Post-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio at week 6 is prognostic in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancers treated with anti-PD-1 antibody

The prognostic utility of the ratio of lymphocyte to monocyte in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Although advancements in treatment have resulted in improved overall outcomes for patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, the prognosis remains unfavorable for individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The association between lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR) and clinical outcomes in mCRC patients is a subject of controversy. To systematically evaluate the correlation between LMR and prognostic factors in individuals with mCRC, we conducted this meta-analysis.

Methods

The databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for all relevant studies from their inception until October 26, 2024. Study selection was conducted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary outcomes of interest included prognosis measures such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Random-effects models or fixed-effects models were used to determine the pooled risk ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome indicator. Additionally, the pooled odds ratio (OR) and its corresponding 95% CI were calculated for LMR and clinicopathological characteristics.

Results

Fourteen studies involving 3,089 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis found that high LMR was correlated with better OS (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.49-0.62, p<0.00001), PFS (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.57-0.81, p<0.0001) and CSS(HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.32-0.95, p=0.03),The prognostic value of high LMR values for DFS(HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.78-1.12, p=0.46) in patients with metastatic rectal cancer was not found to be significant. We performed subgroup analyses based on study characteristics to confirm the robustness of our findings. Further clinicopathological analysis showed no significant difference between patients with elevated LMR and those without elevated LMR.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results demonstrate a robust correlation between elevated LMR levels and a favorable prognosis in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, further high-quality prospective studies are warranted to validate our findings since the majority of current investigations have relied on retrospective study designs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024496467, identifier CRD42024496467.

Clinical Significance of the Peripheral Blood Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Chemotherapy Outcomes for Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

This study aims to assess the clinical significance of the peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting chemotherapy outcomes for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

Methods

A cohort of 44 patients diagnosed with SCLC between January 2021 to June 2022 at Fuyang People's Hospital was selected for analysis. All patients in this group received a first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimen. In parallel, a control group consisting of 44 healthy individuals undergoing routine physical examinations at the same hospital was also selected. Fasting venous blood samples were collected in the morning within one week before the initiation of chemotherapy, and a complete blood cell count was performed to calculate the NLR.

Results

The NLR in the plasma of patients with SCLC was significantly elevated compared to that of healthy individuals (P < 0.01). After two cycles of chemotherapy, there were no statistically significant differences in plasma NLR in SCLC patients compared to pre-chemotherapy levels (P > 0.05). However, in the subgroup of patients with a partial response (PR) to treatment, the NLR decreased to 2.625 (95% CI: 1.900, 3.625), down from a pre-chemotherapy level of 3.430 (2.688, 4.800) (Z = -3.127, P = 0.002). Conversely, in patients whose disease progressed (PD) following chemotherapy, the NLR increased to 3.880 (95% CI: 2.953, 5.223) from a pre-chemotherapy level of 2.060 (1.915, 2.968) (Z = -2.521, P = 0.012).

Conclusion

The dynamic variations in the peripheral blood NLR before and after chemotherapy in patients with SCLC are strongly associated with the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy regimens. These changes in NLR levels may serve as a crucial indicator for predicting the effectiveness of first-line chemotherapy in patients with SCLC.

Avelumab to treat Merkel cell carcinoma: real-life experience in a dedicated oncology center

The arrival of immunotherapy has revolutioned the management of patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). We conducted an observational, retrospective study of 14 cases treated with avelumab. The response rate was 57%: complete response was reached in 29% of patients, and partial responses in 29%. The drug proved effective in 83% (5/6) of the patients with a single metastatic site. However, the disease progressed in 75% (3/4) of the patients with bone metastases. PD1-L expression, MCC polyomavirus (MCPyV) positivity, and an impaired neutrophil-to-lypmhocyte ratio (NLR) could not be associated with responses to the therapy. Avelumab is an effective and safe drug for the management of advanced MCC, and its effectiveness appears to be impacted by the number and location of metastases.

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum and Pemetrexed in Elderly Patients with Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

Objective Pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed (Pemb-Plt-PEM) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 expression. However, the effectiveness and feasibility of first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM therapy in elderly patients (≥75 years old) remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM in elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients ≥75 years old with non-squamous NSCLC who were treated with first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM from December 2018 to December 2020 at 10 institutes in Japan. Data on patient characteristics, efficacy of Pemb-Plt-PEM therapy, and the type and severity of adverse events were reviewed. Results Thirty patients [20 men and 10 women; median age: 76 (range: 75-82) years old] were included in the analysis. The overall response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 40.0%, 66.7%, 7.5 and 24.0 months, respectively. The treatment-related deaths were caused by pneumonitis. First-line Pemb-Plt-PEM was associated with the PFS, based on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The PFS for low and high NLR values was 10.1 and 2.0 months, respectively. Furthermore, the sex and NLR influenced the association between Pemb-Plt-PEM and the OS. The OS for low and high NLR values was 32.8 and 2.6 months, respectively. Conclusion First-line Pemb-Plt-PEM therapy is effective and feasible in elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC.

Immuno-combined treatment versus radio-combined treatment in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

Background

Although the approval of immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has significantly improved the patient's prognosis, synchronous chemoradiotherapy has always been the standard treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

Objectives

Immuno-combined and radio-combined therapy in LS-SCLC has been applied in clinical practice, but what is the best for LS-SCLC?

Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Patients with LS-SCLC from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively screened and divided into three groups according to the initial treatment regimen whether included immune-combined and radio-combined treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to analyze the predictors affecting the survival of LS-SCLC, and the progression pattern of patients and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.

Results

In this study, the median overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months, not yet reached (NR) and NR, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.7, 20.9, and 18.9 months in the immunotherapy combined chemotherapy (N = 34), immune combined chemoradiotherapy (N = 26), and chemoradiotherapy (N = 53) groups, respectively. OS and PFS were significantly prolonged in the radio-combined groups compared with the non-radio-combined group, and there was no significant difference between the radio-combined groups, namely immunotherapy combined chemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups. In this study, we also constructed some indexes to predict prognosis for LS-SCLC, derived neutrophil and lymphocyte ratios were significantly associated with worse survival, and systemic inflammatory index and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were significantly associated with shorter PFS. The primary organs of progression remained the lung and brain, the main immune-related AE was hypothyroidism, and the radiation-related AE was pneumonia.

Conclusion

Radiation-combined therapy still plays an important role in LS-SCLC in the era of immunotherapy, and clinicians cannot abandon the use of radiation therapy in the initial treatment plan for LS-SCLC.

Comparison of Prognostic Values of Seven Immune Indexes in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nivolumab: How Effective Can They Be Regarding Our Treatment Decisions?

Background and Objectives: In this study, we evaluated the impact of seven immune indexes on treatment response and survival outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving second-line and subsequent nivolumab treatment under real-life conditions. Materials and Methods: The pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune inflammation value (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (d-NLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were calculated. All immune indexes were classified as low and high based on cut-off values. Kaplan-Meier and Cox hazard models were used for survival analysis. Results: The median follow-up was 22.0 months (6.0-96.0). The median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 months and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 months. In the univariate analysis, comorbidity (p = 0.03) and nivolumab use for more than eight cycles (p < 0.0001) were associated with an increase in PFS, while smoking history (p < 0.005) and d-NLR (p < 0.05) were more effective regarding OS. Patients who received more than eight cycles of nivolumab had longer median PFS (4 vs. 19 months, p < 0.001) and OS (23 vs. 43 months, p < 0.001). We found longer median OS in the PLR (45.7 vs. 75.4 months; p = 0.05), PIV (53.0 vs. 66.4 months; p = 0.19), SII (50.0 vs. 71.9 vs. months, p = 0.19), and NLR (49.9 vs. 74.55 months, p = 0.10) indexes in nivolumab long-term users (high vs. low groups, respectively). In short-term users of nivolumab, only d-NLR median OS (high vs. low, 19 vs. 75.2 months, p = 0.07) was different. Complete and partial response rates to nivolumab treatment were higher in the PNI-high group (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In these real-life data, we determined that the PLR, PIV, SII, and NLR indexes were effective in the prognosis of patients who received PD1 inhibitor nivolumab for a long time, and the d-NLR index was effective in those who developed progression in a short time. We found that the PNI was effective in patients who responded well to ICI treatment.

Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To explore the association between the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) score and prognosis in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched up to August 1, 2024. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcomes queried. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined, and subgroup analysis was based on pathological type [non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) vs. small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)], lines of ICIs (first-line vs. second- or further-line), and combinations of other therapies (yes vs. no).

RESULTS

Twenty retrospective studies with 2424 participants were included. The pooled results demonstrated that an elevated SII was associated with poorer PFS (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.49-2.21; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.73-3.09; P < 0.001) in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs. Subgroup analysis stratified by pathological type, lines of ICIs and combinations of other therapies for PFS and OS further revealed the predictive role of the SII in ICI-treated lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Based on current evidence the SII is significantly related to prognosis and could serve as a reliable prognostic indicator in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs.

[Translated article] Avelumab to treat Merkel cell carcinoma: real-life experience in a dedicated oncology center

The arrival of immunotherapy has revolutioned the management of patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). We conducted an observational, retrospective study of 14 cases treated with avelumab. The response rate was 57%: complete response was reached in 29% of patients, and partial responses in 29%. The drug proved effective in 83% (5/6) of the patients with a single metastatic site. However, the disease progressed in 75% (3/4) of the patients with bone metastases. PD1-L expression, MCC polyomavirus (MCPyV) positivity, and an impaired neutrophil-to-lypmhocyte ratio (NLR) could not be associated with responses to the therapy. Avelumab is an effective and safe drug for the management of advanced MCC, and its effectiveness appears to be impacted by the number and location of metastases.

Derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio has the potential to predict safety and outcomes of durvalumab after chemoradiation in non-small cell lung cancer

The usefulness of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and its dynamics before/after durvalumab consolidation therapy to predict safety or efficacy remains unclear. We retrospectively reviewed patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with durvalumab consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy (D group) or chemoradiotherapy alone (non-D group) at multiple institutions. We investigated the association between dNLR, or its dynamics, and pneumonitis, checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP), irAEs, and efficacy. Ninety-eight and fifty-six patients were enrolled in the D and non-D groups, respectively. The dNLR at baseline was significantly lower in patients who experienced irAEs or CIP than in those who did not. The low dNLR group, 28 days following durvalumab consolidation therapy (dNLR28 ≤ 3), demonstrated longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the high dNLR group (dNLR28 > 3) (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.88, p = 0.020; OS, HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.94, p = 0.037). Among patients with high dNLR at baseline (dNLR > 3), the dNLR28 ≤ 3 group showed longer PFS than the dNLR28 > 3 group (p = 0.010). The dNLR is a predictive factor for irAEs and CIP in patients receiving durvalumab consolidation therapy. The dNLR at 28 days after durvalumab consolidation therapy and its dynamics predict favorable outcomes.

The Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Predictor of Survival after Chemoradiotherapy for Limited-Disease Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Established biomarkers for predicting chemoradiotherapy efficacy for limited-disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) are lacking. The inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), comprising serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels, can predict survival in advanced cancer. This study investigated whether metabolic and inflammatory markers, including the GPS, can predict the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in patients with LD-SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 124 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy for LD-SCLC at two institutions between April 2007 and June 2021, and assessed the prognostic significance of various metabolic and inflammatory markers. The GPS was calculated using the CRP and albumin concentrations, and categorized as follows: 0, CRP <1.0 mg/dL and albumin ≥3.5 mg/dL; 1, elevated CRP or decreased albumin; and 2, CRP ≥1.0 mg/dL and albumin<3.5 mg/dL. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional-hazard models.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.6-97.9%). The median PFS and OS from chemoradiotherapy initiation were 12.6 (95% CI: 9.9-15.4) and 29.0 (95% CI: 24.8-45.5) months, respectively. The GPS demonstrated independent predictive ability for the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy, wherein favorable scores (GPS 0-1) were significantly correlated with superior PFS and OS compared to unfavorable scores (GPS 2: PFS: 14.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.0001; OS: 35.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary examination revealed that the GPS was significantly associated with PFS and OS in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for LD-SCLC, indicating its potential utility in assessing the therapeutic outcomes in LD-SCLC.

Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.

Association Between Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Durvalumab Consolidation Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The LIPI, based on pretreatment derived neutrophils/[leukocytes-neutrophils] ratio (dNLR) and LDH, is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess baseline LIPI correlation with durvalumab consolidation outcomes in the locally advanced setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Multicentre retrospective study (330 patients) with stage III unresectable NSCLC treated with durvalumab after chemo-radiotherapy between April 2015 and December 2020; 65 patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy only. Baseline LIPI characterized 3 groups: good (dNLR≤3+LDH≤ULN), intermediate (dNLR>3/LDH>ULN) and poor (dNLR>3+LDH>ULN). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In the durvalumab cohort, median age was 67 years, 95% smokers, 98% with a performance status of 0-1; 60% had nonsquamous histology and 16% a PD-L1 expression <1%. Radiotherapy was delivered concurrently in 81%. LIPI was evaluable in 216 patients: 66% good, 31% intermediate, 3% poor. LIPI significantly correlated with median OS (median follow-up: 19 months): 18.1 months vs. 47.0 months vs. not reached in poor, intermediate and good LIPI groups, respectively (P = .03). A trend between objective response rate and LIPI groups was observed: 0% vs. 41% vs. 45%, respectively (P = .05). The pooled intermediate/poor LIPI group was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.97; P = .03) and higher risk of progressive disease (OR 2.68; P = .047). Survivals and response were not influenced in the control cohort.

CONCLUSION

Baseline LIPI correlated with outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with durvalumab consolidation, but not in those who only received chemo-radiotherapy, providing further evidence of its prognostic and potential predictive role of ICI benefit in NSCLC.

Predictors of Immunotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Immune-Related Toxicity

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proposed as the standard first-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analyzed whether patients with good lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICIs and the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in clinical practice.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included in the study. Toxicity was assessed according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (based on treatment and histology) were assessed. LIPI and response were assessed. LIPI included dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/(white blood cell count - absolute neutrophil count)) ≥ 3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal. Patients were stratified into good (G), intermediate (I), and poor (P) prognostic groups.

Results

A total of 168 patients were included (130 men and 38 women, mean age 64.3 years). ICI use in the first- or second-line treatment was 65% and 35%, respectively. Fifteen (9%) patients showed complete response (CR), 50 (30%) showed partial response (PR), 39 (22%) had stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) had progressive disease (PD), and 19 (11%) were not evaluated (NE). Patients with good prognostic LIPI (dNLR < 3 and normal LDH levels) showed a better response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months in G, 6 months in I, and 2 months in P. Overall survival (OS) was 27 months in G, 8 months in I, and 3 months in P. One hundred fourteen patients died (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). Patients with adenocarcinoma were 116 (77 with irAEs G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, eight PD, and four NE)), and without were 39 (three PR, six SD, 21 PD, and nine NE). Fifty-two patients had squamous carcinoma (27 with irAEs G1-4 (two CR, 12 PR, nine SD, and four PD)), and 25 did not (four PR, three SD, 12 PD, and six NE)). IrAEs appearance was observed in longer PFS (19 vs. 2 months) and OS (27 vs. 4 months; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

LIPI was a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAEs is associated with a better immune response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicted a worse prognosis.

Clinical predictors of response to single‑agent immune checkpoint inhibitors in chemotherapy‑pretreated non‑small cell lung cancer

Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard option for chemotherapy-pretreated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however only a subset of patients responds to this treatment. The present study aimed at the development of a tool for personalized prediction of the efficacy of ICIs. The study included 181 epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving single-agent ICI in the second or later line of therapy. For the comparison, a total of 63 metastatic patients with NSCLC treated by chemotherapy were also analyzed. Multivariate analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, never-smoking status and the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥4.3 were associated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) [ECOG PS: Hazard ratio (HR)=2.09; P=0.028 and HR=2.02; P=0.035, respectively; never-smoking: HR=3.53; P=0.007 and HR=1.80; P=0.004, respectively; NLR ≥4.3: HR=4.34; P<0.0001 and HR=4.89; P<0.0001 respectively]. Patients with an NLR <4.3, who had a favorable ECOG PS (0-1) and smoking history in the past, derived the utmost benefit from ICI [n=77; objective response rate (ORR)=35%; PFS and OS: 17.1 and 33.7 months, respectively]. The worst efficacy of ICI was observed in patients who had an NLR ≥4.3 coupled with poor ECOG PS and/or never-smoking status (n=38; ORR=8%; PFS=3.2 months and OS=7.2 months). The remaining patients belonged to the group with intermediate outcomes (n=66; ORR=17%; PFS and OS: 4.3 and 12.2 months, respectively). While combination of these factors was highly predictive for ICIs, it was not associated with outcomes of chemotherapy treatment. Easily available characteristics of the patients allow for highly accurate predictions of outcomes of single-agent ICI therapy in chemotherapy-pretreated NSCLC.

G-CSF improving combined whole brain radiotherapy and immunotherapy prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the therapeutic advantage of G-CSF to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in combination with immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 117 patients (37 in G-CSF group and 80 in no G-CSF group) who underwent first-line WBRT combined with immunotherapy were enrolled. Their survival, intracranial response, BM-related symptoms and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) of patients in G-CSF group was significantly improved compared to patients no G-CSF group (median time: 14.8 vs 10.2 months; HR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.38-0.97, p = 0.035). However, there were no significant differences in intracranial responses between the two groups (p > 0.05). The G-CSF group exhibited a significantly higher rate of relief from BM-related symptoms compared to the no G-CSF group (91.7 % vs 59.5 %, p = 0.037). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses indicated that after-treatment ALC > 0.9 × 10^9/L (HR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.32-0.99, p = 0.046) and Hb > 110 g/dL (HR 0.41, 95 % CI 0.24-0.71, p = 0.001) were significant potential factors associated with extended OS. The addition of G-CSF was well tolerated and effectively reduced the incidence of neutropenia (0 % vs 5.0 %, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Integrating G-CSF with WBRT and immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for NSCLC-BMs has exhibited significant efficacy and favorable tolerability.

Predictability of Neutrophile to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio on the Effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer patients: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The associations between the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with the responses of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and the NLR/PLR predictive potential were evaluated via meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases until October 2021. The relationship between NLR/PLR and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated using pooled hazard ratios (HR). The relationship between NLR/PLR and overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) was assessed via pooled odds ratios (OR). Heterogeneity between studies, publication bias, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, trim and fill meta-analysis, and the contour-enhanced funnel plot were performed using the R software.

RESULTS

A total of 44 (out of 875) studies met the eligibility criteria, providing a sample size of 4597 patients. Patients with a high NLR were statistically significantly associated with worse outcomes, including OS (pooled HR = 2.44; P < 0.001), PFS (pooled HR = 2.06; P < 0.001), DCR (pooled OR = 0.71; P < 0.001), and ORR (pooled OR = 0.33; P < 0.001). Similarly, a high PLR was associated with poorer outcomes in response to ICI drugs, including OS (pooled HR = 2.13; P < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR = 1.61; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High NLR and PLR were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the efficacy of ICI drugs in NSCLC patients. Thereby, it is possible to use NLR and PLR as potential and available biomarkers in the clinical practice to predict the outcome of ICI treatment in NSCLC patients.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) in NSCLC, Gastrointestinal, and Other Solid Tumors: Immunotherapy and Beyond

In the era of immunotherapy, identifying biomarkers of immune system activation has become a high-priority challenge. The blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been largely investigated as a biomarker in several cancer types. NLR values have been shown to mirror the tumor-induced inflammatory status and have been demonstrated to be a reliable prognostic tool across stages of disease and therapeutic approaches. When integrated with other biomarkers of response to immunotherapy, such as PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, and tumor-associated immune cells, the NLR may allow to further stratify patients with different likelihoods of deriving a significant clinical benefit. However, despite its accessibility, low cost, and easy interpretation, the NLR is still poorly used as a prognostic tool in daily clinical practice. In this review, we analyze the role of the NLR in defining the relationship between cancer and the immune system, its usefulness in daily clinical practice, and its relationship with other established or emerging biomarkers of immunotherapy outcomes.

Sixth-Week Immune-Nutritional-Inflammatory Biomarkers: Can They Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors?

BACKGROUND

We investigated the relationships between inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI), and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) to determine whether they could predict treatment response to pembrolizumab or nivolumab (immunotherapy) 6 weeks after the start of treatment (post-treatment).

METHODS

We included all patients with lung cancer treated with immunotherapy. We examined the biomarker trends and explored their associations with progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate (RR) at 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The presence of liver metastasis, low post-treatment NLR (<5), low post-treatment PLR (<170), intermediate post-treatment LIPI, and immune-related adverse events were significantly associated with the response. The multivariate analysis revealed that high post-treatment NLRs ≥ 5 (p = 0.004) and PLRs ≥ 170 (p ≤ 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of shorter OS. A good LIPI status was associated with better PFS (p = 0.020) and OS (p = 0.065). Post-treatment mGPS (0-2) was significantly associated with improved PFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-treatment NLR, PLR, LIPI, and mGPS are associated with worse OS and recurrence. These findings should be independently and prospectively validated in further studies.

Prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in gastric cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Emerging evidence suggests a correlation between the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Nevertheless, the existing findings remain contentious.

Methods

A comprehensive search of literature was conducted in databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, spanning from the inception of each database to August 30, 2023 to collect studies exploring the interplay between LMR and clinical outcomes. Eligible studies were selected following predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcomes encompassed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), which were estimated using hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Our analysis incorporated eight cohort studies, involving 815 patients. Aggregate data revealed associations between an elevated LMR at baseline and prolonged PFS (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.47-0.71, p<0.00001) and improved OS (HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.79; p=0.003). Furthermore, LMR exhibited a favorable association with PFS after treatment (HR=0.48; 95% CI: 0.29-0.79; p= 0.004), while such a correlation was not evident in the OS analysis. Importantly, a high level of LMR was associated with prolonged PFS across varying sample sizes, follow-up duration, treatment combinations, line of therapy, and cut-off values.

Conclusion

A high pre-treatment LMR is associated with improved OS and PFS in GC patients treated with ICIs. LMR emerges as a potent biomarker for prognostic assessment in these patients, offering valuable insights for informed treatment decisions within the domain of GC immunotherapy.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021228512.

Using peripheral immune-inflammatory blood markers in tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An INVIDIa-2 study sub-analysis

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) have been reported as prognosticators in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and melanoma. This analysis of the INVIDIa-2 study on influenza vaccination in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) assessed NLR and SII on overall survival (OS) by literature-reported (LR), receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)-derived (ROC) cutoffs or as continuous variable (CV). NLR and SII with ROC cutoffs of <3.4 (p < 0.001) and <831 (p < 0.001) were independent factors for OS in multivariate analysis. SII with LR, ROC, or CV significantly predicted OS in NSCLC (p = 0.002, p = 0.003, p = 0.003), RCC (p = 0.034, p = 0.014, p = 0.014), and melanoma (p = 0.038, p = 0.022, p = 0.019). NLR with LR and ROC cutoffs predicted OS in first line (p < 0.001 for both) and second line or beyond (p = 0.006 for both); likewise SII (p < 0.001; p = 0.002 and p < 0.001). NLR and SII are prognosticators in NSCLC, RCC, and melanoma treated with ICIs.

Screening biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1 overexpression

PURPOSE

Immunotherapy plays an important role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); in particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy has good therapeutic effects in PD-L1-positive patients. This study aims to screen NSCLC patients with PD-L1-positive expression and select effective biomarkers for ICI immunotherapy.

METHODS

Collected tumor samples from the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and 117 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC were included in the study. All patients were on first- or second-line therapy and not on targeted therapy. Based on the molecular profiles and clinical features, we screened biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with PD-L1 overexpression.

RESULTS

117 NSCLC patients receiving ICIs immunotherapy were enrolled. First, we found that immunotherapy was more effective in patients with positive PD-L1 expression. Second, we found that ROS1 gene mutations, KRAS gene mutations, tumor stage, and the endocrine system diseases history are independent prognostic factors for PD-L1 positive patients. Then we combined independent risk factors and constructed a new Nomogram to predict the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs immunotherapy in PD-L1 positive patients. The Nomogram integrates these factors into a prediction model, and the predicted C-statistic of 3 months, 6 months and 12 months are 0.85, 0.84 and 0.85, which represents the high predictive accuracy of the model.

CONCLUSIONS

We have established a model that can predict the efficacy of ICIs immunotherapy in PD-L1 positive patients. The model consists of ROS1 gene mutations, KRAS gene mutations, tumor staging, and endocrine system disease history, and has good predictive ability.

The prognostic biological markers of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current landscape and future perspective

The emergence of immunotherapy, particularly programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) produced profound transformations for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, not all NSCLC patients can benefit from immunotherapy in clinical practice. In addition to limited response rates, exorbitant treatment costs, and the substantial threats involved with immune-related adverse events, the intricate interplay between long-term survival outcomes and early disease progression, including early immune hyperprogression, remains unclear. Consequently, there is an urgent imperative to identify robust predictive and prognostic biological markers, which not only possess the potential to accurately forecast the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC but also facilitate the identification of patient subgroups amenable to personalized treatment approaches. Furthermore, this advancement in patient stratification based on certain biological markers can also provide invaluable support for the management of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients. Hence, in this review, we comprehensively examine the current landscape of individual biological markers, including PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, hematological biological markers, and gene mutations, while also exploring the potential of combined biological markers encompassing radiological and radiomic markers, as well as prediction models that have the potential to better predict responders to immunotherapy in NSCLC with an emphasis on some directions that warrant further investigation which can also deepen the understanding of clinicians and provide a reference for clinical practice.

Using the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio to predict the outcome of individuals with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer receiving pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed

BACKGROUND

Factors predicting the response to pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed combination therapy (Pemb-Plt-PEM) in nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC) are unclear. We investigated the Glasgow Prognostic (GP) score, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) as predictors of response to initial treatment with combination therapy in individuals with advanced non-sq NSCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 236 patients who received initial treatment with combination therapy for non-sq NSCLC at 13 institutions between December 2018 and December 2020. The usefulness of the GP score, NLR, and BMI as prognostic indicators was assessed. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The response rate was 51.2% (95% CI: 44.9-57.5%). The median PFS and OS after beginning Pemb-Plt-PEM were 8.8 (95% CI: 7.0-11.9) months and 23.6 (95% CI: 18.7-28.6) months, respectively. The NLR independently predicted the efficacy of Pemb-Plt-PEM-the PFS and OS were more prolonged in individuals with NLR <5 than in those with NLR ≥5 (PFS: 12.8 vs. 5.3 months, p = 0.0002; OS: 29.4 vs. 12.0 months, p < 0.0001). BMI predicted the treatment response-individuals with BMI ≥22.0 kg/m2 had longer OS than did those with BMI < 22.0 kg/m2 (OS: 28.4 vs. 18.4 months, p = 0.0086).

CONCLUSIONS

The NLR significantly predicted PFS and OS, whereas BMI predicted OS, in individuals who initially received Pemb-Plt-PEM for non-sq NSCLC. These factors might be prognosis predictors in non-sq NSCLC.

Prognostic Potential of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Pembrolizumab Combination Therapy with Carboplatin and Paclitaxel/Nab-Paclitaxel

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab (Pemb) therapy in conjunction with carboplatin and paclitaxel (PTX)/nab-PTX has been efficacious in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the response predictors of this combination therapy (Pemb-combination) remain undetermined. We aimed to evaluate whether Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), body mass index (BMI), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are potential factors in prognosticating the response to Pemb-combination therapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 144 NSCLC patients receiving first-line treatment with Pemb-combination therapy from 13 institutions between December 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. GPS, NLR, BMI, PLR, and PNI were assessed for their efficacy as prognostic indicators. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to compare the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients.

RESULTS

The treatment exhibited a response rate of 63.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.0-70.6%). Following Pemb-combination administration, the median PFS and OS were 7.3 (95% CI: 5.3-9.4) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.9-22.1) months, respectively. Contrary to PNI, NLR, GPS, BMI, and PLR did not display substantially different PFS in univariate analysis. However, multivariate analysis did not identify PNI as an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Furthermore, univariate analysis revealed that GPS, BMI, and PLR exhibited similar values for OS but not NLR and PNI. Patients with PNI ≥45 were predicted to have better OS than those with PNI <45 (OS: 23.4 and 13.9 months, respectively, p = 0.0028). Multivariate analysis did not establish NLR as an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

The PNI evidently predicted OS in NSCLC patients treated with Pemb-combination as first-line therapy, thereby validating its efficiency as a prognostic indicator of NSCLC.

Circulating immune cell dynamics as outcome predictors for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) continues to transform the therapeutic landscape of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with these drugs now being evaluated at every stage of the disease. In contrast to these advances, little progress has been made with respect to reliable predictive biomarkers that can inform clinicians on therapeutic efficacy. All current biomarkers for outcome prediction, including PD-L1, tumor mutational burden or complex immune gene expression signatures, require access to tumor tissue. Besides the invasive nature of the sampling procedure, other disadvantages of tumor tissue biopsies are the inability to capture the complete spatial heterogeneity of the tumor and the difficulty to perform longitudinal follow-up on treatment. A concept emerges in which systemic immune events developing at a distance from the tumor reflect local response or resistance to immunotherapy. The importance of this cancer 'macroenvironment', which can be deciphered by comprehensive analysis of peripheral blood immune cell subsets, has been demonstrated in several cutting-edge preclinical reports, and is corroborated by intriguing data emerging from ICI-treated patients. In this review, we will provide the biological rationale underlying the potential of blood immune cell-based biomarkers in guiding treatment decision in immunotherapy-eligible NSCLC patients. Finally, we will describe new techniques that will facilitate the discovery of more immune cell subpopulations with potential to become predictive biomarkers, and reflect on ways and the remaining challenges to bring this type of analysis to the routine clinical care in the near future.

Detection of Cancer Recurrence Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Machine Learning after Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancers

Pretreatment values of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-established prognosticators in various cancers, including head and neck cancers. However, there are no studies on whether temporal changes in the NLR and PLR values after treatment are related to the development of recurrence. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to develop a deep neural network (DNN) model to discern cancer recurrence from temporal NLR and PLR values during follow-up after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to evaluate the model's performance compared with conventional machine learning (ML) models. Along with conventional ML models such as logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB), the DNN model to discern recurrences was trained using a dataset of 778 consecutive patients with primary head and neck cancers who received CCRT. There were 16 input features used, including 12 laboratory values related to the NLR and the PLR. Along with the original training dataset (N = 778), data were augmented to split the training dataset (N = 900). The model performance was measured using ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values. External validation was performed using a dataset of 173 patients from an unrelated external institution. The ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of the DNN model were 0.828 ± 0.032 and 0.663 ± 0.069, respectively, in the original training dataset, which were higher than the ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of the LR, RF, and GB models in the original training dataset. With the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm, five input features were selected. The ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of the DNN-RFE model were higher than those of the original DNN model (0.883 ± 0.027 and 0.778 ± 0.042, respectively). The ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values of the DNN-RFE model trained with a split dataset were 0.889 ± 0.032 and 0.771 ± 0.044, respectively. In the external validation, the ROC-AUC values of the DNN-RFE model trained with the original dataset and the same model trained with the split dataset were 0.710 and 0.784, respectively. The DNN model with feature selection using the RFE algorithm showed the best performance among the ML models to discern a recurrence after CCRT in patients with head and neck cancers. Data augmentation by splitting training data was helpful for model performance. The performance of the DNN-RFE model was also validated with an external dataset.

Immunotherapy-related adverse events in real-world patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer on chemoimmunotherapy: a Spinnaker study sub-analysis

Background

The Spinnaker study evaluated survival outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy in the real world. This sub-analysis assessed the immunotherapy-related adverse effects (irAEs) seen in this cohort, their impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and related clinical factors.

Methods

The Spinnaker study was a retrospective multicentre observational cohort study of patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in six United Kingdom and one Swiss oncology centres. Data were collected on patient characteristics, survival outcomes, frequency and severity of irAEs, and peripheral immune-inflammatory blood markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII).

Results

A total of 308 patients were included; 132 (43%) experienced any grade irAE, 100 (32%) Grade 1-2, and 49 (16%) Grade 3-4 irAEs. The median OS in patients with any grade irAES was significantly longer (17.5 months [95% CI, 13.4-21.6 months]) than those without (10.1 months [95% CI, 8.3-12.0 months]) (p<0.001), either if Grade 1-2 (p=0.003) or Grade 3-4 irAEs (p=0.042). The median PFS in patients with any grade irAEs was significantly longer (10.1 months [95% CI, 9.0-11.2 months]) than those without (6.1 months [95% CI, 5.2-7.1 months]) (p<0.001), either if Grade 1-2 (p=0.011) or Grade 3-4 irAEs (p=0.036). A higher rate of irAEs of any grade and specifically Grade 1-2 irAEs correlated with NLR <4 (p=0.013 and p=0.018), SII <1,440 (p=0.029 ad p=0.039), response to treatment (p=0.001 and p=0.034), a higher rate of treatment discontinuation (p<0.00001 and p=0.041), and the NHS-Lung prognostic classes (p=0.002 and p=0.008).

Conclusions

These results confirm survival outcome benefits in patients with irAEs and suggest a higher likelihood of Grade 1-2 irAEs in patients with lower NLR or SII values or according to the NHS-Lung score.

PD-1 blockade potentiates neoadjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC via increasing CD127+ and KLRG1+ CD8 T cells

The combination of PD-1 blockade with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has achieved unprecedented clinical success in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to NAC alone, but the underlying mechanisms by which PD-1 blockade augments the effects of chemotherapy remain incompletely elucidated. Single-cell RNA sequencing was performed on CD45⁺ immune cells isolated from surgically resected fresh tumors of seven NSCLC patients receiving NAC or neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and chemotherapy (NAPC). Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry was performed on FFPE tissues before and after NAC or NAPC from 65 resectable NSCLC patients, and results were validated with GEO dataset. NAC resulted in an increase only of CD20⁺ B cells, whereas NAPC increased the infiltration of CD20⁺ B cells, CD4⁺ T cells, CD4⁺CD127⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, CD8⁺CD127⁺ and CD8⁺KLRG1⁺ T cells. Synergistic increase in B and T cells promotes favorable therapeutic response after NAPC. Spatial distribution analysis discovered that CD8⁺ T cells and their CD127⁺ and KLRG1⁺ subsets were in closer proximity to CD4⁺ T/CD20⁺ B cells in NAPC versus NAC. GEO dataset validated that B-cell, CD4, memory, and effector CD8 signatures correlated with therapeutic responses and clinical outcomes. The addition of PD-1 blockade to NAC promoted anti-tumor immunity through T and B cells recruitment in the tumor microenvironment and induced tumor-infiltrating CD8⁺ T cells skewed toward CD127⁺ and KLRG1⁺ phenotypes, which may be assisted by CD4⁺ T cells and B cells. Our comprehensive study identified key immune cell subsets exerting anti-tumor responses during PD-1 blockade therapy and that may be therapeutically targeted to improve upon existing immunotherapies for NSCLC.

Soluble biomarkers to predict clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer treated by immune checkpoints inhibitors

Lung cancer remains the first cause of cancer-related death despite many therapeutic innovations, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). ICI are now well used in daily practice at late metastatic stages and locally advanced stages after a chemo-radiation. ICI are also emerging in the peri-operative context. However, all patients do not benefit from ICI and even suffer from additional immune side effects. A current challenge remains to identify patients eligible for ICI and benefiting from these drugs. Currently, the prediction of ICI response is only supported by Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression with perfectible results and limitations inherent to tumor-biopsy specimen analysis. Here, we reviewed alternative markers based on liquid biopsy and focused on the most promising biomarkers to modify clinical practice, including non-tumoral blood cell count such as absolute neutrophil counts, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. We also discussed soluble-derived immune checkpoint-related products such as sPD-L1, circulating tumor cells (detection, count, and marker expression), and circulating tumor DNA-related products. Finally, we explored perspectives for liquid biopsies in the immune landscape and discussed how they could be implemented into lung cancer management with a potential biological-driven decision.

Association between immune-related adverse events and immunotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

Objective: Our study aimed to identify potential correlations between anti-tumor efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of online electronic databases up to March 2023 to identify any correlations between irAEs and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in NSCLC. We used meta-analysis RevMan 5.3 software to calculate pooled results. Results: Our meta-analysis of 54 studies revealed that patients who experienced irAEs achieved a significantly higher objective response rate (p < 0.00001) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.00001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.00001) than those who did not experience irAEs. Additionally, patients with ≥2 irAEs had better PFS, whereas no significant difference was observed between patients with or without squamous cell carcinoma. Subgroup analysis of irAE types indicated that irAEs (thyroid dysfunction and gastrointestinal, skin, or endocrine irAEs) were associated with better PFS and OS. However, no significant differences were observed between patients with pneumonitis or hepatobiliary irAEs. Conclusion: Our study showed that the occurrence of irAEs was a strong predictor of survival efficacy in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs. Specifically, patients with ≥2 irAEs and those with thyroid dysfunction and gastrointestinal, skin, or endocrine irAEs achieved a better survival benefit. Systematic Review Registration: Website: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier: CRD42023421690.

Factors Predictive of Primary Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Primary resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is observed in routine clinical practice. We sought to determine factors predictive of primary resistance to ICI monotherapy, defined by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) as progression within 6 months of ICI treatment with patients receiving at least 6 weeks of ICI monotherapy, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHOD

Patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with at least 6 weeks of single-agent ICI at two tertiary hospitals in Singapore were included. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilised to elucidate factors predictive of primary resistance to ICI.

RESULTS

Of the 108 eligible patients, 59 (54.6%) experienced primary resistance. The majority were male (65.7%), smokers (66.3%), Chinese (79.6%), had adenocarcinoma (76.9%), received Pembrolizumab (55.6%) and received immunotherapy treatment in the later line setting (≥2 lines) (61.1%). Female gender (aOR = 3.16, p = 0.041), a sixth-week neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≥3) (aOR = 3.454, p = 0.037) and a later line of immunotherapy treatment (≥2 lines) (aOR = 2.676, p = 0.040) were factors predictive of primary resistance to ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Using SITC criteria, an elevated NLR (≥3) at 6 weeks, female gender and a later line of immunotherapy treatment (≥2 lines) were predictive factors of developing primary resistance to ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) for treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the recent advances

The immune system uses various immune checkpoint axes to adjust responses, support homeostasis, and deter self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Nevertheless, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) can use protective mechanisms to facilitate immune evasion, which leads to potentiated cancer survival and proliferation. In this light, many blocking anti-bodies have been developed to negatively regulate checkpoint molecules, in particular, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) / PD-ligand 1 (L1), and bypass these immune suppressive mechanisms. Meanwhile, anti-PD-1 anti-bodies such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, cemiplimab, and sintilimab have shown excellent competence in successfully inspiring immune responses versus NSCLC. Accordingly, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently approved nivolumab (alone or in combination with ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab (alone or in combination with chemotherapy) as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients. However, PD-1 blockade monotherapy remains inefficient in more than 60% of NSCLC patients, and many patients don't respond or acquire resistance to this modality. Also, toxicities related to anti-PD-1 anti-body have been progressively identified in clinical trials and oncology practice. Herein, we will outline the clinical benefits of PD-1 blockade therapy alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., chemotherapy, radiotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy) in NSCLC patients. Moreover, we will take a glimpse into the recently identified predictive biomarkers to determine patients most likely to suffer serious adverse events to decrease untoward toxicity risk and diminish treatment costs.

Immunotherapy of thymic epithelial tumors: molecular understandings and clinical perspectives

Immunotherapy has emerged to play a rapidly expanding role in the treatment of cancers. Currently, many clinical trials of therapeutic agents are on ongoing with majority of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) especially programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) and its ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. PD-1 and PD-L1, two main immune checkpoints, are expressed at high levels in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) and could be predictors of the progression and immunotherapeutic efficacy of TETs. However, despite inspiring efficacy reported in clinical trials and clinical practice, significantly higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than other tumors bring challenges to the administration of ICIs in TETs. To develop safe and effective immunotherapeutic patterns in TETs, understanding the clinical properties of patients, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of immunotherapy and irAEs occurrence are crucial. In this review, the progress of both basic and clinical research on immune checkpoints in TETs, the evidence of therapeutic efficacy and irAEs based on PD-1 /PD-L1 inhibitors in TETs treatment are discussed. Additionally, we highlighted the possible mechanisms underlying irAEs, prevention and management strategies, the insufficiency of current research and some worthy research insights. High PD-1/PD-L1 expression in TETs provides a rationale for ICI use. Completed clinical trials have shown an encouraging efficacy of ICIs, despite the high rate of irAEs. A deeper mechanism understanding at molecular level how ICIs function in TETs and why irAEs occur will help maximize the immunotherapeutic efficacy while minimizing irAEs risks in TET treatment to improve patient prognosis.

Combined systemic immune-inflammatory index and prognostic nutritional index predict outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy

Background

Systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) could evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in different tumors. However, no studies investigated the SII-PNI score to predict outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the SII-PNI score in predicting outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy.

Materials and methods

Our study retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 124 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving platinum-doublet chemotherapy. The SII and PNI were calculated based on peripheral blood cell counts and serum albumin, and the optimal cut-off values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC). All patients were divided into three groups according to the SII-PNI score. The association between the SII-PNI score and the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients was examined. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival (OS).

Results

There was no significant correlation between SII, PNI at baseline and chemotherapy response in patients with advanced NSCLC (p>0.05). However, after receiving 4 cycles of platinum-doublet chemotherapy, the SII of the SD group (p=0.0369) and PD group (p=0.0286) was significantly higher than that of the PR group. At the same time, the PNI of the SD group (p=0.0112) and the PD group (p=0.0007) was significantly lower than that of the PR group. The PFS of patients with SII-PNI scores of 0, 1, and 2 were 12.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months, and the OS of patients with SII-PNI scores of 0, 1, and 2 were 34.0, 17.0, and 10.5 months, respectively. There was statistical significance among the three groups (all p <0.001). Multivariate analyses showed that the chemotherapy response of progressive disease (PD) (HR, 3.508; 95% CI, 1.546-7.960; p=0.003) and SII-PNI score of 2 (HR, 4.732; 95% CI, 2.561-8.743; p < 0.001) were independently associated with a shorter OS. The uses of targeted drugs (HR, 0.543; 95% CI, 0.329-0.898; p=0.017) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (HR, 0.218; 95% CI, 0.081-0.584; p=0.002) were protective factors for OS in patients with NSCLC.

Conclusion

Compared with baseline parameters, the correlation between SII, PNI after 4 cycles of chemotherapy and the chemotherapy effect was more significant. The SII-PNI score after 4 cycles of chemotherapy is an effective prognostic biomarker for advanced NSCLC patients treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Patients with a higher SII-PNI score had a worse prognosis.

Liquid biopsy on the horizon in immunotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: current status, challenges, and perspectives

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most threatening malignancies to human health and life. In most cases, patients with NSCLC are already at an advanced stage when they are diagnosed. In recent years, lung cancer has made great progress in precision therapy, but the efficacy of immunotherapy is unstable, and its response rate varies from patient to patient. Several biomarkers have been proposed to predict the outcomes of immunotherapy, such as programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Nevertheless, the detection assays are invasive and demanding on tumor tissue. To effectively predict the outcomes of immunotherapy, novel biomarkers are needed to improve the performance of conventional biomarkers. Liquid biopsy is to capture and detect circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and exosomes in body fluids, such as blood, saliva, urine, pleural fluid and cerebrospinal fluid as samples from patients, so as to make analysis and diagnosis of cancer and other diseases. The application of liquid biopsy provides a new possible solution, as it has several advantages such as non-invasive, real-time dynamic monitoring, and overcoming tumor heterogeneity. Liquid biopsy has shown predictive value in immunotherapy, significantly improving the precision treatment of lung cancer patients. Herein, we review the application of liquid biopsy in predicting the outcomes of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and discuss the challenges and future directions in this field.

The predictive value of inflammatory biomarkers for major pathological response in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and its association with the immune-related tumor microenvironment: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory biomarkers in the peripheral blood have been established as predictors for immunotherapeutic efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whether they can also predict major pathological response (MPR) in neoadjuvant setting remains unclear.

METHODS

In this multi-center retrospective study, 122 and 92 stage I-IIIB NSCLC patients from six hospitals who received neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy followed by surgery were included in the discovery and external validation cohort, respectively. Baseline and on-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated and associated with MPR. Furthermore, resected tumor samples from 37 patients were collected for RNA-sequencing to investigate the immune-related tumor microenvironment.

RESULTS

In both the discovery and validation cohorts, the on-treatment NLR, dNLR, PLR, and SII levels were significantly lower in the patients with MPR versus non-MPR. On-treatment SII remained an independent predictor of MPR in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of on-treatment SII for predicting MPR was 0.75 (95%CI, 0.67-0.84) in the discovery cohort. Moreover, the predictive value was further improved by combining the on-treatment SII and radiological tumor regression data, demonstrating an AUC of 0.82 (95%CI, 0.74-0.90). The predictive accuracy was validated in the external cohort. Compared with the SII-high group, patients with SII-Low were associated with the activated B cell receptor signaling pathway and a higher intratumoral immune cell infiltration level.

CONCLUSIONS

On-treatment SII was independently associated with MPR in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Prognostic Significance of the Post-Treatment Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Pharyngeal Cancers Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Even though the pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are well-established prognosticators in various cancers including head and neck cancers, there have been relatively few studies on the clinical significance of the post-treatment values. This study aimed to investigate the changes in NLR and PLR after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and to evaluate their prognostic significance in pharyngeal cancers.

METHODS

This study was retrospectively conducted on 461 consecutive patients with primary pharyngeal cancer who had received definitive CCRT. Blood test results before and after CCRT were obtained, and the pre- and post-treatment NLR and PLR were calculated. Patient prognosis was evaluated based on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

After CCRT, the NLR increased from 2.01 (interquartile range (IQR), 1.53-2.62) to 2.69 (IQR, 1.93-3.81), and the PLR increased from 118.84 (IQR, 92.61-151.63) to 193.19 (IQR, 146.28-262.46). Along with high pre-treatment NLR and high pre-treatment PLR, high post-treatment NLR was also significantly associated with worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). In addition, patients with a high ΔNLR (i.e., the difference between pre- and post-treatment NLRs) had significantly worse OS and RFS (p = 0.013 and p = 0.026). However, only a high pre-treatment NLR (hazard ratio (HR), 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-4.08; p = 0.014), age (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.14-4.08; p = 0.018), and stage IV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.15-3.89; p = 0.017) were independent prognostic factors for OS in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with pharyngeal cancers, following CCRT, the NLR and PLR increased significantly from pre-treatment values. Like the pre-treatment NLR and PLR, a high post-treatment NLR and a significant increase in NLR were also associated with poor prognosis. Further prospective studies are required to prove the independent significance of the post-treatment NLR and PLR.

Prognostic value of inflammatory and nutritional indexes among advanced NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitor therapy

Though immunotherapy has to some extent improved the prognosis of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a few patients benefit. Furthermore, immunotherapy efficacy is affected by inflammatory and nutritional status of patients. To investigate whether dynamics of inflammatory and nutritional indexes were associated with prognosis, 223 patients were analysed retrospectively. The inflammatory indexes of interest were neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) while prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and the haemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet (HALP) score were considered as nutritional indexes. Patients were divided into high and low groups or into 'increase' and 'decrease' groups based on pre-treatment cut-off values and index dynamics after 6-week follow-up respectively. High pre-treatment PLR (OR = 2.612) and increase in NLR during follow-up (OR = 2.516) were significantly associated with lower objective response rates. Using multivariable analysis, high pre-treatment PLR (HR, 2.319) and increase in SII (HR, 1.731) predicted shorter progression-free survival, while high pre-treatment NLR (HR, 1.635), increase in NLR (HR, 1.663) and PLR (HR, 1.691) and decrease in PNI (HR, 0.611) predicted worse overall survival. The nomogram's C-index in inside validation was 0.718 (95% CI: 0.670-0.766). Our results indicated both nutritional and inflammatory indexes are associated with survival outcomes. Inflammatory indexes were additionally linked to treatment response. Index dynamics are better predictors than baseline values in predicting survival in advanced NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy as first-line.

Pretreatment glasgow prognostic score predicts survival among patients administered first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide for small cell lung cancer

Background

There are no established predictive biomarkers for the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate whether the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and body mass index (BMI) can predict the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy in patients with extensive-disease SCLC.

Methods

We reviewed data from 84 patients who received first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC at nine Japanese institutions between August 2019 and May 2021. Further, we evaluated the prognostic value of the GPS, NLR, and BMI. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Moreover, the GPS, NLR, and BMI consisted of C-reactive protein and albumin concentrations, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, and body weight and height, respectively.

Results

The response rate was 72.6% (95% confidence interval: 63.0-82.1%). The median PFS and OS from the initiation of treatment were 5.4 (95% CI: 4.9-5.9) months and 15.4 (95% CI: 11.4-16.8) months, respectively. The GPS independently predicted the effectiveness of first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide treatment, as a favorable GPS (GPS 0-1) was correlated with significantly better PFS and OS rates compared to a poor GPS (GPS 2) (PFS: 5.8 vs. 3.8 months, p = 0.0005; OS: 16.5 vs. 8.4 months, p<0.0001).

Conclusions

This is the first analysis to evaluate the association between the GPS, NLR, and BMI and the treatment effectiveness of survival among patients receiving first-line atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide therapy for SCLC. Among patients receiving this treatment for SCLC, GPS was significantly associated with the PFS and OS rates, suggesting that GPS might be useful for evaluating therapeutic outcomes in these patients.

Predictive significance of surgery-induced lymphopenia on the survival after curative resection for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Following the establishment of the anti-cancer effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors, lymphopenia has attracted attention as a parameter of preexisting cancer-related immune tolerance. Although the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) has been reported as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer patients, the impact of perioperative changes in the ALC remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to explore the relationship between surgery-induced lymphopenia and outcome.

METHODS

Database entries for 584 patients who underwent curative resections for pathological Stage IB-III gastric cancer were reviewed. We retrospectively compared clinicopathological factors including pretreatment ALC (pre-ALC) and ALC at first visit after discharge (post-ALC) with the survival. The low ALC was defined as < 1000/μL.

RESULTS

The ALC decreased significantly at 1 and 3 days after surgery and then recovered to the baseline value. A low pre-ALC (p < 0.001) and a low post-ALC (p < 0.001) were both correlated with a poor relapse-free survival (RFS). A multivariate analysis of RFS identified a low post-ALC (hazard ratio 1.875, 95% CI 1.156-3.402, p = 0.01), age, gender, BMI, T disease, N disease, severe vessel invasion, type of gastrectomy and postoperative morbidity as independent factors. The low post-ALC group had a poor RFS among patients with Stage II (p = 0.04) and Stage III (p = 0.04) disease, but not among patients with Stage IB disease (p = 0.13). Consistently, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly lower among patients with a low post-ALC for all stage (p < 0.001), stage II (p = 0.02) and stage III (p = 0.01) disease, not for stage IB (p = 0.09). A low post-ALC was identified as an independent factor for predicting OS by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 2.275, 95% CI 1.373-3.769, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in post-ALC was correlated with both of RFS and OS after curative resection in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

HIGHLIGHTS

Postoperative lymphopenia was a poor prognostic factor for gastric cancer.

The Effects of GCSF Primary Prophylaxis on Survival Outcomes and Toxicity in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer on First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy: A Sub-Analysis of the Spinnaker Study

GCSF prophylaxis is recommended in patients on chemotherapy with a >20% risk of febrile neutropenia and is to be considered if there is an intermediate risk of 10−20%. GCSF has been suggested as a possible adjunct to immunotherapy due to increased peripheral neutrophil recruitment and PD-L1 expression on neutrophils with GCSF use and greater tumour volume decrease with higher tumour GCSF expression. However, its potential to increase neutrophil counts and, thus, NLR values, could subsequently confer poorer prognoses on patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis follows on from the retrospective multicentre observational cohort Spinnaker study on advanced NSCLC patients. The primary endpoints were OS and PFS. The secondary endpoints were the frequency and severity of AEs and irAEs. Patient information, including GCSF use and NLR values, was collected. A secondary comparison with matched follow-up duration was also undertaken. Three hundred and eight patients were included. Median OS was 13.4 months in patients given GCSF and 12.6 months in those not (p = 0.948). Median PFS was 7.3 months in patients given GCSF and 8.4 months in those not (p = 0.369). A total of 56% of patients receiving GCSF had Grade 1−2 AEs compared to 35% who did not receive GCSF (p = 0.004). Following an assessment with matched follow-up, 41% of patients given GCSF experienced Grade 1−2 irAEs compared to 23% of those not given GCSF (p = 0.023). GCSF prophylaxis use did not significantly affect overall or progression-free survival. Patients given GCSF prophylaxis were more likely to experience Grade 1−2 adverse effects and Grade 1−2 immunotherapy-related adverse effects.

Effectiveness and safety of anti-PD-1 monotherapy or combination therapy in Chinese advanced gastric cancer: A real-world study

Purpose

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers and one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide, especially in eastern Asia and China. Anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab, have been approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC). Our study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of anti-PD-1-based treatment (monotherapy or combination therapy) in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic GC/GEJCs in a real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, and 54 patients from May 31, 2015, to May 31, 2021, were included in our analysis, including 19 patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy and 35 patients treated with anti-PD-1 combination therapy. Demographic and clinical information were evaluated. Clinical response, survival outcomes, and safety profile were measured and analyzed.

Results

Overall, the median overall survival (mOS) was 11.10 months (95% CI, 7.05-15.15), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.93 months (95% CI, 2.47-5.39). Of the patients, 16.7% achieved a clinical response, and 72.2% achieved disease control. Prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and increased clinical response were observed in the combination group compared with the monotherapy group, although statistical significance was not reached. In subgroups with live metastases or elevated baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) levels, combination therapy outperformed anti-PD-1 alone in survival outcomes. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (n = 5, 26.3%) had fewer treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) than those in the combination group (n = 22, 62.9%). There were also fewer patients with TRAEs of grades 3-5 with monotherapy (n = 2, 10.5%) than with combination therapy (n = 7, 20.0%). Pneumonitis in three patients was the only potential immune-related adverse event reported.

Conclusions

Anti-PD-1-based monotherapy and combination therapy showed favorable survival outcomes and manageable safety profiles in advanced or metastatic GC/GEJCs. In clinical treatment, immunotherapy should be an indispensable choice in the treatment strategy for GC/GEJC. Patients with a heavy tumor burden and more metastatic sites might benefit more from combination therapy. Elderly patients and patients with more treatment lines or high Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores might be more suitable for immune monotherapy, and some clinical benefits have been observed.

Decreased monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio was associated with satisfied outcomes of first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer

Objectives

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are more widely used than monotherapy and have shown better survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic driver alterations. The monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) might predict the treatment outcomes of ICI therapy in advanced NSCLC patients but has not yet been investigated. In addition, the cutoff of MLR is controversial. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the associations between changes in MLR at the initial stage of treatment and clinical outcomes in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients receiving first-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy.

Methods

The present study included 139 stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy. The blood results were assessed 10 days before initiation of PD-1 inhibitor-based combination therapy (time point 1, baseline) and before the third cycle of combined therapy (time point 2). Compared to altered MLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in baseline and in time point 2, patients were divided into decreased MLR/NLR/PLR and increased MLR/NLR/PLR groups. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and the association with the changes in blood indicators were analyzed.

Results

A total of 48 patients were categorized in the decreased MLR group and 91 in the increased MLR group. Patients with decreased MLR had a significantly higher ORR in the univariate (P<0.001) and multivariate (P<0.001) Cox proportional hazards models. On the other hand, decreased MLR was significantly associated with prolonged PFS in the univariate (P=0.007) and multivariate (P=0.016) analyses. Next, 91 patients comprised the decreased NLR group and 48 as the increased NLR group. Patients with decreased NLR exhibited high ORR (P=0.001) and prolonged PFS in univariate analysis (P=0.033). Then, 64 patients comprised the decreased PLR group and 75 the increased PLR group. Decreased PLR was significantly associated with high ORR in univariate (P<0.001) and multivariate (P=0.017) analyses. The subgroup analyses showed that decreased MLR was significantly associated with satisfactory outcomes in patients with all PD-L1 expressions.

Conclusion

Decreased MLR was associated with high ORR and long PFS and might have a potential predictive value in patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with first-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy. In addition, changes in MLR might have predictive value in all PD-L1-expressing populations. Decreased NLR and PLR also showed improved survival, suggesting that changes in NLR and PLR may be complementary to predicting prognosis.

Real-world experience of consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab consolidation is associated with improved survival following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the heterogeneity of stage III NSCLC patients, in this study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of durvalumab in the real-world setting.

METHOD

Unresectable stage III NSCLC patients were retrospectively studied: one cohort received CCRT, another had CCRT-durvalumab. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were relapse rate and safety. In CCRT-durvalumab cohort, association between blood markers with survival and pneumonitis risk were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients were enrolled: 45 received CCRT, and 39 received CCRT-durvalumab. Median PFS was 17.5 months for CCRT-durvalumab and 8.9 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.47, p = 0.038). Median OS was not-reached for CCRT-durvalumab and 22.3 months for CCRT-alone (HR 0.35, p = 0.024). Both EGFR-positive and wild-type (WT) patients had numerically improved PFS with durvalumab consolidation compared to CCRT-alone, 17.5 versus 10.9 months and 11.8 versus 6.63 months, respectively (interaction p-value = 0.608). Grade 2+ pneumonitis was detected in 25% of patients in the durvalumab cohort. Most pneumonitis occurred at 3.5 weeks after durvalumab initiation. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥ 3 and ≥5 were associated with shorter PFS with durvalumab. Week 6 platelet-lymphocyte-ratio ≥ 180 was associated with a lower risk of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, durvalumab consolidation post CCRT was associated with a statistically significant improvement in PFS and OS. Effect of durvalumab on PFS was not modified by EGFR status. Active surveillance for pneumonitis is crucial. Baseline NLR may help to predict the benefit of treatment with durvalumab.

Focus on the Dynamics of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: A number of studies have reported an association between the dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and clinical efficacy in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there is still a lack of a meta-analysis or systematic review. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until September 2022 for studies reporting on the association between the change in NLR after ICI treatment and clinical outcomes. Outcome measures of interest included: change in NLR before and after treatment, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Results: A total of 4154 patients in 38 studies were included. The pooled percentage of patients with increased NLR was 49.7% (95CI%: 43.7−55.8%). Six studies discussing the change in NLR in patients with different tumor responses all showed that the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. The upward trend in NLR was associated with shorter OS (pooled HR: 2.05, 95%CI: 1.79−2.35, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.66−2.14, p < 0.001) and higher ORR (pooled OR: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.19−0.39, p < 0.001), and downward trend in NLR was associated with longer OS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.42−0.58, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.48−0.63, p < 0.001) and lower ORR (pooled OR: 3.26, 95%CI: 1.92−5.53, p < 0.001). In addition, post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.52−2.18; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.93, 95%CI: 2.26−3.81), but the NLR at different time points may have a similar predictive effect on PFS (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.44−1.97; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.54−2.59). Conclusions: The NLR level of tumor patients after ICI treatment is stable overall, but the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. Patients with an upward trend in NLR after ICI treatment were associated with worse clinical outcomes; meanwhile, the downward trend in NLR was associated with better clinical outcomes. Post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR.

The prognostic value of baseline and early variations of peripheral blood inflammatory ratios and their cellular components in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab: The Δ-Meet-URO analysis

Background

Treatment choice for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients is still based on baseline clinical and laboratory factors.

Methods

By a pre-specified analysis of the Meet-URO 15 multicentric retrospective study enrolling 571 pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab, baseline and early dynamic variations (Δ) of neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet absolute cell counts (ACC) and their inflammatory ratios (IR) were evaluated alongside their association with the best disease response and overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariable analyses on OS and PFS between baseline and Δ ACC and IR values were investigated with receiving operating curves-based cut-offs.

Results

The analysis included 422 mRCC patients. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) increased over time due to consistent neutrophil increase (p < 0.001). Higher baseline platelets (p = 0.044) and lower lymphocytes (p = 0.018), increasing neutrophil Δ (p for time-group interaction <0.001), higher baseline IR values (NLR: p = 0.012, SII: p = 0.003, PLR: p = 0.003), increasing NLR and systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) (i.e., NLR x platelets) Δ (p for interaction time-group = 0.0053 and 0.0435, respectively) were associated with disease progression. OS and PFS were significantly shorter in patients with baseline lower lymphocytes (p < 0.001 for both) and higher platelets (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively) alongside early neutrophils Δ (p = 0.046 and p = 0.033, respectively). Early neutrophils and NLR Δ were independent prognostic factors for both OS (p = 0.014 and p = 0.011, respectively) and PFS (p = 0.023 and p = 0.001, respectively), alongside baseline NLR (p < 0.001 for both) and other known prognostic variables.

Conclusions

Early neutrophils and NLR Δ may represent new dynamic prognostic factors with clinical utility for on-treatment decisions.

Correlation between the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Prognostic Index and Outcomes in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicentre Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the prognostic value of the immune checkpoint inhibitor prognostic index (ICPI), based on the albumin (ALB) and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

We conducted a multicentre retrospective study with an ICIs cohort (n = 143) and a chemotherapy control cohort (n = 84). A Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression model were used to find the independent risk factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR) in NSCLC patients. The Kaplan–Meier was used to evaluating the PFS and OS.

Results

The ALB <35 g/L and dNLR >3 were correlated with worse PFS and OS for NSCLC patients receiving ICIs, respectively. The moderately high-risk ICPI had a significantly increased risk of progression (hazard ratio (HR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–2.91; P=0.012) and of death (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.12–4.87; P=0.024) and of nondisease control (odds ratio (OR) 3.05, 95% CI 1.19–7.83; P=0.021) and was correlated with worse PFS and 1-year survival rates (4.0 months vs. 7.2 months; P=0.001; 44.3% vs. 76.1%; P=0.001) compared with low-risk ICPI when it was characterized two groups. When ICPI was further divided into three groups, the results showed that the high-risk ICPI was correlated with worse PFS and 1-year survival rates. However, there was no difference in the chemotherapy cohort.

Conclusion

The ICPI was correlated with worse outcomes for NSCLC patients receiving ICIs but not for patients with chemotherapy.

Prognostic role of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It remains controversial whether the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) serves as a potential indicator for the efficacy of immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to address this concern.

Methods

Up to March 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to retrieve potentially eligible articles. Combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the relationship between PLR and progression-free survival (PFS) as well as overall survival (OS), while the combined odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated to evaluate the relationship between PLR and the objective response rate (ORR) as well as the disease control rate (DCR). Subgroup analyses were further performed to detect the source of heterogeneity and potential predictive value of PLR in different groups in terms of OS and PFS.

Results

A total of 21 included studies involving 2312 patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy were included. The combined results suggested that elevated PLR was associated with poorer OS (HR=2.24; 95% CI: 1.87-2.68; I² =44%; P=0.01) and PFS (HR=1.66; 95% CI: 1.36-2.04; I² =64%; P<0.01). Furthermore, elevated PLR showed a lower ORR (OR= 0.61; 95% CI: 0.43-0.87, I²=20%; P=0.29) and DCR (OR= 0.44; 95% CI: 0.27-0.72, I²=61%; P=0.02). In subgroup analyses, pretreatment PLR was significantly associated with adverse OS and PFS. The same results were observed in different PLRs in terms of cutoff value (>200 vs. ≤200). Furthermore, high PLR was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, PLR was not associated with OS and PFS in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In addition, PLR predicted poor OS irrespective of regions and types of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Conclusion

On the whole, patients with low PLR had better OS and PFS, as well as higher ORR and DCR when receiving immunotherapy in advanced lung cancer especially for advanced NSCLC. And further investigations are warranted to confirm the prognostic value of PLR in advanced SCLC.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022315976.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Markers for Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has led to a high number of mortalities. Immunotherapy, as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC, currently has no clarity regarding its prognostic markers to assess the treatment outcome. This systematic review aimed to evaluate neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as prognostic markers in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines, starting from screening for relevant studies from several databases. Each included cohort study was further assessed by using the Newcastle−Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and the available data were extracted for qualitative and quantitative synthesis in pooled and subgroup analysis. Results: A total of 1719 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Hazard ratio (HR) outcomes for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for NLR and PLR showed significant results, supporting NLR and PLR as prognostic markers (NLR: HR PFS 2.21 [95% CI: 1.50−3.24; p < 0.0001] and HR OS 2.68 [95% CI: 2.24−3.6; p < 0.0001]; PLR: HR PFS 1.57 [95% CI: 1.33−1.84; p < 0.00001] and HR OS 2.14 [95% CI: 1.72−2.67; p < 0.00001]). Subgroup analysis with a cut-off value of 5 for NLR and 200 for PLR also demonstrated notable outcomes. Higher NLR and PLR levels are associated with poor prognostic. Conclusions: There is considerable evidence regarding both markers as prognostic markers in NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, further studies with more homogeneous baseline characteristics are required to confirm these findings.

Peripheral Blood Biomarkers Predictive of Efficacy Outcome and Immune-Related Adverse Events in Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors

Background: Gastrointestinal cancers constitute a major burden of global cancer mortalities. In recent years, the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has greatly improved the survival of patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers, while predictive biomarkers of treatment efficacy and toxicities are still unmet demands. Methods: In our retrospective study, patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers who received single or double immune checkpoint inhibitors in the Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology in Peking University Cancer Hospital between July 2016 and February 2022 were enrolled. Records of clinicopathological information, survival parameters, safety data, and baseline and posttreatment peripheral blood constituents were retrieved. Cox regression analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the predictive factors of treatment outcomes and immune-related adverse events. Results: We demonstrated that early treatment lines, the presence of immune-related adverse events, and a lower C2 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent factors predicting a superior objective response rate and progression-free survival in patients treated with immunotherapy. Lower ECOG PS, higher baseline albumin, and lower C2 neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios were independent risk factors for the onset of immune-related adverse events. Patients who succumbed to immune-related adverse events during immunotherapy presented better survival. Conclusion: Our results indicate that peripheral blood markers have potential for predicting treatment outcomes and immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Prospective validations are warranted.