Pharmacokinetic interaction between ondansetron and cyclophosphamide during high-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer

Sequential administration of PD‑1 inhibitor and cetuximab causes pneumonia

Severe drug-induced lung injury (DLI) has been reported to be associated with sequential administration of osimertinib, a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, following a programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor. However, the relationship of sequential treatment with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody and PD-1 inhibitor with the risk of DLI remains to be elucidated. The present study conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of a total of 179 patients with head and neck cancer who had received treatment with cetuximab and/or a PD-1 inhibitor (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) at Chiba University Hospital (Chiba, Japan) between September 2014 and December 2020. The incidence of pneumonia and the clinical background characteristics of the patients were analyzed. The patients were classified into subgroups for analysis of the outcomes in this study: Patients who had received sequential, but not concurrent, cetuximab and PD-1 inhibitor treatment (Group C+P; n=43); patients who had received cetuximab-containing chemotherapy, but not a PD-1 inhibitor (Group C; n=101); and patients who had received PD-1 inhibitor-containing chemotherapy, but not cetuximab (Group P; n=35). The rates of DLI in the three groups were: Group C+P, 18.6%; Group C, 7.9%; and Group P, 11.4%. Prior use of ICI was not associated with any increase in the risk of DLI. DLI is seen frequently in patients receiving sequential PD-1 inhibitor and anti-EGFR antibody therapy.

Pharmacogenomic associations of cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetic candidate genes with event-free survival in intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group

BACKGROUND

In vitro data suggest that the growth of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) cells is suppressed in a concentration-dependent manner by 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4HCY), the principal precursor to the cytotoxic metabolite of cyclophosphamide (CY). Various retrospective studies on the relationship between genes encoding proteins involved in the formation and elimination of 4HCY (i.e., 4HCY pharmacokinetics) and cyclophosphamide (CY) efficacy and toxicity have been conflicting.

PROCEDURES

We evaluated germline pharmacogenetics in 262 patients with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk RMS who participated in one prospective Children's Oncology Group clinical trial, ARST0531. Patients were treated with either vincristine/actinomycin/cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine/irinotecan (VAC/VI). We analyzed the associations between event-free survival and 394 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in 14 drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters involved in 4HCY pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Eight SNPs were associated (p-value < .05 by univariate analysis) with 3-year event-free survival; no SNPs survived a false discovery rate < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that a pharmacogenomic approach to therapy personalization of cyclophosphamide in intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma is not viable. Other methods to personalize therapy should be explored.

Cyclophosphamide bioactivation pharmacogenetics in breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Genetic variation in the activation of the prodrug cyclophosphamide (CP) by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes has been shown to influence outcomes. However, CYP are also subject to phenoconversion due to either the effects of comedications or cancer associated down-regulation of expression. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between CP bioactivation with CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 genotype, as well as CYP2C19 phenotype, in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

CP and the active metabolite levels were assessed in breast cancer patients (n = 34) at cycle 1 and cycle 3 of treatment. Patients were genotyped for a series of SNP known to affect CYP2B6 and CYP2C19 function. The activity of CYP2C19 was also assessed using a probe drug.

RESULTS

We found a significant linear gene-dose relationship with CYP2B6 coding SNP and formation of 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. A possible association with CYP2C19 null genotype at cycle 1 was obscured at cycle 3 due to the substantial intra-individual change in CP bioactivation on subsequent dosing.

CONCLUSION

Comedications may be the cause for this inter-occasion variation in bioactivation of cyclophosphamide and the ensuing phenoconversion may account for the conflicting reports in the literature about the relationship between CYP2C19 genotype and CP bioactivation pharmacokinetics. Trial registration ANZCTR363222 (6/11/2012, retrospectively registered).

Prevalence, severity, and nature of risk factors associated with drug-drug interactions in geriatric patients receiving cancer chemotherapy: A prospective study in a tertiary care teaching hospital

INTRODUCTION

Polypharmacy increases hazard of drug-drug interactions(DDIs), hospitalization, treatment toxicity, and mortality in elderly individuals with cancer. The present study explores and analyzes prevalence and severity of DDIs in geriatric cancer patients subjected to anticancer chemotherapy, their mechanisms, stratification of severity, and correlation between DDI risk and number of medications taken.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted between January-July 2019 at the Medical Oncology/Hematology and Radiation-Oncology Departments, All India Institute of Medical Sciences(AIIMS) Rishikesh. The study included a convenience sampling of 126 geriatric cancer patients.

RESULTS

126 patients were enrolled in present study. DDIs were identified in 97.6% of elderly cancer patients, and 88.9% had at least one DDI with antineoplastic medications. Highest number of DDIs involving antineoplastic medications in any given patient was 12. DDIs involving medications used for treatment of non-cancerous diseases were observed in 83.3% of patients; highest number of interactions identified in any given patient was 15. Out of 473 interactions, 237(50.1%) DDIs were attributable to pharmacodynamic mechanisms of action. 126(27%) of DDIs involved pharmacokinetic mechanisms and 110(23.6%) involved unknown mechanisms. In this present study, total number of DDIs could be positively correlated with total number of medications and number of health problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatric cancer patients are at high risk of DDIs ascribable to polypharmacy. Physicians may utilize online DDI checking softwares to alert themselves, characterize potential DDIs, and modify medications judiciously. An integrative and algorithmic approach with inclusion of geriatricians, oncologists, cardiologists, general practitioners, and clinical pharmacologists/ pharmacists is imperative to optimize drug therapy.

Effects of medicines used to treat gastrointestinal diseases on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered drugs: a PEARRL Review

Objectives

Drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases (GI drugs) are widely used either as prescription or over-the-counter (OTC) medications and belong to both the 10 most prescribed and 10 most sold OTC medications worldwide. The objective of this review article is to discuss the most frequent interactions between GI and other drugs, including identification of the mechanisms behind these interactions, where possible.

Key findings

Current clinical practice shows that in many cases, these drugs are administered concomitantly with other drug products. Due to their metabolic properties and mechanisms of action, the drugs used to treat gastrointestinal diseases can change the pharmacokinetics of some coadministered drugs. In certain cases, these interactions can lead to failure of treatment or to the occurrence of serious adverse events. The mechanism of interaction depends highly on drug properties and differs among therapeutic categories. Understanding these interactions is essential to providing recommendations for optimal drug therapy.

Summary

Interactions with GI drugs are numerous and can be highly significant clinically in some cases. While alterations in bioavailability due to changes in solubility, dissolution rate, GI transit and metabolic interactions can be (for the most part) easily identified, interactions that are mediated through other mechanisms, such as permeability or microbiota, are less well-understood. Future work should focus on characterising these aspects.

Cytochrome P450 in Cancer Susceptibility and Treatment

Cytochrome 450 (CYP450) designates a group of enzymes abundant in smooth endoplasmic reticulum of hepatocytes and epithelial cells of small intestines. The main function of CYP450 is oxidative catalysis of various endogenous and exogenous substances. CYP450 are implicated in phase I metabolism of 80% of drugs currently in use, including anticancer drugs. They are also involved in synthesis of various hormones and influence hormone-related cancers. CYP450 genes are highly polymorphic and their variants play an important role in cancer risk and treatment. Association studies and meta-analyses have been performed to decipher the role of CYP450 polymorphisms in cancer susceptibility. Cancer treatment involves multimodal therapies and evaluation of CYP450 polymorphisms is necessary for pharmacogenetic assessment of anticancer therapy outcomes. In addition, CYP450 inhibitors are being evaluated for improved pharmacokinetics and oral formulation of several anticancer drugs.

Pharmacoepidemiological study of drug-drug interactions in onco-hematological pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Onco-hematological patients are particularly susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) because they often undergo multiple combined treatments. Some studies have analyzed the frequency of DDIs in adult patients with cancer; however, the prevalence of DDIs in children, and especially among pediatric cancer patients, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of DDIs in treatment sheets comparing two commonly used drug interaction databases, to describe the most common clinically relevant DDIs (CR-DDIs) and to investigate the risk factors associated with them.

SETTING

An onco-hematological pediatric unit from a tertiary hospital in Spain.

METHOD

A prospective, observational and descriptive study was carried out from November 2012 to February 2013. Twice a week, every patient's treatment sheet was collected. Each medication list was screened through two databases: Thomson Micromedex™ and Drug Interaction Facts™. All identified DDIs were graded by their level of severity. Summary statistics were used to describe patient and disease characteristics, most often prescribed drugs, and frequency, types and classification of CR-DDIs. Multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with CRDDIs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prevalence of CR-DDIs was measured as percentage.

RESULTS

A total of 506 potential DDIs were detected in 150 treatment sheets. The prevalence of CR-DDIs by Micromedex database and Drug Interaction Facts database were 44.7 and 51.3% respectively. Amikacin, azole antifungals, antiemetics and cyclosporine were the most frequent drugs involved in CR-DDIs. In multivariate analysis, the main risk factor associated with increased odds for CR-DDIs was a higher number of drugs.

CONCLUSION

The frequency of potential DDIs was related to a higher number of drugs, being immunosuppressant and azole antifungal agents the most commonly involved drugs. The lack of agreement between different databases enhances the complexity to detect drug interactions in clinical practice.

A pilot pharmacologic biomarker study in HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Eleven patients diagnosed with various hematologic malignancies receiving an HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) participated in an ancillary biomarker trial. The goal of the trial was to evaluate potential pharmacologic biomarkers pertinent to the conditioning regimen [fludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine) and cyclophosphamide (CY)] or postgrafting immunosuppression [CY and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)] in these patients.

METHODS

We characterized the interpatient variability of nine pharmacologic biomarkers. The biomarkers evaluated were relevant to fludarabine (i.e., area under the curve (AUC) of 2-fluoro-ara-A or F-ara-A), CY (i.e., AUCs of CY and four of its metabolites), and MMF (i.e., total mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC, unbound MPA AUC, and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity).

RESULTS

Interpatient variability in the pharmacologic biomarkers was high. Among those related to HCT conditioning, the interpatient variability ranged from 1.5-fold (CY AUC) to 4.0-fold (AUC of carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard, a metabolite of CY). Among biomarkers evaluated as part of postgrafting immunosuppression, the interpatient variability ranged from 1.7-fold (CY AUC) to 4.9-fold (IMPDH area under the effect curve). There was a moderate correlation (R (2) = 0.441) of within-patient 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide formation clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable interpatient variability exists in the pharmacokinetic and drug-specific biomarkers potentially relevant to clinical outcomes in HLA-haploidentical HCT recipients. Pharmacodynamic studies are warranted to optimize the conditioning regimen and postgrafting immunosuppression administered to HLA-haploidentical HCT recipients.

Cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in patients with glomerulonephritis secondary to lupus and small vessel vasculitis

AIMS

Cyclophosphamide, the precursor to the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, is used in active glomerulonephritis despite limited pharmacokinetics data. The pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide were evaluated. The influence of laboratory and pharmacogenomic covariates on pharmacokinetics was evaluated as a secondary aim.

METHODS

Glomerulonephritis patients (n = 23) participated in a pharmacokinetic evaluation. Blood was serially collected and assayed for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide by LC/MS methods. Kidney function, serum albumin and polymorphisms in drug metabolism or transport genes were evaluated. Analyses included non-compartmental pharmacokinetics and parametric and non-parametric statistics.

RESULTS

The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0,∞)) data were 110,100 ± 42,900 ng ml(-1) h and 5388 ± 2841 ng ml(-1) h for cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, respectively. The mean metabolic ratio was 0.06 ± 0.04. A statistically significant relationship was found between increased serum albumin and increased half-life (0.584, P = 0.007, 95% CI 0.176, 0.820) and a borderline relationship with AUC(0,∞) (0.402, P = 0.079, 95% CI -0.064, 0.724) for 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Covariate relationships that trended toward significance for cyclophosphamide included decreased serum albumin and increased elimination rate constant (-0.427, P = 0.061, 95% CI 0.738, 0.034), increased urinary protein excretion and increased AUC(0,∞) (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699 to 0.037), decreased C(max) (0.367, P = 0.085, 95% CI -0.067, 0.684) and decreased plasma clearance (-0.392, P = 0.064, 95% CI -0.699, 0.037). CYP2B6*9 variants vs. wildtype were found to have decreased elimination rate constant (P = 0.0005, 95% CI 0.033, 0.103), increased V(d) (P = 0.0271, 95% CI -57.5, -4.2) and decreased C(max) (P = 0.0176, 95% CI 0.696, 6179) for cyclophosphamide. ABCB1 C3435T variants had a borderline decrease in cyclophosphamide elimination rate constant (P = 0.0858; 95% CI -0.005, 0.102).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in patients with lupus nephritis and small vessel vasculitis are similar. Clinical and pharmacogenetic covariates alter disposition of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide. Clinical findings of worsened glomerulonephritis lead to increased exposure to cyclophosphamide vs. the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide, which could have relevance in terms of clinical efficacy. The CYP2B6*9 and ABCB1 C3435T polymorphisms alter the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide in glomerulonephritis.

Impact of glomerular kidney diseases on the clearance of drugs

Numerous physiologic variations, including urinary protein excretion, low serum albumin concentrations, and reductions in kidney function (clearance), exist in patients with glomerulonephritis. These factors could alter the disposition of numerous drugs. The purpose of the current article was to review the influence of glomerulonephritis on the pharmacokinetics of drugs used clinically or experimentally in the treatment of these conditions. Several articles or presentations were located that reported on the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressant, cytotoxic, and therapeutic antibody drugs in populations with glomerulonephritis. Most publications reported an increase in systemic clearance in glomerulonephritis as compared with populations in whom the drugs were typically used and in patients with nonglomerular forms of chronic kidney disease. It appears that the increase in systemic clearance is predominantly through nonrenal clearance pathways, although enhancement of renal clearance has also been appreciated for some drugs. Available preliminary data suggest specific alterations in the activity of individual pathways of drug metabolism and transport. Recommendations are provided for the design of future studies of drugs in the glomerulonephritis population and for inclusion of patients with urinary protein excretion in studies that assess drug pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide enantiomers in patients with breast cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (CYC) is used for the treatment of breast cancer. CYC is used as a racemic mixture, although preclinical data have demonstrated differences in the efficacy and toxicity of its enantiomers, with (S)-(-)-CYC exhibiting a higher therapeutic index. The present study investigated the enantioselectivity and influence of CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A on the kinetic disposition of CYC in patients with breast cancer.

METHODS

Fifteen patients previously submitted to removal of the tumor and treated with racemic CYC (900 or 1,000 mg/m(2)) and epirubicin were included in the study. The in vivo activity of CYP3A was evaluated using midazolam as a marker drug. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 h after administration of the first cycle of CYC.

RESULTS

The kinetic disposition of CYC was enantioselective in patients with breast cancer, with plasma accumulation of the (S)-(-)-CYC enantiomer (AUC 195.0 vs. 174.8 μg h/mL) due to the preferential clearance of the (R)-(+)CYC enantiomer (5.1 vs. 5.7 L/h). Clearance of either CYC enantiomer did not differ between the CYP2B6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 genotypes or as a function of the in vivo activity of CYP3A evaluated by midazolam clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of CYC is enantioselective in patients with breast cancer concomitantly treated with epirubicin and ondansetron. Genotyping or phenotyping did not contribute to adjustment of the CYC dose regimen in patients included in this study.

Aprepitant: drug-drug interactions in perspective

The implications of chemotherapeutic drug-drug interactions can be serious and thus need to be addressed. This review concerns the potential interactions of the antiemetic aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist indicated for use (in Europe) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) in combination with a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist and corticosteroids and (in the United States) in combination with other antiemetic agents, for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy including high-dose cisplatin. When considering use of aprepitant for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, its potential drug-drug interaction profile as a moderate inhibitor of cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4) has been a source of concern for some physicians and other health care professionals. We explore in this paper how real those concerns are. Our conclusion is that either no interaction or no clinically relevant interaction exists with chemotherapeutic agents (intravenous cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, intravenous vinorelbine) or 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, palonosetron). For relevant interactions, appropriate measures, such as corticosteroid dose modifications and extended International Normalized Ratio monitoring of patients on warfarin therapy, can be taken to effectively manage them. Therefore, the concern of negative interactions remains largely theoretical but needs to be verified with new agents extensively metabolized through the 3A4 pathway.

Effects of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers and inhibitors on ondansetron pharmacokinetics in rats: involvement of hepatic CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in ondansetron metabolism

The types of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes responsible for the in-vivo metabolism of ondansetron in rats have not been reported. In this study, ondansetron at a dose of 8 mg kg−1 was administered intravenously to rats pretreated with various inducers of CYP isozymes, such as 3-methylcholanthrene, orphenadrine citrate, isoniazid and dexamethasone phosphate (the main inducers of CYP1A1/2, 2B1/2, 2E1 and 3A1/2 in rats, respectively), and inhibitors, such as SKF-525A (a non-specific inhibitor of CYP isozymes), sulfaphenazole, quinine hydrochloride and troleandomycin (the main inhibitors of CYP2C6, 2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in rats, respectively). In rats pretreated with quinine hydrochloride and troleandomycin, the time-averaged non-renal clearance of ondansetron was significantly slower (48.9 and 13.2% decrease, respectively) than that in control rats. In rats pretreated with dexamethasone phosphate, the time-averaged non-renal clearance was significantly faster (18.2% increase) than that in control rats. The results suggest that ondansetron is primarily metabolized via the CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in rats.

Cyclophosphamide and cancer: golden anniversary

Cyclophosphamide remains one of the most successful and widely utilized antineoplastic drugs. Moreover, it is also a potent immunosuppressive agent and the most commonly used drug in blood and marrow transplantation (BMT). It was initially synthesized to selectively target cancer cells, although the hypothesized mechanism of tumor specificity (activation by cancer cell phosphamidases) transpired to be irrelevant to its activity. Nevertheless, cyclophosphamide's unique metabolism and inactivation by aldehyde dehydrogenase is responsible for its distinct cytotoxic properties. Differential cellular expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase has an effect on the anticancer therapeutic index and immunosuppressive properties of cyclophosphamide. This Review highlights the chemistry, pharmacology, clinical toxic effects and current clinical applications of cyclophosphamide in cancer and autoimmune disorders. We also discuss the development of high-dose cyclophosphamide for BMT and the treatment of autoimmune diseases.

Benefit of Satureja khuzestanica in subchronically rat model of cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis

Cyclophosphamide (CP) as a widely used antineoplastic drug causes hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) mainly via induction of oxidative stress. Regarding established antioxidant potential of Satureja khuzestanica (Lamiaceae) essential oil (SKEO), we aimed to investigate its protective effects in a subchronic rat model of CP-induced HC. CP (6mg/kg/day) and SKEO (225mg/kg/day) were administered alone or in combination by gavage for 28 days. Histopathological changes were investigated by light microscopy. Plasma samples were assayed for lipid peroxidation and total antioxidant power as biomarkers of toxic stress. In the CP-treated animals, irregular mucus layer, severe hemorrhage and edema, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and accumulation of mast cells were observed. In the CP+SKEO group, a relatively normal urothelial topography with decreased number of mucosal mast cells and inflammatory cells were observed. Increased lipid peroxidation along with decreased total antioxidant capacity resulting from CP treatment was significantly recovered by SKEO co-treatment. It is concluded that SKEO protects rats from CP-induced HC by reduction of free radical-induced toxic stress. It is strongly recommended to examine SKEO in the clinic to approve its benefit in patients undertaking CP.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between tamoxifen and ondansetron in rats: non-competitive (hepatic) and competitive (intestinal) inhibition of tamoxifen metabolism by ondansetron via CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2

PURPOSE

Tamoxifen and ondansetron were commonly metabolized via rat hepatic CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2, and ondansetron is used to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea. The purpose of this study was to report the pharmacokinetic interaction between tamoxifen and ondansetron in rats.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and ondansetron were evaluated after the intravenous and oral administration of tamoxifen, ondansetron, and both drugs together to rats. The Vmax (maximum velocity), Km (apparent Michaelis-Menten constant), CLint (intrinsic clearance), Ki (inhibition constant), and [I] (concentration of inhibitor in the liver and intestine)/Ki ratio of ondansetron were also measured.

RESULTS

The AUC0-infinitys of tamoxifen were significantly greater after both intravenous and oral administration with ondansetron compared to those of tamoxifen alone. The significantly slower hepatic and intestinal CLints for the disappearance of tamoxifen with both drugs together were due to inhibition of metabolism of tamoxifen by ondansetron via CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2.

CONCLUSIONS

The significantly greater AUC0-infinity of tamoxifen after the intravenous administration of both drugs together could have possibly been attributable to a non-competitive (hepatic) inhibition of CYP2D subfamily- and 3A1/2-mediated tamoxifen metabolism by ondansetron. The significantly greater AUC0-infinity of tamoxifen after the oral administration of both drugs together could have been attributable to a competitive (intestinal) inhibition of CYP2D subfamily- and 3A1/2-mediated tamoxifen metabolism by ondansetron in addition to non-competitive inhibition in the liver.

Effect of aprepitant on intravenous tacrolimus disposition in reduced intensity hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Aprepitant (AP) is a known inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 which may affect tacrolimus metabolism. We retrospectively examined the effect of oral AP on intravenous tacrolimus concentrations in 26 patients undergoing reduced intensity transplantation from 09/2005 to 09/2006. Oral AP 125 mg daily was administered on transplant day +1 and 80 mg on days +2 and +3. Intravenous tacrolimus was administered as a 0.03 mg/kg/day continuous infusion on day -6 through day +1 (pre-AP), during-AP (days +2 to +7), and post-AP starting on day +8. Tacrolimus doses were adjusted to achieve concentrations of 5—20 ng/mL. Dose-corrected tacrolimus concentrations (ng/mL/mg per dose) in the pre-AP, during-AP, and post-AP time periods were: 8.12 (95% CI: 7.3—9.1), 11.63 (95% CI: 9.63—13.63), and 11.42 (95% CI: 8.12—14.7), respectively (P<0.01 between pre-AP and during-AP, P<0.01 between during-AP and post-AP, P = 0.01 between pre-AP and post-AP time periods). Although statistically significant, the observed rise was not clinically significant between during-AP and post-AP time periods. Previous work has shown that AP is not expected to exert an inhibitory effect within 48 h of AP discontinuation. Collectively, these data suggest that AP effect on tacrolimus metabolism is of minor clinical significance. A controlled trial is needed to confirm these findings. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2008) 14: 113—121.

Antiemetic placebo: Reduce adverse drug interactions between chemotherapeutic agents and antiemetic drugs in cancer patients

Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy often require a wide range of drugs to manage symptoms of their cancer. The adverse drug interactions are common in the field of medical oncology. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) continues to have a considerable effect on the physical and psychological well-being of patients with cancer, despite significant advances in antiemetic drugs since the 1990s. Fortunately, evidence-based interventions suggested that to a certain extent antiemetic effects can be achieved by use of placebo appropriately. Placebo effect can be reinforced by conferring much meaning. Thus physician can replace antiemetic drugs with reinforced meaningful antiemetic placebo to get better prevention and treatment efficacy for CINV while reduce the unnecessary adverse drug interactions induced by antiemetic drugs and chemotherapeutic agents.

A systematic review on drug interactions in oncology

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review drug interactions in oncology.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for eligible articles and online databases abstracts of major oncology meetings from 2002 to 2005.

RESULTS

One study reported on the frequency of drug interactions. Interactions between chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy agents have been reported mostly in small clinical trials and case series. Interactions between chemotherapic agents have been reported mostly in Phase I studies. Few studies described fatal outcomes of drug interactions in cancer patients.

CONCLUSION

Drug interactions comprise an important issue in oncology, but very limited data exist on their frequency and clinical consequences.

Effects of serotonin-3 receptor antagonists on cytochrome P450 activities in human liver microsomes

The effects of three serotonin-3 (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists, azasetron, ondansetron, and ramosetron, on cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2-mediated 7-ethoxyresorufin O-deethylation, CYP2C9-mediated tolbutamide hydroxylation, CYP2C19-mediated S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation, CYP2D6-mediated debrisoquine 4-hydroxylation, CYP2E1-mediated chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation, CYP3A4-mediated nifedipine oxidation, and CYP3A4-mediated testosterone 6beta-hydroxylation activities in human liver microsomes were compared. Azasetron and ramosetron at a concentration of 1 or 10 muM neither inhibited nor stimulated any of the metabolic activities. On the other hand, ondansetron competitively inhibited CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activities, and the inhibition constants (K(i)) were 3.2 and 21.0 muM, respectively, which are much higher than the reported plasma concentrations after clinical intravenous or oral dosing. The free fractions of the three 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in the incubation mixture estimated by ultracentrifugation were more than 68.6%. These results suggest that azasetron, ondansetron, and ramosetron do not cause clinically significant interactions with other drugs that are metabolized by CYPs via the inhibition of metabolism.

Drug interactions in cancer therapy

Drug interactions in oncology are of particular importance owing to the narrow therapeutic index and the inherent toxicity of anticancer agents. Interactions with other medications can cause small changes in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of a chemotherapy agent that could significantly alter its efficacy or toxicity. Improvements in in vitro methods and early clinical testing have made the prediction of potentially clinically significant drug interactions possible. We outline the types of drug interaction that occur in oncology, the mechanisms that underlie these interactions and describe select examples.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide

Cyclophosphamide is an extensively used anticancer and immunosuppressive agent. It is a prodrug undergoing a complicated process of metabolic activation and inactivation. Technical difficulties in the accurate determination of the cyclophosphamide metabolites have long hampered the assessment of the clinical pharmacology of this drug. As these techniques are becoming increasingly available, adequate description of the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and its metabolites has become possible. There is incomplete understanding on the role of cyclophosphamide metabolites in the efficacy and toxicity of cyclophosphamide therapy. However, relationships between toxicity (cardiotoxicity, veno-occlusive disease) and exposure to cyclophosphamide and its metabolites have been established. Variations in the balance between metabolic activation and inactivation of cyclophosphamide owing to autoinduction, dose escalation, drug-drug interactions and individual differences have been reported, suggesting possibilities for optimisation of cyclophosphamide therapy. Knowledge of the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide, and possibly monitoring the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide in individuals, may be useful for improving its therapeutic index.

Cyclophosphamide disposition in an anephric child

Although limited data are available about cyclophosphamide disposition in patients with renal insufficiency, nothing has been reported in anephric patients. We characterized cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics in an anephric child with bilateral Wilms tumor, both on (day 1) and off (day 2) hemodialysis. The median cyclophosphamide clearance on and off hemodialysis was 5.34 and 3.82 L/hr*m(2), respectively, demonstrating elimination of cyclophosphamide in this anephric child. The off hemodialysis clearance was similar to that in children with normal renal function. Hydroxycyclophosphamide (HCY) AUC was 20.6 and 8.77 microM*hr on and off hemodialysis. Carboxyethylphosphoramide mustard (CEPM) AUC obtained on hemodialysis (i.e., 194 microM*hr) was similar to that in children with normal renal function, although an elevated CEPM AUC was observed when hemodialysis was not received (i.e., 383 microM*hr). With the recent findings that clinical outcomes are related to CEPM AUC, further data are needed regarding the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and relevant metabolites in anephric children.

Associations Between Drug Metabolism Genotype, Chemotherapy Pharmacokinetics, and Overall Survival in Patients With Breast Cancer

Purpose

To evaluate associations between patient survival, pharmacokinetics, and drug metabolism–related genetic polymorphisms in patients receiving a combination chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

A genotype association study was conducted on 85 chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or inflammatory breast cancer that were evaluated for an extended period after receiving standard-dose chemotherapy followed by high-dose cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and carmustine. Blood pharmacokinetics were evaluated, and DNA was genotyped for 29 polymorphisms in 17 drug metabolism genes.

Results

Patients with cyclophosphamide plasma exposures above the median (implying slower metabolic activation) had a shorter survival than those below the median (1.8 v 3.8 years, respectively; P = .042). Patients having a variant genotype of cytochrome P450 3A4 displayed higher blood concentrations of parent (inactive) cyclophosphamide with the second and third doses (P = .024 and .028, respectively) in addition to slower cyclophosphamide activation over the three doses (P = .031). Median survival for these patients was 1.3 years compared with 2.7 years for those without the variant (P = .043). Similar results were observed for patients carrying a genetic variant of P450 3A5. Median survival for patients with deletions of glutathione-S-transferase M1 gene was 3.5 v 1.5 years for patients with one or both copies (P = .041). Patients with a polymorphism in a gene regulating metallothionein had lower platinum concentrations and shorter survival (P = .033).

Conclusion

These data suggest that pretreatment evaluation of drug metabolism genes may explain some interindividual differences in both anticancer drug pharmacokinetics and response. The correlations found here may have implications for other commonly used anticancer drugs.

5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists in the management of nausea and vomiting in cancer and cancer treatment

The 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists, considered as 'gold standard' therapy for cancer patients, are generally perceived to have similar efficacy and safety profiles, andmost antiemetic guidelines do not distinguish between agents. However, important pharmacological differences exist between agents, which may translate into potential benefits for some patients. In particular, 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists vary in the nature of their receptor antagonism and plasma half-lives, possibly leading to differences in duration of action. Agents with a longer duration of action provide antiemetic protection throughout the acute emetic period (24 h) with a single daily dose, whereas shorter-acting agents, e.g. ondansetron, may require multiple dosing for full efficacy. Differences also exist between agents in their hepatic metabolism and cardiovascular safety, which may present particular problems for elderly patients who often receive additional medications for comorbid conditions, increasing the risk of drug-drug interaction. Recent antiemetic guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend preferential use of palonosetron for moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; however, this agent is newly approved and key clinical questions remain unanswered by clinical trial data. Selection of an appropriate 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist should be based on proven efficacy and safety, as well as on the individual characteristics of the patient.

Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized?

Adverse drug-drug interactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Cancer patients are at particularly high risk of such interactions because they commonly receive multiple medications, including cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal agents and supportive care drugs. In addition, the majority of cancer patients are elderly, and so require medications for co-morbid conditions such as cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and rheumatological diseases. Furthermore, the age-related decline in hepatic and renal function reduces their ability to metabolize and clear drugs and so increases the potential for toxicity. Not all drug-drug interactions can be predicted, and those that are predictable are not always avoidable. However, increased awareness of the potential for these interactions will allow healthcare providers to minimize the risk by choosing appropriate drugs and also by monitoring for signs of interaction. This review considers the basic principles of drug-drug interactions, and presents specific examples that are relevant to oncology.

Optimising antiemetic therapy: what are the problems and how can they be overcome?

BACKGROUND

Management of chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-induced emesis has improved significantly following the introduction of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists. Prophylactic use of these agents is recommended for the prevention of both chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, given with a corticosteroid. Despite these advances, nausea and vomiting remain among the most feared and debilitating adverse effects of cytotoxic therapy. The shift towards a more elderly population of patients with cancer presents additional considerations for supportive care, with an emphasis on achieving control of nausea and vomiting, whilst minimising toxicity and avoiding drug-drug interactions. This review presents some of the key issues for consideration in optimising antiemetic therapy. The PubMed search engine was used to search for relevant literature (up to December 2004) and relevant international congress materials collected during 2003 and 2004.

SCOPE

While the early stages of nausea and vomiting are 5-HT-mediated, identification of a role for substance P in late emesis has led to the development of the NK1-receptor antagonist, aprepitant. As a new agent, the clinical profile of aprepitant is still being explored, including its interaction with concomitant medications. Patients who achieve good control of acute and late-acute nausea and vomiting have a reduced risk of experiencing delayed onset symptoms, emphasising the importance of prophylactic management with effective agents. Although the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists are widely considered to have equivalent efficacy, they vary in half-life and the nature of antagonism at receptors. Their metabolic profiles also differ, with cytochrome P450 (CYP) metabolism affecting their propensity for drug-drug interactions. Several sets of guidelines are available that outline recommendations for selection and use of antiemetic therapy. However, under-use of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists has been reported in both the radiotherapy and chemotherapy settings, and some commonly used doses may be suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

In optimising antiemetic therapy, wider implementation of guidelines is desirable, as is consideration of each patient's individual needs. Safety and tolerability of supportive care medications should be a key consideration, and cardiovascular warnings and the possibility of drug-drug interactions should be given sufficient consideration, particularly in view of the older age of the population with cancer.

Effects of co-medicated drugs on cyclophosphamide bioactivation in human liver microsomes

The alkylating agent cyclophosphamide (CP) is a prodrug requiring cytochrome P-450-mediated bioactivation to form the active 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide (4OHCP). Modifications in the rate of CP bioactivation may have implications for the effectiveness of CP therapy, especially in high-dose regimens. In this study, agents frequently co-administered with CP in high-dose chemotherapy regimens were tested for their possible inhibition of the bioactivation of CP in human liver microsomes. The Km and Vmax values for the conversion of CP to 4OHCP were 93 microM and 4.3 nmol/h.mg, respectively. No inhibition was observed for aciclovir, carboplatin, ciprofloxacine, granisetron, mesna, metoclopramide, ranitidine, roxitromycin and temazepam. Inhibition was observed for amphotericin B, dexamethasone, fluconazole, itraconazole, lorazepam, ondansetron and thiotepa, with IC50 values of 50, >100, >50, 5, 15, >100 and 1.25 microM, respectively. For all but thiotepa, these IC50 values were higher than the therapeutic drug levels and thus considered of no clinical relevance. We conclude that of the tested co-medicated agents, only thiotepa inhibited metabolism of CP to 4OHCP at clinically relevant concentrations, and may thereby influence therapeutic and toxic responses of CP therapy.

Granisetron: An Update on its Clinical Use in the Management of Nausea and Vomiting

Nausea and vomiting are typical side effects of cytotoxic therapy and some surgical procedures. These symptoms can represent a major therapeutic challenge and, if inadequately controlled by antiemetic treatment, will result in increased mortality, morbidity, and health care costs. However, the management of nausea and vomiting has improved greatly in recent years following the introduction of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, known as 'setrons.' In light of recent developments in antiemetic care, including the approval of the first neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist aprepitant (Emend; Merck and Company, Inc.; West Point, PA) and a new 5-HT3 receptor antagonist palonosetron (Aloxi; MGI Pharma; Minneapolis, MN), this article provides an update on the clinical experience gained with the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist granisetron (Kytril; Roche Laboratories, Inc.; Nutley, NJ) for the management of chemotherapy-induced, radiation-induced, and postoperative nausea and vomiting, and also reviews its use in special patient populations. Granisetron is a potent and highly selective 5-HT3-receptor antagonist that has little or no affinity for other receptors, a characteristic that is thought to underlie the favorable side-effect and safety profiles of this agent. Extensive clinical trial data have shown granisetron to be an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in the oncology and surgical settings. Granisetron has also been shown to be effective and well tolerated in special populations, such as patients refractory to antiemetic treatment, patients with hepatic or renal impairment, and children. Data also suggest that its safety profile and minimal potential for drug-drug interactions would make it an antiemetic agent of choice for elderly cancer patients.

Contribution of antioxidants to preventive effect of mesna in cyclophosphamide-induced hemorrhagic cystitis in rats

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether combination of antioxidants and mesna may prevent cystitis induced by cyclophosphamide better than mesna alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 46 male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into six groups. Five groups received single dose of cyclophosphamide (CP, 100 mg/kg) intraperitoneally with the same time intervals: group 2 received CP only, group 3 received mesna (21.5 mg/kg for three times), group 4 beta-carotene (20 mg/kg for two times) and mesna, group 5 received alpha-tocopherol (20 mg/kg for two times) and mesna, and group 6 received melatonin (5 mg/kg for two times) and mesna on the day of CP injection. Group 1 served as control.

RESULTS

CP injection resulted in severe cystitis. Mesna has showed meaningful but not full protection against CP toxicity. Although beta-carotene did not show any additional beneficial effect when combined with mesna, alpha-tocopherol and especially melatonin with mesna resulted full protection that the pathologist, blinded to the slides, could not differ from sham control.

CONCLUSION

Oxidants may be important in the pathogenesis of CP-induced cystitis. Melatonin and alpha-tocopherol may help to ameliorate bladder damage along with other drugs such as mesna and diuretics.

Treatment implications for radiation-induced nausea and vomiting in specific patient groups

Radiation-induced nausea and vomiting (RINV) affect the management and quality of life of cancer patients. Current guidelines for RINV prevention recommend prophylaxis with a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT(3))-receptor antagonist for patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic radiotherapy regimens. Randomised trials have compared such antagonists with conventional antiemetics, and have demonstrated their efficacy and safety. Special consideration is needed for antiemetic treatment in certain patient groups, particularly the elderly and those with renal or hepatic impairment. Radiation oncologists should be aware of the effect on antiemetic treatment of factors such as comorbid conditions (particularly cardiovascular disease), polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions, and choose the agent with the lowest potential for additional complications. The most appropriate antiemetic treatment to improve patient compliance and quality of life should ideally combine proven efficacy with uncomplicated administration and convenient dosing regimens.

Same Old Story? Do We Need to Modify Our Supportive Care Treatment of Elderly Cancer Patients? Focus on Antiemetics

The incidence of cancer is highest among individuals > or =65 years of age. Physiological changes associated with aging, such as cognitive decline, renal and hepatic dysfunction, can often complicate treatment options, and the elderly represent a particular challenge to the oncologist because of the high incidence of comorbidity and polypharmacy. Effective supportive care is of particular importance in elderly cancer patients as they may recover less satisfactorily if adverse events are poorly controlled. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that supportive care agents, for example, antiemetics, are underutilised in this patient population. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens are frequently associated with nausea and vomiting--symptoms that can have deleterious effects on vulnerable patients if not adequately managed. The serotonin 5-HT3-receptor antagonists represent a class of antiemetics that are currently regarded as the gold standard treatment for chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. They are recommended as first-line treatment for patients at moderate-to-high risk of emesis. However, antiemetic guidelines do not differentiate between these agents and, more importantly, do not contain specific recommendations for the elderly. Pharmacological differences exist between the commonly available 5-HT3-receptor antagonists (dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron, tropisetron and palonosetron), namely receptor sensitivity, duration of action, metabolism and tolerability profile. Of particular concern with prescriptions to elderly cancer patients is the convenience of once-daily administration, the low potential for drug-drug interactions and cardiovascular adverse effect profile. Moreover, the addition of the newly approved neurokinin NK1-receptor antagonist aprepitant to the choice of antiemetic regimen may complicate therapy and exacerbate the drug-drug interaction risk in elderly patients. Therefore, the use of antiemetics that are well tolerated and with the lowest risk of drug-drug interactions is imperative in this patient population and will enable even those patients with several comorbidities and a high level of polypharmacy to receive effective antiemetic therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of high-dose chemotherapy

There is considerable variation in the severity of preparative regimen-related toxicity (RRT) in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). This variation has been recognized to be due, in part, to the wide variation in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC). Consequently, therapeutic drug modeling and pharmacokinetic-directed therapy (PKDT) represents an attractive strategy in this setting. Advances in our understanding of drug metabolism, the nature of the active metabolites, and the ability to measure drug concentrations have led to the point where for some agents it is now possible to treat to a given PK end point with a great deal of reliability. In-depth knowledge of the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) associations of the agents employed in the high-dose setting will make possible more efficient research into preparative regimen dosing intensity and comparisons of different preparative regimens as well as safer HSCT overall. In this review, we discuss PK and PD studies of high-dose cyclosphamide, melphalan, thiotepa, carmustine, cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, and busulfan.

Electrocardiographic and cardiovascular effects of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists

OBJECTIVE

To review the electrocardiographic (ECG) and cardiovascular effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine(3) (5-HT(3)) receptor antagonists preclinically, in healthy volunteers, and in patients undergoing chemotherapy or surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed of clinical trials and preclinical data published between 1963 and December 2002 assessing the ECG and cardiovascular effects of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists, supplemented with reviews and secondary sources.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All of the articles identified were evaluated and all information deemed relevant was included in this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There are no clinically relevant differences in efficacy and safety among the available 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting. As a class, they have well-defined electrophysiologic activity. Changes in ECG parameters (PR, QRS, QT, QTc, JT intervals) are small, reversible, clinically insignificant, and independent of the patient population studied, and patients are asymptomatic during these changes. ECG changes are most prominent 1-2 hours after a dose of dolasetron, ondansetron, and granisetron and return to baseline within 24 hours. Clinically important adverse cardiovascular events associated with these changes are rare. No serious cardiac events (including torsade de pointes) arising from ECG interval changes have been attributed to 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist use.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical data demonstrate that ECG interval changes are a class effect of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. Theoretical concern regarding cardiovascular adverse events with these agents is not supported by clinical experience. The significant benefits of these agents outweigh the theoretical small risk of meaningful cardiovascular events.

5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists for the treatment of nausea and vomiting: a reappraisal of their side-effect profile

Nausea and vomiting can cause considerable distress and discomfort to patients undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Several classes of antiemetic agents exist to combat these side effects, though the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists have become the first-line treatment choice for many cancer patients and are considered the "gold standard" in antiemetic therapy. Compared with the older generation antiemetic drugs, 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonists are effective, well tolerated, and associated with few side effects. However, emerging differences among these agents suggest that the incidence and/or intensity of adverse events should not be regarded as a class effect. The side-effect profile of any supportive care therapy is particularly important in certain subgroups of patients, including pediatric patients and the elderly, as well as those suffering comorbid conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and renal or hepatic impairment. Indeed, dolasetron is associated with cardiovascular effects, and thus, should be used with extreme caution in patients who suffer from or may develop prolongation of cardiac conduction intervals. Ondansetron, on the other hand, is associated with a greater incidence of central nervous system side effects than either dolasetron or ondansetron, and pharmacokinetic parameters are affected in patients with hepatic impairment, thereby requiring dose adjustments. Clinicians are encouraged to evaluate patients on an individual basis when choosing which 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist to prescribe.

5-HT3-receptor antagonists and the cytochrome P450 system: clinical implications

Many patients with cancer receive multiple chemotherapy agents as well as other medications for coexisting medical conditions. Despite the introduction of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, the management of nausea and vomiting following cancer treatment and after cancer surgery remains complex, particularly when patients are receiving multiple prescription medications. As a drug class, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have good antiemetic efficacy and an improved safety profile over conventional antiemetics. Nevertheless, pharmacologic differences exist between these agents, such as their interaction with the metabolic cytochrome P450 system. This review examines the major metabolic differences between the most frequently prescribed 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, dolasetron, granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron. The potential drug interactions that these differences may precipitate and key genetic interindividual variations in drug metabolism are also considered. To avoid or minimize potential drug interactions, the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with the lowest risk of these interactions should be considered as first choice.

The cardiotoxic potential of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist antiemetics: is there cause for concern?

PURPOSE

To review and evaluate the potential cardiac effects of 5-HT(3) antiemetic treatment in patients who may be predisposed to cardiac complications resulting from malignancy, cytotoxic oncologic regimens, or preexisting comorbid conditions.

DESIGN

A literature review was conducted on the negative cardiovascular effects of chemotherapeutic agents, and, more specifically, on the cardiac interactions of the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists commonly used to treat chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Clinical studies in healthy subjects have reported electrocardiograph changes following administration of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists. However, there are limited data on the use of 5-HT(3) antiemetics when administered with cardiotoxic chemotherapy. Nonetheless, the development of significant electrocardiograph changes with some agents may indicate a potential for significant cardiac effects in patients, particularly those who may be predisposed to cardiac complication.

CONCLUSIONS

As the predicted human life span increases, clinicians will be treating a larger, older oncology population. Because two of the most common major comorbidities are cardiovascular related, we need to be acutely aware of the toxic effects of chemotherapy, as well as the possible cardiac interaction of supportive agents, specifically the 5-HT(3) antiemetics. Until more data are made available, the best antiemetic option for patients receiving emetogenic and cardiotoxic chemotherapy may be the agent with the fewest apparent cardiac effects.

Cyclophosphamide pharmacokinetics and dose requirements in patients with renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Intravenous pulse administration of cyclophosphamide (CYC) has been successfully used for the treatment of various autoimmune diseases. These patients often present with impaired renal function or even end-stage renal failure. Nevertheless, data concerning pharmacokinetics of CYC in renal insufficiency (RI) and on hemodialysis (HD) are rare and contradictory.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics of CYC (0.5 to 1 g/m2 as a one-hour infusion) were determined in patients with renal involvement of autoimmune diseases. Group A (N = 6) patients had a creatinine clearance (CCr) of 25 to 50 mL/min, group B patients' (N = 5) CCr was 10 to 24 mL/min, and group C (N = 6) patients had CCr values <10 mL/min and HD. Concentrations of CYC in serum, dialysate and urine were measured by HPLC. Twelve previously investigated patients with normal renal function served as controls.

RESULTS

Mean clearance (CL) of CYC was significantly reduced with decreased renal function (79 vs. 57 and 47 mL/min, controls vs. A and B, respectively, P < 0.05), but only moderately lower in the patients who received a three-hour HD during the study period (group C, 64 mL/min, NS). This resulted in reciprocal increases in systemic drug exposure (dose corrected AUC was 216, 298, 382 and 266 microg x h/mL x g, controls, A, B and C, respectively). Urinary excretion of CYC was markedly reduced in all patients with RI (renal CL was 14.9 vs. 3.4, 2.4 and 2.1 mL/min, controls vs. A, B and C, respectively, P < 0.001). However, in patient group C, a mean of 22% of administered CYC dose was eliminated by a three hour HD starting seven hours after CYC administration. Individual CCr values were significantly (P < 0.001) correlated with renal and systemic CL of CYC, respectively, and negatively correlated with dose corrected AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Clearance of CYC is decreased in patients with reduced renal function, thereby resulting in an increased systemic drug exposure. However, in hemodialysis-dependent patients, removal of CYC into the dialysate has to be taken into account. For optimal dosing of CYC in patients with renal insufficiency, the severity of renal impairment and the use and timing of hemodialysis have to be considered.

Ondansetron: a review of its use as an antiemetic in children

Ondansetron, a selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, is an antiemetic agent available for use in adults and children. In children receiving ondansetron (multiple 5 mg/m2 or 0.15 mg/kg intravenous and/or oral doses) in addition to chemotherapy in 2 large (n > 100) non-comparative analyses, < or =2 emetic episodes were observed in 33 and 40% of cisplatin recipients, 48 and 68% of ifosfamide recipients, and 70 and 72% of patients receiving other chemotherapeutic regimens. In comparative trials, ondansetron was significantly more effective at reducing nausea and vomiting than metoclopramide or chlorpromazine (both combined with dexamethasone), although the incidence of delayed symptoms were similar between children receiving ondansetron and metoclopramide. In addition, dexamethasone significantly improved the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron in 1 randomised trial. When used in children undergoing conditioning therapy (including total body irradiation) prior to bone marrow transplantation, ondansetron was significantly better at controlling nausea and vomiting than combined perphenazine and diphenhydramine therapy. In dose-ranging and large placebo-controlled trials, intravenous (0.075 to 0.15 mg/kg) or oral (0.1 mg/kg) ondansetron was significantly more effective than placebo in preventing emesis in children undergoing surgery associated with a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) including tonsillectomy or strabismus repair. In comparative studies, intravenous administration of ondansetron 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg was significantly superior to droperidol 0.02 to 0.075 mg/kg or metoclopramide 0.2 to 0.25 mg/kg in preventing emesis in children undergoing various surgical procedures. In comparison with other antiemetics, including prochlorperazine and dimenhydrinate, ondansetron generally showed greater prophylactic antiemetic efficacy. Ondansetron combined with dexamethasone was significantly more effective than ondansetron or dexamethasone alone, as was the combination of ondansetron with a propofol-based anaesthetic compared with either agent alone. Ondansetron is generally well tolerated in children, rarely necessitating treatment withdrawal. The most frequently reported adverse events were mild to moderate headache, constipation and diarrhoea in patients receiving chemotherapy. Wound problems, anxiety, headache, drowsiness and pyrexia were reported most frequently in patients postsurgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron has shown good efficacy in the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting in children receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and/or irradiation, particularly when combined with dexamethasone. In the chemotherapy setting, ondansetron is significantly better than metoclopramide and chlorpromazine and has a more favourable tolerability profile. In children undergoing surgery, ondansetron demonstrated superior prophylactic antiemetic efficacy compared with placebo, droperidol and metoclopramide, and was relatively free of adverse events. Ondansetron is thus an effective first-line antiemetic in children undergoing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery.

Serum cardiac troponin I levels and ECG/Echo monitoring in breast cancer patients undergoing high-dose (7 g/m(2)) cyclophosphamide

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX) is largely employed in high-dose chemotherapy (HD-CHT) protocols. HD-CTX dose-limiting toxicity expresses itself as cardiac toxicity which is fatal in a minority of patients. The pathophysiology of HD-CTX-associated cardiotoxicity is still poorly understood. Autopsy studies in patients who died from acute HD-CTX-induced cardiac toxicity revealed hemorrhagic myocardial cell death and interstitial edema. Recently troponins, in particular troponin I (cTnI), have been found to represent a uniquely sensitive and specific marker of myocyte membrane integrity and therefore to increase in response to minimal myocardial cell damage in different settings, including doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. We performed a multiparametric cardiologic monitoring in 16 consecutive breast cancer patients undergoing HD-CTX by means of serial ECG registrations and cardiac enzymes (CPK, CPK-MB and cTnI) determinations plus echocardiography in order to clarify acute cardiac events following HD-CTX administration. Neither overt cardiac toxicity nor cardiac enzymes elevation were recorded. Serial ECGs revealed in six cases little and reversible reduction of QRS voltage and/or ST abnormalities. Echo monitoring showed in four cases mild and transient increase of LV diastolic/systolic diameter/volume without decrease of FS% or EF% below normal values: in two of them abnormalities of diastolic function (E/A mitral doppler ratio) were also recorded. We conclude that our protocol of HD-CTX administration does not cause myocardial cell damage as analyzed by serum cTnI levels, thus suggesting that myocyte membrane injury may not be the first direct mechanism of HD-CTX cardiotoxicity. ECG (ie QRS voltages ) and Echo (ie E/A ratio) monitoring leads us to hypothesize that slight interstitial edema with reduction of LV diastolic compliance may be initial signs of cardiac dysfunction in this clinical setting.

The clinical pharmacology of alkylating agents in high-dose chemotherapy

Alkylating agents are widely used in high-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with hematological support. Knowledge about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents administered in high doses is critical for the safe and efficient use of these regimens. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical pharmacology of the alkylating agents (including the platinum compounds) in high-dose chemotherapy. Differences between conventional and high doses will be discussed.