Two multicenter Phase I randomized trials to compare the bioequivalence and safety of a generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection with Doxil® or Caelyx® in advanced ovarian cancer

A comprehensive review on doxorubicin: mechanisms, toxicity, clinical trials, combination therapies and nanoformulations in breast cancer

Doxorubicin is a key treatment for breast cancer, but its effectiveness often comes with significant side effects. Its actions include DNA intercalation, topoisomerase II inhibition, and reactive oxygen species generation, leading to DNA damage and cell death. However, it can also cause heart problems and low blood cell counts. Current trials aim to improve doxorubicin therapy by adjusting doses, using different administration methods, and combining it with targeted treatments or immunotherapy. Nanoformulations show promise in enhancing doxorubicin's effectiveness by improving drug delivery, reducing side effects, and overcoming drug resistance. This review summarizes recent progress and difficulties in using doxorubicin for breast cancer, highlighting its mechanisms, side effects, ongoing trials, and the potential impact of nanoformulations. Understanding these different aspects is crucial in optimizing doxorubicin's use and improving outcomes for breast cancer patients. This review examines the toxicity of doxorubicin, a drug used in breast cancer treatment, and discusses strategies to mitigate adverse effects, such as cardioprotective agents and liposomal formulations. It also discusses clinical trials evaluating doxorubicin-based regimens, the evolving landscape of combination therapies, and the potential of nanoformulations to optimize delivery and reduce systemic toxicity. The review also discusses the potential of liposomes, nanoparticles, and polymeric micelles to enhance drug accumulation within tumor tissues while sparing healthy organs.

Understanding the In Vitro-In Vivo Nexus: Advanced correlation models predict clinical performance of liposomal doxorubicin

In the century of precision medicine and predictive modeling, addressing quality-related issues in the medical supply chain is critical, with 62 % of the disruptions being attributable to quality challenges. This study centers on the development and safety of liposomal doxorubicin, where animal studies alone often do not adequately explain the complex interplay between critical quality attributes and in vivo performances. Anchored in our aim to elucidate this in vitro-in vivo nexus, we compared TLD-1, a novel liposomal doxorubicin delivery system, against the established formulations Doxil® and Lipodox®. Robust in vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) with excellent coefficients of determination (R2 > 0.98) were obtained in the presence of serum under dynamic high-shear conditions. They provided the foundation for an advanced characterization and benchmarking strategy. Despite the smaller vesicle size and reduced core crystallinity of TLD-1, its release behavior closely resembled that of Doxil®. Nevertheless, subtle differences between the dosage forms observed in the in vitro setting were reflected in the bioavailabilities observed in vivo. Data from a Phase-I clinical trial facilitated the development of patient-specific IVIVCs using the physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model, enabling a more accurate estimation of doxorubicin exposure. This advancement could impact clinical practice by allowing for more precise dose estimation and aiding in the assessment of the interchangeability of generic liposomal doxorubicin.

Research progress on the PEGylation of therapeutic proteins and peptides (TPPs)

With the rapid advancement of genetic and protein engineering, proteins and peptides have emerged as promising drug molecules for therapeutic applications. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in the field of chemical modification technology to address challenges associated with their clinical use, including rapid clearance from circulation, immunogenicity, physical and chemical instabilities (such as aggregation, adsorption, deamination, clipping, oxidation, etc.), and enzymatic degradation. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) modification offers an effective solution to these issues due to its favorable properties. This review presents recent progress in the development and application of PEGylated therapeutic proteins and peptides (TPPs). For this purpose, firstly, the physical and chemical properties as well as classification of PEG and its derivatives are described. Subsequently, a detailed summary is provided on the main sites of PEGylated TPPs and the factors that influence their PEGylation. Furthermore, notable instances of PEG-modified TPPs (including antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), interferon, asparaginase and antibodies) are highlighted. Finally, we propose the chemical modification of TPPs with PEG, followed by an analysis of the current development status and future prospects of PEGylated TPPs. This work provides a comprehensive literature review in this promising field while facilitating researchers in utilizing PEG polymers to modify TPPs for disease treatment.

A Design-Conversed Strategy Establishes the Performance Safe Space for Doxorubicin Nanosimilars

Nanomedicines exhibit multifaceted performances, yet their biopharmaceutics remain poorly understood and present several challenges in the translation from preclinical to clinical research. To address this issue and promote the production of high-quality nanomedicines, a systematic screening of the design space and in vivo performance is necessary. Establishing formulation performance specifications early on enables an informed selection of candidates and promotes the development of nanosimilars. The deconvolution of the pharmacokinetics enables the identification of key characteristics that influence their performances and disposition. Using an in vitro-in vivo rank-order relationship for doxorubicin nanoformulations, we defined in vitro release specifications for Doxil/Caelyx-like follow-on products. Additionally, our model predictions were used to establish the bioequivalence of Lipodox, a nanosimilar of Doxil/Caelyx. Furthermore, a virtual safe space was established, providing crucial insights into expected disposition kinetics and informing formulation development. By addressing bottlenecks in biopharmaceutics and formulation screening, our research advances the translation of nanomedicine from bench to bedside.

Research progress of nanomaterial drug delivery in tumor targeted therapy

Cancer is one of the most lethal diseases in human society, and its incidence is gradually increasing. However, the current tumor treatment often meets the problem of poor efficacy and big side effects. The unique physical and chemical properties of nanomaterials can target the delivery of drugs to tumors, which can improve the therapeutic effect while reducing the damage of drugs to normal cells. This makes nanomaterials become a hot topic in the field of biomedicine. This review summarizes the recent progress of nanomaterials in tumor targeted therapy.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer of ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal origin, referred to collectively as ovarian cancer, is the eighth most common cancer in women and is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) are less well and have a limited life expectancy, therefore maintaining quality of life with effective symptom control is an important aim of treatment. However, the unwanted effects of chemotherapy agents may be severe, and optimal treatment regimens are unclear. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), which contains a cytotoxic drug called doxorubicin hydrochloride, is one of several treatment modalities that may be considered for treatment of relapsed EOCs. This is an update of the original Cochrane Review which was published in Issue 7, 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PLD, with or without other anti-cancer drugs, in women with relapsed high grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (via Ovid) and Embase (via Ovid) from 1990 to January 2022. We also searched online registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated PLD in women diagnosed with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data to a pre-designed data collection form and assessed the risk of bias according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions guidelines. Where possible, we pooled collected data in meta-analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

This is an update of a previous review with 12 additional studies, so this updated review includes a total of 26 RCTs with 8277 participants that evaluated the effects of PLD alone or in combination with other drugs in recurrent EOC: seven in platinum-sensitive disease (2872 participants); 11 in platinum-resistant disease (3246 participants); and eight that recruited individuals regardless of platinum sensitivity status (2079 participants). The certainty of the evidence was assessed for the three most clinically relevant comparisons out of eight comparisons identified in the included RCTs. Recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC PLD with conventional chemotherapy agent compared to alternative combination chemotherapy likely results in little to no difference in overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83 to 1.04; 5 studies, 2006 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) but likely increases progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89; 5 studies, 2006 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The combination may slightly improve quality of life at three months post-randomisation, measured using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (mean difference 4.80, 95% CI 0.92 to 8.68; 1 study, 608 participants; low-certainty evidence), but this may not represent a clinically meaningful difference. PLD in combination with another chemotherapy agent compared to alternative combination chemotherapy likely results in little to no difference in the rate of overall severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3) (risk ratio (RR) 1.11, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.30; 2 studies, 834 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). PLD with chemotherapy likely increases anaemia (grade ≥ 3) (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85; 5 studies, 1961 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of PLD with conventional chemotherapy on hand-foot syndrome (HFS)(grade ≥ 3) (RR 4.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 16.01; 2 studies, 1028 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and neurological events (grade ≥ 3) (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.74; 4 studies, 1900 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Recurrent platinum-resistant EOC PLD alone compared to another conventional chemotherapy likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.19; 6 studies, 1995 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of PLD on PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.04; 4 studies, 1803 participants; very low-certainty evidence), overall severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3) (RR ranged from 0.61 to 0.97; 2 studies, 964 participants; very low-certainty evidence), anaemia (grade ≥ 3) (RR ranged from 0.19 to 0.82; 5 studies, 1968 participants; very low-certainty evidence), HFS (grade ≥ 3) (RR ranged from 15.19 to 109.15; 6 studies, 2184 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and the rate of neurological events (grade ≥ 3)(RR ranged from 0.08 to 3.09; 3 studies, 1222 participants; very low-certainty evidence). PLD with conventional chemotherapy compared to PLD alone likely results in little to no difference in OS (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.21; 1 study, 242 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and it may result in little to no difference in PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22; 2 studies, 353 participants; low-certainty evidence). The combination likely increases overall severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3) (RR 2.48, 95% CI 1.98 to 3.09; 1 study, 663 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and anaemia (grade ≥ 3) (RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.87; 2 studies, 785 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but likely results in a large reduction in HFS (grade ≥ 3) (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.40; 2 studies, 785 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). It may result in little to no difference in neurological events (grade ≥ 3) (RR 1.40, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.31; 1 study, 663 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In platinum-sensitive relapsed EOC, including PLD in a combination chemotherapy regimen probably makes little to no difference in OS compared to other combinations, but likely improves PFS. Choice of chemotherapy will therefore be guided by symptoms from previous chemotherapy and other patient considerations. Single-agent PLD remains a useful agent for platinum-resistant relapsed EOC and choice of agent at relapse will depend on patient factors, e.g. degree of bone marrow suppression or neurotoxicity from previous treatments. Adding another agent to PLD likely increases overall grade ≥ 3 adverse events with little to no improvement in survival outcomes. The limited evidence relating to PLD in combination with other agents in platinum-resistant relapsed EOC does not indicate a benefit, but there is some evidence of increased side effects.

Barrier permeation and improved nanomedicine delivery in tumor microenvironments

Nanomedicines can effectively penetrate tumor sites compared to traditionally used drugs. However, effective drugs that reach the interior of tumors remain limited. Based on studies of the complex tumor microenvironment, we summarized the barriers restricting tumor penetration of nanomedicines in this review. Penetration barriers are mainly caused by tumor blood vessels, stroma, and cell abnormalities. The repair of abnormal tumor blood vessels and tumor stroma and adjusting the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles are considered promising strategies to improve the tumor permeation of nanomedicines. The effects of nanoparticle properties, including size, shape, and surface charge, on tumor penetration were also reviewed. We expect to provide research ideas and a scientific basis for nanomedicines to increase intratumoral permeability and improve anti-tumor effects.

A multicenter randomized trials to compare the bioequivalence and safety of a generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection with Caelyx ® in advanced breast cancer

Purpose

To compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence (BE) and safety of a generic pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) formulation with the reference product Caelyx^®.

Methods

A multicenter, single-dose, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in patients with breast cancer. For each period, the patients were administered with the test or the reference PLD intravenously at a dose of 50 mg/m². C_max, AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ for free, and encapsulated doxorubicin (doxorubicin) and partial AUC (AUC_0-48h, AUC_48h-t) for encapsulated doxorubicin were evaluated in 17 blood samples taken predose, and increasing time intervals over the following 14 days in each period. A washout period of 28-35 days was observed before crossing over.

Results

48 patients were enrolled and randomised, of which 44 were included and analysed in bioequivalence set (BES). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of C_max, AUC_0-t and AUC_0-∞ for free doxorubicin and encapsulated doxorubicin all fall within the bioequivalent range of 80% to 125%. The 90% CIs of GMR of partial AUC (AUC_0-48h, AUC48_h-t) for encapsulated doxorubicin also fall within the bioequivalent range. 48 patients were all included in the safety set (SS). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to T and R was 95.8% (46/48) and 97.8% (45/46) respectively. The highest incidence of TEAEs was various laboratory abnormalities. 2 patients withdrew due to T-drug-related AEs. Only one patient experienced serious adverse events and no death occurred in this study. There were no significant differences between the safety profiles of the generic formulation and Caelyx^®.

Conclusions

Bioequivalence between the test and the reference products was established for free and encapsulated doxorubicin.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn, identifier [CTR20210375].

Bioequivalence of a hybrid pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride injection and Caelyx®: A single-dose, randomized, multicenter, open-label, two-period crossover study in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the bioequivalence of a hybrid pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) hydrochloride injection with reference product Caelyx®.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, balanced, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence, single-dose, crossover, bioequivalence study was conducted in female patients aged ≥18 years and ≤75 years with ovarian cancer, whose disease progressed or recurred after platinum-based chemotherapy, and who were scheduled to start PLD therapy. Patients were intravenously infused drugs over 1 h at 50 mg/m² dose two hours after breakfast on the first day of the chemotherapy cycle in period-I and crossed over to the other arm in period-II (day 29). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were performed using two separate, validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods for encapsulated and unencapsulated doxorubicin.

RESULTS

Both the test and reference formulations were well-tolerated and safe. The pharmacokinetic analysis for both encapsulated and unencapsulated doxorubicin was conducted in 50 patients and PK parameters were found to be comparable between test and reference products. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of hybrid PLD/Caelyx® were; maximum measured plasma concentration (C_max): 91.94-97.28%, area under the plasma concentration versus time from time 0 to t (AUC_0-t): 95.19-103.67%_, AUC from time 0 to ∞ (AUC_0-∞): 95.13-103.66% for encapsulated doxorubicin and for unencapsulated doxorubicin C_max: 92.08-116.46%_, AUC_0-t: 91.91-108.28%_, AUC_0-∞: 93.45-110.05%.

CONCLUSION

The PLD formulation was found to be bioequivalent to Caelyx®.

Beyond Formulation: Contributions of Nanotechnology for Translation of Anticancer Natural Products into New Drugs

Nature is the largest pharmacy in the world. Doxorubicin (DOX) and paclitaxel (PTX) are two examples of natural-product-derived drugs employed as first-line treatment of various cancer types due to their broad mechanisms of action. These drugs are marketed as conventional and nanotechnology-based formulations, which is quite curious since the research and development (R&D) course of nanoformulations are even more expensive and prone to failure than the conventional ones. Nonetheless, nanosystems are cost-effective and represent both novel and safer dosage forms with fewer side effects due to modification of pharmacokinetic properties and tissue targeting. In addition, nanotechnology-based drugs can contribute to dose modulation, reversion of multidrug resistance, and protection from degradation and early clearance; can influence the mechanism of action; and can enable drug administration by alternative routes and co-encapsulation of multiple active agents for combined chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss the contribution of nanotechnology as an enabling technology taking the clinical use of DOX and PTX as examples. We also present other nanoformulations approved for clinical practice containing different anticancer natural-product-derived drugs.

Effect of Paclitaxel Combined with Doxorubicin Hydrochloride Liposome Injection in the Treatment of Osteosarcoma and MRI Changes before and after Treatment

Objective

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of paclitaxel combined with doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome injection (DHLI) in the treatment of osteosarcoma and the MRI changes before and after treatment.

Methods

A total of 108 osteosarcoma patients treated in our hospital (January 2020–April 2022) were selected to carry out a single-center retrospective study. Among them, 54 patients receiving the combination chemotherapy (MDT) with high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and ADM were selected as the control group (COG), while 54 patients receiving MDT with high-dose methotrexate, ifosfamide, cisplatin, paclitaxel, and DHLI were chosen as the study group (STG). The COG and STG had the same dose intensity and chemotherapy cycles, and clinical and MRI evaluations were performed after treatment.

Results

The evaluation of postoperative clinical efficacy showed that the disease control rate (DCR) of the STG was markedly higher than that of the COG (P < 0.05). The incidence of cardiac toxicity was remarkably lower in the STG than that in the COG (P < 0.05), with no between-group differences in the incidence of fever, abnormal liver function, myelosuppression, stomatitis, and alopecia (P > 0.05). Obvious differences were found in the semiquantitative parameters of MRI in the STG before and after chemotherapy (P < 0.05) and were also found in the SI_max, TTP, SEE, PPE, WOR, and R values in the COG before and after chemotherapy (P < 0.05). After chemotherapy, statistical differences were observed in the semiquantitative parameters of MRI between the two groups, with lower parameters such as Slope, SI_max, SEE, and R values and higher parameters such as TTP, PPE, and WOR values in the STG than those in the COG (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Paclitaxel combined with DHLI has definite efficacy in osteosarcoma chemotherapy, which is conducive to narrowing the lesion, controlling the disease, and reducing the occurrence of cardiac-related risk events. In addition, the semiquantitative parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) have a high predictive value for the efficacy of chemotherapy, which can reflect the degree of tumor necrosis and contribute to a timely and objective assessment of the efficacy of osteosarcoma chemotherapy.

Stability characterization for pharmaceutical liposome product development with focus on regulatory considerations: An update

Liposomes have several advantages, such as the ability to be employed as a carrier/vehicle for a variety of drug molecules and at the same time they are safe and biodegradable. In the recent times, compared to other delivery systems, liposomes have been one of the most well-established and commercializing drug products of new drug delivery methods for majority of therapeutic applications. On the other hand, it has several limitations, particularly in terms of stability, which impedes product development and performance. In this review, we reviewed all the potential instabilities (physical, chemical, and biological) that a formulation development scientist confronts throughout the development of liposomal formulations as along with the ways to overcome these challenges. We have also discussed the effect of microbiological contamination on liposomal formulations with a focus on the use of sterilization methods used to improve the stability. Finally, we have reviewed quality control techniques and regulatory considerations recommended by the agencies (USFDA and MHLW) for liposome drug product development.

Biopredictive tools for the development of injectable drug products

INTRODUCTION

Biopredictive release tests are commonly used in the evaluation of oral medicines. They support decision-making in formulation development and allow predictions of the expected in-vivo performances. So far, there is limited experience in the application of these methodologies to injectable drug products.

AREAS COVERED

Parenteral drug products cover a variety of dosage forms and administration sites including subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous injections. In this area, developing biopredictive and biorelevant methodologies often confronts us with unique challenges and knowledge gaps. Here, we provide a formulation-centric approach and explain the key considerations and workflow when designing biopredictive assays. Also, we outline the key role of computational methods in achieving clinical relevance and put all considerations into context using liposomal nanomedicines as an example.

EXPERT OPINION

Biopredictive tools are the need of the hour to exploit the tremendous opportunities of injectable drug products. A growing number of biopharmaceuticals such as peptides, proteins, and nucleic acids require different strategies and a better understanding of the influences on drug absorption. Here, our design strategy must maintain the balance of robustness and complexity required for effective formulation development.

Nanomedicine Ex Machina: Between Model-Informed Development and Artificial Intelligence

Today, a growing number of computational aids and simulations are shaping model-informed drug development. Artificial intelligence, a family of self-learning algorithms, is only the latest emerging trend applied by academic researchers and the pharmaceutical industry. Nanomedicine successfully conquered several niche markets and offers a wide variety of innovative drug delivery strategies. Still, only a small number of patients benefit from these advanced treatments, and the number of data sources is very limited. As a consequence, “big data” approaches are not always feasible and smart combinations of human and artificial intelligence define the research landscape. These methodologies will potentially transform the future of nanomedicine and define new challenges and limitations of machine learning in their development. In our review, we present an overview of modeling and artificial intelligence applications in the development and manufacture of nanomedicines. Also, we elucidate the role of each method as a facilitator of breakthroughs and highlight important limitations.

Nanomedicine at the crossroads - A quick guide for IVIVC

For many years, nanomedicine is pushing the boundaries of drug delivery. When applying these novel therapeutics, safety considerations are not only a key concern when entering clinical trials but also an important decision point in product development. Standing at the crossroads, nanomedicine may be able to escape the niche markets and achieve wider acceptance by the pharmaceutical industry. While there is a new generation of drug delivery systems, the extracellular vesicles, standing on the starting line, unresolved issues and new challenges emerge from their translation from bench to bedside. Some key features of injectable nanomedicines contribute to the predictability of the pharmacological and toxicological effects. So far, only a few of the physicochemical attributes of nanomedicines can be justified by a direct mathematical relationship between the in vitro and the in vivo responses. To further develop extracellular vesicles as drug carriers, we have to learn from more than 40 years of clinical experience in liposomal delivery and pass on this knowledge to the next generation. Our quick guide discusses relationships between physicochemical characteristics and the in vivo response, commonly referred to as in vitro-in vivo correlation. Further, we highlight the key role of computational methods, lay open current knowledge gaps, and question the established design strategies. Has the recent progress improved the predictability of targeted delivery or do we need another change in perspective?

Injectable drug delivery systems of doxorubicin revisited: In vitro-in vivo relationships using human clinical data

A growing number of nanomedicines entered the clinical trials and improved our understanding of the in vivo responses expected in humans. The in vitro drug release represents an important critical quality attribute involved in pharmacokinetics. Establishing in vitro-in vivo relationships for nanomedicines requires a careful analysis of the clinical data with respect to the unique differences between drugs and nanomedicines. Also, the biorelevant assay must reflect the release mechanism of the carrier. Four drug delivery systems of doxorubicin were evaluated for their in vitro release behavior under biorelevant conditions using the dispersion releaser. The pharmacokinetics observed during the first-in-men clinical trials were analyzed using a custom-made physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model. The drug product Lipodox® and the clinical candidate NanoCore-7.4 were evaluated to validate the model. Afterward, the in vivo performances of the preclinical candidates NanoCore-6.4 and doxorubicin-loaded nano-cellular vesicle technology systems (an extracellular vesicle preparation) were predicted. In vitro and in vivo release were in good correlation as indicated by the coefficients of determination of 0.98648 (NanoCore-7.4) and 0.94107 (Lipodox®). The predictions required an estimation of the carrier half-life in blood circulation leading to considerable uncertainty. Still, the simulations narrow down the possible scenarios in the clinical evaluation of nanomedicines and provide a valuable addition to animal studies.

DPPG2-based thermosensitive liposomes as drug delivery system for effective muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatment in vivo

PURPOSE

Recommended treatments for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) come with considerable morbidity. Hyperthermia (HT) triggered drug release from phosphatidylglycerol-based thermosensitive liposomes (DPPG₂-TSL) might prevent surgical bladder removal and toxicity from systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of DPPG₂-TSL with HT in a syngeneic orthotopic rat urothelial carcinoma model.

METHODS

A total of 191 female Fischer F344 rats were used. Bladder tumors were initiated by inoculation of AY-27 cells and tumor-bearing rats were selected with cystoscopy and semi-randomized over treatment groups. On days 5 and 8, animals were treated with DOX in different treatment modalities: intravenous (iv) DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with HT, iv free DOX without HT, intravesical DOX without HT, intravesical DOX with HT or no treatment (control group), respectively. Animals were euthanized on day 14 and complete tumor response was assessed by histopathological evaluation.

RESULTS

Iv DPPG₂-TSL-DOX + HT resulted in a favorable rate of animals with complete tumor response (70%), compared to iv free DOX (18%, p = .02), no treatment (0%, p = .001), and intravesical DOX with (43%, p = .35) or without HT (50%, p = .41). All rats receiving intravesical DOX with HT and 24% of rats treated with DPPG₂-TSL-DOX containing the same DOX dose with HT had to be euthanized before day 14 because of substantial bodyweight loss, which was associated with dilated ureters urine retention in a few rats.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with DPPG₂-TSL-DOX combined with intravesical HT outperformed systemic and intravesical DOX in vivo. There might be a role for DPPG_2-TSL encapsulating chemotherapeutics in the treatment of MIBC in the future.

The pharmacokinetics of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin are not significantly affected by sex in rats or humans, but may be affected by immune dysfunction

PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx®, Doxil®) has been suggested to show significant sex-based differences in plasma clearance, as well as high inter-individual variability that may be driven by monocyte counts in cancer patients. This study aimed to establish if these differences are similarly observed in rats, which exhibit similar liposome clearance mechanisms to humans, and to use this model to identify sources of inter-individual and sex-based pharmacokinetic variability. The plasma and lymphatic pharmacokinetics of PLD were evaluated in male and female rats by quantifying doxorubicin as well as the ³H-labelled liposome. In general, the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and the ³H-liposome did not differ significantly between male and female rats when corrected for body surface area. Female rats did, however, show significantly higher doxorubicin concentrations in lymph compared to male rats. With the exception of serum testosterone concentrations in males, none of the physiological parameters evaluated correlated with plasma clearance. Further, reanalysis of published human data that formerly reported sex-differences in PLD plasma clearance similarly revealed no significant differences in PLD plasma clearance between males and females with solid tumours, but increased plasma clearance in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma (generally HIV+/immunocompromised). These data suggest that with the exception of lymphatic exposure, there are unlikely to be significant sex effects in the pharmacokinetics of liposomes, but immune function may contribute to inter individual variability.

Liposomal paclitaxel induces apoptosis, cell death, inhibition of migration capacity and antitumoral activity in ovarian cancer

The main goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the paclitaxel (PTX) drug formulated with a liposomal nanosystem (L-PTX) in a peritoneal carcinomatosis derived from ovarian cancer. In vitro cell viability studies with the human ovarian cancer line A2780 showed a 50% decrease in the inhibitory concentration for L-PTX compared to free PTX. A2780 cells treated with the L-PTX formulation demonstrated a reduced capacity to form colonies in comparison to those treated with PTX. Cell death following L-PTX administration hinted at apoptosis, with most cells undergoing initial apoptosis. A2780 cells exhibited an inhibitory migration profile when analyzed by Wound Healing and real-time cell analysis (xCELLigence) methods after L-PTX administration. This inhibition was related to decreased expression of the zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) and transforming growth factor 2 (TGF-β2) genes. In vivoL-PTX administration strongly inhibited tumor cell proliferation in ovarian peritoneal carcinomatosis derived from ovarian cancer, indicating higher antitumor activity than PTX. L-PTX formulation did not show toxicity in the mice model. This study demonstrated that liposomal paclitaxel formulations are less toxic to normal tissues than free paclitaxel and are more effective in inhibiting tumor cell proliferation/migration and inducing ZEB1/TGF-β2 gene expression.

In vitro to Clinical Translation of Combinatorial Effects of Doxorubicin and Abemaciclib in Rb-Positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Systems-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling Approach

Background

Doxorubicin (DOX) and its pegylated liposomal formulation (L_DOX) are the standard of care for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, resistance to DOX often occurs, motivating the search for alternative treatment approaches. The retinoblastoma protein (Rb) is a potential pharmacological target for TNBC treatment since its expression has been associated with resistance to DOX-based therapy.

Methods

DOX (0.01–20 μM) combination with abemaciclib (ABE, 1–6 μM) was evaluated over 72 hours on Rb-positive (MDA-MB-231) and Rb-negative (MDA-MB-468) TNBC cells. Combination indices (CI) for DOX+ABE were calculated using Compusyn software. The TNBC cell viability time-course and fold-change from the control of phosphorylated-Rb (pRb) protein expression were measured with CCK8-kit and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A cell-based pharmacodynamic (PD) model was developed, where pRb protein dynamics drove cell viability response. Clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) models for DOX, L_DOX, and ABE were developed using data extracted from the literature. After scaling cancer cell growth to clinical TNBC tumor growth, the time-to-tumor progression (TTP) was predicted for human dosing regimens of DOX, ABE, and DOX+ABE.

Results

DOX and ABE combinations were synergistic (CI<1) in MDA-MB-231 and antagonistic (CI>1) in MDA-MB-468. The maximum inhibitory effects (Imax) for both drugs were set to one. The drug concentrations producing 50% of Imax for DOX and ABE were 0.565 and 2.31 μM (MDA-MB-231) and 0.121 and 1.61 μM (MDA-MB-468). The first-orders rate constants of abemaciclib absorption (k_a) and doxorubicin release from L_DOX (k_Rel) were estimated at 0.31 and 0.013 h⁻¹. Their linear clearances were 21.7 (ABE) and 32.1 L/h (DOX). The estimated TTP for intravenous DOX (75 mg/m2 every 21 days), intravenous L_DOX (50 mg/m² every 28 days), and oral ABE (200 mg twice a day) were 125, 31.2, and 8.6 days shorter than drug-free control. The TTP for DOX+ABE and L_DOX+ABE were 312 days and 47.5 days shorter than control, both larger than single-agent DOX, suggesting improved activity with the DOX+ABE combination.

Conclusion

The developed translational systems-based PK/PD model provides an in vitro-to-clinic modeling platform for DOX+ABE in TNBC. Although model-based simulations suggest improved outcomes with combination over monotherapy, tumor relapse was not prevented with the combination. Hence, DOX+ABE may not be an effective treatment combination for TNBC.

DPPG2-Based Thermosensitive Liposomes with Encapsulated Doxorubicin Combined with Hyperthermia Lead to Higher Doxorubicin Concentrations in the Bladder Compared to Conventional Application in Pigs: A Rationale for the Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

Purpose

Current treatment options for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) are associated with substantial morbidity. Local release of doxorubicin (DOX) from phosphatidyldiglycerol-based thermosensitive liposomes (DPPG₂-TSL-DOX) potentiated by hyperthermia (HT) in the bladder wall may result in bladder sparing without toxicity of systemic chemotherapy. We investigated whether this approach, compared to conventional DOX application, increases DOX concentrations in the bladder wall while limiting DOX in essential organs.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-one pigs were anaesthetized, and a urinary catheter equipped with a radiofrequency-emitting antenna for HT (60 minutes) was placed. Experimental groups consisted of iv low or full dose (20 or 60 mg/m²) DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with/without HT, iv low dose (20 mg/m²) free DOX with HT, and full dose (50 mg/50 mL) intravesical DOX with/without HT. After the procedure, animals were immediately sacrificed. HPLC was used to measure DOX levels in the bladder, essential organs and serum, and fluorescence microscopy to evaluate DOX distribution in the bladder wall.

Results

Iv DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with HT resulted in a significantly higher bladder wall DOX concentration which was more homogeneous distributed, than iv and intravesical free DOX administration with HT. Specifically in the detrusor, DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with HT led to a >7- and 44-fold higher DOX concentration, compared to iv free DOX with HT and intravesical DOX, respectively. Organ DOX concentrations were significantly lower in heart and kidneys, and similar in liver, spleen and lungs, following iv DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with HT, compared to iv free DOX. Intravesical DOX led to the lowest organ DOX concentrations.

Conclusion

Iv DPPG₂-TSL-DOX combined with HT achieved higher DOX concentrations in the bladder wall including the detrusor, compared to conventional iv and intravesical DOX application. In combination with lower DOX accumulation in heart and kidneys, compared to iv free chemotherapy, DPPG₂-TSL-DOX with HT has great potential to attain a role as a bladder-sparing treatment for MIBC.

Recent Advancements in Liposome-Targeting Strategies for the Treatment of Gliomas: A Systematic Review

Malignant tumors represent some of the most intractable diseases that endanger human health. A glioma is a tumor of the central nervous system that is characterized by severe invasiveness, blurred boundaries between the tumor and surrounding normal tissue, difficult surgical removal, and high recurrence. Moreover, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and multidrug resistance (MDR) are important factors that contribute to the lack of efficacy of chemotherapy in treating gliomas. A liposome is a biofilm-like drug delivery system with a unique phospholipid bilayer that exhibits high affinities with human tissues/organs (e.g., BBB). After more than five decades of development, classical and engineered liposomes consist of four distinct generations, each with different characteristics: (i) traditional liposomes, (ii) stealth liposomes, (iii) targeting liposomes, and (iv) biomimetic liposomes, which offer a promising approach to promote drugs across the BBB and to reverse MDR. Here, we review the history, preparatory methods, and physicochemical properties of liposomes. Furthermore, we discuss the mechanisms by which liposomes have assisted in the diagnosis and treatment of gliomas, including drug transport across the BBB, inhibition of efflux transporters, reversal of MDR, and induction of immune responses. Finally, we highlight ongoing and future clinical trials and applications toward further developing and testing the efficacies of liposomes in treating gliomas.

Synthetic dimeric-drug phospholipid: a versatile liposomal platform for cancer therapy

An amphiphilic dimeric-podophyllotoxin (PODO) phospholipid was synthesized to assemble into liposomes as a combination of prodrug and nanocarrier. The results have demonstrated that the cell membrane-like delivery system possessed an improved cellular uptake and favorable antitumor efficacy with reduced side-effects. This strategy provides a new effective platform in drug delivery for cancer chemotherapy.

A physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model to reverse-engineer the in vivo drug release

Over the years, a wide variety of nanomedicines has entered global markets, providing a blueprint for the emerging generics industry. They are characterized by a unique pharmacokinetic behavior difficult to explain with conventional methods. In the present approach a physiologically-based nanocarrier biopharmaceutics model has been developed. Providing a compartmental framework of the distribution and elimination of nanocarrier delivery systems, this model was applied to human clinical data of the drug products Doxil®, Myocet®, and AmBisome® as well as to the formulation prototypes Foslip® and NanoBB-1-Dox. A parameter optimization by differential evolution led to an accurate representation of the human data (AAFE < 2). For each formulation, separate half-lives for the carrier and the free drug as well as the drug release were calculated from the total drug concentration-time profile. In this context, a static in vitro set-up and the dynamic in vivo situation with a continuous infusion and accumulation of the carrier were simulated. For Doxil®, a total drug release ranging from 0.01 to 22.1% was determined. With the time of release exceeding the elimination time of the carrier, the major fraction was available for drug targeting. NanoBB-1-Dox released 76.2-77.8% of the drug into the plasma, leading to an accumulated fraction of approximately 20%. The mean residence time of encapsulated doxorubicin was 128 h for Doxil® and 0.784 h for NanoBB-1-Dox, giving the stealth liposomes more time to accumulate at the intended target site. For all other formulations, Myocet®, AmBisome®, and Foslip®, the major fraction of the dose was released into the blood plasma without being available for targeted delivery.

Recalcitrant Issues and New Frontiers in Nano-Pharmacology

Packaging of old pharma drugs into new packaging "nanoparticles" is called nano-pharmacology and the products are called nano-based drugs. The inception of nano-pharmacology research and development (R&D) is marked by the approval of the first nano-based drug Doxil® in 1995 by the Food and Drug Administration. However, even after more than two decades, today, there are only ∼20 nano-based drugs in the market to treat cancers and brain diseases. In this article we share the perspectives of nanotechnology scientists, engineers, and clinicians on the roadblocks in nano-pharmacology R&D. Also, we share our opinion on new frontiers in the field of nano-pharmacology R&D that may allow rapid and efficient transfer of nano-pharma technologies from R&D to market.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Modeling and Simulation Systems to Support the Development and Regulation of Liposomal Drugs

Liposomal formulations have been developed to improve the therapeutic index of encapsulated drugs by altering the balance of on- and off-targeted distribution. The improved therapeutic efficacy of liposomal drugs is primarily attributed to enhanced distribution at the sites of action. The targeted distribution of liposomal drugs depends not only on the physicochemical properties of the liposomes, but also on multiple components of the biological system. Pharmacokinetic⁻pharmacodynamic (PK⁻PD) modeling has recently emerged as a useful tool with which to assess the impact of formulation- and system-specific factors on the targeted disposition and therapeutic efficacy of liposomal drugs. The use of PK⁻PD modeling to facilitate the development and regulatory reviews of generic versions of liposomal drugs recently drew the attention of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The present review summarizes the physiological factors that affect the targeted delivery of liposomal drugs, challenges that influence the development and regulation of liposomal drugs, and the application of PK⁻PD modeling and simulation systems to address these challenges.

Employment of enhanced permeability and retention effect (EPR): Nanoparticle-based precision tools for targeting of therapeutic and diagnostic agent in cancer

In tumorous tissues, the absence of vasculature supportive tissues intimates the formation of leaky vessels and pores (100 nm to 2 μm in diameter) and the poor lymphatic system offers great opportunity to treat cancer and the phenomenon is known as Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. The trends in treating cancer by making use of EPR effect is increasing day by day and generate multitudes of possibility to design novel anticancer therapeutics. This review aimed to present various factors affecting the EPR effect along with important things to know about EPR effect such as tumor perfusion, lymphatic function, interstitial penetration, vascular permeability, nanoparticle retention etc. This manuscript expounds the current advances and cross-talks the developments made in the of EPR effect-based therapeutics in cancer therapy along with a transactional view of its current clinical and industrial aspects.