Quality Improvement Activities for Surgical Services at District Hospitals in Developing Countries and Perceived Barriers to Quality Improvement: Findings From Ghana and the Scientific Literature

Surgical care in district hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a general overview of the reported current surgical capacity and delivery in order to advance current knowledge and suggest targets for further development and research within the region of sub-Saharan Africa.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

SETTING

District hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Ovid EMBASE from January 2000 to December 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they contained information about types of surgical procedures performed, number of operations per year, types of anaesthesia delivered, cadres of surgical/anaesthesia providers and/or patients' outcomes.

RESULTS

The 52 articles included in analysis provided information about 16 countries. District hospitals were a group of diverse institutions ranging from 21 to 371 beds. The three most frequently reported procedures were caesarean section, laparotomy and hernia repair, but a wide range of orthopaedics, plastic surgery and neurosurgery procedures were also mentioned. The number of operations performed per year per district hospital ranged from 239 to 5233. The most mentioned anaesthesia providers were non-physician clinicians trained in anaesthesia. They deliver mainly general and spinal anaesthesia. Depending on countries, articles referred to different surgical care providers: specialist surgeons, medical officers and non-physician clinicians. 15 articles reported perioperative complications among which surgical site infection was the most frequent. Fifteen articles reported perioperative deaths of which the leading causes were sepsis, haemorrhage and anaesthesia complications.

CONCLUSION

District hospitals play a significant role in sub-Saharan Africa, providing both emergency and elective surgeries. Most procedures are done under general or spinal anaesthesia, often administered by non-physician clinicians. Depending on countries, surgical care may be provided by medical officers, specialist surgeons and/or non-physician clinicians. Research on safety, quality and volume of surgical and anaesthesia care in this setting is scarce, and more attention to these questions is required.

Quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Quality of care is an emerging area of focus in the surgical disciplines. However, much of the emphasis on quality is limited to high-income countries. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the quality of essential surgical care in low- and middle- income countries (LMIC).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Cinahl, Embase and CAB Abstracts using three domains: quality of care, surgery and LMIC.

STUDY SELECTION

We limited our review to studies of essential surgeries that pertained to all three search domains.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted data on study characteristics, type of surgery and the way in which quality was studied.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

354 studies were included. 281 (79.4%) were single-center studies and nearly half (n = 169, 46.9%) did not specify the level of facility. 207 studies reported on mortality (58.47%) and 325 reported on a morbidity (91.81%), most commonly surgical site infection (n = 190, 53.67%). Of the Institute of Medicine domains of quality, studies were most commonly of safety (n = 310, 87.57%) and effectiveness (n = 180, 50.85%) and least commonly of equity (n = 21, 5.93%).

CONCLUSION

We find that while there are numerous studies that report on some aspects of quality of care, much of the data is single center and observational. Additionally, there is variability on which outcomes are reported both within and across specialties. Finally, we find under-reporting of parameters of equity and timeliness, which may be critical areas for research moving forward.

A Sustainable and Scalable Approach to the Provision of Cleft Care: A Focus on Safety and Quality

BACKGROUND

A global health model based on partnering with local hospitals and surgical teams, providing education and training for local providers, and mandating adherence to safety and quality standards to ensure safe surgery and anesthesia care can build local surgical capacity and strengthen existing health care systems in low- and middle-income countries. Smile Train uses this sustainable partnership model to provide responsible humanitarian aid while maintaining a bidirectional exchange with its international partners.

METHODS

A voluntary online survey is administered annually to Smile Train's global partners. One portion of this survey focuses on how Smile Train can best support providers' adherence to the Smile Train Safety and Quality Protocol and Anesthesia Guidelines for cleft care.

RESULTS

In 2014 and 2015, 1132 health care providers responded to Smile Train's annual partner survey (77 percent response rate). When asked how Smile Train could best support partners to continually meet the safety and quality standards, most partners reported that they could benefit from additional financial support (59.6 percent) and medical professional education and training opportunities (59.2 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

The results from the partner survey yield important insights into the programmatic needs of Smile Train partners. Smile Train uses this information to efficiently allocate and distribute resources and to strategically plan and implement training opportunities where needed. The partner survey helps to ensure that Smile Train patients around the world consistently receive safe and high-quality cleft surgery and anesthesia care.

A pilot study comparing pattern of damage sustained among instruments from different surgical units in a tertiary care centre in Nepal - reappraising the role of instrument reprocessing in retaining their value

Background: The quality of instruments plays a pivotal role in governing safe operating room culture. The reprocessing system followed in the institution determines their durability thereby ensuring patient safety as well as minimizing health spending. Rigorous reprocessing in a centralized instrument reprocessing department by well trained staff following formulated guidelines helps to achieve the target of "safe surgery saves lives" as formulated by the World Health Organization. Methods: We sought to determine the patterns of wear and tear sustained among sets of surgical equipment from two surgical units that had been sent to the repair department within a year of their purchase. Analysis of similar changes in the joints of the instrument, as well as pattern of fractures sustained was performed. Results: All patterns of wear and tear were common in both the general surgical arm and neurosurgical counterpart, with the exception of fractures and mal-alignments. Similar study was performed examining changes in the joints. Stains were the most commonly observed change pattern in both sets of instruments. Fractures were most frequent in the working ends in both sets of instruments. Conclusion: There is an alarming incidence of wear and tear patterns in the instruments used in the surgical units, even within the first year of their use. This supports the strict implementation of reprocessing guidelines by well trained workers and their quality assessments via audit checks. The quality of the purchased instruments also plays a pivotal role.

Global trends in center accreditation by the Joint Commission International: growing patient implications for international medical and surgical care

Millions of patients travel internationally for medical and surgical care. We found that the annual number of centers accredited by the Joint Commission International increased from one center in 1999 to 132 centers in 2016; there are currently 939 accredited centers across 66 countries. Public health and medicolegal implications related to medical travel deserve attention.

Surgical and trauma care in low- and middle-income countries: a review of capacity assessments

BACKGROUND

Surgical and trauma capacity assessments help guide resource allocation and plan interventions to improve care for the injured in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To forge expert consensus on conducting these assessments, we undertook a systematic review of studies using five tools: (1) World Health Organization's (WHO) Guidelines for Essential Trauma Care, (2) WHO's Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care, (3) Personnel, Infrastructure, Procedures, Equipment, and Supplies tool, (4) Harvard Humanitarian Initiative tool, and (5) Emergency and Critical Care tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications describing utilization of survey instruments to assess surgical or trauma capacity in LMICs were reviewed. Included articles underwent thematic analysis to develop recommendations. A modified Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus. Experts rated recommendations on a Likert-type scale via online survey. Consensus was defined by Cronbach's α ≥ 0.80. Recommendations achieving agreement by ≥80% of experts were included.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-eight publications were identified and 41 included, describing evaluation of 1170 facilities across 36 LMICs. Nine recommendations were agreed upon by expert consensus: (1) inclusion of district hospitals, (2) inclusion of highest level public hospital, (3) inclusion of private facilities, (4) facility visits for on-site completion, (5) direct inspections, (6) checking surgical logs, (7) adaptation of survey instrument, (8) repeat assessments, and (9) need for increased collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

Expert recommendations developed in this review describe methodology to be employed when conducting assessments of surgical and trauma capacity in LMICs. Consensus has yet to be achieved for tool selection.

Assessing Trauma Care Capabilities of the Health Centers in Northern Ghana

INTRODUCTION

Traffic-related injury is a major and increasing cause of global mortality, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, trauma systems, personnel, resources, and infrastructure are frequently insufficient to meet the needs of the population in this at-risk population in LMICs. In addition, these resources are not uniformly distributed, coordinated, nor well described within most countries. Trauma care resources have not previously been characterized in the Northern Region of Ghana.

METHODS

We performed uniform site evaluations and interviews at 92 hospitals in Northern Ghana. Trauma systems, material resources, and human resources were quantified. Equipment was characterized as available in the Emergency Department (ED), in the hospital only, or unavailable. Hospitals were categorized as primary, district, or referral.

RESULTS

Forty-two primary hospitals, 48 district hospitals, 3 regional hospitals, and 1 teaching hospital were surveyed. Over 95 % of hospitals reported having no training or systems for the care of injured patients. Substantial clinical equipment deficits were found at most primary hospitals. In over 90 % of these hospitals, the majority of circulation and monitoring, airway and breathing, and diagnostic imagining resources were not available. Equipment was also frequently unavailable at district and regional hospitals. When available, these resources were infrequently present in the ED.

CONCLUSIONS

Although resources may be unavoidably constrained, there are substantial opportunities to improve the systematic management of trauma care and improve the education of the medical providers regarding care of injured patients in the region studied.

Roadmap to an effective quality improvement and patient safety program implementation in a rural hospital setting

Implementation lessons: (1) implementation of an effective quality improvement and patient safety program in a rural hospital setting requires collaboration between hospital leadership, Ministry of Health and other stakeholders. (2) Building Quality Improvement (QI) capacity to develop engaged QI teams supported by mentoring can improve quality and patient safety.