental biological insights into pediatric dysphagia

Pediatric dysphagia-feeding and swallowing difficulties that begin at birth, last throughout childhood, and continue into maturity--is one of the most common, least understood complications in children with developmental disorders. We argue that a major cause of pediatric dysphagia is altered hindbrain patterning during pre-natal development. Such changes can compromise craniofacial structures including oropharyngeal muscles and skeletal elements as well as motor and sensory circuits necessary for normal feeding and swallowing. Animal models of developmental disorders that include pediatric dysphagia in their phenotypic spectrum can provide mechanistic insight into pathogenesis of feeding and swallowing difficulties. A fairly common human genetic developmental disorder, DiGeorge/22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome (22q11DS) includes a substantial incidence of pediatric dysphagia in its phenotypic spectrum. Infant mice carrying a parallel deletion to 22q11DS patients have feeding and swallowing difficulties that approximate those seen in pediatric dysphagia. Altered hindbrain patterning, craniofacial malformations, and changes in cranial nerve growth prefigure these difficulties. Thus, in addition to craniofacial and pharyngeal anomalies that arise independently of altered neural development, pediatric dysphagia may result from disrupted hindbrain patterning and its impact on peripheral and central neural circuit development critical for feeding and swallowing. The mechanisms that disrupt hindbrain patterning and circuitry may provide a foundation to develop novel therapeutic approaches for improved clinical management of pediatric dysphagia.

Contrast pooling in videofluoroscopic swallowing study as a risk factor for pneumonia in children with dysphagia

OBJECTIVE

To determine if laryngeal contrast pooling on a videofluoroscopic swallowing study increases the risk for pneumonia in the following 6 months in children with dysphagia. Secondarily, to determine in the same population, if laryngeal abnormalities or syndromic disorders increase the risk for pneumonia in the same timeframe.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A chart review of pediatric patients that presented to the swallowing and dysphagia clinic at the Montreal Children's Hospital for a videofluoroscopic swallowing study in the last three years was conducted. Videofluoroscopic findings, patient characteristics, demographic data, and pneumonias occurring within 6 months after the study were recorded for all patients. Patients with unsuccessful swallowing studies, incomplete charts, extra-laryngeal etiologies for recurrent pneumonia, or who were lost to follow up were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 287 children who presented to the clinic, 239 patients remained after exclusion, of which 40 (16.7%) exhibited pooling and 199 (83.3%) did not. Children with pooling on videofluoroscopic swallowing study did not have significantly more pneumonias than patients without pooling (22.5% vs 17.1%, P=0.42). Secondary analyses revealed that laryngeal abnormalities were a significant independent risk factor (P=0.02) for pneumonia at 6 months, while being diagnosed with a syndrome was not (P=0.18).

CONCLUSION

In this study of contrast pooling in videofluoroscopic swallowing study, there was no significant difference in pneumonia occurrence in patients with and without pooling at 6 months post study. Future prospective studies should be conducted to confirm these findings. The present review showed that feeding changes should not be made based on pooling alone.