1
|
Tipirneni-Sajja A, Shrestha U, Esparza J, Morin CE, Kannengiesser S, Roberts NT, Peeters JM, Sharma SD, Hu HH. State-of-the-Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI-Vendor Implementation and Available Tools. J Magn Reson Imaging 2025; 61:1110-1132. [PMID: 39133767 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/06/2025] Open
Abstract
The role of MRI to estimate liver iron concentration (LIC) for identifying patients with iron overload and guiding the titration of chelation therapy is increasingly established for routine clinical practice. However, the existence of multiple MRI-based LIC quantification techniques limits standardization and widespread clinical adoption. In this article, we review the existing and widely accepted MRI-based LIC estimation methods at 1.5 T and 3 T: signal intensity ratio (SIR) and relaxometry (R2 and R2*) and discuss the basic principles, acquisition and analysis protocols, and MRI-LIC calibrations for each technique. Further, we provide an up-to-date information on MRI vendor implementations and available offline commercial and free software for each MRI-based LIC quantification approach. We also briefly review the emerging and advanced MRI techniques for LIC estimation and their current limitations for clinical use. Lastly, we discuss the implications of MRI-based LIC measurements on clinical use and decision-making in the management of patients with iron overload. Some of the key highlights from this review are as follows: 1) Both R2 and R2* can estimate accurate and reproducible LIC, when validated acquisition parameters and analysis protocols are applied, 2) Although the Ferriscan R2 method has been widely used, recent consensus and guidelines endorse R2*-MRI as the most accurate and reproducible method for LIC estimation, 3) Ongoing efforts aim to establish R2*-MRI as the standard approach for quantifying LIC, and 4) Emerging R2*-MRI techniques employ radial sampling strategies and offer improved motion compensation and broader dynamic range for LIC estimation. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Utsav Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Juan Esparza
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cara E Morin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Nathan T Roberts
- MR Clinical Solutions & Research Collaborations, GE HealthCare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Samir D Sharma
- Canon Medical Research USA, Inc., Mayfield Village, Ohio, USA
| | - Houchun H Hu
- Radiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiang SY, Wang YW, Su PY, Chang YY, Yen HH, Chang RF. PBCS-ConvNeXt: Convolutional Network-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver in Abdominal Ultrasound Images. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2025:10.1007/s10278-025-01394-w. [PMID: 39841370 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-025-01394-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 11/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly prevalent chronic liver condition characterized by excessive hepatic fat accumulation. Early diagnosis is crucial as NAFLD can progress to more severe conditions like steatohepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma without timely intervention. While liver biopsy remains the gold standard for NAFLD assessment, abdominal ultrasound (US) imaging has emerged as a widely adopted non-invasive modality due to convenience and low cost. However, the subjective interpretation of US images is challenging and unpredictable. This study proposes a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) model, termed potent boosts channel-aware separable intent - ConvNeXt (PBCS-ConvNeXt), for automated NAFLD classification using B-mode US images. The model architecture comprises three key components: The potent stem cell, an advanced trainable preprocessing module for robust feature extraction; Enhanced ConvNeXt Blocks that amplify channel-wise features to refine processing; and the boosting block that integrates multi-stage features for effective information extraction from US data. Utilizing fatty liver gradings from attenuation imaging (ATI) as the ground truth, the PBCS-ConvNeXt model was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation, achieving an accuracy of 82%, sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 83% for identifying fatty liver on abdominal US. The proposed CAD system demonstrates high diagnostic performance in NAFLD classification from US images, enabling early detection and informing timely clinical management to prevent disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shang-Yu Chiang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - You-Wei Wang
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Yuan Su
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Yen Chang
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsu-Heng Yen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
- Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan.
| | - Ruey-Feng Chang
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Graduate Institute of Network and Multimedia, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cao S, Zhang J, Dong C, Que Y, Gao X, Guo R. Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2* method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2025:10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x. [PMID: 39751630 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression. RESULTS Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10-2 R2* (s-1) (R2 = 0.79). CONCLUSION The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. KEY POINTS Question The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown. Findings In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE) ≤ 1.0 ms and a TE spacing ≤ 1.4 ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5 T achieved good reproducibility. Clinical relevance The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenyu Dong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yutao Que
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruomi Guo
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shrestha U, Brasher S, Abramson Z, Morin CE, Tipirneni-Sajja A. Impact of particle size on R 2 * and fat fraction estimation for accurate assessment of hepatic iron overload and steatosis using MRI. Magn Reson Med 2025. [PMID: 39748534 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.30419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 12/17/2024] [Accepted: 12/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the impact of iron particle size onR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ and fat fraction (FF) estimations for coexisting hepatic iron overload and steatosis condition using Monte Carlo simulations and phantoms. METHODS Three iron particle sizes (0.38, 0.52, and 0.71 μm) were studied using simulations and phantoms. Virtual liver models mimicking in vivo spatial distribution of fat droplets and iron deposits were created, and MRI signals were synthesized using Monte Carlo simulations for FF 1%-30% and liver iron concentration (LIC) 1-20 mg/g. Seventy-five fat-iron phantoms with varying iron (0-8 μg/mL) and fat (0%-40%) concentrations and particle sizes were constructed. Three-way analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of iron particle size onR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ and FF estimations. RESULTS In simulations, estimated and true FF were in excellent agreement (slope: 0.93-1.09) for liver iron concentration ≤ 13 mg/g. For both simulations and phantoms, FF estimation bias increased as iron concentration increased and particle size decreased, with 0.71μm iron particle having the lowest bias (≤ 20%), and 0.52 μm and 0.38 μm iron particles producing higher bias (≥ 20%) for higher iron concentrations and lower FFs. Additionally,R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ increased linearly with increasing iron concentration (r ≥ 0.87) and decreasing particle size. Iron particle size significantly influenced the estimated versus true FF (simulations: p = 0.04; phantoms: p = 0.03) andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ -iron concentration (simulations: p < 0.001; phantoms: p < 0.01) relationships. Heatmap demonstrated broader region with higher FF estimation bias as iron particle size decreased, especially at higher iron concentration. CONCLUSION R 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ and FF estimations are affected by iron particle size, with smaller particles leading to higherR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ values and increased FF estimation bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Utsav Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sarah Brasher
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Zachary Abramson
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Cara E Morin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital; Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering & Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kemp JM, Ghosh A, Dillman JR, Krishnasarma R, Manhard MK, Tipirneni-Sajja A, Shrestha U, Trout AT, Morin CE. Practical approach to quantitative liver and pancreas MRI in children. Pediatr Radiol 2025; 55:36-57. [PMID: 39760887 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-06133-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2024] [Revised: 11/29/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025]
Abstract
Quantitative abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers non-invasive, objective assessment of diseases in the liver, pancreas, and other organs and is increasingly being used in the pediatric population. Certain quantitative MRI techniques, such as liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF), R2* mapping, and MR elastography, are already in wide clinical use. Other techniques, such as liver T1 mapping and pancreas quantitative imaging methods, are emerging and show promise for enhancing diagnostic sensitivity and treatment monitoring. Quantitative imaging techniques have historically required a breath-hold, making them more difficult to implement in the pediatric population. However, technological advances, including free-breathing techniques and compressed sensing imaging, are making these techniques easier to implement. The purpose of this article is to review current liver and pancreas quantitative techniques and to provide a practical guide for implementing these techniques in pediatric practice. Future directions of liver and pancreas quantitative imaging will be briefly discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine M Kemp
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3188 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| | - Adarsh Ghosh
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3188 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Rekha Krishnasarma
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2200 Children's Way, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| | - Mary Kate Manhard
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3188 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Utsav Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Andrew T Trout
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3188 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Cara E Morin
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 3188 Bellevue Avenue, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhou X, Jia X, Chen Y, Song B. Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Liver Iron Overload: From Precise Quantification to Prognosis Assessment. Biomedicines 2024; 12:2456. [PMID: 39595022 PMCID: PMC11592092 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver iron overload is associated with conditions such as hereditary hemochromatosis, thalassemia major, and chronic liver diseases. The liver-related outcomes, patient outcomes, and treatment recommendations of these patients differ depending on the cause and extent of iron overload. Accurate quantification of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is critical for effective patient management. This review focuses on the application of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the precise quantification and prognostic assessment of liver iron overload. In recent years, the use of dual-energy CT and the emergence of MRI-based sequences (such as UTE, QSM, Dixon, and CSE technologies) have significantly increased the potential for noninvasive liver iron quantification. However, the establishment of internationally standardized imaging parameters, postprocessing procedures, and reporting protocols is urgently needed for better management of patients with liver iron overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinrui Zhou
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (X.Z.); (X.J.)
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xinyuan Jia
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (X.Z.); (X.J.)
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yidi Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (X.Z.); (X.J.)
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; (X.Z.); (X.J.)
- Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
- Department of Radiology, Sanya People’s Hospital, Sanya 572000, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kale SR, Karande G, Gudur A, Garud A, Patil MS, Patil S. Recent Trends in Liver Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Techniques. Cureus 2024; 16:e72239. [PMID: 39583507 PMCID: PMC11584332 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver cancer, particularly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), poses a significant global health challenge due to its high mortality rate. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are the two main types of primary liver cancer (PLC), each with its own set of complexities. Secondary or metastatic liver cancer is more common than PLC. It is frequently observed in malignancies such as colorectal, pancreatic, melanoma, lung, and breast cancer. Liver cancer is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, making it difficult to treat. This highlights the need for focused research on early detection and effective treatment strategies. This review explores the epidemiology, risk factors, and diagnostic techniques for HCC. The development of HCC involves various risk factors, including chronic liver diseases, hepatitis B and C infections, alcohol consumption, obesity, smoking, and genetic predispositions. Various invasive and non-invasive diagnostic techniques, such as biopsy, liquid biopsy, and imaging modalities like ultrasonography, computed tomography scans (CT scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, are utilized for HCC detection and monitoring. Advances in imaging technology and biomarker research have led to more accurate and sensitive methods for early HCC detection. We also reviewed advanced research on emerging techniques, including next-generation sequencing, metabolomics, epigenetic biomarkers, and microbiome analysis, which show great potential for advancing early diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. This literature review provides insights into the current state of liver cancer diagnosis and promising future advancements. Ongoing research and innovation in these areas are essential for improving early diagnosis and reducing the global burden of liver cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivani R Kale
- Molecular Biology and Genetics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| | - Geeta Karande
- Microbiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| | - Anand Gudur
- Oncology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| | - Aishwarya Garud
- Molecular Biology and Genetics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| | - Monika S Patil
- Molecular Biology and Genetics, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| | - Satish Patil
- Microbiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Krishna Vishwa Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Karad, IND
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Parente DB, de Melo Malta FCM, de Souza Cravo R, Luiz RR, Rotman V, Perez RM, Rodrigues RS. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and spleen in Gaucher disease. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3069-3077. [PMID: 38642092 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04293-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess liver and spleen characteristics of a population with Gaucher disease (GD) using multiparametric MRI and MR elastography (MRE) for evaluation of diffuse liver and spleen disease, which includes liver fat fraction, liver and spleen volume and iron deposition, and liver and spleen stiffness correlated with DS3 Severity Scoring System for Gaucher disease (GD-DS3). METHODS We prospectively evaluated 41 patients with type 1 Gaucher disease using a 3.0 T MRI and MRE between January 2019 and February 2020. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data was collected. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman's correlation were applied to evaluate liver and spleen MRI and MRE, clinical and laboratory variables, and GD-DS3. ERT and SRT treatment groups were compared. RESULTS Hepatomegaly was seen in 15% and splenomegaly in 42% of the population. Moderate and strong and correlations were found between liver and spleen iron overload (rho = 0.537; p = 0.002); between liver and spleen volume (rho = 0.692, p < 0.001) and between liver and spleen stiffness (rho = 0.453, p = 0.006). Moderate correlations were found between liver stiffness and GD-DS3 (rho = 0.559; p < 0.001) and between splenic volume and GD-DS3 (rho = 0.524; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION The prevalence of hepatosplenomegaly, liver fibrosis, and liver iron overload in treated patients with GD is low, which may be related to the beneficial effect of treatment. Liver MRE and splenic volume correlate with severity score and may be biomarkers of disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniella Braz Parente
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30, 3º Andar. Botafogo., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22281-100, Brazil.
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Av. Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255. Ilha Do Fundão., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21941-913, Brazil.
| | | | - Renata de Souza Cravo
- Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcanti State Institute of Hematology: Hospital Hemorio, R. Frei Caneca, 8. Centro., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20211-030, Brazil
| | - Ronir Raggio Luiz
- Instituto de Estudos Em Saúde Coletiva, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Ilha Do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-592, Brazil
| | - Vivian Rotman
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Av. Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255. Ilha Do Fundão., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21941-913, Brazil
| | - Renata Mello Perez
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30, 3º Andar. Botafogo., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22281-100, Brazil
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Av. Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255. Ilha Do Fundão., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21941-913, Brazil
| | - Rosana Souza Rodrigues
- D'Or Institute for Research and Education, Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30, 3º Andar. Botafogo., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 22281-100, Brazil
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, Av. Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255. Ilha Do Fundão., Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 21941-913, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao F, Chen Y, Zhou T, Tang C, Huang J, Zhang H, Kannengiesser S, Long L. Application of the magnetic resonance 3D multiecho Dixon sequence for quantifying hepatic iron overload and steatosis in patients with thalassemia. Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 111:28-34. [PMID: 38492786 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the feasibility and diagnostic efficacy of a 3D multiecho Dixon (qDixon) research application for simultaneously quantifying the liver iron concentration (LIC) and steatosis in thalassemia patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study enrolled participants with thalassemia who underwent 3 T MRI of the liver for the evaluation of hepatic iron overload. The imaging protocol including qDixon and conventional T2* mapping based on 2D multiecho gradient echo (ME GRE) sequences respectively. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in the liver on the qDixon maps to obtain R2* and proton density fat fraction (PDFF). The reference R2* value was measured and calculated on conventional T2* mapping using the CMRtools software. Correlation analysis, Linear regression analysis, and Bland-Altman analysis were performed. RESULTS 84 patients were finally included in this study. The median R2*-ME-GRE was 366.97 (1/s), range [206.68 (1/s), 522.20 (1/s)]. 8 patients had normal hepatic iron deposition, 16 had Insignificant, 42 had mild, 18 had moderate. The median of R2*-qDixon was 376.88 (1/s) [219.33 (1/s), 491.75 (1/s)]. A strong correlation was found between the liver R2*-qDixon and the R2*-ME-GRE (r = 0.959, P < 0.001). The median value of PDFF was 1.76% (1.10%, 2.95%). 8 patients had mild fatty liver, and 1 had severe fatty liver. CONCLUSION MR qDixon research sequence can rapidly and accurately quantify liver iron overload, that highly consistent with the measured via conventional GRE sequence, and it can also simultaneously detect hepatic steatosis, this has great potential for clinical evaluation of thalassemia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanyu Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Minzu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, China
| | - Yidi Chen
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China
| | - Ting Zhou
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, China
| | - Cheng Tang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, China
| | - Jiang Huang
- Department of Radiology, Minzu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, China
| | - Huiting Zhang
- MR Research Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd., Wuhan, China.
| | | | - Liling Long
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, 530001, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fragkou N, Vlachaki E, Goulis I, Sinakos E. Liver disease in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia: The emerging role of metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Hepatol 2024; 16:671-677. [PMID: 38818299 PMCID: PMC11135276 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i5.671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
In this Editorial, we highlight the possible role that metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) may play in the future, regarding liver disease in patients with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDBT). MASLD is characterized by excessive accumulation of fat in the liver (hepatic steatosis), in the presence of cardiometabolic factors. There is a strong correlation between the occurrence of MASLD and insulin resistance, while its increased prevalence parallels the global epidemic of diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity. Patients with TDBT need regular transfusions for life to ensure their survival. Through these transfusions, a large amount of iron is accumulated, which causes saturation of transferrin and leads to the circulation of free iron molecules, which cause damage to vital organs (primarily the liver and myocardium). Over the past, the main mechanisms for the development of liver disease in these patients have been the toxic effect of iron on the liver and chronic hepatitis C, for which modern and effective treatments have been found, resulting in successful treatment. Additional advances in the treatment and monitoring of these patients have led to a reduction in deaths, and an increase in their life expectancy. This increased survival makes them vulnerable to the onset of diseases, which until recently were mainly related to the non-thalassemic general population, such as obesity and DM. There is insufficient data in the literature regarding the prevalence of MASLD in this population or on the risk factors for its occurrence. However, it was recently shown by a study of 45 heavily transfused patients with beta-thalassemia (Padeniya et al, BJH), that the presence of steatosis is a factor influencing the value of liver elastography and thus liver fibrosis. These findings suggest that future research in the field of liver disease in patients with TDBT should be focused on the occurrence, the risk factors, and the effect of MASLD on these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikolaos Fragkou
- 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokratio Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Efthimia Vlachaki
- 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokratio Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Ioannis Goulis
- 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokratio Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Emmanouil Sinakos
- 4 Department of Internal Medicine, Hippokratio Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Björnsdottir S, Ulfsdottir H, Gudmundsson EF, Sveinsdottir K, Isberg AP, Dobies B, Akerlie Magnusdottir GE, Gunnarsdottir T, Karlsdottir T, Bjornsdottir G, Sigurdsson S, Oddsson S, Gudnason V. User Engagement, Acceptability, and Clinical Markers in a Digital Health Program for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective, Single-Arm Feasibility Study. JMIR Cardio 2024; 8:e52576. [PMID: 38152892 PMCID: PMC10905363 DOI: 10.2196/52576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease in the world. Common comorbidities are central obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among people with NAFLD, and lifestyle changes can improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore the acceptability of a digital health program in terms of engagement, retention, and user satisfaction in addition to exploring changes in clinical outcomes, such as weight, cardiometabolic risk factors, and health-related quality of life. METHODS We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-arm, 12-week study including 38 individuals with either a BMI >30, metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLD screened by FibroScan. An NAFLD-specific digital health program focused on disease education, lowering carbohydrates in the diet, food logging, increasing activity level, reducing stress, and healthy lifestyle coaching was offered to participants. The coach provided weekly feedback on food logs and other in-app activities and opportunities for participants to ask questions. The coaching was active throughout the 12-week intervention period. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptability of the 12-week program, assessed through patient engagement, retention, and satisfaction with the program. Secondary outcomes included changes in weight, liver fat, body composition, and other cardiometabolic clinical parameters at baseline and 12 weeks. RESULTS In total, 38 individuals were included in the study (median age 59.5, IQR 46.3-68.8 years; n=23, 61% female). Overall, 34 (89%) participants completed the program and 29 (76%) were active during the 12-week program period. The median satisfaction score was 6.3 (IQR 5.8-6.7) of 7. Mean weight loss was 3.5 (SD 3.7) kg (P<.001) or 3.2% (SD 3.4%), with a 2.2 (SD 2.7) kg reduction in fat mass (P<.001). Relative liver fat reduction was 19.4% (SD 23.9%). Systolic blood pressure was reduced by 6.0 (SD 13.5) mmHg (P=.009). The median reduction was 0.14 (IQR 0-0.47) mmol/L for triglyceride levels (P=.003), 3.2 (IQR 0.0-5.4) µU/ml for serum insulin (s-insulin) levels (P=.003), and 0.5 (IQR -0.7 to 3.8) mmol/mol for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (P=.03). Participants who were highly engaged (ie, who used the app at least 5 days per week) had greater weight loss and liver fat reduction. CONCLUSIONS The 12-week-long digital health program was feasible for individuals with NAFLD, receiving high user engagement, retention, and satisfaction. Improved liver-specific and cardiometabolic health was observed, and more engaged participants showed greater improvements. This digital health program could provide a new tool to improve health outcomes in people with NAFLD. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05426382; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05426382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigridur Björnsdottir
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gudlaug Bjornsdottir
- Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Sigurdur Sigurdsson
- Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Vilmundur Gudnason
- Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tipirneni-Sajja A, Brasher S, Shrestha U, Johnson H, Morin C, Satapathy SK. Quantitative MRI of diffuse liver diseases: techniques and tissue-mimicking phantoms. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:529-551. [PMID: 36515810 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01053-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are emerging as non-invasive alternatives to biopsy for assessment of diffuse liver diseases of iron overload, steatosis and fibrosis. For testing and validating the accuracy of these techniques, phantoms are often used as stand-ins to human tissue to mimic diffuse liver pathologies. However, currently, there is no standardization in the preparation of MRI-based liver phantoms for mimicking iron overload, steatosis, fibrosis or a combination of these pathologies as various sizes and types of materials are used to mimic the same liver disease. Liver phantoms that mimic specific MR features of diffuse liver diseases observed in vivo are important for testing and calibrating new MRI techniques and for evaluating signal models to accurately quantify these features. In this study, we review the liver morphology associated with these diffuse diseases, discuss the quantitative MR techniques for assessing these liver pathologies, and comprehensively examine published liver phantom studies and discuss their benefits and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Sarah Brasher
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Utsav Shrestha
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Hayden Johnson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Cara Morin
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
- Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Sanjaya K Satapathy
- Northwell Health Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation, Northshore University Hospital/Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bawden SJ, Hoad C, Kaye P, Stephenson M, Dolman G, James MW, Wilkes E, Austin A, Guha IN, Francis S, Gowland P, Aithal GP. Comparing magnetic resonance liver fat fraction measurements with histology in fibrosis: the difference between proton density fat fraction and tissue mass fat fraction. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2023; 36:553-563. [PMID: 36538248 PMCID: PMC10468948 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) provides a powerful method of measuring fat fraction. However, previous studies have shown that MRS results give lower values compared with visual estimates from biopsies in fibrotic livers. This study investigated these discrepancies and considered whether a tissue water content correction, as assessed by MRI relaxometry, could provide better agreement. MATERIALS AND METHODS 110 patients were scanned in a 1.5 T Philips scanner and biopsies were obtained. Multiple echo MRS (30 × 30 × 30 mm volume) was used to determine Proton Density Fat Fraction (PDFF). Biopsies were assessed by visual assessment for fibrosis and steatosis grading. Digital image analysis (DIA) was also used to quantify fat fraction within tissue samples. T1 relaxation times were then used to estimate tissue water content to correct PDFF for confounding factors. RESULTS PDFF values across the four visually assessed steatosis grades were significantly less in the higher fibrosis group (F3-F4) compared to the lower fibrosis group (F0-F2). The slope of the linear regression of PDFF vs DIA fat fraction was ~ 1 in the low fibrosis group and 0.77 in the high fibrosis group. Correcting for water content based on T1 increased the gradient but it did not reach unity. DISCUSSION In fibrotic livers, PDFF underestimated fat fraction compared to DIA methods. Values were improved by applying a water content correction, but fat fractions were still underestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen James Bawden
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, SPMIC, University Park, Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - Caroline Hoad
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Philip Kaye
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mary Stephenson
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre (CIRC), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore
| | - Grace Dolman
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Martin W James
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Emilie Wilkes
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | | | - Indra Neil Guha
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| | - Susan Francis
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, SPMIC, University Park, Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Penny Gowland
- Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, SPMIC, University Park, Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Guruprasad P Aithal
- Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre at the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reeder SB, Yokoo T, França M, Hernando D, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Alústiza JM, Gandon Y, Henninger B, Hillenbrand C, Jhaveri K, Karçaaltıncaba M, Kühn JP, Mojtahed A, Serai SD, Ward R, Wood JC, Yamamura J, Martí-Bonmatí L. Quantification of Liver Iron Overload with MRI: Review and Guidelines from the ESGAR and SAR. Radiology 2023; 307:e221856. [PMID: 36809220 PMCID: PMC10068892 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Accumulation of excess iron in the body, or systemic iron overload, results from a variety of causes. The concentration of iron in the liver is linearly related to the total body iron stores and, for this reason, quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) is widely regarded as the best surrogate to assess total body iron. Historically assessed using biopsy, there is a clear need for noninvasive quantitative imaging biomarkers of LIC. MRI is highly sensitive to the presence of tissue iron and has been increasingly adopted as a noninvasive alternative to biopsy for detection, severity grading, and treatment monitoring in patients with known or suspected iron overload. Multiple MRI strategies have been developed in the past 2 decades, based on both gradient-echo and spin-echo imaging, including signal intensity ratio and relaxometry strategies. However, there is a general lack of consensus regarding the appropriate use of these methods. The overall goal of this article is to summarize the current state of the art in the clinical use of MRI to quantify liver iron content and to assess the overall level of evidence of these various methods. Based on this summary, expert consensus panel recommendations on best practices for MRI-based quantification of liver iron are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B. Reeder
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Manuela França
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - José María Alústiza
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Yves Gandon
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Claudia Hillenbrand
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Kartik Jhaveri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Musturay Karçaaltıncaba
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Suraj D. Serai
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Richard Ward
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - John C. Wood
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jin Yamamura
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fellner C, Nickel MD, Kannengiesser S, Verloh N, Stroszczynski C, Haimerl M, Luerken L. Water-Fat Separated T1 Mapping in the Liver and Correlation to Hepatic Fat Fraction. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13020201. [PMID: 36673011 PMCID: PMC9858222 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13020201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: T1 mapping in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver has been proposed to estimate liver function or to detect the stage of liver disease, among others. Thus far, the impact of intrahepatic fat on T1 quantification has only been sparsely discussed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of water-fat separated T1 mapping of the liver. (2) Methods: A total of 386 patients underwent MRI of the liver at 3 T. In addition to routine imaging techniques, a 3D variable flip angle (VFA) gradient echo technique combined with a two-point Dixon method was acquired to calculate T1 maps from an in-phase (T1_in) and water-only (T1_W) signal. The results were correlated with proton density fat fraction using multi-echo 3D gradient echo imaging (PDFF) and multi-echo single voxel spectroscopy (PDFF_MRS). Using T1_in and T1_W, a novel parameter FF_T1 was defined and compared with PDFF and PDFF_MRS. Furthermore, the value of retrospectively calculated T1_W (T1_W_calc) based on T1_in and PDFF was assessed. Wilcoxon test, Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis were applied as statistical tools. (3) Results: T1_in was significantly shorter than T1_W and the difference of both T1 values was correlated with PDFF (R = 0.890). FF_T1 was significantly correlated with PDFF (R = 0.930) and PDFF_MRS (R = 0.922) and yielded only minor bias compared to both established PDFF methods (0.78 and 0.21). T1_W and T1_W_calc were also significantly correlated (R = 0.986). (4) Conclusion: T1_W acquired with a water-fat separated VFA technique allows to minimize the influence of fat on liver T1. Alternatively, T1_W can be estimated retrospectively from T1_in and PDFF, if a Dixon technique is not available for T1 mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Fellner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Niklas Verloh
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Haimerl
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (M.H.); (L.L.); Tel.: +49-941-944-7401 (M.H.)
| | - Lukas Luerken
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Correspondence: (M.H.); (L.L.); Tel.: +49-941-944-7401 (M.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jin M, Jiang Y, Zhao Q, Pan Z, Xiao F. Diagnostic value of T2 relaxation time for hepatic iron grading in rat model of fatty and fibrotic liver. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0278574. [PMID: 36469532 PMCID: PMC9721484 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the quantitative diagnostic value of T2 relaxation time for determining liver iron grades in the presence of fat and fibrosis. Sixty Sprague-Dawley (SD) male rats were randomly divided into control (10 rats) and model (50 rats) groups. The model group of coexisting iron, steatosis, and liver fibrosis was induced by intraperitoneal injection of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) dissolved in edible vegetable oil (40% v/v). The control group received an intraperitoneal injection of 0.9% saline. All rats underwent multi-echo gradient and spin echo (M-GRASE) magnetic resonance imaging, and the T2 relaxation time of the liver was measured. The rats were killed immediately after imaging, and liver specimens were extracted for histological evaluation of steatosis, iron, and fibrosis. The relationship and differences between T2 relaxation time and liver fibrosis stage, as well as the pathological grade of hepatic steatosis, were assessed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, non-parametric Mann-Whitney test, and the Kruskal-Wallis test. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and interaction analysis were used to quantify the diagnostic performance of T2 relaxation time for detecting different degrees of liver iron grades. Six normal control rats and 34 model rats were included in this study. Fibrosis stages were F0 (n = 6), F1 (n = 6), F2 (n = 8), F3 (n = 10), and F4 (n = 10). Steatosis grades were S0 (n = 5), S1 (n = 8), S2 (n = 12), and S3 (n = 15). Hepatocyte or Kupffer cell iron grades were 0 (n = 7), 1 (n = 9), 2 (n = 12), 3 (n = 10), and 4 (n = 2). The liver fibrosis stages were positively correlated with the iron grades (P < 0.01), and the iron grades and fibrosis stages were negatively correlated with the T2 relaxation time (P < 0.01). The T2 relaxation times exhibited strongly significant differences among rats with different histologically determined iron grades (P < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons between each grade of liver iron indicated significant differences between all iron grades, except between grades 0 and 1, and between grades 1 and 2 (P > 0.05). The T2 relaxation time of the liver had an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.965 (95% CI 0.908-0.100, P < 0.001) for distinguishing rats with a pathological grade of hepatic iron (grade ≥ 1) from those without, an AUC of 0.871 (95% CI 0.757-0.985, P < 0.001) for distinguishing rats with no iron overload (grade ≤ 1) from rats with moderate or severe iron overload (grade ≥ 2), and an AUC of 0.939 (95% CI 0.865-1.000, P < 0.001) for distinguishing rats with no to moderate iron overload (grade ≤ 2) from rats with severe iron overload (grade 3). The interaction of different pathological grades of iron, steatosis, and fibrosis has a negligible influence on the T2 relaxation time (P > 0.05). In conclusion, T2 relaxation time can assess histologically determined liver iron grades, regardless of coexisting liver steatosis or fibrosis; therefore, it is suitable for distinguishing between the presence and absence of iron deposition and it is more accurate for higher iron grading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingli Jin
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Cheng du, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yin Jiang
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Cheng du, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Zhao
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Cheng du, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhihua Pan
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Cheng du, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- * E-mail:
| | - Fang Xiao
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pecorelli A, Franceschi P, Braccischi L, Izzo F, Renzulli M, Golfieri R. MRI Appearance of Focal Lesions in Liver Iron Overload. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12040891. [PMID: 35453939 PMCID: PMC9029711 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12040891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver iron overload is defined as an accumulation of the chemical element Fe in the hepatic parenchyma that exceeds the normal storage. When iron accumulates, it can be toxic for the liver by producing inflammation and cell damage. This can potentially lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as to other liver lesions depending on the underlying condition associated to liver iron overload. The correct assessment of liver iron storage is pivotal to drive the best treatment and prevent complication. Nowadays, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the best non-invasive modality to detect and quantify liver iron overload. However, due to its superparamagnetic properties, iron provides a natural source of contrast enhancement that can make challenging the differential diagnosis between different focal liver lesions (FLLs). To date, a fully comprehensive description of MRI features of liver lesions commonly found in iron-overloaded liver is lacking in the literature. Through an extensive review of the published literature, we aim to summarize the MRI signal intensity and enhancement pattern of the most common FLLs that can occur in liver iron overload.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhao F, Chen Y, Zhang H, Li C, Long L. Multi-echo Dixon and breath-hold T2-corrected multi-echo single-voxel MRS for quantifying hepatic iron overload in rabbits. Acta Radiol 2021; 64:13-19. [PMID: 34904894 DOI: 10.1177/02841851211063007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three-dimensional (3D) multi-echo-Dixon (ME-Dixon) and breath-hold T2-corrected multi-echo single-voxel MR spectroscopy (HISTO) can simultaneously quantify liver fat and liver iron. However, their diagnostic efficacy and application scope for quantitative iron in co-existing fatty liver have not been adequately evaluated. PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of ME-Dixon and HISTO for quantitative analysis of hepatic iron in rabbits with iron deposition and fatty liver using liver-iron concentration (LIC) as a reference standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS ME-Dixon, HISTO, and conventional two-dimensional multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) sequences were performed on 42 rabbits. The following parameters were calculated: R2* from ME-Dixon and GRE; proton density fat fraction (PDFF) from the ME-Dixon, HISTO (normal TE range), and HISTO-H (extended TE range); and R2_water from HISTO and HISTO-H. The LIC and liver-fat concentration (LFC) were measured through chemical analysis, and their relationship with the MRI parameters were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency. RESULTS LIC was significantly correlated with R2_HISTO-H, R2*_Dixon, and R2*_GRE (r = 0.858, 0.910, 0.931, respectively; P < 0.001) and weakly with R2_HISTO (r = 0.424; P = 0.008). A strong correlation was also observed between the LFC and PDFF obtained from HISTO, HISTO-H, and ME-Dixon (r = 0.776, 0.811, 0.888, respectively; P < 0.001). ME-Dixon showed the best performance with moderate iron overload (AUC = 0.983). CONCLUSION 3D ME-Dixon is useful for quantifying the LIC, especially with co-existing fatty liver. Its diagnostic performance is also superior to that of the HISTO sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanyu Zhao
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China
| | - Yidi Chen
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China
| | - Huiting Zhang
- MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare Ltd, Wuhan, PR China
| | - Chenhui Li
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China
| | - Liling Long
- Radiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Martí-Aguado D, Jiménez-Pastor A, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Rodríguez-Ortega A, Alfaro-Cervello C, Mestre-Alagarda C, Bauza M, Gallén-Peris A, Valero-Pérez E, Ballester MP, Gimeno-Torres M, Pérez-Girbés A, Benlloch S, Pérez-Rojas J, Puglia V, Ferrández A, Aguilera V, Escudero-García D, Serra MA, Martí-Bonmatí L. Automated Whole-Liver MRI Segmentation to Assess Steatosis and Iron Quantification in Chronic Liver Disease. Radiology 2021; 302:345-354. [PMID: 34783592 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021211027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background Standardized manual region of interest (ROI) sampling strategies for hepatic MRI steatosis and iron quantification are time consuming, with variable results. Purpose To evaluate the performance of automatic MRI whole-liver segmentation (WLS) for proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and iron estimation (transverse relaxometry [R2*]) versus manual ROI, with liver biopsy as the reference standard. Materials and Methods This prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study recruited participants with chronic liver disease who underwent liver biopsy and chemical shift-encoded 3.0-T MRI between January 2017 and January 2021. Biopsy evaluation included histologic grading and digital pathology. MRI liver sampling strategies included manual ROI (two observers) and automatic whole-liver (deep learning algorithm) segmentation for PDFF- and R2*-derived measurements. Agreements between segmentation methods were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and biases were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the correlation between measurements and digital pathology. Results A total of 165 participants were included (mean age ± standard deviation, 55 years ± 12; 96 women; 101 of 165 participants [61%] with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease). Agreements between mean measurements were excellent, with ICCs of 0.98 for both PDFF and R2*. The median bias was 0.5% (interquartile range, -0.4% to 1.2%) for PDFF and 2.7 sec-1 (interquartile range, 0.2-5.3 sec-1) for R2* (P < .001 for both). Margins of error were lower for WLS than ROI-derived parameters (-0.03% for PDFF and -0.3 sec-1 for R2*). ROI and WLS showed similar performance for steatosis (ROI AUC, 0.96; WLS AUC, 0.97; P = .53) and iron overload (ROI AUC, 0.85; WLS AUC, 0.83; P = .09). Correlations with digital pathology were high (P < .001) between the fat ratio and PDFF (ROI r = 0.89; WLS r = 0.90) and moderate (P < .001) between the iron ratio and R2* (ROI r = 0.65; WLS r = 0.64). Conclusion Proton density fat fraction and transverse relaxometry measurements derived from MRI automatic whole-liver segmentation (WLS) were accurate for steatosis and iron grading in chronic liver disease and correlated with digital pathology. Automated WLS estimations were higher, with a lower margin of error than manual region of interest estimations. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Moura Cunha and Fowler in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Martí-Aguado
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ana Jiménez-Pastor
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Alejandro Rodríguez-Ortega
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Clara Alfaro-Cervello
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Claudia Mestre-Alagarda
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Mónica Bauza
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Ana Gallén-Peris
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Elena Valero-Pérez
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - María Pilar Ballester
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Marta Gimeno-Torres
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Alexandre Pérez-Girbés
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Salvador Benlloch
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Judith Pérez-Rojas
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Víctor Puglia
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Antonio Ferrández
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Victoria Aguilera
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Desamparados Escudero-García
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Miguel A Serra
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- From the Departments of Digestive Diseases (D.M.A., M.P.B., D.E.G.), Pathology (C.A.C., C.M.A., A.F.), and Gastroenterology and Hepatology (D.M.A.), Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Avenida Blasco Ibáñez 17, 46010 Valencia, Spain; Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI2), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (D.M.A., A.R.O., L.M.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL, Valencia, Spain (A.J.P., Á.A.B.); University of Valencia, Faculty of Medicine, Valencia, Spain (C.A.C., A.F., D.E.G., M.A.S.); Departments of Pathology (M.B., J.P.R.), Digestive Diseases (E.V.P., M.G.T.), and Radiology (A.P.G., L.M.B.) and the Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit (V.A.), La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Departments of Digestive Diseases (A.G.P., S.B.) and Pathology (V.P.), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain; CIBERehd (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (S.B., V.A.); and Río Hortega, Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain (D.M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Armstrong T, Zhong X, Shih SF, Felker E, Lu DS, Dale BM, Wu HH. Free-breathing 3D stack-of-radial MRI quantification of liver fat and R 2* in adults with fatty liver disease. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 85:141-152. [PMID: 34662702 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the agreement, intra-session repeatability, and inter-reader agreement of liver proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* quantification using free-breathing 3D stack-of-radial MRI, with and without self-gated motion compensation, compared to reference breath-hold techniques in subjects with fatty liver disease (FLD). METHODS In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, thirty-eight adults with FLD and/or iron overload (24 male, 58 ± 12 years) were imaged at 3T using free-breathing stack-of-radial MRI, breath-hold 3D Cartesian MRI, and breath-hold single-voxel MR spectroscopy (SVS). Each sequence was acquired twice in random order. To assess agreement compared to reference breath-hold techniques, the dependency of liver PDFF and/or R2* quantification on the sequence, radial sampling factor, and radial self-gating temporal resolution was assessed by calculating the Bayesian mean difference (MDB) of the posteriors. Intra-session repeatability and inter-reader agreement (two independent readers) were assessed by the coefficient of repeatability (CR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. RESULTS Thirty-five participants (21 male, 57 ± 12 years) were included for analysis. Both free-breathing radial MRI techniques (with and without self-gating) achieved ICC ≥ 0.92 for quantifying PDFF and R2*, and quantified PDFF with MDB < 1.2% compared to breath-hold techniques. Free-breathing radial MRI required self-gating to accurately quantify R2* (MDB < 10s-1 with self-gating; MDB < 50s-1 without self-gating). The radial sampling factor affected PDFF and R2* quantification while the radial self-gating temporal resolution only affected R2* quantification. Repeated self-gated free-breathing radial MRI scans achieved CR < 3% and CR < 27 s-1 for PDFF and R2*, respectively. CONCLUSION A free-breathing stack-of-radial MRI technique with self-gating demonstrated agreement, repeatability, and inter-reader agreement compared to reference breath-hold techniques for quantification of liver PDFF and R2* in adults with FLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess Armstrong
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Xiaodong Zhong
- MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Shu-Fu Shih
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Ely Felker
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - David S Lu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Brian M Dale
- MR R&D Collaborations, Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Cary, NC, United States
| | - Holden H Wu
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
França M. Editorial for "Limits of Fat Quantification With Chemical Shift Encoded". J Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 54:1175-1176. [PMID: 33876877 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela França
- Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,i3S-Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jimenez-Pastor A, Alberich-Bayarri A, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Marti-Aguado D, França M, Bachmann RSM, Mazzucco J, Marti-Bonmati L. Precise whole liver automatic segmentation and quantification of PDFF and R2* on MR images. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:7876-7887. [PMID: 33768292 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07838-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To automate the segmentation of whole liver parenchyma on multi-echo chemical shift encoded (MECSE) MR examinations using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to seamlessly quantify precise organ-related imaging biomarkers such as the fat fraction and iron load. METHODS A retrospective multicenter collection of 183 MECSE liver MR examinations was conducted. An encoder-decoder CNN was trained (107 studies) following a 5-fold cross-validation strategy to improve the model performance and ensure lack of overfitting. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were quantified on both manual and CNN segmentation masks. Different metrics were used to evaluate the CNN performance over both unseen internal (46 studies) and external (29 studies) validation datasets to analyze reproducibility. RESULTS The internal test showed excellent results for the automatic segmentation with a dice coefficient (DC) of 0.93 ± 0.03 and high correlation between the quantification done with the predicted mask and the manual segmentation (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). The external validation was also excellent with a different vendor but the same magnetic field strength, proving the generalization of the model to other manufacturers with DC of 0.94 ± 0.02. Results were lower for the 1.5-T MR same vendor scanner with DC of 0.87 ± 0.06. Both external validations showed high correlation in the quantification (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). In both internal and external validation datasets, the relative error for the PDFF and R2* quantification was below 4% and 1% respectively. CONCLUSION Liver parenchyma can be accurately segmented with CNN in a vendor-neutral virtual approach, allowing to obtain reproducible automatic whole organ virtual biopsies. KEY POINTS • Whole liver parenchyma can be automatically segmented using convolutional neural networks. • Deep learning allows the creation of automatic pipelines for the precise quantification of liver-related imaging biomarkers such as PDFF and R2*. • MR "virtual biopsy" can become a fast and automatic procedure for the assessment of chronic diffuse liver diseases in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Jimenez-Pastor
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Angel Alberich-Bayarri
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rafael Lopez-Gonzalez
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain
| | - David Marti-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuela França
- Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), Porto, Portugal
| | | | | | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI) at La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain.,Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Attenuation Imaging with Ultrasound as a Novel Evaluation Method for Liver Steatosis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10050965. [PMID: 33801163 PMCID: PMC7957732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, ultrasound attenuation imaging (ATI) has emerged as a new method to detect liver steatosis. However, thus far, no studies have confirmed the clinical utility of this technology. Using a retrospective database analysis of 28 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent ultrasound liver biopsy and ATI, we compared the presence and degree of steatosis measured by ATI with the results obtained through liver biopsy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the ATI for differentiating between normal and hepatic steatosis was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.83–1.00). The AUROC of the ATI was 0.99 (95% confidence interval: 0.86–1.00) in grade ≥2 liver steatosis and 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.82–1.00) in grade 3. ATI showed good consistency and accuracy for the steatosis grading of liver biopsy. Therefore, ATI represents a novel diagnostic measurement to support the diagnosis of liver steatosis in non-invasive clinical practice.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Iron overload is a common clinical problem resulting from hereditary hemochromatosis or secondary hemosiderosis (mainly associated with transfusion therapy), being also associated with chronic liver diseases and metabolic disorders. Excess of iron accumulates in organs like the liver, pancreas and heart. Without treatment, patients with iron overload disorders will develop liver cirrhosis, diabetes and cardiomyopathy. Iron quantification is therefore crucial not only for diagnosis of iron overload but also to monitor iron-reducing therapies. Liver iron concentration is considered the surrogate marker of total body iron stores. Because liver biopsy is invasive and prone to high variability and sampling bias, MR imaging has emerged as a non-invasive method and gained wide acceptance, now being considered the standard of care for assessing iron overload. Nevertheless, there are different MR techniques for iron quantification and there is still no consensus about the best technique or postprocessing tool for hepatic iron quantification, with the choice of imaging technique depending mainly on the local expertise as well on the available equipment and software. Because different methods should not be used interchangeably, it is important to choose one method and use the same one when following up patients over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela França
- Radiology Department - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal.
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, I3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Porto, Portugal.
| | - João Gomes Carvalho
- Radiology Department - Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Marti-Aguado D, Rodríguez-Ortega A, Alberich-Bayarri A, Marti-Bonmati L. Magnetic Resonance imaging analysis of liver fibrosis and inflammation: overwhelming gray zones restrict clinical use. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3557-3568. [PMID: 32857259 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02713-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) identification and grading of subjects with liver fibrosis and inflammation represents a clinical challenge. MR elastography plays a well-defined role in fibrosis estimation, but its use is not widely available in clinical settings. Given that liver MR is becoming the reference standard for fat and iron quantitation, there is a need to clarify whether there is any role for MR imaging in the concomitant evaluation of fibrosis and inflammation in this setting. This review summarizes the diagnostic estimations of different MR imaging parameters obtained from conventional non-contrast-enhanced multiple b values diffusion-weighted acquisitions, variable flip angles T1 relaxation maps and STIR images. Although some derived parameters have shown a significant correlation to histological scores, a small magnitude of effect with wide overlap across severity grades is the rule. Contrary to fat and iron quantification, the low precision and reproducibility of MR imaging metrics limits its clinical relevance in fibrosis and inflammation assessment. In a sequential clinical approach combining different methodologies, MR imaging has no applicability for ruling-out and low accuracy for ruling-in advanced fibrosis. Thereby, MR elastography remains as the only image method with high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of advanced fibrosis. Until date, inflammation remains in a gray zone where biopsy cannot be replaced, and further investigations are needed. The present review offers an in-depth discuss of the MR imaging diagnostic performance for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and inflammation, highlighting the need for scientific improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Marti-Aguado
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230 and PREBI), and Imaging La Fe Node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Rodríguez-Ortega
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230 and PREBI), and Imaging La Fe Node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Alberich-Bayarri
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230 and PREBI), and Imaging La Fe Node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
| | - L Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230 and PREBI), and Imaging La Fe Node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
- Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Av Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Differences in multi-echo chemical shift encoded MRI proton density fat fraction estimation based on multifrequency fat peaks selection in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients. Clin Radiol 2020; 75:880.e5-880.e12. [PMID: 32888653 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare the performance of multi-echo chemical-shift-encoded (MECSE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proton density fat fraction (PDFF) estimation, considering three different fat frequency peak combinations, for the quantification of steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS The present study was a prospective cross-sectional research of 121 patients with metabolic syndrome and evidence of hepatic steatosis on ultrasound, who underwent a 3 T MRI examination. All patients were studied with a multifrequency MECSE sequence. The PDFF was calculated using six peaks (MECSEp123456), three peaks (MECSEp456), and a single peak (MECSEp5) model. The two simpler fat peak models were compared to the six peaks model, which was considered the reference standard. Linearity was evaluated using linear regression while agreement was described using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS The mean age was 47 (±9) years and BMI was 29.9 (±2.9) kg/m2. Steatosis distribution was 15%/31%/54% (S1/S2/S3, respectively). Compared to MECSEp123456, both models provided linear PDFF measurements (R2= 0.99 and 0.97, MECSEp456 and MECSEp5 respectively). Regression slope (0.92; p<0.001) and mean Bland-Altman bias (-1.5%; 95% limits of agreement: -3.19%, 0.22%) indicated minimal underestimation by using PDFF-MECSEp456. Nonetheless, mean differences in PDFF estimations varied from -1.5% (MECSEp456,p=0.006) to -2.2% (MECSEp5,p<0.001) when compared to full six fat frequencies model. CONCLUSION Although simpler spectral fat MECSE analysis shows a linear relationship with the standard six peaks model, their variation in estimated PDFF values introduces a low but clinically significant bias in fat quantification and steatosis grading in NAFLD patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Vieira J, Amorim J, Martí-Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri Á, França M. Quantifying steatosis in the liver and pancreas with MRI in patient with chronic liver disease. RADIOLOGIA 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
28
|
Cunha GM, Thai TT, Hamilton G, Covarrubias Y, Schlein A, Middleton MS, Wiens CN, McMillan A, Agni R, Funk LM, Campos GM, Horgan S, Jacobson G, Wolfson T, Gamst A, Schwimmer JB, Reeder SB, Sirlin CB. Accuracy of common proton density fat fraction thresholds for magnitude- and complex-based chemical shift-encoded MRI for assessing hepatic steatosis in patients with obesity. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:661-671. [PMID: 31781899 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02350-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE MRI proton density fat fraction (PDFF) can be calculated using magnitude (MRI-M) or complex (MRI-C) MRI data. The purpose of this study was to identify, assess, and compare the accuracy of common PDFF thresholds for MRI-M and MRI-C for assessing hepatic steatosis in patients with obesity, using histology as reference. METHODS This two-center prospective study included patients undergoing MRI-C- and MRI-M-PDFF estimations within 3 days before weight loss surgery. Liver biopsy was performed, and histology-determined steatosis grades were used as reference standard. Using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis on data pooled from both methods, single common thresholds for diagnosing and differentiating none or mild (0-1) from moderate to severe steatosis (2-3) were selected as the ones achieving the highest sensitivity while providing at least 90% specificity. Selection methods were cross-validated. Performances were compared using McNemar's tests. RESULTS Of 81 included patients, 54 (67%) had steatosis. The common PDFF threshold for diagnosing steatosis was 5.4%, which provided a cross-validated 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.95) sensitivity and 0.92 (0.75-0.99) specificity for MRI-M and 0.87 sensitivity (0.75-0.94) with 0.81 (0.61-0.93) specificity for MRI-C. The common PDFF threshold to differentiate steatosis grades 0-1 from 2 to 3 was 14.7%, which provided cross-validated 0.86 (95% CI 0.59-0.98) sensitivity and 0.95 (0.87-0.99) specificity for MRI-M and 0.93 sensitivity (0.68-0.99) with 0.97(0.89-0.99) specificity for MRI-C. CONCLUSION If independently validated, diagnostic thresholds of 5.4% and 14.7% could be adopted for both techniques for detecting and differentiating none to mild from moderate to severe steatosis, respectively, with high diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Moura Cunha
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA.
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, Altman Clinical Translational Research Institute, 9452 Medical Center Drive, Lower Level 501, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
| | - Tydus T Thai
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Gavin Hamilton
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Yesenia Covarrubias
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Alexandra Schlein
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Michael S Middleton
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Curtis N Wiens
- Department of Radiology, E3/366 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - Alan McMillan
- Department of Radiology, E3/366 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - Rashmi Agni
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3170 UW Medical Foundation Centennial Building (MFCB), 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA
| | - Luke M Funk
- Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - Guilherme M Campos
- Department of Surgery, West Hospital, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1200 East Broad Street 16th Floor, West Wing Box 980645, Richmond, VA, 23298-0645, USA
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Surgery, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Garth Jacobson
- Surgery, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Tanya Wolfson
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Anthony Gamst
- Computational and Applied Statistics Laboratory (CASL), San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Schwimmer
- Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, E3/366 Clinical Science Center, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
- Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
- Biomedical Engineering, Madison, WI, Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792-3252, USA
| | - Claude B Sirlin
- Liver Imaging Group, Radiology, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, San Diego, CA, 92037, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vieira J, Amorim J, Martí-Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri Á, França M. Quantifying steatosis in the liver and pancreas with MRI in patient with chronic liver disease. RADIOLOGIA 2020; 62:222-228. [PMID: 31932016 DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2019.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Revised: 09/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare pancreatic and hepatic steatosis quantified by proton density fat fraction (PDFF) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with chronic liver disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS This cross-sectional study included 46 adult patients who underwent liver biopsy for chronic viral hepatitis (n=19) or other chronic non-alcoholic liver diseases (NALD) (n=27). Liver biopsy was used as the gold standard for diagnosing and grading hepatic steatosis. All patients underwent clinical evaluation and MRI with a multi-echo chemical shift-encoded (MECSE) gradient-echo sequence for liver and pancreas PDFF quantification. We used Spearman's correlation coefficient to determine the degree of association between hepatic PDFF and steatosis grade, and between pancreatic PDFF and steatosis grade and hepatic PDFF. To compare the chronic viral hepatitis group and the NALD group, we used t-tests for continuous or ordinal variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. RESULTS Hepatic PDFF measurements correlated with steatosis grades (RS=0.875, p<0.001). Pancreatic PDFF correlated with hepatic steatosis grades (RS=0.573, p<0.001) and hepatic PDFF measurements (RS=0.536, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with chronic NALD, the correlations remained significant between pancreatic PDFF and hepatic PDFF (RS=0.632, p<0.001) and between pancreatic PDFF and liver steatosis (RS=0.608, p<0.001); however, in the subgroup of patients with viral hepatitis these correlations were no longer significant. CONCLUSION Pancreatic fat deposition correlates with hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic NALD, but not in those with chronic viral hepatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Vieira
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidad de Oporto, Oporto, Portugal.
| | - J Amorim
- Departamento de Diagnóstico por la Imagen, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Oporto, Portugal; Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal; ICVS/3B's, Instituto de Investigación de Ciencias de la Vida y la Salud, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - L Martí-Bonmatí
- Departamento de Radiología y Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen GIBI2(30). Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - Á Alberich-Bayarri
- Departamento de Radiología y Grupo de Investigación Biomédica en Imagen GIBI2(30). Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe e Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, España; Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (QUIBIM), Valencia, España
| | - M França
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidad de Oporto, Oporto, Portugal; Departamento de Diagnóstico por la Imagen, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Oporto, Portugal; i3S, Instituto de Investigacão e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular, Oporto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Martin-Rodriguez J, Gonzalez-Cantero J, Gonzalez-Cantero A, Martí-Bonmatí L, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Gonzalez-Cejudo T, Gonzalez-Calvin J. Insulin resistance and NAFLD: Relationship with intrahepatic iron and serum TNF-α using 1H MR spectroscopy and MRI. DIABETES & METABOLISM 2019; 45:473-479. [PMID: 30660761 DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
31
|
Zhan C, Olsen S, Zhang HC, Kannengiesser S, Chandarana H, Shanbhogue KP. Detection of hepatic steatosis and iron content at 3 Tesla: comparison of two-point Dixon, quantitative multi-echo Dixon, and MR spectroscopy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:3040-3048. [PMID: 31286208 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-02118-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare qualitative results obtained from computer-aided dual-ratio analysis on T1-weighted two-point Dixon, with T2*-corrected multi-echo Dixon and T2-corrected multi-echo single-voxel MR spectroscopy sequence (MRS) for evaluation of liver fat and iron at 3T. METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective, HIPAA-compliant, IRB-approved study included 479 patients with known or suspected liver disease. Two-point Dixon, multi-echo Dixon, and MR spectroscopy sequences were performed for each patient at 3T. A receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare the diagnostic performance in 80 patients using biopsy as the standard. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of qualitative two-point Dixon results, multi-echo Dixon (PDFF and R2*), and MRS (fat fraction and R2 water) for detection of hepatic steatosis and siderosis were assessed. RESULTS Fat fractions obtained from MRS and multi-echo Dixon have equivalent accuracy for detection of hepatic steatosis (AUC, sensitivity and specificity: 0.90 vs 0.88, 0.77 vs. 0.82, and 0.90 vs. 0.82), but the optimal cutoff value is higher for MRS (6.05% vs. 3.4%). The dual-ratio Dixon discrimination technique showed high negative predictive value for detection of hepatic steatosis and siderosis (0.90 and 0.94, respectively). R2* from multi-echo Dixon and R2water from MRS have equivalent accuracy for detection of iron overload at 3T (AUC 0.89 vs. 0.88). The optimal cutoff for R2* and R2water are 60.5 s-1 and 40.85 s-1, respectively. CONCLUSION The computer-aided dual-ratio discrimination with two-point Dixon is a useful qualitative screening tool with high negative predictive value for hepatic steatosis and iron overload. Multi-echo Dixon and MRS have similar accuracy for detection of hepatic steatosis and iron overload at 3 Tesla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenyang Zhan
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Sonja Olsen
- Department of Hepatology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hoi Cheung Zhang
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | | | - Hersh Chandarana
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Health, 660 First Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Liver MRI susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) compared to T2* mapping in the presence of steatosis and fibrosis. Eur J Radiol 2019; 118:66-74. [PMID: 31439261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To show that both susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T2*-mapping are dependent on liver steatosis, which should be taken into account when using these parameters to grade liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. METHODS In this prospective study, a total of 174 patients without focal liver disease underwent multiparametric MRI at 3 T including SWI, T1- and T2* mapping, proton density fat fraction (PDFF) quantification and MR elastography. SWI, T2* and T1 were measured in the liver (4 locations), as well as in paraspinal muscles, to calculate the liver-to-muscle ratio (LMR). Liver and LMR values were compared among patients with different steatosis grades (PDFF < 5%, 5-10%, 10-20% and >20%), patients with normal, slightly increased and increased liver stiffness (<2.8 kPa, 2.8-3.5 kPa and >3.5 kPa, respectively). ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc tests as well as a multivariate analysis were used to compare values among groups and parameters. RESULTS SWI and T2* both differed significantly among groups with different steatosis grades (p < 0.001). However, SWI allowed a better differentiation among liver fibrosis grades (p < 0.001) than did T2* (p = 0.05). SWI LMR (p < 0.001) and T2* LMR (p = 0.036) showed a similar performance in differentiating among liver fibrosis grades. CONCLUSION SWI and T2*-mapping are strongly dependent on the liver steatosis grades. Nevertheless, both parameters are useful predictors for liver fibrosis when using a multiparametric approach.
Collapse
|
33
|
Hu F, Yang R, Huang Z, Wang M, Yuan F, Xia C, Wei Y, Song B. 3D Multi-Echo Dixon technique for simultaneous assessment of liver steatosis and iron overload in patients with chronic liver diseases: a feasibility study. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019; 9:1014-1024. [PMID: 31367555 PMCID: PMC6629573 DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.05.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs) often suffer from lipidosis or siderosis. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* can be used as quantitative parameters to assess the fat/iron content of the liver. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of liver fibrosis and inflammation on the 3D Multi-echo Dixon (3D ME Dixon) parameters (MRI-PDFF and R2*) in patients with CLDs and to determine the feasibility of 3D ME Dixon technique for the simultaneous assessment of liver steatosis and iron overload using histopathologic findings as the reference standard. METHODS Ninety-nine consecutive patients with CLDs underwent T1-independent, T2*-corrected 3D ME Dixon sequence with reconstruction using multipeak spectral modeling on a 3T MR scanner. Liver specimen was reviewed in all cases, grading liver steatosis, siderosis, fibrosis, and inflammation. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between 3D ME Dixon parameters (MRI-PDFF and R2*) and histopathological and biochemical features [liver steatosis, iron overload, liver fibrosis, inflammation, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL)]. Multiple regression analysis was applied to identify variables associated with 3D ME Dixon parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance of these parameters to differentiate liver steatosis or iron overload. RESULTS In multivariate analysis, only liver steatosis independently influenced PDFF values (R2=0.803, P<0.001), liver iron overload and fibrosis influenced R2* values (R2=0.647, P<0.001). The Spearman analyses showed that R2* values were moderately correlated with fibrosis stages (r=0.542, P<0.001) in the subgroup with the absence of iron overload. The area under the ROC curve of PDFF was 0.989 for the diagnosis of steatosis grade 1 or greater, and 0.986 for steatosis grade 2 or greater. The area under the ROC curve of R2* was 0.815 for identifying iron overload grade 1 or greater, and 0.876 for iron overload grade 2 or greater. CONCLUSIONS 3D Multi-Echo Dixon can be used to simultaneously evaluate liver steatosis and iron overload in patients with CLDs, especially for quantification of liver steatosis. However, liver R2* value may be affected by the liver fibrosis in the setting of CLDs with absence of iron overload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fubi Hu
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610041, China
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ru Yang
- Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Zixing Huang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Fang Yuan
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Chunchao Xia
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Bin Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Karlsson M, Ekstedt M, Dahlström N, Forsgren MF, Ignatova S, Norén B, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, Kechagias S, Lundberg P. Liver R2* is affected by both iron and fat: A dual biopsy-validated study of chronic liver disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 50:325-333. [PMID: 30637926 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver iron content (LIC) in chronic liver disease (CLD) is currently determined by performing an invasive liver biopsy. MRI using R2* relaxometry is a noninvasive alternative for estimating LIC. Fat accumulation in the liver, or proton density fat fraction (PDFF), may be a possible confounder of R2* measurements. Previous studies of the effect of PDFF on R2* have not used quantitative LIC measurement. PURPOSE To assess the associations between R2*, LIC, PDFF, and liver histology in patients with suspected CLD. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Eighty-one patients with suspected CLD. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1.5 T. Multiecho turbo field echo to quantify R2*. PRESS MRS to quantify PDFF. ASSESSMENT Each patient underwent an MR examination, followed by two needle biopsies immediately following the MR examination. The first biopsy was used for conventional histological assessment of LIC, whereas the second biopsy was used to quantitatively measure LIC using mass spectrometry. R2* was correlated with both LIC and PDFF. A correction for the influence of fat on R2* was calculated. STATISTICAL TESTS Pearson correlation, linear regression, and area under the receiver operating curve. RESULTS There was a positive linear correlation between R2* and PDFF (R = 0.69), after removing data from patients with elevated iron levels, as defined by LIC. R2*, corrected for PDFF, was the best method for identifying patients with elevated iron levels, with a correlation of R = 0.87 and a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 98.6%, respectively. DATA CONCLUSION PDFF increases R2*. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:325-333.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Karlsson
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mattias Ekstedt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Nils Dahlström
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Radiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Mikael F Forsgren
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Wolfram MathCore AB and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Simone Ignatova
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Clinical Genetics, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bengt Norén
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
- Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Stergios Kechagias
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Peter Lundberg
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Department of Radiation Physics, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Role of AI in Clinical Trials. Artif Intell Med Imaging 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-94878-2_16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
36
|
Hayashi T, Fukuzawa K, Yamazaki H, Konno T, Miyati T, Kotoku J, Oba H, Kondo H, Toyoda K, Saitoh S. Multicenter, multivendor phantom study to validate proton density fat fraction and T2* values calculated using vendor-provided 6-point DIXON methods. Clin Imaging 2018; 51:38-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
37
|
Labranche R, Gilbert G, Cerny M, Vu KN, Soulières D, Olivié D, Billiard JS, Yokoo T, Tang A. Liver Iron Quantification with MR Imaging: A Primer for Radiologists. Radiographics 2018. [PMID: 29528818 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 115] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Iron overload is a systemic disorder and is either primary (genetic) or secondary (exogenous iron administration). Primary iron overload is most commonly associated with hereditary hemochromatosis and secondary iron overload with ineffective erythropoiesis (predominantly caused by β-thalassemia major and sickle cell disease) that requires long-term transfusion therapy, leading to transfusional hemosiderosis. Iron overload may lead to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, in addition to cardiac and endocrine complications. The liver is one of the main iron storage organs and the first to show iron overload. Therefore, detection and quantification of liver iron overload are critical to initiate treatment and prevent complications. Liver biopsy was the historical reference standard for detection and quantification of liver iron content. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is now commonly used for liver iron quantification, including assessment of distribution, detection, grading, and monitoring of treatment response in iron overload. Several MR imaging techniques have been developed for iron quantification, each with advantages and limitations. The liver-to-muscle signal intensity ratio technique is simple and widely available; however, it assumes that the reference tissue is normal. Transverse magnetization (also known as R2) relaxometry is validated but is prone to respiratory motion artifacts due to a long acquisition time, is presently available only for 1.5-T imaging, and requires additional cost and delay for off-line analysis. The R2* technique has fast acquisition time, demonstrates a wide range of liver iron content, and is available for 1.5-T and 3.0-T imaging but requires additional postprocessing software. Quantitative susceptibility mapping has the highest sensitivity for detecting iron deposition; however, it is still investigational, and the correlation with liver iron content is not yet established. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Labranche
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Guillaume Gilbert
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Milena Cerny
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Kim-Nhien Vu
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Denis Soulières
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Damien Olivié
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Jean-Sébastien Billiard
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Radiology (R.L., G.G., M.C., K.N.V., D.O., J.S.B., A.T.) and Service of Hemato-oncology, Department of Medicine (D.S.), Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1000 rue Saint-Denis, Montréal, QC, Canada H2X 0C2; MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare Canada, Markham, ON, Canada (G.G.); Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.); and Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada (A.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hui SCN, So HK, Chan DFY, Wong SKH, Yeung DKW, Ng EKW, Chu WCW. Validation of water-fat MRI and proton MRS in assessment of hepatic fat and the heterogeneous distribution of hepatic fat and iron in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Eur J Radiol 2018; 107:7-13. [PMID: 30292275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research studies demonstrated pathologic lesions were unevenly distributed in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. As hepatic steatosis occurs prior to steatohepatitis and other late stage liver conditions, the distribution pattern of hepatic fat and iron concentration should be investigated to prevent sampling variability. The first purpose of this study was to perform comparison and validation of in-house hepatic fat measurements using water-fat MRI and MRS. The second objective was to quantify hepatic fat-fraction and T2* values in left and right liver lobes using water-fat MRI. METHOD Fifty-four non-alcoholic adults (27 NAFLD, age: 42.8 ± 11.8), 27 non-NAFLD, age: 45.5 ± 11.2) and 46 non-alcoholic teenagers (23 NAFLD (age: 15.4 ± 2.6), 23 non-NAFLD (age: 13.9 ± 2.3) were recruited. All participants underwent chemical shift water-fat MRI and 1H MRS at 3 T. Hepatic steatosis was defined by intrahepatic triglyceride more than the threshold of 5.56% using MRS (clinical reference) and non-alcoholic was defined by alcohol ingestion of no more than 30 g and 20 g per day for male and female respectively. Hepatic fat-fractions in left and right liver lobes were measured using regions-of-interest (ROIs) approach. Three ROIs were drawn on the fat-fraction images and duplicated on to the co-registered T2* images at the inferior right, superior right and superior left liver lobes. Comparison and validation of water-fat MRI and MRS were performed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. Hepatic fat-fraction and T2* measured from the ROIs were compared using repeated measures ANOVA. Independent t-test was used for between groups analysis. RESULTS Statistical analysis indicated good correlation (R = 0.987) and agreement (ICC = 0.982) between MRS and water-fat MRI in hepatic fat measurements. Results indicated that hepatic fat was significantly higher in the right lobe compared to the left in NAFLD adults (p < 0.001) and NAFLD teenagers (p < 0.001). For T2*, significant difference between left and right lobes was observed in NAFLD adults (p < 0.001) and non-NAFLD adults (p < 0.001) but not in teenagers. CONCLUSION Hepatic fat measurements using MRS and water-fat MRI are statistically equivalent. In subjects with NAFLD regardless of their age, hepatic fat is stored preferentially in the right live lobe probably due to the streamline of blood flow to the right liver. T2* value is significantly higher in the right liver lobe in adults but not in the teenagers regardless of their hepatic fat contents probably due to the longer time span of hepatic iron accumulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve C N Hui
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Hung-Kwan So
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Dorothy F Y Chan
- Department of Paediatrics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Simon K H Wong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - David K W Yeung
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Enders K W Ng
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
| | - Winnie C W Chu
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, N.T., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Evaluation of liver function using gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging based on a three-dimensional volumetric analysis system. Hepatol Int 2018; 12:368-376. [PMID: 29860678 PMCID: PMC6096956 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-018-9874-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (EOB-MRI) is a diagnostic modality for liver tumors. Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis systems using EOB-MRI data are used to simulate liver anatomy for surgery. This study was conducted to investigate clinical utility of a 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI to evaluate liver function. Methods Between August 2014 and December 2015, 181 patients underwent laboratory and radiological exams as standardized preoperative evaluation for liver surgery. The liver-spleen contrast-enhanced ratio (LSR) was measured by a semi-automated 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI. First, the inter-evaluator variability of the calculated LSR was evaluated. Additionally, a subset of liver surgical specimens was evaluated histologically by using immunohistochemical staining. Finally, the correlations between the LSR and grading systems of liver function, laboratory data, or histological findings were analyzed. Results The inter-evaluator correlation coefficient of the measured LSR was 0.986. The mean LSR was significantly correlated with the Child–Pugh score (p = 0.014) and the ALBI score (p < 0.001). Significant correlations were also observed between the LSR and indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (r = − 0.601, p < 0.001), between the LSR and liver fibrosis stage (r = − 0.556, p < 0.001), and between the LSR and liver steatosis grade (r = − 0.396, p < 0.001). Conclusion The LSR calculated by a 3D volumetric analysis system on EOB-MRI was highly reproducible and was shown to be correlated with liver function parameters and liver histology. These data suggest that this imaging modality can be a reliable tool to evaluate liver function. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s12072-018-9874-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
40
|
Lin H, Fu C, Kannengiesser S, Cheng S, Shen J, Dong H, Yan F. Quantitative analysis of hepatic iron in patients suspected of coexisting iron overload and steatosis using multi-echo single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Comparison with fat-saturated multi-echo gradient echo sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018. [PMID: 29513377 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coexistence of hepatic iron and fat is common in patients with hyperferritinemia, which plays an interactive and aggressive role in the progression of diseases (fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinomas). PURPOSE To evaluate a modified high-speed T2 -corrected multi-echo, single voxel spectroscopy sequence (HISTOV) for liver iron concentration (LIC) quantification in patients with hyperferritinemia, with simultaneous fat fraction (FF) estimation. STUDY TYPE Retrospective cohort study. POPULATION Thirty-eight patients with hyperferritinemia were enrolled. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE HISTOV, a fat-saturated multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) sequence, and a spin echo sequence (FerriScan) were performed at 1.5T. ASSESSMENT R2 of the water signal and FF were calculated with HISTOV, and R2* values were derived from the GRE sequence, with R2 and LIC from FerriScan serving as the references. STATISTICAL TESTS Linear regression, correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristic analyses, and Bland-Altman analyses were conducted. RESULTS Abnormal hepatic iron load was detected in 32/38 patients, of whom 10/32 had coexisting steatosis. Strong correlation was found between R2* and FerriScan-LIC (R2 = 0.861), and between HISTOV-R2_ water and FerriScan-R2 (R2 = 0.889). Furthermore, HISTOV-R2_ water was not correlated with HISTOV-FF. The area under the curve (AUC) for HISTOV-R2_ water was 0.974, 0.971, and 1, corresponding to clinical FerriScan-LIC thresholds of 1.8, 3.2, and 7.0 mg/g dw, respectively. No significant difference in the AUC was found between HISTOV-R2_ water and R2* at any of the LIC thresholds, with P-values of 0.42, 0.37, and 1, respectively. HISTOV-LIC showed excellent agreement with FerriScan-LIC, with a mean bias of 0.00 ± 1.18 mg/g dw, whereas the mean bias between GRE-LIC and FerriScan-LIC was 0.53 ± 1.49 mg/g dw. DATA CONCLUSION HISTOV is useful for the quantification and grading of liver iron overload in patients with hyperferritinemia, particularly in cases with coexisting steatosis. HISTOV-LIC showed no systematic bias compared with FerriScan-LIC, making it a promising alternative for iron quantification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Lin
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Caixia Fu
- Application Development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd, Shenzhen, China
| | | | - Shu Cheng
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Shen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Haipeng Dong
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lin H, Wei H, He N, Fu C, Cheng S, Shen J, Wang B, Yan X, Liu C, Yan F. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in combination with water-fat separation for simultaneous liver iron and fat fraction quantification. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3494-3504. [PMID: 29470640 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5263-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2017] [Revised: 12/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSES To evaluate the feasibility of simultaneous quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) and fat fraction (FF) using water-fat separation and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). METHODS Forty-five patients suspected of liver iron overload (LIO) were included. A volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence for QSM and FF, a fat-saturated gradient echo sequence for R2*, a spin echo sequence for LIC measurements and MRS analyses for FF (FF-MRS) were performed. Magnetic susceptibility and FF were calculated using a water-fat separation method (FF-MRI). Correlation and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS Magnetic susceptibility showed strong correlation with LIC (rs=0.918). The optimal susceptibility cut-off values were 0.34, 0.63, 1.29 and 2.23 ppm corresponding to LIC thresholds of 1.8, 3.2, 7.0 and 15.0 mg/g dry weight. The area under the curve (AUC) were 0.948, 0.970, 1 and 1, respectively. No difference in AUC was found between susceptibility and R2* at all LIC thresholds. Correlation was found between FF-MRI and FF-MRS (R2=0.910). CONCLUSIONS QSM has a high diagnostic performance for LIC quantification, similar to that of R2*. FF-MRI provides simultaneous fat quantification. Findings suggest QSM in combination with water-fat separation has potential value for evaluating LIO, especially in cases with coexisting steatosis. KEY POINTS • Magnetic susceptibility showed strong correlation with LIC (r s =0.918). • QSM showed high diagnostic performance for LIC, similar to that of R 2* . • Simultaneously estimated FF-MRI showed strong correlation with MR-Spectroscopy-based FF (R 2 =0.910). • QSM combining water-fat separation has quantitative value for LIO with coexisted steatosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huimin Lin
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Hongjiang Wei
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Naying He
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Caixia Fu
- Application Development, Siemens Shenzhen Magnetic Resonance Ltd., Shenzhen, China
| | - Shu Cheng
- Department of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun Shen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China
| | - Baisong Wang
- Department of Biological Statistics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xu Yan
- MR Collaboration NE Asia, Siemens Healthcare, Shanghai, China
| | - Chunlei Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.,Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, NO. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, 200025, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Alústiza Echeverría J, Barrera Portillo M, Guisasola Iñiguiz A, Ugarte Muño A. Diagnosis and quantification of the iron overload through magnetic resonance. RADIOLOGIA 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rxeng.2017.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
43
|
Diagnóstico y cuantificación de la sobrecarga férrica mediante resonancia magnética. RADIOLOGIA 2017; 59:487-495. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2017.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Revised: 06/25/2017] [Accepted: 07/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
44
|
França M, Martí-Bonmatí L, Silva S, Oliveira C, Alberich Bayarri Á, Vilas Boas F, Pessegueiro-Miranda H, Porto G. Optimizing the management of hereditary haemochromatosis: the value of MRI R2* quantification to predict and monitor body iron stores. Br J Haematol 2017; 183:491-493. [PMID: 29082508 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela França
- Imaging Department - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, IBMC, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- Radiology Department and Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Sara Silva
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Oliveira
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, INEB - Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ángel Alberich Bayarri
- Radiology Department and Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Filipa Vilas Boas
- Imaging Department, Hospital Distrital de Santarém, Santarém, Portugal
| | - Helena Pessegueiro-Miranda
- Liver and Pancreas Transplantation Unit and Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Graça Porto
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, IBMC, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Porto, Portugal.,Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Haematology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
França M, Martí-Bonmatí L, Porto G, Silva S, Guimarães S, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Vizcaíno JR, Pessegueiro Miranda H. Tissue iron quantification in chronic liver diseases using MRI shows a relationship between iron accumulation in liver, spleen, and bone marrow. Clin Radiol 2017; 73:215.e1-215.e9. [PMID: 28863932 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM To investigate iron loading within the liver, pancreas, spleen, and bone marrow using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) transverse relaxation rate (R2*), in patients with diffuse liver diseases; to evaluate the relationships between iron accumulation in these tissue compartments; and to assess the association between tissue iron overload and the pattern of hepatic cellular iron distribution (hepatocytes versus Kupffer cells). MATERIAL AND METHODS Fifty-six patients with diffuse liver diseases had MRI-derived R2* values, using a multi-echo chemical-shift encoded MRI sequence, of the liver, pancreas, spleen, and vertebral bone marrow. All patients had liver biopsy samples scored for hepatic iron grading (0-4) and iron cellular distribution (within hepatocytes only or within both hepatocytes and Kupffer cells). RESULTS Liver R2* increased with histological iron grade (RS=0.58, p<0.001) and correlated with spleen (RS=0.71, p<0.001) and bone marrow R2* (RS=0.66, p<0.001), but not with pancreatic R2* (RS=0.22, p=0.096). Splenic and bone marrow R2* values were also correlated (RS=0.72, p<0.001). Patients with iron inside Kupffer cells had the highest R2* in liver, spleen and bone marrow. CONCLUSIONS Patients with chronic diffuse liver diseases have concomitant hepatic, splenic, and bone marrow iron loading. The highest hepatic iron scores and iron inside Kupffer cells were associated with the highest splenic and bone marrow deposits, suggesting systemic iron accumulation in the mononuclear phagocytic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M França
- Imaging Department - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal; i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.
| | - L Martí-Bonmatí
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell 106 Torre E, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - G Porto
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC, Institute for Molecular and Cell Biology, Rua Alfredo Allen, 208, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal; Haematology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal; Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
| | - S Silva
- Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
| | - S Guimarães
- Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar de S. João, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Á Alberich-Bayarri
- Radiology Department, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), Av. Fernando Abril Martorell 106 Torre E, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - J R Vizcaíno
- Pathology Department - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - H Pessegueiro Miranda
- Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal; Liver and Pancreas Transplantation Unit and Medicine Department - Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Largo Prof Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal; Epidemiology Research Unit (EPIUnit), Institute of Public Health of the University of Porto, Rua das Taipas, 135, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Donato H, França M, Candelária I, Caseiro-Alves F. Liver MRI: From basic protocol to advanced techniques. Eur J Radiol 2017; 93:30-39. [PMID: 28668428 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Liver MR is a well-established modality with multiparametric capabilities. However, to take advantage of its full capacity, it is mandatory to master the technique and optimize imaging protocols, apply advanced imaging concepts and understand the use of different contrast media. Physiologic artefacts although inherent to upper abdominal studies can be minimized using triggering techniques and new strategies for motion control. For standardization, the liver MR protocol should include motion-resistant T2-w sequences, in-op phase GRE T1 and T2-w fast spin echo sequences with fat suppression. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is mandatory, especially for detection of sub-centimetre metastases. Contrast-enhanced MR is the cornerstone of liver MR, especially for lesion characterization. Although extracellular agents are the most extensively used contrast agents, hepatobiliary contrast media can provide an extra-layer of functional diagnostic information adding to the diagnostic value of liver MR. The use of high field strength (3T) increases SNR but is more challenging especially concerning artefact control. Quantitative MR belongs to the new and evolving field of radiomics where the use of emerging biomarkers such as perfusion or DWI can derive new information regarding disease detection, prognostication and evaluation of tumour response. This information can overcome some of the limitations of current tests, especially when using vascular disruptive agents for oncologic treatment assessment. MR is, today, a robust, mature, multiparametric imaging modality where clinical applications have greatly expanded from morphology to advanced imaging. This new concept should be acknowledged by all those involved in producing high quality, high-end liver MR studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrique Donato
- Imaging Department, Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC), Portugal.
| | - Manuela França
- Imaging Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Portugal.
| | - Isabel Candelária
- Imaging Department, Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC), Portugal.
| | - Filipe Caseiro-Alves
- Imaging Department, Faculty of Medicine of Coimbra, University Centre Hospitals of Coimbra (CHUC), Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|