Locoregional tumour evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck area: a comparison between MRI, PET/CT and integrated PET/MRI

Current Applications of PET/MR: Part I: Technical Basics and Preclinical/Clinical Applications

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) imaging has gone through major hardware improvements in recent years, making it a reliable state-of-the-art hybrid modality in clinical practice. At the same time, image reconstruction, attenuation correction, and motion correction algorithms have significantly evolved to provide high-quality images. Part I of the current review discusses technical basics, pre-clinical applications, and clinical applications of PET/MR in radiation oncology and head and neck imaging. PET/MR offers a broad range of advantages in preclinical and clinical imaging. In the preclinic, small and large animal-dedicated devices were developed, making PET/MR capable of delivering new insight into animal models in diseases and facilitating the development of methods that inform clinical PET/MR. Regarding PET/MR's clinical applications in radiation medicine, PET and MR already play crucial roles in the radiotherapy process. Their combination is particularly significant as it can provide molecular and morphological characteristics that are not achievable with other modalities. In addition, the integration of PET/MR information for therapy planning with linear accelerators is expected to provide potentially unique biomarkers for treatment guidance. Furthermore, in clinical applications in the head and neck region, it has been shown that PET/MR can be an accurate modality in head and neck malignancies for staging and resectability assessment. Also, it can play a crucial role in diagnosing residual or recurrent diseases, reliably distinguishing from oedema and fibrosis. PET/MR can furthermore help with tumour characterization and patient prognostication. Lastly, in head and neck carcinoma of unknown origin, PET/MR, with its diagnostic potential, may obviate multiple imaging sessions in the near future.

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Current Evidence and Innovative Applications

This article provides an overview of the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT in various clinical scenarios of head-neck squamous cell carcinoma, ranging from initial staging to treatment-response assessment, and post-therapy follow-up, with a focus on the current evidence, debated issues, and innovative applications. Methodological aspects and the most frequent pitfalls in head-neck imaging interpretation are described. In the initial work-up, 18F-FDG PET/CT is recommended in patients with metastatic cervical lymphadenectomy and occult primary tumor; moreover, it is a well-established imaging tool for detecting cervical nodal involvement, distant metastases, and synchronous primary tumors. Various 18F-FDG pre-treatment parameters show prognostic value in terms of disease progression and overall survival. In this scenario, an emerging role is played by radiomics and machine learning. For radiation-treatment planning, 18F-FDG PET/CT provides an accurate delineation of target volumes and treatment adaptation. Due to its high negative predictive value, 18F-FDG PET/CT, performed at least 12 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, can prevent unnecessary neck dissections. In addition to radiomics and machine learning, emerging applications include PET/MRI, which combines the high soft-tissue contrast of MRI with the metabolic information of PET, and the use of PET radiopharmaceuticals other than 18F-FDG, which can answer specific clinical needs.

Imaging of Tumor Stroma Using 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy of Primary Tumors in Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Comparative Imaging Trial

The low detection rate of primary tumors by current diagnostic techniques remains a major concern for patients with head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the potential role of 68Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (68Ga-FAPI) PET/CT compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary tumors of HNCUP. Methods: In this prospective comparative imaging trial conducted at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 91 patients with negative or equivocal findings of a primary tumor by comprehensive clinical examination and conventional imaging were enrolled from June 2020 to September 2022. The presence of a primary tumor was recorded by 3 experienced nuclear medicine physicians. Primary lesions were validated by histopathologic analysis and a composite reference standard. Results: Of the 91 patients (18 women, 73 men; median age, 60 y; age range, 24-76 y), primary tumors were detected in 46 (51%) patients after a thorough diagnostic work-up. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected more primary lesions than 18F-FDG PET/CT (46 vs. 17, P < 0.001) and showed better sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy in locating primary tumors (51% vs. 25%, 98% vs. 43%, and 51% vs. 19%, respectively). Furthermore, 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT led to treatment changes in 22 of 91 (24%) patients compared with 18F-FDG PET/CT. The Kaplan-Meier curve illustrated that patients with unidentified primary tumors had a significantly worse prognosis than patients with identified primary tumors (hazard ratio, 5.77; 95% CI, 1.86-17.94; P = 0.0097). Conclusion: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary lesions and could serve as a sensitive, reliable, and reproducible imaging modality for HNCUP patients.

MRI and PET/CT in the assessment of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer

The aim of this study is to present the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and PET/CT in the evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Data of 114 patients who underwent MRI and PET/CT prior to surgery in the time period between January 2010 and September 2021 in our center is analyzed retrospectively. Histopathological results of surgical preparations serve as the gold standard. The mean time from MRI to surgery is 22.9 (± 18.7) days, and from PET/CT to surgery 21.7 (± 19.9) days. Sensitivities of 80.4% and 80.4%, specificities of 85.7% and 87.3%, PPVs of 82.0% and 83.7% and NPVs of 84.4% and 84.6% are registered for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. 37 false results are further analyzed with respect to side and level of the affected lymph node, as well as intersections of the two imaging modalities. In 29 patients (25.4%), additional findings are described in PET/CT, 7 (6.1%) of which were histologically confirmed to be further malignancies. A combination of both MRI and PET/CT imaging modalities could improve diagnostic accuracy, especially with regard to sensitivity. A notable number of additional findings in whole body acquisition leads to the potential diagnosis of further malignancies.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Post-Therapy Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer

Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) can either be examined with hybrid PET/MR imaging systems or sequentially, using PET/CT and MR imaging. Regardless of the acquisition technique, the superiority of MR imaging compared to CT lies in its potential to interrogate tumor and surrounding tissues with different sequences, including perfusion and diffusion. For this reason, PET/MR imaging is preferable for the detection and assessment of locoregional residual/recurrent HNSCC after therapy. In addition, MR imaging interpretation is facilitated when combined with PET. Nevertheless, distant metastases and distant second primary tumors are detected equally well with PET/MR imaging and PET/CT.

Evaluation of [68Ga]-DOTATOC PET/MRI in Patients with Meningioma of the Subcranial and Intraorbital Space

Meningiomas are known to express somatostatin receptor (SSTR) type 2 to a high degree. Therefore, radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, such as DOTATOC, have been introduced for PET imaging of meningiomas. However, the benefit of hybrid SSTR PET/MRI is still debated. Here, we report our experience with [⁶⁸Ga]-DOTATOC PET/MRI. Methods: PET/MRI was performed in 60 patients with suspected or diagnosed meningiomas of the skull plane and eye socket. Acquired datasets were reported by 2 independent readers regarding local tumor extent and signal characteristics. Histopathologic results and follow-up imaging served as the reference standard. SUVs of target lesions were analyzed according to the corresponding maximal tracer uptake. The diagnostic accuracy of PET/MRI and conventional MRI was determined independently and compared with the reference standard. Results: In total, 60 target lesions were identified, with 54 considered to be meningiomas according to the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/MRI versus MRI alone were 95% versus 96% and 75% versus 66%, respectively. The McNemar test was not able to distinguish any differences between PET/MRI and the reference standard or MRI and the reference standard. No differences were found between the 2 modalities with respect to local infiltration. Conclusion: SSTR PET/MRI and MRI yielded similar accuracy for the detection of meningiomas of the skull base and intraorbital space. Here, sequential low-dose SSTR PET/CT might be helpful for the planning of radioligand therapy or radiotherapy.

The performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and recurrence detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

Prospectively, 77 patients with histologically proven or highly suspected HNSCC underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in a week for either initial staging (n = 67) or restaging (n = 10). The diagnostic performance was compared for the two imaging approaches, especially for N staging. SUVmax, SUVmean, and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were assessed for paired positive lesions. Furthermore, change in management by 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and histopathologic FAP expression of some lesions were explored.

RESULTS

18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibited a comparable detection efficiency for primary tumor (100%) and recurrence (62.5%). In the twenty-nine patients receiving neck dissection, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed greater specificity and accuracy in evaluating preoperative N staging than 18F-FDG based on patient (p = 0.031 and p = 0.070), neck side (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006), and neck level (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). As for distant metastasis, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected more positive lesions than 18F-FDG (25 vs 23) and with higher SUVmax (7.99 ± 9.04 vs 3.62 ± 2.68, p = 0.002) by lesion-based analysis. The type of neck dissection in 9 cases (9/33) was altered by 68Ga-FAPI-04. Overall, clinical management was significantly changed in 10 patients (10/61). Three patients had a follow-up 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT post neoadjuvant therapy: One showed complete remission, and the others showed progression. The 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake intensity was confirmed to be consistent with FAP expression.

CONCLUSION

68Ga-FAPI-04 outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating preoperative N staging in patients with HNSCC. Furthermore, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT also shows the potential in clinical management and monitoring response to treatment.

Contemporary Imaging and Reporting Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: MRI, FDG PET/MRI, NI-RADS, and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary-AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

CT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT play major roles in the diagnosis, staging, treatment planning, and surveillance of head and neck cancers. Nonetheless, an evolving understanding of head and neck cancer pathogenesis, advances in imaging techniques, changing treatment regimens, and a lack of standardized guidelines have led to areas of uncertainty in the imaging of head and neck cancer. This narrative review aims to address four issues in the contemporary imaging of head and neck cancer. The first issue relates to the standard and advanced sequences that should be included in MRI protocols for head and neck cancer imaging. The second issue relates to approaches to surveillance imaging after treatment of head and neck cancer, including the choice of imaging modality, the frequency of surveillance imaging, and the role of standardized reporting through the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System. The third issue relates to the role of imaging in the setting of neck carcinoma of unknown primary. The fourth issue relates to the role of simultaneous PET/MRI in head and neck cancer evaluation. The authors of this review provide consensus opinions for each issue.

PET/MR versus PET/CT for locoregional staging of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer

Background

The value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for TN staging in head and neck cancer (HNC) has been proven in numerous studies. A few studies have investigated the value of FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of HNC; the combined results indicate potential for FDG-PET/MRI, but the scientific evidence remains weak.

Purpose

To compare performance of FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI for locoregional staging in patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Material and Methods

Two radiologists independently of each other retrospectively reviewed primary pre-therapeutic FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI examinations from 40 individuals with oropharyngeal carcinomas. TN stage and primary tumor size were noted. The results were compared between observers and modalities and against TN stage set at a multidisciplinary conference.

Results

For nodal staging, PET/MRI had slightly higher specificity and accuracy than PET/CT for the most experienced observer. Both methods demonstrated excellent sensitivity (≥ 0.97 and 1.00, respectively), as well as high negative predictive values (≥ 0.95 and 1.00, respectively). No significant differences were found for tumor staging or measurement of maximum tumor diameter. There was a weak agreement (κ = 0.35–0.49) between PET/CT and PET/MRI for T and N stages for both observers. Inter-observer agreement was higher for PET/MRI than for PET/CT, both for tumor staging (κ = 0.57 vs. 0.35) and nodal staging (κ = 0.69 vs. 0.55). The agreement between observers was comparable to the agreement between methods.

Conclusion

PET/MRI may be a viable alternative to PET/CT for locoregional staging (TN staging) and assessment of maximal tumor diameter in oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MRI in Detecting Locoregional Recurrence of HNSCC 12 Weeks after the End of Chemoradiotherapy: Single-Center Experience with PET/MRI

Purpose

In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the early diagnosis and efficient detection of recurrences and/or residual tumor after treatment play a very important role in patient's prognosis. Positron emission tomography (PET) using 2-deoxy-2-¹⁸F-fluoro-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) has become an established method for the diagnosis of suspected recurrence in head and neck carcinomas. In particular, integrated PET/MRI imaging that provides optimal soft tissue contrast and less dental implant artifacts compared to PET/CT is an intriguing technique for the follow-up imaging of HNSCC patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in post-treatment follow-up imaging of HNSCC patients.

Methods

This retrospective observational cohort study consists of 104 patients from our center with histologically confirmed HNSCC. All patients received chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and underwent ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (n = 52) or ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI (n = 52) scan 12 weeks after the end of treatment. Image analysis was performed by two independent readers according to a five-point Likert scale analysis.

Results

PET/MRI was more sensitive (1.00 vs. 0.77) than PET/CT in the detection of locoregional recurrence. PET/MRI also had better negative (1.00 vs. 0.87) predictive values. AUCs for PET/MRI and PET/CT on patient-based analysis were 0.997 (95% CI 0.989–1.000) and 0.890 (95% CI 0.806–0.974), respectively. The comparison of sensitivity, AUCs, and negative predictive values revealed a statistically significant difference, p < 0.05. In PET/CT, false-negative and positive findings were observed in the more advanced disease stages, where PET/MRI performed better. Also, false-negative findings were located in the oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and nasopharyngeal regions, where PET/MRI made no false-negative interpretations.

Conclusion

Based on these results, PET/MRI might be considered the modality of choice in detecting locoregional recurrence in HNSCC patients, especially in the more advanced stages in the oral cavity, larynx, or nasopharynx.

Comparison of CT, MRI, and F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial N-staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Background and purpose

Treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is based on clinical exam, biopsy, and a precise imaging-based TNM-evaluation. A high sensitivity and specificity for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and F-18 FDG PET/CT are reported for N-staging. Nevertheless, staging of oral squamous cell carcinoma is most often based on computed tomography (CT) scans. This study aims to evaluate cost-effectiveness of MRI and PET/CT compared to standard of care imaging in initial staging of OSCC within the US Healthcare System.

Methods

A decision model was constructed using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and overall costs of different imaging strategies including a CT of the head, neck, and the thorax, MRI of the neck with CT of the thorax, and whole body F-18 FDG PET/CT using Markov transition simulations for different disease states. Input parameters were derived from literature and willingness to pay (WTP) was set to US $100,000/QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis of diagnostic parameters and costs was performed. Monte Carlo modeling was used for probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

Results

In the base-case scenario, total costs were at US $239,628 for CT, US $240,001 for MRI, and US $239,131 for F-18 FDG PET/CT whereas the model yielded an effectiveness of 5.29 QALYs for CT, 5.30 QALYs for MRI, and 5.32 QALYs for F-18 FDG PET/CT respectively. F-18 FDG PET/CT was the most cost-effective strategy over MRI as well as CT, and MRI was the cost-effective strategy over CT. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed high robustness of the model with incremental cost effectiveness ratio remaining below US $100,000/QALY for a wide range of variability of input parameters.

Conclusion

F-18 FDG PET/CT is the most cost-effective strategy in the initial N-staging of OSCC when compared to MRI and CT. Despite less routine use, both whole body PET/CT and MRI are cost-effective modalities in the N-staging of OSCC. Based on these findings, the implementation of PET/CT for initial staging could be suggested to help reduce costs while increasing effectiveness in OSCC.

PET/CT and PET/MR Imaging of the Post-treatment Head and Neck: Traps and Tips

PET/computed tomography and PET/MR imaging are used to evaluate the post-treatment neck. Although 18F-FDG is helpful in the staging and treatment response assessment of head and neck cancer, recently developed PET radiotracers targeting specific surface markers are promising for applications of diagnostic problem solving and improved extent delineation. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging is helpful in the differential diagnosis of head and neck neoplasms, and improves the sensitivity and specificity for the detection of certain pathologies. Following standardized imaging parameters for PET/computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging in PET/MR imaging improves diagnostic accuracy and allows for future research data mining.

Advancements in Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Applications to Diagnostic Challenges in Neuroradiology

Since the clinical adoption of magnetic resonance (MR) in medical imaging, MR has proven to be a workhorse in diagnostic neuroradiology, with the ability to provide superb anatomic detail as well as additional functional and physiologic data, depending on the techniques utilized. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography has also shown irreplaceable diagnostic value in certain disease processes of the central nervous system by providing molecular and metabolic information through the development of numerous disease-specific PET tracers, many of which can be utilized as a diagnostic technique in and of themselves or can provide a valuable adjunct to information derived from MR. Despite these advances, many challenges still remain in neuroradiology, particularly in malignancy, neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, and cerebrovascular disease. Through improvements in attenuation correction, motion correction, and PET detectors, combining the 2 modalities of PET and MR through simultaneous imaging has proven feasible and allows for improved spatial and temporal resolution without compromising either of the 2 individual modalities. The complementary information offered by both technologies has provided increased diagnostic accuracy in both research and many clinical applications in neuroradiology.

Clinical Applications of PET/MR Imaging

PET/MR imaging is in routine clinical use and is at least as effective as PET/CT for oncologic and neurologic studies with advantages with certain PET radiopharmaceuticals and applications. In addition, whole body PET/MR imaging substantially reduces radiation dosages compared with PET/CT which is particularly relevant to pediatric and young adult population. For cancer imaging, assessment of hepatic, pelvic, and soft-tissue malignancies may benefit from PET/MR imaging. For neurologic imaging, volumetric brain MR imaging can detect regional volume loss relevant to cognitive impairment and epilepsy. In addition, the single-bed position acquisition enables dynamic brain PET imaging without extending the total study length which has the potential to enhance the diagnostic information from PET.

PET Imaging for Head and Neck Cancers

Head and neck cancers are commonly encountered cancers in clinical practice in the United States. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET/CT has been clinically applied in staging, occult primary tumor detection, treatment planning, response assessment, follow-up, recurrent disease detection, and prognosis prediction in these patients. Alternative PET tracers remain investigational and can provide additional valuable information such as radioresistant tumor hypoxia. The recent introduction of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR imaging has provided the advantage of combining the superior soft tissue resolution of MR imaging with the functional information provided by ¹⁸F-FDG PET. This article is a concise review of recent advances in PET imaging in head and neck cancer.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined PET/CT with MRI, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Oropharyngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

The aim of this paper is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for detecting synchronous cancer and distant metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC).

Method

A large and growing body of literature has been conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). The researchers collected all accessible literature existing through Cochrane Library (John Wiley & Sons) electronic databases, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine), Scopus, and Google Scholar up to June 2020. Analyses were conducted using Stata version 12.0 (StataCorp LP).

Results

A total of nine studies consisting of 1166 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity of combined PET/CT with MRI, 18F-FDG PET/MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT was 0.92, 0.80, and 0.79, respectively, and the corresponding specificities were 0.93, 0.91, and 0.88. The overall prevalence of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas was 9.2% and 11.8%, respectively, with the esophagus (4.6%) being the most common site of synchronous cancer. The most common sites of distant metastases were lung (3%), bone (1.2%), and distant lymph nodes (1.2%), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study showed an approximately similar diagnostic performance for PET/CT, PET/MRI, and the combination of PET/CT and MRI for metastasis assessment in advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Ultrasound in patients with treated head and neck carcinomas: A retrospective analysis for effectiveness of follow-up care

Correct follow-up is necessary to avoid under- or overtreatment in the care of patients with treated carcinomas of head and neck. Ultrasound is a cost-effective, harmless, easy, and feasible method. It can be applied in the outpatient clinic in follow-up but the United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary guidelines are recommended computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of metastasis for head and neck carcinomas in the follow-up period. The purpose of the study was to state that neck ultrasound would be the method of choice on follow-up care of Chinese patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of head and neck.Patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of the head and neck were examined for 5-years in follow-up through physical, clinical, and neck ultrasound (n = 198). If patients had no evidence of disease after 60 months of definitive therapy considered as a cure. If patients had no evidence of disease after 36 months of salvage therapy considered as a cure of recurrence.Irrespective of definitive treatment used, the study was monitored through neck ultrasound during 5 years of a follow-up visit and was reported cure in 126 (64%) patients and recurrence in 72 (36%; distant metastasis: 33 [17%], local recurrence: 24 [12%], and regional recurrence: 15 [7%]) patients. Primary tumor stage IV, III, II, and I had 63% (15/24), 51% (21/41), 32% (18/56), and 23% (18/77) recurrence, respectively. The time to detect regional recurrence was shorter than that for local recurrence (P < .0001, q = 15.059) and distant recurrence (P < .0001, q = 7.958). Local recurrence and stage I primary tumor had the highest percentage cure for recurrence.Neck ultrasound in the follow-up period is reported to be effective for the detection of recurrence of patients who received primary treatment for carcinoma of head and neck especially regional recurrence and primary tumor stage I.Level of Evidence: III.

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in patients with advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of combined positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters provided by simultaneous 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/MRI in patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OHSCC).

METHODS

Forty-five patients with locally advanced OHSCC who underwent simultaneous FDG PET/MRI before (chemo)radiotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Peak standardized uptake value (SULpeak), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of the primary lesion were obtained on PET data. On MRI scans, primary tumor size, diffusion and perfusion parameters were assessed using pre-contrast and high-resolution post-contrast images. Ratios between metabolic/metabolo-volumetric parameters and ADC were calculated. Comparisons between groups were performed by Student's t test. Survival analysis was performed by univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. Overall survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Survivors were censored at the time of the last clinical control. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant RESULTS: During follow-up (mean 31.4 ± 21 months), there were 15 deaths. Univariate analysis shows that SULpeak and SULpeak/ADCmean were significant predictors of overall survival (OS). At multivariate analysis, only SULpeak remained a significant predictor of OS. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that patients with higher SULpeak had poorer outcome compared to those with lower values (HR: 3.7, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Pre-therapy SULpeak of the primary site was predictive of overall survival in patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer treated with (chemo)radiotherapy.

[18F]FDG PET/MRI versus contrast-enhanced MRI in detecting regional HNSCC metastases

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI using established dimensional and morphological criteria versus integrated [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI in identifying regional lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For this purpose, we compare MRI and PET/MRI using the histopathological findings in dissected lymph nodes as the gold standard.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients with histologically proven HNSCC who underwent gadolinium-enhanced [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI as part of their staging. All neck lymph nodes were classified on MRI using dimensional and/or morphological criteria. Then, they were jointly assessed by a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist using integrated [¹⁸F]PET/MR images. ROC curves were obtained to compare the techniques. Lymph node histopathology was considered as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Out of 865 lymph nodes, 35 were malignant at histopathology (3 with micro-metastases). Sensitivity and specificity were 48.6% and 99.5% for MRI using dimensional criteria; 60.0% and 99.6% for MRI using morphological criteria; 60.0% and 99.4% for MRI using both; and 74.3% and 97.6% for PET using MR as anatomic localization. The area under the ROC curve was higher for PET and MRI localization (0.859) than for MRI using dimensional (0.740; p < 0.05), or morphological (0.798; p < 0.05), or both criteria (0.797; p < 0.05). PET/MR using a PET SUVmax cutoff of 5.7 combined with MRI using dimensional and/or morphological criteria reached high values for accuracy (98.2%), NPV (98.2%), and PPV (95.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional contrast-enhanced MRI or PET alone, integrated PET/MRI could improve diagnostic accuracy in detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with HNSCC.

18F-FDG PET/CT Habitat Radiomics Predicts Outcome of Patients with Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

To determine if quantitative features extracted from pretherapy fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT estimate prognosis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, PET/CT images and outcomes were curated from 154 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, who underwent chemoradiotherapy from two institutions between March 2008 and June 2016, separated into independent training (n = 78; mean age, 51 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) and testing (n = 76; mean age, 50 years ± 10) cohorts. Radiomic features were extracted from PET, CT, and habitat (subregions with different metabolic characteristics) images that were derived by fusing PET and CT images. Parsimonious sets of these features were identified by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis and used to generate predictive radiomics signatures for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimation. Prognostic validation of the radiomic signatures as independent prognostic markers was performed using multivariable Cox regression, which was expressed as nomograms, together with other clinical risk factors.

RESULTS

The radiomics nomograms constructed with T stage, lymph node status, and radiomics signatures resulted in significantly better performance for the estimation of PFS (Harrell concordance index [C-index], 0.85 for training and 0.82 for test) and OS (C-index, 0.86 for training and 0.82 for test) compared with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system (C-index for PFS, 0.70 for training [P = .001] and 0.70 for test [P = .002]; C-index for OS, 0.73 for training [P < .001] and 0.70 for test [P < .001]), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic models were generated and validated from quantitative analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT habitat images and clinical data, and may have the potential to identify the patients who need more aggressive treatment in clinical practice, pending further validation with larger prospective cohorts.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between [18F]FDG PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI in T staging for oral tongue cancer

OBJECTIVE

Integrated PET/MRI with [¹⁸F]FDG is advantageous in that it enables simultaneous PET and MR imaging with higher soft-tissue contrast, multiplanar image acquisition, and functional imaging capability without using fat suppression and gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). The aims of this study were to demonstrate the feasibility of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI for assessing the extent of the primary tumor (T) in oral tongue cancer (OTC) based on the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging system, and to compare the diagnostic accuracy between [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and contrast-enhanced MRI (ceMRI).

METHODS

18 patients with biopsy-proven operable OTC underwent preoperative regional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI within 2 weeks. For [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI, rainbow-colored PET images were overlaid on the corresponding MR images. Tumor size and the depth of invasion (DOI) were visually measured on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI and ceMRI. The size, DOI, and clinical T stage were evaluated using the final surgical pathology as the reference.

RESULTS

Of the 18 OTCs, one was not detected by ceMRI due to metal artifacts from an artificial denture, and another due to superficial type (pathological DOI = 0 mm). Tumor sizes measured by ceMRI and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI had significant positive correlations with the pathological size (r = 0.80 and r = 0.90, respectively), and DOIs measured by ceMRI and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI had significant positive correlations with the pathological DOI (r = 0.74 and r = 0.64, respectively). The means ± SD of size (mm) were 20.4 ± 9.1, 22.9 ± 10.9, and 26.2 ± 10.0, and those of DOI (mm) were 7.1 ± 2.5, 6.9 ± 2.2, and 5.8 ± 3.2 for ceMRI, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI, and pathology, respectively. A significant difference was observed in tumor size between ceMRI and pathology (p < 0.05), whereas no significant differences were observed between any other sizes, DOIs, or T stages. The accuracy for T status was 72% (13/18 including 2 undetectable cases) for ceMRI and 89% (16/18) for [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Although shallow DOIs are often overestimated, regional [¹⁸F]FDG PET/MRI without fat suppression and gadolinium enhancement is comparable to and may be substituted for ceMRI in preoperative T staging for OTC patients, reducing metal artifacts and avoiding the adverse effects of GBCAs.

Are Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Sequences Needed in Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for Tumor Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

PET/MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG has demonstrated the advantages of simultaneous PET and MR imaging in head and neck cancer imaging, MRI allowing excellent soft-tissue contrast, while PET provides metabolic information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the added value of gadolinium contrast-enhanced sequences in the tumor delineation of head and neck cancers on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous head and neck ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging staging or restaging followed by surgery were retrospectively included. Local tumor invasion and lymph node extension were assessed in 45 head and neck anatomic regions using ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MR imaging by 2 rater groups (each one including a radiologist and a nuclear medicine physician). Two reading sessions were performed, one without contrast-enhanced sequences (using only T1WI, T2WI, and PET images) and a second with additional T1WI postcontrast sequences. The results were compared with the detailed histopathologic analysis, used as reference standard. The κ concordance coefficient between the reading sessions and sensitivity and specificity for each region were calculated.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. There was excellent agreement between the contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions in delineating precise tumor extension in the 45 anatomic regions studied (Cohen κ = 0.96, 95% CI = [0.94-0.97], P < .001). The diagnostic accuracy did not differ between contrast-free and postgadolinium reading sessions, being 0.97 for both groups and both reading sessions. For the 2 rater groups, there was good sensitivity for both contrast-free (0.83 and 0.85) and postgadolinium reading sessions (0.88 and 0.90, respectively). Moreover, there was excellent specificity (0.98) for both groups and reading sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Gadolinium chelate contrast administration showed no added value for accurate characterization of head and neck primary tumor extension and could possibly be avoided in the PET/MR imaging head and neck workflow.

Clinical PET/MR

Oncologic imaging has been a major focus of clinical research on PET/MR over the last 10 years. Studies so far have shown that PET/MR with ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) overall provides a similar accuracy for tumor staging as FDG PET/CT. The effective radiation dose of whole-body FDG PET/MR is more than 50% lower than for FDG PET/CT, making PET/MR particularly attractive for imaging of children. However, the longer acquisition times and higher costs have so far limited broader clinical use of PET/MR technology for whole-body staging. With the currently available technology, PET/MR appears more promising for locoregional staging of diseases for which MR is the anatomical imaging modality of choice. These include brain tumors, head and neck cancers, gynecologic malignancies, and prostate cancer. For instance, PET imaging with ligands of prostate-specific membrane antigen, combined with multi-parametric MR, appears promising for detection of prostate cancer and differentiation from benign prostate pathologies as well as for detection of local recurrences. The combination of functional parameters from MR, such as apparent diffusion coefficients, and molecular parameters from PET, such as receptor densities or metabolic rates, is feasible in clinical studies, but clinical applications for this multimodal and multi-parametric imaging approach still need to be defined.

PET/MR in Head and Neck Cancer - An Update

In academic centers, PET/MR has taken the road to clinical nuclear medicine in the past 6 years since the last review on its applications in head and neck cancer patients in this journal. Meanwhile, older sequential PET + MR machines have largely vanished from clinical sites, being replaced by integrated simultaneous PET/MR scanners. Evidence from several studies suggests that PET/MR overall performs equally well as PET/CT in the staging and restaging of head and neck cancer and in radiation therapy planning. PET/MR appears to offer advantages in the characterization and prognostication of head and neck malignancies through multiparametric imaging, which demands an exact preparation and validation of imaging modalities, however. The majority of available clinical PET/MR studies today covers FDG imaging of squamous cell carcinoma arising from a broad spectrum of locations in the upper aerodigestive tract. In the future, specific PET/MR studies are desired that address specific histopathological tumor entities, nonepithelial malignancies, such as major salivary gland tumors, squamous cell carcinomas arising in specific locations, and malignancies imaged with non-FDG radiotracers. With the advent of digital PET/CT scanners, PET/MR is expected to partake in future technical developments, such as novel iterative reconstruction techniques and deviceless motion correction for respiration and gross movement in the head and neck region. Owing to the still comparably high costs of PET/MR scanners and facility requirements on the one hand, and the concentration of multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment mainly at academic centers on the other hand, a more widespread use of this imaging modality outside major hospitals is currently limited.

Comparative Study Between Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the T and N Staging of Hypopharyngeal Cancer: An Initial Result

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) versus PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for T and N staging of hypopharyngeal cancer.

METHODS

Integrated PET/MR and PET/CT examinations were performed in 20 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer after same-day single injection. Eleven of 20 patients underwent surgery with histologic findings directly compared with imaging findings. Statistical analysis included Spearman correlation and McNemar test.

RESULTS

Accuracy of PET/MR, PET/CT, and MRI for T staging was 81.8%, 63.6%, and 72.7%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastatic lymph nodes was 88.2% and 98.2% on PET/MR, 76.5% and 98.3% on PET/CT, and 64.7% and 94.7% on MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

The PET/MR and PET/CT provide comparable results for assessing hypopharyngeal carcinoma and detecting metastatic lymph nodes.

Improving MR sequence of 18F-FDG PET/MR for diagnosing and staging gastric Cancer: a comparison study to 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

Evaluate the feasibility of fluorine-18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with gastric cancer by optimizing the scan protocol and to compare the image quality to ¹⁸F FDG PET and computed tomography (CT).

Methods

The PET/CT and PET/MR imaging were sequentially performed in 30 patients with gastric cancer diagnosed by gastroscope using a single-injection-with-dual-imaging protocol. After intravenous injection of ¹⁸F-FDG (mean, 249 MBq), PET/CT imaging including low-dose CT was performed (mean uptake time, 47 ± 6 min), and PET/MR imaging including a T1-weighted Dixon sequence for attenuation correction and two different T2-weighted sequences was subsequently acquired (88 ± 15 min after ¹⁸F-FDG injection). Four series of images (CT from PET/CT, T1W, T2W Half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo [T2W-HASTE] and T2W-BLADE from PET/MR) were visually evaluated using a 3–4 points scale for: (1) image artifacts, (2) lesion conspicuity and (3) image fusion quality. The characteristics of the primary lesions were assessed and compared between the PET/CT and PET/MR acquisitions.

Results

The image quality and lesion conspicuity of the T2W-HASTE images were significantly improved compared to that of the T2W-BLADE images. A significantly higher number of artifacts were seen in the T2W-HASTE images compared with the T1W and CT images (p < 0. 05). No differences in the accuracy of image fusion between PET/MR and PET/CT (p > 0. 05); however, significant difference was seen in the lesion conspicuity measurements (p < 0.05) with T2W-HASTE being superior. For information about the primary lesion characteristics, the T2W-HASTE images provided the most successful identifications compared with those of the T1W and PET/CT (13vs7vs5) images.

Conclusions

PET/MR with the T2W-HASTE was better at revealing the details of local stomach lesions compared with PET/CT imaging. Combining the PET/MR with the T2W-HASTE technique is a promising imaging method for diagnosing and staging gastric cancer.

Radiomics of 18F-FDG PET/CT images predicts clinical benefit of advanced NSCLC patients to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet durable clinical benefit (DCB) is experienced in only a fraction of patients. Here, we test the hypothesis that radiomics features from baseline pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT scans can predict clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

METHODS

This study included 194 patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV NSCLC with pretreatment PET/CT images. Radiomics features were extracted from PET, CT, and PET+CT fusion images based on minimum Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) criteria. The radiomics features from 99 retrospective patients were used to train a multiparametric radiomics signature (mpRS) to predict DCB using an improved least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method, which was subsequently validated in both retrospective (N = 47) and prospective test cohorts (N = 48). Using these cohorts, the mpRS was also used to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by training nomogram models using multivariable Cox regression analyses with additional clinical characteristics incorporated.

RESULTS

The mpRS could predict patients who will receive DCB, with areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.86 (95%CI 0.79-0.94), 0.83 (95%CI 0.71-0.94), and 0.81 (95%CI 0.68-0.92) in the training, retrospective test, and prospective test cohorts, respectively. In the same three cohorts, respectively, nomogram models achieved C-indices of 0.74 (95%CI 0.68-0.80), 0.74 (95%CI 0.66-0.82), and 0.77 (95%CI 0.69-0.84) to predict PFS and C-indices of 0.83 (95%CI 0.77-0.88), 0.83 (95%CI 0.71-0.94), and 0.80 (95%CI 0.69-0.91) to predict OS.

CONCLUSION

PET/CT-based signature can be used prior to initiation of immunotherapy to identify NSCLC patients most likely to benefit from immunotherapy. As such, these data may be leveraged to improve more precise and individualized decision support in the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Usefulness of Hybrid PET/MRI in Clinical Evaluation of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

(1) Background: The novel hybrid of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) examination has been introduced to clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate PET/MR usefulness in preoperative staging of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients (pts); (2) Methods: Thirty eight pts underwent both computed tomography (CT) and PET/MR examination, of whom 21 pts underwent surgical treatment as first-line therapy and were further included in the present study. Postsurgical tissue material was subjected to routine histopathological (HP) examination with additional evaluation of p16, human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Ki67 status. Agreement of clinical and pathological T staging, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of CT and PET/MR in metastatic lymph nodes detection were defined. The verification of dependences between standardized uptake value (SUV value), tumor geometrical parameters, number of metastatic lymph nodes in PET/MR and CT, biochemical parameters, Ki67 index, p16, HPV and EBV status was made with statistical analysis of obtained results; (3) Results: PET/MR is characterized by better agreement in T staging, higher specificity, sensitivity, PPV and NPV of lymph nodes evaluation than CT imaging. Significant correlations were observed between SUVmax and maximal tumor diameter from PET/MR, between SUVmean and CT tumor volume, PET/MR tumor volume, maximal tumor diameter assessed in PET/MR. Other correlations were weak and insignificant; (4) Conclusions: Hybrid PET/MR imaging is useful in preoperative staging of HNC. Further studies are needed.

Defining secure surgical bone margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: The diagnostic impact of intraoperative cytological assessment of bone resection margins compared with preoperative imaging

BACKGROUND

Imaging provides crucial staging information for treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs). Despite technical progress in imaging techniques, defining the extent of bone involvement preoperatively remains challenging and requires intraoperative information to control for adequate resection. The intraoperative cytological assessment of the bone resection margins (ICAB) provides information whether bone is infiltrated by carcinoma. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of preoperative imaging compared with ICAB in order to achieve carcinoma-free bone margins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

108 HNSCC patients underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and orthopantomogram (OPG) for staging and surgical planning. Curative resection was planned based on imaging. Intraoperatively, the resection margins were controlled by ICAB. The diagnostic value of preoperative imaging and ICAB was assessed with reference to the histological findings.

RESULTS

CT showed a sensitivity of 89.7%, specificity of 63.0%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.9%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 70.8%. MRI revealed a sensitivity of 45.5%, specificity of 66.7%, PPV of 71.4% and NPV of 40.0%. OPG-imaging had a sensitivity of 64.7%, specificity of 76.2%, PPV of 81.5%, NPV 57.1%. In comparison, ICAB provided a sensitivity of 78.6%, specificity of 95.7%, PPV 73.3%, and NPV 96.7%. The accuracy was 82.1%, 52.9%, 69.0%, and 93.5% for CT, MRI, OPG, and ICAB, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative imaging lacks accuracy in defining adequate bone resection margins, compared with ICAB. ICAB supports preoperative imaging and intraoperative frozen sections to improve bone margin control.

Preliminary clinical results for PET/MR compared with PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The present study aimed to assess the performance of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) for the visualization and characterization of lesions. In addition, the present study investigated whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters exhibited any significant correlation with standardized uptake values (SUV) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 35 patients with NPC underwent whole body PET-computed tomography (CT) and head and neck MR imaging (MRI) scans using the PET/CT-MRI system. Image quality, lesion conspicuity and the diagnostic confidence of PET/CT, T1 weighted (T1w) PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging were assessed. The true diffusion coefficient (D), the pseudo-diffusion coefficient or diffusion within the microcirculation (D*), and the perfusion fraction or the contribution of water moving in the capillaries (f), and ADC, were calculated. The correlation between the ADC, D*, D and f values and the SUV were analyzed using Pearson's correlation analysis. Similar image quality was obtained using PET/CT, T1w PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging. However, the T1w PET/MR and T2w PET/MR imaging were more effective than PET/CT in analyzing the lesion conspicuity of the primary tumors and lymph nodes. In addition, T2w PET/MR imaging was more efficient than T1w PET/MR imaging in analyzing primary tumors and lymph nodes. Pearson's correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between the SUV and ADC, and D*, D and f values in NPC. The present results suggested that the application of PET/MR is feasible and could serve as a reliable alternative to PET/CT, while SUV and ADC, D*, D and f values were identified as independent biomarkers in NPC.

Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this prospective study, we sought to compare the clinical utility of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT in the detection of synchronous cancers and distant metastases in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OHSCC).

METHODS

We examined 198 consecutive patients with biopsy-proven OHSCC who agreed to receive chemoradiation. All patients underwent pretreatment PET/MRI and PET/CT on the same day. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 12 months or until death. The McNemar's test and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare sensitivity/specificity and the diagnostic capabilities of PET/MRI, MRI, and PET/CT, respectively.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients (27.7%) who had synchronous cancers and/or distant metastases (number of involved sites: 83). The results of site-based analysis revealed that the sensitivity of PET/MRI was 15.7% higher than that of MRI (73.5% versus 57.8%, p < 0.001) and 3.6% higher compared with PET/CT (73.5% versus 69.9%, p = 0.083), whereas the sensitivity of PET/CT was 12.1% higher than that of MRI (69.9% versus 57.8%, p = 0.012). On a patient-basis, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PET/MRI yielded a greater area under curve than MRI (0.930 versus 0.905, p = 0.023). There were no significant differences in terms of diagnostic capability between MRI and PET/CT (0.905 versus 0.917, p = 0.469) and between PET/MRI and PET/CT (0.930 versus 0.917, p = 0.062).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, PET/MRI showed a significantly higher diagnostic capability than MRI and no significant difference compared with PET/CT for the detection of synchronous cancers or distant metastases in patients with OHSCC.

Hybrid PET/MRI in major cancers: a scoping review

PURPOSE

PET/MRI was introduced for clinical use in 2011 and is now an established modality for the imaging of brain and certain pelvic cancers, whereas clinical use for the imaging of other forms of cancer is not yet widespread. We therefore systematically investigated what has been published on the use of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in the imaging of cancers outside the brain, focusing on clinical areas of application related to diagnosis, staging and restaging.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed. Studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of simultaneous PET/MRI in cancer patients were chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 3,138 publications were identified and 116 published during the period 2012-2018 were included and were grouped according to the major cancer forms: 13 head and neck (HNC), 9 breast (BC), 21 prostate (PC), 14 gynaecological, 13 gastrointestinal (GIC), and 46 various cancers. Data from studies comparing PET/MRI and PET/CT for staging/restaging suggested the superiority of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for the detection of tumour extension and retropharyngeal lymph node metastases in nasopharyngeal cancer, and for the detection of liver metastases and possibly bone marrow metastases in high-risk BC. FDG PET/MRI tended to be inferior for the detection of lung metastases in HNC and BC. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was superior to PET/CT for the detection of local PC recurrence. FDG PET/MRI was superior to FDG PET/CT for the detection of local tumour invasion in cervical cancer and had higher accuracy for the detection of liver metastases in colorectal cancer.

CONCLUSION

The scoping review methodology resulted in the identification of a huge number of records, of which less than 5% were suitable for inclusion and only a limited number allowed conclusions on the advantages/disadvantages of PET/MRI compared to PET/CT in the oncological setting. There was evidence to support the use of FDG PET/MRI in staging of nasopharyngeal cancer and high-risk BC. Preliminary data indicate the superiority of PET/MRI for the detection of local recurrence in PC, local tumour invasion in cervical cancer, and liver metastases in colorectal cancer. These conclusions are based on small datasets and need to be further explored.

Attenuation correction of a flat table top for radiation therapy in hybrid PET/MR using CT- and 68Ge/68Ga transmission scan-based μ-maps

Hybrid PET/MR offers new opportunities in radiation oncology for tissue/tumour characterisation and response assessment. Attenuation correction (AC) is an important issue especially in the presence of immobilization devices and flat table tops (FTT). The goal of this study was to compare two methods of AC using CT- and ⁶⁸Ge/⁶⁸Ga transmission scan-based attenuation maps (μ-maps) for a custom-designed FTT. Measurements were performed in the mMR PET/MR and TrueV PET/CT Biograph Siemens scanners with three different phantoms, namely the Siemens MR-QA, a cubic canister and the NEMA IEC body phantom. The study revealed that the MR image quality is not hampered by the presence of the FTT. For cubic canister applying the scanner's inherent AC alone resulted in inaccuracies in PET images, with up to -4.0% underestimation of the activity. The mean NEMA sphere activity measurements without FTT, agreed within 3.5% with the respective inserted activity. Placing the FTT in the PET/MR scanner resulted in a difference to the injected activity of 4.5% when the table was not corrected for. By introducing the μ-maps the discrepancy between the used activity and the measurements decreased down to 2.6%. To improve the AC of the FTT the creation of a dedicated μ-map was necessary while the CT-based μ-map performed equally good as the source transmission scan-based one.

PET/MRI vs PET/CT in Head and Neck Imaging: When, Why, and How?

The increasing availability of hybrid PET/MRI systems has led to a breadth of new publications and opportunities for use of PET/MRI. While PET/CT has been a valuable tool for oncologic staging, including head and neck malignancy, there are several theoretical and practical advantages a PET/MRI system would have over PET/CT in head and neck imaging. This review article discusses the established role of PET/CT, early evidence for the role of PET/MRI, and protocol considerations for both PET/CT and PET/MRI as they apply to head and neck imaging.

Detecting recurrent head and neck cancer using electronic nose technology: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this feasibility study was to assess the diagnostic performance of an electronic nose (e-nose) as a noninvasive diagnostic tool in detecting locoregional recurrent and/or second (or third) primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after curative treatment.

METHODS

Using an e-nose (Aeonose, The eNose Company, Zutphen, The Netherlands), breath samples were collected from patients after curative treatment of an HNSCC with a locoregional recurrence or second (or third) primary tumor (N = 20) and from patients without evidence of recurrent disease (N = 20). Analyses were performed utilizing artificial neural networking based on patterns of volatile organic compounds.

RESULTS

A diagnostic accuracy of 83% was observed in differentiating follow-up patients with locoregional recurrent or second (or third) primary HNSCC from those without evidence of disease.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using an e-nose to detect locoregional recurrent and/or second (or third) primary HNSCC.

Detection of loco-regional recurrence in malignant head and neck tumors: a comparison of CT, MRI, and FDG PET-CT

BACKGROUND

The early and accurate detection of local or regional recurrence of head and neck tumor is critically important.

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-CT, alone and in combination, in detecting the locoregional recurrence of malignant head and neck tumor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 93 patients with loco-regional recurrence of malignant head and neck tumors underwent CT, MRI, and PET-CT within 30 days before surgery. CT, MRI, and PET-CT for each patient were retrospectively reviewed to determine the presence of recurrent tumors in the primary site on a patient-by-patient basis and that of regional lymph nodes on a level-by-level basis. The diagnostic accuracy of CT, MRI, and PET-CT, alone and combined, were accessed with the postoperative histopathological findings or with 12-month follow-up results as the standard of reference.

RESULTS

The sensitivity/specificity/and accuracy of CT, MRI, and PET-CT for the detection of primary site recurrence was 89.9/85.7/89.3%, 94.9/85.7/93.6%, and 97.5/92.9/96.8%, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of CT, MRI, and PET-CT for the detection of nodal recurrence was 66.3/99.4/92.4%, 74.7/99.4/94.2%, and 85.5/94.9/93.0%, respectively. MRI + PET-CT achieved the best performance in the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (Az value = 0.958 for primary site recurrence and 0.929 for nodal recurrence).

CONCLUSION

MRI + PET-CT offered the highest diagnostic performance in the detection of loco-regional recurrence of malignant head and neck tumor, compared with CT, MRI, PET-CT, and other combinations including CT.

18F-FDOPA PET/CT Combined with MRI for Gross Tumor Volume Delineation in Patients with Skull Base Paraganglioma

In this simulation study, we assessed differences in gross tumor volume (GTV) in a series of skull base paragangliomas (SBPGLs) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ¹⁸F-dihydroxyphenylalanine (¹⁸F-FDOPA) combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), and ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/MRI images obtained by rigid alignment of PET and MRI. GTV was delineated in 16 patients with SBPGLs on MRI (GTV_MRI), ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT (GTV_PET), and combined PET/MRI (GTV_PET/MRI). GTV_PET/MRI was the union of GTV_MRI and GTV_PET after visual adjustment. Three observers delineated GTV_MRI and GTV_PET/MRI independently. Excellent interobserver reproducibility was found for both GTV_MRI and GTV_PET/MRI. GTV_PET and GTV_MRI were not significantly different. However, there was some spatial difference between the locations of GTV_MRI, GTV_PET, and GTV_PET/MRI. The Dice similarity coefficient median value was 0.4 between PET/CT and MRI, and 0.8 between MRI and PET/MRI. The combined use of PET/MRI produced a larger GTV than MRI alone. Nevertheless, both the target-delivered dose and organs-at-risk conservancy were respected when treatment was planned on the PET/MRI-matched data set. Future integration of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT into clinical practice will be necessary to evaluate the influence of this diagnostic modality on SBPGL therapeutic management. If the clinical utility of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT and/or PET/MRI is confirmed, GTV_PET/MRI should be considered for tailored radiotherapy planning in patients with SBPGL.

Update 2018: 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI in Head and Neck Cancer

There are recent advances, namely, a standardized method for reporting therapy response (Hopkins criteria), a multicenter prospective cohort study with excellent negative predictive value of F-FDG PET/CT for N0 clinical neck, a phase III multicenter randomized controlled study establishing the value of a negative posttherapy F-FDG PET/CT for patient management, a phase II randomized controlled study demonstrating radiation dose reduction strategies for human papilloma virus-related disease, and Food and Drug Administration approval of nivolumab for treatment of recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

18 F-FDG PET/MRI vs MRI in patients with recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic potential of ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (¹⁸ FDG-PET/MRI) and MRI for recurrence diagnostics after primary therapy in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

METHODS

A total of 32 dedicated head and neck ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were included in this analysis. MRI and ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI datasets were analyzed in separate sessions by two readers for tumor recurrence or metastases.

RESULTS

Lesion-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 96%, 84%, 90%, 93%, and 91% for ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI and 77%, 94%, 95%, 73%, and 84% for MRI, resulting in a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy of ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI compared to MRI (P < .005).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI is superior to MRI in detecting local recurrence and metastases in patients with ACC of the head and neck. Especially concerning its negative predictive value, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/MRI outperforms MRI.

Hyperpolarized carbon-13 magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging: a clinical tool for studying tumour metabolism

Glucose metabolism in tumours is reprogrammed away from oxidative metabolism, even in the presence of oxygen. Non-invasive imaging techniques can probe these alterations in cancer metabolism providing tools to detect tumours and their response to therapy. Although Positron Emission Tomography with (18F)2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG PET) is an established clinical tool to probe cancer metabolism, it has poor spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast, utilizes ionizing radiation and only probes glucose uptake and phosphorylation and not further downstream metabolism. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) has the capability to non-invasively detect and distinguish molecules within tissue but has low sensitivity and can only detect selected nuclei. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) is a technique which greatly increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) achieved with MR by significantly increasing nuclear spin polarization and this method has now been translated into human imaging. This review provides a brief overview of this process, also termed Hyperpolarized Carbon-13 Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (HP 13C-MRSI), its applications in preclinical imaging, an outline of the current human trials that are ongoing, as well as future potential applications in oncology.

Clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI as a single-step imaging modality in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

Both head and neck magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) play a crucial role in the staging of primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this study, we sought to prospectively investigate the clinical utility of simultaneous whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI for primary staging of NPC patients.

METHODS

We examined 113 patients with histologically confirmed NPC who underwent pretreatment, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI and PET/CT for primary tumor staging. The images obtained with the different imaging modalities were interpreted independently and compared with each other.

RESULTS

PET/MRI increased the accuracy of head and neck MRI for assessment of primary tumor extent in four patients via addition of FDG uptake information to increase the conspicuity of morphologically subtle lesions. PET/MR images were more discernible than PET/CT images for mapping tumor extension, especially intracranial invasion. Regarding the N staging assessment, the sensitivity of PET/MRI (99.5%) was higher than that of head and neck MRI (94.2%) and PET/CT (90.9%). PET/MRI was particularly useful for distinguishing retropharyngeal nodal metastasis from adjacent nasopharyngeal tumors. For distant metastasis evaluation, PET/MRI exhibited a similar sensitivity (90% vs. 86.7% vs. 83.3%), but higher positive predictive value (93.1% vs. 78.8% vs. 83.3%) than whole-body MRI and PET/CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For tumor staging of NPC, simultaneous whole-body PET/MRI was more accurate than head and neck MRI and PET/CT, and may serve as a single-step staging modality.

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Applications and Future Directions

Clinical PET/MR imaging is being implemented at institutions worldwide as part of the standard-of-care imaging for select oncology patients. This article focuses on oncologic applications of PET/MR imaging in cancers of the head and neck. Although current published literature is relatively sparse, the potential benefits of a hybrid modality of PET/MR imaging are discussed along with several possible areas of research. With the increasing number of PET/MR imaging scanners in clinical use and ongoing research, the role of PET/MR imaging in the management of head and neck cancer is likely to become more evident in the near future.