Effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone on the pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan and theophylline in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and drug-drug interactions in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer represents a major global health challenge, necessitating efficacious therapeutic strategies. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) have become central to prostate cancer treatment, demonstrating significant effectiveness in both metastatic and non-metastatic contexts. Abiraterone acetate, by inhibiting androgen synthesis, deprives cancer cells androgens necessary for growth, while second-generation androgen receptor (AR) antagonists disrupt AR signaling by blocking AR binding, thereby impeding tumor progression. Given the predominance of prostate cancer in the elderly, who often present with multiple comorbidities requiring complex pharmacological regimens, the potential for drug-drug interactions with ARPIs is a critical concern. These interactions, particularly through pathways like CYP2D6 inhibition by abiraterone and CYP3A4 induction by enzalutamide and apalutamide, necessitate a thorough understanding to optimize therapeutic outcomes and minimize adverse effects. This review aims to delineate the efficacy of ARPIs in prostate cancer management and elucidate their interaction with common medications, highlighting the importance of vigilant drug management to optimize patient care.

Drug Interactions between Androgen Receptor Axis-Targeted Therapies and Antithrombotic Therapies in Prostate Cancer: Delphi Consensus

Background/Objectives: Abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide, which make up the androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs) drug class, are commonly used in the management of prostate cancer. Many patients on ARATs also receive oral antithrombotic therapy (i.e., anticoagulants or antiplatelets). The concomitant use of ARATs and antithrombotic therapies creates the potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions, but the literature regarding the actual consequences of these interactions, and guidance for co-prescribing, is limited. We assembled a multidisciplinary panel of experts and provided them with clinical information derived from a comprehensive literature review regarding the drug-drug interactions between ARATs and antithrombotic therapies. Methods: A three-stage modified electronic Delphi process was used to gather and consolidate opinions from the panel. Each stage consisted of up to three rounds of voting to achieve consensus on which ARAT/antithrombotic therapy drug pairs warrant attention, the possible clinical consequences of drug-drug interactions, and suggested actions for management. Results: The panel achieved consensus to avoid 11 ARAT/antithrombotic therapy drug pairs and modify therapy for eight pairs. Assessments relied heavily on pharmacokinetic data and extrapolation from drug-drug interaction studies of similarly metabolized drugs. Conclusions: This e-Delphi process highlights the need for further research into the clinical impact of ARAT/antithrombotic drug interactions. Nonetheless, the suggested actions aim to provide clinicians with a practical framework for therapeutic decision making.

Impact of Comorbidities and Drug Interactions in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors

PURPOSE

Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) are widely prescribed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Real-world frequencies and potential impacts of comorbidities and concomitant medication (conmed) interactions with ARPIs are not well described.

METHODS

Patients receiving ARPIs for mCRPC were identified from the electronic Prostate Cancer Australian Database (ePAD). Demographics, clinicopathologic characteristics, and outcome data were extracted. Conmeds and comorbidities were collected from medical records. Potential interacting comorbidities were defined from trial and post-trial data. Clinically significant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) were identified using UpToDate Lexicomp and Stockley's databases. Patient characteristics, comorbidity interactions, DDIs, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-five patients received first- or second-line ARPIs for mCRPC from 2012 to 2021, with a median follow-up of 27 months. One hundred sixteen received abiraterone acetate (AAP) and 135 received enzalutamide (ENZ). The median age was 74 years, and the median number of conmeds was 4. Clinically significant DDIs occurred in 55 (47%) AAP patients and 90 (67%) ENZ patients. Only 5% of DDIs were predicted to affect ARPI pharmacokinetics (PK) or pharmacodynamics, whereas 95% were predicted to impact conmed PK or increase toxicity risk. In patients receiving ENZ, DDIs were associated with lower PSA50 (50% v 74%, P = .04) and poorer overall survival (28 v 45 months, P = .04), although statistical significance was not maintained on multivariate analysis. No significant survival differences were seen with DDIs in patients receiving AAP. Potential interactions between comorbidities and ARPI were present in 72% on AAP and 14% on ENZ with no significant associated survival differences.

CONCLUSION

DDIs and drug-comorbidity interactions in real-world patients receiving ARPIs for mCRPC are common and may affect outcomes. Ongoing clinician education regarding DDIs is necessary to optimize patient outcomes.

Assessment of CYP-Mediated Drug Interactions for Enasidenib Based on a Cocktail Study in Patients with Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome

As a selective and potent inhibitor targeting the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib obtained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. In vitro investigations demonstrated that enasidenib affects various drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. This current investigation aimed to assess enasidenib on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CYP substrates, including dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 probe drug), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 probe drug), midazolam (CYP3A4 probe drug), omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe drug), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 probe drug), in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. Results showed that following the co-administration of enasidenib (100 mg, once daily) for 28 days, the PK parameters AUC(0-∞) and Cmax of dextromethorphan increased by 1.37 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.96) and 1.24 (90% CI: 0.94, 1.65)-fold, respectively, compared to dextromethorphan alone. For flurbiprofen, these parameters increased by 1.14 (90%CI: 1.01, 1.29) and 0.97 (90% CI 0.86, 1.08)-fold, respectively, when compared to flurbiprofen alone. Conversely, midazolam exhibited decreases to 0.57 (90% CI 0.34, 0.97) and 0.77 (90% CI 0.39, 1.53)-fold, respectively, in comparison to midazolam alone. The parameters for omeprazole increased by 1.86 (90% CI: 1.33, 2.60) and 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)-fold, respectively, compared to omeprazole alone, while those for pioglitazone decreased to 0.80 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.16)-fold, respectively, in comparison to pioglitazone alone. These findings provide valuable insights into dose recommendations concerning drugs acting as substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2C8 when administered concurrently with enasidenib.

New-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and clinical impact

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic scenario of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has dramatically changed in recent years, with the approval of new-generation Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitors (ARSIs), in combination with the androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which was the previous standard of care. Despite showing a similar clinical efficacy, ARSIs, all of which are administered orally, are different in terms of pharmacokinetic and drug-drug interactions (DDIs).

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the main pharmacokinetic characteristics of ARSIs that have been approved for the first-line therapy of mHSPC patients, underlying the differences among these molecules and focusing on the known or possible interactions with other drugs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

EXPERT OPINION

Since prostate cancer occurs mainly in older age, comorbidities and the consequent polypharmacy increase the DDI risk in mHSPC patients who are candidates for ARSI. Waiting for new therapeutic options, in the absence of direct comparisons, pharmacokinetic knowledge is essential to guide clinicians in prescribing ARSI in this setting.

Investigation of the Differences in the Pharmacokinetics of CYP2D6 Substrates, Desipramine, and Dextromethorphan in Healthy African Subjects Carrying the Allelic Variants CYP2D6*17 and CYP2D6*29, When Compared with Normal Metabolizers

This study investigated the differences in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dextromethorphan and desipramine in healthy African volunteers to understand the effect of allelic variants of the human cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme, namely the diplotypes of CYP2D6*1/*2 (*1*1, *1*2, *2*2) and the genotypes of CYP2D6*17*17 and CYP2D6*29*29. Overall, 28 adults were included and split into 3 cohorts after genotype screening: CYP2D6*1/*2 (n = 12), CYP2D6*17*17 (n = 12), and CYP2D6*29*29 (n = 4). Each subject received a single oral dose of dextromethorphan 30 mg syrup on day 1 and desipramine 50 mg tablet on day 8. The PK parameters of area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time of dosing to time of last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were determined. For both dextromethorphan and desipramine, AUCinf and Cmax were higher in subjects of the CYP2D6*29*29 and CYP2D6*17*17 cohorts, as compared with subjects in the CYP2D6*1/*2 diplotype cohort and with normal metabolizers from the literature. All PK parameters, including AUCinf, Cmax, and the elimination half-life, followed a similar trend: CYP2D6*17*17 > CYP2D6*29*29 > CYP2D6*1/*2. The plasma and urinary drug/metabolite exposure ratios of both drugs were higher in subjects of the CYP2D6*17*17 and CYP2D6*29*29 cohorts, when compared with subjects in the CYP2D6*1/*2 diplotype cohort. All adverse events were mild, except in 1 subject with CYP2D6*17*17 who had moderately severe headache with desipramine. These results indicate that subjects with CYP2D6*17*17 and CYP2D6*29*29 genotypes were 5-10 times slower metabolizers than those with CYP2D6*1/*2 diplotypes. These findings suggest that dose optimization may be required when administering CYP2D6 substrate drugs in African patients. Larger studies can further validate these findings.

Effect of Dexamethasone on Abiraterone Pharmacokinetics in Mice: Determined by LC/MS Analysis

Background: Abiraterone acetate is a cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1) inhibitor that is indicated for use in both castration-resistant and castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients. To manage the mineralocorticoid effects of CYP17A1 inhibition, a glucocorticoid such as dexamethasone is co-administered with abiraterone. The goal of the present study was to understand the effect of dexamethasone on the disposition of abiraterone. Methods: Adult male CD-1 mice were treated with either dexamethasone (80 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for three consecutive days, followed by the administration of a single dose of abiraterone acetate (180 mg/kg) as an oral gavage. Blood samples were collected by tail bleeding at timepoints between 0 to 24 h. Subsequently, abiraterone was extracted from the mouse serum using a neutral pH condition and serum abiraterone levels were determined using a liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry assay. Results: Our results demonstrated that dexamethasone lowered the maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve parameters by approximately five- and ten-fold, respectively. Similar effects were also observed on the plasma half-life and oral clearance parameters. This is the first report of dexamethasone effect on abiraterone disposition in vivo. Conclusions: We conclude that dexamethasone has the potential to reduce the plasma abiraterone level and thus compromise its CYP17A1 inhibitory ability in the procancerous androgen biosynthesis pathway. Thus, use of a higher abiraterone dose may be warranted when used alongside dexamethasone.

Pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions: an insight into recent US FDA-approved drugs for prostate cancer

Pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction is a significant safety and efficiency concern as it results in considerable concentration changes. Drug–drug interactions are a substantial concern in anticancer drugs that possess a narrow therapeutic index. These interactions remain as the principal regulatory obstacle that can lead to termination in the preclinical stage, restrictions in the prescription, dosage adjustments or withdrawal of the drugs from the market. Drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters mediate the majority of clinically relevant drug interactions. Cancer diagnosed aged patients use multiple medications and are more prone to significant drug–drug interactions. This review provides detailed information on clinically relevant drug–drug interactions resulting from drug metabolism by enzymes and transporters with a particular emphasis on recent FDA approved antiprostate cancer drugs.

Drug-Drug Interactions in Prostate Cancer Treatment

Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs), which can cause serious and debilitating drug-induced adverse events. With a steadily aging population and associated increasing multimorbidity and polypharmacy, the potential for DDIs becomes considerably important. Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men and occurs mostly in elderly men in the Western world. Therefore, the aim of this review is to give an overview of DDIs in PCa therapy to better understand pharmacodynamic and pharm kinetic side effects as well as their interactions with other medications. Last, we explore potential future strategies, which might help to optimize treatment and reduce adverse events patients with polypharmacy and PCa.

Abiraterone Acetate: A Review in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostrate Cancer

Oral abiraterone acetate (Zytiga^®) is a selective inhibitor of CYP17 and thereby inhibits androgen biosynthesis, with androgen signalling crucial in the progression from primary to metastatic prostate cancer (PC) and subsequently, in the development of metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC). In large phase 3 trials and in the clinical practice setting, oral abiraterone acetate in combination with prednisone was an effective treatment and had an acceptable, manageable tolerability and safety profile in chemotherapy-naive and docetaxel-experienced men with mCRPC. In the pivotal global phase 3 trials, relative to placebo (+prednisone), abiraterone acetate (+prednisone) prolonged overall survival (OS) at data maturity (final analysis) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) at all assessed timepoints. Given its efficacy in prolonging OS and its convenient once-daily oral regimen, in combination with prednisone, abiraterone acetate is an important first-line option for the treatment of mCRPC.

Pharmacokinetic Aspects of the Two Novel Oral Drugs Used for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Abiraterone Acetate and Enzalutamide

Two novel oral drugs that target androgen signaling have recently become available for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Abiraterone acetate inhibits the synthesis of the natural ligands of the androgen receptor, whereas enzalutamide directly inhibits the androgen receptor by several mechanisms. Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide appear to be equally effective for patients with mCRPC pre- and postchemotherapy. Rational decision making for either one of these drugs is therefore potentially driven by individual patient characteristics. In this review, an overview of the pharmacokinetic characteristics is given for both drugs and potential and proven drug–drug interactions are presented. Additionally, the effect of patient-related factors on drug disposition are summarized and the limited data on the exposure–response relationships are described. The most important pharmacological feature of enzalutamide that needs to be recognized is its capacity to induce several key enzymes in drug metabolism. The potency to cause drug–drug interactions needs to be addressed in patients who are treated with multiple drugs simultaneously. Abiraterone has a much smaller drug–drug interaction potential; however, it is poorly absorbed, which is affected by food intake, and a large interpatient variability in drug exposure is observed. Dose reductions of abiraterone or, alternatively, the selection of enzalutamide, should be considered in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Understanding the pharmacological characteristics and challenges of both drugs could facilitate decision making for either one of the drugs.

The Impact of the Hepatocyte-to-Plasma pH Gradient on the Prediction of Hepatic Clearance and Drug-Drug Interactions for CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 Substrates

Surrogate assays for drug metabolism and inhibition are traditionally performed in buffer systems at pH 7.4, despite evidence that hepatocyte intracellular pH is 7.0. This pH gradient can result in a pKa-dependent change in intracellular/extracellular concentrations for ionizable drugs that could affect predictions of clearance and P450 inhibition. The effect of microsomal incubation pH on in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters for CYP2C9 (diclofenac, (S)-warfarin) and CYP3A4 (midazolam, dextromethorphan, testosterone) substrates, enzyme specific reversible inhibitors (amiodarone, desethylamiodarone, clozapine, nicardipine, fluconazole, fluvoxamine, itraconazole) and a mechanism-based inhibitor (amiodarone) was investigated. Intrinsic clearance through CYP2C9 significantly increased (25% and 50% for diclofenac and (S)-warfarin respectively) at intracellular pH 7.0 compared with traditional pH 7.4. The CYP3A4 substrate dextromethorphan intrinsic clearance was decreased by 320% at pH 7.0, while midazolam and testosterone remained unchanged. Reversible inhibition of CYP2C9 was less potent at pH 7.0 compared with 7.4, while CYP3A4 inhibition potency was variably affected. Maximum enzyme inactivation rate of amiodarone toward CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 decreased at pH 7.0, while the irreversible inhibition constant remained unchanged for CYP2C9, but decreased for CYP3A4 at pH 7.0. Predictions of clearance and drug-drug interactions made through physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were improved with the inclusion of predicted intracellular concentrations based at pH 7.0 and in vitro parameters determined at pH 7.0. No general conclusion on the impact of pH could be made and therefore a recommendation to change buffer pH to 7.0 cannot be made at this time. It is recommended that the appropriate hepatocyte intracellular pH 7.0 be used for in vitro determinations when in vivo predictions are made.

Potential drug-drug interactions with abiraterone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a prevalence study in France

PURPOSE

Abiraterone acetate combined with prednisone improves survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. This oral anticancer agent may result in drug-drug interactions (DDI). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of DDI with abiraterone and the possible determinants for the occurrence of these DDI.

METHODS

We performed a single centre retrospective review from electronic medical records of mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone from 2011 to 2015. Potential DDI with abiraterone were identified using Micromedex and were categorized by a 4-point scale severity.

RESULTS

Seventy-two out of ninety-five mCRPC pts (median age: 77 years [68-82]) had comorbidities. The median number of drugs used per patient was 7 [5-9]. 66 potential DDI with abiraterone were detected in 49 patients (52%): 39 and 61% were classified as major and moderate DDI, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pain (p < 0.0001), hypo-albuminemia (p = 0.032), and higher ECOG performance status (PS) (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with a higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. Pain (p < 0.0001) and PS (p = 0.018) remained significant in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy is an issue among mCRPC patients. In our study, half of the patients have potential DDI with abiraterone. Patients with pain and poor PS are at higher risk of DDI with abiraterone. A medication review by a pharmacist is of crucial importance to prevent DDI with abiraterone.

A Model for Predicting the Interindividual Variability of Drug-Drug Interactions

Pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are frequently characterized and quantified by an AUC ratio (Rauc). The typical value of the AUC ratio in case of cytochrome-mediated interactions may be predicted by several approaches, based on in vitro or in vivo data. Prediction of the interindividual variability of Rauc would help to anticipate more completely the consequences of a drug-drug interaction. We propose and evaluate a simple approach for predicting the standard deviation (sd) of Ln(Rauc), a metric close to the interindividual coefficient of variation of Rauc. First, a model was derived to link sd(Ln Rauc) with the substrate fraction metabolized by each cytochrome and the potency of the interactors, in case of induction or inhibition. Second, the parameters involved in these equations were estimated by a Bayesian hierarchical model, using the data from 56 interaction studies retrieved from the literature. Third, the model was evaluated by several metrics based on the fold prediction error (PE) of sd(Ln Rauc). The median PE was 0.998 (the ideal value is 1) and the interquartile range was 0.96-1.03. The PE was in the acceptable interval (0.5 to 2) in 52 cases out of 56. Fourth, a surface plot of sd(Ln Rauc) as a function of the characteristics of the substrate and the interactor has been built. The minimal value of sd(Ln Rauc) was about 0.08 (obtained for Rauc = 1) while the maximal value, 0.7, was obtained for interactions involving highly metabolized substrates with strong interactors.

The Impact of the Hepatocyte-to-Plasma pH Gradient on the Prediction of Hepatic Clearance and Drug-Drug Interactions for CYP2D6 Substrates

The proton gradient from the intracellular space to plasma creates an unbound drug gradient for weak acids and bases that could modulate apparent drug clearance and drug-drug interactions. Cytochrome P450 intrinsic clearance and inhibitor potency are routinely determined in vitro at the plasma pH of 7.4 rather than the intrahepatocyte pH of 7.0. We determined the impact of pH on in vitro enzyme kinetic parameters and inhibition potency for substrates (bufuralol, dextromethorphan), reversible inhibitors (quinidine, amiodarone, desethylamiodarone, clozapine), and mechanism-based inhibitors (paroxetine, desethylamiodarone) of the major drug metabolizing-enzyme CYP2D6. The lower intracellular pH 7.0 compared with pH 7.4 resulted in a 60 and 50% decrease in intrinsic clearance for the substrates bufuralol and dextromethorphan, respectively. Reversible inhibition constants for three of the four inhibitors tested were unaffected by pH, whereas for the inhibitor quinidine, a 2-fold increase in the inhibition constant was observed at pH 7.0. For time-dependent inhibitors desethylamiodarone and paroxetine, changes in time-dependent inhibition parameters were different for each inhibitor. These results were incorporated into physiologically based pharmacokinetic models indicating that the changes in in vitro parameters determined at pH 7.0 offset the effect of increased unbound intracellular concentrations on apparent clearance and extent of drug-drug interactions. However, this offset between concentration and enzyme activity cannot be generalized for all substrates, inhibitors, and enzymes, as the effect of a lower pH in vitro varied significantly; therefore, it would be prudent to determine in vitro enzyme parameters at the hepatocyte-appropriate pH 7.0.

Abiraterone inhibits 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 metabolism by CYP3A4 in human liver and intestine in vitro

The chemopreventive and therapeutic effects of vitamin D3 are exerted through its dihydroxylated metabolite, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1α,25(OH)2D3]. Inactivation of 1α,25(OH)2D3 by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) may be an important determinant of its serum and tissue levels. Abiraterone, a steroidogenesis inhibitor used in late stage prostate cancer treatment, is a CYP17A1 inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential of abiraterone to block hepatic and intestinal inactivation of biologically active vitamin D3in vitro and to evaluate if abiraterone can alter CYP3A4 marker substrate activities. Biotransformation reactions were initiated with NADPH regenerating solutions following initial preincubation of pooled human hepatic or intestinal microsomal protein or human recombinant CYP3A4 supersomes with 1α,25(OH)2D3, midazolam or triazolam for 10min at 37°C. Formation of hydroxylated metabolites of 1α,25(OH)2D3, midazolam or triazolam was analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Co-incubation of 1α,25(OH)2D3 with abiraterone at varying concentrations (0.2-100μM) led to up to ∼85% inhibition of formation of hydroxylated metabolites of 1α,25(OH)2D3 thus preventing inactivation of active vitamin D3. The IC50 values for individual metabolites of 1α,25(OH)2D3 ranged from 0.4 to 2.2μM in human liver microsomes or human intestinal microsomes. The mechanism of CYP3A4-mediated inhibition of 1α,25(OH)2D3 by abiraterone was competitive (apparent Ki 2.8-4.3μM). Similar inhibitory effects were also observed upon inclusion of abiraterone into midazolam or triazolam hydroxylation assays. In summary, our results suggest that abiraterone inhibits the CYP3A4-mediated inactivation of active vitamin D3 in human liver and intestine, potentially providing additional anti-cancer benefits to prostate cancer patients. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled '16th Vitamin D Workshop'.

Abiraterone acetate: a review of its use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Abiraterone acetate (Zytiga(®)) is an orally administered, selective inhibitor of the 17α-hydroxylase and C17,20-lyase enzymatic activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 17. CYP17 is required for androgen biosynthesis, with androgen receptor signalling crucial in the progression from primary to metastatic prostate cancer. Abiraterone acetate is approved in the European Union and the US, in combination with prednisone or prednisolone, for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When administered in combination with prednisone in a placebo-controlled, multinational phase III study, abiraterone acetate significantly prolonged overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in men with metastatic CRPC who had previously received docetaxel. In men with metastatic CRPC who had not previously received chemotherapy participating in a placebo-controlled, multinational phase III study, there was a strong trend towards an overall survival benefit, a significant prolongation in rPFS and significant delays in clinical decline, the need for chemotherapy and the onset of pain observed. Given the nature of the therapy, the overall tolerability profile of abiraterone acetate, in combination with prednisone, was acceptable in men with metastatic CRPC. Abiraterone acetate is associated with hypokalaemia, hypertension, and fluid retention or oedema, secondary to its mechanism of action, and with cardiac adverse events and hepatotoxicity; however, in the phase III studies the incidences of the most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events of special interest were relatively low. Although the final overall survival data in men with metastatic CRPC who have not previously received chemotherapy are awaited, current evidence indicates that abiraterone acetate is a useful option for the treatment of metastatic CRPC.

Abiraterone in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen deprivation therapy remains the single most effective treatment for the initial therapy of advanced prostate cancer, but is uniformly marked by progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Residual tumor androgens and androgen axis activation are now recognized to play a prominent role in mediating CRPC progression. Despite suppression of circulating testosterone to castrate levels, castration does not eliminate androgens from the prostate tumor microenvironment and residual androgen levels are well within the range capable of activating the androgen receptor (AR) and AR-mediated gene expression. Accordingly, therapeutic strategies that more effectively target production of intratumoral androgens are necessary. The introduction of abiraterone, a potent suppressor of cytochrome P450 17 α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-mediated androgen production, has heralded a new era in the hormonal treatment of men with metastatic CRPC. Herein, the androgen and AR-mediated mechanisms that contribute to CRPC progression and establish cytochrome P450 17 α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase as a critical therapeutic target are briefly reviewed. The mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of abiraterone are reviewed and its recently described activity against AR and 3-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase is discussed. The Phase I and II data initially demonstrating the efficacy of abiraterone and Phase III data supporting its approval for patients with metastatic CRPC are reviewed. The safety and tolerability of abiraterone, including the incidence and management of side effects and potential drug interactions, are discussed. The current place of abiraterone in CRPC therapy is reviewed and early evidence regarding cross-resistance of abiraterone with taxane therapy, mechanisms of resistance to abiraterone, and observations of an abiraterone withdrawal response are presented. Future directions in the use of abiraterone, including optimal dosing strategies, the role of abiraterone in earlier disease settings, including castration sensitive, biochemically recurrent, or localized disease, and the rationale for combinatorial treatment strategies of abiraterone with enzalutamide and other targeted agents are also discussed.

Efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate in an elderly patient subgroup (aged 75 and older) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a disease that primarily affects older men. Abiraterone acetate (AA), a selective androgen biosynthesis inhibitor, in combination with low-dose prednisone (P) improved overall survival (OS) in a randomised trial in mCRPC progressing after docetaxel versus placebo (PL) plus P.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the efficacy and safety of AA plus P versus PL plus P in subgroups of elderly (aged ≥ 75 yr) (n=331) and younger patients (<75 yr) (n=863).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a post hoc analysis of a randomised double-blind PL-controlled study in mCRPC patients progressing after docetaxel chemotherapy.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomised 2:1 to AA (1000 mg) plus low-dose P (5mg twice daily) (n=797) or PL plus P (n=398).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Primary end point was OS. Secondary end points were time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (TTPP), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and PSA response rate. Treatment differences were compared using the stratified log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The key limitation was the post hoc analysis.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Elderly patients treated with AA plus P showed improved OS (HR: 0.64; 95% CI, 0.478-0.853; p=0.0022), TTPP (HR: 0.76; 95% CI, 0.503-1.155; p=0.1995), and rPFS (HR: 0.66; 95% CI, 0.506-0.859; p=0.0019), and higher PSA response rate with relative risk (HR: 4.15; 95% CI, 2.2-8.0]; p ≤ 0.0001) compared with patients treated with PL plus P. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 62% of elderly patients and in 60% of patients aged <75 yr treated with AA plus P. Incidences of hypertension and hypokalaemia, although increased in the AA plus P arm, were similar in both age subgroups and readily managed.

CONCLUSIONS

AA improves OS and is well tolerated in both elderly patients and younger patients with mCRPC following docetaxel, hence providing an important treatment option for elderly patients who may not tolerate alternative therapies with greater toxicity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT00638690.