Trilaciclib dose selection: an integrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of preclinical data and Phase Ib/IIa studies in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Trilaciclib dosage in Chinese patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a pooled pharmacometrics analysis

This study aimed to analyze potential ethnic disparities in the dose-exposure-response relationships of trilaciclib, a first-in-class intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for treating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This investigation focused on characterizing these relationships in both Chinese and non-Chinese patients to further refine the dosing regimen for trilaciclib in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. Population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) and exposure-response (E-R) analyses were conducted using pooled data from four randomized phase 2/3 trials involving Chinese and non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. PopPK analysis revealed that trilaciclib clearance in Chinese patients was approximately 17% higher than that in non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. Sex and body surface area influenced trilaciclib pharmacokinetics in both populations but did not exert a significant clinical impact. E-R analysis demonstrated that trilaciclib exposure increased with a dosage escalation from 200 to 280 mg/m2, without notable changes in myeloprotective or antitumor efficacy. However, the incidence of infusion site reactions, headaches, and phlebitis/thrombophlebitis rose with increasing trilaciclib exposure in both Chinese and non-Chinese patients with ES-SCLC. These findings suggest no substantial ethnic disparities in the dose-exposure-response relationship between Chinese and non-Chinese patients. They support the adoption of a 240-mg/m2 intravenous 3-day or 5-day dosing regimen for trilaciclib in Chinese patients with ES-SCLC.

Translational Pharmacokinetic-Toxicodynamic Model of Myelosuppression for Dose Optimization in Combination Chemotherapy of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin from Rats to Humans

XELOX therapy, which comprises capecitabine and oxaliplatin, is the standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen for colorectal cancer. However, its myelosuppressive effects pose challenges for its clinical management. Mathematical modeling combining pharmacokinetics (PK) and toxicodynamics (TD) is a promising approach for optimizing dosing strategies and reducing toxicity. This study aimed to develop a translational PK-TD model using rat data to inform dosing strategies and TD implications in humans. The rats were administered capecitabine, oxaliplatin, or XELOX combination regimen, and PK and TD data were collected. PK parameters were analyzed using sequential compartment analysis, whereas TD responses were assessed using Friberg's semiphysiological model. A toxicity intensity-based nomogram recommends optimal dosing strategies. Translational modeling techniques using the hybrid PK-TD model were employed to predict clinical responses. The PK-TD model successfully predicted the time-course profiles of hematological responses in rats following monotherapy and XELOX combination treatment. Interactive effects on lymphocytopenia were identified with the coadministration of capecitabine and oxaliplatin. A model-based recommended combination of the dose reduction rate for escaping severe lymphocytopenia was proposed as 40% and 60% doses of capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. The current translational model techniques successfully simulated the time-course profiles of blood cell counts with confidence intervals in patients using rat data. Our study provides valuable insights into dose optimization strategies for each individual drug within the XELOX regimen and underscores the potential of translational modeling to improve patient outcomes. In addition to dose determination, these data will lay the groundwork for advancing drug development processes in oncology. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study introduced a novel translational modeling approach rooted in a rat PK-TD model to optimize dosing strategies for the XELOX regimen for colorectal cancer treatment. Our findings highlight the interactive effects on lymphocytopenia and suggest a toxicity intensity-based nomogram for dose reduction, thus advancing precision medicine. This translational modeling paradigm enhances our understanding of drug interactions, offering a tool to tailor dosing, minimize hematological toxicity, and improve therapeutic outcomes in patients undergoing XELOX therapy.

Synthetic Approaches and Clinical Application of Representative Small-Molecule Inhibitors of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase for Cancer Therapy

The regulation of the cancer cell cycle heavily relies on cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Targeting CDKs has been identified as a promising approach for effective cancer therapy. In recent years, there has been significant attention paid towards developing small-molecule CDK inhibitors in the field of drug discovery. Notably, five such inhibitors have already received regulatory approval for the treatment of different cancers, including breast tumors, lung malignancies, and hematological malignancies. This review provides an overview of the synthetic routes used to produce 17 representative small-molecule CDK inhibitors that have obtained regulatory approval or are currently being evaluated through clinical trials. It also discusses their clinical applications for treating CDK-related diseases and explores the challenges and limitations associated with their use in a clinical setting, which will stimulate the further development of novel CDK inhibitors. By integrating therapeutic applications, synthetic methodologies, and mechanisms of action observed in various clinical trials involving these CDK inhibitors, this review facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the versatile roles and therapeutic potential offered by interventions targeting CDKs.

CDK4/6 inhibitors in lung cancer: current practice and future directions

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and ∼85% of lung cancers are classified as nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These malignancies can proliferate indefinitely, in part due to dysregulation of the cell cycle and the resulting abnormal cell growth. The specific activation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) is closely linked to tumour proliferation. Approximately 80% of human tumours exhibit abnormalities in the cyclin D-CDK4/6-INK4-RB pathway. Specifically, CDK4/6 inhibitors either as monotherapy or combination therapy have been investigated in pre-clinical and clinical studies for the treatment of NSCLC, and promising results have been achieved. This review article focuses on research regarding the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in NSCLC, including the characteristics and mechanisms of action of approved drugs and progress of pre-clinical and clinical research.

Investigating potential immune mechanisms of trilaciclib administered prior to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

PURPOSE

In a phase II trial in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC; NCT02978716), administering trilaciclib prior to gemcitabine plus carboplatin (GCb) enhanced T-cell activation and improved overall survival versus GCb alone. The survival benefit was more pronounced in patients with higher immune-related gene expression. We assessed immune cell subsets and used molecular profiling to further elucidate effects on antitumor immunity.

METHODS

Patients with mTNBC and ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy regimens for locally recurrent TNBC or mTNBC were randomized 1:1:1 to GCb on days 1 and 8, trilaciclib prior to GCb on days 1 and 8, or trilaciclib alone on days 1 and 8, and prior to GCb on days 2 and 9. Gene expression, immune cell populations, and Tumor Inflammation Signature (TIS) scores were assessed in baseline tumor samples, with flow cytometric analysis and intracellular and surface cytokine staining used to assess immune cell populations and function.

RESULTS

After two cycles, the trilaciclib plus GCb group (n = 68) had fewer total T cells and significantly fewer CD8+ T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells compared with baseline, with enhanced T-cell effector function versus GCb alone. No significant differences were observed in patients who received GCb alone (n = 34). Of 58 patients in the trilaciclib plus GCb group with antitumor response data, 27 had an objective response. RNA sequencing revealed a trend toward higher baseline TIS scores among responders versus non‑responders.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that administering trilaciclib prior to GCb may modulate the composition and response of immune cell subsets to TNBC.

CDK inhibitors from past to present: A new wave of cancer therapy

Deregulation of the cell cycle machinery, which has been linked to dysregulation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), is a defining characteristic of cancer, eventually promoting abnormal proliferation that feeds tumorigenesis and disease development. In this regard, several CDK inhibitors (CDKIs) have been developed during the last few decades (1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation CDKIs) to inhibit cancer cell proliferation. 1st and 2nd generation CDKIs have not received much clinical attention for the treatment of cancer patients because of their limited specificity and high toxicity. However, the recent development of combination strategies allowed us to reduce the toxicity and side effects of these CDKIs, paving the way for their potential application in clinical settings. The 3rd generation CDKIs have yielded the most promising results at the preclinical and clinical levels, propelling them into the advanced stages of clinical trials against multiple malignancies, especially breast cancer, and revolutionizing traditional treatment strategies. In this review, we discuss the most-investigated candidates from the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generations of CDKIs, their basic mechanisms of action, the reasons for their failure in the past, and their current clinical development for the treatment of different malignancies. Additionally, we briefly highlighted the most recent clinical trial results and advances in the development of 3rd generation FDA-approved selective CDK4/6 inhibitors that combat the most prevalent cancer. Overall, this review will provide a thorough knowledge of CDKIs from the past to the present, allowing researchers to rethink and develop innovative cancer therapeutic regimens.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Studies Between Trilaciclib and Midazolam, Metformin, Rifampin, Itraconazole, and Topotecan in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background and Objective

Trilaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Trilaciclib is a substrate and time-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and an inhibitor of multidrug and toxin extrusion 1, multidrug and toxin extrusion 2-K, organic cation transporter 1, and organic cation transporter 2. Here, we investigate the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction potential of trilaciclib.

Methods

Two phase I studies were conducted as prospective, open-label, fixed-sequence drug–drug interaction studies in healthy subjects (n = 57, n = 20) to investigate potential interactions between intravenously administered trilaciclib (200 or 240 mg/m²) and orally administered midazolam (5 mg), metformin (1000 mg), itraconazole (200 mg), and rifampin (600 mg). A population pharmacokinetic model was fit to phase Ib/IIa data in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (n = 114) to assess the impact of trilaciclib dose and exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve) on topotecan clearance.

Results

Coadministration with trilaciclib had minimal effects on the exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity) of midazolam (geometric least-square mean ratio [GMR] vs midazolam alone 1.065; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.984–1.154) but statistically significantly increased plasma exposure (GMR 1.654; 90% CI 1.472–1.858) and decreased renal clearance (GMR 0.633; 90% CI 0.572–0.701) of metformin. Coadministration of trilaciclib with rifampin or itraconazole decreased trilaciclib area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity by 17.3% (GMR 0.827; 90% CI 0.785–0.871) and 14.0% (GMR 0.860; 0.820–0.902), respectively, vs trilaciclib alone. Population pharmacokinetic modeling showed no significant effect of trilaciclib on topotecan clearance.

Conclusions

Overall, the drug–drug interaction and safety profiles of trilaciclib in these studies support its continued use in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical Trial Registration

Study 106: EudraCT number: 2019-002303-18; Study 114: not applicable; Study 03: Clinicaltrials.org: NCT02514447; August 2015.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01179-x.

Exploratory composite endpoint demonstrates benefit of trilaciclib across multiple clinically meaningful components of myeloprotection in patients with small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression is an acute, dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Trilaciclib protects haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from chemotherapy-induced damage (myeloprotection). To assess the totality of the myeloprotective benefits of trilaciclib, including analysis of several clinically relevant but low-frequency events, an exploratory composite endpoint comprising five major adverse haematological events (MAHE) was prospectively defined: all-cause hospitalisations, all-cause chemotherapy dose reductions, febrile neutropenia (FN), prolonged severe neutropenia (SN) and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions on/after Week 5. MAHE and its individual components were assessed in three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trials in patients receiving a platinum/etoposide or topotecan-containing chemotherapy regimen for ES-SCLC and in data pooled from the three trials. A total of 242 patients were randomised across the three trials (trilaciclib, n = 123; placebo, n = 119). In the individual trials and the pooled analysis, administering trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the cumulative incidence of MAHE compared to placebo. In the pooled analysis, the cumulative incidences of all-cause chemotherapy dose reductions, FN, prolonged SN and RBC transfusions on/after Week 5 were significantly reduced with trilaciclib vs placebo; however, no significant difference was observed in rates of all-cause hospitalisations. Additionally, compared to placebo, trilaciclib significantly extended the amount of time patients remained free of MAHE. These data support the myeloprotective benefits of trilaciclib and its ability to improve the overall safety profile of myelosuppressive chemotherapy regimens used to treat patients with ES-SCLC.

Improving Outcomes of Chemotherapy: Established and Novel Options for Myeloprotection in the COVID-19 Era

Chemotherapy-induced damage of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HPSCs) often results in myelosuppression that adversely affects patient health and quality of life. Currently, chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression is managed with chemotherapy dose delays/reductions and lineage-specific supportive care interventions, such as hematopoietic growth factors and blood transfusions. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has created additional challenges for the optimal management of myelosuppression. In this review, we discuss the impact of this side effect on patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy, with a focus on the prevention of myelosuppression in the COVID-19 era. During the COVID-19 pandemic, short-term recommendations on the use of supportive care interventions have been issued with the aim of minimizing the risk of infection, reducing the need for hospitalization, and preserving limited blood supplies. Recently, trilaciclib, an intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, was approved to decrease the incidence of myelosuppression in adult patients when administered prior to platinum/etoposide-containing or topotecan-containing chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Approval was based on data from three phase 2 placebo-controlled clinical studies in patients with ES-SCLC, showing that administering trilaciclib prior to chemotherapy significantly reduced multilineage myelosuppression, with patients receiving trilaciclib having fewer chemotherapy dose delays/reductions and myelosuppression/sepsis-related hospitalizations, and less need for supportive care interventions, compared with patients receiving placebo. Several other novel agents are currently in clinical development for the prevention or treatment of multilineage or single-lineage myelosuppression in patients with various tumor types. The availability of treatments that could enable patients to maintain standard-of-care chemotherapy regimens without the need for additional interventions would be valuable to physicians, patients, and health systems.