Tumor morphology and location associate with immune cell composition in pleomorphic sarcoma

Comprehensive Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment Reveals Prognostic ceRNA Network Related to Immune Infiltration in Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Sarcoma is the second most common solid tumor type in children and adolescents. The high level of tumor heterogeneity as well as aggressive behavior of sarcomas brings serious difficulties to developing effective therapeutic strategies for clinical application. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify accurate biomarkers for early detection and prognostic prediction of sarcomas.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this study, we characterized three subtypes of sarcomas based on tumor immune infiltration levels (TIIL), and constructed a prognosis-related competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network to investigate molecular regulations in the sarcoma tumor microenvironment (TME). We further built a subnetwork consisting of mRNAs and lncRNAs that are targets of key miRNAs and strongly correlated with each other in the ceRNA network. After validation using public data and experiments in vivo and in vitro, we deeply dug the biological role of the miRNAs and lncRNAs in a subnetwork and their impact on TME.

RESULTS

Altogether, 5 miRNAs (hsa-mir-125b-2, hsa-mir-135a-1, hsa-mir92a-2, hsa-mir-181a-2, and hsa-mir-214), 3 lncRNAs (LINC00641, LINC01146, and LINC00892), and 10 mRNAs (AGO2, CXCL10, CD86, CASP1, IKZF1, CD27, CD247, CD69, CCR2, and CSF2RB) in the subnetwork were identified as vital regulators to shape the TME. On the basis of the systematic network, we identified that trichostatin A, a pan-HDAC inhibitor, could potentially regulate the TME of sarcoma, thereby inhibiting the tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies a ceRNA network as a promising biomarker for sarcoma. This system provides a more comprehensive understanding and a novel perspective of how ceRNAs are involved in shaping sarcoma TME.

Surgical Site Infection Is Not Associated with 1-Year Progression-Free Survival After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Lower-Extremity Osteosarcoma: A Secondary Analysis of PARITY Study Data

BACKGROUND

Although there is evidence suggesting that postoperative infection confers a survival benefit in osteosarcoma treated with resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction, there have been no prospective studies to date to support these findings. This secondary analysis of Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery (PARITY) study data examines the relationship between surgical site infection (SSI) and disease progression within 12 months after limb salvage surgery.

METHODS

The PARITY trial was an international, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial of 604 patients who underwent resection of a lower-extremity bone tumor and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Our primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year following surgery among the patients with osteosarcoma. Subgroup analyses by disease stage at presentation and infection severity were also performed. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to examine the association between clinical and tumor characteristics, SSI, and PFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine the effect of SSI on PFS.

RESULTS

The 274 PARITY patients with osteosarcoma were included in this secondary analysis. Thirty-two (11.7%) of the patients presented with metastasis at baseline; 53 (19.3%) of the patients developed an SSI. There was no difference in 1-year PFS between patients with and without SSI. There was no decreased risk of disease progression at 1 year in patients with localized disease at baseline who developed an SSI (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.64 to 2.28). Infection was associated with increased disease progression at 1 year in patients with baseline metastases (HR = 4.26; 95% CI = 1.11 to 16.3).

CONCLUSIONS

No positive association was detected between postoperative infection and PFS at 1 year following surgery in this secondary analysis of prospective data. However, this analysis suggests infection could be a risk factor for early disease progression in patients with baseline metastases, and future investigations may better elucidate the association between disease burden and the host immune response to advance immunotherapeutic strategies for osteosarcoma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The immune landscape of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

Introduction

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) can be associated with a relatively dense immune infiltration. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1, anti-PDL1, and anti-CTLA4) are effective in 20% of UPS patients. We characterize the immune microenvironment of UPS and its association with oncologic outcomes.

Material and methods

Surgically resected UPS samples were stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the following: tumor-associated immune cells (CD3, CD8, CD163, CD20), immune checkpoints (stimulatory: OX40, ICOS; inhibitory: PD-L1, LAG3, IDO1, PD1), and the adenosine pathway (CD73, CD39). Sections were reviewed for the presence of lymphoid aggregates (LA). Clinical data were retrospectively obtained for all samples. The Wilcoxon rank-sum and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare distributions. Correlations between biomarkers were measured by Spearman correlation. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to identify biomarkers associated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Unsupervised clustering was performed, and Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests used for comparison of OS and DFS between immune clusters.

Results

Samples analyzed (n=105) included 46 primary tumors, 34 local recurrences, and 25 metastases. LA were found in 23% (n=10/43), 17% (n=4/24), and 30% (n=7/23) of primary, recurrent, and metastatic samples, respectively. In primary UPS, CD73 expression was significantly higher after preoperative radiation therapy (p=0.009). CD39 expression was significantly correlated with PD1 expression (primary: p=0.002, recurrent: p=0.004, metastatic: p=0.001), PD-L1 expression (primary: p=0.009), and CD3+ cell densities (primary: p=0.016, recurrent: p=0.043, metastatic: p=0.028). In recurrent tumors, there was a strong correlation between CD39 and CD73 (p=0.015), and both were also correlated with CD163+ cell densities (CD39 p=0.013; CD73 p<0.001). In multivariate analyses, higher densities of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (Cox Hazard Ratio [HR]=0.33; p=0.010) were independently associated with OS (CD3+, HR=0.19, p<0.001; CD8+, HR= 0.33, p=0.010) and DFS (CD3+, HR=0.34, p=0.018; CD8+, HR=0.34, p= 0.014). Unsupervised clustering of IHC values revealed three immunologically distinct clusters: immune high, intermediate, and low. In primary tumors, these clusters were significantly associated with OS (log-rank p<0.0001) and DFS (p<0.001).

Conclusion

We identified three immunologically distinct clusters of UPS Associated with OS and DFS. Our data support further investigations of combination anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and adenosine pathway inhibitors in UPS.

Chromosome instability and aneuploidy as context-dependent activators or inhibitors of antitumor immunity

Chromosome instability (CIN) and its major consequence, aneuploidy, are hallmarks of human cancers. In addition to imposing fitness costs on tumor cells through several cell-intrinsic mechanisms, CIN/aneuploidy also provokes an antitumor immune response. However, as the major contributor to genomic instability, intratumor heterogeneity generated by CIN/aneuploidy helps tumor cells to evolve methods to overcome the antitumor role of the immune system or even convert the immune system to be tumor-promoting. Although the interplay between CIN/aneuploidy and the immune system is complex and context-dependent, understanding this interplay is essential for the success of immunotherapy in tumors exhibiting CIN/aneuploidy, regardless of whether the efficacy of immunotherapy is increased by combination with strategies to promote CIN/aneuploidy or by designing immunotherapies to target CIN/aneuploidy directly.

CC-01 (chidamide plus celecoxib) modifies the tumor immune microenvironment and reduces tumor progression combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefit in solid tumors, with modest rates of clinical response. Hence, improved therapeutic approaches need to be investigated. Herein, we assessed a combination of chidamide plus celecoxib (called CC-01) combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade in a CT26 model as potent tumor microenvironment (TME) regulator. The antitumor activity was assessed by measuring tumor size, overall response rate, and survival rate. Immune profiling of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was performed by flow cytometry. Tumor tissues were assessed by chip assay to predict the possible pathway. Tumor size was significantly reduced in mice treated with CC-01 combined with or without anti-PD-1 antibody, however the triple combination therapy consistently demonstrated that it significantly increased both the ORR and survival rate in term of clinical applications. In the combination group, immune landscape profiling revealed decreased populations of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor-associated macrophages. Analysis of the mouse tumor chip data using Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of biological processes revealed that the triple combination upregulated genes associated with responses to interferon-gamma. Our results demonstrated that CC-01 possessed potent TME regulatory properties, augmenting the antitumor effect when combined with ICIs. This antitumor effect was achieved by altering the immune landscape in TILs (tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes) and was associated with immune cell activation in the TME. Furthermore, CC-01 demonstrated potent anticancer immune response activity, mainly reducing the number and function of several immunosuppressive cells. The combination of CC-01 with an ICI will further enhance the anticancer effect and boost the immune response rate. Collectively, our results support the clinical evaluation of CC-01 in combination with ICIs in several advanced cancers.

Novel Insights into the Immunotherapy of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Do We Need a Change of Perspective?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are rare mesenchymal tumors. With more than 80 histological subtypes of STSs, data regarding novel biomarkers of strong prognostic and therapeutic value are very limited. To date, the most important prognostic factor is the tumor grade, and approximately 50% of patients that are diagnosed with high-grade STSs die of metastatic disease within five years. Systemic chemotherapy represents the mainstay of metastatic STSs treatment for decades but induces response in only 15–35% of the patients, irrespective of the histological subtype. In the era of immunotherapy, deciphering the immune cell signatures within the STSs tumors may discriminate immunotherapy responders from non-responders and different immunotherapeutic approaches could be combined based on the predominant cell subpopulations infiltrating the STS tumors. Furthermore, understanding the immune diversity of the STS tumor microenvironment (TME) in different histological subtypes may provide a rationale for stratifying patients according to the TME immune parameters. In this review, we introduce the most important immune cell types infiltrating the STSs tumors and discuss different immunotherapies, as well as promising clinical trials, that would target these immune cells to enhance the antitumor immune responses and improve the prognosis of metastatic STSs patients.

Molecular Determinants of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Immunity: Targets for Immune Intervention

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a family of rare malignant tumors encompassing more than 80 histologies. Current therapies for metastatic STS, a condition that affects roughly half of patients, have limited efficacy, making innovative therapeutic strategies urgently needed. From a molecular point of view, STSs can be classified as translocation-related and those with a heavily rearranged genotype. Although only the latter display an increased mutational burden, molecular profiles suggestive of an “immune hot” tumor microenvironment are observed across STS histologies, and response to immunotherapy has been reported in both translocation-related and genetic complex STSs. These data reinforce the notion that immunity in STSs is multifaceted and influenced by both genetic and epigenetic determinants. Cumulative evidence indicates that a fine characterization of STSs at different levels is required to identify biomarkers predictive of immunotherapy response and to discover targetable pathways to switch on the immune sensitivity of “immune cold” tumors. In this review, we will summarize recent findings on the interplay between genetic landscape, molecular profiling and immunity in STSs. Immunological and molecular features will be discussed for their prognostic value in selected STS histologies. Finally, the local and systemic immunomodulatory effects of the targeted drugs imatinib and sunitinib will be discussed.