Comparison of image quality between synthetic and patients' electrocardiogram-gated 320-row pediatric cardiac computed tomography

Comparison of pediatric lens scattered dose measurements between axial 40-mm and helical 160-mm detector width computed tomography scan modes

BACKGROUND

Reports comparing field lens doses between helical scans with a 40-mm detector width and axial scans with a 160-mm detector width using different computed tomography (CT) scanners are currently scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare scatter doses for lenses between a helical scan with a 40-mm detector width and an axial scan with a 160-mm detector width when using different CT scanners in the context of pediatric chest examinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two different CT machines were used: Revolution CT (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with a 256-row, 0.625-mm multidetector; and Aquilion ONE GENESIS Edition (Canon Medical Systems, Otawara, Japan) with a 320-row, 0.5-mm multidetector. Three pediatric anthropomorphic phantoms were used, with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs) placed on the left and right lenses. The scatter dose values measured by the OSLDs were compared between a helical scan with a 40-mm detector width and an axial scan with a 160-mm detector width during pediatric chest CT examinations.

RESULTS

Median equivalent doses for the helical and axial scans were 0.12 and 0.12 mSv/mGy for the newborn, 0.17 and 0.16 mSv/mGy for the 1-year-old, and 0.18 and 0.15 mSv/mGy for the 5-year-old, respectively, when using the Revolution CT. With the Revolution CT, no significant differences were observed in the scatter doses between helical and axial scans in the newborn and 1-year-old phantoms. However, the lens scatter dose for the helical scan was approximately 20-35% higher than that for the axial scan in the 5-year-old phantom (P<0.01). The median equivalent doses of eye lenses for the helical and axial scans were 0.12 and 0.07 mSv/mGy for the newborn, 0.07 and 0.05 mSv/mGy for the 1-year-old, and 0.14 and 0.12 mSv/mGy for the 5-year-old, respectively, when using the Aquilion ONE. With the Aquilion ONE, lens scatter doses for the helical scan were approximately 70%, 40%, and 30% higher in the newborn, 1-year-old, and 5-year-old phantoms, respectively, than those for the axial scan (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

When using the Aquilion ONE, lens scatter doses for the helical scan were significantly higher in all three phantoms than those for the axial scan. In contrast, when using the Revolution CT, the lens scatter dose for the helical scan was significantly higher in the 5-year-old phantom than that for the axial scan. These results suggest that although scattered doses may vary with respect to the CT scanner and body size, they are generally lower in the case of axial scans.

Impact of beam collimation of z-overscanning on dose to the lens and thyroid gland in paediatric thoracic computed tomography imaging

BACKGROUND

Adaptive collimation reduces the dose deposited outside the imaged volume along the z-axis. An increase in the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid) in the z-axis direction is a concern in paediatric computed tomography (CT).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid) between 40-mm and 80-mm collimation during thoracic paediatric helical CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used anthropomorphic phantoms of newborns and 5-year-olds with 40-mm and 80-mm collimation during helical CT. We compared the measured dose deposited outside the imaged volume using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLD) at the surfaces of the lens and thyroid and the image noise between the 40-mm and 80-mm collimations.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid) between the 40-mm and 80-mm collimations for both phantoms (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Compared with that observed for 80-mm collimation in helical CT scans of the paediatric thorax, the dose deposited outside the imaged volume (to the lens and thyroid) was significantly lower in newborns and 5-year-olds with 40-mm collimation.

Usefulness of electrocardiogram mA modulation during the electrocardiogram-gated CT scan in paediatrics with high heart rate for different helical pitch: a phantom-based assessment study

We investigated the effect of electrocardiographic (ECG) mA-modulation of ECG-gated scans of computed tomography (CTA) on radiation dose and image noise at high heart rates (HR) above 100 bpm between helical pitches (HP) 0.16 and 0.24. ECG mA-modulation range during ECG-gated CTA is 50-100 mA, the phase setting is 40-60% and the scan range is 90 mm for clinical data during HR for 90, 120 and 150 bpm. Radiation dose and image noise in Housfield units are measured for CT equipment during HR for 90, 120 and 150 bpm between HP 0.16 and 0.24. ECG mA-modulation, dose reduction ratio for HR 90, 120 and 150 bpm are 19.1, 13.4 and 8.7% at HP 0.16 and 17.1, 13.3 and 7.7% at HP 0.24, respectively. No significant differences were observed in image noise between both HP. Dose reductions of 8-24% are achieved with ECG mA-modulation during ECG-gated CCTA scan, which is beneficial even in high HR more than 100 bpm.