Outcome of patients with primary refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma after R-CHOP treatment

How can we improve the successful identification of patients suitable for CAR-T cell therapy?

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has resulted in a breakthrough in the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsed hematological malignancies. However, the identification of patients suitable for CAR-T cell therapy needs to be improved.

AREAS COVERED

CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated excellent efficacy in hematological malignancies; however, views on determining when to apply CAR-T cells in terms of the evaluation of patient characteristics remain controversial.

EXPERT OPINION

We reviewed the current feasibility and challenges of CAR-T cell therapy in the most common hematological malignancies and classified them according to the disease type and treatment priority, to guide clinicians and researchers in applying and investigating CAR-T cells furtherly.

Defining primary refractory large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) that fail to achieve a complete response (CR) or who relapse early after anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy (IC) have a poor prognosis and are commonly considered to have "primary refractory disease." However, different definitions of primary refractory disease are used in the literature and clinical practice. In this study, we examined variation in the time to relapse used to define refractory status and association with survival outcomes in patients with primary refractory LBCL in a single-center prospective cohort with validation in an independent multicenter cohort. Patients with newly diagnosed LBCL were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiological Resource cohort (MER; N = 949) or the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes cohort (LEO; N = 2755) from September 2002 to May 2021. Primary refractory LBCL was defined as no response (stable disease [SD]) or progressive disease (PD) during, or by the end of, frontline (1L) IC (primary PD; PPD); partial response at end of treatment (EOT PR); or relapse within 3 to 12 months after achieving CR at EOT to 1L IC (early relapse). In the MER cohort, patients with PPD had inferior overall survival (OS; 2-year OS rate: 15% MER, 31% LEO) when compared with other subgroups considered in defining primary refractory disease, EOT PR (2-year OS rate: 38% MER, 50% LEO) and early relapse (2-year OS rate: 44% MER, 58% LEO). Among patients receiving 1L IC with curative intent, we identified that patients with PPD are the key subgroup with poor outcomes. We propose a definition of primary refractory LBCL as SD or PD during, or by the end of, 1L treatment.

Cholesterol efflux from C1QB-expressing macrophages is associated with resistance to chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in primary refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in early trials for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, its efficacy in treating primary refractory DLBCL has not been comprehensively investigated, and the underlying resistance mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we report the outcomes of a phase I, open-label, single-arm clinical trial of relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel), a CD19-targeted CAR-T cell product, with safety and efficacy as primary endpoints. Among the 12 enrolled patients, 8 experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity of treatment-emergent adverse event. No grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity occurred. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed an increase proportion of C1QB-expressing macrophages in patients with progressive disease before CAR-T cell therapy. Cholesterol efflux from M2 macrophages was found to inhibit CAR-T cells cytotoxicity by inducing an immunosuppressive state in CD8+ T cells, leading to their exhaustion. Possible interactions between macrophages and CD8+ T cells, mediating lipid metabolism (AFR1-FAS), immune checkpoint activation, and T cell exhaustion (LGALS9-HAVCR2, CD86-CTLA4, and NECTIN2-TIGIT) were enhanced during disease progression. These findings suggest that cholesterol efflux from macrophages may trigger CD8+ T cell exhaustion, providing a rationale for metabolic reprogramming to counteract CAR-T treatment failure. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20200376.

Molecular Subtypes and the Role of TP53 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Richter Syndrome

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy and a heterogeneous entity comprised of several biologically distinct subtypes. Recently, novel genetic classifications of DLBCL have been resolved based on common mutational patterns indicative of distinct pathways of transformation. However, the complicated and costly nature of the novel classifiers has precluded their inclusion into routine practice. In view of this, the status of the TP53 gene, which is mutated or deleted in 20-30% of the cases, has emerged as an important prognostic factor for DLBCL patients, setting itself apart from other predictors. TP53 genetic lesions are particularly enriched in a genetic subtype of DLBCL that shares genomic features with Richter Syndrome, highlighting the possibility of a subset of DLBCL arising from the transformation of an occult chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like malignancy, such as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Patients with TP53-mutated DLBCL, including those with Richter Syndrome, have a particularly poor prognosis and display inferior responses to standard chemoimmunotherapy regimens. The data presented in this manuscript argue for the need for improved and more practical risk-stratification models for patients with DLBCL and show the potential for the use of TP53 mutational status for prognostication and, in prospect, treatment stratification in DLBCL.

Combinational therapy of CAR T-cell and HDT/ASCT demonstrates impressive clinical efficacy and improved CAR T-cell behavior in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Approximately two-thirds of patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) do not respond to or relapse after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T)-cell therapy, leading to poor outcomes. Previous studies have suggested that intensified lymphodepletion and hematological stem cell infusion can promote adoptively transferred T-cell expansion, enhancing antitumor effects. Therefore, we conducted a phase I/II clinical trial in which CNCT19 (an anti-CD19 CAR T-cell) was administered after myeloablative high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT/ASCT) in patients with R/R LBCL.

METHODS

Transplant-eligible patients with LBCL who were refractory to first-line immunochemotherapy or experiencing R/R status after salvage chemotherapy were enrolled. The study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combinational therapy. Additionally, frozen peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples from this trial and CNCT19 monotherapy studies for R/R LBCL were used to evaluate the impact of the combination therapy on the in vivo behavior of CNCT19 cells.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with R/R LBCL were enrolled in this study. The overall response and complete response rates were 92.0% and 72.0%, respectively. The 2-year progression-free survival rate was 62.3%, and the overall survival was 68.5% after a median follow-up of 27.0 months. No unexpected toxicities were observed. All cases of cytokine release syndrome were of low grade. Two cases (8%) experienced grade 3 or higher CAR T-cell-related encephalopathy syndrome. The comparison of CNCT19 in vivo behavior showed that patients in the combinational therapy group exhibited enhanced in vivo expansion of CNCT19 cells and reduced long-term exhaustion formation, as opposed to those receiving CNCT19 monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The combinational therapy of HDT/ASCT and CNCT19 demonstrates impressive efficacy, improved CNCT19 behavior, and a favorable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ChiCTR1900025419 and NCT04690192.

Combination of acalabrutinib with lenalidomide and rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a single-arm phase II trial

Potential synergism between Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor and lenalidomide in treating aggressive B-cell lymphoma has been suggested. Here, the authors report a single-arm phase II clinical trial of combination of acalabrutinib, lenalidomide and rituximab (R2A) in patients with aggressive relapsed/refractory aggressive (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The primary endpoint of this study is objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary endpoints are complete remission (CR) rate, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 66 patients are enrolled mostly with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The ORR is 54.5% and CR rate is 31.8% meeting the primary end point. The median DoR is 12.9 months, and 1-year PFS and OS rate is 33.1% and 67.5% respectively. Adverse events (AE) are manageable with the most frequent AE being neutropenia (31.8%). Patients with MYD88 mutations, subtypes known for NF-κB activation, and high BTK expression by immunohistochemistry respond well. Overall, these results show a significant efficacy of the R2A regimen in patients with aggressive R/R B-cell NHL, with exploratory biomarkers suggesting potential associations with response. (ClinicalTrials.gov 51 identifier: NCT04094142).

Modulating Cholesterol Metabolism via ACAT1 Knockdown Enhances Anti-B-Cell Lymphoma Activities of CD19-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells by Improving the Cell Activation and Proliferation

CD19-specific CAR-T immunotherapy has been extensively studied for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. Recently, cholesterol metabolism has emerged as a modulator of T lymphocyte function and can be exploited in immunotherapy to increase the efficacy of CAR-based systems. Acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1 (ACAT1) is the major cholesterol esterification enzyme. ACAT1 inhibitors previously shown to modulate cardiovascular diseases are now being implicated in immunotherapy. In the present study, we achieved knockdown of ACAT1 in T cells via RNA interference technology by inserting ACAT1-shRNA into anti-CD19-CAR-T cells. Knockdown of ACAT1 led to an increased cytotoxic capacity of the anti-CD19-CAR-T cells. In addition, more CD69, IFN-γ, and GzmB were expressed in the anti-CD19-CAR-T cells. Cell proliferation was also enhanced in both antigen-independent and antigen-dependent manners. Degranulation was also improved as evidenced by an increased level of CD107a. Moreover, the knockdown of ACAT1 led to better anti-tumor efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in the B-cell lymphoma mice model. Our study demonstrates novel CAR-T cells containing ACAT1 shRNA with improved efficacy compared to conventional anti-CD19-CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Mosunetuzumab monotherapy is active and tolerable in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

As part of a phase 1 or 2 study, this single-arm expansion cohort established the efficacy and safety of mosunetuzumab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (received ≥2 previous lines of therapy). Intravenous mosunetuzumab was administered with cycle (C) 1 step-up dosing for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) mitigation: C1 day (D) 1: 1 mg; C1D8 2 mg; C1D15 and C2D1: 60 mg; C3 + D1: 30 mg. Hospitalization was not mandatory. Patients with complete response (CR) completed treatment after C8; those with partial response or stable disease continued treatment for a total of 17 cycles. The primary end point was CR rate (best response), assessed against a historical control CR rate (20%) by independent review facility. Eighty-eight patients (73.9% de novo DLBCL; 26.1% transformed follicular lymphoma) were enrolled; all had received previous anthracycline and anti-CD20 therapy. Overall response and CR rates were 42.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.6-53.1) and 23.9% (95% CI, 15.4-34.1), respectively; CR rate did not reach statistical significance vs the historical control (P = .36). Median time to first response was 1.4 months. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.3). The CR rate in 26 patients who received previous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy was 12%. CRS was one of the most common adverse events (26.1% of patients); predominantly grade 1 to 2 and primarily in C1. Four patients (4.5%) discontinued mosunetuzumab owing to adverse events. Mosunetuzumab demonstrated notable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with R/R DLBCL, including those previously treated with CAR-Ts. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02500407.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Relmacabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma in China

OBJECTIVES

Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) was recently approved in China for treating relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (r/r LBCL). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.

METHODS

A mixture-cure model was developed to project life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and overall direct cost with a lifetime horizon for patients with r/r LBCL treated with relma-cel versus salvage chemotherapy. Patient-level data from RELIANCE trial and published data from Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma extension study were used to inform the model. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated and cost-effectiveness was evaluated at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times the national gross domestic product per capita.

RESULTS

The model projected that treatment with relma-cel was associated with incremental gains of 5.11 LYs and 5.26 QALYs compared with salvage chemotherapy at an increased cost of ¥1 067 430 (∼$154 152), resulting in an ICER of ¥203 137 (∼$29 435) per QALY. The model was most sensitive to the uncertainty around the estimated cure rate. The ICER of relma-cel was within the willingness-to-pay threshold in the base case and the probability of relma-cel treatment being considered cost-effective was approximately 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with salvage chemotherapy, treatment with relma-cel for r/r LBCL in patients who have failed at least 2 lines of systemic therapy is within the cost-effective range from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system and represents a good use of healthcare resources.

Relapse Timing Is Associated With Distinct Evolutionary Dynamics in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is cured in more than 60% of patients, but outcomes remain poor for patients experiencing disease progression or relapse (refractory or relapsed DLBCL [rrDLBCL]), particularly if these events occur early. Although previous studies examining cohorts of rrDLBCL have identified features that are enriched at relapse, few have directly compared serial biopsies to uncover biological and evolutionary dynamics driving rrDLBCL. Here, we sought to confirm the relationship between relapse timing and outcomes after second-line (immuno)chemotherapy and determine the evolutionary dynamics that underpin that relationship.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Outcomes were examined in a population-based cohort of 221 patients with DLBCL who experienced progression/relapse after frontline treatment and were treated with second-line (immuno)chemotherapy with an intention-to-treat with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Serial DLBCL biopsies from a partially overlapping cohort of 129 patients underwent molecular characterization, including whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing in 73 patients.

RESULTS

Outcomes to second-line therapy and ASCT are superior for late relapse (>2 years postdiagnosis) versus primary refractory (<9 months) or early relapse (9-24 months). Diagnostic and relapse biopsies were mostly concordant for cell-of-origin classification and genetics-based subgroup. Despite this concordance, the number of mutations exclusive to each biopsy increased with time since diagnosis, and late relapses shared few mutations with their diagnostic counterpart, demonstrating a branching evolution pattern. In patients with highly divergent tumors, many of the same genes acquired new mutations independently in each tumor, suggesting that the earliest mutations in a shared precursor cell constrain tumor evolution toward the same genetics-based subgroups at both diagnosis and relapse.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that late relapses commonly represent genetically distinct and chemotherapy-naïve disease and have implications for optimal patient management.

Relapse timing is associated with distinct evolutionary dynamics in DLBCL

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is cured in over 60% of patients, but outcomes are poor for patients with relapsed or refractory disease (rrDLBCL). Here, we performed whole genome/exome sequencing (WGS/WES) on tumors from 73 serially-biopsied patients with rrDLBCL. Based on the observation that outcomes to salvage therapy/autologous stem cell transplantation are related to time-to-relapse, we stratified patients into groups according to relapse timing to explore the relationship to genetic divergence and sensitivity to salvage immunochemotherapy. The degree of mutational divergence increased with time between biopsies, yet tumor pairs were mostly concordant for cell-of-origin, oncogene rearrangement status and genetics-based subgroup. In patients with highly divergent tumors, several genes acquired exclusive mutations independently in each tumor, which, along with concordance of genetics-based subgroups, suggests that the earliest mutations in a shared precursor cell constrain tumor evolution. These results suggest that late relapses commonly represent genetically distinct and chemotherapy-naïve disease.

Relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Current challenges and therapeutic options

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR-T) therapy can provide durable remission in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after failure of chemoimmunotherapy. However, patients who are refractory or relapsing after CAR-T therapy have poor outcomes. Multiple mechanisms of CAR-T therapy failure have been proposed but management of these patients remains a challenge. As CAR-T therapy moves earlier in the treatment of DLBCL, we urgently need trials focused on patients with relapse after CAR-T therapy. Recent advances in novel immunotherapies such as bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and next-generation CAR-T therapies may provide avenues for treatment. Here we review the available data on using these drugs after failure of CAR-T therapy and provide a framework for the ideal sequencing of these novel agents.

Quantitative evaluation of therapy options for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A model-based meta-analysis

New therapies for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/rDLBCL) have emerged in recent years, but there have been no comprehensive quantitative comparisons of the efficacy of these therapies. In this study, the efficacy characteristics of 11 types of treatment strategy and 63 treatment regimens were compared by model based meta-analysis. We found that compared with monotherapy, association therapy had significant benefits in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). However, whereas treatment regimens involving chemotherapy contributed to significant improvements in ORR and PFS, OS was not improved. In terms of treatment strategy, we identified chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy sequential autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), the association of two different types of immunotherapies, chemotherapy sequential ASCT, chemotherapy in association with immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in association with two types of immunotherapies as showing better efficacy. With respect to specific treatment regimens, we found that the following had better efficacy: rituximab in association with inotuzumab ozogamicin; rituximab in association with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan sequential ASCT (R-BEAM+ASCT); lenalidomide in association with rituximab, etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine, and methylprednisolone; iodine-131 tositumomab in association with BEAM sequential ASCT; and chemotherapy sequential chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy, with median OS of 48.2, 34.2, 27.8, 25.8, and 25 months, respectively. Moreover, with respect to association therapy, there was a strong correlation between the 6-month PFS and 2-year OS. The findings of this study provide the necessary quantitative information for clinical practice and clinical trial design for the treatment of r/rDLBCL.

Tafasitamab and lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a patient on chronic intermittent hemodialysis

INTRODUCTION

Tafasitamab is an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma to be given in combination with lenalidomide. Experiences with tafasitamab in the setting of hemodialysis are limited and the efficacy and safety of this agent in this setting are unknown.

CASE REPORT

We describe a patient with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with hemodialysis-dependent end-stage renal disease who successfully received tafasitamab/lenalidomide.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Tafasitamab and reduced dose lenalidomide were initiated for relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Tafasitamab was administered on non-dialysis days. Follow-up imaging for disease response assessment demonstrated a complete response. Therapy was well tolerated; the only major toxicity experienced was grade 4 neutropenia that resolved with dose adjustment to lenalidomide. Over a year from initiating therapy, the patient remains in a complete response.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The combination of tafasitamab and dose-reduced lenalidomide produced a complete response in the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the setting of chronic intermittent hemodialysis.

The Cost Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in Canada

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) received marketing authorisation in Canada for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, and the clinical and economic value of axi-cel to patients and the healthcare system should be examined. The objective of this analysis is to determine, from societal and public healthcare payer perspectives, the cost effectiveness of axi-cel versus best supportive care for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada.

METHODS

A pharmacoeconomic model was developed and populated with clinical data derived from the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 studies using a propensity score-matched comparison. A partitioned survival mixture-cure modelling approach was taken to characterise the potential curative effect of axi-cel therapy in large B-cell lymphoma. Healthcare resource utilisation and adverse event data were based on results from ZUMA-1, and utility values were derived from ZUMA-1 data supplemented with published literature. Costs (in 2021 Canadian dollars) were taken from publicly available Canadian cost databases and published literature. Benefits and costs were discounted at 1.5% per year, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

In the base case, axi-cel generated an incremental 6.2 life-years compared to best supportive care, corresponding to 4.6 additional quality-adjusted life-years, and was associated with $606,010 in additional costs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was $132,747 per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared with best supportive care from a societal perspective ($106,392 per quality-adjusted life-year gained from a public healthcare payer perspective). Key drivers of the analysis included progression-free survival and overall survival values for axi-cel.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this analysis suggest that axi-cel may be considered a cost-effective allocation of resources compared with best supportive care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada.

Baseline Total Metabolic Tumor Volume is Prognostic for Refractoriness to Immunochemotherapy in DLBCL: Results From GOYA

INTRODUCTION

A good response to initial therapy is key to maximizing survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but patients with chemorefractory disease and early progression have poor outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from the GOYA study in patients with DLBCL who received first-line rituximab or obinutuzumab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) were analyzed. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-derived characteristics associated with total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and clinical risk factors for primary chemorefractory disease and disease progression within 12 months (POD12) were explored.

RESULTS

Of those patients fulfilling the criteria for analysis, 108/1126 (10%) were primary chemorefractory and 147/1106 (13%) had POD12. Primary chemorefractory and POD12 status were strongly associated with reduced overall survival. After multivariable analysis of clinical and imaging-based risk factors by backward elimination, only very high TMTV (quartile [Q] 1 vs. Q4 odds ratio [OR]: 0.45; P = .006) and serum albumin levels (low vs. normal OR of 1.86; P = .004) were associated with primary chemorefractoriness. After additionally accounting for BCL2/MYC translocation in a subset of patients, TMTV and BCL2/MYC double-hit status remained as significant predictors of primary chemorefractoriness (Q1 vs. Q4 OR: 0.32, P = .01 and double-hit vs. no-hit OR of 4.47, P = .02, respectively). Risk factors including very high TMTV, high sum of the product of the longest diameters (SPD), geographic region (Asia), short time since diagnosis, extranodal involvement and low serum albumin were retained for POD12.

CONCLUSION

PET-derived TMTV has prognostic value in identifying patients at risk of early treatment failure.

Phase Ib study of combinations of avadomide (CC-122), CC-223, CC-292, and rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

There is a need for additional treatment options for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who do not benefit from available therapies. We examined combinations of the cereblon E3 ligase modulator (CELMoD) agent avadomide (CC-122), the selective, ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor CC-223, and the potent, selective, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor CC-292 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL. In the multicenter, phase Ib CC-122-DLBCL-001 study (NCT02031419), the dose-escalation portion explored combinations of CC-122, CC-223, and CC-292 administered as doublets or triplets with rituximab in patients with chemorefractory DLBCL. Primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, and dose-limiting toxicities; additional endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, biomarkers, and preliminary efficacy. As of December 1, 2017, 106 patients were enrolled across four cohorts. The median age was 65 years (range 24-84 years), and patients had a median of 3 (range 1-10) prior to regimens. A total of 101 patients (95.3%) discontinued, most commonly due to disease progression (49.1%). The most common any-grade adverse events (AEs) across treatment arms were gastrointestinal and hematologic; the most common grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic. CC-122 was well tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns. Preliminary efficacy was observed in three of four treatment arms. CC-122 plus rituximab was considered suitable for dose expansion, whereas CC-223 and CC-292 combinations were associated with enhanced toxicity and/or insufficient improvement in responses. CC-122 plus rituximab was well tolerated, with preliminary antitumor activity in patients with R/R DLBCL. This innovative study demonstrates the feasibility of assessing the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of novel combinations utilizing a multi-arm dose-finding design.

Novel biologic therapies in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma: CAR-T is not the only answer

Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who have refractory or relapsed disease following first line treatment have a poor prognosis when treated with conventional therapies. Significant efforts have been made in recent years to bring a broad spectrum of novel targeted therapies, the most noteworthy of which is chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T). Not all patients are eligible for CAR-T given the relatively high risk of complications and limited availability. Here we discuss promising novel biologic therapies that have been introduced in the last few years and go over ongoing clinical trials in the field.

Megadose 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan prior to allogeneic transplantation is effective for aggressive large B-cell lymphoma

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) can be curative for relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas (BCLs), although outcomes are worse in aggressive disease, and most patients will still experience relapse. Radioimmunotherapy using 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan can induce disease control across lymphoma subtypes in a dose-dependent fashion. We hypothesized that megadoses of 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan with reduced-intensity conditioning could safely produce deeper remissions in aggressive BCL further maintained with the immunologic effect of allo-HCT. In this phase 2 study, CD20+ BCL patients received outpatient 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (1.5 mCi/kg; maximum, 120 mCi), fludarabine, and then 2 Gy total body irradiation before HLA-matched allo-HCT. Twenty patients were enrolled after a median of 4.5 prior lines of therapy, including 14 with prior autologous transplant and 4 with prior anti-CD19 chimeric T-cellular therapy. A median 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan activity of 113.6 mCi (range, 71.2-129.2 mCi) was administered, delivering a median of 552 cGy to the liver (range, 499-2411 cGy). The estimated 1- and 5-year progression-free survival was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-73) and 50% (95% CI, 27-69) with a median progression-free survival of 1.57 years. The estimated 1- and 5-year overall survival was 80% (95% CI, 54-92) and 63% (95% CI, 38-81) with a median overall survival of 6.45 years. Sixteen patients (80%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicities, although nonrelapse mortality was 10% at 1 year. No patients developed secondary acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome. Megadose 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation followed by an HLA-matched allo-HCT was feasible, safe, and effective in treating aggressive BCL, exceeding the prespecified end point while producing nonhematologic toxicities comparable to those of standard reduced-intensity conditioning regimens.

Dysregulated MDR1 by PRDM1/Blimp1 Is Involved in the Doxorubicin Resistance of Non-Germinal Center B-Cell-Like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

The chemoresistance mechanism of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still poorly understood, and patient prognosis remains unsatisfactory. This study aimed to investigate drug resistance mechanisms in non-germinal center B-cell-like (non-GCB) DLBCL.

METHODS

Doxorubicin (DOX)-resistant OCI-Ly3 cells were generated through long-term incubation of cells in a medium with gradually increasing DOX concentrations. The expression levels of genes related to drug metabolism were determined using a functional gene grouping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array. Drug-resistant proteins were identified using bioinformatics, and molecular association networks were subsequently generated. The association and mechanism of key genes were determined using a dual-luciferase reporter assay System and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). The expression of drug-resistant genes and target genes was then measured using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. The correlation between gene expressions was analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Using the PCR array, MDR1 was identified as the key gene that regulates DOX resistance in OCI-Ly3/DOX-A100, a non-GCB DLBCL cell line. The dual-luciferase reporter assay system demonstrated that MDR1 transcription could be inhibited by PRDM1. ChIP results showed that PRDM1 had the ability to bind to the promoter region (-1,132 to -996) of MDR1. In OCI-Ly3/DOX cells, NF-κB activity and PRDM1 expression decreased with an increase in drug-resistant index, whereas MDR1 expression increased with enhanced drug resistance. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that relative MDR1 expression was higher than that of PRDM1 in human DLBCL tissue samples. A negative correlation was observed between MDR1 and PRDM1.

CONCLUSION

In non-GCB DLBCL cells, NF-κB downregulates PRDM1 and thereby promotes MDR1 transcription by terminating PRDM1-induced transcriptional inhibition of MDR1. Such a mechanism may explain the reason for disease recurrence in non-GCB DLBCL after R-CHOP or combined CHOP with bortezomib treatment. Our findings may provide a potential therapeutic strategy for reducing drug resistance in patients with DLBCL.

Economic evaluation of polatuzumab-bendamustine-rituximab vs. tafasitamab-lenalidomide in transplant-ineligible R/R DLBCL

AIM

Polatuzumab vedotin-bendamustin-rituximab (PBR) and tafasitamab-lenalidomide (Tafa-L) were approved recently for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) ineligible patients. We performed an industry-independent pharmacoeconomic evaluation of both regimens over a 5-year (y) time horizon (US payer perspective; 2020 USD).

METHODS

Survival curves, treatment costs, and utility values were applied in a three-state Markov model (progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS), death) to estimate the incremental follow-up (ICER) and cost-utility ratios (ICUR). A novel metric of the incremental cost per 1% gain in the probability of achieving objective response (OR), PFS, and OS were estimated.

RESULTS

Five-year Tafa-L costs ($470,119) exceeded PBR's ($249,217) by $220,902 with incremental gains of 0.71 life-years (LY) and 0.32 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY); yielding ICER of $310,041/LYg and ICUR of $694,241/QALYg. Tafa-L had favorable PFS and OS rates over PBR with adjusted differences of +19.2 and +34.1%, respectively at trial follow-up (∼2 years), with corresponding 5 years differences in survival of +7.8% in PFS and +21.4% in OS. The incremental cost per 1% gain in the probability of achieving OR, PFS and OS at follow-up were $8,479, $6,359, and $3,583; and $28,321 and $10,323 for PFS and OS at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

The sustained Tafa-L treatment demonstrated better survival outcomes than 6-cycle PBR though at a greater cost. The incremental costs to gain a 1% improvement in 2 and 5 years survival outcomes with Tafa-L over PBR were modest, underscoring the longer-term benefit of Tafa-L over PBR in patients ineligible for or opting out of ASCT.

Tafasitamab: First Approval

Tafasitamab (tafasitamab-cxix; MONJUVI^®) is an Fc-modified (i.e. two amino acid substitutions within the Fc region, resulting in increased Fcγ receptor affinity), humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody. Developed by MorphoSys AG, under a license from Xencor, it received accelerated approval (in July 2020) for use in combination with lenalidomide as a treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). It is the first therapy to be approved as a second-line treatment for this patient population in the USA. The recommended dose of tafasitamab is 12 mg per kg of bodyweight, administered via an intravenous infusion. A regulatory assessment for tafasitamab plus lenalidomide for the treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL is currently underway in the EU. Tafasitamab is also being clinically investigated as a therapeutic option in various other B-cell malignancies, including follicular lymphoma and other indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tafasitamab leading to this first approval for its use in combination with lenalidomide in adults with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Equal access to care and nurse navigation leads to equitable outcomes for minorities with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Aggressive large B-cell lymphomas (LBCLs) are curable, but previous studies have shown inferior outcomes in minorities. Nurse navigation programs can improve patient outcomes by providing patient support. This study presents the outcomes of White and minority patients with aggressive LBCL at an institution with an active nurse navigation program.

METHODS

The authors prospectively collected baseline characteristics, treatment regimens, and outcome data for patients with aggressive LBCL. Navigation encounters were characterized as low or high intensity. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with Kaplan-Meier methods. Baseline characteristics were compared with Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Two hundred four consecutive patients (47 minority patients and 157 White patients) were included. Results were presented as minorities versus Whites. There were no differences in prognostic scores (Revised International Prognostic Index score of 3-5, 43% vs 47%; P = .50), frontline chemotherapy (98% vs 96%; P = .68), or the incidence of relapsed/refractory disease (40% vs 38%; P = .74). For relapsed/refractory LBCL, similar proportions of patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (32% vs 29%; P > .99) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (16% vs 19%; P > .99). Enrollment in clinical trials was comparable (17% vs 14%; P = .64). More than 85% received nurse navigation, but minorities had higher intensity navigation encounters (42% vs 21%; P = .01). The 2-year OS rates were 81% and 76% for minorities and Whites, respectively (P = .27); the 2-year PFS rates were 62% and 65%, respectively (P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows similar survival between Whites and minorities with aggressive LBCL, which was likely due to equal access to guideline-concordant therapy. Minorities received higher intensity navigation encounters, which may have helped them to overcome socioeconomic disadvantages.

Long-term activity of tandem CD19/CD20 CAR therapy in refractory/relapsed B-cell lymphoma: a single-arm, phase 1-2 trial

Increasing the remission rate and reducing the recurrence rate can improve the clinical efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in recurrent/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/rNHL). In this open-label, single-arm phase I/II trial, 87 patients with r/rNHL, including 58 patients with aggressive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and 24 with high tumour burden, received an infusion at doses of 0.5 × 10⁶–8 × 10⁶ TanCAR7 T cells per kilogram of body weight after conditioning chemotherapy. The best overall response rate was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68–86); response rates were consistent across prognostic subgroups. The median follow-up was 27.7 months. The median progression-free survival was 27.6 months (95% CI, 11 to not reached). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 61 patients (70%) with 60% of cases being grade 1 or 2 and 10% being grade 3 or greater. Grade 3 CAR T cell-related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES) occurred in 2 patients (2%). Two patients died from treatment-associated severe pulmonary infection, and one died from CRS-related pulmonary injury between 1 and 3 months post infusion. Long-term remissions were observed following the use of TanCAR7 T cells in r/rNHL with a safety profile that included CRS but few cases of CRES.

Clinicopathological analysis of primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone chemoimmunotherapy

Background

Approximately 15% of patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) experience refractory or early relapsed disease after initial rituximab‐containing chemoimmunotherapy is regarded as a primary refractory disease. Although the standard treatment for relapsed DLBCL is high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC‐ASCT), the efficacy of this approach for primary refractory DLBCL is not well understood. We aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of patients with primary refractory DLBCL.

Methods

Sixty‐nine consecutive patients with primary refractory DLBCL who were treated at our institution were categorized as partial responders (partial response to rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone [R‐CHOP] or relapse within 6 months of R‐CHOP) (n = 41) or primary progressors (no response to R‐CHOP) (n = 28). Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log‐rank test.

Results

At initial diagnosis, 70% of patients had Ann Arbor stage III/IV disease, 56% had non‐germinal center B‐cell‐like type DLBCL, and 42% had double‐expressor lymphoma (MYC and BCL2 expression). The 3‐year overall survival rate was significantly poorer in the primary progressors group than in the partial responders’ group (15% vs. 48%, p < 0.001). Four of 17 patients treated with HDC‐ASCT were primary progressors; only one patient survived without relapse. Although double‐expressor lymphoma status did not significantly impact overall survival among all patients (p = 0.794), it was identified as an independent poor prognostic factor in HDC‐ASCT‐treated patients (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

We identified a subgroup of patients with primary refractory DLBCL who may not benefit from current treatment strategies. Further treatment development is needed to improve the outcomes of these patients.

Improved prediction of chemoresistance in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma through a new interim positron emission tomography-computed tomography evaluation model

OBJECTIVES

The positron emission tomography (PET) could predict the prognosis of DLBCL patients, but the exact procedure on interim PET (iPET) to determine chemoresistant patients remains elusive.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 593 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients uniformly treated with R-CHOP regimen. Among them, 352 patients diagnosed from August 2010 to December 2016 were included in the test cohort and 241 patients diagnosed from January 2017 to December 2019 were included in the validation cohort. The iPET was evaluated with Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax method. The reduction of maximal SUV between baseline and after 4 cycles of chemotherapy were defined as ΔSUVmax. The survival functions were depicted using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Patients with iPET Deauville 4 had heterogeneous outcome and end of treatment complete response rates (eCRR). Combined Deauville with ΔSUVmax method, we proposed a modified-Deauville model: patients with Deauville 4 and ΔSUVmax > 70%, as well as those with Deauville 1-3, were reclassified into the modified-Deauville negative group, while patients with Deauville 4 and ΔSUVmax ≤ 70%, as well as those with Deauville 5, into the modified-Deauville positive group. In the test cohort, 3-year PFS, OS and eCRR of modified-Deauville negative group were 80.2%, 89.9% and 91.8%, significantly higher than those of positive group (12.5%, 27.3% and 29.2%, p ≤ .001). Similar results were found in the validation cohort, that 3-year PFS, OS and eCRR were 87.8%, 95.4%, 96.3% in modified-Deauville negative group, and 27.4%, 32.5%, 13.5% in positive group. Through modified-Deauville model, patients in iPET positive group had very low eCRR and were resistant to conventional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified-Deauville model could better distinguish DLBCL patients with poor response to chemotherapy. Accordingly, these patients could be recognized early and provided with alternative therapeutic agents, which might improve the clinical outcome of refractory DLBCL patients.

Real-World, Single-Center Data for Lenalidomide Plus Rituximab in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Transformed Follicular Lymphoma

Background

This study explored the efficacy of lenalidomide plus rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) including cases of secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement and transformed follicular lymphoma (FL) in real-world context because of anti-tumor effect and blood–brain barrier permeability of lenalidomide.

Methods

Twenty-four patients including relapsed or refractory DLBCL (n = 21) including seven patients with secondary CNS involvement and transformed FL (n = 3) were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Based on the best response, the complete response (CR) rate was 21% (5/24) and the overall response rate (ORR) was 38% (9/24). However, as all cases of transformed FL (n = 3) did not respond, all responders had DLBCL, and the CR and ORR rates of DLBCL were 24% (5/21) and 43% (9/21), respectively. The median number of treatment cycles was only two (range: 1–7) due to frequent occurrence of early progression, and 18 patients died and the cause of death was disease progression. The response rate was not significantly different among patients with and without secondary CNS involvement. The median post-treatment overall and progression-free survival were 7.3 and 1.8 months, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were common adverse events, but most hematologic toxicities were manageable. There were no serious infectious complications or treatment-related mortality.

Conclusion

Lenalidomide plus rituximab might be a salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory DLBCL, especially in case of secondary CNS involvement. However, the addition of other agents should be considered to prolong the duration of response.

Real-life experience with the combination of polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, and bendamustine in aggressive B-cell lymphomas

Transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory (rr) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients represent an unmet medical need. Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola), an anti-CD79b antibody-drug-conjugate (ADG), with bendamustine- rituximab(BR) has recently gained approval for these patients, both in the USA and Europe, based on the GO29365 phase IIb trial. Real-life data with Pola are extremely limited. We report the outcomes of 61 Greek patients, who received Pola-(B)R mainly within a compassionate use program. Treatment was given for up to six 21-day cycles. Bendamustine was omitted in three cases due to previous short-lived responses. Fourty-nine rrDLBCL(efficacy cohort-EC) and 58 rr aggressive B-NHL (safety cohort-SC) patients received at least 1 Pola-BR cycle. Twenty-one (43%) patients of the EC responded with 12/49 (25%) CR and 9/49 (18%) PR as best response. Median progression-free survival, overall survival and duration of response were 4.0, 8.5, and 8.5 months respectively, while 55% of patients experienced a grade ≥3 adverse event, mainly hematologic. Treatment discontinuations and death during treatment were mainly due to disease progression. Twenty-two (41%) patients received further treatment; 11/22 are still alive, including one after CAR-T cells, and two after stem cell transplantation. Our data confirm that Pola-BR is a promising treatment for rrDLBCL patients, inducing an adequate response rate with acceptable toxicity. Pola-BR could be used as bridging therapy before further consolidative treatments.

Outcomes in refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from a multicenter real-world study in China

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients refractory to rituximab-based immunochemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. However, the definition of refractory DLBCL remains inconsistent and no large cohort study data is available from Asian countries. To validate the definition and outcomes of refractory DLBCL in China, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The REtrospective AnaLysis of Treatment REspoNse of refractory DLBCL (REAL-TREND) study was performed using real-world data from 8 centers in China. DLBCL patients with curative intent were included in the REAL-TREND dataset. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Due to heterogeneity in response rates among different centers, the response rates of refractory patients were pooled using random-effect models. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 2778 DLBCL patients diagnosed between January, 2010 and December, 2015 were enrolled to this study. After validating previous definitions, the SCHOLAR-1 study was most suitable to define refractory DLBCL. The estimated 5-year cumulative incidence of refractory patients was 20% (95% confidence Interval [CI] = 18%-22%). After the determination of refractory disease, overall response rate and complete remission rate were 30% (95% CI = 22%-38%) and 9% (95% CI = 4%-15%), respectively. Patients with either no response to immunochemotherapy or relapse within 12 months after stem-cell transplantation had inferior survival with a median OS of 5.9 months (95% CI = 5.5-7.1 months) and 2-year OS rate of 16% (95% CI = 12%-20%). International prognostic index score 4-5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.47-3.35), central nervous system relapse (HR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.04-1.97), and best response status (HR = 2.68; 95% CI = 1.42-5.03 for partial remission. HR = 5.97, 95% CI = 3.21-11.11 for stable disease/progressive disease) were independent unfavorable prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large-scale Asian cohort study focusing on outcomes of refractory DLBCL. The definition of the SCHOLAR-1 study identifies patients with homogenously inferior survival, thus is appropriate to select refractory DLBCL. Due to poor clinical outcomes in the rituximab era, patients with refractory DLBCL may be potential candidates for novel treatment modalities.

ADCs, BiTEs, CARs, and Small Molecules: A New Era of Targeted Therapy in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Novel immunotherapies and small molecular inhibitors are transforming our approach to previously treated and newly diagnosed patients across the spectrum of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). Anti-CD19 CAR T cells are now indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas after at least two previous lines of therapy in which durable remissions are achieved in approximately 40% of previously incurable patients. Second-line chemoimmunotherapy remains the standard of care at first relapse, but poor outcomes with conventional treatment in this setting creates an appealing rationale for earlier use of CAR T cells, which is currently under investigation, along with even earlier use in selected high-risk patients in the frontline setting. Other emerging immunotherapies include antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), such as polatuzumab vedotin for multiple-relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in combination with bendamustine-rituximab. Multiple bispecific antibodies that bring malignant B cells in contact with effector T cells appear promising in early clinical trials and will likely emerge as off-the-shelf immunotherapy options. Chemotherapy-free small molecule-based regimens are increasingly available for mantle cell (MCLs) and follicular lymphomas (FLs). Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) now represent standard second-line therapy for MCL and are being investigated in combination and as initial therapy. Lenalidomide-rituximab is an active regimen in both FL and MCL and may be used in either relapsed/refractory or previously untreated disease. Three PI3K inhibitors are approved for multiple-relapsed FL and can induce durable remissions in patients with chemotherapy- and rituximab-refractory disease. Additional emerging targeted therapies include BCL2 inhibition in MCL and EZH2 inhibition in FL.

Outcomes of patients with double/triple expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with R-DA-EPOCH/R-CHOP: A single-center experience

In Pakistan 76.4% of all NHLs to be diagnosed as DLBCLs. The survival of R-CHOP is better compared to the DA-REPOCH treatment regimen. A prospective follow-up study was conducted with 113 patients to study the outcomes of treatment. Multivariable cox-proportional hazard model was used to estimate the hazard ratios in patients receiving these treatment regimens considering p-value ≤0.05 significant. The survival rate among double/triple expressor lymphoma patients received R-DA-EPOCH was 82.8%, and 83.3% received R-CHOP. For double/triple expressor lymphoma patients received R-DA-EPOCH. The findings of our study demonstrated that the survival rate in both R-CHOP and R-DA-EPOCH is mostly similar.

Relmacabtagene autoleucel (relma-cel) CD19 CAR-T therapy for adults with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma in China

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) trials conducted in China, no CAR-T has been registered in the country. Furthermore, China law and regulations restrict the export of patient material for CAR-T manufacture abroad. Relma-cel (JWCAR029), an anti-CD19 product produced with a commercial-ready process in China, was evaluated in the first prospective, single-arm, multicenter, pivotal study of CAR-T therapy conducted under Chinese IND to support an NMPA-accepted BLA submission in relapsed/refractory (r/r) LBCL (NCT04089215).

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive either 100 × 10⁶ (low dose, n = 27) or 150 × 10⁶ (high dose, n = 32) CAR+ T-cells as a single infusion following lymphodepleting chemotherapy (fludarabine 25 mg/m² and cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m² daily × 3), and then, monitored for efficacy and safety outcomes and pharmacokinetics. The primary endpoint was ORR at 3 months, as assessed by the investigators. Secondary endpoints included DOR, PFS, OS, and adverse event frequency/severity and cell expansion kinetics.

RESULTS

As of the data cutoff on 17 June 2020, 68 patients were enrolled, and 59 were treated. Among the 58 efficacy-evaluable patients, the primary endpoint of 3 month ORR was 60.3% (95% CI, 46.6-73.0), excluding the null hypothesis rate of 20%. Any grade and severe grade CRS occurred in 47.5% and 5.1%, respectively, and any grade and severe grade neurotoxicity events occurred in 20.3% and 5.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Relma-cel met the primary endpoint analysis and demonstrated a high rate of durable responses and low rate of CAR-T-associated toxicities in patients with r/r LBCL in a multicenter trial supporting regulatory submission in China.

CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell NHL

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is a valuable new treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the pivotal phase I/II trials, emerging real-world evidence and ongoing trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

For decades, attempts at improvement of the poor prognosis of patients with R/R large B-cell lymphoma with new treatment regimens have been disappointing. Since the first report of CD19-directed CAR-T-cell therapy in 2010, three constructs have been tested in large phase I/II trials and resulted in 30-40% durable responses. This has led to Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval for axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel and filing of the biologics license application for lisocabtagene maraleucel. Emerging real-world evidence seems to confirm the promising results. However, considerable toxicity, mainly cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity limits their general applicability and not all patients intended to be treated can be bridged during the manufacturing period due to kinetics of the disease. Randomized phase III clinical trials are being conducted to test anti-CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy in the second-line and several phase II trials are aiming to improve efficacy and decrease toxicity.

SUMMARY

CD19-directed CAR-T-cell therapy has become standard of care for aggressive R/R diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (DLBCL), but challenges still remain.

Characteristics and Management of TP53-Mutated Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients

Background/Aim

TP53 mutation is recognized as a negative prognostic factor for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Here, we present the characteristics of TP53^mut DLBCL patients following investigation of the effect of a treatment approach on survival of TP53^mut DLBCL patients.

Methods

A total of 44 DLBCL patients with TP53^mut and treated with an R-CHOP regimen were included for analysis. Patients who failed to achieve a complete response (CR) to initial treatment or relapsed in the first 6 months after initial CR were deemed to have primary refractory disease.

Results

Among 44 patients harboring TP53 mutations who underwent upfront R-CHOP or R-CHOP–like treatment, 21 (47.7%) had limited-stage and 23 (52.3%) presented advanced-stage disease. Apart from the seven patients receiving upfront surgical resection, 37 had measurable disease under the R-CHOP regimen, with 59.1% (n=26) developing primary refractory disease. Seven limited-stage patients after early complete resection and one with residue resection remained event-free at median follow-up of 37 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), extranodal involvement (two or more), Ann Arbor stage, and locoregional treatment (surgery or radiation therapy) were independent indicators for progression-free survival (PFS). After adjustment for baseline LDH and extranodal involvement, adding locoregional treatment including surgery and radiation to the R-CHOP regimen significantly improved PFS (p=0.008) and overall survival (p=0.017) in limited-stage TP53^mut DLBCL patients compared to R-CHOP–only treatment.

Conclusion

This study presents the characteristics of TP53-mutated DLBCL and implies a potential benefit of locoregional treatment in limited-stage DLBCL patients with TP53 mutations.

Biomarkers and novel therapeutic approaches for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the era of precision medicine

Despite the great efforts for better treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL) to treat and prevent relapse, it continues to be a challenge. Here, we present an overview of DLBCL and address the diagnostic assays and molecular techniques used in its diagnosis, role of biomarkers in detection, treatment of early and advanced stage DLBCL, and novel drug regimens. We discuss the significant biomarkers that have emerged as essential tools for stratifying patients according to risk factors and for providing insights into the use of more targeted and individualized therapeutics. We discuss techniques such as gene expression studies, including next-generation sequencing, which have enabled a more understanding of the complex pathogenesis of DLBCL and have helped determine molecular targets for novel therapeutic agents. We examine current treatment approaches, outline the findings of completed clinical trials, and provide updates for ongoing clinical trials. We highlight clinical trials relevant to the significant fraction of DLBCL patients who present with complex cases marked by high relapse rates. Supported by an increased understanding of targetable pathways in DLBCL, clinical trials involving specialized combination therapies are bringing us within reach the promise of an effective cure to DLBCL using precision medicine. Optimization of therapy remains a crucial objective, with the end goal being a balance between high survival rates through targeted and personalized treatment while reducing adverse effects in DLBCL patients of all subsets.

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in the Non-Trial Setting: Outcomes and Correlates of Response, Resistance, and Toxicity

PURPOSE

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in part on the basis of durable remission rates of approximately 40% in a clinical trial population. Whether this efficacy, and the rates of toxicity, would be consistent in a postcommercial setting, with relaxed eligibility criteria and bridging therapy, is unknown. This study describes the efficacy and safety correlates and outcomes in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-two patients from 7 medical centers in the United States were treated with axi-cel and were included in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Seventy-six patients (62%) were ineligible for the ZUMA-1 trial. Response and toxicity rates, duration of response (DOR), survival, and covariates are described on the basis of the mITT population. Correlative studies on blood and tumor samples were performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response and resistance.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 10.4 months. In the mITT population, the best overall and complete response (CR) rates were 70% and 50%, respectively. Median DOR and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.0 and 4.5 months in all patients and were not reached (NR) in CR patients. Median overall survival (OS) was NR; 1-year OS was 67% (95% CI, 59% to 77%). Although response rates were similar in the ZUMA-1-eligible and ZUMA-1-ineligible groups (70% v 68%), there was a statistically significant improvement in CR rate (63% v 42%, P = .016), DOR (median, NR v 5.0 months; P = .014), PFS (median, NR v 3.3 months; P = .020), and OS (1-year OS, 89% v 54%; P < .001) in patients who were ZUMA-1 eligible. Rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicty were 16% and 35%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Axi-cel yields similar rates of overall response and toxicity in commercial and trial settings, although CR rates and DOR were more favorable in patients eligible for ZUMA-1.

Phase II trial of co-administration of CD19- and CD20-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy for refractory and relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL). However, this therapy failed in nearly 25% patients mainly due to antigen loss. The authors performed a phase Ⅱ trial by coadministration of anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells treatment for R/R DLBCL and evaluated its efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

Totally 21 patients with DLBCL were enrolled in this study. The patients were conditioned with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide before the infusion of anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR-T cells. Treatment response, toxicity, and persistence were monitored continuously.

RESULTS

Of the 21 patients received the treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) is 81.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58.1%-94.6%) with four cases of bulk (4/5) and one case of testis involvement; 52.4% (95% CI, 29.8%-74.3%) had a complete response (CR). Peak levels of anti-CD19 and anti-CD20 CAR cells were associated with response (P = .007 and .002). Grade 3-4 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events occurred in 28.5% and 9.5% patients, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 8.1 and 5.0 months, respectively. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of CD4/CD8 ratio before and after infusion were associated with responses, and the total lesion glycolysis (TLG) before infusion correlates with cytokines level.

CONCLUSIONS

Coadministration of anti-CD19 and CD20 CAR-T cells therapy for DLBCL is feasible with manageable toxicity. Cytokine markers are related to toxicity and SUVmax could predict efficacy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03207178.

Selinexor in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL): a single-arm, multinational, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer with a median overall survival of less than 6 months. We aimed to assess the response to single-agent selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export, in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who had no therapeutic options of potential clinical benefit.

METHODS

SADAL was a multicentre, multinational, open-label, phase 2b study done in 59 sites in 19 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less, who had received two to five lines of previous therapies, and progressed after or were not candidates for autologous stem-cell transplantation were enrolled. Germinal centre B-cell or non-germinal centre B-cell tumour subtype and double or triple expressor status were determined by immunohistochemistry and double or triple hit status was determined by cytogenetics. Patients received 60 mg selinexor orally on days 1 and 3 weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The study was initially designed to evaluate both 60 mg and 100 mg twice-weekly doses of selinexor; however, the 100 mg dose was discontinued in the protocol (version 7.0) on March 29, 2017, when an improved therapeutic window was observed at 60 mg. Primary outcome was overall response rate. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in all patients who received 60 mg selinexor under protocol version 6.0, or enrolled under protocol versions 7.0 or higher and received at least one dose of selinexor. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02227251 (active but not enrolling).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 21, 2015, and Nov 2, 2019, 267 patients were randomly assigned, with 175 allocated to the 60 mg group and 92 to the discontinued 100 mg group. 48 patients assigned to the 60 mg group were excluded due to enrolment before version 6.0 of the protocol; the remaining 127 patients received selinexor 60 mg and were included in analyses of primary outcome and safety. The overall response rate was 28% (36/127; 95% CI 20·7-37·0); 15 (12%) achieved a complete response and 21 (17%) a partial response. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n=58), neutropenia (n=31), anaemia (n=28), fatigue (n=14), hyponatraemia (n=10), and nausea (n=8). The most common serious adverse events were pyrexia (n=9), pneumonia (n=6), and sepsis (n=6). There were no deaths judged as related to treatment with selinexor.

INTERPRETATION

Single-drug oral selinexor induced durable responses and had a manageable adverse events profile in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who received at least two lines of previous chemoimmunotherapy. Selinexor could be considered a new oral, non-cytotoxic treatment option in this setting.

FUNDING

Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes and few treatment options. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is an Fc-enhanced, humanised, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that has shown preclinical and single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Preclinical data suggested that tafasitamab might act synergistically with lenalidomide. We aimed to assess the antitumour activity and safety of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (L-MIND), patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who relapsed or had refractory disease after previous treatment with one to three systemic regimens (with at least one anti-CD20 therapy), were not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had measurable disease at baseline were recruited from 35 academic and community hospitals in ten countries. Patients received coadministered intravenous tafasitamab (12 mg/kg) and oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for up to 12 cycles (28 days each), followed by tafasitamab monotherapy (in patients with stable disease or better) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response (centrally assessed), defined as a complete or partial response according to the 2007 International Working Group response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Antitumour activity analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide; safety analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of either study medication. Recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02399085.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 18, 2016, and Nov 15, 2017, 156 patients were screened: 81 were enrolled and received at least one dose of either study medication, and 80 received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide. Median follow-up was 13·2 months (IQR 7·3-20·4) as of data cutoff on Nov 30, 2018. 48 (60%; 95% CI 48-71) of 80 patients who received tafasitamab plus lenalidomide had an objective response: 34 (43%; 32-54) had a complete response and 14 (18%; 10-28) had a partial response. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (39 [48%] of 81 patients), thrombocytopenia (14 [17%]), and febrile neutropenia (ten [12%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 41 (51%) of 81 patients. The most frequently reported serious adverse events (in two or more patients) were pneumonia (five [6%]), febrile neutropenia (five [6%]), pulmonary embolism (three [4%]), bronchitis (two [2%]), atrial fibrillation (two [2%]), and congestive cardiac failure (two [2%]).

INTERPRETATION

Tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide was well tolerated and resulted in a high proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation having a complete response, and might represent a new therapeutic option in this setting.

FUNDING

MorphoSys.

EMA Review of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Yescarta) for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

On June 28, 2018, the Committee for Advanced Therapies and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use adopted a positive opinion, recommending the granting of a marketing authorization for the medicinal product Yescarta for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma, after two or more lines of systemic therapy. Yescarta, which was designated as an orphan medicinal product and included in the European Medicines Agency's Priority Medicines scheme, was granted an accelerated review timetable. The active substance of Yescarta is axicabtagene ciloleucel, an engineered autologous T-cell immunotherapy product whereby a patient's own T cells are harvested and genetically modified ex vivo by retroviral transduction using a retroviral vector to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) comprising an anti-CD19 single chain variable fragment linked to CD28 costimulatory domain and CD3-zeta signaling domain. The transduced anti-CD19 CAR T cells are expanded ex vivo and infused back into the patient, where they can recognize and eliminate CD19-expressing cells. The benefits of Yescarta as studied in ZUMA-1 phase II (NCT02348216) were an overall response rate per central review of 66% (95% confidence interval, 56%-75%) at a median follow-up of 15.1 months in the intention to treat population and a complete response rate of 47% with a significant duration. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome, neurological adverse events, infections, pyrexia, diarrhea, nausea, hypotension, and fatigue. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) was the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy to be submitted for evaluation to the European Medicines Agency and admitted into the "priority medicine" scheme; it was granted accelerated assessment on the basis of anticipated clinical benefit in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a condition of unmet medical need. Indeed, Yescarta showed an overall response rate of 66% and a complete response rate of 47% with a significant duration and a manageable toxicity that compared very favorably with historical controls. Here the analysis of benefits and risks is presented, and specific challenges with this important novel product are highlighted, providing further insights and reflections for future medical research.

Fatty acid beta oxidation enzyme HADHA is a novel potential therapeutic target in malignant lymphoma

Cancer cells, including malignant lymphoma cells, alter their metabolism, termed "metabolic reprograming," on initiation of malignant transformation as well as upon accumulation of genetic abnormalities. Here, to identify a novel therapeutic target involved in the metabolic changes during malignant lymphoma, we performed global analyses combined with shotgun proteomics, in silico database analysis, and clinic-pathologic analysis of nonneoplastic lymphoid tissue and malignant lymphoma tissue and verified the molecular functions in vitro. In total, 2002 proteins were detected from both samples and proteins related to fatty acid beta-oxidation (FAO) were detected more frequently in malignant lymphoma tissue. Consequently, the most frequently detected protein, the mitochondrial trifunctional enzyme subunit-alpha (HADHA), was identified as a potential target. Immunohistochemical analyses revealed that HADHA tended to be overexpressed in a high-grade subtype of malignant lymphoma tissue. Clinicopathologic study revealed that HADHA overexpression was correlated with significantly worse overall survival (P = 0.013) and was an independent prognostic predictor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (P = 0.027). In vitro, downregulation of HADHA negatively regulated cell growth by causing G0/G1 arrest (P = 0.0008) similar to treatment with etomoxir, an inhibitor of FAO (P = 0.032). Moreover, downregulation of HADHA increased the susceptibility to doxorubicin (P = 0.002) and etoposide (P = 0.004). Moreover, these phenotypes were confirmed in an HADHA knockout system. Thus, we provide a basis for a novel therapeutic strategy through the regulation of HADHA and FAO in patients with refractory malignant lymphoma.

AID assists DNMT1 to attenuate BCL6 expression through DNA methylation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines

The BCL6 proto-oncogene encodes a transcriptional repressor, which is required for germinal centers (GCs) formation and lymphomagenesis. Previous studies have been reported that the constitutive expression of BCL6 leads to diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) through activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) mediated chromosomal translocations and mutations. However, other DLBCLs (45%) without structural variants were characterized by abnormally high level of BCL6 expression through an unknown mechanism. Herein, we report that deficiency in AID or methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) triggers high level of BCL6 expression. AID-DNMT1 complex binds to −0.4 kb −0 kb region of BCL6 promoter and contributes to generate BCL6 methylation which results in inhibition of BCL6 expression. The proteasome pathway inhibitor MG132 induces accumulation of AID and DNMT1, causes decreased BCL6 expression, and leads to cell apoptosis and tumor growth inhibition in DLBCL cell xenograft mice. These findings propose mechanistic insight into an alternative cofactor role of AID in assisting DNMT1 to maintain BCL6 methylation, thus suppress BCL6 transcription in DLBCL. This novel mechanism will provide a new drug selection in the therapeutic approach to DLBCL in the future.

Challenges and Opportunities for High-grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 Rearrangement (Double-hit Lymphoma)

The most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, is cured in approximately two thirds of patients after initial therapy. The remaining one-third of patients who suffer relapse or become refractory have very poor survival outcomes despite salvage chemotherapy with or without stem cell transplantation. A considerable proportion of relapsed or refractory large B cells belong to the WHO subtype known as high-grade B-cell lymphoma with rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6, also known as double-hit lymphoma (DHL). Most DHL patients present with Ann Arbor's stage III/IV, a comparatively higher rate of extranodal involvement including bone marrow and central nervous system infiltration, high levels of lactate dehydrogenase, and an elevated Ki67 expression in the tumor cells. Newer therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapy against BCL2, MYC, or other associated pathways, are needed. In addition, recent therapies that harness the immune system, such as checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, are changing the paradigm of treatment for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and could impact the outcome of DHL.

Obesity is associated with an impaired survival in lymphoma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) provides a potentially curative treatment option for relapsed and refractory lymphomas. Obesity displays an emerging epidemic risk factor for global mortality and is associated with an increased mortality in cancer patients. To date, the impact of obesity on the outcome of lymphoma patients undergoing auto-HSCT is understudied. We conducted a retrospective single-center study assessing 119 lymphoma patients who underwent auto-HSCT. Overall survival (OS) served as the primary endpoint whereas progression free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of non-relapse related mortality (NRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Obese patients (Body mass index, BMI≥30) had significantly lower OS (45.3% vs. 77.9%; p = 0.005) and PFS (29.8% vs. 67.2%; p<0.001) compared to non-obese patients at 48 months post-transplantation. The cumulative incidence of NRM displayed no significant differences while the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly increased in patients with BMI≥30 (66.2% vs. 21.5%; p<0.001). Patients with a BMI<25 and overweight patients (BMI 25–30; 76.1% vs. 80.9%; p = 0.585), showed no significant difference in OS, whereas patients with BMI≥30 exhibited significant lower OS when compared to either of both groups (76.1% vs. 45.3%; p = .0.021 and 80.9% vs. 45.3%; p = 0.010). Furthermore, in a multivariate analysis, obesity was identified as an independent risk factor for death (Hazard ratio 2.231; 95% CI 1.024 to 4.860; p = 0.043). Further studies are needed to evaluate the reasons for the higher relapse rate causing higher mortality in obese patients.

T cell immunotherapy enhanced by designer biomaterials

Cancer immunotherapy has recently burst onto the center stage of cancer treatment and research. T lymphocyte adoptive cellular transfer (ACT), a form of cancer immunotherapy, has spawned unprecedented complete remissions for terminal patients with certain leukemias and lymphomas. Unfortunately, the successes have been overshadowed by the disappointing clinical results of ACT administered to treat solid tumors, in addition to the toxicities associated with the treatment, a lack of efficacy in a significant proportion of the patient population, and cancer relapse following the treatment. Biomaterials hold the promise of addressing these shortcomings. ACT consists of two main stages - T lymphocyte ex vivo expansion followed by reinfusion into the patient - and biomaterials can improve the efficacy of ACT at both stages. In this review, we highlight recent advances in the use of biomaterials for T lymphocyte adoptive cellular cancer immunotherapy and discuss the challenges at each stage.

Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (dlbcl) is an aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, accounting for approximately 30% of lymphoma cases in Canada. Although most patients will achieve a cure, up to 40% will experience refractory disease after initial treatment, or relapse after a period of remission. In eligible patients, salvage therapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (asct) is the standard of care. However, many patients are transplant-ineligible, and more than half of those undergoing asct will subsequently relapse. For those patients, outcomes are dismal, and novel treatment approaches are a critical unmet need. In this paper, we present available data about emerging treatment approaches in the latter setting and provide a perspective about the potential use of those approaches in Canada.

A new therapeutic approach in very refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

PURPOSE

Patients with diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who relapse after stem cell transplant (SCT) or are no candidates to SCT, have a poor prognosis and no current treatment is available. Thus, we conduct a rotatory chemotherapy schedule that employed low doses of chemotherapy agents to assess efficacy and toxicity in this setting of patients; the end point was the improved outcome.

METHODS

Retrospectively we revised an analysis of 461 patients who were treated with a low-doses regimen of cytotoxic agents, who were treated in a single institution, all patients has been treated with at least two salvage regimens, including SCT, > 18 years, performance status < 3, and that were informed about the possibility of severe toxicities,, were considered candidates to the study. They received a weekly rotatory scheme including low doses of cytotoxic agents during 2 years.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was achieved in 314 patients (68%, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 59-76%) and complete response was achieved in 151 cases (32%, 95% CI 25-38%); actuarial curves at 10 years show that progression-free survival was 58% (95% CI 51-66%) and OS was 50% (95% CI 43-57%). Dose reduction was not necessary; toxicity was minimal and well controlled. No death related to acute or late toxicities has been observed.

CONCLUSION

Low doses of cytotoxic agents for continuous, prolonged periods, with minimal drug-free intervals, represent a novel, active, and easily tolerated approach to management of patients with DLBCL in a terminal phase and improved outcome.

CAR-T cell Therapy for Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: A New Treatment Paradigm

The majority of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) can be cured with standard chemoimmunotherapy. However, patients who fail first line therapy have dismal outcomes, particularly if they have disease that is resistant to salvage therapy, including chemoimmunotherapy, radiation and/or autologous stem cell transplantation. Indolent B-NHLs, such as follicular lymphoma (FL), although not generally considered curable may be treated over many years with good prognosis. However, a subset of B-NHLs can undergo histologic transformation into more aggressive subtypes with outcomes similar to aggressive B-NHLs. In recent years, T cells genetically modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), have demonstrated a remarkable capacity to induce complete and durable clinical responses in patients with chemotherapy-refractory lymphomas. Indeed, two autologous CD19-directed CAR-modified T cell products have now been FDA-approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) and transformed FL, while a plethora of other CAR-T cell targets are being explored in ongoing clinical trials. The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical efficacy and unique toxicities of individually developed CAR-T cell products for the treatment of lymphomas, and their evolution from the laboratory bench to commercialization.

FDA Approval Summary: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma

In October 2017, the FDA granted regular approval to axicabtagene ciloleucel, a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, for treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy. Efficacy was based on complete remission (CR) rate and duration of response (DOR) in 101 adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (median 3 prior systemic regimens) treated on a single-arm trial. Patients received a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel, preceded by lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The objective response rate per independent review committee was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI), 62-81], with a CR rate of 51% (95% CI, 41-62). With a median follow-up of 7.9 months, the median DOR was not reached in patients achieving CR (95% CI, 8.1 months; not estimable, NE), whereas patients with partial remission had an estimated median DOR of 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.3-5.3). Among 108 patients evaluated for safety, serious adverse reactions occurred in 52%. Cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicities occurred in 94% and 87% of patients, respectively, leading to implementation of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy.