Evaluation of articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using T2* mapping at different time points at 3.0 Tesla MRI: a feasibility study

Feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) T2* cartilage mapping in the hip: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Ultrashort echo time (UTE) T2* is sensitive to molecular changes within the deep calcified layer of cartilage. Feasibility of its use in the hip needs to be established to determine suitability for clinical use.

PURPOSE

To establish feasibility of UTE T2* cartilage mapping in the hip and determine if differences in regional values exist.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MRI scans with UTE T2* cartilage maps were prospectively acquired on eight hips. Hip cartilage was segmented into whole and deep layers in anterosuperior, superior, and posterosuperior regions. Quantitative UTE T2* maps were analyzed (independent one-way ANOVA) and reliability was calculated (ICC).

RESULTS

UTE T2* mean values (anterosuperior, superior, posterosuperior): full femoral layer (19.55, 18.43, 16.84 ms) (P=0.004), full acetabular layer (19.37, 17.50, 16.73 ms) (P=0.013), deep femoral layer (18.68, 17.90, 15.74 ms) (P=0.010), and deep acetabular layer (17.81, 16.18, 15.31 ms) (P=0.007). Values were higher in anterosuperior compared to posterosuperior regions (mean difference; 95% confidence interval [CI]): full femur layer (2.71 ms; 95% CI 0.91-4.51: P=0.003), deep femur layer (2.94 ms; 95% CI 0.69-5.19; P=0.009), full acetabular layer (2.63 ms 95% CI 0.55-4.72; P=0.012), and deep acetabular layer (2.50 ms; 95% CI 0.69-4.30; P=0.006). Intra-reader (ICC 0.89-0.99) and inter-reader reliability (ICC 0.63-0.96) were good to excellent for the majority of cartilage layers.

CONCLUSION

UTE T2* cartilage mapping was feasible in the hip with mean values in the range of 16.84-19.55 ms in the femur and 16.73-19.37 ms in the acetabulum. Significantly higher values were present in the anterosuperior region compared to the posterosuperior region.

Simultaneous bilateral T1 , T2 , and T1ρ relaxation mapping of the hip joint with magnetic resonance fingerprinting

Quantitative MRI can detect early biochemical changes in cartilage, but its bilateral use in clinical routines is challenging. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate the feasibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting for bilateral simultaneous T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ mapping of the hip joint. The study population consisted of six healthy volunteers with no known trauma or pain in the hip. Monoexponential T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ relaxation components were assessed in femoral lateral, superolateral, and superomedial, and inferior, as well as acetabular, superolateral, and superomedial subregions in left and right hip cartilage. Aligned ranked nonparametric factorial analysis was used to assess the side's impact on the subregions. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare subregions, and coefficient of variation to assess repeatability. Global averages of T₁ (676.0 ± 45.4 and 687.6 ± 44.5 ms), T₂ (22.5 ± 2.6 and 22.1 ± 2.5 ms), and T_1ρ (38.2 ± 5.5 and 38.2 ± 5.5 ms) were measured in the left and right hip, and articular cartilage, respectively. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed a significant difference between different subregions' relaxation times regardless of the hip side (p < 0.001 for T₁ , p = 0.012 for T₂ , and p < 0.001 for T_1ρ ). The Wilcoxon test showed that T₁ of femoral layers was significantly (p < 0.003) higher than that for acetabular cartilage. The experiments showed excellent repeatability with CV_rms of 1%, 2%, and 4% for T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ, respectively. It was concluded that bilateral T₁ , T₂ , and T_1ρ relaxation times, as well as B₁⁺ maps, can be acquired simultaneously from hip joints using the proposed MRF sequence.

A New Method for Cartilage Evaluation in Femoroacetabular Impingement Using Quantitative T2 Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Preliminary Validation against Arthroscopic Findings

OBJECTIVE

The outcome of arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) depends on the preoperative status of the hip cartilage. Quantitative T2 can detect early biochemical cartilage changes, but its routine implementation is challenging. Furthermore, intrinsic T2 variability between patients makes it difficult to define a threshold to identify cartilage lesions. To address this, we propose a normalized T2-index as a new method to evaluate cartilage in FAI.

DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 18 FAI patients with arthroscopically confirmed cartilage defects. Cartilage T2 maps were reconstructed from multi-spin-echo 3-T data using the echo-modulation-curve (EMC) model-based technique. The central femoral cartilage, assumed healthy in early-stage FAI, was used as the normalization reference to define a T2-index. We investigated the ability of the T2-index to detect surgically confirmed cartilage lesions.

RESULTS

The average T2-index was 1.14 ± 0.1 and 1.13 ± 0.1 for 2 separated segmentations. Using T2-index >1 as the threshold for damaged cartilage, accuracy was 88% and 100% for the 2 segmentations. We found moderate intraobserver repeatability, although separate segmentations yielded comparable accuracy. Damaged cartilage could not be identified using nonnormalized average T2 values.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study confirms the importance of normalizing T2 values to account for interpatient variability and suggests that the T2-index is a promising biomarker for the detection of cartilage lesions in FAI. Future work is needed to confirm that combining T2-index with morphologic MRI and other quantitative biomarkers could improve cartilage assessment in FAI.

Exploration of MRI T2 Mapping Image Application in Articular Disc Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint in Adolescents

Purpose

To explore the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 mapping technique in clinical practice through morphological and quantitative analysis of T2 mapping sequences in adolescents with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and control groups comprising healthy participants.

Patients and Methods

A total of 45 and 63 patients, who had articular disc displacement with and without reduction, respectively, were assigned to the experimental groups, and 57 participants with normal articular discs of the temporomandibular joint were considered as the control group. All participants in the three groups underwent MRI. T2 mapping was performed in the oblique sagittal plane. The regions of interest (ROIs) for the T2 relaxation time maps of the disc were selected manually. The performance of morphological and structural changes and quantitative parameters in MRI T2 mapping image artifacts were statistically compared.

Results

In the control group, the mean T2 value was 39.284 ±5.634 ms, in the group of disc displacement with reduction, the mean T2 value was 33.634 ±4.235 ms, and in the group of disc displacement without reduction, the mean T2 value was 30.982 ±3.205 ms. The T2 mapping values of the experimental groups, together with different morphological structures, were significantly lower than were those of the control group.

Conclusion

MRI T2 mapping enables a more accurate evaluation of TMD severity. Sequentially, it helps provide a more reliable medical imaging basis for classifying diagnosis and evaluation in clinical practice.

Using Cartilage MRI T2-Mapping to Analyze Early Cartilage Degeneration in the Knee Joint of Young Professional Soccer Players

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and characterize the appearance of articular cartilage in the tibiofemoral joint of young professional soccer players using T2-relaxation time evaluation on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

DESIGN

In this study, we included 57 male adolescents from the youth academy of a professional soccer team. The MRI scans were acquired of the knee joint of the supporting leg. An "early unloading" (minute 0) and "late unloading" (minute 28) T2-sequence was included in the set of images. Quantitative T2-analysis was performed in the femorotibial joint cartilage in 4 slices with each 10 regions of interest (ROIs). Statistical evaluation, using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, was primarily performed to compare the T2 values of the "early unloading" and "late unloading."

RESULTS

When comparing "early unloading" with "late unloading," our findings showed a significant increase of T2-relaxation times in the weightbearing femoral cartilage of the medial (P < 0.001) and lateral (P < 0.001) compartment of the knee and in the tibial cartilage of the medial compartment (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this study, alterations of the cartilage were found with a maximum in the medial condyle where the biomechanical load of the knee joint is highest, as well as where most of the chronic cartilage lesions occur. To avoid chronic damage, special focus should be laid on this region.

T2* Mapping of the Hip in Asymptomatic Volunteers with Normal Cartilage Morphology: An Analysis of Regional and Age-Dependent Distribution

Objective To assess age-dependent and regional differences in T2* relaxation measurements in hip joint cartilage of asymptomatic volunteers at 3 T. Design Three age cohorts (cohort 1: age 20-30 years, 15 individuals; cohort 2: age 30-40 years, 17 individuals; cohort 3: age 40-50 years, 15 individuals) were enrolled. T2* values were obtained in the central and peripheral cartilage of the acetabulum and the femoral head in 7 regions (anterior to superior and posterior). Results T2* did not differ among age cohorts in acetabular cartilage (cohort 1: 24.65 ± 6.56 ms, cohort 2: 24.70 ± 4.83 ms, cohort 3: 25.81 ± 5.10 ms, P = 0.10) and femoral head cartilage (cohort 1: 27.08 ± 8.24 ms, cohort 2: 25.90 ± 7.82 ms, cohort 3: 26.50 ± 5.61 ms, P = 0.34). Analysis of the regional T2* distribution pattern indicates increased T2* values in the anterior, anterior-superior, superior-anterior, and the posterior-superior aspects of acetabular and femoral head cartilage. For acetabular cartilage, higher values were observed in the central region (25.90 ± 4.80 ms vs. 24.21 ± 4.05 ms, P < 0.0001) whereas femoral head cartilage did not reveal such differences (26.62 ± 5.74 ms vs. 26.37 ± 5.89 ms, P = 0.44). Conclusions The T2* analysis of presumably healthy hip joint cartilage does not seem to be stratified according to age in this population. Regional T2* variation throughout hip joint cartilage is apparent in this modality.

T2* Mapping for Hip Joint Cartilage Assessment: Pre-MRI Exercise and Time of Imaging Do Not Bias the T2* Measurement in Asymptomatic Volunteers

Objective To identify if the time of day and pre-imaging exercise matter while performing T2* mapping of hip joint cartilage at 3 T. Design Nine asymptomatic healthy volunteers (mean age 27.4 ± 4.0 years) with no obvious morphological evidence of cartilage damage were enrolled. The MRI protocol included a double-echo steady state (DESS) sequence for morphological cartilage assessment and a multi-echo data image combination sequence for the T2* measurement. T2* values were obtained between 8 and 11 a.m., between 3 and 6 p.m., and after 50 knee-bends at several time points of each measurement (0, 15, 30, 45, 60 minutes). Results We observed no differences ( P = 0.47) between the T2* values obtained in the morning (T2* = 22.9 ± 3.0 ms) and those measured in the afternoon (T2* = 23.2 ± 3.2 ms). We also observed no statistically significant differences between the T2* values at different time points ( P = 0.67) or after 50 knee-bends ( P = 0.43). Conclusions Timing of the scan and pre-imaging exercise clearly did not matter in this modality. This study consolidates the value of T2* imaging in hip joint cartilage that seems to be independent of diurnal effects and physical activity prior to MRI.

A narrative overview of the current status of MRI of the hip and its relevance for osteoarthritis research - what we know, what has changed and where are we going?

OBJECTIVE

To review and discuss the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the context of hip osteoarthritis (OA) research.

DESIGN

The content of this narrative review, based on an extensive PubMed database research including English literature only, describes the advances in MRI of the hip joint and its potential usefulness in hip OA research, reviews the relevance of different MRI features in regard to symptomatic and structural progression in hip OA, and gives an outlook regarding future use of MRI in hip OA research endeavors.

RESULTS

Recent technical advances have helped to overcome many of the past difficulties related to MRI assessment of hip OA. MRI-based morphologic scoring systems allow for detailed assessment of several hip joint tissues and, in combination with the recent advances in MRI, may increase reproducibility and sensitivity to change. Compositional MRI techniques may add to our understanding of disease onset and progression. Knowledge about imaging pitfalls and anatomical variants is crucial to avoid misinterpretation. In comparison to research on knee OA, the associations between MRI features and the incidence and progression of disease as well as with clinical symptoms have been little explored. Anatomic alterations of the hip joint as seen in femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) seem to play a role in the onset and progression of structural damage.

CONCLUSIONS

With the technical advances occurring in recent years, MRI may play a major role in investigating the natural history of hip OA and provide an improved method for assessment of the efficacy of new therapeutic approaches.

Imaging of femoroacetabular impingement-current concepts

Following the recognition of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) as a clinical entity, diagnostic tools have continuously evolved. While the diagnosis of FAI is primarily made based on the patients' history and clinical examination, imaging of FAI is indispensable. Routine diagnostic work-up consists of a set of plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MR-arthrography. Recent advances in MRI technology include biochemically sensitive sequences bearing the potential to detect degenerative changes of the hip joint at an early stage prior to their appearance on conventional imaging modalities. Computed tomography may serve as an adjunct. Advantages of CT include superior bone to soft tissue contrast, making CT applicable for image-guiding software tools that allow evaluation of the underlying dynamic mechanisms causing FAI. This article provides a summary of current concepts of imaging in FAI and a review of the literature on recent advances, and their application to clinical practice.

Three-dimensional Imaging and Computer Navigation in Planning for Hip Preservation Surgery

Hip preservation surgery is performed to address femoroacetabular impingement, alleviate any associated pain, and reduce the risk of early onset of osteoarthritis. In the last decade, arthroscopy has become more popular in addressing femoroacetabular impingement, due to its minimally invasive approach. However, poor visualization and limited spatial awareness of the joint make arthroscopy of the hip difficult, resulting in a steep learning curve. This paper reviews the utility and benefits of 3-dimensional imaging and computer navigation and what these tools may add to the preoperative planning stages of hip preservation surgery.

Quantitative magnetic resonance arthrography in patients with femoroacetabular impingement

PURPOSE

Quantitative MRI (QMRI) of the hip with sequences such as T1_ρ and T2 mapping has been utilized to detect early changes in cartilage matrix composition. However, QMRI has not been performed in the presence of intra-articular contrast. Thus the purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and use of QMRI during MR-arthrography (MRA) in femoracetabular impingement (FAI) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using a 3 Tesla MR-scanner, 10 FAI patients underwent a unilateral MRA and standard MRI of the hip joint. Global and sub-regional T1_ρ and T2 relaxation times of the acetabular and femoral articular cartilage were computed in the MRA and MRI assessments and agreement of these values were assessed using the Krippendorff's alpha (α) coefficient and linear regression (μ). T1_ρ and T2 relaxation times between the MRA and MRI were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Both global and sub-regional T1_ρ and T2 relaxation times demonstrated strong agreement (α > 0.83; μ > 0.85) independent of intra-articular contrast. Also, global and sub-regional acetabular T1_ρ (P = 0.72) and T2 (P = 0.94), as well as femoral T1_ρ , relaxation times were similar between MRA and MRI (P = 0.73) yet femoral T2 relaxation times decreased when using intra-articular contrast (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility of T1ρ and T2 mapping for use in hip MRA with FAI patients. The inclusion of QMRI in MRA provides a quantitative assessment of the effects of FAI on hip joint articular cartilage while allowing for detailed assessment of labral pathology with the use of intra-articular contrast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:1539-1545.

Regional Articular Cartilage Abnormalities of the Hip

OBJECTIVE

Imaging of hip cartilage is challenging because of its limited thickness and complex geometry and therefore requires advanced MRI techniques. However, cartilage abnormalities are found in a number of disease entities, and their diagnosis may impact patient management. This article will provide pertinent information about the motivation to image hip cartilage, which imaging techniques to use, and how to analyze cartilage; finally, we will discuss disease entities with regional cartilage lesions, including the typical MRI findings.

CONCLUSION

Because the detection and quantification of regional cartilage abnormalities are critical for guidance of operative and nonoperative management of hip disorders, radiologists should be familiar with imaging and analysis techniques for assessing hip cartilage.

Hip arthroscopy and osteoarthritis: Where are the limits and indications?

The use of hip arthroscopy, as a surgical technique, has increased significantly over the past ten years. The procedure has shown good and excellent results in symptom relief and function improvement for patients with femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) and concurrent chondro-labral lesions. It is also a reliable method to correct the characteristic pathomorphologic alteration of FAI. However, surgical results are less successful among patients with advanced articular damage and secondary hip osteoarthritis. The aim of this article is to present some clinical and imagenological tools to discriminate the good candidates for arthroscopic FAI treatment from those who are not, due to extensive articular damage.

Assessing risk factors for early hip osteoarthritis in activity-related hip pain: a Delphi study

OBJECTIVE

Hip pain and injury as a result of activity can lead to the development of early hip osteoarthritis (OA) in susceptible individuals. Our understanding of the factors that increase susceptibility continues to evolve. The ability to clearly identify individuals (and cohorts) with activity-related hip pain who are at risk of early hip OA is currently lacking. The purpose of this study was to gain expert consensus on which key clinical measures might help predict the risk of early hip OA in individuals presenting with activity-related hip pain. The agreed measures would constitute a standardised approach to initial clinical assessment to help identify these individuals.

METHODS

This Dephi study used online surveys to gain concordance of expert opinion in a structured process of 'rounds'. In this study, we asked 'What outcome measures are useful in predicting hip OA in activity-related hip pain?' The Delphi panel consisted of experts from sport and exercise medicine, orthopaedics, rheumatology, physiotherapy and OA research.

RESULTS

The study identified key clinical measures in the history, examination and investigations (plain anteroposterior radiograph and femoroacetabular impingement views) that the panel agreed would be useful in predicting future risk of hip OA when assessing activity-related hip pain. The panel also agreed that certain investigations and tests (eg, MR angiography) did not currently have a role in routine assessment. There was a lack of consensus regarding the role of MRI, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and certain biomechanical and functional assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a standardised approach to the clinical assessment of patients with activity-related hip pain. Assessment measures rejected by the Delphi panel were newer, more expensive investigations that currently lack evidence. Assessment measures that did not reach consensus include MRI and PROMs. Their role remains ambiguous and would benefit from further research.

Cartilage T1ρ and T2 Relaxation Times in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Radiographic Hip Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze region-specific T1ρ and T2 relaxation times of the hip joint cartilage in relation to presence or absence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis (OA) and presence or absence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected cartilage defects.

METHODS

Weight-bearing radiographs and 3T MRI studies of the hip were obtained from 84 volunteers. Based on Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scoring of the radiographs, 54 subjects were classified as healthy controls (K/L grade ≤1) and 30 were classified as having mild or moderate radiographic hip OA (K/L grades 2 or 3, respectively). Two-dimensional fat-suppressed fast spin-echo MRI sequences were used for semiquantitative clinical scoring of cartilage defects, and a T1ρ/T2 sequence was used to quantitatively assess the cartilage matrix. The femoral and acetabular cartilage was then segmented into 8 regions and the mean T1ρ/T2 values were calculated. Differences in T1ρ and T2 relaxation times were compared between subjects with and those without radiographic hip OA, and those with and those without femoral or acetabular cartilage defects.

RESULTS

Higher T1ρ and T2 relaxation times in the anterior superior and central regions of the acetabular cartilage were seen in individuals with radiographic hip OA and those with acetabular cartilage defects compared to their respective controls (P < 0.05). In the femoral cartilage, the differences in T1ρ and T2 were not significant for any of the comparisons. Significant differences in the T1ρ and T2 values (each P < 0.05) were found in more subregions of the cartilage and across the whole cartilage when subjects were stratified based on the presence of MRI-detected cartilage defects than when they were stratified based on the presence of radiographic hip OA.

CONCLUSION

T1ρ and T2 relaxation parameters are sensitive to the presence of cartilage degeneration. Both parameters may therefore support MRI evidence of cartilage defects of the hip.

Is the contralateral hip at risk in patients with unilateral symptomatic cam femoroacetabular impingement? A quantitative T1ρ MRI study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the profile of weight-bearing cartilage of hips with a cam deformity using T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluate for a side-to-side difference in the T1ρ profile of patients with bilateral cam morphology but only unilateral hip pain.

METHODS

19 patients with bilateral cam morphology undergoing osteochondroplasty for unilateral hip pain were prospectively recruited. Anterior and anterosuperior alpha angles were measured using computer tomography. All patients underwent bilateral 1.5T T1ρ MRI. The cartilage bilayer of the hip joint was evaluated and the mean T1ρ relaxation time calculated for each quadrant of the weight-bearing surface.

RESULTS

Mean T1ρ relaxation times were not significantly different when each quadrant was compared to the rest of the weight-bearing surface of the symptomatic (P = 0.068) and asymptomatic hips (P = 0.102). There was also no significant side-to-side difference between the same quadrants of symptomatic and asymptomatic hips. No correlation was detected between alpha angle and the mean T1ρ relaxation time in each quadrant. There was no significant difference in mean alpha angles between the symptomatic and asymptomatic sides at the anterior (54.2 vs 56.0°; P = 0.382) and anterosuperior positions (65.1 vs 65.2°; P = 0.971).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that previously observed regional variation in T1ρ values of normal hips is altered in hips with cam morphology. No difference in T1ρ values between symptomatic and asymptomatic cam hips was demonstrated. Therefore, regardless of the presence of hip pain, a cam deformity may predispose to hip joint cartilage degradation and increase the risk of hip osteoarthritis.

T2* relaxation time of acetabular and femoral cartilage with and without intraarticular gadopentetate dimeglumine in patients with femoroacetabular impingement

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the presence of intraarticular gadopentetate dimeglumine during clinical MR arthrography significantly alters the T2* relaxation time of hip articular cartilage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

T2* mapping of 10 patient volunteers (seven female patients, three male patients; age range, 14-49 years; mean, 33.0 ± 12.2 [SD] years) with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement was performed before and after intraarticular administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Overall 323 ROIs were defined in each acetabular and femoral cartilage before and after gadolinium injection. Agreement of the T2* relaxation times before and after gadolinium injection was assessed with the Krippendorff alpha coefficient and linear regression through the origin.

RESULTS

T2* relaxation times before and after gadolinium injection in both acetabular and femoral cartilage were found to agree strongly. Specifically, estimated Krippendorff alpha values were greater than 0.8 for both acetabular and femoral cartilage, linear regressions through the origin yielded estimated slopes very close to 1, and R(2) values were greater than 0.98.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that intraarticular injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine according to the protocol described in this study has little effect on the T2* of femoral and acetabular cartilage. The results suggest that T2* mapping can be safely performed as an addition to a standard clinical hip imaging protocol that includes gadopentetate dimeglumine administration.

Advanced Imaging in Femoroacetabular Impingement: Current State and Future Prospects

Symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is now a known precursor of early osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip. In terms of clinical intervention, the decision between joint preservation and joint replacement hinges on the severity of articular cartilage degeneration. The exact threshold during the course of disease progression when the cartilage damage is irreparable remains elusive. The intention behind radiographic imaging is to accurately identify the morphology of osseous structural abnormalities and to accurately characterize the chondrolabral damage as much as possible. However, both plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) are insensitive for articular cartilage anatomy and pathology. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques include magnetic resonance arthrography and biochemically sensitive techniques of delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), T1rho (T1ρ), T2/T2* mapping, and several others. The diagnostic performance of these techniques to evaluate cartilage degeneration could improve the ability to predict an individual patient-specific outcome with non-surgical and surgical care. This review discusses the facts and current applications of biochemical MRI for hip joint cartilage assessment covering the roles of dGEMRIC, T2/T2*, and T1ρ mapping. The basics of each technique and their specific role in FAI assessment are outlined. Current limitations and potential pitfalls as well as future directions of biochemical imaging are also outlined.

OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Hip imaging in clinical trials in osteoarthritis

Imaging of hip in osteoarthritis (OA) has seen considerable progress in the past decade, with the introduction of new techniques that may be more sensitive to structural disease changes. The purpose of this expert opinion, consensus driven recommendation is to provide detail on how to apply hip imaging in disease modifying clinical trials. It includes information on acquisition methods/techniques (including guidance on positioning for radiography, sequence/protocol recommendations/hardware for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)); commonly encountered problems (including positioning, hardware and coil failures, artifacts associated with various MRI sequences); quality assurance/control procedures; measurement methods; measurement performance (reliability, responsiveness, and validity); recommendations for trials; and research recommendations.

Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness

PURPOSE

To deploy and quantify the accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography with hip traction to image acetabular cartilage. Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences used to image hip cartilage often have reduced out-of-plane resolution and may lack adequate signal-to-noise to image cartilage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Saline was injected into four cadaver hips placed under traction. 3D DESS MRI scans were obtained before and after cores of cartilage were harvested from the acetabulum; the two MRIs were spatially aligned to reference core positions. The thickness of cartilage cores was measured under microscopy to serve as the reference standard. 3D reconstructions of cartilage and subchondral bone were generated using automatic and semiautomatic image segmentation. Cartilage thickness estimated from the 3D reconstructions was compared to physical measurements using Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

As revealed by the automatic segmentation mask, saline imbibed the joint space throughout the articulating surface, with the exception of the posteroinferior region in two hips. Locations where air bubbles were introduced and regions of suspected low density bone disrupted an otherwise smooth automatic segmentation mask. Automatic and semiautomatic segmentation yielded a bias ± repeatability coefficient (95% limits of agreement) of 0.10 ± 0.51 mm (-0.41 to 0.61 mm) and 0.06 ± 0.43 mm (-0.37 to 0.49 mm), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cartilage thickness can be estimated to within ∼0.5 mm of the physical value with 95% confidence using 3D reconstructions of 3D DESS MR arthrography images. Manual correction of the automatic segmentation mask may improve reconstruction accuracy.

Patient-specific anatomical and functional parameters provide new insights into the pathomechanism of cam FAI

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) represents a constellation of anatomical and clinical features, but definitive diagnosis is often difficult. The high prevalence of cam deformity of the femoral head in the asymptomatic population as well as clinical factors leading to the onset of symptoms raises questions as to what other factors increase the risk of cartilage damage and hip pain.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose was to identify any differences in anatomical parameters and squat kinematics among symptomatic, asymptomatic, and control individuals and if these parameters can determine individuals at risk of developing symptoms of cam FAI.

METHODS

Forty-three participants (n = 43) were recruited and divided into three groups: symptomatic (12), asymptomatic (17), and control (14). Symptomatic participants presented a cam deformity (identified by an elevated alpha angle on CT images), pain symptoms, clinical signs, and were scheduled for surgery. The other recruited volunteers were blinded and unaware whether they had a cam deformity. After the CT data were assessed for an elevated alpha angle, participants with a cam deformity but who did not demonstrate any clinical signs or symptoms were considered asymptomatic, whereas participants without a cam deformity and without clinical signs or symptoms were considered healthy control subjects. For each participant, anatomical CT parameters (axial alpha angle, radial alpha angle, femoral head-neck offset, femoral neck-shaft angle, medial proximal femoral angle, femoral torsion, acetabular version) were evaluated. Functional squat parameters (maximal squat depth, pelvic range of motion) were determined using a motion capture system. A stepwise discriminant function analysis was used to determine which of the parameters were most suitable to classify each participant with their respective subgroup.

RESULTS

The symptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles and lower femoral neck-shaft angles, whereas the asymptomatic group showed elevated alpha angles in comparison with the control group. The best discriminating parameters to determine symptoms were radial alpha angle, femoral neck-shaft angle, and pelvic range of motion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the presence of a cam deformity, indications of a decreased femoral neck-shaft angle and reduced pelvic range of motion can identify those at risk of symptomatic FAI.

[Morphological and functional cartilage imaging]

Excellent morphological imaging of cartilage is now possible and allows the detection of subtle cartilage pathologies. Besides the standard 2D sequences, a multitude of 3D sequences are available for high-resolution cartilage imaging. The first part therefore deals with modern possibilities of morphological imaging. The second part deals with functional cartilage imaging with which it is possible to detect changes in cartilage composition and thus early osteoarthritis as well as to monitor biochemical changes after therapeutic interventions. Validated techniques such as delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping as well the latest techniques, such as the glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange-dependent saturation transfer (gagCEST) technique will be discussed.

T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects

With advances in joint preservation surgery that are intended to alter the course of osteoarthritis by early intervention, accurate and reliable assessment of the cartilage status is critical. Biochemically sensitive MRI techniques can add robust biomarkers for disease onset and progression, and therefore, could be meaningful assessment tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of cartilage abnormalities. T2* mapping could be a good alternative because it would combine the benefits of biochemical cartilage evaluation with remarkable features including short imaging time and the ability of high-resolution three-dimensional cartilage evaluation-without the need for contrast media administration or special hardware. Several in vitro and in vivo studies, which have elaborated on the potential of cartilage T2* assessment in various cartilage disease patterns and grades of degeneration, have been reported. However, much remains to be understood and certain unresolved questions have become apparent with these studies that are crucial to the further application of this technique. This review summarizes the principles of the technique and current applications of T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment. Limitations of recent studies are discussed and the potential implications for patient care are presented.

Feasibility and preliminary experience of quantitative T2* mapping at 3.0 T for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of quantitative T2* mapping at 3.0 T for prostate cancer detection and to investigate the use of T2* values to characterize tumor aggressiveness, with whole-mount step-section pathologic analysis as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prostate multiecho T2* was performed in 55 consecutive patients with prostate cancer using a multishot fast-field echo sequence at 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. T2* mapping was obtained by exponentially fitting the multiecho T2* images pixel by pixel with different echo times for each slice. Generalized estimating equations were used to test the T2* value difference between normal and malignant prostate regions and the association between T2* value and tumor Gleason scores.

RESULTS

The T2* values of the cancerous prostatic regions (mean: 42.51 ± 0.65 milliseconds) were significantly lower (P < .001) than those of the normal prostatic regions (mean: 74.87 ± 0.99 milliseconds). Adopting a threshold value of 59.27 milliseconds, T2* mapping resulted in 94.8% sensitivity and 77.3% specificity in the identification of prostate cancer. A lower mean T2* value was significantly associated with a higher tumor Gleason score (mean T2* values of 53.53, 43.75, 33.66, and 22.95 milliseconds were associated with Gleason score of 3 + 3, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, and ≥8, respectively P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

From these preliminary data, quantitative T2* mapping seems to be a potential method in the characterization of prostate cancer. T2* mapping may provide additional quantitative information that significantly correlated with prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Clinically Relevant Subregions of Articular Cartilage of the Hip for Analysis and Reporting Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Technical Note

OBJECTIVE

Before quantitative imaging techniques can become clinically valuable, the method, and more specifically, the regions of locating and reporting these values should be standardized toward reproducibility comparisons across centers and longitudinal follow-up of individual patients. The purpose of this technical note is to describe a rigorous and reproducible method of locating, analyzing, and reporting quantitative MRI values in hip articular cartilage with an approach that is consistent with current orthopedic literature.

DESIGN

To demonstrate this localization and documentation, 3 patients (age, 23 ± 5.1 years; 2 males, 1 female) who presented with symptomatic mixed-type femoroacetabular impingement (α angle, 63.3° ± 2.1°; center edge angle, 39° ± 4.2°) were evaluated with T2-mapping at 3 T MRI prior to hip arthroscopy. Manual segmentation was performed and cartilage of the acetabulum and femur was divided into 12 subregions adapted from the geographic zone method. Bone landmarks in the acetabulum and femur, identifiable both in arthroscopy and MR images, were manually selected and the coordinates exported for division of cartilage.

RESULTS

Mean T2 values in each zone are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

The current work outlines a standardized system to locate and describe quantitative mapping values that could aid in surgical decision making, planning, and the noninvasive longitudinal follow-up of implemented cartilage preservation and restoration techniques.

Repair tissue quality after arthroscopic autologous collagen-induced chondrogenesis (ACIC) assessed via T2* mapping

OBJECTIVE

A novel single-stage approach using arthroscopic microdrilling and atelocollagen/fibrin-gel application is employed for cartilage repair of the knee. The purpose of our study was to investigate the morphological and biochemical MRI outcome after this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective case series of ten patients (mean age 45 years) with symptomatic chondral defects in the knee who were treated arthroscopically with microdrilling and atelocollagen application was analyzed. All defects were ICRS grade III or IV and the sizes were 2-8 cm(2) intra-operatively. All patients underwent morphological MRI and T2-star mapping at 1.5 T at 1-year follow-up. The magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was assessed. T2* relaxation time values of repair tissue and a healthy native cartilage area was assessed by means of region of interest analysis on the T2* maps.

RESULTS

The mean MOCART score at 1-year follow-up was 71.7 ± 21.0 ranging from 25 to 95. The mean T2* relaxation times were 30.6 ± 11.3 ms and 28.8 ± 6.8 ms for the repair tissue and surrounding native cartilage, respectively. The T2* ratio between the repair tissue and native cartilage was 105%  ± 30%, indicating repair tissue properties similar to native cartilage.

CONCLUSIONS

An arthroscopic single-stage procedure using microdrilling in combination with atelocollagen gel and fibrin-glue can provide satisfactory MRI results at 1-year follow-up, with good cartilage defect filling. The T2* values in the repair tissue achieved similar values compared to normal hyaline cartilage.

Elevation in circulating biomarkers of cartilage damage and inflammation in athletes with femoroacetabular impingement

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is one of the most common causes of early cartilage and labral damage in the nondysplastic hip. Biomarkers of cartilage degradation and inflammation are associated with osteoarthritis. It was not known whether patients with FAI have elevated levels of biomarkers of cartilage degradation and inflammation.

HYPOTHESIS

Compared with athletes without FAI, athletes with FAI would have elevated levels of the inflammatory C-reactive protein (CRP) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), a cartilage degradation marker.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Male athletes with radiographically confirmed FAI (n = 10) were compared with male athletes with radiographically normal hips with no evidence of FAI or hip dysplasia (n = 19). Plasma levels of COMP and CRP were measured, and subjects also completed the Short Form-12 (SF-12) and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) surveys.

RESULTS

Compared with controls, athletes with FAI had a 24% increase in COMP levels and a 276% increase in CRP levels as well as a 22% decrease in SF-12 physical component scores and decreases in all of the HOOS subscale scores.

CONCLUSION

Athletes with FAI demonstrate early biochemical signs of increased cartilage turnover and systemic inflammation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Chondral injury secondary to the repetitive microtrauma of FAI might be reliably detected with biomarkers. In the future, these biomarkers might be used as screening tools to identify at-risk patients and assess the efficacy of therapeutic interventions such as hip preservation surgery in altering the natural history and progression to osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis year 2013 in review: imaging

PURPOSE

To review recent original research publications related to imaging of osteoarthritis (OA) and identify emerging trends and significant advances.

METHODS

Relevant articles were identified through a search of the PubMed database using the query terms "OA" in combination with "imaging", "radiography", "MRI", "ultrasound", "computed tomography", and "nuclear medicine"; either published or in press between March 2012 and March 2013. Abstracts were reviewed to exclude review articles, case reports, and studies not focused on imaging using routine clinical imaging measures.

RESULTS

Initial query yielded 932 references, which were reduced to 328 citations following the initial review. MRI (118 references) and radiography (129 refs) remain the primary imaging modalities in OA studies, with fewer reports using computed tomography (CT) (35 refs) and ultrasound (23 refs). MRI parametric mapping techniques remain an active research area (33 refs) with growth in T2*- and T1-rho mapping publications compared to prior years. Although the knee is the major joint studied (210 refs) there is interest in the hip (106 refs) and hand (29 refs). Imaging continues to focus on evaluation of cartilage (173 refs) and bone (119 refs).

CONCLUSION

Imaging plays a major role in OA research with publications continuing along traditional lines of investigation. Translational and clinical research application of compositional MRI techniques is becoming more common driven in part by the availability of T2 mapping data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). New imaging techniques continue to be developed with a goal of identifying methods with greater specificity and responsiveness to changes in the joint, and novel functional neuroimaging techniques to study central pain. Publications related to imaging of OA continue to be heavily focused on quantitative and semiquantitative MRI evaluation of the knee with increasing application of compositional MRI techniques in the hip.

A review of imaging modalities for the hip

Hip arthroscopy is one of the fastest growing surgical procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons, with the number of hip arthroscopies expected to double in 2013. The increase in surgical prevalence is at least in part due to an increased awareness of prearthritic hip pathology. The diagnoses of prearthritic hip conditions are made through a comprehensive history, physical examination, and selection of appropriate diagnostic imaging modalities. The purpose of this review article is to provide the practicing orthopaedic surgeon with an overview of the imaging modalities available for the diagnosis of prearthritic hip pathology, with a focus on literature supporting advancements in imaging techniques and new applications of existing modalities.

Non-invasive imaging of cartilage in early osteoarthritis

Treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) has traditionally focused on joint replacement for end-stage disease. An increasing number of surgical and pharmaceutical strategies for disease prevention have now been proposed. However, these require the ability to identify OA at a stage when it is potentially reversible, and detect small changes in cartilage structure and function to enable treatment efficacy to be evaluated within an acceptable timeframe. This has not been possible using conventional imaging techniques but recent advances in musculoskeletal imaging have been significant. In this review we discuss the role of different imaging modalities in the diagnosis of the earliest changes of OA. The increasing number of MRI sequences that are able to non-invasively detect biochemical changes in cartilage that precede structural damage may offer a great advance in the diagnosis and treatment of this debilitating condition.

Femoroacetabular impingement

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of early-onset osteoarthritis of the hip. It can be caused by morphologic abnormalities involving the proximal femur or acetabulum, leading to abnormal abutment of the femoral head-neck against the acetabular rim. This repetitive trauma causes mechanical wear of the labrum and articular cartilage, leading to osteoarthritis of the hip. Magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate noninvasive imaging modality that can detect acetabular labral lesions and adjacent cartilage damage, and is able to detect underlying subtle anatomic variations of the femoral head-neck junction and acetabulum associated with FAI.

Arthroscopic hip preservation surgery

The technical advances in arthroscopic surgery of the hip, including the improved ability to manage the capsule and gain extensile exposure, have been paralleled by a growth in the number of conditions that can be addressed. This expanding list includes symptomatic labral tears, chondral lesions, injuries of the ligamentum teres, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), capsular laxity and instability, and various extra-articular disorders, including snapping hip syndromes. With a careful diagnostic evaluation and technical execution of well-indicated procedures, arthroscopic surgery of the hip can achieve successful clinical outcomes, with predictable improvements in function and pre-injury levels of physical activity for many patients.

This paper reviews the current position in relation to the use of arthroscopy in the treatment of disorders of the hip.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:10–19.

Labral refixation: current techniques and indications

BACKGROUND

Labral tears have been associated with femoroacetabular impingement, instability, sports-related activity or trauma, capsular laxity or hypermobility, dysplasia, and degeneration. Disruption of the labrum increases the rate of acetabular cartilage compression and the contact stress between the femoral and acetabular cartilage. If left untreated, these lesions will alter normal hip joint function and may eventually lead to osteoarthritis.

METHODS

For the labrum with adequate tissue (>7 mm), the labrum is repaired if it is detached or torn. If the labrum is bruised, a rim reduction and repair is performed, especially in the presence of cartilage damage and the labral-chondral junction. Labri are debrided only if there is enough substance to maintain the function of the labrum. Care must be taken to fix the labrum so that it provides adequate seal with the femoral head.

RESULTS

Two-year outcome on 122 patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement and chondrolabral dysfunction showed that, overall, most patients showed an improvement in symptoms and function and were satisfied with the results. Independent predictors of improved outcomes were joint space >2 mm and repair of labral pathology instead of debridement. Several other studies have shown excellent results following labral refixation and repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Labral tears have been associated with femoroacetabular impingement, instability, sports-related activity or trauma, capsular laxity or hypermobility, dysplasia, and degeneration. Untreated labral tears can result in premature osteoarthritis of the hip. Debridement only used to be the standard of care, but excellent results reveal arthroscopic labral repair and refixation are an option with good outcomes.