1
|
Fan H, Wang B, Shi L, Pan N, Yan W, Xu J, Gong L, Li L, Liu Y, Du C, Cui J, Zhu G, Deng S, Sui W, Xu Y, Yi S, Hao M, Zou D, Chen X, Qiu L, An G. Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Multiple Myeloma by Targeted Tracking Serum M-Protein Using Mass Spectrometry (EasyM). Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:1131-1142. [PMID: 38170583 PMCID: PMC10940853 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated both the clinical utilities and the prognostic impacts of the clonotypic peptide mass spectrometry (MS)-EasyM, a blood-based minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring protocol in multiple myeloma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN A total of 447 sequential serum samples from 56 patients with multiple myeloma were analyzed using EasyM. Patient-specific M-protein peptides were sequenced from diagnostic samples; sequential samples were quantified by EasyM to monitor the M-protein. The performance of EasyM was compared with serum immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), bone marrow multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), and next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) detection. The optimal balance of EasyM sensitivity/specificity versus NGF (10-5 sensitivity) was determined and the prognostic impact of MS-MRD status was investigated. RESULTS Of the 447 serum samples detected and measured by EasyM, 397, 126, and 92 had time-matching results for comparison with serum IFE, MFC-MRD, and NGF-MRD, respectively. Using a dotp >0.9 as the MS-MRD positive, sensitivity was 99.6% versus IFE and 100.0% versus MFC and NGF. Using an MS negative cutoff informed by ROC analysis (<1.86% of that at diagnosis), EasyM sensitivity remained high versus IFE (88.3%), MFC (85.1%), and NGF (93.2%), whereas specificity increased to 90.4%, 55.8%, and 93.2%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, older diagnostic age was an independent predictor for progression-free survival [PFS; high risk (HR), 3.15; 1.26-7.86], the best MS-MRD status (MS-MRD negative) was independent predictor for both PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.12-0.52) and overall survival (HR, 0.16; 0.06-0.40). CONCLUSIONS EasyM is a highly sensitive and minimal invasive method of MRD monitoring in multiple myeloma; MS-MRD had significant predictive ability for survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huishou Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Bing Wang
- Shanghai Kuaixu Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Lihui Shi
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Ni Pan
- Shanghai Kuaixu Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqiang Yan
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Jingyu Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Lixin Gong
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Lingna Li
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuntong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Chenxing Du
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Jian Cui
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Guoqing Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuhui Deng
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Weiwei Sui
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Shuhua Yi
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Mu Hao
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Dehui Zou
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiequn Chen
- Department of Hematology, Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Institute of Hematology, Northwest University, Xian, Shaanxi, China
| | - Lugui Qiu
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| | - Gang An
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
- Tianjin Institutes of Health Science, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang J, Li J, Zhang R, Li J, Chen L, Jin Y. Real-world prognostic significance of attaining minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:38. [PMID: 38367151 PMCID: PMC10874347 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-00891-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the real-world setting and the interaction between MRD and molecular risk, clinical response and autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT). A retrospective analysis of 275 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who achieved very good partial remission (VGPR) or better before maintenance were involved. We examined MRD status by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC). At a median follow-up of 37 months (4-88 months), In patients who achieved ≥ VGPR, those with MRD negativity had significantly longer PFS (51 vs. 26 months; P < 0.001) and OS (Not reached: NR vs. 62 months, P < 0.001) than those with MRD positivity. MRD positivity was the independent prognostic factor for PFS with hazard ratios of 2.650 (95% CI 1.755-4.033, P < 0.001) and OS with hazard ratios of 2.122 (95% CI 1.155-3.899, P = 0.015). Achieving MRD negativity was able to ameliorate a poor prognosis associated with genetic high risk. MRD negativity was associated with better PFS regardless of ASCT treatment. MRD status was more predictable for clinical outcome than conventional clinical responses. Moreover, Sustained MRD negativity ≥ 12 or ≥ 24 months improved both PFS and OS. Patients with NDMM who achieved MRD-negative status or sustained MRD negativity had deep remission and improved clinical outcomes regardless of high-risk cytogenetics, ASCT and clinical responses in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Wang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Run Zhang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Jianyong Li
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Lijuan Chen
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Yuanyuan Jin
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, No. 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Medina-Herrera A, Sarasquete ME, Jiménez C, Puig N, García-Sanz R. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Past, Present, and Future. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3687. [PMID: 37509348 PMCID: PMC10377959 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Responses to treatment have improved over the last decades for patients with multiple myeloma. This is a consequence of the introduction of new drugs that have been successfully combined in different clinical contexts: newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible or ineligible patients, as well as in the relapsed/refractory setting. However, a great proportion of patients continue to relapse, even those achieving complete response, which underlines the need for updated response criteria. In 2014, the international myeloma working group established new levels of response, prompting the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) for those patients already in complete or stringent complete response as defined by conventional serological assessments: the absence of tumor plasma cells in 100,000 total cells or more define molecular and immunophenotypic responses by next-generation sequencing and flow cytometry, respectively. In this review, we describe all the potential methods that may be used for MRD detection based on the evidence found in the literature, paying special attention to their advantages and pitfalls from a critical perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Medina-Herrera
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Eugenia Sarasquete
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Cristina Jiménez
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Noemí Puig
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ramón García-Sanz
- Departament of Hematology, University Hospital of Salamanca (HUSA/IBSAL), CIBERONC, CIC-IBMCC (USAL-CSIC), 37007 Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rath A, Panda T, Dass J, Seth T, Mahapatra M, Tyagi S. Minimal residual disease analysis in multiple myeloma: A single-center experience. JOURNAL OF APPLIED HEMATOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.4103/joah.joah_69_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
|
5
|
Bergantim R, Peixoto da Silva S, Polónia B, Barbosa MAG, Albergaria A, Lima J, Caires HR, Guimarães JE, Vasconcelos MH. Detection of Measurable Residual Disease Biomarkers in Extracellular Vesicles from Liquid Biopsies of Multiple Myeloma Patients-A Proof of Concept. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232213686. [PMID: 36430163 PMCID: PMC9690807 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232213686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Monitoring measurable residual disease (MRD) is crucial to assess treatment response in Multiple Myeloma (MM). Detection of MRD in peripheral blood (PB) by exploring Extracellular Vesicles (EVs), and their cargo, would allow frequent and minimally invasive monitoring of MM. This work aims to detect biomarkers of MRD in EVs isolated from MM patient samples at diagnosis and remission and compare the MRD-associated content between BM and PB EVs. EVs were isolated by size-exclusion chromatography, concentrated by ultrafiltration, and characterized according to their size and concentration, morphology, protein concentration, and the presence of EV-associated protein markers. EVs from healthy blood donors were used as controls. It was possible to isolate EVs from PB and BM carrying MM markers. Diagnostic samples had different levels of MM markers between PB and BM paired samples, but no differences between PB and BM were found at remission. EVs concentration was lower in the PB of healthy controls than of patients, and MM markers were mostly not detected in EVs from controls. This study pinpoints the potential of PB EVs from MM remission patients as a source of MM biomarkers and as a non-invasive approach for monitoring MRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Bergantim
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Hematology, Hospital Center of São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Hematology, FMUP—Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
| | - Sara Peixoto da Silva
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Bárbara Polónia
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Mélanie A. G. Barbosa
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - André Albergaria
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Research Innovation Unit, Translational Research & Industry Partnerships Office, i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Jorge Lima
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Research Innovation Unit, Translational Research & Industry Partnerships Office, i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Hugo R. Caires
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - José E. Guimarães
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Hematology, Hospital Center of São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Clinical Hematology, FMUP—Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
- Instituto Universitário de Ciências da Saúde, Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário IUCSESPU, 4585-116 Gandra-Paredes, Portugal
- Correspondence: (J.E.G.); (M.H.V.); Tel.: +351-225-570-772 (J.E.G. & M.H.V.)
| | - M. Helena Vasconcelos
- i3S—Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Cancer Drug Resistance Group, IPATIMUP—Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
- Department of Biological Sciences, FFUP—Faculty of Pharmacy of the University of Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
- Correspondence: (J.E.G.); (M.H.V.); Tel.: +351-225-570-772 (J.E.G. & M.H.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steps towards a Multiple Myeloma Cure? J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091451. [PMID: 36143236 PMCID: PMC9504254 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma survival has increased in last 20 years because of new treatments, better clinical management due to novel diagnostic tools such as imaging, and better understanding of the disease, biologically and genetically. Novel drugs have been introduced that act with different therapeutic mechanisms, but so have novel therapeutic strategies such as consolidation and maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant. Imaging (such as PET-CT and MRI) has been applied at diagnosis and after therapy for minimal residual disease monitoring. Multiparametric flow and molecular NGS may detect, with high-sensitivity, residual monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow. With this novel therapeutic and biological approach, a considerable fraction of multiple myeloma patients can achieve durable remission or even MGUS-like regression, which can ultimately lead to disease disappearance. The big dogma, “Myeloma is an incurable disease”, is hopefully fading.
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun Q, Li X, Gu J, Huang B, Liu J, Chen M, Li J. Prognostic Significance of the Stage at Which an MRD-Negative Status Is Achieved for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Received ASCT. Front Oncol 2022; 12:776920. [PMID: 35664799 PMCID: PMC9157574 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.776920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the prognostic significance of the stage at which a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status is achieved for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who received autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Cases and Methods A retrospective analysis of 186 NDMM patients who received "induction therapy-ASCT-maintenance therapy" in our center and achieved an MRD-negative status was performed. Patients were divided into three groups, A (induction therapy), B (3 months after ASCT), and C (maintenance therapy), according to the stage at which an MRD-negative status was achieved. Results The median time to progression (TTP) of 186 patients was not reached; the median overall survival (OS) was 113.8 months. The median TTP of the patients in three groups was not reached (P=0.013), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 71.2 months, respectively (P=0.026). Among patients with standard-risk cytogenetics, the median TTP of those in all three groups was not reached (P=0.121), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months, respectively (P=0.091). Among patients with high-risk cytogenetics, the median TTP of those in three groups was not reached, 53.9 months, and 35.8 months (P=0.060), and the median OS was not reached, 71.2 months, and 60.2 months, respectively (P=0.625). Among patients with R-ISS stage I-II, the median TTP of those in three groups was not reached (P=0.174), and the median OS of the patients in three groups was not reached, not reached, and 99.6 months, respectively (P=0.186). Among the 29 patients with R-ISS stage III, the median TTP of those in the 3 groups were unreached, unreached, and 35.1 months (P<0.001), and the median OS was unreached, unreached, and 48.5 months, respectively (P=0.020). In all enrolled patients, the stage of reaching MRD-negative was an independent prognostic factor for TTP, rather than a prognostic factor for OS. The stage of reaching MRD-negative in patients with R-ISS III was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Conclusion For the same patients who are MRD-negative, the prognoses of those who achieve an MRD-negative status at different groups are different. The stage at which an MRD-negative status is achieved can predict the prognosis of patients with R-ISS stage III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Juan Li
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Charalampous C, Kourelis T. Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Multiple Myeloma Patients: Minimal Disease With Maximal Implications. Front Oncol 2022; 11:801851. [PMID: 35155198 PMCID: PMC8825476 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.801851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic malignancy, has been the target of many therapeutic advances over the past two decades. The introduction of novel agents, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies, along with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the current standard of care, has increased the median survival of myeloma patients significantly. Nevertheless, a curative treatment option continues to elude us, and MM remains an incurable disease, with patients relapsing even after achieving deep conventionally defined responses, underscoring the need for the development of sensitive methods that will allow for proper identification and management of the patients with a higher probability of relapse. Accurate detection of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) from a bone marrow biopsy represents a relatively new approach of evaluating response to treatment with data showing clear benefit from obtaining MRD(-) status at any point of the disease course. As life expectancy for patients with MM continues to increase and deep responses are starting to become the norm, establishing and refining the role of MRD in the disease course is more relevant than ever. This review examines the different methods used to detect MRD and discusses future considerations regarding the implementation in day-to-day clinical practice and as a prospective primary endpoint for clinical trials.
Collapse
|
9
|
Lecouvet FE, Vekemans MC, Van Den Berghe T, Verstraete K, Kirchgesner T, Acid S, Malghem J, Wuts J, Hillengass J, Vandecaveye V, Jamar F, Gheysens O, Vande Berg BC. Imaging of treatment response and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: state of the art WB-MRI and PET/CT. Skeletal Radiol 2022; 51:59-80. [PMID: 34363522 PMCID: PMC8626399 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03841-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Bone imaging has been intimately associated with the diagnosis and staging of multiple myeloma (MM) for more than 5 decades, as the presence of bone lesions indicates advanced disease and dictates treatment initiation. The methods used have been evolving, and the historical radiographic skeletal survey has been replaced by whole body CT, whole body MRI (WB-MRI) and [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone marrow lesions and less frequent extramedullary plasmacytomas.Beyond diagnosis, imaging methods are expected to provide the clinician with evaluation of the response to treatment. Imaging techniques are consistently challenged as treatments become more and more efficient, inducing profound response, with more subtle residual disease. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT are the methods of choice to address these challenges, being able to assess disease progression or response and to detect "minimal" residual disease, providing key prognostic information and guiding necessary change of treatment.This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the WB-MRI and PET/CT techniques, their observations in responsive and progressive disease and their role and limitations in capturing minimal residual disease. It reviews trials assessing these techniques for response evaluation, points out the limited comparisons between both methods and highlights their complementarity with most recent molecular methods (next-generation flow cytometry, next-generation sequencing) to detect minimal residual disease. It underlines the important role of PET/MRI technology as a research tool to compare the effectiveness and complementarity of both methods to address the key clinical questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederic E. Lecouvet
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Christiane Vekemans
- Haematology Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Van Den Berghe
- Radiology Department, Universiteit Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Koenraad Verstraete
- Radiology Department, Universiteit Ghent, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 33, 9000 Gent, Belgium
| | - Thomas Kirchgesner
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Souad Acid
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jacques Malghem
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joris Wuts
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Avenue du Laerbeek 101, 1090 Jette, Belgium
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Departement of Medicine, Myeloma Unit, Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY USA
| | - Vincent Vandecaveye
- Radiology Department, Katholieke Univesiteit Leuven, Oude Markt, 13, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - François Jamar
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Gheysens
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Bruno C. Vande Berg
- Radiology Department, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Hippocrate Avenue 10, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ding H, Xu J, Lin Z, Huang J, Wang F, Yang Y, Cui Y, Luo H, Gao Y, Zhai X, Pang W, Zhang L, Zheng Y. Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma: current status. Biomark Res 2021; 9:75. [PMID: 34649622 PMCID: PMC8515655 DOI: 10.1186/s40364-021-00328-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a treatable plasma cell cancer with no cure. Clinical evidence shows that the status of minimal residual disease (MRD) after treatment is an independent prognostic factor of MM. MRD indicates the depth of post-therapeutic remission. In this review article, we outlined the major clinical trials that have determined the prognostic value of MRD in MM. We also reviewed different methods that were used for MM MRD assessment. Most important, we reviewed our current understanding of MM MRD biology. MRD studies strongly indicate that MRD is not a uniform declination of whole MM tumor population. Rather, MM MRD exhibits unique signatures of cytogenetic aberration and gene expression profiles, unlike those of MM cells before therapy. Diagnostic high-risk MM and low-risk MM exhibited a diversity of MRD features. Clonal evaluation may occur at the MRD stage in MM. The dynamics from the diagnostic MM to MRD correlate with the disease prognosis. Lastly, on the aspect of omics, we performed data-based analysis to address the biological features underlying the course of diagnostic-to-MRD MM. To summarize, the MRD stage of disease represents a critical step in MM pathogenesis and progression. Demonstration of MM MRD biology should help us to deal with the curative difficulties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Ding
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Xu
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhimei Lin
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China.,Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jingcao Huang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Fangfang Wang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Yan Yang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Yushan Cui
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongmei Luo
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuhan Gao
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Xinyu Zhai
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Weicui Pang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China.
| | - Yuhuan Zheng
- Department of Hematology, West China Hospital, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Sichuan University, #37 GuoXue Xiang Street, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bravo-Pérez C, Sola M, Teruel-Montoya R, García-Malo MD, Ortuño FJ, Vicente V, de Arriba F, Jerez A. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Something Old, Something New. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4332. [PMID: 34503142 PMCID: PMC8430644 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The game-changing outcome effect, due to the generalized use of novel agents in MM, has cre-ated a paradigm shift. Achieving frequent deep responses has placed MM among those neoplasms where the rationale for assessing MRD is fulfilled. However, its implementation in MM has raised specific questions: how might we weight standard measures against deep MRD in the emerging CAR-T setting? Which high sensitivity method to choose? Are current response criteria still useful? In this work, we address lessons learned from the use of MRD in other neoplasms, the steps followed for the harmonization of current methods for comprehensively measuring MRD, and the challenges that new therapies and concepts pose in the MM clinical field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bravo-Pérez
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - María Sola
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Raúl Teruel-Montoya
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| | - María Dolores García-Malo
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Francisco José Ortuño
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Vicente Vicente
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| | - Felipe de Arriba
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
| | - Andrés Jerez
- Hematology and Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital Morales Meseguer, IMIB, 30003 Murcia, Spain; (C.B.-P.); (M.S.); (M.D.G.-M.); (F.J.O.); (V.V.); (F.d.A.); (A.J.)
- CB15/00055-CIBERER, 30003 Murcia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Next-Generation Biomarkers in Multiple Myeloma: Understanding the Molecular Basis for Potential Use in Diagnosis and Prognosis. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22147470. [PMID: 34299097 PMCID: PMC8305153 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22147470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered to be the second most common blood malignancy and it is characterized by abnormal proliferation and an accumulation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. Although the currently utilized markers in the diagnosis and assessment of MM are showing promising results, the incidence and mortality rate of the disease are still high. Therefore, exploring and developing better diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers have drawn global interest. In the present review, we highlight some of the recently reported and investigated novel biomarkers that have great potentials as diagnostic and/or prognostic tools in MM. These biomarkers include angiogenic markers, miRNAs as well as proteomic and immunological biomarkers. Moreover, we present some of the advanced methodologies that could be utilized in the early and competent diagnosis of MM. The present review also focuses on understanding the molecular concepts and pathways involved in these biomarkers in order to validate and efficiently utilize them. The present review may also help in identifying areas of improvement for better diagnosis and superior outcomes of MM.
Collapse
|
13
|
A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood Adv 2021; 4:5988-5999. [PMID: 33284948 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 197] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in a large cohort of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) using a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Medline and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published up to 8 June 2019, with no date limit on the indexed database. Clinical end points stratified by MRD status (positive or negative) were extracted, including hazard ratios (HRs) on PFS and OS, P values, and confidence intervals (CIs). HRs were estimated based on reconstructed patient-level data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. Forty-four eligible studies with PFS data from 8098 patients, and 23 studies with OS data from 4297 patients were identified to assess the association between MRD status and survival outcomes. Compared with MRD positivity, achieving MRD negativity improved PFS (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.29-0.37; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39-0.51; P < .001). MRD negativity was associated with significantly improved survival outcomes regardless of disease setting (newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM), MRD sensitivity thresholds, cytogenetic risk, method of MRD assessment, depth of clinical response at the time of MRD measurement, and MRD assessment premaintenance and 12 months after start of maintenance therapy. The strong prognostic value of MRD negativity and its association with favorable outcomes in various disease and treatment settings sets the stage to adopt MRD as a treatment end point, including development of therapeutic strategies. This large meta-analysis confirms the utility of MRD as a relevant surrogate for PFS and OS in MM.
Collapse
|
14
|
Parrott AM, Murty VV, Walsh C, Christiano A, Bhagat G, Alobeid B. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of CD19-selected cells: Utility in detecting disease in post-therapy samples of B-cell neoplasms. Cancer Med 2021; 10:2680-2689. [PMID: 33724696 PMCID: PMC8026942 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Context The detection of low‐level persistent or relapsed B‐cell neoplasms, particularly post‐therapy, can be challenging, often requiring multiple testing modalities. Objective Here we investigate the utility of CD19‐based selection of neoplastic B‐cells (CD19S) as an enrichment strategy to improve the detection rate of cytogenetic abnormalities in post‐therapy samples of B‐cell neoplasms, especially those with low‐level disease. Design In a cohort largely comprised of post‐therapy B‐ALL and CLL samples, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on CD19‐selected cells (CD19S FISH) in 128 specimens from 88 patients, and on non‐selected cells (NS FISH) in a subset of cases. The FISH findings were compared with the concurrent flow cytometry (FC) results in all samples and molecular analysis in a subset. Results CD19S FISH was able to detect cytogenetic aberrations in 86.0% of post‐therapy samples with evidence of disease as determined by routine or MRD FC, compared to 59.1% of samples by NS FISH. CD19S FISH detected significantly higher percentages of positive cells compared to NS FISH (p < 0.001). Importantly, CD19S FISH enabled the detection of emergent subclones (clonal evolution) associated with poor prognosis. Conclusions CD19S FISH can be useful in daily diagnostic practice. Compared to NS FISH, CD19S FISH is quantitatively and qualitatively superior for the detection of cytogenetic aberrations in B‐cell neoplasms, which are important for risk stratification and optimal management of patients with B‐cell neoplasms, especially in the relapsed setting. Although CD19S FISH has a diagnostic sensitivity inferior to that of MRD FC, the sensitivity of this modality is comparable to routine FC for the evaluation of low‐level disease in the post‐therapy setting. Moreover, CD19S samples are invaluable for additional molecular and genetic analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Parrott
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vundavalli V Murty
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Caitlin Walsh
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alecia Christiano
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Govind Bhagat
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bachir Alobeid
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tapia-Alveal C, Olsen TR, Worgall TS. Personalized immunoglobulin aptamers for detection of multiple myeloma minimal residual disease in serum. Commun Biol 2020; 3:781. [PMID: 33335255 PMCID: PMC7747622 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-020-01515-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplasm of plasma cells that secrete patient specific monoclonal immunoglobulins. A recognized problem in MM treatment is the early recognition of minimal residual disease (MRD), the major cause of relapse. Current MRD detection methods (multiparameter flow cytometry and next generation sequencing) are based on the analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Both methods cannot detect extramedullary disease and are unsuitable for serial measurements. We describe the methodology to generate high affinity DNA aptamers that are specific to a patient’s monoclonal Fab region. Such aptamers are 2000-fold more sensitive than immunofixation electrophoresis and enabled detection and quantification of MRD in serum when conventional MRD methods assessed complete remission. The aptamer isolation process that requires small volumes of serum is automatable, and Fab specific aptamers are adaptable to multiple diagnostic formats including point-of-care devices. Tapia-Alveal, Olsen and Worgall develop a novel strategy for patient-specific multiple myeloma diagnostics platform using DNA aptamers. The high affinity DNA aptamers enabled detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) when conventional MRD methods assessed complete remission and are adaptable to multiple diagnostic formats including point-of-care devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Tapia-Alveal
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Timothy R Olsen
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Tilla S Worgall
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gozzetti A, Raspadori D, Bacchiarri F, Sicuranza A, Pacelli P, Ferrigno I, Tocci D, Bocchia M. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: State of the Art and Applications in Clinical Practice. J Pers Med 2020; 10:jpm10030120. [PMID: 32927719 PMCID: PMC7565263 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10030120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2020] [Revised: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Novel drugs have revolutionized multiple myeloma therapy in the last 20 years, with median survival that has doubled to up to 8–10 years. The introduction of therapeutic strategies, such as consolidation and maintenance after autologous stem cell transplants, has also ameliorated clinical results. The goal of modern therapies is becoming not only complete remission, but also the deepest possible remission. In this context, the evaluation of minimal residual disease by techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and next-generation flow (NGF) is becoming part of all new clinical trials that test drug efficacy. This review focuses on minimal residual disease approaches in clinical trials, with particular attention to real-world practices.
Collapse
|
17
|
Kostopoulos IV, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Gavriatopoulou M, Tsitsilonis OE, Terpos E. Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma: Current Landscape and Future Applications With Immunotherapeutic Approaches. Front Oncol 2020; 10:860. [PMID: 32537439 PMCID: PMC7267070 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The basic principle that deeper therapeutic responses lead to better clinical outcomes in cancer has emerged technologies capable of detecting rare residual tumor cells. The need for ultra-sensitive approaches for minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is particularly evident in Multiple Myeloma (MM), where patients will ultimately relapse despite the achievement of complete remission, which is commonplace due to remarkable therapeutic advances. Consequently, current response criteria on MM have been amended based on MRD status and MRD negativity is now considered the most dominant prognostic factor and the most valuable indicator for a subsequent relapse. However, there are particular limitations and several aspects for MRD assessment that remain open. This review summarizes current data on MRD in the clinical management of MM, highlights open issues and discusses the challenges and the endless opportunities arising for both patients and clinicians. Furthermore, it focuses on the current status of MRD in clinical trials, its dynamics in addressing debatable aspects in the clinical handling and its potential role as the prevailing factor for future MRD-driven tailored therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis V Kostopoulos
- Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Gavriatopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ourania E Tsitsilonis
- Department of Biology, School of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Terpos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Holstein SA, Al-Kadhimi Z, Costa LJ, Hahn T, Hari P, Hillengass J, Jacob A, Munshi NC, Oliva S, Pasquini MC, Shi Q, Stadtmauer EA, Waldvogel SL, McCarthy PL. Summary of the Third Annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; 26:e7-e15. [PMID: 31526843 PMCID: PMC6942175 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2019] [Revised: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The third annual Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Myeloma Intergroup Workshop on Minimal Residual Disease and Immune Profiling was held on November 29, 2018, at the American Society of Hematology (ASH) annual meeting. This workshop featured the latest research focused on minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment and immune profiling (IP) in myeloma as well as discussion of the statistical and regulatory issues intrinsic to the development of MRD as a surrogate endpoint. In this report, we provide a summary of the workshop and focus on the integration of MRD and IP assessment into trial design and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.
| | - Zaid Al-Kadhimi
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Luciano J Costa
- Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Theresa Hahn
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Parameswaran Hari
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | | | | | | | - Marcelo C Pasquini
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Qian Shi
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Edward A Stadtmauer
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephanie L Waldvogel
- Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Philip L McCarthy
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sidana S, Manasanch E. Evidence-Based Minireview: Does achieving MRD negativity after initial therapy improve prognosis for high-risk myeloma patients? HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2019; 2019:142-147. [PMID: 31808853 PMCID: PMC6913499 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2019000075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
You are evaluating a 47-year-old man with revised international staging system stage III myeloma who recently underwent an autologous stem cell transplant after receiving 6 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed disease. Fluorescence in situ hybridization testing at initial presentation also revealed t(4;14). On day 100 evaluation after transplant, he has achieved a stringent complete response. Two-tube, 8-color advanced flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 10-5 shows no minimal residual disease. Whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan shows resolution of all fluorodeoxyglucose avid uptake seen at diagnosis. The patient asks you how these test results impact his prognosis and whether this overcomes his baseline high risk from t(4;14)?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Sidana
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and
| | - Elisabet Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Romano A, Palumbo GA, Parrinello NL, Conticello C, Martello M, Terragna C. Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives. Front Oncol 2019; 9:699. [PMID: 31482061 PMCID: PMC6710454 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Romano
- Department of Surgery and Medical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Alberto Palumbo
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele di Catania, Catania, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia,” University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Nunziatina Laura Parrinello
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele di Catania, Catania, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Tecnologie avanzate “G.F. Ingrassia,” University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Concetta Conticello
- Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Marina Martello
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carolina Terragna
- Istituto di Ematologia “L.A.Seràgnoli,” Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|