Narrowing of ischiofemoral and quadratus femoris spaces in pediatric ischiofemoral impingement

Sex-specific bone and muscular morphological features in ischiofemoral impingement: A three-dimensional study

The study aimed to investigate how hip bone and muscular morphology features differ between ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) patients and healthy subjects among males and females. Three-dimensional models were reconstructed based on magnetic resonance imaging images from IFI patients and healthy subjects of different sexes. Bone morphological parameters and the cross-sectional area of the hip abductors were measured. The diameter and angle of the pelvis were compared between patients and healthy subjects. Bone parameters of the hip and cross-sectional area of the hip abductors were compared between affected and healthy hips. The comparison results of some parameters were significant for females but not males. For females, the comparison results of pelvis parameters showed that the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet (p = 0.001) and intertuberous distance (p < 0.001) were both larger in IFI patients than in healthy subjects. Additionally, the comparison results of hip parameters showed that the neck shaft angle (p < 0.001) and the cross-sectional area of the gluteus medius (p < 0.001) and gluteus minimus (p = 0.005) were smaller, while the cross-sectional area of the tensor fasciae latae (p < 0.001) was significantly larger in affected hips. Morphological changes in IFI patients demonstrated sexual dimorphism, including bone and muscular morphology. Differences in the anteroposterior diameter of the pelvic inlet, intertuberous distance, neck shaft angle, gluteus medius, and gluteus minimus may explain why females are more susceptible to IFI.

Quadratus femoris muscle edema in children

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence and clinical relevance of quadratus femoris muscle edema (QFME) in pediatric pelvic MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The axial T2-W with fat saturation sequence of pelvic/hip MRI examinations of pediatric patients (≤ 18 years) and a control group of young adults aged 19-45 years was retrospectively and independently evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists for the presence of QFME in each hip. Demographics, indication for imaging studies, and pain location were documented. The prevalence of QFME was compared between the groups on a patient level and on a hip level.

RESULTS

The study group included 119 children (164 MRI examinations; F:M 1:1.08, mean age 11.4 ± 3.6 years), and 120 young adults, > 18, < 45 years old, served as controls (F:M 1:0.9, mean age 33.7 ± 6.4 years). QFME was significantly more prevalent among the study compared to the control group, both on a patient level (15% and 4.2%, respectively, p < 0.05) and on a hip level (12.1% and 2.5%, respectively, p < 0.05). This significant difference was also seen in the subgroup of MRI studies performed for orthopedic indications but not for non-orthopedic indications. There was no correlation between the side of localized pain and the side with QFME.

CONCLUSION

QFME is significantly more prevalent in pediatric patients compared to adults under 45 years old, especially in subjects scanned for orthopedic indications. The clinical relevance of QFME in children and adolescents is unclear.

What Factors Are Associated With Postoperative Ischiofemoral Impingement After Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

BACKGROUND

Any abnormal structures that contribute to the narrowing of the ischiofemoral space could induce ischiofemoral impingement. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) medializes the hip center and, therefore, decreases contact stress on the cartilage in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, medialization of the hip center might also narrow the ischiofemoral space, which may increase the risk of postoperative ischiofemoral impingement in patients with acetabular dysplasia who are undergoing PAO. Furthermore, the dysplastic hip has less ischiofemoral space and less space for the quadratus femoris. A few studies have focused on the amount of medialization of the hip center, but the proportion of postoperative ischiofemoral impingement after PAO has not been investigated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients develop ischiofemoral impingement after undergoing unilateral PAO for DDH? (2) What radiographic factors are associated with postoperative ischiofemoral impingement in patients who underwent PAO for DDH? (3) How much hip center medialization is safe so as to avoid postoperative ischiofemoral impingement during PAO?

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2016, we treated 265 adult patients who had symptomatic residual acetabular dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle less than 20°) using PAO. During that time, we generally offered PAO to patients with acetabular dysplasia when the patients had no advanced osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade < 2). Of those, we considered only patients who underwent primary PAO without femoral osteotomy as potentially eligible. Based on that, 65% (173 of 265) were eligible; a further 9% (24 of 265) were excluded due to leg length discrepancy, spine disorders, or joint replacement in the contralateral side, and another 6% (17 of 265) of patients were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years or had incomplete datasets, leaving 50% (132 of 265) for analysis in this retrospective study at a mean of 2.70 ± 0.71 years. The diagnosis of ischiofemoral impingement was defined by symptoms, MRI, and diagnostic ischiofemoral injection. We ascertained the percentage of patients with this diagnosis to answer the first research question. To answer the second question, we divided the patients into two groups: PAO patients with ischiofemoral impingement and PAO patients without ischiofemoral impingement. The demographic data and preoperative imaging parameters of patients in both groups were compared. There were statistical differences in acetabular version, ischial angle, neck-shaft angle, the presence of positive coxa profunda sign, McKibbin index, ischiofemoral space, quadratus femoris space, anterior acetabular section angle, and the net amount of hip center medialization. To investigate potential factors associated with postoperative ischiofemoral impingement in patients who underwent PAO, these factors underwent binary logistic regression analysis. To answer the third question, the cutoff value of the net amount of hip center medialization was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic curve and the Youden index method.

RESULTS

We found that 26% (35 of 132) of PAO dysplastic hips had postoperative ischiofemoral impingement. After controlling for confounding variables such as acetabular version, ischial angle, femoral neck version, McKibbin index, and ischiofemoral space, we found that an increasing neck-shaft angle (odds ratio 1.14 [95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.29]; p = 0.03), a positive coxa profunda sign (OR 0.13 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.58]; p < 0.01), and an increasing net amount of hip center medialization (OR 2.76 [95% CI 1.70 to 4.47]; p < 0.01) were associated with postoperative ischiofemoral impingement in patients with DDH who underwent PAO (R 2 = 0.73). The cutoff values of neck-shaft angle was 138.4°. The cutoff values of the net amount of hip center medialization was 1.9 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative ischiofemoral impingement could occur in patients with acetabular dysplasia who have undergone PAO after hip center medialization. An increasing neck-shaft angle, a positive coxa profunda sign on preoperative imaging, and excessive medialization of the hip center are factors associated with ischiofemoral impingement development in these patients. Therefore, we suggest that physicians measure the ischiofemoral space on a preoperative CT when patients with DDH have an increasing neck-shaft angle (> 138.4°) or a positive coxa profunda sign on radiological imaging. During PAO, the amount of hip center medialization should be carefully controlled to keep these patients from developing postoperative ischiofemoral impingement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Ischiofemoral space dimensions for ischiofemoral impingement: is it different in children?

OBJECTIVE

This study intended to analyze alterations in ischiofemoral space (IFS) dimensions in normal children between the ages of 1 and 18 years for the ischiofemoral impingement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively focused on computed tomography images of 360 hips of 180 (90 boys and 90 girls) pediatric subjects (mean age: 9.50 ± 5.20 years, range: 1-18 years) without any hip disorders to measure IFS, femoral neck angle (FNA), and ischial angle (IA).

RESULTS

Mean IFS, FNA, and IA were measured as 14.64 ± 7.24 mm, 34.61 ± 11.47°, and 131.52 ± 4.22°, respectively. IFS increased in children aged between 1 and 18 years, whereas FNA and IA decreased. IFS was similar in infancy and early childhood periods but then increased up to postpubescent period. FNA decreased proportionally from birth, whereas IA decreased in an irregular pattern. Linear functions were detected as y = 3.451 + 1.178 × years for IFS, as y = 48.555 - 1.468 × years for FNA, and as y = 132.535 - 0.107 × years for IA.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that IFS tends to increase in size with age during childhood but decreases with further aging. Therefore, age-specific values for IFS, FNA, and IA may be beneficial for clinicians and radiologists for the diagnosis of ischiofemoral impingement.

Interpretation of ischiofemoral impingement via a clinical test using hip triaxial dynamic magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to use magnetic resonance (MR) to explore the dynamic changes of the ischiofemoral space (IFS) under the triaxial motion of the hip joint and verify the clinical test mechanism for ischiofemoral impingement (IFI).

METHODS

A prospective design was used to screen 37 patients with clinically confirmed IFI, which included a total of 67 lateral hips, and 39 healthy controls with a total of 69 lateral hips. A dynamic MR examination was performed in positions designed by a simulated IFI test (adduction, adduction with 30° external rotation, 30° internal rotation, supine with 30° flexion, and prone with 30° backward extension). The IFS (mm) and quadratus femoris space (QFS, mm) were measured in different positions. All the data were evaluated independently by three musculoskeletal radiologists. The differences between the two groups were compared using the two-tailed t-test.

RESULTS

The IFS and QFS in the case group were smaller than those in the control group. The IFS and QFS were significantly reduced in the prone with backward extension and adduction with external rotation positions of the hip. The correlation coefficients of the IFI test and long-stride walking (LSW) test were -0.621 and -0.715 for IFS and -0.653 and -0.696 for QFS, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the mechanism of the IFI-specific clinical examination (IFI and LSW tests) was verified by triaxial dynamic MR imaging of the hip joint, which provided a dynamic imaging basis for the clinical application of the IFI-specific impingement test. The IFI impingement test can be used as a specific clinical test for IFI screening.

Kinematic MRI of ischiofemoral impingement

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of external hip rotation on ischiofemoral (IF) and quadratus femoris (QF) spaces using real-time kinematic MRI, with the hypothesis that hips with IF and QF space narrowing have distinct motion patterns compared with control hips.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was IRB-approved and complied with HIPAA guidelines. We recruited women (≥ 18 years) with and without ischiofemoral impingement to undergo kinematic MRI of the hips. A kinematic imaging protocol using T2-HASTE was performed beginning at maximal internal rotation followed by active external hip rotation. The duration of each acquisition was 30 s, providing 8 images/3 s. IF and QF spaces, and femoral metaphyseal and lesser trochanter centroid coordinates were measured on sequential images. Hips were classified as controls or narrowed based on IF and QF space thresholds and compared statistically throughout motion stages.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 12 women (24 hips; 10 control and 14 narrowed hips) aged 58 ± 10 years. External rotation caused IF space reduction of 59% in narrowed hips versus 41% in control hips. QF space decreased 71% in narrowed hips versus 50% in control hips. IF and QF spaces differed significantly between groups only when external rotation exceeded the neutral position (P < 0.02 for both). The lesser trochanter terminated more posteriorly in narrowed hips compared with controls (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematic MRI during external hip rotation in women with narrowed and control hips reveals dynamic differences in IF and QF spaces and lesser trochanter terminal position.