Somatostatin receptor PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumours: update on systematic review and meta-analysis

One-day dual-tracer examination in neuroendocrine neoplasms: a real advantage of low activity LAFOV PET imaging

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-PET is crucial for effective treatment stratification of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). In highly proliferating or poorly differentiated NENs, dual-tracer approaches using additional [18F]FDG PET can effectively identify SSTR-negative disease, usually requiring separate imaging sessions. We evaluated the feasibility of a one-day dual-tracer imaging protocol with a low activity [18F]FDG PET followed by an SSTR-PET using the recently introduced [18F]SiFAlin-TATE tracer in a long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanner and its implications in patient management.

METHODS

Twenty NEN patients were included in this study. Initially, a low activity [18F]FDG PET was performed (0.5 ± 0.01 MBq/kg; PET scan 60 min p.i.). After 4.2 ± 0.09 h after completion of the [18F]FDG PET, a standard activity of [18F]SiFAlin-TATE was administered (3.0 MBq/kg; PET scan 90 min p.i.). To ensure the quantification accuracy of the second scan, we evaluated the potential impact of residual [18F]FDG activity by segmenting organs with minimal physiological SSTR-tracer uptake, such as the brain and myocardium, and assessing the activity concentrations (ACTs) of tumor lesions. Residual tumor lesion ACTs of [18F]FDG were calculated by factoring fluorine-18 decay, identifying a maximum residual ACT of 15% (R15%). To account for increased [18F]FDG trapping over time, higher residual ACTs of 20% (R20%) were considered. These simulated [18F]FDG ACTs were compared with those measured in the second PET scan with [18F]SiFAlin-TATE. The influence of the dual-tracer PET/CT results on therapeutic strategies was evaluated.

RESULTS

[18F]FDG cerebral uptake significantly decreased in the subsequent SSTR-PET (mean uptake [18F]FDG: SUVmean 6.0 ± 0.4; mean uptake in [18F]SiFAlin-TATE PET: SUVmean 0.2 ± 0.01; p < 0.0001); with similar results recorded for the myocardium. Simulated residual [18F]FDG ACTs represented only a minimal percentage of ACTs measured in the tumor lesions from the second PET scan (R15%: mean 5.2 ± 0.9% and R20%: mean 6.8 ± 1.2%), indicating only minimal residual activity of [18F]FDG that might interfere with the second PET scan using [18F]SiFAlin-TATE and preserved semi-quantification of the latter. Dual-tracer PET/CT findings directly influenced changes in therapy plans in eleven (55%) of the examined patients.

CONCLUSION

LAFOV PET scanners enable a one-day dual-tracer protocol, providing diagnostic image quality while preserving the semi-quantification of two 18F-labeled radiotracers, potentially simplifying the assessment of tumor biology and improving the clinical patient management while reducing logistical challenges. Additionally, low-activity PET imaging facilitates one-day dual-tracer PET examinations.

Diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in localizing ectopic ACTH syndrome: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

To elucidate the role of various imaging modalities for tumor localization in ectopic ACTH Cushing's syndrome (EAS).

DESIGN AND METHOD

Systematic review of the literature published between January 2015-2024 was performed. Patients (290 EAS patients, 23.8% Occult) who underwent contrast enhanced CT (CECT) and at least one PET/CT-scan (68Ga-SSTR, FDG and/or F-DOPA) were included.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for identifying EAS tumor was comparable across CECT (63.1%, n=290), SSTR-PET/CT (58.2%, n=187), and FDG-PET/CT (57.6%, n=191), but was poor for DOPA-PET/CT (30.8%, n=26). Sensitivity for detecting metastasis was also comparable across CECT (78%, n=73), SSTR-PET/CT (85.3%, n=41), and FDG-PET (73.7%, n=38). For localised lesions, sensitivity as per etiology and grade of NET were similar for three scans, with exception of Thymic NET and grade 1 NET where CECT was better than FDG PET/CT. In patients not localised on CECT, sensitivity of SSTR PET/CT was 33.3% (vs. 18.9% FDG-PET/CT) whereas for patients negative on CECT and FDG-PET, sensitivity of SSTR-PET/CT was 15%. In cases where CECT and SSTR-PET/CT failed to localize, the sensitivities of FDG-PET/CT and DOPA-PET/CT were only 5.7% (2/35) and 0% (0/9), respectively. SSTR-PET/CT has a distinct advantage with significantly lesser false positive (FP) lesions (2.6%, mostly in thyroid/or pancreas). In comparison, CECT and FDG-PET/CT had FP ∼11% (mostly in lung and/or mediastinum), most of which were negative on SSTR-PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

As per the current evidence, SSTR-PET/CT can be considered as the scan of choice in EAS evaluation, and further research is needed as one-fourth of the lesions remain occult.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogs for Cancer Imaging

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed by many tumours especially those related to neuro-endocrine origin and molecular functional imaging of SSTR expression using radiolabelled somatostatin analogs have revolutionized imaging of patients with these group of malignancies. Coming a long way from the first radiolabelled somatostatin analog 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide, there has been significant developments in terms of radionuclides used, the ligands and somatostatin derivatives. 111In-Pentetreotide extensively employed for imaging NETs at the beginning has now been replaced by 68Ga-SSA based PET-CT. SSA-PET/CT performs superior to conventional imaging modalities and has evolved in the mainframe for NET imaging. The advantages were multiple: (i) superior spatial resolution of PET versus SPECT, (ii) quantitative capabilities of PET aiding in disease activity and treatment response monitoring with better precision, (iii) shorter scan time and (iv) less patient exposure to radiation. The modality is indicated for staging, detecting the primary in CUP-NETs, restaging, treatment planning (along with FDG: the concept of dual-tracer PET-CT) as well as treatment response evaluation and follow-up of NETs. SSA PET/CT has also been incorporated in the guidelines for imaging of Pheochromocytoma-Paraganglioma, Medullary carcinoma thyroid, Meningioma and Tumor induced osteomalacia. At present, there is rising interest on (a) 18F-labelled SSA, (b) 64Cu-labelled SSA, and (c) somatostatin antagonists. 18F offers excellent imaging properties, 64Cu makes delayed imaging feasible which has implications in dosimetry and SSTR antagonists bind with the SST receptors with high affinity and specificity, providing high contrast images with less background, which can be translated to theranostics effectively. SSTR have been demonstrated in non-neuroendocrine tumours as well in the peer-reviewed literature, with studies demonstrating the potential of SSA PET/CT in Neuroblastoma, Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, carcinoma prostate (neuroendocrine differentiation) and lymphoma. This review will focus on the currently available SSAs and their history, different SPECT/PET agents, SSTR antagonists, comparison between the various imaging tracers, and their utility in both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine tumors.

Neuroendocrine Tumors: Diagnostics

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare tumors arising from neuroendocrine cells. NEN are ideally suited for a theragnostic approach due to their specific expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR). SSTR imaging of NEN dates back to the 1980s, but has evolved recently due to the introduction of more sensitive SSTR PET radiotracers. SSTR PET is a primary imaging modality for identifying NEN and characterizing SSTR expression. SSTR PET is complementary to anatomic imaging for assessing tumor response to treatment. SSTR PET is mandated to determine eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Here, the role of imaging to aid management of NEN is reviewed.

Time-of-Flight PET/CT Imaging of Ga-68-Dotatate: Normal Pattern, SUV Quantification, and Differences from Non-Time-of-Flight Imaging

Purpose  The biodistribution of gallium-68-dotatate (Ga-68-dotatate) and standardized uptake values (SUVs) using non-time-of-flight (TOF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) cameras is well established. However, with the eventual retirement of older PET cameras and their replacement with newer, highly sensitive TOF PET/CT cameras, where SUV max measurements are reportedly higher, updated knowledge of normal SUV max range is needed and, to our knowledge, not previously reported. Our objectives are as follows: To establish normal Ga-68-dotatate TOF SUV max database for common structures and to aid the visual detection of abnormalities objectively. To compare SUV max values using the TOF and non-TOF algorithms. Methods  Fifty consecutive patients referred routinely to our nuclear medicine service (20 men, 30 women; median age 55 years) with presumed neuroendocrine tumors underwent Ga-68-dotatate scans on a PET-CT camera having capability of reconstructing both TOF/non-TOF images. Region of interests (ROIs) were drawn around 24 normal structures as well as the primary lesion with abnormal radiotracer uptake and SUV max was measured. The same ROI was analyzed using both algorithms simultaneously and both TOF and non-TOF SUV max values were compared. Results  Twelve hundred ROIs were evaluated. Non-TOF Ga-68-dotatate uptake in normal structures was in alignment with previously published studies. As compared to non-TOF, TOF images had better target to background ratios visually. TOF SUV max was higher for all structures except for lung and brain. TOF SUV max was more than double in adrenals/uncinate process of the pancreas; approximately 1.8 times in abnormal lesions, lymph nodes, pineal gland; and greater than 1.5 times in thyroid, breast, and pancreatic head. Conclusion  Normal database of Ga-68-dotatate TOF SUV max is provided for common structures to aid visual detection of abnormalities objectively. Overall, TOF SUV max measures higher in identical ROIs, with abnormal lesions measuring approximately 1.8 times higher versus non-TOF technology. These findings need to be taken in consideration when comparing patient scans imaged on different PET/CT technologies.

Outcome prediction of SSTR-RADS-3A and SSTR-RADS-3B lesions in patients with neuroendocrine tumors based on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR

PURPOSE

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET imaging has emerged as a common approach to evaluating those patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The SSTR reporting and data system (SSTR-RADS) version 1.0 provides a means of categorizing lesions from 1 to 5 according to the likelihood of NET involvement, with SSTR-RADS-3A (soft-tissue) and SSTR-RADS-3B (bone) lesions being those suggestive of but without definitive NET involvement. The goal of the present study was to assess the ability of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR imaging data to predict outcomes for indeterminate SSTR-RADS-3A and 3B lesions.

METHODS

NET patients with indeterminate SSTR-RADS-3A or SSTR-RADS-3B lesions who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR imaging from April 2020 through August 2023 were retrospectively evaluated. All patients underwent follow-up through December 2023 (median, 17 months; (3-31 months)), with imaging follow-up or biopsy findings ultimately being used to classify lesions as malignant or benign. Lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) along with minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin and ADCmean) values were measured and assessed for correlations with outcomes on follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 33 indeterminate SSTR-RADS-3 lesions from 22 patients (19 SSTR-RADS-3A and 14 SSTR-RADS-3B) were identified based upon baseline 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/MR findings. Over the course of follow-up, 16 of these lesions (48.5%) were found to exhibit true NET positivity, including 9 SSTR-RADS-3A and 7 SSTR-RADS-3B lesions. For SSTR-RADS-3A lymph nodes, a diameter larger than 0.7 cm and an ADCmin of 779 × 10-6mm2/s or lower were identified as being more likely to be associated with metastatic lesions. Significant differences in ADCmin and ADCmean were identified when comparing metastatic and non-metastatic SSTR-RADS-3B bone lesions (P < 0.05), with these parameters offering a high predictive ability (AUC = 0.94, AUC = 0.86).

CONCLUSION

Both diameter and ADCmin can aid in the accurate identification of the nature of lesions associated with SSTR-RADS-3A lymph nodes, whereas ADCmin and ADCmean values can inform the accurate interpretation of SSTR-RADS-3B bone lesions.

Prevalence of metastases outside the liver and abdominal lymph nodes on 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT in patients with small intestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

Metastases outside the liver and abdominal/retroperitoneal lymph nodes are nowadays detected frequently in patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), owing to the high sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) with Gallium-68-DOTA-somatostatin analogues (68Ga-SSA) and concomitant diagnostic computed tomography (CT). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of extra-abdominal metastases on 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT in a cohort of patients with small intestinal (Si-NET) and pancreatic NET (Pan-NET), as well as that of pancreatic metastasis in patients with Si-NET. Among 2090 patients examined by 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT at two tertiary referral centres, a total of 1177 patients with a history of Si- or Pan-NET, were identified. The most recent 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT report for each patient was reviewed, and the location and number of metastases of interest were recorded. Lesions outside the liver and abdominal nodes were found in 26% of patients (n = 310/1177), of whom 21.5% (255/1177) were diagnosed with Si-NET and 4.5% (55/1177) Pan-NET. Bone metastases were found in 18.4% (215/1177), metastases to Virchow's lymph node in 7.1% (83/1177), and lung/pleura in 4.8% (56/1177). In the subset of 255 Si-NET patients, 5.4% (41/255) manifested lesions in the pancreas, 1.5% in the breast (18/255), 1.3% in the heart (15/255) and 1% in the orbita (12/255). In Si-NET patients, the Ki-67 proliferation index was higher in those with ≥2 metastatic sites of interest, than with 1 metastatic site, (p <0.001). Overall, extra-abdominal or pancreatic metastases were more often found in patients with Si-NET (34%) than in those with Pan-NET (13%) (p <0.001). Bone metastases were 2.6 times more frequent in patients with Si-NET compared to Pan-NET patients (p <0.001). Lesions to the breast and orbita were encountered in almost only Si-NET patients. In conclusion, lesions outside the liver and abdominal nodes were detected in as many as 26% of the patients, with different prevalence and metastatic patterns in patients with Si-NET compared to Pan-NET. The impact of such metastases on overall survival and clinical decision-making needs further evaluation.

Two synchronous primary mesenteric neuroendocrine tumors in a patient: a case report

Primary mesenteric neuroendocrine tumors represent a rare clinical entity, challenging to manage, while a combination of imaging is demanded in order to differentiate it from metastatic disease, and set the diagnosis. If the tumor is resectable, surgery is the fundament of the therapeutic approach. The appearance of a second primary mesenteric tumor suggests an unacquainted scenario. The current article presents a case of a 40-year-old woman, who underwent laparoscopic excision of a mesenteric tumor located close to the left pararenal space. Pathology with immunohistochemistry examination reported neuroendocrine tumor grade 2. No further treatment was necessary. Seven months later, 68-Gallium DOTATATE detected another primary neuroendocrine tumor located at the right retroperitoneal space without other lesions. The second tumor was also resected laparoscopically, and the pathology confirmed the diagnosis of another neuroendocrine tumor G2. The postoperative course was uneventful, and six months later the patient is disease-free. The adequacy of 68-Gallium DOTATATE for the preoperative diagnosis of primary mesenteric tumors, the role of the laparoscopic approach, and the extent of lymph node resection are matters addressed in this article.

Recent developments in the diagnosis of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (PanNENs) are characterized by a highly heterogeneous clinical and biological behavior, making their diagnosis challenging. PanNENs diagnostic work-up mainly relies on biochemical markers, pathological examination, and imaging evaluation. The latter includes radiological imaging (i.e. computed tomography [CT] and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), functional imaging (i.e. 68Gallium [68 Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT and Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose [18F]FDG PET/CT), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) with its associated procedures.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the recent advancements in the PanNENs diagnostic field. PubMed and Embase databases were used for the research, performed from inception to October 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

A deeper understanding of PanNENs biology, recent technological improvements in imaging modalities, as well as progresses achieved in molecular and cytological assays, are fundamental players for the achievement of early diagnosis and enhanced preoperative characterization of PanNENs. A multimodal diagnostic approach is required for a thorough disease assessment.

Real-Life Use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Confirmed and Suspected NETs from a Prospective 5-Year Electronic Archive at an ENETS Center of Excellence: More Than 2000 Scans in More Than 1500 Patients

The recent introduction of novel treatments for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and the well-established impact of clinical case discussion within dedicated multidisciplinary teams indicates the need to promote the centralization of rare diseases, such as NENs (neuroendocrine neoplasms). Data on the real-life use of and indications for [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT were collected from a prospective monocentric 5-year electronic archive including consecutive patients with confirmed and suspected NETs (September 2017 to May 2022). Overall, 2082 [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT scans (1685 confirmed NETs, 397 suspected NETs) were performed in 1537 patients. A high positivity rate was observed across different clinical settings (approximately 70%). Approximately 910/2082 scans were requested by the local oncology ward (851 confirmed NETs, 59 suspected NETs). The following observations were found: (i) the detection rate across all indications was 73.2% (higher for staging, peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) selection, and treatment response assessment); (ii) in suspected NETs, PET was more often positive when based on radiological findings. This systematic data collection in a high-volume diagnostic center represents a reliable cohort reflecting the global trends in the use of [68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for different clinical indications and primary tumor sites, but prompts the need for further multicenter data sharing in such a rare and slowly progressive disease setting.

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Primary Orbital Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs): Systematic Literature Review and Clinical Case Presentation

BACKGROUND

The ocular involvement of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is uncommon and mainly represented by metastases from gastrointestinal and lung neuroendocrine tumors. Primary orbital NENs are even less common and their diagnostic and therapeutic management is a challenge.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted from 1966 to September 2023 on PubMed to identify articles on orbital NENs and to summarize their clinical-pathological features, diagnosis and therapeutic management. Furthermore, we presented a case of a locally advanced retro-orbital primary neuroendocrine tumor that was referred to the certified Center of Excellence of Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 63 records on orbital NENs and 11 records focused on primary orbital NENs. The localization was mostly unilateral and in the right orbit; proptosis or exophthalmos represented the initial symptoms. The diagnostic work-up and therapeutic management was discussed and a diagnostic algorithm for the suspicion of primary orbital NENs was proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidisciplinary approach is required for the management of primary orbital NENs, emphasizing the importance of early referral to dedicated centers for prompt differential diagnosis, tailored treatment, and an improved quality of life and survival.

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas]

CLINICAL/METHODOLOGICAL ISSUE

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) of the pancreas fall into the group of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN). The assignment of imaging morphological criteria to this heterogeneous group of complex tumors is often difficult.

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Diagnostic ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-CT (PET/CT) are available for the detection of pancreatic NET (also referred to as NEN) and for the diagnosis of spread and the search for metastases.

METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS

In particular, nuclear medicine examination methods with somatostatin analogues are of high value, since they make tumors visible with high sensitivity via radioactively labeled receptor ligands.

PERFORMANCE

CT and MRI have high detection rates of pancreatic NET. Further developments, such as diffusion imaging, have further improved these traditional cross-sectional imaging diagnostics. However, nuclear medicine methods are an important component in detection and are superior to CT and MRI.

ACHIEVEMENTS

It is important for the radiologist to be familiar with NET of the pancreas, as it is an important differential diagnosis-also with regard to prognosis-of other pancreatic lesions.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Because NET are often hypervascularized, a biphasic examination technique after contrast administration is mandatory for cross-sectional imaging. PET/CT with somatostatin analogues should be performed for further diagnosis.

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors-Current Status and Advances in Diagnostic Imaging

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasia (GEP-NEN) is a heterogeneous and complex group of tumors that are often difficult to classify due to their heterogeneity and varying locations. As standard radiological methods, ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) are available for both localization and staging of NEN. Nuclear medical imaging methods with somatostatin analogs are of great importance since radioactively labeled receptor ligands make tumors visible with high sensitivity. CT and MRI have high detection rates for GEP-NEN and have been further improved by developments such as diffusion-weighted imaging. However, nuclear medical imaging methods are superior in detection, especially in gastrointestinal NEN. It is important for radiologists to be familiar with NEN, as it can occur ubiquitously in the abdomen and should be identified as such. Since GEP-NEN is predominantly hypervascularized, a biphasic examination technique is mandatory for contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging. PET/CT with somatostatin analogs should be used as the subsequent method.

Druggability of Targets for Diagnostic Radiopharmaceuticals

Targets play an indispensable and pivotal role in the development of radiopharmaceuticals. However, the initial stages of drug discovery projects are often plagued by frequent failures due to inadequate information on druggability and suboptimal target selection. In this context, we aim to present a comprehensive review of the factors that influence target druggability for diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals. Specifically, we explore the crucial determinants of target specificity, abundance, localization, and positivity rate and their respective implications. Through a detailed analysis of existing protein targets, we elucidate the significance of each factor. By carefully considering and balancing these factors during the selection of targets, more efficacious and targeted radiopharmaceuticals are expected to be designed for the diagnosis of a wide range of diseases in the future.

Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Molecular Hybrid Imaging and Theragnostics for Neuro-Endocrine Neoplasms (NENs)

Nuclear medicine has acquired a crucial role in the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) by improving the accuracy of diagnosis and staging as well as their risk stratification and personalized therapies, including radioligand therapies (RLT). Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics can enable physicians to further improve the overall efficiency and accuracy of the use of these tools in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings by improving the prediction of the tumor grade, differential diagnosis from other malignancies, assessment of tumor behavior and aggressiveness, and prediction of treatment response. This systematic review aims to describe the state-of-the-art AI and radiomics applications in the molecular imaging of NENs.

PET/CT Imaging in Treatment Planning and Surveillance of Sinonasal Neoplasms

Sinonasal cancers are uncommon malignancies with a generally unfavorable prognosis, often presenting at an advanced stage. Their high rate of recurrence supports close imaging surveillance and the utilization of functional imaging techniques. Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT has very high sensitivity for the diagnosis of sinonasal malignancies and can also be used as a "metabolic biopsy" in the characterization of some of the more common subgroups of these tumors, though due to overlap in uptake, histological confirmation is still needed. For certain tumor types, radiotracers, such as 11C-choline, and radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, including 68Ga-DOTATATE/DOTATOC, have proven useful in treatment planning and surveillance. Although serial scans for posttreatment surveillance allow the detection of subclinical lesions, the optimal schedule and efficacy in terms of survival are yet to be determined. Pitfalls of 18F-FDG, such as post-surgical and post-radiotherapy crusting and inflammation, may cause false-positive hypermetabolism in the absence of relapse.

Prognostic Implications of PET-Derived Tumor Volume and Uptake in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors

Historically, molecular imaging of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) was performed using SSTR scintigraphy (SRS). Sustained advances in medical imaging have led to its gradual replacement with SSTR positron-emission tomography (SSTR-PET). The higher sensitivity in comparison to SRS on the one hand and conventional cross-sectional imaging, on the other hand, enables more accurate staging and allows for image quantification. In addition, in recent years, a growing body of evidence has assessed the prognostic implications of SSTR-PET-derived prognostic biomarkers for NET patients, with the aim of risk stratification, outcome prognostication, and prediction of response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. In this narrative review, we give an overview of studies examining the prognostic value of advanced SSTR-PET-derived (semi-)quantitative metrics like tumor volume, uptake, and composite metrics. Complementing this analysis, a discussion of the current trends, clinical implications, and future directions is provided.

Diagnosis, Management and Theragnostic Approach of Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) constitute an ideal target for radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. The theragnostic approach is able to combine diagnosis and therapy by the identification of a molecular target that can be diagnosed and treated with the same radiolabeled compound. During the last years, advances in functional imaging with the introduction of somatostatin analogs and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, have improved the diagnosis and treatment of GEP-NENs. Moreover, PET/CT imaging with ¹⁸F-FDG represents a complementary tool for prognostic evaluation of patients with GEP-NENs. In the field of personalized medicine, the theragnostic approach has emerged as a promising tool in diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs, focusing on the theragnostic approach.

Molecular imaging Theranostics of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are rare and heterogeneous tumors, originating mostly from the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract followed by the lungs. Multidisciplinary discussion is mandatory for optimal diagnostic and therapeutic management. Well-differentiated NEN (NET) present a high expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) and can be studied with [68Ga]-DOTA-peptides ([68Ga]Ga-DOTANOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC, [68Ga]Ga-DOTATATE) PET/CT to assess disease extension and the eligibility for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). SSTR-analogues labelled with 90Y or 177Lu have been used since mid-90s for NET therapy. PRRT is now considered an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NET: following the approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE by FDA and EMA, PRRT is now part of the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. New strategies to improve PRRT efficacy and to reduce its toxicity are under evaluation (eg, personalization of treatment schemes, the selection of the most suitable patients, improvement of response assessment criteria, optimization of treatment sequencing, feasibility of PRRT-retreatment, combination of PRRT with other treatments options). Recently, several emerging radiopharmaceuticals showed encouraging results for both imaging and therapy (eg, SSTR-analogues labelled with 18F, SSTR-antagonists for both diagnosis and therapy, alpha-labelling for therapy, radiopharmaceuticals binding to new cellular targets). Aim of this review is to focus on current knowledge and to outline emerging perspectives for NEN's diagnosis and therapy.

Somatostatin Receptor Targeted PET-CT and Its Role in the Management and Theranostics of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) agonist-based Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) imaging is nowadays the mainstay for the assessment and diagnostic imaging of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), especially in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) (World Health Organization (WHO) grade I and II). Major clinical indications for SSTR imaging are primary staging and metastatic workup, especially (a) before surgery, (b) detection of unknown primary in metastatic NET, (c) patient selection for theranostics and appropriate therapy, especially peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), while less major indications include treatment response evaluation on and disease prognostication. Dual tracer PET-CT imaging using SSTR targeted PET tracers, viz. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-Tyr3-Octreotate (DOTA-TATE) and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-DOTA-NaI3-Octreotide (DOTA-NOC), and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), have recently gained widespread acceptance for better assessment of whole-body tumor biology compared to single-site histopathology, in terms of being non-invasive and the ability to assess inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity on a global scale. FDG uptake has been identified as independent adverse risk factor in various studies. Recently, somatostatin receptor antagonists have been shown to be more sensitive and specific in detecting the disease. The aim of this review article is to summarize the clinical importance of SSTR-based imaging in the clinical management of neuroendocrine and related tumors.

Validation of the SSTR-RADS 1.0 for the structured interpretation of SSTR-PET/CT and treatment planning in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients

OBJECTIVES

The recently proposed standardized reporting and data system for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted PET/CT SSTR-RADS 1.0 showed promising first results in the assessment of diagnosis and treatment planning with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). This study aimed to determine the intra- and interreader agreement of SSTR-RADS 1.0.

METHODS

SSTR-PET/CT scans of 100 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of expertise according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen by each reader (not more than three lesions per organ) and stratified according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria. Overall scan score and binary decision on PRRT were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Interreader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 0.91) and overall scan score (ICC ≥ 0.93) was excellent. The decision to state "functional imaging fulfills requirements for PRRT and qualifies patient as potential candidate for PRRT" also demonstrated excellent agreement among all readers (ICC ≥ 0.86). Intrareader agreement was excellent even among different experience levels when comparing target lesion-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.98), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 0.93), and decision for PRRT (ICC ≥ 0.88).

CONCLUSION

SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and accurate system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans with high intra- and interreader agreement. The system is a promising approach to standardize the diagnosis and treatment planning in NET patients.

KEY POINTS

• SSTR-RADS 1.0 offers high reproducibility and accuracy. • SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a promising method to standardize diagnosis and treatment planning for patients with NET.

Clinical Pharmacology of Radiotheranostics in Oncology

The combined use of diagnostic and therapeutic radioligands with the same molecular target, also known as theranostics, enables accurate patient selection, targeted therapy, and prediction of treatment response. Radioiodine, bone-seeking radioligands and norepinephrine analogs have been used for many years for diagnostic imaging and radioligand therapy of thyroid carcinoma, bone metastases, pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and neuroblastoma, respectively. In recent years, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands have shown clinical efficacy in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer, respectively. Several candidate compounds are targeting novel theranostic targets such as fibroblast activation protein, C-X-C chemokine receptor 4, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor. In addition, several strategies to improve efficacy of radioligand therapy are being evaluated, including dosimetry-based dose optimization, multireceptor targeting, upregulation of target receptors, radiosensitization, pharmacogenomics, and radiation genomics. Design and evaluation of novel radioligands and optimization of dose and dose schedules, within the complex context of individualized multimodal cancer treatment, requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes clinical pharmacology. Significant increases in the use of these radiopharmaceuticals in routine oncological practice can be expected, which will have major impact on patient care as well as (radio)pharmacy utilization.

Primary neuroendocrine tumors and primary neuroendocrine carcinomas of the liver: a proposal for a multidiscipline definition

Primary hepatic neuroendocrine tumors and primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare and pose challenges for both diagnosis and for determining whether the tumor is primary to the liver versus metastatic disease. The lack of a uniform definition for primary hepatic neuroendocrine neoplasms is also a limitation to understanding and treating these rare tumors. Recently, there have been significant histological advances in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine tumors in general, as well as significant advances in imaging for neuroendocrine neoplasms, all of which are important for their treatment. This article presents a multiple disciplinary definition and proposed guidelines for diagnosing a neuroendocrine tumor/neuroendocrine carcinomas as being primary to the liver.

Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT in a patient with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome

This case report follows a 70-year-old male patient with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome undergoing computed tomography (CT) for weight loss and surveillance of bilateral adrenal nodules. Incidentally, diffuse gastric and duodenal wall thickening was noted on CT. The patient underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy with biopsy results showing well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) in the stomach and duodenum. Subsequent imaging with gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT showed intense tracer uptake in the stomach and proximal duodenum with liver and regional nodal metastases around the superior mesenteric artery. This case outlines the utility of Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT in diagnosing, localizing, and staging NET such as gastrinomas.

Diagnostic work-up and advancement in the diagnosis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms ranging from well-differentiated, slowly growing tumors to poorly differentiated carcinomas. These tumors are generally characterized by indolent course and quite often absence of specific symptoms, thus eluding diagnosis until at an advanced stage. This underscores the importance of establishing a prompt and accurate diagnosis. The gold-standard remains histopathology. This should contain neuroendocrine-specific markers, such as chromogranin A; and also, an estimate of the proliferation by Ki-67 (or MIB-1), which is pivotal for treatment selection and prognostication. Initial work-up involves assessment of serum Chromogranin A and in selected patients gut peptide hormones. More recently, the measurement of multiple NEN-related transcripts, or the detection of circulating tumor cells enhanced our current diagnostic armamentarium and appears to supersede historical serum markers, such as Chromogranin A. Standard imaging procedures include cross-sectional imaging, either computed tomography or magnetic resonance, and are combined with somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. In particular, the advent of ¹¹¹In-DTPA-octreotide and more recently PET/CT and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-Octreotate scans revolutionized the diagnostic landscape of NENs. Likewise, FDG PET represents an invaluable asset in the management of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. Lastly, endoscopy, either conventional, or more advanced modalities such as endoscopic ultrasound, capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy, are essential for the diagnosis and staging of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and are routinely integrated in clinical practice. The complexity and variability of NENs necessitate the deep understanding of the current diagnostic strategies, which in turn assists in offering optimal patient-tailored treatment. The current review article presents the diagnostic work-up of GEP-NENs and all the recent advances in the field.

Surgical options for the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the ampulla of Vater: a reference centre experience

INTRODUCTION

The main objective of this study was to analyse the results of the surgical treatment of ampullary neuroendocrine tumours (NET) based on transduodenal ampullectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy, in a reference centre in hepatobiliopancreatic pathology.

METHOD

Retrospective, observational study, including all patients operated on for pancreatic and/or duodenal NET in a reference unit of hepatobiliopancreatic pathology and prospectively registered between January 1st, 1993 and September 30th, 2021. For those parameters not present, retrospective research was performed. Demographic, clinical, analytical and pathological data were analysed. A descriptive study was carried out. Overall and disease-free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log-Rank test.

RESULTS

Of 181 patients operated on for pancreatic and/or duodenal NET, only 9 were located in the ampulla of Vater, which represents 4.9% of all pancreatic and/or duodenal NET. Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in 6 patients, while 3 patients underwent transduodenal ampullectomy (TDA). Longer surgical time and more postoperative complications were observed in the PD group. There were no differences in hospital stay. Overall and disease-free survival at 5 years in the PD group compared to ATD was 83.3% vs. 100% and 50% vs. 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ampullary NET without locoregional involvement or risk factors, can be treated by conservative surgeries such as transduodenal ampullectomy.

The Quest for an Accurate Functional Tumor Volume with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

⁶⁸Ga-labeled somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT is now a standard-of-care component in the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, treatment response for NETs is still assessed with morphologic size measurements from other modalities, which can result in inaccuracy about the disease burden. Functional tumor volume (FTV) acquired from SSA PET/CT has been suggested as a possible metric, but no validated measurement tool to measure FTV exists. We tested the precision of multiple FTV computational approaches compared with morphologic volume measurements to identify a candidate for incorporation into future FTV studies to assess tumor burden more completely and accurately. Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 327 NET patients were collected at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2016 and April 2018. Patients were required to have SSA PET/CT and dedicated CT scans within 6 wk and were excluded if they had any intervention between scans. When paired studies were evaluated, 150 correlating lesions demonstrated SSA. Lesions were excluded if they contained necrotic components or were lobulated. This exclusion resulted in 94 lesions in 20 patients. The FTV for each lesion was evaluated with a hand-drawn assessment and 3 automated techniques: 50% threshold from SUV_max, 42% threshold from SUV_max, and background-subtracted lesion activity. These measurements were compared with volume calculated from morphologic volume measurements. Results: The FTV calculation methods showed varying correlations with morphologic volume measurements. FTV using a 42% threshold had a 0.706 correlation, hand-drawn volume from PET imaging had a 0.657 correlation, FTV using a 50% threshold had a 0.645 correlation, and background-subtracted lesion activity had a 0.596 correlation. The Bland-Altman plots indicated that all FTV methods had a positive mean difference from morphologic volume, with a 50% threshold showing the smallest mean difference. Conclusion: FTV determined with thresholding of SUV_max demonstrated the strongest correlation with traditional morphologic lesion volume assessment and the least bias. This method was more accurate than FTV calculated from hand-drawn volume assessments. Threshold-based automated FTV assessment promises to better determine disease extent and prognosis in patients with NETs.

Molecular Imaging of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

The key for molecular imaging is the use of a radiotracer with a radioactive and a functional component. While the functional component targets a specific feature of the tumor, the radioactive component makes the target visible. Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) are a diverse group of rare tumors that arise from neuroendocrine cells found mainly in the gastroenteropancreatic system, lung, thyroid, and adrenal glands. They are characterized by the expression of specific hormone receptors on the tumor cell surface, which makes them ideal targets for radiolabeled peptides. The most commonly expressed hormone receptors on NEN cells are the somatostatin receptors. They can be targeted for molecular imaging with various radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, but also with somatostatin antagonists, which have shown improved imaging quality. 18F-DOPA imaging has become a second-line imaging modality in NENs, with the exception of the evaluation of advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma. Alternatives for NENs with insufficient somatostatin receptor expression due to poor differentiation involve targeting glucose metabolism, which can also be used for prognosis. For the localization of the often-small insulinoma, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor imaging has become the new standard. Other alternatives involve metaiodobenzylguanidine and the molecular target C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4. In addition, new radiopeptides targeting the fibroblast activation protein, the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor and cholecystokinin-2 receptors have been identified in NENs and await further evaluation. This mini-review aims to provide an overview of the major molecular imaging modalities currently used in the field of NENs, and also to provide an outlook on future developments.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-VI. Primary Cutaneous Cancer, Sarcomas and Neuroendocrine Tumors

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications, and guidelines for image interpretation. Tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided. The current, sixth article in this series addresses PET-CT in an evaluation of aggressive cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. A discussion of the role of FDG PET for all types of tumors in these categories is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common malignancies in adult patients encountered in clinical practice. It also focuses on Food and Drug Agency (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals rather than research tracers or those requiring a local cyclotron. This information will serve as a guide to primary providers for the appropriate role of PET-CT in managing patients with cutaneous malignancies, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumors. The nuances of PET-CT interpretation as a practical guide for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees, are also addressed.

Theranostics bei gut bis mäßig differenzierten GEP-NEN

Neuroendokrine Neoplasien (NEN) sind seltene, heterogene und typischerweise langsam wachsende Tumoren. Die häufigsten Lokalisationen finden sich im gastro-entero-pankreatischen System (GEP-NEN). NENs werden nach proliferativer Aktivität (Ki-67-Index) eingeteilt (G1–3). Gut differenzierte Tumoren exprimieren dabei typischerweise Somatostatinrezeptoren (SSTR), die als Zielstruktur in der nuklearmedizinischen Theranostik dienen. Bei diesem Prinzip kann nach einer diagnostischen molekularen Bildgebung, meist mittels Positronenemissionstomografie/Computertomografie (PET/CT), eine individuell zugeschnittene Peptidradiorezeptortherapie (PRRT) mit einem β-Strahler-markierten Radiopharmakon erfolgen. In Metaanalysen zeigte die Diagnostik mittels SSTR-gerichteter PET/CT eine Sensitivität von 93% und eine Spezifität von 96%. Die SSTR-gerichtete Diagnostik kann auch zur radioaktiven Markierung von Tumoren verwendet werden, um eine zielgerichtete Chirurgie zu ermöglichen. Die Indikation zur Einleitung einer PRRT soll stets in einer interdisziplinären Tumorkonferenz getroffen werden. Ein Tumorprogress unter der vorangegangenen Therapie sollte dokumentiert sein. Die Therapie wird intravenös und insgesamt 4-mal in 8-wöchigem Abstand in spezialisierten nuklearmedizinischen Zentren verabreicht. Die Wirksamkeit der PRRT wurde in der NETTER-1-Studie prospektiv untersucht und konnte eine signifikante Verbesserung des progressionsfreien Überlebens (primärer Endpunkt) zeigen. Ausgehend von diesen Studienergebnissen steht mit Lutathera (177Lu-DOTATATE) inzwischen ein in Deutschland zugelassenes Radiopharmazeutikum zu Behandlung von nicht resektablen oder metastasierten bzw. progredienten, gut differenzierten (G1 und G2), SSTR-positiven GEP-NEN zur Verfügung.

Current updates and future directions in diagnosis and management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are a heterogenous group of rare neoplasms that are increasingly being discovered, often incidentally, throughout the gastrointestinal tract with varying degrees of activity and malignant potential. Confusing nomenclature has added to the complexity of managing these lesions. The term carcinoid tumor and embryonic classification have been replaced with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm, which includes gastrointestinal neuroendocrine and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. A comprehensive multidisciplinary approach is important for clinicians to diagnose, stage and manage these lesions. While histological diagnosis is the gold standard, recent advancements in endoscopy, conventional imaging, functional imaging, and serum biomarkers complement histology for tailoring specific treatment options. In light of developing technology, our review sets out to characterize diagnostic and therapeutic advancements for managing gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, including innovations in radiolabeled peptide imaging, circulating biomarkers, and endoscopic treatment approaches adapted to different locations throughout the gastrointestinal system.

Current status and future of targeted peptide receptor radionuclide positron emission tomography imaging and therapy of gastroenteropancreatic-neuroendocrine tumors

Theranostics is the highly targeted molecular imaging and therapy of tumors. Targeted peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has taken the lead in demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of this molecular approach to treating cancers. Metastatic, well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may be most effectively imaged and treated with DOTATATE ligands. We review the current practice, safety, advantages, and limitations of DOTATATE based theranostics. Finally, we briefly describe the exciting new areas of development and future directions of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor theranostics.

Contribution of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal malignancies

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a promising hybrid imaging technique for evaluating musculoskeletal malignancies. Both technologies, independently are useful for evaluating this type of tumors. PET/MR has great potential combining metabolic and functional imaging PET with soft tissue contrast and multiparametric sequences of MR. In this paper we review the existing literature and discuss the different protocols, new available radiotracers to conclude with the scarce evidence available the most useful/probable indications of the PET MR for the for musculoskeletal malignancies.

Radiolabeled Somatostatin Analogues for Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare and heterogeneous tumors that require multidisciplinary discussion for optimal care. The theranostic approach (DOTA peptides labelled with 68Ga for diagnosis and with 90Y or 177Lu for therapy) plays a crucial role in the management of NENs to assess disease extension and as a criteria for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) eligibility based on somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression. On the diagnostic side, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA peptides PET/CT (SSTR PET/CT) is the gold standard for imaging well-differentiated SSTR-expressing neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). [18F]FDG PET/CT is useful in higher grade NENs (NET G2 with Ki-67 > 10% and NET G3; NEC) for more accurate disease characterization and prognostication. Promising emerging radiopharmaceuticals include somatostatin analogues labelled with 18F (to overcome the limits imposed by 68Ga), and SSTR antagonists (for both diagnosis and therapy). On the therapeutic side, the evidence gathered over the past two decades indicates that PRRT is to be considered as an effective and safe treatment option for SSTR-expressing NETs, and is currently included in the therapeutic algorithms of the main scientific societies. The positioning of PRRT in the treatment sequence, as well as treatment personalization (e.g., tailored dosimetry, re-treatment, selection criteria, and combination with other alternative treatment options), is warranted in order to improve its efficacy while reducing toxicity. Although very preliminary (being mostly hampered by lack of methodological standardization, especially regarding feature selection/extraction) and often including small patient cohorts, radiomic studies in NETs are also presented. To date, the implementation of radiomics in clinical practice is still unclear. The purpose of this review is to offer an overview of radiolabeled SSTR analogues for theranostic use in NENs.

Clinical outcomes, Kadish-INSICA staging and therapeutic targeting of somatostatin receptor 2 in olfactory neuroblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare cancer of the sinonasal region. We provide a comprehensive analysis of this malignancy with molecular and clinical trial data on a subset of our cohort to report on the potential efficacy of somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2)-targeting imaging and therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 404 primary, locally recurrent, and metastatic olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) patients from 12 institutions in the United States of America, United Kingdom and Europe. Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment approach were evaluated. SSTR2 expression, SSTR2-targeted imaging and the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy [PRRT](177Lu-DOTATATE) were reported in a subset of our cohort (LUTHREE trial; NCT03454763).

RESULTS

Dural infiltration at presentation was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in primary cases (n = 278). Kadish-Morita staging and Dulguerov T-stage both had limitations regarding their prognostic value. Multivariable survival analysis demonstrated improved outcomes with lower stage and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Prophylactic neck irradiation significantly reduces the rate of nodal recurrence. 82.4% of the cohort were positive for SSTR2; treatment of three metastatic cases with SSTR2-targeted peptide-radionuclide receptor therapy (PRRT) in the LUTHREE trial was well-tolerated and resulted in stable disease (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents pertinent clinical data from the largest dataset, to date, on ONB. We identify key prognostic markers and integrate these into an updated staging system, highlight the importance of adjuvant radiotherapy across all disease stages, the utility of prophylactic neck irradiation and the potential efficacy of targeting SSTR2 to manage disease.

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT versus 111In-octreotide scintigraphy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective study

Objective

To compare ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-DPhe1,Tyr3-octreotate (⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) findings with those of conventional ¹¹¹In-octreotide scintigraphy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

Materials and Methods

This was a single-center prospective study including 41 patients (25 males; mean age, 55.4 years) with biopsy-proven NETs who underwent whole-body ¹¹¹In-octreotide scintigraphy and whole-body ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. The patients had been referred for tumor staging (34.1%), tumor restaging (61.0%), or response evaluation (4.9%). Images were compared in a patient-by-patient analysis to identify additional lesions, and we attempted to determine the impact that discordant findings had on treatment planning.

Results

Compared with ¹¹¹In-octreotide scintigraphy, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT revealed more lesions, the additional lesions typically being in the liver or bowel. Changes in management owing to the additional information provided by ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT occurred in five patients (12.2%), including intermodal changes in three (7.3%) and intramodal changes in two (4.9%). In addition, ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT yielded incidental findings unrelated to the primary NET in three patients (7.3%): Hürthle cell carcinoma of the thyroid, bowel non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and a suspicious breast lesion.

Conclusion

We conclude that ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is superior to conventional ¹¹¹In-octreotide scintigraphy for the management of NETs because of its ability to determine the extent of the disease more accurately, which, in some cases, translates to changes in the treatment plan.

Somatostatin and Somatostatin Receptors: From Signaling to Clinical Applications in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms which arise from neuroendocrine cells that are distributed widely throughout the body. Although heterogenous, many of them share their ability to overexpress somatostatin receptors (SSTR) on their cell surface. Due to this, SSTR and somatostatin have been a large subject of interest in the discovery of potential biomarkers and treatment options for the disease. The aim of this review is to describe the molecular characteristics of somatostatin and somatostatin receptors and its application in diagnosis and therapy on patients with NENs as well as the use in the near future of somatostatin antagonists.

Theragnostic in neuroendocrine tumors

In the last few decades, the incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine tumors has been increasing. The theragnostic approach, that allows the diagnosis and treatment of different neoplasms with the same ligand, is a typical nuclear medicine tool. Applied for years, is also pivotal in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) where it has improved the diagnostic accuracy and the therapeutic efficacy with impact on patient's survival. Theragnostic also allows the identification of important prognostic factors such as tumor location and burden, presence of liver metastases and intensity of somatostatin receptors (SSTR) expression to consider in new and possibly combined studies to ameliorate patient's outcome. Moreover, the possibility to evaluate receptor expression even in non-NET malignancies has de facto widened the possible indications for PRRT. We believe that this innovative therapeutic approach will be implemented in next years by radiomics and biological tumors characterization to better address PRRT applications.

Current update on imaging for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNEN) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with differing pathological, genetic, and clinical features. Based on clinical findings, they may be categorized into functioning and nonfunctioning tumors. Adoption of the 2017 World Health Organization classification system, particularly its differentiation between grade 3, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNET) and grade 3, poorly-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (panNEC) has emphasized the role imaging plays in characterizing these lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound can help obtain biopsy specimen and assess tumor margins and local spread. Enhancement patterns on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to classify panNEN. Contrast enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging have been reported to be useful for characterization of panNEN and quantifying metastatic burden. Current and emerging radiotracers have broadened the utility of functional imaging in evaluating panNEN. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and somatostatin receptor imaging such as Gallium-68 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid–octreotate PET/CT may be useful for improved identification of panNEN in comparison to anatomic modalities. These new techniques can also play a direct role in optimizing the selection of treatment for individuals and predicting tumor response based on somatostatin receptor expression. In addition, emerging methods of radiomics such as texture analysis may be a potential tool for staging and outcome prediction in panNEN, however further investigation is required before clinical implementation.

PET with Different Radiopharmaceuticals in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Umbrella Review of Published Meta-Analyses

Simple Summary

Functional imaging methods and, in particular, positron emission tomography (PET) using several radiopharmaceuticals may play a pivotal role in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) located in different sites, paraganglioma (PGL) and neuroblastoma (NB), recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma (rMTC) and aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. Several radiopharmaceuticals can be used in this setting such as Gallium-68 somatostatin analogues (⁶⁸Ga-SSA), Fluorine-18 fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine (¹⁸F-FDOPA), Gallium-68 exendin-4 (⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4), Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG). This umbrella review provides an evidence-based summary about meta-analyses on diagnostic performance, prognostic value, clinical impact and safety of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Overall, evidence-based data support the use of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms but with specific indications for each radiopharmaceutical.

Abstract

Background: Several meta-analyses have reported quantitative data about the diagnostic performance, the prognostic value, the impact on management and the safety of positron emission tomography (PET) including related hybrid modalities (PET/CT or PET/MRI) using different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. We performed an umbrella review of published meta-analyses to provide an evidence-based summary. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses listed in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases was carried out (last search date: 30 June 2021). Results: Thirty-four published meta-analyses were selected and summarized. About the diagnostic performance: ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET yields high diagnostic performance in patients with NETs and PGL; ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET yields good diagnostic performance in patients with intestinal NETs, PGL, NB, being the best available PET method in detecting rMTC; ⁶⁸Ga-exendin-4 PET has good diagnostic accuracy in detecting insulinomas; ¹⁸F-FDG PET has good diagnostic performance in detecting aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. About the prognostic value: ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET has a recognized prognostic value in well-differentiated NETs, whereas ¹⁸F-FDG PET has a recognized prognostic value in aggressive neuroendocrine neoplasms. A significant clinical impact of ⁶⁸Ga-SSA PET and related hybrid modalities in patients with NETs was demonstrated. There are no major toxicities or safety issues related to the use of PET radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Conclusions: Evidence-based data support the use of PET with different radiopharmaceuticals in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms with specific indications for each radiopharmaceutical.