European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) Malnutrition Criteria for Predicting Major Complications After Hepatectomy and Pancreatectomy

Standard Nutritional Assessment Tools Are Unable to Predict Loss of Muscle Mass in Patients Due to Undergo Pancreatico-Duodenectomy: Highlighting the Need for Detailed Nutritional Assessment

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) carries significant morbidity and mortality, with very few modifiable risk factors. Radiological evidence of sarcopenia is associated with poor outcomes. This retrospective study aimed to analyse the relationship between easy-to-use bedside nutritional assessment techniques and radiological markers of muscle loss to identify those patients most likely to benefit from prehabilitation.

RESULTS

Data were available in 184 consecutive patients undergoing PD. Malnutrition was present in 33-71%, and 48% had a high visceral fat-to-skeletal muscle ratio, suggestive of sarcopenic obesity (SO). Surgical risk was higher in patients with obesity (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.01-1.14, p = 0.031), and length of stay was 5 days longer in those with SO (p = 0.006). There was no correlation between skeletal muscle and malnutrition using percentage weight loss or the malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), but a weak correlation between the highest hand grip strength (HGS; 0.468, p < 0.001) and the Global Leadership in Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria (-0.379, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional assessment tools give widely variable results. Further research is needed to identify patients at significant nutritional risk prior to PD. In the meantime, those with malnutrition (according to the GLIM criteria), obesity or low HGS should be referred to prehabilitation.

Multidisciplinary prehabilitation to improve frailty and functional capacity in high-risk elective surgical patients: a retrospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Frailty is associated with worse outcomes and higher healthcare costs. The long waiting time for surgery is a potential 'teachable' moment. We examined the feasibility and safety of a pilot prehabilitation programme on high-risk frail patients undergoing major elective surgery.

METHODS

A single-centre, retrospective pilot study (Dec 2020-Nov 2021) on a one-stop prehabilitation programme (structured exercise training, nutritional counselling/therapy, and psychological support) in collaboration with geriatricians and allied health professionals. At least 4 weeks before surgery, patients at high risk of frailty or malnutrition, or undergoing major hepatectomy, esophagectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or radical cystectomy, were referred for prehabilitation (2-3 sessions/week). The primary outcomes were the feasibility and safety of prehabilitation. The secondary outcomes were changes in functional, emotional, and nutritional status and days alive and at home within 30 days after surgery (DAH30) associated with prehabilitation.

RESULTS

Over a 12-month period, 72 out of 111 patients (64.9%) from the Perioperative Medicine Clinic were eligible for prehabilitation, of which 54 (75%) were recruited. The mean (standard deviation) age was 71.9 (6.9) years. The adherence rate to 3 weeks of prehabilitation was high in 52 (96.3%) participants. Prehabilitation improved exercise capacity (P = 0.08), enhanced some functional mobility measures (P = 0.02), and increased nutritional energy (P = 0.04) and protein intakes (P < 0.01). However, prehabilitation-related changes in muscle strength, cognitive function, and emotional resilience were minimal. The median (interquatile range) DAH30 was 19 (14-23) days. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This outpatient-based, one-stop multidisciplinary prehabilitation programme was feasible, safe, and improved several measures of patient's physiological reserve and functional capacity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05668221.

Efficacy of Standardized Process Management of Early Postoperative Enteral Nutrition After Laparoscopic Hepatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

We sought to investigate the efficacy of standardized process management of early postoperative enteral nutrition in patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy.

METHODS

From January 2022 to January 2023, a total of 98 patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy in our hospital were enrolled in this prospective study. The participants were allocated into the study group (49 cases, given standardized process management of early postoperative enteral nutrition) and the control group (49 cases, given conventional early postoperative enteral nutrition) based on a random number table. Observation indicators included postoperative recovery, nutritional status, quality of life, and complications.

RESULTS

The time of first anal exhaust, eating, off-bed, first defecation, and postoperative hospital stay in the 2 groups was significantly shorter than those in the control group ( P <0.05). After the intervention, the levels of transferrin, prealbumin, and albumin in the study group were evidently higher than those in the control group ( P <0.05). The scores of overall health, body pain, body function, physiological function, vitality, social function, emotional function, and mental health in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group after intervention ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The standardized process management of early postoperative enteral nutrition showed promising results in effectively improving the nutritional status, rehabilitation, and quality of life, as well as reducing the incidence of related complications among patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy, which supports a wide application in clinical practice.

Protein-energy malnutrition and worse outcomes after major cancer surgery: A nationwide analysis

Background

Protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) has been recognized as a poor prognostic factor in many clinical issues. However, nationwide population studies concerning the impact of PEM on outcomes after major cancer surgery (MCS) are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with PEM following MCS.

Methods

By using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, data of patients undergoing MCS including colectomy, cystectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, hysterectomy, lung resection, pancreatectomy, or prostatectomy were analyzed retrospectively from 2009 to 2015, resulting in a weighted estimate of 1,335,681 patients. The prevalence trend of PEM, as well as mortality and major complications after MCS were calculated. Multivariable regression analysis was applied to estimate the impact of PEM on postoperative outcomes after MCS.

Results

PEM showed an estimated annual percentage increase of 7.17% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4-10.44%) from 2009 to 2015, which contrasts with a 4.52% (95% CI: -6.58-2.41%) and 1.21% (95% CI: -1.85-0.56%) annual decrease in mortality and major complications in patients with PEM after MCS. PEM was associated with increased risk of mortality (odds ratio (OR)=2.26; 95% CI: 2.08-2.44; P < 0.0001), major complications (OR=2.46; 95% CI: 2.36-2.56; P < 0.0001), higher total cost ($35814 [$22292, $59579] vs. $16825 [$11393, $24164], P < 0.0001), and longer length of stay (14 [9-21] days vs. 4 [2-7] days, P < 0.0001), especially in patients underwent prostatectomy, hysterectomy and lung resection.

Conclusions

PEM was associated with increased worse outcomes after major cancer surgery. Early identification and timely medical treatment of PEM for patients with cancer are crucial for improving postoperative outcomes.

Malnutrition as a risk factor of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatic resection: analysis of US hospitals

Patients with liver cancer or space-occupying cysts suffer from malnutrition due to compression of gastric and digestive structures, liver and cancer-mediated dysmetabolism, and impaired nutrient absorption. As proportion of these patients requires removal of lesions through hepatic resection, it is important to evaluate the effects of malnutrition on post-hepatectomy outcomes. In our study approach, 2011-2017 National Inpatient Sample was used to isolate in-hospital hepatectomy cases, which were stratified using malnutrition (composite of malnutrition, sarcopenia and weight loss/cachexia). The malnutrition-absent controls were matched to cases using nearest neighbour propensity score matching method and compared with the following endpoints: mortality, length of stay, hospitalisation costs and postoperative complications. There were 2531 patients in total who underwent hepatectomy with matched number of controls from the database; following the match, malnutrition cohort (compared with controls) was more likely to experience in-hospital death (6·60 % v. 5·25 % P < 0·049, OR 1·27, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·61) and was more likely to have higher length of stay (18·10 d v. 9·32 d, P < 0·001) and hospitalisation costs ($278 780 v. $150 812, P < 0·001). In terms of postoperative complications, malnutrition cohort was more likely to experience bleeding (6·52 % v. 3·87 %, P < 0·001, OR 1·73, 95 % CI 1·34, 2·24), infection (6·64 % v. 2·49 %, P < 0·001, OR 2·79, 95 % CI 2·07, 3·74), wound complications (4·5 % v. 1·38 %, P < 0·001, OR 3·36, 95 % CI 2·29, 4·93) and respiratory failure (9·40 % v. 4·11 %, P < 0·001, OR 2·42, 95 % CI 1·91, 3·07). In multivariate analysis, malnutrition was associated with higher mortality (P < 0·028, adjusted OR 1·3, 95 % CI 1·03, 1·65). Thus, we conclude that malnutrition is a risk factor of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing hepatectomy.