1
|
Gagnon L, Gupta D, Mastorakos G, White N, Goodwill V, McDonald CR, Beaumont T, Conlin C, Seibert TM, Nguyen U, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Kesari S, Schulte JD, Piccioni D, Schmainda KM, Farid N, Dale AM, Rudie JD. Deep Learning Segmentation of Infiltrative and Enhancing Cellular Tumor at Pre- and Posttreatment Multishell Diffusion MRI of Glioblastoma. Radiol Artif Intell 2024; 6:e230489. [PMID: 39166970 PMCID: PMC11427928 DOI: 10.1148/ryai.230489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a deep learning (DL) method to detect and segment enhancing and nonenhancing cellular tumor on pre- and posttreatment MRI scans in patients with glioblastoma and to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 1397 MRI scans in 1297 patients with glioblastoma, including an internal set of 243 MRI scans (January 2010 to June 2022) for model training and cross-validation and four external test cohorts. Cellular tumor maps were segmented by two radiologists on the basis of imaging, clinical history, and pathologic findings. Multimodal MRI data with perfusion and multishell diffusion imaging were inputted into a nnU-Net DL model to segment cellular tumor. Segmentation performance (Dice score) and performance in distinguishing recurrent tumor from posttreatment changes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) were quantified. Model performance in predicting OS and PFS was assessed using Cox multivariable analysis. Results A cohort of 178 patients (mean age, 56 years ± 13 [SD]; 116 male, 62 female) with 243 MRI timepoints, as well as four external datasets with 55, 70, 610, and 419 MRI timepoints, respectively, were evaluated. The median Dice score was 0.79 (IQR, 0.53-0.89), and the AUC for detecting residual or recurrent tumor was 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.89). In the internal test set, estimated cellular tumor volume was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04 per milliliter; P < .001) and PFS (HR = 1.04 per milliliter; P < .001) after adjustment for age, sex, and gross total resection (GTR) status. In the external test sets, estimated cellular tumor volume was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.01 per milliliter; P < .001) after adjustment for age, sex, and GTR status. Conclusion A DL model incorporating advanced imaging could accurately segment enhancing and nonenhancing cellular tumor, distinguish recurrent or residual tumor from posttreatment changes, and predict OS and PFS in patients with glioblastoma. Keywords: Segmentation, Glioblastoma, Multishell Diffusion MRI Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Gagnon
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Diviya Gupta
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - George Mastorakos
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Nathan White
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Vanessa Goodwill
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Carrie R McDonald
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Thomas Beaumont
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Christopher Conlin
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Tyler M Seibert
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Uyen Nguyen
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jona Hattangadi-Gluth
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Santosh Kesari
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jessica D Schulte
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - David Piccioni
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Kathleen M Schmainda
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Nikdokht Farid
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Anders M Dale
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| | - Jeffrey D Rudie
- From the Departments of Radiology (L.G., D.G., C.C., T.M.S., U.N., N.F., A.M.D., J.D.R.), Pathology (V.G.), Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences (C.R.M., T.M.S., J.H.G.), Neurologic Surgery (T.B.), Bioengineering (T.M.S.), and Neurosciences (J.D.S., D.P., A.M.D.), University of California San Diego, 9500 Gillman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92093; Cortechs.ai, San Diego, Calif (G.M., N.W.); Department of Translational Neurosciences, Pacific Neuroscience Institute and Saint John's Cancer Institute at Providence Saint John's Health Center, Santa Monica, Calif (S.K.); and Department of Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis (K.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chehri S, Henriksen OM, Marner L, Christensen M, Muhic A, Poulsen HS, Law I. A prospective clinical study of the influence of oral protein intake on [ 18F]FET-PET uptake and test-retest repeatability in glioma. EJNMMI Res 2024; 14:58. [PMID: 38922458 PMCID: PMC11208353 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography ([18F]FET PET) scanning is used in routine clinical management and evaluation of gliomas with a recommended 4 h prior fasting. Knowledge of test-retest variation of [18F]FET PET imaging uptake metrics and the impact of accidental protein intake can be critical for interpretation. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of [18F]FET-PET metrics and to assess the impact of protein-intake prior to [18F]FET PET scanning of gliomas. RESULTS Test-retest variability in the non-protein group was good with absolute (and relative) upper and lower limits of agreement of + 0.15 and - 0.13 (+ 9.7% and - 9.0%) for mean tumour-to-background ratio (TBRmean), + 0.43 and - 0.28 (+ 19.6% and - 11.8%) for maximal tumour-to-background ratio (TBRmax), and + 2.14 cm3 and - 1.53 ml (+ 219.8% and - 57.3%) for biological tumour volume (BTV). Variation was lower for uptake ratios than for BTV. Protein intake was associated with a 27% increase in the total sum of plasma concentration of the L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT1) relevant amino acids and with decreased standardized uptake value (SUV) in both healthy appearing background brain tissue (mean SUV - 25%) and in tumour (maximal SUV - 14%). Oral intake of 24 g of protein 1 h prior to injection of tracer tended to increase variability, but the effects on derived tumour metrics TBRmean and TBRmax were only borderline significant, and changes generally within the variability observed in the group with no protein intake. CONCLUSION The test-retest repeatability was found to be good, and better for TBRmax and TBRmean than BTV, with the methodological limitation that tumour growth may have influenced results. Oral intake of 24 g of protein one hour before a [18F]FET PET scan decreases uptake of [18F]FET in both tumour and in healthy appearing brain, with no clinically significant difference on the most commonly used tumour metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Chehri
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Radiation Biology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Otto Mølby Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Lisbeth Marner
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Christensen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- Department of Radiation Biology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou M, Yin X, Chen B, Hu S, Zhou W. A PET probe targeting polyamine transport system for precise tumor diagnosis and therapy. Asian J Pharm Sci 2024; 19:100924. [PMID: 38903130 PMCID: PMC11186966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Polyamine metabolism dysregulation is a hallmark of many cancers, offering a promising avenue for early tumor theranostics. This study presents the development of a nuclear probe derived from spermidine (SPM) for dual-purpose tumor PET imaging and internal radiation therapy. The probe, radiolabeled with either [68Ga]Ga for diagnostic applications or [177Lu]Lu for therapeutic use, was synthesized with exceptional purity, stability, and specific activity. Extensive testing involving 12 different tumor cell lines revealed remarkable specificity towards B16 melanoma cells, showcasing outstanding tumor localization and target-to-non-target ratio. Mechanistic investigations employing polyamines, non-labeled precursor, and polyamine transport system (PTS) inhibitor, consistently affirmed the probe's targetability through recognition of the PTS. Notably, while previous reports indicated PTS upregulation in various tumor types for targeted therapy, this study observed no positive signals, highlighting a concentration-dependent discrepancy between targeting for therapy and diagnosis. Furthermore, when labeled with [177Lu], the probe demonstrated its therapeutic potential by effectively controlling tumor growth and extending mouse survival. Investigations into biodistribution, excretion, and biosafety in healthy humans laid a robust foundation for clinical translation. This study introduces a versatile SPM-based nuclear probe with applications in precise tumor theranostics, offering promising prospects for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
| | - Xiaoqin Yin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
| | - Bei Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
| | - Shuo Hu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China
- Key Laboratory of Biological Nanotechnology of National Health Commission, Changsha 410008, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya), Changsha 410008, China
| | - Wenhu Zhou
- Xiangya School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya), Changsha 410008, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Breen WG, Aryal MP, Cao Y, Kim MM. Integrating multi-modal imaging in radiation treatments for glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S17-S25. [PMID: 38437666 PMCID: PMC10911793 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in diagnostic and treatment technology along with rapid developments in translational research may now allow the realization of precision radiotherapy. Integration of biologically informed multimodality imaging to address the spatial and temporal heterogeneity underlying treatment resistance in glioblastoma is now possible for patient care, with evidence of safety and potential benefit. Beyond their diagnostic utility, several candidate imaging biomarkers have emerged in recent early-phase clinical trials of biologically based radiotherapy, and their definitive assessment in multicenter prospective trials is already in development. In this review, the rationale for clinical implementation of candidate advanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers to guide personalized radiotherapy, the current landscape, and future directions for integrating imaging biomarkers into radiotherapy for glioblastoma are summarized. Moving forward, response-adaptive radiotherapy using biologically informed imaging biomarkers to address emerging treatment resistance in rational combination with novel systemic therapies may ultimately permit improvements in glioblastoma outcomes and true individualization of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Madhava P Aryal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Teske N, Tonn JC, Karschnia P. How to evaluate extent of resection in diffuse gliomas: from standards to new methods. Curr Opin Neurol 2023; 36:564-570. [PMID: 37865849 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Maximal safe tumor resection represents the current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas. Recent efforts have highlighted the prognostic value of extent of resection measured as residual tumor volume in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype and -mutant gliomas. Accurate assessment of such information therefore appears essential in the context of clinical trials as well as patient management. RECENT FINDINGS Current recommendations for evaluation of extent of resection rest upon standardized postoperative MRI including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences, T2-weighted/fluid-attenuated-inversion-recovery sequences, and diffusion-weighted imaging to differentiate postoperative tumor volumes from ischemia and nonspecific imaging findings. In this context, correct timing of postoperative imaging within the postoperative period is of utmost importance. Advanced MRI techniques including perfusion-weighted MRI and MR-spectroscopy may add further insight when evaluating residual tumor remnants. Positron emission tomography (PET) using amino acid tracers proves beneficial in identifying metabolically active tumor beyond anatomical findings on conventional MRI. SUMMARY Future efforts will have to refine recommendations on postoperative assessment of residual tumor burden in respect to differences between IDH-wildtype and -mutant gliomas, and incorporate the emerging role of advanced imaging modalities like amino acid PET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nico Teske
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barry N, Francis RJ, Ebert MA, Koh ES, Rowshanfarzad P, Hassan GM, Kendrick J, Gan HK, Lee ST, Lau E, Moffat BA, Fitt G, Moore A, Thomas P, Pattison DA, Akhurst T, Alipour R, Thomas EL, Hsiao E, Schembri GP, Lin P, Ly T, Yap J, Kirkwood I, Vallat W, Khan S, Krishna D, Ngai S, Yu C, Beuzeville S, Yeow TC, Bailey D, Cook O, Whitehead A, Dykyj R, Rossi A, Grose A, Scott AM. Delineation and agreement of FET PET biological volumes in glioblastoma: results of the nuclear medicine credentialing program from the prospective, multi-centre trial evaluating FET PET In Glioblastoma (FIG) study-TROG 18.06. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3970-3981. [PMID: 37563351 PMCID: PMC10611835 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06371-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) trial is an Australian prospective, multi-centre study evaluating FET PET for glioblastoma patient management. FET PET imaging timepoints are pre-chemoradiotherapy (FET1), 1-month post-chemoradiotherapy (FET2), and at suspected progression (FET3). Before participant recruitment, site nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) underwent credentialing of FET PET delineation and image interpretation. METHODS Sites were required to complete contouring and dynamic analysis by ≥ 2 NMPs on benchmarking cases (n = 6) assessing biological tumour volume (BTV) delineation (3 × FET1) and image interpretation (3 × FET3). Data was reviewed by experts and violations noted. BTV definition includes tumour-to-background ratio (TBR) threshold of 1.6 with crescent-shaped background contour in the contralateral normal brain. Recurrence/pseudoprogression interpretation (FET3) required assessment of maximum TBR (TBRmax), dynamic analysis (time activity curve [TAC] type, time to peak), and qualitative assessment. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) assessed volume agreement, coefficient of variation (CoV) compared maximum/mean TBR (TBRmax/TBRmean) across cases, and pairwise analysis assessed spatial (Dice similarity coefficient [DSC]) and boundary agreement (Hausdorff distance [HD], mean absolute surface distance [MASD]). RESULTS Data was accrued from 21 NMPs (10 centres, n ≥ 2 each) and 20 underwent review. The initial pass rate was 93/119 (78.2%) and 27/30 requested resubmissions were completed. Violations were found in 25/72 (34.7%; 13/12 minor/major) of FET1 and 22/74 (29.7%; 14/8 minor/major) of FET3 reports. The primary reasons for resubmission were as follows: BTV over-contour (15/30, 50.0%), background placement (8/30, 26.7%), TAC classification (9/30, 30.0%), and image interpretation (7/30, 23.3%). CoV median and range for BTV, TBRmax, and TBRmean were 21.53% (12.00-30.10%), 5.89% (5.01-6.68%), and 5.01% (3.37-6.34%), respectively. BTV agreement was moderate to excellent (ICC = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.63-0.97) with good spatial (DSC = 0.84 ± 0.09) and boundary (HD = 15.78 ± 8.30 mm; MASD = 1.47 ± 1.36 mm) agreement. CONCLUSION The FIG study credentialing program has increased expertise across study sites. TBRmax and TBRmean were robust, with considerable variability in BTV delineation and image interpretation observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel Barry
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia.
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia.
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
- Australian Centre for Quantitative Imaging, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Eng-Siew Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Pejman Rowshanfarzad
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Ghulam Mubashar Hassan
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
| | - Jake Kendrick
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, WA, Crawley, Australia
- Centre for Advanced Technologies in Cancer Research (CATCR), WA, Perth, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sze T Lee
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bradford A Moffat
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Greg Fitt
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - David A Pattison
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Tim Akhurst
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Ramin Alipour
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth L Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoffrey P Schembri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter Lin
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Tam Ly
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - June Yap
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Ian Kirkwood
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Wilson Vallat
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Shahroz Khan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT, Australia
| | - Dayanethee Krishna
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Canberra Hospital, Woden, ACT, Australia
| | - Stanley Ngai
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Chris Yu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Scott Beuzeville
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Tow C Yeow
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, St George Hospital, Kogarah, NSW, Australia
| | - Dale Bailey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine 7 Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Olivia Cook
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela Whitehead
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael Dykyj
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Alana Rossi
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Grose
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG Cancer Research), University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koh ES, Gan HK, Senko C, Francis RJ, Ebert M, Lee ST, Lau E, Khasraw M, Nowak AK, Bailey DL, Moffat BA, Fitt G, Hicks RJ, Coffey R, Verhaak R, Walsh KM, Barnes EH, De Abreu Lourenco R, Rosenthal M, Adda L, Foroudi F, Lasocki A, Moore A, Thomas PA, Roach P, Back M, Leonard R, Scott AM. [ 18F]-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (FET) in glioblastoma (FIG) TROG 18.06 study: protocol for a prospective, multicentre PET/CT trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071327. [PMID: 37541751 PMCID: PMC10407346 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma is the most common aggressive primary central nervous system cancer in adults characterised by uniformly poor survival. Despite maximal safe resection and postoperative radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide-based chemotherapy, tumours inevitably recur. Imaging with O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to impact adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) planning, distinguish between treatment-induced pseudoprogression versus tumour progression as well as prognostication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The FET-PET in Glioblastoma (FIG) study is a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised, phase II study across 10 Australian sites and will enrol up to 210 adults aged ≥18 years with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. FET-PET will be performed at up to three time points: (1) following initial surgery and prior to commencement of chemoradiation (FET-PET1); (2) 4 weeks following concurrent chemoradiation (FET-PET2); and (3) within 14 days of suspected clinical and/or radiological progression on MRI (performed at the time of clinical suspicion of tumour recurrence) (FET-PET3). The co-primary outcomes are: (1) to investigate how FET-PET versus standard MRI impacts RT volume delineation and (2) to determine the accuracy and management impact of FET-PET in distinguishing pseudoprogression from true tumour progression. The secondary outcomes are: (1) to investigate the relationships between FET-PET parameters (including dynamic uptake, tumour to background ratio, metabolic tumour volume) and progression-free survival and overall survival; (2) to assess the change in blood and tissue biomarkers determined by serum assay when comparing FET-PET data acquired prior to chemoradiation with other prognostic markers, looking at the relationships of FET-PET versus MRI-determined site/s of progressive disease post chemotherapy treatment with MRI and FET-PET imaging; and (3) to estimate the health economic impact of incorporating FET-PET into glioblastoma management and in the assessment of post-treatment pseudoprogression or recurrence/true progression. Exploratory outcomes include the correlation of multimodal imaging, blood and tumour biomarker analyses with patterns of failure and survival. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol V.2.0 dated 20 November 2020 has been approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Austin Health, Victoria). Other clinical sites will provide oversight through local governance processes, including obtaining informed consent from suitable participants. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. Results of the FIG study (TROG 18.06) will be disseminated via relevant scientific and consumer forums and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ANZCTR ACTRN12619001735145.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eng-Siew Koh
- Radiation Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hui K Gan
- Austin Health, Department of Medical Oncology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Clare Senko
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roslyn J Francis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Martin Ebert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sze Ting Lee
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eddie Lau
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Department of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anna K Nowak
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dale L Bailey
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bradford A Moffat
- Melbourne Brain Centre Imaging Unit, Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Greg Fitt
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert Coffey
- Epithelial Biology Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Roel Verhaak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kyle M Walsh
- Department of Neurosurgery and Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth H Barnes
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard De Abreu Lourenco
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Rosenthal
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lucas Adda
- The Cooperative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology (COGNO) Consumer Advisor Panel, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Farshad Foroudi
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Arian Lasocki
- Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alisha Moore
- Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG), Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul A Thomas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul Roach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Back
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Leonard
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew M Scott
- School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tumour Targeting Program, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harat M, Rakowska J, Harat M, Szylberg T, Furtak J, Miechowicz I, Małkowski B. Combining amino acid PET and MRI imaging increases accuracy to define malignant areas in adult glioma. Nat Commun 2023; 14:4572. [PMID: 37516762 PMCID: PMC10387066 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-39731-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Accurate determination of the extent and grade of adult-type diffuse gliomas is critical to patient management. In clinical practice, contrast-enhancing areas of diffuse gliomas in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences are usually used to target biopsy, surgery, and radiation therapy, but there can be discrepancies between these areas and the actual tumor extent. Here we show that adding 18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography (FET-PET) to MRI sequences accurately locates the most malignant areas of contrast-enhancing gliomas, potentially impacting subsequent management and outcomes. We present a prospective analysis of over 300 serial biopsy specimens from 23 patients with contrast-enhancing adult-type diffuse gliomas using a hybrid PET-MRI scanner to compare T2-weighted and contrast-enhancing MRI images with FET-PET. In all cases, we observe and confirm high FET uptake in early PET acquisitions (5-15 min after 18F-FET administration) outside areas of contrast enhancement on MRI, indicative of high-grade glioma. In 30% cases, inclusion of FET-positive sites changes the biopsy result to a higher tumor grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Harat
- Department of Neurooncology and Radiosurgery, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Józefina Rakowska
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marek Harat
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Centre of Medical Sciences, Bydgoszcz, University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Tadeusz Szylberg
- Department of Pathomorphology, 10th Military Research Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jacek Furtak
- Department of Neurosurgery, 10th Military Research Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Izabela Miechowicz
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Bogdan Małkowski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography and Molecular Imaging, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Niyazi M, Andratschke N, Bendszus M, Chalmers AJ, Erridge SC, Galldiks N, Lagerwaard FJ, Navarria P, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Ricardi U, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Belka C, Minniti G. ESTRO-EANO guideline on target delineation and radiotherapy details for glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109663. [PMID: 37059335 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Target delineation in glioblastoma is still a matter of extensive research and debate. This guideline aims to update the existing joint European consensus on delineation of the clinical target volume (CTV) in adult glioblastoma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ESTRO Guidelines Committee identified 14 European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee and EANO who discussed and analysed the body of evidence concerning contemporary glioblastoma target delineation, then took part in a two-step modified Delphi process to address open questions. RESULTS Several key issues were identified and are discussed including i) pre-treatment steps and immobilisation, ii) target delineation and the use of standard and novel imaging techniques, and iii) technical aspects of treatment including planning techniques and fractionation. Based on the EORTC recommendation focusing on the resection cavity and residual enhancing regions on T1-sequences with the addition of a reduced 15 mm margin, special situations are presented with corresponding potential adaptations depending on the specific clinical situation. CONCLUSIONS The EORTC consensus recommends a single clinical target volume definition based on postoperative contrast-enhanced T1 abnormalities, using isotropic margins without the need to cone down. A PTV margin based on the individual mask system and IGRT procedures available is advised; this should usually be no greater than 3 mm when using IGRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany.
| | - Nicolaus Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sara C Erridge
- Edinburgh Centre for Neuro-Oncology, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 1EU, UK
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Dept. of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy; IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cruz N, Herculano-Carvalho M, Roque D, Faria CC, Cascão R, Ferreira HA, Reis CP, Matela N. Highlighted Advances in Therapies for Difficult-To-Treat Brain Tumours Such as Glioblastoma. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15030928. [PMID: 36986790 PMCID: PMC10054750 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains a challenging disease, as it is the most common and deadly brain tumour in adults and has no curative solution and an overall short survival time. This incurability and short survival time means that, despite its rarity (average incidence of 3.2 per 100,000 persons), there has been an increased effort to try to treat this disease. Standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal tumour resection followed by initial concomitant radiotherapy and temozolomide (TMZ) and then further chemotherapy with TMZ. Imaging techniques are key not only to diagnose the extent of the affected tissue but also for surgery planning and even for intraoperative use. Eligible patients may combine TMZ with tumour treating fields (TTF) therapy, which delivers low-intensity and intermediate-frequency electric fields to arrest tumour growth. Nonetheless, the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and systemic side effects are obstacles to successful chemotherapy in GBM; thus, more targeted, custom therapies such as immunotherapy and nanotechnological drug delivery systems have been undergoing research with varying degrees of success. This review proposes an overview of the pathophysiology, possible treatments, and the most (not all) representative examples of the latest advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuno Cruz
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
- iMED.ULisboa, Research Institute for Medicines, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Manuel Herculano-Carvalho
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHULN), 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Diogo Roque
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHULN), 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Cláudia C. Faria
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHULN), 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rita Cascão
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Hugo Alexandre Ferreira
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Catarina Pinto Reis
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
- iMED.ULisboa, Research Institute for Medicines, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence: (C.P.R.); (N.M.); Tel.: +351-217-946-400 (ext. 14244) (C.P.R.); Fax: +351-217-946-470 (C.P.R.)
| | - Nuno Matela
- Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
- Correspondence: (C.P.R.); (N.M.); Tel.: +351-217-946-400 (ext. 14244) (C.P.R.); Fax: +351-217-946-470 (C.P.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagy DG, Fedorcsák I, Bagó AG, Gáti G, Martos J, Szabó P, Rajnai H, Kenessey I, Borbély K. Therapy Defining at Initial Diagnosis of Primary Brain Tumor-The Role of 18F-FET PET/CT and MRI. Biomedicines 2023; 11:biomedicines11010128. [PMID: 36672636 PMCID: PMC9855996 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11010128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary malignant brain tumors are heterogeneous and infrequent neoplasms. Their classification, therapeutic regimen and prognosis have undergone significant development requiring the innovation of an imaging diagnostic. The performance of enhanced magnetic resonance imaging depends on blood-brain barrier function. Several studies have demonstrated the advantages of static and dynamic amino acid PET/CT providing accurate metabolic status in the neurooncological setting. The aim of our single-center retrospective study was to test the primary diagnostic role of amino acid PET/CT compared to enhanced MRI. Emphasis was placed on cases prior to intervention, therefore, a certain natural bias was inevitable. In our analysis for newly found brain tumors 18F-FET PET/CT outperformed contrast MRI and PWI in terms of sensitivity and negative predictive value (100% vs. 52.9% and 36.36%; 100% vs. 38.46% and 41.67%), in terms of positive predictive value their performance was roughly the same (84.21 % vs. 90% and 100%), whereas regarding specificity contrast MRI and PWI were superior (40% vs. 83.33% and 100%). Based on these results the superiority of 18F-FET PET/CT seems to present incremental value during the initial diagnosis. In the case of non-enhancing tumors, it should always be suggested as a therapy-determining test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dávid Gergő Nagy
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1145 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Imre Fedorcsák
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1145 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Attila György Bagó
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1145 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Georgina Gáti
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1145 Budapest, Hungary
| | - János Martos
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, 1145 Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Hajnalka Rajnai
- Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
| | - István Kenessey
- National Cancer Registry, National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
- Pathology, Forensic and Insurance Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1091 Budapest, Hungary
- Correspondence:
| | - Katalin Borbély
- PET/CT Outpatient Department, National Institute of Oncology, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ladefoged CN, Andersen FL, Andersen TL, Anderberg L, Engkebølle C, Madsen K, Højgaard L, Henriksen OM, Law I. DeepDixon synthetic CT for [ 18F]FET PET/MRI attenuation correction of post-surgery glioma patients with metal implants. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1142383. [PMID: 37090806 PMCID: PMC10115992 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1142383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can for glioma assessment be supplemented by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with radiolabeled amino acids such as O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET), which provides additional information on metabolic properties. In neuro-oncology, patients often undergo brain and skull altering treatment, which is known to challenge MRI-based attenuation correction (MR-AC) methods and thereby impact the simplified semi-quantitative measures such as tumor-to-brain ratio (TBR) used in clinical routine. The aim of the present study was to examine the applicability of our deep learning method, DeepDixon, for MR-AC in [18F]FET PET/MRI scans of a post-surgery glioma cohort with metal implants. Methods The MR-AC maps were assessed for all 194 included post-surgery glioma patients (318 studies). The subgroup of 147 patients (222 studies, 200 MBq [18F]FET PET/MRI) with tracer uptake above 1 ml were subsequently reconstructed with DeepDixon, vendor-default atlas-based method, and a low-dose computed tomography (CT) used as reference. The biological tumor volume (BTV) was delineated on each patient by isocontouring tracer uptake above a TBR threshold of 1.6. We evaluated the MR-AC methods using the recommended clinical metrics BTV and mean and maximum TBR on a patient-by-patient basis against the reference with CT-AC. Results Ninety-seven percent of the studies (310/318) did not have any major artifacts using DeepDixon, which resulted in a Dice coefficient of 0.89/0.83 for tissue/bone, respectively, compared to 0.84/0.57 when using atlas. The average difference between DeepDixon and CT-AC was within 0.2% across all clinical metrics, and no statistically significant difference was found. When using DeepDixon, only 3 out of 222 studies (1%) exceeded our acceptance criteria compared to 72 of the 222 studies (32%) with the atlas method. Conclusion We evaluated the performance of a state-of-the-art MR-AC method on the largest post-surgical glioma patient cohort to date. We found that DeepDixon could overcome most of the issues arising from irregular anatomy and metal artifacts present in the cohort resulting in clinical metrics within acceptable limits of the reference CT-AC in almost all cases. This is a significant improvement over the vendor-provided atlas method and of particular importance in response assessment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Li Z, Holzgreve A, Unterrainer LM, Ruf VC, Quach S, Bartos LM, Suchorska B, Niyazi M, Wenter V, Herms J, Bartenstein P, Tonn JC, Unterrainer M, Albert NL, Kaiser L. Combination of pre-treatment dynamic [ 18F]FET PET radiomics and conventional clinical parameters for the survival stratification in patients with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:535-545. [PMID: 36227357 PMCID: PMC9816231 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05988-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to build and evaluate a prediction model which incorporates clinical parameters and radiomic features extracted from static as well as dynamic [18F]FET PET for the survival stratification in patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. METHODS A total of 141 patients with newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and dynamic [18F]FET PET prior to surgical intervention were included. Patients with a survival time ≤ 12 months were classified as short-term survivors. First order, shape, and texture radiomic features were extracted from pre-treatment static (tumor-to-background ratio; TBR) and dynamic (time-to-peak; TTP) images, respectively, and randomly divided into a training (n = 99) and a testing cohort (n = 42). After feature normalization, recursive feature elimination was applied for feature selection using 5-fold cross-validation on the training cohort, and a machine learning model was constructed to compare radiomic models and combined clinical-radiomic models with selected radiomic features and clinical parameters. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to assess the predictive performance for identifying short-term survivors in both the training and testing cohort. RESULTS A combined clinical-radiomic model comprising six clinical parameters and six selected dynamic radiomic features achieved highest predictability of short-term survival with an AUC of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.88) in the independent testing cohort. CONCLUSIONS This study successfully built and evaluated prediction models using [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features and clinical parameters for the individualized assessment of short-term survival in patients with a newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. The combination of both clinical parameters and dynamic [18F]FET PET-based radiomic features reached highest accuracy in identifying patients at risk. Although the achieved accuracy level remained moderate, our data shows that the integration of dynamic [18F]FET PET radiomic data into clinical prediction models may improve patient stratification beyond established prognostic markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicong Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Viktoria C Ruf
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Quach
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laura M Bartos
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Hospital, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jochen Herms
- Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lena Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pálsson S, Cerri S, Poulsen HS, Urup T, Law I, Van Leemput K. Predicting survival of glioblastoma from automatic whole-brain and tumor segmentation of MR images. Sci Rep 2022; 12:19744. [PMID: 36396681 PMCID: PMC9671967 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-19223-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Survival prediction models can potentially be used to guide treatment of glioblastoma patients. However, currently available MR imaging biomarkers holding prognostic information are often challenging to interpret, have difficulties generalizing across data acquisitions, or are only applicable to pre-operative MR data. In this paper we aim to address these issues by introducing novel imaging features that can be automatically computed from MR images and fed into machine learning models to predict patient survival. The features we propose have a direct anatomical-functional interpretation: They measure the deformation caused by the tumor on the surrounding brain structures, comparing the shape of various structures in the patient's brain to their expected shape in healthy individuals. To obtain the required segmentations, we use an automatic method that is contrast-adaptive and robust to missing modalities, making the features generalizable across scanners and imaging protocols. Since the features we propose do not depend on characteristics of the tumor region itself, they are also applicable to post-operative images, which have been much less studied in the context of survival prediction. Using experiments involving both pre- and post-operative data, we show that the proposed features carry prognostic value in terms of overall- and progression-free survival, over and above that of conventional non-imaging features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sveinn Pálsson
- grid.5170.30000 0001 2181 8870Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Stefano Cerri
- grid.5170.30000 0001 2181 8870Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- grid.475435.4Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Urup
- grid.475435.4Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- grid.475435.4Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Center of Diagnostic Investigation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Koen Van Leemput
- grid.5170.30000 0001 2181 8870Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark ,grid.32224.350000 0004 0386 9924Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ryan JT, Nakayama M, Gleeson I, Mannion L, Geso M, Kelly J, Ng SP, Hardcastle N. Functional brain imaging interventions for radiation therapy planning in patients with glioblastoma: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:178. [PMID: 36371225 PMCID: PMC9653002 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02146-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE This systematic review aims to synthesise the outcomes of different strategies of incorporating functional biological markers in the radiation therapy plans of patients with glioblastoma to support clinicians and further research. METHODS The systematic review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021221021). A structured search for publications was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study characteristics, intervention methodology and outcomes were extracted using Covidence. Data analysis focused on radiation therapy target volumes, toxicity, dose distributions, recurrence and survival mapped to functional image-guided radiotherapy interventions. RESULTS There were 5733 citations screened, with 53 citations (n = 32 studies) meeting review criteria. Studies compared standard radiation therapy planning volumes with functional image-derived volumes (n = 20 studies), treated radiation therapy volumes with recurrences (n = 15 studies), the impact on current standard target delineations (n = 9 studies), treated functional volumes and survival (n = 8 studies), functionally guided dose escalation (n = 8 studies), radiomics (n = 4 studies) and optimal organ at risk sparing (n = 3 studies). The approaches to target outlining and dose escalation were heterogeneous. The analysis indicated an improvement in median overall survival of over two months compared with a historical control group. Simultaneous-integrated-boost dose escalation of 72-76 Gy in 30 fractions appeared to have an acceptable toxicity profile when delivered with inverse planning to a volume smaller than 100 cm[Formula: see text]. CONCLUSION There was significant heterogeneity between the approaches taken by different study groups when implementing functional image-guided radiotherapy. It is recommended that functional imaging data be incorporated into the gross tumour volume with appropriate technology-specific margins used to create the clinical target volume when designing radiation therapy plans for patients with glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Ryan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia
- Medical Radiations Department, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Masao Nakayama
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunokicho, Chuou-ku, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ian Gleeson
- Cancer Research UK RadNet Cambridge, Medical Physics, NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ UK
| | - Liam Mannion
- Division of Midwifery and Radiography, School of Health Sciences, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK
| | - Moshi Geso
- Medical Radiations Department, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jennifer Kelly
- Medical Radiations Department, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, STEM College, RMIT University Bundoora, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sweet Ping Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ladefoged CN, Henriksen OM, Mathiasen R, Schmiegelow K, Andersen FL, Højgaard L, Borgwardt L, Law I, Marner L. Automatic detection and delineation of pediatric gliomas on combined [ 18F]FET PET and MRI. FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 2:960820. [PMID: 39354975 PMCID: PMC11440972 DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2022.960820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 10/03/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the second most common cancer type in children and adolescents. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with radiolabeled amino acids visualizes the amino acid uptake in brain tumor cells compared with the healthy brain tissue, which provides additional information over magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differential diagnosis, treatment planning, and the differentiation of tumor relapse from treatment-related changes. However, tumor delineation is a time-consuming task subject to inter-rater variability. We propose a deep learning method for the automatic delineation of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET PET) pediatric CNS tumors. Methods A total of 109 [18F]FET PET and MRI scans from 66 pediatric patients with manually delineated reference were included. We trained an artificial neural network (ANN) for automatic delineation and compared its performance against the manual reference on delineation accuracy and subsequent clinical metric accuracy. For clinical metrics, we extracted the biological tumor volume (BTV) and tumor-to-background mean and max (TBRmean and TBRmax). Results The ANN produced high tumor overlap (median dice-similarity coefficient [DSC] of 0.93). The clinical metrics extracted with the manual reference and the ANN were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.99). The spatial location of TBRmax was identical in almost all cases (96%). The ANN and the manual reference produced similar changes in the clinical metrics between baseline and follow-up scans. Conclusion The proposed ANN achieved high concordance with the manual reference and may be an important tool for decision aid, limiting inter-reader variance and improving longitudinal evaluation in clinical routine, and for future multicenter studies of pediatric CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes Nøhr Ladefoged
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Otto Mølby Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - René Mathiasen
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kjeld Schmiegelow
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming Littrup Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Liselotte Højgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lise Borgwardt
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Marner
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Withofs N, Kumar R, Alavi A, Hustinx R. Facts and Fictions About [ 18F]FDG versus Other Tracers in Managing Patients with Brain Tumors: It Is Time to Rectify the Ongoing Misconceptions. PET Clin 2022; 17:327-342. [PMID: 35717096 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
MRI is the first-choice imaging technique for brain tumors. Positron emission tomography can be combined together with multiparametric MRI to increase diagnostic confidence. Radiolabeled amino acids have gained wide clinical acceptance. The reported pooled specificity of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography is high and [18F]FDG might still be the first-choice positron emission tomography tracer in cases of World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 gliomas or [18F]FDG-avid tumors, avoiding the use of more expensive and less available radiolabeled amino acids. The present review discusses the additional value of positron emission tomography with a focus on [18F]FDG and radiolabeled amino acids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Withofs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital, 1, Liege 1 4000, Belgium; GIGA-CRC in vivo imaging, University of Liege, GIGA CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital Avenue de l'Hôpital,11, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Division, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Quartier Hopital, Avenue de l'hopital, 1, Liege 1 4000, Belgium; GIGA-CRC in vivo imaging, University of Liege, GIGA CHU - B34 Quartier Hôpital Avenue de l'Hôpital,11, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Borja AJ, Saini J, Raynor WY, Ayubcha C, Werner TJ, Alavi A, Revheim ME, Nagaraj C. Role of Molecular Imaging with PET/MR Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Brain Tumors. PET Clin 2022; 17:431-451. [PMID: 35662494 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors. Hybrid PET/MR imaging has revolutionized brain tumor imaging, allowing for noninvasive, simultaneous assessment of morphologic, functional, metabolic, and molecular parameters within the brain. Molecular information obtained from PET imaging may aid in the detection, classification, prognostication, and therapeutic decision making for gliomas. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) has been widely used in the setting of brain tumor imaging, and multiple techniques may be employed to optimize this methodology. More recently, a number of non-18F-FDG-PET radiotracers have been applied toward brain tumor imaging and are used in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin J Borja
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jitender Saini
- Department of Neuro Imaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560-029, India
| | - William Y Raynor
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Cyrus Ayubcha
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Thomas J Werner
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Mona-Elisabeth Revheim
- Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Sognsvannsveien 20, Oslo 0372, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Problemveien 7, Oslo 0315, Norway
| | - Chandana Nagaraj
- Department of Neuro Imaging and Interventional Radiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Hosur Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560-029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brighi C, Puttick S, Li S, Keall P, Neville K, Waddington D, Bourgeat P, Gillman A, Fay M. A novel semiautomated method for background activity and biological tumour volume definition to improve standardisation of 18F-FET PET imaging in glioblastoma. EJNMMI Phys 2022; 9:9. [PMID: 35122529 PMCID: PMC8818070 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00438-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multicentre clinical trials evaluating the role of 18F-Fluoroethyl-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET as a diagnostic biomarker in glioma management have highlighted a need for standardised methods of data analysis. 18F-FET uptake normalised against background in the contralateral brain is a standard imaging technique to delineate the biological tumour volume (BTV). Quantitative analysis of 18F-FET PET images requires a consistent and robust background activity. Currently, defining background activity involves the manual selection of an arbitrary region of interest, a process that is subject to large variability. This study aims to eliminate methodological errors in background activity definition through the introduction of a semiautomated method for region of interest selection. A new method for background activity definition, involving the semiautomated generation of mirror-image (MI) reference regions, was compared with the current state-of-the-art method, involving manually drawing crescent-shape (gCS) reference regions. The MI and gCS methods were tested by measuring values of background activity and resulting BTV of 18F-FET PET scans of ten patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme generated from inputs provided by seven readers. To assess intra-reader variability, each scan was evaluated six times by each reader. Intra- and inter-reader variability in background activity and BTV definition was assessed by means of coefficient of variation. Results Compared to the gCS method, the MI method showed significantly lower intra- and inter-reader variability both in background activity and in BTV definition. Conclusions The proposed semiautomated MI method minimises intra- and inter-reader variability, providing a valuable approach for standardisation of 18F-FET PET quantitative parameters. Trial registration ANZCTR, ACTRN12618001346268. Registered 9 August 2018, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=374253 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-022-00438-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Brighi
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Simon Puttick
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Shenpeng Li
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul Keall
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - David Waddington
- ACRF Image X Institute, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pierrick Bourgeat
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ashley Gillman
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Fay
- GenesisCare, Newcastle, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tatekawa H, Uetani H, Hagiwara A, Bahri S, Raymond C, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Pope WB, Salamon N, Ellingson BM. Worse prognosis for IDH wild-type diffuse gliomas with larger residual biological tumor burden. Ann Nucl Med 2021; 35:1022-1029. [PMID: 34121166 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-021-01637-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The association of overall survival (OS) with tumor burden, including contrast enhanced (CE) volume on CE T1-weighted images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense volume, and 3, 4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) hypermetabolic volume, in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type gliomas remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association between biological tumor burden in pre- and post-operative status and OS in IDH wild-type gliomas, and evaluated which volume was the best predictor of OS. METHODS Thirty-four patients with treatment-naïve IDH wild-type gliomas (WHO grade II 6, III 15, IV 13) were retrospectively included. Three pre-operative tumor regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented based on the CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic regions. Resected ROIs were segmented from the post-operative images. Residual CE, FLAIR hyperintense, and FDOPA hypermetabolic ROIs were created by subtracting resected ROIs from pre-operative ROIs. Cox regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association of OS with the volume of each ROI, and Akaike information criterion was used to assess the fitness. RESULTS Residual CE volume had a significant association with OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.26, p = 0.039], but this effect disappeared when controlling for tumor grade. Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic volume best fit the regression model and was significantly associated with OS (HR = 1.18, p = 0.008), even when controlling for tumor grade. FLAIR hyperintense volume showed no significant association with OS. CONCLUSION Residual FDOPA hypermetabolic burden predicted OS for IDH wild-type gliomas, regardless of the tumor grade. Furthermore, removing hypermetabolic and CE regions may improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Uetani
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Shadfar Bahri
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
- Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Repeatability of image features extracted from FET PET in application to post-surgical glioblastoma assessment. Phys Eng Sci Med 2021; 44:1131-1140. [PMID: 34436751 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01049-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using the amino acid tracer O-[2-(18F)fluoroethyl]-L-tyrosine (FET) has gained increased popularity within the past decade in the management of glioblastoma (GBM). Radiomics features extracted from FET PET images may be sensitive to variations when imaging at multiple time points. It is therefore necessary to assess feature robustness to test-retest imaging. Eight patients with histologically confirmed GBM that had undergone post-surgical test-retest FET PET imaging were recruited. In total, 1578 radiomic features were extracted from biological tumour volumes (BTVs) delineated using a semi-automatic contouring method. Feature repeatability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The effect of both bin width and filter choice on feature repeatability was also investigated. 59/106 (55.7%) features from the original image and 843/1472 (57.3%) features from filtered images had an ICC ≥ 0.85. Shape and first order features were most stable. Choice of bin width showed minimal impact on features defined as stable. The Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG, σ = 5 mm) and Wavelet filters (HLL and LHL) significantly improved feature repeatability (p ≪ 0.0001, p = 0.003, p = 0.002, respectively). Correlation of textural features with tumour volume was reported for transparency. FET PET radiomic features extracted from post-surgical images of GBM patients that are robust to test-retest imaging were identified. An investigation with a larger dataset is warranted to validate the findings in this study.
Collapse
|
22
|
18F-FET PET Uptake Characteristics of Long-Term IDH-Wildtype Diffuse Glioma Survivors. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13133163. [PMID: 34202726 PMCID: PMC8268019 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13133163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary IDH-wildtype (IDHwt) gliomas represent a tumor entity with poor overall survival. Only rare cases have an overall survival over several years. Dynamic and static 18F-FET PET is recommended as valuable complementary tool for glioma imaging in gliomas. This study shows that, besides molecular genetic prognosticators, long survival (≥36 months survival) in IDHwt gliomas is associated with a longer time-to-peak and smaller volume on 18F-FET PET at initial diagnosis compared to glioma patients with a short-term survival (≤15 months survival). 18F-FET uptake intensity and MRI-derived tumor size do not differ in patients with long-term survival compared to patient with a short-term survival. Abstract Background: IDHwt diffuse gliomas represent the tumor entity with one of the worst clinical outcomes. Only rare cases present with a long-term survival of several years. Here we aimed at comparing the uptake characteristics on dynamic 18F-FET PET, clinical and molecular genetic parameters of long-term survivors (LTS) versus short-term survivors (STS): Methods: Patients with de-novo IDHwt glioma (WHO grade III/IV) and 18F-FET PET prior to any therapy were stratified into LTS (≥36 months survival) and STS (≤15 months survival). Static and dynamic 18F-FET PET parameters (mean/maximal tumor-to-background ratio (TBRmean/max), biological tumor volume (BTV), minimal time-to-peak (TTPmin)), diameter and volume of contrast-enhancement on MRI, clinical parameters (age, sex, Karnofksy-performance-score), mode of surgery; initial treatment and molecular genetics were assessed and compared between LTS and STS. Results: Overall, 75 IDHwt glioma patients were included (26 LTS, 49 STS). LTS were significantly younger (p < 0.001), had a higher rate of WHO grade III glioma (p = 0.032), of O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation (p < 0.001) and missing Telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter (TERTp) mutations (p = 0.004) compared to STS. On imaging, LTS showed a smaller median BTV (p = 0.017) and a significantly longer TTPmin (p = 0.008) on 18F-FET PET than STS, while uptake intensity (TBRmean/max) did not differ. In contrast to the tumor-volume on PET, MRI-derived parameters such as tumor size as well as all other above-mentioned parameters did not differ between LTS and STS (p > 0.05 each). Conclusion: Besides molecular genetic prognosticators, a long survival time in IDHwt glioma patients is associated with a longer TTPmin as well as a smaller BTV on 18F-FET PET at initial diagnosis. 18F-FET uptake intensity as well as the MRI-derived tumor size (volume and maximal diameter) do not differ in patients with long-term survival.
Collapse
|
23
|
Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL, Kocher M, Langen KJ, Law I, Minniti G, Kim MM, Tsien C, Dhermain F, Soffietti R, Mehta MP, Weller M, Tonn JC. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:881-893. [PMID: 33538838 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with glioma usually requires multimodality treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Accurate neuroimaging plays a central role for radiotherapy planning and follow-up after radiotherapy completion. In order to maximize the radiation dose to the tumor and to minimize toxic effects on the surrounding brain parenchyma, reliable identification of tumor extent and target volume delineation is crucial. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) for radiotherapy planning and monitoring in gliomas has gained considerable interest over the last several years, but Class I data are not yet available. Furthermore, PET has been used after radiotherapy for response assessment and to distinguish tumor progression from pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group provides a summary of the literature and recommendations for the use of PET imaging for radiotherapy of patients with glioma based on published studies, constituting levels 1-3 evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cecchin D, Garibotto V, Law I, Goffin K. PET Imaging in Neurodegeneration and Neuro-oncology: Variants and Pitfalls. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:408-418. [PMID: 33820651 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In neurodegenerative diseases, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging plays an important role in the early identification and differential diagnosis in particular in clinically challenging patients. 18F-FDG is still the most widely used and established tracer in this patient group, with different cortical and subcortical regions being preferentially affected in different neurodegenerative diseases, such as frontotemporal dementia, Alzheimer's disease or Lewy Body dementia, resulting in typical hypometabolic patterns. Over the last decades, however, the implementation of tracers specific for the pathological deposits characteristic of the different diseases, such as amyloid and tau, has revolutionized the way of classifying and reporting cases of cognitive impairment of neurodegenerative origin, providing complementary information to 18F-FDG PET. In neuro-oncology, PET imaging can be performed in several clinical indications, as highlighted in the joint European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)/European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO)/Response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) practice guidelines on imaging in neuro-oncology. For assessment of glioma, amino-acid analogues, such as 11C-methionine or 18F-FET, are used whenever clinically available, as they offer excellent tumor-to-background ratios in malignant tumors. Moreover, dynamic acquisition of amino-acid analogue tracers and assessment of the shape of the time-activity curve can be used to perform noninvasive grading of brain gliomas, differentiating low from high grade presentations. In both settings, however, thorough knowledge of the normal physiological tracer distribution and the variants and pitfalls that can occur during image acquisition, processing and interpretation is mandatory in order to provide optimal diagnostic information to referring physicians and patients. Especially in neuro-oncology, this process can be aided by the active use of coregistered magnetic resonance imaging to accurately identify the imaging correlates of developmental origin, acute and chronic stroke, inflammation, infection and seizure related activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Cecchin
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Division, Diagnostic Department, University Hospitals of Geneva and NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McAleenan A, Kelly C, Spiga F, Kernohan A, Cheng HY, Dawson S, Schmidt L, Robinson T, Brandner S, Faulkner CL, Wragg C, Jefferies S, Howell A, Vale L, Higgins JPT, Kurian KM. Prognostic value of test(s) for O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation for predicting overall survival in people with glioblastoma treated with temozolomide. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 3:CD013316. [PMID: 33710615 PMCID: PMC8078495 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013316.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is an aggressive form of brain cancer. Approximately five in 100 people with glioblastoma survive for five years past diagnosis. Glioblastomas that have a particular modification to their DNA (called methylation) in a particular region (the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter) respond better to treatment with chemotherapy using a drug called temozolomide. OBJECTIVES To determine which method for assessing MGMT methylation status best predicts overall survival in people diagnosed with glioblastoma who are treated with temozolomide. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index to December 2018, and examined reference lists. For economic evaluation studies, we additionally searched NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED) up to December 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA Eligible studies were longitudinal (cohort) studies of adults with diagnosed glioblastoma treated with temozolomide with/without radiotherapy/surgery. Studies had to have related MGMT status in tumour tissue (assessed by one or more method) with overall survival and presented results as hazard ratios or with sufficient information (e.g. Kaplan-Meier curves) for us to estimate hazard ratios. We focused mainly on studies comparing two or more methods, and listed brief details of articles that examined a single method of measuring MGMT promoter methylation. We also sought economic evaluations conducted alongside trials, modelling studies and cost analysis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently undertook all steps of the identification and data extraction process for multiple-method studies. We assessed risk of bias and applicability using our own modified and extended version of the QUality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. We compared different techniques, exact promoter regions (5'-cytosine-phosphate-guanine-3' (CpG) sites) and thresholds for interpretation within studies by examining hazard ratios. We performed meta-analyses for comparisons of the three most commonly examined methods (immunohistochemistry (IHC), methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and pyrosequencing (PSQ)), with ratios of hazard ratios (RHR), using an imputed value of the correlation between results based on the same individuals. MAIN RESULTS We included 32 independent cohorts involving 3474 people that compared two or more methods. We found evidence that MSP (CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87) is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at varying thresholds (RHR 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01 to 1.71). We also found evidence that PSQ is more prognostic than IHC for MGMT protein at various thresholds (RHR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.84). The data suggest that PSQ (mainly at CpG sites 74 to 78, using various thresholds) is slightly more prognostic than MSP at sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 (RHR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.48). Many variants of PSQ have been compared, although we did not see any strong and consistent messages from the results. Targeting multiple CpG sites is likely to be more prognostic than targeting just one. In addition, we identified and summarised 190 articles describing a single method for measuring MGMT promoter methylation status. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS PSQ and MSP appear more prognostic for overall survival than IHC. Strong evidence is not available to draw conclusions with confidence about the best CpG sites or thresholds for quantitative methods. MSP has been studied mainly for CpG sites 76 to 80 and 84 to 87 and PSQ at CpG sites ranging from 72 to 95. A threshold of 9% for CpG sites 74 to 78 performed better than higher thresholds of 28% or 29% in two of three good-quality studies making such comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra McAleenan
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Claire Kelly
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Francesca Spiga
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Hung-Yuan Cheng
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Dawson
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) , University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Lena Schmidt
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sebastian Brandner
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- Division of Neuropathology, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Claire L Faulkner
- Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Pathology Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Christopher Wragg
- Bristol Genetics Laboratory, Pathology Sciences, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Sarah Jefferies
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy Howell
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Luke Vale
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Julian P T Higgins
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (ARC West) , University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathreena M Kurian
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School: Brain Tumour Research Centre, Public Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tatekawa H, Uetani H, Hagiwara A, Yao J, Oughourlian TC, Ueda I, Raymond C, Lai A, Cloughesy TF, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Bahri S, Pope WB, Salamon N, Ellingson BM. Preferential tumor localization in relation to 18F-FDOPA uptake for lower-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:573-582. [PMID: 33704629 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03730-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although tumor localization and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-18F-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) uptake may have an association, preferential tumor localization in relation to FDOPA uptake is yet to be investigated in lower-grade gliomas (LGGs). This study aimed to identify differences in the frequency of tumor localization between FDOPA hypometabolic and hypermetabolic LGGs using a probabilistic radiographic atlas. METHODS Fifty-one patients with newly diagnosed LGG (WHO grade II, 29; III, 22; isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type, 21; mutant 1p19q non-codeleted,16; mutant codeleted, 14) who underwent FDOPA positron emission tomography (PET) were retrospectively selected. Semiautomated tumor segmentation on FLAIR was performed. Patients with LGGs were separated into two groups (FDOPA hypometabolic and hypermetabolic LGGs) according to the normalized maximum standardized uptake value of FDOPA PET (a threshold of the uptake in the striatum) within the segmented regions. Spatial normalization procedures to build a 3D MRI-based atlas using each segmented region were validated by an analysis of differential involvement statistical mapping. RESULTS Superimposition of regions of interest showed a high number of hypometabolic LGGs localized in the frontal lobe, while a high number of hypermetabolic LGGs was localized in the insula, putamen, and temporal lobe. The statistical mapping revealed that hypometabolic LGGs occurred more frequently in the superior frontal gyrus (close to the supplementary motor area), while hypermetabolic LGGs occurred more frequently in the insula. CONCLUSION Radiographic atlases revealed preferential frontal lobe localization for FDOPA hypometabolic LGGs, which may be associated with relatively early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Tatekawa
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Uetani
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Radiology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Talia C Oughourlian
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Issei Ueda
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA.,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Timothy F Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Phioanh L Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Shadfar Bahri
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd., Suite 615, Los Angeles, CA, 90024, USA. .,Department of Radiological Science, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of Bioengineering, Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Castellano A, Bailo M, Cicone F, Carideo L, Quartuccio N, Mortini P, Falini A, Cascini GL, Minniti G. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning of Gliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051063. [PMID: 33802292 PMCID: PMC7959155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The accuracy of target delineation in radiation treatment (RT) planning of cerebral gliomas is crucial to achieve high tumor control, while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, represents the current standard imaging modality for target volume delineation of gliomas. However, conventional sequences have limited capability to discriminate treatment-related changes from viable tumors, owing to the low specificity of increased blood-brain barrier permeability and peritumoral edema. Advanced physiology-based MRI techniques, such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI, have been developed for the biological characterization of gliomas and may circumvent these limitations, providing additional metabolic, structural, and hemodynamic information for treatment planning and monitoring. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) with amino acid radiopharmaceuticals, are also increasingly used in the workup of primary brain tumors, and their integration in RT planning is being evaluated in specialized centers. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical results of advanced MRI and PET imaging techniques that have promise as a complement to RT planning of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0-961-369-4155
| | - Luciano Carideo
- National Cancer Institute, G. Pascale Foundation, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90144 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Seidlitz A, Beuthien-Baumann B, Löck S, Jentsch C, Platzek I, Zöphel K, Linge A, Kotzerke J, Petr J, van den Hoff J, Steinbach J, Krex D, Schmitz-Schackert G, Falk M, Baumann M, Krause M. Final Results of the Prospective Biomarker Trial PETra: [ 11C]-MET-Accumulation in Postoperative PET/MRI Predicts Outcome after Radiochemotherapy in Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:1351-1360. [PMID: 33376095 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This prospective trial investigates the association of time to recurrence (TTR) in glioblastoma with [11C]methionine (MET) tracer uptake before postoperative radiochemotherapy (RCT) aiming to guide radiotherapy boost regions. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Between 2013 and 2016, 102 patients with glioblastoma were recruited. RCT was performed with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide to a total dose of 60 Gy. Tumor residues in postresection PET and MRI were together defined as gross tumor volumes for radiotherapy treatment planning. [11C]methionine (MET)-PET/MRI was performed before RCT and at each follow-up. RESULTS The primary hypothesis of a longer TTR for patients without increased tracer accumulation in postoperative MET-PET was confirmed in 89 patients. With 18.9 months (95% confidence interval, 9.3-28.5 months), median TTR was significantly (P < 0.001) longer for patients without (n = 29, 32.6%) as compared with 6.3 months (3.6-8.9) for patients with MET accumulation (n = 60, 67.4%) in pre-RCT PET. Although MRI often did not detect all PET-positive regions, an unfavorable impact of residual tumor in postsurgical MRI (n = 38, 42.7%) on TTR was observed [4.6 (4.2-5.1) vs. 15.5 months (6.0-24.9), P < 0.001]. Significant multivariable predictors for TTR were MRI positivity, PET-positive volume, and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) hypermethylation. CONCLUSIONS Postsurgical amino acid PET has prognostic value for TTR after RCT in glioblastoma. Because of the added value of the metabolic beyond the pure structural information, it should complement MRI in radiotherapy planning if available with reasonable effort, at least in the context of maximal therapy. Furthermore, the spatial correlation of regions of recurrence with PET-positive volumes could provide a bioimaging basis for further trials, for example, testing local radiation dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annekatrin Seidlitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bettina Beuthien-Baumann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Radiology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christina Jentsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ivan Platzek
- Institute of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Annett Linge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Petr
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York
| | - Jörg van den Hoff
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Steinbach
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dietmar Krex
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gabriele Schmitz-Schackert
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Monique Falk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site, Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abedi AA, Grunnet K, Christensen IJ, Michaelsen SR, Muhic A, Møller S, Hasselbalch B, Poulsen HS, Urup T. A Prognostic Model for Glioblastoma Patients Treated With Standard Therapy Based on a Prospective Cohort of Consecutive Non-Selected Patients From a Single Institution. Front Oncol 2021; 11:597587. [PMID: 33718145 PMCID: PMC7946965 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.597587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma patients administered standard therapies, comprising maximal surgical resection, radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, have a variable prognosis with a median overall survival of 15–16 months and a 2-year overall survival of 30%. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic nomogram for overall survival for glioblastoma patients treated with standard therapy outside clinical trials. Methods The study included 680 consecutive, non-selected glioblastoma patients administered standard therapy as primary treatment between the years 2005 and 2016 at Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. The prognostic model was generated employing multivariate Cox regression analysis modeling overall survival. Results The following poor prognostic factors were included in the final prognostic model for overall survival: Age (10-year increase: HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08–1.28, p < 0.001), ECOG performance status (PS) 1 vs. 0 (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.07–1.57, p = 0.007), PS 2 vs. 0 (HR = 2.99, 95% CI: 1.99–4.50, p < 0.001), corticosteroid use (HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.18–1.70, p < 0.001), multifocal disease (HR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.25–2.13, p < 0.001), biopsy vs. resection (HR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.04–1.72, p = 0.02), un-methylated promoter of the MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) gene (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.42–2.04, p < 0.001). The model was validated internally and had a concordance index of 0.65. Conclusion A nomogram for overall survival was established. This model can be used for risk stratification and treatment planning, as well as improve enrollment criteria for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armita Armina Abedi
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Grunnet
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Signe Regner Michaelsen
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Biotech, Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aida Muhic
- Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Møller
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Benedikte Hasselbalch
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Urup
- Department of Radiation Biology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, The Finsen Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Farrell C, Shi W, Bodman A, Olson JJ. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:269-359. [PMID: 33215345 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
TARGET POPULATION These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. IMAGING Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATION Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma. SURGERY Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery. NEUROPATHOLOGY Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. RADIATION Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques. CHEMOTHERAPY Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy. MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATION Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies. NOVEL THERAPIES Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas? RECOMMENDATIONS Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Farrell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey J Olson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bashir A, Mathilde Jacobsen S, Mølby Henriksen O, Broholm H, Urup T, Grunnet K, Andrée Larsen V, Møller S, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Skovgaard Poulsen H, Law I. Recurrent glioblastoma versus late posttreatment changes: diagnostic accuracy of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine positron emission tomography (18F-FET PET). Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:1595-1606. [PMID: 31618420 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic accuracy in previous studies of O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET in patients with suspected recurrent glioma may be influenced by prolonged dynamic PET acquisitions, heterogeneous populations, different non-standard-of-care therapies, and PET scans performed at different time points post radiotherapy. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of a 20-minute 18F-FET PET scan in MRI-suspected recurrent glioblastoma 6 months after standard radiotherapy and its ability to prognosticate overall survival (OS). METHODS In total, 146 glioblastoma patients with 168 18F-FET PET scans were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with MRI responses to bevacizumab or undergoing re-irradiation or immunotherapy after 18F-FET PET were excluded. Maximum and mean tumor-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) and biological tumor volume (BTV) were recorded and verified by histopathology or clinical/radiological follow-up. Thresholds of 18F-FET parameters were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Prognostic factors were investigated in Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Surgery was performed after 104 18F-FET PET scans, while clinical/radiological surveillance was used following 64, identifying 152 glioblastoma recurrences and 16 posttreatment changes. ROC analysis yielded thresholds of 2.0 for TBRmax, 1.8 for TBRmean, and 0.55 cm3 for BTV in differentiating recurrent glioblastoma from posttreatment changes with the best performance of TBRmax (sensitivity 99%, specificity 94%; P < 0.0001) followed by BTV (sensitivity 98%, specificity 94%; P < 0.0001). Using these thresholds, 166 18F-FET PET scans were correctly classified. Increasing BTV was associated with shorter OS (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION A 20-minute 18F-FET PET scan is a powerful tool to distinguish posttreatment changes from recurrent glioblastoma 6-month postradiotherapy, and predicts OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asma Bashir
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Otto Mølby Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Broholm
- Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Urup
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Grunnet
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke Andrée Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Søren Møller
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jane Skjøth-Rasmussen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine, and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) specific PET for advanced target volume delineation in glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 150:159-163. [PMID: 32598977 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-specific Positron Emission Tomography (PET) has shown promising results in various cancers. This pilot study compares FAP-specific PET to MRI for treatment planning in 13 Glioblastoma patients. The resulting incongruent volumes could provide additional information for radiotherapy or biopsy planning.
Collapse
|
33
|
Song S, Cheng Y, Ma J, Wang L, Dong C, Wei Y, Xu G, An Y, Qi Z, Lin Q, Lu J. Simultaneous FET-PET and contrast-enhanced MRI based on hybrid PET/MR improves delineation of tumor spatial biodistribution in gliomas: a biopsy validation study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47:1458-1467. [PMID: 31919633 PMCID: PMC7188715 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04656-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Glioma treatment planning requires precise tumor delineation, which is typically performed with contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI. However, CE MRI fails to reflect the entire extent of glioma. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET may detect tumor volumes missed by CE MRI. We investigated the clinical value of simultaneous FET-PET and CE MRI in delineating tumor extent before treatment planning. Guided stereotactic biopsy was used to validate the findings. Methods Conventional MRI and 18F-FET PET were performed simultaneously on a hybrid PET/MR in 33 patients with histopathologically confirmed glioma. Tumor volumes were quantified using a tumor-to-brain ratio ≥ 1.6 (VPET) and a visual threshold (VCE). We visually assessed abnormal areas on FLAIR images and calculated Dice’s coefficient (DSC), overlap volume (OV), discrepancy-PET, and discrepancy-CE. Additionally, several stereotactic biopsy samples were taken from “matched” or “mismatched” FET-PET and CE MRI regions. Results Among 31 patients (93.94%), FET-PET delineated significantly larger tumor volumes than CE MRI (77.84 ± 51.74 cm3 vs. 34.59 ± 27.07 cm3, P < 0.05). Of the 21 biopsy samples obtained from regions with increased FET uptake, all were histopathologically confirmed as glioma tissue or tumor infiltration, whereas only 13 showed enhancement on CE MRI. Among all patients, the spatial similarity between VPET and VCE was low (average DSC 0.56 ± 0.22), while the overlap was high (average OV 0.95 ± 0.08). The discrepancy-CE and discrepancy-PET were lower than 10% in 28 and 0 patients, respectively. Eleven patients showed VPET partially beyond abnormal signal areas on FLAIR images. Conclusion The metabolically active biodistribution of gliomas delineated with FET-PET significantly exceeds tumor volume on CE MRI, and histopathology confirms these findings. Our preliminary results indicate that combining the anatomic and molecular information obtained from conventional MRI and FET-PET would reveal a more accurate glioma extent, which is critical for individualized treatment planning. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00259-019-04656-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuangshuang Song
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Ye Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Leiming Wang
- Department of Pathology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Yukui Wei
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Geng Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yang An
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Qi
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China
| | - Qingtang Lin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Radiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital medical University, Beijing, China. .,Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing, China. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Giammarile F, Castellucci P, Dierckx R, Estrada Lobato E, Farsad M, Hustinx R, Jalilian A, Pellet O, Rossi S, Paez D. Non-FDG PET/CT in Diagnostic Oncology: a pictorial review. Eur J Hybrid Imaging 2019; 3:20. [PMID: 34191163 PMCID: PMC8218094 DOI: 10.1186/s41824-019-0066-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is currently one of the main imaging modalities for cancer patients worldwide. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has earned its global recognition in the modern management of cancer patients and is rapidly becoming an important imaging modality for patients with cardiac, neurological, and infectious/inflammatory conditions. Despite its proven benefits, FDG has limitations in the assessment of several relevant tumours such as prostate cancer. Therefore, there has been a pressing need for the development and clinical application of different PET radiopharmaceuticals that could image these tumours more precisely. Accordingly, several non-FDG PET radiopharmaceuticals have been introduced into the clinical arena for management of cancer. This trend will undoubtedly continue to spread internationally. The use of PET/CT with different PET radiopharmaceuticals specific to tumour type and biological process being assessed is part of the personalised precision medicine approach. The objective of this publication is to provide a case-based method of understanding normal biodistribution, variants, and pitfalls, including several examples of different imaging appearances for the main oncological indications for each of the new non-FDG PET radiopharmaceuticals. This should facilitate the interpretation and recognition of common variants and pitfalls to ensure that, in clinical practice, the official report is accurate and helpful. Some of these radiopharmaceuticals are already commercially available in many countries (e.g. 68Ga-DOTATATE and DOTATOC), others are in the process of becoming available (e.g. 68Ga-PSMA), and some are still being researched. However, this list is subject to change as some radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly utilised, while others gradually decrease in use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giammarile
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sant'Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rudi Dierckx
- Medical Imaging Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Enrique Estrada Lobato
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohsen Farsad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Bolzano Hospital, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Roland Hustinx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Liège, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Amirreza Jalilian
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Olivier Pellet
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| | - Susana Rossi
- Centro Uruguayo de Imagenología Molecular (CUDIM), Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Diana Paez
- Department of Nuclear Sciences and Applications, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Moreau A, Febvey O, Mognetti T, Frappaz D, Kryza D. Contribution of Different Positron Emission Tomography Tracers in Glioma Management: Focus on Glioblastoma. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1134. [PMID: 31737567 PMCID: PMC6839136 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Although rare, glioblastomas account for the majority of primary brain lesions, with a dreadful prognosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the imaging method providing the higher resolution. However, it does not always succeed in distinguishing recurrences from non-specific temozolomide, have been shown to improve -related changes caused by the combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, also called pseudoprogression. Strenuous attempts to overcome this issue is highly required for these patients with a short life expectancy for both ethical and economic reasons. Additional reliable information may be obtained from positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. The development of this technique, along with the emerging of new classes of tracers, can help in the diagnosis, prognosis, and assessment of therapies. We reviewed the current data about the commonly used tracers, such as 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and radiolabeled amino acids, as well as different PET tracers recently investigated, to report their strengths, limitations, and relevance in glioblastoma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Kryza
- UNIV Lyon - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, LAGEPP UMR 5007 CNRS Villeurbanne, Villeurbanne, France
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
« Définition des volumes cibles : quand et comment l’oncologue radiothérapeute peut-il utiliser la TEP ? ». Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:745-752. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.07.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
37
|
Report of first recurrent glioma patients examined with PET-MRI prior to re-irradiation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216111. [PMID: 31339892 PMCID: PMC6655559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The advantage of combined PET-MRI over sequential PET and MRI is the high spatial conformity and the absence of time delay between the examinations. The benefit of this technique for planning of re-irradiation (re-RT) treatment is unkown yet. Imaging data from a phase 1 trial of re-RT for recurrent glioma was analysed to assess whether planning target volumes and treatment margins in glioma re-RT can be adjusted by PET-MRI with rater independent PET based biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Patients and methods Combined PET-MRI with the tracer O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) prior to re-RT was performed in recurrent glioma patients in a phase I trial. GTVs including all regions suspicious of tumour on contrast enhanced MRI were delineated by three experienced radiation oncologists and included into MRI based consensus GTVs (MRGTVs). BTVs were semi-automatically delineated with a fixed threshold of 1.6 x background activity. Corresponding BTVs and MRGTVs were fused into union volume PET-MRGTVs. The Sørensen–Dice coefficient and the conformity index were used to assess the geometric overlap of the BTVs with the MRGTVs. A recurrence pattern analysis was performed based on the original planning target volumes (PTVs = GTV + 10 mm margin or 5 mm in one case) and the PET-MRGTVs with margins of 10, 8, 5 and 3 mm. Results Seven recurrent glioma patients, who received PET-MRI prior to re-RT, were included into the present planning study. At the time of re-RT, patients were in median 54 years old and had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80. Median post-recurrence survival after the beginning of re-RT was 13 months. Concomitant bevacizumab therapy was applied in six patients and one patient received chemoradiation with temozolomide. Median GTV volumes of the three radiation oncologists were 35.0, 37.5 and 40.5 cubic centimeters (cc) and median MRGTV volume 41.8 cc. Median BTV volume was 36.6 cc and median PET-MRGTV volume 59.3 cc. The median Sørensen–Dice coefficient for the comparison between MRGTV and BTV was 0.61 and the median conformity index 0.44. Recurrence pattern analysis revealed two central, two in-field and one distant recurrence within both, the original PTV, as well as the PET-MRGTV with a reduced margin of 3 mm. Conclusion PET-MRI provides radiation treatment planning imaging with high spatial and timely conformity for high-grade glioma patients treated with re-RT with potential advancements for target volume delineation. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to further investigate the treatment benefits of PET-MRI based re-RT planning.
Collapse
|
38
|
Zschaeck S, Wust P, Graf R, Misch M, Onken J, Ghadjar P, Badakhshi H, Florange J, Budach V, Kaul D. Locally dose-escalated radiotherapy may improve intracranial local control and overall survival among patients with glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:251. [PMID: 30567592 PMCID: PMC6299982 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The dismal overall survival (OS) prognosis of glioblastoma, even after trimodal therapy, can be attributed mainly to the frequent incidence of intracranial relapse (ICR), which tends to present as an in-field recurrence after a radiation dose of 60 Gray (Gy). In this study, molecular marker-based prognostic indices were used to compare the outcomes of radiation with a standard dose versus a moderate dose escalation. Methods This retrospective analysis included 156 patients treated between 2009 and 2016. All patients were medically fit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy. In the dose-escalation cohort a simultaneous integrated boost of up to 66 Gy (66 Gy RT) within small high-risk volumes was applied. All other patients received daily radiation to a total dose of 60 Gy or twice daily to a total dose of 59.2 Gy (60 Gy RT). Results A total of 133 patients received standard 60 Gy RT, while 23 received 66 Gy RT. Patients in the 66 Gy RT group were younger (p < 0.001), whereas concomitant temozolomide use was more frequent in the 60 Gy RT group (p < 0.001). Other intergroup differences in known prognostic factors were not observed. Notably, the median time to ICR was significantly prolonged in the 66 Gy RT arm versus the 60 Gy RT arm (12.2 versus 7.6 months, p = 0.011), and this translated to an improved OS (18.8 versus 15.3 months, p = 0.012). A multivariate analysis revealed a strong association of 66 Gy RT with a prolonged time to ICR (hazard ratio = 0.498, p = 0.01) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.451, p = 0.01). These differences remained significant after implementing molecular marker-based prognostic scores (ICR p = 0.008, OS p = 0.007) and propensity-scored matched pairing (ICR p = 0.099, OS p = 0.023). Conclusion Radiation dose escalation was found to correlate with an improved time to ICR and OS in this cohort of glioblastoma patients. However, further prospective validation of these results is warranted. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-018-1194-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Wust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Reinhold Graf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Martin Misch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Julia Onken
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Harun Badakhshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ernst von Bergmann Medical Center, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Julian Florange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lundemann M, Munck Af Rosenschöld P, Muhic A, Larsen VA, Poulsen HS, Engelholm SA, Andersen FL, Kjær A, Larsson HBW, Law I, Hansen AE. Feasibility of multi-parametric PET and MRI for prediction of tumour recurrence in patients with glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:603-613. [PMID: 30276440 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence in glioblastoma patients often occur close to the original tumour and indicates that the current treatment is inadequate for local tumour control. In this study, we explored the feasibility of using multi-modality imaging at the time of radiotherapy planning. Specifically, we aimed to identify parameters from pre-treatment PET and MRI with potential to predict tumour recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Sixteen patients were prospectively recruited and treated according to established guidelines. Multi-parametric imaging with 18F-FET PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/MR including diffusion and dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion MRI were performed before radiotherapy. Correlations between imaging parameters were calculated. Imaging was related to the voxel-wise outcome at the time of tumour recurrence. Within the radiotherapy target, median differences of imaging parameters in recurring and non-recurring voxels were calculated for contrast-enhancing lesion (CEL), non-enhancing lesion (NEL), and normal appearing grey and white matter. Logistic regression models were created to predict the patient-specific probability of recurrence. The most important parameters were identified using standardized model coefficients. RESULTS Significant median differences between recurring and non-recurring voxels were observed for FDG, FET, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, mean transit time, extra-vascular, extra-cellular blood volume and permeability derived from scans prior to chemo-radiotherapy. Tissue-specific patterns of voxel-wise correlations were observed. The most pronounced correlations were observed for 18F-FDG- and 18F-FET-uptake in CEL and NEL. Voxel-wise modelling of recurrence probability resulted in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 from scans prior to therapy. Overall, FET proved to be the most important parameter for recurrence prediction. CONCLUSION Multi-parametric imaging before radiotherapy is feasible and significant differences in imaging parameters between recurring and non-recurring voxels were observed. Combining parameters in a logistic regression model enabled patient-specific maps of recurrence probability, where 18F-FET proved to be most important. This strategy could enable risk-adapted radiotherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Lundemann
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Department of Oncology, Section for Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. .,Niels Bohr Institute, Department of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Per Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Niels Bohr Institute, Department of Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Scania, Sweden
| | - Aida Muhic
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vibeke A Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hans S Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Svend-Aage Engelholm
- Department of Oncology, Section for Radiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming L Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Kjær
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik B W Larsson
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Adam E Hansen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Buder-Bakhaya K, Hassel JC. Biomarkers for Clinical Benefit of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment-A Review From the Melanoma Perspective and Beyond. Front Immunol 2018; 9:1474. [PMID: 30002656 PMCID: PMC6031714 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) with anti-CTLA-4 and/or anti-PD-1 antibodies is standard treatment for metastatic melanoma. Anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab, nivolumab) and anti-PD-L1 antibodies (atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab) have been approved for treatment of several other advanced malignancies, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); renal cell, and urothelial carcinoma; head and neck cancer; gastric, hepatocellular, and Merkel-cell carcinoma; and classical Hodgkin lymphoma. In some of these malignancies approval was based on the detection of biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression or high microsatellite instability. Methods We review the current status of prognostic and predictive biomarkers used in ICI for melanoma and other malignancies. We include clinical, tissue, blood, and stool biomarkers, as well as imaging biomarkers. Results Several biomarkers have been studied in ICI for metastatic melanoma. In clinical practice, pre-treatment tumor burden measured by means of imaging and serum lactate dehydrogenase level is already being used to estimate the likelihood of effective ICI treatment. In peripheral blood, the number of different immune cell types, such as lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils, as well as different soluble factors, have been correlated with clinical outcome. For intra-tumoral biomarkers, expression of the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 has been found to be of some predictive value for anti-PD-1-directed therapy for NSCLC and melanoma. A high mutational load, particularly when accompanied by neoantigens, seems to facilitate immune response and correlates with patient survival for all entities treated by use of ICI. Tumor microenvironment also seems to be of major importance. Interestingly, even the gut microbiome has been found to correlate with response to ICI, most likely through immuno-stimulatory effects of distinct bacteria. New imaging biomarkers, e.g., for PET, and magnetic resonance imaging are also being investigated, and results suggest they will make early prediction of patient response possible. Conclusion Several promising results are available regarding possible biomarkers for response to ICI, which need to be validated in large clinical trials. A better understanding of how ICI works will enable the development of biomarkers that can predict the response of individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Buder-Bakhaya
- Section of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jessica C Hassel
- Section of Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Verger A, Arbizu J, Law I. Role of amino-acid PET in high-grade gliomas: limitations and perspectives. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:254-266. [PMID: 29696948 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03092-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) using radiolabeled amino-acids was recently recommended by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group as an additional tool in the diagnostic assessment of brain tumors. The aim of this review is to summarize available literature data on the role of amino-acid PET imaging in high-grade gliomas (HGGs), with regard to diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up of these tumors. Indeed, amino-acid PET applications are multiple throughout the evolution of HGGs. However, certain limitations such as lack of specificity, uncertain value for grading and prognostication or the limited data for treatment monitoring should to be taken into account, the latter of which are further developed in this review. Notwithstanding these limitations, amino-acid PET is becoming increasingly accessible in many nuclear medicine centers. Larger prospective cohort prospective studies are thus needed in order to increase the clinical value of this modality and enable its extended use to the largest number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy, Lorraine University, Nancy, France - .,IADI, INSERM, Lorraine University, Nancy, France -
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Poetsch N, Woehrer A, Gesperger J, Furtner J, Haug AR, Wilhelm D, Widhalm G, Karanikas G, Weber M, Rausch I, Mitterhauser M, Wadsak W, Hacker M, Preusser M, Traub-Weidinger T. Visual and semiquantitative 11C-methionine PET: an independent prognostic factor for survival of newly diagnosed and treatment-naïve gliomas. Neuro Oncol 2018; 20:411-419. [PMID: 29016947 PMCID: PMC5817953 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Few data exist regarding the prognostic value of L-[S-methyl-11C]methionine (MET) PET for treatment-naïve gliomas. Methods A total of 160 glioma patients (89 men, 71 women; mean age: 45, range 18-84 y) underwent a MET PET prior to any therapy. The PET scans were evaluated visually and semiquantitatively by tumor-to-background (T/N) ratio thresholds chosen by analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Additionally, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-R132H (IDH1-R132H) immunohistochemistry was performed. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Significantly shorter mean survival times (7.2 vs 8.6 y; P = 0.024) were seen in patients with amino acid avid gliomas (n = 137) compared with visually negative tumors (n = 33) in MET PET. T/N ratio thresholds of 2.1 and 3.5 were significantly associated with survival (10.3 vs 7 vs 4.3 y; P < 0.001). Mean survival differed significantly using the median T/N ratio of 2.4 as cutoff, independent of histopathology (P < 0.01; mean survival: 10.2 ± 0.8 y vs 5.5 ± 0.6 y). In the subgroup of 142 glioma patients characterized by IDH1-R132H status, METT/N ratio demonstrated a significant prognostic impact in IDH1-R132H wildtype astrocytomas and glioblastoma (P = 0.001). Additionally, multivariate testing revealed semiquantitative MET PET as an independent prognostic parameter for treatment-naïve glioma patients without (P = 0.031) and with IDH1-R132H characterization of gliomas (P = 0.024; odds ratio 1.57). Conclusion This retrospective analysis demonstrates the value of MET PET as a prognostic parameter on survival in treatment-naïve glioma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Poetsch
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Adelheid Woehrer
- Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johanna Gesperger
- Institute of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julia Furtner
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexander R Haug
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dorothee Wilhelm
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg Widhalm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georgios Karanikas
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Weber
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivo Rausch
- Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Mitterhauser
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Applied Diagnostics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wadsak
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ladefoged CN, Andersen FL, Kjær A, Højgaard L, Law I. RESOLUTE PET/MRI Attenuation Correction for O-(2- 18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) in Brain Tumor Patients with Metal Implants. Front Neurosci 2017; 11:453. [PMID: 28848379 PMCID: PMC5554515 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is a useful tool for assisting in correct differentiation of tumor progression from reactive changes, and the radiolabeled amino acid analog tracer O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-PET is amongst the most frequently used. The FET-PET images need to be quantitatively correct in order to be used clinically, which require accurate attenuation correction (AC) in PET/MRI. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the subject-specific MR-derived AC method RESOLUTE in post-operative brain tumor patients. Methods: We analyzed 51 post-operative brain tumor patients (68 examinations, 200 MBq [18F]-FET) investigated in a PET/MRI scanner. MR-AC maps were acquired using: (1) the Dixon water fat separation sequence, (2) the ultra short echo time (UTE) sequences, (3) calculated using our new RESOLUTE methodology, and (4) a same day low-dose CT used as reference “gold standard.” For each subject and each AC method the tumor was delineated by isocontouring tracer uptake above a tumor(T)-to-brain background (B) activity ratio of 1.6. We measured B, tumor mean and maximal activity (TMEAN, TMAX), biological tumor volume (BTV), and calculated the clinical metrics TMEAN/B and TMAX/B. Results: When using RESOLUTE 5/68 studies did not meet our predefined acceptance criteria of TMAX/B difference to CT-AC < ±0.1 or 5%, TMEAN/B < ±0.05 or 5%, and BTV < ±2 mL or 10%. In total, 46/68 studies failed our acceptance criteria using Dixon, and 26/68 using UTE. The 95% limits of agreement for TMAX/B was for RESOLUTE (−3%; 4%), Dixon (−9%; 16%), and UTE (−7%; 10%). The absolute error when measuring BTV was 0.7 ± 1.9 mL (N.S) with RESOLUTE, 5.3 ± 10 mL using Dixon, and 1.7 ± 3.7 mL using UTE. RESOLUTE performed best in the identification of the location of peak activity and in brain tumor follow-up monitoring using clinical FET PET metrics. Conclusions: Overall, we found RESOLUTE to be the AC method that most robustly reproduced the CT-AC clinical metrics per se, during follow-up, and when interpreted into defined clinical use cut-off criteria and into the patient history. RESOLUTE is especially suitable for brain tumor patients, as these often present with distorted anatomy where other methods based on atlas/template information might fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claes N Ladefoged
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Flemming L Andersen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Kjær
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Liselotte Højgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of CopenhagenCopenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Galldiks N, Law I, Pope WB, Arbizu J, Langen KJ. The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy. Neuroimage Clin 2016; 13:386-394. [PMID: 28116231 PMCID: PMC5226808 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Routine diagnostics and treatment monitoring of brain tumors is usually based on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the capacity of conventional MRI to differentiate tumor tissue from posttherapeutic effects following neurosurgical resection, chemoradiation, alkylating chemotherapy, radiosurgery, and/or immunotherapy may be limited. Metabolic imaging using PET can provide relevant additional information on tumor metabolism, which allows for more accurate diagnostics especially in clinically equivocal situations. This review article focuses predominantly on the amino acid PET tracers 11C-methyl-l-methionine (MET), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]-fluoro-l-phenylalanine (FDOPA) and summarizes investigations regarding monitoring of brain tumor therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Dept. of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Dept.of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- Dept. of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Javier Arbizu
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|