Quality improvement for portal vein embolization

Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR

BACKGROUND

The regenerative capacities of the liver and improvements in surgical techniques have expanded the possibilities of resectability. Liver resection is often the only curative treatment for primary and secondary malignancies, despite the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). This serious complication (with a 50% mortality rate) can be avoided by better assessment of liver volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to understand and assess clinical, biological, and imaging predictors of PHLF risk, as well as the various hypertrophy techniques, to achieve an adequate FLR before hepatectomy.

METHOD

We reviewed the state of the art in liver regeneration and FLR hypertrophy techniques.

RESULTS

The use of new biological scores (such as the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index + albumin-bilirubin [APRI+ALBI] score), concurrent utilization of 99mTc-mebrofenin scintigraphy (HBS), or dynamic hepatocyte contrast-enhanced MRI (DHCE-MRI) for liver volumetry helps predict the risk of PHLF. Besides portal vein embolization, there are other FLR optimization techniques that have their indications in case of risk of failure (e.g., associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, liver venous deprivation) or in specific situations (transarterial radioembolization).

CONCLUSION

There is a need to standardize volumetry and function measurement techniques, as well as FLR hypertrophy techniques, to limit the risk of PHLF.

Vascular Interventions in Oncology

Vascular interventions are an important and established tool in the management of the oncology patient. The goal of these procedures may be curative, palliative or adjunctive in nature. Some of the common vascular interventions used in oncology include transarterial embolisation or chemoembolisation, selective internal radiation therapy, chemosaturation, venous access lines, superior vena cava stenting and portal vein embolisation. We provide an overview of the principles, technology and approach of vascular techniques for tumour therapy in both the arterial and venous systems. Arterial interventions are currently mainly used in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Transarterial embolisation, chemoembolisation and selective internal radiation therapy deliver targeted catheter-delivered treatments with the aim of reducing tumour burden, controlling tumour growth or increasing survival in patients not eligible for transplantation. Chemosaturation is a regional chemotherapy technique that delivers high doses of chemotherapy directly to the liver via the hepatic artery, while reducing the risks of systemic effects. Venous interventions are more adjunctive in nature. Venous access lines are used to provide a means of delivering chemotherapy and other medications directly into the bloodstream. Superior vena cava stenting is a palliative procedure that is used to relieve symptoms of superior vena cava obstruction. Portal vein embolisation is a procedure that allows hypertrophy of a healthy portion of the liver in preparation for liver resection. Interventional radiology-led vascular interventions play an essential part of cancer management. These procedures are minimally invasive and provide a safe and effective adjunct to traditional cancer treatment methods. Appropriate work-up and discussion of each patient-specific problem in a multidisciplinary setting with interventional radiology is essential to provide optimum patient-centred care.

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Portal Vein Embolization and Double Vein Embolization/Liver Venous Deprivation

This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practices for performing liver regeneration therapies prior to major hepatectomies, including portal vein embolization, double vein embolization and liver venous deprivation. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It encompasses all clinical and technical details required to perform liver regeneration therapies, revising the indications, contra-indications, outcome measures assessed, technique and expected outcomes.

Comparing iodized oil with polyvinyl alcohol for portal vein embolization in promoting liver remnant increase before partial hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficacy and safety of iodized oil versus polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles in portal vein embolization (PVE) before partial hepatectomy.

METHODS

From October 2016 to December 2021, 86 patients who planned to undergo hepatectomy after PVE were enrolled, including 61 patients post-PVE with PVA particles + coils and 25 patients post-PVE with iodized oil + coils. All patients underwent CT examination before and 2-3 weeks after PVE to evaluate the future liver remnant (FLR). The intercohort comparison included the degree of liver volume growth, changes in laboratory data, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the resection rate between the iodized oil group and the PVA particle group (68 % vs. 70 %, p = 0.822). In terms of the degree of hypertrophy (9.52 % ± 13.47 vs. 4.03 % ± 10.55, p = 0.047) and kinetic growth rate (4.07 % ± 5.4 vs. 1.55 % ± 4.63, p = 0.032), the iodized oil group was superior to the PVA group. The PVE operation time in the PVA particle group was shorter than that in the iodized oil group (121. 72 min ± 34.45 vs. 156. 2 min ± 71.58, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the degree of hypertrophy between the high bilirubin group and the control group (5.32 % ± 9.21 vs. 6.1 % ± 14.79, p = 0.764). Only 1 patient had a major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with PVA particles, iodized oil PVE can significantly increase liver volume and the degree of hypertrophy without any significant difference in safety.

Accidental portal vein catheterization during pleural drainage catheter insertion: a case report

BACKGROUND

Iatrogenic portal vein (PV) injuries following pleural drainage catheter (PDC) insertion are rare but life-threatening. This case report emphasizes the importance of prompt recognition and effective interventional radiology (IR) management.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 38-year-old Asian male, admitted for a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, suffered a critical PV injury during PDC insertion, leading to rapid clinical deterioration. The IR team conducted a portogram, retrieved the catheter, and successfully executed an embolization procedure. The patient's recovery, confirmed through imaging and improving liver function tests, enabled discharge with follow-up instructions.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the clinical significance of promptly recognizing and effectively managing iatrogenic PV injuries during PDC insertion, with the pivotal role of IR. Collaboration between IR and surgical teams is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

Percutaneous radiological interventions of the portal vein: a comprehensive review

The portal vein is the largest vessel supplying the liver. A number of radiological interventions are performed through the portal vein, namely for primary pathologies of the portal vein, for inducing liver hypertrophy or to treat the sequelae of portal hypertension among others. The routes used include direct transhepatic, transjugular, and, uncommonly, trans-splenic and through subcutaneous varices. Portal vein embolization and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt are among the most common portal vein interventions that are performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant and to treat complications of portal hypertension, respectively. Other interventions include transhepatic obliteration of varices and shunts, portal vein thrombolysis, portal vein recanalization, pancreatic islet cell transplantation, and embolization of portal vein injuries. We present a detailed illustrative review of the various radiological portal vein interventions.

Surgery

This chapter provides a comprehensive background from basic to applied knowledge of surgical anatomy which is necessary for the surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Significant advances that have been made in the surgical treatment of CCA were examined. For instance, in-depth details are provided for appropriate preoperative assessment and treatment to optimize patient status and to improve the outcome of surgical treatment(s). Comprehensive details are provided for the surgical techniques and outcomes of treatments for each type of CCA with clear illustrations and images. This chapter also describes the role of minimally invasive surgery and liver transplantation in CCA treatment.

Promoting Surgical Resection through Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy

An inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) can preclude curative-intent surgical resection for patients with primary or secondary hepatic malignancies. For patients with normal baseline liver function and without risk factors, an FLR of 20% is needed to maintain postsurgical hepatic function. However, the FLR requirement is higher for patients who are exposed to systemic chemotherapy (FLR, >30%) or have cirrhosis (FLR, >40%). Interventional radiologic and surgical methods to achieve FLR hypertrophy are evolving, including portal vein ligation, portal vein embolization, radiation lobectomy, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Each technique offers particular advantages and disadvantages. Knowledge of these procedures can help clinicians to choose the suitable technique for each patient. The authors review the techniques used to develop FLR hypertrophy, focusing on technical considerations, outcomes, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Future liver remnant hypertrophy rate in portal vein embolization before left trisectionectomy: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Reports on the future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy rate in patients undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) before left trisectionectomy are sparse. This study aimed to assess the FLR hypertrophy rate in patients undergoing PVE before left trisectionectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and June 2021, 30 patients (22 men and eight women; mean age, 65.7 years) underwent PVE, mainly using gelatin sponge, before left trisectionectomy. The preoperative diagnosis was cholangiocarcinoma in 28 patients and colorectal liver metastases in two patients. The FLR hypertrophy rate, increase in the FLR volume (FLRV) ratio (the ratio of the FLRV to the total liver volume), and complications were evaluated. The patients were further divided into two groups: one group of patients with left portal vein stenosis or occlusion before PVE (n = 12) and another without left portal vein stenosis or occlusion before PVE (n = 18). The FLR hypertrophy rate and increase in the FLRV ratio were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The FLR hypertrophy rate and increase in the FLRV ratio were 31.3% and 6.9%, respectively. One major complication, cholangitis, developed; however, its association with PVE was unclear. The difference in the FLR hypertrophy rate and the increase in the FLRV ratio between the two groups of patients was statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

PVE before left trisectionectomy is effective in achieving FLR hypertrophy. PVE before left trisectionectomy was equally effective in patients with left portal vein stenosis or occlusion as compared to those without. The complication rates were acceptable.

Induction of Robust Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy Before Hepatectomy With a Modified Liver Venous Deprivation Technique Using a Trans-venous Access for Hepatic Vein Embolization

Purpose: Hepatic and/or portal vein embolization are performed before hepatectomy for patients with insufficient future liver remnant and usually achieved with a trans-hepatic approach. The aim of the present study is to describe a modified trans-venous liver venous deprivation technique (mLVD), avoiding the potential risks and limitations of a percutaneous approach to hepatic vein embolization, and to assess the safety, efficacy, and surgical outcome after mLVD. Materials and Methods: Retrospective single-center institutional review board-approved study. From March 2016 to June 2019, consecutive oncologic patients with combined portal and hepatic vein embolization were included. CT volumetric analysis was performed before and after mLVD to assess liver hypertrophy. Complications related to mLVD and surgical outcome were obtained from medical records. Results: Thirty patients (62.7 ± 14.5 years old, 20 men) with liver metastasis (60%) or primary liver cancer (40%) underwent mLVD. Twenty-one patients (70%) had hepatic vein anatomic variants. Technical success of mLVD was 100%. Four patients had complications (three minor and one major). FLR hypertrophy was 64.2% ± 51.3% (mean ± SD). Twenty-four patients (80%) underwent the planned hepatectomy and no surgery was canceled as a consequence of mLVD complications or insufficient hypertrophy. Fifty percent of patients (12/24) had no or mild complications after surgery (Clavien-Dindo 0-II), and 45.8% (11/24) had more serious complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV). Thirty-day mortality was 4.2% (1/24). Conclusion: mLVD is an effective method to induce FLR hypertrophy. This technique is applicable in a wide range of oncologic situations and in patients with complex right liver vein anatomy.

Portal vein embolization with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate before hepatectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant enabling major liver resection in patients with various types of liver tumors.

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and effectiveness of PVE with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients referred to our hospital for PVE between July 2006 and July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Volumetry was performed on computed tomography images before and after PVE, segmenting the total liver volume and the future liver remnant (FLR), i.e. liver segments I-III.

RESULTS

PVE was performed in 46 patients (18 women, 28 men; mean age = 61 years) using local anesthesia. The ipsilateral technique was used in 45 patients. Adverse events were rare. The mean FLR volume increase was 56%, the degree of hypertrophy was 9.7%, and the kinetic growth rate was 2.1%/week. The median ± SD period between PVE and liver surgery was 7 ± 3 weeks. Forty-two patients (91%) had surgery; liver resection was performed in 37 (80%) patients. Three patients (7%) developed transient liver failure after surgery. There was no 90-day post-PVE or postoperative mortality.

CONCLUSION

PVE using NBCA through the ipsilateral approach in local anesthesia is safe and effective in inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant enabling surgery, and thereby increasing survival in patients with liver tumors.

Direct percutaneous access to a mesenteric vein for antegrade embolization of esophageal varices: A case report

A 79-year-old woman with a history of advanced gastric cancer and portal vein tumor thrombus, treated with surgery and chemoradiotherapy, presented with hematemesis due to esophageal variceal bleeding around the esophagojejunal anastomosis. Endoscopic treatment was unsuccessful. Due to portal vein occlusion, percutaneous transhepatic access was difficult. Thus, the middle colic vein, which was dilated due to portal vein occlusion, was percutaneously punctured, and antegrade embolization of a jejunal vein feeding the varices was performed using a microcatheter through a 4-F dilator placed as a sheath. After embolization, the sheath was removed, and ultrasound-guided compression of the puncture site was performed. No bleeding complication occurred. Therefore, direct percutaneous access to a mesenteric vein is a viable alternative to transhepatic access.

Portal vein embolization with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer for contralateral lobe hypertrophy before liver resection: safety, feasibility and initial experience

Background

To report our preliminary experience with preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) using liquid ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer.

Methods

Retrospectively review of patients with primary or secondary liver malignancies scheduled for extensive hepatectomy after the induction of future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy by right or left PVE with EVOH as the only embolic agent between 2014 and 2018 at two academic centers. Cross-sectional imaging liver volumetry data obtained before and 3-6 weeks after PVE were used to assess the FLR volume (FLRV) increase, degree of FLR hypertrophy and the FLR kinetic growth rate (KGR).

Results

Twenty-six patients (17 males; mean age, 58.7±11 years; range, 32-79 years) were included. The technical and clinical success rate was 100%. PVE produced adequate FLR hypertrophy in all patients. Embolization occurred in all targeted portal branches and in no non-target vessels. The %FLRV increased by 52.9%±32.5% and the degree of FLR hypertrophy was 16.7%±6.8%. The KGR was 4.4%±2.0% per week. Four patients experience minor complications after PVE which resolved with symptomatic treatment. The resection rate was 84.5%. One patient died during surgery for reasons unrelated to PVE.

Conclusions

Preoperative PVE with EVOH copolymer is feasible, safe, and effective in inducing FLR hypertrophy.

Portal vein embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue is superior to other materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

It remains uncertain which embolization material is best for portal vein embolization (PVE). We investigated the various materials for effectiveness in inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, technical and growth success rates, and complication and resection rates.

METHODS

A systematic review from 1998 to 2019 on embolization materials for PVE was performed on Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane. FLR growth between the two most commonly used materials was compared in a random effects meta-analysis. In a separate analysis using local data (n = 52), n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) was compared with microparticles regarding costs, radiation dose, and procedure time.

RESULTS

In total, 2896 patients, 61.0 ± 4.0 years of age and 65% male, from 51 papers were included in the analysis. In 61% of the patients, either NBCA or microparticles were used for embolization. The remaining were treated with ethanol, gelfoam, or sclerosing agents. The FLR growth with NBCA was 49.1% ± 29.7 compared to 42.2% ± 40 with microparticles (p = 0.037). The growth success rate with NBCA vs microparticles was 95.3% vs 90.7% respectively (p < 0.001). There were no differences in major complications between NBCA and microparticles. In the local analysis, NBCA (n = 41) entailed shorter procedure time and reduced fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), lower radiation exposure (p < 0.01), and lower material costs (p < 0.0001) than microparticles (n = 11).

CONCLUSION

PVE with NBCA seems to be the best choice when combining growth of the FLR, procedure time, radiation exposure, and costs.

KEY POINTS

• The meta-analysis shows that n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) is superior to microparticles regarding hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, 49.1% ± 29.7 vs 42.2% ± 40.0 (p = 0.037). • There is no significant difference in major complication rates for portal vein embolization using NBCA, 4% (24/681), compared with microparticles, 5% (25/494) (p > 0.05). • Local data shows a shorter procedure time, 215 vs 348 mins from arrival to departure at the interventional radiology unit, and fluoroscopy time, 43 vs 96 mins (p < 0.001), lower radiation dosage, 573 vs 1287 Gycm² (p < 0.01), and costs, €816 vs €4233 (p < 0.0001) for NBCA compared to microparticles.

Portal Vein Embolization with PVA and Coils before Major Hepatectomy: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis in Sixty-Four Patients

Objectives

Portal vein embolization (PVE) stimulates hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) and improves the safety of extended hepatectomy. This study evaluated the efficacy of PVE, performed with PVA and coils, in relation to its effect on FLR volume and ratio. Secondary endpoints were the assessment of PVE complications, accomplishment of liver surgery, and patient outcome after hepatectomy.

Materials and Methods

All patients who underwent PVE before planned major hepatectomy between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, comprising a total of 64 patients. Baseline patient clinical characteristics, imaging records, liver volumetric changes, complications, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

There were 45 men and 19 women with a mean age of 64 years. Colorectal liver metastasis was the most frequent liver tumor. The majority of patients (n = 53) had a right PVE. FLR increased from a mean value of 484 ml ± 242 to 654 ml ± 287 (p < 0.001) after PVE. Two major complications were experienced after PVE: 1 case of left hepatic artery branch laceration and 1 case of hemoperitoneum and hemothorax. A total of 44 (69%) patients underwent liver surgery. Twenty-one patients were not taken to surgery due to disease progression (n = 18), liver insufficiency (n = 1), and insufficient FLR volume (n = 1), and one patient declined surgery (n = 1).

Conclusions

PVE with PVA and coils was accomplished safely and promoted a high FLR hypertrophy yield, enabling most of our patients to be submitted to the potentially curative treatment of liver tumor resection.

Effect of portal vein embolization on treatment plan prior to major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is used before major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to increase future liver remnant (FLR) volume. However, this may increase tumour growth rate, leading to more extensive resections. This study aimed to determine the effect of tumour growth, following PVE, on treatment plan.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study conducted on patients treated from 2008 to 2015 with PVE before major hepatectomy for HCC. Liver and tumour volumetry was performed on pre- and post-PVE CT scans. Image-based and actioned plans were compared before and after PVE.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients received PVE. Non-tumour total liver volume decreased (median 1440 to 1394 cm³; p = 0.031), while tumour (median 161-240 cm³; p < 0.001) and FLR volumes (median 430-574 cm³; p < 0.001) increased. The treatment plan changed in 15/31 patients: more extensive resection (n = 6), less extensive resection (n = 1), no resection as scheduled (n = 8). Tumour progression accounted for a clinically relevant change in treatment plan in 8/31 patients.

CONCLUSION

Following PVE in the setting of HCC, tumour progression accounts for a change in treatment plan in approximately a quarter of patients. Further research is warranted to determine whether additional liver directed therapy should routinely be used to slow the growth of HCC post-PVE.

Percutaneous Portal Vein Embolization Using a Simplified Sheathless 18-Gauge Trocar Needle Approach: Review of Efficacy and Safety

PURPOSE

Portal vein (PV) embolization (PVE) is traditionally performed via a PV sheath with selective embolization of PV branches. Here, the efficacy and safety of PVE with the use of only an 18-gauge needle is reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent PVE from 2009 through 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Forty-five patients (mean age, 60 y ± 7.6; 38 men) underwent 45 PVE procedures. Hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastases accounted for 26 (58%), 13 (29%), and 6 (13%) patients, respectively. PVE was performed by puncturing a branch of right PV with an 18-gauge needle under US guidance. Via the same needle, direct portography was performed, followed by PVE with an N-butyl cyanoacrylate/Lipiodol mixture. Percentage increase of future liver remnant (FLR) volume and increase in ratio of FLR to total liver volume were estimated as measures of efficacy. Complications were reported according to Society of Interventional Radiology classification. Fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and dose-area product (DAP) were recorded.

RESULTS

Technical success rate was 100%. The median DAP, fluoroscopy time, and procedure time were 74,387 mGy·cm² (IQR, 90,349 mGy·cm²), 3.5 min (IQR, 2.10 min), and 24 min (IQR, 10.5 min). Among the 23 patients with complete CT volumetry data, mean increase in the ratio of FLR to total liver volume and percentage increase of FLR volume were 12.5% ± 7.7 and 50% ± 33, respectively. There were 3 minor complications (asymptomatic nonocclusive emboli in FLR) and 3 major complications (1 hepatic vein emboli, 1 subphrenic collection, and 1 hepatic infarct).

CONCLUSIONS

PVE via a sheathless 18-gauge needle approach is feasible, with satisfactory FLR hypertrophy.

Segment 2/3 Hypertrophy is Greater When Right Portal Vein Embolisation is Extended to Segment 4 in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

In patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), right portal vein embolisation (RPVE) is used to increase the volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) before major hepatic resection. It is not established whether embolisation of segment 4 in addition RPVE (RPVE + 4) induces greater hypertrophy of the FRL. Limitations of prior studies include heterogenous populations and use of hypertrophy metrics sensitive to baseline variables.

Methods

From 2010 to 2015, consecutive patients undergoing RPVE or RPVE + 4 for CRLM, who had not undergone prior major hepatic resection and in whom imaging was available, were included in a retrospective study. Data were extracted from hospital electronic records. Volumetric assessments of segments 2–3 were made on cross-sectional imaging before and after embolisation and corrected for standardised liver volume.

Results

Ninety-nine patients underwent PVE, and 60 met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-eight patients underwent RPVE, and 22 underwent RPVE + 4. Forty-five patients had undergone median 6 cycles of prior chemotherapy. Eighteen patients had FRL metastases at PVE, and 16 had undergone subsegmental metastasectomy in the FRL. Assessments of the degree of hypertrophy (DH) of segments 2/3 were made at median 35 (interquartile range 30–49) days after PVE. RPVE + 4 resulted in a significantly greater increase in DH than RPVE (7.7 ± 1.8% vs 11.3 ± 2.6%, p = 0.011). No confounding association between baseline variables and the decision to undertake RPVE or RPVE + 4 was identified. Median survival was 2.4 years and was not influenced by segment 4 embolisation.

Conclusion

RPVE + 4 results in greater DH of segments 2/3 than RPVE in people with CLRM.

Liver hypertrophy: Underlying mechanisms and promoting procedures before major hepatectomy

Various procedures can promote hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) before major hepatectomy to prevent postoperative liver failure. The pathophysiological situation following portal vein embolization (PVE), hepatic artery ligation/embolization or hepatectomy remains unclear. On one hand, the main mechanisms of hepatic regeneration appear to be driven by hepatic hypoxia (involving the hepatic arterial buffer response), an increased portal blood flow inducing shear stress and the involvement of several mediators (inflammatory cytokines, vasoregulators, growth factors, eicosanoids and several hormones). On the other hand, several factors are associated with impaired liver regeneration, such as biliary obstruction, malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, male gender, age, ethanol and viral infection. All these mechanisms may explain the varying degrees of hypertrophy observed following a surgical or radiological procedure promoting hypertrophy the FLR. Radiological procedures include left and right portal vein embolization (extended or not to segment 4), sequential PVE and hepatic vein embolization (HVE), and more recently combined PVE and HVE. Surgical procedures include associated liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and more recently the combined portal embolization and arterial ligation procedure. This review aimed to clarify the pathophysiology of liver regeneration; it also describes radiological or surgical procedures employed to improve liver regeneration in terms of volumetric changes, the feasibility of the second step and the benefits and drawbacks of each procedure.

Ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer for occlusion of specific portal branches during preoperative portal vein embolisation with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) injection for selective occlusion of portal branches considered at risk for non-target embolisation during preoperative portal vein embolisation (PVE).

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients (mean age, 57 ± 17 years) submitted to PVE with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and additional EVOH for selected portal branches were retrospectively analysed. Indications for the use of EVOH and the selected portal branches were evaluated. Degree of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR) and kinetic growth were assessed by CT volumetry performed before and 3-6 weeks after PVE. Clinical outcome and histopathological analysis of portal veins occluded with EVOH were reviewed.

RESULTS

EVOH was indicated intraoperatively for embolisation of selected portal branches that the operator reported at risk to provoke non-target embolisation with NBCA. Indications for the use of EVOH were embolisation of segment IV (n = 21), embolisation of segmental portal branches with early bifurcation (n = 7) and PVE in a 1-year-old girl with cystic hamartomas. All targeted portal branches were successfully embolised. There were no cases with non-target embolisation by EVOH. The degree of hypertrophy of the FLR was 14.3 ± 8.1% and the kinetic growth rate was 2.7 ± 1.8% per week.

CONCLUSION

EVOH is safe and effective for embolisation of selected portal vein branches considered at risk for non-target embolisation.

KEY POINTS

• EVOH is another effective liquid embolic agent for preoperative PVE. • EVOH is relatively simple to handle with a minimal risk of non-target embolisation. • During PVE, some portal branches considered complicated to occlude with NBCA may be efficiently embolised with EVOH.

Portal Vein Embolization Utilizing N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate for Contralateral Lobe Hypertrophy Prior to Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for portal vein embolization (PVE) when used to induce contralateral future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients undergoing planned hepatic resection for hepatic malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed database (including articles indexed by MEDLINE) was searched for articles published from 1970 to 2018 describing patients treated with PVE utilizing NBCA to induce hypertrophy of the FLR prior to contralateral hepatic lobe resection. Demographic data, embolization technique, complications of embolization, resultant FLR hypertrophy, and surgical outcomes were obtained when available. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the cumulative relative hypertrophy rate of the FLR following PVE with NBCA.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 18 relevant articles. Six hundred and seven patients (383 men, 220 women; mean age 60.7 years) with procedures describing PVE utilizing NBCA were reviewed. The most common underlying hepatic malignancies were colorectal metastases (n = 348), followed by cholangiocarcinomas (n = 92), and hepatocellular carcinomas (n = 89). Technical success was reportedly achieved in 603/607 patients, for a success rate of 99.3%. Fixed effects meta-analysis of the relative hypertrophy rate of the FLR among studies resulted in an aggregate rate of 49.4 ± 1.3%. Of the patients who underwent attempted PVE, 461/607 (75.9%) eventually underwent surgical resection. Major complications following PVE occurred in 19 patients (3.13%), while minor complications following PVE occurred in 38 patients (6.26%).

CONCLUSIONS

PVE utilizing NBCA to induce hypertrophy of the FLR prior to contralateral lobe resection in the setting of hepatic malignancy is safe and effective.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IIa-Systematic review of cohort studies.

Portal Vein Embolization: State-of-the-Art Technique and Options to Improve Liver Hypertrophy

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is associated with a high technical and clinical success rate for induction of future liver remnant hypertrophy prior to surgical resection. The degree of hypertrophy is variable and depends on multiple factors, including technical aspects of the procedure and underlying chronic liver disease. For patients with insufficient liver volume following PVE, adjunctive techniques, such as intra-portal administration of stem cells, dietary supplementation, transarterial embolization, and hepatic vein embolization, are available. Our purpose is to review the state-of-the-art technique associated with high-quality PVE and to discuss options to improve hypertrophy of the future liver remnant.

Portal vein embolization with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate through an ipsilateral approach before major hepatectomy: single center analysis of 50 consecutive patients

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy of portal vein embolization (PVE) with n-Butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) through an ipsilateral approach before major hepatectomy. Secondary end-points were PVE safety, liver resection and patient outcome.

Methods

Over a 5-year period 50 non-cirrhotic consecutive patients were included with primary or secondary liver cancer treatable by hepatectomy with a liver remnant (FLR) volume less than 25% or less than 40% in diseased livers.

Results

There were 37 men and 13 women with a mean age of 57 years. Colorectal liver metastases were the most frequent tumor and patients were previously exposed to chemotherapy. FLR increased from 422 ml to 629 ml (P < 0.001) after PVE, corresponding to anincrease of 52%. The FLR ratio increased from 29.6% to 42.3% (P < 0.001). Kinetic growth rate was 2.98%/week. A negative association was observed between increase in the FLR and FLR ratio and FLR volume before PVE (P = 0.002). In 31 patients hepatectomy was accomplished and only one patient presented with liver insufficiency within 30 days after surgery.

Conclusions

PVE with NBCA through an ipsilateral puncture is effective before major hepatectomy. Meticulous attention is needed especially near the end of the embolization procedure to avoid complications.

Trial registration

Clinical Study ISRCTN registration number: ISRCTN39855523. Registered March 13th 2017.

C-Arm Cone Beam CT for Intraprocedural Image Fusion and 3D Guidance in Portal Vein Embolization (PVE)

PURPOSE

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is applied in patients with extended oncologic liver disease to induce hyperplasia of the future liver remnant and make resection feasible. Ultrasound (US) guidance is the gold standard for percutaneous portal vein access. This study evaluated feasibility and safety of C-arm cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for needle guidance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 10 patients, puncture was performed under 3D needle guidance in a CBCT data set. Contrast-enhanced (CE) CBCT was generated (n = 7), or native CBCT was registered to pre-examination CE-CT via image fusion (n = 3). Technical success, number of punctures, puncture time (time between CBCT acquisition and successful portal vein access), dose parameters and safety were evaluated. For comparison, 10 patients with PVE under US guidance were analyzed retrospectively. Study and control group were matched for age, BMI, INR, platelets, portal vein anatomy.

RESULTS

All interventions were technically successful without intervention-related complications. In the study group, the mean number of puncture attempts was 3.1 ± 2.5. Mean puncture time was 12 min (±10). Mean total dose area product (DAP) was 288 Gy cm² (±154). The mean relative share of CBCT-related radiation exposure was 6% (±3). Intervention times and DAP were slightly higher compared to the control group without reaching significance.

CONCLUSION

CBCT-guided PVE is feasible and safe. The relative dose of CBCT is low compared to the overall dose of the intervention. This technique may be a promising approach for difficult anatomic situations that limit the use of US for needle guidance.

Other non-surgical treatments for liver cancer

Interventional radiology plays a major role in the modern management of liver cancers, in primary hepatic malignancies or metastases and in palliative or curative situations. Radiological treatments are divided in two categories based on their approach: endovascular treatment and direct transcapsular access. Endovascular treatments include mainly three applications: transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and portal vein embolization (PVE). TACE and TARE share an endovascular arterial approach, consisting of a selective catheterization of the hepatic artery or its branches. Subsequently, either a chemotherapy (TACE) or radioembolic (TARE) agent is injected in the target vessel to act on the tumor. PVE raises the volume of the future liver remnant in extended hepatectomy by embolizing a portal vein territory which results in hepatic regeneration. Direct transcapsular access treatments involve mainly three techniques: radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA), microwave thermal ablation (MWA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI). RFA and MWA procedures are almost identical, their clinical applications are similar. A probe is deployed directly into the tumor to generate heat and coagulation necrosis. PEI has known implications based on the chemical toxicity of intra-tumoral injection with highly concentrated alcohol by a thin needle.

Current status and future perspectives on treatment of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer (Review)

Liver metastasis is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastasis. Approximately half of all colorectal cancer patients will develop liver metastases. Although radical surgery is the standard treatment modality, only 10-20% of patients are deemed eligible for resection. Despite advances in survival with chemotherapy, surgical resection is still considered the only curative option for patients with liver metastases. Much effort has been expended to address patients with metastatic liver disease. The majority of evidence stated a significant survival benefit with surgical resection to reach an overall 5-year survival rate of 35-55% after hepatic resection. However, still majority of patients will experience disease recurrence even after a successful resection. In this review, we describe current status and controversies related to treatment options for CRC liver metastases and its potential for enhancing oncologic outcomes and improving quality of life.

Portal Vein Embolization as an Oncosurgical Strategy Prior to Major Hepatic Resection: Anatomic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations

Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is used to extend the indications for major hepatic resection, and it has become the standard of care for selected patients with hepatic malignancies treated at major hepatobiliary centers. To date, various techniques with different embolic materials have been used with similar results in the degree of liver hypertrophy. Regardless of the specific strategy used, both surgeons and interventional radiologists must be familiar with each other's techniques to be able to create the optimal plan for each individual patient. Knowledge of the segmental anatomy of the liver is paramount to fully understand the liver segments that need to be embolized and resected. Understanding the portal vein anatomy and the branching variations, along with the techniques used to transect the portal vein during hepatic resection, is important because these variables can affect the PVE procedure and the eventual surgical resection. Comprehension of the advantages and disadvantages of approaches to the portal venous system and the various embolic materials used for PVE is essential to best tailor the procedures for each patient and to avoid complications. Before PVE, meticulous assessment of the portal vein branching anatomy is performed with cross-sectional imaging, and embolization strategies are developed based on the patient's anatomy. The PVE procedure consists of several technical steps, and knowledge of these technical tips, potential complications, and how to avoid the complications in each step is of great importance for safe and successful PVE and ultimately successful hepatectomy. Because PVE is used as an adjunct to planned hepatic resection, priority must always be placed on safety, without compromising the integrity of the future liver remnant, and close collaboration between interventional radiologists and hepatobiliary surgeons is essential to achieve successful outcomes.

Preoperative Assessment and Optimization of the Future Liver Remnant

Liver resection of benign, primary, and metastatic tumors is challenging and places patients at risk for postoperative liver insufficiency. The magnitude of this risk largely depends on the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR). It is, therefore, critical that hepatobiliary surgeons are well versed in measurement of liver volume and function as well as various techniques for preoperative liver volume augmentation. The absolute volume of FLR required to avoid postoperative liver insufficiency depends on patient, disease, and anatomic factors. Rapid expansion of the FLR can safely be achieved with portal venous embolization of the contralateral liver segments.

Portal vein embolization for induction of selective hepatic hypertrophy prior to major hepatectomy: rationale, techniques, outcomes and future directions

The ability to modulate the future liver remnant (FLR) is a key component of modern oncologic hepatobiliary surgery practice and has extended surgical candidacy for patients who may have been previously thought unable to survive liver resection. Multiple techniques have been developed to augment the FLR including portal vein embolization (PVE), associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (ALPPS), and the recently reported transhepatic liver venous deprivation (LVD). PVE is a well-established means to improve the safety of liver resection by redirecting blood flow to the FLR in an effort to selectively hypertrophy and ultimately improve functional reserve of the FLR. This article discusses the current practice of PVE with focus on summarizing the large number of published reports from which outcomes based practices have been developed. Both technical aspects of PVE including volumetry, approaches, and embolization agents; and clinical aspects of PVE including data supporting indications, and its role in conjunction with chemotherapy and transarterial embolization will be highlighted. PVE remains an important aspect of oncologic care; in large part due to the substantial foundation of information available demonstrating its clear clinical benefit for hepatic resection candidates with small anticipated FLRs.

Preoperative portal vein embolization in liver cancer: indications, techniques and outcomes

Postoperative liver failure is a severe complication of major hepatectomies, in particular in patients with a chronic underlying liver disease. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is an approach that is gaining increasing acceptance in the preoperative treatment of selected patients prior to major hepatic resection. Induction of selective hypertrophy of the non-diseased portion of the liver with PVE in patients with either primary or secondary hepatobiliary, malignancy with small estimated future liver remnants (FLR) may result in fewer complications and shorter hospital stays following resection. Additionally, PVE performed in patients initially considered unsuitable for resection due to lack of sufficient remaining normal parenchyma may add to the pool of candidates for surgical treatment. A thorough knowledge of hepatic segmentation and portal venous anatomy is essential before performing PVE. In addition, the indications and contraindications for PVE, the methods for assessing hepatic lobar hypertrophy, the means of determining optimal timing of resection, and the possible complications of PVE need to be fully understood before undertaking the procedure. Technique may vary among operators, but cyanoacrylate glue seems to be the best embolic agent with the highest expected rate of liver regeneration for PVE. The procedure is usually indicated when the remnant liver accounts for less than 25-40% of the total liver volume. Compensatory hypertrophy of the non-embolized segments is maximal during the first 2 weeks and persists, although to a lesser extent during approximately 6 weeks. Liver resection is performed 2 to 6 weeks after embolization. The goal of this article is to discuss the rationale, indications, techniques and outcomes of PVE before major hepatectomy.

Impact of 3D Rotational Angiography on Liver Embolization Procedures: Review of Technique and Applications

In the last years, the interest into interventional applications of C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) progressively raised, widening its clinical application from the original field of interventional neuroradiology to the field of peripheral procedures. Liver embolization procedures, due to their complexity and potential treatment-related life-threatening complications, represent one of the main clinical applications of this novel angiographic technique. CBCT has been demonstrated to render procedures safer and technically easier, and to predict outcome as well as to avoid major complications in different treatment scenarios (trans-arterial embolization, trans-arterial chemoembolization, selective internal radiation therapy, percutaneous portal vein embolization). This review summarizes all technical, dosimetric and procedural aspects of CBCT techniques, underlying all its potential clinical advantages in the field of liver embolization procedures. Moreover, the paper provides all the instructions to obtain the best diagnostic performance out of this novel angiographic technique.

Disastrous Portal Vein Embolization Turned into a Successful Intervention

Portal vein embolization (PVE) may be performed before hemihepatectomy to increase the volume of future liver remnant (FLR) and to reduce the risk of postoperative liver insufficiency. We report the case of a 71-year-old patient with hilar cholangiocarcinoma undergoing PVE with access from the right portal vein using a mixture of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and ethiodized oil. During the procedure, nontarget embolization of the left portal vein occurred. An aspiration maneuver of the polymerized plug failed; however, the embolus obstructing portal venous flow in the FLR was successfully relocated into the right portal vein while carefully bypassing the plug with a balloon catheter, inflating the balloon, and pulling the plug into the main right portal vein.

Portal vein embolization before right hepatectomy or extended right hepatectomy using sodium tetradecyl sulfate foam: technique and initial results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of portal vein embolization (PVE) with sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) foam.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of 35 patients (27 men and 8 women; mean age, 61 y) who underwent PVE with STS foam was performed. The technical success rate, rate of PVE at producing adequate future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy, and rate of disease progression precluding resection after PVE were analyzed. Complications of PVE and liver resection after PVE were recorded.

RESULTS

PVE was performed on 35 patients before right hepatic resection for both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies (22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 10 metastasis, 2 cholangiocarcinoma, 1 invasive gallbladder carcinoma). Technical success was achieved in 97.1% (34 of 35) of patients. Mean FLR of the total estimated liver volume increased from 24.5% (SD, 7.7%) to 36.5% (SD, 14.5%), a mean percentage increase of 48.8% (SD, 34.3%). PVE produced adequate FLR hypertrophy in 31 of 35 patients (88.6%). Proposed right hepatectomy was subsequently performed in 27 patients (77.1%). One patient remains scheduled for surgery, two had peritoneal spread at surgery and resection was aborted, two had disease progression on imaging after PVE, and three had inadequate FLR hypertrophy with no surgery. One major complication was observed related to PVE that involved nontarget embolization to segment III, which was managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative PVE with STS foam is a safe and effective method to induce hypertrophy of the FLR.

Preoperative portal vein embolization with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficiency of preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils for inducing lobar hypertrophy in hepatobiliary malignancy patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PVE was performed by a percutaneous left approach in 63 patients with hepatic malignancy (hepatocarcinoma=38, colorectal metastasis=14, cholangiocarcinoma=11). The indication of PVE and surgery was evaluated by hepatic tumor board take into consideration to the tumor extension and the hepatic volume on initial and post-embolization CT-scans. The total functional liver volume (TELV) and future liver remnant (FLR) volume were measured before and 24±5days after PVE to assess FLR, TELV and FLR/TELV ratios. Efficiency evaluation was based on FLR increase, the ability to perform the hepatectomy and the hepatic function after surgery. Safety evaluation was determined by clinical and biological follow-up after embolization and surgery.

RESULTS

PVE was successful in all the patients. The mean FLR volume increases by 57±56% after embolization (449±180cm(3) to 663±254cm(3)) (P<0.0001). The FLR/TELV ratio increases by 11% after PVE (25±8% to 36±12%). Three minors' complications were registered without impact on surgery, and four patients developed portal hypertension. Forty-nine patients underwent hepatectomy; none of them developed liver failure. Surgery was not performed in 14 patients due to tumor progression (n=9), inadequate hypertrophy of FLR (n=1) and portal hypertension (n=4).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PVE with a combination of trisacryl microspheres, gelfoam and coils is a safe and effective method for inducing contralateral hypertrophy before right hepatectomy in patients with advanced hepatobiliary malignancy.

Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique, and current application

Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a technique used before hepatic resection to increase the size of liver segments that will remain after surgery. This therapy redirects portal blood to segments of the future liver remnant (FLR), resulting in hypertrophy. PVE is indicated when the FLR is either too small to support essential function or marginal in size and associated with a complicated postoperative course. When appropriately applied, PVE has been shown to reduce postoperative morbidity and increase the number of patients eligible for curative intent resection. PVE is also being combined with other therapies in novel ways to improve surgical outcomes. This article reviews the rationale, technical considerations, and current use of preoperative PVE.

Percutaneous portal vein access and transhepatic tract hemostasis

Percutaneous portal vein interventions require minimally invasive access to the portal venous system. Common approaches to the portal vein include transjugular hepatic vein to portal vein access and direct transhepatic portal vein access. A major concern of the transhepatic route is the risk of postprocedural bleeding, which is increased when patients are anticoagulated or receiving pharmaceutical thrombolytic therapy. Thus percutaneous portal vein access and subsequent closure are important technical parts of percutaneous portal vein procedures. At present, various techniques have been used for either portal access or subsequent transhepatic tract closure and hemostasis. Regardless of the method used, meticulous technique is required to achieve the overall safety and effectiveness of portal venous procedures. This article reviews the various techniques of percutaneous transhepatic portal vein access and the various closure and hemostatic methods used to reduce the risk of postprocedural bleeding.

Interventional oncologic approaches to liver metastases

Metastatic liver disease is the most common cause of death in cancer patients. Complete surgical resection is currently considered the only curative treatment, with only about 25% of patients being amenable to surgery. Therefore, a variety of interventional oncologic techniques have been developed for treating secondary liver malignancies. The aim of these therapies is either to allow patients with unresectable tumors to become surgical candidates, provide curative treatment options in nonsurgical candidates, or improve survival in a palliative or even curative approach. Among these interventional therapies are transcatheter therapies such as portal vein embolization, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization, as well as interstitial techniques, particularly radiofrequency ablation as the most commonly applied technique. The rationale, application and clinical results of each of these techniques are reviewed on the basis of the current literature. Future prospects such as gene therapy and immunotherapy are introduced.

The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the UK is increasing. The role of interventional radiology in the treatment of HCC is well established. We discuss the minimally invasive treatment options that are available. It is important that procedures are undertaken in and postprocedure imaging is reviewed by centers with accredited hepatobiliary units. This is when the best outcomes are achieved. Advances in tumor biology and in technology will continue to expand the role of interventional radiology in the treatment of HCC in the future.

Acute portal hypertension models in dogs: low- and high-flow approaches

Effective animal models are needed to evaluate the feasibility of new techniques to assess portal hypertension (PH). Here we developed 2 canine models of acute PH by increasing intrasinusoidal resistance and by increasing the portal vein (PV) flow volume to test the efficacy of a noninvasive technique to evaluate PH. The acute low-flow PH model was based on embolization of liver circulation by using a gelatin sponge material. The acute high-flow PH model was based on increasing the PV flow volume by using an arteriovenous (A-V) shunt from the femoral artery and saline infusion. PV pressures and diameters were assessed before and after inducing PH. Pressure values and diameters were obtained from the inferior vena cava in 3 unmanipulated controls. The low-flow model of PH was repeatable and successfully increased PV pressure by an average of 16.5 mm Hg within 15 min. The high-flow model of PH failed to achieve increased PV pressures. However, saline supplementation of the portal circulation in the high-flow model led to mean increases in PV pressures of 12.8 mm Hg within 20 min. Pulsatility in the PV was decreased in the low-flow model and increased in the high-flow model relative to baseline. No changes in PV diameter were noted in either model. These acute PH models are relatively straightforward to implement and may facilitate the evaluation of new techniques to assess PH.

Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization with ethanol injection

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization with ethanol injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 143 patients who underwent percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. Hypertrophy of the future liver remnant was assessed by comparing the volumetric data obtained from CT image data before and after percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization. The evaluation of effectiveness was based on changes in the absolute volume of the future liver remnant and the ratio of the future liver remnant to the total estimated liver volume.

RESULTS

Ten of 143 patients (7.0%) underwent additional embolization because of recanalization and insufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. The mean increase in the ratio of the future liver remnant was 33.6% (p < 0.0001), and the mean ratio of future liver remnant to total estimated liver volume increased from 34.9% to 45.7% (p < 0.0001). Although most of the patients complained of pain after ethanol injection, they were gradually relieved of pain in a few minutes by conservative treatment. Fever (38-39°C) was reported after 47 of 151 (31.1%) percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization sessions and was resolved within a few days. Transient elevation of the liver transaminases was observed after the procedures and resolved within about a week. Major complications occurred in nine of 151 (6%) percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization sessions, but no patients developed hepatic insufficiency or severe complications precluding successful resection. One hundred twenty patients underwent hepatic resection, and two patients developed hepatic failure after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic portal vein embolization with ethanol is a feasible and effective procedure to obtain hypertrophy of the future liver remnant for preventing hepatic failure after hepatectomy.

Safety and efficacy of preoperative right portal vein embolization in patients at risk for postoperative liver failure following major right hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

Right portal vein embolization (RPVE) has been utilized with or without segment IV (RPVE + IV) prior to hepatectomy to induce hypertrophy and prevent liver insufficiency in patients with a predicted future liver remnant (FLR) of ≤30% or cirrhosis.

METHODS

Records of patients who underwent RPVE during 2006-2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, operative outcomes and complications were analysed. Computed tomography-based volumetrics were performed to determine FLR volume and degree of hypertrophy. Patients were stratified by segment IV embolization. Short-term outcomes following RPVE and liver resection are reported.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients were identified. Ten patients underwent RPVE and 13 underwent RPVE + IV. The RPVE procedure resulted in a 38% increase in FLR volume. Liver volumes, hypertrophy rates and outcomes were similar in both groups. Rates of operative complications in the RPVE and RPVE + IV groups were similar at 50% and 54%, respectively, and most complications were minor. Complication rates as a result of embolization were 30% in the RPVE group and 31% in the RPVE + IV group. One patient underwent modified operative resection as a result of a complication of RPVE.

CONCLUSIONS

Right portal vein embolization (±segment IV) is a safe and effective modality to increase FLR volume. Post-embolization complications and short-term outcomes after resection are acceptable and are similar in both RPVE and RPVE + IV.