Role of early Ilizarov ring fixator in the definitive management of type II, IIIA and IIIB open tibial shaft fractures

Mid to Long-Term Outcomes of Grade III-B Open Tibial Fractures Definitively Managed With a Circular Frame: A 13-Year Prospective Database Study at a Major Trauma Center

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to report experience of a major trauma center utilizing circular frames as definitive fixation in patients sustaining Gustilo-Anderson 3B open tibial fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively interrogated.

SETTING

Single major trauma center in the United Kingdom.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

All patients over the age of 16 sustaining an open tibial fracture with initial debridement performed at the study center. All patients also received orthoplastic care for a soft tissue defect (via skeletal deformation or a soft tissue cover procedure) and subsequent definitive management using an Ilizarov ring fixator. Patients who received primary debridement at another center, had preexisting infection, sustained a periarticular fracture, or those who did not afford a minimum of 12-month follow-up were excluded. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to collate patient demographics and injury factors.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome of interest was deep infection rate with secondary outcomes including time to union and secondary interventions.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 43.2 year old, with 72% males, 34% smokers, and 3% diabetics. Total duration of frame management averaged 6.4 months (SD 7.7). Eight (3.5%) patients developed a deep infection and 41 (20%) exhibited signs of a pin site infection. Seventy-nine (35.1%) patients had a secondary intervention, of which 8 comprised debridement of deep infection, 29 bony procedures, 8 soft tissue operations, 30 frame adjustments, and 4 patients requiring a combination of soft tissue and bony procedures. Bony union was achieved in 221 cases (98.2%), 195 (86.7%) achieved union in a single frame without the need for secondary intervention, 26 required frame adjustments to achieve union. Autologous bone grafts were used in 10 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthoplastic care including circular frame fixation for Gustilo-Anderson-3B fractures of the tibia resulted in a low rate of deep infection (3.5%) and achieved excellent union rates (98.2%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Use of the Ilizarov Fixator for the Treatment of Open and Closed Tibial Shaft and Distal Tibial Fractures in Patients with Complex Cases

INTRODUCTION

Open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft or distal tibia can be challenging for surgeons to treat if the fractures are accompanied by aggravating conditions, such as various accompanying diseases, pronounced soft tissue injuries, osteomyelitis, and/or noncompliance. The aim of this retrospective study was to present our approach and results with the Ilizarov fixator as a treatment option for such individually complex cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2005 and 2018, 20 patients were treated with the Ilizarov fixator for fractures of the tibial shaft/distal tibia. The indication for this was a 2nd- to 3rd-degree open fracture in 10 patients, a 1st-degree open fracture in one patient, and closed fractures in 9 patients. Aggravating conditions included soft tissue injuries, osteomyelitis, leg deformities, multiple traumas, smoking, alcohol/drug abuse, and obesity (BMI > 60). In addition to demographic data, the time of fixator treatment, complications, and the endpoint of consolidation were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean time of fixator treatment was 29 (range 15-65) weeks. Complete fracture consolidation was achieved in 13 patients (65%) with the Ilizarov fixator. The mean follow-up period after fixator removal was 36 (range 2-186) months in 14 patients. Five patients with complete consolidation were lost to further follow-up. One patient was amputated. In six patients without union, internal osteosynthesis was carried out.

CONCLUSION

The use of the Ilizarov fixator is a treatment option for individual high-risk patients with complicating courses but should be seen as a salvage procedure due to the high complication rate and long treatment process.

Updates in Traumatic Lower Extremity Free Flap Reconstruction

SUMMARY

Lower extremity reconstruction, particularly in the setting of trauma, remains one of the most challenging tasks for the plastic surgeon. Advances in wound management and microsurgical techniques in conjunction with long-term outcomes studies have expanded possibilities for limb salvage, but many aspects of management have continued to rely on principles set forth by Gustilo and Godina in the 1980s. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive update on the various management aspects of traumatic lower extremity microvascular reconstruction based on the latest evidence, with an examination of recent publications.

Modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure for complex lower extremity reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Complex lower limb reconstruction due to severe trauma remains a challenge for reconstructive surgeons. Here, we introduce a modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure and evaluate its clinical efficacy.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 22 patients (range 10 to 64 years old) with unilateral lower limb injury underwent modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedures. Among them, 16 cases were traffic accidents, 5 cases were persistent ulcers, and 1 case was a degloving injury. The arterial pedicle of the flap was prepared in a Y-shaped fashion and microanastomosed to the posterior tibial artery of intact leg in a flow-through style. A split-thickness skin graft was applied to wrap the vascular pedicle after anastomosis. The flap was designed in a single or bilobed fashion according to the shape of the tissue defect. The operation time, the intraoperative blood loss and the length of hospital stays were recorded. The vascular pedicle was divided 4 weeks after anastomosis. Doppler ultrasound was performed to evaluate the blood flow of the donor posterior tibial artery during postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

All 22 flaps survived. The tissue defects ranged from 12 × 6 to 21 × 18 cm². The flap sizes ranged from 14 × 7.5 to 24 × 21 cm². The average operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stays were 6.73 ± 1.49 h, 280.95 ± 59.25 ml and 30.55 ± 2.52 days, respectively. Eighteen flaps were designed in a single fashion, while four were in bilobed fashion. Twenty patients underwent fasciocutaneous flap transplantations, while two underwent musculocutaneous flap transplantations. Two cases developed local lysis of the flap which healed after further debridement. Direct suture of the incision after flap harvest was performed in 16 cases, while additional full-thickness skin grafting was performed in the remaining 6 cases. Further bone transport procedures were performed in 15 patients who had severe tibia bone defects. The blood flow of donor posterior tibial artery was confirmed in all patients during follow-ups. All patients recovered flap sensation at the final follow-up. The postoperative follow-ups ranged from 18 to 84 months, and no long-term complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified donor blood flow-preserved cross-leg anterolateral thigh flap procedure is an ideal method to repair severe lower limb trauma with tibial artery occlusion which avoids sacrificing the major artery of the uninjured lower limb.

Retrospective clinical outcomes in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures using hexapod external fixator versus monolateral external fixator

BACKGROUND

External fixation, which can preserve the biomechanical microenvironment of fracture healing, plays an important role in managing the high-energy fractures with poor surrounding soft tissues. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences of clinical outcomes, if any, between hexapod external fixator and monolateral external fixator in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures.

METHODS

A total of 53 patients with high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures and definitively treated by the hexapod external fixator (HEF) or monolateral external fixator (MEF) were retrospectively collected and analyzed, from March 2015 to June 2019. There were 31 patients in the HEF treatment, and the other 22 patients were managed by the MEF. The demographic data, surgical duration, external fixation time, final radiological results, complications, and clinical outcomes were documented and analyzed. Difficulties that occurred during the treatment were classified according to Paley. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov criteria (ASAMI) at the last clinical visit.

RESULTS

The mean surgical duration in the HEF group (62.4 ± 8.3 min) was shorter than that in the MEF group (91.4 ± 6.9 min) (P < 0.05). All patients acquired complete bone union finally. Patients in the HEF group (24.2 ± 3.1 weeks) underwent a shorter average external fixation time than that in the MEF group (26.3 ± 3.8 weeks) (P < 0.05). Satisfactory alignment was achieved in all patients without the need for remanipulation. The residual sagittal plane deformities in the HEF group were all less than that in the MEF group (P < 0.05). The complication rate was 35.5% in the HEF group, while 45.5% in the MEF group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in ASAMI scores (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

There is no statistically significant difference in finally clinical outcomes between hexapod external fixator and monolateral external fixator in the definitive treatment of high-energy tibial diaphyseal fractures. The hexapod external fixation treatment is a superior effective method, including advantages of stable fixation, less surgical duration, postoperatively satisfactory fracture reduction, and fewer complications.

Evolution and Development of Ilizarov Technique in the Treatment of Infected Long Bone Nonunion with or without Bone Defects

The treatment of infected bone nonunion and bone defects is a considerable challenge in the orthopedics field. The standard clinical therapy methods include local free bone transplantation, vascularized bone graft, and the Ilizarov technique; the first two are controversial due to the iatrogenic self‐injury. The Ilizarov bone transport technique has been widely used to treat infected bone nonunion and bone defects, and good clinical effect has been demonstrated. Yet, it brings many related complications, which exerts additional suffering to the patient. The best treatment is to combine bone defect rehabilitation with infection control, intramedullary nail fixation, appropriate time for bone grafts, beaded type scaffold slippage and new Taylor fixation, reducing the external fixation time and the incidence of complications, thereby reducing the occurrence of patients' physical and psychological problems. This review focuses on the induction, summary and analysis of the Ilizarov bone transport technique in the treatment of infected long bone nonunion with or without bone defects, providing new ideas and methods for orthopedic disease prevention and treatment by the Ilizarov technique, which is following the development direction of digital orthopedics.

Staged correction trajectory with hexapod external fixator for the satisfactory reduction of long bone shaft fracture

Backgroud

When the reduction of long bone shaft fracture fragments is performed by a hexapod external fixator, the collision and interference between bony ends often results in an incomplete reduction and a time-consuming procedure. The purpose of this study was to present and determine the clinical effectiveness of staged correction trajectory with hexapod external fixator in the reduction of a long bone shaft fracture.

Methods

A total of 57 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by hexapod external fixator were retrospectively analyzed from June 2016 to February 2020. Thirty-one cases (Group I) underwent a conventional one-step reduction trajectory from June 2016 to July 2018. Starting in September 2018, the other twenty-six patients (Group II) underwent staged correction trajectory (three key points reduction trajectory of “distraction-derotation-reduction”). The demographic data, residual deformities before and after correction, number of repeated X-rays after the first postoperative X-ray, duration of deformity correction process, and external fixation time were analyzed. Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to evaluate the final clinical outcomes.

Results

All the 57 patients achieved satisfactory fracture reduction and bone union. There were no significant differences between the two groups in demographic data, residual deformities before and after correction, external fixation time, and final clinical outcomes (p > 0.05). The average number of repeated X-rays after the first postoperative X-ray and mean duration of deformity correction process in Group II (1.3 times, 2.9 days) were all less than those in Group I (2.3 times, 5.1 days) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the conventional one-step reduction trajectory, there is no differences in final clinical outcomes, but the staged correction trajectory provides less repeated X-rays and shorter reduction process duration.

The 50 most influential papers pertaining to the Ilizarov method: A bibliometric analysis

The Ilizarov method has become a widely recognised surgical technique. A bibliometric analysis of the 50 most-cited publications relating to the Ilizarov method was carried out. Cumulative number of citations was 4,918. Mean number of citations was 98. h-index was 50. Impact factor of these journals ranged from 0.5-5.082. Our study suggests that a highly cited and influential paper likely originated from an American journal with a high impact factor and was published in the 1990s/2000s. Our compilation of the 50 most influential papers on the Ilizarov method will prove invaluable to those in training and those involved in further advancing the technique.

Bone reconstruction: Subjective evaluation and objective analysis based on conventional digital X-rays - a retrospective evaluation

BACKGROUND

Various approaches have been used to evaluate callus stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. This assessment becomes even more critical as inadequate corticalization and premature removal of the frame lead to bending, refracture, and loss of length. This study aimed to verify the objective Pixel Value Ratio (PVR) and define an evaluation scheme to assess callus tissue development during internal and external bone lengthening.

HYPOTHESIS

There are no differences between subjective parameters and objective evaluation for external and internal bone lengthening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 24 patients in this retrospective study, treated by distraction osteogenesis of the lower limb. Ten patients were treated with external ring fixators and 14 with intramedullary lengthening devices. The minimum distraction distance was 3cm. Callus tissue was evaluated with the PVR, using digital X-rays during and after treatment. We combined this method with subjective evaluation parameters, including the continuity, signal intensity, and the regeneration tissue's homogeneity, presented in the X-ray Evaluation System for Distraction Osteogenesis (XESDO).

RESULTS

The subjective evaluation showed an increase of continuity and signal-intensity between 4th postoperative weeks and complete healing with significant differences between the external and internal groups for homogeneity only after four weeks and for all parameters at 3C (p<0.05). The PVR showed an increase during consolidation with values between 0.7 and 1.0 for both groups with almost perfect interobserver agreement. Significant lower values were found in the anterior tibial cases.

CONCLUSION

PVR appears to be a practical tool for radiological evaluation of callus tissue development. In combination with the newly introduced XESDO and the surgeon's experience, these methods can be helpful for decisions during all phases of distraction osteogenesis. It is important for adapting alignment or distraction-rate, as various potential complications can be detected early. However, further studies are necessary to assess the image-based determination of callus tissue stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; cohort study.

A Novel technique of three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame in gap non-union of tibia

INTRODUCTION

Gap non-union of tibia occurring mostly after trauma and many times complicated by infection, is a difficult problem to treat. The study aimed to assess the outcome of the three-ring construct of the Ilizarov fixator frame in the management of gap non-union of the tibia.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients of gap non-union of tibia operated from April 2016 to March 2019 with a three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame and follow-up done till March 2021. The mean age was 39.27 (range 10-66) years. The results were assessed by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria. MPTA, PPTA, and LDTA after removal of the frame were also measured.

RESULTS

Out of the total 30 cases, all the patients showed complete union. The Ilizarov fixator was kept for an average period of 11.43 months and the mean defect size was 7.17 (range 2-12) cm. All patients were followed up for an average period of 39.36 (range 24-54) months. According to the ASAMI score bone/radiological results, 27 were classified as excellent, 2 as good, and 1 as poor. Functionally 28 were graded as excellent and the remainder as good. The normal ranges of MPTA, LDTA & PPTA were also achieved in a majority (80%) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Our results after using only a three-ring Ilizarov fixator frame are almost equivalent to earlier studies and have advantages such as less weight, better patient compliance, superior radiographic visualization, easy mobilization, and reduced costs. Ilizarov ring fixator remains an excellent treatment modality for tibial non-union with a defect, regarding bone union, deformity correction, infection eradication, limb-length achievement, and limb function.

Locally developed external fixators as definitive treatment of open tibia diaphyseal fractures: a clinical prospective study conducted in Ivory Coast

BACKGROUND

This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of locally developed external fixators (LDEF) as definitive treatment for open tibia diaphyseal fractures (OTDF) in Ivory Coast.

METHODS

Gustilo I, II, and IIIA OTDFs of patients admitted within 24 hours of injury were prospectively included and treated with LDEF. The rates of union, mal-union, septic complications, as well as the functional results were assessed, in addition to the LDEF construct's integrity. Predictive factors of failure or poor results were assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 40 OTDF patients were admitted within 24 hours of injury. Gustilo I, II, and IIIA fractures were observed in three, 13, and 24 patients, respectively. Uneventful fracture healing was obtained in 29 cases, with an average union time of 8.47 months. Mal-union and non-union were registered in three and four cases, respectively. Pin-track infection (PTI) was observed in 13 cases and deep infection in seven. Infection resolved in all patients except four, who developed chronic osteomyelitis. None of the non-unions were associated with an infection. The overall functional result was satisfactory in 32 patients. PTI was the only predictive factor for chronic infection. Biplanar frames, when compared to monoplanar constructs, were associated with a significantly improved functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

LDEF improved significantly the OTDF management, as it provided better stability and superior fracture healing rates than what is observed with the standard of care in the same environment. PTI remains an essential problem but with, hopefully, limited negative consequences.

Determination of outcomes of complex upper end tibial fractures in squatting and cross leg sitting South Asian population

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of complex upper end tibial fractures has always been a challenge to orthopaedic surgeons. Though the roentgenogram results are satisfactory, the clinical and functional outcomes especially in terms of squatting/cross-leg sitting after long term follow-up are little known. Hence, we have done this study with a primary aim to assess the clinico-radiological and functional outcomes after operative fixation (mostly by locking plates) in complex upper end tibial fractures and a secondary aim to analyze correlation between functional outcome scores/range of motion (ROM) and the ability to squat & sit cross-legged in post-operative period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study included a total of 33 patients who were mainly treated with locking plates. In the follow-up, patients were assessed clinico-radiologically and outcome measurements were determined using the Tegner-Lysholm (T-L) Knee Score. Patients were categorized according to their ability to squat/sit cross-legged and a subgroup analysis was performed by comparing mean ROM and T-L score in each group.

RESULTS

Majority of patients were in young and adult age group with a male to female ratio of 4.5:1. The average age was 42.39 ±14.64 years. Road traffic accident was the most common mode of injury. Average time interval between injury and surgery was 5.8±4.4 days. All the fractures united by 5-9 months. Mean ROM and T-L score at last follow-up were 120.94°±13.63° and 88.12±7.24 respectively. Average shortening, varus and valgus deformity were 0.43±0.09 cm, 2.12°±0.62° and 1.06°±0.45° respectively. 14 patients (42.42%) were able to squat and 15 (45.45%) were able to sit cross-legged postoperatively. Upon subgroup analysis, difference of mean ROM in those who could squat/sit cross-legged was found statistically significant (p≤0.05), however the difference in mean functional scores was not significant (p≥0.05).

CONCLUSION

Complex upper tibial fractures are a difficult entity to deal with. Anatomical locking plates take care of the alignment, articular congruity as well as ligamentous balancing thus giving good mid-term outcomes after ORIF/MIPO. However, applicability of the present functional outcome scores in assessing squatting/cross leg sitting remains doubtful. More weightage needs to be given to these activities to evaluate the outcome in South Asian population.

Gustilo Type III Open and Comminuted Tibial Fractures Managed by Simultaneous Combination of a Free Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap and Ilizarov External Fixation: A Case Report

CASE

A 70-year-old woman who sustained Gustilo type III open and comminuted tibial fractures presented with extensive soft-tissue defect. Definitive surgery was performed using a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap for the extensive soft-tissue defect and Ilizarov external fixation (IEF) to stabilize the fractures and arthrodese the ankle. Ankle arthrodesis was accomplished by the wires penetrating the implanted muscle flap.

CONCLUSION

The combined free flap and IEF management protocol described in this report was effective in achieving early weight-bearing and prompt bone healing in an elderly patient with poor bone quality and extensive open and comminuted fractures.

Circular external fixation as definitive treatment for open or comminuted femoral fractures: Radiologic and functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Ring external fixation can be a definitive treatment of high energy femoral fractures. A retrospective analysis of outcomes is presented.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

23 patients with open or comminuted femoral fractures treated with circular external fixators were included. Mean age was 33 (range, 13-81) years. Lesions were classified according to AO/ASIF. 12 fractures were open. Mean follow up period has been 26.3, (range 20-144) months. The results were assessed according to the modified criteria of Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov. Knee functional results were assessed with Hospital for Special Surgery knee scoring system.

RESULTS

22 fractures united primarily, one showed nonunion. Knee stiffness developed in two patients. No patient had deep pin tract infection. Bone results were quoted as excellent, good, fair and poor in 19, 1, 1 and 2. The functional results were excellent, good, and fair in 16, 6, and 1, on the basis of ASAMI criteria. Mean HSS knee score has been 90.1 (range 60-100).

CONCLUSION

Circular external fixation can achieve reliable rates of union and good to excellent functional outcome in open or comminuted femoral fractures. A strict rehabilitation protocol was effective in preserving knee joint function.

Ilizarov bone transport and treatment of critical-sized tibial bone defects: a narrative review

Background

Critical-sized bone defects of the tibia are complex injuries associated with significant problems that are difficult to treat, and they are associated with a significant burden of disease in clinical practice; however, the treatment of these cases has still been a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. The aim of this review was to evaluate the current available studies reporting on classical Ilizarov methods in the treatment of infected or noninfected critical-sized bone defects of the tibia, and to perform an analysis of treatment period and complications.

Methods

This is a narrative review based on a comprehensive literature search among the studies in Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science articles. The studies included were written in the English language or translated to English and they were published between 2008 and 2018. They were appraised with narrative data synthesis. The primary outcome measures were the external fixation time (EFT), bone union rate, and bone and functional results. Secondary outcomes were complications including docking site problems and solutions. The heterogeneity of the data in the studies which were taken into consideration allowed a narrative analysis.

Results

Twenty-seven articles with 619 patients were included in this study. These included 6 prospective and 21 retrospective case series. Mean age was 36.1 (range 13–89) years. Of the cases, 88.8% were infected and the remaining 11.2% were noninfected. The external fixation time was 10.75 (range 2.5–23.2) months. The mean bone union rate was 90.2% (range 77–100)%. Radiographic outcome measures were reported in 20 studies. Functional outcome measures were reported in 18 studies. ASAMI (Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov) criteria are useful and give reproducible data on patient outcome measurements. Data collected from these studies showed excellent radiological outcomes in 303, good in 143, fair in 31, and poor in 25 patients. Functional outcomes were excellent in 200, good in 167, fair in 58, and poor in 19, where reported. The excellent and good rate in bone results and functional results were 88.8% and 82.6%, respectively. The poor rate in bone results and functional results were 5% and 4.5%. Mean complication rate per patient was 1.22 (range 3–60). The most common complication was pin tract infection (PTI). Its occurrence was 46.6%. Joint stiffness followed PTI with a 25% incidence. The rates of refracture, malunion, infectious recurrence, and amputation, were 4%, 8.4%, 4.58%, and 1%, respectively.

Conclusions

This narrative review shows that the patients with infected or noninfected critical-sized tibial bone defects treated by Ilizarov methods had a low rate of poor bone and functional results. Therefore, Ilizarov methods may be a good choice for the treatment of infected or noninfected tibial bone defects. The small number of cases in some studies, the absence of homogenity between studies and the fact that most data available are derived from retrospective studies are some of the difficulties encountered in the evaluation of evidence.

Level of evidence

V.

Outcomes Following Treatment of Complex Tibial Fractures with Circular External Fixation: A Comparison between the Taylor Spatial Frame and TrueLok-Hex

Aim

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes of complex tibia fractures treated with two different hexapod fixators.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective comparative study of patients treated for complex tibial fractures between 2010 and 2015. Inclusion criteria was patients between 18 years and 60 years of age, who sustained a complex comminuted open or closed tibial fracture with or without bone loss, who had a minimum of 12 months’ follow-up, and who have been treated definitively using either Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) or TrueLok-Hexapod System (TL-HEX). The outcome measures were Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) score, foot function index (FFI), EQ5-D, four-step square test (FSST), and timed up and go (TUG) test. Descriptive statistics were used to assess patient demographic information. Categorical variables (ASAMI and EQ5D-5L) were analysed using the χ² test. Continuous variables (FFI, functional tests, and radiographic outcomes) were analysed with two-tailed Student’s t tests.

Results

In all, 24 patients were treated with the TL-HEX and 21 with the TSF. The mean time for external fixation was 219 ± 107 days (TL-HEX) and 222 ± 98 days (TSF). Union occurred in 92% (TL-HEX) and 100% (TSF). The mean follow-up was 777 ± 278 days (TL-HEX) and 1211 ± 388 days (TSF). Using the ASAMI scores, there were 17 excellent and 6 good results for the TL-HEX and 10 excellent and 11 good results for the TSF (p = 0.33). The FFI was 30 ± 28.7 (TL-HEX) and 26.1+23.9 (TSF) (p = 0.55). The EQ5D was 0.67 ± 0.3 (TL-HEX) and 0.73 ± 0.2 (TSF) (p = 0.43). The mean TUG and FSST were 9.2 ± 3.2 and 10 ± 2.9 seconds (TL-HEX) and 8.4 ± 2.3 and 9.6 ± 3.1 seconds (TSF) (p = 0.34 and 0.69).

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that both hexapod external fixation devices have comparable clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes. Either fixator can be used for the treatment of complex tibial fractures, anticipating good and excellent clinical outcomes in approximately 80% patients.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic level III

How to cite this article

Naude J, Manjra M, Birkholtz FF, et al. Outcomes Following Treatment of Complex Tibial Fractures with Circular External Fixation: A Comparison between the Taylor Spatial Frame and TrueLok-Hex. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(3):142–147.

Periarticular large bone defects treatment with ring external fixator

BACKGROUND

Joint stiffness and limited bone stock for fixation were the main problems in management of periarticular bone defects. The present study aimed to report clinical and radiographic outcome of periarticular, large (≥8 cm) bone defects treated with ring external fixator.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients (10 males and 7 females) who had periarticular bone loss at the minimum of 8 cm were treated with ring external fixator. Acute shortening and subsequent lengthening at the corticotomy site were performed in 5 patients. Bone transport was performed in 12 patients. Clinical outcome and radiographic outcome were reviewed.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (10 males and 7 females). Mean age was 31.1 years (9-52 years). Mean bone gap was 9.17 cm (8-14 cm.). Mean follow-up period was 39.7 months (30-60 months). Fracture united primarily in 14 cases and after iliac bone graft in 2 cases. One patient had nonunion. Based on ASAMI evaluation;The bone result was excellent, good, and poor in 13, 3, and 1 patients, respectively. The functional results were excellent and good in 14 and 3 patients respectively. Ten patients had superficial pin tract infection.

CONCLUSION

Periarticular large bone defects were successfully treated with ring external fixator by bone transport or acute shortening and subsequent lengthening at corticotomy site. Superficial pin tract infection and joint stiffness were common problems in management of periarticular large bone defects. Early convert to internal fixation after achieve the acceptable length or after successfully bony contact of bone transport fragment to allowed early motion of the joint was recommend. Good to excellent functional outcomes were achieve in majority of the patients.

Circular external fixation and cemented PMMA spacers for the treatment of complex tibial fractures and infected nonunions with segmental bone loss

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of combined circular external fixation and cemented polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer application between a cohort of patients with grade 3 open fractures and infected tibial nonunions and concomitant segmental bone loss.

METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective cohort study. All patients who were treated for complex tibial fractures or infected nonunions with segmental bone loss between 2009 and 2013 were included if they were aged between 16 years and 60 years, sustained acute traumatic grade 3 open tibial fractures, presented with infected nonunion, and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Patients with a history of ipsilateral tibial fractures, contralateral lower extremity fractures, polytrauma, chest, or abdominal trauma and patients with head injuries were excluded. Both groups were treated with aggressive debridement, circular external fixation, and antibiotic-impregnated PMMA spacer. Outcome measures were the time in the external fixator (EFT) and the external fixation index (EFI).

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 32 ± 14.7 years were included. Twelve patients with a mean age of 32 + 14 years and a mean bone defect of 82 + 36 mm were treated for acute complex grade 3 open tibial fractures, and 12 patients with a mean age of 35.1 + 15.7 years and a mean bone defect of 50 + 26 mm were treated for infected nonunions. There was no significant difference ( p = 0.44) between the groups for EFT (249 ± 99 days-tibial fractures; 255 ± 142 days-infected nonunion). There were significant between group differences ( p = 0.027) for EFI (37.3 ± 9.1 cm/days-tibial fractures; 56 ± 14.5 cm/days-infected nonunion).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that patients were treated for infected nonunion with segmental bone loss using circular external fixation, distraction osteogenesis, and antibiotic-impregnated PMMA spacers, and the spacers may not offer any advantage over a conventional approach using the principles of osteogenesis only. In contrast, antibiotic-impregnated spacers for open tibial trauma were advantageous and reduced the EFI considerably.

Analysis of Staged Treatment for Gustilo Anderson IIIB/C Open Tibial Fractures

BACKGROUND

Gustilo Anderson III B/C open tibial fractures are more difficult to manage than I, II, and III A fractures. These open tibial fractures are often associated with wound infection, soft tissue necrosis, bone nonunion, osteomyelitis or amputation. Staged treatment for this severe trauma is very necessary.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

25 cases of Gustilo Anderson IIIB/C open tibial fractures with serious soft-tissue defects treated between January 2010 and January 2015 were included in this study. The treatment was administered in three stages. The first stage included emergency debridement, external fixation, repair of damaged main blood vessels and nerves, covering of the wound, and infection control. The second stage involved skin flap or skin graft placement to repair wounds. The third stage involved replacement of the external fixator with an internal fixator and the placement of bone grafts.

RESULTS

All the skin flaps or skin grafts survived, and a small necrotic area in the distal flap was observed in only two cases (which resolved spontaneously after the dressing was changed). Bone union occurred at the predicted time in 23 cases, while it was delayed in 2 cases. The rate of excellent and good was 88%.

CONCLUSION

Staged treatment was safe and effective for Gustilo Anderson IIIB/C tibial fractures. The timing for the placement of internal and external fixators and choosing the appropriate skin flap repair technique are important.

The "Road to Union" protocol for the reconstruction of isolated complex high-energy tibial trauma

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to describe a standardized staged approach, "The Road to Union", for the reconstruction of isolated complex tibial trauma, both acute and chronic in nature.

METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients treated for complex tibial trauma at a specialized limb reconstruction centre, including acute open fracture as well as infected and aseptic non-unions. This standardized approach includes eight specific steps, employed in sequence. The time in external fixation (EFT), the external fixation index (EFI), and the distraction consolidation index (DCI) were the primary outcome measures. The relationship between EFI and DCI was assessed using Pearson's moment correlations.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 34.7±14.2years were included; 12 were treated for complex open tibial fractures with bone loss, 13 for infected non-unions, and 6 for aseptic non-union. The mean bone defect was 66±32mm. The total EFT was 42.5±14.8 weeks; the EFI measured 51.9±25.3 days/cm, and the DCI measured 48.3±21.4 days/cm. Union was achieved in 29 out of 32 patients (91%), and there was a strong and significant relationship between EFI and DCI (r=0.92, p=0.0001) measurements. Pin site infections were observed in 11 patients, and 3 patients had persistent non-union. Three patients underwent delayed amputations when reconstructive procedures were unable to achieve union.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study demonstrate that a standardized staged treatment protocol of debridement, circular external fixation, soft-tissue management, distraction osteogenesis, and functional rehabilitation can result in a high rate of union in cases of complex tibial trauma, both acute and chronic in nature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; case series.

Prospective randomised comparison of ring versus rail fixator in infected gap nonunion of tibia treated with distraction osteogenesis

AIMS

This is a prospective randomised study which compares the radiological and functional outcomes of ring and rail fixators in patients with an infected gap (> 3 cm) nonunion of the tibia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2008 and February 2013, 70 patients were treated at our Institute for a posttraumatic osseocutaneous defect of the tibia measuring at least 3 cm. These were randomised into two groups of 35 patients using the lottery method. Group I patients were treated with a ring fixator and group II patients with a rail fixator. The mean age was 33.2 years (18 to 64) in group I and 29.3 years (18 to 65) in group II. The mean bone gap was 5.84 cm in group I and 5.78 cm in group II. The mean followup was 33.8 months in group I and 32.6 months in group II. Bone and functional results were assessed using the classification of the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI). Functional results were also assessed at six months using the short musculoskeletal functional assessment (SMFA) score.

RESULTS

The bone result was excellent, good, fair and poor in 21, 12, 0 and 2 in group I; and 14, 15, 3, and 3 in group II, respectively. The functional results were excellent, good, fair, poor and failure in 16, 17, 1, 0 and 1 in group I; and 22, 10, 0, 3 and 0 in group II, respectively. Both fixator systems achieved comparable rates of union and functional outcomes. The rate of deep pintract infection was significantly higher in the rail fixator group but patients found it more comfortable.

CONCLUSION

We recommend the use of a ring fixator in patients with a bone gap of more than 6 cm. Patients with a bone gap up to 6 cm can be managed with either a ring or rail fixator. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98B:1399-1405.

Comparative study of the results of compound tibial shaft fractures treated by Ilizarov ring fixators and limb reconstruction system fixators

PURPOSE

Ilizarov ring fixator and limb reconstruction system (LRS) fixators have been used in the management of complex tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries, compound tibial fractures, and infected tibial nonunion for which conventional internal fixation cannot be contemplated. Fracture union and distraction osteogenesis can be done simultaneously with these external fixators, allowing early weight bearing. Several previous studies have shown almost equal results of rail and ring fixators for the compound tibial shaft fractures. Thus we performed a prospective study to evaluate the union rate, functional outcome and amount of limb lengthening after the treatment of compound tibial shaft fractures with or without infected nonunion by ring or LRS fixators.

METHODS

This prospective study was done at Sarojini Naidu Medical College and Hospital, Agra, India and included 32 patients of compound tibial shaft fractures with or without infected nonunion. There were 26 males and 6 females and the average age was 40 years. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (n=16 for each): one underwent Ilizarov fixation and the other received LRS fixation. Cases were followed up for 3-24 months, 6 months on average from September 2012 to October 2014. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria for both rail and ring fixators.

RESULTS

Union was achieved in all cases. Radiological outcome was found excellent in 68.75%, good in 18.75% and fair in 12.50% of cases treated by rail fixators whereas it was excellent in 56.25%, good in 18.75%, fair in 12.50% and poor in 12.50% of cases treated by ring fixators. Functional result was satis- factory in 75.00% of cases treated by rail fixator and 68.75% of cases treated by ring fixators whereas the corresponding rate of unsatisfactory was 25.00% vs. 31.25%.

CONCLUSION

In our short-term assessment, LRS fixators show a better result than Ilizarov fixators in terms of fracture union and functional outcome with soft tissue care and limb length.

Outcome of application of primary versus secondary Illizarov's fixator in open tibial shaft fractures

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to compare outcome of primary and secondary Illizarov's fixator application as a treatment method for type III open tibial fractures in terms of non-union and wound infection.

METHODS

This prospective study was done in a tertiary care center. Forty-eight type III tibial fractures were treated with Illizarov's apparatus between 2008 and 2011. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the treatment protocol, timing of wound closure and Illizarov's application, primary (n=28) and secondary (n=20).

RESULTS

In the primary group, healing was achieved in all 28 patients. The median time to recovery was 24 weeks, and the median number of operations was 3. There were 6 patients with a bone defect. In the secondary group, complete recovery was achieved in 18 out of 20 patients. The median time to recovery was 30 weeks, and the median number of operations 5. There were 9 patients with a bone defect. The median time to recovery and the number of operations were significantly smaller in patients undergoing primary operation. Union was 100% in the primary group and more than 95% in the secondary group. Chronic osteomyelitis persisted in one patient and below amputation was done in one patient in the secondary group.

CONCLUSION

Primary wound closure and Illizarov's fixation required a smaller number of operations and shorter time to recovery than secondary wound closure and Illizarov's fixation, mostly due to a significantly less number of patients with a bone defect in the primary group.

Treatment of complex nonunion of the shaft of the tibia using Ilizarov technique and its functional outcome

BACKGROUND

A complex nonunion of the shaft of the tibia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with lower extremity injuries.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of the functional and radiological outcome of complex nonunion shaft of tibia, treated by radical debridement, Ilizarov ring fixator with compression and distraction osteogenesis.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2010, sixty cases of complex nonunion shaft of tibia were included in our study. All infected nonunions were managed by radical debridement, fixed with Ilizarov ring fixator, monofocal/bifocal compression, and distraction osteogenesis. The average duration of follow-up is 36 months (26-50 months). The functional evaluation was done by using Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and bone union with serial radiographs.

RESULTS

All patients had a successful union. The mean time for union was 7 months (5-9 months). The mean time of fixator removal is 12 months (8-14 months). Every patient had pin tract infections which were successfully treated with oral antibiotics. Four patients had an equinus deformity, one patient had insignificant limb shortening (1.5 cm), and three patients had soft tissue dystrophy. Using the ASAMI scoring system, we obtained 45 excellent, 10 good, 3 fair, and 2 poor functional results.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ilizarov technique for complex nonunions has a high rate of success in achieving union and eradicating infection, bone loss, and malalignment. Radical debridement is the key step to control bone infection.

Early Conversion of External Fixation to Interlocked Nailing in Open Fractures of Both Bone Leg Assisted with Vacuum Closure (VAC) - Final Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Management of compound grade III fractures of both bone leg includes external stabilization for long period, followed by various soft tissue coverage procedures. Primary interlocking of tibia had been also done with variable results. External fixation for long time without any bone loss often leads to infected nonunion, loss of reduction, pin tract infection and failure of fixation, primary interlocking in compound grade III fractures had shown high medullary infection rate. We managed all cases of compound grade III A/B fractures with primary external fixation, simultaneous wound management using vacuum assisted closure (VAC) followed by early conversion to interlocking within 2 weeks of fixator application.

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) for the early conversion of external fixator to definitive interlocking in open fractures of the both bone leg.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In current study we selected 84 cases of compound grade IIIA/B diaphyseal fractures of both bone leg during period of May 2010 to September 2013. We managed these cases by immediate debridement and application of external fixation followed by repeated debridement, application of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) and conversion to interlocking within two weeks.

RESULTS

Out of 84 cases union was achieved in 80(95%) of cases with definitive tibial interlocking. Excellent to good result were obtained in 77(91.8%) of cases and fair to poor result seen in rest of 7(8.2%) of cases according to modified Ketenjian's criteria. 5 out of these 7 poor result group cases were from Compound Grade III B group to start with. Deep infection rate in our series were 7% i.e. total 6 cases and 4 out of these were from compound Grade III B group to start with.

CONCLUSION

Vacuum assisted closure (VAC) give a good help for rapid closure of the wound and help in early conversion to definitive intramedullary nailing. Reamed nail could well be used in compound grade IIIA/B fractures without increasing the risk of infection. It gives better stability to fracture site and lessen the risk of implant failure.

Outcome of distraction osteogenesis by ring fixator in infected, large bone defects of tibia

BACKGROUND

Salvage of large, infected bone defects in tibia poses a formidable problem. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate radiologic and functional outcome of ring fixator in infected, large (≥6 cm) bone defects of tibia treated with distraction osteogenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 35 patients (30 males and 5 females) who had minimum of 6 cm gap after radical resection of necrotic bone and presence or history of active infection. Mean age was 36.1 years. Mean bone gap was 7.27 cm. Mean follow-up period was 25.4 months.

RESULTS

Fracture united primarily in 17 cases and after fixator adjustment with freshening of fracture margins in 15 cases. Fixator adjustment with bone grafting was done in one patient to achieve union. One patient had nonunion and another had amputation. The bone result was excellent, good, and poor in 19, 13, and 3 patients, respectively. The functional results were excellent, good, fair and failure in 14, 19, 1, and one patient, respectively. 24 patients had superficial pin tract infection and 18 patients had ankle stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Ring fixator systems reliably achieve union in infected, large bone defects of tibia and help in treating infection, shortening, bone and soft tissue loss simultaneously. We advocate early freshening of fracture ends and removal of interposed soft tissue at docking sites to achieve union. Superficial pin tract infection and ankle stiffness are common problems in managing large tibial defects. But good to excellent functional outcomes can be achieved in majority of patients.

The effects of tibial fracture and Ilizarov osteosynthesis on the structural reorganization of sciatic and tibial nerves during the bone consolidation phase and after fixator removal

Reactive and adaptive changes in mechanically uninjured nerves during fracture healing have not been studied previously although the status of innervation is important for bone union and functional recovery. This study explores whether subclinical nerve fibre degeneration occurs in mechanically uninjured nerves in an animal fracture model and to quantify its extent and functional significance. Twenty-four dogs were deeply anaesthetized and subjected to experimental tibial shaft fracture and Ilizarov osteosynthesis. Before fracture and during the experiment, electromyography was performed. In 7, 14, 20, 35–37 and 50 days of fixation and 30, 60–90 and 120 days after fixator removal, the dogs were euthanized. Samples from sciatic, peroneal and tibial nerves were processed for semithin section histology and morphometry. On the 37th postoperative day, M-response amplitudes in leg muscles were 70 % lower than preoperative ones. After fixator removal, these increased but were not restored to normal values. There were no signs of nerve injuries from bone fragments or wires from the fixator. The incidence of degenerated myelin fibres (MFs) was less than 12 %. Reorganization of Remak bundles (Group C nerve fibres—principally sensory) led to a temporal increase in numerical nerve fibre densities. Besides axonal atrophy, the peroneal nerve was characterized with demyelination–remyelination, while tibial nerve with hypermyelination. There were changes in endoneural vessel densities. In spite of minor acute MF degeneration, sustained axonal atrophy, dismyelination and retrograde changes did not resolve until 120 days after fracture healing. Correlations of morphometric parameters of degenerated MF with M-response amplitudes from electromyography underlie the subclinical neurologic changes in functional outcomes after tibial fractures even when nerves are mechanically uninjured.

Ilizarov ring fixator in the management of infected non-unions of tibia

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of debridement and application of Ilizarov ring fixator (IRF) in the management of infected tibial non-unions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty six patients with infected non-unions of tibia were managed by debridement and resection of infected portion ± partial fibulectomy and stabilization by Ilizarov ring fixator. Bone segment transport was done in 18 patients who had greater than 2.5 cm bone defect after debridement. Bone grafting was required in three patients to augment union.

RESULTS

All fractures united and infection eradicated completely. There were 13 excellent, nine good, and four fair results. Functional results were excellent in nine, good in 11, fair in five and poor in one. Pin site inflammation was the most common problem and occurred in 23 (88%) patients. There were no major complications or neurovascular complications.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that debridement combined with Ilizarov ring fixator with or without partial fibulectomy is a reliable method of treatment of infected non-unions of tibia.

Grade 3 open tibial shaft fractures treated with a circular frame, functional outcome and systematic review of literature

We report on the surgical and functional outcome of 22 patients with Grade 3 open tibial fractures treated with circular frame. All cases united and there were no re-fractures or amputations. All patients were assessed at a minimum of 1-year post frame removal. Assessment included clinical examination, IOWA ankle and knee scores, Olerud and Molander ankle score and EuroQol EQ-5D. Clinical scores were either good or excellent in over half of the patients in all knee and ankle scores. There was a significant positive correlation between functional outcomes and the EQ-5D score. The EQ-5D mean health state visual analogue score was comparable to the general UK population despite patients scoring less than the average UK population in three of the five domains. 36% reported some difficulties in walking and 41% had problems with pain. 14% had difficulties with self-care and 46% had difficulties with their usual activities. 14% had problems with anxiety or depression. Systematic review of the literature suggests, in the management of open tibial fractures, circular frames provide equivalent or superior surgical outcomes in comparison with other techniques. Our study finds the application of a circular frame also results in a good functional outcome in the majority of cases.

Outcome of limb reconstruction system in open tibial diaphyseal fractures

BACKGROUND

Management of open tibial diaphyseal fractures with bone loss is a matter of debate. The treatment options range from external fixators, nailing, ring fixators or grafting with or without plastic reconstruction. All the procedures have their own set of complications, like acute docking problems, shortening, difficulty in soft tissue management, chronic infection, increased morbidity, multiple surgeries, longer hospital stay, mal union, nonunion and higher patient dissatisfaction. We evaluated the outcome of the limb reconstruction system (LRS) in the treatment of open fractures of tibial diaphysis with bone loss as a definative mode of treatment to achieve union, as well as limb lengthening, simultaneously.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty open fractures of tibial diaphysis with bone loss of at least 4 cm or more with a mean age 32.5 years were treated by using the LRS after debridement. Distraction osteogenesis at rate of 1 mm/day was done away from the fracture site to maintain the limb length. On the approximation of fracture ends, the dynamized LRS was left for further 15-20 weeks and patient was mobilized with weight bearing to achieve union. Functional assessment was done by Association for the Study and Application of the Methods of Illizarov (ASAMI) criteria.

RESULTS

Mean followup period was 15 months. The mean bone loss was 5.5 cm (range 4-9 cm). The mean duration of bone transport was 13 weeks (range 8-30 weeks) with a mean time for LRS in place was 44 weeks (range 24-51 weeks). The mean implant index was 56.4 days/cm. Mean union time was 52 weeks (range 31-60 weeks) with mean union index of 74.5 days/cm. Bony results as per the ASAMI scoring were excellent in 76% (19/25), good in 12% (3/25) and fair in 4% (1/25) with union in all except 2 patients, which showed poor results (8%) with only 2 patients having leg length discrepancy more than 2.5 cm. Functional results were excellent in 84% (21/25), good in 8% (2/25), fair in 8% (2/25). Pin tract infection was seen in 5 cases, out of which 4 being superficial, which healed to dressings and antibiotics. One patient had a deep infection which required frame removal.

CONCLUSION

Limb reconstruction system proved to be an effective modality of treatment in cases of open fractures of the tibia with bone loss as definite modality of treatment for damage control as well as for achieving union and lengthening, simultaneously, with the advantage of early union with attainment of limb length, simple surgical technique, minimal invasive, high patient compliance, easy wound management, lesser hospitalization and the lower rate of complications like infection, deformity or shortening.

The use of circular external fixators in the management of lower limb trauma in Dublin: a single surgeon's 20-year experience

INTRODUCTION

It has been estimated that approximately 520,000 injury presentations are made to Irish accident and emergency departments each year. Fractures account for 20 % of these injuries. Circular external fixators (frames) have been shown to be a safe and effective method of treatment for long bone fractures where internal fixation is impossible or in-advisable. We present the outcomes of all frames applied at our institution for stabilisation of acute fractures over a 20-year period.

METHODS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively compiled database of all frames applied in our institution and identified all frames which were applied for acute lower limb trauma.

RESULTS

We identified 68 fractures in 63 patients. There were 11 femoral fractures and 57 tibial fractures. All fractures were classified using the AO Classification system, and most fractures were Type C fractures. We used an Ilizarov frame for 53 fractures and a Taylor Spatial Frame for 15 fractures. The mean time in frame was 365 days for a femoral fracture and 230 days for a tibial fracture. There were five tibial non-unions giving an overall union rate of 93 %. Factors associated with non-union included high-energy trauma and cigarette smoking.

CONCLUSION

The vast majority of lower limb fractures can be treated using 'conventional' methods. Complex fractures which are not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation or cast immobilisation can be treated in a frame with excellent results. The paucity of published reports regarding the use of frames for complex trauma reflects the under-utilisation of the technique.

Bone healing by using Ilizarov external fixation combined with flexible intramedullary nailing versus Ilizarov external fixation alone in the repair of tibial shaft fractures: experimental study

Purpose. Our research was aimed at studying the radiographic and histological outcomes of using flexible intramedullary nailing (FIN) combined with Ilizarov external fixation (IEF) versus Ilizarov external fixation alone on a canine model of an open tibial shaft fracture. Materials and Methods. Transverse diaphyseal tibial fractures were modelled in twenty dogs. Fractures in the dogs of group 1 (n = 10) were stabilized with the Ilizarov apparatus while it was combined with FIN in group 2 (n = 10). Results. On day 14, a bone tissue envelope started developing round the FIN wires. Histologically, we revealed only endosteal bone union in group 1 while in group 2 the radiographs revealed complete bone union on day 28. At the same time-point, the areas of cancellous and mature lamellar bone tissues were observed in the intermediary area in group 2. The periosteal layers were formed of the trabeculae net of lamellar structure and united the bone fragments. The frame was removed at 30 days after the fracture in group 2 and after 45 days in group 1 according to bone regeneration. Conclusion. The combination of the Ilizarov apparatus and FIN accelerates bone repair and augments stabilization of tibial shaft fractures as compared with the use of the Ilizarov fixation alone.

Nailing treatment in bone transport complications

A series of cases of reamed intramedullary nailings carried out after complications in regenerated bone and docking site had occurred in bone transport is presented here. Nine patients (femur = 5; tibia = 4) had treatment with resection after open fractures or infection and underwent bone transport. The mean length of regenerated bone was 9.5 cm (range 6–18 cm). After bone transport, the fixator remained in place for a mean period of 12.8 months (range 8–24 months). In six cases (femur 4; tibia 2), the thickness of the cortical wall of the regenerate column was insufficient, and in two of these, there was, in addition, nonunion of the docking site. In the two tibial cases, nailing was carried out shortly after the fixator had been removed and after refracture of the regenerated bone had occurred due to insufficient cortical thickness. In one femur, nailing was carried out for nonunion of the docking site. Follow-up involved clinical and X-ray checks. The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (range 2–6 years). In all cases, union and with complete corticalization of the regenerate column was observed at an average 6 months after nailing (range 4–11 months). Infection occurred in one tibia 4 months after nailing. The infection was treated with antibiotics, and the nail was subsequently removed. We conclude that nailing is a potential solution for regenerated bone and docking site problems but, if used after prolonged periods of external fixation, may necessitate antibiotic therapy for at least 10 days after the fixator has been removed.

Principles of tibial fracture management with circular external fixation

There is a growing mass of literature to suggest that circular external fixation for high-energy tibial fractures has advantages over traditional internal fixation, with potential improved rates of union, decreased incidence of posttraumatic osteomyelitis, and decreased soft tissue problems. To further advance our understanding of the role of circular external fixation in the management of these tibial fractures, randomized controlled trials should be implemented. In addition to complication rates and radiographic outcomes, validated functional outcome tools and cost analysis of this method should be compared with open reduction with internal fixation.

Outcome of rail fixator system in reconstructing bone gap

BACKGROUND

Bone loss following open fracture or infected gap nonunion is a difficult situation to manage. There are many modes of treatment such as bone grafting, vascularized bone grafting and bone transport by illizarov and monolateral fixator. We evaluated the outcome of rail fixator treatment in reconstructing bone and limb function. We felt that due to problems such as heavy apparatus, persistent pain, deformity of joints and discomfort caused by an Ilizarov ring fixator, rail fixator is a good alternative to treat bone gaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

20 patients (17 males and 3 females with mean age 30.5 years) who suffered bone loss due to open fracture and chronic osteomyelitis leading to infected gap nonunion. Ten patients suffered an open fracture (Gustilo type II and type III) and 10 patients suffered bone gap following excision of necrotic bone after infected nonunion. There were 19 cases of tibia and one case of humerus. All patients were treated with debridement and stabilization of fracture with a rail fixator. Further treatment involved reconstructing bone defect by corticotomy at an appropriate level and distraction by rail fixator.

RESULT

We achieved union in all cases. The average bone gap reconstructed was 7.72 cm (range 3.5-15.5 cm) in 9 months (range 6-14 months). Normal range of motion in nearby joint was achieved in 80% cases. We had excellent to good limb function in 85% of cases as per the association for the study and application of the method of ilizarov scoring system[ASAMI] score.

CONCLUSION

All patients well tolerated rail fixator with good functional results and gap reconstruction. Easy application of rail fixator and comfortable distraction procedure suggest rail fixator a good alternative for gap reconstruction of limbs.

Bone propeller flap: a staged procedure

The ideal reconstruction technique for complex defects of the lower limb consists of replacing tissue with similar tissue in an attempt to achieve a good functional result. A 23-year-old white male sustained a crush injury with a grade IIIB open ankle dislocation. After open reduction and fixation, the patient developed severe osteomyelitis at the tibiotalar joint requiring a staged and radical debridement with a substantial combined soft tissue and bony defect over the distal tibia, fibula, and talus area. The reconstructive approach consisted of a modified model of the propeller flap, implementing the spare part concept in a 2-stage procedure using a prefabricated and vascularized "double-barrel" fibular graft. At 17 months postoperatively, a plain radiograph showed bony union with complete and stable coverage of the soft tissue defect. The patient was fully weightbearing. In conclusion, there is evidence to suggest that the established concept of a soft tissue propeller flap can be implemented on bone.

Histomorphometric analysis of knee synovial membrane in dogs undergoing leg lengthening by classic Ilizarov method and rapid automatic distraction

PURPOSE

This pilot study aimed to test the theory that different lengthening methods affect the microscopic structure of knee joint synovium in diverse ways.

METHODS

This was a descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study of synovium carried out in two experimental models of canine leg lengthening using the Ilizarov fixator. Group 1 (n = 6) used manual gradual distraction most commonly used in clinical practice at one millimetre/day divided into four equal increments, 0.25 mm at each increment. Group 2 (n = 7) used an increased rate of automatic distraction at three millimetres/day divided in 120 increments, 0.025 mm at each increment. At the end of distraction and after fixator removal, the animals were euthanised. Control was via intact dogs. The thickness of the synovial lining layer, number of synovial cell rows, and numerical density of subsynovial microvessels were assessed in digital images for semiautomated computerised analysis of semi-thin sections stained with toluidine blue and methylene blue-basic fuchsin. Comparison of synovitis manifestation was made with grading scale. The vascular and nerve changes in the subsynovial layer were also compared.

RESULTS

Group 1 developed marked synovitis, synovium hypervascularisation, degeneration of the nerve fibres in subsynovial nerves with the tendency to regeneration. Group 2 had moderate to mild degree of synovitis with progressive degenerative changes in subsynovial vessels and nerves.

CONCLUSION

Both methods used are unfavourable for the state of the joint synovium, but modify it in different ways.

The Ilizarov paradigm: thirty years with the Ilizarov method, current concerns and future research

The Ilizarov method of bone lengthening, reconstruction and osteosynthesis has developed immensely since its introduction by G.A. Ilizarov in the Soviet Union in the 1960s and in the Western countries in the early 1980s. It has become an integral part of the arsenal used by the orthopaedic community worldwide. The evolutionary development of the method and its current role has considerably improved the quality of life for millions of people around the whole world. Despite the great versatility of its possible applications for bone injuries and diseases, the Ilizarov method could not and cannot be the alternative to a range of other methods that are applied for some specific bone conditions, but rather is a method of choice. Its combination with the current methods of internal fixation or the means of internal fixation that use the biological principles that were laid down by G.A. Ilizarov have demonstrated the importance of tension stress, blood supply, functional loading, and fragment control during bone treatment. The objective of this study was to present an overview of the current state and concerns in the application of the Ilizarov method and define the prospective research trends aimed at regeneration stimulation, better control of treatment, infection barriers and patient comfort.

Treatment of Gustilo grade III tibial fractures with unreamed intramedullary nailing versus external fixator: a meta-analysis

Unreamed Intramedullary nailing and external fixation are 2 major treatments widely used in Gustilo grade III open tibial fractures, but the difference in effectiveness and complication remains controversial. We retrieved original publications of comparative studies from medical literature databases and selected 9 of them for a meta-analysis. Observation items include malunion and deep infection rate, non-union and comparison of time to union. The analysis showed a lower malunion rate using unreamed intramedullary nailing than external fixation. No significant differences were revealed in deep infection/nonunion rate and time to union. More studies of larger scale and better design are needed to reach an ultimate and definite conclusion.

Ilizarov Versus AO External Fixator for the Treatment of Tibia Open Fractures

BACKGROUND

In developing countries, Ilizarov or AO external fixator is usually used for treatment of tibial open fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two methods for treatment of tibial open fractures.

METHODS

From April 2002 to April 2010, 120 patients with open tibial fractures admitted to the Department of Orthopedics of Babol University of Medical Sciences entered this study. In each arm, 60 subjects randomly received Ilizarov or AO external fixator. All patients were followed at least for one year. These two groups were compared regarding non-union, malunion and cure rates.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients in Ilizarov group was 32.35±11.28 and for AO were 31.3±10.99 years. Mean time for union in Ilizarov group was 5.25±1.85 and for AO external fixator was 5.85±2.13 months. Nonunion rate in Ilizarov group was 10% and for AO external fixator was 11.7%. Malunion rate in Ilizarov group was 10% and for AO external fixator was 18.3%. Totally, efficacy of treatment in the Ilizarov group was 81.7% and in AO external fixator was 65%.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of treatment in Ilizarov was higher than that AO external fixator in treatment of open tibial fractures.

Comparison of 39 post-traumatic tibia bone transports performed with and without the use of an intramedullary rod: the long-term outcomes

Bone transport can be performed with an external fixator alone or with the monorail technique which entails the combination of a fixator and an intramedullary nail. The purpose of this study was to compare the complication rates and long-term outcomes of these methods. Two groups of patients, the external fixator (n = 21) and the monorail group (n = 18), were compared. The average follow-up period was 7.9 ± 5.6 years and the mean defect length 8.3 ± 3.1 cm. Healing was achieved in 19 (90%) and 13 (72%) of the fixator and monorail patients, respectively. Six patients underwent amputations because of persistent infections (two in the fixator and four in the monorail group). The rate of deformities was significantly higher in the fixator group (p = 0.049). No statistically significant difference was found when comparing categories of the SF-36 test or the ability to work or do sports. The main advantages of the monorail method are reduction of the external fixation time and the lower rate of deformities. However, the authors recommend segmental transport with external fixator in patients with chronic infections.